Scribd
Upload
91 views

Design and Implementation of Transient Secure Encoder and Decoder

- In this project, the aim is to protect the circuit from transient errors due to increase in rate of transient errors in logic circuits. This is done by designing a transient secure encoder and decoder using Verilog HDL. Project is divided into two parts. First is error detection module, which is used to detect error in the encoder circuit. if there is any error in the code word the encoder circuit does not allow the code word to pass further. RE-DO operation takes place and the new input is taken for the code word to pass through encoder circuit. Second part is the majority logic decoding in which corrector is used to correct the codes if there is any transient generated during decoding the code word. The result demonstrate that the method is effective for EG-LDPC codes which are one step majority logic decodable. This proposed method has reduced decoding time by detecting whether the code word has error in the first iteration of majority logic decoding and if the code is error free the decoding stops without completing the rest of the iterations. In this way decoding time will greatly be reduced. The design is implemented in board and performed coding in Verilog hardware description language and simulating in Xilinx ISE Simulator.

Uploaded by

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
91 views

Design and Implementation of Transient Secure Encoder and Decoder

- In this project, the aim is to protect the circuit from transient errors due to increase in rate of transient errors in logic circuits. This is done by designing a transient secure encoder and decoder using Verilog HDL. Project is divided into two parts. First is error detection module, which is used to detect error in the encoder circuit. if there is any error in the code word the encoder circuit does not allow the code word to pass further. RE-DO operation takes place and the new input is taken for the code word to pass through encoder circuit. Second part is the majority logic decoding in which corrector is used to correct the codes if there is any transient generated during decoding the code word. The result demonstrate that the method is effective for EG-LDPC codes which are one step majority logic decodable. This proposed method has reduced decoding time by detecting whether the code word has error in the first iteration of majority logic decoding and if the code is error free the decoding stops without completing the rest of the iterations. In this way decoding time will greatly be reduced. The design is implemented in board and performed coding in Verilog hardware description language and simulating in Xilinx ISE Simulator.

Uploaded by

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Volume 3, Issue 4, April – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165

Design and Implementation of Transient Secure


Encoder and Decoder
Ashish Goyal1, Abhishek Bajpai2, Sohel Meraj3
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
Ghaziabad, India

Abstract:- In this project, the aim is to protect the circuit repeat technique we can correct transients in the encoder or
from transient errors due to increase in rate of transient decoder output and provide a error or transient free
errors in logic circuits. This is done by designing a supporting circuitry.
transient secure encoder and decoder using Verilog
HDL. Project is divided into two parts. First is error
detection module, which is used to detect error in the II. BASIC BLOCK DIAGRAM
encoder circuit. if there is any error in the code word the
encoder circuit does not allow the code word to pass
further. RE-DO operation takes place and the new input
is taken for the code word to pass through encoder
circuit. Second part is the majority logic decoding in
which corrector is used to correct the codes if there is
any transient generated during decoding the code word.
The result demonstrate that the method is effective for
EG-LDPC codes which are one step majority logic Fig 1:- Basic Block Diagram
decodable. This proposed method has reduced decoding
time by detecting whether the code word has error in the
first iteration of majority logic decoding and if the code III. PROPOSED CIRCUIT DIAGRAM OF
is error free the decoding stops without completing the MAJORITY LOGIC DECODER
rest of the iterations. In this way decoding time will
greatly be reduced. The design is implemented in board
and performed coding in Verilog hardware description
language and simulating in Xilinx ISE Simulator.

Keywords:- Verilog HDL, EG-LDPC codes, majority logic


decoding, Xilinx ISE simulator.

I. INTRODUCTION

Error correcting codes are used to protect the circuit


from transient errors. These errors does not damage the
circuit but corrupts the data code word. Since devices
become larger so more powerful codes are required. More
advance has been proposed which can correct larger number
of errors and require complex decoders. To avoid high
decoding complexity one step majority logic decodable
codes are proposed which can be implemented serially with
very simple circuitry but require large decoding time. In
order to reduce decoding time Euclidean geometry low
density Parity check (EG-LDPC) codes are used. This
method was proposed to accelerate the serial
implementation of majority logic decoding. In this method Fig 2:- Proposed circuit diagram of Majority Logic Decoder
the first iteration of majority logic decoding is to detect
whether there is a error in the code word if the code word is
error free then the decoding can be stopped without IV. DESCRIPTION OF MAJORITY LOGIC
completing the rest of the iterations which results in DECODER
reducing the decoding time. The majority logic decoder consists of five main
We use transient secure detector to check the output of components
encoder and decoder circuitry and if there is any error in  One cyclic shift register
either of these units the units starts to do re-do operation to
generate the correct output code word. Using this detect and  One Xor matrix

IJISRT18AP557 www.ijisrt.com 320


Volume 3, Issue 4, April – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
 Extra control logic unit V. ADVANTAGES
 One majority logic gate  Low power consumption.
 One Xor gate for correcting the bits  Take less decoding time.
 Corrects multiple error at a certain time.
The main steps involved during decoding are :-
 The encoded information is stacked into the cyclic shift VI. DISADVATAGES
register and afterward registering the direct entireties of
the encoded bits utilizing XOR matrix.  If the code word has more than four bit error then
MLDD can-not correct the code word suitably.
 Control Logic takes the contribution from XOR matrix
and watches that whether the Matrix yield is giving VII. SIMULATION RESULTS
outcome „0000‟ in first „3‟ clock cycles or not.
 Majority logic circuit calculates the majority values of Simulation results of Transient secure encoder and
the direct entireties of bits which are processed in stage decoder are shown below:
1.
 XOR gate is used to correct the bit when the ML gate
output is 1.
The design flow for majority logic decoding is shown
below:

Fig 4:- Encoder Fault

Fig 5:- Decoder Fault

Fig 3:- Description of Majority Logic Decoder


With the help of control logic check the first three
cycles to check the output of the XOR matrix is 0000 or not.
If the output is zero then the encoded data will be sent to the
output of the decoder and only 2 extra clock cycles will be
used to load the input and give output. If the encoded data is
not zero then the decoding process will take place for
another 15 clock cycles it take two extra cycles for taking
input and giving output. Fig 6:- Final Output

IJISRT18AP557 www.ijisrt.com 321


Volume 3, Issue 4, April – 2018 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

VIII. CONCLUSION

In this concise, the first iterations of serial one step Majority


Logic Decoding of EG-LDPC codes has been studied. The
goal was to lessen the decoding time by halting the coding
process when no errors are distinguished. The result show
that all tested combinations of errors affecting up to four bits
are detected in the first three iterations of decoding.

IX. FUTURE SCOPE

The future scope for the project is to eliminate the


silent error corruption which occurs when we have more
than four bit error in the code word. In such cases MLDD is
not perfectly suitable. To reduce such fault one more
detection logic can be implemented after the completion of
15 iteration.

X. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to express our special thanks of


gratitude to our project guide MR Abhishek chauhan
(Assistant Professor), for his continuous guidance and
support. His profound knowledge and advice helped up in
understanding various technical concepts and its application
in the project. We would also like to express thanks of
gratitude to our course coordinators; Mrs. Rupali Singh
(Assistant Professor) and Mr. Arun Kumar (Assistant
Professor), for providing valuable suggestions and
encouragement to our project. At last we would like thank
all those who had helped us in completing this project.

REFRENCES

[1]. G.C cardarilli et al. concurrent error detection in reed-


solomon encoder and decoders. IEEE Trans VLSI,
15:842-826, 2007.
[2]. S. Hareland et al. Impact of CMOS process scaling and
SOI on the soft error rates of logic processes. In
proceeding of symposium on VLSI Digest of
technology papers, pages 73-74, 2001.
[3]. R. Horan et al. Idempotents, mattson-solomon
polynomials and binary LDPC codes. IEE proceedings
of communications, 153(2):256-262, 2006.
[4]. J. Kim et al. Error rate in current-control logic
processors with Shot noise. Fluctuation and Noise
Letters, 4(1):83-86, 2004.
[5]. R. J. McEliece. The Theory of Information and Coding.
Cambridge University Press, 2002.

IJISRT18AP557 www.ijisrt.com 322

You might also like