ARC Report On Disaster Management
ARC Report On Disaster Management
ARC Report On Disaster Management
1 (a) A new entry, “Management of Disasters and (a) The recommendation is not accepted
Emergencies, natural or manmade”, may be as the existing dispensation in the
included in List III (Concurrent List) of the Constitution of India adequately meets
Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. (1) the objectives contained in the
recommendation.
2. Analysis of the Disaster Management Act,
2005: (Para 4.2.3.5)
3 (b) The Act should provide categorization of (b) The recommendation is not accepted.
disasters (say, local, district, state or national For flexibility, it could be in the guidelines
level). This categorization along with intensity of and not in the Act, and that categorization
each type of disaster will help in determining the is possible only after the event.
level of authority primarily responsible for
dealing with the disaster as well as the scale of
response - detailed guidelines may be stipulated
by the NDMA on this subject.(3)
4 (c) The functions of the National Disaster (c) The recommendation is partially
Management Authority should be: to accepted. As per Section 6 of Disaster
recommend policies, to lay down guidelines for Management Act, 2005, NDMA has
preparation of different disaster management already been vested inter-alia with the
plans and standard operating procedures; to responsibilities of laying down policies on
1
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
promote and organize vulnerability studies, disaster management and guidelines to
research and evaluation; to advise on be followed by the State Authorities in
parameters of categorization and on declaration drawing up the State Plan which included
of national and state disasters; to develop various subcomponents as mentioned in
expertise and knowledge in the field of recommendations of ARC. However,
crisis/disaster management and disseminate to the deployment of specialized manpower,
the field, to develop and organize training and machinery and advising on the use and
capacity building programmes, to coordinate the constitution of disaster management
early warning system and deploy specialized funds should be with Central and State
manpower and machinery in support of Governments, as at present.
local/state governments, where required; to Responsibility for general
advise on the constitution and use of the superintendence of the National Disaster
Disaster Management Funds; and to give Response Force should rest with the
recommendations on all matters relating to Central Government, which is responsible
crisis/disaster management to the for the paramilitary forces from which
government.(4) NDRF battalions were drawn.
6 (e) The law should cast a duty on every public (e) The recommendation is not accepted.
functionary, to promptly inform the concerned There is no need to amend the DM Act
authority about any crisis, if he/she feels that since the existing provisions adequately
such authority does not have such meet the objectives sought to be fulfilled
information.(6) by the recommendation.
7 (f) The law should create a uniform structure at (f) The recommendation is partially
the apex level to handle all accepted. NDMA provides for Prime
crises. Such a structure may be headed by the Minister and Chief Ministers to head
Prime Minister at the national level and the Central and State structures
Chief Minister at the state level. At the respectively. Natural disasters could be
administrative level, the structure is operationally handled by
appropriately headed by the Cabinet Secretary the NEC under GoI’s supervision.
and the Chief Secretary respectively.(7) Other serious crises could be handled
by existing arrangement of NCMC and
CMGs. No amendment is required to
the Act.
8 (g) The law should make provisions for stringent (g) The recommendation is accepted.
2
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
punishment for misutilization of funds meant for
crisis/disaster management.(8)
9 (h) The role of the local governments should be (h) The recommendation is accepted.
brought to the forefront for crisis/disaster
management.(9)
10 (i) The NEC as stipulated under the Disaster (i) The recommendation is not
Management Act need not be constituted, and accepted since the NEC has already
the NCMC should continue to be the apex been constituted on 27.9.06. In addition
coordination body. At the state level, the to coordinating response measures, NEC
existing coordination mechanism under the also implements NDMA guidelines.
Chief Secretary should continue (refer para Serious crises other than natural
4.3.3).(10) calamities would continue to be managed
by the NCMC.
11 (j) Since all sections of the Act have not been (j) The recommendation is accepted.
notified, it is suggested that the above
amendments be carried out without further
delay. Meanwhile, except for those sections for
which amendments are suggested, the others
can be notified straightway so that the law can
be brought into effect.(11)
3. Coordination at the Apex Operational
Level: (Para 4.3.3.3)
12 (a) There is no need for a separate ministry/ (a) The recommendation is accepted.
department of disaster management at the
national or the state level.(12)
13 (b) The NEC as stipulated under the Disaster (b) The recommendation is not accepted
Management Act, 2005 need not be constituted, since the NEC has already been
and the NCMC can continue to be the apex constituted on 27.9.06.
coordination body. At the state level, the
existing coordination mechanism under the
Chief Secretary may continue. (13)
3
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
4. Role of Local Self-Governments: (Para
4.3.4.2)
15 (a) State Governments may examine the need (a) The recommendation is accepted.
to incorporate provisions in the state disaster The Central Act specifies it already.
management law and also the state laws
governing local bodies to provide for a well
defined role to the municipal bodies and
panchayat raj institutions.(15)
5. Crisis Management Set Up for
Metropolitan Cities: (Para 4.3.5.2)
16 (a) In larger cities (say, with population (a) The recommendation is accepted.
exceeding 2.5 million), the Mayor, assisted by
the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation
and the Police Commissioner should be directly
responsible for Crisis Management.(16)
6. Creation of Legal and Institutional
Framework for Managing Floods in Inter-
State Rivers: (Para 4.3.8.2)
17 (a) Using powers under Entry 56 in the Union (a) The recommendation is not accepted.
List, a Law may be enacted to set up There is a law proposed on dam safety
mechanisms for collection of data, managing and protocols for release of water from
flow in rivers and release of water from reservoirs. The proposed National
reservoirs, so as to prevent disasters, with Flood Management Commission being
interstate ramifications.(17) set up in the Ministry of Water Resources
would also look into these aspects.
Hence no law is needed.
7. Empowering the Relief
Commissioners/Disaster Management
Departments to Effectively Discharge
Disaster Related Responsibilities: (Para
4.3.9.2)
4
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
ensure that the ‘framework’ is put in active
operation instantaneously.
5
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
Technology organizations and the users of the
technologies. Such a mechanism may be
operationalised both at the Union and State
levels.(19)
9. Strengthening of National Institute of
Disaster Management (NIDM): (Para 4.3.11.2)
20 (a) NIDM may continue as an autonomous body (a) The recommendation is accepted.
and function as an apex professional institution
in disaster management. In addition to research
and studies, the institution needs to engage
itself in documenting and disseminating global
and national best practices and in developing
planning, training and evaluation
methodologies.(20)
10. Professionalization of Disaster
Management: (Para 4.3.12.3)
22 (b) The possibility of bilateral agreements with (b) The recommendation is accepted.
foreign governments and international
institutions dealing with different aspects of
disaster management, for exchange of
experiences and learning from their
documentation and research efforts may be
explored.(22)
11. Enunciating a Policy Towards Crisis
Management Which Emphasizes Risk
Reduction: (Para 5.2.3)
6
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
centre stage in all disaster mitigation plans.
24 (a) Hazard and vulnerability analyses should be (a) The recommendation is accepted.
made an essential component of all
crisis/disaster mitigation plans.(24)
25 (b) Priority should be given to seismic micro- (b) The recommendation is accepted.
zonation of vulnerable major cities, hazard
prone areas, and urban agglomerations in a
scale of 1:1000 in Zones V and IV, with topmost
priority being given to cities with population of
more than one million.(25)
7
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
should be used to integrate spatial data such as
topography, hydrology, land use, land cover,
settlement pattern and built structure as well as
non-spatial data such as demography,
socioeconomic conditions and infrastructure in a
common platform. This should be integrated
with satellite and aerospace data as well as
data from Geographical Positioning Systems for
real time monitoring of crisis situations and for
scientific assessment of damages.(26)
30 (b) A responsible media, which is also well (b) & (c): The recommendations are
informed about all aspects of disaster, is a very accepted.
powerful tool for sensitizing people. Proactive
disclosures about all aspects of disaster
management would build a healthy relationship
between the media and disaster management
agencies.(30)
8
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
31 (c) Details of past accidents and disasters and
the lessons learnt, should be documented and
kept in the public domain. The Disaster
Management Authorities have to take up this
task.(31)
14. Preparation of Disaster Management
Plans: (Para 5.5.9)
9
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
35 (d) The plan should be prepared in consultation
with all role players. Each role player should
understand and accept his/her roles. This would
require awareness campaigns, especially for the
community.(35)
36 (e) For ensuring quality of on-site and off-site (e) The recommendation is accepted.
emergency plans (for hazardous units), the
professional expertise available, both in
industry, and in enforcement agencies such as
the Factory Inspectorates should be
improved.(36)
37 (f) All crisis/disaster management plans should (f) & (g): The recommendations are
be tested periodically through mock drills.(37) accepted.
39 (h) The same principles would apply to plan at (h) The recommendation is accepted.
other levels.(39)
15. Making Crisis/Disaster Management
Plans a Part of Development Plans: (Para
5.6.3)
40 (a) The activities in the disaster management (a) & (b): The recommendations are
plans should be included in the development accepted.
plans of the line agencies and the authorities
like panchayats and municipal bodies.(40)
10
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
42 (c) Incorporation of disaster mitigation plans into (c) The recommendation is accepted.
the development plans should be specially
monitored at the five-year and annual plan
discussions at State and Union (Planning
Commission) levels. The Planning Commission,
State Planning Boards and Planning
Departments must revise on priority basis the
proforma for formulating plan proposals to
ensure that the process adequately takes into
account the disaster prevention concerns.(42)
45 (b) Appropriate Zoning Regulations need to be (b) & (c): The recommendations are
extended to all areas. Phasing of the areas to accepted.
be covered should be done based on the
intensity of the hazard anticipated. This would
require strengthening of the Town and Country
Planning Departments of State Governments.
Local bodies can be given financial incentives
for preparation of Zoning Regulations. The
hazard zonation maps prepared should be one
of the inputs for preparation of Zoning
Regulations.(45)
11
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
47 (d) The importance of disaster resistant (d) The recommendation is accepted.
constructions and simplified safety guidelines
should be widely disseminated so as to promote
compliance. In so far as the rural areas are
concerned, other methods of dissemination
including setting up of Building Technology
Demonstration Centres and undertaking
demonstrative disaster constructions in severe
hazard prone areas should be taken up.
Demonstration camps should also be used to
make the people aware of the concerns and the
solutions.(47)
49 (f) The standards prescribed by BIS for disaster (f) The recommendation is accepted.
resistant buildings should be available in the
public domain, free of cost. This should be
posted on websites of the concerned
government agencies to promote
compliance.(49)
50 (g) Among the existing buildings, government (g) The recommendation is accepted.
buildings used by the public should be
evaluated and retrofitted first, giving preference
to buildings housing essential services. It would
be advisable to fix a schedule for all such
buildings in hazard prone areas. Private
buildings used by the public should also be
tackled on priority. A mix of regulatory and
financial incentives could be used for this
purpose by the local bodies.(50)
51 (h) All these measures should become an (h) The recommendation is accepted.
integral part of long term disaster/crisis
management plans. (51)
12
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
18. Effective Implementation of Laws and
Regulations: (Para 5.7.3.2)
13
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
redundancies so as to maintain line of
communication in the event of a disaster
striking. Care has to be taken to put in place
systems to disseminate warnings to all sections
of the people.(59)
60 (c) The early warning system should be (c) The recommendation is accepted.
evaluated after each disaster to carry out further
improvements. (60)
20. Building Community Resilience: (Para
5.9.2)
61 (a) Location specific training programmes for (a) The recommendation is accepted.
the community should be executed through the
panchayats. (61)
65 (e) NIDM and NDMA would have to play a vital (e) The recommendation is accepted.
role in working out the details of these
suggestions for implementation by different
authorities.(65)
21. Financial Tools for Risk-Reduction: (Para
5.10.4)
66 (a) Government and the insurance companies (a) The recommendation is accepted.
should play a more pro-active role in motivating
14
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
citizens in vulnerable areas to take insurance
cover. This could be done through suitably
designed insurance policies, if required, with
part funding from government. NDMA could play
a major facilitating role in this area.(66)
22. Research and Use of Knowledge: (Para
5.11.4)
67 (a) NIDM should develop methodologies for (a) The recommendation is accepted .
effective dissemination of knowledge on
disaster management. (67)
68 (b) Disaster management plans should attempt (b) to (d): The recommendations are
to integrate traditional knowledge available with accepted.
the communities.(68)
71 (a) Since the initial response in any (a) The recommendation is accepted.
crisis/disaster should be timely and speedy, the
Emergency Response Plans should be up-to-
date and should lay down the ‘trigger points’ in
unambiguous terms.(71)
72
(b) The district emergency response plan should (b) The recommendation is accepted.
be prepared in consultation with all concerned.
The plan should be known and accepted by all
the role players. (This should be apart of the
District Disaster management Plan).(72)
15
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
disaster management personnel, search and
rescue teams, and Emergency Operations
Centres.(73)
74 (d) Unity of command should be the underlying (d) The recommendation is accepted.
principle for effective rescue operations. For
example, in a district, all agencies of Union and
State Government have to work under the
leadership of the Collector. Such unity of
command principle should pervade at all field
levels.(74)
75 (e) The plan should be validated annually (e) The recommendation is accepted.
through mock drills and should be backed up by
capability building efforts.(75)
76 (f) Any plan would have its limitations as each (f) The recommendation is accepted.
crisis situation would vary from another. Plans
are, therefore, no substitute for sound
judgement at the time of crisis.(76)
78 (h) These principles apply to plans at other (h) The recommendation is accepted.
levels and also in case of metropolitan
cities.(78)
24. Coordinating Relief: (Para 6.2.6)
79 (a) Effective coordination is essential at the (a) to (g) The recommendations are
district and sub-district levels for rescue/relief accepted.
operations and to ensure proper receipt and
provision of relief. During rescue and relief
operations, unity of command should be
ensured with the Collector in total
command.(79)
16
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
81 (c) Ensuring safe drinking water and sanitized
living conditions should receive as much a
priority as other basic means of livelihood.(81)
86 (a) The Civil Defence Act should be amended (a) The recommendation is accepted.
as proposed so as to cover all types of
disasters.(86)
87 (b) Civil Defence should be constituted in all (b) & (c) The recommendations are
districts which are vulnerable not only to hostile accepted.
attacks but also to natural calamities. The goal
of community participation should be pursued
primarily through the instrumentality of Civil
Defence especially in urban areas.(87)
17
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
Financial Assistance for Civil Defence should be
increased substantially.(89)
90 (e) Civil Defence set-ups at all levels should be (e) & (f) The recommendations are
permitted to accept donations.(90) accepted.
92 (a) Policemen, Firemen and the Home Guards (a) The recommendation is accepted.
at the field level who are among the first
responders should be adequately trained in
handling crises/disasters. Such training should
be specific to the types of crises envisaged in
an area. More importantly, they should be fully
involved in the preparation of the local
Crisis/Disaster Management Plan and also be
fully conversant with them.(92)
93 (b) The minimum qualification for entry to Home (b) to (g) The recommendations are
Guards may be revised to at least a pass in the accepted.
10th class, given the increased responsibility
and complexity of tasks to be entrusted to
them.(93)
18
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
Crisis/Disaster Management Authority. Transfer
of these services to municipal authorities should
be accompanied by transfer of commensurate
financial resources.(96)
99 (h) The NDMA may be requested to suggest (h) The recommendation is accepted.
model provisions regarding these services for
inclusion in the Disaster Management Act/s.(99)
27. Setting-up Integrated Emergency
Operations Centre (EOC): (Para 6.4.2)
100 (a) While it is necessary that each nodal (a) The recommendation is accepted.
ministry handling crisis has an EOC, it is clearly
desirable to have an integrated National
Emergency Operation Centre for all types of
crises. ‘Subject-matter specific’ Ministries/
Departments should deploy representatives in
this Centre which must be networked with all
other EOCs and control rooms.(100)
28. Organising Emergency Medical Relief:
(Para 6.5.7)
101 (a) An institutional arrangement to attend to (a) to (c): The recommendations are
medical emergencies is required to be put in accepted.
place.(101)
19
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
29. Relief and Rehabilitation: (Para 7.1.12)
104 (a) Damage assessment should be carried out (a) to (g): The recommendations are
by multi-disciplinary teams in a transparent and accepted.
participatory manner in accordance with
guidelines laid down by NDMA. (refer para 6.2.6
g).(104)
20
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
111 (h) All new civil constructions should (h) The recommendation is accepted.
mandatorily be made disaster resistant as per
prescribed standards.(111)
112 (i) A mechanism for redressal of grievances (i) The recommendation is accepted.
should be established at the local and district
levels.(112)
113 (j) For all major disasters, NIDM should conduct (j) The recommendation is accepted.
a detailed evaluation exercise through
independent professional agencies.(113)
30. Revisiting the Financial Procedures:
(Para 7.2.6)
114 (a) Both the funds (National Disaster Mitigation (a) The recommendation is accepted.
Fund and the National Disaster Response
Fund) may be operationalised from April 1, 2007
with an initial annual contribution of Rs. 5000
crores each from the Government of India. This
would be in addition to CRF and NCCF for the
present. The CRF and NCCF would cease to
exist at the end of the award period of the
Twelfth Finance Commission. (114)
115 (b) NDMA may recommend to Government of (b) The recommendation is accepted.
India the quantum and criteria of assistance and
conditions of release from the two new funds as
well as manner of replenishment of these funds
from different sources.(115)
116 (c) A system of compiling accounts for each (c) The recommendation is accepted.
calamity separately with reference to each head
of relief expenditure should be initiated. The
Comptroller and Auditor General of India may
consider laying down a standardized format in
this regard.(116)
117 (d) Accounts as above may be available on the (d) The recommendation is accepted.
website of the state level nodal agency at such
intervals as may be laid down.(117)
118 (e) The basis for calculation of assistance from (e) The recommendation is accepted.
the funds should be available on appropriate
websites.(118)
21
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
31. Gender Issues and Vulnerability of
Weaker Sections: (Para 8.3)
119 (a) The vulnerability analysis should bring out (a) The recommendation is accepted.
the specific vulnerabilities of women and these
should be addressed in any mitigation effort.
Disaster mitigation plans should be prepared, in
consultation with women’s groups. Similar
steps should be taken for other vulnerable
groups.(119)
120 (b) Rescue and relief operations should focus (b) & (c) The recommendations are
on the most vulnerable groups-women, children, accepted. .
the elderly and the physically challenged. (120)
122 (d) In the recovery phase, efforts should focus (d) & (e) The recommendations are
on making women economically independent by accepted.
offering them opportunities of earning incomes;
providing training in new skills, forming self-help
groups and providing microfinance, marketing
facilities etc.(122)
124 (f) Camp managing committees should have (f) The recommendation is accepted.
adequate number of women
representatives.(124)
125 (g) Trauma counselling and psychological care (g) & (h) The recommendations are
should be provided to widows and women and accepted.
other persons in distress. These activities
should form part of the disaster management
plan.(125)
22
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
their rehabilitation.(126)
32. Revisiting Long Term Interventions
(Droughts): (Para 9.2.5)
127 (a) A National Institute of Drought Management (a) The recommendation is accepted.
may be set up for networking on multi-
disciplinary, cross-sectoral research on various
aspects of drought, acting as a resource centre
on droughts and carrying out impact evaluation
studies of the drought management efforts. It
needs to be ensured that the mandate and
agenda of this proposed institute does not
duplicate the efforts of the National Institute of
Disaster Management.(127)
33. Livelihood Management in Extremely
Drought Prone Areas: (Para 9.3.2)
128 (a) A strategy for making people pursue (a) The recommendation is accepted.
livelihoods compatible with their ecosystems
needs to be evolved. Some concrete steps in
this direction could be:
(i) A multi-disciplinary team needs to be
immediately constituted by the Ministry of
Environment and Forests to specifically identify
villages where soil and climatic conditions make
‘conventional agriculture’ unsustainable.
(ii) Alternate means of livelihood have to be
evolved in consultation with the communities, in
such areas.
(128)
34. Codifications of Management
Methodologies: (Para 9.4.3)
129 (i) State Governments need to rewrite the (i) The recommendation is accepted.
Relief ‘Manuals’ thoroughly in the light of recent
developments including inputs from the NDMA
and their own experience and update them once
in a few years.(129)
130 (ii) Ministry of Science and Technology may (ii) The recommendation is accepted.
compile from time to time a document
incorporating details of available scientific and
technical inputs/facilities for detecting the onset
and progress of drought; and inter-face between
23
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
scientific and technical organizations with
disaster management agencies of the Union
and State Governments.(130)
35. Rationalization of Drought Declarations:
(Para 9.5.2)
(a) Where a certain percentage (say, twenty per (a) & (b) The recommendations are
cent) of area normally cultivated remains accepted.
unsown till the end of July or December for
Kharif and Rabi respectively, the affected
Tehsil/ Taluka/Mandal could be declared
drought affected by the government.
132 (a) Deployment of remote sensing as the (a) The recommendation is accepted.
primary tool for diagnosing droughts, monitoring The work on improving these tools would
their course and forecasting prognosis is a goal continue, but there is no need for an
that needs to be pursued speedily and NRSA cell at the district level.
systematically. This would require dovetailing
remote sensing into the routine framework of
drought management. This could be best
achieved through establishment of an NRSA
cell in identified drought prone districts. The
24
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
activities of the NRSA cells in the districts must
include monitoring of other disasters as
well.(132)
37. Making Rivers Perennial: (Para 9.7.4)
133 (a) Technical agencies under the Ministries of (a) The recommendation is accepted.
Water Resources, Environment and Forests and
Science and Technology must immediately
carry out river specific feasibility studies to
determine the ecological and hydrological
implications of making seasonal rivers
perennial.(133)
38. Rainfed Areas Authority: (Para 9.8.2)
134 (a) A National Rainfed Areas Authority may be (a) The recommendation is accepted.
constituted immediately. The Authority can deal
inter alia, with all the issues of drought
management mentioned in this chapter.(134)
39. Epidemics: (Para 10.1.12)
135 (i) To more effectively prevent outbreak/spread (i) to (v): The recommendations are
of epidemics, it is imperative that a accepted.
comprehensive revised ‘model’ legislation on
public health is finalized at an early date and
that the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
systematically pursues its enactment by the
states with adaptations necessitated by local
requirements.(135)
25
Sl. Recommendations made by Administrative Government’s Decision
No. Reforms Commission
138 (iv) While surveillance and management of
epidemics are the responsibilities of public
health professionals, it is clear that a particularly
severe outbreak could overwhelm the capacities
of the ‘line organisations’. The Ministry of Health
and Family Welfare and the State Governments
must ensure that ‘standard operating
procedures’ are devised to assign roles and
responsibilities of agencies and personnel
outside the line organizations wherever a
situation so warrants.(138)
140 (i) All crisis/disaster management plans should (i) to (iii): The recommendations are
include plans for handling possible disruptions accepted.
in essential services. (140)
26