Understanding SIP

Dorgham Sisalem
Jiri Kuthan
Mobile Integrated Services
GMD Fokus
Sisalem,[email protected]
Attention!
a Update Notice
Authors are committed to ongoing improvement of this tutorial.
Thus, this version may include updates and differ slightly from
printed version. You can get the updated version at the following
address:
http://www.fokus.gmd.de/mobis/siptutorial/

a Frequent Misunderstandings
There are numerous issues that turned out to be difficult to
understand. Such issues are labeled with the symbol bellow. Please,
pay special attention to them.
Frequently
Misunderstood
Issue
Outline

a It’s IP Telephony a Mobility and 3gpp

a Who is who a SIP vs H.323
a IP Telephony Basics a Robustness
`Protocol ZOO a Security
`SIP Signaling
a Legacy
`Multimedia Communication
a Political Issues
a Advanced Signaling
a Status Update
`Programmability
`QoS Preconditions a Conclusions
a References
The Big FAQ

a Q: You are too IP-centric, aren’t you?

a A: Of course, we are.

a Internet telephony (which has Internet in its name) is

about IP.
`IP telephony runs on top of IP and utilizes the IP service model.
`It is not about re-engineering PSTN -- PSTN is good enough.

a SIP is much more similar to HTTP rather than to legacy

signaling both in terms of service model and protocol
design.
Appeals of IP Telephony
aSaving, but ...
_lower QoS
_Telcos lower prices (1998: Berlin-Prague, 99 Pf/Min, 1999:
39 Pf/Min, 2000: 32 Pf/Min call-by-call, 23 Pf/Min
preselection)
aInternet Service integration
`IP is the first true Integrated Services Digital
Network
`Major argument: convenience
aIn IP, you are your own master
`Open service market: access providers located across
the globe; even you can be a provider.
`Programmability: programs by user as well as third
parties.
Integrated Applications

a Distributed games a Video conferencing

`SIP Quake sighted! a Instant Messaging
a Virtual reality `voicemail notifications
a Web-pages and applets `stock notifications
`callback notification
a Links in e-mails
a Web-IVRs a Calendars
`pre-setup conference calls
a Click-to-dial
a Unified Messaging
a Directory Services
`voicemail2email

etc.
IP Service Model
a Split of Transport and Application Services
`these are different businesses run on top of different
technologies
`service promiscuity: anyone can access services brought by any
providers
`anyone with IP connectivity can become a provider
`setting up a signaling service as easy setting up a web server
¿ service market is completely open
`Applications Are Split As Well
`Example:
`IP operated by UUNET
`SIP signaling by WCOM
`PSTN call termination by mypstn.com and another-pstn.xy
`least-cost PSTN termination routing by yet another company
Example: Trial Site
a Provides just signaling services
` gives users a unique globally reachable address
` resembles Web-hosting in IP world or NetCentrex in PSTN world
` no media transport -- only signaling relayed, media does not hit the
server at all
a To set it up, we needed
` PC
` Freely available software
` IP access
` one part-time undergraduate student
a Users need
` IP phone (either in SW or HW)
a Complimentary services may be easily provided by other parties,
users just need to set up their signaling preferences:
` bridging to PSTN, voicemail--2-email, etc.
IP Design Concepts

a Distributed end-2-end design

a Intelligence and states resides in end-devices
a Network maintains almost zero intelligence (except
routing) and state (except routing tables).
a End-devices speak to each other using whatever
applications they have. There is almost no logic in the
network affecting this behavior.
a Result:
`Flexibility. Introducing new applications is easy.
`Failure recovery. No state, no problem on failure.
`Scalability. No state, no memory scalability issues.
Who is Who
Who Engineers the Internet

aInternet Engineering Task Force (www.ietf.org)

a“large open international community of network
designers, operators, vendors, and researchers
concerned with the evolution of the Internet
architecture and the smooth operation of the
Internet. It is open to any interested individual.”
aIETF’s business:
`Design and standardization of interoperable protocols
`Almost anything else out of scope: deployment,
promotion, API specification, etc.
IETF - Standardization
Procedure (RFC 2026)
a Much of the work is handled via mailing lists. The IETF
holds meetings three times per year
a Proposals submitted for discussion as Internet Drafts. If
approved they are published as RFCs.
a No formal voting -- rough consensus
a RFC
`Most of them are NOT standards - informational, experimental,
historic, funny (Check April 1st ones (RFC 1149)).
`Published RFCs never change.
`multiple instances of running code required before standardizing
a New topic Î BOF
Concepts of the Internet
Design (RFC 1958, 2775)
a Single inter-networking protocol deployed end2end
a State stored only in end-devices, no single point of failure, scalable
core, higher message overhead
` example: TCP cb stored only in end-devices; no TCP state in routers
(per-link reliability would not solve the e2e problem)
a Keep it simple and stupid (avoid options and parameters)
a Be conservative when sending and liberal when receiving.
a Performance and cost subject to consideration
a Modularity is good. (Puzzle/LEGO concept)
a Distributed design
a Some of current technical triggers: IPv4 scaling limits, gigabit
speeds, QoS, security
Advantages of the IETF
Standardization Process

aAnyone can join both actively and

passively and contribute to quality of
standards.
aStandards available for free.
aLong years of Internet engineering
practice.
Related IETF Working
Groups
a SIP: Session Initiation Protocol
a IPTEL: Internet Telephony
a AVT: Audio Video Transport
a MIDCOM: Firewall/NAT Traversal
a SIMPLE: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence
Leveraging
a MMUSIC: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control
a QoS Related: DiffServ, IntServ, RSVP
a PSTN legacy: SigTran, Megaco
a interaction of PSTN and IP services: PINT,SPIRITS
Other Related Bodies

a Third Generation Partnership Project (3gpp)

`creation of technical specifications for 3rd generation mobile
systems
`uses SIP as call signaling in IP networks
a ITU-T SG 16
`H.323 V1-V4 umbrella standard
`H.248 (Megaco)
a ETSI Tiphon
`concerned with IP/PSTN interoperability
`analysis of security threats, Open Settlement Protocol
Other Related Bodies (cont.)

aSIP Forum for promotion of SIP

technology
aIMTC concerned with interoperability
aPacketCable established by CableLabs to
look at cable technologies
aTelecommunications Industry Association
(TIA) involved in layers bellow IP
aSoftswitch promoting IN replicas in IP
Other Related Bodies (cont.)

a The list still goes on...

aJAIN developing abstract APIs for developing
service creations across PSTN, ATM, IP, etc.
aTIPIA
aTTL
aVoiceXML Forum
Protocol ZOO
 Internet Telephony
aRouting a call over the Internet

™PC-to-PC (MS NetMeeting, appliances)

Internet
IP Phone
™PC-to-phone (net2phone.com)
Internet
IP Phone
Egress PSTN Gateway PSTN Phone
™phone-to-phone (Paegas)
Internet

PSTN Phone Egress PSTN Gateway

Ingress PSTN Gateway PSTN Phone
™phone-to-PC as well
What Protocols Are
Needed?

aSignaling protocol to establish presence,

locate users, set up, modify and tear
down sessions
aMedia Transport Protocols for
transmission of packetized audio/video
aSupporting Protocols
`Gateway Location, QoS, interdomain AAA*,
address translation, IP, etc.
* AAA = Authentication, Authorization, Accounting
What Protocols Are There
a Signaling: SIP/SDP (IETF), H.323 (ITU-T)
` Note: SIP adopted by 3gpp; lower production and operation costs
reported
a Media: RTP (IETF’s, adopted by ITU-T)
a Transport: UDP, TCP, (Stream Control Transmission Protocol - RFC
2960)
a Supporting protocols:
` DNS
` TRIP - Telephony Routing over IP - discovery and exchange of IP
telephony gateway routing tables between providers
` RSVP - Resource Reservation Setup Protocol
` COPS - Common Open Policy Service - protocol for for supporting policy
control over QoS
` Diameter - Authentication, Accounting, Authorization
Protocol ZOO

Source: Henning Schulzrinne,

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/internet/
SIP Signaling
Session Initiation Protocol
aSIP is end-to-end, client-server session signaling
protocol
`SIP’s primarily provides presence and mobility
`Protocol primitives: Session setup, termination,
changes
aArbitrary services built on top of SIP, e.g.:
`Redirect calls from unknown callers to secretary
`Reply with a webpage if unavailable
`Send a JPEG on invitation
aFeatures:
`Textual encoding (telnet, tcpdump compatible)
`Programmability
SIP - General Purpose
Presence Protocol
a SIP is not limited to Internet telephony
`SIP establishes user presence
`SIP messages can convey arbitrary signaling payload: session
description, instant messages, JPEGs, any MIME types
a Suitable for applications having a notion of session
`distributed virtual reality systems,
`network games (Quake II/III implementations),
`video conferencing, etc.
a Applications may leverage SIP infrastructure (Call Processing, User
Location, Authentication)
`Instant Messaging and Presence
`SIP for Appliances
SIP Is Not
a Transport Protocol
a QoS Reservation Protocol
a Gateway Control Protocol

a Some argue it may be used for accessing IP-enabled

appliances ...
a It does NOT dictate ...
`Product features and services (color of your phone
and distinctive ringing melodies, number of
simultaneous calls your phone can handle, don’t
disturb feature, ...)
`network configuration
SIP History
a Work began in 1995 in IETF mmusic WG
a 02/1996: draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-00: 15 ASCII pages, one request type
a 12/1996: -01 30 ASCII pages, 2 request types
a 01/1999: -12 149 ASCII pages, 6 methods
a 03/1999: RFC 2543, 153 ASCII pages, 6 methods
a 11/1999: SIP WG formed
a 11/2000: draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-02, 171 ASCII pages, 6 methods
a 12/2000: it was recognized that amount of work at SIP WG was becoming
unmanageable; 1 RFC; 18 I-Ds on WG’s agenda; numerous individual
submissions
a 04/2001: proposal for splitting SIP WG into SIP and SIPPING announced

a 2001: SIP implementations widely available

` http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/sip/implementations.html
` http://www.pulver.com/sip/products.html
SIP End-devices

a User Agent (user application)

`UA Client (originates calls)
`UA Server (listens for incoming calls)
`both SW and HW available
SIP Workhorses

a SIP Proxy Server

`relays call signaling, i.e. acts as both client and server
`operates in a transactional manner, i.e., it keeps no session
state
a SIP Redirect Server
`redirects callers to other servers
a SIP Registrar
`accept registration requests from users
`maintains user’s whereabouts at a Location Server (like GSM
HLR)
 SIP Addresses
a SIP gives you a globally reachable address.
` Callees bind to this address using SIP REGISTER method.
` Callers use this address to establish real-time communication with callees.
a URLs used as address data format; examples:
`sip:[email protected]
`sip:[email protected]?subject=callme
`sip:[email protected]; geo.position:=48.54_-123.84_120
a must include host, may include user name, port number, parameters
(e.g., transport), etc.
a may be embedded in Webpages, email signatures, printed on your
business card, etc.
a address space unlimited
a non-SIP URLs can be used as well (mailto:, http:, ...)
SIP Registration
This registration example
Location Server establishes presence of
user with address [email protected]
Jiri @ 195.37.78.173

and binds this address to user’s

current location 195.37.78.173.
#2

REGISTER sip:iptel.org SIP/2.0

From: sip:[email protected]
To: sip:[email protected] #1
Contact: <sip:195.37.78.173>
Expires: 3600

#3 SIP/2.0 200 OK
SIP Registrar
(domain iptel.org)
 SIP Operation in Proxy
Mode
Location Server
#0

[email protected]
DNS SRV Query ? iptel.org #2 #3
Reply: IP Address of iptel.org SIP Server
INVITE sip:[email protected]

jiri
INVITE sip:[email protected] From: sip:[email protected]
From: sip:[email protected] To: sip: [email protected] #4
To: sip: [email protected] #1 Call-ID: [email protected]
Call-ID: [email protected]

OK 200 OK 200
#6
From: sip:[email protected] From: sip:[email protected] #5
To: sip: [email protected] Proxy To: sip: [email protected]
Call-ID: [email protected] Call-ID: [email protected]

#7 ACK sip:[email protected]

[email protected] sip:[email protected]

Media streams #8
Proxy Server Functionality

a Serve as rendezvous point at which callees are globally

reachable
a Perform routing function, i.e., determine to which hop
(UA/proxy/redirect) signaling should be relayed
a Allow the routing function to be programmable.
Arbitrary logic may be built on top of the protocol
`user’s signaling preferences
`AAA
`firewall control
`etc.
a Forking: Several destinations may be tried for a request
sequentially or in parallel.
Proxy Chaining
a There may be also cases when a local outbound proxy
may be involved
`provides locally important call processing logic (e.g., identifying
nearest 911)
`manages firewall
`provides least-gateway-cost routing service
`IP phones must know address of the proxy:may be configured
manually or with a configuration protocol (DHCP, TFTP, ... )
a In general, servers may be arbitrarily chained
`a central company’s server may distribute signaling to
departmental servers
`a user may want to forward incoming calls to her cell phone
a Servers have to avoid loops and recognize spirals
 Proxy Chaining - an Example
Caller’s administrative domain Administrative domain of a PSTN gateway operator
gw01.asia.pstn.com
pstn.com asia.pstn.com

#2 #3 #4
#1

Caller’s outbound Destination’s Proxy in the target

proxy accomplishes “first-hit proxy” area distributes load
firewall traversal. identifies a proxy in a gateway farm.
serving dialed
area.
Note: signaling (in red) may take a completely different
path from media (in blue).
“Stateful” Proxy Refers to
Transactions
SIP state a If a proxy is stateful it keeps state
forgotten during a SIP transaction and
as soon as completely forgets it afterwards.
transaction over
a A SIP proxy is not aware of
existing calls
INVITE a Unless route recording is used,
BYE may take a completely
[email protected] different path (I.e., cannot be
expected to terminate the state.)
OK a Theoretically, there may be
session state as well. Unless there
is a well defined use of it, it
Legend indicates unscalable
SIP signaling implementation.
SIP state Frequently
Misunderstood
media
Issue
Subsequent Transactions
Bypass Proxy
a Unless route recording is used,
BYE may take a completely
different path to destination
indicated in Contact: header
field.
OK
Contact:
INVITE
sip:[email protected]

BYE takes
direct path
Frequently
Misunderstood
Issue
 SIP Operation in Redirect
Mode
Location Server
#2

[email protected]
Callee
#3

[email protected]
#1 INVITE [email protected]

302 moved temporarily

#4
Contact: [email protected]
Proxy
#5 ACK [email protected]

[email protected]
#6 INVITE [email protected]

#7 OK 200

#8 ACK [email protected]
SIP Server -- Proxy versus
Redirection

a A SIP server may either proxy or redirect a request

a Which of the two method applies is a configuration
issue. It may be statically configured or dynamically
determined (CPL).
a Redirection useful if a user moves or changes her
provider (PSTN: “The number you have dialed is not
available.”) -- caller does not need to try the original
server next time. Stateless.
a Proxy useful if forking, AAA, firewall control needed. In
general, proxying grants more control to the server.
SIP RFC2543 Methods
aINVITE initiates sessions
`session description included in message body
`re-INVITEs used to change session state
aACK confirms session establishment
`can only be used with INVITE
aBYE terminates sessions
aCANCEL cancels a pending INVITE
aOPTIONS capability inquiry
aREGISTER binds a permanent address to current
location; may convey user data (CPL scripts)
SIP Extension Methods

a INFO mid-call signaling

(RFC 2976)
a COMET precondition met
(draft-ietf-sip-manyfolks-resource)
a PRACK provisional reliable responses
acknowledgement
(draft-ietf-sip-100rel)
a SUBSCRIBE/ instant messaging
NOTIFY/ (draft-rosenberg-impp-*)
MESSAGE
SIP Response Codes
a Borrowed from HTTP: xyz explanatory text
a Receivers need to understand x
a x80 and higher codes avoid conflicts with future HTTP
response codes
a 1yz Informational
`100 Trying
`180 Ringing (processed locally)
`181 Call is Being Forwarded
a 2yz Success
`200 ok
a 3yz Redirection
`300 Multiple Choices
`301 Moved Permanently
`302 Moved Temporarily
SIP Response Codes
(cont.)

a4yz Client error

`400 Bad Request
`401 Unauthorized
`482 Loop Detected
`486 Busy Here
a5yz Server failure
`500 Server Internal Error
a6yz Global Failure
`600 Busy Everywhere
 SIP Message Structure
Request Method Response Status
INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP here.com:5060 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP here.com:5060
From: BigGuy <sip:[email protected]> From: BigGuy <sip:[email protected]>
To: LittleGuy <sip:[email protected]> To: LittleGuy <sip:[email protected]>;tag=65a35
Call-ID: [email protected] Message Call-ID: [email protected]
CSeq: 1 INVITE Header CSeq: 1 INVITE
Subject: Happy Christmas Fields Subject: Happy Christmas
Contact: BigGuy <sip:[email protected]> Contact: LittleGuy <sip:[email protected]>
Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 147 Content-Length: 134

v=0 v=0
o=UserA 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 here.com o=UserB 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 there.com
s=Session SDP s=Session SDP
c=IN IP4 100.101.102.103 c=IN IP4 110.111.112.113
t=0 0 t=0 0
m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0
Payload m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

“receive RTP G.711-encoded audio at

100.101.102.103:49172”
Session Description
Protocol (SDP)

aConvey sufficient information to enable

participation in a multimedia session
aSDP includes description of:
`Media to use (codec, sampling rate)
`Media destination (IP address and port number)
`Session name and purpose
`Times the session is active
`Contact information
aNote: indeed SDP is a data format rather than a
protocol.
Session Description
Protocol (SDP)

v=0
o=sisalem 28908044538 289080890 IN IP4 193.175.132.118
s=SIP Tutorial
[email protected]
c=IN IP4 126.16.69.4
t=28908044900 28908045000
m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0 98
a=rtpmap:98 L16/11025/2
Address Header Fields
a From: message originator
a To: final recipient
a Request-URI: current destination; may change along signaling path
a Contact: appears in INVITE / OPTIONS / ACK / REGISTER requests and in
responses. It indicates direct response address to which subsequent
transactions are sent.
` A UA may send subsequent BYE or ACK to Contact: address (unless configured
to use an outbound proxy).
` It includes redirection address in 3xx and 485 responses.
` It includes additional error information in 4xx, 5xx, and 6xx responses.
` It may include preference weights.
` It includes current location in REGISTER requests.
` Multiple Contact: header fields may be included.
SIP Protocol Design
a Infrastructure follows IP state model
`Most intelligence and state in the end-devices
`Network core maintains at most transactional state
`Network edge may maintain session state
`Benefits: memory and CPU consumption low in
servers, reliability and scalability high (no single point
of failure)
a UDP Support
`faster set-up, less state
a Idempotent INVITEs (no collection of data spanning
multiple requests)