Scribd
Upload
50 views

Finding Potential Function For Conservative Force PDF

1) The document describes finding a potential function F for a given vector field. 2) An example vector field F = 2xyi + (x^2 + 2yz)j + (y^2 + 2z)k is used to illustrate the process. 3) Through taking partial derivatives and integrating, the potential function is found to be f(x,y,z) = x^2y + y^2z + z^2 + C2, where C2 is an arbitrary constant.

Uploaded by

nitin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
50 views

Finding Potential Function For Conservative Force PDF

1) The document describes finding a potential function F for a given vector field. 2) An example vector field F = 2xyi + (x^2 + 2yz)j + (y^2 + 2z)k is used to illustrate the process. 3) Through taking partial derivatives and integrating, the potential function is found to be f(x,y,z) = x^2y + y^2z + z^2 + C2, where C2 is an arbitrary constant.

Uploaded by

nitin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Finding Potential Functions

Marc
c Conrad
November 6, 2007

1 Introduction
Given a vector field F, one thing we may be asked is to find a potential
function for F. That is, we want to find a scalar-valued function f (x, y, z)
such that ∇f = F. In general, we cannot guarantee the existance of such a
function. To establish the existance of a potential for F (that is, to show that
F is conservative), we can use the Component Test given on Page 1164 of the
text. If it is the case that F is conservative, then we can find the potential f
through a systematic procedure that is best illustrated by example.

2 An Example
2.1 Setting up the problem
Let F be the vector field 2xyi + (x2 + 2yz)j + (y 2 + 2z)k. Find a potential
function for F.

One can use the component test to show that F is conservative, but we will
skip that step and go directly to finding the potential. We want to find f
such that ∇f = F. That is we want to have
∂f ∂f ∂f
∇f = i+ j+ k = 2xyi + (x2 + 2yz)j + (y 2 + 2z)k
∂x ∂y ∂z
So the problem is to find a function f such that

1
∂f
= 2xy (1)
∂x
∂f
= x2 + 2yz (2)
∂y
∂f
= y 2 + 2z (3)
∂z

2.2 Step 1: Finding a preliminary form for f


∂f
We have that = 2xy. Therefore f is given by the indefinite integral
R ∂x
f (x, y, z) = 2xy dx. Solving this yields
Z
f (x, y, z) = 2xy dx = x2 y + C(y, z) (4)

Note that the book uses the notation g(y, z) instead of C(y, z). Now, before
proceeding any further, we explore why the term C(y, z) appears in our
expression, and in particular why we must allow it to depend on y and z.

2.3 The reason for the term C(y,z)


When we calculate a single variable indefinite integral, we need a constant
of integration C. For example x dx = 21 x2 + C. The reason for the C term
R

is that we want the most general antiderivative we can find. The function
f1 (x) = 12 x2 has the property that f10 (x) = x, but so do the functions f2 (x) =
1 2
2
x + 5, f3 (x) = 12 x2 − π and, in general f (x) = 12 x2 + C for any constant C.
Similarily, in our case we want (for the time being) to find the most gen-
∂f
eral function f (x, y, z) that has the property that = 2xy. The function
∂x
∂f1
f1 (x, y, z) = x2 y has the property that = 2xy, but so each of the follow-
∂x
ing functions

f2 (x, y, z) = x2 y − 2
f3 (x, y, z) = x2 y + yz
 
2 2z−cos(yz) −1 yz
f4 (x, y, z) = x y + sin ye + tan
y + z2 + 1
2

2
In general f (x, y, z) = x2 y + C(y, z) will have the desired property for any
function C(y, z). Hence, the most general form of f with the property that
∂f
= 2xy is f (x, y, z) = x2 y + C(y, z) and it is therefore the indefinite
∂x
integral.
We now return to the problem of finding the potential.

2.4 Step 2: Refining f


∂f
We have found an f (actually an infinite family of f ’s) such that = 2xy.
∂x
∂f ∂f
But we also have conditions on and . We first work with our condition
∂y ∂z
∂f
for . On the one hand, by Equation (2) we have that
∂y
∂f
= x2 + 2yz
∂y
On the other hand, taking the partial derivative of both sides of Equation
(4) with respect to y gives us that
∂f ∂C
= x2 + (5)
∂y ∂y
∂C
Taken together, Equations (2) and (5) imply that x2 + 2yz = x2 + and
∂y
therefore
∂C
= 2yz
∂y
Integrating this result gives us that
Z
C(y, z) = 2yz dy = y 2 z + C1 (z) (6)

The reason for having C1 (z) in Equation (6) is the same as the reason for
having C(y, z) in Equation (4). That is, C(y, z) = y 2 z + C1 (z) has the
∂C
property that = 2yz for any choice of C1 (z) and (at the moment) we
∂y
want the most general expression for C(y, z) that we can find.

3
Now, substituting our expression for C(y, z) from Equation (6) into Equation
(4) gives us that

f (x, y, z) = x2 y + y 2 z + C1 (z) (7)

2.5 Step 3: Obtaining the final answer


The expression we have obtaining for f in Equation (7) has the property that
∂f ∂f ∂f
= 2xy and = x2 + 2yz. Now we use our condition on , proceeding
∂x ∂y ∂z
in a similar manner as in Step 2. On the one hand, Equation (3) tells us that
∂f
= y 2 + 2z
∂z
On the other hand, taking the partial derivative of both sides of Equation
(7) gives us that
∂f dC1
= y2 + (8)
∂z dz
dC1
Taken together, Equations (3) and (8) imply that y 2 + 2z = y 2 + and
dz
therefore
dC1
= 2z
dz
Integrating the result gives us that
Z
C1 (z) = 2z dz = z 2 + C2 (9)

Where C2 is an arbitrary constant. Substituting our expression for C1 (z)


from Equation (9) into Equation (7) gives us that

f (x, y, z) = x2 y + y 2 z + z 2 + C2 (10)
We can now verify by direct calculation that

∇f = 2xyi + (x2 + 2yz)j + (y 2 + 2z)k = F


Therefore f as given in Equation (10) is a potential function for any choice
of the constant C2 . That is, we can let C2 be any (fixed) real number we
want. In practice it is often convenient for calculations to let C2 = 0.

You might also like