Threat of Entry: Review
Threat of Entry: Review
Whatever their collective strength, the corporate strategist’s goal is to find a position in the
industry where his or her company can best defend itself against these forces or can
influence them in its favor. The collective strength of the forces may be painfully apparent
to all the antagonists; but to cope with them, the strategist must delve below the surface
and analyze the sources of each. For example, what makes the industry vulnerable to entry,
What determines the bargaining power of suppliers?
Threat of entry
New entrants to an industry bring new capacity, the desire to gain market share, and often
substantial resources. Companies diversifying through acquisition into the industry from
other markets often leverage their resources to cause a shake-up, as Philip Morris did with
Miller beer.
1. Economies of scale
These economies deter entry by forcing the aspirant either to come in on a large scale or to
accept a cost disadvantage. Scale economies in production, research, marketing, and
service are probably the key barriers to entry in the mainframe computer industry, as
Xerox and GE sadly discovered. Economies of scale can also act as hurdles in distribution,
utilization of the sales force, financing, and nearly any other part of a business.
2. Product differentiation
The need to invest large financial resources in order to compete creates a barrier to entry,
particularly if the capital is required for unrecoverable expenditures in up-front
advertising or R&D. Capital is necessary not only for fixed facilities but also for customer
credit, inventories, and absorbing start-up losses. While major corporations have the
financial resources to invade almost any industry, the huge capital requirements in certain
fields, such as computer manufacturing and mineral extraction, limit the pool of likely
entrants.
Entrenched companies may have cost advantages not available to potential rivals, no
matter what their size and attainable economies of scale. These advantages can stem from
the effects of the learning curve (and of its first cousin, the experience curve), proprietary
technology, access to the best raw materials sources, assets purchased at preinflation
prices, government subsidies, or favorable locations. Sometimes cost advantages are legally
enforceable, as they are through patents. (For an analysis of the much-discussed
experience curve as a barrier to entry, see the insert.)
The newcomer on the block must, of course, secure distribution of its product or service. A
new food product, for example, must displace others from the supermarket shelf via price
breaks, promotions, intense selling efforts, or some other means. The more limited the
wholesale or retail channels are and the more that existing competitors have these tied up,
obviously the tougher that entry into the industry will be. Sometimes this barrier is so high
that, to surmount it, a new contestant must create its own distribution channels, as Timex
did in the watch industry in the 1950s.
6. Government policy
The government can limit or even foreclose entry to industries with such controls as
license requirements and limits on access to raw materials. Regulated industries like
trucking, liquor retailing, and freight forwarding are noticeable examples; more subtle
government restrictions operate in fields like ski-area development and coal mining. The
government also can play a major indirect role by affecting entry barriers through controls
such as air and water pollution standards and safety regulations.
It is dominated by a few companies and is more concentrated than the industry it sells to.
Its product is unique or at least differentiated, or if it has built up switching costs. Switching
costs are fixed costs buyers face in changing suppliers. These arise because, among other
things, a buyer’s product specifications tie it to particular suppliers, it has invested heavily
in specialized ancillary equipment or in reaming how to operate a supplier’s equipment (as
in computer software), or its production lines are connected to the supplier’s
manufacturing facilities (as in some manufacture of beverage containers).
It is not obliged to contend with other products for sale to the industry. For instance, the
competition between the steel companies and the aluminum companies to sell to the can
industry checks the power of each supplier.
It poses a credible threat of integrating forward into the industry’s business. This provides a
check against the industry’s ability to improve the terms on which it purchases.
The industry is not an important customer of the supplier group. If the industry is an
important customer, suppliers’ fortunes will be closely tied to the industry, and they will
want to protect the industry through reasonable pricing and assistance in activities like
R&D and lobbying.
Most of these sources of buyer power can be attributed to consumers as a group as well as
to industrial and commercial buyers; only a modification of the frame of reference is
necessary. Consumers tend to be more price sensitive if they are purchasing products that
are undifferentiated, expensive relative to their incomes, and of a sort where quality is not
particularly important.
The buying power of retailers is determined by the same rules, with one important
addition. Retailers can gain significant bargaining power over manufacturers when they
can influence consumers’ purchasing decisions, as they do in audio components, jewelry,
appliances, sporting goods, and other goods.