Data Mining:

Concepts and Techniques

— Chapter 5 —

Jiawei Han
Department of Computer Science
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
www.cs.uiuc.edu/~hanj
Data
©2006 Jiawei Han and Mining:
Micheline Kamber, All rights reserved
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 1
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations

■ Basic concepts and a road map

■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 2
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations

■ Basic concepts and a road map

■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 3
 What Is Frequent Pattern Analysis?
■ Frequent pattern: a pattern (a set of items, subsequences, substructures,
etc.) that occurs frequently in a data set
■ First proposed by Agrawal, Imielinski, and Swami [AIS93] in the context
of frequent itemsets and association rule mining
■ Motivation: Finding inherent regularities in data
■ What products were often purchased together?— Beer and diapers?!
■ What are the subsequent purchases after buying a PC?
■ What kinds of DNA are sensitive to this new drug?
■ Can we automatically classify web documents?
■ Applications
■ Basket data analysis, cross-marketing, catalog design, sale campaign
Data Mining:
Aprilanalysis,
16, Web log (click stream) analysis,
Concepts and and DNA sequence analysis.
2018 Techniques 4
 Why Is Freq. Pattern Mining Important?

■ Discloses an intrinsic and important property of data sets

■ Forms the foundation for many essential data mining tasks
■ Association, correlation, and causality analysis
■ Sequential, structural (e.g., sub-graph) patterns
■ Pattern analysis in spatiotemporal, multimedia,
time-series, and stream data
■ Classification: associative classification
■ Cluster analysis: frequent pattern-based clustering
■ Data warehousing: iceberg cube and cube-gradient
■ Semantic data compression: fascicles
Data Mining:
■ Broad applications
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 5
 Basic Concepts: Frequent Patterns and
Association Rules
Transaction-id Items bought ■ Itemset X = {x1, …, xk}
10 A, B, D
■ Find all the rules X → Y with minimum
20 A, C, D support and confidence
30 A, D, E
■ support, s, probability that a
40 B, E, F
transaction contains X ∪ Y
50 B, C, D, E, F
■ confidence, c, conditional
Customer Customer probability that a transaction
buys both buys diaper having X also contains Y
Let supmin = 50%, confmin = 50%
Freq. Pat.: {A:3, B:3, D:4, E:3, AD:3}
Association rules:
Customer A → D (60%, 100%)
Data Mining:
buys beer
April 16, D → A (60%, 75%)
Concepts and
2018 Techniques 6
 Closed Patterns and Max-Patterns
■ A long pattern contains a combinatorial number of
sub-patterns, e.g., {a1, …, a100} contains (1001) + (1002) +
… + (110000) = 2100 – 1 = 1.27*1030 sub-patterns!
■ Solution: Mine closed patterns and max-patterns instead
■ An itemset X is closed if X is frequent and there exists no
super-pattern Y ‫ כ‬X, with the same support as X
(proposed by Pasquier, et al. @ ICDT’99)
■ An itemset X is a max-pattern if X is frequent and there
exists no frequent super-pattern Y ‫ כ‬X (proposed by
Bayardo @ SIGMOD’98)
■ Closed pattern is a lossless compression of freq. patterns
Data Mining:
Reducing the # of
April■ 16, patterns
Concepts andand rules
2018 Techniques 7
 Closed Patterns and Max-Patterns
■ Exercise. DB = {<a1, …, a100>, < a1, …, a50>}
■ Min_sup = 1.
■ What is the set of closed itemset?
■ <a1, …, a100>: 1
■ < a1, …, a50>: 2
■ What is the set of max-pattern?
■ <a1, …, a100>: 1
■ What is the set of all patterns?
■ !! Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 8
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations
■ Basic concepts and a road map
■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 9
Scalable Methods for Mining Frequent Patterns

■ The downward closure property of frequent patterns

■ Any subset of a frequent itemset must be frequent

■ If {beer, diaper, nuts} is frequent, so is {beer,

diaper}
■ i.e., every transaction having {beer, diaper, nuts} also

contains {beer, diaper}

■ Scalable mining methods: Three major approaches

■ Apriori (Agrawal & Srikant@VLDB’94)

■ Freq. pattern growth (FPgrowth—Han, Pei & Yin

@SIGMOD’00)
■ Vertical data format approach (Charm—Zaki & Hsiao

@SDM’02) Data Mining:

April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 10
 Apriori: A Candidate Generation-and-Test Approach

■ Apriori pruning principle: If there is any itemset which is

infrequent, its superset should not be generated/tested!
(Agrawal & Srikant @VLDB’94, Mannila, et al. @ KDD’ 94)
■ Method:
■ Initially, scan DB once to get frequent 1-itemset
■ Generate length (k+1) candidate itemsets from length k
frequent itemsets
■ Test the candidates against DB
■Terminate when no frequent or candidate set can be
generated Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 11
 The Apriori Algorithm—An Example
Supmin = 2 Itemset sup
Itemset sup
Database TDB {A} 2
L1 {A} 2
Tid Items C1 {B} 3
{B} 3
10 A, C, D {C} 3
20 B, C, E 1st scan {C} 3
{D} 1
{E} 3
30 A, B, C, E {E} 3
40 B, E
C2 Itemset sup C2 Itemset
{A, B} 1
L2 Itemset sup
{A, C} 2
2nd scan {A, B}
{A, C} 2 {A, C}
{A, E} 1
{B, C} 2
{B, C} 2 {A, E}
{B, E} 3
{B, E} 3 {B, C}
{C, E} 2
{C, E} 2 {B, E}
{C, E}
C3 Itemset rdData Mining:
L3 Itemset sup
3 scan
April 16,
{B, C, E} Concepts and
{B, C, E} 2
2018 Techniques 12
 The Apriori Algorithm
■ Pseudo-code:
Ck: Candidate itemset of size k
Lk : frequent itemset of size k
L1 = {frequent items};
for (k = 1; Lk !=∅; k++) do begin
Ck+1 = candidates generated from Lk;
for each transaction t in database do
increment the count of all candidates in Ck+1
that are contained in t
Lk+1 = candidates in Ck+1 with min_support
end
return ∪k Lk; Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 13
 Important Details of Apriori
■ How to generate candidates?
■ Step 1: self-joining Lk
■ Step 2: pruning
■ How to count supports of candidates?
■ Example of Candidate-generation
■ L3={abc, abd, acd, ace, bcd}
■ Self-joining: L3*L3
■ abcd from abc and abd
■ acde from acd and ace
■ Pruning:
■ acde is removed because ade is not in L3
■ C4={abcd}
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 14
 How to Generate Candidates?

■ Suppose the items in Lk-1 are listed in an order

■ Step 1: self-joining Lk-1
insert into Ck
select p.item1, p.item2, …, p.itemk-1, q.itemk-1
from Lk-1 p, Lk-1 q
where p.item1=q.item1, …, p.itemk-2=q.itemk-2, p.itemk-1 < q.itemk-1
■ Step 2: pruning
forall itemsets c in Ck do
forall (k-1)-subsets s of c do
if (s is not in Lk-1) then delete c from Ck
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 15
 How to Count Supports of Candidates?

■ Why counting supports of candidates a problem?

■ The total number of candidates can be very huge
■ One transaction may contain many candidates
■ Method:
■ Candidate itemsets are stored in a hash-tree
■ Leaf node of hash-tree contains a list of itemsets and
counts
■ Interior node contains a hash table
■ Subset function: finds all the candidates contained in
a transaction Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 16
 Example: Counting Supports of Candidates

Subset function
Transaction: 1 2 3 5 6
3,6,9
1,4,7
2,5,8

1+2356

13+56 234
567
145 345 356 367
136 368
357
12+356
689
124
457 125 159
Data 458
Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 17
 Efficient Implementation of Apriori in SQL

■ Hard to get good performance out of pure SQL

(SQL-92) based approaches alone

■ Make use of object-relational extensions like UDFs,

BLOBs, Table functions etc.

■ Get orders of magnitude improvement

■ S. Sarawagi, S. Thomas, and R. Agrawal. Integrating
association rule mining with relational database
systems: Alternatives and implications. In SIGMOD’98
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 18
 Challenges of Frequent Pattern Mining

■ Challenges
■ Multiple scans of transaction database
■ Huge number of candidates
■ Tedious workload of support counting for candidates
■ Improving Apriori: general ideas
■ Reduce passes of transaction database scans
■ Shrink number of candidates
■ Facilitate support counting of candidates
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 19
 Partition: Scan Database Only Twice
■ Any itemset that is potentially frequent in DB must be
frequent in at least one of the partitions of DB
■ Scan 1: partition database and find local frequent
patterns
■ Scan 2: consolidate global frequent patterns
■ A. Savasere, E. Omiecinski, and S. Navathe. An efficient
algorithm for mining association in large databases. In
VLDB’95
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 20
 DHP: Reduce the Number of Candidates

■ A k-itemset whose corresponding hashing bucket count is

below the threshold cannot be frequent
■ Candidates: a, b, c, d, e
■ Hash entries: {ab, ad, ae} {bd, be, de} …
■ Frequent 1-itemset: a, b, d, e
■ ab is not a candidate 2-itemset if the sum of count of
{ab, ad, ae} is below support threshold
■ J. Park, M. Chen, and P. Yu. An effective hash-based
algorithm for mining association rules. In SIGMOD’95
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 21
 Sampling for Frequent Patterns

■ Select a sample of original database, mine frequent

patterns within sample using Apriori
■ Scan database once to verify frequent itemsets found in
sample, only borders of closure of frequent patterns are
checked
■ Example: check abcd instead of ab, ac, …, etc.
■ Scan database again to find missed frequent patterns
■ H. Toivonen. Sampling large databases for association
rules. In VLDB’96
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 22
 DIC: Reduce Number of Scans

ABCD
■ Once both A and D are determined
frequent, the counting of AD begins
ABC ABD ACD BCD ■ Once all length-2 subsets of BCD are
determined frequent, the counting of BCD
begins
AB AC BC AD BD CD
Transactions
1-itemsets
A B C D
Apriori 2-itemsets
…
{}
Itemset lattice 1-itemsets
S. Brin R. Motwani, J. Ullman, 2-items
and S. Tsur. Dynamic itemset DIC 3-items
Data
counting and implication rules for Mining:
market
Aprilbasket
16, data. In Concepts and
SIGMOD’97
2018 Techniques 23
 Bottleneck of Frequent-pattern Mining

■ Multiple database scans are costly

■ Mining long patterns needs many passes of
scanning and generates lots of candidates
■ To find frequent itemset i1i2…i100
■ # of scans: 100
■ # of Candidates: (1001) + (1002) + … + (110000) =
2100-1 = 1.27*1030 !
■ Bottleneck: candidate-generation-and-test
■ Can we avoid candidate generation?
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 24
 Mining Frequent Patterns Without
Candidate Generation

■ Grow long patterns from short ones using local

frequent items
■ “abc” is a frequent pattern

■ Get all transactions having “abc”: DB|abc

■ “d” is a local frequent item in DB|abc → abcd is

a frequent pattern

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 25
Construct FP-tree from a Transaction Database

TID Items bought (ordered) frequent items

100 {f, a, c, d, g, i, m, p} {f, c, a, m, p}
200 {a, b, c, f, l, m, o} {f, c, a, b, m}
300 {b, f, h, j, o, w} {f, b} min_support = 3
400 {b, c, k, s, p} {c, b, p}
500 {a, f, c, e, l, p, m, n} {f, c, a, m, p} {}
Header Table
1. Scan DB once, find
frequent 1-itemset Item frequency head f:4 c:1
(single item pattern) f 4
c 4 c:3 b:1 b:1
2. Sort frequent items in a 3
frequency descending b 3 a:3 p:1
order, f-list m 3
3. Scan DB again, p 3 m:2 b:1
construct FP-tree Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
F-list=f-c-a-b-m-p p:2 m:1
2018 Techniques 26
 Benefits of the FP-tree Structure

■ Completeness
■ Preserve complete information for frequent pattern

mining
■ Never break a long pattern of any transaction

■ Compactness

■ Reduce irrelevant info—infrequent items are gone

■ Items in frequency descending order: the more

frequently occurring, the more likely to be shared

■ Never be larger than the original database (not count

node-links and the count field)

■ For Connect-4 DB, compression ratio could be over 100
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 27
 Partition Patterns and Databases

■ Frequent patterns can be partitioned into subsets

according to f-list
■ F-list=f-c-a-b-m-p

■ Patterns containing p

■ Patterns having m but no p

■ …

■ Patterns having c but no a nor b, m, p

■ Pattern f

■ Completeness and non-redundency

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 28
Find Patterns Having P From P-conditional Database

■ Starting at the frequent item header table in the FP-tree

■ Traverse the FP-tree by following the link of each frequent item p
■ Accumulate all of transformed prefix paths of item p to form p’s
conditional pattern base

{}
Header Table
f:4 c:1 Conditional pattern bases
Item frequency head
f 4 itemcond. pattern base
c 4 c:3 b:1 b:1
c f:3
a 3
b 3 a:3 p:1 a fc:3
m 3 b fca:1, f:1, c:1
p 3 m:2 b:1 m fca:2, fcab:1
Data Mining:
p fcam:2, cb:1
April 16, p:2 Concepts
m:1 and
2018 Techniques 29
From Conditional Pattern-bases to Conditional FP-trees

■ For each pattern-base

■ Accumulate the count for each item in the base

■ Construct the FP-tree for the frequent items of the

pattern base

m-conditional pattern base:

{} fca:2, fcab:1
Header Table
Item frequency head f:4 c:1 All frequent
f 4 {} patterns relate to m
c 4 c:3 b:1 b:1 m,
↘
a 3 f:3 ↘ fm, cm, am,
b 3 a:3 p:1 fcm, fam, cam,
m 3 m:2 b:1 c:3 fcam
p 3 Data Mining:
April 16, p:2 Concepts
m:1 and a:3
m-conditional FP-tree
2018 Techniques 30
 Recursion: Mining Each Conditional FP-tree
{}

{} Cond. pattern base of “am”: (fc:3) f:3

c:3
f:3
am-conditional FP-tree
c:3 {}
Cond. pattern base of “cm”: (f:3)
a:3 f:3
m-conditional FP-tree
cm-conditional FP-tree

{}
Cond. pattern base of “cam”: (f:3) f:3
Data Mining:cam-conditional FP-tree
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 31
 A Special Case: Single Prefix Path in FP-tree
■ Suppose a (conditional) FP-tree T has a shared
single prefix-path P
■ Mining can be decomposed into two parts
{} ■ Reduction of the single prefix path into one node
a1:n1 ■ Concatenation of the mining results of the two
a2:n2 parts
a3:n3
{} r1

b1:m1 C1:k1 a1:n1

↘ r1 = + b1:m1 C1:k1
Data Mining:
a2:n2
AprilC216,
:k2 C3:k3 Concepts and
a3:n3 C2:k2 C3:k3
2018 Techniques 32
 Mining Frequent Patterns With FP-trees

■ Idea: Frequent pattern growth

■ Recursively grow frequent patterns by pattern and

database partition
■ Method

■ For each frequent item, construct its conditional

pattern-base, and then its conditional FP-tree

■ Repeat the process on each newly created conditional

FP-tree
■ Until the resulting FP-tree is empty, or it contains only

one path—single path will generate all the

combinations of its sub-paths, each of which is a
frequent pattern Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 33
 Scaling FP-growth by DB Projection

■ FP-tree cannot fit in memory?—DB projection

■ First partition a database into a set of projected DBs
■ Then construct and mine FP-tree for each projected DB
■ Parallel projection vs. Partition projection techniques
■ Parallel projection is space costly

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 34
 Partition-based Projection

Tran. DB
■ Parallel projection needs a lot fcamp
of disk space fcabm
■ Partition projection saves it fb
cbp
fcamp

p-proj DB m-proj DB b-proj DB a-proj DB c-proj DB f-proj DB

fcam fcab f fc f …
cb fca cb … …
fcam fca …

am-proj DB cm-proj DB
fc f
Data Mining:
…
fc f
April 16, fc Concepts
f and
2018 Techniques 35
 FP-Growth vs. Apriori: Scalability With the Support
Threshold

Data set T25I20D10K

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 36
 FP-Growth vs. Tree-Projection: Scalability with
the Support Threshold

Data set T25I20D100K

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 37
 Why Is FP-Growth the Winner?

■ Divide-and-conquer:
■ decompose both the mining task and DB according to
the frequent patterns obtained so far
■ leads to focused search of smaller databases
■ Other factors
■ no candidate generation, no candidate test
■ compressed database: FP-tree structure
■ no repeated scan of entire database
■ basic ops—counting local freq items and building sub
FP-tree, no pattern search and matching
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 38
 Implications of the Methodology

■ Mining closed frequent itemsets and max-patterns

■ CLOSET (DMKD’00)
■ Mining sequential patterns

■ FreeSpan (KDD’00), PrefixSpan (ICDE’01)

■ Constraint-based mining of frequent patterns

■ Convertible constraints (KDD’00, ICDE’01)

■ Computing iceberg data cubes with complex measures

■ H-tree and H-cubing algorithm (SIGMOD’01)

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 39
 MaxMiner: Mining Max-patterns
■ 1st scan: find frequent items Tid Items

■ A, B, C, D, E 10 A,B,C,D,E
nd 20 B,C,D,E,
■ 2 scan: find support for
30 A,C,D,F
■ AB, AC, AD, AE, ABCDE
■ BC, BD, BE, BCDE
Potential
■ CD, CE, CDE, DE,
max-patterns
■ Since BCDE is a max-pattern, no need to check BCD, BDE,
CDE in later scan
■ R. Bayardo. Efficiently mining long patterns from
databases. In SIGMOD’98
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 40
 Mining Frequent Closed Patterns: CLOSET

■ Flist: list of all frequent items in support ascending order

■ Flist: d-a-f-e-c
Min_sup=2
■ Divide search space TID Items
10 a, c, d, e, f
■ Patterns having d
20 a, b, e
■ Patterns having d but no a, etc. 30 c, e, f
40 a, c, d, f
■ Find frequent closed pattern recursively 50 c, e, f
■ Every transaction having d also has cfa → cfad is a
frequent closed pattern
■ J. Pei, J. Han & R. Mao. CLOSET: An Efficient Algorithm for
DataItemsets",
Mining Frequent Closed Mining: DMKD'00.
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 41
 CLOSET+: Mining Closed Itemsets by
Pattern-Growth
■ Itemset merging: if Y appears in every occurrence of X, then Y
is merged with X
■ Sub-itemset pruning: if Y ‫ כ‬X, and sup(X) = sup(Y), X and all of
X’s descendants in the set enumeration tree can be pruned
■ Hybrid tree projection
■ Bottom-up physical tree-projection
■ Top-down pseudo tree-projection
■ Item skipping: if a local frequent item has the same support in
several header tables at different levels, one can prune it from
the header table at higher levels
■ Efficient subset checking
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 42
CHARM: Mining by Exploring Vertical Data Format

■ Vertical format: t(AB) = {T11, T25, …}

■ tid-list: list of trans.-ids containing an itemset
■ Deriving closed patterns based on vertical intersections
■ t(X) = t(Y): X and Y always happen together
■ t(X) ⊂ t(Y): transaction having X always has Y
■ Using diffset to accelerate mining
■ Only keep track of differences of tids
■ t(X) = {T1, T2, T3}, t(XY) = {T1, T3}
■ Diffset (XY, X) = {T2}
■ Eclat/MaxEclat (ZakiData
et al. @KDD’97), VIPER(P. Shenoy et
Mining:
al.@SIGMOD’00),
April 16, CHARM
Concepts (Zaki
and & Hsiao@SDM’02)
2018 Techniques 43
 Further Improvements of Mining Methods

■ AFOPT (Liu, et al. @ KDD’03)

■ A “push-right” method for mining condensed frequent

pattern (CFP) tree

■ Carpenter (Pan, et al. @ KDD’03)
■ Mine data sets with small rows but numerous columns

■ Construct a row-enumeration tree for efficient mining

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 44
Visualization of Association Rules: Plane Graph

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 45
Visualization of Association Rules: Rule Graph

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 46
 Visualization of Association Rules
(SGI/MineSet 3.0)

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 47
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations
■ Basic concepts and a road map
■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 48
 Mining Various Kinds of Association Rules

■ Mining multilevel association

■ Miming multidimensional association

■ Mining quantitative association

■ Mining interesting correlation patterns

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 49
 Mining Multiple-Level Association Rules

■ Items often form hierarchies

■ Flexible support settings
■ Items at the lower level are expected to have lower
support
■ Exploration of shared multi-level mining (Agrawal &
Srikant@VLB’95, Han & Fu@VLDB’95)

uniform support reduced support

Level 1
Milk Level 1
min_sup = 5%
min_sup = 5%
[support = 10%]

Level 2 2% Milk Skim Milk Level 2

min_sup = 5% Data Mining:
[support = 6%] [support = 4%]
min_sup = 3%
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 50
 Multi-level Association: Redundancy Filtering

■ Some rules may be redundant due to “ancestor”

relationships between items.
■ Example
■ milk ⇒ wheat bread [support = 8%, confidence = 70%]
■ 2% milk ⇒ wheat bread [support = 2%, confidence = 72%]
■ We say the first rule is an ancestor of the second rule.
■ A rule is redundant if its support is close to the “expected”
value, based on the rule’s ancestor.

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 51
 Mining Multi-Dimensional Association
■ Single-dimensional rules:
buys(X, “milk”) ⇒ buys(X, “bread”)
■ Multi-dimensional rules: ≥ 2 dimensions or predicates
■ Inter-dimension assoc. rules (no repeated predicates)
age(X,”19-25”) ∧ occupation(X,“student”) ⇒ buys(X, “coke”)
■ hybrid-dimension assoc. rules (repeated predicates)
age(X,”19-25”) ∧ buys(X, “popcorn”) ⇒ buys(X, “coke”)
■ Categorical Attributes: finite number of possible values, no
ordering among values—data cube approach
■ Quantitative Attributes: numeric, implicit ordering among
values—discretization, clustering,
Data Mining: and gradient approaches
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 52
 Mining Quantitative Associations

■ Techniques can be categorized by how numerical

attributes, such as age or salary are treated
1. Static discretization based on predefined concept
hierarchies (data cube methods)
2. Dynamic discretization based on data distribution
(quantitative rules, e.g., Agrawal & Srikant@SIGMOD96)
3. Clustering: Distance-based association (e.g., Yang &
Miller@SIGMOD97)
■ one dimensional clustering then association
4. Deviation: (such as Aumann and Lindell@KDD99)
Data
Sex = female => Wage: Mining: (overall mean = $9)
mean=$7/hr
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 53
 Static Discretization of Quantitative Attributes

■ Discretized prior to mining using concept hierarchy.

■ Numeric values are replaced by ranges.
■ In relational database, finding all frequent k-predicate sets
will require k or k+1 table scans.
■ Data cube is well suited for mining. ()

■ The cells of an n-dimensional

(age) (income) (buys)
cuboid correspond to the
predicate sets.
(age, income) (age,buys) (income,buys)
■ Mining from data cubes
can be much faster. Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and (age,income,buys)
2018 Techniques 54
 Quantitative Association Rules
■ Proposed by Lent, Swami and Widom ICDE’97
■ Numeric attributes are dynamically discretized
■ Such that the confidence or compactness of the rules
mined is maximized
■ 2-D quantitative association rules: Aquan1 ∧ Aquan2 ⇒ Acat
■ Cluster adjacent
association rules
to form general
rules using a 2-D grid
■ Example
age(X,”34-35”) ∧ income(X,”30-50K”)
⇒ buys(X,”high resolution TV”)
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 55
 Mining Other Interesting Patterns

■ Flexible support constraints (Wang et al. @ VLDB’02)

■ Some items (e.g., diamond) may occur rarely but are
valuable
■ Customized supmin specification and application
■ Top-K closed frequent patterns (Han, et al. @ ICDM’02)
■ Hard to specify supmin, but top-k with lengthmin is more
desirable
■ Dynamically raise supmin in FP-tree construction and
mining, and select most promising path to mine

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 56
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations
■ Basic concepts and a road map
■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 57
 Interestingness Measure: Correlations (Lift)
■ play basketball ⇒ eat cereal [40%, 66.7%] is misleading
■ The overall % of students eating cereal is 75% > 66.7%.
■ play basketball ⇒ not eat cereal [20%, 33.3%] is more accurate,
although with lower support and confidence
■ Measure of dependent/correlated events: lift
Basketball Not basketball Sum (row)

Cereal 2000 1750 3750

Not cereal 1000 250 1250
Sum(col.) 3000 2000 5000

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 58
Are lift and χ2 Good Measures of Correlation?
■ “Buy walnuts ⇒ buy milk [1%, 80%]” is misleading
■ if 85% of customers buy milk
■ Support and confidence are not good to represent correlations
■ So many interestingness measures? (Tan, Kumar, Sritastava @KDD’02)

Milk No Milk Sum (row)

Coffee m, c ~m, c c
No Coffee m, ~c ~m, ~c ~c
Sum(col.) m ~m Σ

DB m, c ~m, c m~c ~m~c lift all-conf coh χ2

A1 1000 100 100 10,000 9.26 0.91 0.83 9055
A2 100
Data 1000 1000
Mining: 100,000 8.44 0.09 0.05 670
A3 1000 100 10000 100,000 9.18 0.09 0.09 8172
April 16, A4
Concepts and
1000 1000 1000 1000 1 0.5 0.33 0
2018 Techniques 59
 Which Measures Should Be Used?
■ lift and χ2 are not
good measures for
correlations in large
transactional DBs
■ all-conf or
coherence could be
good measures
(Omiecinski@TKDE’03)
■ Both all-conf and
coherence have the
downward closure
property
■ Efficient algorithms
can be derived for
mining (Lee et al.
@ICDM’03sub) Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 60
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations
■ Basic concepts and a road map
■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 61
 Constraint-based (Query-Directed) Mining

■ Finding all the patterns in a database autonomously? —

unrealistic!
■ The patterns could be too many but not focused!
■ Data mining should be an interactive process
■ User directs what to be mined using a data mining
query language (or a graphical user interface)
■ Constraint-based mining
■ User flexibility: provides constraints on what to be
mined
■ System optimization: explores such constraints for
Data Mining:
efficient mining—constraint-based
April 16, Concepts and mining
2018 Techniques 62
 Constraints in Data Mining

■ Knowledge type constraint:

■ classification, association, etc.

■ Data constraint — using SQL-like queries

■ find product pairs sold together in stores in Chicago in

Dec.’02
■ Dimension/level constraint

■ in relevance to region, price, brand, customer category

■ Rule (or pattern) constraint

■ small sales (price < $10) triggers big sales (sum >
$200)
■ Interestingness constraint

■ strong rules: min_support

Data Mining:≥ 3%, min_confidence ≥
60%
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 63
 Constrained Mining vs. Constraint-Based Search

■ Constrained mining vs. constraint-based search/reasoning

■ Both are aimed at reducing search space

■ Finding all patterns satisfying constraints vs. finding

some (or one) answer in constraint-based search in AI

■ Constraint-pushing vs. heuristic search

■ It is an interesting research problem on how to integrate

them
■ Constrained mining vs. query processing in DBMS

■ Database query processing requires to find all

■ Constrained pattern mining shares a similar philosophy

as pushing selections
Data deeply
Mining:in query processing
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 64
 Anti-Monotonicity in Constraint Pushing
TDB (min_sup=2)
■ Anti-monotonicity TID Transaction

■ When an intemset S violates the 10 a, b, c, d, f

20 b, c, d, f, g, h
constraint, so does any of its superset
30 a, c, d, e, f
■ sum(S.Price) ≤ v is anti-monotone 40 c, e, f, g
■ sum(S.Price) ≥ v is not Item Profit
anti-monotone a 40
■ Example. C: range(S.profit) ≤ 15 is b 0
c -20
anti-monotone
d 10
■ Itemset ab violates C e -30
■ So does every superset of ab f 30
Data Mining: g 20
April 16, Concepts and h -10
2018 Techniques 65
 Monotonicity for Constraint Pushing
TDB (min_sup=2)
TID Transaction
■ Monotonicity
10 a, b, c, d, f
■ When an intemset S satisfies the 20 b, c, d, f, g, h
constraint, so does any of its 30 a, c, d, e, f
superset 40 c, e, f, g

■ sum(S.Price) ≥ v is monotone Item Profit

a 40
■ min(S.Price) ≤ v is monotone b 0
■ Example. C: range(S.profit) ≥ 15 c -20
d 10
■ Itemset ab satisfies C
e -30
■ So does every superset of ab f 30
Data Mining: g 20
April 16, Concepts and h -10
2018 Techniques 66
 Succinctness

■ Succinctness:
■ Given A1, the set of items satisfying a succinctness
constraint C, then any set S satisfying C is based on
A1 , i.e., S contains a subset belonging to A1
■ Idea: Without looking at the transaction database,
whether an itemset S satisfies constraint C can be
determined based on the selection of items
■ min(S.Price) ≤ v is succinct
■ sum(S.Price) ≥ v is not succinct
■ Optimization: If C isData
succinct, C is pre-counting pushable
Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 67
 The Apriori Algorithm — Example
Database D
L1
C1
Scan D

C2 C2
L2 Scan D

C3 Data Mining:
L3
Scan D
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 68
 Naïve Algorithm: Apriori + Constraint
Database D
L1
C1
Scan D

C2 C2
L2 Scan D

C3 Data Mining:
L3 Constraint:
Scan D
April 16, Concepts and Sum{S.price} < 5
2018 Techniques 69
 The Constrained Apriori Algorithm: Push
an Anti-monotone Constraint Deep
Database D
L1
C1
Scan D

C2 C2
L2 Scan D

C3 Data Mining:
L3 Constraint:
Scan D
April 16, Concepts and Sum{S.price} < 5
2018 Techniques 70
 The Constrained Apriori Algorithm: Push a
Succinct Constraint Deep
Database D
L1
C1
Scan D

C2 C2
L2 Scan D
not immediately
to be used

C3 Data Mining:
L3 Constraint:
Scan D
April 16, Concepts and min{S.price } <= 1
2018 Techniques 71
 Converting “Tough” Constraints
TDB (min_sup=2)
TID Transaction
■ Convert tough constraints into
10 a, b, c, d, f
anti-monotone or monotone by properly
20 b, c, d, f, g, h
ordering items
30 a, c, d, e, f
■ Examine C: avg(S.profit) ≥ 25 40 c, e, f, g
■ Order items in value-descending Item Profit
order a 40

■ <a, f, g, d, b, h, c, e> b 0
c -20
■ If an itemset afb violates C d 10
■ So does afbh, afb* e -30
f 30
■It becomes anti-monotone!
Data Mining: g 20
April 16, Concepts and h -10
2018 Techniques 72
 Strongly Convertible Constraints

■ avg(X) ≥ 25 is convertible anti-monotone w.r.t.

item value descending order R: <a, f, g, d, b,
h, c, e> Item Profit
■ If an itemset af violates a constraint C, so a 40
does every itemset with af as prefix, such as b 0
afd c -20
■ avg(X) ≥ 25 is convertible monotone w.r.t. d 10
item value ascending order R-1: <e, c, h, b, d, e -30
g, f, a> f 30
■ If an itemset d satisfies a constraint C, so g 20
does itemsets df and dfa, which having d as h -10
a prefix
Data Mining:
■ Thus, avg(X) ≥ 25 is strongly convertible
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 73
 Can Apriori Handle Convertible Constraint?

■ A convertible, not monotone nor anti-monotone

nor succinct constraint cannot be pushed deep
into the an Apriori mining algorithm
■ Within the level wise framework, no direct
Item Value
pruning based on the constraint can be made a 40
■ Itemset df violates constraint C: avg(X)>=25 b 0
■ Since adf satisfies C, Apriori needs df to c -20
assemble adf, df cannot be pruned d 10

■ But it can be pushed into frequent-pattern

e -30

growth framework! f 30
g 20
Data Mining:
h -10
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 74
 Mining With Convertible Constraints
Item Value
■ C: avg(X) >= 25, min_sup=2 a 40

■ List items in every transaction in value descending f 30

order R: <a, f, g, d, b, h, c, e> g 20

d 10
■ C is convertible anti-monotone w.r.t. R
b 0
■ Scan TDB once
h -10
■ remove infrequent items c -20
■ Item h is dropped e -30
■ Itemsets a and f are good, …
TDB (min_sup=2)
■ Projection-based mining
TID Transaction
■ Imposing an appropriate order on item projection 10 a, f, d, b, c
■ Many tough constraints can be converted into 20 f, g, d, b, c
(anti)-monotone Data Mining: 30 a, f, d, c, e
April 16, Concepts and 40 f, g, h, c, e

2018 Techniques 75
 Handling Multiple Constraints

■ Different constraints may require different or even

conflicting item-ordering
■ If there exists an order R s.t. both C1 and C2 are
convertible w.r.t. R, then there is no conflict between
the two convertible constraints
■ If there exists conflict on order of items
■ Try to satisfy one constraint first
■ Then using the order for the other constraint to
mine frequent itemsets in the corresponding
projected database
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 76
 What Constraints Are Convertible?

Convertible Convertible Strongly

Constraint anti-monotone monotone convertible

avg(S) ≤ , ≥ v Yes Yes Yes

median(S) ≤ , ≥ v Yes Yes Yes

sum(S) ≤ v (items could be of any value,

Yes No No
v ≥ 0)
sum(S) ≤ v (items could be of any value,
No Yes No
v ≤ 0)
sum(S) ≥ v (items could be of any value,
No Yes No
v ≥ 0)
sum(S) ≥ v (items could be of any value,
Yes No No
v ≤ 0)
Data Mining:
……
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 77
 Constraint-Based Mining—A General Picture

Constraint Antimonotone Monotone Succinct

v∈S no yes yes
S⊇V no yes yes

S⊆V yes no yes

min(S) ≤ v no yes yes

min(S) ≥ v yes no yes

max(S) ≤ v yes no yes

max(S) ≥ v no yes yes

count(S) ≤ v yes no weakly

count(S) ≥ v no yes weakly

sum(S) ≤ v ( a ∈ S, a ≥ 0 ) yes no no
sum(S) ≥ v ( a ∈ S, a ≥ 0 ) no yes no

range(S) ≤ v yes no no
range(S) ≥ v no yes no

avg(S) θ v, θ ∈ { =, ≤, ≥ } convertible convertible no

support(S) ≥ ξ Data Mining:
yes no no

April 16,support(S) ≤ ξ Concepts

no and yes no

2018 Techniques 78
 A Classification of Constraints

Monotone
Antimonotone

Strongly
convertible
Succinct

Convertible Convertible
anti-monotone monotone

Inconvertible Data Mining:

April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 79
 Chapter 5: Mining Frequent Patterns,
Association and Correlations
■ Basic concepts and a road map
■ Efficient and scalable frequent itemset mining
methods
■ Mining various kinds of association rules
■ From association mining to correlation analysis
■ Constraint-based association mining
■ Summary
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 80
 Frequent-Pattern Mining: Summary

■ Frequent pattern mining—an important task in data mining

■ Scalable frequent pattern mining methods
■ Apriori (Candidate generation & test)
■ Projection-based (FPgrowth, CLOSET+, ...)
■ Vertical format approach (CHARM, ...)
▪ Mining a variety of rules and interesting patterns
▪ Constraint-based mining
▪ Mining sequential and structured patterns
▪ Extensions and applications
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 81
 Frequent-Pattern Mining: Research Problems

■ Mining fault-tolerant frequent, sequential and structured

patterns
■ Patterns allows limited faults (insertion, deletion,
mutation)
■ Mining truly interesting patterns
■ Surprising, novel, concise, …
■ Application exploration
■ E.g., DNA sequence analysis and bio-pattern
classification
■ “Invisible” data mining
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 82
 Ref: Basic Concepts of Frequent Pattern Mining

■ (Association Rules) R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami. Mining

association rules between sets of items in large databases.
SIGMOD'93.
■ (Max-pattern) R. J. Bayardo. Efficiently mining long patterns from
databases. SIGMOD'98.
■ (Closed-pattern) N. Pasquier, Y. Bastide, R. Taouil, and L. Lakhal.
Discovering frequent closed itemsets for association rules. ICDT'99.
■ (Sequential pattern) R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Mining sequential
patterns. ICDE'95

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 83
 Ref: Apriori and Its Improvements

■ R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules.

VLDB'94.
■ H. Mannila, H. Toivonen, and A. I. Verkamo. Efficient algorithms for
discovering association rules. KDD'94.
■ A. Savasere, E. Omiecinski, and S. Navathe. An efficient algorithm for
mining association rules in large databases. VLDB'95.
■ J. S. Park, M. S. Chen, and P. S. Yu. An effective hash-based algorithm
for mining association rules. SIGMOD'95.
■ H. Toivonen. Sampling large databases for association rules. VLDB'96.
■ S. Brin, R. Motwani, J. D. Ullman, and S. Tsur. Dynamic itemset counting
and implication rules for market basket analysis. SIGMOD'97.
■ S. Sarawagi, S. Thomas, and R. Agrawal. Integrating association rule
mining with relational database systems: Alternatives and implications.
Data Mining:
SIGMOD'98.
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 84
 Ref: Depth-First, Projection-Based FP Mining

■ R. Agarwal, C. Aggarwal, and V. V. V. Prasad. A tree projection

algorithm for generation of frequent itemsets. J. Parallel and
Distributed Computing:02.
■ J. Han, J. Pei, and Y. Yin. Mining frequent patterns without candidate
generation. SIGMOD’ 00.
■ J. Pei, J. Han, and R. Mao. CLOSET: An Efficient Algorithm for Mining
Frequent Closed Itemsets. DMKD'00.
■ J. Liu, Y. Pan, K. Wang, and J. Han. Mining Frequent Item Sets by
Opportunistic Projection. KDD'02.
■ J. Han, J. Wang, Y. Lu, and P. Tzvetkov. Mining Top-K Frequent Closed
Patterns without Minimum Support. ICDM'02.
■ J. Wang, J. Han, and J. Pei. CLOSET+: Searching for the Best
Strategies for Mining Frequent Closed Itemsets. KDD'03.
■ G. Liu, H. Lu, W. Lou, J.Data
X. Yu. On Computing, Storing and Querying
Mining:
Frequent Patterns. KDD'03.
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 85
 Ref: Vertical Format and Row Enumeration Methods

■ M. J. Zaki, S. Parthasarathy, M. Ogihara, and W. Li. Parallel algorithm

for discovery of association rules. DAMI:97.
■ Zaki and Hsiao. CHARM: An Efficient Algorithm for Closed Itemset
Mining, SDM'02.
■ C. Bucila, J. Gehrke, D. Kifer, and W. White. DualMiner: A
Dual-Pruning Algorithm for Itemsets with Constraints. KDD’02.
■ F. Pan, G. Cong, A. K. H. Tung, J. Yang, and M. Zaki , CARPENTER:
Finding Closed Patterns in Long Biological Datasets. KDD'03.

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 86
 Ref: Mining Multi-Level and Quantitative Rules

■ R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining generalized association rules.

VLDB'95.
■ J. Han and Y. Fu. Discovery of multiple-level association rules from
large databases. VLDB'95.
■ R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining quantitative association rules in large
relational tables. SIGMOD'96.
■ T. Fukuda, Y. Morimoto, S. Morishita, and T. Tokuyama. Data mining
using two-dimensional optimized association rules: Scheme,
algorithms, and visualization. SIGMOD'96.
■ K. Yoda, T. Fukuda, Y. Morimoto, S. Morishita, and T. Tokuyama.
Computing optimized rectilinear regions for association rules. KDD'97.
■ R.J. Miller and Y. Yang. Association rules over interval data.
SIGMOD'97.
■ Y. Aumann and Y. Lindell.
DataA Statistical
Mining: Theory for Quantitative
Association Rules KDD'99.
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 87
 Ref: Mining Correlations and Interesting Rules

■ M. Klemettinen, H. Mannila, P. Ronkainen, H. Toivonen, and A. I.

Verkamo. Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered
association rules. CIKM'94.
■ S. Brin, R. Motwani, and C. Silverstein. Beyond market basket:
Generalizing association rules to correlations. SIGMOD'97.
■ C. Silverstein, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and J. Ullman. Scalable techniques
for mining causal structures. VLDB'98.
■ P.-N. Tan, V. Kumar, and J. Srivastava. Selecting the Right
Interestingness Measure for Association Patterns. KDD'02.
■ E. Omiecinski. Alternative Interest Measures for Mining Associations.
TKDE’03.
■ Y. K. Lee, W.Y. Kim, Y. Data
D. Cai,Mining:
and J. Han. CoMine: Efficient Mining of
Correlated
April 16, Patterns. ICDM’03.
Concepts and
2018 Techniques 88
 Ref: Mining Other Kinds of Rules

■ R. Meo, G. Psaila, and S. Ceri. A new SQL-like operator for mining

association rules. VLDB'96.
■ B. Lent, A. Swami, and J. Widom. Clustering association rules. ICDE'97.
■ A. Savasere, E. Omiecinski, and S. Navathe. Mining for strong negative
associations in a large database of customer transactions. ICDE'98.
■ D. Tsur, J. D. Ullman, S. Abitboul, C. Clifton, R. Motwani, and S.
Nestorov. Query flocks: A generalization of association-rule mining.
SIGMOD'98.
■ F. Korn, A. Labrinidis, Y. Kotidis, and C. Faloutsos. Ratio rules: A new
paradigm for fast, quantifiable data mining. VLDB'98.
■ K. Wang, S. Zhou, J. Han. Profit Mining: From Patterns to Actions.
EDBT’02.
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 89
 Ref: Constraint-Based Pattern Mining

■ R. Srikant, Q. Vu, and R. Agrawal. Mining association rules with item

constraints. KDD'97.
■ R. Ng, L.V.S. Lakshmanan, J. Han & A. Pang. Exploratory mining and
pruning optimizations of constrained association rules. SIGMOD’98.
■ M.N. Garofalakis, R. Rastogi, K. Shim: SPIRIT: Sequential Pattern
Mining with Regular Expression Constraints. VLDB’99.
■ G. Grahne, L. Lakshmanan, and X. Wang. Efficient mining of
constrained correlated sets. ICDE'00.
■ J. Pei, J. Han, and L. V. S. Lakshmanan. Mining Frequent Itemsets
with Convertible Constraints. ICDE'01.
■ J. Pei, J. Han, and W. Wang, Mining Sequential Patterns with
Data Mining:
Constraints in Large Databases, CIKM'02.
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 90
 Ref: Mining Sequential and Structured Patterns

■ R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining sequential patterns: Generalizations

and performance improvements. EDBT’96.
■ H. Mannila, H Toivonen, and A. I. Verkamo. Discovery of frequent
episodes in event sequences. DAMI:97.
■ M. Zaki. SPADE: An Efficient Algorithm for Mining Frequent Sequences.
Machine Learning:01.
■ J. Pei, J. Han, H. Pinto, Q. Chen, U. Dayal, and M.-C. Hsu. PrefixSpan:
Mining Sequential Patterns Efficiently by Prefix-Projected Pattern
Growth. ICDE'01.
■ M. Kuramochi and G. Karypis. Frequent Subgraph Discovery. ICDM'01.
■ X. Yan, J. Han, and R. Afshar. CloSpan: Mining Closed Sequential
Patterns in Large Datasets. SDM'03.
■ X. Yan and J. Han. CloseGraph: Mining Closed Frequent Graph
Data Mining:
Patterns.
April 16, KDD'03. Concepts and
2018 Techniques 91
 Ref: Mining Spatial, Multimedia, and Web Data

■ K. Koperski and J. Han, Discovery of Spatial Association Rules in

Geographic Information Databases, SSD’95.
■ O. R. Zaiane, M. Xin, J. Han, Discovering Web Access Patterns and
Trends by Applying OLAP and Data Mining Technology on Web Logs.
ADL'98.
■ O. R. Zaiane, J. Han, and H. Zhu, Mining Recurrent Items in
Multimedia with Progressive Resolution Refinement. ICDE'00.
■ D. Gunopulos and I. Tsoukatos. Efficient Mining of Spatiotemporal
Patterns. SSTD'01.

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 92
 Ref: Mining Frequent Patterns in Time-Series Data

■ B. Ozden, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Silberschatz. Cyclic association rules.

ICDE'98.
■ J. Han, G. Dong and Y. Yin, Efficient Mining of Partial Periodic Patterns
in Time Series Database, ICDE'99.
■ H. Lu, L. Feng, and J. Han. Beyond Intra-Transaction Association
Analysis: Mining Multi-Dimensional Inter-Transaction Association Rules.
TOIS:00.
■ B.-K. Yi, N. Sidiropoulos, T. Johnson, H. V. Jagadish, C. Faloutsos, and
A. Biliris. Online Data Mining for Co-Evolving Time Sequences. ICDE'00.
■ W. Wang, J. Yang, R. Muntz. TAR: Temporal Association Rules on
Evolving Numerical Attributes. ICDE’01.
■ J. Yang, W. Wang, P. S. Yu.
DataMining Asynchronous Periodic Patterns in
Mining:
Time16,
April Series Data. TKDE’03.
Concepts and
2018 Techniques 93
 Ref: Iceberg Cube and Cube Computation

■ S. Agarwal, R. Agrawal, P. M. Deshpande, A. Gupta, J. F. Naughton,

R. Ramakrishnan, and S. Sarawagi. On the computation of
multidimensional aggregates. VLDB'96.
■ Y. Zhao, P. M. Deshpande, and J. F. Naughton. An array-based
algorithm for simultaneous multidi-mensional aggregates.
SIGMOD'97.
■ J. Gray, et al. Data cube: A relational aggregation operator
generalizing group-by, cross-tab and sub-totals. DAMI: 97.
■ M. Fang, N. Shivakumar, H. Garcia-Molina, R. Motwani, and J. D.
Ullman. Computing iceberg queries efficiently. VLDB'98.
■ S. Sarawagi, R. Agrawal, and N. Megiddo. Discovery-driven
exploration of OLAP data cubes. EDBT'98.
■ K. Beyer and R. Ramakrishnan. Bottom-up computation of sparse and
Data Mining:
iceberg
April 16, cubes. SIGMOD'99.
Concepts and
2018 Techniques 94
 Ref: Iceberg Cube and Cube Exploration

■ J. Han, J. Pei, G. Dong, and K. Wang, Computing Iceberg Data Cubes

with Complex Measures. SIGMOD’ 01.
■ W. Wang, H. Lu, J. Feng, and J. X. Yu. Condensed Cube: An Effective
Approach to Reducing Data Cube Size. ICDE'02.
■ G. Dong, J. Han, J. Lam, J. Pei, and K. Wang. Mining
Multi-Dimensional Constrained Gradients in Data Cubes. VLDB'01.
■ T. Imielinski, L. Khachiyan, and A. Abdulghani. Cubegrades:
Generalizing association rules. DAMI:02.
■ L. V. S. Lakshmanan, J. Pei, and J. Han. Quotient Cube: How to
Summarize the Semantics of a Data Cube. VLDB'02.
■ D. Xin, J. Han, X. Li, B. W. Wah. Star-Cubing: Computing Iceberg
Cubes by Top-Down and Data Bottom-Up Integration. VLDB'03.
Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 95
 Ref: FP for Classification and Clustering
■ G. Dong and J. Li. Efficient mining of emerging patterns: Discovering
trends and differences. KDD'99.
■ B. Liu, W. Hsu, Y. Ma. Integrating Classification and Association Rule
Mining. KDD’98.
■ W. Li, J. Han, and J. Pei. CMAR: Accurate and Efficient Classification
Based on Multiple Class-Association Rules. ICDM'01.
■ H. Wang, W. Wang, J. Yang, and P.S. Yu. Clustering by pattern
similarity in large data sets. SIGMOD’ 02.
■ J. Yang and W. Wang. CLUSEQ: efficient and effective sequence
clustering. ICDE’03.
■ B. Fung, K. Wang, and M. Ester. Large Hierarchical Document
Clustering Using Frequent Itemset. SDM’03.
■ X. Yin and J. Han. CPAR: Classification
Data Mining: based on Predictive
Association
April 16, Rules. SDM'03.
Concepts and
2018 Techniques 96
 Ref: Stream and Privacy-Preserving FP Mining

■ A. Evfimievski, R. Srikant, R. Agrawal, J. Gehrke. Privacy Preserving

Mining of Association Rules. KDD’02.
■ J. Vaidya and C. Clifton. Privacy Preserving Association Rule Mining in
Vertically Partitioned Data. KDD’02.
■ G. Manku and R. Motwani. Approximate Frequency Counts over Data
Streams. VLDB’02.
■ Y. Chen, G. Dong, J. Han, B. W. Wah, and J. Wang. Multi-Dimensional
Regression Analysis of Time-Series Data Streams. VLDB'02.
■ C. Giannella, J. Han, J. Pei, X. Yan and P. S. Yu. Mining Frequent
Patterns in Data Streams at Multiple Time Granularities, Next
Generation Data Mining:03.
■ A. Evfimievski, J. Gehrke, and R. Srikant. Limiting Privacy Breaches in
Privacy Preserving Data Mining. PODS’03.
Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 97
 Ref: Other Freq. Pattern Mining Applications

■ Y. Huhtala, J. Kärkkäinen, P. Porkka, H. Toivonen. Efficient

Discovery of Functional and Approximate Dependencies Using
Partitions. ICDE’98.
■ H. V. Jagadish, J. Madar, and R. Ng. Semantic Compression and
Pattern Extraction with Fascicles. VLDB'99.
■ T. Dasu, T. Johnson, S. Muthukrishnan, and V. Shkapenyuk. Mining
Database Structure; or How to Build a Data Quality Browser.
SIGMOD'02.

Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 98
 Data Mining:
April 16, Concepts and
2018 Techniques 99