Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 170 views

    Nestorius' Anathemas

    Uploaded by

    Rsphere
    Nestorius's Twelve Anathemas outlines positions that were deemed heretical by Nestorius regarding the nature of Christ. The document defines 12 positions that, if held, would result in someone being declared anathema or expelled from the church. The positions rejected include stating that Jesus Christ was not fully God or fully human, denying that Mary is the Mother of God, claiming the divine and human natures of Christ were mixed together, or attributing divine attributes only to Christ's human nature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Nestorius' Anathemas

    Uploaded by

    Rsphere
    170 views2 pages
    Nestorius's Twelve Anathemas outlines positions that were deemed heretical by Nestorius regarding the nature of Christ. The document defines 12 positions that, if held, would result in someone being declared anathema or expelled from the church. The positions rejected include stating that Jesus Christ was not fully God or fully human, denying that Mary is the Mother of God, claiming the divine and human natures of Christ were mixed together, or attributing divine attributes only to Christ's human nature.

    Original Description:

    12 anathemas in response to Cyril

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Nestorius's Twelve Anathemas outlines positions that were deemed heretical by Nestorius regarding the nature of Christ. The document defines 12 positions that, if held, would result in someone being declared anathema or expelled from the church. The positions rejected include stating that Jesus Christ was not fully God or fully human, denying that Mary is the Mother of God, claiming the divine and human natures of Christ were mixed together, or attributing divine attributes only to Christ's human nature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    170 views2 pages

    Nestorius' Anathemas

    Uploaded by

    Rsphere
    Nestorius's Twelve Anathemas outlines positions that were deemed heretical by Nestorius regarding the nature of Christ. The document defines 12 positions that, if held, would result in someone being declared anathema or expelled from the church. The positions rejected include stating that Jesus Christ was not fully God or fully human, denying that Mary is the Mother of God, claiming the divine and human natures of Christ were mixed together, or attributing divine attributes only to Christ's human nature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Nestorius’s Twelve Anathemas (English) – Deciph... https://decipheringchristianity.wordpress.com/nes...

    Nestorius’s Twelve Anathemas (English)

    1. If anyone says that the Emmanuel is true God, and not rather God with us, that is, that he has united
    himself to a like nature with ours, which he assumed from the Virgin Mary, and dwelt in it; and if
    anyone calls Mary the mother of God the Word, and not rather mother of him who is Emmanuel; and
    if he maintains that God the Word has changed himself into the flesh, which he only assumed in
    order to make his Godhead visible, and to be found in form as a man, let him be anathema.
    2. If any one asserts that, at the union of the Logos with the flesh, the divine Essence moved from one
    place to another; or says that the flesh is capable of receiving the divine nature, and that it has been
    partially united with the flesh; or ascribes to the flesh, by reason of its reception of God, an extension
    to the infinite and boundless, and says that God and man are one and the same in nature; let him be
    anathema.
    3. If any one says that Christ, who is also Emmanuel, is One, not [merely] in consequence of connection,
    but [also] in nature, and does not acknowledge the connection (συνάφεια) of the two natures, that of
    the Logos and of the assumed manhood, in one Son, as still continuing without mingling; let him be
    anathema.
    4. If any one assigns the expressions of the Gospels and Apostolic letters, which refer to the two natures
    of Christ, to one only of those natures, and even ascribes suffering to the divine Word, both in the
    flesh and in the Godhead; let him be anathema.
    5. If any one ventures to say that, even after the assumption of human nature, there is only one Son of
    God, namely, he who is so in nature (naturaliter filius = Logos), while he (since the assumption of the
    flesh) is certainly Emmanuel; let him be anathema.
    6. If anyone, after the Incarnation calls another than Christ the Word, and ventures to say that the form
    of a servant is equally with the Word of God, without beginning and uncreated, and not rather that it
    is made by him as its natural Lord and Creator and God, and that he has promised to raise it again in
    the words: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will build it up again”; let him be anathema.
    7. If any one says that the man who was formed of the Virgin is the Only-begotten, who was born from
    the bosom of the Father, before the morning star was Psalm 108:3 , and does not rather confess that he
    has obtained the designation of Only-begotten on account of his connection with him who in nature
    is the Only-begotten of the Father; and besides, if any one calls another than the Emmanuel Christ let
    him be anathema.
    8. If any one says that the form of a servant should, for its own sake, that is, in reference to its own
    nature, be reverenced, and that it is the ruler of all things, and not rather, that [merely] on account of
    its connection with the holy and in itself universally-ruling nature of the Only-begotten, it is to be
    reverenced; let him be anathema.
    9. If anyone says that the form of a servant is of like nature with the Holy Ghost, and not rather that it
    owes its union with the Word which has existed since the conception, to his mediation, by which it
    works miraculous healings among men, and possesses the power of expelling demons; let him be
    anathema.
    10. If any one maintains that the Word, who is from the beginning, has become the high priest and
    apostle of our confession, and has offered himself for us, and does not rather say that it is the work of
    Emmanuel to be an apostle; and if any one in such a manner divides the sacrifice between him who
    united [the Word] and him who was united [the manhood] referring it to a common sonship, that is,
    1 of 2
    not giving to God that which is God’s, and to man that which is man’s; let him be anathema. 5/18/18, 6:39 PM
    11. If any one maintains that the flesh which is united with God the Word is by the power of its own
    Nestorius’s Twelve Anathemas (English) – Deciph... https://decipheringchristianity.wordpress.com/nes...
    nature life-giving, whereas the Lord himself says, “It is the Spirit that quickens; the flesh profits
    nothing” John 6:61, let him be anathema. [He adds, “God is a Spirit” John 4:24. If, then, any one
    maintains that God the Logos has in a carnal manner, in his substance, become flesh, and persists in
    this with reference to the Lord Christ; who himself after his resurrection said to his disciples,
    “Handle me and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones, as you behold me having” Luke 24:39; let
    him be anathema.]
    12. If any one, in confessing the sufferings of the flesh, ascribes these also to the Word of God as to the
    flesh in which he appeared, and thus does not distinguish the dignity of the natures; let him be
    anathema.

    2 of 2 5/18/18, 6:39 PM

    You might also like