Arper
Arper
Arper
Parker Ramey
30 November 2015
The two works compared in this paper are Cross, a bronze sculpture by an unknown
Kongo artist from the mid-17th – 18th century, and The Veiled Rebekah, a marble sculpture by the
Italian artist Giovanni Maria Benzoni from 1864. Though the two works are dissimilar in their
style, medium, and context, the fact that the two pieces are both one of many similar works, and
both showcase prominent Christian religious figures and iconography in a sculpture in the round
Cross is a sculpture that was cast in bronze, rather than carved in marble like The Veiled
Rebekah, probably using the lost-wax method of casting. The lost-wax method, which has
existed in Africa from as early on as the 9th century AD, involves making a negative mold of the
original sculpture, from which a wax model is made. The wax model is then covered with a
second mold made of fireproof clay. This final mold is heated, causing the wax model to be
“lost” and melt out from it. Molten bronze is then poured into the empty clay mold to produce
the final cast sculpture. This would have allowed religious iconography and other culturally
significant art to spread quickly through Africa, by effectively making copies of the same piece
in a precursor to today’s mass-manufacturing of prints and scale replicas of popular art. Cross
and other African cast bronze statues, similarly to the carved idols that made up much of
Ramey 2
Paleolithic art, would have been durable and easy to transport because of their small size, and
In direct contrast to the more simplistic copycat process involved in Cross’s creation, The
Veiled Rebekah was carved from white marble with the intent of showcasing the artist’s talent at
subject of a veiled figure was conceived in 18th century Italy, and was popularized in the 19th
century as a way to display an artist’s virtuosity with the medium of marble. However, despite it
being an original work instead of a copy, a total of four identical sculptures were hand-carved by
Benzoni. Similarly to Cross, The Veiled Rebekah was one of many pieces in a similar vein,
though not an exact copy. Instead of being copies of one another created through a casting
process designed to spread Christian iconography, the many veiled figures from this time period
were created in a spirit of one-upmanship by artists trying to make a name for themselves in the
world of marble sculpture. Some of these artists, as is especially the case with Benzoni, would
create multiple copies of the same sculpture in order to further promote themselves.
Cross depicts a crucified Jesus flanked by two praying figures of unknown identity. His
features appear to be exaggeratedly African, with a large nose and lips, as well as almond-shaped
eyes. This contrasts the European features Jesus is shown with in most Christian art, which is
evidence that the image of Jesus was being assimilated into African culture and changing to
match their ideals through cultural cross-pollination. Stylistically, Jesus’ features are simple at
best, and crude at worst, both due to the simplistic casting method used to create Cross, and the
emphasis of the work’s story, the Crucifixion of Jesus, over any form of realism. This story-over-
realism ethos is common in Early Christian art, and would’ve migrated to Africa along with the
religion. Finally, Jesus’ ribs, as well as the pattern on the belt of the African loincloth he is
Ramey 3
depicted wearing, display a geometric quality that is characteristic of Early Medieval and Greek
Geometric art, both of which are art styles that also favor story or style over realism.
The Veiled Rebekah depicts Rebekah, who appears in the Book of Genesis as the wife of
Abraham’s son, Isaac. In direct contrast to the story-over-realism approach evident in Cross, the
main focus of The Veiled Rebekah is the female figure. The hyper-realistic quality of the dress’
fabric, and how the semi-transparent veil shows an impression of her face are meant to showcase
the artist’s skill at working with marble. The dress’ flowing qualities take their influence from
the wet drapery style of Early Classical Greece, which is meant to emphasize the sculptor’s
knowledge of the female form without depicting it nude. The veil’s wet, semi-transparent
properties in this piece are arguably the natural progression from the wet drapery style, but
function as a form of showmanship on the part of the artist rather than as a way to depict
proportions. According to the High Museum’s records, the individual details of the sculpture,
such as Rebekah’s demure expression and welcoming outstretched hand are meant to portray her
as an idealized woman according to the standards of the 19th Century’s Victorian Era. This
idealized depiction stems from an ethos that has existed not just since Early Classical Greece, but
in other, older ancient art as well, that the human body should be depicted in its ideal form.
Cross displays Christian iconography that is meant to communicate the story of Jesus’
crucifixion, as well as other symbols that are unique to African interpretations of Christianity and
African spiritualism. According to an article in the Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, from The
Metropolitan Museum of Art’s website on a similar piece, called Crucifix, Jesus’ flattened hands
and feet, as well as the way that his feet seem to merge together are meant to symbolize
heightened spiritual power. His stylized, ovular eyes are meant to depict Jesus having a
supernatural, spiritual vision. These oval-shaped eyes are also present on the stylized praying
Ramey 4
figures on either side of Jesus. It is unknown who or what these figures are meant to represent,
but theories suggest that they could be angels or even devotees mourning his fate. Crosses such
as these were believed by the people of the Kongo to have magical protective properties and
were believed to be involved in matters of everything from fertility to rainfall. The Kongo people
affording mystical powers to their art is similar to the phenomenon of Christian idol worship that
Again, in direct contrast to Cross, The Veiled Rebekah has little to no iconography or
symbolism at play. However, the piece does convey the purity of Rebekah, who is captured on
the day of her marriage to Isaac, the son of Abraham. Her veil is in fact a transparent wedding
veil, meant to symbolize her purity and innocence. However, this is the extent of the work’s
inherent symbolism; other aspects of what it represents are derived from the work’s historical
context. The Veiled Rebekah also represents the sculptor’s, Giovanni Maria Benzoni’s, ego. He
created The Veiled Rebekah in order to show off the artistry that he could accomplish within the
medium of marble, and created not just one, but four copies in order to promote himself as an
artist.
In conclusion, the fundamental difference between Cross and The Veiled Rebekah is that
Cross, by an unknown author from mid-17th – 18th century Kongo, is a piece that is meant to
speak for itself, to convey the message and the belief system of Christianity cross-pollinated by
the fundamental ideals of Kongo culture. It doesn’t matter who cast the bronze, because the
focus is on the work’s message rather than the artistry behind it. The Veiled Rebekah, by
Giovanni Maria, from 1864 Italy, is Cross’ polar opposite, in that it speaks not for itself, but for
its author. It conveys only Rebekah’s purity as its message, and was created solely to showcase
the artist’s skill at working with marble as a means of self-promotion. The two pieces are
Ramey 5
influenced by vastly different artistic movements, originate from corners of the world far-
removed from one another, and were created for entirely different purposes, but nonetheless
share a common thread. Despite having such disparate stylistic and cultural influences, they are
both one of multiple copies of themselves that depict iconic Christian figures in a sculpture in the
round medium.