Fundamentals of Bridge Design Note (Repaired)
Fundamentals of Bridge Design Note (Repaired)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1General
Bridge is a structure corresponding to the heaviest responsibility in carrying a free flow of
transport and is the most significant component of a transportation system in case of
communication over spacing/gaps for whatever reason such as aquatic obstacles, valleys gorges,
and structures, etc. and to facilitate the transportation systems. Or “Bridges are elevated
transportation structure spanning across some obstacle (a river, a valley, a road or a railway)”. It
provides a passage for transporting pedestrians, vehicles, trains, pipelines, etc. Or “Bridges are
any structures having an opening not less than 6100mm that forms part of a highway or that is
located over or under a highway”.
In large cities, due to traffic jam at the intersection of two or more roads, bridges called
interchange or flyover bridges are provided. Bridges must be planed and engineered before they
can be constructed. Bridge engineering is one of the fascinating fields in civil engineering calling
for expertise in many areas like structural analysis and design, geotechnical, geological
investigation runoff calculation and methods of bridge construction.
Bridges have great importance in terms of urban, social, cultural and economic development.
They also have major military significance.
They are not seen or understood in the same way by everyone.
For instance: A simple bridge over a small river will be viewed differently by different people
because the eyes each one sees it with are unique to that individual.
- Someone travelling over the bridge everyday while going to work may only realize a
bridge is there because the road way has posts and railing on either side.
- Others may remember a time before the bridge was built how far they had to travel to
visit friends and to get the children to school.
- Civic leaders see the bridge as a link between neighborhoods and a way to provide fire
and police protection and access to hospital.
- In business community, the bridge is seen as opening up new markets and expanding
commerce.
- An artist will consider the bridge and its setting as a possible subject for a future painting.
- A theologian may see the bridge as symbolic of making a connection between God and
human beings.
- While a boater on the river, looking up when passing underneath the bridge, will have a
completely different perspective.
Bridges affect people day today life. People use them; engineers design , later build and maintain
them.
Transportation System and Bridges
Transportation system which is implemented on land needs bridges.
Basically in Road Transportation System Bridge is mandatory for two reasons.
1. To pass obstacles
2. To facilitate the transportation system. This is to say in large cities there is traffic jam
when two or more roads meet at a point.
A bridge controls the capacity of the transportation system. For instance: If the strength of the
bridge is unable to carry heavy trucks, loads limits will be posted and heavy trucks will be
rerouted. Bridges are expensive structures. The cost per meter of a bridge is high in comparison
to the road. If the bridge fails, the transportation system will not be in a position to give function.
Therefore, bridge designer has control over the capacity, cost and Safety.
rod or other harvested fibers woven together to form a connective rope capable of binding and
holding together the materials used in early bridges.
Natural bridges: These are bridges which are designed and constructed in nature. They may be
formed due to erosion and scoring of erodible materials under rocks, due to geological formation
or due to their natural behavior. These may be fallen trees, stepping stones, rock arches,
overhanging branches, creepers.
Primitive bridges: The most primitive human communities must often have created bridges
from material lying easily to hand. Hunters and gatherers follow favorite paths and streams need
to be crossed. A fallen tree was dragged into position to serve as a plank. Forest strand may be
intertwined as an elementary suspension bridge.
These are Primitive bridges which are constructed across the stream using fallen tress and
bamboos “The primitive man who felled a tree deliberately so that it fell across a stream was the
first bridge builder”. But these bridge types cannot cross wide rivers.
Early bridges: These are bridges having architectural plan during ancient civilization. brick
masonry arch bridge, stone masonry arch bridge, stone masonry segmental arch bridges (Middle
Ages, Renaissance period) are called early bridges
Modern bridges: These are reinforced concrete bridges, prestressed concrete bridges steel
bridges and fiber bridges which are used for roadway and railway bridges.
4. Soil Investigation
This stage of the Geotechnical Investigation is involved with the exploration of subsurface
conditions and retrieval of test data for generating geotechnical parameters and geotechnical
profiles. Once at the site it is easy and of great value to sample for soil, rock, stone, water, etc. in
cooperation with the soil investigators.
Soil investigation is required to get soil profile, engineering property of the foundation material and
foundation level of the abutments and piers for design of the foundation.
This information is obtained by analyzing samples taken from boreholes, test pits or geophysical
surveying.
Samples of at least 2kg each should be collected marking station number and river name where the
crossing site is fixed. (See 2.3.3)
5. Desk Study
Every site investigation should commence with a desk study directed towards collecting, collating
and reviewing the following:
Design drawings from any previous structure at the site.
Previous site investigation reports, borehole logs, penetrometer results and construction
experience e.g. piling records.
Geological and Topographical maps,
Survey data and records.
Hydrological data.
Aerial photographs
Regional seismicity data.
Survey records, local knowledge and resources
The collection and collation of the above information, where possible, could be undertaken during
the field reconnaissance survey stag.
During the desk study stage, an overview of complexity and risks associated with each geotechnical
design should be clearly identified.
1.4 Bridge Site Selection
In this first stage of design the engineer identifies a preferred location for the bridge and decides on
the type, size and capacity of the structure. She/he reaches these decisions on the basis of field
surveys and information concerning:
In locating a bridge crossing the following considerations come in to picture.
The reach of the river should be straight. Especially this has to hold on upstream side of the
crossing. This is necessary so that the approach flow is not angular and the obstructions
caused by piers, etc have minimum disturbance effect on the flow.
The river in the reach should have a regime flow free of excess of currents.
If this is present, it will be aggravated by the piers that have to be put up and will result in
excessive scour which endanger the foundation.
The channel in the reach should be well defined.
The crossing site should be as narrow as possible.
The crossing site should have firm high banks which are fairly inerodable. In this case the
river flow will be defined and confined and any excessive velocity will not cause erosion.
The site on a meandering river should be at nodal point. A nodal point is defined as the
location where the river regime does not normally shift and the location serves as a fulcrum
about which river channel swing laterally ( both upstream and downstream)
The site should have suitable strata at reasonable and workable depth for founding piers and
abutments.
The site should allow for constructing approach road.
The site should be selected where skewness can be avoided.
For a river crossing it is important to identify the type of river to be crossed. There are two types of
rivers namely alluvial and incised.
Alluvial rivers are winding and they erode their banks and scour their beds; they have flood plains
on either side of the channel and the flow regularly overtops the channel banks to spread across the
flood plain. They are continually active, scouring and depositing materials on the banks and
transporting sediments.
Incised rivers have a relatively stable banks and arc generally narrower and deeper than alluvial
rivers.
Bridge crossing over alluvial rivers nearly always require training works to stabilize the channel
flow with in tile bridge waterway opening.
What is the aim of investigation?
From field surveys and information the following information are gathered
The proposed road alignment
The local terrain and site condition
The required design life of the bridge
Traffic volume
Available resources
Therefore aim of investigation is to select suitable site from possible alternatives at which a
bridge can be built satisfying Economy, Safety, Traffic demand, Stream demand, Aesthetic
1.6 Data Collection and Span Determination
Once the engineer has identified a likely site for the bridge, he/she needs to obtain field information
on the catchment area and run off, local terrain conditions and water levels, navigational and other
clearance requirements.
Field reviews shall be made by the designer in order to become familiar with the site. The most
complete survey data cannot adequately depict all site conditions or substitute for personal
inspection by someone experienced in bridge design.
1.6.1 River Survey
Information required by the designer for analysis and design should include all features that can
affect the magnitude and the frequency of the flood flow which will pass the site under study. These
are: Climatologically characteristics, land runoff characteristics, stream gauging records, high water
marks and size and performance of existing structures in the vicinity
High water marks can be obtained from gauges or from local people. In addition, they can be
identified from small debris, such as grass or twigs caught in tree branches, elephant grass or
similar matted down, mud lines on stones or bridges, are all high water indicators.
The hydrologic characteristics of the basin or watershed of the stream under study are needed for
any predictive methods used to forecast flood flows. Although many of these characteristics can be
found from office studies, some are better found by a field survey of the basin. The size and
configuration of the watershed, the geometry of the stream network, storage volumes of ponds,
lakes, reservoirs, and flood plains, and the general geology and soils of the basin can be found from
maps.
Having determined these basin characteristics, runoff times, infiltration values, storage values, and
runoff coefficients can be found and used in calculating flood flow values using different methods .
Like: Reve’s formula, rational formula, Area-Velocity formula
Hydraulic Requirements
Bridges are designed to accommodate design discharge at design flood. When a river has a wide
flood plain, the economical solution may be using short span bridge with proper scour and erosion
protection for the embankment, abutments and piers.
Piers should be located in such a manner that they can provide the required lineal waterway and
navigational clearance.
The alignment of piers and abutments should, if possible, be set parallel to the direction of flow
during maximum flood.
Free Board
The waterway below the superstructure must be designed to pass the design flood and the floating
debris carried on it.
The free board allows for uncertainty in determining design flood level also. The minimum free
board above the design water level is given in table below unless refined hydraulic analyses have
been made.
Table: Free Board
Discharge (m3/s) Vertical Clearance/Free board (m)
0 to 3.0 0.3
3.0 to 30.0 0.6
30.0 to 300 0.9
> 300 1.2
These clearance measurements should be increased for backwater effects when the flow is restricted
by short span bridge or when the river has history of unusual large floating items or in case of
navigational requirements.
Topographic Surveys are used to identify and map the contours of the ground and existing features
on the surface of the earth or slightly above or below the earth's surface (i.e. trees, buildings, streets,
walkways, manholes, utility poles, retaining walls, etc.). If the purpose of the survey is to serve as a
base map for the design of a residence or building of some type, or design a road or driveway, it
may be necessary to show perimeter boundary lines and the lines of easements on or crossing the
property being surveyed, in order for a designer to accurately show zoning and other agency
required setbacks.
Topographic Surveys require "bench marks" to which ground contours are related, information
regarding surface and underground utilities, determination of required setbacks, etc.
From this information a three-dimensional map may be prepared. The work usually consists of
the following:
Establishing horizontal and vertical control that will serve as the framework of the survey.
Determining enough horizontal location and elevation (usually called side shots) of ground
points to provide enough data for plotting when the map is prepared to create a Digital
Terrain Model (DTM).
Locating natural and man-made features that may be required by the purpose of the survey.
Computing distances, angles, and elevations.
Drawing the topographic map with contours.
Bridge surveys are often required for navigation projects. In many instances, a plan of the bridge
may be available from the highway department, county engineer, railroad, etc. When as-built
drawings can be obtained, it may be substituted for portions of the data required herein. However,
an accuracy check should be made in the field. Field survey measurements should include the
elevation of bridge floor, low steel, and a ground section under bridge to present an accurate
portrait of the bridge opening. Piers, bents, and piling should be located with widths or thicknesses
being measured so that their volume can be computed and deducted from the effective opening
under the bridge. Superstructure is not important and need not be shown. However, guardrail
elevations should be obtained and the rails described as to whether they are of solid or open
construction. A very brief description of bridge as to type of construction (wood, steel, concrete,
etc.) and its general condition should be furnished. If wing walls exist, minimum measurements
should be made to draw them in proper perspective. Sketches of existing bridges may be required
on many of the various types of surveys performed by a District. Obtain digital photographs of all
bridges. All photographs should be carefully indexed, and a sketch made to show approximate
position and angle of each exposure. In general, survey data to be included on bridge survey field
notes should include:
Direction facing bridge, whether upstream or downstream.
Length of bridge, or stationing if established.
Distances from centre to centre of piers or bents.
Dimensions of piers or pilings including batter.
Low chord (or steel) elevation over channel.
Profile of bridge deck, roadway, handrail, etc.
Sketch of plan of bridge, when required, showing deck dimensions including girder size and
spacing.
Sketch of typical bent, when required, including cap size.
Sketch of wing wall, when required.
Digital photographs from various aspects.
Material of which constructed (wood, steel, concrete, prestressed concrete, etc.).
Type of construction, such as truss, trestle, or girder.
General condition of bridge.
Alignment of bridge to channel, whether normal or at angle (may be shown on plan sketch).
Alignment of piers or bents, whether normal or at angle.
Composition of bents may be indicated on sketch.
Designation of highway, road, street, railroad, etc., utilizing bridge--describe surface, if road.
Grade Requirements
Often in mountainous areas the road way grade is governed by the capacity of heaviest vehicle to
climb, vertical curve and sight distance. These requirements may increase the span beyond the
hydraulic requirement.
1.6.3 Soil Sampling and Testing
Central to the investigation and subsequent design stage an understanding of the ultimate limit state
design to be adopted for design is an essential. This should be done by a suitably qualified and
experienced geotechnical engineer and conveyed to the personnel conducting the investigation prior
to the commencement of site works.
Field reviews shall be made by the designer in order to become familiar with the site. The most
complete survey data cannot adequately depict all site conditions or substitute for personal
inspection by someone experienced in bridge and drainage design. The selection of characteristic
values of geotechnical parameters, the modification of these values by using Geotechnical Strength
reduction factors and the use of these modified values in calculating ultimate limit state design
capacity must be fully understood. Communication between the bridge design engineer and the
geotechnical engineer to achieve an appropriate understanding is imperative. The types of
geotechnical field investigation are usually site specific and require discussion with the structural
and waterways engineers.
All in situ testing, for example Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Electric Friction-Cone penetration
Test (EFCPT) etc, should be carried out in accordance with the relevant standards and supervised
accordingly. The purpose of in situ testing is to determine the soil parameters necessary for the
design of foundations.
Field Sketching and Photos
It has proved very practical to make a simple sketch of the bridge site with approximate water
shores, existing structures, scour holes, main stream location, etc including very rough dimensions
with approximate measurements
As a minimum, photos shall be taken looking upstream and downstream from the site as well as
along the contemplated highway centerline in both directions. Details of the streambed and banks
should also be photographed along with any existing structures in the vicinity both upstream and
downstream. Close-up photographs complete with a scale or grid shall be taken to facilitate
estimates of the stream bed gradation.
Check List of Site Investigation
A form or checklist that can be used by the field investigator/designer in identifying and cataloging
field information is shown on .A checklist for Inspection of existing bridges is shown below.
FIELD VISIT INVESTIGATION FORM
PROJECT:…………...............................................…………… Date: …................……….
Inv. by ………...................……….........................… Site Situated @ STA: .................……….
WATERWAY: Name: ......................................... Direction of flow: ....................................
High Water Mark:... ................ Level: +...............Side Slopes: ........................degrees: ............
Diversions/ Flow concentration / Flood Hazards year, level: .........................................................
% Grade of Stream: ......... Channel, Base: ……(m) Height of Banks:…...... (m)
Manning's Value n=..................Crossing angle (estimated): …………degrees
Meandering: ……………………………………(show with figure)
Bottom/Base material.................................. Material on channel side: ......................... n=..........
Up or Downstream Restriction (debris/sedimentation/scour/soil mtrl.): ……………………..
STRUCTURES : Bridges/ Buildings upstream and downstream: ..................... @ M
up/down:.......
Type:.....................................Piers: Type: ....................
Abutment Types: .......................Width: ...............(m) Size of Spans: ............
Clear Height: ……(m) @............; ............m@..............; .............m@ .............; Total water width
at HWL:............(m);
(Overflow? Year? Level: +...) ..................................
Land Uses upstream and downstream: ......................................
Vegetation (Location, Type, Name): ....................................................
Wildlife (Paths, Traces, Type, Name): .....................................................................
Soil Conditions: ..................................................................... at Roadway STA: .....................
Sample no: ............. @ STA: .............; Sample no: ............ @ STN: ................; Sample no: ............
@ STA: ................;
Photos no:............@STN:............... Shows: ................... Photos no:..........@STA:...............
Shows: .........................
Photos no:............@STN:............... Shows: ..................... Photos no:............@STN:...............
Shows: .........................
REMARKS: .....................................................................................................................................
..................
( make simple plan sketch incl. water shores/Road alignment and continue the text on back side
of this page, if needed)
Economical Span
Span determination is usually dictated by the hydraulic requirement. However, there are conditions
where lengthen spans are chosen for the sake of road alignment.
For a given span the most economical span is the length at which superstructure cost equals to
substructure cost.
The most economical bridge site selected :
is on a straight reach of the river
is beyond the disturbing influence of larger tributaries
Steady river flow without serious turn and cross currents
has well defined banks
has reasonably straight approach roads
The bridge should be square bridge
Has a good foundation condition.
shall allow appropriate approach roads gradient
should offer suitable vertical curves and sight distances
Easy available resources like labour, construction material, transport
facility in the vicinity
Avoidance of excessive under water construction for minimum
foundation cost
On curved alignment bridge should be possibly on tangent side
Reasonable proximity to a direct alignment of the road to the served
Adequate vertical height and waterway for navigation purpose
No adverse environmental impact
Before decision of bridge site the followings factors should be examined carefully
Grade of alignment
Government requirement
Commercial influence
General features of the bridge structures
Time consideration
Foundation characteristics
Erection consideration
Environmental impact
Geographical conditions of the area
Public requirement
Adjacent property considerations
Future expansion
stream characteristic
construction facilities available
maintenance and repair considerations
aesthetic values
In short bridge location depends upon
Local demand
Administrative requirement
As a part of road project
CHAPTER TWO
2.1 TYPES OF BRIDGES AND THEIR SELECTION
In this chapter, different types of bridge structures are introduced and their structural behavior,
suitability, relative advantages, and disadvantages are discussed.
The main parameter of an arch is the rise to span ratio, r/l (1/6 to 1/10).
From economic point of view it is attempted to coincide the center of pressure of a given
load with center of line of the arch. If the pressure line coincides with the axis of
structure, (as in a uniformly loaded parabolic arch), all cross sections will be subjected to
compression, with no moment or shear. If the pressure line falls within the kern, there
will not be tension. But if shape of structure and pressure line differs moment may
become dominant. Figure below shows parts of arch bridges.
Steel Truss bridges
Steel truss girder bridges have been used economically in the past over a span range of
100 m to 500 m. A bridge truss derives its economy from its two major structural
advantages, (a) the primary forces in the members are axial forces (stress resultants are
less), and (b) greater overall depths permissible with its open web construction leads to
reduced self-weight when compared to solid web systems. Warren truss is most common
for short span bridges, while other types like Pratt truss, N-girder and K-girder trusses are
also common. The main components of the truss girder bridges are (a) two main truss
girders, (b) floor beams connecting bottom chord joints, (c) stringer beams connected to
floor beams, (d) decking or flooring, (e) top tie beams parallel to the floor beams and (f)
lateral bracings provided at the top and bottom chord levels to resist horizontal transverse
loads. Truss girder bridges can be of different further structural classifications, like
cantilever truss bridge, arch truss bridge, suspension bridge with steel truss deck etc.
Aesthetics: It is necessary to understand what qualities and features of a bridge tend to make
that aesthetics statement a good one. This understanding requires training and time.
When a bridge is placed across a relatively shallow valley, the most pleasing appearance occurs
when there are an odd number of spans with span lengths that decrease going up the side of the
valley.
Harmony between the whole structure and its surrounding needed to be addressed.
Repeating similar spans too many times can become monotonous, just as hearing the same music
with a heavy beat that is repeated over and over again can be uncomfortable.
Moreover, contrast and texture, light and shadow are additional aesthetic parameter in bridge
design.
Economics and ease of maintenance: In comparison of the economics of different bridge
types, the construction cost and maintenance cost should be taken together. A general rule is
that the bridge with minimum number of spans, fewest deck joints and widest spacing of
girders will be the most economical. By reducing the number of spans, the construction cost
of one pier is eliminated.
Deck joints are a high maintenance cost item, so minimizing their number will reduce the life
cycle cost of the bridge,
Generally, concrete structures require less maintenance than steel structures.
Construction and erection considerations: The selection of the bridge type to be built is
often governed by construction and erection considerations. The length of time required to
construct a bridge is important and varies with bridge type. In general, the larger the
prefabricated or precast member, the shorter the construction time. However, the larger the
members, the more difficult they are to transport and lift into place.
The availability of skilled labor and specified materials will also influence the choice of a
particular bridge type.
Legal Considerations: One of the components of the model was the constraint put on the design
procedure by regulations. These regulations are usually beyond the control of the engineer, but
they are real and must be considered. Applicable laws like environmental laws, Local and
regional politics also govern the type of bridge.
CHAPTER THREE
Multiple Presence Factor of Live Load: The provisions of this subchapter shall not be applied to the fatigue limit state for which one design
truck is used, regardless of the number of design lanes.
Trucks will be present in adjacent lanes on roadways with multiple design lanes but this is unlikely that all adjacent lanes will be loaded
simultaneously. This will be considered by the multiple presence factors.
Number of Loaded Lanes 1 2 3 >3
Multiple Presence Factors “m” 1.20 1.0 0.85 0.65
The multiple presence factor of 1.20 for a single lane does not apply to the pedestrian loads. Therefore, the case of the pedestrian loads without
the vehicular live load is a subset of the second bulleted item.
The multiple presence factors in Table 3.2 were developed based on an ADTT (Average Daily Truck Traffic) of 5000 trucks in one direction.
The force effect resulting from the appropriate number of lanes shall be reduced for sites with lower ADTT as follows:
If 100 ADTT 1000; 95 % of the specified force effect shall be used; and
If ADTT < 100; 90 % of the specified force effect shall be used.
This adjustment is based on the reduced probability of attaining the design event during a 75-year design life with reduced truck volume.
Design Truck
The weights and spacing of axles and wheels for the design truck shall be as specified in Figure 3-1. A dynamic load allowance shall be
considered as specified in the following subchapter on Vehicular Dynamic Load Allowance.
4.3 m
4.3 –9.0 m
1.8 m
3.000 mm
Figure 3-1 Characteristics of the Design Truck
Except as specified in following subchapters on the application of Design Vehicular Live Loads and Fatigue Loads, the spacing between the two
145 kN axles shall be varied between 4.3 and 9.0 m to produce extreme force effects.
Design Tandem
The design tandem used for Strategic Bridges (see Chapter 2: General Requirements) shall consist of a pair of 110 KN axles spaced 1.2 m
apart. The transverse spacing of wheels shall be taken as 1.8 m. A dynamic load allowance shall be considered as specified in a following
subchapter. The spacing and loading is illustrated in Figure 3-2
110 kN
1.2 m
110 kN
1.8 m
Pedestrian Loads
A pedestrian load of 4.0 kPa (kN/m2) shall be applied to all sidewalks wider than 0.6 m and considered simultaneously with the vehicular design
live load.
See the provisions of above subchapter Multiple Presence of Live Load for applying the pedestrian loads in combination with the vehicular live
load. Usually the 4 kN/m2 load will allow for small cars to pass. To avoid accidents for bridges wider than 2.4 m, provision shall be made for an
additional axle load.
Where sidewalks, pedestrian, and/or bicycle bridges are intended to be used by maintenance and/or other incidental vehicles, these loads shall be
considered in the design. If unknown, at least one movable axle load of 70 kN acting together with the pedestrian load shall be applied. The
dynamic load allowance need not be considered for these vehicles.
In half-through-trusses of steel, the compressed top chord of a simple span truss shall be designed to resist a lateral force of not less than 4.0
kN/m length, considered as a permanent load for the Strength I Load Combination and factored accordingly.
Component IM
Deck Joints – All Limit States 75%
All Other Components
Fatigue and Fracture Limit State 15%
All Other Limit States
33%
The dynamic load allowance shall be reduced for components, other than joints, if justified by sufficient evidence, but in no case shall the
dynamic load allowance used in design be less than 50% of IM in the table above.
The dynamic load allowance (IM) in Table 3.3 is an increment to be applied to the static wheel load to account for wheel load impact from
moving vehicles.
Buried Components
The dynamic load allowance for culverts and other buried structures, in %, shall be taken as:
IM = 33 (1.0 - 4.l*10-4 DE) > 0%
Where:
DE = the minimum depth of earth cover above the structure (mm)
Wood Components
Wood structures are known to experience reduced dynamic wheel load effects due to internal friction between the components and the damping
characteristics of wood.
For wood bridges and wood components of bridges, the dynamic load allowance values specified in table of dynamic load allowance shall be
reduced to 70 of the values specified therein for IM.
The tire pressure shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed over the contact area. The tire pressure shall be assumed to be distributed as
follows:
On continuous surfaces, uniformly over the specified contact area, and
On interrupted surfaces, uniformly over the actual contact area within the footprint with the pressure increased in the ratio of the specified to
actual contact areas.
However, for all concrete decks including composite decks the length 200 mm shall be used in Equation 3.1.
But ERABDM specifies tyre contact area of a wheel consisting of one or two tyres shall be assumed to be a single rectangle, whose width
is 510 mm. and whose length is 250mm.
The design truck or tandem shall be positioned transversely such that the center of any wheel load is not closer than:
For the design of the deck overhang - 300 mm from the face of the curb or railing, and
For the design of all other components - 600 mm from the edge of the design lane.
Unless otherwise specified, the lengths of design lanes, or parts thereof that contribute to the extreme force effect under consideration shall be
loaded with the design lane load.
The lane load is not interrupted to provide space for the axle sequences of the design tandem or the design truck.
Calculations using a braking length of 122 m and a speed of 90 km/h (25 m/s) yield b = 0.26 for a horizontal force that will act for a period of
about 10 seconds. The factor "b" applies to all lanes in one direction because all vehicles may have reacted within this time frame. Only the
design truck or tandem is to be considered.
From ERA bridge design manual the braking force shall be taken as the greater of:
• 25% of the axle weights of the design truck or design tandem; or
• 5% of the design truck plus lane load; or5% of the design tandem plus lane load placed in all design lanes headed in the same direction.
These forces shall be assumed to act horizontally at a distance of 1800 mm above the roadway surface in either longitudinal direction to cause
extreme force effects.
Type CD
Semicircular-nosed pier 0.7
Square-ended pier 1.4
Debris lodged against the pier 1.4
Wedged-nosed pier with nose angle 90o or less 0.8
Drag Coefficient
Lateral: The lateral, uniformly distributed pressure on substructure due to water flowing at an angle, , to the longitudinal axis of the pier (see
Figure below) shall be taken as:
PL = 5.14 x 10-4CLV2
Where: PL = lateral pressure (MPa)
CL = lateral drag coefficient specified in Table below.
Plan View of Pier Showing Stream Flow Pressure
3.1.10 Wind Loads (WL= Wind on Live load; WS= Wind load on Structure)
General
Pressures specified herein shall be assumed to be caused by a base design wind velocity, VB, of 160 km/h (= 45 m/s).
Wind load shall be assumed to be uniformly distributed on the area exposed to the wind. The exposed area shall be the sum of areas of all
components, including floor system and railing, as seen in elevation taken perpendicular to the assumed wind direction. This direction shall be
varied to determine the extreme force effect in the structure or in its components. Areas that do not contribute to the extreme force effect under
consideration shall be neglected in the analysis.
For bridges or parts of bridges more than 10 m above low ground or water level, the design wind velocity, V DZ (km/h), at design elevation, z,
should be adjusted according to:
V DZ=2.5∗Voalignl [ V 10 ¿ ] ¿ ¿¿¿
¿
Where:V10 = wind velocity at 10 m above low ground or above design water level (km/h)
VB = base wind velocity of 160 km/h (45 m/s) at 10 m height, yielding design pressures specified in following subchapters Wind
Pressure on Structures and Vertical Wind Pressure
Z = height of structure at which wind loads are being calculated as measured from low ground, or from water level, > 10 m (m)
Vo = friction velocity, a meteorological wind characteristic taken, as specified in Table 3-4, for various upwind surface characteristics
(km/h)
Zo = friction length of upstream fetch, a meteorological wind characteristic taken as specified in Table 3-4 below (m)
The following descriptions are for the terms "open country" and "suburban" in Table 3-4:
Open Country: Open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights generally less than 10 m. This category includes flat open country
and grasslands.
Urban and Suburban: Urban and suburban areas, wooded areas, or other terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the size
of single-family or larger dwellings. Use of this category shall be limited to those areas for which representative terrain prevails in the
upwind direction at least 500 m.
CONDITION OPEN COUNTRY URBAN AND SUBURBAN
Vo (km/h) 13.2 17.6
Zo (m) 70 1000
Base design wind velocity varies significantly due to local conditions. For small and/or low structures, wind usually does not govern. For large
and/or tall bridges, however, the local conditions should be investigated.
Pressures on windward and leeward sides are to be taken simultaneously in the assumed direction of wind.
Typically, a bridge structure should be examined separately under wind pressures from two or more different directions in order to ascertain
those windward, leeward, and side pressures producing the most critical loads on the structure.
The suggested wind speed V10 = 40 m/s should be compared with the Ethiopian Building Code Standard, where V 10 = 150 km/h (42 m/s) is used
for the highest mountaintops. The National Atlas of Ethiopia shows that the western parts of the country (Bahar Dar, Nekemte, Gore, Jima,
Awasa and Goba) have a wind speed (V 10) that never exceeds 15 knots (equal to 30 m/s or 105 km/h). However, since the National
Meteorological Services Agency has collected wind data only every 4 hours it is not certain that the maximum wind speeds are given at the
meteorological stations. Therefore, it is recommended to make separate observations for large or wind-sensitive bridges.
Equation 3.2 below is based on boundary layer theory combined with empirical observations and represents the most recent approach to defining
wind speeds for various conditions as used in meteorology. In the past, an exponential equation was sometimes used to relate wind speed to
heights above 10 m. This formulation was based solely on empirical observations and had no theoretical basis.
Wind Pressure on Structures, (WS): For small and medium sized concrete bridges below 50m length the wind load on structures shall be
neglected.
In the absence of more precise data, design wind pressure, PD in kPa, shall be determined as:
Where PB = base wind pressure specified in Table below:
VDZ = design velocity of wind at design elevation, Z (Km/hr)
VB= Base wind velocity (Km/hr)
STRUCTURAL WINDWARD LOAD, kPa LEEWARD LOAD, kPa
COMPONENT
Trusses, Columns, and Arches 2.4 1.2
Beams 2.4 Not applicable
Large Flat Surfaces 1.9 Not applicable
Wind Pressure on Vehicles, (WL): When vehicles are present, the design wind pressure shall be applied to both structure and vehicles.
Wind pressure on vehicles shall be represented by an interruptible, moving force of 1.46 kN/m acting normal to, and 1.8 m above, the
roadway and shall be transmitted to the structure
Aero elastic Instability: Many bridges, decks, or individual structural components have been shown to be aero elastically insensitive if their
length-to-width or length-to-depth ratios are under about 30.0. Wind tunnel testing of bridges and other civil engineering structures is a
highly developed technology, which shall be used to study the wind response characteristics of a structural model or to verify the results of
analysis. This is especially applicable to long spans.
3.1.11 Earthquake Effects (EQ= Earthquake)
Earthquake loads are given by the product of the elastic seismic response coefficient Csm and the equivalent weight of the superstructure. These
are inertia forces due to mass of the bridge when a sudden shaking of the ground occurs. Minimum seat width requirements shall be at least 500
mm at each abutment.
For multi span structures, the minimum analysis requirements shall be as specified in the table:
Approximate Values of Relative Movements Required to Reach Minimum Active or Maximum Passive Earth Pressure Conditions
Values of /H
Type of Backfill Active Passive
Dense sand 0.001 0.01
Medium-dense sand 0.002 0.02
Loose sand 0.004 0.04
Compacted silt 0.002 0.02
Compacted lean clay 0.010 0.05
Compacted fat clay 0.010 0.05
Where:
= movement of top of wall required to reach minimum active or maximum passive pressure by tilting or lateral translation (mm)
H = height of wall (mm)
For walls that are backfilled with cohesive materials, the effects of soil creep should be taken into consideration in estimating the design earth
pressures.
Where activity by mechanical compaction equipment is anticipated within a distance of one-half the height of the wall, taken as the difference in
elevation between the point where finished grade intersects the back of the wall and the base of the wall, the effect of additional earth pressure
that shall be induced by compaction shall be taken into account.
Wherever possible, the development of hydrostatic water pressure on walls should be eliminated through use of free-draining (rapid-draining)
backfill material and/or the use of weep holes and crushed rock, pipe drains, gravel drains, perforated drains, or geofabric drains that provide
drainage.
Where soils are subject to saturation and seismic or other cyclic/instantaneous loads, special consideration should be given to addressing the
possibility of soil liquefaction.
EH = Horizontal Earth Pressure
There are two earth pressure theories used. These are Rankin and Coulomb Earth Pressure Theories.
Coulomb theory is recommended by AASHTO for masonry and RC abutment since this theory holds better for the actual situation.
Basic earth pressure (p, in MPa) shall be assumed to be linearly proportional to the depth of earth and taken as:
p = kh*s*g*z *10-9
Where: kh = coefficient of lateral earth pressure taken as ko, from table below for walls that do not deflect or move,
Soil type Coefficient of Lateral Earth Pressure, ko
OCR = 1 OCR = 2 OCR = 5 OCR = 10
Loose sand 0.45 0.65 1.10 1.60
Medium Sand 0.40 0.60 1.05 1.55
Dense Sand 0.35 0.55 1.00 1.50
Silt (ML) 0.50 0.70 1.10 1.60
Lean Clay (CL) 0.60 0.80 1.20 1.65
Highly Plastic Clay (CH) 0.65 0.80 1.10 1.40
Or ka, specified in Equations below, walls that deflect
ka = sin2 ( + /)
* sin2 sin ( - )
In which:
Φ∗Rn≥∑ γi∗Qi
And this equation involves both load factors and resistance factor due to this the design method is called load and resistance factor design
method. In AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification the equation is given by
η∗∑ γi∗Qi≤Φ∗Rn
The additional parameter η is known as load modifier which is incorporated to consider ductility, redundancy and operational importance of the
bridge.
Under the umbrella of the LRFD the strength limit state, extreme event limit state, service limit state and fatigue and fracture limit state exist.
Load Factors and Load Combinations:
The total factored force effect shall be taken as:
Q = ii Qi
Where:
i= load modifier
Qi = force effects from loads specified herein
i = load factors specified in Tables B and C below
Rn= is resistance
Components and connections of a bridge shall satisfy the above equation for the applicable combinations of factored extreme force effects as
specified at each of the limit states presented in Table A:
The permit vehicle should not be assumed to be the only vehicle on the
bridge unless so assured by traffic control. Otherwise, the other lanes
should be assumed to be occupied by the vehicular live load as specified
herein. For bridges longer than the permit vehicle, the presence of the
design lane load, preceding and following the permit load in its lane,
should be considered.
STRENGTH Load combination relating to the bridge exposed to wind velocity
III exceeding 90 km/h.
The standard calibration process for the strength limit state consists of
trying out various combinations of load and resistance factors on a
number of bridges and their components. Combinations that yield a
safety index close to the target value of = 3.5 are retained for potential
application. From these are selected constant load factors and
corresponding resistance factors for each type of structural component
reflecting its use.
This calibration process had been carried out for a large number of
bridges with spans not exceeding 60 m. For the primary components of
large bridges, the ratio of dead and live load force effects is rather high,
and could result in a set of resistance factors different from those found
acceptable for small- and medium-span bridges. It is believed to be more
practical to investigate one additional load case than to require the use of
two sets of resistance factors with the load factors provided in Strength
Load Combination I, depending on other permanent loads present. For
bridges with up to 180 m spans, Load Combination IV will govern where
the dead load to live load force effect ratio exceeds 7.0.
STRENGTH Load combination relating to normal vehicular use of the bridge with
V wind of 90 km/h (25 m/s) velocity
EXTREME Load combination including earthquake
EVENT I
This limit state includes water loads, WA. The probability of a major
flood and an earthquake occurring at the same time is very small.
Therefore, consideration of basing water loads and scour depths on mean
discharges shall be warranted. Live load coincident with an earthquake
is discussed elsewhere in this chapter.
SERVICE I Load combination relating to the normal operational use of the bridge
with a 90 km/h (25 m/s) wind and all loads taken at their nominal values.
Also related to deflection control in buried metal structures, tunnel liner
plate, and thermoplastic pipe and to control crack width in reinforced
concrete structures. This load combination should also be used for the
investigation of slope stability.
The load factor, applied to a single design truck, reflects a load level
found to be representative of the truck population with respect to a large
number of return cycles of stresses and to their cumulative effects in steel
elements, components, and connections.
The load factors for various loads comprising a design load combination shall be taken as specified in Table B. All relevant subsets of the load
combinations shall be investigated. For each load combination, every load that is indicated to be taken into account and that is germane to the
component being designed, including all significant effects due to distortion, shall be multiplied by the appropriate load factor and multiple
presence factor specified in, if applicable..
The factors shall be selected to produce the total extreme factored force effect. For each load combination, both positive and negative extremes
shall be investigated.
In load combinations where one force effect decreases another effect, the minimum value shall be applied to the load reducing the force effect.
For permanent force effects, the load factor that produces the more critical combination shall be selected from Table C.
Where the permanent load increases the stability or load-carrying capacity of a component or bridge, the minimum value of the load factor for
that permanent load shall also be investigated.
The larger of the two values provided for load factors of Uniform Temperature (TU), Creep (CR), and Shrinkage (SH) shall be used for
deformations and the smaller values for all other effects.
Table B - Load Combinations and Load Factors
Load DC LL WA WS WL FR TU TG SE Use one of
Combination DD IM CR these at a
Limit State DW CE SH time
EH BR
EV PL
ES LS
EQ CT
EL
STRENGTH I p 1.75 1.00 - - 1.00 0.50/1.20 TG SE - -
(Unless noted)
STRENGTH p 1.35 1.00 - - 1.00 0.50/1.20 TG SE - -
II
STRENGTH p - 1.00 1.40 - 1.00 0.50/1.20 TG SE - -
III
STRENGTH - -
IV p - 1.00 - - 1.00 0.50/1.20 - -
EH, EV, ES, 1.5
DW DC ONLY
STRENGTH V p 1.35 1.00 0.50 1.0 1.00 0.50/1.20 TG SE - -
EXTREME p EQ 1.00 - - 1.00 - - - 1.00 -
EVENT I
SERVICE I 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.0 1.00 1.00/1.20 TG SE - -
SERVICE II 1.00 1.30 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00/1.20 - - - -
SERVICE III 1.00 0.80 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00/1.20 TG SE - -
FATIGUE
LL, IM and CE - 0.75 - - - - - - - -
ONLY
For example, at Strength I Limit State where the permanent load reaction is positive and live load can cause a negative reaction, the
load combination would be:
Load Modifiers, i = D R I :
D = a factor relating to ductility, as specified below
R = a factor relating to redundancy as specified below
I = a factor relating to operational importance as specified below
Ductility, redundancy, and operational importance are significant aspects affecting the margin of safety of bridges.
Ductility: The structural system of a bridge shall be proportioned and detailed to ensure the development of significant and visible
inelastic deformations at the strength and extreme event limit states prior to failure.
For the strength limit state:
D 1.05 for non-ductile components and connections
D = 1.00 for conventional designs and details complying with these Specifications
D 0.95 for components and connections for which additional ductility-enhancing measures have been specified beyond
those required by these Specifications
For all other limit states:
D = 1.00
Redundancy: Multiple load-path structures should be used unless there are compelling reasons not to use them.
For the strength limit state:
R 1.05 for nonredundant members
=1.00 for conventional levels of redundancy
0.95 For exceptional levels of redundancy
For all other limit states:
R = 1.00
Operational importance: This definition shall apply to the strength and extreme event limit states only. Some bridges or structural
components and connections shall be declared to be of operational importance.
Such classification should be based on social/survival and/or security/defense requirements.
For the strength limit state:
l 1.05 for important bridges
= 1.00 for typical bridges
0.95 For relatively less important bridges
For all other limit states:
l = 1.00
For Conventional Construction, Resistance Factors Ф shall be taken as
For flexure and tension of RC = 0.9
For flexure and tension of PSC = 1.0
For shear and torsion = 0.9
For bearing on concrete = 0.7
For compression in strut-and-tie model = 0.7
For compression in anchorage zones = 0.8
For tension in steel in anchorage zones = 1.0
For resistance during pile driving = 1.0
1. SUPERSTRUCTURE
An efficient design of bridge superstructure is essential to achieve overall economy in the whole
bridge structure in that the superstructure dead weight may form a significant portion of the
gravity load the bridge must sustain and transmit to the foundation. A light superstructure is
economical not _only material requirements of the superstructure but also requires smaller size
for substructure and foundations. A clear understanding of the structural behavior of structural
behavior under loads is essential for efficient design.
A bridge superstructure is an integrated body of various members of reinforced concrete,
prestressed concrete, steel, composite, diaphragms, trusses, arches, etc. Determination of' forces
in theses components is essential for design purposes.
The following types of bridges are discussed as follows.
RC Bridge, Steel Bridge, Arch Bridge, Cable Stayed Bridge and Suspension Bridge
Reinforced concrete bridges:
Steel and concrete are construction materials.
Reinforced concrete bridges possess several advantages over steel bridges.
- adaptability of concrete wide variety of structural shapes
- Low maintenance cost
- Long life and better resistance to temporary overloads and dynamic loads than steel bridges.
- Cast-in-place Reinforced concrete structures are continuous and monolithic, attributes, which
translate into easy construction, low cost and good seismic resistance. They can also be given
the desired aesthetic appearance.
The disadvantage
- large dead weight
- difficulty to widen
- longer construction time
- requires formwork and false work
Bridge live loads occupy partial area of the decks unlike live loads in buildings which is taken
uniformly distributed all over the floor area. Live load on bridges can occupy random positions
both longitudinally and transversely, and this affects the live load shared by various beams. This
aspect of live load distribution is one of the primary concerns in the analysis of bridge decks.
Influence lines will be used to determine load position for maximum effect and the magnitude of
these effects.
The following RC bridges will be discussed.
1.1.1 Slab bridge
1.1.2 T-girder bridge
1.1.3 Box girder bridge
1.1.4 Continuous RC bridge
1.1.5 RC rigid frame bridges
Slab Bridge:
Notch Slab
Edge beam
Typical Cross-section of Slab Bridge
The load carrying mechanism is by plate action, i.e., by bending and twisting due to continuity in
all directions. Application of a load on the portion make the slab deflect into a dish shape locally,
causing a two-dimensional system of bending and twisting moments, the mechanism through
which the load is transferred to the adjacent elements of the deck, which are less severely loaded.
Where: Z is the downward deflection of the plate
q is intensity of uniform load
D is flexural rigidity of tile plate
In the absence of closed form solution to the above equation, approximate methods are
developed.
One method is the method of influence surfaces, which uses design charts. These charts have
been prepared by Pucher or slabs of various shapes and support conditions (1964), and by Rusch
and Heregnroder (1961) and Dalas and Hanuska (1964) for simply supported skew slabs.
Grillage method is also used for analysis and softwares are available for this. Another method
that AASHTO recommends is the Strip Method.
Depth Determination:
AASHTO Recommendations’
Load distributions:
The equivalent width of longitudinal strips per lane for both shear and moment with one lane,
i.e., two lines of wheels, loaded shall be determined as:
E=250+0.42 √ L 1W 1
The equivalent width, E of longitudinal strips per lane for both shear and moment with more than
one lane loaded shall be determined as:
W
E=2100+0 .12 √ L 1 W 1≤
NL
Where: E = equivalent width (mm)
L1 = modified span length taken of the actual span or 18,000 (mm)
W1 = modified edge-to-edge width of bridge taken to be of the actual width or
18,000 mm for multilane loading, or 9,000 mm for single-lane loading (mm)
W = physical edge-to-edge width of bridge (mm)
NL = number of design lanes as specified
Where decks span primarily in the direction of traffic, the effective width of a strip, with or
without an edge beam, shall be taken as the sum of the distance between the edge of the deck and
the inside face of the barrier, plus 300 mm, plus one-half of the strip width.
Section analysis:
Rectangular stress block is used for determination of section capacity.
Remember inserting equations
Limits for reinforcement:
Maximum reinforcement c/de ratio and minimum reinforcement 0.03*fc’/fy
T-girder Bridge:
Design of T- girder bridges consists of deck slab analysis and design, and the T-girder analysis
and design.
Structural analysis of the deck slab involves taking a continuous strip perpendicular to the girders
(AASHTO Art.9.6.1) and analyzing by moment distribution or using design aid given by
AASHTO, ILS for critical position of loads. Extreme positive moment at any point will be taken
to apply to all positive moment regions (Art 4.6.2.1.1). The width of equivalent interior
transverse strip over which the wheel loads can be considered distributed longitudinally in cast -
in - place concrete decks is given as [Table Art. 4.6.2. I .3-1]
overhang, 11401-0.83lX
positive moment, 660+0.55S
negative moment, 1220+0.25S
Where X is the distance from the wheel load to centerline of support and S is the spacing of' the
T-beams.
In the design of overhang deck slab design forces acting on the post and railings or barrier should
be considered.
Depth Determination:
AASHTO Recommendations’
Load Distribution Factors:
bridges usually have more than one girder
So we have to distribute lane load from the deck
Two main methods
1. Using ASTHO’s table
gives more an approximate (conservative) value
no need to consider multiple presence factor
. Refined analysis
Using finite element method
need to consider multiple presence factor
DFS are different for different superstructures
DFs are different for interior and exterior girders
Are determined for one lane loaded and two or more lanes loaded
Then the governing one is to be used
Moment and Shear in a typical Girder
At any section, if not using AASHTOs GDF
MLL+IM=DFs* (Mtruck/tandem* IM+Mlane)*m
VLL+IM=DFs* (Vtruck/tandem* IM+Vlane)*m
At any section, using AASHTOs GDF
MLL+IM=DFs* (Mtruck/tandem* IM + Mlane)
VLL+IM=DFs* (Vtruck/tandem* IM + Vlane)