Polonium-210 Poisoning: A Fi Rst-Hand Account: Articles
Polonium-210 Poisoning: A Fi Rst-Hand Account: Articles
Polonium-210 Poisoning: A Fi Rst-Hand Account: Articles
Summary
Background Polonium-210 (²¹⁰Po) gained widespread notoriety after the poisoning and subsequent death of Lancet 2016; 388: 1075–80
Mr Alexander Litvinenko in London, UK, in 2006. Exposure to ²¹⁰Po resulted initially in a clinical course that was Published Online
indistinguishable from infection or exposure to chemical toxins, such as thallium. July 22, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(16)00144-6
Methods A 43-year-old man presented to his local hospital with acute abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and vomiting, and
Department of Haematology,
was admitted to the hospital because of dehydration and persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. He was initially UCL Cancer Institute, London,
diagnosed with gastroenteritis and treated with antibiotics. Clostridium difficile toxin was subsequently detected in his UK (A C Nathwani MBChB);
stools, which is when he first raised the possibility of being poisoned and revealed his background and former identity, Department of Haematology
(A C Nathwani, A Virchis MBBS)
having been admitted under a new identity with which he had been provided on being granted asylum in the UK.
and Katharine Dormandy
Within 6 days, the patient had developed thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, which was initially thought to be drug Haemophilia Centre and
induced. By 2 weeks, in addition to bone marrow failure, he had evidence of alopecia and mucositis. Thallium Thrombosis Unit
poisoning was suspected and investigated but ultimately dismissed because blood levels of thallium, although raised, (A C Nathwani), Royal Free
London NHS Foundation Trust
were lower than toxic concentrations. The patient continued to deteriorate and within 3 weeks had developed multiple
Hospital, London, UK; National
organ failure requiring ventilation, haemofiltration, and cardiac support, associated with a drop in consciousness. On Health Services Blood and
the 23rd day after he first became ill, he suffered a pulseless electrical activity cardiorespiratory arrest from which he Transplant, Watford, UK
could not be resuscitated and was pronounced dead. (A C Nathwani); Intensive Care
Unit, University College
London Hospitals NHS
Findings Urine analysis using gamma-ray spectroscopy on day 22 showed a characteristic 803 keV photon emission, Foundation Trust, London, UK
raising the possibility of ²¹⁰Po poisoning. Results of confirmatory analysis that became available after the patient’s (J F Down MBBS,
death established the presence of ²¹⁰Po at concentrations about 10⁹-times higher than normal background levels. J Goldstone MBBS,
J Yassin MBBS); Clinical
Post-mortem tissue analyses showed autolysis and retention of ²¹⁰Po at lethal doses in several organs. On the basis Toxicology, Guy’s & St Thomas’
of the measured amounts and tissue distribution of ²¹⁰Po, it was estimated that the patient had ingested several NHS Foundation Trust,
1000 million becquerels (a few GBq), probably as a soluble salt (eg, chloride), which delivered very high and fatal London, UK (P I Dargan MBBS);
radiation doses over a period of a few days. Faculty of Life Sciences and
Medicine, King’s College
London, London, UK
Interpretation Early symptoms of ²¹⁰Po poisoning are indistinguishable from those of a wide range of chemical (P I Dargan); and Public Health
toxins. Hence, the diagnosis can be delayed and even missed without a high degree of suspicion. Although body England, London, UK
surface scanning with a standard Geiger counter was unable to detect the radiation emitted by ²¹⁰Po, an atypical (N Gent MBChB, D Lloyd PhD,
J D Harrison PhD)
clinical course prompted active consideration of poisoning with radioactive material, with the diagnosis ultimately
Correspondence to:
being made with gamma-ray spectroscopy of a urine sample. Dr Amit C Nathwani,
Department of Haematology,
Funding UK NHS, Public Health England, and the UK Department of Health. UCL Cancer Institute, London
WC1E 6BT, UK
[email protected]
Introduction and included review of the patient’s medical records,
Alexander Litvinenko (born Dec 4, 1962) was an officer of clinical course, spectroscopy results, and statements
the Russian secret service who, in 2000, was granted from experts. The hearing concluded on July 31, 2015,
asylum in the UK and is said by his widow to have begun and the final report into the death of Mr Litvinenko was
working as a consultant for the British intelligence published on Jan 21, 2016.
services. On Nov 1, 2006, Mr Litvinenko fell ill and was Following the public hearing, the primary clinicians
admitted to hospital. His illness was later attributed to and toxicology experts involved in the care of
poisoning with polonium-210 (²¹⁰Po), since substantial Mr Litvinenko in 2006 are now free of any restrictions to
amounts of this highly toxic radionuclide were found in describe the clinical aspects of this highly unusual case.
his body by the Health Protection Agency (now In this report, we provide a first-hand account of the
Public Health England). An inquest into Mr Litvinenko’s events leading to the diagnosis of ²¹⁰Po poisoning, as
death was opened and adjourned in November, 2006, due well as the detailed toxico-kinetics of the first documented
to outstanding criminal proceedings. The inquest was case of lethal poisoning with polonium.
subsequently resumed when it became clear that the two
men suspected of his murder could not be extradited Presentation
from Russia. The inquest was suspended in July, 2014, to On Nov 3, 2006, a 43-year-old man named Edwin Carter
allow a public inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 to presented to the Accident and Emergency department of
take place. The inquiry’s public hearing commenced at Barnet General Hospital (now part of Royal Free Hospital,
the Royal Courts of Justice in London in January, 2015, London) complaining of abdominal pain, vomiting, and
Table 1: Progression of the patient’s haematological parameters and hepatic and renal biochemistry after suspected poisoning on day 1
diarrhoea, which had started on Nov 1, 2006 (designated as revealed his previous identity and suggested the possibility
day 1 in the following chronology). On examination, he of being poisoned. He disclosed that before coming to the
appeared dehydrated. He was afebrile and had a normal UK he had been known as Alexander Litvinenko and that
pulse and blood pressure. Abdominal examination he had defected from the Russian Security Service.
revealed epigastric tenderness. In view of the profuse Mr Litvinenko explained that on the day he became ill,
nature of his diarrhoea, a provisional diagnosis of he had met with former Komitet gosudarstvennoy
gastroenteritis, possibly of infective origin, was made. He bezopasnosti (KGB) agents and feared that he had been
was admitted for further investigation and started on poisoned (figure 1, table 1). The patient and his wife asked
intravenous fluids and oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg every medical staff whether poisoning by infection with C difficile
12 h. Investigations showed that serum urea and might have occurred since they had a friend who had been
conjugated bilirubin concentrations were mildly raised at killed in this way. Mr Litvinenko was commenced on oral
12·1 mmol per L and 49 μmol per L, respectively, and metronidazole (400 mg three times daily) but his
creatinine was high at 101 μmol per L, suggesting gastrointestinal symptoms persisted. The working
dehydration. Haemoglobin concentration was 201 g per L diagnosis was of C difficile diarrhoea associated with a
(reference range 120–180 g/L) associated with a leucocytosis possible underlying viral gastroenteritis. By day 9,
(white blood cell count 22 × 10⁹ cells/L; reference range Mr Litvinenko had become neutropenic with a neutrophil
4·0–11·0 × 10⁹ cells/L) and neutrophilia (19·8 × 10⁹ cells/L; count 1·1 × 10⁹ per L (table 1). His platelet count had also
reference range 2·0–7·5 × 10⁹/L; table 1). fallen from normal levels to 63 × 10⁹ per L. The cause of the
cytopenia was unknown but thought to be due to a viral
Clinical course gastroenteritis or a consequence of ciprofloxacin toxicity.
On day 7, Clostridium difficile toxin was identified in the On day 11, his neutrophil count was lower than
patient’s stools by the microbiology department at 0·5 × 10⁹ per L and he had spiked a fever. He was started
Barnet General Hospital. The possibility was raised that empirically on intravenous piperacillin–tazobactam
this finding might have been secondary to ciprofloxacin. (4·5 g every 6 h) to avoid progression to a sepsis syndrome.
When the diagnosis was discussed with the patient, he He was also given one dose of pegylated G-CSF (Neulasta,
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
published data on the biodistribution of ²¹⁰Po.2–4 The 2 days after intake 1·8 0·4 11 18 6·4 1·3 1·9
lower concentration of ²¹⁰Po in lung tissue (3·5 MBq/g) 3 days after intake 2·7 0·6 17 27 9·9 2·0 2·9
was consistent with intake by ingestion. On the 4 days after intake 3·6 0·8 22 36 13 2·8 4·1
assumption of ²¹⁰Po ingestion on day 1 with 10% being 5 days after intake 4·5 1·1 28 44 16 3·6 5·2
absorbed into the systemic circulation, the concentrations 10 days after intake 8·7 2·0 51 80 31 7·9 12
of ²¹⁰Po measured in the liver, kidneys, and urine were 15 days after intake 12 2·8 70 110 44 13 19
used to estimate intake as 4400 MBq (4·4 GBq)2,4 20 days after intake 16 3·5 86 130 55 18 26
We estimated the cumulative radiation doses to the 22 days after intake 17 3·7 92 140 59 20 29
organs of a reference 70 kg adult man over 22 days
GBq=gigabecquerels. 1 Bq=1 dissociation per second (releasing one alpha particle per second, with associated low-yield
following the ingestion of 4·4 GBq of ²¹⁰Po (table 3). [10–⁵] gamma rays). 1 Gy=1 joule per kg.
Radiation doses causing lethal damage to body organs are
Table 3: Cumulative doses to organs or tissues of a reference adult man after ingestion of 4·4 GBq of
generally quantified in terms of the lethal dose of acute
polonium-210, assuming 10% absorption to blood
gamma radiation estimated to kill 50% of people exposed
in this way (lethal dose 50 [LD50] values), with
corresponding LD0–LD100 ranges. Doses necessary to 803 keV gamma rays. It has a half-life of 138 days and high
cause prodromal symptoms of vomiting and diarrhoea specific activity, so that a very small mass corresponds to a
are expressed as effective doses (however, it should be high amount of radioactivity. Human beings are constantly
noted that LD and effective dose [ED] are toxicological exposed to ²¹⁰Po, which occurs at low concentrations in the
terms and ED should not to be confused with the environment as part of the uranium decay chain. However,
radiation protection quantity of effective dose). When annual intake from natural sources is about 10⁸ times less
estimating values for ²¹⁰Po, it was necessary to take than the intake estimated in our patient at around 4 GBq.
account of the reduced effectiveness of protracted Polonium is used in various industrial processes and as
irradiation and the greater damage caused per Gy by a power supply in small satellites, but its manufacture
alpha particles compared with gamma rays (ie, the relative requires sophisticated equipment. It is, therefore, not
biological effectiveness for alpha particles is >1). Taking widely available, but it is an effective poison. It forms
account of dose protraction and assuming a relative water-soluble, colourless salts that are readily absorbed
biological effectiveness of 2, the ED0 and ED50 values for across biological membranes, becoming widely dis-
vomiting and diarrhoea were estimated to be about tributed in body organs and tissues where the alpha
0·6–0·8 Gy and 7 Gy, respectively.4 Therefore, our particles deliver a large amount of energy to surrounding
estimated dose rate to all regions of the gut of about cells, causing cell death and organ damage. Early
0·2 Gy per day for the first few days after intake (table 3) symptoms of ²¹⁰Po poisoning are indistinguishable from
does not seem to be sufficient to cause the prodromal those of a wide range of chemical toxins. Therefore, the
symptoms the patient experienced. However, the model diagnosis can be delayed and even missed without a high
might have underestimated gut doses, especially since degree of suspicion. Furthermore, ²¹⁰Po can be transported
data from animals suggest that a proportion of ingested easily and safely without detection because its high-energy
²¹⁰Po is retained in the gastric and intestinal mucosa.4 alpha particles have a short range and can be blocked by
Alternatively, these symptoms might have been caused by quite a thin barrier, such as the skin, and the associated
or compounded by infection with C difficile or a gamma-ray emissions are very low yield. Hence, the
cumulative radiation dose delivered by the radiotoxin in Geiger counter used in this case was unable to detect the
the gut lumen as well as that absorbed into the radiation emitted by ²¹⁰Po. Alpha-particle spectroscopy is
bloodstream. By contrast, the estimated dose to the red the best way to test for radiotoxins such as ²¹⁰Po that emit
bone marrow was about 6 Gy after 1 week, rising to 17 Gy alpha particles. However, these devices are not readily
after 22 days. The estimated radiation doses to the liver available in most hospitals.
and kidneys were also very high—about 5 Gy to the liver Reports of ²¹⁰Po poisoning in human beings are scarce;
and 9 Gy to the kidneys per day over the first few days and a Russian accident case involving inhalation of an aerosol
reaching 92 Gy and 140 Gy, respectively, after 22 days. of ²¹⁰Po at a dose of about 530 MBq ²¹⁰Po resulted in death
in 13 days.4,5 However, the timecourse of rapid clinical
Discussion deterioration observed in our patient, resulting in death
Polonium-210 is a naturally occurring radioactive element within 23 days, is consistent with animal data for several
that was discovered in 1898 by Marie Curie. It decays to mammalian species.4 Aside from the gastrointestinal tract,
stable lead-206 by emitting one alpha particle, with the bone marrow was one of the first organ systems to be
occasional excitation in the nucleus and emission of damaged. From an initial neutrophilia, a feature of acute
radiation injury,6 the neutrophil count fell rapidly over a future would need a high degree of clinical suspicion and
2-week period. The LD50 for the bone marrow was investment in sensitive detection instrumentation by
estimated to be about 3 Gy, with an LD0–LD100 range of hospitals. However, such cases would remain untreatable
1–4 Gy. Our calculations indicate that the LD100 value for without research into effective antidotes that reduce levels
the red bone marrow was exceeded after 5 days (table 3), and biodistribution of ²¹⁰Po, and limit the extent of organ
causing irreversible damage to the haemopoietic stem cell damage. Nevertheless, early diagnosis of poisoning with
and stromal compartments.4 At substantially lower doses radiotoxin is important to maximise the potential for
of ²¹⁰Po, transplanted progenitor cells might provide effective treatment and enable appropriate precautions to
transient support but animal data suggest that death in be taken to protect hospital staff.
such a setting can occur later, mainly as a consequence of Contributors
radiation damage to the kidneys.7 Similarly, the estimated ACN, NG, DL, and JDH collated all the data and prepared the first draft
LD50 value for acute kidney damage was 6 Gy, with a of the report. ACN provided the University College London Hospital
clinical data for the patient. JFD, JG, JY, and ACN provided the data
corresponding value for liver failure of 8 Gy. Our estimates relating to the intensive treatment unit management of the patient.
of the cumulative dose delivered to the kidney and liver PID provided toxicology input. JDH provided the polonium-210
were 44 and 28 Gy, respectively, at day 5. Hence, the wide biodistribution and dosimetry data. AV provided data from the initial
distribution of ²¹⁰Po probably resulted in the delivery of management of the patient in Barnet General Hospital.
lethal radiation doses to several organs early after intake. Declaration of interests
Several chelating agents have been assessed in animal We declare no competing interests.
models of ²¹⁰Po poisoning to reduce organ retention Acknowledgments
and enhance excretion.8,9 Unithiol (sodium 2,3-dimer- This work was supported by the UK NHS, Public Health England, and
the UK Department of Health. We thank the staff of Public Health
captopropane-1-sulphonate) has been used in children England (formerly of the Health Protection Agency) for polonium-210
accidentally exposed to ²¹⁰Po in the former Soviet Union10 measurements and dose calculations. We are grateful to Mike Holland
and has recently been given to two individuals thought to for his assistance with the writing and formating of the final report.
have been exposed at around the same time as The high global media coverage and unique circumstances of this case
preclude the customary patient anonymity. This report has been
Mr Litvinenko: both survived, but both had received published with the agreement of the patient’s relatives.
much lower doses of ²¹⁰Po than our patient. Animal data
References
suggest that chelation can reduce ²¹⁰Po retention in the 1 International Commission on Radiological Protection.
blood, spleen, and bone, although this might be Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological
protection: reference values. ICRP Publication 89, report no. 32
associated with increased retention in the kidneys and (3–4). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2002.
the brain. Typically, the amounts used in animal studies 2 Leggett RW, Eckerman KF. A systemic biokinetic model for
are higher than recommended for administration to polonium. Sci Total Environ 2001; 275: 109–25.
human beings. 3 Fellman A, Ralston L, Hickman D, Ayres L, Cohen N.
Polonium metabolism in adult female baboons. Radiat Res 1994;
137: 238–50.
Conclusion 4 Harrison J, Leggett R, Lloyd D, Phipps A, Scott B. Polonium-210 as
This case has raised our awareness of the possibility that a poison. J Radiol Prot 2007; 27: 17–40.
radioactive materials can be used as poisons with 5 Ilyin LA. Radiation medicine guidance for medical researchers and
health management. Radiation damage of humans. Volume 2.
catastrophic effect. Importantly, early symptoms of ²¹⁰Po Bushmanov AY, Grigoriev YG, Guskova AK, et al, eds. Moscow:
poisoning were indistinguishable from those of a wide AT, 2001.
range of chemical toxins, including thallium, thus causing 6 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic
Radiation (UNSCEAR). 1988 Report to the General Assembly with
a delay in diagnosis. Additionally, body surface scanning Annexes. Annex G. Early effects in man of high doses of radiation.
with a standard Geiger counter was unable to detect the New York: United Nations, 1988.
alpha radiation emitted by ²¹⁰Po. Nevertheless, an atypical 7 Bruenger FW, Lloyd RD, Taylor GN, Miller SC, Mays CW.
Kidney disease in beagles injected with polonium-210. Radiat Res
clinical course, including mucositis, alopecia, and bone 1990; 122: 241–51.
marrow failure, prompted active consideration of 8 Gerber GB, Thomas RG, eds. Guidebook for the treatment of
poisoning with radioactive material, with the diagnosis accidental internal radionuclide contamination of workers.
Report no. 41. Ashford, UK: Nuclear Technology Publishing, 1992.
ultimately being made with gamma-ray spectroscopy of a 9 Jefferson RD, Goans RE, Blain PG, Thomas SH. Diagnosis and
urine sample. An earlier diagnosis in our patient would treatment of polonium poisoning. Clin Toxicol 2009; 47: 379–92.
not have enabled him to survive because the high amount 10 Guskova AK, Drutman RD, Malysheva MS, Soldatova VA.
of ²¹⁰Po absorbed and distributed to body organs within Dose assessment and the possibility of clinical recognition of
disease associated with the ingestion of ²¹⁰Po into the human body.
hours of intake would have resulted in rapid cell death and Med Radiol 1964; 62: 51–60.
multiple organ failure. Preparedness for such cases in the