Aha 2018 Stroke

AHA/ASA Guideline
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients

With Acute Ischemic Stroke
A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association
Reviewed for evidence-based integrity and endorsed by the American Association of Neurological
Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Endorsed by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
William J. Powers, MD, FAHA, Chair; Alejandro A. Rabinstein, MD, FAHA, Vice Chair;
Teri Ackerson, BSN, RN; Opeolu M. Adeoye, MD, MS, FAHA;
Nicholas C. Bambakidis, MD, FAHA; Kyra Becker, MD, FAHA; José Biller, MD, FAHA;
Michael Brown, MD, MSc; Bart M. Demaerschalk, MD, MSc, FAHA; Brian Hoh, MD, FAHA;
Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on April 22, 2018
Edward C. Jauch, MD, MS, FAHA; Chelsea S. Kidwell, MD, FAHA;

Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi, MD; Bruce Ovbiagele, MD, MSc, MAS, MBA, FAHA;
Phillip A. Scott, MD, MBA, FAHA; Kevin N. Sheth, MD, FAHA;
Andrew M. Southerland, MD, MSc; Deborah V. Summers, MSN, RN, FAHA;
David L. Tirschwell, MD, MSc, FAHA; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council
Background and Purpose—The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations
for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke in a single document. The intended audiences
are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators. These guidelines
supersede the 2013 guidelines and subsequent updates.
Methods—Members of the writing group were appointed by the American Heart Association Stroke Council’s Scientific
Statements Oversight Committee, representing various areas of medical expertise. Strict adherence to the American
Heart Association conflict of interest policy was maintained. Members were not allowed to participate in discussions or
to vote on topics relevant to their relations with industry. The members of the writing group unanimously approved all
recommendations except when relations with industry precluded members voting. Prerelease review of the draft guideline
was performed by 4 expert peer reviewers and by the members of the Stroke Council’s Scientific Statements Oversight
The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside
relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are
required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of
interest.
This guideline was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee on November 29, 2017, and the American
Heart Association Executive Committee on December 11, 2017. A copy of the document is available at http://professional.heart.org/statements by using
either “Search for Guidelines & Statements” or the “Browse by Topic” area. To purchase additional reprints, call 843-216-2533 or e-mail kelle.ramsay@
wolterskluwer.com.
Data Supplement 1 (Evidence Tables) is available with this article at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000158/-/DC1.
Data Supplement 2 (Literature Search) is available with this article at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000158/-/DC2.
The American Heart Association requests that this document be cited as follows: Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC,
Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM,
Summers DV, Tirschwell DL; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with
acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:eXXX–
eXXX. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.
The expert peer review of AHA-commissioned documents (eg, scientific statements, clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews) is conducted by
the AHA Office of Science Operations. For more on AHA statements and guidelines development, visit http://professional.heart.org/statements. Select the
“Guidelines & Statements” drop-down menu, then click “Publication Development.”
Permissions: Multiple copies, modification, alteration, enhancement, and/or distribution of this document are not permitted without the express
permission of the American Heart Association. Instructions for obtaining permission are located at http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/General/
Copyright-Permission-Guidelines_UCM_300404_Article.jsp. A link to the “Copyright Permissions Request Form” appears on the right side of
the page.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
Stroke is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158
e1
e2 Stroke March 2018
Committee and Stroke Council Leadership Committee. These guidelines use the American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association 2015 Class of Recommendations and Levels of Evidence and the new American Heart
Association guidelines format.
Results—These guidelines detail prehospital care, urgent and emergency evaluation and treatment with intravenous and
intra-arterial therapies, and in-hospital management, including secondary prevention measures that are appropriately
instituted within the first 2 weeks. The guidelines support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care in both the
prehospital and hospital settings.
Conclusions—These guidelines are based on the best evidence currently available. In many instances, however,
only limited data exist demonstrating the urgent need for continued research on treatment of acute ischemic
stroke. (Stroke. 2018;49:eXXX–eXXX. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.)
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements ◼ secondary prevention ◼ stroke ◼ therapeutics
N ew high-quality evidence has produced major changes

in the evidence-based treatment of patients with acute
ischemic stroke (AIS) since the publication of the most
These guidelines use the American College of Cardiology
(ACC)/AHA 2015 Class of Recommendations (COR) and
Levels of Evidence (LOE) (Table 1) and the new AHA guide-
recent “Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients lines format. New or revised recommendations that supersede
With Acute Ischemic Stroke” in 2013.1 Much of this new previous guideline recommendations are accompanied by
evidence has been incorporated into American Heart 250-word knowledge bytes and data supplement tables sum-
Association (AHA) focused updates, guidelines, or scientific marizing the key studies supporting the recommendations in
statements on specific topics relating to the management of place of extensive text. Existing recommendations that are
patients with AIS since 2013. The purpose of these guide- unchanged are reiterated with reference to the previous pub-
lines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of rec- lication. These previous publications and their abbreviations
ommendations for clinicians caring for adult patients with used in this document are listed in Table 2. When there is no
acute arterial ischemic stroke in a single document. These new pertinent evidence, for these unchanged recommenda-
guidelines address prehospital care, urgent and emergency tions, no knowledge byte or data supplement is provided. For
evaluation and treatment with intravenous (IV) and intra- some unchanged recommendations, there are new pertinent
arterial therapies, and in-hospital management, including data that support the existing recommendation, and these are
secondary prevention measures that are often begun during provided. Additional abbreviations used in this guideline are
the initial hospitalization. We have restricted our recommen- listed in Table 3.
dations to adults and to secondary prevention measures that Members of the writing group were appointed by the AHA
are appropriately instituted within the first 2 weeks. We have Stroke Council’s Scientific Statements Oversight Committee,
not included recommendations for cerebral venous sinus representing various areas of medical expertise. Strict adher-
thrombosis because they were covered in a 2011 scientific ence to the AHA conflict of interest policy was maintained
statement and there is no new evidence that would change throughout the writing and consensus process. Members were
those conclusions.2 not allowed to participate in discussions or to vote on topics
An independent evidence review committee was commis- relevant to their relationships with industry. Writing group
sioned to perform a systematic review of a limited number of members accepted topics relevant to their areas of expertise,
clinical questions identified in conjunction with the writing reviewed the stroke literature with emphasis on publications
group, the results of which were considered by the writing since the prior guidelines, and drafted recommendations. Draft
group for incorporation into this guideline. The systematic recommendations and supporting evidence were discussed by
reviews “Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing the writing group, and the revised recommendations for each
Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected topic were reviewed by a designated writing group member.
Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the The full writing group then evaluated the complete guidelines.
Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke”3 The members of the writing group unanimously approved all
and “Effect of Dysphagia Screening Strategies on Clinical recommendations except when relationships with industry pre-
Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 cluded members voting. Prerelease review of the draft guideline
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute was performed by 4 expert peer reviewers and by the mem-
Ischemic Stroke”4 are published in conjunction with this bers of the Stroke Council’s Scientific Statements Oversight
guideline. Committee and Stroke Council Leadership Committee.
Powers et al 2018 Guidelines for Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke e3
Table 1. Applying ACC/AHA Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence to Clinical Strategies, Interventions, Treatments, or
Diagnostic Testing in Patient Care* (Updated August 2015)
Table 2. Guidelines, Policies, and Statements Relevant to the Management of AIS
Publication Abbreviation Used
Document Title Year in This Document
“Recommendations for the Implementation of Telemedicine Within Stroke Systems of Care: A Policy 2009 N/A
Statement From the American Heart Association”5
“Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare 2013 2013 AIS Guidelines
Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association”1
“Interactions Within Stroke Systems of Care: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association/ 2013 2013 Stroke Systems of Care
American Stroke Association”6
“2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular 2013 2013 Cholesterol Guidelines
Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines”7
“2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary: 2014 N/A
A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice
Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society”8
“Recommendations for the Management of Cerebral and Cerebellar Infarction With Swelling: A Statement 2014 2014 Cerebral Edema
for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association”9
“Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American 2014 2014 Palliative Care
Heart Association/American Stroke Association”10
“Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline 2014 2014 Secondary Prevention
“Clinical Performance Measures for Adults Hospitalized With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Performance Measures 2014 N/A
“Part 15: First Aid: 2015 American Heart Association and American Red Cross Guidelines Update for 2015 2015 CPR/ECC
First Aid”13
“2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines 2015 2015 Endovascular
for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment:
A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association”14
“Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic 2015 2015 IV Alteplase
Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association”15
“Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the 2016 2016 Rehab Guidelines
American Heart Association/American Stroke Association”16
ACC indicates American College of Cardiology; AHA, American Heart Association; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECC, emergency
cardiovascular care; HRS, Heart Rhythm Society; IV, intravenous; and N/A, not applicable.
Table 3. Abbreviations in This Guideline Table 3. Continued

ACC American College of Cardiology ICH Intracerebral hemorrhage
AHA American Heart Association IPC Intermittent pneumatic compression
AIS Acute ischemic stroke IV Intravenous
ARD Absolute risk difference LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
ASCVD Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease LMWH Low-molecular-weight heparin
ASPECTS Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography LOE Level of evidence
Score LVO Large vessel occlusion
BP Blood pressure M1 Middle cerebral artery segment 1
CEA Carotid endarterectomy M2 Middle cerebral artery segment 2
CeAD Cervical artery dissection M3 Middle cerebral artery segment 3
CI Confidence interval MCA Middle cerebral artery
CMB Cerebral microbleed MI Myocardial infarction
COR Class of recommendation MRA Magnetic resonance angiography
CS Conscious sedation MRI Magnetic resonance imaging

CT Computed tomography mRS Modified Rankin Scale
CTA Computed tomographic angiography mTICI Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction
CTP Computed tomographic perfusion NCCT Noncontrast computed tomography
DTN Door-to-needle NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
DVT Deep vein thrombosis NINDS National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
DW-MRI Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging OR Odds ratio
ED Emergency department OSA Obstructive sleep apnea
EMS Emergency medical services RCT Randomized clinical trial
EVT Endovascular therapy RR Relative risk
GA General anesthesia rtPA recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator
GWTG Get With The Guidelines sICH Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage
HBO Hyperbaric oxygen TIA Transient ischemic attack
HR Hazard ratio TJC The Joint Commission
(Continued ) UFH Unfractionated heparin

1. Prehospital Stroke Management and Systems of Care

1.1. Prehospital Systems
1.1. Prehospital Systems COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Public health leaders, along with medical professionals and others, Recommendation revised from 2013 Stroke
should design and implement public education programs focused on Systems of Care. COR and LOE added.
stroke systems and the need to seek emergency care (by calling 9-1-1) I B-R
in a rapid manner. These programs should be sustained over time and
designed to reach racially/ethnically, age, and sex diverse populations.
Early stroke symptom recognition is essential for seeking timely care. Unfortunately, knowledge of stroke See Tables I and II in online Data Supplement 1.
warning signs and risk factors in the United States remains poor. Blacks and Hispanics particularly have
lower stroke awareness than the general population and are at increased risk of prehospital delays in seeking
care.17 These factors may contribute to the disparities in stroke outcomes. Available evidence suggests that
public awareness interventions are variably effective by age, sex, and racial/ethnic minority status.18 Thus,
stroke education campaigns should be designed in a targeted manner to optimize their effectiveness.18
2. Activation of the 9-1-1 system by patients or other members of the Recommendation and Class unchanged
public is strongly recommended. 9-1-1 dispatchers should make from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I B-NR
stroke a priority dispatch, and transport times should be minimized. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
Recommendation Classification System.
Emergency medical services (EMS) use by stroke patients has been independently associated with earlier See Table I in online Data Supplement 1.
emergency department (ED) arrival (onset-to-door time ≤3 hours; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.00; 95%
confidence interval [CI], 1.93–2.08), quicker ED evaluation (more patients with door-to-imaging time ≤25
minutes; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.78–2.00), more rapid treatment (more patients with door-to-needle [DTN] time
≤60 minutes; OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28–1.63), and more eligible patients being treated with alteplase if onset is
≤2 hours (67% versus 44%; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.33–1.64),18 yet only ≈60% of all stroke patients use EMS.19
Men, blacks, and Hispanics are less likely to use EMS.17,19 Thus, persistent efforts to ensure activation of the
9-1-1 or similar emergency system by patients or other members of the public in the case of a suspected stroke
are warranted.
3. To increase both the number of patients who are treated and the Recommendation and Class unchanged
quality of care, educational stroke programs for physicians, hospital from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I B-NR
personnel, and EMS personnel are recommended. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
On 9-1-1 activation, EMS dispatch and clinical personnel should prioritize the potential stroke case, minimize See Table I in online Data Supplement 1.
on-scene times, and transport the patient as quickly as possible to the most appropriate hospital. A recent
US-based analysis of EMS response times found that median EMS response time (9-1-1 call to ED arrival) in
184 179 cases in which EMS provider impression was stroke was 36 minutes (interquartile range, 28.7–48.0
minutes).20 On-scene time (median, 15 minutes) was the largest component of this time, and longer times were
noted for patients 65 to 74 years of age, whites, and women and in nonurban areas. Dispatch designation of
stroke was associated with minimally faster response times (36.0 versus 36.7 minutes; P<0.01). Notably, only
52% of cases were identified by dispatch as stroke.
1.2. EMS Assessment and Management

1.2. EMS Assessment and Management COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. The use of a stroke assessment system by first aid providers, Recommendation reworded for clarity from
including EMS dispatch personnel, is recommended. 2015 CPR/ECC. Class and LOE unchanged.
I B-NR
See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
for original wording.
2. EMS personnel should begin the initial management of stroke in Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
the field. Implementation of a stroke protocol to be used by EMS I B-NR Guidelines.
personnel is strongly encouraged.
In 1 study, the positive predictive value for a hospital discharge diagnosis of stroke/transient ischemic attack See Table III in online Data Supplement 1.
(TIA) among 900 cases for which EMS dispatch suspected stroke was 51% (95% CI, 47–54), and the positive
predictive value for ambulance personnel impression of stroke was 58% (95% CI, 52–64).21 In another study of
21 760 dispatches for stroke, the positive predictive value of the dispatch stroke/TIA symptoms identification
was 34.3% (95% CI, 33.7–35.0), and the sensitivity was 64.0% (95% CI, 63.0–64.9).22 In both cases, use of a
prehospital stroke scale improved stroke identification, but better stroke identification tools are needed in the
prehospital setting.
1.2. EMS Assessment and Management (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
3. EMS personnel should provide prehospital notification to the Recommendation reworded for clarity from
receiving hospital that a suspected stroke patient is en route so 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
that the appropriate hospital resources may be mobilized before amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
patient arrival. I B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
In the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) registry, EMS personnel provided prearrival notification to the destination ED See Table I in online Data Supplement 1.
for 67% of transported stroke patients. EMS prenotification was associated with increased likelihood of alteplase
treatment within 3 hours (82.8% versus 79.2%), shorter door-to-imaging times (26 versus 31 minutes), shorter
DTN times (78 versus 80 minutes), and shorter symptom onset-to-needle times (141 versus 145 minutes).23
1.3. EMS Systems

1.3. EMS Systems COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. EMS leaders, in coordination with local, regional, and state agencies Recommendation reworded for clarity from
and in consultation with medical authorities and local experts, should 2013 Stroke Systems of Care. Class and
develop triage paradigms and protocols to ensure that patients with a LOE added to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
known or suspected stroke are rapidly identified and assessed by use I B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
of a validated and standardized instrument for stroke screening, such See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
as the FAST (face, arm, speech test) scale, Los Angeles Prehospital for original wording.
Stroke Screen, or Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale.
See Table IV in online Data Supplement 1.
2. Regional systems of stroke care should be developed. These should Recommendation reworded for clarity
consist of the following: (a) Healthcare facilities that provide initial from 2015 Endovascular. Class and LOE
emergency care, including administration of IV alteplase, and, (b) unchanged.
I A
Centers capable of performing endovascular stroke treatment with See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
comprehensive periprocedural care to which rapid transport can be for original wording.
arranged when appropriate.
3. Patients with a positive stroke screen and/or a strong suspicion Recommendation reworded for clarity from
of stroke should be transported rapidly to the closest healthcare 2013 AIS Guidelines.
facilities that can capably administer IV alteplase. I B-NR
The 2013 recommendation referred to initial emergency care as described elsewhere in the guidelines, which
specified administration of IV alteplase as part of this care. The current recommendation is unchanged in intent
but reworded to make this clear.
4. When several IV alteplase–capable hospital options exist within a New recommendation.
defined geographic region, the benefit of bypassing the closest to bring
IIb B-NR
the patient to one that offers a higher level of stroke care, including
mechanical thrombectomy, is uncertain. Further research is needed.
At least 6 stroke severity scales targeted at recognition of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the prehospital setting See Table V in online Data Supplement 1.
to facilitate transfer to endovascular centers have been published.24–29 The performance of all available scales
based on published literature was recently compared.3 All the scales were initially derived from data sets of
confirmed stroke cases or selected prehospital cases, and there has been only limited study of their performance
in the prehospital setting. For prehospital patients with suspected LVO by a stroke severity scale, the Mission:
Lifeline Severity–based Stroke Triage Algorithm for EMS30 recommends direct transport to a comprehensive
stroke center if the travel time to the comprehensive stroke center is <15 additional minutes compared with
the travel time to the closest primary stroke center or acute stroke-ready hospital. However, at this time, there
is insufficient evidence to recommend 1 scale over the other or a specific threshold of additional travel time for
which bypass of a primary stroke center or acute stroke-ready hospital is justifiable. Given the known impact of
delays to IV alteplase on outcomes,31 the known impact of delays to mechanical thrombectomy on outcome,32
and the anticipated delays in transport for mechanical thrombectomy in eligible patients originally triaged to a
nonendovascular center, the Mission: Lifeline algorithm may be a reasonable guideline in some circumstances.
Customization of the guideline to optimize patient outcomes will be needed to account for local and regional
factors, including the availability of endovascular centers, door in–door out times for nonendovascular stroke
centers, interhospital transport times, and DTN and door-to-puncture times. Rapid, protected, collaborative,
regional quality review, including EMS agencies and hospitals, is recommended for operationalized bypass
algorithms.
1.4. Hospital Stroke Capabilities

1.4. Hospital Stroke Capabilities COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Certification of stroke centers by an independent external body, Recommendation reworded for clarity from
such as Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality, Det Norske 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
Veritas, Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program, and The Joint amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
Commission (TJC),* or a state health department, is recommended. I B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
Additional medical centers should seek such certification. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
*AHA has a cobranded, revenue-generating stroke certification with TJC. for original wording.
Data support the development of stroke centers to improve patient care and outcomes.33 Differences in stroke See Table VI in online Data Supplement 1.
quality of care are associated with differences in certifying organization. Between 2010 and 2012, an analysis of
477 297 AIS admissions from 977 certified primary stroke centers (73.8% TJC, 3.7% Det Norske Veritas, 1.2%
Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program, and 21.3% state based) participating in GWTG-Stroke was conducted.
Composite care quality was generally similar among the 4 groups of hospitals, although state-certified primary
stroke centers underperformed TJC-certified primary stroke centers in a few key measures. The rates of alteplase
use were higher in TJC and Det Norske Veritas (9.0% and 9.8%) and lower in state- and Healthcare Facilities
Accreditation Program-certified hospitals (7.1% and 5.9%) (P<0.0001). DTN times were significantly longer in
Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program hospitals. State primary stroke centers had higher in-hospital risk-
adjusted mortality (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07–1.41) compared with TJC-certified primary stroke centers.34
1.5. Hospital Stroke Teams

1.5. Hospital Stroke Teams COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. An organized protocol for the emergency evaluation of patients with Recommendation and Class unchanged
suspected stroke is recommended. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I B-NR
to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
2. It is recommended that DTN time goals be established. A primary Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
goal of achieving DTN times within 60 minutes in ≥50% of AIS I B-NR Guidelines.
patients treated with IV alteplase should be established.
In GWTG-Stroke hospitals, median DTN time for alteplase administration decreased from 77 minutes (interquartile See Table VII in online Data Supplement 1.
range, 60–98 minutes) during the 2003 to 2009 preintervention period to 67 minutes (interquartile range,
51–87 minutes) during the 2010 to 2013 postintervention period (P<0.001). The percentage of alteplase-treated
patients having DTN times of ≤60 minutes increased from 26.5% (95% CI, 26.0–27.1) to 41.3% (95% CI,
40.8–41.7) (P<0.001). Comparing the quarter immediately before the intervention (quarter 4 of 2009) to the final
postintervention quarter (quarter 3 of 2013) showed that DTN times of ≤60 minutes increased from 29.6% (95%
CI, 27.8–31.5) to 53.3% (95% CI, 51.5–55.2) (P<0.001).35 In a subsequent study evaluating a cohort of hospitals
from 2014 to 2015, 59.3% of patients received IV alteplase within a DTN time of 60 minutes.36
3. It may be reasonable to establish a secondary DTN time goal of New recommendation.
achieving DTN times within 45 minutes in ≥50% of patients with IIb C-EO
AIS who were treated with IV alteplase.
In a cohort of 888 GWTG-Stroke hospitals surveyed between June 2014 and April 2015, 16 901 patients with See Table VII in online Data Supplement 1.
ischemic stroke were treated with IV alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. The patient-level median DTN
time was 56 minutes (interquartile range, 42–75 minutes), with 30.4% treated within 45 minutes after hospital
arrival.36 This recommendation mirrors Target: Stroke phase II objectives.37
4. Designation of an acute stroke team that includes physicians, Recommendation wording modified from 2013 AIS
nurses, and laboratory/radiology personnel is recommended. Guidelines to match Class I stratifications. Class
I B-NR
Patients with stroke should have a careful clinical assessment, unchanged. LOE added to conform with ACC/AHA
including neurological examination. 2015 Recommendation Classification System.
5. M
ulticomponent quality improvement initiatives, which include ED New recommendation.
education and multidisciplinary teams with access to neurological I A
expertise, are recommended to safely increase IV thrombolytic treatment.
Multicomponent quality improvement programs to improve stroke care have demonstrated utility in safely increasing See Tables VIII and IX in online Data
alteplase use in the community hospital setting. The US cluster-randomized INSTINCT trial (Increasing Stroke Supplement 1.
Treatment Through Interventional Change Tactics) demonstrated increased rates of alteplase use among all stroke
patients. In the intervention group hospitals, alteplase use increased from 59 of 5882 (1.00%) before intervention to
191 of 7288 (2.62%) after intervention. This compared favorably with the change in the control group hospitals from
65 of 5957 (1.09%) to 120 of 6989 (1.72%), with a relative risk (RR) of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.09–2.57; P=0.02). Safety
was also demonstrated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (within 36 hours) in 24 of 404 (5.9%) treated
strokes.38 In the PRACTISE trial (Penumbra and Recanalisation Acute Computed Tomography in Ischaemic Stroke
Evaluation), a multilevel intervention was conducted in a sample of 12 Dutch hospitals. After implementation of an
intensive stroke treatment strategy, intervention hospitals treated 393 patients with IV thrombolysis (13.1% of all
patients with acute stroke) versus 308 (12.2%) at control hospitals (adjusted OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.93–1.68).39
1.6. Telemedicine
1.6. Telemedicine COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. For sites without in-house imaging interpretation expertise, Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
teleradiology systems approved by the US Food and Drug Guidelines.
I A
Administration are recommended for timely review of brain imaging
in patients with suspected acute stroke.
2. When implemented within a telestroke network, teleradiology Recommendation reworded for clarity from
systems approved by the US Food and Drug Administration are 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
useful in supporting rapid imaging interpretation in time for IV I A revised.
alteplase administration decision making. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
Studies of teleradiology to read brain imaging in acute stroke have successfully assessed feasibility; agreement See Table X in online Data Supplement 1.
between telestroke neurologists, radiologists, and neuroradiologists over the presence or absence of radiological
contraindications to IV alteplase; and reliability of telestroke radiological evaluations.40–45
3. Because of the limited distribution and availability of neurological, Recommendation wording modified from 2013
neurosurgical, and radiological expertise, the use of telemedicine/ Stroke Systems of Care to match Class IIa
telestroke resources and systems can be beneficial and should be stratifications. COR and LOE added to conform
IIa C-EO
supported by healthcare institutions, governments, payers, and with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
vendors as one method to ensure adequate 24/7 coverage and care Classification System.
of acute stroke patients in a variety of settings.
4. Telestroke/teleradiology evaluations of AIS patients can be effective New recommendation.
IIa B-R
for correct IV alteplase eligibility decision making.
The STRokEDOC (Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera) pooled analysis supported See Table XI in online Data Supplement 1.
the hypothesis that telemedicine consultations, which included teleradiology, compared with telephone-only
resulted in statistically significantly more accurate IV alteplase eligibility decision making for patients exhibiting
symptoms and signs of an acute stroke syndrome in EDs.46
5. Administration of IV alteplase guided by telestroke consultation for New recommendation.
patients with AIS may be as safe and as beneficial as that of stroke IIb B-NR
centers.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV alteplase See Table XII in online Data Supplement 1.
delivered through telestroke networks in patients with AIS. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rates
were similar between patients subjected to telemedicine-guided IV alteplase and those receiving IV alteplase
at stroke centers. There was no difference in mortality or in functional independence at 3 months between
telestroke-guided and stroke center–managed patients. The findings indicate that IV alteplase delivery through
telestroke networks is safe and effective in the 3-hour time window.47
6. Providing alteplase decision-making support via telephone New recommendation.
consultation to community physicians is feasible and safe and may
IIb C-LD
be considered when a hospital has access to neither an in-person
stroke team nor a telestroke system.
The advantages of telephone consultations for patients with acute stroke syndromes are feasibility, history of See Table XIII in online Data Supplement 1.
use, simplicity, availability, portability, short consultation time, and facile implementation.48
7. Telestroke networks may be reasonable for triaging patients with New recommendation.
AIS who may be eligible for interfacility transfer in order to be IIb B-NR
considered for acute mechanical thrombectomy.
An observational study compared clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) between patients with See Table XII in online Data Supplement 1.
anterior circulation stroke transferred after teleconsultation and those directly admitted to a tertiary stroke
center. The study evaluated 151 patients who underwent emergency EVT for anterior circulation stroke. Of
these, 48 patients (31.8%) were transferred after teleconsultation, and 103 (68.2%) were admitted primarily
through an ED. Transferred patients were younger, received IV alteplase more frequently, had prolonged
time from stroke onset to EVT initiation, and tended to have lower rates of symptomatic intracranial
hemorrhage and mortality than directly admitted patients. Similar rates of reperfusion and favorable
functional outcomes were observed in patients treated by telestroke and those who were directly admitted.
Telestroke networks may enable the triage and the delivery of EVT to selected ischemic stroke patients
transferred from remote hospitals.49
1.7. Organization and Integration of Components

1.7. Organization and Integration of Components COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. It may be useful for primary stroke centers and other healthcare Recommendation reworded for clarity from
facilities that provide initial emergency care, including 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
administration of IV alteplase, to develop the capability of amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
performing emergency noninvasive intracranial vascular imaging IIb C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
to most appropriately select patients for transfer for endovascular See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
intervention and to reduce the time to EVT. for original wording.
Between 2006 and 2010, the proportion of ischemic strokes undergoing computed tomography (CT) angiography
(CTA) increased from 3.8% to 9.1% (P<0.0001). CT perfusion (CTP) increased from 0.05% to 2.9% over the
same period (P<0.0001). Reperfusion treatment was more common among those who were imaged with CTA
(13.0%) and CTP (17.6%) compared with those with CT of the head alone (4.0%; P<0.0001).50 However, when
considering implementation of multimodal CT imaging at small or remote access hospitals, resource availability
and realistic expectations for gains in efficiency should be taken into account.
2. Mechanical thrombectomy requires the patient to be at an Recommendation reworded for clarity from
experienced stroke center with rapid access to cerebral 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
angiography, qualified neurointerventionalists, and a amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
comprehensive periprocedural care team. Systems should be Recommendation Classification System.
designed, executed, and monitored to emphasize expeditious I C-EO See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
assessment and treatment. Outcomes for all patients should be for original wording.
tracked. Facilities are encouraged to define criteria that can be
used to credential individuals who can perform safe and timely
intra-arterial revascularization procedures.
3. All hospitals caring for stroke patients within a stroke system Recommendation unchanged from 2013
of care should develop, adopt, and adhere to care protocols that Stroke Systems of Care. COR and LOE
reflect current care guidelines as established by national and I C-EO added to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
international professional organizations and state and federal Recommendation Classification System.
agencies and laws.
4. D
ifferent services within a hospital that may be transferring Recommendation unchanged from 2013
patients through a continuum of care, as well as different Stroke Systems of Care. COR and LOE
hospitals that may be transferring patients to other facilities, added to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
should establish hand-off and transfer protocols and procedures Recommendation Classification System.
I C-EO
that ensure safe and efficient patient care within and between
facilities. Protocols for interhospital transfer of patients should
be established and approved beforehand so that efficient patient
transfers can be accomplished at all hours of the day and night.
5. It may be beneficial for government agencies and third-party Recommendation revised from 2013 Stroke
payers to develop and implement reimbursement schedules for Systems of Care.
patients with acute stroke that reflect the demanding care and
IIb C-EO
expertise that such patients require to achieve an optimal outcome,
regardless of whether they receive a specific medication or
procedure.
Multiple studies evaluating fibrinolytic therapy and mechanical thrombectomy, alone or in combination,
have demonstrated substantial cost-effectiveness of acute stroke treatment across multiple countries. Pre–
mechanical thrombectomy era data demonstrate that, in the United States, cost savings of approximately US $30
million would be realized if the proportion of all ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis was increased to
8%. This excludes any gain from increased quality-adjusted life-years gained, a source of tremendous additional
economic and patient value. Before the implementation of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services diagnosis-
related group 559 payment in 2005, treatment of acute stroke was economically discouraged at a hospital
level because of a high hospital cost-reimbursement ratio. Diagnosis-related group 559 favorably altered the
cost-reimbursement ratio for stroke care. In a single-hospital study, this ratio decreased from 1.41 (95% CI,
0.98–2.28) before diagnosis-related group 559 to 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–0.97) after diagnosis-related group 559.
The subsequent years corresponded to a period of rapid growth in the number of primary stroke centers and
increasing total stroke treatment cases. Addressing emerging economic barriers to treatment is important as
acute stroke care complexity evolves.51–56
1.8. Establishment of Data Repositories

1.8. Establishment of Data Repositories COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Participation in a stroke data repository is recommended to New recommendation.
promote consistent adherence to current treatment guidelines,
I B-NR
to allow continuous quality improvement, and to improve patient
outcomes.
In GWTG-Stroke hospitals, participation in a stroke data repository as 1 part of a quality improvement See Table XIV in online Data Supplement 1.
process was associated with improved timeliness of IV alteplase administration after AIS, lower in-hospital
mortality and intracranial hemorrhage rates, and an increase in the percentage of patients discharged
home.35,57
1.9. Stroke System Care Quality Improvement Process

1.9. Stroke System Care Quality Improvement Process COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Healthcare institutions should organize a multidisciplinary quality Recommendation and Class unchanged
improvement committee to review and monitor stroke care quality from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
benchmarks, indicators, evidence-based practices, and outcomes. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
The formation of a clinical process improvement team and the Recommendation Classification System.
establishment of a stroke care data bank are helpful for such I B-NR
quality of care assurances. The data repository can be used to
identify the gaps or disparities in quality stroke care. Once the
gaps have been identified, specific interventions can be initiated
to address these gaps or disparities.
In GWTG-Stroke hospitals, a multidisciplinary quality improvement committee, as 1 part of a quality improvement See Tables VIII and IX in online Data
process, was associated with improved timeliness of IV alteplase administration after AIS, lower in-hospital Supplement 1.
mortality and intracranial hemorrhage rates, and an increase in the percentage of patients discharged home.35,57
Identification of stroke treatment barriers with targeted interventions has demonstrated benefit in improving
stroke treatment in community hospitals.38
2. Continuous quality improvement processes, implemented by each Recommendation revised from 2013
major element of a stroke system of care and the system as a Stroke Systems of Care. Class and LOE
IIa B-NR
whole, can be useful in improving patient care or outcomes. added to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
3. Stroke outcome measures should include adjustments for baseline Recommendation revised from 2013 Stroke
severity. Systems of Care. Class and LOE added to
I B-NR
conform with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
Classification System.
Data indicate continuous quality improvement efforts along the stroke spectrum of care, from initial patient See Tables VIII, IX, and XIV in online Data
identification to EMS activation, ED evaluation, stroke team activation, and poststroke care, can be useful in Supplement 1.
improving outcomes.35,38,57 Stroke outcome measures are strongly influenced by baseline stroke severity as
measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).58–61 Other identified predictors of poor
outcomes include age, blood glucose, and infarct on imaging.61 Quality improvement efforts should recognize
these predictors in order to have meaningful comparisons between stroke care systems.
2. Emergency Evaluation and Treatment

2.1. Stroke Scales
2.1. Stroke Scales COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. The use of a stroke severity rating scale, preferably the NIHSS, is Recommendation reworded for clarity from
recommended. 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
I B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
Formal stroke scores or scales such as the NIHSS (Table 4) may be performed rapidly, have demonstrated utility, See Table III in online Data Supplement 1.
and may be administered by a broad spectrum of healthcare providers with accuracy and reliability.63,64 Use
of a standardized scale quantifies the degree of neurological deficit, facilitates communication, helps identify
patients for thrombolytic or mechanical intervention, allows objective measurement of changing clinical status, and
identifies those at higher risk for complications such as intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).59–61,65
Table 4. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

Tested Item Title Responses and Scores
1A Level of consciousness 0—Alert
1—Drowsy
2—Obtunded
3—Coma/unresponsive
1B Orientation questions (2) 0—Answers both correctly
1—Answers 1 correctly
2—Answers neither correctly
1C Response to commands (2) 0—Performs both tasks correctly
1—Performs 1 task correctly
2—Performs neither
2 Gaze 0—Normal horizontal movements
1—Partial gaze palsy
2—Complete gaze palsy
3 Visual fields 0—No visual field defect

1—Partial hemianopia
2—Complete hemianopia
3—Bilateral hemianopia
4 Facial movement 0—Normal
1—Minor facial weakness
2—Partial facial weakness
3—Complete unilateral palsy
5 Motor function (arm) 0—No drift
a. Left 1—Drift before 10 s
b. Right 2—Falls before 10 s
3—No effort against gravity
4—No movement
6 Motor function (leg) 0—No drift
a. Left 1—Drift before 5 s
b. Right 2—Falls before 5 s
3—No effort against gravity
4—No movement
7 Limb ataxia 0—No ataxia
1—Ataxia in 1 limb
2—Ataxia in 2 limbs
8 Sensory 0—No sensory loss
1—Mild sensory loss
2—Severe sensory loss
9 Language 0—Normal
1—Mild aphasia
2—Severe aphasia
3—Mute or global aphasia
10 Articulation 0—Normal
1—Mild dysarthria
2—Severe dysarthria
11 Extinction or inattention 0—Absent
1—Mild loss (1 sensory modality lost)
2—Severe loss (2 modalities lost)
Adapted from Lyden et al.62 Copyright © 1994, American Heart Association, Inc.
2.2. Brain Imaging

2.2. Brain Imaging COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. All patients admitted to hospital with suspected acute stroke Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
should receive brain imaging evaluation on arrival to hospital. In Guidelines.
I B-NR
most cases, noncontrast CT (NCCT) will provide the necessary
information to make decisions about acute management.
Diagnostic testing is most cost-effective when it leads to a change in treatment that improves outcomes, not just See Table XV in online Data Supplement 1.
a change in treatment. Although diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is more sensitive than
CT for detecting AIS,66,67 routine use in all patients with AIS is not cost-effective.68,69 NCCT scanning of all patients
with acute stroke has been shown to be cost-effective primarily because of the detection of acute ICH and the
avoidance of antithrombotic treatment in these patients.70 In many patients, the diagnosis of ischemic stroke can be
made accurately on the basis of the clinical presentation and either a negative NCCT or one showing early ischemic
changes, which can be detected in the majority of patients with careful attention.66,71,72 In some patients with negative
NCCT such as those with puzzling clinical presentations or those with uncertain clinical stroke localization for early
carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting, demonstration of an area of restricted diffusion on DW-MRI may lead to a
change in treatment that improves outcomes. There are inadequate data at this time to establish which patients will
benefit from DW-MRI, and more research is needed to determine criteria for its cost-effective use.
2. Systems should be established so that brain imaging studies can be New recommendation.
performed within 20 minutes of arrival in the ED in at least 50% of
I B-NR
patients who may be candidates for IV alteplase and/or mechanical
thrombectomy.
The benefit of both IV alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy is time dependent, with earlier treatment within the See Table XVI in online Data Supplement 1.
therapeutic window leading to bigger proportional benefits.32,73 A brain imaging study to exclude ICH is recommended as
part of the initial evaluation of patients who are potentially eligible for these therapies. Reducing the time interval from ED
presentation to initial brain imaging can help to reduce the time to treatment initiation. Studies have shown that median
or mean door-to-imaging times of ≤20 minutes can be achieved in a variety of different hospital settings.74–76
3. There remains insufficient evidence to identify a threshold of acute Recommendation revised from 2015 IV
CT hypoattenuation severity or extent that affects treatment response Alteplase.
to IV alteplase. The extent and severity of acute hypoattenuation or III: No Benefit B-R
early ischemic changes should not be used as a criterion to withhold
therapy for such patients who otherwise qualify.
Analysis of data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of IV alteplase for AIS has shown no statistically significant See Table XVII in online Data Supplement 1.
deleterious interaction on clinical outcomes between alteplase treatment and baseline CT hypodensity or
hypoattenuation.77–81 In the National Institute of Neurological Disorders (NINDS) rtPA (recombinant tissue-type
plasminogen activator) trial, subsequent analysis showed there was no significant modification of the effect of alteplase
by the following findings on baseline CT: early ischemic changes (loss of gray/white matter distinction, hypoattenuation,
or compression of cerebrospinal fluid spaces), the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score
(ASPECTS), or the Van Swieten score for leukoaraiosis.78 In both ECASS (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study) II and
IST (International Stroke Trial)-3, there was no interaction with baseline ASPECTS.77,79 A meta-analysis of NINDS rtPA,
ECASS II, PROACT (Intra-Arterial Prourokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke) II, and IST-3 showed no significant interactions
for IV alteplase with functional outcomes for ASPECTS subgroups.77 A pooled analysis of NINDS rtPA, ECASS I, ECASS II,
and IST-3 showed no significant interaction between baseline CT leukoaraiosis and the effect of IV alteplase.82
Patients with baseline CT hypoattenuation of greater than one third of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory
were excluded from both ECASS I and ECASS II but not from NINDS rtPA and IST-3.
4. T he CT hyperdense MCA sign should not be used as a criterion to New recommendation.
III: No Benefit B-R
withhold IV alteplase from patients who otherwise qualify.
Analyses of data from RCTs of IV alteplase for AIS have shown no statistically significant deleterious interaction on See Table XVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
clinical outcomes between alteplase treatment and the hyperdense MCA sign on baseline CT. In the NINDS rtPA
trial, there was no interaction between hyperdense MCA sign and treatment for outcomes at 3 months measured by
any of the 4 clinical scales (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0–1, NIHSS score 0–1, Barthel Index ≥95, Glasgow
Outcome Scale score 0–1) or for death.83 In IST-3, no significant interaction of the hyperdense MCA sign with
benefit of alteplase measured by the Oxford Handicap Score at 6 months was observed.77,84
5. Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to exclude New recommendation.
cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) before administration of IV alteplase III: No Benefit B-NR
is not recommended.
No RCTs of IV alteplase in AIS with baseline MRI to identify CMBs have been conducted, so no determination See Table XIX in online Data Supplement 1.
of the effect of baseline CMB on the treatment effect of alteplase with CMB is available. Two meta-analyses of
the association of baseline CMBs on the risk of sICH after IV alteplase have shown that sICH is more common
in patients with baseline CMBs (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.12–4.22; OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.21–4.61).85,86 However, sICH
in patients with baseline CMBs is not more common (6.1%, 6.5%)85,86 than in the NINDS rtPA trial (6.4%).87 One
meta-analysis reported that the sICH rate was 40% in patients with >10 CMBs, but this was based on only 6
events in 15 patients, and patients with >10 CMBs constituted only 0.8% of the sample.86
2.2. Brain Imaging (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

6. Use of imaging criteria to select ischemic stroke patients who Recommendation unchanged from 2015 IV
awoke with stroke or have unclear time of symptom onset for Alteplase. Class and LOE amended to conform
III: No Benefit B-NR
treatment with IV alteplase is not recommended outside a clinical with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
trial. Classification System.
7. Multimodal CT and MRI, including perfusion imaging, should not New recommendation.
III: Harm B-NR
delay administration of IV alteplase.
Analysis of trials using advanced, multimodal pretreatment imaging (including CTP measures of penumbral See Table XX and XXI in online Data
imaging, diffusion-perfusion mismatch, or vessel imaging) for IV fibrinolytics has failed to demonstrate Supplement 1.
clinical efficacy in patients with various pretreatment imaging biomarkers compared with those without those
markers.88–95
8. For patients who otherwise meet criteria for EVT, a noninvasive Recommendation reworded for clarity
intracranial vascular study is recommended during the initial from 2015 Endovascular. Class and LOE
imaging evaluation of the acute stroke patient, but should not delay unchanged.
IV alteplase if indicated. For patients who qualify for IV alteplase See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
according to guidelines from professional medical societies, initiating I A for original wording.
IV alteplase before noninvasive vascular imaging is recommended for
patients who have not had noninvasive vascular imaging as part of
their initial imaging assessment for stroke. Noninvasive intracranial
vascular imaging should then be obtained as quickly as possible.

A recent systematic review evaluated the accuracy of prediction instruments for diagnosing LVO.3 In the setting
where confirmed ischemic stroke patients would be assessed by a neurologist or emergency physician in the
ED, the authors suggested that the NIHSS is the best of the LVO prediction instruments. According to their meta-
analysis, a threshold of ≥10 would provide the optimal balance between sensitivity (73%) and specificity (74%).
To maximize sensitivity (at the cost of lower specificity), a threshold of ≥6 would have 87% sensitivity and 52%
specificity. However, even this low threshold misses some cases with LVO, whereas the low specificity indicates
that false-positives will be common.
9. F or patients who otherwise meet criteria for EVT, it is reasonable New recommendation.
to proceed with CTA if indicated in patients with suspected
IIa B-NR
intracranial LVO before obtaining a serum creatinine concentration
in patients without a history of renal impairment.
Analyses from a number of observational studies suggest that the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy secondary See Table XXII in online Data Supplement 1.
to CTA imaging is relatively low, particularly in patients without a history of renal impairment. Moreover, waiting
for these laboratory results may lead to delays in mechanical thrombectomy.96–101
10. In patients who are potential candidates for mechanical New recommendation.
thrombectomy, imaging of the extracranial carotid and vertebral
arteries, in addition to the intracranial circulation, is reasonable to IIa C-EO
provide useful information on patient eligibility and endovascular
procedural planning.
Knowledge of vessel anatomy and presence of extracranial vessel dissections, stenoses, and occlusions may
assist in planning endovascular procedures or identifying patients ineligible for treatment because of vessel
tortuosity or inability to access the intracranial vasculature.
11. Additional imaging beyond CT and CTA or MRI and magnetic New recommendation.
resonance angiography (MRA) such as perfusion studies for
III: No Benefit B-R
selecting patients for mechanical thrombectomy in <6 hours is not
recommended.
Of the 6 RCTs that independently demonstrated clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers See Table XXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
when performed <6 hours from stroke onset, 4 trials (REVASCAT [Randomized Trial of Revascularization With
Solitaire FR Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due to Anterior Circulation
Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting Within Eight Hours of Symptom Onset], SWIFT PRIME [Solitaire With
the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment], EXTEND-IA [Extending the Time for
Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits–Intra-Arterial], and ESCAPE [Endovascular Treatment for Small
Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times])102–105
used some form of advanced imaging to determine eligibility, whereas 2 (THRACE [Trial and Cost Effectiveness
Evaluation of Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke] and MR CLEAN [Multicenter Randomized
Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for AIS in the Netherlands])106,107 required only NCCT and demonstration
of LVO. Because the last 2 studies independently demonstrated benefit in the treated group, additional imaging-
based eligibility criteria could lead to the exclusion of patients who would benefit from treatment and are
therefore not indicated at this time. Further RCTs may be helpful to determine whether advanced imaging
paradigms using CTP, CTA, and MRI perfusion and diffusion imaging, including measures of infarct core,
collateral flow status, and penumbra, are beneficial for selecting patients for acute reperfusion therapy who are
within 6 hours of symptom onset and have an ASPECTS score <6.
2.2. Brain Imaging (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

12. In selected patients with AIS within 6 to 24 hours of last known New recommendation.
normal who have LVO in the anterior circulation, obtaining CTP,
DW-MRI, or MRI perfusion is recommended to aid in patient
selection for mechanical thrombectomy, but only when imaging I A
and other eligibility criteria from RCTs showing benefit are
being strictly applied in selecting patients for mechanical
thrombectomy.
The DAWN trial (Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing See Table XXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
Neurointervention With Trevo) used clinical imaging mismatch (a combination of NIHSS and imaging findings on
CTP or DW-MRI) as an eligibility criterion to select patients with large anterior circulation vessel occlusion for
mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours from last known normal. This trial demonstrated an overall
benefit in functional outcome at 90 days in the treatment group (mRS score 0–2, 49% versus 13%; adjusted
difference, 33%; 95% CI, 21–44; posterior probability of superiority >0.999).108 The DEFUSE 3 trial (Diffusion and
Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution) used perfusion-core mismatch and maximum
core size as imaging criteria to select patients with large anterior circulation occlusion 6 to 16 hours from last
seen well for mechanical thrombectomy. This trial showed a benefit in functional outcome at 90 days in the
treated group (mRS score 0–2, 44.6% versus 16.7%; RR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.60–4.48; P<0.0001).109 Benefit was
independently demonstrated for the subgroup of patients who met DAWN eligibility criteria and for the subgroup
who did not. DAWN and DEFUSE 3 are the only RCTs showing benefit of mechanical thrombectomy >6 hours
from onset. Therefore, only the eligibility criteria from these trials should be used for patient selection. Although
future RCTs may demonstrate that additional eligibility criteria can be used to select patients who benefit from
mechanical thrombectomy, at this time, the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 eligibility should be strictly adhered to in
clinical practice.
13. It may be reasonable to incorporate collateral flow status into Recommendation revised from 2015
clinical decision making in some candidates to determine IIb C-LD Endovascular.
eligibility for mechanical thrombectomy.
Several studies, including secondary analyses from MR CLEAN and IMS (Interventional Management of Stroke) See Table XXIV in online Data Supplement 1.
III, provide data supporting the role of collateral assessments in identifying patients likely or unlikely to benefit
from mechanical thrombectomy.110,111
2.3. Other Diagnostic Tests

2.3. Other Diagnostic Tests COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Only the assessment of blood glucose must precede the initiation of Recommendation reworded for clarity from
IV alteplase in all patients. 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged.
I B-R Class unchanged. LOE amended to conform
with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
Recommendation was modified to clarify that it is only blood glucose that must be measured in all patients.
Other tests, for example, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, and platelet
count, may be necessary in some circumstances if there is suspicion of coagulopathy. Given the extremely
low risk of unsuspected abnormal platelet counts or coagulation studies in a population, IV alteplase
treatment should not be delayed while waiting for hematologic or coagulation testing if there is no reason to
suspect an abnormal test.
2. Baseline ECG assessment is recommended in patients presenting Recommendation reworded for clarity from
with AIS, but should not delay initiation of IV alteplase. 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
3. Baseline troponin assessment is recommended in patients Recommendation reworded for clarity from
presenting with AIS, but should not delay initiation of IV alteplase. 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
I B-NR revised.
2.3. Other Diagnostic Tests (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
4. Usefulness of chest radiographs in the hyperacute stroke setting Recommendation reworded for clarity from
in the absence of evidence of acute pulmonary, cardiac, or 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
pulmonary vascular disease is unclear. If obtained, they should not amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
unnecessarily delay administration of IV alteplase. IIb B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
Additional support for this reworded recommendation from the 2013 AIS Guidelines comes from a cohort study See Table XXV in online Data Supplement 1.
of 615 patients, 243 of whom had chest x-ray done before IV thrombolytics. Cardiopulmonary adverse events in
the first 24 hours of admission, endotracheal intubation in the first 7 hours, and in-hospital mortality were not
different between the 2 groups. Patients with chest x-ray done before treatment had longer mean DTN times
than those who did not (75.8 versus 58.3 minutes; P=0.0001).112
3. General Supportive Care and Emergency Treatment

3.1. Airway, Breathing, and Oxygenation
3.1. Airway, Breathing, and Oxygenation COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Airway support and ventilatory assistance are recommended for
Recommendation and Class unchanged

the treatment of patients with acute stroke who have decreased from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended to
I C-EO
consciousness or who have bulbar dysfunction that causes conform with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
compromise of the airway. Classification System.
2. Supplemental oxygen should be provided to maintain oxygen Recommendation and Class unchanged
saturation >94%. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended to
I C-LD
3. Supplemental oxygen is not recommended in nonhypoxic patients Recommendation unchanged from 2013
with AIS. AIS Guidelines. COR and LOE amended to
III: No Benefit B-R
Additional support for this unchanged recommendation from the 2013 AIS Guidelines is provided by an RCT of See Table XXVI in online Data Supplement 1.
8003 participants randomized within 24 hours of admission. There was no benefit on functional outcome at 90
days of oxygen by nasal cannula at 2 L/min (baseline O2 saturation >93%) or 3 L/min (baseline O2 saturation
≤93%) continuously for 72 hours or nocturnally for 3 nights.113
4. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) is not recommended for patients with AIS Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
except when caused by air embolization. Guidelines.
The limited data available on the utility of HBO therapy for AIS (not related to cerebral air embolism) show no See Table XXVII in online Data Supplement 1.
benefit.114 HBO therapy is associated with claustrophobia and middle ear barotrauma,115 as well as an increased
risk of seizures.116 Given the confines of HBO chambers, the ability to closely/adequately monitor patients may
also be compromised. HBO thus should be offered only in the context of a clinical trial or to individuals with
cerebral air embolism.
3.2. Blood Pressure

3.2. Blood Pressure COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Hypotension and hypovolemia should be corrected to maintain New recommendation.
I C-EO
systemic perfusion levels necessary to support organ function.
The blood pressure (BP) level that should be maintained in patients with AIS to ensure best outcome is not See Table XXVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
known. Some observational studies show an association between worse outcomes and lower BPs, whereas
others have not.117–124 No studies have addressed the treatment of low BP in patients with stroke. In a systematic
analysis of 12 studies comparing colloids with crystalloids, the odds of death or dependence were similar.
Clinically important benefits or harms could not be excluded. There are no data to guide volume and duration of
parenteral fluid delivery.125 No studies have compared different isotonic fluids.
3.2. Blood Pressure (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

2. Patients who have elevated BP and are otherwise eligible for Recommendation reworded for clarity from
treatment with IV alteplase should have their BP carefully lowered 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
so that their systolic BP is <185 mm Hg and their diastolic BP is amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
<110 mm Hg before IV fibrinolytic therapy is initiated. I B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
The RCTs of IV alteplase required the BP to be <185 mm Hg systolic and <110 mm Hg diastolic before treatment See Table XXIX in online Data Supplement 1.
and <180/105 mm Hg for the first 24 hours after treatment. Options to treat arterial hypertension in patients with
AIS who are candidates for acute reperfusion therapy are given in Table 5. Some observational studies suggest
that the risk of hemorrhage after administration of alteplase is greater in patients with higher BPs126–132 and in
patients with more BP variability.133 The exact BP at which the risk of hemorrhage after thrombolysis increases is
unknown. It is thus reasonable to target the BPs used in the RCTs of IV thrombolysis.
3. Until additional data become available, in patients for whom Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
intra-arterial therapy is planned and who have not received IV Guidelines.
IIa B-R
thrombolytic therapy, it is reasonable to maintain BP ≤185/110
mm Hg before the procedure.
Of the 6 RCTs that each independently demonstrated clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy with stent See Table XXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
retrievers when performed <6 hours from stroke onset, 5 (REVASCAT, SWIFT PRIME, EXTEND-IA,THRACE,
and MR CLEAN102–104,106,107) had eligibility exclusions for BP >185/110 mm Hg, The sixth, ESCAPE,105 had no
BP eligibility exclusion. DAWN also used an exclusion for BP >185/110 mm Hg.108 RCT data for optimal BP
management approaches in this setting are not available. Because the vast majority of patients enrolled in these
RCTs had preprocedural BP managed below 185/110 mm Hg, it is reasonable to use this level as a guideline.
4. The usefulness of drug-induced hypertension in patients with AIS is Recommendation and Class unchanged from
IIb C-LD
not well established. 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE revised.
Table 5. Options to Treat Arterial Hypertension in Patients With AIS Who Are Candidates for Acute Reperfusion Therapy*
Class IIb, LOE C-EO
Patient otherwise eligible for acute reperfusion therapy except that BP is >185/110 mm Hg:
Labetalol 10–20 mg IV over 1–2 min, may repeat 1 time; or
Nicardipine 5 mg/h IV, titrate up by 2.5 mg/h every 5–15 min, maximum 15 mg/h; when desired BP reached, adjust to maintain proper BP limits; or
Clevidipine 1–2 mg/h IV, titrate by doubling the dose every 2–5 min until desired BP reached; maximum 21 mg/h
Other agents (eg, hydralazine, enalaprilat) may also be considered
If BP is not maintained ≤185/110 mm Hg, do not administer alteplase
Management of BP during and after alteplase or other acute reperfusion therapy to maintain BP ≤180/105 mm Hg:
Monitor BP every 15 min for 2 h from the start of alteplase therapy, then every 30 min for 6 h, and then every hour for 16 h
If systolic BP >180–230 mm Hg or diastolic BP >105–120 mm Hg:
Labetalol 10 mg IV followed by continuous IV infusion 2–8 mg/min; or
Nicardipine 5 mg/h IV, titrate up to desired effect by 2.5 mg/h every 5–15 min, maximum 15 mg/h; or
Clevidipine 1–2 mg/h IV, titrate by doubling the dose every 2–5 min until desired BP reached; maximum 21 mg/h
If BP not controlled or diastolic BP >140 mm Hg, consider IV sodium nitroprusside
AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; BP, blood pressure; IV, intravenous; and LOE, Level of Evidence.
*Different treatment options may be appropriate in patients who have comorbid conditions that may benefit from acute reductions in BP such as acute coronary event,
acute heart failure, aortic dissection, or preeclampsia/eclampsia.
Data derived from Jauch et al.1
3.3. Temperature
3.3. Temperature COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Sources of hyperthermia (temperature >38°C) should be identified Recommendation and Class unchanged
and treated, and antipyretic medications should be administered to from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I C-EO
lower temperature in hyperthermic patients with stroke. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
Additional support for this recommendation unchanged from the 2013 AIS Guidelines is provided by a large See Tables XXX and XXXI in online Data
retrospective cohort study conducted from 2005 to 2013 of patients admitted to intensive care units in Australia, Supplement 1.
New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Peak temperature in the first 24 hours <37°C and >39°C was associated
with an increased risk of in-hospital death compared with normothermia in 9366 patients with AIS.134
2. The benefit of induced hypothermia for treating patients with Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
ischemic stroke is not well established. Hypothermia should be IIb B-R Guidelines.
offered only in the context of ongoing clinical trials.
Hypothermia is a promising neuroprotective strategy, but its benefit in patients with AIS has not been proven. See Tables XXXII and XXXIII in online Data
Most studies suggest that induction of hypothermia is associated with an increase in the risk of infection, Supplement 1.
including pneumonia.135–138 Therapeutic hypothermia should be undertaken only in the context of a clinical trial.
3.4. Blood Glucose

3.4. Blood Glucose COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

1. Evidence indicates that persistent in-hospital hyperglycemia during Recommendation and Class unchanged
the first 24 hours after AIS is associated with worse outcomes than from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
normoglycemia and thus, it is reasonable to treat hyperglycemia to IIa C-LD to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
achieve blood glucose levels in a range of 140 to 180 mg/dL and to Recommendation Classification System.
closely monitor to prevent hypoglycemia in patients with AIS.
2. Hypoglycemia (blood glucose <60 mg/dL) should be treated in Recommendation and Class unchanged
patients with AIS. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I C-LD
3.5. IV Alteplase
3.5. IV Alteplase COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg over 60 minutes with initial Recommendation reworded for clarity
10% of dose given as bolus over 1 minute) is recommended for selected from 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class and LOE
patients who may be treated within 3 hours of ischemic stroke symptom I A unchanged.
onset or patient last known well or at baseline state. Physicians should See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
review the criteria outlined in Table 6 to determine patient eligibility. for original wording.
The safety and efficacy of this treatment when administered within the first 3 hours after stroke onset are solidly See Table XXXIV in online Data Supplement 1.
supported by combined data from multiple RCTs90,139,140 and confirmed by extensive community experience
in many countries.141 The eligibility criteria for IV alteplase have evolved over time as its usefulness and true
risks have become clearer. A recent AHA statement provides a detailed discussion of this topic.15 Eligibility
recommendations for IV alteplase in patients with AIS are summarized in Table 6. The benefit of IV alteplase is
well established for adult patients with disabling stroke symptoms regardless of age and stroke severity.73,142
Because of this proven benefit and the need to expedite treatment, when a patient cannot provide consent (eg,
aphasia, confusion) and a legally authorized representative is not immediately available to provide proxy consent,
it is justified to proceed with IV thrombolysis in an otherwise eligible adult patient with a disabling AIS. In a recent
trial, a lower dose of IV alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) was not shown to be equivalent to standard-dose IV alteplase for the
reduction of death and disability at 90 days.143 Main elements of postthrombolysis care are listed in Table 7.
2. IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg over 60 minutes with Recommendation reworded for clarity from
initial 10% of dose given as bolus over 1 minute) is also recommended 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
for selected patients who can be treated within 3 and 4.5 hours of amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
ischemic stroke symptom onset or patient last known well. Physicians I B-R Recommendation Classification System.
should review the criteria outlined in Table 6 determine patient eligibility. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
One trial (ECASS-III) specifically evaluating the efficacy of IV alteplase within 3 and 4.5 hours after symptom onset144 See Table XXXIV in online Data Supplement 1.
and pooled analysis of multiple trials testing IV alteplase within various time windows90,139,140 support the value of IV
thrombolysis up to 4.5 hours after symptom onset. ECASS-III excluded octogenarians, patients taking warfarin regardless
of international normalized ratio, patients with combined history of diabetes mellitus and previous ischemic stroke, and
patients with very severe strokes (NIHSS score >25) because of a perceived excessive risk of intracranial hemorrhage in
those cases. However, careful analysis of available published data summarized in an AHA/American Stroke Association
scientific statement indicates that these exclusion criteria from the trial may not be justified in practice (Table 6).15
3.5. IV Alteplase (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3. For otherwise eligible patients with mild stroke presenting in the 3- New recommendation.
to 4.5-hour window, treatment with IV alteplase may be reasonable. IIb B-NR
Treatment risks should be weighed against possible benefits.
In ECASS III, there was no significant interaction of benefit (mRS score 0–1 at 90 days) or safety (sICH or death) with See Tables XXXV and XXXVI in online Data
stroke severity when patients were categorized by baseline NIHSS score of 0 to 9, 10 to 19, and >20.144 Patients Supplement 1.
with a minor neurological deficit were excluded. Only 128 patients with an NIHSS score of 0 to 5 were included,
and they were not analyzed separately.145 In SITS-ISTR (Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke–International
Stroke Thrombolysis Registry), good functional outcomes (mRS score 0–1 at 90 days) and risk of sICH were similar
or the same in mild stroke treated in 0 to 3 and 3 to 4.5 hours.146 Similarly, in the GWTG registry, good functional
outcomes, mortality, and risk of sICH were the same in mild stroke treated in 0 to 3 and 3 to 4.5 hours.147
4. In otherwise eligible patients who have had a previously New recommendation.
demonstrated small number (1–10) of CMBs on MRI, administration IIa B-NR
of IV alteplase is reasonable.
5. In otherwise eligible patients who have had a previously New recommendation.
demonstrated high burden of CMBs (>10) on MRI, treatment with IV
alteplase may be associated with an increased risk of sICH, and the IIb B-NR
benefits of treatment are uncertain. Treatment may be reasonable if
there is the potential for substantial benefit.
MRI with hemosiderin-sensitive sequences has shown that clinically silent CMBs occur in approximately one See Table XIX in online Data Supplement 1.
fourth of patients who have received IV alteplase. No RCTs of IV alteplase in AIS with baseline MRI to identify
CMBs have been conducted, so no determination of the effect of baseline CMB on the treatment effect of
alteplase with CMB is available. Two meta-analyses of the association of baseline CMBs on the risk of sICH after
IV alteplase have shown that sICH is more common in patients with baseline CMBs (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.12–
4.22; OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.21–4.61).85,86 However, sICH in patients with baseline CMBs is not more common
(6.1%, 6.5%)85,86 than in the NINDS rtPA trial (6.4%).87 In patients with >10 CMBs, the sICH rate was 40%, but
this is based on only 6 events in 15 patients, and patients with >10 CMBs constituted only 0.8% of the sample.86
Meta-analysis of the 4 studies that provided information on 3- to 6-month functional outcomes showed that
the presence of CMBs was associated with worse outcomes after IV alteplase compared with patients without
CMBs (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.18–2.14; P=0.002).85 Thus, the presence of CMBs increases the risk of ICH and the
chances of poor outcomes after IV alteplase, but it is unclear whether these negative effects fully negate the
benefit of thrombolysis. It is also unknown whether the location and number of CMBs may differentially influence
outcomes. These questions deserve further investigation.
6. IV alteplase for adults presenting with an AIS with known sickle New recommendation.
IIa B-NR
cell disease can be beneficial.
A case-control analysis using the population from the AHA GWTG-Stroke registry, including 832 cases with See Table XXXVII in online Data Supplement 1.
sickle cell disease (all adults) and 3328 age-, sex-, and race-matched controls without sickle cell disease with
similar severity of neurological deficits at presentation, showed that sickle cell disease did not have a significant
impact on the safety or the outcome at discharge of treatment with IV alteplase.148
7. Abciximab should not be administered concurrently with IV Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
III: Harm B-R
alteplase. Guidelines.
8. IV alteplase should not be administered to patients who have Recommendation reworded for clarity
received a treatment dose of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) from 2015 IV Alteplase. Class and LOE
within the previous 24 hours. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
III: Harm B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
The recommendation refers to full treatment doses and not to prophylactic doses. The 2015 “Scientific
Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke” stated,
“Intravenous alteplase in patients who have received a dose of LMWH within the previous 24 hours is not
recommended. This applies to both prophylactic doses and treatment doses (Class III; Level of Evidence B).”15
This statement was updated in a subsequently published erratum to specify that the contraindication does not
apply to prophylactic doses.
9. T he potential risks should be discussed during thrombolysis Recommendation and Class unchanged from
eligibility deliberation and weighed against the anticipated benefits 2015 IV Alteplase. LOE amended to conform
I C-EO
during decision making. with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
10. Given the extremely low risk of unsuspected abnormal platelet counts Recommendation and Class unchanged from
or coagulation studies in a population, it is reasonable that urgent IV 2015 IV Alteplase. LOE amended to conform
IIa B-NR
alteplase treatment not be delayed while waiting for hematologic or with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
coagulation testing if there is no reason to suspect an abnormal test. Classification System.
3.5. IV Alteplase (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

11. Treating clinicians should be aware that hypoglycemia and Recommendation reworded for clarity from
hyperglycemia may mimic acute stroke presentations and 2015 IV Alteplase. Class and LOE amended to
determine blood glucose levels before IV alteplase initiation. IV conform with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
alteplase is not indicated for nonvascular conditions. III: No Benefit B-NR Classification System.
12. Because time from onset of symptoms to treatment has such a Recommendation wording modified from 2015
powerful impact on outcomes, treatment with IV alteplase should IV Alteplase to match Class III stratifications
not be delayed to monitor for further improvement. and reworded for clarity. Class and LOE
III: Harm C-EO amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
13. In patients undergoing fibrinolytic therapy, physicians should be Recommendation reworded for clarity from
prepared to treat potential emergent adverse effects, including 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
bleeding complications and angioedema that may cause partial amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
airway obstruction. I B-NR Recommendation Classification System.

See Table 8 for options for management of symptomatic intracranial bleeding occurring within 24 hours
after administration of IV alteplase for treatment of AIS and Table 9 for options for management of orolingual
angioedema associated with IV alteplase administration for AIS.
14. BP should be maintained <180/105 mm Hg for at least the first 24 Recommendation reworded for clarity from
hours after IV alteplase treatment. 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
15. T he risk of antithrombotic therapy within the first 24 hours after New recommendation.
treatment with IV alteplase (with or without EVT) is uncertain. Use
might be considered in the presence of concomitant conditions
IIb B-NR
for which such treatment given in the absence of IV alteplase
is known to provide substantial benefit or withholding such
treatment is known to cause substantial risk.
A retrospective analysis of consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted to a single center in Seoul, South See Table XXXVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
Korea, found no increased risk of hemorrhage with early initiation of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (<24
hours) after IV alteplase or EVT compared with initiation >24 hours. However, this study may have been subject
to selection bias, and the timing of the initiation of antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation should be based on an
individual level, balancing risk versus benefit.166
16. In patients eligible for IV alteplase, benefit of therapy is time Recommendation reworded for clarity
dependent, and treatment should be initiated as quickly as from 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class and LOE
possible. I A unchanged.
Table 6. Eligibility Recommendations for IV Alteplase in Patients With AIS

Indications (Class I)
Within 3 h* IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg over 60 min with initial 10% of dose given as bolus over 1 min) is recommended for
selected patients who may be treated within 3 h of ischemic stroke symptom onset or patient last known well or at baseline state.
Physicians should review the criteria outlined in this table to determine patient eligibility.† (Class I; LOE A)
Age For otherwise medically eligible patients ≥18 y of age, IV alteplase administration within 3 h is equally recommended for patients
<80 and >80 y of age.† (Class I; LOE A)
Severity For severe stroke symptoms, IV alteplase is indicated within 3 h from symptom onset of ischemic stroke. Despite increased risk of
hemorrhagic transformation, there is still proven clinical benefit for patients with severe stroke symptoms.† (Class I; LOE A)
For patients with mild but disabling stroke symptoms, IV alteplase is indicated within 3 h from symptom onset of ischemic stroke.
There should be no exclusion for patients with mild but nonetheless disabling stroke symptoms, in the opinion of the treating
physician, from treatment with IV alteplase because there is proven clinical benefit for those patients.† (Class I; LOE B-R)‡
3–4.5 h* IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg over 60 min with initial 10% of dose given as bolus over 1 min) is also
recommended for selected patients who can be treated within 3 and 4.5 h of ischemic stroke symptom onset or patient last known
well. Physicians should review the criteria outlined in this table to determine patient eligibility.† (Class I; LOE B-R)‡
Age IV alteplase treatment in the 3- to 4.5-h time window is recommended for those patients ≤80 y of age, without a history of both
Diabetes mellitus diabetes mellitus and prior stroke, NIHSS score ≤25, not taking any OACs, and without imaging evidence of ischemic injury
Prior stroke involving more than one third of the MCA territory.† (Class I; LOE B-R)‡
Severity
OACs
Imaging
Urgency Treatment should be initiated as quickly as possible within the above listed time frames because time to treatment is strongly
associated with outcomes.† (Class I; LOE A)
BP IV alteplase is recommended in patients whose BP can be lowered safely (to <185/110 mm Hg) with antihypertensive agents, with
the physician assessing the stability of the BP before starting IV alteplase.† (Class I; LOE B-NR)‡
Blood glucose IV alteplase is recommended in otherwise eligible patients with initial glucose levels >50 mg/dL.† (Class I; LOE A)
CT IV alteplase administration is recommended in the setting of early ischemic changes on NCCT of mild to moderate extent (other than
frank hypodensity).† (Class I; LOE A)
Prior antiplatelet IV alteplase is recommended for patients taking antiplatelet drug monotherapy before stroke on the basis of evidence that the
therapy benefit of alteplase outweighs a possible small increased risk of sICH.† (Class I; LOE A)
IV alteplase is recommended for patients taking antiplatelet drug combination therapy (eg, aspirin and clopidogrel) before stroke on
the basis of evidence that the benefit of alteplase outweighs a probable increased risk of sICH.† (Class I; LOE B-NR)‡
End-stage renal disease In patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis and normal aPTT, IV alteplase is recommended.† (Class I; LOE C-LD)‡
However, those with elevated aPTT may have elevated risk for hemorrhagic complications.
Contraindications (Class III)
Time of onset IV alteplase is not recommended in ischemic stroke patients who have an unclear time and/ or unwitnessed symptom onset and in
whom the time last known to be at baseline state is >3 or 4.5 h.† (Class III: No Benefit; LOE B-NR)‡§
IV alteplase is not recommended in ischemic stroke patients who awoke with stroke with time last known to be at baseline state >3
or 4.5 h.† (Class III: No Benefit; LOE B-NR)‡§
CT IV alteplase should not be administered to a patient whose CT reveals an acute intracranial hemorrhage.† (Class III: Harm; LOE
C-EO)‡§
There remains insufficient evidence to identify a threshold of hypoattenuation severity or extent that affects treatment response
to alteplase. However, administering IV alteplase to patients whose CT brain imaging exhibits extensive regions of clear
hypoattenuation is not recommended. These patients have a poor prognosis despite IV alteplase, and severe hypoattenuation
defined as obvious hypodensity represents irreversible injury.† (Class III: No Benefit; LOE A)§
Ischemic stroke within Use of IV alteplase in patients presenting with AIS who have had a prior ischemic stroke within 3 mo may be harmful.† (Class III:
3 mo Harm; LOE B-NR)‡§
Severe head trauma In AIS patients with recent severe head trauma (within 3 mo), IV alteplase is contraindicated.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§
within 3 mo
Given the possibility of bleeding complications from the underlying severe head trauma, IV alteplase should not be administered in
posttraumatic infarction that occurs during the acute in-hospital phase.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§
(Recommendation wording modified to match Class III stratifications.)
Intracranial/intraspinal For patients with AIS and a history of intracranial/spinal surgery within the prior 3 mo, IV alteplase is potentially harmful.† (Class III:
surgery within 3 mo Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§
(Continued )
Table 6. Continued

History of intracranial IV alteplase administration in patients who have a history of intracranial hemorrhage is potentially harmful.† (Class III: Harm;
hemorrhage LOE C-EO)‡§
Subarachnoid IV alteplase is contraindicated in patients presenting with symptoms and signs most consistent with an SAH.† (Class III: Harm;
hemorrhage LOE C-EO)‡§
GI malignancy or GI Patients with a structural GI malignancy or recent bleeding event within 21 d of their stroke event should be considered high risk,
bleed within 21 d and IV alteplase administration is potentially harmful.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§
Coagulopathy The safety and efficacy of IV alteplase for acute stroke patients with platelets <100 000/mm3, INR >1.7, aPTT >40 s, or PT >15 s
are unknown, and IV alteplase should not be administered.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§
(In patients without history of thrombocytopenia, treatment with IV alteplase can be initiated before availability of platelet count
but should be discontinued if platelet count is <100 000/mm3. In patients without recent use of OACs or heparin, treatment with IV
alteplase can be initiated before availability of coagulation test results but should be discontinued if INR is >1.7 or PT is abnormally
elevated by local laboratory standards.)
LMWH IV alteplase should not be administered to patients who have received a treatment dose of LMWH within the previous 24 h.† (Class
III: Harm; LOE B-NR)‖
Thrombin inhibitors or The use of IV alteplase in patients taking direct thrombin inhibitors or direct factor Xa inhibitors has not been firmly established but may be
factor Xa inhibitors harmful.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§ IV alteplase should not be administered to patients taking direct thrombin inhibitors or direct factor
Xa inhibitors unless laboratory tests such as aPTT, INR, platelet count, ecarin clotting time, thrombin time, or appropriate direct factor Xa
activity assays are normal or the patient has not received a dose of these agents for >48 h (assuming normal renal metabolizing function).
(Alteplase could be considered when appropriate laboratory tests such as aPTT, INR, ecarin clotting time, thrombin time, or direct
factor Xa activity assays are normal or when the patient has not taken a dose of these ACs for >48 h and renal function is normal.)

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Antiplatelet agents that inhibit the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor should not be administered concurrently with IV alteplase outside a
receptor inhibitors clinical trial.† (Class III: Harm; LOE B-R)‡§
Infective endocarditis For patients with AIS and symptoms consistent with infective endocarditis, treatment with IV alteplase should not be administered
because of the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-LD)‡§
Aortic arch dissection IV alteplase in AIS known or suspected to be associated with aortic arch dissection is potentially harmful and should not be
administered.† (Class III: Harm; LOE C-EO)‡§
Intra-axial intracranial IV alteplase treatment for patients with AIS who harbor an intra-axial intracranial neoplasm is potentially harmful.† (Class III: Harm;
neoplasm LOE C-EO)‡§
Additional recommendations for treatment with IV alteplase for patients with AIS (Class II)
Extended 3- to 4.5-h For patients >80 y of age presenting in the 3- to 4.5-h window, IV alteplase is safe and can be as effective as in younger patients.†
window (Class IIa; LOE B-NR)‡
For patients taking warfarin and with an INR ≤1.7 who present in the 3- to 4.5-h window, IV alteplase appears safe and may be
beneficial.† (Class IIb; LOE B-NR)‡
In AIS patients with prior stroke and diabetes mellitus presenting in the 3- to 4.5- h window, IV alteplase may be as effective as
treatment in the 0- to 3-h window and may be a reasonable option.† (Class IIb; LOE B-NR)‡
Severity 0- to 3-h Within 3 h from symptom onset, treatment of patients with mild ischemic stroke symptoms that are judged as nondisabling may be
window considered. Treatment risks should be weighed against possible benefits; however, more study is needed to further define the risk-
to-benefit ratio.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Severity 3- to 4.5-h For otherwise eligible patients with mild stroke presenting in the 3- to 4.5-h window, IV alteplase may be as effective as treatment
window in the 0- to 3-h window and may be a reasonable option. Treatment risks should be weighed against possible benefits. (Class IIb;
LOE B-NR)‖
The benefit of IV alteplase between 3 and 4.5 h from symptom onset for patients with very severe stroke symptoms (NIHSS > 25) is
uncertain.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)
Preexisting disability Preexisting disability does not seem to independently increase the risk of sICH after IV alteplase, but it may be associated
with less neurological improvement and higher mortality. Thrombolytic therapy with IV alteplase for acute stroke patients with
preexisting disability (mRS score ≥2) may be reasonable, but decisions should take into account relevant factors, including
quality of life, social support, place of residence, need for a caregiver, patients’ and families’ preferences, and goals of care.†
(Class IIb; LOE B-NR)‡
(Continued )
Table 6. Continued

Patients with preexisting dementia may benefit from IV alteplase. Individual considerations such as life expectancy and
premorbid level of function are important to determine whether alteplase may offer a clinically meaningful benefit.† (Class
IIb; LOE B-NR)‡
Early improvement IV alteplase treatment is reasonable for patients who present with moderate to severe ischemic stroke and demonstrate early
improvement but remain moderately impaired and potentially disabled in the judgment of the examiner.† (Class IIa; LOE A)
Seizure at onset IV alteplase is reasonable in patients with a seizure at the time of onset of acute stroke if evidence suggests that residual
impairments are secondary to stroke and not a postictal phenomenon.† (Class IIa; LOE C-LD)‡
Blood glucose Treatment with IV alteplase in patients with AIS who present with initial glucose levels <50 or >400 mg/dL that are subsequently
normalized and who are otherwise eligible may be reasonable. (Recommendation modified from 2015 IV Alteplase to conform to text
of 2015 IV Alteplase. [Class IIb; LOE C-LD])‡
Coagulopathy The safety and efficacy of IV alteplase for acute stroke patients with a clinical history of potential bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
are unknown. IV alteplase may be considered on a case-by-case basis.† (Class IIb; LOE C-EO)‡
IV alteplase may be reasonable in patients who have a history of warfarin use and an INR ≤1.7 and/or a PT <15 s.† (Class IIb; LOE
B-NR)‡
Dural puncture IV alteplase may be considered for patients who present with AIS, even in instances when they may have undergone a lumbar dural
puncture in the preceding 7 d.† (Class IIb; LOE C-EO)‡
Arterial puncture The safety and efficacy of administering IV alteplase to acute stroke patients who have had an arterial puncture of a
noncompressible blood vessel in the 7 d preceding stroke symptoms are uncertain.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Recent major trauma In AIS patients with recent major trauma (within 14 d) not involving the head, IV alteplase may be carefully considered, with the
risks of bleeding from injuries related to the trauma weighed against the severity and potential disability from the ischemic stroke.
(Recommendation modified from 2015 IV Alteplase to specify that it does not apply to head trauma. [Class IIb; LOE C-LD])‡
Recent major surgery Use of IV alteplase in carefully selected patients presenting with AIS who have undergone a major surgery in the preceding 14 d
may be considered, but the potential increased risk of surgical-site hemorrhage should be weighed against the anticipated benefits
of reduced stroke related neurological deficits.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
GI and genitourinary Reported literature details a low bleeding risk with IV alteplase administration in the setting of past GI/genitourinary bleeding.
bleeding Administration of IV alteplase in this patient population may be reasonable.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD‡
(Note: Alteplase administration within 21 d of a GI bleeding event is not recommended; see Contraindications.)
Menstruation IV alteplase is probably indicated in women who are menstruating who present with AIS and do not have a history of menorrhagia.
However, women should be warned that alteplase treatment could increase the degree of menstrual flow.† (Class IIa; LOE C-EO)
Because the potential benefits of IV alteplase probably outweigh the risks of serious bleeding in patients with recent or active
history of menorrhagia without clinically significant anemia or hypotension, IV alteplase administration may be considered.†
(Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
When there is a history of recent or active vaginal bleeding causing clinically significant anemia, then emergency consultation with a
gynecologist is probably indicated before a decision about IV alteplase is made.† (Class IIa; LOE C-EO)‡
Extracranial cervical IV alteplase in AIS known or suspected to be associated with extracranial cervical arterial dissection is reasonably safe within 4.5 h
dissections and probably recommended.† (Class IIa; LOE C-LD)‡
Intracranial arterial IV alteplase usefulness and hemorrhagic risk in AIS known or suspected to be associated with intracranial arterial dissection remain
dissection unknown, uncertain, and not well established.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Unruptured intracranial For patients presenting with AIS who are known to harbor a small or moderate-sized (<10 mm) unruptured and unsecured
aneurysm intracranial aneurysm, administration of IV alteplase is reasonable and probably recommended.† (Class IIa; LOE C-LD)‡
Usefulness and risk of IV alteplase in patients with AIS who harbor a giant unruptured and unsecured intracranial aneurysm are not
well established.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Intracranial vascular For patients presenting with AIS who are known to harbor an unruptured and untreated intracranial vascular malformation the
malformations usefulness and risks of administration of IV alteplase are not well established.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Because of the increased risk of ICH in this population of patients, IV alteplase may be considered in patients with stroke with
severe neurological deficits and a high likelihood of morbidity and mortality to outweigh the anticipated risk of ICH secondary to
thrombolysis.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
CMBs In otherwise eligible patients who have previously had a small number (1–10) of CMBs demonstrated on MRI, administration of IV
alteplase is reasonable. (Class IIa; Level B-NR)‖
In otherwise eligible patients who have previously had a high burden of CMBs (>10) demonstrated on MRI, treatment with IV
alteplase may be associated with an increased risk of sICH, and the benefits of treatment are uncertain. Treatment may be
reasonable if there is the potential for substantial benefit. (Class IIb; Level B-NR)‖
(Continued )
Table 6. Continued

Extra-axial intracranial IV alteplase treatment is probably recommended for patients with AIS who harbor an extra-axial intracranial neoplasm.† (Class IIa;
neoplasms LOE C-EO)‡
Acute MI For patients presenting with concurrent AIS and acute MI, treatment with IV alteplase at the dose appropriate for cerebral ischemia,
followed by percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stenting if indicated, is reasonable.† (Class IIa; LOE C-EO)‡
Recent MI For patients presenting with AIS and a history of recent MI in the past 3 mo, treating the ischemic stroke with IV alteplase is
reasonable if the recent MI was non-STEMI.† (Class IIa; LOE C-LD)‡
For patients presenting with AIS and a history of recent MI in the past 3 mo, treating the ischemic stroke with IV alteplase is
reasonable if the recent MI was a STEMI involving the right or inferior myocardium.† (Class IIa; LOE C-LD)‡
For patients presenting with AIS and a history of recent MI in the past 3 mo, treating the ischemic stroke with IV alteplase may
reasonable if the recent MI was a STEMI involving the left anterior myocardium.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Other cardiac diseases For patients with major AIS likely to produce severe disability and acute pericarditis, treatment with IV alteplase may be reasonable†
(Class IIb; LOE C-EO)‡; urgent consultation with a cardiologist is recommended in this situation.
For patients presenting with moderate AIS likely to produce mild disability and acute pericarditis, treatment with IV alteplase is of
uncertain net benefit.† (Class IIb; LOE C-EO)‡
For patients with major AIS likely to produce severe disability and known left atrial or ventricular thrombus, treatment with IV
alteplase may be reasonable.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
For patients presenting with moderate AIS likely to produce mild disability and known left atrial or ventricular thrombus, treatment
with IV alteplase is of uncertain net benefit.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
For patients with major AIS likely to produce severe disability and cardiac myxoma, treatment with IV alteplase may be reasonable.†
For patients presenting with major AIS likely to produce severe disability and papillary fibroelastoma, treatment with IV alteplase
may be reasonable.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
Procedural stroke IV alteplase is reasonable for the treatment of AIS complications of cardiac or cerebral angiographic procedures, depending on the
usual eligibility criteria.† (Class IIa; LOE A)‡
Systemic malignancy The safety and efficacy of alteplase in patients with current malignancy are not well established.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡ Patients
with systemic malignancy and reasonable (>6 mo) life expectancy may benefit from IV alteplase if other contraindications such as
coagulation abnormalities, recent surgery, or systemic bleeding do not coexist.
Pregnancy IV alteplase administration may be considered in pregnancy when the anticipated benefits of treating moderate or severe stroke
outweigh the anticipated increased risks of uterine bleeding.† (Class IIb; LOE C-LD)‡
The safety and efficacy of IV alteplase in the early postpartum period (<14 d after delivery) have not been well established.†
Ophthalmological Use of IV alteplase in patients presenting with AIS who have a history of diabetic hemorrhagic retinopathy or other hemorrhagic
conditions ophthalmic conditions is reasonable to recommend, but the potential increased risk of visual loss should be weighed against the
anticipated benefits of reduced stroke-related neurological deficits.† (Class IIa; LOE B-NR)‡
Sickle cell disease IV alteplase for adults presenting with an AIS with known sickle cell disease can be beneficial. (Class IIa; LOE B-NR)‖
Illicit drug use Treating clinicians should be aware that illicit drug use may be a contributing factor to incident stroke. IV alteplase is reasonable in
instances of illicit drug use–associated AIS in patients with no other exclusions.† (Class IIa; LOE C-LD)‡
Stroke mimics The risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the stroke mimic population is quite low; thus, starting IV alteplase is probably
recommended in preference over delaying treatment to pursue additional diagnostic studies.† (Class IIa; LOE B-NR)
Clinicians should also be informed of the indications and contraindications from local regulatory agencies (for current information from the US Food and Drug
Administration refer to http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/103172s5203lbl.pdf).
For a detailed discussion of this topic and evidence supporting these recommendations, refer to the American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement on the
rationale for inclusion and exclusion criteria for IV alteplase in AIS.15
AC indicates anticoagulants; ACC, American College of Cardiology; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; AHA, American Heart Association; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin
time; BP, blood pressure; CMB, cerebral microbleed; CT, computed tomography; GI, gastrointestinal; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; INR, international normalized
ratio; IV, intravenous; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; LOE, level of evidence; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MI, myocardial infarction; MRI, magnetic resonance
imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NCCT, noncontrast computed tomography; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OAC, oral anticoagulant; PT,
prothromboplastin time; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; and STEMI, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction.
*When uncertain, the time of onset time should be considered the time when the patient was last known to be normal or at baseline neurological condition.
†Recommendation unchanged or reworded for clarity from 2015 IV Alteplase. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1 for original wording.
‡LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation Classification System.
§COR amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation Classification System.
‖See also the text of these guidelines for additional information on these recommendations.
Table 7. Treatment of AIS: IV Administration of Alteplase Table 9. Management of Orolingual Angioedema Associated
With IV Alteplase Administration for AIS
Infuse 0.9 mg/kg (maximum dose 90 mg) over 60 min, with 10% of the
dose given as a bolus over 1 min. Class IIb, LOE C-EO
Admit the patient to an intensive care or stroke unit for monitoring. Maintain airway
If the patient develops severe headache, acute hypertension, nausea, or Endotracheal intubation may not be necessary if edema is limited to
vomiting or has a worsening neurological examination, discontinue the anterior tongue and lips.
infusion (if IV alteplase is being administered) and obtain emergency head
Edema involving larynx, palate, floor of mouth, or oropharynx with rapid
CT scan.
progression (within 30 min) poses higher risk of requiring intubation.
Measure BP and perform neurological assessments every 15 min during
Awake fiberoptic intubation is optimal. Nasal-tracheal intubation may be
and after IV alteplase infusion for 2 h, then every 30 min for 6 h, then
required but poses risk of epistaxis post-IV alteplase. Cricothyroidotomy
hourly until 24 h after IV alteplase treatment.
is rarely needed and also problematic after IV alteplase.
Increase the frequency of BP measurements if SBP is >180 mm Hg or if
Discontinue IV alteplase infusion and hold ACEIs
DBP is >105 mm Hg; administer antihypertensive medications to maintain
BP at or below these levels (Table 5). Administer IV methylprednisolone 125 mg
Delay placement of nasogastric tubes, indwelling bladder catheters, or Administer IV diphenhydramine 50 mg
intra-arterial pressure catheters if the patient can be safely managed
Administer ranitidine 50 mg IV or famotidine 20 mg IV
without them.
If there is further increase in angioedema, administer epinephrine (0.1%)
Obtain a follow-up CT or MRI scan at 24 h after IV alteplase before starting

0.3 mL subcutaneously or by nebulizer 0.5 mL
anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents.
AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; BP, blood pressure; CT, computed Icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, 3 mL (30 mg)
tomography; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; IV, intravenous; MRI, magnetic subcutaneously in abdominal area; additional injection of 30 mg may be
resonance imaging; and SBP, systolic blood pressure. administered at intervals of 6 h not to exceed total of 3 injections in 24 h;
Reprinted from Jauch et al.1 Copyright © 2013, American Heart Association, and plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor (20 IU/kg) has been successfully
Inc. used in hereditary angioedema and ACEI-related angioedema
Supportive care
ACEI indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; AIS, acute ischemic
Table 8. Management of Symptomatic Intracranial Bleeding stroke; IV, intravenous; and LOE, Level of Evidence.
Occurring Within 24 Hours After Administration of IV Alteplase Sources: Foster-Goldman and McCarthy,158 Gorski and Schmidt,159 Lewis,160
for Treatment of AIS Lin et al,161 Correia et al,162 O’Carroll and Aguilar,163 Myslimi et al,164 and Pahs
et al.165
Class IIb, LOE C-EO
Stop alteplase infusion
CBC, PT (INR), aPTT, fibrinogen level, and type and cross-match
Emergent nonenhanced head CT
Cryoprecipitate (includes factor VIII): 10 U infused over 10–30 min (onset in
1 h, peaks in 12 h); administer additional dose for fibrinogen level of <200
mg/dL
Tranexamic acid 1000 mg IV infused over 10 min OR ε-aminocaproic acid
4–5 g over 1 h, followed by 1 g IV until bleeding is controlled (peak onset
in 3 h)
Hematology and neurosurgery consultations
Supportive therapy, including BP management, ICP, CPP, MAP,
temperature, and glucose control
AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin
time; BP, blood pressure; CBC, complete blood count; CPP, cerebral perfusion
pressure; CT, computed tomography; ICP, intracranial pressure; INR,
international normalized ratio; IV, intravenous; LOE, Level of Evidence; MAP,
mean arterial pressure; and PT, prothrombin time.
Sources: Sloan et al,149 Mahaffey et al,150 Goldstein et al,151 French et al,152
Yaghi et al,153–155 Stone et al,156 and Frontera et al.157
3.6. Other IV Thrombolytics and Sonothrombolysis

3.6. Other IV Thrombolytics and Sonothrombolysis COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. The benefit of IV defibrinogenating agents and of IV fibrinolytic Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
agents other than alteplase and tenecteplase is unproven; Guidelines.
III: No Benefit B-R
therefore, their administration is not recommended outside a
clinical trial.
Randomized placebo-controlled trials have not shown benefit from the administration of IV streptokinase within See Table XXXIX in online Data Supplement 1.
6 hours or desmoteplase within 3 to 9 hours after stroke onset in patients with ischemic penumbra or large
intracranial artery occlusion or severe stenosis.92,95,167,168
2. T enecteplase administered as a 0.4-mg/kg single IV bolus has New recommendation.
not been proven to be superior or noninferior to alteplase but
might be considered as an alternative to alteplase in patients IIb B-R
with minor neurological impairment and no major intracranial
occlusion.
IV tenecteplase has been compared to IV alteplase up to 6 hours after stroke onset in 3 phase II and 1 phase See Table XXXIX in online Data Supplement 1.
III superiority trials; tenecteplase appears to be similarly safe, but it is unclear whether it is as effective as
or more effective than alteplase.89,91,169,170 In the largest trial of 1100 subjects, tenecteplase at a dose of 0.4
mg/kg failed to demonstrate superiority and had a safety and efficacy profile similar to that of alteplase in a
stroke population composed predominantly of patients with minor neurological impairment (median NIHSS
score, 4) and no major intracranial occlusion.170 Tenecteplase is given as a single IV bolus as opposed to the
1-hour infusion of alteplase.
3. The use of sonothrombolysis as adjuvant therapy with IV New recommendation.
III: No Benefit B-R
thrombolysis is not recommended.
Since the publication of the 2013 AIS Guidelines, a further RCT of sonothrombolysis as adjuvant therapy for IV See Table XL in online Data Supplement 1.
thrombolysis has shown no clinical benefit. NOR-SASS (Norwegian Sonothrombolysis in Acute Stroke Study)
randomized 183 patients who had received either alteplase or tenecteplase for AIS within 4.5 hours of onset to
either contrast-enhanced sonothrombolysis (93 patients) or sham (90 patients). Neurological improvement at 24
hours and functional outcome at 90 days were not statistically significantly different in the 2 groups, nor were
the rates of sICH.171 At this time, there are no RCT data to support additional clinical benefit of sonothrombolysis
as adjuvant therapy for IV thrombolysis.
3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy

3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Patients eligible for IV alteplase should receive IV alteplase even if Recommendation reworded for clarity from
EVTs are being considered. 2015 Endovascular.
I A
2. In patients under consideration for mechanical thrombectomy, Recommendation revised from 2015
observation after IV alteplase to assess for clinical response should III: Harm B-R Endovascular.
not be performed.
In pooled patient-level data from 5 trials (HERMES [Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple See Tables XXIII and XLI in online Data
Endovascular Stroke Trials], which included the 5 trials MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, SWIFT PRIME, and Supplement 1.
EXTEND-IA), the odds of better disability outcomes at 90 days (mRS scale distribution) with the mechanical
thrombectomy group declined with longer time from symptom onset to expected arterial puncture: common
odds ratio (cOR) at 3 hours, 2.79 (95% CI, 1.96–3.98), absolute risk difference (ARD) for lower disability
scores, 39.2%; cOR at 6 hours, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.30–3.00), ARD, 30.2%; and cOR at 8 hours, 1.57 (95% CI,
0.86–2.88), ARD, 15.7%, retaining statistical significance through 7 hours 18 minutes.32 Among 390 patients
who achieved substantial reperfusion with endovascular thrombectomy, each 1-hour delay to reperfusion was
associated with a less favorable degree of disability (cOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76–0.93; ARD, −6.7%) and less
functional independence (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71–0.92; ARD, −5.2%; 95% CI, −8.3 to −2.1) but no change
in mortality (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.93–1.34; ARD, 1.5%; 95% CI, −0.9 to 4.2).32 These data do not directly
address the question of whether patients should be observed after IV alteplase to assess for clinical response
before pursuing mechanical thrombectomy. However, one can infer that because disability outcomes at 90
days were directly associated with time from symptom onset to arterial puncture, any cause for delay to
mechanical thrombectomy, including observing for a clinical response after IV alteplase, should be avoided.
Therefore, the recommendation is slightly modified from the 2015 Endovascular Update.
3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3. Patients should receive mechanical thrombectomy with a stent Recommendation revised from 2015
retriever if they meet all the following criteria: (1) prestroke mRS Endovascular.
score of 0 to 1; (2) causative occlusion of the internal carotid
I A
artery or MCA segment 1 (M1); (3) age ≥18 years; (4) NIHSS score
of ≥6; (5) ASPECTS of ≥6; and (6) treatment can be initiated (groin
puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset.
Results from 6 recent randomized trials of mechanical thrombectomy using predominantly stent retriever See Tables XXIII and XLI in online Data
devices (MR CLEAN, SWIFT PRIME, EXTEND-IA, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, THRACE) support Class I, LOE A Supplement 1.
recommendations for a defined group of patients as described in the 2015 guidelines.102–107 A pooled, patient-
level analysis from 5 of these studies reported by the HERMES collaboration showed treatment effect in the
subgroup of 188 patients not treated with IV alteplase (cOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.30–4.55); therefore, pretreatment
with IV alteplase has been removed from the prior recommendation. The HERMES pooled patient-level data
also showed that mechanical thrombectomy had a favorable effect over standard care in patients ≥80 years
old (cOR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.95–6.92).172 In patient-level data pooled from trials in which the Solitaire was the
only or the predominant device used, a prespecified meta-analysis (SEER Collaboration [Safety and Efficacy
of Solitaire Stent Thrombectomy–Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials]: SWIFT PRIME,
ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, REVASCAT) showed that mechanical thrombectomy had a favorable effect over standard
care in patients ≥80 years old (3.46; 95% CI, 1.58–7.60).173 In a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (MR CLEAN,
ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, SWIFT PRIME, REVASCAT), there was favorable effect with mechanical thrombectomy
over standard care without heterogeneity of effect across patient age subgroups (for patient age <70 and
≥70 years: OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.51–3.84; and OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.20–4.26, respectively).174 However, the
number of patients in these trials who were ≥90 years of age was very small, and the benefit of mechanical
thrombectomy over standard care in patients ≥90 years of age is not clear. As with any treatment decision
in an elderly patient, consideration of comorbidities and risks should factor into the decision making for
mechanical thrombectomy.
4. Although the benefits are uncertain, the use of mechanical Recommendation reworded for clarity from
thrombectomy with stent retrievers may be reasonable for carefully 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
selected patients with AIS in whom treatment can be initiated revised.
IIb B-R
(groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset and who have See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
causative occlusion of the MCA segment 2 (M2) or MCA segment 3 for original wording.
(M3) portion of the MCAs.
In pooled patient-level data from 5 trials (HERMES, which included the 5 trials MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, See Tables XXIII and XLI in online Data
SWIFT PRIME, and EXTEND-IA), the direction of treatment effect for mechanical thrombectomy over standard Supplement 1.
care was favorable in M2 occlusions, but the adjusted common OR was not significant (1.28; 95% CI,
0.51–3.21).172 In patient-level data pooled from trials in which the Solitaire was the only or the predominant
device used, a prespecified meta-analysis (SEER Collaboration: SWIFT PRIME, ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, REVASCAT)
showed that the direction of treatment effect was favorable for mechanical thrombectomy over standard care
in M2 occlusions, but the OR and 95% CI were not significant.173 In an analysis of pooled data from SWIFT
(Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy), STAR (Solitaire Flow Restoration Thrombectomy for Acute
Revascularization), DEFUSE 2, and IMS III, among patients with M2 occlusions, reperfusion was associated with
excellent functional outcomes (mRS score 0–1; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0–4.7).175 Therefore, the recommendation for
mechanical thrombectomy for M2/M3 occlusions does not change substantively from the 2015 AHA/American
Stroke Association focused update.
5. A
lthough the benefits are uncertain, the use of mechanical Recommendation reworded for clarity from
thrombectomy with stent retrievers may be reasonable for carefully 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
selected patients with AIS in whom treatment can be initiated amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
(groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset and who have IIb C-EO Recommendation Classification System.
causative occlusion of the anterior cerebral arteries, vertebral See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
arteries, basilar artery, or posterior cerebral arteries. for original wording.
6. Although its benefits are uncertain, the use of mechanical Recommendation unchanged from 2015
thrombectomy with stent retrievers may be reasonable for Endovascular.
patients with AIS in whom treatment can be initiated (groin
puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset and who have IIb B-R
prestroke mRS score >1, ASPECTS <6, or NIHSS score <6, and
causative occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or proximal
MCA (M1). Additional randomized trial data are needed.

normal who have LVO in the anterior circulation and meet other DAWN
I A
or DEFUSE 3 eligibility criteria, mechanical thrombectomy is
recommended.
normal who have LVO in the anterior circulation and meet other IIa B-R
DAWN eligibility criteria, mechanical thrombectomy is reasonable.
The DAWN trial used clinical imaging mismatch (a combination of NIHSS score and imaging findings on CTP See Table XXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
or DW-MRI) as eligibility criteria to select patients with large anterior circulation vessel occlusion for treatment
with mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours from last known normal. This trial demonstrated
an overall benefit in function outcome at 90 days in the treatment group (mRS score 0–2, 49% versus 13%;
adjusted difference, 33%; 95% CI, 21–44; posterior probability of superiority >0.999).108 In DAWN, there were
few strokes with witnessed onset (12%).The DEFUSE 3 trial used perfusion-core mismatch and maximum
core size as imaging criteria to select patients with large anterior circulation occlusion 6 to 16 hours from
last seen well for mechanical thrombectomy. This trial showed a benefit in functional outcome at 90 days in
the treated group (mRS score 0–2, 44.6% versus 16.7%; RR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.60–4.48; P<0.0001).109 Benefit
was independently demonstrated for the subgroup of patients who met DAWN eligibility criteria and for the
subgroup who did not. DAWN and DEFUSE 3 are the only RCTs showing benefit of mechanical thrombectomy
>6 hours from onset. Therefore, only the eligibility criteria from these trials should be used for patient
selection. Although future RCTs may demonstrate that additional eligibility criteria can be used to select
patients who benefit from mechanical thrombectomy, at this time, the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 eligibility should
be strictly adhered to in clinical practice.
9. The technical goal of the thrombectomy procedure should be Recommendation reworded for clarity from
reperfusion to a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2015 Endovascular.
(mTICI) 2b/3 angiographic result to maximize the probability of a I A
good functional clinical outcome. for original wording.
Mechanical thrombectomy aims to achieve reperfusion, not simply recanalization. A variety of reperfusion scores
exist, but the mTICI score is the current assessment tool of choice, with proven value in predicting clinical
outcomes.176,177 All recent endovascular trials used the mTICI 2b/3 threshold for adequate reperfusion, with high
rates achieved. In HERMES, 402 of 570 patients (71%) were successfully reperfused to mTICI 2b/3.172 Earlier
trials with less efficient devices showed lower recanalization rates, 1 factor in their inability to demonstrate
benefit from the procedure (IMS III, 41%; MR RESCUE, 25%). The additional benefit of pursuing mTICI of 3 rather
than 2b deserves further investigation.
10. As with IV alteplase, reduced time from symptom onset to Recommendation revised from 2015
reperfusion with endovascular therapies is highly associated with Endovascular.
better clinical outcomes. To ensure benefit, reperfusion to TICI I B-R
grade 2b/3 should be achieved as early as possible within the
therapeutic window.
In pooled patient-level data from 5 trials (HERMES, which included the 5 trials MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, See Tables XXIII and XLI in online Data
SWIFT PRIME, and EXTEND-IA), the odds of better disability outcomes at 90 days (mRS scale distribution) Supplement 1.
with the mechanical thrombectomy group declined with longer time from symptom onset to expected arterial
puncture: cOR at 3 hours, 2.79 (95% CI, 1.96–3.98), ARD for lower disability scores, 39.2%; cOR at 6
hours, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.30–3.00), ARD, 30.2%; cOR at 8 hours, 1.57 (95% CI, 0.86–2.88), and ARD, 15.7%,
retaining statistical significance through 7 hours 18 minutes.32 Among 390 patients who achieved substantial
reperfusion with endovascular thrombectomy, each 1-hour delay to reperfusion was associated with a less
favorable degree of disability (cOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76–0.93; ARD, −6.7%) and less functional independence
(OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71–0.92; ARD, −5.2%; 95% CI, −8.3 to −2.1).32 In the DAWN trial, the likelihood of
achieving an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days in the mechanical thrombectomy group declined with time
since last known normal.108 Therefore, reduced time from symptom onset to reperfusion with endovascular
therapies is highly associated with better clinical outcomes. A variety of reperfusion scores exist, but the mTICI
score is the current assessment tool of choice, with proven value in predicting clinical outcomes.129,130 All
recent endovascular trials used the mTICI 2b/3 threshold for adequate reperfusion, with high rates achieved.
In HERMES, 402 of 570 patients (71%) were successfully reperfused to TICI 2b/3.172 Earlier trials with less
efficient devices showed lower recanalization rates, 1 factor in their inability to demonstrate benefit from the
procedure (IMS III, 41%; MR RESCUE, 25%).
11. U
se of stent retrievers is indicated in preference to the Mechanical Recommendation unchanged from 2015
I A
Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) device. Endovascular.

12. The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent Recommendation revised from 2015
retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may Endovascular.
IIb B-R
be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain
the first choice.
The ASTER trial (Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization) compared the contact See Table XXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
aspiration technique and the standard stent retriever technique as first-line EVT for successful revascularization
within 6 hours among patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke and LVO. The proportion of
patients with successful revascularization at the end of all interventions was 85.4% (n=164) in the contact
aspiration group versus 83.1% (n=157) in the stent retriever group (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.68–2.10; P=0.53;
difference, 2.4%; 95% CI, −5.4 to 9.7%). The secondary clinical end point of mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days was
achieved by 82 of 181 (45.3%) in the contact aspiration group versus 91 of 182 (50.0%) in the stent retriever
group (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54–1.26; P=0.38). The primary end point in ASTER was technical (successful
revascularization after all interventions), and the trial was not powered to detect a smaller yet potentially
clinically important difference between groups. Given its superiority design to detect a 15% difference in the
primary end point, this trial was not designed to establish noninferiority.178
13. The use of a proximal balloon guide catheter or a large-bore Recommendation and Class unchanged from
distal-access catheter, rather than a cervical guide catheter 2015 Endovascular. LOE amended to conform
alone, in conjunction with stent retrievers may be beneficial. with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
IIa C-LD
Future studies should examine which systems provide the Classification System.
highest recanalization rates with the lowest risk for nontarget
embolization.
14. Use of salvage technical adjuncts including intra-arterial Recommendation reworded for clarity from
thrombolysis may be reasonable to achieve mTICI 2b/3 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
angiographic results. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
IIb C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
Intra-arterial lytic therapy played a limited role in the recent endovascular trials but was used as rescue therapy,
not initial treatment. In MR CLEAN, the EVT method was at the discretion of operator, with 40 of 233 treated
with alternative stent retrievers to Trevo and Solitaire or intra-arterial alteplase. Details are not available, but no
patients were treated with intra-arterial alteplase alone. Twenty-four of 233 (10.3%) had treatment with a second
modality. Treatment method had no impact on outcomes in this trial.179 In THRACE, an intra-arterial lytic was used
to a maximum dose of 0.3 mg/kg and allowed to establish goal reperfusion, only after mechanical thrombectomy
was attempted. A mean dose of 8.8 mg was administered in 15 of 141 patients receiving mechanical
thrombectomy (11%). There was no effect on outcomes compared with mechanical thrombectomy alone.
15. EVT of tandem occlusions (both extracranial and intracranial Recommendation revised from 2015
IIb B-R
occlusions) at the time of thrombectomy may be reasonable. Endovascular.
Tandem occlusions were considered in recent endovascular trials that showed benefit of mechanical See Tables XXIII and XLI in online Data
thrombectomy over medical management alone. In the HERMES meta-analysis, 122 of 1254 tandem occlusions Supplement 1.
(RR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.96–3.4) and 1132 of 1254 nontandem occlusions (RR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.40–2.09) were
reported compared with medical management.172 In THRACE, 24 of 196 tandem occlusions (RR, 1.82; 95% CI,
0.55–6.07) and 172 of 196 nontandem occlusions (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.87–2.07) were treated compared with IV
alteplase alone.106 In HERMES, there is heterogeneity of treatment methods directed to the proximal extracranial
carotid occlusion (no revascularization of the proximal lesion versus angioplasty versus stenting). Multiple
retrospective reports detail the technical success of EVT for tandem occlusions but do not provide specifics
on comparative approaches. No conclusions about the optimum treatment approach for patients with tandem
occlusions are therefore possible.
16. It is reasonable to select an anesthetic technique during Recommendation revised from 2015
endovascular therapy for AIS on the basis of individualized Endovascular.
assessment of patient risk factors, technical performance of the IIa B-R
procedure, and other clinical characteristics. Further randomized
trial data are needed.
Conscious sedation (CS) was widely used in the recent endovascular trials (90.9% of ESCAPE, 63% of SWIFT See Tables XLII and XLIII in online Data
PRIME) with no clear positive or negative impact on outcome. In MR CLEAN, post hoc analysis showed a 51% Supplement 1.
(95% CI, 31–86) decrease in treatment effect of general anesthesia (GA) compared with CS.180 In THRACE, 51
of 67 patients receiving GA and 43 of 69 patients receiving CS achieved TICI 2b/3 (P=0.059) with no impact
on outcome.106 Thirty-five of 67 patients with GA and 36 of 74 with CS had mRS scores of 0 to 2 at 90 days.
Although several retrospective studies suggest that GA produces worsening of functional outcomes, there are
limited prospective randomized data. Two small (≤150 participants) single-center RCTs have compared GA with
CS. Both failed to show superiority of either treatment for the primary clinical end point.181,182 Until further data
are available, either method of procedural sedation is reasonable.

17. In patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy, it is New recommendation.
reasonable to maintain the BP ≤180/105 mm Hg during and for 24 IIa B-NR
hours after the procedure.
18. In patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy with New recommendation.
successful reperfusion, it might be reasonable to maintain BP at a IIb B-NR
level <180/105 mm Hg.
There are very limited data to guide BP therapy during and after the procedure in patients who undergo See Table XXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
mechanical thrombectomy. RCT data on optimal BP management approaches in this setting are not available.
The vast majority of patients enrolled in under 6-hour RCTs received IV alteplase and the trial protocols
stipulated management according to local guidelines with BP ≤80/105 during and for 24 hours after the
procedure for these participants. Two trial protocols provided additional recommendations. The ESCAPE protocol
states that systolic BP ≥150 mm Hg is probably useful in promoting and keeping collateral flow adequate
while the artery remains occluded and that controlling BP once reperfusion has been achieved and aiming
for a normal BP for that individual is sensible. Labetalol or an IV β-blocker such as metoprolol in low doses is
recommended.104 The DAWN protocol recommends maintaining systolic BP <140 mm Hg in the first 24 hours in
subjects who are reperfused after mechanical thrombectomy (defined as achieving more than two thirds MCA
territory reperfusion).183
3.8. Other EVTs

3.8. Other EVTs COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Initial treatment with intra-arterial thrombolysis is beneficial for Recommendation and Class unchanged from
carefully selected patients with major ischemic strokes of <6 2015 Endovascular. LOE amended to conform
I B-R
hours’ duration caused by occlusions of the MCA. with the ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
2. Regarding the previous recommendation about intra-arterial Recommendation reworded for clarity from
thrombolysis, these data are derived from clinical trials that no 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
longer reflect current practice, including the use of fibrinolytic amended to conform with the ACC/AHA 2015
drugs that are not available. A clinically beneficial dose of intra- Recommendation Classification System.
I C-EO
arterial alteplase is not established, and alteplase does not have See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
US Food and Drug Administration approval for intra-arterial use. As for original wording.
a consequence, mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers is
recommended over intra-arterial thrombolysis as first-line therapy.
3. Intra-arterial thrombolysis initiated within 6 hours of stroke onset Recommendation reworded for clarity from
in carefully selected patients who have contraindications to the 2015 Endovascular. Class unchanged. LOE
use of IV alteplase might be considered, but the consequences are amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
unknown. IIb C-EO Recommendation Classification System.
3.9. Antiplatelet Treatment

3.9. Antiplatelet Treatment COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Administration of aspirin is recommended in patients with Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
AIS within 24 to 48 hours after onset. For those treated with Guidelines.
IV alteplase, aspirin administration is generally delayed until
24 hours later but might be considered in the presence of I A
concomitant conditions for which such treatment given in the
absence of IV alteplase is known to provide substantial benefit or
withholding such treatment is known to cause substantial risk.
The safety and benefit of aspirin in the treatment of patients with AIS were established by 2 large clinical trials See Table XXXVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
administering doses between 160 and 300 mg.184,185 This has recently been confirmed by a large Cochrane review
of aspirin trials.186 In patients unsafe or unable to swallow, rectal or nasogastric administration is appropriate.
Limited data exist on the use of alternative antiplatelet agents in the treatment of AIS. However, in patients with a
contraindication to aspirin, administering alternative antiplatelet agents may be reasonable. A retrospective analysis
of consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted to a single center in Seoul, South Korea, found no increased risk of
hemorrhage with early initiation of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (<24 hours) after IV alteplase or EVT compared
with initiation >24 hours. However, this study may have been subject to selection bias, and the timing of initiation
of antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation should be made on an individual level, balancing risk versus benefit. The
recommendation was modified from the previous guideline to remove the specific dosing recommendation, “initial
dose is 325 mg,” because previous clinical trials supporting its use for AIS included doses of 160 to 300 mg.
3.9. Antiplatelet Treatment (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

2. Aspirin is not recommended as a substitute for acute stroke Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
treatment in patients who are otherwise eligible for IV alteplase or III: No Benefit B-R Guidelines.
mechanical thrombectomy.
Recommendation was modified to eliminate wording about “acute interventions,” which are broadly defined, and
to specify that aspirin is a less effective substitute for the treatment of AIS in patients who are otherwise eligible
for IV alteplase or mechanical thrombectomy.
3. The efficacy of IV tirofiban and eptifibatide is not well established. Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
IIb B-R
Further clinical trials are needed. Guidelines.
Prospective, randomized, open-label phase II trials of tirofiban187 and eptifibatide188 have suggested safety for See Table XLIV in online Data Supplement 1.
treatment in patients with AIS. Single-arm studies of eptifibatide as adjunctive therapy to IV alteplase support
ongoing RCTs to establish safety and efficacy.189,190
4. The administration of other glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
antagonists, including abciximab, in the treatment of AIS is Guidelines.
potentially harmful and should not be performed. Further research III: Harm B-R
testing the safety and efficacy of these medications in patients with
AIS is required.
A recent Cochrane review of IV glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in the treatment of AIS found that these See Table XLV in online Data Supplement 1.
agents are associated with a significant risk of ICH without a measurable improvement in death or disability.191
The majority of trial data apply to abciximab, which was studied in the AbESTT trial (A Study of Effectiveness and
Safety of Abciximab in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke). The phase III trial was terminated early because of
an unfavorable risk-benefit analysis.192
5. In patients presenting with minor stroke, treatment for 21 days with New recommendation.
dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) begun within 24
IIa B-R
hours can be beneficial for early secondary stroke prevention for a
period of up to 90 days from symptom onset.
The CHANCE trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) was a See Table XLV in online Data Supplement 1.
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in China to study the efficacy of short-term dual
antiplatelet therapy begun within 24 hours, clopidogrel plus aspirin for 21 days followed by clopidogrel alone to
90 days, in patients with minor stroke (NIHSS score ≤3) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 [Age, Blood Pressure, Clinical
Features, Duration, Diabetes] score ≥4). The primary outcome of recurrent stroke at 90 days (ischemic or
hemorrhagic) favored dual antiplatelet therapy over aspirin alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57–0.81;
P<0.001).193 A subsequent report of 1-year outcomes found a durable treatment effect, but the HR for secondary
stroke prevention was only significantly beneficial in the first 90 days.194 The generalizability of this intervention
in non-Asian populations remains to be established, and a large phase III multicenter trial in the United States,
Canada, Europe, and Australia is ongoing.195
6. Ticagrelor is not recommended (over aspirin) in the acute treatment New recommendation.
III: No Benefit B-R
of patients with minor stroke.
The recently completed SOCRATES trial (Acute Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack Treated With Aspirin See Table XLV in online Data Supplement 1.
or Ticagrelor and Patient Outcomes) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ticagrelor
versus aspirin begun within 24 hours in patients with minor stroke (NIHSS score ≤5) or TIA (ABCD2 [Age,
Blood Pressure, Clinical Features, Duration, Diabetes] score ≥4). With a primary outcome of time to the
composite end point of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death up to 90 days, ticagrelor was not found to
be superior to aspirin (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78–1.01; P=0.07).196 However, because there were no significant
safety differences in the 2 groups, ticagrelor may be a reasonable alternative in stroke patients who have a
contraindication to aspirin.
3.10. Anticoagulants
3.10. Anticoagulants COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Urgent anticoagulation, with the goal of preventing early recurrent Recommendation and LOE unchanged
stroke, halting neurological worsening, or improving outcomes after from 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class
III: No Benefit A
AIS, is not recommended for treatment of patients with AIS. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
Further support for this unchanged recommendation from the 2013 AIS Guidelines is provided by 2 updated See Table XLV in online Data Supplement 1.
meta-analyses that confirm the lack of benefit of urgent anticoagulation.197,198 An additional study, not included in
these meta-analyses, investigated the efficacy of LMWH compared with aspirin in preventing early neurological
deterioration in an unblinded RCT. Although there was a statistically significant difference in early neurological
deterioration at 10 days after admission (LMWH, 27 [3.95%] versus aspirin, 81 [11.82%]; P<0.001), there was
no difference in 6-month mRS score of 0 to 2 (LMWH, 64.2% versus aspirin, 6.52%; P=0.33).199
3.10. Anticoagulants (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

2. The usefulness of urgent anticoagulation in patients with severe Recommendation and Class unchanged
stenosis of an internal carotid artery ipsilateral to an ischemic from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
IIb B-NR
stroke is not well established. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
3. The safety and usefulness of short-term anticoagulation for New recommendation.
nonocclusive, extracranial intraluminal thrombus in the setting of IIb C-LD
AIS are not well established.
The optimal medical management of patients with AIS and radiologic evidence of nonocclusive, intraluminal See Table XLVII in online Data Supplement 1.
thrombus (eg, cervical carotid, vertebrobasilar arteries) remains uncertain. Several small observational studies
have suggested the safety of short-term IV heparin or LMWH in this setting,203,204 but further research is required
to establish safety and efficacy.
4. At present, the usefulness of argatroban, dabigatran, or other Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
thrombin inhibitors for the treatment of patients with AIS is not well IIb B-R Guidelines.
established. Further clinical trials are needed.
Several observational studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of treating AIS with thrombin See Table XLVII in online Data Supplement 1.
inhibitors, as either a single or an adjunct therapy to alteplase. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran
was studied in 53 patients with TIA or minor stroke (NIHSS score ≤3) with no occurrences of sICH up to
30 days.201 ARTSS (Argatroban With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Stroke)-1 was
an open label, pilot safety study of argatroban infusion plus IV alteplase in 65 patients with complete or
partially occlusive thrombus diagnosed by transcranial Doppler.205 In the ARTSS-2 phase II study, patients
with AIS treated with alteplase (n=90) were randomized to receive placebo or argatroban (100-μg/kg bolus),
followed by infusion of either 1 (low dose) or 3 (high dose) μg/kg per minute for 48 hours. Rates of sICH were
similar among the control, low-dose, and high-dose arms: 3 of 29 (10%), 4 of 30 (13%), and 2 of 31 (7%),
respectively.206
5. The safety and usefulness of factor Xa inhibitors in the treatment of New recommendation.
IIb C-LD
AIS are not well established. Further clinical trials are needed.
Limited data exist on the use of factor Xa inhibitors (eg, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) in the acute treatment See Table LXXVII in online Data Supplement 1.
of patients with ischemic stroke.207 Several prospective observational studies and early-phase trials are ongoing
(NCT02279940, NCT02042534, NCT02283294).
3.11. Volume Expansion/Hemodilution, Vasodilators, and Hemodynamic Augmentation

3.11. Volume Expansion/Hemodilution, Vasodilators, and
COR LOE
Hemodynamic Augmentation New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Hemodilution by volume expansion is not recommended for Recommendation and LOE unchanged
treatment of patients with AIS. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class
III: No Benefit A
A recent Cochrane review of 4174 participants from multiple RCTs confirmed the previous guideline See Table XLVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
recommendation that hemodilution therapy, including varying methods of volume expansion with or without
venesection, demonstrates no significant benefit in patients with AIS.208
2. The administration of high-dose albumin is not recommended for Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
III: No Benefit A
the treatment of patients with AIS. Guidelines.
The ALIAS (Albumin in Acute Ischemic Stroke) part II trial of high-dose albumin infusion versus placebo See Table XLVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
in patients with AIS was terminated early for futility.209 Combined analysis of the ALIAS parts I and II trials
demonstrated no difference between groups in 90-day disability.210
3. The administration of vasodilatory agents, such as pentoxifylline, is Recommendation and LOE unchanged
not recommended for treatment of patients with AIS. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class
III: No Benefit A
4. A
t present, use of devices to augment cerebral blood flow for Recommendation reworded for clarity from
the treatment of patients with AIS is not well established. These 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
devices should be used only in the setting of clinical trials. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
IIb B-R Recommendation Classification System.
3.12. Neuroprotective Agents

3.12. Neuroprotective Agents COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. At present, no pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments Recommendation reworded for clarity from
with putative neuroprotective actions have demonstrated efficacy 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE unchanged. COR
in improving outcomes after ischemic stroke, and therefore, other amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
neuroprotective agents are not recommended. III: No Benefit A Recommendation Classification System.
Recent trials of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological neuroprotective treatments in AIS have been See Table XLVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
negative. The FAST-MAG trial (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy–Magnesium) of hyperacute magnesium
infusion was the first acute stroke neuroprotection drug trial to enroll participants during ambulance transport,
but no differences were seen between the intervention group and placebo control subjects.103 A recent Cochrane
review of neuroprotection trials in AIS further confirms the recommendation of no benefit with previously studied
interventions to date.114
3.13. Emergency CEA/Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Without Intracranial Clot

3.13. Emergency CEA/Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Without
COR LOE
Intracranial Clot New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. The usefulness of emergent or urgent CEA when clinical indicators Recommendation and Class unchanged
or brain imaging suggests a small infarct core with large territory from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
at risk (eg, penumbra), compromised by inadequate flow from to conform with the ACC/AHA 2015
IIb B-NR
a critical carotid stenosis or occlusion, or in the case of acute Recommendation Classification System.
neurological deficit after CEA, in which acute thrombosis of the
surgical site is suspected, is not well established.
2. In patients with unstable neurological status (eg, stroke-in- IIb B-NR Recommendation reworded for clarity from
evolution), the efficacy of emergency or urgent CEA is not well 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
established. amended to conform with the ACC/AHA 2015
3.14. Other
3.14. Other COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Transcranial near-infrared laser therapy is not recommended for Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
III: No Benefit B-R
the treatment of AIS. Guidelines.
Previous data suggested that transcranial near-infrared laser therapy for stroke held promise as a therapeutic See Table XLIX in online Data Supplement 1.
intervention through data published in NEST (Neurothera Effectiveness and Safety Trial)-1 and NEST-2.211–213
Such basic science and preclinical data culminated in the NEST-3 trial, which was a prospective RCT. This
trial investigated the use of transcranial laser therapy for the treatment of ischemic stroke between 4.5
and 24 hours of stroke onset in patients with moderate stroke (NIHSS score 7–17) who did not receive IV
alteplase.214 This study was terminated because of futility after analysis of the first 566 patients found no
benefit of transcranial laser therapy over sham treatment. There is currently no evidence that transcranial
laser therapy is beneficial in the treatment of ischemic stroke.
4. In-Hospital Management of AIS: General Supportive Care

4.1. Stroke Units
4.1. Stroke Units COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. The use of comprehensive specialized stroke care (stroke units) Recommendation unchanged from 2013 AIS
I A
that incorporates rehabilitation is recommended. Guidelines.
2. The use of standardized stroke care order sets is recommended to Recommendation and Class unchanged
improve general management. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I B-NR
4.2. Supplemental Oxygen

4.2. Supplemental Oxygen COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Airway support and ventilatory assistance are recommended for Recommendation and Class unchanged
the treatment of patients with acute stroke who have decreased from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I C-EO
consciousness or who have bulbar dysfunction that causes to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
compromise of the airway. Recommendation Classification System.
2. Supplemental oxygen should be provided to maintain oxygen Recommendation and Class unchanged
saturation >94%. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I C-LD
3. Supplemental oxygen is not recommended in nonhypoxic patients Recommendation reworded for clarity from
hospitalized with AIS. 2013 AIS Guidelines. COR and LOE amended to
III: No Benefit B-R Classification System.
Additional support for this unchanged recommendation from the 2013 AIS Guidelines is provided by an RCT of See Table XXVI in online Data Supplement 1.
8003 participants randomized within 24 hours of admission. There was no benefit on functional outcome at 90
days of oxygen by nasal cannula at 2 L/min (baseline O2 saturation >93%) or 3 L/min (baseline O2 saturation
≤93%) continuously for 72 hours or nocturnally for 3 nights.113
4.3. Blood Pressure

4.3. Blood Pressure COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. In patients with AIS, early treatment of hypertension is indicated New recommendation.
when required by comorbid conditions (eg, concomitant acute
coronary event, acute heart failure, aortic dissection, postthrombolysis I C-EO
sICH, or preeclampsia/eclampsia). Lowering BP initially by 15% is
probably safe.
Patients with AIS can present with severe acute comorbidities that demand emergency BP reduction to prevent
serious complications. However, it is important to keep in mind that excessive BP lowering can sometimes
worsen cerebral ischemia.215 Ideal management in these situations should be individualized, but in general,
initial BP reduction by 15% is a reasonable goal.
2. In patients with BP <220/120 mm Hg who did not receive IV Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
alteplase or EVT and do not have a comorbid condition requiring Guidelines.
acute antihypertensive treatment, initiating or reinitiating treatment III: No Benefit A
of hypertension within the first 48 to 72 hours after an AIS is not
effective to prevent death or dependency.
Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses of these trials216–230 have consistently shown that initiating or reinitiating See Table L in online Data Supplement 1.
antihypertensive therapy within the first 48 to 72 hours after an AIS is safe but this strategy is not associated with
improved mortality or functional outcomes. However, none of these trials were designed to study BP reduction
within the first 6 hours after stroke, and all excluded patients with extreme hypertension or coexistent indications
for acute BP reduction.
3. In patients with BP ≥220/120 mm Hg who did not receive IV New recommendation.
alteplase or EVT and have no comorbid conditions requiring acute
antihypertensive treatment, the benefit of initiating or reinitiating
IIb C-EO
treatment of hypertension within the first 48 to 72 hours is
uncertain. It might be reasonable to lower BP by 15% during the
first 24 hours after onset of stroke.
Patients with severe hypertension (most commonly >220/120 mm Hg) were excluded from clinical trials See Table L in online Data Supplement 1.
evaluating BP lowering after AIS.218,219,222,223,225,228 BP reduction has been traditionally advised for these cases, but
the benefit of such treatment in the absence of comorbid conditions that may be acutely exacerbated by severe
hypertension has not been formally studied.
4. Although no solid data are available to guide selection of Recommendation/table revised from 2013 AIS
medications for BP lowering after AIS, the antihypertensive IIa C-EO Guidelines.
medications and doses included in Table 5 are reasonable options.
There are no data to show that 1 strategy to lower BP is better than another after AIS. The medications and
doses in Table 5 are all reasonable options.
4.3. Blood Pressure (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

5. Starting or restarting antihypertensive therapy during New recommendation.
hospitalization in patients with BP >140/90 mm Hg who are
IIa B-R
neurologically stable is safe and is reasonable to improve long-term
BP control unless contraindicated.
Starting or restarting antihypertensive medications has been shown to be associated with improved control of See Table L in online Data Supplement 1.
the BP after discharge in 2 trials.223,225 Therefore, it is reasonable to start or restart antihypertensive medications
in the hospital when the patient remains hypertensive and is neurologically stable. Studies evaluating this
question included only patients with previous diagnosis of hypertension223 or enrolled mostly patients with
previous hypertension.225 However, because hypertension is not uncommonly first diagnosed during the
hospitalization for stroke, it is reasonable to apply this recommendation also to patients without preexistent
hypertension.
6. Hypotension and hypovolemia should be corrected to maintain New recommendation.
I C-EO
systemic perfusion levels necessary to support organ function.
The BP level that should be maintained in patients with AIS to ensure the best outcome is not known. Some See Table XXVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
observational studies show an association between worse outcomes and lower BPs, whereas others do not.117–124
No studies address the treatment of low BP in patients with stroke. In a systematic analysis of 12 studies
comparing colloids with crystalloids, the odds of death or dependence were similar. Clinically important benefits
or harms could not be excluded. There are no data to guide volume and duration of parenteral fluid delivery.125
No studies have compared different isotonic fluids.
4.4. Temperature
4.4. Temperature COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Sources of hyperthermia (temperature >38°C) should be identified Recommendation and Class unchanged
and treated. Antipyretic medications should be administered to from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I C-EO
lower temperature in hyperthermic patients with stroke. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
Additional support for this recommendation unchanged from the 2013 AIS Guidelines is provided by a large See Tables XXX and XXXI in online Data
retrospective cohort study conducted from 2005 to 2013 of patients admitted to intensive care units in Supplement 1.
Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Peak temperature in the first 24 hours <37°C and >39°C
was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death compared with normothermia in 9366 patients
with AIS.134
2. The benefit of induced hypothermia for treating patients with Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
ischemic stroke is not well established. Hypothermia should be IIb B-R Guidelines.
offered only in the context of ongoing clinical trials.
Hypothermia is a promising neuroprotective strategy, but its benefit in patients with AIS has not been See Tables XXXII and XXXIII in online Data
proven. Most studies suggest that induction of hypothermia is associated with an increase in the risk of Supplement 1.
infection, including pneumonia.135–138 Therapeutic hypothermia should be undertaken only in the context of
a clinical trial.
4.5. Glucose
4.5. Glucose COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Evidence indicates that persistent in-hospital hyperglycemia during Recommendation and Class unchanged
the first 24 hours after AIS is associated with worse outcomes than from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
normoglycemia, and thus, it is reasonable to treat hyperglycemia to IIa C-LD to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
achieve blood glucose levels in a range of 140 to 180 mg/dL and to Recommendation Classification System.
closely monitor to prevent hypoglycemia.
2. Hypoglycemia (blood glucose <60 mg/dL) should be treated in Recommendation and Class unchanged
patients with AIS. from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I C-LD
4.6. Dysphagia Screening

4.6. Dysphagia Screening COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Dysphagia screening before the patient begins eating, drinking, New recommendation.
or receiving oral medications is reasonable to identify patients at IIa C-LD
increased risk for aspiration.
Dysphagia, a common (37%–78%) complication of acute stroke, is a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia and See Tables LI and LII in online Data
is associated with higher mortality and worse patient outcomes. The evidence review committee completed Supplement 1.
a systematic review to determine whether dysphagia screening, compared with no screening or usual care,
decreased outcomes of pneumonia, death, or dependency.4,231–233 There were insufficient data to determine
whether implementation of a dysphagia screening protocol reduces the risk of death or dependency. However,
insufficient evidence does not mean that dysphagia screening is ineffective. Joundi et al234 determined that
patients who failed dysphagia screening were older, had a higher rate of multiple comorbidities (including prior
stroke and dementia), more often came from a long-term care facility, more often presented with weakness
and speech deficits, had a lower level of consciousness, and had a higher stroke severity. Patients who failed
dysphagia screening were more likely to develop pneumonia (13.1% versus 1.9%), to have more severe
disability (52.4% versus 18.0%), and to be discharged to a long-term care institution (14.0% versus 4.3%). Early
dysphagia screening is reasonable to identify patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes.
2. It is reasonable for dysphagia screening to be performed by a Recommendation reworded for clarity from
speech-language pathologist or other trained healthcare provider. 2016 Rehab Guidelines. Class unchanged.
LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015

IIa C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
3. A
n instrumental evaluation is reasonable for those patients Recommendation wording modified from
suspected of aspiration to verify the presence/absence of aspiration 2016 Rehab Guidelines to match Class
and to determine the physiological reasons for the dysphagia to IIa B-NR IIa stratifications. Class unchanged. LOE
guide the treatment plan. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
4. It is not well established which instrument to choose for evaluation Recommendation reworded for clarity from
of swallowing with sensory testing, but the choice may be based 2016 Rehab Guidelines. Class unchanged.
on instrument availability or other considerations (ie, fiberoptic LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic IIb C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
endoscopic evaluation). See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
4.7. Nutrition
4.7. Nutrition COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Enteral diet should be started within 7 days of admission after an New recommendation.
I B-R
acute stroke.
2. For patients with dysphagia, it is reasonable to initially use nasogastric New recommendation.
tubes for feeding in the early phase of stroke (starting within the first
IIa C-EO
7 days) and to place percutaneous gastrostomy tubes in patients with
longer anticipated persistent inability to swallow safely (>2–3 weeks).
The FOOD RCTs (Feed Or Ordinary Diet; phases I–III), completed in 131 hospitals in 18 countries,235 showed See Table LIII in online Data Supplement 1.
that supplemented diet was associated with an absolute reduction in risk of death of 0.7% and that early
tube feeding (within 7 days of admission) was associated with an absolute reduction in risk of death of 5.8%
and a reduction in death or poor outcomes of 1.2%. When nasogastric feeding and percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy feeding were compared, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding was associated with
an increase in absolute risk of death of 1.0% and an increased risk of death or poor outcomes of 7.8%. The
conclusion was that stroke patients should be started on enteral diet within the first 7 days of admission.235 In
2012, a Cochrane review analyzed 33 RCTs involving 6779 patients to assess the intervention for dysphagia
treatment, feeding strategies and timing (early [within 7 days] versus later), fluid supplementation, and
the effects of nutritional supplementation on acute and subacute stroke patients.236 The conclusion was
that, although data remained insufficient to offer definitive answers, available information suggested that
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding and nasogastric tube feeding do not differ in terms of case
fatality, death, or dependency, but percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is associated with fewer treatment
failures (P=0.007), less gastrointestinal bleeding (P=0.007), and higher food delivery (P<.00001).
4.7. Nutrition (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3. Nutritional supplements are reasonable to consider for patients Recommendation and Class unchanged
who are malnourished or at risk of malnourishment. from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
IIa B-R
4. Implementing oral hygiene protocols to reduce the risk of New recommendation.
IIb B-NR
pneumonia after stroke may be reasonable.
Limited studies suggest that intensive oral hygiene protocols might reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonia. In See Tables LIV and LV in online Data
patients with acute stroke, Sørensen et al237 showed that intervention with standardized dysphagia screening Supplement 1.
and diet and standardized oral hygiene with antibacterial mouth rinse with chlorhexidine reduced pneumonia
(7% versus 28%) compared with a historical control group in which patients were unsystematically screened
for dysphagia within 24 hours and received unsystematic and arbitrary oral hygiene without chlorhexidine.
In this experimental design, the efficacy of the standardized oral hygiene portion in the intervention group
could not be separated from the standardized dysphagia screening and diet. Furthermore, because of the
historic nature of the control group, it is possible that other changes in care that could have occurred between
the historical control subjects and the intervention group might have affected the risk for development of
pneumonia. A Cochrane review that included 3 studies found that oral care and decontamination gel versus
oral care and placebo gel reduced the incidence of pneumonia in the intervention group (P=0.03).238 Wagner et
al239 conducted a cohort study comparing rates of pneumonia in hospitalized stroke patients before and after
implementation of systematic oral hygiene care. The unadjusted incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia
was lower in the group assigned to oral hygiene care compared with control subjects (14% versus 10.33%;
P=0.022), with an unadjusted OR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.48–0.95; P=0.022). After adjustment for confounders,
the OR of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intervention group remained significantly lower at 0.71 (95% CI,
0.51–0.98; P=0.041).
4.8. Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis

4.8. Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. In immobile stroke patients without contraindications, intermittent Recommendation revised from 2016 Rehab
pneumatic compression (IPC) in addition to routine care (aspirin Guidelines.
I B-R
and hydration) is recommended over routine care to reduce the risk
of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
CLOTS (Clots in Legs or stockings After Stroke) 3 was a multicenter trial enrolling 2867 patients in 94 centers See Table LVI in online Data Supplement 1.
in the United Kingdom and comparing the use of IPC with routine care to no IPC with routine care in immobile
stroke patients for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Eligible patients were enrolled within 3 days of the
acute stroke and could not mobilize to the toilet without the help of another person. Routine care was defined
as the use of aspirin for nonhemorrhagic stroke, hydration, and possible compression stockings. A total of 31%
of the patients received prophylactic or full-dose heparin or LMWH, but these patients were evenly distributed
between both groups. After the exclusion of 323 patients who died before any primary outcome and 41 who
had no screening, the primary outcome of DVT occurred in 122 of 1267 IPC participants (9.6%) compared with
174 of 1245 no-IPC participants (14.0%), giving an adjusted OR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51–0.84; P=0.001). Among
patients treated with IPC, there was a statistically significant improvement in survival to 6 months (HR, 0.86;
95% CI, 0.73–0.99; P=0.042) but no improvement in disability. Skin breaks were more common in the IPC group
(3.1% versus 1.4%; P =0.002). Contraindications to IPC include leg conditions such as dermatitis, gangrene,
severe edema, venous stasis, severe peripheral vascular disease, postoperative vein ligation, or grafting, as well
as existing swelling or other signs of an existing DVT.403 A meta-analysis including this trial and 2 smaller trials
confirmed these results.240
2. The benefit of prophylactic-dose subcutaneous heparin New recommendation.
(unfractionated heparin [UFH] or LMWH) in immobile patients with IIb A
AIS is not well established.
The most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis of pharmacological interventions for venous thromboembolism See Table LVI in online Data Supplement 1.
prophylaxis in AIS included 1 very large trial (n=14 578) and 4 small trials of UFH, 8 small trials of LMWHs or
heparinoids, and 1 trial of a heparinoid.240 Prophylactic anticoagulants were not associated with any significant
effect on mortality or functional status at final follow-up. There were statistically significant reductions
in symptomatic pulmonary embolisms (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49–0.98) and in DVTs, most of which were
asymptomatic (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.15–0.29). There were statistically significant increases in symptomatic
intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11–2.55) and symptomatic extracranial hemorrhages (OR, 1.65;
95% CI, 1.0–2.75). There may be a subgroup of patients in whom the benefits of reducing the risk of venous
thromboembolism are high enough to offset the increased risks of intracranial and extracranial bleeding; however,
no prediction tool to identify such a subgroup has been derived.197,198,240
4.8. Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
3. When prophylactic anticoagulation is used, the benefit of New recommendation.
IIb B-R
prophylactic-dose LMWH over prophylactic-dose UFH is uncertain.
The most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis comparing LMWH or heparinoid with UFH for venous See Table LVI in online Data Supplement 1.
thromboembolism prophylaxis in AIS included 1 large trial (n=1762) and 2 smaller trials comparing LMWH with
UFH and 4 small trials comparing heparinoids with UFH. There were no significant effects on death or disability
for LMWH/heparinoids compared with UFH.240 The use of LMWH/heparinoid was associated with a statistically
significant reduction in DVTs (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44–0.70), which were mostly asymptomatic, at the expense
of a greater risk of major extracranial hemorrhages (OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.30–11.03). LMWH can be administered
once a day and thus is more convenient for nurses and comfortable for patients. Higher cost and increased
bleeding risk in elderly patients with renal impairment are disadvantages of LMWH that should be kept in mind.
4. In ischemic stroke, elastic compression stockings should not be Recommendation wording modified
used. from 2016 Rehab Guidelines to match
III: Harm B-R Class III stratifications. COR and LOE
4.9. Depression Screening

4.9. Depression Screening COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

1. Administration of a structured depression inventory is Recommendation revised from 2016 Rehab
recommended to routinely screen for poststroke depression, but the I B-NR Guidelines.
optimal timing of screening is uncertain.
A meta-analysis of studies assessing poststroke depression screening tools (24 studies, n=2907) found several See Table LVII in online Data Supplement 1.
inventories with high sensitivity for detecting poststroke depression.241 However, further research is needed to
determine the optimal screening method and timing to diagnose and treat poststroke depression.242
2. Patients diagnosed with poststroke depression should be treated Recommendation and Class unchanged
with antidepressants in the absence of contraindications and from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
I B-R
closely monitored to verify effectiveness. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
4.10. Other
4.10. Other COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Routine use of prophylactic antibiotics has not been shown to be Recommendation unchanged from 2013 AIS
beneficial. Guidelines. COR and LOE amended to conform
III: No Benefit B-R
2. Routine placement of indwelling bladder catheters should not be Recommendation wording modified
performed because of the associated risk of catheter-associated from 2013 AIS Guidelines to match
urinary tract infections. III: Harm C-LD Class III stratifications. COR and LOE
3. During hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation, regular skin Recommendation and Class unchanged
assessments are recommended with objective scales of risk such from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
I C-LD
as the Braden scale. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
4. It is recommended to minimize or eliminate skin friction, to minimize Recommendation and Class unchanged
skin pressure, to provide appropriate support surfaces, to avoid from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
excessive moisture, and to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
I C-LD
to prevent skin breakdown. Regular turning, good skin hygiene, and Recommendation Classification System.
use of specialized mattresses, wheelchair cushions, and seating are
recommended until mobility returns.
5. It is reasonable for patients and families with stroke to be directed to New recommendation.
palliative care resources as appropriate. Caregivers should ascertain and
IIa C-EO
include patient-centered preferences in decision making, especially during
prognosis formation and considering interventions or limitations in care.
The AHA scientific statement for palliative care in stroke10 outlines, in detail, a number of palliative care considerations
for patients with AIS. The consensus is that patient- and family-centered care, aimed at improving the well-being
of survivors and family members while preserving the dignity of patients, is the cornerstone of care. Appropriate
consultations, educational resources, and other aids should be identified in order to support patients and families.
4.11. Rehabilitation
4.11. Rehabilitation COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. It is recommended that early rehabilitation for hospitalized Recommendation unchanged from 2016
stroke patients be provided in environments with organized, I A Rehab Guidelines.
interprofessional stroke care.
2. It is recommended that stroke survivors receive rehabilitation at an Recommendation and Class unchanged
intensity commensurate with anticipated benefit and tolerance. from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
I B-NR
3. High-dose, very early mobilization within 24 hours of stroke onset Recommendation wording modified from
should not be performed because it can reduce the odds of a 2016 Rehab Guidelines to match Class
favorable outcome at 3 months. III: Harm B-R III stratifications. LOE revised. Class
The AVERT RCT (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial) compared high-dose, very early mobilization with standard-of- See Table LVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
care mobility.243 High-dose mobilization protocol interventions included the following: Mobilization was begun
within 24 hours of stroke onset whereas usual care typically was 24 hours after the onset of stroke; there was
a focus on sitting, standing, and walking activity; and there were at least 3 additional out-of-bed sessions
compared with usual care. Favorable outcome at 3 months after stroke was defined as an mRS score of 0 to 2.
A total of 2104 patients were randomly assigned (1:1). The results of the RCT showed that patients in the high-
dose, very early mobilization group had less favorable outcomes (46% versus 50%) than those in the usual care
group: 8% versus 7% of patients died in the very early mobilization group and 19% versus 20% had a nonfatal
serious adverse event with high-dose, very early mobilization.
4. It is recommended that all individuals with stroke be provided a Recommendation and Class unchanged
formal assessment of their activities of daily living and instrumental from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
activities of daily living, communication abilities, and functional amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
I B-NR
mobility before discharge from acute care hospitalization and the Recommendation Classification System.
findings be incorporated into the care transition and the discharge
planning process.
5. A functional assessment by a clinician with expertise in Recommendation and Class unchanged
rehabilitation is recommended for patients with an acute stroke from 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE
I C-LD
with residual functional deficits. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
6. T he effectiveness of fluoxetine or other selective serotonin reuptake Recommendation and Class unchanged from
inhibitors to enhance motor recovery is not well established. IIb C-LD 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE revised from
2016 Rehab Guidelines.
5. In-Hospital Management of AIS: Treatment of Acute Complications

5.1. Cerebellar and Cerebral Edema
5.1. Cerebellar and Cerebral Edema COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Ventriculostomy is recommended in the treatment of obstructive Recommendation revised from 2014 Cerebral
hydrocephalus after a cerebellar infarct. Concomitant or Edema.
subsequent decompressive craniectomy may or may not be
I C-LD
necessary on the basis of factors such as infarct size, neurological
condition, degree of brainstem compression, and effectiveness of
medical management.
Ventriculostomy is a well-recognized effective treatment for the management of acute obstructive hydrocephalus See Table LIX in online Data Supplement 1.
and is often effective in isolation in relieving symptoms, even among patients with acute ischemic cerebellar
stroke.244,245 Thus, in patients who develop symptoms of obstructive hydrocephalus from a cerebellar stroke,
emergency ventriculostomy is a reasonable first step in the surgical management paradigm. If cerebrospinal
diversion by ventriculostomy fails to improve neurological function, decompressive suboccipital craniectomy
should be performed.244–246 Although a risk of upward herniation exists with ventriculostomy alone, it can be
minimized with conservative cerebrospinal fluid drainage or subsequent decompression if the cerebellar infarct
causes significant edema or mass effect.244,245
5.1. Cerebellar and Cerebral Edema (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
2. D
ecompressive suboccipital craniectomy with dural expansion should Recommendation revised from 2014 Cerebral
be performed in patients with cerebellar infarction causing neurological Edema.
deterioration from brainstem compression despite maximal medical I B-NR
therapy. When deemed safe and indicated, obstructive hydrocephalus
should be treated concurrently with ventriculostomy.
The data support decompressive cerebellar craniectomy for the management of acute ischemic cerebellar See Table LIX in online Data Supplement 1.
stroke with mass effect.244–246 This surgery is indicated as a therapeutic intervention in cases of neurological
deterioration caused by cerebral edema as a result of cerebellar infarction that cannot be otherwise managed
with medical therapy or ventriculostomy in the setting of obstructive hydrocephalus.244,245
3. When considering decompressive suboccipital craniectomy Recommendation and Class unchanged from
for cerebellar infarction, it may be reasonable to inform family 2014 Cerebral Edema. Wording revised and
IIb C-LD
members that the outcome after cerebellar infarct can be good after LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
sub-occipital craniectomy. Recommendation Classification System.
4. Patients with large territorial supratentorial infarctions are at high risk New recommendation.
for complicating brain edema and increased intracranial pressure.
Discussion of care options and possible outcomes should take place
quickly with patients (if possible) and caregivers. Medical professionals I C-EO
and caregivers should ascertain and include patient-centered
preferences in shared decision making, especially during prognosis

formation and considering interventions or limitations in care.
Cerebral edema can cause serious and even life-threatening complications in patients with large territorial
supratentorial infarctions. Although less severe edema can be managed medically, surgical treatment may be the only
effective option for very severe cases; in such instances, timely decompressive surgery has been shown to reduce
mortality.247 Nevertheless, there is evidence that persistent morbidity is common and individual preexisting decisions
about end-of-life and degree of treatment performed in the face of severe neurological injury must be considered.
5. Patients with major infarctions are at high risk for complicating brain Recommendation revised from 2013 AIS
edema. Measures to lessen the risk of edema and close monitoring of Guidelines. LOE revised.
the patient for signs of neurological worsening during the first days
I C-LD
after stroke are recommended. Early transfer of patients at risk for
malignant brain edema to an institution with neurosurgical expertise
should be considered.
6. In patients ≤60 years of age with unilateral MCA infarctions who Recommendation revised from 2014 Cerebral
deteriorate neurologically within 48 hours despite medical therapy, Edema.
decompressive craniectomy with dural expansion is reasonable because
IIa A
it reduces mortality by close to 50%, with 55% of the surgical survivors
achieving moderate disability (able to walk) or better (mRS score 2 or 3)
and 18% achieving independence (mRS score 2) at 12 months.
The pooled results of RCTs demonstrated significant reduction in mortality when decompressive craniectomy See Tables LIX and LX in online Data
was performed within 48 hours of malignant MCA infarction in patients <60 years of age, with an absolute risk Supplement 1.
reduction in mortality of 50% (95% CI, 34–66) at 12 months.247 These findings were noted despite differences
in the clinical trials in terms of inclusion and exclusion criteria, percent of MCA territory involved, and surgical
timing.248,249 At 12 months, moderate disability (ability to walk) or better (mRS score 2 or 3) was achieved in 43%
(22 of 51) of the total surgical group and 55% (22 of 40) of survivors compared with 21% (9 of 42; P=0.045) of
the total nonsurgical group and 75% (9 of 12; P=0.318) of the nonsurgical survivors. At 12 months, independence
(mRS score 2) was achieved in 14% (7 of 51) of the total surgical group and 18% (7 of 40) of survivors compared
with 2% (1 of 42) of the total nonsurgical group and 8% (1 of 12) of the nonsurgical survivors.245,247–250
7. In patients >60 years of age with unilateral MCA infarctions Recommendation revised from 2014 Cerebral
who deteriorate neurologically within 48 hours despite medical Edema.
therapy, decompressive craniectomy with dural expansion may be
considered because it reduces mortality by close to 50%, with 11% IIb B-R
of the surgical survivors achieving moderate disability (able to walk
[mRS score 3]) and none achieving independence (mRS score ≤2)
at 12 months.
There is evidence that patients >60 years of age can have a reduction in mortality of ≈50% (76% in the See Tables LIX and LX in online Data
nonsurgical group versus 42% in the surgical group in DESTINY [Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment Supplement 1.
of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery] II) when decompressive craniectomy for malignant MCA
infarction is performed within 48 hours of stroke onset.248,249,251–255 However, functional outcomes in elderly
patients seem to be worse than those in patients <60 years of age. At 12 months, moderate disability (able
to walk; mRS score 3) was achieved in 6% (3 of 47) of the total surgical group and 11% (3 of 27) of survivors
compared with 5% (3 of 22) of the total nonsurgical group and 20% (3 of 15) of the nonsurgical survivors. At
12 months, independence (mRS score ≤2) was not achieved by any survivors in either group.
5.1. Cerebellar and Cerebral Edema (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
8. Although the optimal trigger for decompressive craniectomy Recommendation, Class, and LOE unchanged
is unknown, it is reasonable to use a decrease in level of IIa A from 2014 Cerebral Edema.
consciousness attributed to brain swelling as selection criteria.
9. Use of osmotic therapy for patients with clinical deterioration from Recommendation reworded for clarity from
cerebral swelling associated with cerebral infarction is reasonable. 2014 Cerebral Edema. Class unchanged. LOE
IIa C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
10. Use of brief moderate hyperventilation (Pco2 target 30–34 New recommendation.
mm Hg) is a reasonable treatment for patients with acute severe
IIa C-EO
neurological decline from brain swelling as a bridge to more
definitive therapy.
Hyperventilation is a very effective treatment to rapidly improve brain swelling, but it works by inducing
cerebral vasoconstriction, which can worsen ischemia if the hypocapnia is sustained or profound.256 Thus,
hyperventilation should be induced rapidly but should be used as briefly as possible and avoid excessive
hypocapnia (<30 mm Hg).
11. H
ypothermia or barbiturates in the setting of ischemic cerebral Recommendation and LOE revised from 2014
or cerebellar swelling are not recommended. Cerebral Edema. COR amended to conform
III: No Benefit B-R
The data on the use of hypothermia and barbiturates for the management of AIS continue to be limited. Such See Tables LIX and LX in online Data
data include only studies with small numbers of patients and unclear timing of intervention with respect to Supplement 1.
stroke onset. Hypothermia use has recently been shown to have no impact on stroke outcomes in a meta-
analysis of 6 RCTs.257 Further research is recommended.
12. B
ecause of a lack of evidence of efficacy and the potential to Recommendation wording modified from
increase the risk of infectious complications, corticosteroids (in 2013 AIS Guidelines to match Class III
conventional or large doses) should not be administered for the III: Harm A stratifications. LOE unchanged. Class
treatment of cerebral edema and increased intracranial pressure amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
complicating ischemic stroke. Recommendation Classification System.
5.2. Seizures
5.2. Seizures COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Recurrent seizures after stroke should be treated in a manner Recommendation reworded for clarity from
similar to when they occur with other acute neurological conditions, 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
and anti-seizure drugs should be selected based upon specific amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
patient characteristics. I C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
2. Prophylactic use of anti-seizure drugs is not recommended. Recommendation reworded for clarity from
2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE revised. COR
III: No Benefit B-R Recommendation Classification System.
6. In-Hospital Institution of Secondary Prevention: Evaluation

6.1. Brain Imaging
6.1. Brain Imaging COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. R
outine use of brain MRI in all patients with AIS is not cost-effective and New recommendation.
is not recommended for initial diagnosis or to plan subsequent treatment.
2. In some patients with AIS, the use of MRI might be considered New recommendation.
to provide additional information for initial diagnosis or to plan IIb C-EO
subsequent treatment, although the effect on outcomes is uncertain.
Diagnostic testing is cost-effective when it leads to a change in treatment that improves outcomes. NCCT scanning See Tables XV, LXI, and LXII in online Data
of all patients with acute stroke has been shown to be cost-effective primarily because of the detection of acute ICH Supplement 1.
and the avoidance of antithrombotic treatment in these patients.70 In many patients, the diagnosis of ischemic stroke
can be made accurately on the basis of the clinical presentation and either a negative NCCT or one showing early
ischemic changes, which can be detected in the majority of patients with careful attention.71 Although DW-MRI is
more sensitive than CT for detecting AIS,66,67 systematic reviews with meta-analyses and decision-analytic modeling
have shown that routine use of MRI in all patients with AIS is not cost-effective.68,69 Studies of patients with AIS have
shown poor or no association between the pattern on ischemic lesions on brain MRI and etiologic classification.258–266
Specifically, the pattern of acute multiple infarcts in multiple cerebral circulations has a positive likelihood ratio of 1.41
and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.96 for cardioembolic etiologic classification (combined data from 4 studies263–265,267)
and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.18 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.98 for subsequent detection of atrial fibrillation
on long-term cardiac monitoring (combined data from 2 studies258,260). In some patients with negative NCCT such as
those with uncertain clinical stroke localization who are candidates for early CEA or stenting for secondary prevention,
demonstration of an area of restricted diffusion on DW-MRI may be helpful in selecting treatment that improves
outcomes. However, there are inadequate data at this time to establish which patients will benefit from DW-MRI, and its
routine use is not recommended. More research is needed to determine criteria for its cost-effective use.
6.2. Vascular Imaging

6.2. Vascular Imaging COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. For patients with nondisabling (mRS score 0–2) AIS in the carotid territory New recommendation.
who are candidates for CEA or stenting, noninvasive imaging of the cervical I B-NR
vessels should be performed routinely within 24 hours of admission.
Past data have indicated that the risk of recurrent stroke caused by symptomatic carotid stenosis is See Table LXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
highest early after the initial event.268–272 Although there is evidence that early or emergency revascularization
via either CEA or carotid angioplasty and stenting may be safe in selected cases,273–275 there are no high-quality
prospective data supporting early versus late carotid revascularization in all cases.276 In cases of nondisabling
stroke, a meta-analysis by De Rango et al269 demonstrates high rates of complications when treated <48
hours after the initial event and no difference in risks when treated between 0 and 7 days and 0 and 15
days. Revascularization between 48 hours and 7 days after initial stroke is supported by the data in cases of
nondisabling stroke (mRS score 0–2).277 Imaging within 24 hours of admission is feasible and recommended to
facilitate CEA/carotid angioplasty and stenting in eligible patients in the 48- to 72-hour window.
2. In patients with AIS, routine noninvasive imaging by means of CTA New recommendation.
or MRA of the intracranial vasculature to determine the presence
III: No Benefit A
of intracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion is not recommended to
plan subsequent secondary preventive treatment.
3. In some patients with AIS, noninvasive imaging by means of New recommendation.
CTA or MRA of the intracranial vasculature to provide additional
IIb C-EO
information to plan subsequent secondary preventive treatment
may be reasonable, although the effect on outcomes is uncertain.
Intracranial atherosclerosis is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke, often in the same arterial distribution.278,279 See Tables LXIV and LXV in online Data
There is no RCT evidence that patients with AIS and symptomatic intracranial stenosis should be treated differently Supplement 1.
from other patients with ischemic stroke of presumed atherosclerotic cause. In the WASID RCT (Warfarin-Aspirin
Symptomatic Intracranial Disease), warfarin provided no benefit over aspirin 325 mg/d, even in those who were
taking antithrombotics at the time of the qualifying event.280 The SAMMPRIS study (Stenting and Aggressive Medical
Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis) showed no benefit of adding Wingspan stenting
to aggressive medical therapy that included aspirin 325 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 90 days after enrollment,
again even in those who were taking antithrombotics at the time of qualifying event.281-283 Compared with pooled
historical control subjects from similar patients in WASID, the medical treatment–only group in SAMMPRIS had an
almost 2-fold lower risk of any stroke or death within 30 days or ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying
artery after 30 days. Whether this was the result of dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel for 90 days
remains to be demonstrated by an RCT.282–284 Thus, the added utility and cost-effectiveness of noninvasive imaging
CTA or MRA of the intracranial vessels to identify intracranial arterial steno-occlusive disease in guiding validated
therapy that will ultimately improve outcomes are unproven. Moreover, MRA and CTA often overestimate the degree of
stenosis,285,286 so any data from the angiographically based WASID or SAMMPRIS RCTs cannot be reliably extrapolated.
6.3. Cardiac Evaluation

6.3. Cardiac Evaluation COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Cardiac monitoring is recommended to screen for atrial fibrillation Recommendation and Class unchanged
and other potentially serious cardiac arrhythmias that would from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
I B-NR
necessitate emergency cardiac interventions. Cardiac monitoring to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
should be performed for at least the first 24 hours. Recommendation Classification System.
2. The clinical benefit of prolonged cardiac monitoring to detect atrial New recommendation.
IIb B-R
fibrillation after AIS is uncertain.
3. In some patients with AIS, prolonged cardiac monitoring to provide New recommendation.
additional information to plan subsequent secondary preventive
IIb C-EO
treatment may be reasonable, although the effect on outcomes is
uncertain.
In patients with TIA or ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation detected by ECG at the time or within the preceding See Tables LXVI through LXVIII in online Data
24 months, oral anticoagulation begun within 3 months is superior to aspirin for the prevention of vascular Supplement 1.
death, stroke, MI, and systemic embolism (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41–0.87).287 With prolonged cardiac monitoring
by a variety of techniques, atrial fibrillation is newly detected in nearly a quarter of patients with stroke or
TIA.288 However, in the few RCTs of prolonged cardiac monitoring after stroke with clinical end points, no
significant benefit of oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in such patients has been demonstrated.289–294
In CRYSTAL AF (Study of Continuous Cardiac Monitoring to Assess Atrial Fibrillation After Cryptogenic Stroke),
at 36 months, atrial fibrillation was detected in 30% of 221 patients with implantable cardiac monitors and in
3% of 220 control subjects (P<0.001), but the occurrence of TIA or ischemic stroke was 9% in the implantable
cardiac monitor group and 11% in the control group (P=0.64).291,292 In Find-AFRANDOMISED (Finding Atrial Fibrillation
in Stroke–Evaluation of Enhanced and Prolonged Holter Monitoring), atrial fibrillation was detected in 14% of
200 patients with 10-day Holter monitoring at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months versus 5% of 198 patients in
the standard care group who had at least 24 hours of rhythm monitoring (P=0.002). There was no significant
difference in recurrent stroke at 12 months (3.7% versus 5.4%; P=0.46).294 Other smaller studies have also
failed to show a difference in outcomes.290,293,295 All of these studies were underpowered for the secondary
clinical end points. Thus, the appropriate patient selection criteria for prolonged cardiac monitoring and the
clinical benefits of doing so remain uncertain at this time. Further randomized trials are planned or ongoing and
are needed to clarify best practice.
4. Routine use of echocardiography in all patients with AIS to plan New recommendation.
subsequent secondary preventive treatment is not cost-effective III: No Benefit B-NR
and is not recommended.
5. In selected patients with AIS, echocardiography to provide New recommendation.
additional information to plan subsequent secondary preventive IIb B-R
treatment may be reasonable.
Current evidence on cost-effectiveness is insufficient to justify routine use of echocardiography in stroke See Tables LXIX and LXX in online Data
patients. Those patients with known or newly discovered atrial fibrillation by ECG will benefit from oral Supplement 1.
anticoagulation regardless of echocardiographic findings. The risk of recurrent stroke associated with most
echocardiographic lesions and the efficacy of treatment in reducing that risk are unclear. The estimated yield
and accuracy of echocardiography in detecting intracardiac thrombus indicate that for unselected patients,
transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography will produce at least as many false-
positive as true-positive diagnoses. Intracardiac thrombus occurs almost exclusively in patients with clinical
evidence of heart disease but is rare even in them.296 Additional research on how to identify patients likely to
harbor intracardiac thrombus, on recurrent stroke risk in patients with intracardiac thrombus, and on the efficacy
of oral anticoagulation in reducing that risk is needed.296–298 Five RCTs have evaluated mechanical closure of
echocardiographically detected patent foramen ovale to prevent recurrent stroke in patients without obvious
cause for their index stroke.299–304 All 5 suffered from potential bias resulting from unblinded investigators
determining which events should be referred for blinded end-point adjudication. Three had many more patients
lost to follow-up than stroke end points, making their results unreliable.299,301–303 Of 2 RCTs with 1% lost to
follow-up, 1 showed no benefit of closure over antithrombotic therapy alone over a 2-year period of 12 strokes
(2.9%) versus 13 strokes (3.1%; P=0.79),304 and the other showed a reduction in all stroke versus antiplatelet
therapy alone over a mean of 5.3 years of 0 versus 14 (P< 0.001) with rates at 5 years of 0% and 5%. There
was, however, no change in disabling stroke, 0 versus 1 (P=0.63), over the duration of the trial.300 These 2 trials
had different highly restrictive eligibility criteria, used different closure devices, and had different guidelines for
antithrombotic therapy.
6.4. Glucose
6.4. Glucose COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. After AIS, it is reasonable to screen all patients for diabetes Recommendation wording modified from
mellitus with testing of fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, 2014 Secondary Prevention to match Class
or an oral glucose tolerance test. Choice of test and timing should IIa stratifications and reworded for clarity.
be guided by clinical judgment and recognition that acute illness Class unchanged. LOE amended to conform
may temporarily perturb measures of plasma glucose. In general, IIa C-EO with ACC/AHA 2015 Recommendation
hemoglobin A1c may be more accurate than other screening tests Classification System.
in the immediate post-event period. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
6.5. Cholesterol
6.5. Cholesterol COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Routine measurement of blood cholesterol levels in all patients with New recommendation.
ischemic stroke presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin who are III: No Benefit B-R
not already taking a high-intensity statin is not recommended.
2. Measurement of blood cholesterol levels in patients with ischemic New recommendation.
stroke presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin who are already

taking an optimized regimen of statin therapy may be useful
IIb B-R
for identifying patients who would be candidates for outpatient
proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor treatment to
reduce the risk of subsequent cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke.
The “2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular See Tables LXXI and LXXII in online Data
Risk in Adults” recommend statin therapy for secondary prevention for adults with clinical atherosclerotic Supplement 1.
cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including stroke presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin. No data were
identified for treatment or titration to a specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal.7 The
2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines for the management of
dyslipidemias and the 2014 guidelines from the UK National Institute for Health Care Excellence also contain
recommendations based on clinical factors and not blood cholesterol measurements.305,306 Thus, statin therapy
can be recommended in patients with stroke presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin without measurement
of blood cholesterol. For patients with ischemic stroke that is presumed to be the result of nonatherosclerotic
disease such as arterial dissection, measurement of blood cholesterol may be of value because the primary
prevention guidelines are based on LDL-C levels.7 It is of note that the 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular
Society guidelines recommend a target LDL-C <2.0 mmol/L or >50% reduction of LDL-C for patients with
cerebrovascular disease.307 The FOURIER study (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9
Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk) randomized 27 564 patients with clinically evident ASCVD and elevated
fasting LDL-C level or non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol who were taking an optimized regimen of lipid-
lowering therapy to subcutaneous injections of evolocumab or placebo. Over a mean follow-up of 2.2 years,
evolocumab treatment significantly reduced the risk of the composite primary end point of cardiovascular death,
MI, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization (9.8% versus 11.3%; HR, 0.85; 95%
CI, 0.79–0.92) and the composite secondary end point of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (5.9% versus 7.4%;
HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73–0.88). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke over
a period of 2 years was 74 with an estimated 2-year cost of $2.1 million.308
6.6. Other Tests for Secondary Prevention

6.6. Other Tests for Secondary Prevention COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Baseline troponin assessment is recommended in patients Recommendation reworded for clarity from
presenting with AIS but should not delay initiation of IV alteplase or 2013 AIS Guidelines. Class unchanged. LOE
mechanical thrombectomy. amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
I C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
2. Routine screening for hyperhomocysteinemia among patients with Recommendation reworded for clarity from
a recent ischemic stroke is not indicated. 2014 Secondary Prevention. COR and LOE
III: No Benefit C-EO Recommendation Classification System.
6.6. Other Tests for Secondary Prevention (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
3. The usefulness of screening for thrombophilic states in patients Recommendation reworded for clarity from
with ischemic stroke is unknown. 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class unchanged.
IIb C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
A recent review article concludes that there is little, if any, contribution of the inherited thrombophilias to the
development of arterial thrombotic events and therefore tests for inherited thrombophilia should not be ordered
for the evaluation of stroke.309
4. Anticoagulation might be considered in patients who are found Recommendation reworded for clarity from
to have abnormal findings on coagulation testing after an initial 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class unchanged.
ischemic stroke, depending on the abnormality and the clinical LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
circumstances. IIb C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
5. R
outine testing for antiphospholipid antibodies is not recommended Recommendation reworded for clarity from
for patients with ischemic stroke who have no other manifestations 2014 Secondary Prevention. COR and LOE
of the antiphospholipid syndrome and who have an alternative amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
explanation for their ischemic event, such as atherosclerosis, III: No Benefit C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
carotid stenosis, or atrial fibrillation. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
6. Routine screening of patients with recent ischemic stroke for New recommendation.
III: No Benefit B-R
obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is not recommended.
Numerous studies have established an association between OSA and stroke. OSA is highly prevalent See Table LXXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
among ischemic stroke patients and has been associated with considerable morbidity, including increased
risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, worse prognosis, and higher mortality. Continuous
positive airway pressure remains the most effective medical therapy for OSA.310–314 However, secondary
prevention RCTs showed no benefit of treating moderate to severe OSA with continuous positive airway
pressure in preventing cardiovascular events or death in patients with previous stroke.315,316 Thus,
the routine screening for OSA of all patients with AIS is not beneficial for the secondary prevention of
cardiovascular events or death.
6.7. Antithrombotic Treatment

6.7. Antithrombotic Treatment COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. For patients with non-cardioembolic AIS, the use of antiplatelet Recommendation reworded for clarity from
agents rather than oral anticoagulation is recommended to reduce 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class and LOE
the risk of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events. I A unchanged.
2. F or patients who have a noncardioembolic AIS while taking Recommendation revised from 2014
aspirin, increasing the dose of aspirin or switching to an Secondary Prevention.
IIb B-R
alternative antiplatelet agent for additional benefit in secondary
stroke prevention is not well established.
In patients with a noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, the therapeutic benefit of aspirin is similar across a wide See Tables LXXIV and LXXV in online Data
range of doses, but the hemorrhagic risk increases with higher doses. In patients taking aspirin at the time of Supplement 1.
the incident stroke, the benefit of switching to an alternative antiplatelet agent or combination therapy is not well
established. The SPS3 (Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes) RCT found no benefit from adding
clopidogrel to aspirin compared with placebo in patients with a recent small vessel, lacunar stroke taking aspirin
at the time of their index event. However, the median time from qualifying event to enrollment in the SPS3 trial
was >40 days, so results may have underestimated benefit in the early poststroke period.317 A recent meta-
analysis of 5 studies, including 3 RCTs and 2 observational registries, of patients with noncardioembolic stroke
taking aspirin at the time of the index event found a decreased risk of major cardiovascular events and recurrent
stroke in patients switching to an alternative antiplatelet agent or combination antiplatelet therapy. This
analysis included data from aspirin failure subgroups in the CHANCE trial of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients
with minor stroke or TIA and the SOCRATES trial of aspirin versus ticagrelor. However, there was significant
heterogeneity among the included studies, and results may have been driven by data from registries susceptible
to unmeasured confounders and bias.318
6.7. Antithrombotic Treatment (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3. For patients who have a noncardioembolic AIS while taking New recommendation.
antiplatelet therapy, switching to warfarin is not beneficial for III: No Benefit B-R
secondary stroke prevention.
In patients taking aspirin at the time of baseline stroke in WARSS (Warfarin Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study; See Table LXXVI in online Data Supplement 1.
n=181), there was no difference in recurrence of stroke between those randomized to remain on aspirin and
those who switched to warfarin (RR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5–1.5; P=0.63).319,320 In addition, post hoc analysis from
the WASID trial found no difference in the primary outcome of ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, or vascular
death in patients taking antiplatelet therapy at the time of their qualifying event who were subsequently
randomized to warfarin.278,321
4. F or early secondary prevention in patients with Recommendation reworded for clarity from
noncardioembolic AIS, the selection of an antiplatelet agent 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class unchanged.
should be individualized on the basis of patient risk factor LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
profiles, cost, tolerance, relative known efficacy of the agents, I C-EO Recommendation Classification System.
and other clinical characteristics. See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
5. F or patients with a history of ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation, Recommendation reworded for clarity from
and coronary artery disease, the usefulness of adding antiplatelet 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class unchanged.
therapy to oral anticoagulants is uncertain for purposes of LOE amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
reducing the risk of ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular IIb C-LD Recommendation Classification System.
events. Unstable angina and coronary artery stenting represent See Table LXXXIII in online Data Supplement 1
special circumstances in which management may warrant dual for original wording.
antiplatelet/oral anticoagulation.
6. For most patients with an AIS in the setting of atrial fibrillation, it is Recommendation revised from 2014
reasonable to initiate oral anticoagulation within 4 to 14 days after IIa B-NR Secondary Prevention.
the onset of neurological symptoms.
A multicenter prospective cohort of 1029 patients with AIS and newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation showed a See Table LXXVII in online Data Supplement 1.
better composite outcome of stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, sICH, and major extracranial bleeding within
90 days when anticoagulant was initiated 4 to 14 days from stroke onset (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30–0.93 for
starting anticoagulation at 4–14 compared with <4 days); high CHADS2-VASC score, high NIHSS score,
large ischemic lesions, and type of anticoagulation were associated with poorer outcomes.202 In addition,
a prospective, open-label study of patients (n=60) with atrial fibrillation and mild to moderate AIS (NIHSS
score <9) treated with rivaroxaban for ≤14 days found no symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation by 7
days from initiation.207
7. For patients with AIS and hemorrhagic transformation, initiation Recommendation revised from 2014
or continuation of antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy may Secondary Prevention.
IIb B-NR
be considered, depending on the specific clinical scenario and
underlying indication.
Numerous observational studies suggest that antithrombotics can be safely initiated or continued in patients with See Table LXXVII in online Data Supplement 1.
AIS and hemorrhagic conversion. Individual assessment of the clinical indication, benefits, and associated risks
is warranted.322,323
8. For patients with AIS and extracranial carotid or vertebral arterial Recommendation revised from 2014
dissection, treatment with either antiplatelet or anticoagulant IIb B-R Secondary Prevention.
therapy for 3 to 6 months may be reasonable.
The CADISS (Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study) group published a randomized, open-label, phase See Table LXXVIII in online Data Supplement 1.
II feasibility trial of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in 250 participants with extracranial carotid
or vertebral artery dissection recruited from 46 centers in the United Kingdom and Australia.324 The primary
outcome was ipsilateral stroke or all-cause mortality within 3 months of randomization in an intention-
to-treat analysis, and there were no significant differences between groups. There was also no difference
in rates of major bleeding. As a phase II trial, the study concluded that a definitive phase III trial would
not be feasible, driven primarily by low event rates in both groups. Additional limitations included a lack
of central radiological confirmation in 20% of cases and a mean time to randomization of 3.65 days that
perhaps limits generalizability in the hyperacute period. Nonetheless, the CADISS trial supports numerous
previous observational studies that found no significant difference in clinical outcomes with the use of
anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with cervical artery dissection (CeAD). In
addition, a follow-up CADISS analysis found no difference in the natural history of dissecting aneurysms
or associated stroke risk by treatment allocation, suggesting an overall favorable prognosis in regard to
recurrent events.325
6.7. Antithrombotic Treatment (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

9. For patients with AIS and extracranial carotid or vertebral arterial Recommendation revised from 2014
dissection who have definite recurrent cerebral ischemic events Secondary Prevention.
IIb C-LD
despite medical therapy, the value of EVT (stenting) is not well
established.
There have been no controlled trials of EVT and stenting in patients with extracranial CeAD. The published See Table LXXVII in online Data Supplement 1.
literature reflects small case series, individual case reports, and several systematic reviews.326 A systematic
review of the literature published until 2009 found 31 published reports (n=140) with a technical success rate
of 99% and procedural complication rate of 1.3%. However, these observational data are prone to selection and
reporting bias. A retrospective analysis of patients with CeAD (n=161) comparing EVT (with and without stenting)
with medical therapy alone found no difference in 90-day outcomes (adjusted OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.12–3.14;
P=0.56). With medical therapy alone, the overall prognosis and natural history of CeAD, including dissecting
aneurysms, are favorable.324,325 Therefore, the benefit of EVT and stenting in patients with CeAD is not well
established, and consideration of EVT should be reserved for patients with definite recurrent cerebral ischemic
events despite medical therapy.
6.8. Statins
6.8. Statins COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Among patients already taking statins at the time of onset of Recommendation and Class unchanged
ischemic stroke, continuation of statin therapy during the acute from 2013 AIS Guidelines. LOE amended
IIa B-R
period is reasonable. to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
2. High-intensity statin therapy should be initiated or continued as Recommendation and Class unchanged from
first-line therapy in women and men ≤75 years of age who have I A 2013 Cholesterol Guidelines.
clinical ASCVD*, unless contraindicated.
3. In individuals with clinical ASCVD* in whom high-intensity statin Recommendation and Class unchanged from
therapy would otherwise be used, when high-intensity statin 2013 Cholesterol Guidelines.
therapy is contraindicated or when characteristics predisposing to I A
statin-associated adverse effects are present, moderate-intensity
statin should be used as the second option if tolerated.
4. In individuals with clinical ASCVD* >75 years of age, it is reasonable Recommendation and Class unchanged
to evaluate the potential for ASCVD risk-reduction benefits and for from 2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. LOE
adverse effects and drug–drug interactions and to consider patient IIb C-EO amended to conform with ACC/AHA 2015
preferences when initiating a moderate- or high-intensity statin. It is Recommendation Classification System.
reasonable to continue statin therapy in those who are tolerating it.
*Clinical ASCVD includes acute coronary syndromes, history of MI, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other See Table LXXI in online Data Supplement 1.
arterial revascularization, stroke, TIA, or peripheral arterial disease presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin.
For high-intensity statin therapy, the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce
atherosclerotic risk recommend atorvastatin 80 mg daily or rosuvastatin 20 mg daily.7 Please refer to these
guidelines for contraindications to high-intensity statin therapy and recommendations for moderate-intensity
statin therapy.
5. Patients with ischemic stroke and other comorbid ASCVD should Recommendation, Class, and LOE unchanged
be otherwise managed according to the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol from 2014 Secondary Prevention.
I A
guidelines, which include lifestyle modification, dietary
recommendations, and medication recommendations.
6. For patients with an AIS who qualify for statin treatment, in-hospital New recommendation.
IIa C-LD
initiation of statin therapy is reasonable.
Statins have an established role in secondary stroke prevention and harbor promise in improving index stroke See Tables LXXIX and LXXX in online Data
outcomes.1,11 A retrospective cohort study that assessed 3-month treatment adherence rates after in-hospital Supplement 1.
initiation of statins in patients with ischemic stroke showed a high rate of adherence to statin therapy 3
months after hospital discharge.327 A meta-analysis of primarily observational studies found that in-hospital
statin use was associated with good functional outcomes.328 Withdrawal of statins after ischemic stroke was
associated with poor functional outcomes. There are limited published randomized trials examining the role of
early statin use in AIS patients. FASTER (Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack to Prevent
Early Recurrence) evaluated simvastatin 40 mg versus placebo in patients with a TIA or minor stroke within
the previous 24 hours.329 Because of slow enrollment, this trial was terminated early. There were no significant
differences in recurrent stroke or safety outcomes in the simvastatin versus placebo groups. FASTER was
underpowered because of early termination, and the statin doses used in FASTER were of moderate intensity
(not the high-intensity dose recommended for secondary stroke prevention). ASSORT (Administration of Statin on
Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient) showed no difference in 90-day mRS score when statins were begun within 24
hours or on the seventh day.330
6.9. Carotid Revascularization

6.9. Carotid Revascularization COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. When revascularization is indicated for secondary prevention Recommendation revised from 2014
in patients with minor, nondisabling stroke (mRS score 0–2), it Secondary Prevention.
is reasonable to perform the procedure between 48 hours and 7 IIa B-NR
days of the index event rather than delay treatment if there are no
contraindications to early revascularization.
The risk of recurrent stroke resulting from symptomatic carotid stenosis is highest in the first few days after the initial See Table LXIII in online Data Supplement 1.
event.268–272 Although there is evidence that early or emergency revascularization via either CEA or carotid angioplasty
and stenting may be safe in selected cases,273–275 there are no high-quality prospective data supporting early versus
late carotid revascularization in all cases.276 In cases of minor, nondisabling stroke, a meta-analysis by De Rango et
al269 demonstrates favorable rates of complications when treated at least 48 hours after the initial event, and the risks
are not different when treated between 0 to 7 and 0 to 15 days. Revascularization between 48 hours and 7 days after
initial stroke is supported by these data in cases of nondisabling stroke (mRS score 0–2).277
6.10. Smoking Cessation Intervention

6.10. Smoking Cessation Intervention COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Healthcare providers should strongly advise every patient with AIS Recommendation reworded for clarity from
who has smoked in the past year to quit. 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class unchanged.
I C-EO Recommendation Classification System.
2. Counseling, nicotine products, and oral smoking cessation Recommendation, Class, and LOE unchanged
I A
medications are effective in helping smokers to quit. from 2014 Secondary Prevention.
3. For smokers with an AIS, in-hospital initiation of high-intensity New recommendation.
IIa B-R
behavioral therapies is reasonable.
4. For smokers with an AIS, in-hospital initiation of varenicline might New recommendation.
IIb B-R
be considered.
5. For smokers with an AIS, in-hospital initiation of interventions that New recommendation.
incorporate both pharmacotherapy and behavioral support might be IIb B-R
considered.
A meta-analysis by the Cochrane group indicates that (1) high-intensity behavioral interventions that begin during an See Table LXXXI and LXXXII in online Data
index hospitalization and include at least 1 month of supportive contact after discharge promote smoking cessation Supplement 1.
among hospitalized patients, regardless of the patients’ admitting diagnoses,331 and (2) interventions that incorporate
both pharmacotherapy and behavioral support enhance smoking cessation success compared with minimal
intervention or usual care.332,333 There are limited data on the efficacy of the various smoking cessation strategies
and when they should be implemented after the occurrence of an acute atherosclerotic event. A multicenter, double-
blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which 302 smokers hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome were
randomized to varenicline or placebo for 12 weeks showed that at 24 weeks abstinence rates were 47.3% in the
varenicline group versus 32.5% in the placebo group and continuous abstinence rates were 35.8% in the varenicline
group versus 25.8% in the placebo group.334 Patients in both groups received low-intensity counseling. A study of
Korean smokers with AIS assessed a timely intervention strategy versus conventional counseling.335 Timely intervention
comprised a certified nurse providing comprehensive education during admission and additional counseling after
discharge. Timely intervention was associated with greater odds of sustained smoking cessation for 12 months.
6. It is reasonable to advise patients after ischemic stroke to avoid Recommendation reworded for clarity from
second-hand (passive) tobacco smoke. 2014 Secondary Prevention. Class unchanged.
IIa B-NR Recommendation Classification System.
6.11. Stroke Education

6.11. Stroke Education COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged
1. Patient education about stroke is recommended. Patients should be Recommendation and Class unchanged from
provided with information, advice, and the opportunity to talk about I C-EO 2016 Rehab Guidelines. LOE revised.
the impact of the illness on their lives.
Additional reference support for this guideline is provided in online Data Supplement 1.200,336-402,404-421
Disclosures
Writing Group Disclosures
Other Speakers’ Consultant/
Writing Group Research Bureau/ Ownership Advisory
Member Employment Research Grant Support Honoraria Expert Witness Interest Board Other
William J. University of North NIH (coinvestigator None None Cleveland Clinic*; None None None
Powers Carolina, Chapel on grant to develop Wake Forest
Hill MR CMRO2 University*; Ozarks
measurement)*; NIH Medical Center*
(coinvestigator on
clinical trial of dental
health to prevent
stroke)*
Alejandro A. Mayo Clinic None None None None None None None
Rabinstein
Teri Ackerson Saint Luke’s Health None None None None None None None
System, AHA/ASA
Opeolu M. University of NIH/NINDS* None None None Sense None None
Adeoye Cincinnati Diagnostics,

LLC†
Nicholas C. University None None None None None None None
Bambakidis Hospitals,
Cleveland Medical
Center
Kyra Becker University of None None None Various law firms† None Icon† None
Washington
School of Medicine
Harborview
Medical Center
José Biller Loyola University Accorda (DSMB None None None None None Journal of
Chicago committee member)* Stroke and
Cerebrovascular
Disease (family)†;
Up-to-Date
(Editorial Board
member)*; editor
(self; Journal
of Stroke and
Cerebrovascular
Disease, unpaid)*
Michael Brown Michigan State None None None Wicker Smith None None None
University O’Hara McCoy &
College of Ford PA*; Anthony
Human Medicine, T. Martino, Clark,
Emergency Martino, PA*
Medicine
Bart M. Mayo Clinic None None None None None None None
Demaerschalk Neurology, Mayo
Clinic Hospital
Brian Hoh University of None None None None None None None
Florida
Edward C. Medical University Genentech (Executive None None Defense* Jan Medical* None None
Jauch of South Carolina Committee for PRISMS
Study)*; Ischemia
Care (Biomarker
research study)*; NIH
(PI StrokeNet hub)†
Chelsea S. University of None None None None None None None
Kidwell Arizona
(Continued )
Writing Group Disclosures Continued

Other Speakers’ Consultant/
Writing Group Research Bureau/ Ownership Advisory
Member Employment Research Grant Support Honoraria Expert Witness Interest Board Other
Thabele M. Massachusetts None None None None None None None
Leslie-Mazwi General Hospital
Bruce Medical University NIH (U01 NS079179, None None None None None None
Ovbiagele of South Carolina U54 HG007479)†
Phillip A. Scott University of NIH/NINDS (PI for None None Medical legal None None None
Michigan, NINDS Regional consultant,
Department Coordinating Stroke defense and
of Emergency Center grant RCC- plaintiff*
Medicine 17)†
Kevin N. Sheth Yale University None Remedy None Defense and None None None
School of Medicine (grant for PI Plaintiff*
on Clinical
Trial)†; Bard
(grant for PI
on Clinical
Trial)†;
Stryker
(Adjudication
Committee)*
Andrew M. University of HRSA None AHA/ASA* Legal expert US provisional None Neurology®
Southerland Virginia GO1RH27869-01-00 review* patent journal*
(investigator, research application
salary support)†; serial No.
American Academy of 61/867,477*
Neurology (PI, project
support)*; American
Board of Psychiatry
and Neurology (Faculty
Fellowship, research
and salary support)†;
NHLBI, NINDS
(U01 HL088942)
(Cardiothoracic
Surgical Trials
Network)†
Deborah V. St. Luke’s Health None None None None None None None
Summers System
David L. University of None None None None None St. Jude/ None
Tirschwell Washington– Abbott*
Harborview
Medical Center
This table represents the relationships of writing group members that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the
Disclosure Questionnaire, which all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person
receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the
entity, or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.
*Modest.
†Significant.
Reviewer Disclosures
Other Speakers’
Research Research Bureau/ Ownership Consultant/
Reviewer Employment Grant Support Honoraria Expert Witness Interest Advisory Board Other
Karen L. Furie Rhode Island Hospital None None None None None None None
Steven J. Veterans Affairs Maryland None None None None None None None
Kittner Health Care System;
University of Maryland
(Continued )
Reviewer Disclosures Continued

Other Speakers’
Research Research Bureau/ Ownership Consultant/
Reviewer Employment Grant Support Honoraria Expert Witness Interest Advisory Board Other
Lawrence R. University of Pittsburgh None None None None None None None
Wechsler
Babu G. Welch UT Southwestern Medical None None Stryker None None Stryker None
Center Neurovascular* Neurovascular*
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure
Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $10 000 or more during
any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10 000 or
more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.
*Modest.
References [published corrections appear in Circulation. 2014;129:S46–S48

and Circulation. 2015;132:e396]. Circulation. 2014;129(suppl 2):S1–S45.
1. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.
BM, Khatri P, McMullan PW Jr, Qureshi AI, Rosenfield K, Scott PA,
8. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC
Summers DR, Wang DZ, Wintermark M, Yonas H; on behalf of the
Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco
American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular
RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2014 AHA/ACC/
Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical
HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation:
Cardiology. Guidelines for the early management of patients with
executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/
acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the
the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Heart Rhythm Society [published correction appears in Circulation.
2013;44:870–947. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a. 2014;130:e270–271]. Circulation. 2014;130:2071–2104. doi: 10.1161/
2. Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr, Bushnell CD, CIR.0000000000000040.
Cucchiara B, Cushman M, deVeber G, Ferro JM, Tsai FY; on behalf 9. Wijdicks EF, Sheth KN, Carter BS, Greer DM, Kasner SE, Kimberly
of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on WT, Schwab S, Smith EE, Tamargo RJ, Wintermark M; on behalf of
Epidemiology and Prevention. Diagnosis and management of cere- the American Heart Association Stroke Council. Recommendations
bral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swell-
the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. ing: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart
2011;42:1158–1192. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e31820a8364. Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1222–1238.
3. Smith EE, Kent DM, Bulsara KR, Leung LY, Lichtman JH, Reeves doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6.
MJ, Towfighi A, Whiteley WN, Zahuranec D. Accuracy of prediction 10. Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Lewis EF, Lutz BJ, McCann
instruments for diagnosing large vessel occlusion in individuals with RM, Rabinstein AA, Saposnik G, Sheth KN, Zahuranec DB, Zipfel
suspected stroke: a systematic review for the 2018 guidelines for the GJ, Zorowitz RD; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke
early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council
healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American on Clinical Cardiology. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a state-
Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:XXX–XXX. doi: 10.1161/STR. ment for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
0000000000000160. American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1887–1916. doi: 10.1161/
4. Smith EE, Kent DM, Bulsara KR, Leung LY, Lichtman JH, Reeves MJ, STR.0000000000000015.
Towfighi A, Whiteley WN, Zahuranec D. Effect of dysphagia screening 11. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI,
strategies on clinical outcomes after stroke: a systematic review for the Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher M, Furie KL, Heck DV, Johnston
2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute isch- SC, Kasner SE, Kittner SJ, Mitchell PH, Rich MW, Richardson D,
emic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Schwamm LH, Wilson JA; on behalf of the American Heart Association
Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:XXX– Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council
XXX. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000159. on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease.
5. Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P, Chumbler NR, Frankel MR, Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and tran-
George MG, Gorelick PB, Horton KB, Kaste M, Lackland DT, Levine sient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the
SR, Meyer BC, Meyers PM, Patterson V, Stranne SK, White CJ; on American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [published
behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on correction appears in Stroke. 2015;46:e54]. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–2236.
Epidemiology and Prevention; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024.
Vascular Disease; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. 12. Smith EE, Saver JL, Alexander DN, Furie KL, Hopkins LN, Katzan
Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke IL, Mackey JS, Miller EL, Schwamm LH, Williams LS; on behalf of
systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. the AHA/ASA Stroke Performance Oversight Committee. Clinical per-
Stroke. 2009;40:2635–2660. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192361. formance measures for adults hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke:
6. Higashida R, Alberts MJ, Alexander DN, Crocco TJ, Demaerschalk performance measures for healthcare professionals from the American
BM, Derdeyn CP, Goldstein LB, Jauch EC, Mayer SA, Meltzer NM, Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:3472–
Peterson ED, Rosenwasser RH, Saver JL, Schwamm L, Summers D, 3498. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000045.
Wechsler L, Wood JP; on behalf of the American Heart Association 13. Singletary EM, Charlton NP, Epstein JL, Ferguson JD, Jensen JL,
Advocacy Coordinating Committee. Interactions within stroke sys- MacPherson AI, Pellegrino JL, Smith WW, Swain JM, Lojero-Wheatley
tems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/ LF, Zideman DA. Part 15: first aid: 2015 American Heart Association
American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:2961–2984. doi: 10.1161/ and American Red Cross guidelines update for first aid. Circulation.
STR.0b013e3182a6d2b2. 2015;132(suppl 2):S574–S589. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000269.
7. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, 14. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch EC,
Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF,
P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Watson K, Wilson PW. 2013 ACC/ Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR; on behalf of the American Heart Association
AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce athero- Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke
sclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early man-
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines agement of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular
treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American comparison with other scales. Stroke. 2016;47:1772–1776. doi: 10.1161/
Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46:3020– STROKEAHA.115.012482.
3035. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000074. 28. Singer OC, Dvorak F, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Lanfermann H, Sitzer
15. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, Demchuk AM, M, Neumann-Haefelin T. A simple 3-item stroke scale: comparison with
Fugate JE, Grotta JC, Khalessi AA, Levy EI, Palesch YY, Prabhakaran the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and prediction of middle
S, Saposnik G, Saver JL, Smith EE; on behalf of the American Heart cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2005;36:773–776. doi: 10.1161/01.
Association Stroke Council and Council on Epidemiology and STR.0000157591.61322.df.
Prevention. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for 29. Nazliel B, Starkman S, Liebeskind DS, Ovbiagele B, Kim D, Sanossian
intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare N, Ali L, Buck B, Villablanca P, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Jahan R,
professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Saver JL. A brief prehospital stroke severity scale identifies ischemic
Association [published correction appears in Stroke. 2016;47:e262]. stroke patients harboring persisting large arterial occlusions. Stroke.
Stroke. 2016;47:581–641. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000086. 2008;39:2264–2267. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508127.
16. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, 30. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Severity-
Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Based Stroke Triage Algorithm for EMS. http://www.heart.org/mission-
Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz lifelinestroke. Accessed December 1, 2017.
RD; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, 31. Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Grau-Sepulveda MV,
Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Pan W, Olson DM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH. Time
Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome
Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2013;309:2480–2488.
healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American 32. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW,
Stroke Association [published corrections appear in Stroke. 2017;48:e78 Campbell BC, Nogueira RG, Demchuk AM, Tomasello A, Cardona P,
and Stroke. 2017;48:e369]. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–e169. doi: 10.1161/ Devlin TG, Frei DF, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkhemer OA, Jovin
STR.0000000000000098. TG, Siddiqui AH, van Zwam WH, Davis SM, Castaño C, Sapkota BL,
17. Ojike N, Ravenell J, Seixas A, Masters-Israilov A, Rogers A, Jean-Louis Fransen PS, Molina C, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Chamorro Á, Lingsma
G, Ogedegbe G, McFarlane SI. Racial disparity in stroke awareness H, Silver FL, Donnan GA, Shuaib A, Brown S, Stouch B, Mitchell PJ,
in the US: an analysis of the 2014 National Health Interview Survey. Davalos A, Roos YB, Hill MD; HERMES Collaborators. Time to treat-
J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2016;7:365. ment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic
18. Ekundayo OJ, Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Xian Y, Zhao X, stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1279–1288. doi: 10.1001/
Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Cheng EM. Patterns of emergency medical jama.2016.13647.
services use and its association with timely stroke treatment: findings 33. Ganesh A, Lindsay P, Fang J, Kapral MK, Côté R, Joiner I, Hakim AM,
from Get With The Guidelines–Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Hill MD. Integrated systems of stroke care and reduction in 30-day
2013;6:262–269. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000089. mortality: a retrospective analysis. Neurology. 2016;86:898–904. doi:
19. Mochari-Greenberger H, Xian Y, Hellkamp AS, Schulte PJ, Bhatt DL, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002443.
Fonarow GC, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Schwamm LH, Smith EE. Racial/ 34. Man S, Cox M, Patel P, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Saver JL, Bhatt DL, Xian Y,
ethnic and sex differences in emergency medical services transport Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC. Differences in acute ischemic stroke quality
among hospitalized US Stroke patients: analysis of the national Get With of care and outcomes by primary stroke center certification organization.
The Guidelines-Stroke Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002099. Stroke. 2017;48:412–419. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014426.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002099. 35. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Bhatt DL, Xian
20. Boden-Albala B, Stillman J, Roberts ET, Quarles LW, Glymour MM, Y, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH. Door-to-needle times
Chong J, Moats H, Torrico V, Parides MC. Comparison of acute stroke for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in
preparedness strategies to decrease emergency department arrival acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative.
time in a multiethnic cohort: the Stroke Warning Information and JAMA. 2014;311:1632–1640.
Faster Treatment Study. Stroke. 2015;46:1806–1812. doi: 10.1161/ 36. Xian Y, Xu H, Lytle B, Blevins J, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Smith
STROKEAHA.114.008502. EE, Saver JL, Messe SR, Paulsen M, Suter RE, Reeves MJ, Jauch
21. Berglund A, Svensson L, Wahlgren N, von Euler M; HASTA EC, Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC. Use of strategies to improve door-
Collaborators. Face Arm Speech Time Test use in the prehospital setting, to-needle times with tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute
better in the ambulance than in the emergency medical communication ischemic stroke in clinical practice: findings from Target: Stroke.
center. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37:212–216. doi: 10.1159/000358116. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003227. doi: 10.1161/
22. De Luca A, Giorgi Rossi P, Villa GF; Stroke Group Italian Society Pre CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003227.
Hospital EMERGENCY SERVICES. The use of Cincinnati Prehospital 37. Target Stroke Phase II website http://www.strokeassociation.org/
Stroke Scale during telephone dispatch interview increases the accuracy STROKEORG/Professionals/TargetStroke/Target-Stroke-Phase-II_
in identifying stroke and transient ischemic attack symptoms. BMC UCM_469859_Article.jsp#.Wk1CBd-nF3g. Accessed January 3, 2018.
Health Serv Res. 2013;13:513. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-513. 38. Scott PA, Meurer WJ, Frederiksen SM, Kalbfleisch JD, Xu Z, Haan
23. Lin CB, Peterson ED, Smith EE, Saver JL, Liang L, Xian Y, Olson DM, MN, Silbergleit R, Morgenstern LB; INSTINCT Investigators. A mul-
Shah BR, Hernandez AF, Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC. Emergency medi- tilevel intervention to increase community hospital use of alteplase for
cal service hospital prenotification is associated with improved evaluation acute stroke (INSTINCT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet
and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Neurol. 2013;12:139–148. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70311-3.
2012;5:514–522. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965210. 39. Dirks M, Niessen LW, van Wijngaarden JD, Koudstaal PJ, Franke CL,
24. Katz BS, McMullan JT, Sucharew H, Adeoye O, Broderick JP. Design van Oostenbrugge RJ, Huijsman R, Lingsma HF, Minkman MM, Dippel
and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity: Cincinnati DW; PRomoting ACute Thrombolysis in Ischemic StrokE (PRACTISE)
Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale. Stroke. 2015;46:1508–1512. doi: Investigators. Promoting thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke.
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008804. 2011;42:1325–1330. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596940.
25. Lima FO, Silva GS, Furie KL, Frankel MR, Lev MH, Camargo ÉC, 40. Phabphal K, Hirunpatch S. The effectiveness of low-cost teleconsulta-
Haussen DC, Singhal AB, Koroshetz WJ, Smith WS, Nogueira RG. tion for emergency head computer tomography in patients with sus-
Field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination: a simple and pected stroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:439–442. doi: 10.1258/
accurate prehospital scale to detect large vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke. jtt.2008.080603.
2016;47:1997–2002. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013301. 41. Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill MD, Goyal
26. Perez de la Ossa N, Carrera D, Gorchs M, Querol M, Millan M, Gomis M. A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diag-
M, Dorado L, Lopez-Cancio E, Hernandez-Perez M, Chicharro V, nosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e31. doi: 10.2196/
Escalada X, Jimenez X, Davalos A. Design and validation of a pre- jmir.1732.
hospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arte- 42. Johnston KC, Worrall BB; Teleradiology Assessment of Computerized
rial occlusion evaluation scale. Stroke. 2014;45:87–91. doi: 10.1161/ Tomographs Online Reliability Study. Teleradiology Assessment of
STROKEAHA.113.003071. Computerized Tomographs Online Reliability Study (TRACTORS)
27. Hastrup S, Damgaard D, Johnsen SP, Andersen G. Prehospital acute for acute stroke evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2003;9:227–233. doi:
stroke severity scale to predict large artery occlusion: design and 10.1089/153056203322502605.
43. Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Hoxworth JM, 59. Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke
Patel AC, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Meyer BC; WR, Woolson RF, Hansen MD. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score
for the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172
Camera (STRokE DOC) in Arizona–The Initial Mayo Clinic Experience in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology. 1999;53:126–131.
(AZ TIME) Investigators. CT interpretation in a telestroke network: 60. Frankel MR, Morgenstern LB, Kwiatkowski T, Lu M, Tilley BC,
agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and Broderick JP, Libman R, Levine SR, Brott T. Predicting prognosis
hub neuroradiologist. Stroke. 2012;43:3095–3097. doi: 10.1161/ after stroke: a placebo group analysis from the National Institute of
STROKEAHA.112.666255. Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Trial. Neurology.
44. Spokoyny I, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Demaerschalk BM, Lyden PD, 2000;55:952–959.
Hemmen TM, Guzik AK, Chen JY, Meyer BC. Pooled assessment 61. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, Aichner F, Bluhmki E, Dávalos
of computed tomography interpretation by vascular neurologists in A, Erilä T, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, Hennerici MG, Kaste M,
the STRokE DOC telestroke network. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. Köhrmann M, Larrue V, Lees KR, Machnig T, Roine RO, Toni D,
2014;23:511–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.023. Vanhooren G; for the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-
45. Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC, Dzialowski I, Kunz A, Wolz M, MOnitoring STudy Investigators. Multivariable analysis of outcome pre-
Hentschel H, Schultheiss T, Kepplinger J, Schneider H, Wiedemann B, dictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile
Wojciechowski C, Reichmann H, Gahn G, von Kummer R. Reliability of in randomized controlled trials: Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in
brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology. Stroke-MOnitoring STudy (SITS-MOST). Stroke. 2008;39:3316–3322.
2013;80:332–338. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07d0. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768.
46. Demaerschalk BM, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Meyer BC. Efficacy of 62. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, Haley
telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the Stroke Team Remote EC, Grotta J, Marler J. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale
Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke.
and STRokE DOC Arizona telestroke trials. Telemed J E Health. 1994;25:2220–2226.
2012;18:230–237. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0116. 63. Josephson SA, Hills NK, Johnston SC. NIH Stroke Scale reliability in
47. Kepplinger J, Barlinn K, Deckert S, Scheibe M, Bodechtel U, Schmitt ratings from a large sample of clinicians. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22:389–
J. Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: a systematic review 395. doi: 10.1159/000094857.
and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87:1344–1351. doi: 10.1212/ 64. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Emr M, Warren M, Marler J. National Institutes
WNL.0000000000003148. of Health Stroke Scale certification is reliable across multiple venues.
48. Fong WC, Ismail M, Lo JW, Li JT, Wong AH, Ng YW, Chan PY, Chan Stroke. 2009;40:2507–2511. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532069.
AL, Chan GH, Fong KW, Cheung NY, Wong GC, Ho HF, Chan ST, 65. Fonarow GC, Saver JL, Smith EE, Broderick JP, Kleindorfer DO, Sacco
Kwok VW, Yuen BM, Chan JH, Li PC. Telephone and teleradiology- RL, Pan W, Olson DM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH.
guided thrombolysis can achieve similar outcome as thrombolysis by Relationship of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale to 30-day mor-
neurologist on-site. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:1223–1228. doi: tality in Medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke. J Am Heart
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.01.022. Assoc. 2012;1:42–50. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.111.000034.
49. Barlinn J, Gerber J, Barlinn K, Pallesen LP, Siepmann T, Zerna C, 66. Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, Luby M, Butman JA, Demchuk
Wojciechowski C, Puetz V, von Kummer R, Reichmann H, Linn AM, Hill MD, Patronas N, Latour L, Warach S. Magnetic resonance
J, Bodechtel U. Acute endovascular treatment delivery to isch- imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of
emic stroke patients transferred within a telestroke network: a ret- patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet.
rospective observational study. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:502–509. doi: 2007;369:293–298. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2.
10.1177/1747493016681018. 67. Hwang DY, Silva GS, Furie KL, Greer DM. Comparative sensitivity
50. Vagal A, Meganathan K, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye O, Hornung R, Khatri of computed tomography vs. magnetic resonance imaging for detect-
P. Increasing use of computed tomographic perfusion and computed ing acute posterior fossa infarct. J Emerg Med. 2012;42:559–565. doi:
tomographic angiograms in acute ischemic stroke from 2006 to 2010. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.101.
Stroke. 2014;45:1029–1034. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004332. 68. Brazzelli M, Sandercock PA, Chappell FM, Celani MG, Righetti E,
51. Demaerschalk BM, Yip TR. Economic benefit of increasing utilization Arestis N, Wardlaw JM, Deeks JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging ver-
of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke sus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in
in the United States. Stroke. 2005;36:2500–2503. doi: 10.1161/01. patients presenting with stroke symptoms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
STR.0000185699.37843.14. 2009:CD007424.
52. Demaerschalk BM, Durocher DL. How diagnosis-related group 559 will 69. Wardlaw J, Brazzelli M, Miranda H, Chappell F, McNamee P, Scotland
change the US Medicare cost reimbursement ratio for stroke centers. G, Quayyum Z, Martin D, Shuler K, Sandercock P, Dennis M. An assess-
Stroke. 2007;38:1309–1312. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260185.74694. ment of the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance, including diffu-
a7. sion-weighted imaging, in patients with transient ischaemic attack and
53. Penaloza-Ramos MC, Sheppard JP, Jowett S, Barton P, Mant J, Quinn minor stroke: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evalua-
T, Mellor RM, Sims D, Sandler D, McManus RJ; on behalf of the BBC tion. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1–368, v. doi: 10.3310/hta18270.
CLAHRC Investigators. Cost-effectiveness of optimizing acute stroke 70. Wardlaw JM, Seymour J, Cairns J, Keir S, Lewis S, Sandercock P.
care services for thrombolysis. Stroke. 2014;45:553–562. doi: 10.1161/ Immediate computed tomography scanning of acute stroke is cost-
STROKEAHA.113.003216. effective and improves quality of life. Stroke. 2004;35:2477–2483. doi:
54. Tan Tanny SP, Busija L, Liew D, Teo S, Davis SM, Yan B. Cost- 10.1161/01.STR.0000143453.78005.44.
effectiveness of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke: 71. Barber PA, Hill MD, Eliasziw M, Demchuk AM, Pexman JH, Hudon
experience from Australian stroke center. Stroke. 2013;44:2269–2274. ME, Tomanek A, Frayne R, Buchan AM; ASPECTS Study Group.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001295. Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of com-
55. Health Quality Ontario. Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute puted tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imag-
ischemic stroke: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol ing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1528–1533. doi: 10.1136/
Assess Ser. 2016;16:1–79. jnnp.2004.059261.
56. Ganesalingam J, Pizzo E, Morris S, Sunderland T, Ames D, Lobotesis 72. Heidenreich JO, Hsu D, Wang G, Jesberger JA, Tarr RW, Zaidat OO,
K. Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriev- Sunshine JL. Magnetic resonance imaging results can affect therapy
ers in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:2591–2598. doi: 10.1161/ decisions in hyperacute stroke care. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:550–557. doi:
STROKEAHA.115.009396. 10.1080/02841850801958320.
57. Song S, Fonarow GC, Olson DM, Liang L, Schulte PJ, Hernandez 73. Lees KR, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Bluhmki E, Davis SM, Donnan
AF, Peterson ED, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, Schwamm LH, Saver JL. GA, Grotta JC, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Lansberg MG, Lindley RI,
Association of Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program participa- Lyden P, Murray GD, Sandercock PA, Toni D, Toyoda K, Wardlaw
tion and clinical outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with ischemic JM, Whiteley WN, Baigent C, Hacke W, Howard G; on behalf of
stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:1294–1302. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA. the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists’ Collaborators Group. Effects of
115.011874. alteplase for acute stroke on the distribution of functional outcomes: a
58. Generalized efficacy of t-PA for acute stroke: subgroup analysis of the pooled analysis of 9 trials. Stroke. 2016;47:2373–2379. doi: 10.1161/
NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1997;28:2119–2225. STROKEAHA.116.013644.
74. Aghaebrahim A, Streib C, Rangaraju S, Kenmuir CL, Giurgiutiu DV, 90. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute
Horev A, Saeed Y, Callaway CW, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Pacella C, ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD000213.
Ducruet AF, Jankowitz BT, Jovin TG, Jadhav AP. Streamlining door to 91. Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, Campbell B, Chung K, Miteff F, O’Brien
recanalization processes in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv B, Bladin C, McElduff P, Allen C, Bateman G, Donnan G, Davis S,
Surg. 2017;9:340–345. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012324. Levi C. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute
75. Messe SR, Khatri P, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, Saver JL, Bhatt DL, Grau- ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1099–1107. doi: 10.1056/
Sepulveda MV, Cox M, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH. Why NEJMoa1109842.
are acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving IV tPA? Results from a 92. Hacke W, Furlan AJ, Al-Rawi Y, Davalos A, Fiebach JB, Gruber F,
national registry. Neurology. 2016;87:1565–1574. Kaste M, Lipka LJ, Pedraza S, Ringleb PA, Rowley HA, Schneider D,
76. Zaidi SF, Shawver J, Espinosa Morales A, Salahuddin H, Tietjen G, Schwamm LH, Leal JS, Söhngen M, Teal PA, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K,
Lindstrom D, Parquette B, Adams A, Korsnack A, Jumaa MA. Stroke Wintermark M, Warach S. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with
care: initial data from a county-based bypass protocol for patients acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted
with acute stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:631–635. doi: 10.1136/ imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-
neurintsurg-2016-012476. blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:141–150. doi:
77. IST-3 Collaborative Group. Association between brain imaging signs, 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70267-9.
early and late outcomes, and response to intravenous alteplase after acute 93. Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, Levi C, Butcher KS, Peeters A,
ischaemic stroke in the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3): secondary Barber PA, Bladin C, De Silva DA, Byrnes G, Chalk JB, Fink JN, Kimber
analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:485–496. TE, Schultz D, Hand PJ, Frayne J, Hankey G, Muir K, Gerraty R, Tress
78. Demchuk AM, Khan F, Hill MD, Barber PA, Silver B, Patel S, Levine BM, Desmond PM; EPITHET Investigators. Effects of alteplase beyond
SR; NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Importance of leukoaraiosis on 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation
CT for tissue plasminogen activator decision making: evaluation of the Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol.
NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26:120–125. doi: 2008;7:299–309. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70044-9.
10.1159/000139658. 94. Furlan AJ, Eyding D, Albers GW, Al-Rawi Y, Lees KR, Rowley
79. Dzialowski I, Hill MD, Coutts SB, Demchuk AM, Kent DM, Wunderlich HA, Sachara C, Soehngen M, Warach S, Hacke W; for the DEDAS
O, von Kummer R. Extent of early ischemic changes on computed Investigators. Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic
tomography (CT) before thrombolysis: prognostic value of the Alberta Stroke (DEDAS): evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours af-
Stroke Program Early CT Score in ECASS II. Stroke. 2006;37:973–978. ter stroke onset. Stroke. 2006;37:1227–1231. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000206215.62441.56. 0000217403.66996.6d.
80. Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Barber PA, Silver B, Patel SC, Levine SR; for the 95. Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, Bogousslavsky J, Davalos A, Eliasziw
NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group, NIH. Importance of early ischemic com- M, Fischer M, Furlan A, Kaste M, Lees KR, Soehngen M, Warach S;
puted tomography changes using ASPECTS in NINDS rtPA Stroke Study. for the DIAS Study Group. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke. 2005;36:2110–2115. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000181116.15426.58. Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke throm-
81. Patel SC, Levine SR, Tilley BC, Grotta JC, Lu M, Frankel M, Haley EC Jr, bolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke. 2005;36:66–73. doi:
Brott TG, Broderick JP, Horowitz S, Lyden PD, Lewandowski CA, Marler 10.1161/01.STR.0000149938.08731.2c.
JR, Welch KM; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA 96. Ehrlich ME, Turner HL, Currie LJ, Wintermark M, Worrall BB,
Stroke Study Group. Lack of clinical significance of early ischemic changes Southerland AM. Safety of computed tomographic angiography in the
on computed tomography in acute stroke. JAMA. 2001;286:2830–2838. evaluation of patients with acute stroke: a single-center experience.
82. Charidimou A, Pasi M, Fiorelli M, Shams S, von Kummer R, Pantoni Stroke. 2016;47:2045–2050. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013973.
L, Rost N. Leukoaraiosis, cerebral hemorrhage, and outcome after intra- 97. Aulicky P, Mikulík R, Goldemund D, Reif M, Dufek M, Kubelka T.
venous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis (v1). Safety of performing CT angiography in stroke patients treated with in-
Stroke. 2016;47:2364–2372. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014096. travenous thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:783–
83. Qureshi AI, Ezzeddine MA, Nasar A, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, Janjua N, 787. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.184002.
Divani AA. Is IV tissue plasminogen activator beneficial in patients 98. Lima FO, Lev MH, Levy RA, Silva GS, Ebril M, de Camargo EC,
with hyperdense artery sign? Neurology. 2006;66:1171–1174. doi: Pomerantz S, Singhal AB, Greer DM, Ay H, González RG, Koroshetz
10.1212/01.wnl.0000208407.69544.5a. WJ, Smith WS, Furie KL. Functional contrast-enhanced CT for evalu-
84. Mair G, von Kummer R, Morris Z, von Heijne A, Bradey N, Cala L, ation of acute ischemic stroke does not increase the risk of contrast-
Peeters A, Farrall AJ, Adami A, Potter G, Cohen G, Sandercock PA, induced nephropathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:817–821. doi:
Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM; IST-3 Collaborative Group. Effect of alteplase 10.3174/ajnr.A1927.
on the CT hyperdense artery sign and outcome after ischemic stroke. 99. Hopyan JJ, Gladstone DJ, Mallia G, Schiff J, Fox AJ, Symons SP, Buck
Neurology. 2016;86:118–125. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002236. BH, Black SE, Aviv RI. Renal safety of CT angiography and perfu-
85. Charidimou A, Shoamanesh A; International META-MICROBLEEDS sion imaging in the emergency evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J
Initiative. Clinical relevance of microbleeds in acute stroke thromboly- Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1826–1830. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1257.
sis: comprehensive meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87:1534–1541. doi: 100. Krol AL, Dzialowski I, Roy J, Puetz V, Subramaniam S, Coutts SB,
10.1212/WNL.0000000000003207. Demchuk AM. Incidence of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients un-
86. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH, Turc G, Nolte CH, Jung S, dergoing acute stroke computed tomography angiography. Stroke.
Cordonnier C, Fiebach JB, Scheitz JF, Klinger-Gratz PP, Oppenheim 2007;38:2364–2366. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482778.
C, Goyal N, Safouris A, Mattle HP, Alexandrov AW, Schellinger PD, 101. Josephson SA, Dillon WP, Smith WS. Incidence of contrast nephropathy
Alexandrov AV. Risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after from cerebral CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging. Neurology.
intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and 2005;64:1805–1806. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000161845.69114.62.
high cerebral microbleed burden: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 102. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A,
2016;73:675–683. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0292. San Román L, Serena J, Abilleira S, Ribó M, Millán M, Urra X, Cardona
87. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: the National P, López-Cancio E, Tomasello A, Castaño C, Blasco J, Aja L, Dorado L,
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Quesada H, Rubiera M, Hernandez-Pérez M, Goyal M, Demchuk AM,
Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587. von Kummer R, Gallofré M, Dávalos A; REVASCAT Trial Investigators.
88. Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, Kemp S, Schlaug G, Skalabrin E, Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N
Bammer R, Kakuda W, Lansberg MG, Shuaib A, Coplin W, Hamilton S, Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780.
Moseley M, Marks MP; DEFUSE Investigators. Magnetic resonance imag- 103. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, Albers
ing profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the Diffusion GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle HP,
and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, Baxter BW, Devlin TG, Lopes
(DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:508–517. doi: 10.1002/ana.20976. DK, Reddy VK, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer OC, Jahan R; SWIFT
89. Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, Kalladka D, Moreton FC, Siddiqui PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous
A, Ford I, Muir KW. Alteplase Versus Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285–2295. doi:
After Ischaemic Stroke (ATTEST): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.
blinded endpoint study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:368–376. doi: 10.1016/ 104. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J,
S1474-4422(15)70017-7. Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei DF,
Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib Group. Effect of routine low-dose oxygen supplementation on death
A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA, Choe H, and disability in adults with acute stroke: the Stroke Oxygen Study
Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Linares G, Mandzia Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1125–1135. doi: 10.1001/
JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB, Smith EE, jama.2017.11463.
Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison 114. Bennett MH, Weibel S, Wasiak J, Schnabel A, French C, Kranke P.
MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized as- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane
sessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD004954.
Med. 2015;372:1019–1030. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905. 115. Heyboer M 3rd, Sharma D, Santiago W, McCulloch N. Hyperbaric oxy-
105. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi gen therapy: side effects defined and quantified. Adv Wound Care (New
N, Yan B, Dowling RJ, Parsons MW, Oxley TJ, Wu TY, Brooks M, Rochelle). 2017;6:210–224. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0718.
Simpson MA, Miteff F, Levi CR, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, 116. Heyboer M 3rd, Jennings S, Grant WD, Ojevwe C, Byrne J, Wojcik SM.
Steinfort BS, Priglinger M, Ang T, Scroop R, Barber PA, McGuinness Seizure incidence by treatment pressure in patients undergoing hyper-
B, Wijeratne T, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Bladin CF, Badve M, baric oxygen therapy. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014;41:379–385.
Rice H, de Villiers L, Ma H, Desmond PM, Donnan GA, Davis SM; 117. Wohlfahrt P, Krajcoviechova A, Jozifova M, Mayer O, Vanek J,

EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke Filipovsky J, Cifkova R. Low blood pressure during the acute period
with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009–1018. of ischemic stroke is associated with decreased survival. J Hypertens.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792. 2015;33:339–345. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000414.
106. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL, Soudant M, Oppenheim C, Moulin T, 118. Vemmos KN, Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K, Zakopoulos N, Synetos A,
Guillemin F; THRACE Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after Manios E, Konstantopoulou P, Mavrikakis M. U-shaped relationship
intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a between mortality and admission blood pressure in patients with acute
randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1138–1147. doi: stroke. J Intern Med. 2004;255:257–265.
10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6. 119. Okumura K, Ohya Y, Maehara A, Wakugami K, Iseki K, Takishita S.
107. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo Effects of blood pressure levels on case fatality after acute stroke.
AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJ, van Walderveen J Hypertens. 2005;23:1217–1223.
MA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, 120. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Decker WW, Weaver AL, Brown RD Jr. Initial
Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, emergency department blood pressure as predictor of survival after
Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;65:1179–1183. doi: 10.1212/01.
JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen wnl.0000180939.24845.22.
PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den 121. Castillo J, Leira R, García MM, Serena J, Blanco M, Dávalos A. Blood
Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke is associated
EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, with brain injury and poor stroke outcome. Stroke. 2004;35:520–526.
van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000109769.22917.B0.
van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CB, Dippel DW; MR CLEAN Investigators. 122. Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM, Phillips SJ, Sandercock PA; for the IST
A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Collaborative Group. Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in the
N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587. International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2002;33:1315–1320.
108. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva 123. Manning LS, Mistri AK, Potter J, Rothwell PM, Robinson TG. Short-
P, Yavagal DR, Ribo M, Cognard C, Hanel RA, Sila CA, Hassan AE, term blood pressure variability in acute stroke: post hoc analysis of the
Millan M, Levy EI, Mitchell P, Chen M, English JD, Shah QA, Silver Controlling Hypertension and Hypotension Immediately Post Stroke
FL, Pereira VM, Mehta BP, Baxter BW, Abraham MG, Cardona P, and Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives collaborative
Veznedaroglu E, Hellinger FR, Feng L, Kirmani JF, Lopes DK, Jankowitz study trials. Stroke. 2015;46:1518–1524. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.
BT, Frankel MR, Costalat V, Vora NA, Yoo AJ, Malik AM, Furlan AJ, 115.009078.
Rubiera M, Aghaebrahim A, Olivot JM, Tekle WG, Shields R, Graves T, 124. Muscari A, Puddu GM, Serafini C, Fabbri E, Vizioli L, Zoli M. Predictors
Lewis RJ, Smith WS, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Jovin TG DAWN Trial of short-term improvement of ischemic stroke. Neurol Res. 2013;35:594–
Investigators. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch 601. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000181.
between deficit and infarct [published online ahead of print November 125. Visvanathan A, Dennis M, Whiteley W. Parenteral fluid regimens for
11, 2017]. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. http://www. improving functional outcome in people with acute stroke. Cochrane
nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD011138.
109. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez 126. Butcher K, Christensen S, Parsons M, De Silva DA, Ebinger M, Levi C,
S, McTaggart R, Torbey MT, Kim-Tenser M, Leslie-Mazwi T, Sarraj A, Jeerakathil T, Campbell BC, Barber PA, Bladin C, Fink J, Tress B, Donnan
Kasner SE, Ansari SA, Yeatts SD, Hamilton S, Mylnash M, Heit JJ, GA, Davis SM; for the EPITHET Investigators. Postthrombolysis blood
Zaharchuk G, Kim S, Carrozzella J, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Bammer pressure elevation is associated with hemorrhagic transformation. Stroke.
R, Lavori PW, Broderick JP, Lansberg MG; on behalf of the DEFUSE 3 2010;41:72–77. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.563767.
Investigators. Thrombectomy for stroke with perfusion imaging selection 127. Perini F, De Boni A, Marcon M, Bolgan I, Pellizzari M, Dionisio LD.
at 6–16 hours. N Engl J Med. In press. Systolic blood pressure contributes to intracerebral haemorrhage after
110. Berkhemer OA, Jansen IG, Beumer D, Fransen PS, van den Berg LA, thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2010;297:52–54. doi:
Yoo AJ, Lingsma HF, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Lycklama À 10.1016/j.jns.2010.06.025.
Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MA, van den Berg R, Bot JC, Beenen LF, 128. Toni D, Ahmed N, Anzini A, Lorenzano S, Brozman M, Kaste M,
Boers AM, Slump CH, Roos YB, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Dippel DW, van Mikulik R, Putaala J, Wahlgren N; SITS Investigators. Intravenous
der Lugt A, van Zwam WH, Marquering HA, Majoie CB; on behalf of thrombolysis in young stroke patients: results from the SITS-ISTR.
the MR CLEAN Investigators. Collateral status on baseline computed Neurology. 2012;78:880–887. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824d966b.
tomographic angiography and intra-arterial treatment effect in patients 129. Mazya M, Egido JA, Ford GA, Lees KR, Mikulik R, Toni D, Wahlgren
with proximal anterior circulation stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:768–776. doi: N, Ahmed N; for the SITS Investigators. Predicting the risk of symptom-
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011788. atic intracerebral hemorrhage in ischemic stroke treated with intravenous
111. Menon BK, Qazi E, Nambiar V, Foster LD, Yeatts SD, Liebeskind D, alteplase: safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) symptom-
Jovin TG, Goyal M, Hill MD, Tomsick TA, Broderick JP, Demchuk atic intracerebral hemorrhage risk score. Stroke. 2012;43:1524–1531.
AM; for the Interventional Management of Stroke III Investigators. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644815.
Differential effect of baseline computed tomographic angiography col- 130. Wu W, Huo X, Zhao X, Liao X, Wang C, Pan Y, Wang Y, Wang Y; TIMS-
laterals on clinical outcome in patients enrolled in the Interventional CHINA Investigators. Relationship between blood pressure and out-
Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke. 2015;46:1239–1244. doi: comes in acute ischemic stroke patients administered lytic medication
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009009. in the TIMS-China Study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0144260. doi: 10.1371/
112. Saber H, Silver B, Santillan A, Azarpazhooh MR, Misra V, Behrouz R. journal.pone.0144260.
Role of emergent chest radiography in evaluation of hyperacute stroke. 131. Endo K, Kario K, Koga M, Nakagawara J, Shiokawa Y, Yamagami
Neurology. 2016;87:782–785. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002964. H, Furui E, Kimura K, Hasegawa Y, Okada Y, Okuda S, Namekawa
113. Roffe C, Nevatte T, Sim J, Bishop J, Ives N, Ferdinand P, Gray R; Stroke M, Miyagi T, Osaki M, Minematsu K, Toyoda K. Impact of early
Oxygen Study Investigators and the Stroke Oxygen Study Collaborative blood pressure variability on stroke outcomes after thrombolysis: the
SAMURAI rt-PA Registry. Stroke. 2013;44:816–818. doi: 10.1161/ after onset of acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS III): additional outcomes
STROKEAHA.112.681007. and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol.
132. Waltimo T, Haapaniemi E, Surakka IL, Melkas S, Sairanen T, Sibolt G, 2009;8:1095–1102. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70264-9.
Tatlisumak T, Strbian D. Post-thrombolytic blood pressure and symp- 146. Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Grond M, Hennerici M, Lees KR, Mikulik
tomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:1757–1762. R, Parsons M, Roine RO, Toni D, Ringleb P; SITS Investigators.
doi: 10.1111/ene.13118. Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 h after
133. Liu K, Yan S, Zhang S, Guo Y, Lou M. Systolic blood pressure variability an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR. Lancet Neurol.
is associated with severe hemorrhagic transformation in the early stage 2010;9:866–874. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70165-4.
after thrombolysis. Transl Stroke Res. 2016;7:186–191. doi: 10.1007/ 147. Romano JG, Smith EE, Liang L, Gardener H, Camp S, Shuey L, Cook
s12975-016-0458-6. A, Campo-Bustillo I, Khatri P, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Sacco RL,
134. Saxena M, Young P, Pilcher D, Bailey M, Harrison D, Bellomo R, Finfer Schwamm LH. Outcomes in mild acute ischemic stroke treated with
S, Beasley R, Hyam J, Menon D, Rowan K, Myburgh J. Early tem- intravenous thrombolysis: a retrospective analysis of the Get With
perature and mortality in critically ill patients with acute neurological the Guidelines-Stroke registry. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:423–431. doi:
diseases: trauma and stroke differ from infection. Intensive Care Med. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4354.
2015;41:823–832. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3676-6. 148. Adams RJ, Cox M, Ozark SD, Kanter J, Schulte PJ, Xian Y, Fonarow GC,
135. Lyden P, Hemmen T, Grotta J, Rapp K, Ernstrom K, Rzesiewicz T, Smith EE, Schwamm LH. Coexistent sickle cell disease has no impact on
Parker S, Concha M, Hussain S, Agarwal S, Meyer B, Jurf J, Altafullah the safety or outcome of lytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke: findings
I, Raman R. Results of the ICTuS 2 Trial (Intravascular Cooling in from Get With The Guidelines–Stroke. Stroke. 2017;48:686–691. doi:
the Treatment of Stroke 2). Stroke. 2016;47:2888–2895. doi: 10.1161/ 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015412.
STROKEAHA.116.014200. 149. Sloan MA, Price TR, Petito CK, Randall AM, Solomon RE, Terrin ML,
136. Geurts M, Petersson J, Brizzi M, Olsson-Hau S, Luijckx GJ, Algra A, Gore J, Collen D, Kleiman N, Feit F. Clinical features and pathogen-
Dippel DW, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB. COOLIST (Cooling for esis of intracerebral hemorrhage after rt-PA and heparin therapy for
Ischemic Stroke Trial): a multicenter, open, randomized, phase ii, clinical acute myocardial infarction: the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction
trial. Stroke. 2017;48:219–221. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014757. (TIMI) II Pilot and Randomized Clinical Trial combined experience.
137. Piironen K, Tiainen M, Mustanoja S, Kaukonen KM, Meretoja A,
Neurology. 1995;45:649–658.
Tatlisumak T, Kaste M. Mild hypothermia after intravenous thromboly- 150. Mahaffey KW, Granger CB, Sloan MA, Green CL, Gore JM, Weaver
sis in patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. WD, White HD, Simoons ML, Barbash GI, Topol EJ, Califf RM.
2014;45:486–491. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003180. Neurosurgical evacuation of intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolytic
138. Hemmen TM, Raman R, Guluma KZ, Meyer BC, Gomes JA, Cruz- therapy for acute myocardial infarction: experience from the GUSTO-I
Flores S, Wijman CA, Rapp KS, Grotta JC, Lyden PD; for the ICTuS-L trial: Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Plasminogen
Investigators. Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Hypothermia for Activator (tPA) for Occluded Coronary Arteries. Am Heart J. 1999;138(pt
Acute Treatment of Ischemic Stroke (ICTuS-L): final results. Stroke. 1):493–499.
2010;41:2265–2270. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592295. 151. Goldstein JN, Marrero M, Masrur S, Pervez M, Barrocas AM, Abdullah A,
139. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Broderick Oleinik A, Rosand J, Smith EE, Dzik WH, Schwamm LH. Management
JP, Brott T, Frankel M, Grotta JC, Haley EC Jr, Kwiatkowski T, Levine of thrombolysis-associated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch
SR, Lewandowski C, Lu M, Lyden P, Marler JR, Patel S, Tilley BC, Neurol. 2010;67:965–969. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.175.
Albers G, Bluhmki E, Wilhelm M, Hamilton S; ATLANTIS Trials 152. French KF, White J, Hoesch RE. Treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage
Investigators; ECASS Trials Investigators; NINDS rt-PA Study Group with tranexamic acid after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activa-
Investigators. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled tor. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:107–111. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9681-5.
analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. 153. Yaghi S, Eisenberger A, Willey JZ. Symptomatic intracerebral hemor-
2004;363:768–774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15692-4. rhage in acute ischemic stroke after thrombolysis with intravenous
140. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo G, Sandercock P, Lindley recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a review of natural his-
RL, Cohen G. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute isch- tory and treatment. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1181–1185. doi: 10.1001/
aemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. jamaneurol.2014.1210.
2012;379:2364–2372. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60738-7. 154. Yaghi S, Haggiagi A, Sherzai A, Marshall RS, Agarwal S. Use of re-
141. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, combinant factor VIIa in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage fol-
Hennerici MG, Kaste M, Kuelkens S, Larrue V, Lees KR, Roine lowing intravenous thrombolysis. Clin Pract. 2015;5:756. doi: 10.4081/
RO, Soinne L, Toni D, Vanhooren G; SITS-MOST investigators. cp.2015.756.
Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe 155. Yaghi S, Boehme AK, Dibu J, Leon Guerrero CR, Ali S, Martin-Schild
Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS- S, Sands KA, Noorian AR, Blum CA, Chaudhary S, Schwamm LH,
MOST): an observational study. Lancet. 2007;369:275–282. doi: Liebeskind DS, Marshall RS, Willey JZ. Treatment and outcome of
10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4. thrombolysis-related hemorrhage: a multicenter retrospective study.
142. IST-3 Collaborative Group, Sandercock P, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI, JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1451–1457. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2371.
Dennis M, Cohen G, Murray G, Innes K, Venables G, Czlonkowska A, 156. Stone JA, Willey JZ, Keyrouz S, Butera J, McTaggart RA, Cutting S,
Kobayashi A, Ricci S, Murray V, Berge E, Slot KB, Hankey GJ, Correia Silver B, Thompson B, Furie KL, Yaghi S. Therapies for hemorrhagic
M, Peeters A, Matz K, Lyrer P, Gubitz G, Phillips SJ, Arauz A. The ben- transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol.
efits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue 2017;19:1. doi: 10.1007/s11940-017-0438-5.
plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the Third 157. Frontera JA, Lewin JJ 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Aisiku IP, Alexandrov

International Stroke Trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. AW, Cook AM, del Zoppo GJ, Kumar MA, Peerschke EI, Stiefel MF,
2012;379:2352–2363. Teitelbaum JS, Wartenberg KE, Zerfoss CL. Guideline for reversal of
143. Anderson CS, Robinson T, Lindley RI, Arima H, Lavados PM, Lee TH, antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage: a statement for health-
Broderick JP, Chen X, Chen G, Sharma VK, Kim JS, Thang NH, Cao care professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of
Y, Parsons MW, Levi C, Huang Y, Olavarría VV, Demchuk AM, Bath Critical Care Medicine. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:6–46. doi: 10.1007/
PM, Donnan GA, Martins S, Pontes-Neto OM, Silva F, Ricci S, Roffe s12028-015-0222-x.
C, Pandian J, Billot L, Woodward M, Li Q, Wang X, Wang J, Chalmers 158. Foster-Goldman A, McCarthy D. Angioedema from recombinant TPA
J; ENCHANTED Investigators and Coordinators. Low-dose versus stan- administration: case report and pathophysiology review. Am J Ther.
dard-dose intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;20:691–693. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3182799083.
2016;374:2313–2323. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515510. 159. Gorski EM, Schmidt MJ. Orolingual angioedema with alteplase ad-
144. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, ministration for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Emerg Med.
Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer 2013;45:e25–e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.02.004.
R, Wahlgren N, Toni D; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with 160. Lewis LM. Angioedema: etiology, pathophysiology, current and

alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. emerging therapies. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:789–796. doi: 10.1016/j.
2008;359:1317–1329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656. jemermed.2013.03.045.
145. Bluhmki E, Chamorro A, Dávalos A, Machnig T, Sauce C, Wahlgren N, 161. Lin SY, Tang SC, Tsai LK, Yeh SJ, Hsiao YJ, Chen YW, Chen KH, Yip
Wardlaw J, Hacke W. Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3.0-4.5 h BS, Shen LJ, Wu FL, Jeng JS. Orolingual angioedema after alteplase
therapy of acute ischaemic stroke: incidence and risk of prior angioten- for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled tri-
sin-converting enzyme inhibitor use. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21:1285–1291. als. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147287.
doi: 10.1111/ene.12472. 175. Lemmens R, Hamilton SA, Liebeskind DS, Tomsick TA, Demchuk

162. Correia AS, Matias G, Calado S, Lourenço A, Viana-Baptista M.
AM, Nogueira RG, Marks MP, Jahan R, Gralla J, Yoo AJ, Yeatts SD,
Orolingual angiodema associated with alteplase treatment of acute Palesch YY, Saver JL, Pereira VM, Broderick JP, Albers GW, Lansberg
stroke: a reappraisal. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:31–40. doi: MG; DEFUSE 2, IMS III, STAR, and SWIFT Trialists; DEFUSE 2 IMS
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.045. III STAR and SWIFT Trialists. Effect of endovascular reperfusion in
163. O’Carroll CB, Aguilar MI. Management of postthrombolysis hemor- relation to site of arterial occlusion. Neurology. 2016;86:762–770. doi:
rhagic and orolingual angioedema complications. Neurohospitalist. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002399.
2015;5:133–141. doi: 10.1177/1941874415587680. 176. Yoo AJ, Simonsen CZ, Prabhakaran S, Chaudhry ZA, Issa MA, Fugate
164. Myslimi F, Caparros F, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Moulin S, Gautier S, JE, Linfante I, Liebeskind DS, Khatri P, Jovin TG, Kallmes DF, Dabus
Girardie P, Cordonnier C, Bordet R, Leys D. Orolingual angioedema dur- G, Zaidat OO; for the Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading
ing or after thrombolysis for cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2016;47:1825– Collaborators. Refining angiographic biomarkers of revasculariza-
1830. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013334. tion: improving outcome prediction after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke.
165. Pahs L, Droege C, Kneale H, Pancioli A. A novel approach to the 2013;44:2509–2512. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990.
treatment of orolingual angioedema after tissue plasminogen activa- 177. Marks MP, Lansberg MG, Mlynash M, Kemp S, McTaggart R, Zaharchuk
tor administration. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68:345–348. doi: 10.1016/j. G, Bammer R, Albers GW; DEFUSE 2 Investigators. Correlation of
annemergmed.2016.02.019. AOL recanalization, TIMI reperfusion and TICI reperfusion with infarct
166. Jeong HG, Kim BJ, Yang MH, Han MK, Bae HJ, Lee SH. Stroke out- growth and clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:724–728. doi:
comes with use of antithrombotics within 24 hours after recanaliza- 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010973.
tion treatment. Neurology. 2016;87:996–1002. doi: 10.1212/WNL. 178. Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Marnat G,
0000000000003083. Saleme S, Costalat V, Bracard S, Desal H, Mazighi M, Consoli A, Piotin
167. von Kummer R, Mori E, Truelsen T, Jensen JS, Grønning BA, Fiebach M; ASTER Trial Investigators. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration
JB, Lovblad KO, Pedraza S, Romero JM, Chabriat H, Chang KC, vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic
Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grotta J, Kaste M, Schwamm LH, Shuaib A, Albers stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial.
GW; for the DIAS-4 Investigators. Desmoteplase 3 to 9 hours after major JAMA. 2017;318:443–452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9644.
artery occlusion stroke: the DIAS-4 Trial (Efficacy and Safety Study of 179. Dippel DW, Majoie CB, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge
Desmoteplase to Treat Acute Ischemic Stroke). Stroke. 2016;47:2880– RJ, van Zwam WH, Lingsma HF, Koudstaal PJ, Treurniet KM, van
2887. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013715. den Berg LA, Beumer D, Fransen PS, Berkhemer OA; for the MR
168. Albers GW, von Kummer R, Truelsen T, Jensen JK, Ravn GM, Grønning CLEAN Investigators. Influence of device choice on the effect of intra-
BA, Chabriat H, Chang KC, Davalos AE, Ford GA, Grotta J, Kaste M, arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in MR CLEAN (Multicenter
Schwamm LH, Shuaib A; DIAS-3 Investigators. Safety and efficacy of Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute
desmoteplase given 3-9 h after ischaemic stroke in patients with occlu- Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands). Stroke. 2016;47:2574–2581. doi:
sion or high-grade stenosis in major cerebral arteries (DIAS-3): a dou- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013929.
ble-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 180. Berkhemer OA, van den Berg LA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, Yoo

2015;14:575–584. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00047-2. AJ, Lingsma HF, Schonewille WJ, van den Berg R, Wermer MJ,
169. Haley EC Jr, Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown Boiten J, Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Hollmann MW,
DL, Fanale C, Libman R, Kwiatkowski TG, Llinas RH, Levine SR, van Zwam WH, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie
Johnston KC, Buchsbaum R, Levy G, Levin B; for the Tenecteplase CB, Dippel DW, Roos YB; MR CLEAN Investigators. The effect
in Stroke Investigators. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute of anesthetic management during intra-arterial therapy for acute
ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized stroke in MR CLEAN. Neurology. 2016;87:656–664. doi: 10.1212/
clinical trial. Stroke. 2010;41:707–711. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA. WNL.0000000000002976.
109.572040. 181. Löwhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Leiram
170. Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Rønning OM, B, Sundeman H, Dunker D, Schnabel K, Wikholm G, Hellström M,
Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H, Kaur K, Ricksten SE. General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for en-
Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund Å, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund dovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the AnStroke trial
C, Næss H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Tenecteplase versus (Anesthesia During Stroke). Stroke. 2017;48:1601–1607. doi: 10.1161/
alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a STROKEAHA.117.016554.
phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 182. Schönenberger S, Uhlmann L, Hacke W, Schieber S, Mundiyanapurath
2017;16:781–788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. S, Purrucker JC, Nagel S, Klose C, Pfaff J, Bendszus M, Ringleb PA,
171. Nacu A, Kvistad CE, Naess H, Øygarden H, Logallo N, Assmus J, Waje- Kieser M, Möhlenbruch MA, Bösel J. Effect of conscious sedation vs
Andreassen U, Kurz KD, Neckelmann G, Thomassen L. NOR-SASS general anesthesia on early neurological improvement among patients
(Norwegian Sonothrombolysis in Acute Stroke Study): randomized with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a ran-
controlled contrast-enhanced sonothrombolysis in an unselected acute domized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:1986–1996. doi: 10.1001/
ischemic stroke population. Stroke. 2017;48:335–341. doi: 10.1161/ jama.2016.16623.
STROKEAHA.116.014644. 183. Jovin TG, Saver JL, Ribo M, Pereira V, Furlan A, Bonafe A, Baxter
172. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ,
B, Gupta R, Lopes D, Jansen O, Smith W, Gress D, Hetts S, Lewis
Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel RJ, Shields R, Berry SM, Graves TL, Malisch T, Rai A, Sheth KN,
MA, Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Liebeskind DS, Nogueira RG. Diffusion-weighted imaging or computer-
Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millán M, ized tomography perfusion assessment with clinical mismatch in the tri-
Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Román LS, Ribó M, Beumer D, Stouch age of wake up and late presenting strokes undergoing neurointervention
B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, with Trevo (DAWN) trial methods. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:641–652. doi:
Jovin TG; HERMES Collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after 10.1177/1747493017710341.
large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data 184. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcu-
from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/ taneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute isch-
S0140-6736(16)00163-X. aemic stroke: International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet.
173. Campbell BC, Hill MD, Rubiera M, Menon BK, Demchuk A, Donnan 1997;349:1569–1581.
GA, Roy D, Thornton J, Dorado L, Bonafe A, Levy EI, Diener HC, 185. CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000
Hernández-Pérez M, Pereira VM, Blasco J, Quesada H, Rempel J, Jahan patients with acute ischaemic stroke: CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial)
R, Davis SM, Stouch BC, Mitchell PJ, Jovin TG, Saver JL, Goyal M. Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1997;349:1641–1649.
Safety and efficacy of solitaire stent thrombectomy: individual patient 186. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Tseng MC, Cecconi E. Oral antiplate-
data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Stroke. 2016;47:798–806. doi: let therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012360. 2014:CD000029.
174. Bush CK, Kurimella D, Cross LJ, Conner KR, Martin-Schild S, He J, Li 187. Siebler M, Hennerici MG, Schneider D, von Reutern GM, Seitz RJ,
C, Chen J, Kelly T. Endovascular treatment with stent-retriever devices Röther J, Witte OW, Hamann G, Junghans U, Villringer A, Fiebach JB.
Safety of Tirofiban in acute Ischemic Stroke: the SaTIS trial. Stroke. Lodovici ML, Bono G, Baldi A, D’Anna S, Sacco S, Carolei A, Tiseo C,
2011;42:2388–2392. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599662. Acciarresi M, D’Amore C, Imberti D, Zabzuni D, Doronin B, Volodina
188. Pancioli AM, Broderick J, Brott T, Tomsick T, Khoury J, Bean J, del V, Consoli D, Galati F, Pieroni A, Toni D, Monaco S, Baronello MM,
Zoppo G, Kleindorfer D, Woo D, Khatri P, Castaldo J, Frey J, Gebel J Barlinn K, Pallesen LP, Kepplinger J, Bodechtel U, Gerber J, Deleu D,
Jr, Kasner S, Kidwell C, Kwiatkowski T, Libman R, Mackenzie R, Scott Melikyan G, Ibrahim F, Akhtar N, Mosconi MG, Bubba V, Silvestri I,
P, Starkman S, Thurman RJ; for the CLEAR Trial Investigators. The Lees KR. Early recurrence and cerebral bleeding in patients with acute
combined approach to lysis utilizing eptifibatide and rt-PA in acute isch- ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: effect of anticoagulation and
emic stroke: the CLEAR stroke trial. Stroke. 2008;39:3268–3276. doi: its timing: the RAF study. Stroke. 2015;46:2175–2182. doi: 10.1161/
10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.517656. STROKEAHA.115.008891.
189. Adeoye O, Sucharew H, Khoury J, Tomsick T, Khatri P, Palesch Y, Schmit 203. Mokin M, Kass-Hout T, Kass-Hout O, Radovic V, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI,
PA, Pancioli AM, Broderick JP; for the CLEAR-ER, IMS III, and ALIAS Snyder KV. Intravenous heparin for the treatment of intraluminal throm-
Part 2 Investigators. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator plus bus in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a case series. J Neurointerv
eptifibatide versus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator alone Surg. 2013;5:144–150. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010134.
in acute ischemic stroke: propensity score-matched post hoc analysis. 204. Vellimana AK, Kadkhodayan Y, Rich KM, Cross DT 3rd, Moran CJ,
Stroke. 2015;46:461–464. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006743. Zazulia AR, Lee JM, Chicoine MR, Dacey RG Jr, Derdeyn CP, Zipfel
190. Adeoye O, Sucharew H, Khoury J, Vagal A, Schmit PA, Ewing I, Levine GJ. Symptomatic patients with intraluminal carotid artery throm-
SR, Demel S, Eckerle B, Katz B, Kleindorfer D, Stettler B, Woo D, Khatri bus: outcome with a strategy of initial anticoagulation. J Neurosurg.
P, Broderick JP, Pancioli AM. Combined approach to lysis utilizing ep- 2013;118:34–41. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12406.
tifibatide and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute 205. Barreto AD, Alexandrov AV, Lyden P, Lee J, Martin-Schild S, Shen L,
ischemic stroke-full dose regimen stroke trial. Stroke. 2015;46:2529– Wu TC, Sisson A, Pandurengan R, Chen Z, Rahbar MH, Balucani C,
2533. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010260. Barlinn K, Sugg RM, Garami Z, Tsivgoulis G, Gonzales NR, Savitz
191. Ciccone A, Motto C, Abraha I, Cozzolino F, Santilli I. Glycoprotein IIb- SI, Mikulik R, Demchuk AM, Grotta JC. The Argatroban and Tissue-
IIIa inhibitors for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Type Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study: final results of a pilot
2014:CD005208. safety study. Stroke. 2012;43:770–775. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.

192. Adams HP Jr, Effron MB, Torner J, Dávalos A, Frayne J, Teal P, Leclerc 111.625574.
J, Oemar B, Padgett L, Barnathan ES, Hacke W; for the AbESTT-II 206. Barreto AD, Ford GA, Shen L, Pedroza C, Tyson J, Cai C, Rahbar
Investigators. Emergency administration of abciximab for treatment of MH, Grotta JC; on behalf of the ARTSS-2 Investigators. Randomized,
patients with acute ischemic stroke: results of an international phase III multicenter trial of ARTSS-2 (Argatroban With Recombinant Tissue
trial: Abciximab in Emergency Treatment of Stroke Trial (AbESTT-II). Plasminogen Activator for Acute Stroke). Stroke. 2017;48:1608–1616.
Stroke. 2008;39:87–99. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.476648. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016720.
193. Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Wang D, Wang C, Wang C, Li H, Meng 207. Gioia LC, Kate M, Sivakumar L, Hussain D, Kalashyan H, Buck B,
X, Cui L, Jia J, Dong Q, Xu A, Zeng J, Li Y, Wang Z, Xia H, Johnston Bussiere M, Jeerakathil T, Shuaib A, Emery D, Butcher K. Early riva-
SC; CHANCE Investigators. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor roxaban use after cardioembolic stroke may not result in hemorrhagic
stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:11–19. doi: transformation: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke.
10.1056/NEJMoa1215340. 2016;47:1917–1919. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013491.
194. Wang Y, Pan Y, Zhao X, Li H, Wang D, Johnston SC, Liu L, Meng X, 208. Chang TS, Jensen MB. Haemodilution for acute ischaemic stroke.

Wang A, Wang C, Wang Y; on behalf of the CHANCE Investigators. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD000103.
Clopidogrel With Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic 209. Ginsberg MD, Palesch YY, Hill MD, Martin RH, Moy CS, Barsan WG,
Attack (CHANCE) trial: one-year outcomes. Circulation. 2015;132:40– Waldman BD, Tamariz D, Ryckborst KJ; ALIAS and Neurological
46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014791. Emergencies Treatment Trials (NETT) Investigators. High-dose al-
195. Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, Barsan W, Battenhouse H, Conwit bumin treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (ALIAS) part 2: a ran-
R, Dillon C, Elm J, Lindblad A, Morgenstern L, Poisson SN, Palesch domised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol.
Y. Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke 2013;12:1049–1058. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70223-0.
(POINT) trial: rationale and design. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:479–483. doi: 210. Martin RH, Yeatts SD, Hill MD, Moy CS, Ginsberg MD, Palesch

10.1111/ijs.12129. YY; for the ALIAS Parts 1 and 2 and NETT Investigators. ALIAS
196. Johnston SC, Amarenco P. Ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or (Albumin in Acute Ischemic Stroke) trials: analysis of the combined
transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1395. doi: 10.1056/ data from parts 1 and 2. Stroke. 2016;47:2355–2359. doi: 10.1161/
NEJMc1610106. STROKEAHA.116.012825.
197. Whiteley WN, Adams HP Jr, Bath PM, Berge E, Sandset PM, Dennis 211. Lapchak PA. Taking a light approach to treating acute ischemic stroke
M, Murray GD, Wong KS, Sandercock PA. Targeted use of heparin, patients: transcranial near-infrared laser therapy translational science.
heparinoids, or low-molecular-weight heparin to improve outcome af- Ann Med. 2010;42:576–586. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.532811.
ter acute ischaemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 212. Stemer AB, Huisa BN, Zivin JA. The evolution of transcranial la-

randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:539–545. doi: ser therapy for acute ischemic stroke, including a pooled analysis of
10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70079-6. NEST-1 and NEST-2. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:29–33. doi: 10.1007/
198. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Kane EJ. Anticoagulants for acute isch- s11886-009-0071-3.
aemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD000024. 213. Zivin JA, Albers GW, Bornstein N, Chippendale T, Dahlof B, Devlin T,
199. Yi X, Lin J, Wang C, Zhang B, Chi W. Low-molecular-weight hepa- Fisher M, Hacke W, Holt W, Ilic S, Kasner S, Lew R, Nash M, Perez J,
rin is more effective than aspirin in preventing early neurologic dete- Rymer M, Schellinger P, Schneider D, Schwab S, Veltkamp R, Walker
rioration and improving six-month outcome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. M, Streeter J; for the NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-2
2014;23:1537–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.036. Investigators. Effectiveness and safety of transcranial laser therapy
200. Wada T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsubara T, Fushimi K, Nakajima for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:1359–1364. doi: 10.1161/
S, Yahagi N. Outcomes of argatroban treatment in patients with ath- STROKEAHA.109.547547.
erothrombotic stroke: observational nationwide study in Japan. Stroke. 214. Hacke W, Schelinger PD, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Dahlof BS, Kasner
2016;47:471–476. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011250. SE, Howard G, Shuaib A, Richieri SP, Dilly S, Zivin J. Transcranial
201. Kate M, Gioia L, Buck B, Sivakumar L, Jeerakathil T, Shuaib A,
laser therapy (TLT) for acute ischemic stroke: results of NEST 3, a
Butcher K. Dabigatran therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients pivotal phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT). Cerebrovasc Dis.
without atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2015;46:2685–2687. doi: 10.1161/ 2013;35:191.
STROKEAHA.115.010383. 215. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Vedula KC, Weaver AL, Decker WW,

202. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Falocci N, Caso V, Becattini C, Marcheselli Brown RD Jr. Impact of acute blood pressure variability on ischemic
S, Rueckert C, Pezzini A, Poli L, Padovani A, Csiba L, Szabó L, Sohn stroke outcome. Neurology. 2006;66:1878–1881. doi: 10.1212/01.
SI, Tassinari T, Abdul-Rahim AH, Michel P, Cordier M, Vanacker P, wnl.0000219628.78513.b5.
Remillard S, Alberti A, Venti M, Scoditti U, Denti L, Orlandi G, Chiti 216. Kaste M, Fogelholm R, Erilä T, Palomäki H, Murros K, Rissanen
A, Gialdini G, Bovi P, Carletti M, Rigatelli A, Putaala J, Tatlisumak A, Sarna S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled tri-
T, Masotti L, Lorenzini G, Tassi R, Guideri F, Martini G, Tsivgoulis al of nimodipine in acute ischemic hemispheric stroke. Stroke.
G, Vadikolias K, Liantinioti C, Corea F, Del Sette M, Ageno W, De 1994;25:1348–1353.
217. Wahlgren NG, MacMahon DG, De Keyser J, Indredavik B, Ryman T. protocols to manage fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction
The Intravenous Nimodipine West European Trial (INWEST) of ni- in acute stroke (QASC): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet.
modipine in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;378:1699–1706. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61485-2.
1994;4:204–210. 233. Miles A, Zeng IS, McLauchlan H, Huckabee ML. Cough reflex testing
218. Horn J, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, Limburg M. Very Early Nimodipine in dysphagia following stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med
Use in Stroke (VENUS): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Res. 2013;5:222–233. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1340w.
trial. Stroke. 2001;32:461–465. 234. Joundi RA, Martino R, Saposnik G, Giannakeas V, Fang J,

219. Schrader J, Lüders S, Kulschewski A, Berger J, Zidek W, Treib J, Einhäupl Kapral MK. Predictors and outcomes of dysphagia screening af-
K, Diener HC, Dominiak P; on behalf of the Acute Candesartan Cilexetil ter acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2017;48:900–906. doi: 10.1161/
Therapy in Stroke Survivors Study Group. The ACCESS Study: evalua- STROKEAHA.116.015332.
tion of Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors. Stroke. 235. Dennis M, Lewis S, Cranswick G, Forbes J; FOOD Trial Collaboration.
2003;34:1699–1703. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000075777.18006.89. FOOD: a multicentre randomised trial evaluating feeding policies in pa-
220. Eveson DJ, Robinson TG, Potter JF. Lisinopril for the treatment
tients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke. Health Technol Assess.
of hypertension within the first 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke 2006;10:iii–iv, ix.
and follow-up. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j. 236. Geeganage C, Beavan J, Ellender S, Bath PM. Interventions for dysphagia
amjhyper.2006.08.005. and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane Database
221. Bath PM, Martin RH, Palesch Y, Cotton D, Yusuf S, Sacco R, Diener Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000323.pub2.
HC, Toni D, Estol C, Roberts R; for the PRoFESS Study Group. Effect 237. Sørensen RT, Rasmussen RS, Overgaard K, Lerche A, Johansen AM,
of telmisartan on functional outcome, recurrence, and blood pressure in Lindhardt T. Dysphagia screening and intensified oral hygiene re-
patients with acute mild ischemic stroke: a PRoFESS subgroup analysis. duce pneumonia after stroke. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013;45:139–146. doi:
Stroke. 2009;40:3541–3546. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555623. 10.1097/JNN.0b013e31828a412c.
222. Potter JF, Robinson TG, Ford GA, Mistri A, James M, Chernova J, Jagger 238. Brady M, Furlanetto D, Hunter RV, Lewis S, Milne V. Staff-led interven-
C. Controlling Hypertension and Hypotension Immediately Post-Stroke tions for improving oral hygiene in patients following stroke. Cochrane
(CHHIPS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial. Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD003864.
Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:48–56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70263-1. 239. Wagner C, Marchina S, Deveau JA, Frayne C, Sulmonte K, Kumar S.
223. Robinson TG, Potter JF, Ford GA, Bulpitt CJ, Chernova J, Jagger C, Risk of stroke-associated pneumonia and oral hygiene. Cerebrovasc Dis.
James MA, Knight J, Markus HS, Mistri AK, Poulter NR; COSSACS 2016;41:35–39. doi: 10.1159/000440733.
Investigators. Effects of antihypertensive treatment after acute stroke in 240. Dennis M, Caso V, Kappelle LJ, Pavlovic A, Sandercock P. European
the Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for prophylaxis for venous throm-
(COSSACS): a prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial. boembolism in immobile patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Eur
Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:767–775. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70163-0. Stroke J. 2016;1:6–19.
224. Sandset EC, Bath PM, Boysen G, Jatuzis D, Kõrv J, Lüders S, Murray 241. Meader N, Moe-Byrne T, Llewellyn A, Mitchell AJ. Screening for post-
GD, Richter PS, Roine RO, Terént A, Thijs V, Berge E; SCAST Study stroke major depression: a meta-analysis of diagnostic validity stud-
Group. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of ies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:198–206. doi: 10.1136/
acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind jnnp-2012-304194.
trial. Lancet. 2011;377:741–750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60104-9. 242. Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El Husseini N, Hackett ML, Jorge RE,

225. He J, Zhang Y, Xu T, Zhao Q, Wang D, Chen CS, Tong W, Liu C, Xu Kissela BM, Mitchell PH, Skolarus LE, Whooley MA, Williams LS;
T, Ju Z, Peng Y, Peng H, Li Q, Geng D, Zhang J, Li D, Zhang F, Guo on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council
L, Sun Y, Wang X, Cui Y, Li Y, Ma D, Yang G, Gao Y, Yuan X, Bazzano on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Quality of Care
LA, Chen J; CATIS Investigators. Effects of immediate blood pressure and Outcomes Research. Poststroke depression: a scientific statement
reduction on death and major disability in patients with acute ischemic for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
stroke: the CATIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:479–489. American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e30–e43. doi: 10.1161/
doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282543. STR.0000000000000113.
226. Bath PM, Krishnan K. Interventions for deliberately altering blood pres- 243. AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mo-
sure in acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD000039. bilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled
227. Oh MS, Yu KH, Hong KS, Kang DW, Park JM, Bae HJ, Koo J, Lee J, trial. Lancet. 2015;386:46–55.
Lee BC; Valsartan Efficacy oN modesT blood pressUre REduction in 244. Raco A, Caroli E, Isidori A, Salvati M. Management of acute cer-
acute ischemic stroke (VENTURE) Study Group. Modest blood pressure ebellar infarction: one institution’s experience. Neurosurgery.
reduction with valsartan in acute ischemic stroke: a prospective, random- 2003;53:1061–1605.
ized, open-label, blinded-end-point trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:745–751. 245. Agarwalla PK, Stapleton CJ, Ogilvy CS. Craniectomy in acute isch-
doi: 10.1111/ijs.12446. emic stroke. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(suppl 1):S151–S162. doi: 10.1227/
228. Enos Trial Investigators, Bath PM, Woodhouse L, Scutt P, Krishnan K, NEU.0000000000000226.
Wardlaw JM, Bereczki D, Sprigg N, Berge E, Beridze M, Caso V, Chen 246. Mostofi K. Neurosurgical management of massive cerebellar in-

C, Christensen H, Collins R, El Etribi A, Laska AC, Lees KR, Ozturk farct outcome in 53 patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:28. doi:
S, Phillips S, Pocock S, de Silva HA, Szatmari S, Utton S. Efficacy of 10.4103/2152-7806.107906.
nitric oxide, with or without continuing antihypertensive treatment, for 247. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink
management of high blood pressure in acute stroke (ENOS): a partial- GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp
factorial randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:617–28. HB, Hacke W; DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET Investigators.
229. Lee M, Ovbiagele B, Hong KS, Wu YL, Lee JE, Rao NM, Feng
Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle ce-
W, Saver JL. Effect of blood pressure lowering in early ischemic rebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials.
stroke: meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:1883–1889. doi: 10.1161/ Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:215–222. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70036-4.
STROKEAHA.115.009552. 248. Maciel CB, Sheth KN. Malignant MCA stroke: an update on surgical
230. Woodhouse L, Scutt P, Krishnan K, Berge E, Gommans J, Ntaios G, decompression and future directions. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015;17:40.
Wardlaw J, Sprigg N, Bath PM; on behalf of the ENOS Investigators. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0519-4.
Effect of hyperacute administration (within 6 hours) of transdermal glyc- 249. Yang MH, Lin HY, Fu J, Roodrajeetsing G, Shi SL, Xiao SW.

eryl trinitrate, a nitric oxide donor, on outcome after stroke: subgroup Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with malignant middle ce-
analysis of the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) Trial. Stroke. rebral artery infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon.
2015;46:3194–3201. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009647. 2015;13:230–240. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.12.002.
231. Rai N, Prasad K, Bhatia R, Vibha D, Singh MB, Rai VK, Kumar A. 250. Alexander P, Heels-Ansdell D, Siemieniuk R, Bhatnagar N, Chang Y, Fei
Development and implementation of acute stroke care pathway in a ter- Y, Zhang Y, McLeod S, Prasad K, Guyatt G. Hemicraniectomy versus
tiary care hospital in India: a cluster-randomized study. Neurol India. medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and meta-analysis.
2016;64(suppl):S39–S45. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.178038. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e014390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014390.
232. Middleton S, McElduff P, Ward J, Grimshaw JM, Dale S, D’Este C, 251. Sundseth J, Sundseth A, Jacobsen EA, Pripp AH, Sorteberg W, Altmann
Drury P, Griffiths R, Cheung NW, Quinn C, Evans M, Cadilhac D, Levi M, Lindegaard KF, Berg-Johnsen J, Thommessen B. Predictors of early
C; QASC Trialists Group. Implementation of evidence-based treatment in-hospital death after decompressive craniectomy in swollen middle
cerebral artery infarction. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159:301–306. meta-analysis of current risks. Stroke. 2015;46:3423–3436. doi: 10.1161/
doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-3049-0. STROKEAHA.115.010764.
252. Suyama K, Horie N, Hayashi K, Nagata I. Nationwide survey of decom- 270. Marnane M, Ni Chroinin D, Callaly E, Sheehan OC, Merwick A, Hannon
pressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarc- N, Horgan G, Kyne L, Moroney J, McCormack PM, Dolan E, Duggan J,
tion in Japan. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1158–1163. doi: 10.1016/j. Williams D, Crispino-O’Connell G, Kelly PJ. Stroke recurrence within
wneu.2014.07.015. the time window recommended for carotid endarterectomy. Neurology.
253. Yu JW, Choi JH, Kim DH, Cha JK, Huh JT. Outcome following decom- 2011;77:738–743. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822b00cf.
pressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in 271. Johansson EP, Arnerlöv C, Wester P. Risk of recurrent stroke before ca-
patients older than 70 years old. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. rotid endarterectomy: the ANSYSCAP study. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:220–
2012;14:65–74. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2012.14.2.65. 227. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00790.x.
254. Jüttler E, Unterberg A, Woitzik J, Bösel J, Amiri H, Sakowitz OW, 272. Strömberg S, Nordanstig A, Bentzel T, Österberg K, Bergström GM.
Gondan M, Schiller P, Limprecht R, Luntz S, Schneider H, Pinzer T, Risk of early recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur J Vasc
Hobohm C, Meixensberger J, Hacke W; DESTINY II Investigators. Endovasc Surg. 2015;49:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.11.004.
Hemicraniectomy in older patients with extensive middle-cerebral- 273. Kazandjian C, Kretz B, Lemogne B, Aboa Eboulé C, Béjot Y,

artery stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1091–1100. doi: 10.1056/ Steinmetz E. Influence of the type of cerebral infarct and timing
NEJMoa1311367. of intervention in the early outcomes after carotid endarterectomy
255. Zhao J, Su YY, Zhang Y, Zhang YZ, Zhao R, Wang L, Gao R, Chen for symptomatic stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:1256–1261. doi:
W, Gao D. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle ce- 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.097.
rebral artery infarct: a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients 274. Azzini C, Gentile M, De Vito A, Traina L, Sette E, Fainardi E, Mascoli
up to 80 years old. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:161–171. doi: 10.1007/ F, Casetta I. Very early carotid endarterectomy after intravenous throm-
s12028-012-9703-3. bolysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.
256. Curley G, Kavanagh BP, Laffey JG. Hypocapnia and the injured brain: ejvs.2015.11.006.
more harm than benefit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1348–1359. doi: 275. Adachi K, Sadato A, Hayakawa M, Maeda S, Hirose Y. Acute carotid ar-
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8cf2b. tery stenting in symptomatic high-grade cervical carotid artery stenosis.

257. Wan YH, Nie C, Wang HL, Huang CY. Therapeutic hypothermia (differ- Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40:45–51. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0737-4.
ent depths, durations, and rewarming speeds) for acute ischemic stroke: 276. Vasconcelos V, Cassola N, da Silva EM, Baptista-Silva JC. Immediate
a meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:2736–2747. doi: versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.06.017. stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD011401. doi:
258. Roh JK, Kang DW, Lee SH, Yoon BW, Chang KH. Significance of 10.1002/14651858.CD011401.pub2.
acute multiple brain infarction on diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 277. Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, Clagett GP, Barnes RW, Wallace
2000;31:688–694. MC, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Finan JW, Hachinski VC, Barnett HJ. The
259. Kang DW, Chalela JA, Ezzeddine MA, Warach S. Association of isch- North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical re-
emic lesion patterns on early diffusion-weighted imaging with TOAST sults in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999;30:1751–1758.
stroke subtypes. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1730–1734. doi: 10.1001/ 278. Turan TN, Maidan L, Cotsonis G, Lynn MJ, Romano JG, Levine SR,
archneur.60.12.1730. Chimowitz MI; for the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial
260. Cho AH, Kim JS, Jeon SB, Kwon SU, Lee DH, Kang DW. Mechanism of Disease Investigators. Failure of antithrombotic therapy and risk of stroke
multiple infarcts in multiple cerebral circulations on diffusion-weighted in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Stroke. 2009;40:505–
imaging. J Neurol. 2007;254:924–930. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0397-3. 509. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528281.
261. Braemswig TB, Usnich T, Albach FN, Brunecker P, Grittner U, Scheitz JF, 279. Jung JM, Kang DW, Yu KH, Koo JS, Lee JH, Park JM, Hong KS, Cho YJ,
Fiebach JB, Nolte CH. Early new diffusion-weighted imaging lesions ap- Kim JS, Kwon SU; on behalf of the TOSS-2 Investigators. Predictors of
pear more often in stroke patients with a multiple territory lesion pattern. recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.
Stroke. 2013;44:2200–2204. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000810. Stroke. 2012;43:2785–2787. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659185.
262. Depuydt S, Sarov M, Vandendries C, Guedj T, Cauquil C, Assayag P, 280. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS,
Lambotte O, Ducreux D, Denier C. Significance of acute multiple in- Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila
farcts in multiple cerebral circulations on initial diffusion weighted im- CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial
aging in stroke patients. J Neurol Sci. 2014;337:151–155. doi: 10.1016/j. Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symp-
jns.2013.11.039. tomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1305–
263. Rabinstein AA, Fugate JE, Mandrekar J, Burns JD, Seet RC, Dupont SA, 1316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033.
Kauffman TJ, Asirvatham SJ, Friedman PA. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 281. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF,
in cryptogenic stroke: a case-control study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM,
2013;22:1405–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.013. Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark
264. Bernstein RA, Di Lazzaro V, Rymer MM, Passman RS, Brachmann JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO,
J, Morillo CA, Sanna T, Thijs V, Rogers T, Liu S, Ziegler PD, Diener Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus
HC. Infarct topography and detection of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J
stroke: results from CRYSTAL AF. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40:91–96. Med. 2011;365:993–1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335.
doi: 10.1159/000437018. 282. Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS,
265. Favilla CG, Ingala E, Jara J, Fessler E, Cucchiara B, Messé SR, Mullen Montgomery J, Nizam A, Lane BF, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF,
MT, Prasad A, Siegler J, Hutchinson MD, Kasner SE. Predictors Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D,
of finding occult atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke. Stroke. Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Lynch
2015;46:1210–1215. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007763. JR, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; Stenting and Aggressive Medical
266. Sudacevschi V, Bertrand C, Chadenat ML, Tarnaud C, Pico F.
Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis
Predictors of occult atrial fibrillation in one hundred seventy-one pa- Trial Investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stent-
tients with cryptogenic transient ischemic attack and minor stroke. ing in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS):
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:2673–2677. doi: 10.1016/j. the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;383:333–341. doi:
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.014. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3.
267. Novotny V, Thomassen L, Waje-Andreassen U, Naess H. Acute cerebral 283. Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Larsen DT, Lynn MJ, Hong M, Turan TN,
infarcts in multiple arterial territories associated with cardioembolism. Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Chimowitz MI; for the SAMMPRIS
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135:346–351. doi: 10.1111/ane.12606. Investigators. Outcome in patients previously on antithrombotic therapy
268. Ois A, Cuadrado-Godia E, Rodríguez-Campello A, Jimenez-Conde
in the SAMMPRIS trial: subgroup analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:775–779.
J, Roquer J. High risk of early neurological recurrence in symp- doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007752.
tomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2009;40:2727–2731. doi: 10.1161/ 284. Chaturvedi S, Turan TN, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS,
STROKEAHA.109.548032. Chimowitz MI; for the SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Do patient char-
269. De Rango P, Brown MM, Chaturvedi S, Howard VJ, Jovin T, Mazya MV, acteristics explain the differences in outcome between medically treated
Paciaroni M, Manzone A, Farchioni L, Caso V. Summary of evidence patients in SAMMPRIS and WASID? Stroke. 2015;46:2562–2567. doi:
on early carotid intervention for recently symptomatic stenosis based on 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009656.
285. Feldmann E, Wilterdink JL, Kosinski A, Lynn M, Chimowitz MI, Sarafin Investigators. Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for
J, Smith HH, Nichols F, Rogg J, Cloft HJ, Wechsler L, Saver J, Levine cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1033–1042. doi: 10.1056/
SR, Tegeler C, Adams R, Sloan M; Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging NEJMoa1707404.
of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) Trial Investigators. The Stroke 300. Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff
Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. L, Arquizan C, Béjot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S,
Neurology. 2007;68:2099–2106. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261488.05906.c1. Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S,
286. Liebeskind DS, Kosinski AS, Saver JL, Feldmann E; SONIA
Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel
Investigators. Computed tomography angiography in the Stroke JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guérin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-
Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) Randé JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM,
study. Interv Neurol. 2014;2:153–159. doi: 10.1159/000360952. Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet
287. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G;
ischaemic attack or minor stroke: EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation CLOSE Investigators. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation
Trial) Study Group. Lancet. 1993;342:1255–62. vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1011–1021. doi:
288. Sposato LA, Cipriano LE, Saposnik G, Ruíz Vargas E, Riccio PM, 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915.
Hachinski V. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation after stroke and transient 301. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA,
ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. Marks DS, Tirschwell DL; RESPECT Investigators. Closure of patent
2015;14:377–387. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70027-X. foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J
289. Higgins P, MacFarlane PW, Dawson J, McInnes GT, Langhorne P,
Med. 2013;368:1092–1100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301440.
Lees KR. Noninvasive cardiac event monitoring to detect atrial fibril- 302. Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, MacDonald LA, Marks
lation after ischemic stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. DS, Tirschwell DL; RESPECT Investigators. Long-term outcomes of
2013;44:2525–2531. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001927. patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J
290. Martin DT, Bersohn MM, Waldo AL, Wathen MS, Choucair WK, Lip Med. 2017;377:1022–1032. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057.
GY, Ip J, Holcomb R, Akar JG, Halperin JL; IMPACT Investigators. 303. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek
Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagula- D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker
tion in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchroniza- S, Jüni P; PC Trial Investigators. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen
tion devices. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1660–1668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1083–1091.
ehv115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211716.
291. Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, Di Lazzaro V, Bernstein RA, Morillo 304. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers GW,
CA, Rymer MM, Thijs V, Rogers T, Beckers F, Lindborg K, Brachmann Felberg R, Herrmann H, Kar S, Landzberg M, Raizner A, Wechsler L;
J; CRYSTAL AF Investigators. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying CLOSURE I Investigators. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic
atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2478–2486. doi: 10.1056/ stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:991–999. doi:
NEJMoa1313600. 10.1056/NEJMoa1009639.
292. Brachmann J, Morillo CA, Sanna T, Di Lazzaro V, Diener HC, Bernstein 305. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel
RA, Rymer M, Ziegler PD, Liu S, Passman RS. Uncovering atrial fi- H, Hoes AW, Jennings CS, Landmesser U, Pedersen TR, Reiner Ž,
brillation beyond short-term monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients: Riccardi G, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Verschuren WM, Vlachopoulos
three-year results from the Cryptogenic Stroke and Underlying Atrial C, Wood DA, Zamorano JL. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the manage-
Fibrillation Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003333. doi: ment of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058. doi: 10.1093/
10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003333. eurheartj/ehw272.
293. Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, Panzov V, Thorpe KE, Hall J, Vaid 306. NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). Cardiovascular
H, O’Donnell M, Laupacis A, Côté R, Sharma M, Blakely JA, Shuaib disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification.
A, Hachinski V, Coutts SB, Sahlas DJ, Teal P, Yip S, Spence JD, Buck 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg181. Accessed January 3,
B, Verreault S, Casaubon LK, Penn A, Selchen D, Jin A, Howse D, 2018.
Mehdiratta M, Boyle K, Aviv R, Kapral MK, Mamdani M; EMBRACE 307. Anderson TJ, Grégoire J, Hegele RA, Couture P, Mancini GB, McPherson
Investigators and Coordinators. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryp- R, Francis GA, Poirier P, Lau DC, Grover S, Genest J Jr, Carpentier AC,
togenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2467–2477. doi: 10.1056/ Dufour R, Gupta M, Ward R, Leiter LA, Lonn E, Ng DS, Pearson GJ,
NEJMoa1311376. Yates GM, Stone JA, Ur E. 2012 Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular
294. Wachter R, Gröschel K, Gelbrich G, Hamann GF, Kermer P, Liman J, Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for
Seegers J, Wasser K, Schulte A, Jürries F, Messerschmid A, Behnke the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol.
N, Gröschel S, Uphaus T, Grings A, Ibis T, Klimpe S, Wagner-Heck 2013;29:151–167. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.032.
M, Arnold M, Protsenko E, Heuschmann PU, Conen D, Weber- 308. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD,

Krüger M; Find-AFRANDOMISED Investigators and Coordinators. Holter- Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen
electrocardiogram-monitoring in patients with acute ischaemic stroke TR, FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and
(Find-AFRANDOMISED): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med.
Neurol. 2017;16:282–290. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30002-9. 2017;376:1713–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664.
295. Higgins P, Dawson J, MacFarlane PW, McArthur K, Langhorne P, Lees 309. Connors JM. Thrombophilia testing and venous thrombosis. N Engl J
KR. Predictive value of newly detected atrial fibrillation paroxysms in Med. 2017;377:1177–1187. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1700365.
patients with acute ischemic stroke, for atrial fibrillation after 90 days. 310. Brown DL, Chervin RD, Hickenbottom SL, Langa KM, Morgenstern
Stroke. 2014;45:2134–2136. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005405. LB. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in stroke patients: a cost-
296. Meenan RT, Saha S, Chou R, Swarztrauber K, Krages KP, O’Keefee- effectiveness analysis. Stroke. 2005;36:1291–1293. doi: 10.1161/01.
Rosetti M, McDonagh M, Chan BK, Hornbrook MC, Helfand M. STR.0000166055.52742.2b.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of echocardiography and carotid 311. Pack AI, Pien GW. Update on sleep and its disorders. Annu Rev Med.
imaging in the management of stroke. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2011;62:447–460. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050409-104056.
2002:1–10. 312. Medeiros CA, de Bruin VM, Andrade GM, Coutinho WM, de Castro-
297. McNamara RL, Lima JA, Whelton PK, Powe NR. Echocardiographic Silva C, de Bruin PF. Obstructive sleep apnea and biomarkers of inflam-
identification of cardiovascular sources of emboli to guide clinical mation in ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;126:17–22. doi:
management of stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01589.x.
1997;127:775–787. 313. Camilo MR, Sander HH, Eckeli AL, Fernandes RM, Dos Santos-

298. Meenan RT, Saha S, Chou R, Swarztrauber K, Pyle Krages K, O’Keeffe- Pontelli TE, Leite JP, Pontes-Neto OM. SOS score: an optimized score
Rosetti MC, McDonagh M, Chan BK, Hornbrook MC, Helfand M. Cost- to screen acute stroke patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med.
effectiveness of echocardiography to identify intracardiac thrombus 2014;15:1021–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.03.026.
among patients with first stroke or transient ischemic attack. Med Decis 314. Stahl SM, Yaggi HK, Taylor S, Qin L, Ivan CS, Austin C, Ferguson J,
Making. 2007;27:161–177. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06297388. Radulescu R, Tobias L, Sico J, Vaz Fragoso CA, Williams LS, Lampert
299. Søndergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, Andersen G, Iversen HK,
R, Miech EJ, Matthias MS, Kapoor J, Bravata DM. Infarct location and
Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Settergren M, Sjöstrand C, Roine RO, Hildick- sleep apnea: evaluating the potential association in acute ischemic stroke.
Smith D, Spence JD, Thomassen L; Gore REDUCE Clinical Study Sleep Med. 2015;16:1198–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.07.003.
315. Parra O, Sánchez-Armengol A, Bonnin M, Arboix A, Campos-Rodríguez Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD008286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.
F, Pérez-Ronchel J, Durán-Cantolla J, de la Torre G, González Marcos CD008286.pub3.
JR, de la Peña M, Carmen Jiménez M, Masa F, Casado I, Luz Alonso M, 333. Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Lancaster T. Additional behavioural support as an
Macarrón JL. Early treatment of obstructive apnoea and stroke outcome: adjunct to pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database
a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:1128–1136. doi: Syst Rev. 2015:CD009670.
10.1183/09031936.00034410. 334. Eisenberg MJ, Windle SB, Roy N, Old W, Grondin FR, Bata I, Iskander
316. McEvoy RD, Antic NA, Heeley E, Luo Y, Ou Q, Zhang X, Mediano O, A, Lauzon C, Srivastava N, Clarke A, Cassavar D, Dion D, Haught H,
Chen R, Drager LF, Liu Z, Chen G, Du B, McArdle N, Mukherjee S, Mehta SR, Baril JF, Lambert C, Madan M, Abramson BL, Dehghani
Tripathi M, Billot L, Li Q, Lorenzi-Filho G, Barbe F, Redline S, Wang P; for the EVITA Investigators. Varenicline for smoking cessation
J, Arima H, Neal B, White DP, Grunstein RR, Zhong N, Anderson CS; in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation.
SAVE Investigators and Coordinators. CPAP for prevention of cardio- 2016;133:21–30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019634.
vascular events in obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:919– 335. Lee MJ, Park E, Kim HC, Lee HS, Cha MJ, Kim YD, Heo JH, Nam HS.
931. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606599. Timely interventions can increase smoking cessation rate in men with
317. Côté R, Zhang Y, Hart RG, McClure LA, Anderson DC, Talbert RL, ischemic stroke. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016;46:610–617. doi: 10.4040/
Benavente OR. ASA failure: does the combination ASA/clopidogrel con- jkan.2016.46.4.610.
fer better long-term vascular protection? Neurology. 2014;82:382–389. 336. Schwartz J, Dreyer RP, Murugiah K, Ranasinghe I. Contemporary

doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000076. prehospital emergency medical services response times for suspected
318. Lee M, Saver JL, Hong KS, Rao NM, Wu YL, Ovbiagele B. Antiplatelet stroke in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20:560–565. doi:
regimen for patients with breakthrough strokes while on aspirin: a sys- 10.3109/10903127.2016.1139219.
tematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2017;48:2610–2613. doi: 337. Morgenstern LB, Gonzales NR, Maddox KE, Brown DL, Karim AP,
10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017895. Espinosa N, Moyé LA, Pary JK, Grotta JC, Lisabeth LD, Conley KM. A
319. Mohr JP. Evidence of aspirin and warfarin failure in the WARSS Study. randomized, controlled trial to teach middle school children to recognize
Paper presented at: 27th International Stroke Conference; 2002; San stroke and call 911: the Kids Identifying and Defeating Stroke Project.
Antonio, TX. Stroke. 2007;38:2972–2978. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490078.

320. John S, Katzan I. Recurrent stroke while on antiplatelet therapy. Neurol 338. Carrera D, Campbell BC, Cortés J, Gorchs M, Querol M, Jiménez X,
Clin. 2015;33:475–489. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.12.007. Millán M, Dávalos A, Pérez de la Ossa N. Predictive value of modifica-
321. Kasner SE, Lynn MJ, Chimowitz MI, Frankel MR, Howlett-Smith H, tions of the prehospital rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale for large
Hertzberg VS, Chaturvedi S, Levine SR, Stern BJ, Benesch CG, Jovin vessel occlusion in patients with acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis.
TG, Sila CA, Romano JG; Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial 2017;26:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.032.
Disease (WASID) Trial Investigators. Warfarin vs aspirin for symptom- 339. Kim JT, Chung PW, Starkman S, Sanossian N, Stratton SJ, Eckstein M,
atic intracranial stenosis: subgroup analyses from WASID. Neurology. Pratt FD, Conwit R, Liebeskind DS, Sharma L, Restrepo L, Tenser MK,
2006;67:1275–1278. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238506.76873.2f. Valdes-Sueiras M, Gornbein J, Hamilton S, Saver JL; on behalf of the
322. Kim JT, Heo SH, Park MS, Chang J, Choi KH, Cho KH. Use of anti- FAST-MAG Trial (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy–Magnesium)
thrombotics after hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Nurse-Coordinators and Investigators. Field validation of the Los
PLoS One. 2014;9:e89798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089798. Angeles Motor Scale as a tool for paramedic assessment of stroke sever-
323. England TJ, Bath PM, Sare GM, Geeganage C, Moulin T, O’Neill D, ity. Stroke. 2017;48:298–306. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015247.
Woimant F, Christensen H, De Deyn P, Leys D, Ringelstein EB; on be- 340. McMullan JT, Katz B, Broderick J, Schmit P, Sucharew H, Adeoye
half of the TAIST Investigators. Asymptomatic hemorrhagic transforma- O. Prospective prehospital evaluation of the Cincinnati Stroke Triage
tion of infarction and its relationship with functional outcome and stroke Assessment Tool. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017:1–8.
subtype: assessment from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial. 341. Sauser K, Levine DA, Nickles AV, Reeves MJ. Hospital variation in
Stroke. 2010;41:2834–2839. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.573063. thrombolysis times among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the con-
324. CADISS Trial Investigators, Markus HS, Hayter E, Levi C, Feldman A, tributions of door-to-imaging time and imaging-to-needle time. JAMA
Venables G, Norris J. Antiplatelet treatment compared with anticoagu- Neurol. 2014;71:1155–1161. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1528.
lation treatment for cervical artery dissection (CADISS): a randomised 342. van Wijngaarden JD, Dirks M, Niessen LW, Huijsman R, Dippel DW.
trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:361–367. Do centres with well-developed protocols, training and infrastructure
325. Larsson SC, King A, Madigan J, Levi C, Norris JW, Markus HS.
have higher rates of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke? QJM.
Prognosis of carotid dissecting aneurysms: results from CADISS 2011;104:785–791. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr075.
and a systematic review. Neurology. 2017;88:646–652. doi: 10.1212/ 343. Jeng JS, Tang SC, Deng IC, Tsai LK, Yeh SJ, Yip PK. Stroke center char-
WNL.0000000000003617. acteristics which influence the administration of thrombolytic therapy for
326. Ahlhelm F, Benz RM, Ulmer S, Lyrer P, Stippich C, Engelter S.
acute ischemic stroke: a national survey of stroke centers in Taiwan. J
Endovascular treatment of cervical artery dissection: ten case re- Neurol Sci. 2009;281:24–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.03.004.
ports and review of the literature. Interv Neurol. 2013;1:143–150. doi: 344. Douglas VC, Tong DC, Gillum LA, Zhao S, Brass LM, Dostal J, Johnston
10.1159/000351687. SC. Do the Brain Attack Coalition’s criteria for stroke centers improve
327. Sanossian N, Saver JL, Liebeskind DS, Kim D, Razinia T, Ovbiagele care for ischemic stroke? Neurology. 2005;64:422–427. doi: 10.1212/01.
B. Achieving target cholesterol goals after stroke: is in-hospital statin WNL.0000150903.38639.E1.
initiation the key? Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1081–1083. doi: 10.1001/ 345. Asimos AW, Norton HJ, Price MF, Cheek WM. Therapeutic yield and
archneur.63.8.1081. outcomes of a community teaching hospital code stroke protocol. Acad
328. Hong KS, Lee JS. Statins in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Emerg Med. 2004;11:361–370.
J Stroke. 2015;17:282–301. doi: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.3.282. 346. Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall
329. Kennedy J, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, Eliasziw M, Demchuk AM, Buchan TJ, Dodick DW, Ward MP, Richemont PC, Brazdys K, Koch TC, Miley
AM; FASTER Investigators. Fast assessment of stroke and transient ML, Hoffman Snyder CR, Corday DA, Meyer BC; for the STRokE DOC
ischaemic attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a randomised AZ TIME Investigators. Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital
controlled pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:961–969. doi: 10.1016/ observation camera in Arizona: the initial Mayo Clinic Experience Trial.
S1474-4422(07)70250-8. Stroke. 2010;41:1251–1258. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574509.
330. Yoshimura S, Uchida K, Daimon T, Takashima R, Kimura K, Morimoto 347. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, Thomas
T; on behalf of the ASSORT Trial Investigator. Randomized con- RG, Lyden PD. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE
trolled trial of early versus delayed statin therapy in patients with acute DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol.
ischemic stroke: ASSORT trial (Administration of Statin on Acute 2008;7:787–795. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-6.
Ischemic Stroke Patient). Stroke. 2017;48:3057–3063. doi: 10.1161/ 348. Rai AT, Smith MS, Boo S, Tarabishy AR, Hobbs GR, Carpenter JS. The
STROKEAHA.117.017623. ‘pit-crew’ model for improving door-to-needle times in endovascular
331. Rigotti NA, Clair C, Munafo MR, Stead LF. Interventions for smok- stroke therapy: a Six-Sigma project. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:447–
ing cessation in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 452. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012219.
2012:CD001837. 349. Wardlaw JM, Carpenter T, Sakka E, Mair G, Cohen G, Shuler K, Palmer
332. Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Combined pharmaco- JM, Innes K, Sandercock PA. Imaging perfusion deficits, arterial paten-
therapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane cy and thrombolysis safety and efficacy in acute ischaemic stroke: an
observational study of the effect of advanced imaging methods in the 364. Adelman EE, Scott PA, Skolarus LE, Fox AK, Frederiksen SM, Meurer
Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3), a randomised controlled trial. WJ. Protocol deviations before and after treatment with intravenous tis-
Efficacy Mech Eval. 2014;1(3). doi: 10.3310/eme.01030. sue plasminogen activator in community hospitals. J Stroke Cerebrovasc
350. Mocco J, Zaidat OO, von Kummer R, Yoo AJ, Gupta R, Lopes D, Dis. 2016;25:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.036.
Frei D, Shownkeen H, Budzik R, Ajani ZA, Grossman A, Altschul D, 365. Kodankandath TV, Shaji J, Kohn N, Arora R, Salamon E, Libman

McDougall C, Blake L, Fitzsimmons BF, Yavagal D, Terry J, Farkas J, RB, Katz JM. Poor hypertension control and longer transport times
Lee SK, Baxter B, Wiesmann M, Knauth M, Heck D, Hussain S, Chiu D, are associated with worse outcome in drip-and-ship stroke patients.
Alexander MJ, Malisch T, Kirmani J, Miskolczi L, Khatri P; THERAPY J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:1887–1890. doi: 10.1016/j.
Trial Investigators. Aspiration thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.04.013.
versus intravenous alteplase alone. Stroke. 2016;47:2331–2338. doi: 366. Lyerly MJ, Albright KC, Boehme AK, Bavarsad Shahripour R,

10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013372. Houston JT, Rawal PV, Kapoor N, Alvi M, Sisson A, Alexandrov AW,
351. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Yeatts SD, Khatri P, Hill Alexandrov AV. Safety of protocol violations in acute stroke tPA admin-
MD, Jauch EC, Jovin TG, Yan B, Silver FL, von Kummer R, Molina istration. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:855–860. doi: 10.1016/j.
CA, Demaerschalk BM, Budzik R, Clark WM, Zaidat OO, Malisch jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.019.
TW, Goyal M, Schonewille WJ, Mazighi M, Engelter ST, Anderson 367. Kellert L, Rocco A, Sykora M, Hacke W, Ringleb PA. Frequency of
C, Spilker J, Carrozzella J, Ryckborst KJ, Janis LS, Martin RH, increased blood pressure levels during systemic thrombolysis and risk
Foster LD, Tomsick TA; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2011;42:1702–1706. doi: 10.1161/
III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus STROKEAHA.110.604744.
t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903. doi: 10.1056/ 368. Karaszewski B, Thomas RG, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Temporal profile of
NEJMoa1214300. body temperature in acute ischemic stroke: relation to stroke severity and
352. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, Sgoifo A, Ponzio M, Sterzi R, outcome. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-123.
Boccardi E; SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators. Endovascular treat- 369. den Hertog HM, van der Worp HB, van Gemert HM, Algra A, Kappelle
ment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:904–913. doi: LJ, van Gijn J, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DW. An early rise in body tempera-
10.1056/NEJMoa1213701. ture is related to unfavorable outcome after stroke: data from the PAIS
353. Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, Alger JR, Nenov V, Ajani Z, Feng study. J Neurol. 2011;258:302–307. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5756-4.
L, Meyer BC, Olson S, Schwamm LH, Yoo AJ, Marshall RS, Meyers 370. Broessner G, Beer R, Lackner P, Helbok R, Fischer M, Pfausler B,
PM, Yavagal DR, Wintermark M, Guzy J, Starkman S, Saver JL; MR Rhorer J, Küppers-Tiedt L, Schneider D, Schmutzhard E. Prophylactic,
RESCUE Investigators. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular endovascularly based, long-term normothermia in ICU patients with
treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:914–923. doi: severe cerebrovascular disease: bicenter prospective, randomized trial.
10.1056/NEJMoa1212793. Stroke. 2009;40:e657–e665. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.557652.
354. Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA, 371. den Hertog HM, van der Worp HB, van Gemert HM, Algra A, Kappelle
Liebeskind DS, Smith WS; TREVO 2 Trialists. Trevo versus Merci re- LJ, van Gijn J, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DW; PAIS Investigators. The
trievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) In Stroke (PAIS) trial: a multicentre, ran-
in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet. domised, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:434–
2012;380:1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61299-9. 440. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70051-1.
355. Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, Jovin TG, Baxter B, Nogueira RG, Clark 372. Horn CM, Sun CH, Nogueira RG, Patel VN, Krishnan A, Glenn BA,
W, Budzik R, Zaidat OO; SWIFT Trialists. Solitaire Flow Restoration Belagaje SR, Thomas TT, Anderson AM, Frankel MR, Schindler KM,
Device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke Gupta R. Endovascular Reperfusion and Cooling in Cerebral Acute
(SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. Ischemia (ReCCLAIM I). J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:91–95. doi:
2012;380:1241–1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61384-1. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010656.
356. Ogawa A, Mori E, Minematsu K, Taki W, Takahashi A, Nemoto S, 373. Su Y, Fan L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Ye H, Gao D, Chen W, Liu G. Improved
Miyamoto S, Sasaki M, Inoue T; for the MELT Japan Study Group. neurological outcome with mild hypothermia in surviving patients with
Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 massive cerebral hemispheric infarction. Stroke. 2016;47:457–463. doi:
hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the Middle Cerebral Artery 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009789.
Embolism Local Fibrinolytic Intervention Trial (MELT) Japan. Stroke. 374. Hong JM, Lee JS, Song HJ, Jeong HS, Jung HS, Choi HA, Lee K.
2007;38:2633–2639. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488551. Therapeutic hypothermia after recanalization in patients with acute
357. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, Pessin ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014;45:134–140. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.
M, Ahuja A, Callahan F, Clark WM, Silver F, Rivera F. Intra-arterial 113.003143.
prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study: a ran- 375. Ovesen C, Brizzi M, Pott FC, Thorsen-Meyer HC, Karlsson T, Ersson A,
domized controlled trial: Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. Christensen H, Norrlin A, Meden P, Krieger DW, Petersson J. Feasibility
JAMA. 1999;282:2003–2011. of endovascular and surface cooling strategies in acute stroke. Acta
358. Ali K, Warusevitane A, Lally F, Sim J, Sills S, Pountain S, Nevatte T, Neurol Scand. 2013;127:399–405. doi: 10.1111/ane.12059.
Allen M, Roffe C. The Stroke Oxygen Pilot Study: a randomized con- 376. Clark WM, Albers GW, Madden KP, Hamilton S. The rtPA (alteplase)
trolled trial of the effects of routine oxygen supplementation early af- 0- to 6-hour acute stroke trial, part A (A0276g): results of a double-blind,
ter acute stroke: effect on key outcomes at six months. PLoS One. placebo-controlled, multicenter study: Thromblytic Therapy in Acute
2014;8:e59274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059274. Ischemic Stroke Study Investigators. Stroke. 2000;31:811–816.
359. Singhal A, Partners SPOTRIAS Investigators. A phase IIB clinical trial 377. Clark WM, Wissman S, Albers GW, Jhamandas JH, Madden KP,

of normobaric oxygen therapy (NBO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Hamilton S. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase)
Neurology. 2013;80(suppl):S02.001. for ischemic stroke 3 to 5 hours after symptom onset: the ATLANTIS
360. Roffe C, Ali K, Warusevitane A, Sills S, Pountain S, Allen M, Hodsoll J, study: a randomized controlled trial: Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute
Lally F, Jones P, Crome P. The SOS pilot study: a RCT of routine oxygen Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke. JAMA. 1999;282:
supplementation early after acute stroke: effect on recovery of neuro- 2019–2026.
logical function at one week. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19113. doi: 10.1371/ 378. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D,
journal.pone.0019113. Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor
361. Roffe C, Sills S, Pountain SJ, Allen M. A randomized controlled trial E, Trouillas P. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of
of the effect of fixed-dose routine nocturnal oxygen supplementation on thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic
oxygen saturation in patients with acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc stroke (ECASS II): Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study
Dis. 2010;19:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.02.008. Investigators. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251.
362. Singhal AB, Benner T, Roccatagliata L, Koroshetz WJ, Schaefer PW, Lo 379. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R,
EH, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, Sorensen AG. A pilot study of normo- Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Höxter G, Mahagne MH. Intravenous thromboly-
baric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:797–802. sis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000158914.66827.2e. stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA.
363. Rønning OM, Guldvog B. Should stroke victims routinely receive
1995;274:1017–1025.
supplemental oxygen? A quasi-randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 380. Mori E, Minematsu K, Nakagawara J, Hasegawa Y, Nagahiro S, Okada Y,
1999;30:2033–2037. Truelsen T, Lindsten A, Ogawa A, Yamaguchi T; on behalf of the DIAS-J
Investigators. Safety and tolerability of desmoteplase within 3 to 9 hours in acute stroke caused by large artery occlusive disease. Arch Neurol.
after symptoms onset in Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;69:1454–1460. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1633.
2015;46:2549–2554. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009917. 399. Wang QS, Chen C, Chen XY, Han JH, Soo Y, Leung TW, Mok V,
381. Coutinho JM, Liebeskind DS, Slater LA, Nogueira RG, Clark W,
Wong KS. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin for acute
Davalos A, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Fischer U, Gralla J, Saver JL, Pereira ischemic stroke with large artery occlusive disease: subgroup analy-
VM. Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy vs throm- ses from the Fraxiparin in Stroke Study for the treatment of ischemic
bectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke: a pooled analysis of the SWIFT stroke (FISS-tris) study. Stroke. 2012;43:346–349. doi: 10.1161/
and STAR Studies. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:268–274. doi: 10.1001/ STROKEAHA.111.628347.
jamaneurol.2016.5374. 400. Saver JL, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Stratton SJ, Pratt FD, Hamilton S,
382. Grech R, Pullicino R, Thornton J, Downer J. An efficacy and safety com- Conwit R, Liebeskind DS, Sung G, Kramer I, Moreau G, Goldweber
parison between different stentriever designs in acute ischaemic stroke: R, Sanossian N; FAST-MAG Investigators and Coordinators. Prehospital
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:48–57. doi: use of magnesium sulfate as neuroprotection in acute stroke. N Engl J
10.1016/j.crad.2015.09.011. Med. 2015;372:528–536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408827.
383. Rodrigues FB, Neves JB, Caldeira D, Ferro JM, Ferreira JJ, Costa J. 401. Hacke W, Schellinger PD, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Dahlof BL, Fulton
Endovascular treatment versus medical care alone for ischaemic stroke: R, Kasner SE, Shuaib A, Richieri SP, Dilly SG, Zivin J, Lees KR; for
systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;353:i1754. the NEST 3 Committees and Investigators. Transcranial laser therapy in
384. Touma L, Filion KB, Sterling LH, Atallah R, Windle SB, Eisenberg MJ. acute stroke treatment: results of Neurothera Effectiveness and Safety
Stent retrievers for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a systematic Trial 3, a phase III clinical end point device trial. Stroke. 2014;45:3187–
review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 3193. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005795.
2016;73:275–281. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4441. 402. Seedat J, Penn C. Implementing oral care to reduce aspiration pneumo-
385. Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, Alhazzani W, Selim MH, Farrokhyar F, Spears nia amongst patients with dysphagia in a South African setting. S Afr J
J, Kulkarni AV, Singh S, Alqahtani A, Rochwerg B, Alshahrani M, Murty Commun Disord. 2016;63.
NK, Alhazzani A, Yarascavitch B, Reddy K, Zaidat OO, Almenawer SA. 403. Dennis M, Sandercock P, Reid J, Graham C, Forbes J, Murray G;

Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. CLOTS (Clots in Legs Or sTockings after Stroke) Trials Collaboration.
JAMA. 2015;314:1832–1843. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13767. Effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression in reduction of risk
386. Chen CJ, Ding D, Starke RM, Mehndiratta P, Crowley RW, Liu KC, of deep vein thrombosis in patients who have had a stroke (CLOTS 3): a
Southerland AM, Worrall BB. Endovascular vs medical management multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:516–524. doi:
of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2015;85:1980–1990. doi: 10.1212/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61050-8.
WNL.0000000000002176. 404. Geeganage CM, Sprigg N, Bath MW, Bath PM. Balance of symp-

387. Elgendy IY, Kumbhani DJ, Mahmoud A, Bhatt DL, Bavry AA.
tomatic pulmonary embolism and symptomatic intracerebral hem-
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis orrhage with low-dose anticoagulation in recent ischemic stroke: a
of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2498–2505. doi: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled tri-
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.070. als. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:1018–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.
388. Fargen KM, Neal D, Fiorella DJ, Turk AS, Froehler M, Mocco J. A jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.03.005.
meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating 405. Qaseem A, Chou R, Humphrey LL, Starkey M, Shekelle P; Clinical
endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Venous
2015;7:84–89. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011543. thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: a clinical prac-
389. Kumar G, Shahripour RB, Alexandrov AV. Recanalization of acute basi- tice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med.
lar artery occlusion improves outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv 2011;155:625–632. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-9-201111010-00011.
Surg. 2015;7:868–874. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011418. 406. Herisson F, Godard S, Volteau C, Le Blanc E, Guillon B, Gaudron
390. Marmagkiolis K, Hakeem A, Cilingiroglu M, Gundogdu B, Iliescu C, M; SEVEL Study Group. Early Sitting in Ischemic Stroke Patients
Tsitlakidou D, Katramados A. Safety and efficacy of stent retrievers (SEVEL): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149466.
for the management of acute ischemic stroke: comprehensive review doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149466.
and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1758–1765. doi: 407. Morreale M, Marchione P, Pili A, Lauta A, Castiglia SF, Spallone A,
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.021. Pierelli F, Giacomini P. Early versus delayed rehabilitation treatment in
391. Yarbrough CK, Ong CJ, Beyer AB, Lipsey K, Derdeyn CP.
hemiplegic patients with ischemic stroke: proprioceptive or cognitive ap-
Endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke: systematic proach? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:81–89.
review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:3177–3183. doi: 10.1161/ 408. Johansson E, Cuadrado-Godia E, Hayden D, Bjellerup J, Ois A, Roquer
STROKEAHA.115.009847. J, Wester P, Kelly PJ. Recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis
392. Almekhlafi MA, Menon BK, Freiheit EA, Demchuk AM, Goyal M. A awaiting revascularization: a pooled analysis. Neurology. 2016;86:498–
meta-analysis of observational intra-arterial stroke therapy studies using 504. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002354.
the Merci device, Penumbra system, and retrievable stents. AJNR Am J 409. Bazan HA, Zea N, Jennings B, Smith TA, Vidal G, Sternbergh WC
Neuroradiol. 2013;34:140–145. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3276. 3rd. Urgent carotid intervention is safe after thrombolysis for minor to
393. Fields JD, Khatri P, Nesbit GM, Liu KC, Barnwell SL, Lutsep HL, Clark moderate acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:1529–1538. doi:
WM, Lansberg MG. Meta-analysis of randomized intra-arterial throm- 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.082.
bolytic trials for the treatment of acute stroke due to middle cerebral 410. Chisci E, Pigozzi C, Troisi N, Tramacere L, Zaccara G, Cincotta M,
artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3:151–155. doi: 10.1136/ Ercolini L, Michelagnoli S. Thirty-day neurologic improvement as-
jnis.2010.002766. sociated with early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy in symp-
394. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Rabinstein AA, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Kallmes tomatic patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29:435–442. doi: 10.1016/j.
DF. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular avsg.2014.08.028.
acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-anal- 411. Devlin TG, Phade SV, Hutson RK, Fugate MW, Major GR 2nd, Albers
ysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:525–529. doi: 10.3174/ajnr. GW, Sirelkhatim AA, Sapkota BL, Quartfordt SD, Baxter BW. Computed
A4159. tomography perfusion imaging in the selection of acute stroke patients to
395. Li W, Lin L, Zhang M, Wu Y, Liu C, Li X, Huang S, Liang C, Wang undergo emergent carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29:125.
Y, Chen J, Feng W. Safety and preliminary efficacy of early tirofi- e1–125.11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.023.
ban treatment after alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke. 412. Steglich-Arnholm H, Holtmannspötter M, Kondziella D, Wagner A,

2016;47:2649–2651. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014413. Stavngaard T, Cronqvist ME, Hansen K, Højgaard J, Taudorf S, Krieger
396. Wada T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, Nakajima DW. Thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting in acute ischemic stroke
S, Yahagi N. Ozagrel for patients with noncardioembolic ischemic management: benefits and harms. J Neurol. 2015;262:2668–2675. doi:
stroke: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 10.1007/s00415-015-7895-0.
2016;25:2828–2837. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.044. 413. Ferrero E, Ferri M, Viazzo A, Labate C, Berardi G, Pecchio A,

397. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Kamal AK. Anticoagulants for acute isch- Piazza S, Ripepi M, Nessi F. A retrospective study on early carotid
aemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD000024. endarterectomy within 48 hours after transient ischemic attack and
398. Wang Q, Chen C, Chen XY, Han JH, Soo Y, Leung TW, Mok V, Wong stroke in evolution. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.
KS. Low-molecular-weight heparin and early neurologic deterioration avsg.2013.02.015.
414. Limone BL, Baker WL, Mearns ES, White CM, Kluger J, Coleman CI. 418. Lee M, Wu YL, Saver JL, Lee HC, Lee JD, Chang KC, Wu CY, Lee
Common flaws exist in published cost-effectiveness models of phar- TH, Wang HH, Rao NM, Ovbiagele B. Is clopidogrel better than
macologic stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Clin Epidemiol. aspirin following breakthrough strokes while on aspirin? A retro-
2014;67:1093–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.013. spective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006672. doi: 10.1136/
415. Shariat A, Yaghoubi E, Farazdaghi M, Aghasadeghi K, Borhani Haghighi bmjopen-2014-006672.
A. Comparison of medical treatments in cryptogenic stroke patients 419. Abdul-Rahim AH, Fulton RL, Frank B, Tatlisumak T, Paciaroni M, Caso
with patent foramen ovale: a randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci. V, Diener HC, Lees KR; VISTA Collaborators. Association of improved
2013;18:94–98. outcome in acute ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation who re-
416. Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP; for the PFO ceive early antithrombotic therapy: analysis from VISTA. Eur J Neurol.
in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS) Investigators. Effect of medical 2015;22:1048–1055. doi: 10.1111/ene.12577.
treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: Patent Foramen 420. Jensen J, Salottolo K, Frei D, Loy D, McCarthy K, Wagner J, Whaley M,
Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study. Circulation. 2002;105:2625–2631. Bellon R, Bar-Or D. Comprehensive analysis of intra-arterial treatment
417. Kim JT, Park MS, Choi KH, Cho KH, Kim BJ, Han MK, Park TH, Park for acute ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection. J Neurointerv
SS, Lee KB, Lee BC, Yu KH, Oh MS, Cha JK, Kim DH, Nah HW, Lee Surg. 2017;9:654–658. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012421.
J, Lee SJ, Ko YC, Kim JG, Park JM, Kang K, Cho YJ, Hong KS, Choi 421. Aronow HD, Novaro GM, Lauer MS, Brennan DM, Lincoff AM, Topol
JC, Kim DE, Ryu WS, Shin DI, Yeo MJ, Kim WJ, Lee J, Lee JS, Saver EJ, Kereiakes DJ, Nissen SE. In-hospital initiation of lipid-lowering
JL, Bae HJ. Different antiplatelet strategies in patients with new isch- therapy after coronary intervention as a predictor of long-term utiliza-
emic stroke while taking aspirin. Stroke. 2016;47:128–134. doi: 10.1161/ tion: a propensity analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2576–2582. doi:
STROKEAHA.115.011595. 10.1001/archinte.163.21.2576.
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A
Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American
Stroke Association
William J. Powers, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Teri Ackerson, Opeolu M. Adeoye, Nicholas C.
Bambakidis, Kyra Becker, José Biller, Michael Brown, Bart M. Demaerschalk, Brian Hoh,
Edward C. Jauch, Chelsea S. Kidwell, Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi, Bruce Ovbiagele, Phillip A.

Scott, Kevin N. Sheth, Andrew M. Southerland, Deborah V. Summers, David L. Tirschwell and
on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council
Stroke. published online January 24, 2018;

Stroke is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231
Copyright © 2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0039-2499. Online ISSN: 1524-4628
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
World Wide Web at:
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2018/01/23/STR.0000000000000158
An erratum has been published regarding this article. Please see the attached page for:
/content/early/2018/04/17/STR.0000000000000172.full.pdf
Data Supplement (unedited) at:

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/suppl/2018/01/23/STR.0000000000000158.DC1
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/suppl/2018/01/23/STR.0000000000000158.DC2
Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published
in Stroke can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office.
Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click
Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this
process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document.
Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at:

http://www.lww.com/reprints
Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Stroke is online at:

http://stroke.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/
CORRECTION
Correction to: 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke:
A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association
Based on recent feedback received from the clinical stroke community related to the article by Powers et
al, “2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for
Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association,” which
published ahead of print January 24, 2018, and appeared in the March 2018 issue of the journal (Stroke.
2018;49:e46–e110. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158), the American Heart Association/American
Stroke Association has reviewed the guideline and is preparing clarifications, modifications, and/or updates
to several sections in it. Currently, those sections, listed here, have been deleted from the guideline while
this clarifying work is in process:
Section 1.3 EMS Systems Recommendation 4
Section 1.4 Hospital Stroke Capabilities Recommendation 1
Section 1.6 Telemedicine Recommendation 3
Section 2.2 Brain Imaging Recommendation 11
Section 3.2 Blood Pressure Recommendation 3
Section 4.3 Blood Pressure Recommendation 2
Section 4.6 Dysphagia Recommendation 1
Section 6.0 All subsections (11)
We continue to support this corrected version of the guideline and its support for clinical decision-making.
After review, a revised guideline, with consideration given to the clarifications, modifications, and/or
updates of the sections noted above, will be posted over the coming weeks.
Ensuring our scientific guidelines reflect the best, most comprehensive scientific analysis has always been,
and remains, the Association’s top priority. We appreciate the continuing commitment and dedication of
our volunteer writing group, peer reviewers, and the scientific community at large, who share our devotion
to the integrity and quality of guideline development.
The revised, online version of the guideline is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/49/3/e46.
1. On page e49, in Table 2, the following changes have been made:

 The fourth row beginning “2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol…”
has been deleted.
 The eighth row beginning “Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke…” has
been deleted.
2. On page e50, in Table 3, the entry for “TJC,” defined as “The Joint Commission,” has been deleted.
3. On page e52, in section “1.3. EMS Systems,” recommendation 4, the associated knowledge byte, and
the associated references have been deleted.
4. On page e52, section “1.4. Hospital Stroke Capabilities,” recommendation 1, the associated knowledge
byte, and the associated references have been deleted.
5. On page e54, in section “1.6 Telemedicine,” recommendation 3 has been deleted.
6. On page e59, in section “2.2 Brain Imaging,” recommendation 11, the associated knowledge byte, and
the associated references have been deleted.
7. On page e61 (previously page e62), in section “3.2 Blood Pressure,” recommendation 3, the associated
knowledge byte, and the associated references have been deleted.
8. On page e78 (previously page e79), in section “4.3 Blood Pressure,” recommendation 2, the associated
knowledge byte, and the associated references have been deleted.
9. On page e80 (previously page e81), in section “4.6 Dysphagia Screening,” recommendation 1, the
associated knowledge byte, and the associated references have been deleted.
10. On pages e87 through e93 in the previous version, section “6. In-Hospital Institution of Secondary
Prevention: Evaluation” (recommendations, associated knowledge bytes, and references) has been
deleted.
11. On page e87 (previously page e93), the following sentence was updated to include references 202, 216,
217, 220, 221, 224, 226, 227, 229, 322, 323, 325, and 326: “Additional reference support for this
guideline is provided in online Data Supplement 1.200,202,216,217,220,221,224,226,227,229,322,323,325,326,336-402,404-421”
12. On pages e88 through e99 (previously pages e96 through e110), the following references have been
deleted: 7, 11, 24-31, 33, 34, 230-234, 258-321, 324, and 327-335.
13. In Data Supplement 1, the following changes have been made:

 Table V, Table VI, Table LI, Table LII, Tables LXI-LXXVI, and Tables LXXVIII-LXXXII have
been deleted.
 In Table LXXXIII, the original wording of text for the following has been deleted:
o 1.4 Rec 1
o 6.4. Rec 1
o 6.6. Recs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
o 6.7. Recs 1, 4, and 5
o 6.10. Recs 1 and 6
 References 7, 11, 24-31, 33, 34, 230-234, 258-321, 324, and 327-335 have been deleted.
14. In Data Supplement 2, the following changes have been made:

 All references to Data Supplement 1 Table V, Table LI, Tables LXI-LXXVI, and Tables LXXVIII-
LXXXII have been deleted.
 Because of these deletions, the following literature search sections have been removed:
o ASA Failure
o Statins
o Smoking
o Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting Timing
o Complications After Acute Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting
o Guidelines for Treatment of Blood Cholesterol for Secondary Stroke Prevention
o Cost-Effectiveness of Echocardiography in Acute Stroke
o Prolonged Cardiac Monitoring for Secondary Stroke Prevention
o Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Early Recurrent Stroke
o Risk of Early Carotid Intervention
o Routine Screening of Patients With Recent Ischemic Stroke for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
o MRA Intracranial, Non-Invasive Imaging Intracranial
o CTA Intracranial, Non-Invasive Imaging
o Association of AMIMCC With Stroke Etiologic Classification
o Infarct Topography and Detection of AF By Long Term Monitoring
o Evolocumab and Secondary Stroke Prevention
o Dysphagia Screening
The pagination of this article has changed from e46–e110 to e46–e99. This has been updated in the citations
on pages e46 and e47 and in the issue’s online table of contents.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
Stroke is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org
DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000172
2018 AIS GL Data Supplement 1
Table of Contents
Table I. Nonrandomized Studies of Stroke Awareness and Emergency Medical Services Use……………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
Table II. Randomized Clinical Trials for Improving Stroke Awareness………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....6
Table III. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Prediction Value of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale…………………………………... 7
Table IV. Nonrandomized Studies of Emergency Medical Services Use of Prehospital Stroke Severity Scales.……………………………………………………………………. 10
Table V. Deleted……………………………………………………………………………….....................................................................………………………………………………11
Table VI. Deleted...........................................................................………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11
Table VII. Nonrandomized Studies of Hospitals Achieving Rapid Door-to-Needle Times for IV Alteplase in Stroke…………………………………………………………………12
Table VIII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Efficacy of Multilevel Interventions to Increase Intravenous Alteplase Use………………………………………………........ 13
Table IX. Nonrandomized Studies Comparing Efficacy of Multilevel Interventions to Increase Intravenous Alteplase Use……………………………………………….............. 15
Table X. Randomized Clinical Trials of Level of Agreement Between Central Read and Spoke Radiologists and Hub Neurologists in Interpreting Head Computed
Tomography Scans of Stroke Patients Presenting to Telestroke Hospitals………………………………………………..............………………………………........ 17
Table XI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Synchronous Audio Video Telemedicine to Telephone-Only for Acute Ischemic Stroke..........…………………………….... 19
Table XII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Telestroke for Triaging Patients for Endovascular Therapy..........……………………………… 20
Table XIII. Nonrandomized Trails, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Alteplase Decision-Making via Telephone Consultation..........………………………………… 21
Table XIV. Nonrandomized Studies Assessing the Impact of Stroke System Quality Improvement Processes..........………………………………………………......................22
Table XV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Routine Stroke Care……….. 25
Table XVI. Observational Studies of 2016 Door-to-Computed Tomography Times..........……………………………………………….................................................................27
Table XVII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Interaction of Baseline Imaging Computed Tomography Hypodensity with Treatment Effect for Intravenous Alteplase………...... 29
Table XVIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Interaction of Baseline Computed Tomography Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign with Treatment Effect for
Intravenous Alteplase………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 31
Table XIX. Observational Studies of Interaction of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebral Microbleeds with Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage After
Intravenous Alteplase…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 32
Table XX. Randomized Clinical Trials of Intravenous Thrombolytics Employing Multimodal Imaging……………………………………………………………………………....... 33
Table XXI. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Intravenous Thrombolytics Employing Multimodal Imaging……………………………………. 37
Table XXII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Creatinine Testing Prior to Contrast Computed Tomography…………………………………. 37
Table XXIII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Endovascular Therapy…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... 39
Table XXIV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Collateral Status…………………………………………………………………………………… 50
Table XXV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Chest Radiography in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke…………………………………... 50
Table XXVI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Supplemental Oxygen………………………………….………………………………………………………………………..... 51
Table XXVII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hyperbaric Oxygen………………………………………………………………………………..54
Table XXVIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypotension and Hypovolemia………………………………………………………………….55
Table XXIX. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Blood Pressure and Thrombolysis………………………………………………………………. 59
Table XXX. Nonrandomized Studies of Hyperthermia After Acute Ischemic Stroke…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 61
Table XXXI. Randomized Clinical Trials of Normothermia………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 62
Table XXXII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypothermia………………………………………………………………………………………. 63
Table XXXIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Hypothermia………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 64
1
Table XXXIV. Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Intravenous Alteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke…………………………………………………………...... 68
Table XXXV. Randomized Clinical Trials of Intravenous Alteplase for Mild Stroke 3–4.5 Hours…………………………………………………………………………………........ 72
Table XXXVI. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Intravenous Alteplase 3–4.5 Hours for Mild Stroke………………………………………..... 73
Table XXXVII. Nonrandomized trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Sickle Cell Disease and IV Alteplase………………………………………………………..... 75
Table XXXVIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies of Antithrombotic Agents Given Within 24 Hours After Intravenous Alteplase for the Treatment of
Acute Ischemic Stroke………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 75
Table XXXIX. Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Intravenous Fibrinolytics Other Than Alteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke…………………………........... 76
Table XL. Randomized Clinical Trials of Adjuvant Sonothrombolysis (since 2013 AIS Guidelines) …………………………………………………………………………............. 82
Table XLI. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Endovascular Therapy …………………………………………………………............................ 83
Table XLII. Randomized Trials Comparing General Anesthesia to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Therapy……………………………………........................... 92
Table XLIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries Comparing General Anesthesia to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Therapy..... 94
Table XLIV. Nonrandomized Studies of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke……………………………………………………………………………...... 95
Table XLV. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Antiplatelet to Control………………………………………………………………………………………………………............ 96
Table XLVI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Anticoagulant to Control…………………………………………………………………………………………………...............99
Table XLVII. Nonrandomized Studies of Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke…………………………………………………………...................................... 103
Table XLVIII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Other Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke…………………………………………………………................................... 105
Table XLIX. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Transcranial Laser Therapy for Stroke………………………………………………………….............................................. 108
Table L. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Treatment for Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke............108
Table LI. Deleted…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........……………………....………...117
Table LII. Deleted………………………………………………………….................………………………………………………………………………………....................................117
Table LIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Nutrition……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................................ 117
Table LIV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Oral Hygiene…………………………………………………………............................................ 119
Table LV. Randomized Clinical Trials of Oral Care…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. 122
Table LVI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis………………………………………………………………………………………….......... 123
Table LVII. Nonrandomized Studies of Depression Screening in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke………………………………………………………….............................. 130
Table LVIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Mobility Intervention………………………………………………………….......................................................................................... 131
Table LIX. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Treatment of Cerebral and Cerebellar Edema Following Acute Ischemic Stroke................... 134
Table LX. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Impact of Treatment of Cerebral and Cerebellar Edema Following Acute Ischemic Infarction............................................ 137
Table LXI. Deleted…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................... 139
Table LXII. Deleted.................……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........ 139
Table LXIII. Deleted……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............. 139
Table LXIV. Deleted………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......... 139
Table LXV. Deleted……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 139
Table LXVI. Deleted....................................………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 139
Table LXVII. Deleted…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............... 139
Table LXVIII. Deleted………………………………………………………….......……………………………………………………………………………………………...................... 139
Table LXIX. Deleted…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 139
Table LXX. Deleted ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............. 139
Table LXXI. Deleted………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. 139
Table LXXII. Deleted ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..................……………………………………….... 139
2
Table LXXIII. Deleted………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................. 139
Table LXXIV. Deleted…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 139
Table LXXV. Deleted…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…........ 139
Table LXXVI. Deleted …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………................... 139
Table LXXVII. Nonrandomized Studies of Early Secondary Prevention in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ………………………............................................................. 140
Table LXXVIII. Deleted……………………………………………….........…………………………………………………………………………………………………………............. 143
Table LXXIX.Deleted.....................................…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................143
Table LXXX.Deleted............................………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ...............................143
Table LXXXI.Deleted................…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..................... 143
Table LXXXII. Deleted............................………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...........................................143
Table LXXXIII. Original Wording of Recommendations Reworded from Previous Guidelines and Statements ................................................................................................ 143
References………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............ 147
3
Table I. Nonrandomized Studies of Stroke Awareness and Emergency Medical Services Use
Study Acronym; Study Type/Design; Patient Population Primary End Point and Results Summary
Author; Study Size (P value; OR or RR; Conclusions
Year Published & 95% CI) Comments
Ojike N, et al.17 Study type: Survey Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Assess stroke knowledge and likelihood of • Stroke awareness varied by
2016 National Health calling 911 race/ethnicity, sex and region/location
27478680 Size: N=36,697 Interview Survey but not by level of education or
Results: insurance coverage
Exclusion criteria: • Age-adjusted stroke awareness was 66% • Stroke awareness lowest for
N/A • Stroke awareness lowest for Hispanics, Blacks and those Hispanics, Blacks and those residing
residing in the Western United States; least recognized stroke in the Western United States.
symptom was sudden severe headache
Schwartz J, et Study type: Registry Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: EMS response time There are opportunities for
al.336 911 calls for patients improvement in EMS stroke
2016 Size: N=184,179 ≥18 y with an EMS Results: recognition and response times
26953776 provider impression of • Median EMS response time (911 call to ED arrival) was 36
stroke (IQR, 28.7–48.0) min
• On-scene time (15 min) was the largest component of this
Exclusion criteria: time
N/A • Longer times were noted for patients aged 65–74 y, of white
race, females, and non-urban areas
Mochari- Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Association of race/ethnicity and EMS use EMS use differs by race ethnicity and
Greenberger H, Observational study Get With the among stroke patients gender
et al.19 Guidelines
2015 Size: N=398,798 Hospitalized Stroke Results:
26268882 Cases • 59% of all patients used EMS
• White women were most likely to use EMS (62%), and
Exclusion criteria: Hispanic men least likely (52%)
N/A
Berglund A, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: PPV for discharge diagnosis of stroke/TIA Better stroke identification tools are
al.21 Observational study Dispatch EMS stroke needed in the prehospital setting
2014 activation Results:
24576912 Size: N=900 • PPV for a discharge diagnosis of stroke/TIA was 51% (95%
Exclusion criteria: CI, 47–54%) for dispatch and 58% (95% CI, 52-64%) in
N/A ambulance
• Positive FAST increased PPV to 56% (95% CI: 52–61%) for
dispatch and 73% (95% CI, 66–80%) for ambulance
4
• Positive FAST also found in 44% of non-stroke by dispatch
and a negative FAST in up to 17% of true dispatch stroke
cases
De Luca A, et Study type: Cross- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: PPV of EMS dispatchers’ ability to recognize Better stroke identification tools are
al.22 sectional Dispatch EMS stroke stroke/TIA with CPSS needed in the prehospital setting
2013 observational study activation
24330761 Results:
Size: N=21,760 Exclusion criteria: • 9791 of 21760 dispatch cases were confirmed as stroke on
N/A scene
• PPV of the dispatch stroke/TIA symptoms identification was
34.3% (95% CI, 33.7–35.0), and sensitivity was 64.0% (95%
CI, 63.0–64.9)
• Centers using CPSS had higher PPV and sensitivity
Ekundayo OJ, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: EMS use by stroke patients Interventions aimed at increased
al.18 Observational study Get With the EMS use should target at-risk
2013 Guidelines Results: EMS transport was independently associated with: populations, particularly young and
23633218 Size: N=204,591 Hospitalized Stroke • Earlier arrival (onset-to-door time, ≤3 h; adjusted OR, 2.00; minority race/ethnic populations
Cases 95% CI,1.93–2.08)
• Prompt ER evaluation (more patients with door-to-imaging
Exclusion criteria: time, ≤25 min; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.78–2.00)
N/A • More rapid treatment (more patients with door-to-needle time,
≤60 min; OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28–1.63)
• More patients eligible to be treated with tissue-type
plasminogen activator if onset is ≤2 h (67% vs. 44%; OR, 1.47;
95% CI, 1.33–1.64).
Lin CB, et al.23 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Evaluation and treatment times EMS prenotification is associated with
2012 Observational study Get With the improved and timelier treatment, and
22787065 Guidelines Results: initiatives to improve prenotification
Size: N=371,988 Hospitalized Stroke • Prenotification occurred in 67% of EMS transports rates should be implemented
Cases Transported by • Patients with EMS prenotification were more likely to be
EMS treated with alteplase within 3 h (82.8% vs. 79.2%, P<0.0001)
• Patients with EMS prenotification had shorter door-to-imaging
Exclusion criteria: times (26 min vs. 31 min, P<0.0001), shorter door-to-needle
N/A times (78 min vs. 80 min, P<0.0001), and shorter symptom
onset-to-needle times (141 min vs. 145 min, P<0.0001)
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; CPSS, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale; EMS, emergency medical services; FAST, Face, Arm, Speech, Time test; h, hour;
min, minute; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; PPV, positive predictive value; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Literature search topic: Public education, EMS assessment and management: recognize stroke, call 911.
5
Table II. Randomized Clinical Trials for Improving Stroke Awareness
Study Aim of Study; Patient Study End Point Results Relevant 2 Study Summary
Acronym; Study Type; Population Intervention (Absolute Event Rates, End Point (if Limitations; Conclusions
Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & any) Adverse Comments
Year Published Study 95% CI) Events
Comparator
(# patients)
SWIFT Aim: “Determine whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Recurrent N/A Underpowered A multi-media
Boden-Albala B, a culturally tailored, criteria: Two interactive event rates, early arrival at to detect impact approach to
et al.20 interactive educational Ischemic stroke multimedia recurrent event, and of intervention stroke education
2015 program in a racially and or TIA, patients educational stroke knowledge: on earlier arrival and awareness
26069259 ethnically diverse high risk >18 y and living group sessions times and is feasible. More
population, aimed at in a household (N=601) • At baseline, 28% arrived education work is needed
stroke awareness and with a telephone at the ED within 3 h provided to both to impact
emergency treatment will Comparator: • Over 5 y, 224 (19%) groups may subsequent be-
lead to increased stroke Exclusion Standard stroke participants experienced a have enhanced havior to
knowledge, behavioral criteria: Unable care and recurrent event knowledge in improve early
change and improved time to give informed treatment, as • 40% of the interactive the “non- arrival after
to arrival to the ED upon consent; well as the intervention group vs. 46% intervention” stroke onset.
onset of stroke discharged to distribution of of the enhanced education group
symptoms.” long term stroke group arrived within 3 h
nursing home, pamphlets in (P=0.33)
Study type: Single-center or requiring 24-h English and • The interactive
RCT care; mRS >4 at Spanish intervention group had
baseline; severe designed by the greater stroke knowledge
Size: N=1193 aphasia limiting American Heart at 1 mo (OR, 1.63; 95%
comprehension; Association CI, 1.23–2.15)
pre-stroke (N=592)
dementia Safety end point: N/A
history, or end
stage disease
resulting in
probable
mortality ≤1 y
KIDS Aim: “Increase the Inclusion Intervention: 12 1 end point: Pre- and N/A • High loss to An educational
Morgenstern LB, correct identification of criteria: CCISD h of classroom post-test on stroke follow-up intervention may
et al.337 stroke signs and 6th graders instruction in 6th, knowledge: • Parents not improve stroke
2007 symptoms and encourage 7th, and 8th directly knowledge in
17885255 immediate contact with Exclusion graders; parents • Knowledge of stroke educated children. A multi-
emergency medical criteria: Non-6th were educated pathophysiology improved pronged
6
services (calling 911) grader, non through in intervention students approach with
when these signs and CCISD student homework from 29% to 34% correct, education
symptoms were detected” assignments whereas control students dedicated to
(N=294 kids, changed from 28% correct parents/adults is
Study type: RCT N=256 parents) to 25% warranted to
• Stroke symptom improve overall
Size: N=573 kids, N=462 Comparator: knowledge improved from societal stroke
parents Schools that did 28% correct to 43% in knowledge
not receive the intervention students, and
intervention 25% correct to 29% in
(N=279 kids, control
N=206 parents) • For a witnessed stroke,
intervention students
improved their correct
answers from 36% to 54%
whereas control changed
from 32% correct to 34%
• Parental response rate
was not testable due to
poor response rate
Safety end point: N/A

Abbreviations: CCISD indicates Corpus Christi Independent School District; ED, emergency department; h, hour; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; RCT,
randomized clinical trial; and RR, relative risk; TIA, transient ischemic attack, and y, years.
Literature search topic: Public education, EMS assessment and management: recognize stroke, call 911.
Table III. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Prediction Value of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Study Study Type/Design; Patient Population Primary End Point and Results Summary
Acronym; Study Size (P value; OR or RR; Conclusions
Author; & 95% CI) Comments
Year Published
Fonarow GC, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: All-cause mortality within 30 d The NIHSS provides substantial
al.65 Retrospective cohort GWTG-Stroke prognostic information regarding
2012 (GWTG-Stroke Registry inclusion Results: mortality within the first 30 d among
23130117 Registry) and Medicare Part A • There was a strong graded relation between increasing Medicare beneficiaries with AIS
claim data with AIS at NIHSS score and higher 30-d mortality
Size: N=33102 AIS centers w ≥25 AIS • The 30-d mortality rates for acute ischemic stroke by
patients between 2003–07 NIHSS categories were as follows: 0–7, 4.2%; 8–13, 13.9%;
14–21, 31.6%; 22–42, 53.5%
7
with NIHSS • A model with NIHSS alone provided excellent
documented discrimination whether included as a continuous variable (c-
statistic 0.82; 0.81 to 0.83), 4 categories (c-statistic 0.80;
Exclusion criteria: 0.79–0.80), or 3 categories (c-statistic 0.79; 0.78–0.79)
N/A
Lyden P, et al.64 Study type: Inclusion criteria: End Points: Rater agreement on NIHSS score assessed • NIHSS training and certification
2009 Observational Convenience sample using unweighted kappa statistic for multiple raters and intra- using DVD is valid and reliable
19520998 class correlation coefficient among general users with
Size: 8214 NIHSS Exclusion criteria: remarkable consistency across
score ratings N/A Results: different venues
• Individual NIHSS test item scoring agreement ranged from • Reliability assessments of novice
0.15 (ataxia) to 0.81 (LOC item 1c) with agreement being users were similar to what was
similar across all subgroups and venues of raters. found using experienced stroke
• Overall total NIHSS score intra-class correlation coefficient centers
across all subgroups and venues was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72– • No differences in the ICC of the
0.90) with no clinically meaningful differences between rater total NIHSS were identified when
specialty and setting used by neurologists, emergency
physicians, or nurses
• Agreement across various settings
was similar and generally moderate
to excellent
SITS-MOST Study type: Post hoc Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, • Stroke severity at baseline as
Wahlgren N, et subgroup analysis of See SITS-MOST mortality and independency (mRS 0–2 at 3 mo post-stroke) measured by NIHSS score and
al.61 a prospective, open, functional disability before current
2008 monitored, Exclusion criteria: Results: In the multivariable analysis, older age, high blood stroke appeared to be strongest
18927461 observational study Same glucose, high NIHSS score and current infarction on imaging predictors for mortality and rate of
scans were related to poor outcome in all parameters independence at 3 mo
Size: N=6483 • The association between NIHSS
scores and symptomatic ICH (SITS-
MOST definition) was not linear
Josephson SA, Study type: Inclusion criteria: End Points: Rater agreement on overall NIHSS score; • Substantial variability was found in
et al.63 Retrospective Convenience sample determination of passing scores on examination; individual total NIHSS score for the videotape
2006 observational questions assessed using unweighted and modified kappa vignettes; the author suggests this
16888381 Exclusion criteria: statistics was due to problems with the test
Size: N=7405 unique N/A Results: itself, rather than poorly performing
raters •Greater mean NIHSS scores were associated with greater raters
scoring variance • High agreement was found on
• Nurses (RNs) demonstrated less variance from the most many items in the NIHSS
common response compared to other professions
(P<0.0001)
8
• Observed agreement on individual NIHSS elements ranged
from 0.697 (aphasia) to 0.995 (LOC item 1c)
• Modified kappa ranged from 0.596 (aphasia) to 0.993 (LOC
1c)
NINDS t-PA Study type: Post hoc Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Outcome was measured with four stroke rating • Baseline NIHSS strongly predicts
Stroke Study subgroup analysis of See NINDS t-PA scales administered 3 mo after treatment long-term outcome in stroke patients
Frankel MR, et the placebo group of Stroke Study
al.60 a randomized, Results: Baseline variables that predicted a poor outcome
2000 double-blind, placebo Exclusion criteria: were NIHSS score >17 plus atrial fibrillation, yielding a PPV
11061250 controlled trial Same for poor outcome of 96% (95% CI, 88–100); at 24 h the best
predictor was an NIHSS score >22 (PPV 98%; 95% CI, 93–
Size: N=312 100), and at 7–10 d the best predictor was NIHSS >16 (PPV
92%; 95% CI, 85–99)
Adams HP Jr, et Study type: Post hoc Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Outcomes assessed at 7 d and 3 mo using the • Baseline NIHSS strongly predicts
al.59 subgroup analysis of See Trial of ORG Barthel Index and Glasgow Outcome Scale long-term outcome in stroke patients
1999 a randomized, 10172 in Acute
10408548 double-blind, placebo Stroke Results: Baseline NIHSS score strongly predicted outcome,
controlled trial with one additional point on the NIHSS decreasing the
Exclusion criteria: likelihood of excellent outcome at 3 mo by 17%
Size: N=1281 Same
NINDS t-PA Study type: Post hoc Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Outcome was measured with four stroke rating • No patient subgroups with
Stroke Trial subgroup analysis of See NINDS t-PA scales administered 3 mo after treatment differential response to alteplase
Subgroup a randomized, Stroke Study could be identified
Analysis double-blind, placebo Results: • Older patients with severe deficits
NINDS t-PA controlled trial Exclusion criteria: • No pretreatment information significantly affected patients’ (high NIHSS) were less likely to do
Stroke Study Same response to alteplase (all P>0.05) well in the long term compared to
Group58 Size: N=624 subjects • Outcome was related to age-by-deficit severity interaction, those younger or with less severe
1997 diabetes, age-by-blood pressure interaction, and early CT deficits; however, these patients still
9368551 findings benefited from t-PA treatment
Abbreviations: AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; GWTG, Get With The Guidelines; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; ICC, intraclass correlation
coefficient; LOC, level of consciousness; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NINDS, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders; PPV, positive predictive value; OR, odds ratio; and RN, registered nurse.
Literature search topic: Emergency evaluation: benefit of stroke scale use
9
Table IV. Nonrandomized Studies of Emergency Medical Services Use of Prehospital Stroke Severity Scales
Year Published
Carrera D, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Receiver operating characteristics of test • The use of simplified versions of
al.338 Reanalysis of Previously enrolled in performance the original RACE scale reduced
2017 observational data original RACE performance
27720525 derivation Results: • No direct comparison to other
Size: N=341 • Seven simpler versions of RACE scale derived scores was feasible, and biases of
Exclusion criteria: • Original RACE scale had an AUC of 0.82 for detecting LVO patient selection in the original
No prehospital RACE • The 7 simpler RACE versions generated slightly lower AUC cohort persist
score available for detecting LVO
Kim JT, et al.339 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Correlation of prehospital LAMS with early ED • LAMS score correlates well with
2017 Secondary analysis Confirmed NIHSS NIHSS and outcomes when
28087807 of prospective data cerebrovascular performed in the ED but only
from the FAST-MAG disease, transported Results: moderately when performed by
trial by EMS and enrolled • ED LAMS score correlated with concurrently performed prehospital personnel
in FAST-MAG NIHSS in all cerebrovascular cases (r=0.89) • This paper did not address the
Size: N=1632 • Prehospital LAMS correlated moderately with ED NIHSS utility of LAMS for LVO detection
Exclusion criteria: (r=0.49) and triage
Non-FAST-MAG • Although the ED LAMS correlated moderately with 3-month
transports mRS, r=0.55, the association of prehospital LAMS with 3-
month mRS was less strong (r=0.34)
McMullan JT, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: C-STAT sensitivity and specificity • Among FAST-positive prehospital
al.340 Observational study Prehospital suspected stroke patients, C-STAT
2017 suspected stroke Results: C-STAT sensitivity and specificity for each outcome could be readily performed and
28121225 Size: N=58 (FAST-positive), C- were: incorporated into the prehospital
STAT scored, and • NIHSS≥ 15, 77% (95% CI, 46–95) and 84% (95% CI, 69– workflow
transported to a 93) • The small study sample size and
comprehensive • NIHSS≥10, 64% (95% CI, 41–83) and 91% (95% CI, 76– regional restriction preclude
stroke center or 98) meaningful conclusions on test
having a stroke team • LVO, 71% (95% CI, 29–96) and 70% (95% CI, 55–83) characteristics for predicting LVO to
consult note inform prehospital triage
Exclusion criteria:
FAST-negative
10
Abbreviations: AUC indicates area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence inter\val; C-STAT, Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool; ED,
emergency department; EMS, emergency medical services; FAST, Face Arm Speech Time algorithm; LAMS, Los Angeles Motor Scale; LVO, large vessel occlusion; mRS,
modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and RACE, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation.
Literature search topic: Public Education, EMS assessment and management: recognize, call 911
Table V. Deleted
Table VI. Deleted
Table VII. Nonrandomized Studies of Hospitals Achieving Rapid Door-to-Needle Times for IV Alteplase in Stroke
Study Study Type/Design; Patient Population Primary Endpoint and Results Summary/Conclusion
Acronym; Study Size (P values; OR or RR; 95% CI) Comment(s)
Author;
Year Published
Xian Y, et al.36 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 endpoint: • Median DTN times of less than 60
2017 Retrospective, Patients receiving IV No primary endpoint declared. Door-to-needle times for minutes were achievable in a
28096207 observational study alteplase within 4.5 alteplase administration determined along with survey majority of patients.
of 888 hospitals. hours of symptom assessing extent which hospitals were using the
onset between June Target:Stroke interventions to reduce DTN times and quantify • The achievement of DTN times
Size: 16,901 2014 and April 2015. the association. within 45 minutes is feasible in a
patients with AIS substantial proportion of patients.
treated with alteplase Exclusion criteria: Results:
within 4.5h of onset. N/A • Median DTN time for alteplase administration was 56
minutes (IQR 42-75).
• 59.3% of patients received IV alteplase within 60 minutes.
• 30.4% of patients were treated within 45 minutes.
• 16 strategies were associated with significant reductions in

DTN times.
Fonarow GC, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 endpoint: • Implementation of the

al.35 Retrospective, Patients receiving No primary endpoint declared. Door-to-needle times for Target:Stroke quality improvement
2014 observational study guideline concordant alteplase administration; in-hospital all-cause mortality; initiative was associated with
24756513 with pre-/post- intravenous alteplase discharge status determined. improved timeliness of tPA delivery.
Target:Stroke at GWTG-Stroke
intervention design participating hospitals Results:
11
using GWTG hospital from April 2003 to • Median DTN time for tPA administration declined from 77 • Median hospital door-to-needle
convenience sample Sept 2013. minutes (IQR, 60-98 minutes) during the pre-intervention target times of less than 60 minutes
period to 67 minutes (IQR, 51-87 minutes) during the post- were achievable in over 50% of
Size: 71,169 Exclusion criteria: intervention period (P < .001). cases.
patients with AIS N/A
treated with tPA • The DTN times for tPA administration of 60 minutes or less
(27,319 pre- increased from 26.5% (95% CI, 26.0%-27.1%) of patients
intervention period, during the pre-intervention period to 41.3% (95% CI, 40.8%-
43,850 post- 41.7%) during the post-intervention period (P<.001)
intervention period)
at 1,030 Get With
The Guidelines-
Stroke participating
hospitals (52.8% of
total)
Sauser K, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 endpoint: • In this study, mean and median
al.341 Retrospective, Patients receiving IV Continuous measure of DTN time, in minutes, from DTN times exceeded 60 minutes in
2014 observational study alteplase within 4.5 emergency department arrival to thrombolytic delivery. a clear majority of patients.
25023407 of 25 hospitals. hours of symptom
onset between Jan Results: • Approximately one-quarter of
Size: 1193 patients 2009 and Dec 2012. • Mean (SD) DTN time for alteplase administration was 82.9 patients were treated within 60
with AIS treated with minutes (35.4). Median time was 76 minutes. minutes.
alteplase within 4.5h Exclusion criteria:
of onset. N/A • 28.7% of patients received IV alteplase within 60 minutes.
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; DTN, Door-to-Needle; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; and RR, relative risk.
Literature search topic: Achieving rapid door-to-needle treatment time in stroke
12
Table VIII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Efficacy of Multilevel Interventions to Increase Intravenous Alteplase Use
Comparator
(# patients)
INSTINCT Aim: To test a multilevel Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: From pre- The difference One hospital • The pragmatic
Scott PA, et al.38 intervention to increase criteria: Adult, Standardized, to post-intervention was not pair was INSTINCT
2013 community hospital non-specialty, barrier- periods, alteplase use significant in the excluded from multilevel
23260188 alteplase use acute-care, assessment, increase in intervention comparison analysis due to intervention
community multicomponent group hospitals (59/5882 based on the conversion to modestly
Study type: Multicenter hospitals in intervention [1.00%] to 191/7288 mixed-effects academic increased
cluster RCT using Michigan with ≥ (n=12) [2.62%]) was significantly Poisson model comprehensive alteplase use in
matched-pair design 100 stroke greater than control group (RR 1.37, 95% stroke center target group
patients/y Comparator: (65/5957 [1.09%] to CI 0·96–1.93; mid-trial community
Size: N= 24 hospitals No intervention 120/6989 [1.72%]); RR, P=0·08; hospital EDs
Exclusion (n=12) 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09–2.57; • Identified
criteria: P=0.02. safety of
Academic alteplase use in
comprehensive Safety end point: Total community EDs
stroke centers; symptomatic intracranial with sufficient
hospitals with hemorrhage within 36 h numbers to
>100,000 ED occurred in 24/404 [5.9%]; ensure precise
visits per year total mortality was 62/557 safety metrics
[11.1%]; between group
differences were NS
(P=0.84)
PRACTISE Aim: To test a Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Intervention Among the 1657 The intensive The PRACTISE
Dirks M, et al.39 multidimensional criteria: Intervention hospitals treated 393 patients with intervention may intervention
2011 implementation strategy to Convenience meetings based (13.1% of all patients with ischemic stroke not be increased the
21393587 increase alteplase use sample 12 on Breakthrough acute stroke) vs. 308 admitted within generalizable to proportion of
hospitals Series model (12.2%) at control 4 hours from all hospital stroke patients
Study type: Multicenter, (n=6 hospitals) hospitals, adjusted OR, onset, 391 settings as it treated with
cluster-randomized Exclusion 1.25 (95% CI, 0.93–1.68) (44.5%) of 880 included forming alteplase
controlled trial using criteria: None Comparator: in the local teams
matched pair design listed No intervention Safety end point: intervention consisting of a
(n=6 hospitals) Symptomatic intracranial centers were stroke
Size: N=5515 patients hemorrhage rate was treated with neurologist and
admitted with stroke (12 5.6% (intervention) vs. thrombolysis stroke nurse
13
hospitals); 2990 in 6 4.6% (control); RR, 1.08; and 305 (39.3%)
intervention hospitals, 95% CI, 0.83–1.43 of 777 in the
2525 in 6 control hosptials control centers (
adjusted OR,
1.58 (95% CI,
1.11-2.27).
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; ED, emergency department; HR, hazard ratio; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; and RR, relative risk.
Literature search topic: Increasing alteplase treatment in stroke
Table IX. Nonrandomized Studies Comparing Efficacy of Multilevel Interventions to Increase Intravenous Alteplase Use
Year Published
Ganesh A, et al. Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Crude 30-day mortality • First demonstration of population-
33 Retrospective cohort Patients with stroke wide reduction in mortality from
2016 analysis (ischemic or Results: stroke systems of care
26850979 hemorrhagic) or TIA • Crude 30-day mortality rate decreased from 15.8% in Could not account for the potential
Size: N=319,972 admitted to acute 2003/2004 to 12.7% in 2012/2013 in provinces with stroke effects of concurrent interventions,
care hospitals in systems, while remaining 14.5% in provinces without such such as stroke specialist training
Canada in fiscal systems programs and variability in
years 2003/2004 to • Starting with the fiscal year 2009/2010, there was a clear adherence to national best practices
2013/2014 reduction in relative mortality in provinces with stroke recommendations
systems vs. those without, sustained at aIRR of 0.85 (95% • The outcome of 30-day mortality in
Exclusion criteria: CI, 0.79–0.92) in the 2011/ 2012, 2012/2013, and 2013/2014 the study may not reflect other
Patients hospitalized fiscal years clinical outcomes of interest, like 90-
in Quebec province • The surveys indicated that facilities in provinces with such d or longer-term mortality
because complete systems were more likely to care for patients on a stroke unit,
data were not and have timely access to a stroke prevention clinic and
available telestroke services
Fonarow GC, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: DTN times for alteplase administration of ≤60 • Implementation of a national
al.35 Target: Stroke • Patients with AIS min quality improvement initiative was
2014 intervention (multi- treated with alteplase associated with improved timeliness
24756513 modal), pre-post • GWTG hospital Results: of alteplase administration following
design, • Median DTN time for alteplase administration declined from AIS on a national scale, and this
convenience sample Exclusion criteria: 77 min (IQR: 60–98 min) during the preintervention period to improvement was associated with
• Not treated with 67 min (IQR: 51–87 min) during the postintervention period lower in-hospital mortality and
Size: N=71,169 alteplase (P<0.001) intracranial hemorrhage, along with
14
• Transferred from • DTN times for alteplase administration ≤60 min increased an increase in the percentage of
another facility from 26.5% (95% CI, 26.0%–27.1%) of patients during the patients discharged home
• Had stroke while in preintervention period to 41.3% (95% CI, 40.8%-41.7%) • Study limitations included
hospital during the postintervention period (P<0.001) convenience sample; lack of
concurrent control; potential
unmeasured confounders;
retrospectively collected data
van Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Treatment with thrombolysis or not as • Intramural protocols are important
Wijngaarden JD, Prospective • Patients age>18 y measured by proportion of stroke patients admitted within 24 tools to increase thrombolysis rates
et al.342 observational cohort admitted with acute h of symptom onset treated with thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in
2011 stroke hospitals
21613273 Size: N=5515 • Symptom onset Results: • The study was carried out at 12
≤24 h before • The unadjusted multilevel logistic regression shows a sites
admission significant association between thrombolysis rates and
availability of intramural protocols (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.12–
Exclusion criteria: 1.91)
N/A • After adjusting for hospital size and teaching vs. non-
teaching hospitals, the strength of the association increased
(adjusted OR, 1.77; CI, 1.30–2.39)
Jeng JS, et al.343 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Factors influencing administration of Well-organized stroke centers,
2009 Multicenter national Qualified medical thrombolytic therapy were analyzed routine use of thrombolytic therapy
19362319 Taiwan stroke center centers and regional protocols in the emergency room,
survey teaching hospitals in Results: and guidance by a stroke center
Taiwan • The frequency of thrombolytic therapy administration director are important for enhancing
Size: Survey sent to significantly correlated with stroke center criteria (Spearman's thrombolytic therapy in patients with
17 medical Exclusion criteria: rho=0.731, P<0.001) acute ischemic stroke
centers/69 regional N/A • Multivariate analysis showed routine IV alteplase protocol
teaching hospitals in in the ED (OR, 4.6; P=0.042) and supervision by the stroke
2004, and 19 medical center director OR, 3.7; P=0.031) significantly influenced the
centers/97 regional administration of thrombolytic therapy
teaching hospitals in
2006
Douglas VC, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: In-hospital mortality rate • Four elements predicted increased
al.344 Retrospective Patients admitted alteplase use, including
2005 multicenter study with ischemic stroke Results: written care protocols, integrated
15699369 • None of the 11 major stroke center elements was EMS, organized EDs, and
Size: N=16,853 Exclusion criteria: associated with decreased in-hospital mortality or increased continuing medical/public education
patients (34 Patients <18 y were frequency of discharge home in stroke (each OR>2.0, P<0.05)
academic medical excluded from • In-hospital mortality rate was 6.3% (n=1062), and 2.4% • Use of alteplase also tended to be
centers) analysis of alteplase (n=399) of patients received alteplase greater at centers with an
15
acute stroke team, a stroke unit, or
rapid neuroimaging (each OR>2.0,
P<0.10)
Asimos AW, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Descriptive • ED-directed CSPs are a feasible
al.345 Retrospective • History and and effective means to screen AIS
2004 registry review of physical exam Results: patients for treatment with
15064210 single community consistent with acute • Over a 56-month period, CSP activation occurred 255 thrombolysis
teaching hospital stroke times, with 24% (n=60) of patients treated with IV alteplase • There were multiple study
• Within 36 h of IV alteplase treatment, 10% (NINDS=6%) of limitations
Size: N=255 Exclusion criteria: patients (n=6) sustained a sICH
• Age≤18 y • Treatment protocol violations occurred in 32% of IV
• Stroke onset >2 h alteplase-treated patients but were not significantly
prior to triage associated
And many others with sICH (Fisher’s exact test, P>0.05)
• Three mo after IV alteplase treatment, 60% of
patients had achieved an excellent neurologic outcome
based on Barthel Index ≥95 (NINDS=52%), while mortality
measured 12% (NINDS=17%)
Abbreviations: aIRR indicates adjusted incidence rate ratio; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; CSP, code stroke protocol; DTN, door-to-needle; ED, emergency
department; EMS, emergency medical services; GWTG, American Heart Association's Get with the Guideline; h, hour; IQR, interquartile range; IV, intravenous; min, minutes;
NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; OR, odds ratio; and sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Literature search topic: Increasing alteplast treatment in stroke AND Achieving rapid door-to-needle treatment time in stroke AND Benefit of participation in QI registry
Table X. Randomized Clinical Trials of Level of Agreement Between Central Read and Spoke Radiologists and Hub Neurologists in
Interpreting Head Computed Tomography Scans of Stroke Patients Presenting to Telestroke Hospitals
Study Aim of Study; Patient Study End Point Relevant 2 End Point (if Study Summary
Acronym; Study Type; Population Intervention Results any) Limitations; Conclusions
Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / (Absolute Adverse Comments
Year Published Study Event Rates, Events
Comparator P value; OR &
(# patients) 95% CI)
Spokoyny I, et Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Vascular neurologist and • Low incidence • Reports from
al.44 agreement levels between criteria: Telemedicine Level of spoke radiologist percent of secondary neurologists and
2014 central read and each of Acute stroke arm: agreement agreement with central end points that spoke
23697761 two groups, spoke syndrome CT interpretation between central read in the presence of resulted in less radiologists had
radiologists and hub by hub vascular read and spoke normal scan opportunity to excellent
vascular neurologists, on Exclusion neurologist and radiologists and (74.6%,77.1%), acute assess reliability in
head CT scans of stroke criteria: central read hub neurologists stroke (74.6%,77.9%), differences identifying
patients (n=130) in interpreting ICH (99.2%, 98.5%), SAH between groups radiologic
16
Time >12 h, head CT scans (98.5%, 96.9%), subdural • Bias in favor of contra-
Study type: Pooled RCTs incarceration Comparator: of stroke hematoma (100%, 100%), the interpreting indications to IV
Telephone arm patients tumor (100%, 97.7%), and vascular alteplase
Size: N=261 CT interpretation presenting to hyperdense artery (93.8%, neurologist • These pooled
by spoke telestroke 88.5%) findings
radiologist and hospitals: demonstrated
central read overall that telestroke
(n=131) agreement evaluation of
(95.4%; κ=0.74; head CT scans
95% CI, 0.59– for acute stroke
0.88) assessments
were reliable
Safety end
point: N/A
Puetz V, et al.45 Aim: To determine the Inclusion: NA NA The neuroradiologists Retrospective Clinically
2013 reliability and therapeutic Acute stroke detected discrepant CT study design relevant mis-
23255831 impact of standardized syndrome findings in 43 patients and interpretations of
cerebral CT evaluation by patients (8.0%) that were rated as interpretation the CT scans
telestroke neurologists clinically relevant in 9 bias were rare in an
Study type: retrospective Exclusion: patients (1.7%). acute telestroke
cohort study of NA service
prospectively collected
data
Size: N=536
Demaerschalk Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Spoke radiologist and • Small number In the context of
BM, et al.43 agreement levels between criteria: Acute Telemedicine Level of telestrokologist percent of subjects a telestroke
2012 neuroradiologists and stroke syndrome Arm: CT agreement agreement with hub • Concern about network
22984007 each of 2 groups, spoke interpretation by between central neuroradiologist in the applicability of designed to
radiologists and Exclusion spoke read and spoke presence of normal scan the findings to assess patients
telestrokologists, on criteria: Time radiologist and radiologists and (85%, 89%), acute stroke real world of with acute
baseline brain CT scan of >12 h, hub hub neurologists (81%, 73%), chronic acute head CT stroke
acute stroke patients incarceration neuroradiologist in interpreting stroke (63%, 85%), edema interpretation in syndromes,
(n=27) head CT scans (78%, 77%), tumor (96%, patients agreement over
Study type: RCT of stroke 100%), hyperdense artery • Bias in favor of the presence or
Comparator: patients (93%, 92%) the interpreting absence of
Size: N=54 Telephone-only presenting to telestrokologist radiological
Arm: CT telestroke contraindication
interpretation by hospitals: s to IV alteplase
telestrokologist overall was excellent
and whether the
17
neuroradiologist agreement comparisons
(n=26) 91.0% were between a
telestrokologist
Safety end and
point: neuroradiologist
or between
spoke
radiologist and
neuroradiologist
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence Interval; CT, computed tomography; h, hours; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IV, intravenous; N/A, not available; RCT, randomized clinical trial;
and SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Literature search topic: Telestroke and Teleradiology
Table XI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Synchronous Audio Video Telemedicine to Telephone-Only for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR & any) Adverse Comments
Comparator
(# patients)
STRokEDOC Aim: To assess whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Correct Alteplase use Underpowered Pooled analysis
Pooled telemedicine or telephone criteria: Acute Telemedicine thrombolysis decision rate 29% vs. to detect supported the
Analysis consultation was superior stroke syndrome (n=138) making: 96% vs. 83%, 24% (OR, 1.27; differences in 90 hypothesis that
Demaerschalk for acute stroke decision OR, 4.2 (95% CI, 1.7– 95% CI, 0.71– d functional telemedicine
BM, et al.46 making Exclusion Comparator: 10.5; P=0.002) 2.25; P=0.41), outcome consultations,
2012 criteria: Time Telephone 90 d BI 46% vs. compared with
22400970 Study type: >12 h, (n=138) Safety end point: N/A 45% (OR, 0.69; telephone only,
Meta-analysis of RCTs incarceration 95% CI, 0.41– resulted in more
1.16; P=0.167), accurate
Size: N=276 90 d mRS 36% decision making
vs. 38% (OR,
0.70; 95% CI,
0.41-1.19;
P=0.201), ICH
rate 8% vs. 6%
(P>0.999)
18
STRokEDOC Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Correct • Thrombolytic Trial was not • Not designed
AZ TIME efficacy of telemedicine criteria: Acute Telemedicine thrombolysis decision use rate 30% vs. designed to to have
Demaerschalk and telephone stroke syndrome (n=27) making: 85% vs. 89% 30% (P>0.99), detect a sufficient power
BM, et al.346 consultations for acute (P>0.99) 90 d BI 59% vs. difference to detect a
2010 stroke decision making Exclusion Comparator: 58% (P=0.77), between difference
20431081 criteria: Time Telephone Safety end point: N/A 90 d mRS 46% telemedicine • Feasibility
Study type: RCT >12 h, (n=27) vs. 38% and telephone RCT
incarceration (P=0.61), ICH only modes of • Technical
Size: N=54 rate 4% vs. 0% consultation problems were
(P>0.99) frequent
STRokEDOC Aim: To compare Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Correct • Alteplase use- • Increase in • First trial to
Meyer BC, et telemedicine to telephone criteria: Telemedicine thrombolysis decision rate 28% vs. alteplase use establish the
al.347 consultations for Acute stroke (n=111) making: 98% v 82%, OR: 23% (OR,1.3; not measured benefit of
2008 assessing decision syndrome 10.9 (95% CI, 2.7–44.69; 95% CI, 0.7–2.5; • Absence of telemedicine
18676180 making in acute stroke Comparator: P=0.0009) P=0.4248), 90 d placebo over telephone
Exclusion Telephone BI (OR, 0.6; comparator, specifically for
Study type: RCT criteria: (n=111) Safety end point: N/A 95% CI, 0.4–1.1; resulting in acute medical
Time >12 h, P=0.1268), 90 d underestimating decision-making
Size: N=222 incarceration mRS (OR, 0.6; the true benefit • Stopped early
95% CI, 0.3–1.1; of telemedicine for superiority
P=0.0898), ICH • Lack of
rate 7% vs. 8% complete
(OR, 0.8; 95% reproducibility
CI, 0.1–6.3; between
P=1.0) telephone
practice in “real
world” and the
trial
Abbreviations: BI indicates Barthel Index; CI, confidence interval; h, hours; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; RCT,
randomized clinical trial.
Literature search topic: Telestroke and Teleradiology
19
Table XII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Telestroke for Triaging Patients for Endovascular Therapy
Year Published
Barlinn J, et al.49 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Baseline characteristics, onset-to-treatment • Telestroke networks may enable
2017 Retrospective review Patients with times, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital delivery of endovascular treatment
27899742 of consecutively intracranial large mortality, reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral to selected ischemic stroke patients
collected cases vessel occlusion who Infarction 2b/3), and favorable functional outcome transferred from remote hospitals
underwent that is equitable to patients admitted
Size: N=151 endovascular Results: Transferred patients were younger (P=0.020), directly to tertiary hospitals.
48 (31.8%) patients treatment presenting received more frequently intravenous tissue plasminogen
were transferred after either via telestroke activator (P=0.008), had prolonged time from stroke onset to
teleconsultation and network or directly endovascular treatment initiation (P<0.0001) and tended to
103 (68.2%) were have lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
primarily admitted to Exclusion criteria: (4.2% vs. 11.7%; P=0.227) and mortality (8.3% vs. 22.6%;
our emergency NA P=0.041) than directly admitted patients. Similar rates of
department. reperfusion (56.2% vs. 61.2%; P=0.567) and favorable
functional outcome (18.8% vs. 13.7%; P=0.470) were
observed in telestroke patients and those who were directly
admitted.
Kepplinger J, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: functional independence, SICH, mortality • IV tPA delivery through telestroke
al.47 Systematic review studies which evaluate networks is safe and effective in the
2016 and meta-analysis the safety and efficacy Results: Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were 3-h time window.
27566746 of IV thrombolysis similar between patients subjected to telemedicine-guided
Size: 7 studies (IVT) with tissue IVT and those receiving tPA at stroke centers (risk ratio
totaling 1,863 plasminogen activator [RR],1.01; 95% CI, 0.37-2.80; P=0.978) with low evidence of
patients (tPA) delivered heterogeneity (I(2), 37%; P=0.189). There was no difference
through telestroke
in mortality (RR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.74-1.48; P=0.806) or in
networks in patients
functional independence (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.78-1.57;
with acute ischemic
P=0.565) at 3 mo between telemedicine-guided and stroke
stroke.
center thrombolysis. No heterogeneity was identified (I(2),
0%; P=0.964 and I(2), 52%; P=0.123, respectively).
Exclusion criteria:
NA
20
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; and RR, relative risk.
Literature Search: Telestroke and Teleradiology
Table XIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Alteplase Decision-Making via Telephone Consultation
Year Published
Fong, WC, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: clinical outcomes, sICH, mortality • Telephone consultation and
al.48 Retrospective Patients with stroke teleradiology-guided IV alteplase
2015 Comparative Cohort treated with IV Results: administration appeared safe and
Study alteplase by • Excellent clinical outcome achieved by 52% of telephone effective
25906936
telephone with group vs 43% of the neurologist on-site group (P=0.30)
Size: N=152 teleradiology • Limitations: small sample size,
compared with • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage 4.0% vs 4.9% non-randomized design
patients treated by in-
(P=1.0)
person assessment
Exclusion criteria: • Mortality 8.3 vs 11.9% (P=0.49)

N/A
Table XIV. Nonrandomized Studies Assessing the Impact of Stroke System Quality Improvement Processes
Study Study Patient Primary Endpoint and Results Summary/Conclusion
Acronym; Type/Design; Population (P values; OR or RR; 95% CI) Comment(s)
Author; Study Size
Year
Published
Ganesh A, et Study type: Inclusion 1 endpoint: • A sustained decrease in
al.33 Retrospective, criteria: Summary statistics used to describe all patient and stroke resource information. 30-day in-hospital mortality
2016 cohort analysis All patients with Multivariable generalized linear Poisson regression model constructed for 30-day over time was identified in
26850979 using Canadian stroke (ischemic in-hospital mortality included the following predictors: presence or absence of a Canadian provinces with
Institute of Health or hemorrhagic) stroke system, fiscal years of discharge, common prognostic variables (age, sex, integrated stroke systems of
Information’s or TIA admitted stroke type and comorbid conditions). Comparison of adjusted incidence rate care compared to provinces
Discharge to Canadian ratio (aIRR) for each single fiscal year, estimated from the model, compared without such systems.
Abstract acute care provinces with stroke systems of care vs. those without. • These data demonstrate
Database hospital an association between
21
(excludes (excluding Results: integrated stroke systems of
Province of Quebec) • Overall crude 30-day mortality rate decreased from 15.8% in 2003/04 to 12.7% care and population-wide
Quebec) from in 2013/14 in the provinces with stroke care systems, while remaining constant at reduction in acute stroke
2003/04 to Exclusion 14.5% in provinces without such systems. mortality.
2012/13 criteria: N/A
combined with • Relative mortality rate (aIRR) was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.92) in 2013/14 in
surveys of stroke provinces with stroke care systems vs those without.
care resources in
Canadian • Prior to 2010/11, there was no clear difference in stroke mortality between
hospitals in 2009 provinces with or without stroke care systems.
(n = 309) and
2013 (n = 601).
Size: Cohort of
319,972
hospitalized
stroke/TIA
patients.
Song S, et Study type: Inclusion 1 endpoint: • Hospital adoption of the
al.57 Retrospective, criteria: Primary clinical outcomes analyzed functional status; mortality measures; GWTG-Stroke program was
2016 observational Hospitals Secondary outcomes included length of stay and readmission measures. associated with improved
27079809 matched cohort implementing functional outcomes at
study using GWTG-Stroke Results: discharge and reduced post-
difference-in- between 2003 • Adjusted Comparison of Change (Difference-in-Differences) on Discharge discharge mortality.
differences and 2008 and Home/Mortality Outcomes From Run-Up, Early, or Sustained vs Pre Period
design. Changes matched Between at Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals vs at Matched Non–Get
in outcomes at hospitals that did With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals (HR = Hazard Ratio)
hospitals joining not during the
GWTG-Stroke same period.
program were
compared with Exclusion
non-joining criteria: N/A
matched Discharge RUN-UP EARLY SUSTAINED
hospitals. home/Mortality HR 95% P HR 95% P HR 95% P
Outcomes CI value CI value CI value
22
Size: Matching Discharge 1.07 1.00- .06 1.08 1.01- 0.02 1.06 1.00- 0.06
Home 1.14 1.16 1.12
algorithm 30d Mortality 0.97 0.90- 0.48 0.92 0.86- 0.04 0.96 0.90- 0.16
identified 366 1.05 0.99 1.02
GWTG-Stroke 1-year Mortality 1.00 0.94- 0.92 0.89 0.85- 0.0001 0.92 0.88- 0.0005
1.05 0.95 0.97
adopting
hospitals that
cared for 88,584
AIS admissions
and 366 non-
GWTG-Stroke
hospitals that
cared for 85,401
AIS admissions
Fonarow Study type: Inclusion 1 endpoint: • Implementation of the
GC, et al.35 Retrospective, criteria: No primary endpoint declared. Door-to-needle times for alteplase administration; Target:Stroke quality
2014 observational Patients in-hospital all-cause mortality; discharge status determined. improvement initiative was
24756513 study with pre- receiving associated with improved
/post- guideline Results: timeliness of tPA.
Target:Stroke concordant • Median DTN time for tPA administration declined from 77 minutes (interquartile
intervention intravenous range [IQR], 60-98 minutes) during the pre-intervention period to 67 minutes • This improvement was
design using alteplase at (IQR, 51-87 minutes) during the post-intervention period (P<.001). The DTN associated with lower in-
GWTG hospital GWTG-Stroke times for tPA administration of 60 minutes or less increased from 26.5% (95% CI, hospital mortality and
convenience participating 26.0%-27.1%) of patients during the pre-intervention period to 41.3% (95% CI, intracranial hemorrhage,
sample hospitals from 40.8%-41.7%) during the post-intervention period (P<.001) along with an increase in the
April 2003 to percentage of patients
Size: 71,169 Sept 2013. • In-hospital all-cause mortality improved significantly from the pre-intervention to discharged home.
patients with AIS the post-intervention period (9.93% vs 8.25%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio
treated with tPA Exclusion [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94; P<.001). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
(27,319 pre- criteria: N/A within 36 hours was less likely to occur post-intervention (5.68% vs 4.68%;
intervention adjusted OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P<.001) and discharge to home was more
period, 43,850 frequent (37.6% vs 42.7%; adjusted OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19; P<.001).
post-intervention
period) at 1,030
Get With The
Guidelines-
23
Stroke
participating
hospitals (52.8%
of total)
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; and RR, relative risk.
Literature search topic: Benefit of participation in QI registry
Table XV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
for Routine Stroke Care
Year Published
Wardlaw J, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: The primary outcome was the incremental • Magnetic resonance with DW-MRI
al.69 Cost-effectiveness of Patients with a TIA or cost-effectiveness of MR scanning compared with CT for the is not cost-effective for secondary
2014 MRI, including DWI, minor ischemic whole population stroke prevention for TIA and minor
24791949 in patients with stroke/stroke mimics stroke
transient ischemic presenting within a Results: • MRI was most helpful in patients
attack and minor few hours who are • Compared with “CT scan all patients” MRI was more presenting at >1 wk after symptoms
stroke; a systematic not being treated with expensive and no more cost-effective, except for patients if blood-sensitive sequences were
review, meta-analysis statins and presenting at >1 wk after symptoms to diagnose hemorrhage used
and economic antiplatelet drugs • “One-stop” CT/MRI angiographic-plus-brain imaging was • Rapid specialist assessment, CT
evaluation; decision- not cost-effective brain scanning, and identification of
analytic model of Exclusion criteria: serious underlying stroke causes is
stroke prevention None provided the most cost-effective stroke
including on a 20-y prevention strategy
time horizon
including nine
representative
imaging scenarios
Size: Nine key

scanning strategies
were assessed in the
modelling exercise
Brazzelli M, et Study type: Review Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Sensitivity and specificity for detection of acute Further well-designed studies
al.68 Studies that either ischemic stroke without methodological biases, in
2009 compared DW-MRI more representative patient
24
19821415 Size: N=308 patients and CT in the same Results: DW-MRI appears to be more sensitive than CT for samples, with practicality and cost
(8 studies) patients for detection the early detection of ischemic stroke in highly selected estimates are now needed to
of ischemic stroke or patients; however, the variability in the quality of included determine which patients should
examined the utility studies and the presence of spectrum and incorporation undergo MRI and which CT in
of MRI for detection biases render the reliability and generalizability of observed suspected acute stroke
of hemorrhagic results questionable
stroke, had imaging
performed within 12 h
of stroke onset, and
presented sufficient
data to allow
construction of
contingency tables
Exclusion criteria:
Studies that focused
on patients
presenting
exclusively with a
clinical syndrome
suggesting either
subarachnoid
hemorrhage or
isolated
intraventricular
hemorrhage; studies
that: addressed
specific anatomical,
metabolic,
microvascular, or
volumetric aspects of
stroke; focused on
specific technical
aspects of CT and
MRI; analyzed
perfusion versus
diffusion imaging
differences in
patients with acute
cerebral ischemia
25
Wardlaw JM, et Study type: Decision Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Cost and QALYs • Immediate CT scanning is the
al.70 tree representing Data were obtained most cost-effective strategy
2004 acute stroke care from many sources Results: • For the majority of acute stroke
15459431 pathways populated including systematic • The most cost-effective strategy was “scan all immediately” patients, increasing independent
with data from reviews of: (1) the (£9 993 676 and 1982.4 QALYs) survival by correct early diagnosis,
multiple sources; accuracy of clinical • The least cost-effective was “scan patients on ensuring appropriate subsequent
determined the effect diagnosis of stroke; anticoagulants and those in a life-threatening condition treatment and management
of diagnostic (2) CT scan immediately and the rest within 14 d” (£12 592 666 and decisions, reduced costs of stroke
information from CT diagnosis (stroke vs. 1931.8 QALYs) and increased QALYs
scanning on not stroke and infarct • “Scan no patients” reduced QALYs (1904.2) and increased
functional outcome, from hemorrhage); cost (£10 544 000)
length of stay, costs, (3) antithrombotic
and quality of life drugs for primary
during 5 y for 13 treatment and
alternative CT secondary prevention
strategies (varying of ischemic stroke
proportions and types and after intracranial
of patients and hemorrhage; and (4)
rapidity of scanning) thrombolysis
Size: The primary Exclusion criteria:

analysis was Subarachnoid
conducted for a hemorrhage
cohort of 1000
patients aged 70–74
y and repeated for
1000 patients aged
60–64 y and 80–84 y
in teaching urban and
rural general
hospitals
Abbreviations: CT indicates computed tomography; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; h, hour; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; N/A, not available; QALY, quality-adjusted life
year; TIA, transient ischemic attack; and y, year.
Literature search topics: Cost-effectiveness of CT/MRI in acute stroke
26
Table XVI. Observational Studies of 2016 Door-to-Computed Tomography Times
Year Published
Aghaebrahim A, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Door-to-CT Median 11-min door-to-CT achieved
et al.74 Prospective, single- Patients with anterior
2017 center, observational circulation LVO with Results:
27048957 pre- and post- baseline CT showing • Pre-optimization, median 14 min (IQR, 6–28)
workflow optimization an ASPECTS of ≥6 • Post-optimization, median 11 min (IQR, 5–22)
or mismatch between
Size: N=286 infarct and
threatened but viable
brain who were
treated with
endovascular therapy
April 2012 to July
2014
Exclusion criteria:
No time of onset
exclusion
Lees KR, et al.73 Study type: Pooled Inclusion criteria: 2 end point: Time to treatment interaction with benefit The earlier the treatment with IV
2016 analysis of 9 RCTs of Various by trial alteplase, the greater the benefit
27507856 IV alteplase Results: Treatment initiation within 4.5 h was associated
Exclusion criteria: with statistically significant net benefit, 55 patients (95% CI,
Size: N=6756 Various by trial 13–91) per 1000 treated were better with
alteplase (P=0.004), with earlier treatment resulting in bigger
proportional benefits
Messe SR, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Door-to-image time Median 20-min door-to-image
al.75 Multicenter, Within 2 h of onset of achieved
2016 retrospective analysis ischemic stroke Results:
27629092 of Get With the • Received alteplase, median 20 min (IQR, 13–30)
Guidelines database Exclusion criteria: • Did not receive alteplase, median 40 min (IQR, 23–65)
(2003–2011) Documented
contraindication to
Size: N=61,698 thrombolysis
Rai AT, et al.348 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: ER to CT Mean 26-min door-to-CT achieved
2016 Prospective, single- Endovascular
26863106 center, observational Results:
27
pre- and post- patients presenting to Pre-optimization, mean 42±8 min; post-optimization, mean
workflow optimization ER 26±13 min (mean±SD)
Size: N=94 Exclusion criteria:

In-house patients
undergoing an
intervention for
stroke, patients
undergoing another
procedure in the
hospital with a stroke
and patients treated
with unknown
symptom onset
Saver JL, et al.32 Study type: Pooled Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Degree of disability at 3 mo The earlier the treatment with
2016 analysis of 5 RCTs of Various by trial mechanical thrombectomy, the
27673305 endovascular Results: The degree of treatment benefit declined with greater the benefit
treatment with Exclusion criteria: longer times from symptom onset to expected arterial
second-generation Various by trial puncture
devices
Size: N=1287
Zaidi SF, et al.76 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Arrival-to-CT Mean 8.5 min door-to-CT achieved
2016 Prospective, All Stroke Alert and
27342763 observational before RACE alert patients Results:
and after EMS January 1–December • Pre-intervention, median 15 min (IQR, 7–17)
training and ED 31, 2015 • Post-intervention, median 8.5 min (IQR, 6–15)
protocols in two
hospitals Exclusion criteria:
>12 h since onset
Size: N=251
Abbreviations: ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; ED, emergency department; EMS, emergency
medical services; ER, emergency room; h, hours; min, minutes; IQR, interquartile range; IV, intravenous; LVO, large vessel occlusion; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; RCT,
randomized clinical trial; and SD, standard deviation.
Literature search topic: Door-to-imaging times achievable
28
Table XVII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Interaction of Baseline Imaging Computed Tomography Hypodensity with Treatment Effect for
Intravenous Alteplase
Year Published
Charidimou A, Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS>2 at 90 d or Oxford Handicap Score at Statistically significantly lower risk of
et al.82 analysis of baseline For individual trials 6 mo poor outcome with IV alteplase for
2016 CT in NINDS rt-PA, patients with leukoaraiosis (OR:
27491738 ECASS I & II, IST-3 Exclusion criteria: Results: Statistically significantly lower risk of poor outcome 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60–0.95) in pooled
For individual trials with IV alteplase for patients with leukoaraiosis (OR, 0.75; analysis of NINDS rt-PA, ECASS I
Size: N=2234 95% CI, 0.60–0.95) & II, and IST-3
IST-3 Study type: Pooled Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Good functional outcome No statistically significant subgroup
IST-3 analysis of baseline For individual trials difference (P=0.94) for IV alteplase
Collaborative imaging in NINDS rt- Results: No statistically significant subgroup difference effect on functional outcome for
Group77 PA, ECASS II, Exclusion criteria: (P=0.94) for IV alteplase effect on functional outcome for ASPECTS subgroups (0–7 vs. 8–
2015 PROACT II, IST-3 For individual trials ASPECTS subgroups (0–7 vs. 8–10) 10) in pooled analysis of NINDS rt-
25819484 PA, ECASS II, PROACT II, IST-3
Size: N=4567
IST-3 Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Oxford Handicap Score at 6 mo No statistically significant
IST-3 of baseline CT or IST-3 interactions (all P>0.20) between
Collaborative MRI in IST-3 Results: No statistically significant interactions (all P>0.20) baseline imaging  effect of IV
Group77 Exclusion criteria: for IV alteplase with function outcome for: alteplase in IST-3
2015 Size: N=3017 ISt-3 • Acute ischemic change
25819484 • Swelling
• Tissue attenuation change
• Lesion size
• Old lesions
• Leukoaraiosis
NINDS rt-PA Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS 0–1 at 90 d No statistically significant interaction
Demchuk AM, et of baseline CT in NINDS rt-PA (P=0.528) between baseline Van
al.78 NINDS rt-PA Trial Results: Van Swieten Score for leukoaraiosis  IV alteplase Swieten Score for leukoaraiosis 
2008 Exclusion criteria: interaction: P=0.528 effect of IV alteplase in NINDS rt-PA
18560214 Size: N=788 NINDS rt-PA Trial
ECASS II Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at 90 d No statistically significant interaction
Dzialowski I, et of baseline CT in ECASS II (P=0.29) between baseline
al.79 ECASS II Results: ASPECTS  IV alteplase interaction: P=0.29
29
2006 Exclusion criteria: ASPECTS  effect of IV alteplase in
16497977 Size: N=603 ECASS II ECASS II
NINDS rt-PA Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Favorable outcome at 3 mo No evidence of treatment effect
Demchuk AM, et of baseline CT in NINDS rt-PA modification by the baseline
al.80 NINDS rt-PA Trial Results: ASPECTS  IV alteplase interaction: "no ASPECTS value in the NINDS rt-PA
2005 Exclusion criteria: evidence" Stroke Study
16166579 Size: N=616 NINDS rt-PA
NINDS rt-PA Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Favorable outcome at 3 mo No statistically significant interaction
Patel SC, et al.81 of baseline CT in NINDS rt-PA (P=0.52) between baseline CT early
2001 NINDS rt-PA Trial Results: Adjusted early ischemic change  IV alteplase ischemic change  effect of IV
11735758 Exclusion criteria: interaction, P=0.52 alteplase in NINDS rt-PA Trial
Size: N=616 NINDS rt-PA
Abbreviations: ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; IV, intravenous; MRI, magnetic resonance
imaging; N/A, not available; NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders; and OR, odds ratio.
Literature search topic: CT attenuation IV alteplase interaction; CT attenuation IAT interaction
Table XVIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Interaction of Baseline Computed Tomography Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign with
Treatment Effect for Intravenous Alteplase
Year Published
IST-3 Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Oxford Handicap Score at 6 mo No statistically significant interaction
Mair G, et al.84 of baseline CT in IST-3 P=0.167) between baseline HMCAS
2016 IST3 Results: No significant interaction with benefit of alteplase,  effect of IV alteplase in IST-3 Trial
26658907 Exclusion criteria: P=0.167
Size: N=2961 IST-3
IST-3 Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Oxford Handicap Score at 6 mo No statistically significant interaction
IST of baseline imaging IST-3 (P=0.517) between baseline
Collaborative in IST3 Results: No interaction between hyperattenuated arteries hyperattenuated artery  effect of IV
Group77 Exclusion criteria: and IV alteplase for function outcome (P=0.517) alteplase in IST-3 Trial
2015 Size: N=3017 IST-3
25819484
NINDS rt-PA Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS 0–1, NIHSS 0–1, Barthel Index ≥95, No statistically significant interaction
Qureshi AI, et of baseline CT in NINDS rt-PA GOS 0–1, death at 90 days between baseline HMCAS  effect
al.83 NINDS rt-PA of IV alteplase in NINDS rt-PA Trial
2006 Exclusion criteria: (P>0.30)
16636232 Size: N=616 NINDS rt-PA
30
Results: No statistically significant HMCAS  treatment
interaction for any of the four clinical scales or death (all
P>0.30)
Abbreviations: CT indicates computed tomography; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale; HMCAS, hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign; IV, intravenous; NIHSS, National Institutes
of Health Stroke Scale; and NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders.
Literature search: CT attenuation IV alteplase interaction; Hyperdense MCA IV alteplase interaction
31
Table XIX. Observational Studies of Interaction of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebral Microbleeds with Symptomatic
Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Alteplase
Year Published
META- Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1) 1 end point: sICH sICH statistically significantly more
MICROBLEEDS Systematic review Defined and common in those with CMBs (OR,
Charidimou A, et and analysis of 8 assessed sICH risk Results: 2.18; 95% CI, 1.12–4.22) but no
al.85 studies or 3- to 6-month • sICH with CMBs: 6.1% (38/624) vs. sICH w/o CMBs: 4.4% more common than in NINDS rt-PA
2016 functional outcome in (87/1977), OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.12–4.22 Trial
27629086 Size: N=2601 patients with acute
ischemic stroke
treated with IV
alteplase
thrombolysis and (2)
quantified this risk in
relation to the
presence of CMBs
detected on
pretreatment MRI
scans
Exclusion criteria
Studies of patients
treated with
endovascular
therapies were only
included in the post
hoc subanalysis; in
cases of multiple
publications from the
same or overlapping
cohorts, only the
report with the largest
sample size was
used in the analysis
Tsivgoulis G, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH • sICH statistically significantly more
al.86 Systematic review Studies of incidence common in those with CMBs (OR:
32
2016 and analysis of 9 of sICH after IV Results: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.21–4.61), but no
27088650 studies alteplase in patients • sICH with CMBs: 6.5% (38/581) vs. sICH w/o CMBs: 4.4% more common than in NINDS rt-PA
with and without (87/1898), OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.21–4.61) Trial
Size: N=2479 cerebral microbleeds • sICH with 1–10 CMBs, 6.1% (21/343) vs. sICH with >10 • sICH with >10 CMB 40% but
on pre-Rx MRI CMBs, 40% (6/15), OR, 7.01; 95% CI, 3.20–15.38 occurred only in 15/1808 (0.8%)
Exclusion criteria:
IST-3
NINDS rt-PA Study type: Inclusion criteria: 2 end point: sICH withni 36 h • sICH 6.4% vs. 0.6%, but still
Study Randomized, double- Acute ischemic overall clinical benefit at 3 mo
NINDS rt-PA blinded controlled stroke with treatment Results:
Study Group87 trial possible within 3 h of • sICH with alteplase 6.4%
1995 onset • sICH w/o alteplase 0.6%
7477192 Size: N=624
Exclusion criteria:
NINDS rt-PA
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; CMB, cerebral microbleed; h, hours; IV, intravenous; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NINDS, National Institute of Neurological
Disorders; OR, odds ratio; and Rx, treatment; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; and w/o, without.
Literature search topic: Hyperdense MCA IV alteplase interaction II; Interaction of baseline MRI microbleeds with IV alteplase
Table XX. Randomized Clinical Trials of Intravenous Thrombolytics Employing Multimodal Imaging
Comparator
(# patients)
DIAS 3 Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at • SAEs: N/A No benefit, no
Albers GW, et and efficacy of criteria: AIS 3– desmoteplase day 90: desmoteplase desmoteplase safety concerns
al.168 desmoteplase between 3 9 h, 18-85, 90 mcg/kg 51%, placebo 50%; 27%, placebo
2015 h and 9 h after symptom NIHSS 4–24, (n=247) (adjusted OR, 1.20; 95% 29%
25937443 onset in patients with occlusion or CI, 0.79–1.81; P=0.40) • sICH 3% vs.
occlusion or high-grade stenosis of M1, Comparator: 2%
stenosis in major cerebral M2, ACA, PCA; Placebo (n=245) Safety end point: SAEs,
arteries mRS 0–1 sICH
Study type: Phase III Exclusion

RCT criteria: Pre-
stroke mRS >1,
Size: N=492 standard criteria
33
ATTEST Aim: Assess the efficacy Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point: Penumbral Recanalization: N/A Not designed to
Huang X, et al.89 and safety of criteria: AIS tenecteplase salvage: alteplase 68% alteplase 74%, prove imaging
2015 tenecteplase vs. alteplase <4.5 h; baseline 0.25 mg/kg (23%), tenecteplase 68% tenecteplase selection
25726502 within 4.5 h of stroke CT, CTP, CTA (n=52) (28%), P=0.81 66%, P=0.38 hypothesis; no
onset in a population not difference in
selected on the basis of Exclusion Comparator: IV Safety end point: sICH: neurologic or
advanced criteria: alteplase 0.9 tenecteplase 6%, radiologic
neuroimaging Standard criteria mg/kg (n=52) alteplase 8%, P=0.59 outcomes
Study type: Phase II RCT
Size: N=104
IST III Aim: To determine if CT Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point: Oxford N/A N/A No evidence
Wardlaw JM, et or MR perfusion or criteria: AIS, alteplase 0.9 Handicap Score 0–2 at 6 that imaging
al.349 angiography (CTP/CTA; age≥18 y, <6 h mg/kg (n=NR) mo biomarkers of
2014 MRP/MRA) imaging to treatment mismatch or
25642519 provide important Comparator: Safety end point: vessel occlusion
information to guide the Exclusion Standard care • Hemorrhage modified
use of rt-PA up to 6 h after criteria: (NR) • Neither perfusion lesion alteplase
a stroke Standard size nor mismatch treatment
alteplase modified rt-PA effect on effects
Study type: exclusions hemorrhage or 6-month
Observational study of outcome.
IST-3 • rt-PA effects did not
differ between patients
Size: N=151 with with angiographic
perfusion imaging, N=423 occlusion compared with
with vessel imaging those without
Parsons M, et Aim: To compare IV Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point: Percent of N/A N/A Imaging
al.91 tenecteplase vs. IV criteria: AIS <6 tenecteplase 0.1 perfusion lesion selection used
2012 alteplase enhanced by h, CTA vessel mg/kg (n=25); IV reperfused at 24 h: to identify
22435369 imaging selection occlusion tenecteplase alteplase 55.4±38.7, patients most
0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase 79.3±28.8, likely to benefit;
Study type: Phase IIB Exclusion (n=25) P=0.004; not designed to
RCT criteria: extent of clinical prove selection
Standard Comparator: IV improvement (NIHSS) at hypothesis
Size: N=75 alteplase alteplase 0.9 24 h: alteplase 3.0±6.3,
exclusions mg/kg (n=25) tenecteplase 8.0±5.5,
P<0.001
34
Safety end point:
Parenchymal hematoma:
4% tenecteplase, 16%
alteplase (P=0.09)
DIAS 2 Aim: Investigate further Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Day 90 N/A N/A No benefit vs.
Hacke W, et the clinical efficacy and criteria: AIS 3– Desmoteplase good outcome placebo; not
al.92 safety of desmoteplase in 9 h, 18-85, 90 mcg/kg (composite): 46% placebo, designed to
2009 patients with AIS who NIHSS 4-24, (n=57); 47% 90 mcg/kg, 36% 125 prove imaging
19097942 have tissue at risk, as 20% diffusion- desmoteplase mcg/kg selection
assessed by MR PI–DWI perfusion 125 mcg/kg hypothesis
or perfusion CT mismatch (CT or (n=66) Safety end point: ICH:
MRI) 3.5% 90 mcg/kg
Study type: Phase III Comparator: desmoteplase, 4.5% 125
RCT Exclusion Placebo (n=63) mcg/kg desmoteplase, 0%
criteria: Pre- placebo
Size: N=193 stroke mRS>1,
standard criteria,
ICA occlusion
EPITHET Aim: Compare Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point: Infarct • Reperfusion Underpowered Failed to
Davis SM, et reperfusion and infarct criteria: AIS 3– alteplase 0.9 growth in mismatch greater in for no mismatch demonstrate
al.93 growth measures in 6 h, baseline mg/kg (n=52) patients (geometric alteplase vs. group significantly
2008 patients treated with MRI, age≥18 y, mean): alteplase 1.24; placebo better outcomes
18296121 alteplase vs. placebo 3-6 NIHSS>4, Comparator: placebo 1.78; ratio 0.69; (P=0.001) and in mismatch
h from onset MRS≤2 Placebo (n=49) 95% CI, 0.38–1.28; associated with treated group
P=0.239 better functional vs. other groups
Study type: Phase II RCT Exclusion outcome
criteria: Inability Safety end point: Not (P=0.01)
Size: N=101 to undergo MRI, reported • Infarct growth
standard in mismatch
alteplase criteria patients
(geometric
mean:
reperfusion
0.79; no
reperfusion
2.25; ratio 0.35;
95% CI, 0.20–
0.63; P=0.001
35
• Good
neurologic
outcome in
mismatch
patients:
reperfusion
73%, no
reperfusion
27%, P<0.0001
DEDAS Aim: Evaluate safety and Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: N/A N/A Phase II study
Furlan AJ, et efficacy of IV criteria: AIS 3– Desmoteplase • Reperfusion 4–8 h: not powered for
al.94 desmoteplase in patients 9 h, 18–85 y, 90 mcg/kg 37.5% placebo, 18.2% 90 clinical end
2006 with perfusion/diffusion NIHSS 4–20, (N=14); mcg/kg, 53.3% 125 points; not
16574922 mismatch on MRI 3 to 9 h 20% diffusion- desmoteplase mcg/kg designed to
after onset of acute perfusion 125 mcg/kg • Good outcome prove
ischemic stroke mismatch (N=15) (composite) at day 90: penumbral
25%, 28.6%, 60%; selection
Study type: Dose Exclusion Comparator: desmoteplase overall vs. hypothesis
escalation Phase II RCT criteria: Placebo (N=8) placebo (P=0.022)
Standard
Size: N=37 criteria; ICA Safety end point: sICH:
occlusion none
DIAS Aim: Evaluate safety and Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: N/A Part I: halted Phase II study
Hacke W, et efficacy of IV criteria: AIS 3– Part 1: • Reperfusion 4–8 h: up to due to sICH not powered for
al.95 desmoteplase in patients 9 h, 18–85 y, desmoteplase 71.4% (P=0.0012) in clinical end
2005 with perfusion/diffusion NIHSS 4–20, 25 mg (n=17), desmoteplase vs. 19.2% points; not
15569863 mismatch on MRI 3 to 9 h 20% diffusion- 37.5 mg (n=13), placebo designed to
after onset of acute perfusion 50 mg (n=13); • Good outcome prove
ischemic stroke mismatch Part 2: 62.5 (composite) at day 90: penumbral
mcg/kg (n=15), Part 2: 22.2% placebo, selection
Study type: Dose Exclusion 90 mcg/kg 13.3%–60% hypothesis
escalation Phase II RCT criteria: (n=15), 125 desmoteplase
Prestroke mRS mcg/kg (n=15)
Size: N=104 of >1, standard Safety end point: sICH;
criteria Comparator: Part I: halted due to sICH;
Placebo Part 1: part 2: 0% placebo, 2.2%
(n=16); Part 2 desmoteplase
(n=11)
Abbreviations: ACA indicates anterior cerebral artery; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; CTA, computed tomography angiography; CTP,
computed tomography perfusion; h, hours; ICA, internal carotid artery; IV, intravenous; M1, middle cerebral artery segment 1; M2, middle cerebral artery segment 2; MRI, magnetic
36
resonance imaging; MR PI-DWI, magnetic resonance perfusion imaging–diffusion-weighted imaging; MRP/MRA, magnetic resonance perfusion/magnetic resonance angiography; mRS,
modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; RCT, randomized clinical
trial; SAEs, serious adverse events; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; and y, years.
Literature search topic: Multimodal imaging
Table XXI. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Intravenous Thrombolytics Employing Multimodal Imaging
Year Published
DEFUSE Study type: Single- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: FCR • Single-arm study not designed to
Albers GW, et arm study AIS 3–6 h, age ≥18 determine if MRI profiles can identify
al.88 y, NIHSS>5, MRS≤2, Results: clinical responders treated with IV
2006 Size: N=74 baseline MRI • FCR in Mismatch with Reperfusion (n=18): 56% (34–75) alteplase 3–6 h from onset
17066483 • FCR in Mismatch without Reperfusion: (n=16): 19% (7–43) • Single-arm study not designed to
Exclusion criteria: • FCR in TM with Reperfusion (n=15): 67% (42-84) prove penumbral selection
Prestroke mRS>2 • TM without Reperfusion (n=16): 19% (7-43) hypothesis
Abbreviations: AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; FCR, favorable clinical response; IV, intravenous; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified
Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TM, target mismatch; and y, years
Literature search topic: Multimodal imaging
Table XXII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Creatinine Testing Prior to Contrast Computed Tomography
Year Published
Ehrlich ME, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Acute kidney injury and time to IV alteplase, CTA was safe, did not delay IV
al.96 Retrospective Acute ischemic mean creatinine alteplase, and had added clinical
2016 observational study stroke patients value
27364528 comparing CTA vs. Results: Mean creatinine at 24–48 h: CTA, 1.06; no CTA,
Size: N=289 no CTA 1.40 (P=0.059); acute kidney injury in 5/157 with CTA, 7/132
without CTA (P=0.422)
Exclusion criteria:
Inpatient acute stroke
alerts; missing 24–48
h creatinine value
Aulicky P, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Creatinine increase ≥ 44 micromol/l Contrast agents given for CTA,
al.97 Retrospective Acute ischemic performed in patients with normal
2010 stroke patients Results: 3% in CTA group vs. 4% in control (P=0.50) and abnormal creatinine levels,
37
19965846 observational study treated with IV neither caused renal injury nor
with historical control alteplase undergoing interfered with the safety of
CTA vs. control alteplase treatment
Size: N=241 group treated with IV
alteplase without
CTA
Exclusion criteria:
Missing creatinine
levels, or no CTA
performed
Lima FO, et al.98 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 25% increase in creatinine Administration of a contrast-
2010 Prospective Acute ischemic enhanced CT protocol involving
20044502 observational study stroke patients, non- Results: 5% in exposed vs. 10% in non-exposed (P=0.003); CTA/CTP and conventional
with retrospective contrast vs. contrast no difference in patients with conventional angiography angiography in selected patients
controls. CT exposure following CTA/CTP vs. CTA/CTP alone (5% vs. 5%, P=0.7) does not appear to increase the
incidence of contrast-induced
Size: N=918 Exclusion criteria: nephropathy
Dialysis-dependent
patients
Hopyan JJ, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Contrast-induced nephropathy within 72 h, Prompt CTA/CTP imaging of acute
al.99 Retrospective Acute stroke patients chronic kidney disease stroke, if indicated, need not be
2008 observational study undergoing contrast delayed in those with no history of
18719035 CT Results: 2.9% developed contrast-induced nephropathy, 0% renal impairment.
Size: N=198 chronic kidney disease
Exclusion criteria:
GFR<30 ml/min
Krol AL, et al.100 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Radiocontrast nephropathy Low incidence of radiocontrast
2007 Retrospective Acute ischemic nephropathy in acute stroke patients
17600231 observational study stroke patients Results: 3% developed radiocontrast nephropathy undergoing emergency CTA
undergoing CTA
Size: N=224 within 24 h of onset
Exclusion criteria:
Short-term follow-up
creatinine not
available
Josephson SA, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Rise in creatinine ≥0.5 Contrast nephropathy incidence is
et al.101 Retrospective Patients undergoing low in neurovascular patients
2005 observational study
38
15911820 stroke protocol CTA Results: 3.7% without hemodialysis dependency had
Size: N=1075 and CTP imaging creatinine increase; 0.37% had contrast nephropathy
Exclusion criteria:
No pre- or post-study
creatinine
Abbreviations: CTA indicates computed tomography angiography; CT, computed tomography; CTP, computed tomography perfusion; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; h, hours;
IV, intravenous; and min, minutes.
Literature search topics: Vessel and collateral status imaging
Table XXIII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Endovascular Therapy

Comparator
(# patients)
DEFUSE 3 Aim: to test the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: 2 End Point •Stopped early •Expands
Albers GW et hypothesis that patients criteria: Mechanical mRS shift analysis at 90 d mRS 0-2 at 90 at first interim criteria to
al.109 who were likely to have Age 18-90 thrombectomy unadjusted OR 2.77; 95% d: analysis, may identify patients
2018 salvageable ischemic years; NIHSSS with FDA- CI, 1.63-4.70; P=0.0002 44.6% % vs overestimate who benefit from
brain tissue identified on ≥ 6; femoral approved device 16.7%, treatment effect mechanical
perfusion imaging and puncture within (n=92) Safety end point: Relative risk thrombectomy
who undergo 6 -16 hours of Mortality at 90 d: 2.67; 95% CI after 6 hours
endovascular therapy 6-16 stroke onset/last Comparator: 14% vs 26%; P=0.053 1.60-4.48; P<
hours after last known to known well; pre- Medical 0.0001
have been well will have morbid management sICH: 6.5% vs 4.4%;
better functional outcomes mRS2≤2; ICA or according to P=0.75 Subgroup
compared to subjects M1 occlusion by 2013 AHA/ASA analysis by
treated with standard MRA or guidelines DAWN
medical therapy. CTA AND (n=90) eligibility
Target Mismatch
Study type: multi-center, Profile on CT DAWN eligible
prospective, open-label, perfusion or MRI (n=112)
blinded end-point RCT (ischemic core OR 2.66; 95%
volume is <70 CI, 1.36-5.23
Size: N=182 ml, mismatch
ratio is >1.8 and
[Stopped early for efficacy mismatch Dawn ineligible
at first interim analysis] (n=70)
39
volume is >15 OR 2.96; 95%
ml) CI, 1.26-6.97
Exclusion
criteria: Many,
similar to IV
alteplase
exclusions,
including BP >
185/110; treated
with tPA >4.5
hours after time
last known well;
treated with tPA
3-4.5 hours after
last known well
AND any of the
following: age
>80, current
anticoagulant
use, history of
diabetes AND
prior stroke,
NIHSS >25;
ASPECT score
<6 on non-
contrast CT;
Significant mass
effect with
midline shift;
acute
symptomatic
arterial
occlusions in
more than one
vascular territory
40
DAWN Aim: To demonstrate Inclusion Intervention: Co-1 end points: Subgroups by •Stopped early •The first RCT
Nogueira RG, et superior functional criteria: Mechanical 90-day disability assessed time: at first interim evidence of a
al.108 outcomes at 90 days with Age 18; thrombectomy by utility weighted mRS: 90-day mRS 0-2 analysis, may group
2017 failed or with specified 5.5 +/- 3.8 vs 3.4 +/- 3.1, overestimate identifiable by
stent retriever plus
29129157 contraindicated stent retriever Adjusted Difference 2.0; • 6-12 hrs treatment effect clinical and
medical management (n=107)
for IV t-PA; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0, posterior 55.1% vs imaging criteria
compared to medical NIHSS ≥10; probability of superiority 20.0%, posterior •Mostly M1 who derive
management alone in Pre-stroke -mRS Comparator: >0.999 probability of occlusions: benefit from
selected patients treated 0-1; Time last Medical superiority >0.99 M1 78%/78% mechanical
six to 24 hours after last seen well to management mRS 0-2 at 90 d: ICA 21%/19% thrombectomy
seen well Randomization: according to 49% vs 13%, • 12-24 hrs M2 2%/3% after 6 hours
6-24h; <1/3 respective Adjusted Difference 33%, 43.1% vs 7.4%,
MCA territory by national 95% CI, 21%-44%, posterior
Study type: multi-center, CT or MRI; ICA- guidelines posterior probability of probability of •Few strokes
prospective, open-label, T and/or MCA- (n=99) superiority >0.999 superiority >0.99 with witnessed
blinded end-point RCT M1 occlusion;- onset:
Clinical Imaging Safety end point: Wake up
Size: N=206 Mismatch: Mortality at 90 d: 63%/47%
A. 80 y/o, 19% vs 18%, P=1.00 Unwitnesed
[Stopped early for efficacy NIHSS 10 + 27%/38%
at first planned interim core <21 mL sICH: 6% vs 3%, P=0.50 Witnessed
analysis] B. <80 y/o, 10%/14%
NIHSS 10 +
core <31 mL
C. < 80 y/o,
NIHSS 20 +
core <51 mL
Exclusion
criteria: Many,
similar to IV
alteplase
exclusions,
including BP >
185/110
41
ASTER Aim: To compare efficacy • Major Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: proportion •mRS 0-2 at 90 •Primary end •Among
Lapergue B et and adverse events using Criteria: Age > first-line contact of patients with mTICI 2b- days, point was patients with
al.178 the contact aspiration 18 years with no aspiration (n = 3 at the end of all technical ischemic stroke
technique vs upper age limit; 192) endovascular procedures: •Contact (successful in the anterior
28763550 the standard stent Cerebral aspiration revasculari- circulation
retriever technique as a infarction in the Comparator: Contact aspiration 85.4% 82/181 (45.3%) zation after all undergoing
first-line endovascular anterior first-line stent (n=164) vs stent retriever vs stent retriever interventions);tri thrombectomy,
treatment among patients circulation; retriever (n = 83.1% (n=157) (odds 91/182 (50.0%); al was first-line
with acute ischemic stroke Occlusion of the 189) ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.68- OR 0.83 (95% not powered to thrombectomy
and large vessel anterior 2.10; P=.53; difference, CI 0.54-1.26) P= detect a smaller with contact
occlusion. circulation 2.4%; 95% CI, −5.4%- 0.38 yet potentially aspiration
proven by CT 9.7%). clinically compared with
Study Type: multi-center, angiography or •Difference important stent retriever
open-label, blinded end- MR Safety end point: −4.6% (95% CI, difference did not result in
point RCT angiography; Symptomatic intracranial −14.7% to 6.1%) between groups. an increased
• With or without hemorrhage at 24 h: successful
Size: N=381 previous revasculari-
Intravenous Contact aspiration 10/188 •Given its zation rate
thrombolysis vs (5.3%) vs stent superiority at the end of the
• Start of retriever 12/188 (6.5%) design procedure.
thrombectomy to detect a 15%
procedure within difference in the
6 hours of primary end
symptoms point, this trial
onset. was not
Major designed to
Exclusion establish
Criteria: noninferiority.
• Occlusion of the
cervical carotid
artery; mRS > 3
prior to stroke
THRACE Aim: To determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at • TICI 2b/3: Study halted For patients with
Bracard S, et whether mechanical criteria: Age ET (n=204) 90 d: 53% vs. 42%, 69% early after MR acute ischemic
al.106 thrombectomy in addition 18–80 y; IV P=0.028 • Median time to CLEAN results stroke due to
2016 to IV thrombolysis alteplase <4 h; Comparator: reperfusion: 250 reported; 3 mo anterior
27567239 improves clinical outcome ET <5 h; NIHSS Standard care - Safety end point: mins (IQR 210– mRS non- circulation,
10–25; ICA, M1, 290) blinded; long proximal large
42
in patients with acute superior 1/3 IV alteplase • Death: 12% vs. 13%, duration of trial vessel occlusion
ischemic stroke. basilar (n=208) P=0.7 (5 y) with not selected on
• sICH: 2% vs. 2%, subsequent the basis of
Study type: RCT Exclusion P=0.71 protocol additional
criteria: evolution imaging criteria
Size: N=414 (halted Cervical ICA endovascular
prematurely) occlusion, therapy with
subocclusive medical
stenosis, BP > management
185/110 and showed benefit
many more over medical
therapy alone
THERAPY Aim: To determine if Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at • TICI 2b/3: • Study halted First trial
Mocco J, et benefit from criteria: Age Aspiration 90 d: 38% vs. 30%, 70% early after MR evaluating
al.350 thrombectomy is exclusive ≥18 y, ICA or thrombectomy + P=0.52 • Trend of CLEAN results primary
2016 to stent retrievers or also MCA LVO; IV alteplase benefit towards reported aspiration
27486173 includes primary NIHSS ≥8, mRS (n=55) Safety end point: endovascular • Not powered thrombectomy
aspiration 0–1, CTA • Death: 12% vs. 23.9%, therapy in pre- to meet primary vs. medical
thrombus ≥8 Comparator: P=0.18 specified end point management in
Study type: RCT mm on thin Standard care - • sICH: 9.3% vs. 9.7%, secondary • Stent retriever the treatment of
section CT IV alteplase P=1.0 outcomes rescue utilized in anterior
Size: N=108 (halted (n=53) 13% of patients circulation acute
prematurely) Exclusion ischemic stroke
criteria: from large
Cervical ICA vessel occlusion
stenosis, 1/3 of
MCA territory
hypodensity,
and mRS >1
pre-stroke, and
many more
MR CLEAN Aim: To determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS shift • TICI 2b/3: • Relatively low • First
Berkhemer OA, whether IAT plus usual criteria: Age>18 ET (n=233) analysis at 90 d, adjusted 59% reperfusion randomized trial
et al.107 care would be more y, 6 h to IAT, OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.21– • Median time to rates to demonstrate
2015 effective than usual care anterior Comparator: 2.3; mRS of 0–2 in 32.6% reperfusion: 332 • Low benefit of
25517348 alone in patients with a circulation LVO, Standard care - vs. 19.1% min (IQR, 279– percentage of current ET with
proximal arterial occlusion NIHSS>2 IV alteplase 394) patients with medical
in the anterior cerebral (n=267) Safety end point: functional management
circulation that could be Exclusion • Death: 21% vs. 22% neurological over medical
treated intraarterially criteria: (P=0.75) outcome management
43
within 6 h after symptom Exclusion of ICA • sICH: 7.7% vs. 6.4% alone for
onset dissection or (P=0.24) anterior
occlusion at circulation acute
Study type: RCT discretion of ischemic stroke
treating • Broad
Size: N=500 physician, BP > inclusion criteria
185/110, and
many more
EXTEND-IA Aim: To test whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: • TICI 2b/3: • Limited ability Substantial
Campbell BC, et more advanced imaging criteria: Age ET (n=35) • Median reperfusion at 86% to generalize benefit to
al.105 selection, recently ≥18 y, 6 h to 24 h: 100% vs. 37%, • Median time to results given endovascular
2015 developed devices, and groin, complete Comparator: adjusted OR, 4.7 (95% CI, reperfusion: 248 homogenous therapy in
25671797 earlier intervention in 8 h, LVO Standard care - 2.5–9) min (IQR, 204– study population patients with
improve outcomes anterior IV alteplase • Decrease in NIHSS of 8 277) with narrow anterior
circulation, mRS (n=35) points or NIHSS 0–1 at 3 selection circulation large
Study type: RCT 0–1, mismatch d: 80% vs. 37%, adjusted parameters, vessel occlusion
on automated OR, 6 (95% CI, 2–18) provision of care ischemic stroke,
Size: N=70 (halted perfusion at tertiary care small ischemic
prematurely) imaging (Tmax Safety end point: facilities only cores
threshold 6 s, • Death: 9% vs. 20%, and early randomized
CBF threshold adjusted OR, 0.45 (95% timeframe after IV
30%) CI, 0.1–2.1) presentation and alteplase and
• sICH: 0 vs. 6% treatment treated <6 h
Exclusion • Study halted from onset of
criteria: Carotid early after MR symptoms
dissection, >1/3 CLEAN results
MCA reported
hypodensity, BP • Small patient
> 185/110, and numbers
many more
ESCAPE Aim: To test whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS shift • TICI 2b/3: • Screening logs • Emphasized
Goyal M, et patients with acute criteria: Age>18 ET (n=150) analysis at 90 d; adjusted 72% not required process
al.104 ischemic stroke, who were y, 12 h to OR, 3.1 (95% CI, 2–4.7) • Median time to • Small improvement to
2015 selected on the basis of randomization, Comparator: reperfusion: 241 numbers of maximize
25671798 results of CT and CTA, ICA/MCA LVO, Standard care ± Safety end point: min (IQR, 176– patients in 6- to treatment effect
would benefit from rapid NIHSS>5, IV alteplase • Death: 10.4% vs. 19%; 359) 12-h treatment in patients
endovascular treatment Barthel (n=165) adjusted rate ratio, 0.5 • Median time window selected based
involving contemporary score≥90, (95% CI, 0.3–0.8) CT to groin • Study halted on collateral
endovascular techniques ASPECTS>6, puncture: 51 min early after MR assessment of
CT collateral (IQR, 39–68) core and
44
Study type: RCT score good or • sICH: 3.6% vs. 2.7%; • Mortality: CLEAN penumbral
intermediate on adjusted rate ratio, 1.2 10.4% published tissue
Size: N=316 (halted multiphase CTA (95% CI, 0.3–4.6) endovascular • Only recent
prematurely) vs. 19% medical trial to show
Exclusion (P=0.04) mortality benefit
criteria: from
ASPECTS≤6, endovascular
and many more therapy
REVASCAT Aim: To assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS shift • TICI 2b/3: • Study halted For patients with
Jovin TG, et and efficacy of criteria: Age ET (n=103) analysis at 90 d (mRS 5 66% early after MR acute ischemic
al.102 thrombectomy for the 18–80 (85) y, 8 and 6 combined), adjusted • Median time to CLEAN results stroke due to
2015 treatment of acute h to groin, LVO Comparator: OR, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.05– reperfusion: 355 reported anterior
25882510 ischemic stroke in a trial ICA/M1, NIHSS Standard care - 2.8) min (IQR, 269– • Small circulation,
embedded within a ≥6, mRS 0–1 IV alteplase 430) numbers of proximal large
population-based acute (n=103) Safety end point: patients in 6- to vessel occlusion
ischemic stroke Exclusion • Death: 18% vs. 16%; 8-h treatment without large
reperfusion registry criteria: adjusted risk ratio, 1.2 window core on CT
ASPECTS<7 on (95% CI, 0.6–2.2) • Screening logs imaging and
Study type: RCT CT or <6 on • sICH: 2% vs. 2%; not available treated within 8
MRI, BP > adjusted risk ratio, 1.0 h of onset,
Size: N=206 (halted 185/110, and (95% CI, 0.1–7) endovascular
prematurely) many more therapy with
medical
management
showed benefit
over medical
therapy alone
SWIFT-PRIME Aim: To establish the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS shift • Functional • Limited ability Substantial
Saver JL, et efficacy and safety of criteria: Age ET (n=98) analysis at 90 d (mRS 5 independence at to generalize benefit to
al.103 rapid neurovascular 18–80 y, 6 h to and 6 combined), P<0.001 90 d: 60% results given endovascular
2015 thrombectomy with the groin puncture, Comparator: endovascular homogenous therapy in
25882376 stent retriever in ICA/M1 LVO, Standard care - Safety end point: vs. 35% medical study population patients with
conjunction with IV target mismatch IV alteplase • Death: 9% vs. 12%, (P<0.001) with narrow anterior
alteplase vs. IV alteplase profile on (n=98) adjusted rate ratio: 0.74 • TICI 2b/3: selection circulation LVO
alone in patients with imaging with (95% CI, 0.33–1.68) 88% parameters, ischemic stroke;
acute ischemic stroke RAPID or local • sICH: 0 vs. 3% • Median time to provision of care small ischemic
perfusion reperfusion: 332 at tertiary care cores
Study type: RCT software, NIHSS min (IQR, 279– facilities only randomized
8–29, mRS 0–1 394) and workflow after IV
and process alteplase and
45
Size: N=196 (halted Exclusion • Reperfusion at development as treated <6 h
prematurely) criteria: 24 h: 83% part of protocol from onset of
Inability to endovascular • Study halted symptoms
receive IV vs. 40% medical early after MR
alteplase, management CLEAN results
cervical (P<0.001) reported
dissection or • CT or MRI
complete mismatch for
occlusion selection of first
requiring 71 patients, then
stenting, CT only
ASPECTS<6, ASPECTS≥6 for
BP > 185/110 the next 125
and many more
IMS-III Aim: To test the approach Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at • TICI 2b/3: • Limited use of Trial halted due
Broderick JP, et of IV alteplase followed by criteria: Age18– IAT (n=434) 90 d: 40.8% vs. 38.7%; 41% newer- to futility; no
al.351 protocol-approved 82 y; 3 h to IV adjusted difference: 1.5% • Mean time to generation, outcome benefit
2013 endovascular treatment, alteplase; 5 h to Comparator: (95% CI, -6 to 9) reperfusion: more efficient to endovascular
23390923 as compared with ET; NIHSS≥10 Standard care - 325±52 min thrombectomy therapy with
standard IV alteplase or 8–9 with IV alteplase Safety end point: devices medical therapy
occlusion; mRS (n=222) • Death: 19.1% vs. 21.6% • Evolving over medical
Study type: RCT 0–2 (P=0.52) protocol during therapy alone
• sICH: 6.2% vs. 5.9% the duration of
Size: N=656 Exclusion (P=0.83) the study
criteria: Inability (addition of
to receive CTA, newer
alteplase, thrombectomy
hypodensity devices)
>1/3 of MCA • Reduced dose
territory, and of IV alteplase
many more (two-thirds) for
endovascular
patients
SYNTHESIS Aim: To investigate Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–1 at • No secondary • Limited use of No benefit to
Expansion whether endovascular criteria: Age ET with IA drug, 3 mo: 39% vs. 34.8%, outcome newer- endovascular
Ciccone A, et treatment, including the 18–80 y; 6 h to device, both adjusted OR, 0.71; 95% differences generation, therapy with
al.352 options of a mechanical ET, NIHSS≤25, (n=181) CI, 0.44–1.14 between groups more efficient medical
2013 device and intraarterial mRS 0–1 thrombectomy management
23387822 alteplase, is more effective Safety end point: devices over medical
than the currently therapy alone in
46
available treatment with IV Exclusion Comparator: IV • Death: 14.4% vs. 9.9% • No reperfusion a broadly
alteplase criteria: alteplase (P=0.22) rates reported selected patient
Hemorrhage on (n=181) • sICH: 6% vs. 6% • Vessel group with
Study type: RCT initial imaging (P=0.53) occlusion not a anterior
prerequisite for circulation acute
Size: N=362 treatment ischemic stroke
selection (3/181
endovascular
pts not treated
because of no
occlusion)
MR RESCUE Aim: To determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Mean mRS • TICI 2b/3: • No use of Trial showed no
Kidwell CS, et whether brain imaging can criteria: Anterior ET (n=64) at 90 d: 3.9 vs. 3.9, 27% newer- benefit from
al.353 identify patients who are circulation LVO P=0.99 • No difference generation, endovascular
2013 most likely to benefit from <8 h; favorable Comparator: in infarct growth more efficient therapy with
23394476 therapies for acute penumbral Standard care ± Safety end point: or final infarct thrombectomy medical
ischemic stroke and multimodal IV alteplase) • Death: 19% vs. 24% volume between devices management
whether endovascular imaging for (n=54) (P=0.75) groups • Long trial compared to
thrombectomy improves stratification • sICH: 5% vs. 4% • No benefit in duration (8 y) medical
clinical outcomes (favorable (P=0.24) favorable • Relative management
defined as core penumbra group delays to groin alone after
Study type: RCT <90 cc, or <70% puncture from treatment
of volume of imaging selection based
Size: N=118 tissue at risk) acquisition on penumbral
imaging
Exclusion
criteria:
Cervical artery
occlusion,
severe stenosis
or dissection,
inability to
process imaging
by study
software, and
many more
47
TREVO 2 Aim: To compare efficacy Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: TICI scale mRS 0–2 at 90 • Did not Demonstrated
Nogueira RG, et and safety of the Trevo criteria: Age Trevo 2/3: 86% vs. 60%; OR, d: 40% vs. 22%, compare to the superiority of
al.354 Retriever with its US FDA- 18–85 y, thrombectomy 4.22; 95% CI, 1.92–9.69 OR, 2.39; 95% aspiration Trevo stent
2012 cleared predecessor, the anterior (n=88) CI, 1.16–4.95 systems or other retrievers over
22932714 Merci Retriever circulation LVO Safety end point: stent retrievers early-generation
<8 h, NIHSS 8– Comparator: • Death 33% vs. 24% • No tandem devices for
Study type: RCT 29 Merci (P=0.18) carotid thrombectomy
thrombectomy • sICH 7% vs. 9% occlusions
Size: N=178 Exclusion (n=90) (P=0.78) included
criteria:
Exclusions for IV
alteplase,
excessive
tortuosity,
proximal cervical
stenosis, >1/3
MCA
hypodensity,
and many more
SWIFT Aim: To compare the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: TIMI scale mRS 0–2 at 90 • Did not First acute
Saver JL, et efficacy and safety of criteria: Age Solitaire 2/3 without sICH: 61% vs. d: 58% vs. 33%; compare to ischemic stroke
al.355 Solitaire with the standard, 22–85 y, thrombectomy 24%; OR, 4.87; 95% CI, OR, 2.78; 95% aspiration trial to
2012 predicate mechanical anterior (n=58) 2.14–11.1 CI, 1.25–6.22 systems or other randomize one
22932715 thrombectomy device, the circulation LVO stent retrievers endovascular
Merci Retrieval System <8 h, NIHSS 8– Comparator: Safety end point: • Halted early, technique for
30, ineligible Merci • Death: 17% vs. 38% which limited reperfusion
Study type: RCT for/failure to thrombectomy (P=0.02) precision of against another;
respond to IV (n=55) • sICH: 2% vs. 11% treatment effect demonstrated
Size: N=113 alteplase (P=0.057) estimates the superiority of
• No tandem Solitaire stent
Exclusion carotid retriever over
criteria: Infarct occlusions early generation
>1/3 of MCA included devices for
territory, and thrombectomy
many more
MELT Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at TIMI 2/3: 73% • Comparator Multicenter
Ogawa A, et safety and clinical efficacy criteria: 20–75, IAT urokinase 90 d: 49.1% vs. 39%; OR, (extrapolated group not randomized trial
al.356 of intraarterial infusion of NIHSS ≥5 <23, (n=57) 1.54; 95% CI, 0.73–3.23; mTICI 2b/3: contemporary assessing
2007 urokinase in patients with mRS 0–2, P=0.345 53%) medical acute endovascular
17702958 thrombolysis
48
acute ischemic stroke initiation of IAT Comparator: Safety end point: ischemic stroke terminated early
within 6 h of onset within 6 h Control (n=57) • Death: 5.3% vs. 3.5% therapy and therefore
(P=1.0) • Study halted unable to meet
Study type: RCT Exclusion • ICH <24 h: 9% vs. 2% early after IV primary end
criteria: High (P=0.21) alteplase point
Size: N=114 intracranial approved in
hemorrhage Japan
risk, NIHSS>22, • Not powered
and many more to meet primary
end point
PROACT II Aim: To determine Inclusion Intervention: 9 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at TIMI 2/3: 66% in Comparator Original
Furlan A, et efficacy and safety of IA criteria: 18–85 mg IA pro- 90 d: 40% vs. 25%, pro-urokinase group not multicenter
al.357 pro-urokinase in acute y; NIHSS≥4–30 urokinase + P=0.04 group vs. 18% in contemporary randomized trial
1999 ischemic stroke <6 h in (except isolated heparin (n=121) controls on 2 h medical acute showing clinical
10591382 MCA occlusion aphasia, Comparator: Safety end point: angiogram ischemic stroke efficacy of IA
hemianopia) Heparin (n=59) • Death: 25% vs. 27% (P<0.001) therapy intervention
Study type: RCT (P=0.8) (thrombolysis) in
Exclusion • sICH: 10% vs. 2% patients with
Size: N=180 criteria: High (P=0.06) acute MCA
intracranial ischemic stroke
hemorrhage <6 h duration
risk, NIHSS>30,
and many more
Abbreviations: ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score; CBF, cerebral blood flow; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; CTA,
computed tomographic angiography; ET, endovascular therapy; h, hours; IA, intra-arterial; IAT, intra-arterial therapy; ICA, internal carotid artery; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IQR,
interquartile range; IV, intravenous; LVO, large vessel occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Score; mTICI, modified
thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral
hemorrhage; TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; Tmax, time-to-maximum; US FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration; y,
years.
Literature search topic: Hypotension AND Endovascular interventions
Table XXIV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Collateral Status
Year Published
MR CLEAN Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: CTA collateral status (4-point scale ranging The benefit of intra-arterial therapy
Berkhemer OA, Secondary analysis MR CLEAN patients from 0 for absent collaterals and 3 for good collaterals with was greatest in patients with good
et al.110 of CTA collateral with CTA and ICA, 100% filling of the occluded territory) and adjusted common collaterals; treatment benefit
2016 M1, or M2 occlusion OR for shift in mRS appeared less and may be absent in
49
26903582 status from MR patients with absent or poor
CLEAN RCT Exclusion criteria: Results: Collateral status (CTA) modified treatment effect collaterals
N/A (P=0.038); common OR: grade 3, 3.2 (1.7–6.2); grade 2, 1.6
Size: N=493 (1.0–2.7); grade 1, 1.2 (0.7-2.3); grade 0, 1.0 (0.1–8.7)
IMS III Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: CTA collateral status Baseline CTA collaterals appear to
Menon BK, et Secondary analysis IMS III patients with be a robust determinant of final
al.111 of CTA collateral CTA and M1/ICA Results: Collateral status was a significant predictor of all clinical outcome
2015 status from IMS III occlusion clinical outcomes (P<0.05); maximal benefit with intermediate
25791716 RCT collaterals, some benefit with good collaterals; modification of
Exclusion criteria: treatment effect was not observed (limited power due to
Size: N=185 Incomplete CTA small number of patients noted)
coverage,
unavailable scans, or
poor image quality
Abbreviations: CTA indicates computed tomography angiography; ICA internal carotid artery; M1/ICA, middle cerebral artery segment; OR, odds ratio; and RCT, randomized
clinical trial.
Literature search topic: Vessel and collateral status imaging
Table XXV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Chest Radiography in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Year Published
Saber H, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Door-to-needle time The benefit of intra-arterial therapy
al.112 Secondary analysis IMS-III who had data was greatest in patients with good
2016 of data from IMS-III recorded on Results: Patients with CXR done before treatment (n=243) collaterals; treatment benefit
27412145 pefromance of CXR had longer mean door-to-needle times than those who did appeared less and may be absent in
Size: N=615 on the initial not (n=372); 75.8 vs 58.3 minutes, P=0.0001. patients with absent or poor
evaluation collaterals
2 end point: Cardiopulmonary adverse events in the first 24
Exclusion criteria: hours of admission, endotracheal intubation in the first 7
IMS-III, did not hours, and in-hospital mortality were not different between
originally present to the 2 groups.
facility providing IV
alteplase
Abbreviations: CXR indicates chest X-ray
50
Table XXVI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Supplemental Oxygen
Study Acronym; Author; Aim of Study; Patient Study End Point Relevant 2 Study Summary
Year Published Study Type; Population Intervention Results End Point (if Limitations; Conclusions
Study Size (N) (# patients) / (Absolute any) Adverse Comments
Study Event Rates, Events
Comparator P value; OR or
(# patients) RR; &
95% CI)
SO2S Aim: to determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: No subgroup • Includes Among
Roffe, et al.113 whether low-dose criteria: clinical O2 at 3 L/min if Ordinal mRS at could be some nonhypoxic
2017 oxygen therapy during diagnosis of baseline 90 d was similar identified participants patients with
28973619 the first 3 days after an acute stroke saturation was among groups: that with ICH acute stroke,
acute stroke improves within 24 hours 93% or below or unadjusted OR benefited (7.3%), stroke the prophylactic
outcome compared of hospital at of 2 L/min if for a better from oxygen mimics (3.6%) use of low-dose
with usual care admission baseline outcome was or transient oxygen
(oxygen only when Exclusion saturation was 0.97; 95% CI, ischemic supplementation
needed) criteria: greater than 0.89- attacks (2.1%) did not reduce
Indications or 93%. 1.05; P = .47; death or
Study type: RCT with contraindiactions for oxygen vs •1 end point disability at 3
blinded 1 end point for O2 (1) continuous control, and assessed by months. These
assessment oxygen for 72 h 1.03; 95% CI, postal findings do not
(n=2668); (2) 0.93- questionnaire support low-
Size: N=8003 nocturnal 1.13; P = .61; and supported dose oxygen in
oxygen only for for continuous by telephone this setting.
3 nights vs nocturnal interviews with
(n=2667) oxygen. nonresponders
Comparator: Safety end

No O2 (n=2668) point: No
oxygen related
adverse events
SOS Aim: Supplemental O2 Inclusion Intervention: 2 1 end point: Barthel Index • Includes No clear benefit
Ali K, et al.358 to prevent hypoxia criteria: Acute L O2 by NC if Ordinal mRS at at 6 mo some to supplemental
2014 stroke baseline O2 6 mo was trended participantswith O2, and maybe
23755093 Study type: >93% or 3 L NC similar among worse in ICH some harm
Randomized single- Exclusion if baseline O2 groups (1.04 patients who • SaO2 was not
blind pilot study criteria: <93% for 72 h [0.67–1.60]; received O2 continuously
Indications for (n=148) P=0.86) (1.50 [0.94– monitored
Size: N=289 O2 2.37];
P=0.09)
51
Comparator: Safety end • Larger study
No O2 (n=141) point: N/A is underway
SPOTRIAS Aim: Benefit of O2 Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: • Percent Imbalance in Study stopped
Singhal AB, et al.359 criteria: AIS <9 Supplemental Change in lesion growth stroke severity early by DSMB
2013 Study type: RCT h and NIHSS >4 O2 (n=43) NIHSS at 0–4 h: at 3 mo in treated and published
Link to article no difference • Tissue groups; no only as an
Size: N=85 Exclusion Comparator: reperfusion difference if abstract
criteria: Use of Room air (n=42) Safety end and % controlled for
alteplase; need point: 0–24 h mismatch comorbidities
for >3 L/min change in lost were all
oxygen to NIHSS: no similar
maintain SaO2 difference •SAEs, brain
>92%; NYHA between groups hemorrhage
Class III heart and brain
failure edema were
all similar
SOS pilot study Aim: Effect of oxygen Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: There were Supplemental Patients with
Roffe C, et al.360 within 24 h on 7-day criteria: Acute Oxygen Similar NIHSS no oxygen did not supplemental
2011 outcomes stroke admitted supplementation at 1 wk; oxygen- differences prevent oxygen
21625533 within the via NC for 72 h treated patients in desaturations appeared to
Study type: Single- preceding 24 h (n=148) had more physiologic have greater
blind RCT improvement in parameters improvement in
Exclusion Comparator: NIHSS at 7 d; (BP and HR) NIHSS over the
Size: N=148 vs. criteria: Room air more oxygen- between first wk, but the
N=141 Recognized (n=141) treated patients groups absolute NIHSS
need for oxygen had at least a 4- did not differ
or point between groups
contraindication improvement in
for oxygen NIHSS (OR,
2.9; 95% CI,
1.59–5.4)
Safety end
point: N/A
Roffe C, et al.361 Aim: Study the effects Inclusion Intervention: 2 1 end point: There were Supplemental Supplemental
2010 of supplemental criteria: RX L/min oxygen at Nocturnal no oxygen did not oxygen prevents
20123224 oxygen at night on within 72 h night (n=30) oxygen differences prevent desaturations,
oxygen saturation supplementation in desaturations but there is no
increased the physiologic
52
Study type: RCT Exclusion Comparator: mean nocturnal parameters clinical correlate
criteria: Definite Room air (n=33) oxygen by 2.5% (BP and HR) in this study
Size: N=63 (59 with need for oxygen and decreased between
actual stroke) desaturations by groups
1.3%
Safety end
point: N/A
Singhal AB, et al.362 Aim: Evaluate high Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: 24-h MRIs Very small pilot Study too small
2005 flow O2 in those with criteria: RX High-flow O2 by No difference in showed study to say anything
15761201 acute stroke with within 12 h; face mask (n=9) stroke scale petechial
diffusion perfusion diffusion scores at 3 mo; hemorrhages
mismatch perfusion Comparator: transient in 50% of
mismatch Room air (n=7) improvements in hyperoxia-
Study type: RCT MRI in treated
Exclusion hyperoxia- patients vs.
Size: N=16 criteria: COPD, treated patients 17% of
need for >3 controls (NS)
L/min to Safety end
maintain SaO2 point: N/A
>95%, medical
instability,
inability to obtain
MRI
Ronning OM, et al.363 Aim: Supplemental Inclusion Intervention: 3 1 end point: 1- • For those Not all patients No clear benefit
1999 oxygen (100%) vs. no criteria: RX L oxygen via NC y survival: no with minor (11%) to supplemental
10512903 supplemental oxygen within 24 h of for 24 h (n=292) differences strokes, allocated to oxygen, and
stroke onset between groups oxygen use treatment maybe some
Study type: Quasi- Comparator: was received harm
randomized RCT Exclusion No Scandinavian associated oxygen for the
criteria: Age<60 supplemental stroke scale and with full 24 h,
Size: N=550 y oxygen (or NC) BI at 7 mo: no decreased 1- implying that
(n=258) difference y survival oxygen therapy
between groups (0.45 [0.23– may be even
0.90]; worse than the
Safety end P=0.02) data suggest
point: N/A • Trend
towards
worse BI at 7
mo (P=0.07)
53
Abbreviations: AIS, indicates acute ischemic stroke; BP, blood pressure; BI, Barthel Index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DSMB, data safety and monitoring
board; h, hours; HR, heart rate; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NC, nasal cannula; NIHSS,
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NS, not significant; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RX, treatment; SAE, serious
adverse event; SaO2, oxygen saturation; and y, year.
Literature search topic: Oxygen supplementation
Table XXVII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hyperbaric Oxygen
Study Study Type/Design; Patient Population Primary Endpoint and Results Summary/Conclusion
Acronym; Study Size (P values; OR or RR; Comment(s)
Author; & 95% CI)
Year Published
Heyboer M, et Study type: Review Inclusion criteria: 1 endpoint: Side-effects • HBO therapy is associated with a
al.115 of side effects of Review of HBO number of potential side effects
2017 HBO studies Results: • Review; no primary data
28616361 • Middle ear barotrauma is the most common complication –
Size: NA Exclusion criteria: reported rates vary drastically but a recent review suggests it
N/A may be as common as 43%.
• Other side effects include sinus/paranasal barotrauma,
dental barotrauma, pulmonary barotrauma, increased BP,
claustrophobia and seizures.
Heyboer M, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 endpoint: frequency of seizures • HBO therapy is associated with an
al.116 retrospective chart any patient increased risk of seizures, with the
2014 review undergoing HBO Results: risk being greater at higher
25558546 treatment at a Seizures occurred at a rate of 1/2121 treatments (5/10,000) pressures
Size: 931 patients university hospital and were more common at higher pressures – 0/16,430 at • Retrospective chart review in a
undergoing 23,328 and an outpatient 2.0 atm, 1/669 at 2.4/2.5 atm and 1/197 at 2.8 atm (P<0.001) cohort of patients undergoing HBO
treatments center for any therapy, but not for stroke
indication
Exclusion criteria:
N/A
Bennett MH, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 endpoint: death at 3-6 months • There is no evidence that HBO
al.114 Cochrane review of Pooled analysis of therapy improves outcome in AIS,
2014 RCTs HBO RTCs for AIS Results: although the possibility of clinical
25387992 benefit has not been excluded.
54
Size: 11 RCTs with Exclusion criteria: • No difference in case fatalities at 6 mo for those receiving • Methodologies of trials differed
705 patients N/A HBO compared with controls (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.34-2.75; making pooled analysis of outcomes
P=0.96) other than fatality difficult.
• 4/14 measures of disability/functional outcome showed
some benefit to HBO therapy
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; HBO, hyperbaric oxygen; HR, hazard ratio; N/A, not available; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; and RR, relative risk.
Literature search topic: HBO
Table XXVIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypotension and Hypovolemia
Year Published
Visvanathan A, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Death or dependence at follow-up • No evidence that colloids were
et al.125 Cochrane systematic Randomized trials of associated with lower odds of death
2015 review parenteral fluid Results: or dependence in the medium term
26329401 regimens in adults • Odds of death or dependence were similar (OR, 0.97; 95% after stroke compared with
Size: N=2351 with ischemic or CI, 0.79–1.21) crystalloids
participants (12 hemorrhagic stroke • Pulmonary edema was more common in participants • No evidence to guide the best
studies) within 7 d of onset allocated to colloids (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.28–4.29) and a volume, duration, or mode of
that reported death or higher risk of cerebral edema (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.02–1.74) parenteral fluid delivery for people
dependence and pneumonia (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.17–2.01) was observed with acute stroke
with crystalloids
Exclusion criteria: • Clinically important benefits or harms could not be
Quasi-randomized, excluded
non-randomized, and • There was no evidence to guide volume, duration, or mode
cross-over trials of parenteral fluid delivery
Wohlfahrt P, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Total mortality, median follow-up was 66 wk Among patients hospitalized for their
al.117 Consecutive patients, • Consecutive first-ever ischemic stroke, the risk of
2015 Observational hospitalized patients Results: all-cause death is significantly
25380168 <81 y with symptoms • Admission MBP<100 mmHg had a higher risk of death than increased in those with admission
Size: N=532 more than 24 h those with MBP between 100–110 and 110–121 mmHg, MBP<100 mmHg and discharge
(unless thrombolytic whereas the risk of mortality did not differ from the group with SBP<120 mmHg, even after
therapy was applied) admission MBP>122 mmHg adjustments for other confounders
• Only patients with • Similarly, patients with discharge SBP<120 mmHg had an
CT or MRI excluding increased risk of death as compared to groups with SBP
hemorrhagic stroke between 120–130 and 130–141 mmHg, whereas the risk of
death was similar to that with discharge SBP>141 mmHg
55
Exclusion criteria:
Admission and
discharge BP value
unavailable
Muscari A, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Improvement defined as a difference between Lower blood pressure associated
al.124 Observational Patients with initial and final assessment (ΔNIHSS) ≥2 points with early neurological improvement
2013 ischemic stroke
23561704 Size: N=252 admitted to the stroke Results: Among 27 patients with average SBP≤118 mmHg,
unit within 24 h from 21 improved (77.8%) vs. 100 of 225 patients with average
onset of symptoms SBP>118 mmHg (44.4%; Chi-square ,10.7; P= 0·001)
• With respect to the patients with average SBP>118 mmHg,
Exclusion criteria: those with average SBP≤118 mmHg had an OR of improving
Undergoing systemic of 4.29 (95% CI, 1.60–1.50; P=0.004), after adjustment for
thrombolysis the three other variables independently associated with
improvement
Manning LS, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Death or major disability (defined as mRS>3 at Minimum BP not associated with 2-
al.123 Subsequent analysis • CHHIPS: symptom 2 wk) week outcome
2015 of 2 RCTs of blood onset <36 h and
25908462 pressure SBP>160 mmHg Results: Neither maximum or minimum SBP or DBP
management in acute • COSSACS: associated with death or major disability (defined as mRS>3
ischemic stroke patients with acute at 2 wk)
stroke, recruited <48
Size: N=706 h of symptom onset
(COSSACS) +
N=171 (CHHIPS) Exclusion criteria:
• CHHIPS: SBP>200
mmHg or DBP>120
mmHg in association
with ICH, impaired
conscious level, and
premorbid
dependency
(mRS>3)
• COSSACS: same
as those in CHHIPS
(listed above), with
the addition of:
dysphagia; definite
indication or
contraindication to
56
continue/discontinue
antihypertensive
therapy
Okamura K, et Study type: Registry Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Death within 30 d Lower and higher BP after brain
al.119 Brain infarction infarction were predictors for poor
2005 Size: N=1004 admitted on the first Results: early prognosis
15894898 day and who had • A U-shaped relationship was observed between admission
undergone CT BP levels (both SBP and DBP) and mortality rate within 30 d
• Patients at the lowest BP level (SBP<130 mmHg or
Exclusion criteria: DBP<70 mmHg) had the poorest outcomes
No available data on
SBP, DBP, and level
of consciousness on
admission
Stead LG, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mortality Early hypotension (as measured by
al.120 Consecutive patients, Presented to the ED DBP, SBP, and MAP) is associated
2005 observational with acute ischemic Results: with increased early mortality risk
16247043 stroke (ICD-CM • Patients with DBP<70 mmHg were significantly more likely
Size: N=357 codes 433 through to die than those with DBP in the 70–105 mmHg range even
437) between mid- after adjusting for age, gender, and NIHSS (RR, 1.8; 95% CI,
December 2001 and 1.1–3.1; P=0.024)
March 2004 within 24 • Patients with SBP <155 mmHg were significantly more
h of symptom onset, likely to die within 90 d when compared to those with SBP in
for whom the initial the range of 156–220 mmHg, even after adjusting for age,
BP was available gender, and NIHSS score (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1–
3.0; P=0.022)
Exclusion criteria: • Patients with MAP<100 mmHg were more likely to die than
Limited to the 381 patients with a MAP in the range of 101–140 mmHg, even
patients who resided after adjusting for age, sex, and NIHSS score (RR, 1.8; 95%
in the local county or CI, 1.1–2.9; P=0.027)
the surrounding nine-
county area
Castillo J, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: • Both high and low SBP or DBP
al.121 Consecutive patients, Patients admitted • Early neurological deterioration values within the first 24 h after
2004 observational consecutively for a • Neurological deficit at 3 mo stroke onset are associated with a
14726553 first episode of • Mortality at 90 d poor prognosis in terms of early
Size: N=300/258/258 hemispheric ischemic neurological deterioration,
(numbers evaluated stroke within 24 h Results: A U-shaped effect was observed: for every 10 neurological deficit at 90 d, and
for each of the mmHg ≤180 mmHg of SBP, the risk of early neurological infarct volume
primary end points) deterioration, poor outcome, and mortality increased by 6%,
57
Exclusion criteria: 25%, and 7%, respectively, whereas for every 10 mmHg • This effect is independent of
Patients without a >180 mmHg, the risk of early neurological deterioration prognostic factors such as stroke
confirmed diagnosis increased by 40% and the risk of poor outcome increased by severity, body temperature, serum
of cerebral infarct 23%, with no effect on mortality glucose, and stroke subtype
(n=13), treated in an
acute clinical trial
(n=32), or with
vasoactive amines
(n=3) were excluded
Vemmos KN, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Mortality at 1 mo and 12 mo Acute ischemic stroke patients with
al.118 Consecutive patients, First-ever stroke high and low admission BP values
2004 observational patients admitted to Results: Early (16.6%) and late (29.0%) mortality rate in have a higher early and late
14746563 hospital between July patients with acute ischemic stroke showed the characteristic mortality
Size: N=930 1992 and November U-shaped distribution relative to the registered admission BP
2000 value; inflection at SBP 121–140, DBP 81–90
Exclusion criteria:
Patients with
transient ischemic
attack, age <18 y,
recurrent stroke and
subarachnoid
hemorrhage
Leonardi-Bee J, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end points: Death within 14 d and death or dependency Both high blood pressure and low
et al.122 Subsequent analysis Patients with CT- at 6 mo blood pressure were independent
2002 of RCT of heparin confirmed ischemic prognostic factors for poor outcome,
11988609 and aspirin in acute stroke from the Results: relationships that appear to be
ischemic stroke International Stroke • A U-shaped relationship was found between baseline SBP mediated in part by increased rates
Trial (IST) and both primary outcomes of death within 14 d and death or of early recurrence and death
Size: N=17,398 dependency at 6 mo resulting from presumed cerebral
Exclusion criteria: • The lowest frequency of poor outcome occurred in patients edema in patients with high blood
Nonstroke, with a baseline SBP of 140–179 mmHg, with the nadir pressure and increased coronary
hemorrhagic stroke, around 150 mmHg heart disease events in those with
or stroke of unknown • Patients with an SBP<150 mmHg had, for every 10-mmHg low blood pressure
type (i.e., no CT scan fall in blood pressure, an increased risk of early death of
or postmortem was 17.9% (P<0.0001) and an increased risk of death or
performed) dependency at 6 mo of 3.6% (P=0.044)
• Deaths resulting from coronary heart disease within 14 d
were independently associated with low SBP (P=0.002)
58
Abbreviations: BP indicates blood pressure; CHHIPS, Controlling Hypertension and Hypotension Immediately Post-stroke; CI, confidence interval; COSSACS, Continue or Stop
Post-stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study; CT, computed tomography; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ED, emergency department; h, hours; HR, hazard ratio; ICD-CM,
International Classification of Diseases-Clinical Modification; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; MRI, magnetic resonance
imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomizerd clinical trial; RR, relative risk; and
SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Literature search topics: Treatment of hypotension AND Intravenous fluids and stroke
Table XXIX. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Blood Pressure and Thrombolysis
Year Published
Adelman EE, et Study type: Review Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH and other bad outcomes Data from community hospitals
al.364 of data from an RCT AIS and thrombolysis
2016 to increase alteplase Results: No increase in sICH among patients with protocol
26419527 use in Michigan Exclusion criteria: violations, including BP
N/A
Size: N=557 (233
patients with protocol
deviations)
Kodankandath Study type: Inclusion criteria: IV 1 end point: Poor outcomes – discharge to SNF, death, Elevated BP at arrival to a CSC after
TV, et al.365 Retrospective review alteplase at OSH and and discharge mRS>2, sICH thrombolysis at an outside hospital
2016 of drip and ship transfer to CSC is associated with worse outcomes,
27160383 patients to single Results: but not necessarily sICH
CSC Exclusion criteria: • Increased risk of death and d/c to hospice among patients
Stroke mimics with inadequate BP control (SBP>180) upon arrival to CSC
Size: N=130 • sICH not associated with inadequate BP control at arrival to
CSC
Liu K, et al.133 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Severe hemorrhagic transformation • Chinese cohort
2016 Observational AIS s/p thrombolysis • Severe hemorrhagic
26892891 Results: Early (within the first 6 h) high SBP variability is transformation was defined as sICH
Size: N=461 Exclusion criteria: associated with severe hemorrhagic transformation with worsening of the NIHSS by at
N/A least 4 points for parenchymal
hematoma
Waltimo T, et Study type: Cohort Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH Higher BP after alteplase associated
al.132 AIS treated with IV with sICH
2016 Size: N=1868 alteplase Results: The OR for development of ICH per 10 mmHg
27529662 increase in SBP at 2 h was 1.14 (1.03–1.25), at 4 h was 1.14
59
Exclusion criteria: (1.03–1.25), at 12 h was 1.12 (1.01–1.23), and at 48 h was
N/A 1.12 (1.01–1.23)
TIMS-China Study type: Review Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH • Lower SBP is associated with
Wu W, et al.130 of data from alteplase AIS and thrombolysis decreased risk of sICH
2016 registry within 4.5 h Results: • Lower SBP is associated with
26828609 • Lower BP at baseline, at 2 h and 24 h after alteplase was better outcomes
Size: N=1128 Exclusion criteria: associated with better outcomes (mRS<2 at 90 d)
N/A • SBP>160 2 h after alteplase was associated with sICH
(compared to SBP<140)
• An increase or no change in SBP after thrombolysis was
associated with sICH compared to a decrease in SBP
Lyerly MJ, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH and other bad outcomes • Very few patients with BP
al.366 Retrospective review AIS and thrombolysis violations
2014 of stroke registry Results: No increase in sICH among patients with protocol
23954609 Exclusion criteria: violations
Size: 76 violations N/A
out of 212
SAMURAI rt-PA Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Outcomes Increased SBP variability, as
registry of sICH in SAMURAI AIS s/p alteplase opposed to absolute SBPs, was
Endo K, et al.131 registry (0.6 mg/kg) Results: Initial BPs before thrombolysis were not associated associated with worse outcomes
2013 Exclusion criteria: with sICH, but SBP variability within the first 25 h was
23329210 Size: N=527 N/A associated with sICH and death
SITS Study type: Analysis Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH • Higher BP before treatment with
Mazya M, et of sICH in SITS AIS, thrombolysis alteplase is associated with an
al.129 registry Results: SBP≥146 before treatment associated with sICH increased risk of sICH
2012 Exclusion criteria: (1.6; [1.3–2.0]; P<0.001) • The inflection point for risk occurs
22442178 Size: N=31,627 N/A within the target BP range for
administering alteplase
SITS-ISTR Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Outcome, sICH No direct mention of BPs>185/110
Toni D, et al.128 Subgroup analysis of Age 18–50 y, AIS s/p or 180/105
2012 SITS registry for thrombolysis Results: Baseline SBP predicted sICH
22402853 outcomes in the
young Exclusion criteria:
N/A
Size: N=3246
Kellert L, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Hemorrhagic transformation BP violations were frequent but not
al.367 Observational/retrosp AIS with thrombolysis associated with ICH or sICH
2011 ective Results: BP protocol violations did not predict ICH or sICH
21527769
60
N/A
Butcher K, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Hemorrhagic conversion • No direct mention of BPs
al.126 Observation of blood AIS with thrombolysis >185/110 or 180/105
2010 pressures within the Results: Increased hemorrhagic conversion in patients with
19926841 EPITHET RCT Exclusion criteria: large DWI lesion volumes and atrial fibrillation and higher 24-
N/A h weighted BP
Size: N=97
Perini F, et al.127 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Hemorrhagic conversion – HI or PH No direct mention of BPs>185/110
2010 Observational AIS with thrombolysis or 180/105
20674932 Results: There was an association between higher SBP and
Size: N=86 Exclusion criteria: ICH, but not MBP and ICH
N/A
Abbreviations: AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; CSC, comprehensive stroke center; HI, hemorrhagic infarction; ICH, intracerebral
hemorrhage; IV, intravenous; MBP, myelin basic protein; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; OSH,
outside hospital; PH, parenchymal hemorrhage; RCT, randomizerd clinical trial; SBP, systolic blood pressure; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; SNF, skilled nursing
facility; and s/p, status post.
Literature search topic: Blood pressure AND Blood pressure and Endovascular Therapy AND Blood Pressure and Thrombolysis
Table XXX. Nonrandomized Studies of Hyperthermia After Acute Ischemic Stroke

Year Published
Saxena M, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Relationship between peak temperature and Both hypothermia and hyperthermia
al.134 Retrospective Adult patients stroke outcome are associated with worse stroke
2015 observational (2 admitted to one of outcomes
25643903 countries) 148 ICUs in New Results: Both low (<37.0) and high (>39.0) temperatures are
Zealand or the UK associated with worse stroke outcome
Size: N=53,942 in with a primary
Australia and New neurological
Zealand (5176 with diagnosis
acute ischemic
stroke) and N=56.696 Exclusion criteria:
in the UK (4190 with CPR in the last 24 h
acute ischemic
stroke)
61
Karaszewski B, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Relationship between body temperature Delayed fever after stroke is
et al.368 Prospective, AIS changes and stroke severity associated with severe stroke and
2012 observational more closely associated with poor
23075282 Exclusion criteria: Results: Delayed fever is associated with severe stroke and outcome than admission body
Size: N=44 ICH, stroke mimics worse outcome temperature; very small patient
cohort
PAIS Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Relationship between admission temperature • An increase in body temperature
den Hertog HM, Observation within an Admission within 12 and stroke outcome over the first 24 h after admission is
et al.369 RCT h of AIS associated with worse stroke
2011 Results: Admission temperature does not predict outcome, outcome
20878419 Size: N=1332 Exclusion criteria: but elevation within the first 24 h does; the odds for poor • Patients were treated with
Temp <36˚C or outcome increase by 1.3 (95% CI, 1.05–1.63) for each antipyretics
>39˚C, imminent degree C increase in temperature, and the odds for death
death, liver disease, increase by 1.51 (95% CI, 1.15–1.98) for each degree C
ETOH abuse increase in temperature
Abbreviations: AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ETOH, ethanol; h, hours; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; ICU,
intensive care unit; RCT, randomizerd clinical trial; and UK, United Kingdom.
Literature search topic: Temperature
Table XXXI. Randomized Clinical Trials of Normothermia

Comparator
(# patients)
Broessner G, et Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Feasibility Mortality and Very few No clear clinical
al.370 feasibility of endovascular criteria: AIS, Endovascular and fever burden, which neurological patients with benefit of
2009 cooling to achieve SAH, ICH in ICU maintenance of was lower in the outcome (GOS) ischemic stroke achieving
19762706 prophylactic normothermia normothermia endovascularly cooled were similar were included normothermia
in an ICU cohort. Exclusion (n=51) patients among groups
criteria: Active at discharge,
Study type: Prospective sepsis, h/o HIT, Comparator: Safety end point: day 30, and
RCT contraindication Standard of care Infections were more month 6
to placement of (n=51) common in patients with
Size: N=102 a central line, endovascular cooling
thrombolysis in (96% vs. 80%; P=0.03)
the last 12 h
62
PAIS Aim: To determine if early Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: The study was In post hoc There is no
den Hertog HM, treatment with criteria: AIS or Paracetamol Improvement on the mRS terminated early analysis, benefit to routine
et al.371 paracetamol ICH with (acetaminophen using the sliding (planned patients with use of
2009 (acetaminophen) improves treatment within ) at a dose of 6 dichotomy approach at 3 enrollment was baseline body acetaminophen
19297248 outcome by reducing body 12 h of onset g/d for 3 d mo: there was no overall 2500) due to temperature of in acute stroke
temperature. (n=697) benefit. OR, 1.20 (95% CI, poor enrollment 37–39˚C did
Exclusion 0.96–1.50) and funding improve (1.43,
Study type: Prospective criteria: Temp Comparator: issues 1.02–1.97)
double-blind RCT <36˚C or >39˚C, Matched Safety end point: No
imminent death, placebo (n=703) difference in SAEs
Size: N=1400 liver disease, between groups.
ETOH abuse
Abbreviations: AIS indicates acute ischemic stroke; ETOH, ethanol; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale; HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; h/o, history of; ICU, intensive care unit;
OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; SAE, serious adverse event; and SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Table XXXII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypothermia

Year Published
ReCCLAIM I Study type: Single- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Feasibility and safety of intravascular Endovascular cooling is possible
Horn CM, et arm study, open- AIS, age 18–85 y, hypothermia after reperfusion after intervention for stroke, but
al.372 label, single site of ASPECTS 5–7 on there are no data to suggest it
2014 hypothermia in pretreatment Results: improves outcome
23468538 patients treated with imaging, M1/M2 • Three patients developed new hemorrhages on the 24 h
thrombectomy; occlusion or ICA T CT scan, one of which was symptomatic
endovascular cooling occlusion, • Six patients died due to malignant cerebral edema
presentation within 8 • Pneumonia occurred in 25% of patients, UTI occurred in
Size: N=20 h of symptom onset 20% of patients, and DVT in 1 patient
Exclusion criteria:
Mild cognitive
impairment, IVC filter,
end-stage renal
failure on HD,
anaphylaxis to
iodinated contrast,
h/o ventricular
arrhythmia leading to
63
cardiac arrest,
bleeding diathesis
Abbreviations: ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score; CT, computed tomography; ICA T, internal carotid artery terminus; HD,
hemodialysis; IVC, inferior venal cava.; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; UTI, urinary tract infection; HD, hemodialysis; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; and y, years
Table XXXIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Hypothermia

Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & any) Adverse Events Comments
Year Published Study 95% CI)
Comparator
(# patients)
COOLIST Aim: Safety and feasibility Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Safety and Time to target Shivering • Hypothermia
Geurts M, et of surface cooling criteria: AIS, Cooled IV fluids feasibility – could only cool temperature: no occurred in all is difficult to
al.136 RX within 4.5 h following by to 35.0, not 34.5, with patients patients achieve with
2017 Study type: Open-label of stroke onset; surface cooling surface cooling randomized to surface cooling
27856954 multicenter RCT NIHSS≥6 within 4.5 h of 34.0˚C achieved • There is an
symptom onset, Safety end point: that goal, only 1 increased risk of
Size: N=22 (stopped early Exclusion 3 different Increased risk of PNA – patient achieved PNA with
due to poor recruitment) criteria: ICH, temperature absolute increase 53% the goal of 34.5 hypothermia
any conditions goals (34.0˚C, (28%–79%; P=0.002)
that might be n=5; 34.5˚C,
exacerbated by n=6; 35.0˚C,
hypothermia n=5)
(i.e., bleeding
diatheses), Comparator:
bradycardia, Standard care
hypoxia (n=6)
ICTUS2 Aim: Safety and feasibility Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–1 at None • Relatively Increased risk of
Lyden P, et of endovascular cooling criteria: AIS Cooled IV fluids 90 d and the proportion of small study and PNA
al.135 treated with followed by patients with mRS 0–1 at underpowered
2016 Study type: Multicenter alteplase; insertion of 90 d was similar (33% vs. for the primary
27834742 single-blind RCT NIHSS ≥7 and endovascular 38%; 0.81; 0.36–1.85) outcome
≤20 for left brain cooling device • Patients
Size: N=120 stroke and ≤24 (n=63) Safety end point: Trends received
for right brain to increased mortality meperidine,
stroke Comparator: (15.9% vs. 8.8%; OR, buspirone and
Standard care 1.95; 95% CI, 0.56–7.79) surface warming
(n=57) and PNA (19.0% vs.
64
Exclusion 10.5%; OR, 1.99; 95% CI to prevent
criteria: 0.63–6.98) in hypothermic shivering
Prestroke mRS patients
>1, contraindica-
tions to
hypothermia,
item 1a on
NIHSS >1
Su Y, et al.373 Aim: Evaluate Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: N/A • Very small Hypothermia
2016 hypothermia in malignant criteria: Hypothermia to • Feasibility and all-cause study was associated
26696645 MCA infarction • Age 18–80 y 33˚C–34˚C for mortality and mRS at 6; • No difference with a trend
• RX within 48 h 24–72 h using mortality was similar in in PNA with toward better
Study type: Single-center of onset endovascular both groups (8/16 vs. hypothermia outcomes in
RCT, not blinded • Infarct at least catheter (n=16) 7/17) • Patients were survivors, but
2/3 MCA • Survivors treated with not treated with there were many
Size: N=33 territory on MRI Comparator: hypothermia achieved decompressive more
or CT Standard better neurological hemicraniectomy complications
• NIHSS ≥15 for medical care outcomes at 6 mo (OR, • Patients were
non-dominant with goal 10.5; 95% CI, 0.9–121.4; not treated with
hemisphere or temperature adjusted OR, 4.794; 95% decompressive
NIHSS ≥20 for 36.5˚C–37.5˚C CI, 0.323–71.103) hemicraniectomy
dominant (n=17) • Hypothermia
hemisphere Safety end point: More was initiated
• Reduced LOC complications with rather late in the
(NIHSS≥1 on hypothermia group course of stroke
item 1a) (P<0.001) (an average of
• Unable to 42 h)
undergo DC
Exclusion
criteria:
• Premorbid
mRS >2
• Hemorrhagic
conversion >1/3
MCA territory
with space
occupying effect
• GCS<6;
rapidly
65
improving
symptoms
• Both pupils
fixed and dilated
• Other brain
lesions
• Platelets <75K
• Severe
coagulopathy
HARIS Aim: Hypothermia after Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: More • Less HT, with • Relatively • Therapeutic
Hong JM, et recanalization criteria: IA RX; Surface cooling patients treated with no HT in 39% of small study done hypothermia
al.374 NIHSS ≥10; to 34.5˚C– hypothermia had a good hypothermia- in 2 centers after
2014 Study type: RCT with DWI 35.0˚C for 48 h outcome (mRS 0–2) at 3 treated patients • Trends toward recanalization is
24203846 randomization by center confirmation of (n=39) mo; 45% vs. 23% and no HT in more favorable associated with
infarct; (P=0.017); OR, 3.0 (95% 14% standard characteristics at less HT, less
Size: N=75 recanalization Comparator: CI, 1.02–8.90; P=0.047) care group baseline in the cerebral edema
(TICI ≥2b) within Normothermia (P=0.016) hypothermia and better
6 h of symptom (n=36) Safety end point: Similar • Less cerebral group outcomes at 3
onset mortality in both groups edema with mo
(15% vs. 14%) hypothermia (no • Further
Exclusion cerebral edema studies will need
criteria: Not in 54% with to be done to
specified hypothermia and confirm these
no cerebral results
edema in 17%
with standard of
care, P=0.001)
Piironen K, et Aim: Safety and feasibility Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Feasibility: No difference in Trend towards Increased risk of
al.137 of mild hypothermia criteria: AIS Hypothermia to number of patients with good outcome more PNA with PNA with
2014 treated with 35˚C with temperature <36˚C for (mRS 0–2) at 3 hypothermia hypothermia
24436240 Study type: RCT alteplase; surface cooling >80% of the cooling mo (7/18 [39%] (39% vs. 11%,
NIHSS 7–20 and IV cold period was 15/18 (83%) in each group) P=0.054)
Size: N=36 saline (n=18)
Exclusion Safety end point: AEs
criteria: Comparator: were more common in
mRS>2; CHF; Standard of hypothermia group (19 vs.
angina, sepsis, care/normother 12), with pneumonia
ICH mia (n=18) occurring in 39% vs. 11%;
P=0.054
66
COOLAID Aim: Feasibility study Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Safety; mRS at 90 d Small study Hypothermia
Ovesen C, et criteria: Endovascular feasibility: endovascular was 3.0 (1–6) in was not
al.375 Study type: RCT (2 Age≥18; cooling (n=7) or cooling achieves goal cooled patients associated with
2013 centers) NIHSS≥5 and surface cooling temperature more quickly and 1.5 (1–6) in clinical benefit
23278712 ≤18; RX within (n=10) targeting than surface cooling controls but was
Size: N=31 24 h of temperature of associated with
symptoms 33˚C Safety end point: More more AEs
onset; stroke by bradycardia in cooled
CT or MRI Comparator: patients (65% vs. 0%;
Normothermia P=0.0001); Trend towards
Exclusion (n=14) more PNA in cooled
criteria: patients (35% vs. 9%,
mRS≥3; >50% P=0.09)
MCA territory;
severe
concomitant
disease
ICTUS-L Aim: Feasibility and safety Inclusion Intervention: 24 1 end point: Safety 90-d mortality • Small study There is no
Hemmen TM, et of hypothermia criteria: AIS h of was similar in • Patients signal of clinic
al.138 and RX with endovascular Safety end point: both groups received benefit in this
2010 Study type: RCT alteplase within cooling (n=28) Increased PNA in (21.4% vs. meperidine, study, and
20724711 6h hypothermia group (50% 16.7%) as was buspirone and hypothermia
Size: N=58 Comparator: vs. 10%; P=0.001) and good outcome surface warming was associated
Exclusion No active more patients with at least (mRS 0–1), to prevent with a significant
criteria: cooling (n=30) 1 SAE (75% vs. 43.3%; which occurred shivering risk of PNA
Contraindication P=0.018) in 5/28 in the
s to hypothermia hypothermia
group and 7/30
in the
normothermia
group
Abbreviations: AE indicates adverse event; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; CHF, congestive heart failure; CT, computed tomography; DC, decompressive craniectomy; DHC,
decompressive hemicraniectomy; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; h, hour; HT, hemorrhagic transformation; IA, intra-arterial; ICH, intracerebral
hemorrhage; IV, intravenous; LOC, level of consciousness; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale;
OR, odds ratio; PNA, pneumonia; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RX, treatment; SAE, serious adverse event; and TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.
67
Table XXXIV. Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Intravenous Alteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke*
Comparator
(# patients)
ENCHANTED Aim: Determine if Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 2–6 at • Ordinal shift • Open label Low-dose IV
Anderson CS, et reduced-dose alteplase criteria: Alteplase 0.6 90 d: 53.2% vs. 51.1%; analysis of mRS design alteplase did not
al.143 would be non-inferior to Patients with mg/kg up to 60 OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95– scores: OR, 1.0; • Large meet the non-
2016 standard-dose alteplase disabling stroke mg (n=1653) 1.25; P=0.51 95% CI, 0.89– proportion of inferiority end
27161018 symptoms within 1.13; P=0.04 for Asian patients point for the
Study type: RCT (open 4.5 h of onset Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: non-inferiority reduction of
label) who were Alteplase 0.9 1% vs. 2.1% • Mortality at 90 death and
candidates for mg/kg up to 90 d: 8.9% vs. disability at 90 d
Size: N=3310 IV alteplase as mg (n=1654) 10.3%, P=0.07 in comparison to
per approved standard-dose
indications IV alteplase
Exclusion
criteria:
Pre-existent
disability;
hemorrhage on
CT scan; high
risk of bleeding
IST-3 Aim: Determine whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: OHS 0–2 at Ordinal shift in This trial IV alteplase did
IST-3 alteplase would benefit criteria: Alteplase 0.9 6 mo: 37% vs. 35%; OR, OHS scores at enrolled patients not meet the
Collaborative patients who did not meet Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 1.13; 95% CI, 0.95–1.35; 180 d: OR, 1.27; without primary efficacy
Group142 license criteria for symptoms within mg (n=1515) P=0.18 95% CI, 1.10– established end point but
2012 alteplase (mainly older 6 h of onset 1.47; P=0.001) indication for IV improved
22632908 than 80 y and up to 6 h Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: alteplase (e.g., outcomes based
from onset) Exclusion Open control 7% vs. 1% age>80 y, time on an ordinal
criteria: (n=1520) beyond 4.5 h) in shift in the
Study type: RCT (open Hemorrhage on Europe distribution of
control) CT scan; the OHS scores
prohibitive risk
Size: N=3035 of bleeding
68
EPITHET Aim: Establish the effect Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Infarct • mRS 0–1: • Small size • The trial
Davis SM, et of IV alteplase on lesion criteria: Alteplase 0.9 growth at 90 d by MRI: NS 36% vs. 21% • Primary focused
al.93 growth, reperfusion, and Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 (P=0.15) analysis was per primarily on the
2008 clinical outcome in symptoms 3–6 h mg (n=52) Safety end point: sICH: • Reperfusion protocol value of MRI for
18296121 patients with radiological from onset N/A was more patient selection
penumbra 3–6 h after Comparator: common with • Alteplase was
stroke onset Exclusion Placebo (n=49) alteplase than associated with
criteria: Age>80 with placebo increased
Study type: RCT y; hemorrhage and was reperfusion in
on CT scan; associated with patients who
Size: N=101 infarction >1/3 of less infarct had mismatch
MCA territory on growth and a trend to
CT scan; high (P=0·001), less infarct
risk of bleeding better growth
neurological
outcome
(P<0·0001), and
better functional
outcome
(P=0·010) than
was no
reperfusion
ECASS 3 Aim: Determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–1 at • Global No difference in IV alteplase was
Hacke W, et efficacy of alteplase criteria: Alteplase 0.9 90 d: 52.4% vs. 45.2%; outcome the rate of other superior to
al.144 between 3 and 4.5 h of Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.02– analysis serious adverse placebo in
2008 stroke onset symptoms 3–4.5 mg (n=418) 1.76; P=0.04 (algorithm for events improving
18815396 h from onset chances of functional
Study type: RCT Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: favorable outcomes when
Exclusion Placebo (n=403) 2.4% vs. 0.2% outcome): 1.28; administered
Size: N=821 criteria: Age>80 95% CI, 1.00– between 3 and
y; hemorrhage 1.65; P=0.05 4.5 h from
on CT scan; • Mortality at 90 stroke onset
infarction >1/3 of d: 7.7% vs.
MCA territory on 8.4%
CT scan; high (P=0.68)
risk of bleeding,
including:
NIHSS >25,
history of
previous stroke
69
and diabetes;
use of warfarin
regardless of
INR
ATLANTIS A Aim: Determine the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Mortality at 90 d: The trial was • IV alteplase
Clark WM, et and efficacy of alteplase criteria: Alteplase 0.9 • NIHSS score 23% vs. stopped by the administered
al.376 up to 6 h after stroke Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 improvement by 4 points 7% (P=0.01) DMSB because within 6 h had
2000 onset symptoms within mg (n=71) at 24 h: 40% vs. 21%; of safety early but not
10753980 6 h of onset P=0.02 concerns in the sustained
Study type: RCT Comparator: • NIHSS score 5- to 6-h group benefit
Exclusion Placebo (n=71) improvement by 4 points • Only a small
Size: N=142 criteria: Age>80 at 30 d: 60% vs. 75%; minority were
y; hemorrhage P=0.05 treated within 3
on CT scan; h
high risk of Safety end point: sICH: • The small
bleeding 11% vs. 0% sample size
limited power
and reliability
ATLANTIS B Aim: Determine the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: NIHSS Mortality at 90 d: More than • IV alteplase
Clark WM, et and efficacy of alteplase criteria: Alteplase 0.9 score ≤1 at 90 d: 34.5% 11% vs. 6.9% 80% of the was not
al.377 3-5 h after stroke onset Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 vs. 34%; P=0.89 (34% vs. (P=0.09) patients were beneficial within
1999 symptoms 3–5 h mg (n=307; 32%; P=0.65 per protocol enrolled after the 3- to 5-h
10591384 Study type: RCT from onset n=272 within 3– within 3–5 h) 3h window
5 h) • IV alteplase
Size: N=613 (547 treated Exclusion Secondary end point: was beneficial in
within 3–5 h) criteria: Age>80 Comparator: mRS 0–1 at 90 d: 41.7% the small
y; hemorrhage Placebo (n=306, vs. 40.5%; P=0.77 (42.3% subgroup of
on CT scan; n=275 within 3– vs. 38.9%; P=0.42 per patients treated
infarction >1/3 of 5 h) protocol within 3–5 h) within 3 h
MCA territory on
CT scan; high Safety end point:
risk of bleeding sICH: 6.7% vs. 1.3% (7%
vs. 1.1% per protocol
within 3–5 h)
ECASS II Aim: Determine the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–1 at • mRS scores Small minority of IV alteplase was
Hacke W, et and efficacy of alteplase criteria: Alteplase 0.9 90 d: 40.3% vs. 36.6%; dichotomized for patients treated not significantly
al.378 up to 6 h after stroke Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9–1.6; death or within the first 3 beneficial when
1998 onset symptoms within mg (n=409) P=0.28 dependency h therapeutic
9788453 6 h of onset (post hoc
70
Study type: RCT Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: analysis): 54.3% window was
Exclusion Placebo (n=391) 8.8% vs. 3.4% in the alteplase extended to 6 h
Size: N=800 criteria: Age>80 group and
y; hemorrhage 46.0% in the
on CT scan; placebo group
infarction >1/3 of had favorable
MCA territory on outcomes
CT scan; high (score 0–2;
risk of bleeding absolute
difference 8.3%,
P=0.024)
• Mortality: no
difference at 90
ECASS Aim: Determine the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: N/A Many patients Alteplase was
Hacke W, et and efficacy of alteplase criteria: Alteplase 1.1 •Median BI at 90 d: 75 vs. with protocol not beneficial on
al.379 up to 6 h after stroke Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 100 85; P=0.99 violations the ITT analysis
1995 onset symptoms within mg (n=313) •Median mRS at 90 d: 3 (N=109) were when patients
7563451 Study type: RCT 6 h of onset vs. 3; P=0.41 included in the with protocol
Comparator: ITT analysis violations were
Size: N=620 Exclusion Placebo (n=307) Safety end point: excluded from
criteria: Parenchymal hematoma: the target
Age>80 y; 19.8% vs. 6.9% population
hemorrhage on analysis; there
CT scan; was a significant
infarction >1/3 of difference in
MCA territory on favor of
CT scan; high alteplase in the
risk of bleeding median mRS
and mRS 0–1
(although not
significant on
the median BI
score)
NINDS Aim: Determine the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Global test Mortality at 90 d: The trial was IV alteplase was
NINDS Stroke and efficacy of alteplase criteria: Alteplase 0.9 of neurological function at alteplase 17% composed of superior to
Study rt-PA within 3 h after stroke Disabling stroke mg/kg up to 90 90 d (BI, mRS, GOS, vs. placebo 21% two parts, and placebo in
Group87 onset symptoms within mg (n=312) NIHSS) (P=0.30) parts 1 and 2 improving
1995 3 h of onset • OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3– had different functional
7477192 Study type: RCT Comparator: 2.9; P=0.002 primary end outcomes when
Placebo (n=312) points administered
71
Size: N=624 Exclusion • mRS 0–1 at 90 d: 39% within 3 h of
criteria: vs. 26%; OR, 2.4; 95% stroke onset
Hemorrhage on CI,1.5–3.7; P<0.001
CT scan; high
risk of bleeding Safety end point: sICH:
6.4% vs. 0.6%
*Trials with ≤100 subjects are not included
Abbreviations: BI, Barthel index; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography DMSB, Data Monitoring and Safety Board; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Score; h, hour; ITT, intention-
to-treat; IV, intravenous; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke
Scale; NS: not significant; OHS: Oxford handicap scale; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; and y, years.
Literature search topic: Alteplase, IV, stroke
Table XXXV. Randomized Clinical Trials of Intravenous Alteplase for Mild Stroke 3–4.5 Hours
Comparator
(# patients)
ECASS III: Aim: To seek evidence of Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–1 at • NIHSS 0–1 at Only 128 No interaction of
additional confounding factors or criteria: Intravenous 90 d (OR, 95% CI) 90 d patients NIHSS benefit or safety
subgroups subgroups that might • Clinical alteplase (0.9 • Overall: 1.34 (1.02– Overall: 1.33 0–5, not with stroke
Bluhmki E, et differentially affect diagnosis of mg/kg, 1.76) 144 (1.01–1.75) 144 analyzed severity
al.145 treatment outcome ischemic stroke maximum dose • According to NIHSS: 0– According to separately
2009 causing a 90 mg over 60 9, 1.28 (0.84–1.96); 10– NIHSS: 0–9,
19850525 Study type: RCT measurable min with initial 19, 1.16 (0.73–1.84); ≥20, 1.17 (0.77–
neurological 10% of dose 2.32 (0.61–8.90); 1.78); 10–19,
Size: N=821 (total); deficit defined given as bolus interaction P=0.63 1.32 (0.82–
according to NIHSS: 0–5, as impairment of over 1 min) 2.12); ≥20, 1.88
66(I)/62(C); 6–10, language, motor (n=418) Safety end point: (047–7.52)
169(I)/148(C); 11–15, function, Symptomatic intracranial • Global
85(I)/77(C); 16–20, cognition and/or Comparator: hemorrhage (NINDS outcome statistic
77(I)/76(C); >20, gaze, vision or Standard care – definition) at 90 d
21(I)/40(C) neglect no intravenous • Overall: 2.38 (1.25– Overall: 1.28
• Onset of heparin, oral 4.52) 144 (1.00–1.65) 144
symptoms anticoagulants, • According to NIHSS: 0– According to
between 3 and 4 aspirin, or 9, 3.04 (0.82–11.22); 10– NIHSS 0–9:
h prior to volume 19, 2.18 (096–4.98); ≥20, 1.12 (0.77–
initiation of expanders 1.64); 10–19:
during the first
72
administration of 24 h; 3.03 (0.52–17.50); 1.15 (0.77–
study drug, and subcutaneous interaction P=0.89 1.71); ≥ 20: 1.76
others heparin (0.44–7.15)
(≤10,000 IU), or • Mortality at 90
Exclusion of equivalent d
criteria: Minor doses of low- Overall: 0.90
neurological molecular- (0.54–1.49) 144
deficit or weight heparin, According to
symptoms was permitted NIHSS: 0–9,
rapidly for DVT 2.70 (0.54–
improving before prophylaxis 13.53); 10–19,
start of infusion, (n=403) 0.81 (0.41–
and others 1.59); ≥20, 1.03
(0.37–2.87);
interaction
P=0.40
Abbreviations: C indicates control; CI, confidence interval; d, days; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; h, hours; HR, hazard ratio; I, intervention; IV, intravenous; N/A, not available; NIHSS,
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; and RR, relative risk.
Literature search topic: Intravenous alteplase for mild stroke 3-4.5 hours
Table XXXVI. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Intravenous Alteplase 3–4.5 Hours for Mild Stroke
Year Published
GWTG Study type: Registry Inclusion criteria: End Points: Discharge home, independent ambulation, Good functional outcomes, mortality,
Romano JG, et of hospitalized Final diagnosis of death, sICH and risk of sICH are the same in
al.147 patients with stroke acute ischemic stroke mild stroke treated 0–3 h and 3–4.5
2015 Results: h
25642650 Size: N=7621 Exclusion criteria: Discharge home:
patients with NIHSS • Less than 75% • 0–3 h: 70.3%%
≤5 treated with IV completion on • 3–4.5 h: 71.6%
alteplase within 4.5 h medical history
variables, arrived Independent ambulation
beyond 4.5 h from • 0–3 h: 69.6%
symptom onset, • 3–4.5 h: 70.2%
not treated with
alteplase, Death
NIHSS>5, missing an • 0–3 h: 1.3%
NIHSS score
73
• Did not arrive • 3–4.5 h: 1.3%
through the
emergency sICH
department, not • 0–3 h: 2.0%
discharged from the • 3–4.5 h: 1.4%
same hospital, time
to treatment
longer than 4.5 h or
missing
SITS-ISTR Study type: Registry Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS at 3 mo Good functional outcomes (mRS 0–
Ahmed N, et of patients treated Ischemic 1) and risk of sICH are the same in
al.146 with IV alteplase for stroke and were Results: Baseline NIHSS ≤5 mild stroke treated 0–3 h and 3–4.5
2010 acute ischemic stroke treated with IV • 0–3 h: mRS 0–1, 71% h
20667790 alteplase within 4.5 h • 3–4.5 h: mRS 0–1, 72%
Size: N=23,942 after symptom onset
between 12/2002 and Safety: Mortality at 3 mo
2/2010; N=2376 Exclusion criteria: Baseline NIHSS ≤5
treated 3–4.5 h after European Summary • 0–3 h: mRS 0–1, 3%
symptom onset of Product • 3–4.5 h: mRS 0–1, 4%
Characteristics
criteria
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; h, hours; HR, hazard ratio; IV, intravenous; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; and sICH,
symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Literature search topic: Intravenous alteplase for mild stroke 3-4.5 hours
74
Table XXXVII. Nonrandomized trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Sickle Cell Disease and IV Alteplase
Year Published
Adams RJ, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Outcomes after IV alteplase • IV alteplase is safe and effective in
al.148 Observational case- Get With the adult patients with sickle cell
2017 control study Guidelines Results: disease
28183857 Hospitalized Stroke • No difference in IV alteplase use (8.2% in cases vs 10.1%
Size: 832 Sickle cell Cases in controls, P=0.9818)
disease cases and • No difference in rates of symptomatic ICH (4.9% in cases
3328 non-sickle cell Exclusion criteria: vs 3.2% in controls, P=0.4502)
disease controls N/A • No difference in rates of in-hospital death (3.5% in cases vs
(matched for age, 5.0% in controls, P=0.5654)
sex and race)
Table XXXVIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies of Antithrombotic Agents given within 24 hours after Intravenous Alteplase
for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Year Published
Jeong HG, et Study type: Single- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Hemorrhagic transformation at 4-7 d post- • No increased risk of hemorrhage
al.166 center, retrospective AIS and IV alteplase treatment, mRS 0-1 at 3 mo with early initiation of AP or AC
2016 analysis of early or EVT therapy (<24 h) following IV
27521435 antithrombotics (<24 Results: No increased odds of sICH (0.85; 0.35–2.10) or alteplase or EVT compared to
h) in AIS + Exclusion criteria: difference in mRS at 3 mo (1.09; 0.75–1.59) in patients with initiation >24 h
alteplase/EVT Early sICH or early initiation of antithrombotics • Limitations include generalizability
systemic bleeding, and selection bias
Size: N=712 grave prognosis,
planned surgical
treatment
Abbreviations: AC indicates anticoagulant; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; AP, antiplatelet; d, days; EVT, endovascular therapy; h, hours; IV, intravenous; mRS, modified Rankin
Scale; and sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Literature search topic: Intravenous Fibrinolysis
75
Table XXXIX. Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Intravenous Fibrinolytics Other Than Alteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic
Stroke
Acronym; Study Type; Population Intervention (Absolute Event Rates, End Point Limitations; Conclusions
Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & (if any) Adverse Comments
Comparator
(# patients)
NOR-TEST Aim: To establish Major Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point:: NIHSS score of • Only mild •Tenecteplase
Logallo N, et superiority of tenecteplase criteria: tenecteplase 0.4 mRS 0-1 at 3 months: 0 or strokes: at a dose of 0·4
al.170 0.4 mg/kg (single bolus) mg/kg (single tenecteplase : 354/549 improvement of Median NIHSS 4 mg/kg has a
28780236 as compared with intravenous (64% ) ≥4 at 24 h: (IQR 2-8) similar safety
Age 18 years or
alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (10% older; Ischemic bolus) n=549 alteplase: 345/551 (63%) tenecteplase: and efficacy
bolus + 90% infusion/60 41.7% •18% stroke profile to
stroke with
minutes) for patients with Comparator: IV OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84 - alteplase 38.8% mimics alteplase in a
acute ischemic stroke measurable alteplase 0.9 OR, 1.12 (95%
1.38; P=.52 stroke
deficit on mg/kg (10% CI, 0.89-1.43; • 4% had population
Study Type: multicenter, NIHSS); bolus + 90% Safety endpoint: P=0.97) symptoms on predominantly
prospective, open-label, treatment within infusion/60 Symptomatic ICH at 24-36 awakening and composed of
blinded endpoint, phase 3 4½ hours of minutes) n=551 hrs: had positive patients with
RCT stroke onset, or tenecteplase: 3% DWI-FLAIR minor
alteoplase: 2% mismatch neurological
Wake-Up
Size: N=1107 OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.51 - impairment and
Stroke- 2.68; P=0.70 no major
Treatment within intracranial
4½ hours after • given its occlusion.
awakening superiority
based on design
FLAIR-DWI to detect a 9%
mismatch on difference in the
primary end
MRI; eligible for
point, this trial
bridging therapy was not
before designed to
thrombectomy establish
noninferiority
76
Major
Exclusion
Criteria:
Premorbid mRS
≥3; Seizure at
stroke onset and
no visible
occlusion on
baseline CT;
large areas of
hypodense
ischaemic
changes on
baseline CT;
systolic blood
pressure >180
mm Hg or
diastolic blood
pressure >110
mm Hg despite
of blood
pressure
lowering
therapy; other
usual IV
alteplase
exclusions
DIAS 4 Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at Desmoteplase • Terminated • Desmoteplase
von Kummer R, and efficacy of criteria: NIHSS Desmoteplase, 90 d*: 42% vs. 36%; increased the after enrollment was not superior
et al.167 desmoteplase between 3 4–24; within 3–9 90 mcg/kg adjusted OR, 1.45; 95% recanalization of 270 of 400 to placebo
2016 h and 9 h after stroke h of symptom (n=124) CI, 0.79–2.64; P=0.23 rate at 12 to 24 planned patients • Patients
27803391 onset in patients with onset; occlusion h by an absolute following the recruited from
occlusion or high-grade or high-grade Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: difference of results of DIAS North America,
stenosis of a Placebo (n=128) 5% vs. 2% 22.8% (P=0.02) 3
77
stenosis in major cerebral major cerebral • No safety Latin America
arteries artery on concerns and Europe
MRA/CTA
Study type: RCT
Exclusion
Size: N=270 criteria: Age>85
y; hemorrhage
on CT or MRI;
infarction >1/3 of
MCA territory or
>1/2 of ACA or
PCA territory;
high risk of
bleeding
DIAS 3 Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–2 at No differences No safety • Desmoteplase
Albers GW, et and efficacy of criteria: NIHSS Desmoteplase, 90 d*: 51% vs. 50%; in mortality (10% concerns was not superior
al.168 desmoteplase between 3 4–24; within 3–9 90 mcg/kg adjusted OR, 1.20; 95% in both groups) to placebo
2015 h and 9 h after stroke h of symptom (N=247) CI, 0.79–1.81; P=0.40. • Patients
25937443 onset in patients with onset; occlusion recruited from
occlusion or high-grade or high-grade Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: Asia and Europe
stenosis in major cerebral stenosis of a Placebo 3% vs. 2%
arteries major cerebral (N=245)
artery on
Study type: RCT MRA/CTA
Size: N=492 Exclusion

criteria: Age>85
y; hemorrhage
on CT or MRI;
infarction >1/3 of
MCA territory or
>1/2 of ACA or
PCA territory;
high risk of
bleeding
ATTEST Aim: Assess the efficacy Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Percentage • No differences • Analysis was Tenecteplase
Huang X, et al.89 and safety of tenecteplase criteria: Tenecteplase, of penumbral tissue in mRS at 30 or per protocol 0.25 mg/kg
2015 vs. alteplase within 4·5 h Indication for 0.25 mg/kg salvaged at 24–48 h: 68% 90 d • Extracranial appears to be as
25726502 of stroke onset alteplase; within single bolus, up vs. 68%; P=0.81 bleeding: 8% vs. safe as
4.5 h of to 25 mg (N=52) 0%
78
Study type: RCT (Phase symptom onset; Safety end point: sICH: • No difference standard-dose
II) available CTP at Comparator: 2% vs. 4% in mortality at 90 alteplase
baseline Alteplase, 0.9 d
Size: N=104 mg/kg infusion,
Exclusion up to 90 mg
criteria: Any (N=52)
contraindication
s for alteplase
GFR<30 ml/min
DIAS-J Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: sICH within No increase in Dose ranging Desmoteplase in
Mori E, et al.380 and tolerability of criteria: NIHSS Desmoteplase, 72 h: 6% with 70 mcg/kg brain edema or trial doses of 70
2015 desmoteplase within 3 to 9 4–24; within 3–9 70 mcg/kg vs. 0% with 90 mcg/kg vs. other major mcg/kg or 90
26251244 h of stroke onset in h of symptom (N=16); 90 13% with placebo adverse events mcg/kg
Japanese patients onset; occlusion mcg/kg (n=16) appeared safe
or high-grade Safety end point: Primary
Study type: RCT (Phase stenosis of a Comparator: end point was the safety
II dose ranging) major cerebral Placebo (n=16) end point
artery on
Size: N=193 MRA/CTA
Exclusion
criteria: Age>85
y; hemorrhage
on CT or MRI;
infarction >1/3 of
MCA territory or
>1/2 of ACA or
PCA territory;
high risk of
bleeding
Parsons M, et Aim: Compare the Inclusion Intervention: Co-primary end points: mRS 0–1 at 90 No differences Both
al.91 effectiveness of two criteria: Tenecteplase, • Percentage of perfusion d: 72% with in ICH or other tenecteplase
2012 different doses of Indication for 0.1 mg/kg single lesion that was tenecteplase serious adverse doses appeared
22435369 tenecteplase vs. alteplase alteplase; within bolus, up to 10 reperfusion at 24 h on 0.25 mg/kg vs. events superior to
in acute stroke patients 6 h of symptom mg (N=25) or MRI: 79% with 40% with standard-dose
within 6 h of symptom onset; ≥20% 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase (both doses alteplase alteplase for the
onset and selected by mismatch by single bolus, up combined) vs. 55% with studied end
CTP DWI/PWI or to 25 mg (n=25) alteplase; P=0.004 points
CTP; large • NIHSS improvement at
intracranial 24 h: 8±5 with
79
Study type: RCT (phase artery occlusion Comparator: tenecteplase (both doses
IIb) on CTA Alteplase, 0.9 combined) vs. 3±6 with
mg/kg infusion, alteplase
Size: N=75 Exclusion up to 90 mg
criteria: Any (n=25) Safety end point: No
contraindication sICH cases
s for alteplase
Haley EC, et Aim: Compare the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0–1: N/A Prematurely The 0.4 mg/kg
al.169 effectiveness of three criteria: Tenecteplase, 45% with 0.1 mg/kg, 48% terminated due dose was
2010 different doses of Indication for 0.1 mg/kg with 0.25 mg/kg, 37% with to slow inferior; the
20185783 tenecteplase vs. alteplase alteplase; within (N=31), 0.25 0.4 mg/kg and 42% with recruitment other two doses
in acute stroke patients 3 h of symptom mg/kg (N=31), placebo; P>0.3 for all appeared to be
within 3 h of symptom onset and 0.4 mg/kg comparisons similar to
onset (n=19) standard dose
Exclusion Safety end point: Total of alteplase
Study type: RCT (phase criteria: Any Comparator: 6 symptomatic ICHs: 3 of
IIb/III) contraindication Alteplase 0.9 19 (15.8%) in the 0.4
s for alteplase mg/kg infusion, mg/kg group, 2 of 31
Size: N=112 up to 90 mg (6.5%) in the 0.25 mg/kg
(n=31) tenecteplase group, and
none (0 of 31) in the 0.1
mg/kg tenecteplase group;
by comparison, there was
1 of 31 (3.2%)
symptomatic ICH in the
rtPA group
DIAS 2 Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Favorable • Median Dose-ranging The investigated
Hacke W, et and efficacy of two doses criteria: NIHSS Desmoteplase, clinical outcome at 90 d*: changes in trial doses of
al.92 of desmoteplase between 4–24; ≥20% 90 mcg/kg 47% with 90 mcg/kg vs. lesion volume: desmoteplase
2009 3–9 h after stroke onset in mismatch by (n=57) or 125 36% with 125 mcg/kg vs. 90 mcg/kg did not improve
19097942 patients with radiological DWI/PWI or mcg/kg (N=66) 46% with placebo; P=0.47 desmoteplase outcomes in
penumbra CTP; within 3–9 14% (0.5 cm³), patients with
h of symptom Comparator: Safety end point: sICH: 125 mcg/kg acute stroke and
Study type: RCT (phase onset Placebo (n=63) 3.5% with 90 mcg/kg vs. desmoteplase tissue-at-risk
II dose-ranging) 4.5% with 125 mcg/kg vs. 11% (0.3 cm³), within 3–9 h
Exclusion 0% with placebo placebo 10% (– from symptom
Size: N=193 criteria: Age>85 0.9 cm³) onset
y; hemorrhage • Mortality rate
on CT or MRI; was 5% for 90
infarct core >1/3 mcg/kg
80
of MCA territory desmoteplase,
on DWI or CTP; 21% for 125
high risk of mcg/kg
bleeding; ICA desmoteplase,
occlusion and 6% for
placebo
DEDAS Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Rate of Favorable Dose-escalation Desmoteplase in
Furlan AJ, et and efficacy of two doses criteria: NIHSS Desmoteplase, reperfusion on MRI after clinical outcome trial doses of 90
al.94 of desmoteplase between 4–20; DWI/PWI 90 mcg/kg 4–8 h: favorable clinical at 90 d*: 29% mcg/kg or 125
2006 3–9 h after stroke onset in mismatch; within (n=14) or 125 outcome at 90 d*: 18% with 90 mcg/kg mcg/kg
16574922 patients with radiological 3–9 h of mcg/kg (n=15) with 90 mcg/kg vs. 53% vs. 60% with appeared safe
penumbra symptom onset with 125 mcg/kg vs. 38% 125 mcg/kg vs.
Comparator: with placebo 25% with
Study type: RCT (Phase Exclusion Placebo (n=8) placebo; P=0.02
II, dose-escalation) criteria: Age>85 Safety end point: sICH: in favor of the
y; hemorrhage 0% in all groups 125 mcg/kg
Size: N=104 on MRI; dose
infarction >1/3 of
MCA territory on
DWI; high risk of
bleeding
DIAS Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Rate of Favorable Dose-finding • Acceptable
Hacke W, et and efficacy of various criteria: NIHSS Desmoteplase, reperfusion on MRI after clinical outcome trial rate of sICH with
al.95 doses of desmoteplase 4–20; DWI/PWI multiple doses 4–8 h: 71% vs. 19%; at 90 d*: 60% doses of up to
2005 between 3–9 h after stroke mismatch; within (n=75) P=0.001 (125 mcg/kg vs. 47%; 125 mcg/kg
15569863 onset in patients with 3–9 h of dose) P=0.009 (125 • Desmoteplase
radiological penumbra symptom onset Comparator: mcg/kg dose) may confer
Placebo (n=27) Safety end point: sICH: improved rates
Study type: RCT (Phase Exclusion 26.7% with fixed doses of reperfusion by
II, dose-finding) criteria: Age>85 (i.e., not weight-adjusted) MRI criteria
y; hemorrhage and 2.2% with weight-
Size: N=104 on MRI; adjusted doses vs. 0%
infarction >1/3 of with placebo
MCA territory on
DWI; high risk of
bleeding
*Defined as ≥8 points improvement on NIHSS (or 0 to 1), mRS (0 to 2), and Barthel Index (75 to 100).
Abbreviations: ACA indicates anterior cerebral artery; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; CTA, computed tomography angiogram; CTP, computed tomography
perfusion; DWI, diffusion weighted imaging; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; h, hours; ICA, internal carotid artery; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; MRA, magnetic resonance angiogram;
81
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; PCA, posterior
cerebral artery; PWI, perfusion weighted imaging; RCT, randomized clinical trial; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; y, years.
Literature search topic: IV lysis
Table XL. Randomized Clinical Trials Of Adjuvant Sonothrombolysis (since 2013 AIS Guidelines)
Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & (if any) Adverse Comments
Comparator
(# patients)
NOR-SASS Aim: to demonstrate 5. Major Inclusion Intervention: 6 1 end points defined Stopped Sonothrombolysi
Nacu A, et al.171 superiority of contrast- Criteria: Acute Contrast in different ways: prematurely s was safe
27980128 enhanced ultrasound ischemic stroke Enhanced neurological improvement (183 of planned among
treatment patients ≥ 18 Sonothrombolysi at 24 hours (3) and 276) for lack of unselected
(sonothrombolysis) versus years, with or s with 2 MHz functional handicap at 90 funding ischemic stroke
sham ultrasound without visible pulse-wave days (3): patients with or
treatment in consecutively arterial transcranial without a visible
admitted patients with occlusion on Doppler (TCD) All P 0.05 occlusion on
acute ischemic stroke computed ultrassund computed
within 4.5 tomography for 60 tomography
hours after stroke onset angiography minutes and Safety end point: angiography and
(CTA) and microbubbles with varying
Study Type: multicenter, treatable ≤ 4(½) plus sICH 2/93 vs 4/90; P=0.13 grades of clinical
prospective, open-label, hours after alteplase/tenect severity. There
blinded endpoint, phase 3 symptom onset eplase (n=93) was no
RCT 6. statistically
7. Major Comparator: significant
Size: N=183 Exclusion sham clinical effect of
Criteria: ultrasound, sonothrombolysi
Premorbid mRS sham s in this
≥3; Primary microbubbles prematurely
endovascular (NaCl 0.9%) stopped trial.
treatment; plus
Recent or alteplase/tenect
unstable eplase
coronary (n=90)
ischemia or
resting angina
<7 days; Acute
82
cardiac
insufficiency,
cardiac
insufficiency
class III/IV;
serious cardiac
arrhythmias;
Any right-left-
shunt, severe
pulmonary
hypertension
(PAP
>90 mmHg)
Moderate to
severe chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease
(COPD),
baseline O2
saturation
<80 %)
Table XLI. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Endovascular Therapy
Year Published
Coutinho JM, et Study type: Post Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: • Similar treatment times, device
al.381 hoc-analysis Two multicenter, • Reperfusion passes, and
2017 prospective clinical • 90 d mRS 0–2 emboli to new territory between
28097310 Size: N=291 (N=160 trials using the • Mortality groups
ET and IV alteplase, Solitaire device: • Non-randomized patient sample,
N=131 ET alone) SWIFT and STAR Results: with local site variation in treatment
registry • No clinically meaningful differences between groups protocols
• TICI 2b/3: ET+IV alteplase 84.1%, ET alone 84.7%. • Approximately 1/4 of patients in
Exclusion criteria: ET+IV alteplase group were treated
• 90 d mRS 0–2: ET+IV alteplase 57.7%, ET alone 47.7%
Patients in dataset with reduced dose alteplase (0.6
(P=0.1)
mg/kg), although sensitivity analysis
83
treated with Merci • Mortality: ET+IV alteplase 8.1%, ET alone 12.2% excluding these patients found
device similar results
• Findings suggest that IV alteplase
does not provide additional benefit
in endovascular treatment of acute
ischemic stroke from large vessel
occlusion
Bush CK, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS 0–2 • Improved functional outcomes and
al.174 analysis Meta-analysis of greater chance of functional
2016 contemporary ET Results: OR for ET: 2.2 (95% CI, 1.66–2.98; P<0.0001) outcome after ET with new
26807742 Size: N=1287 with stent retrievers generation thrombectomy devices
vs. standard care for • Similar complication profiles and
patients with acute mortality between ET and standard
ischemic anterior care
circulation stroke: MR • Treatment effect independent of IV
CLEAN, ESCAPE, alteplase administration
EXTEND-IA, SWIFT • Findings underscore impact of
PRIME, REVASCAT time dependence on treatment
outcome but cannot provide precise
Exclusion criteria: time-point after onset of symptoms
Non-randomized for futility
trials, studies not • Homogenous benefit across
reporting ORs or subgroups
variances, studies • Findings strongly support
where ET with new recommendations for early ET for
generation acute ischemic stroke patients with
thrombectomy LVO, using new thrombectomy
devices was not part devices
of intervention
SEER Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS ordinal analysis • No difference in secondary end
Campbell BC, et analysis Meta-analysis points of sICH or mortality
al.173 (patient-level data) of Results: • NNT of 4.25 for independent
2016 Size: N=787 acute ischemic stroke • mRS score improvement OR, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0–3.5; functional outcome, homogeneity of
26888532 trials in which P≤110-10) benefit across subgroups
Solitaire stent • NNT of 2.5 for improvement in 1 grade of mRS score • Revascularization rates 77% with
retriever was the only Solitaire
or the predominant • Reduced mortality after ET in
device used: patients ≥80 y 20% vs. 40%,
adjusted OR: 3.7 (1.3–10.6) P=0.01,
84
SWIFT PRIME, despite overall equivalence for
ESCAPE, EXTEND- mortality as a secondary outcome
IA, REVASCAT • Study details results with Solitaire
and does not evaluate other devices
Exclusion criteria: for thrombectomy
Non-randomized • Identifies robust benefit for
trials, trials without Solitaire thrombectomy in acute
imaging confirmation ischemic stroke patients
of LVO, trials where
Solitaire was not the
dominant device
utilized initially, and
others
HERMES Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS shift analysis • Shows clinical benefit from
Goyal M, et analysis Meta-analysis thrombectomy across wide range of
al.172 (patient level data) of Results: age and stroke severity
2016 Size: N=1287 ET vs. medical • Adjusted cOR: 2.49 (95% CI, 1.76–3.53; P<0.0001) • 71% with TICI 2b/3 result after ET
26898852 management for • NNT for 1 point reduced disability on mRS is 2.6 • Mortality, sICH, and parenchymal
acute ischemic stroke hematoma equivalent between
due to LVO: MR groups
CLEAN, ESCAPE, • Homogeneous benefit across pre-
EXTEND-IA, SWIFT specified subgroups, including
PRIME, REVASCAT age>80 y, tandem occlusions,
ASPECTS or NIHSS score
Exclusion criteria: • Benefit irrespective of IV alteplase
Trials other than the administration
5 recent randomized • Patient-level data utilized for
trials listed analysis from studies utilizing
current clinical practice patterns.
• Consistency of benefit suggests
that results likely apply to broader
patient range after acute ischemic
stroke from LVO
Grech R, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: • Aggregates information from
al.382 analysis Meta-analysis of • Recanalization rates studies regarding stent retrievers to
2016 studies utilizing • 90 d mRS 0–2 increase statistical power
26597570 Size: Solitaire Solitaire or Trevo in • sICH • Evaluates only Solitaire and Trevo
N=762, Trevo N=210 the treatment of devices
acute ischemic stroke Results:
85
Exclusion criteria: • No clinically meaningful differences between Solitaire and • Only two RCTs included;
Case reports or Trevo groups remainder are observational or non-
series, patients • Recanalization 86.7% vs. 80.8% (Solitaire vs. Trevo) RCT designs
treated without ET, • Weighted mean 1.9 passes vs. 2.5 passes (Solitaire vs. • Includes trials utilizing TIMI 2/3
trails utilizing pooled Trevo) recanalization targets
data from other • Functional outcome in 52.1% vs. 47.6% (Solitaire vs. • Supports the use of stent
sources, animal Trevo) retrievers to achieve functional
studies, and others • sICH 7% vs. 8.5% (Solitaire vs. Trevo) outcomes with good safety profiles,
without clear differences between
Solitaire and Trevo
Rodrigues FB, Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: • Provides evidence for the benefit
et al.383 analysis Meta-analysis of ET • 90 d mRS 0–2 of ET, particularly stent retriever
2016 vs. medical • Mortality thrombectomy, over medical
27091337 Size: N=2925 management for management alone for treatment of
acute ischemic stroke Results: acute ischemic stroke from LVO
due to LVO: IMS II, • ET functional outcome risk ratio: 1.37 (95% CI, 1.14–1.64) • Includes both THERAPY and
MR RESCUE, • No mortality differences risk ratio: 0.9 (95% CI, 0.76–1.06) THRACE but only data from results
SYNTHESIS •Analysis restricted to MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, presented in press or meetings
Expansion, MR SWIFT PRIME, EXTEND-IA, THERAPY, THRACE: • Heterogeneous group of studies
CLEAN, ESCAPE, functional outcome risk ratio: 1.56 (95% CI, 1.38–1.75), included, with variable endovascular
REVASCAT, SWIFT mortality risk ratio: 0.86 (95% CI, 0.69–1.06) treatment methods. Analyzed further
PRIME, EXTEND-IA, as studies published prior to 2015
THERAPY, THRACE and those published during or after
2015
Exclusion criteria:
Observational
studies, non-
controlled or non-
randomized
interventional
studies, studies
without mechanical
thrombectomy in
intervention arm or IV
alteplase in control
arm
Saver JL, et al.32 Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mRS ordinal shift • Defines a time window of <7.3 h to
2016 analysis Meta-analysis of time arterial puncture for benefit of ET for
27673305 to treatment of ET vs. Results: acute ischemic stroke patients with
Size: N=1287 medical management • ET mRS 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7–3.1); LVO
86
for acute ischemic standard care mRS 3.6 (95% CI, 3.5–3.8) • No sub group analysis by trial to
stroke due to LVO: • mRS scale distribution declined with longer time to determine which imaging criteria
MR CLEAN, treatment. selected patients who benefitted
ESCAPE, EXTEND- • Absolute risk difference for reduced disability 39.2% at 3 h, after 6 h most accurately
IA, SWIFT PRIME, 30.2% at 6 h, 15.7% at 8 h; benefit absent after 7.3 h • Time dependence for therapy
REVASCAT highlights need for initiation of
therapy as rapidly as possible after
Exclusion criteria: onset of symptoms, with benefit
Trials other than the greatest for treatment initiation <2 h
5 recent randomized from symptom onset
trials listed • In hospital processes directly
associated with improved functional
outcome
• Mortality, sICH, and parenchymal
hematoma rates did not vary with
longer delay to reperfusion
Touma L, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mRS 0–2 • Mortality, sICH, parenchymal
al.384 Systematic review Systematic review hematoma inconclusive between
2016 and meta-analysis and meta-analysis to Results: groups (wide CI), no detectable
26810499 quantify benefits and Stent retriever patients: differences between groups
Size: N=1287 risks of using stent • Greater functional outcome, RR: 1.72 (95% CI, 1.48–1.99) • Asserts the benefit of stent
retrievers with • Greater odds of 1-unit decrease in 90 d mRS, pooled OR: retriever thrombectomy for treatment
alteplase compared 2.03 (95% CI, 1.65–2.50) of acute ischemic stroke patients
to alteplase alone for with LVO
acute ischemic stroke
from large vessel
occlusion, MR
CLEAN, ESCAPE,
EXTEND-IA, SWIFT
PRIME, REVASCAT
Exclusion criteria:
Observational
studies, case reports,
reviews, abstracts,
and others
Badhiwala JH, Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: • Confirms improved functional
et al.385 analysis Meta-analysis of ET • Day 90 mRS 0–2 outcomes and higher rates of
2015 vs. medical • Ordinal mRS improvement angiographic revascularization at 24
26529161 Size: N=2423 management for • Revascularization at 24 h
87
acute ischemic • sICH within 90 d h for ET compared to IV alteplase
stroke: IMS II, MR • All-cause mortality at 90 d alone
RESCUE, • No clinically meaningful difference
SYNTHESIS Results: between groups in symptomatic
Expansion, MR • mRS score 0–2: 44.6% for ET vs. 31.8% for standard care, intracranial hemorrhage or all-cause
CLEAN, ESCAPE, OR, 1.71 (95% CI, 1.18–2.49; P=.005) mortality at 90 d
REVASCAT, SWIFT • ET treatment benefit across all mRS scores, OR, 1.56 • Confirmation of LVO pre-
PRIME, EXTEND-IA (95% CI, 1.14–2.13; P=.005) procedurally increased chance of
• ET higher rates of angiographic revascularization at 24 h improved functional outcome after
Exclusion criteria: (75.8% vs. 34.1%; OR, 6.49 (95% CI, 4.79–8.79; P<.001)) ET
Non-randomized • Similar sICH and mortality • Benefit of ET was increased by
studies, retrospective concomitant use of IV alteplase
series, pilot studies,
abstracts, studies
that did not include IV
alteplase for controls
or ET for
interventions, and
others
Chen CJ, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS 0–2 • Subgroup analysis of 2 trials
al.386 analysis Meta-analysis of without LVO selection criteria failed
2015 outcomes in RCT of Results: to demonstrate difference between
26537058 Size: N=2423 acute ischemic stroke • OR for ET, 1.71; P=0.005 groups in functional independence
patients undergoing • Subgroup analysis of 6 trials with LVO criteria: OR, 2.23 for • Angiographic revascularization
ET: IMS II, MR d 90 mRS 0–2; P<0.00001 achieved in 565 (56%) of 1,005
RESCUE, patients
SYNTHESIS • Similar sICH and mortality rates
Expansion, MR • Heterogeneous treatment
CLEAN, ESCAPE, methods in ET group
EXTEND-IA, SWIFT
PRIME, REVASCAT
Exclusion criteria:
Single center, non-
randomized trials,
failure to compare ET
to standard care
directly
Elgendy IY, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mRS 0–2 • ET associated with 45% relative
al.387 analysis Meta-analysis of and 13% absolute higher likelihood
88
2015 outcomes in RCT of Results: For ET RR, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.22–1.72; P<0.0001) of mRS 0–2 compared to standard
26653623 Size: N=2410 ET for patients care alone
presenting within 4.5 • Demonstrates the efficacy and
h of symptom onset: safety of ET compared to standard
IMS II, MR RESCUE, care for acute ischemic stroke
MR CLEAN, patients
ESCAPE, EXTEND- • Similar rates of sICH but a trend
IA, SWIFT PRIME, towards decreased mortality with ET
REVASCAT (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.72–1.02;
P=0.09)
Exclusion criteria:
Trials that prohibited
IV alteplase before
thrombectomy, non-
randomized studies,
retrospective series,
and others
Fargen KM, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS 0–2 shift analysis • Identifies superior outcomes in
al.388 analysis Meta-analysis of patients undergoing ET, particularly
2015 outcomes in RCT of Results: with LVO demonstrated pre-
25432979 Size: N=183/N=1903 ET in acute ischemic • LVO confirmation: OR, 1.67 (95% CI: 1.29–1.16, P=0.0001) procedurally
stroke patients with • No LVO confirmation: OR, 1.27 (95% CI, 1.05–1.54; • Does not include contemporary ET
LVO criteria and P=0.019) trials, with the exception of MR
without LVO criteria: CLEAN
PROACT II, MELT,
IMS III, SYNTHESIS,
MR RESCUE, MR
CLEAN
Exclusion criteria:
Non-randomized
studies, retrospective
series, comparison to
historical controls
Kumar G, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Death or dependency (DoD), mortality • Included endovascular and IV
al.389 analysis Meta-analysis of cases of basilar occlusion
2015 published studies on Results: • Suggests equivalence between
25271064 Size: N=2056 (IA stroke therapy for • For entire population endovascular therapies and IV
N=1715, IV N=341) basilar artery Recanalization decreased: treatment, but supports the benefit
occlusion DoD RR: 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63–0.72)
89
Mortality RR: 0.49 (95% CI, 0.44–0.55) of recanalization in patients with
Exclusion criteria: • For IA patients recanalized: acute basilar occlusion
Studies of LVO other DoD RR: 0.67; mortality RR: 0.53
than basilar artery,
abstracts, case
reports, reviews,
meta-analyses,
studies lacking
outcome data, and
others
Marmagkiolis K, Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS 0–2 • Analysis restricted to acute
et al.390 analysis Meta-analysis of ET ischemic stroke therapy in
2015 for ICA and M1 Results: ET 42.6% vs. standard care 26.1% (P<0.0001), contemporary trials
26476611 Size: N=1287 occlusions vs. OR, 2.43 (95% CI, 1.9–3.09) • sICH and 90-d mortality equivalent
standard care: MR between groups
CLEAN, ESCAPE, • Confirms safety and efficacy of
REVASCAT, SWIFT stent retriever use for ischemic
PRIME, EXTEND-IA stroke after large vessel occlusion
Exclusion criteria:
Non-randomized
studies, retrospective
series, and others
Yarbrough CK, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mRS 0–2 • Confirms benefit of ET for acute
et al.391 Systematic review Systematic review ischemic stroke patients compared
2015 and meta-analysis and meta-analysis to Results: to standard care alone
26396032 evaluate effect of ET • All trials: pooled OR: 1.75 (95% CI: 1.2–2.54) • Use of IV alteplase associated
Size: N=2049 on outcome for LVO • All trials requiring LVO confirmation: OR, 2.0 (95% CI, with improved outcomes (OR: 1.83,
patients: IMS II, MR 1.48–2.71) 95% CI: 1.46–2.31), no IV alteplase
RESCUE, also increased odds for good
SYNTHESIS outcome, but not statistically
Expansion, MR significant (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.86–
CLEAN, ESCAPE, 2.95)
EXTEND-IA, SWIFT • Effect of ET greater in subgroup
PRIME, REVASCAT with higher NIHSS
• Trend towards decreased mortality
Exclusion criteria: in ET group; similar sICH rates
Non-randomized • Treatment benefit if ET
studies, case reports commenced before 6-8 h from onset
or series, and others
90
• Heterogeneous ET techniques in
studies included
Almekhalfi MA, Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: TICI 2b/3, day 90 mRS 0–2 • Analyzes comparative
et al.392 analysis Meta-analysis of recanalization rates, procedural
2013 device-based trials to Results: timing, and outcomes between
22837311 Size: N=925 (MERCI assess impact of • Successful recanalization in 59.1% MERCI studies (95% various devices based on published
N=357, Penumbra recanalization on the CI, 49.3–77.7), 86.6% Penumbra studies (95% CI, 84.1– trials
N=455, outcome of ET 93.8), and 92.9% stent retriever studies (95% CI, 90.9–99.9) • Minimal data available for
stent retriever • mRS 0–2 in 31.5% MERCI, 36.6% Penumbra, and 46.9% procedure times for MERCI device,
N=113) Exclusion criteria: stent retriever but Penumbra and stent retriever
Studies investigating comparable in treatment times
devices other than • References first generations of
MERCI, Penumbra, stent retrievers, and earlier
or stent retrievers generations of aspiration systems;
does not reflect current practice
patterns
Fields JD, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Day 90 mRS 0–1, 0–2; sICH • Estimates benefit of endovascular
al.393 analysis Meta-analysis of IA therapy from intra-arterial lytic
2011 thrombolytics for Results: administration
21990808 Size: N=334 MCA occlusion vs. • IAT day 90 mRS 0–1: 31% vs. 20%, OR, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2– • Endovascular therapy improved all
placebo: PROACT, 3.4; P=0.01) functional outcome measures with
PROACT II, MELT • IAT mRS 0–2: 43% vs. 31%, OR, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2–3.0; similar mortality despite increased
P=0.01) risk of sICH
Exclusion criteria: • sICH: 11% vs. 2%, OR, 4.6 (95% CI, 1.3–16; P=0.02) • Supports efficacy and safety within
Studies utilizing 6 h of intra-arterial lytic therapy for
mechanical MCA occlusions
thrombectomy • Heterogeneity in sample; MELT
techniques (compared to PROACT and
PROACT II) treated patients earlier
and with more mild strokes, and
permitted guidewire maceration
• Urokinase not available in the US
since October 2010
• Many control patients would now
receive IV alteplase; effect of intra-
arterial thrombolytic compared to
contemporary stroke therapy
therefore uncertain
91
Abbreviations: ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; CI, confidence interval; DoD, death or dependency; ET, endovascular therapy; GA, general
anesthesia; IAT, internal carotid artery; IV, intravenous; LVO, large vessel occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of
Health Stroke Scale; NNT, number needed to treat; OR, odds ratio; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; TIMI, thrombolysis in
myocardial infarction; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; and y, years.
Literature search topic: Endovascular interventions
Table XLII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing General Anesthesia to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Therapy
Study Aim of Study; Study Patient Study End Point Results Relevant 2 Study Summary
Acronym; Type; Study Size (N) Population Intervention (# (Absolute Event Rates, P End Point (if Limitations; Conclusions
Author; Year patients) / value; OR or RR; & 95% any) Adverse Comments
Published Study CI) Events
Comparator (#
patients)
AnSTROKE Aim: null hypothesis was Major Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS 0-2 at mTICI 2b–3 • single-center •In this small,
Lowhagen that the anesthesia criteria:) ≥18 General 3 months: study single center
Henden P et technique does not have years of age; anesthesia (GA) GA: 41/45 • size of the study no
al.181 an impact on neurological proven by propofol and GA: 19/45 (42.2%) (91%0 study limited statistically
28522637 outcome, as long as occlusion in remifentanil, CS: 18/45 (40.0%) CS: 40/45(89%) •superiority significant
severe hypotension during anterior cerebral maintained with (P=1.00) P=1.00 design difference was
the procedure is avoided circulation by CT sevoflurane and not designed to found between
angiography; remifentanil, Safety end point: establish GA and CS in
Study type: single-center, NIHSS ≥10 (n=45) • Symptomatic ICH 22-36 noninferiority neurological
open-label, blinded end- (iright-sided hrs: outcome 3
point RCT occlusion) or Comparator: months after
≥14 ( left-sided Conscious GA: 0/45 (0%) stroke or in
Size: 90 occlusion; sedation (CS) CS: 3/45 (7%) mTICI 2b/3
treatment by remifentanil P=0.24 recanalization.
initiated within 8 infusion (n=45)
hours after
onset of
symptoms.
Major
Exclusion
criteria:
anesthesiologica
l concerns
(airway,
agitation, etc) at
the discretion of
92
the attending
anesthetist;)
premorbidity
mRS ≥4 or other
comorbidity
contraindicating
embolectomy.
SIESTA Aim: To assess whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: NIHSS • TICI 2b/3: Single center; Trial findings do
Schonenberger conscious sedation is criteria: GA during improvement after 24 h: - 89% GA vs. experienced not support an
S, et al.182 superior to general NIHSS>10, IC procedure 3.2 NIHSS points GA 80% conscious with general advantage for
2016 anesthesia for early ICA, M1, <9 h (n=73) group, -3.6 NIHSS points sedation group anesthesia pre- conscious
27785516 neurological improvement conscious sedation group; (not clinically trial initiation, sedation over
among patients receiving Exclusion Comparator: mean difference 0.4 points meaningful) small sample GA in acute
acute ischemic stroke criteria: Conscious (95% CI, -3.4 to 2.7; • No clinically size, early endovascular
thrombectomy Aspiration risk, sedation during P=0.82) meaningful primary end ischemic stroke
severe agitation, procedure differences in point intervention
Study type: RCT difficult airway (n=77) Safety end point: mRS or mortality assessment (24
access, and • Death 24.7% vs. 24.7% at 3 mo between h)
Size: N=150 many more • Vessel perforation/SAH groups
1.4% vs. 2.6% (P=0.59) • No clinically
meaningful
differences in
process time
points or
duration of
endovascular
therapy
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; ICA, internal carotid artery; GA, general anesthesia; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Score; RCT, randomized clinical
trial; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; and TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.
Literature search topics: Endovascular interventions
93
Table XLIII. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries Comparing General Anesthesia to Conscious Sedation for
Endovascular Stroke Therapy
Year Published
Berkhemer OA, Study type: Post hoc Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mRS 0–2 • Conversion to GA occurred in
et al.180 analysis of MR Post hoc analysis 4.4%
2016 CLEAN comparing the clinical Results: • No data on type of anesthesia
27421546 and angiographic • GA with 51% lower chance of mRS 0–2 (95% CI: 31%– collected in MR CLEAN
Size: GA N=79, CS outcomes of GA vs. 86%), absolute risk difference 19% for mRS 0–2 in favor of • Limited details about procedural
N=137, control CS for all patients CS group compared to control (adjusted OR, 2.96; 95% CI, BP changes
N=267 allocated to ET in MR 1.78–4.92) • Results challenge routine use of
CLEAN • Greater infarct growth in GA group. Door to groin time 32 GA
min longer in GA group (P=0.001)
Exclusion criteria: • Similar safety outcomes and procedural duration between
Inability to undergo GA and CS
ET (1 patient)
Brinjkji W, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: 90 d mRS 0–2 • No included studies were
al.394 Systematic review Systematic review randomized trials
2015 and meta-analysis and meta-analysis Results: GA with lower odds of mRS 0–2 (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, • Higher rates of both recanalization
25395655 comparing the clinical 0.35–0.53) and TICI 2b/3 (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37–0.80); and good functional outcomes for
Size: N=1956 and angiographic higher odds of death (OR, 2.59; 95% CI; 1.87–3.58) and patients treated with conscious
outcomes of GA vs. respiratory complications (OR, 2.09; 95% CI; 1.36–3.23). sedation
CS • Decreased rates of mortality and
respiratory complications for
Exclusion criteria: patients treated with conscious
Case reports, non- sedation
comparative studies, • Similar procedural time-points
studies that failed to between groups
separate outcome by
anesthesia type, and
others
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; CS, conscious sedation; ET, endovascular therapy; GA, general anesthesia; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; OR, odds ratio; and
TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.
Literature search topic: Endovascular interventions
94
Table XLIV. Nonrandomized Studies of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Year Published
Li W, et al.395 Study type: Single- Inclusion criteria: IV 1 end point: 90 d mRS (favorable 0–1) Interpretation limited by
2016 arm, open label, alteplase + tirofiban generalizability; warrants a
27608821 propensity matched infusion Results: 70.7% vs. 46.2% (P=0.026) prospective randomized trial

alteplase exclusions
Wada T, et al.396 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS at discharge Limited by generalizability; warrants
2016 Retrospective, AIS in Japan treated further study in a prospective
27567296 observational, with ozagrel Results: randomized trial
propensity matched (subtyped LAA, SVD) • LAA, OR, 0.99 (0.88–1.11); SVD, OR, 1.99 (0.87–1.16)
• sICH no difference
Size: N=2726 (LAA), Exclusion criteria:
N=1612 (SVD) Age<40 y, atrial
fibrillation or other
indication for AC
CLEAR-ER Study type: Post Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Severity-adjusted mRS at 90 d (favorable 0.6 mg/kg IV alteplase + eptifibatide
Adeoye O, et hoc, propensity 0.6 mg/kg IV outcome mRS 0–2) in AIS warrants a prospective
al.189 matched analysis of alteplase <3 h, + randomized trial
2015 data from 3 prior eptifibatide infusion Results: 45% vs. 36% unadjusted RR, 1.24 (0.91–1.69)
25523054 trials
Exclusion criteria:
Size: 85 vs. 169 alteplase exclusions
matched controls
(IMS III, ALIAS Part
2)
CLEAR-FDR Study type: Single- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH within 36 h Full dose IV alteplase + eptifibatide
Adeoye O, et arm, open-level, Full dose IV alteplase appears safe and warrants a
al.190 multicenter <3 h, + eptifibatide Results: 3.7% sICH prospective randomized trial
2015 infusion
26243231 Size: N=27
Exclusion criteria:
alteplase exclusions
Abbreviations: AC indicates anticoagulation; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; CI, confidence interval; IV, intravenous; LAA, large-artery atherosclerosis; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative
risk; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; and SVD, small vessel disease.
Literature search topic: Antiplatelet
95
Table XLV. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Antiplatelet to Control
Comparator
(# patients)
SOCRATES Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Time to • Ischemic • Low Ticagrelor not
Johnston SC efficacy of ticagrelor vs. criteria: Acute Ticagrelor (180 composite stroke, MI, or stroke: 385 (5.8) enrollment of recommended
and Amarenco ASA in minor stroke or minor stroke mg day 1, 90 mg death up to 90 d: vs. 441 (6.7), high-risk
P196 high-risk TIA (NIHSS≤5) or BID  90 d) + ticagrelor 442 (6.7%) vs. HR, 0.87 (0.76– patients (e.g.,
2016 TIA (ABCD2≥4), placebo (n= ASA 497 (7.5%); HR, 0.89 1.00); P=0.046 symptomatic
27705253 Study Type: age>40, ability 6589) (0.78–1.01); P=0.07 • All stroke: 390 carotid)
Randomized, double- to start study Safety end point: Time to (5.9) vs. 450 • Low event
blind, placebo-controlled drug within 24 h Comparator: first bleeding event up to (6.8) HR, 0.86 rates in TIA
trial onset ASA (300 mg 90 d: no difference (0.75–0.99); group
day 1, 100 mg P=0.03; p- • More patients
Size: N=13,199 (674 Exclusion daily  90 d) + values had premature
centers, 33 countries) criteria: Clear placebo considered non- discontinuation
indication or (n=6610) significant in the ticagrelor
contraindication group due to
for specific adverse events
antiplatelet (e.g., dyspnea)
therapy;
thrombolytic or
EVT; numerous
others
Ciccone A, et Aim: To assess safety Inclusion Intervention: IV 1 end point: Death or Non-significant • Abciximab Supports current
al.191 and efficacy of criteria: GP IIb-IIIa dependency at follow-up: difference in risk contributed 89% LOE
2014 glycoprotein GP IIb-IIIa Randomized, inhibitor abciximab vs. placebo: of extracranial of the total study
24609741 inhibitors in AIS unconfounded (abciximab, OR: 0.97 (0.77–1.22); hemorrhage: participants
trials, started tirofiban) either tirofiban vs. ASA: OR, abciximab (OR, considered
Study Type: Cochrane treatment within alone or in 1.00 (0.52–1.92) 1.81; 95% CI: • Heterogeneity
review 6 h of stroke combination with 0.96–3.41); between trials
onset IV thrombolytic Safety end point: sICH: tirofiban (OR, • Only 2 new
Size: N=1365 (4 trials) agents (n=685) abciximab vs. placebo, 3.04, 95% CI, trials (abESTT-II
Exclusion OR, 4.6 (95% CI, 2.01– 0.12–75.83) and SETIS)
criteria: Comparator: 10.54); tirofiban vs. ASA, included since
Nonrandomized, (n=680) OR, 0.32 (95% 2006 review
risk of bias at CI, 0.03–3.19)
96
discretion of • Excluded
reviewers CLEAR trials
(2008, 2013)
due to lower
dose of IV
alteplase in the
intervention
group compared
to control
Sandercock PA, Aim: To assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or Significant • 98% of data Supports current
et al.186 and efficacy of oral criteria: Antiplatelet dependency at follow-up: reduction in contributed by 2 LOE
2014 antiplatelet therapy in AIS Randomized, therapy (4 ASA vs. control, OR, 0.95 recurrent trials published
24668137 started within 14 d from unconfounded studies tested (0.91–0.99); P=0.01 ischemic stroke, in 1997 (IST,
onset trials of oral ASA, 3 tested PE CAST)
antiplatelet ticlopidine, and Safety end point: sICH: • No new trials
Study Type: Cochrane therapy in AIS 1 tested ASA / ASA vs. control, OR: 1.23 included since
review started within 14 dipyridamole); (1.00–1.50), P=0.04 2008
d from onset *2 trials (IST, • Trial data
Size: N=41,483 (8 trials) CAST) testing limited primarily
Exclusion ASA 160–300 to conclusions
criteria: mg daily, started about ASA
Nonrandomized, within 48 h, • Excluded IV
treatment contributed 98% antiplatelet
allocation not of the data agents
concealed from (n=20,647)
enrolling
investigator Comparator:
(n=20,644)
CHANCE Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: New stroke • Stroke, MI, • Stratified Adds to current
Wang Y, et al.193 efficacy of criteria: Acute Open label ASA (ischemic or hemorrhagic vascular death: randomization LOE; awaiting
2013 ASA/clopidogrel vs. ASA minor stroke (75–300 mg day at 90 d): ASA/clopidogrel 216 (8.4%) vs. by site and time definitive RCT
23803136 alone in patients with (NIHSS ≤3) or 1, 75 mg day 2– 212 (8.2%) vs. 307 (11.9%), of randomization (POINT)
minor stroke or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 21) + clopidogrel ASA/placebo 303 (11%), HR, 0.69 (0.58– • Intervention
TIA ≥4), age>40, (300 mg day 1, HR, 0.68 (0.57–0.81); 0.82); P<0.001 group received
ability to start 75 mg daily day P<0.001 • Ischemic placebo ASA d
Study Type: study drug 2–90) (n=2584) stroke 204 21–90
Randomized, double- within 24 h (7.9%) vs. 295 • Questionable
blind, placebo-controlled onset Comparator: (11.4%), HR, external validity
trial Open label ASA Safety end point: 0.67 (0.56– in non-Asian
(75–300 mg day Moderate to severe 0.81); P<0.001 populations and
97
Size: N=5170 (114 Exclusion 1, 75 mg day 2– bleeding event: no • No difference outside of
centers in China) criteria: Isolated 90 + placebo difference in hemorrhagic Chinese
sensory, visual (n=2586) stroke healthcare
symptoms, system: POINT
dizziness trial ongoing in
without evidence the US
of infarct on
MRI, a clear
indication for
AC, history of
GIB or surgery
within previous 3
mo, numerous
other exclusions
CHANCE-1 Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: New stroke • Stroke, MI, • Stratified The early benefit
YEAR efficacy of criteria: Acute Open label ASA (ischemic or hemorrhagic vascular death randomization of clopidogrel-
Wang Y, et al.194 ASA/clopidogrel vs. ASA minor stroke (75–300 mg day at 1 yr: 282 by site and time aspirin treatment
2015 alone in patients with (NIHSS ≤3) or 1, 75 mg day 2– 1 end point at 1 year (10.9%) vs. 370 of randomization in reducing the
25957224 minor stroke or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 21) + clopidogrel ASA/clopidogrel 275 (14.3%), HR, • Intervention risk of
TIA ≥4), age>40, (300 mg day 1, (10.6%) vs. ASA/placebo 0.78 (0.65– group received subsequent
ability to start 75 mg daily day 362 (14.0%), HR, 0.78 0.93); P=0.005 placebo ASA d stroke persisted
Study Type: study drug 2–90) (n=2584) (0.65–0.93); P<0.001 • Ischemic 21–90 for the
Randomized, double- within 24 h stroke at 1 yr: • Questionable duration of 1-
blind, placebo-controlled onset Comparator: 263 (10.2%) vs. external validity year of follow-
trial Open label ASA Safety end point: 349 (13.5%), in non-Asian up.
Exclusion (75–300 mg day Moderate to severe HR, 0.77 (0.64– populations and
Size: N=5170 (114 criteria: Isolated 1, 75 mg day 2– bleeding event: no 0.93); P=0.006 outside of
centers in China) sensory, visual 90 + placebo difference • No difference Chinese
symptoms, (n=2586) in hemorrhagic healthcare Adds to current
dizziness stroke system: POINT LOE; awaiting
without evidence trial ongoing in definitive RCT
of infarct on the US (POINT)
MRI, a clear
indication for
AC, history of
GIB or surgery
within previous 3
mo, numerous
other exclusions
98
Abbreviations: AC indicates anticoagulation; ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; BID, twice a day; CI, confidence interval; EVT, endovascular therapy; GIB, gastrointestinal bleeding; HR, hazard
ratio; IV, intravenous; LOE, level of evidence; MI, myocardial infarction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; PE,
pulmonary embolus; RCT, randomized clinical trial; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; sx, symptoms; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Literature search topic: Antiplatelet
Table XLVI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Anticoagulant to Control

Comparator
(# patients)
ARTSS-2 Aim: To assess safety of Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point Recanalization • No formal Supports the
Barreto AD, et argatroban as adjunct criteria: AIS Argatroban (100 Probability of a clinical at 2–3 h, sample size safety of
al.206 therapy in patients with patients μg/kg bolus) benefit (mRS 0–1 at 90 d) neurological estimation adjunctive
2017 AIS treated with alteplase receiving IV followed by RR>1.0: improvement by • Study not argatroban + IV
28507269 alteplase within infusion of either • Low dose: 1.17 (0.57– NIHSS, QOL at powered to alteplase at the
Study Type: Randomized 4.5 h, age≥18 y, 1 (low dose) 2.37), 0.67 90 d: no determine doses assessed
controlled trial NIHSS≥10 or (N=30) or 3 • High dose: 1.27 (0.63– clinically differences in to proceed with
proximal LVO μg/kg per min 2.53), 0.74 meaningful end points a Phase III
Size: N=90 (high dose) • Low + high dose: 1.34 differences • Open label efficacy trial
Exclusion (n=31) for 48 h (0.68–2.76), 0.79 design
criteria:
• Planned EVT Comparator: Safety end point:
• Full listing in No argatroban Incidence of sICH:
data supplement (n=29) • Control: 3/29 (10%)
• Low-dose: 4/30 (13%)
• High-dose: 2/31 (7%)
Probability RR>1.0: • Low

dose: 1.55 (1.07–2.25),
0.99
• High dose: 1.73 (1.04–
2.89), 0.98
Sandercock PA, Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or • Recurrent IS: • Heterogeneity Supports current
et al.198 efficacy and safety of early criteria: UFH, LMWH, disability at the end of OR, 0.76 (95% (intervention, LOE
2015 AC in first 14 d from AIS Randomized oral AC, follow-up (8 trials, CI, 0.65–0.88) stroke
25764172 trials of early AC thrombin n=22,125): OR, 0.99 (95% populations,
started within 14 CI, 0.93–1.04)
99
Study Type: Cochrane d from onset of inhibitors • PE: OR, 0.60 intervention,
review of randomized acute ischemic (n=11,613) Safety end point: sICH: (95% CI, 0.44– follow-up)
trials stroke (>90% OR, 2.55 (95% CI, 1.95– 0.81) • No additional
trials AC started Comparator: 3.33) • Extracranial studies included
Size: N=23,748 in first 48 h) Control hemorrhage: since 2008
(n=11,613) OR, 2.99 (95% review
Exclusion CI, 2.24–3.99)
criteria: Non-
randomization,
no control
group,
confounded
studies
Yi X, et al.199 Aim: To investigate the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: END (≥4 • Early recurrent • Unblinded Does not add to
2014 efficacy of LMWH criteria: Age Enoxaparin (40 pts on NIHSS) at 10 d ischemic stroke, • Excluded current LOE
24656240 compared to aspirin in 18–85 y; mg, 4000 IU) after admission: END: VTE, or cardioembolic
preventing END in acute diagnosis of started <48 h LMWH, 27 (3.95%) vs. myocardial etiologies
stroke patients ischemic stroke onset and ASA, 81 (11.82%), infarction at 10 d • Questionable
as defined by continued for 10 P<0.001 after admission; generalizability
Study Type: Unblinded CT and MRI; d (n=683) 6 mo mRS
RCT LAA or SVD by Safety end point: Time to (good outcome
TOAST criteria; Comparator: first bleeding event up to 0–2)
Size: N=1368 (2 Chinese symptoms of ASA (200 mg) 90 d: no difference
hospitals) stroke <48 h started <48 h • DVT: LMWH
before receiving onset and 10 (1.46%) vs.
the first dose of continued for 10 29 (4.23%),
trial medication; d (n=685) P=0.003
presence of • ERIS, MI: no
motor deficit as difference
a result of acute • 6 mo mRS 0–
stroke 2: LMWH 64.2%
vs. ASA 6.52%
Exclusion P=0.33
criteria: • Symptomatic
• NIHSS score basilar artery -
>15 LMWH 41
• History of ICH; (82.00%) vs.
known ASA 25
100
contraindication (48.08%),
for the use of P=0.001
LMWH or aspirin
• Patient on
anticoagulation
therapy before
the onset of
stroke;
sustained
hypertension
(BP >200/110
mmHg)
immediately
before
randomization
• Coexisting
terminal disease
or dementia,
atrial fibrillation
on ECG, chronic
rheumatic heart
disease, or
metallic heart
valve
• Thrombo-
cytopenia
Whiteley WN, et Aim: To investigate Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Composite • Dead or • Results driven Supports current
al.197 targeted heparinoids in criteria: UFH, of thrombotic events within dependent at 3– by IST (83% of LOE
2013 AIS for patients at high Individual heparinoid, 14 d (any fatal or non-fatal 6 mo (trial outcomes,
23642343 risk of DVT and/or lower patient data LMWH (n=N/A) pulmonary embolism, defined); source of
risk for hemorrhagic from 5 deep vein thrombosis, predictive derivation set for
events randomized Comparator: myocardial infarction, or modeling to predictive
control trials: ASA/placebo recurrent ischemic stroke define modeling)
Study Type: Meta- IST, TOAST, (n=N/A) [not stroke extension parameters that • Models only
analysis of randomized FISS-tris, alone): heparin vs. control might help target modestly
trials HAEST, TAIST ARR: 1.4% heparin regimen predictive for
for specific thrombotic and
Size: N=22,655 Exclusion Safety end point: patient groups hemorrhagic
criteria: n<100, Composite of hemorrhagic (e.g., age, events
non- events within 14 d (any presence of
101
randomized, recorded fatal or non-fatal atrial fibrillation, • Generaliz-
data not intracranial hemorrhage, NIHSS) ability limited to
available or extracranial • No group stroke subtypes
(excluded 22 hemorrhages that led to showed benefit predominant in
trials death, transfusion, or of heparins over the included
surgery: control vs. aspirin or trials
heparin ARR: 1.6% placebo for the • Heterogeneity
prevention of between trials
death or • Trials
disability at the identified from
time of last Cochrane
follow-up review397
FISS-tris Study Aim: To investigate the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: • mRS 0–2 at 6 • "Progressive Does not add to
Wang Q, et efficacy of LMWH vs. ASA criteria: Age Nadroparin • END at 10 d defined by mo stroke" poorly current LOE
al.398 in patients with LAOD 18–90 y; (3800 IU) progressive stroke, ERIS, LMWH better defined
2012 subgroups diagnosis of started <48 h sICH than ASA: >68, • Different
22893265 ischemic stroke onset and • "Progressive stroke" no antiplatelet primary
Study Type: Unblinded and vascular continued for 10 was defined as stroke on admission outcomes
Wang QS, et RCT imaging to d (n=180) events of END without • All other compared to
al.399 confirm LAOD evidence of ERIS or sICH: subgroups no main FISS-tris
2012 Size: N=353 (11 hospitals (intracranial and Comparator: dichotomized Barthel difference trial
22076004 Hong Kong, Singapore) extracranial) ASA (160 mg) Index 6 mo (good >85) • Exploratory
started <48 h subgroup
Exclusion onset and END (progressive stroke) - analysis
criteria: continued for 10 LMWH better than ASA: • Questionable
Patients with d (n=173) (5.0% [9 of 180] vs. 12.7% generalizability
pre-existing [22 of 173]; OR, 0.36 [95%
disability CI, 0.16–0.81]); no
(defined as difference in ERIS or sICH
prestroke mRS 6 mo Barthel Index: >68 y
1) and severe (P=0.043; OR, 1.86 [95%
stroke (defined CI, 1.02–3.41]); without
as a NIHSS 22) ongoing antiplatelet
treatment on admission
(P=0.029; OR, 1.85 [95%
CI, 1.06–3.21]), and with
symptomatic posterior
circulation arterial disease
(P=0.001; OR, 5.76 [95%
CI, 2.00–16.56])
102
Abbreviations: AC indicates anticoagulation; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; ARR, absolute risk reduction; ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; CT,
computed tomography; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ECG; electrocardiogram; END, early neurologic deterioration; ERIS, early recurrence of ischemic stroke; EVT, endovascular
therapy; h, hours; IU, international units; IV, intravenous; LAA, large-artery atherosclerosis; LAOD, large artery occlusive disease; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; LOE, level of
evidence; LVO, large vessel occlusion; MI, myocardial infarction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale;
OR, odds ratio; PE, pulmonary embolus; QOL, quality of life; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; SVD, small vessel disease;
UFH, unfractionated heparin; VTE, venous thromboembolism, and y, years.
Literature search topic: Anticoagulation
Table XLVII. Nonrandomized Studies of Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Year Published
Wada T, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: mRS at discharge (propensity matched) Interpretation limited by
al.200 Retrospective, AIS in Japanese generalizability and selection bias
2016 observational hospitals treated with Results:
26670085 argatroban • OR, 1.01 (0.88–1.16)
Size: N=2289 • ICH 3.5% vs. 3.8%
Exclusion criteria:
• Age<40 y
• Pregnancy
• Pre-preexisting
comorbidities of
malignancy
coagulopathy,
preexisting atrial
fibrillation
• Receipt of oral
anticoagulants
including warfarin
and dabigatran
during hospitalization
• Liver failure
• IV antihypertensive
therapy or heparin on
admission
• Alteplase or
endovascular
103
therapy during
hospitalization
Kate M, et al.201 Study type: Open- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH Dabigatran appears safe in AIS
2015 label, single-arm TIA or stroke with minor stroke or TIA and
26304866 safety trial of NIHSS≤3; Results: 0% sICH provides preliminary data for a
dabigatran in AIS dabigatran started larger randomized trial
<24 h LKW and
Size: N=53 continued for 30 d
Exclusion criteria:
GFR<30, alteplase or
EVT, clear indication
for AC
RAF Study Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Composite stroke, TIA, systemic • Initiating AC 4–14 d from stroke
Paciaroni M, et Prospective cohort Known or newly embolism, sICH, major extracranial bleeding within 90 d onset in patients with atrial
al.202 diagnosed atrial fibrillation had better outcomes
2015 Size: N=1029 fibrillation Results: • High CHA2DS2-VASc, NIHSS,
26130094 (multicenter Europe • 12.6% primary outcome large ischemic lesions, and type of
and Asia) Exclusion criteria: • HR, 0.53 (0.30–0.93) starting AC 4–14 d compared to AC associated with composite
Contraindication to <4 d outcome
AC • Study limited by non-
randomization
Mokin M, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Follow-up recanalization (range treatment Numbers too small to draw any
al.203 Retrospective, Non-occlusive 1–8 d) meaningful conclusions; short
2013 observational intraluminal duration of treatment and follow-up
22345142 thrombus of Results:
Size: N=18 intracranial and • 9 pts complete, 9 pts partial
extracranial arteries • No ICH
confirmed by CTA,
treated with IV
heparin
Exclusion criteria:
alteplase or EVT
Vellimana AK, Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Recurrent ischemic events; TIA Numbers too small to draw any
et al.204 Retrospective, TIA or stroke, meaningful conclusions; 10
2013 observational intraluminal Results: No recurrent ischemic events; one TIA (mean patients underwent delayed
23061393 thrombus CCA, ICA follow-up 16.4 mo revascularization
Size: N=24 treated with AC
104
Exclusion criteria:
Intracranial
thrombus,
trauma/dissection,
ipsilateral CAS, ICH
ARTSS-1 Study type: Open- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: sICH or PH-2 Argatroban infusion + IV alteplase
Barreto AD, et label, pilot safety Age 18–65 y, <3 to potentially safe and feasible for
al.205 study of argatroban 4.5 h LKW, complete Results: Phase III trial
2012 infusion + IV or partially occlusive • 6.2% sICH
22223235 alteplase thrombus on TCD, • TCD recanalization 61%
eligible for IV
Size: N=65 alteplase
Exclusion criteria:
NIHSS >17 right
MCA, >22 left MCA
Abbreviations: AC indicates anticoagulation; CAS, carotid artery stenting; CI, confidence interval; CCA, common carotid artery;CTA, computed tomography angiography; EVT,
endovascular therapy; HR, hazard ratio; ICA, internal carotid artery; IV, intravenous; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; LKW, last known well;
sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PH-2, parenchymal hematoma type 2; TIA, transient ischemic attack; and TCD, transcranial Doppler.
Literature search topic: Anticoagulation
Table XLVIII. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Other Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Comparator
(# patients)
ALIAS Aim: To determine the *Combined Intervention: 1 end point: 90 d Secondary Part I stopped High-dose
Martin RH, et safety and efficacy of dataset from 25% albumin disability (proportion of efficacy, death early for safety; albumin is not
al.210 albumin infusion in AIS ALIAS Parts I & infusion (2 g/kg) favorable outcomes (30 & 90 d), ICH Part II stopped recommended
2016 II trials (n=637) defined by mRS 0–1, within 24 h: no early for futility;
(Parts I & II Study Type: NIHSS 0–1, or both): differences saline group in
combined data) Randomized, double- Inclusion Comparator: • Combined: proportion of between groups Part II did better
27462118 blinded, placebo- criteria: AIS, Saline placebo good outcomes identical than expected,
controlled trial age 18–83 y, (1:1) (n=638) (41%) between groups stratified
Ginsberg MD, et NIHSS>6, • Part II: RR, 0.96 (0.84– randomization
al.209 Size: N=1275 combined initiation of 1.10) by thrombolysis;
2013 (Part II) (NETT) infusion within 5 differences in
24076337 h LKW and alteplase rates
105
within 90 min of Safety end point: CHF, and age
alteplase (if pulmonary edema within between Parts I
treated) 48 h: CHF within 48 h: & II
RR, 7.76 (3.87–15.57)
Exclusion (combined)
criteria: CHF or
other
cardiac/systemic
conditions
exacerbated by
volume
expansion;
numerous other
exclusions
listed209
FAST-MAG, Aim: To determine the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: 90 d • NIHSS, • Long Magnesium
Saver JL, et efficacy of magnesium criteria: Age Magnesium disability (shift in mRS): no Barthel Index, enrollment infusion is not
al.400 infusion, initiated early, on 40–95 y, + sulfate 4 g bolus significant shift (P=0.28) GOS: no period recommended
2015 stroke outcomes LAPSS, + 16 g infusion differences • Higher ICH
25651247 treatment  24 h (n=857) Safety end point: 90 d: • SAEs, sICH, rate than
Study Type: initiation within 2 Mortality (P=0.95); sICH death: no predicted (22%)
Randomized, double- h LKW, deficit Comparator: (P=0.12), SAEs (P=0.67) differences • 4% mimic rate
blind, placebo-controlled >15 min Placebo (n=843) • 33%–38%
trial alteplase
Exclusion treatment rate in
Size: N=1700 (multiple criteria: Patient eligible patients
CA sites) unable to
provide informed
consent or
enrollment
under EFIC;
otherwise
standard
exclusions
(NEJM
appendix)
106
Chang TS and Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or • Early and late • Heterogeneity, Hemodilution is
Jensen MB208 effects of hemodilution in criteria: Plasma volume dependency at 3-6 mo: mortality, isovolemic vs. not
2014 AIS Randomized expansion vs risk ratio: 0.96 (95% CI, venous hypervolemic recommended
25159027 trials of (plasma, dextran 0.85–1.07) thromboembolic intervention
Study Type: Cochrane hemodilution 40, HES, events, serious • Risk of bias
review treatment in AIS, albumin, ± Safety end point: Serious cardiac events, • Treatment
treatment venesection) cardiac events: Overview anaphylactoid effect (reduced
Size: N=4174 (21 trials) started w/in 72 h analysis reactions: no HCT) delayed
Comparator: (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.66– significant >6 h in most
Exclusion Control 1.50) differences in participants
criteria: No secondary • Small
details of outcomes numbers to
intervention, • Cardiac assess some
incomplete events at 3–6 interventions
outcomes data, mo, OR, 0.99 (e.g., HES)
no control (0.66–1.50)
group, lack of
randomization
Abbreviations: ADL indicates activities of daily living; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; ATA, arterial transit artifact; CHF, chronic heart failure; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed
tomography; EVT, endovascular therapy; g, gram; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale; h, hours; HCT, hematocrit; HES, hydroxyethyl starch; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; LAPSS, Los
Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen; LKW, last known well; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR,
odds ratio; OTT, onset to treatment; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; SAE, serious adverse event; sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; TLT, transcranial laser
therapy; and y, years.
Literature search topic: Neuroprotection
107
Table XLIX. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Transcranial Laser Therapy for Stroke
Study Acronym; Aim of Study; Patient Study End Point Results Relevant 2° End Study Summary
Author; Study Type; Population Intervention (Absolute Event Rates, Point (if any) Limitations; Conclusions
Year Published Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & Adverse Events Comments
Study 95% CI)
Comparator
(# patients)
NEST-3 Aim: To investigate benefit Inclusion Intervention: 1° end point: Disability N/A Potential non- • Terminated
Hacke W, et of TLT for acute ischemic criteria: Transcranial 90 d mRS (success 0–2, standardization due to futility;
al.401 stroke Ischemic stroke laser therapy failure 3–6) of TLT between analysis after
2014 within 24 h, (TLT) between animal models
566 subjects
25293665 Study type: Prospective NIHSS 7–17, 4.5–24 h of Safety end point: N/A and human trials
randomized clinical trial ≤80 y stroke onset (not taking skull •No benefit of
(n=288) thickness into NILT over sham
Size: N=1000 Exclusion account) procedure
criteria: IV Comparator:
alteplase Sham TLT •Terminated
(n=288) after inclusion of
2/3 of planned
patient number
Abbreviations: h indicates hours; IV, intravenous; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NILT, near infrared laser
therapy; OR, odds ratio; TLT, transcranial laser therapy; y, year.
Literature search topic: Transcranial laser therapy AND transcranial near-infrared laser therapy
Table L. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Treatment for Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients with
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Study Aim of Study; Study Patient Study End Point Results Relevant 2 Study Summary
Acronym; Type; Population Intervention (Absolute Event Rates, End Point (if Limitations; Conclusions
Comparator
(# patients)
ENOS Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: mRS • 90-d Barthel • Subset of • Early
ENOS Trial efficacy and safety of BP criteria: Transdermal distribution at 90 d: OR for Index, mini- patients treatment of
Investigators228 reduction with transdermal • Acute glyceryl nitrate 5 worse outcome: 1.01 mental state previously on hypertension
2015 glyceryl nitrate within 48 h ischemic stroke mg/d for 7 d (95% CI, 0.91–1.13; score, HRQOL, antihypertensive with transdermal
25465108 of an acute stroke (or ICH) within (n=2000) P=0.83) for the active arm and depression s were also glyceryl nitrate
previous 48 h randomized to was safe but
108
Study type: RCT • SBP 140–220 Comparator: Safety end points: All score: P>0.1 for continue ineffective to
mmHg Placebo cause-mortality, early all comparisons (n=1053) or stop prevent death or
Size: N=4011 (n=2011) neurological decline, • Post-hoc (n=1044) those dependency
Exclusion recurrent stroke within 7 d, subgroup drugs: there • Early
criteria: symptomatic hypotension, analysis were no reinitiation of
• Coma and serious systemic (Woodhouse et differences in antihypertensive
• Minor stroke events: P>0.1 for all al. 2015) of the comparison s was ineffective
• Hypertensive comparisons patients started of those two to prevent death
emergency on treatment groups either or dependency
• SBP>220 within 6 h of (OR, 1.05; 95% • Treatment
mmHg stroke onset CI, 0.90–1.22; within 6 h was
• Premorbid (N=273) showed P=0.55) safe and may be
disability benefit • Results were beneficial to
(improved mRS similar when the improve
at 90 d on analysis was functional
ordinal shift restricted to outcomes
analysis) from patients with
the intervention: ischemic stroke
common OR:
0.51 (95% CI:
0.32–0.80)
Lee M, et al.229 Aim: Assess the effect of Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or Recurrent Heterogeneity Early BP
2015 BP reduction within 72 h criteria: As per Treatment dependency (mRS 3–6) at vascular events, across trials reduction was
26022636 of an acute ischemic individual trials; started for BP 90 d: RR, 1.04 (95% CI, all-cause safe but
stroke on functional only including reduction within 0.96–1.13; P=0.35) mortality, ineffective to
outcomes at 3 mo acute ischemic the first 72 h disability, prevent death or
stroke (n=6392) Safety end point: Serious recurrent stroke: dependency
Study type: Meta- adverse events (as per P>0.05 for all
analysis of RCTs Exclusion Comparator: each trial definition): comparisons
criteria: As per No new P>0.05 for all
Size: N=12,703 (13 trials) individual trials treatment comparisons
started for BP
reduction within
the first 72 h
(n=6311)
VENTURE Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or Major vascular Early Early reduction
Oh M, et al.227 efficacy and safety of criteria: Oral valsartan major disability (mRS 3–6) events within 90 termination due of BP with
2015 modest blood pressure • Acute 80 mg/d for 7 d at 90 d: OR, 1.11; 95% CI, d: OR, 1.41; to futility valsartan did not
25580869 reduction with valsartan ischemic stroke (n=195) 0.69–1.79; P=0.667 95% CI, 0.44– determined on reduce death or
within 48 h after symptom 4.49; P=0.771 interim analysis dependency and
109
onset in patients with within previous Comparator: Safety end point: Early (target size=289 major vascular
acute ischemic stroke and 48 h Placebo (n=198) neurological deterioration per group) events at 90 d
high BP • SBP 150–185 (within 7 d): OR, 2.43; but increased
mmHg 95% CI, 1.25–4.73; the risk of early
Study type: RCT P=0.008 neurological
Exclusion deterioration
Size: N=393 criteria:
• Impaired level
of
consciousness
• NIHSS ≥22
• Pre-existent
disability
• Coexistent
vascular
emergency
• Severe
comorbidities
COCHRANE Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Treatment within Great Early treatment
Bath PM and clinical effectiveness of criteria: Treatment • Death or dependency 6 h of stroke heterogeneity of hypertension
Krishnan K 226 altering blood pressure in • As per started for BP (mRS >2 or 3) ≥ 1 mo appeared across included was safe but
2014 people with acute stroke, individual trials reduction within after the stroke: OR, 0.98; effective in trials ineffective to
25353321 and the effect of different • In acute the acute phase 95% CI, 0.92-1.05 reducing death prevent death or
vasoactive drugs on ischemic stroke (n=8497) • Blood pressure lowering or dependency dependency
blood pressure in acute and ICH did not reduce death or (OR: 0.86, 95%
stroke • Age ≥18 y Comparator: dependency either by drug CI: 0.76–0.99)
No new class (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, but not death
Study type: Meta- Exclusion treatment 0.92–1.05), stroke type (OR: 0.70, 95%
analysis of RCTs criteria: As per started for BP (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92– CI: 0.38–1.26)
individual trials reduction within 1.05), or time to treatment by the end of the
Size: N=17,011 (from 26 the acute phase (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92– trial
trials) (n=8514) 1.05)
Safety end points:

Early neurological decline:
OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92–
1.24
110
CATIS Aim: Evaluate whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or • Death or major Antihypertensive • Early
He J, et al.225 immediate blood pressure criteria: Antihypertensive major disability (mRS 3–6) disability (mRS regimen was not treatment of
2014 reduction in patients with • Age >22 y medication to at 14 d: OR, 1.0 (95% CI, 3–5) at 90 d: standardized hypertension
24240777 acute ischemic stroke • Acute maintain BP 0.88–1.14; P=0.98) OR, 0.99 (95% was safe but
would reduce death and ischemic stroke <140/90 for the CI, 0.86–1.15; ineffective to
major disability at 14 d or within previous first wk (n=2038) Safety end point: P=0.93) prevent death or
hospital discharge 24 h • Vascular disease events dependency
Comparator: P=0.28 • Lower blood • Early initiation
Study type: RCT Exclusion No • Recurrent stroke P=0.07 pressure at 14 d of anti-
criteria: antihypertensive (mean hypertensives
Size: N=4071 • Impaired level medication for difference of - was associated
of the first wk 8.6 mmHg in with better BP
consciousness (n=2033) SBP and -3.9 control at 2 wk
• Hypertensive mmHg in DBP;
emergency P<0.001) and at
• BP >220/120 90 d (mean
• Atrial difference of -
fibrillation 2.9 mmHg in
• Intravenous SBP and -1.4
alteplase mmHg in DBP;
P<0.001) in the
active arm
SCAST Aim: Examine whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: • Death from Mean BPs were Early initiation of
Sandset EC, et blood-pressure lowering criteria: Candesartan 4– • mRS at 6 mo: OR for any cause, similar in both candesartan
al.224 treatment candesartan is • Acute 16 mg/d for 7 d worse outcome: 1.17 vascular death, groups after the was safe but
2011 beneficial in patients with ischemic stroke (n=1017) (95% CI, 1.00–1.38; ischemic stroke, first 7 d ineffective to
21316752 acute stroke and (or ICH) within P=0·048) hemorrhagic prevent death or
hypertension previous 30 h Comparator: • Vascular death or MI or stroke, MI, dependency
• SBP >140 Placebo recurrent stroke within 6 stroke score,
Study type: RCT mmHg (n=1004) mo: HR, 1.09 (95% CI, and Barthel
• Age >18 y 0.84–1.41; P=0.52) Index at 7 d and
Size: N=2029 6 mo: P>0.1 for
Exclusion Safety end point: all comparisons
criteria: • Stroke progression: RR,
• Impaired level 1.47 in favor of placebo;
of 95% CI, 1.01–2.13;
consciousness P=0.04
• Hypertensive • Symptomatic
emergency hypotension: no
difference; P=0.29
111
• Premorbid • Renal failure: no
disability difference; P=0.37
COSSACS Aim: Assess the efficacy Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or • 2-week • Trial was • Early
Robinson TG, et and safety of continuing or criteria: Acute Continue major disability (mRS 3–6) NIHSS: P=0.46 terminated early reinitiation of
al.223 stopping pre-existing ischemic stroke previous at 14 d: RR, 0.86 (95% CI, and 2-week because of slow antihypertensive
2010 antihypertensive drugs in (or ICH) within antihypertensive 0.65–1.14; P=0.3) Barthel Index: recruitment, and medications was
20621562 patients with acute stroke previous 48 h medication/s P=0.30 consequently it safe but
(n=379) Safety end point: • 2-week BP: was ineffective to
Study type: RCT Exclusion Adverse events, minor significantly underpowered prevent death or
criteria: Comparator: and serious: P>0.05 for all lower in the • Treatment was dependency
Size: N=763 • Impaired level Stop previous continue arm not • Early
of antihypertensive (mean homogeneous reinitiation of
consciousness medication/s difference of -13 (different drugs, antihypertensive
• Unable to (n=384) mmHg in SBP no specific BP s was
swallow and -8 mmHg in target) associated with
• Hypertensive DBP) P<0.0001 • No differences better BP control
emergency • 6-month when analysis at 2 wk
• BP >200/120 mortality: restricted to
mmHg P=0.98; 6-month patients with
• Premorbid disability P<0.05 ischemic stroke
disability
• Intravenous
alteplase
PRoFESS Aim: Assess the safety Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Death or • Death or • Pre-specified Early treatment
Bath PM, et and efficacy of lowering criteria: Oral telmisartan dependency at 30 d: OR, dependency at 7 analysis of a of hypertension
al.221 blood pressure with • Age >55 or 80 mg/d (n=647) 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84–1.26; and 90 d: larger trial with with telmisartan
2009 telmisartan (on top of 50–54 y with P=0.81 P>0.05 factorial design was safe but
19797187 standard poststroke multiple vascular Comparator: • Composite • Trial evaluated ineffective to
antihypertensive risk factors Placebo (n=713) Safety end point: Serious recurrent mild strokes prevent death or
treatment) in patients with • Acute adverse events: P>0.05 vascular events (mean dependency
acute ischemic stroke ischemic at 90 d: P=0.40 NIHSS=3)
hemispheric • Mini-Mental
Study type: RCT stroke within 72 State
h of onset Examination at
Size: N=1360 90 d: P>0.05
Exclusion
criteria:
112
• Inability to
swallow
• Pre-existent
disability
• Renal failure
or renal artery
stenosis
• Hyperkalemia
• Recent
myocardial
infarction or
severe coronary
artery disease
CHHIPS Aim: Assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end points: Death or Mortality at 3 mo Pilot trial with Early treatment
Potter JF, et feasibility, safety, and criteria: Labetalol (n=58) major disability (mRS 3–6) lower in active small sample of hypertension
al.222 effects of two regimens for • Acute or lisinopril at 14 d: RR, 1.03, 95% CI, arm (9.7% vs. size was safe but
2009 lowering blood pressure in ischemic stroke (n=58), titrated 0.80–1.33; P=0.82 20.3%, HR: 0.40 ineffective to
19058760 patients with acute stroke (or ICH) within to keep SBP (95% CI: 0.2– prevent death or
previous 36 h <160 mmHg for Safety end point: 1.0; P=0.05) dependency
Study type: RCT • SBP >160 2 wk • Early neurological
mmHg decline: RR, 1.22; 95% CI,
Size: N=179 Comparator: 0.33–4.54; P=0.76
Exclusion Placebo (n=63) • Serious systemic
criteria: adverse events: RR, 0.91;
• Coma 95% CI, 0.69–1.12;
• Hypertensive P=0.50
emergency
• BP >200/120
mmHg
• Premorbid
disability
Eveson DJ, et Aim: Explore the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Functional N/A • Single center Early initiation of
al.220 hemodynamic effect and criteria: Oral lisinopril 5– outcomes at 3 mo: P=0.7 • Designed to lisinopril was
2007 safety of oral lisinopril • Acute 10 mg for 14 d evaluate safety safe
17324738 initiated within 24 h after ischemic stroke (n=18) Safety end point:
an acute stroke within 24 h of • Excessive drop in BP:
onset Comparator: P>0.05
Placebo (n=22)
113
Study type: RCT (phase • SBP >140 • Doubling in serum
II) mmHg or DBP creatinine concentration:
>90 mmHg P>0.05
Size: N=40
Exclusion
criteria:
• Coma
• Re-existent
disability
• Inability to
swallow
• Severe carotid
stenosis
• Advanced
heart failure
• Acute
myocardial
infarction within
6 mo
• Severe aortic
stenosis
ACCESS Aim: Assess the safety of Inclusion Intervention: 1 end points: Barthel • Combined • Terminated • Early initiation
Schrader J, et modest blood pressure criteria: Oral Index at 3 mo: 87.0±22.9 mortality, early (planned of oral
al.219 reduction in the early • Age 18–85 y candesartan 4– vs. 88.9±19.9; P>0.05 cerebrovascular size 500) candesartan
2003 treatment of stroke • Acute 16 mg/d titrated and • Designed to was safe but not
12817109 ischemic to keep BP Safety end point: cardiovascular evaluate safety associated with
Study type: RCT (phase hemispheric <160/100 for 7 d • Cerebral complications events at 12 mo: reduction in
II) stroke within 36 (n=173) at 7 d: P>0.05 OR, 0.475 (95% disability.
h of onset • Cardiac complications at CI, 0.252–0.895) • Oral
Size: N=339 • Severe Comparator: 7 d: P>0.05 • BP at 3, 6, and candesartan
hypertension Placebo (n=166) 12 mo: P>0.05 was associated
(SBP ≥200 with reduced
mmHg or DBP rates of mortality
≥110 mmHg and
within 6–24 h cardiovascular
after admission, events at 12 mo
or SBP ≥180 despite similar
mmHg or DBP long-term
≥105 mmHg control of BP
114
within 24–36 h
after admission
Exclusion
criteria:
• Coma
• Severe carotid
stenosis
• Advanced
heart failure
• Unstable
angina
• Severe aortic
or mitral
stenosis
VENUS Aim: Determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end points: Death or Change in Study rationale Early oral
Horn J, et al.218 the safety and efficacy of criteria: Oral nimodipine dependency at 3 mo: 32% neurological was based on nimodipine was
2001 nimodipine on the • Age 18–85 y 30 mg four vs. 27% (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, status at 24 h: presumed associated with
11157183 functional outcome of Acute ischemic times/d for 10 d 0.9–1.6; NS) P=0.35 neuroprotective worse outcomes
acute ischemic or hemorrhagic (n=225) Mortality at 10 d: effect of after acute
stroke stroke within 6 h Safety end point: Major RR, 0.7; 95% nimodipine ischemic stroke
of onset Comparator: adverse events: P>0.1 CI, 0.4–1.4 rather than
Study type: RCT Placebo (n=229) solely its
Exclusion antihypertensive
Size: N=454 criteria: effect
• Coma
• Minor deficits
• Inability to
swallow pills
• Severe
comorbidity
• Pre-existent
disability
• SBP <130 or
>220 mmHg
115
Kaste M, et Aim: Determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end points: All at 12 Functional Study rationale • No functional
al.216 the safety and efficacy of criteria: Nimodipine 120 mo: outcome at 3 was based on benefit from the
1994 nimodipine on the • Age 16–69 y mg/d for 21 d • Rankin score: scores 1– mo, mortality at presumed early initiation of
8023348 functional outcome of •Acute ischemic (n=174) 2 in 96 patients of both 3 and 12 mo, neuroprotective antihypertensive
acute ischemic stroke hemispheric groups (P>0.5) and residence at effect of therapy with
stroke within 48 Comparator: • Neurological score: 12 mo: all P>0.5 nimodipine nimodipine
Study type: RCT h of onset Placebo (n=176) median 28 vs. 25 (P>0.5) rather than • Greater fatality
• Mobility: unaided in 117 solely its rates on the
Size: N=350 Exclusion vs. 126 patients (P>0.5) antihypertensive nimodipine arm
criteria: effect during the first 3
• Coma Safety end point: None mo
• TIA specified
• Severe
comorbidity
INWEST Aim: Determine Inclusion Intervention: 1 end points: Neurological •Study rationale Early IV
Wahlgren NG, et the safety and efficacy of criteria: Intravenous • Neurological outcome by outcome by the was based on nimodipine was
al.217 nimodipine on the • Age ≥40 y nimodipine 1 the Orgogozo scale at 21 Orgogozo and presumed associated with
1994 functional outcome of • Acute mg/h (n=101) or d: significantly worse in Mathew scales neuroprotective worse outcomes
Link to article acute ischemic ischemic stroke 2 mg/h (n=94) the 2 mg/h nimodipine arm and functional effect of after acute
stroke in carotid for 5 d followed (P=0.0005) outcome by nimodipine ischemic stroke
territory within by oral • Functional outcome by Barthel Index at rather than in a dose-
Study type: RCT 24 h of onset nimodipine 30 Barthel Index at 21 d: 12 and 24 wk: solely its dependent
• Stable mg four times/d significantly worse in the 2 all markedly antihypertensive manner
Size: N=295 hemiparesis for 16 d mg/h nimodipine arm worse in the 2 effect
(P=0.0033) mg/h nimodipine • Trial
Exclusion Comparator: arm (P<0.001) terminated early
criteria: Placebo (n=100) Safety end point: because of
• Coma Mortality: P>0.1 worse outcomes
• Pre-existent in the high-dose
disability active arm
• Unstable (planned
cardiac disease size=600
• Severe patients)
comorbidity • Trial
terminated early
because of
futility
determined in an
interim analysis
(planned
116
size=1500
patients)
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; h, hour; HR, hazard ratio; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; ICH, intracerebral
hemorrhage; IV, intravenous; MI, myocardial infarction; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical
trial; RR, relative risk; SBP, systolic blood pressure; and y, year.
Literature search topic: Blood pressure II
Table LI. Deleted
Table LII. Deleted
Table LIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Nutrition

Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & Adverse Comments
Comparator
(# patients)
Geeganage C, Aim: To assess the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Functional • Case fatality at The Cochrane • Continues to
et al.236 effectiveness of criteria: Interventions for outcome: death or the end of the Collaborative be insufficient
2012 interventions for treatment Participants dysphagia; dependency, or death or trial assessed the data on the
23076886 of dysphagia and recruited with a feeding disability, at the end of the • Neurological risk of bias in effect of
nutritional and fluid clinical strategies and trial; results related to deterioration the included swallowing
supplementation in diagnosis of timing (early – PEG vs. NG within 4 wk trials using the therapy, feeding,
patients with acute and stroke within 6 within 7 d) vs. supplemental feeding: • Late disability “Risk of Review and nutritional
subacute (within 6 mo mo later); fluid • PEG was associated or dependency of Intervention”; and fluid
from onset) stroke supplementation; with fewer treatment at the end of the the assessment supplementation
Exclusion swallowing failures (t=3; n=72; OR, trial included: on functional
Study type: Cochrane criteria: Studies therapy (n=967), 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.51; • Proportions sequence outcome and
review RCT with no control feeding (route, P=0.0007; 12=0% with dysphagia generation, death in
group, not timing, • PEG was associated at the end of the allocation dysphagic
Size: N=6779 participants randomized, or supplementation with fewer GI bleeding trial concealment, patients with
(33 studies) no relevant (n=5812) events (t=1; n=321; OR, • Improvement blinding of acute stroke
outcome data 0.25%; 95% CI, 0.09– in dysphagia participants and • Behavioral
available Comparator: 0.69; P=0.0007) personnel, interventions
N/A in review blinding of and acupuncture
117
• PEG was associated outcomes reduced
with higher feed delivery assessment, dysphagia
(t=1; n=30; MD=22.00; incomplete • PEG reduced
95% CI, 16.15–27.85; outcome data, treatment
P<0.000001) and selective failures
• PEG was associated outcome and
with fewer pressure sores reporting gastrointestinal
(t=1; n=321; OR, 3.10; bleeding, and
95% CI, 0.98–9.83; had higher feed
P=0.05) delivery and
• PEG and NG tube albumin
feeding did not differ for concentration
end-of-trial case fatality • Reduced
(t=5; n=455; OR, 0.81; pressure sores
95% CI, 0.42–1.56) was associated
with nutritional
Safety end point: N/A supplementation
FOOD Trial Aim: To determine Inclusion Trial 1 1 end point: None • Failure to • Trial 1 unable
Collaboration whether routine oral criteria: Stroke • Intervention: • Trial 1: Normal vs reach sample to confirm the
Dennis M, et nutritional patients with Normal hospital normal plus supplements: sizes in all: Trial expected 4%
al.235 supplementation of a dysphagia diet (n=2007) the supplemented diet 1, 67%; Trial 2, absolute benefit
2006 normal hospital diet • Comparator: was associated with an 43%; Trial 3, for death or poor
16409880 improves outcome after Exclusion Normal hospital absolute reduction in risk 32% outcome from
stroke criteria: SAH, diet plus oral of death of 0.7% (95% CI, • Stopping routine oral
TIA, coma nutritional -1.4–2.7; P=0.5) and a recruitment prior nutritional
Study type: RCT – three patients; or supplements 0.7% (95% CI, -2.3 to 3.8, to sample sizes supplements;
pragmatic multicenter patients already (equivalent to P=0.6) increased risk of being achieved did not support
randomized entered into the 360 ml of 1.5 death or poor outcome can lead to bias supplementation
same FOOD kcal/ml, 20 g • Trial 2: Early enteral vs. in RCTs of hospital diet
Size: N=5033 patients Trial protein per d) no tube feeding for more for unselected
(131 hospitals in 18 until hospital than 7 d: early tube stroke patients
countries) discharge feeding was associated who are
(n=2016) with an absolute reduction predominantly
in risk of death of 5.8% well nourished
Trial 2 (95% CI, -0.8 to 12.5; on admission
• Intervention: P=0.09) and a reduction • Trial 2
Early enteral in death or poor outcome suggests that a
tube (n=429) of 1.2% (95% CI, -4.2 to policy of early
• Comparator: 6.6; P=0.7) tube feeding
No tube feeding may
118
for more than 7 d • Trial 3: Tube feeding substantially
(avoid) (n=430) via PEG or NG tube: PEG reduce the risk
was associated with an of dying after
Trial 3 increase in absolute risk stroke but it is
• Intervention: of death of 1.0% (95% CI, very unlikely the
Tube feeding via -10.0 to 11.9; P=0.9) and alternative policy
PEG (n=162) an increased risk of death of avoiding early
• Comparator: or poor outcome of 7.8% tube feeding
Tube feeding via (95% CI, 0.0–15.5; would improve
NG tube (n=159) P=0.05) survival
• Trial 3 data
Safety end point: N/A suggest that in
the first 2–3 wk
after stroke
better functional
outcomes result
from feeding via
NG tube than
PEG tube
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; GI, gastrointestinal; HR, hazard ratio; MD, mean difference; N/A, not available; NG, nasogastric; OR, odds ratio; PEG, percutaneous
endoscopic gastrostomy; RCT, randomized clinical trial; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Literature search topic: Nutrition
Table LIV. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Oral Hygiene
Year Published
Seedat J and Study Type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Aspiration pneumonia • No participant from either group
Penn C402 Quantitative, quasi- Diagnosed with either presented with aspiration
2016 experimental parallel stroke or traumatic Results: The Fisher’s exact test showed that there was a pneumonia at the initiation of
26974243 group design brain significant, moderate association between the occurrence of dysphagia intervention (entry into
injury as their primary aspiration pneumonia and group: all seven were participants the study), although signs of
Size: There were two medical diagnosis from the comparison group (P=0.0092) aspiration were observed and
groups of participants with a confirmed aspiration pneumonia developed
with oropharyngeal diagnosis of over the course of intervention in the
dysphagia: oropharyngeal comparison group, but there was no
• Group one (study dysphagia diagnosis of aspiration in the study
group, N=23) was group
recruited by
119
consecutive Exclusion criteria: • A limitation of the current study
sampling, received N/A was the exclusion of
regular oral care and videofluoroscopy pre-intervention for
were not restricted each participant in the study group
from drinking water; to confirm swallowing function
however, all other • It is possible to reduce adverse
liquids were medical effects of aspiration
restricted including fatality by implementing a
• Group two cost-effective and low resource oral
(comparison group, care protocol for patients with
N=23) was recruited dysphagia
via a retrospective • Further studies should be
record review, completed
received inconsistent
oral care and were
placed on thickened
liquids or liquid-
restricted diets
Wagner C, et Study Type: Cohort Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Hospital-acquired pneumonia In this large hospital-based cohort of
al.239 study compared the All patients patients admitted with acute stroke,
2016 proportion of hospitalized with Results: systematic OHC use was associated
26584429 pneumonia cases in acute ischemic stroke • The unadjusted incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia with decreased odds of hospital-
hospitalized stroke or intracerebral was lower in the group assigned to OHC compared to acquired pneumonia
patients before and hemorrhage admitted controls (14 vs. 10.33%; P=0.022), unadjusted OR, 0.68
after implementation to a large, urban (95% CI, 0.48–0.95; P=0.022)
of a systematic academic medical • After adjustment for influential confounders, the OR of
intervention center in Boston, MA, hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intervention group
USA from May 31, remained significantly lower at 0.71 (95% CI, 0.51–0.98;
Size: N=1656 2008, to June 1, P=0.041)
admissions (707 2010 (epoch prior to
formed historical implementation of
controls; 949 were in OHC), and from
the intervention January 1, 2012, to
group) December 31, 2013
(epoch after full
implementation of
OHC), who were 18 y
of age and
hospitalized for ≥2 d
120
were eligible for
inclusion
Exclusion criteria:
N/A
Sorensen RT, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: The intervention consisted of early screening • Cohort studies have shown that
al.237 Controlled trial cohort Hospitalized acute with a clinical method of dysphagia screening, the Gugging oral hygiene protocols may help
2013 study stroke patients with Swallowing Screen, and intensified oral hygiene; investigate reduce aspiration pneumonia after
23636069 moderate or severe whether the incidence of aspiration pneumonia could be stroke
Size: N=146 dysphagia reduced in such patients by an early screening for dysphagia • The intervention group received
hospitalized acute early and systematic dysphagia
stroke patients Exclusion criteria: Results: screening (which indicated
included in three Active metastatic • The incidence of x-ray verified pneumonia was 4 of 58 (7%) recommendations for diet
groups: an cancer, severe liver in the intervention group compared with 16 of dysphagia and administrated orally or by tube)
intervention group or kidney failure, and intensified oral hygiene together with intensified oral hygiene
(N=58), one internal terminal illness • 58 (28%) in the internal control group (P<0.01) and with 8 • The control group contained
control group (N=58, including cancellation of 30 (27%) in the external control group (P<0.05) patients who were not systematically
retrospectively of active treatment screened for dysphagia within 24 h
selected from same within 3 d after and who received unsystematic and
clinic), and one admission at the arbitrary oral hygiene without the
external control stroke unit use of antibacterial mouth rinse with
group (N=30) from a chlorhexidine
comparable stroke • Pneumonia was reduced in the
unit in a neighboring intervention group (7% vs. 28%)
hospital • The efficacy of oral hygiene
portion cannot be separated from
the combination
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; OHC, oral health care; and OR, odds ratio.
Literature search topic: Oral care
121
Table LV. Randomized Clinical Trials of Oral Care
Comparator
(# patients)
Brady MC, et Aim: To compare the Inclusion Interventions: 1 end point: Dental • Patient • Blinding of • Evidence with
al.238 effectiveness of staff led criteria: • OHC plaque (plaque scale and satisfaction care participants review indicates
2006 OHC interventions with • RCTs education denture cleanliness scale): received, oral impossible for the potential
17054189 standard care for ensuring evaluating one training • OHC demonstrated comfort and some OHC, benefits of
oral hygiene for individuals or more program: staff significant reduction in appearance: recorded when decontamination
affected after a stroke interventions trained (n=40), denture plaque score result not that happened gel on the
(post stroke) designed to patients (P<0.0000.1) reported • Incomplete incidence of
improve oral receiving OHC • No difference in dental • Staff outcome data, pneumonia, but
Study type: Intervention health interventions plaque (DMS, -0.25; 95% knowledge on selective further
review of RCT that • Recruited from (n=132) CI, -0.77 to 0.28) oral care outcome investigation is
evaluated one or more a health care • Decontami- (P=0.0008) reporting, needed
interventions designed to setting with a nation gel Safety end point: None • Staff attitude sample size • Was not an
improve oral hygiene mixed (n=103) toward oral care calculations, outcome, but
population of • Ventilator- (P=0.0001) comparability of patients
Size: N=470 patients (3 individuals post- associated • Presence of groups at receiving the
studies) stroke pneumonia oral disease: no baseline, decontamination
bundle of care evidence of a reliability of gel had fewer
Exclusion augmented with difference in measures used, incidences on
criteria: Studies an OHC (n=100) gingivitis and evidence of pneumonia (one
that did not have between groups intention-to-treat incident) over
patient specific Comparators: (DMS, -1.57, analysis the course the
data • OHC 95% CI, -2.23 to trial period than
education 0.92; those that used
training P<0.00001) the placebo gel
program: (100
untrained staff participants;
(n=27), standard seven incidents
oral care of pneumonia)
(n=129) (OR, 0.20, CI
• Placebo gel 95%, 0.05–0.84,
(n=103) P=0.03)
• Standard VAP
bundle no
122
augmented
OHC (n=100)
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; DMS, difference in mean score; HR, hazard ratio; N/A, not available; OHC, oral health care; OR, odds ratio; RCT, randomized clinical
trial; and RR, relative risk.
Literature search topic: Oral care
Table LVI. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis
Author; Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & any) Adverse Events Comments
Year Published Study 95% CI)
Comparator
(# patients)
European Aim: Focused on both Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Other outcomes • Risk of bias ESO
Stroke non-pharmacological and criteria: RCTs Pharmacologic • Death or dependency at were fatal PE due to limitations recommendation
Organisation pharmacological and systematic or non- follow-up and HRQOL- in study design s:
(ESO) interventions given with the reviews pharmacologic • Survival (or its reciprocal adjusted survival and • GCS should
guidelines for primary objective of evaluating GCS, interventions: – mortality) inconsistency of not be used in
prophylaxis for reducing the risk of VTE IPC, and 1. GSC (n=1256) • Functional status (mRS, results, patients with
VTE prophylactic 2. IPC (n=1438) the Oxford handicap scale, indirectness of ischemic stroke
Dennis M, et Study type: RCTs and anticoagulation 3. Anti- the International Stroke evidence, • Thigh-length
al.240 systematic reviews/meta- with UFH, coagulants trial simple questions, or imprecision, IPC should be
2016 analyses LMWH and UFH (n=5363) the Barthel Index) reporting bias, used for
Link to article heparinoids, but 4.LMWH or • ICH magnitude of the immobile
Size: 24 RCT’s reviewed, no randomized heparinoid • Symptomatic PE (fatal treatment effect, patients
total (N=22,700) trials evaluating (n=876) and non-fatal) evidence of a •Prophylactic
NES dose–response anticoagulation
• Major (or serious)
Comparator: relationship, and with UFH
extracranial hemorrhages
Exclusion Care which did the effect of all (5000U  2, or 
• Symptomatic DVT
criteria: Did not not include plausible 3 daily) or
include trials that specific VTE • Asymptomatic DVT
confounding LMWH or
directly prophylactic • Fractures secondary to
• The quality of heparinoid
compared intervention: falls due to mechanical
evidence was should be
anticoagulants 1. No GCS devices or osteoporosis
judged to be considered in
with antiplatelet (n=1262) secondary to prolonged
moderate and immobile
medications 2. No IPC heparin use
strength of patients with
(n=1438) recommendation
123
3. No • Any hemorrhage weak due to lack ischemic stroke
anticoagulants including minor bruising of blinding in whom the
(n=10,197) • Skin breaks which may • The strength of benefits of
4.Only UFH (n= be caused by stockings recommendation reducing the risk
870 and IPC sleeves was weak of VTE is high
enough to offset
Results: the increased
• GCS had no significant risks of ICH and
effect on death (P=0.41) extracranial
• IPC had no significant bleeding
effect, despite a strong associated with
trend on deaths during their use
treatment period (OR, 82; •If prophylactic
95% CI, 0.66–1.02) but anticoagulation
improved survival to 6 mo is indicated,
(HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74– LMWH or
0.99) heparinoid
• Anticoagulants were should be
associated with a reduction considered
in DVT (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, instead of UFH
0.15–0.29); there were because of its
also statistically significant greater reduction
increases in sICH (OR, in risk of DVT,
1.68; 95% CI. 1.11–2.55) the greater
and symptomatic convenience,
extracranial hemorrhages reduced staff
(OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.0– costs, and
2.75) patient comfort
• For LMWHs of associated with
heparinoids or UFH, there single daily dose
were nonsignificant trends vs. multiple daily
towards reduction in PE injections, but
(P=0.81) and sICH these
(P=0.84) advantages
• There was a statistically should be
significant increase in weighed against
major extracranial the higher risk of
hemorrhage (OR, 3.79; extracranial
95% CI, 1.30–11.03; bleeding, higher
P=0.01) with LMWH drug costs and
124
• The use of LMWH was risks in elderly
associated with a patients with
statistically significant poor renal
reduction in DVTs (OR, function
0.55; 95% CI, 0.44–0.70),
which were mostly
asymptomatic
Safety end point: None

Sandercock et Aim: To assess the Inclusion Not specified End points: •Symptomatic • Different forms • Benefit of
al.198 effectiveness and safety of criteria: Patients • PE (symptomatic): OR, ICH: OR, 2.55; of anticoagulation
2015 anticoagulation within 14 with confirmed 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.81) 95% CI, 1.95- anticoagulation in the reduction
25764172 days of ischemic stroke or suspected with anticoagulation vs no 3.33 for • Various forms of VTE are offset
onset ischemic stroke anticoagulation anticoagulation of defining and by the increased
within the • DVT (symptomatic or vs no assessing the risk of bleeding
Study Type: Meta- previous 14 days asymptomatic): OR, 0.21; anticoagulation endpoints
analysis 95% CI, 0.15-0.29 with
anticoagulation vs no • Major ECH:
Size: anticoagulation OR, 2.99; 95%
CI, 2.24-3.99
N=22,544 (from 14 trials)
for PE analysis
N=916 (from 10 trials) for
DVT analysis
for ICH analysis
for major ECH
CLOTS 3 Aim: Establish whether Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: • 30- and 60-d •Moderate • IPC, UFH, or
CLOTS Trials routine application of IPC criteria: Routine care • Symptomatic or death adherence to LMWH and
Collaboration to the legs of immobile Admitted within plus IPC (thigh asymptomatic DVT in the heparinoids can
• DVT (including IPC
Dennis M et patients who had a stroke 3 d of acute high length) popliteal or femoral veins reduce the risk
al.403 reduced their risk of DVT stroke and be (n=1438) symptomatic or
detected on a screening •Masking poor of VTE in
2013 immobile within 30 d of asymptomatic immobile
at times: patient
23727163 Study type: Multicenter Comparator: randomization: calf, popliteal or patients with
went for
parallel group randomized Exclusion Routine care • An absolute reduction in femoral) acute ischemic
screening with
trial criteria: Age and no IPC risk of 3.6% (95% CI, 1.4– • Symptomatic stroke, but
device on
<16 y, SAH, or (n=1438) 5.8) DVT, PE further research
Size: N=2876 contraindications is required to
confirmed on
125
to IPC • The adjusted OR for the imaging or test whether
comparison of 122 of 1267 autopsy NES is effective
patients vs. 174 of 1245 • The strongest
patients was 0.65 (95% CI, • Complications evidence is for
0.51–0.84; P=0.001) of IPC IPC
• Deaths in the treatment association with • Better
period occurred in (11%) days worn (i.e., methods are
allocated IPC and (13%) end date minus needed to help
allocated no IPC within the start date) stratify patients
30 d of treatment period divided by the in the first few
(P=0.057) number of days wks after stroke
• Skin breaks on the legs it should have onset by their
were reported in (3%) been worn risk of VTE and
patients allocated IPC and their risk of
in 20 (1%) patients bleeding on
allocated no IPC (P=0.002) anticoagulants
• Falls with injury were
reported in (2%) patients in
the IPC group and in (2%)
patients in the no-IPC
group (P=0.221)

Geeganage CM, Aim: To assess the effect Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: The ratio of Insufficient data • Trials were Routine acute
et al.404 of heparin and other criteria: RCT LMWH sICH to sPE was were obtained excluded use was not
2013 antithrombotic therapies in assessing (n=18,29), increased with LMWH (RR: for other because data on recommended
22516428 patients with acute/early anticoagulation heparinoids 2.1; 95% CI: 1.03–4.28), outcomes, both sICH and but may still be
ischemic stroke (UFH, LMWH, (n=341), and but was in approximated precluding sPE were relevant in
and heparinoid UFH (n=5875) unity with heparinoids (RR, further analysis unavailable in patients at very
Study type: Systematic in adults>18 y 1.27; 95% CI, 0.31–5.17) the primary high risk of PE
review and meta-analysis and within 14 d Comparator: and UFH (RR, 0.99; 95% publications (e.g., morbid
of RCTs of acute stroke Same as above CI, 0.65–1.52) • Many of the obesity, previous
included trials VTE, and
Size: 15 RCTs that fulfilled Exclusion did not primarily inherited
the selection criteria criteria: If trial focus on sICH thrombophilia) or
(N=8045 patients) did not record and PE and so if started later,
information on only collected although trials
PE and sICH symptomatic and have not
fatal events assessed these
issues
126
• Definition of
sICH also varied
widely among
trials
• The trials used
different types
and doses of
low-dose
anticoagulation
Whiteley W, et Aim: To test the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Prediction of The state of • Predictive In view of the
al.197 hypothesis that a policy of criteria: Patients RCTs (5) thrombotic events (MI, being dead or variable missing lack of evidence
2013 using clinical data to target with baseline compared stroke, deep VTE, or PE) dependent at in dataset that for heparin
23642343 heparins in patients with diagnosis of heparins (UFH and hemorrhagic events final follow-up may impact prophylaxis in
ischemic stroke who have probable or or LMWH) (symptomatic intracranial predictive reducing
a high risk of venous or definite ischemic (n=11,478) or extracranial in the first models mortality in other
arterial thromboembolism, stroke 14 d after stroke: • Random error categories of
and avoiding heparins in Comparator: • No group had a in variable due high-risk medical
patients with a high risk of Exclusion Aspirin statistically significant to data defined patients and in
bleeding, leads to overall criteria: (n=10,941) benefit of heparins over and obtained stroke, these
better outcomes Excluded 22 aspirin or placebo in an differently data suggest
other trials of ordinal logistic regression (particularly current guideline
Study type: Meta-analysis heparins model (P=0.43) for the measures of recommendation
because they prevention of death or stroke severity) s for routine or
Size: N=22,655 patients; 5 were small disability at the time of last • Large RCTs selective use of
RCTs using UFH, (<100 patients), follow-up collection of data heparin in stroke
heparinoids and LMWH in and were not • In none of the 16 groups for death or (and perhaps
acute ischemic stroke clearly was there evidence of dependence at other patients)
included: randomized, or heterogeneity between the end of follow-up should be
IST, TOAST, TAIST, data not readily risk differences rather than data revised
HAEST, FISS-tris available from the different trials on recurrent
• There was no visible events or VTE
pattern or trend of
increasing benefit or harm
across the groups
127
ACP Clinical Aim: To assess the Inclusion 1. Heparin 1 end point: Mortality up • Symptomatic None reported • In patients with
Guidelines benefits and harms of criteria: English- prophylaxis vs. to 120 d after enrollment: DVT: in medical acute stroke,
Qaseem A, et prophylaxis in hospitalized language no heparin 1. Medical patients without patients: not there was no
al.405 adult medical patients and randomized prophylaxis in stroke: compared with no statistically statistically
2011 those with acute stroke trials were medical patients heparin prophylaxis, significant (RR, significant
22041951 included if they without stroke heparin prophylaxis was 0.78; CI, 0.45– benefit from
Study type: provided clinical (n=20,717) and not associated with a 1.35); in stroke heparin
Systematic evidence outcomes and with stroke statistically significant patients: no prophylaxis but
review evaluated (n=15,405) reduced risk for statistically there was
therapy with low- mortality (risk ratio: 0.94; significant increased risk
Size: Ten trials (N=20,717) dose heparin or 2. LMWH vs. 95% CI, 0.84–1.04; I2=0%; symptomatic for major
evaluated medical patients related agents or UFH in medical absolute reduction); acute DVT, or PE (risk bleeding
without stroke, 8 trials mechanical patients without stroke patients: LMWH ratio: 1.11; 95% • In both groups,
(N=15,405) of patients with measures stroke with UFH in patients with CI, 0.87–1.42) low-dose
acute stroke compared with (n=11,650) and acute stroke did not show • All PE, fatal heparin
placebo, no with stroke statistically significant PE: in medical prophylaxis may
treatment, or (n=2785) differences for mortality patients, heparin have reduced
other active (risk ratio: 1.00; 95% CI, was associated PE and
prophylaxis in 3. Medical 0.81–1.22; I2=1%; absolute with reduced risk increased risk
the target device for BTE reduction) for PE (risk ratio: for bleeding and
population prophylaxis vs. 0.69; 95% CI, major bleeding
no mechanical 2. Medical patients without 0.52–0.90; events and had
Exclusion devices in stroke showed no I2=0%; absolute no statistically
criteria: Surgical medical patients statistically reduction); in significant effect
hospitalized with and without significant difference in stroke patients, on mortality
patients stroke (n=2518) mortality (risk ratio: 0.91; heparin had no • The conclusion
95% CI, 0.73–1.13; statistically of findings
I2=25%; absolute significant effect indicate little or
reduction); stroke patients on PE (risk ratio: no net benefit
did not show statistically 0.70; 95% CI, • No significant
significant differences for 0.44–1.11; differences in
mortality (risk ratio: 1.00; I2=0%; major clinical benefits
95% CI, 0.81–1.22; I2=1%; bleeding events or harms were
absolute reduction (risk ratio: 0.89; found between
95% CI, 0.70– UFH and LMWH
3. Medical results 1.15; I2=0%;
showed no statistically • Bleeding
significant difference in risk events: in
for mortality (risk ratio: medical patients
1.11; 95% CI, 0.87–1.42) risk for major
128
bleeding events
Safety end point: None increased but
did not reach
statistical
significance (risk
ratio: 1.49; 95%
CI, 0.91–2.43;
I2=16%; absolute
increase); in
stroke patients
heparin
associated with
statistically
significant
increase in
major bleeding
events (risk
ratio: 1.66; 95%
CI, 1.20–2.28;
I2=0%; absolute
increase); in 14-
day hemorrhagic
stroke or serious
extracranial
hemorrhage
(1.3% vs. 0.80%;
OR, 1.73; 95%
CI, 1.22–2.46)
• Mechanical
prophylaxis
effect on skin in
medical and
stroke patients
(statistically
significantly
increased
among patients
treated with
compression
stockings (risk
129
ratio: 4.02; 95%
CI, 2.34–6.91)
(risk ratio: 1.11;
95% CI, 0.87–
1.42); risk for
lower-extremity
skin damage
statistically
significantly
increased
among patients
treated with
compression
stockings (risk
ratio: 4.02; 95%
CI, 2.34–6.91)
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ECH, extracranial hemorrhage; ESO, European Stroke Organisation; GCS, graduated compression
stockings; HR, hazard ratio; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; IPC, intermittent pneumatic compression; LMWH, low-molecular–weight heparin;
MI, myocardial infarction; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; OR, odds ratio; PE, pulmonary embolism; RCT, randomized
clinical trial; RR, relative risk; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; UFH, unfractionated heparin; and VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Literature search topic: Stroke, DVT prophylaxis
Table LVII. Nonrandomized Studies of Depression Screening in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Year Published
Meader N, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1 end points: Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of Several tools have optimal ROC
al.241 analysis Validation studies of post-stroke depression; ROC meta-analysis characteristics for detecting post-
2014 mood questionnaires stroke depression including the
23385849 Size: N=2907 (24 from inception to Results: CESD, HDRS, and PHQ-9;
studies) 2012 • CESD: sensitivity: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.60–0.85); specificity: however, further research is needed
0.88 (95% CI, 0.71–0.95) to determine the optimal screening
Exclusion criteria: • HDRS: sensitivity: 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75–0.90); method and timing to diagnose and
Studies not clearly specificity:0.83 (95% CI, 0.72–0.90) treat PSD242
stating diagnostic • PHQ-9: sensitivity: 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70–0.94); specificity:
status of depression 0.79 (95% CI, 0.60–0.90)
or insufficient data for
extraction
130
Abbreviations: CESD indicates Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale; HDRS, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PSD,
poststroke depression; and ROC, receiver operating curve.
Literature search topic: Depression
Table LVIII. Randomized Clinical Trials of Mobility Intervention

Comparator
(# patients)
SEVEL Aim: To test the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Primary • Prevalence of • Slow There was also
Herisson F, et hypothesis criteria: Age Early-sitting outcome measure was the medical enrollment, no difference
al.406 that early sitting could be >18 y group patients proportion of patients with complications could detect between groups
2016 beneficial to stroke patient were seated out a mRS [0–2] at 3 mo post • Length of beneficial/detrim for secondary
27023901 outcome Exclusion of bed at the stroke: there was no hospital stay ental effects of ± outcome
criteria: earliest possible difference regarding • Tolerance to 15% of the early measures, and
Study type: RCT Massive infarct time but no later outcome of people with the procedure sitting procedure the procedure
or than one stroke, with a proportion of on stroke was well
Size: N=138 contraindication calendar day mRS [0–2] score at 3 mo outcome with a tolerated in both
for sitting after stroke of 76.2% and 77.3% of realized 37% arms
onset (n=63) patients in the early- and power; however,
progressive-sitting groups, enrollment was
Comparator: respectively (P=0.52) sufficient to rule
Progressively- out effect sizes
sitting group Safety end point: N/A >25% with 80%
was first seated power
out of bed on • No blinded
the third assessment of
calendar day the primary
after stroke outcome
onset (n=75)
Morreale M, et Aim: To compare PNF Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Disability at • Six-Minute Homogenous A time-
al.407 and CTE methods in two criteria: • All patients 3–12 mo (disability Walking Test, population that dependent effect
2016 different time settings First ever sub- were randomly measures: mRS and Motricity Index, may not reflect of rehabilitation
26220327 (early vs. standard cortical ischemic assigned by Barthel Index): disability MMSE, Beck other strokes; on post
approach) to evaluate stroke in the means of a was not different between Depression moderate stroke stroke motor
different role of time and MCA territory computer- groups at 3 mo but Barthel Inventory: Six- severity in recovery was
techniques in functional and contralateral generated Index significantly Minute Walking population observed,
hemiplegia randomization changed between early Test (P=0.01) particularly in
131
recovery after acute admitted within sequence in vs. delayed groups at 12 and Motricity lower limb
ischemic stroke 6 and 24 h from blocks of 4 to mo (P=0.01) Index in both improvement.
symptoms onset one to the 4 upper (P=0.01) According to our
Study type: We designed interventional Safety end point: Safety and lower limbs results,
a prospective multicenter Exclusion groups: early outcome: immobility- (P=0.001) rehabilitation
blinded interventional criteria: PNF (n=110), related adverse events increased in technique
study of early vs. standard NIHSS<2, delayed PNF early vs. seems not to
approach with two aphasia, visual (n=60), early delayed groups affect long-term
different methods by disturbances, CTE (n=110), regardless motor recovery
means of both PNF and neglect and/or delated CTE rehabilitation
CTE other spatial (n=60) schedule
representation • Patients in
Size: N=340 defects, both delayed
disorientation or group
confusion, underwent to a
ongoing standard
seizures, protocol in the
MMSE<26, acute phase
cardiovascular
or neurological Comparator:
instability, Standard
hemorrhagic approach
transformation, delayed PNF
prior diagnosed (n=60), delayed
neurological CTE (n=60)
disease, chronic
inflammatory
disease,
psychiatric
disease,
amputation,
fractures or
neoplasms
AVERT Aim: Compare the Inclusion Intervention: 1 end point: Favorable Outcomes • A limitation of Early
AVERT Trial effectiveness of frequent, criteria: High-dose, very outcome 3 mo after included an large trials is the mobilization
Collaboration higher dose, very early • Age ≥18 y, early stroke, defined as a mRS assumption free small amount of after stroke is
Group243 mobilization with usual with confirmed mobilization of 0–2: patients in the ordinal shift of information that recommended in
2015 care after stroke first (or protocol high-dose, very early the mRS across can be obtained many clinical
25892679 recurrent) stroke interventions mobilization group has the entire range about potential practice
(infarct or included: less favorable outcomes of the scale; confounding guidelines
132
Study type: RCT parallel- intracerebral beginning (46% vs. 50%) than those time taken to factors (e.g., worldwide, and
group, single-blind hemorrhage) mobilization in the usual care group; achieve physiological our findings
• Admitted to a within 24 h of 8% vs. 7% of patients died unassisted variables) and should affect
Size: N=2104 patients of stroke unit within stroke onset in the very early walking over 50 about each clinical practice
56 acute stroke units 24 h of stroke whereas usual mobilization group, and m and the staff–patient by refining
onset care typically 19% vs. 20% had a non- proportion of interaction present
• Treatment with was 24 h after fatal serious adverse patients • Not guidelines;
alteplase onset of stroke; event with high-dose, very achieving prescriptive however, clinical
there was a early mobilization unassisted about usual care recommendation
Exclusion focus on sitting, walking by 3 mo; mobilization s should be
criteria: standing and Safety end point: N/A and deaths and practices, which informed by
• mRS >2, early walking activity; the number of changed during future analyses
deterioration, and at least non-fatal serious the trial; usual of dose–
direct admission three additional adverse events care clinicians response
to the ICU, out-of-bed at 3 mo started associations
documented sessions mobilization
palliative (n=1054) earlier each
treatment, year, with the
immediate Comparator: result that
surgery, another Standard of care roughly 60% of
serious medical (n=1054) patients
illness or receiving usual
unstable care had started
coronary out-of-bed
condition, coma, therapy within
SBP <110 24 h of stroke
mmHg or >220 onset
mmHg, oxygen • Whether this
saturation <92% result was a
with oxygen consequence of
supplementation contamination
, resting heart from the trial
rate of <40 protocol, a
beats/min or response to
>110 beats/min, changes in
temperature attitudes to early
>38.5°C mobilization
• SAH over time as
reflected in
recent clinical
133
guidelines, or
both, is
uncertain
Abbreviations: CTE indicates cognitive therapeutic exercise; h, hours; HR, hazard ratio; ICU, intensive care unit; MCA, mean cerebral artery; min, minutes; MMSE, Mini-Mental
State Examination; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; PNF, proprioceptive neuromuscular
facilitation; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; SBP, systolic blood pressure; and y, year.
Literature search topic: Early mobility
Table LIX. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Treatment of Cerebral and Cerebellar Edema Following
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Study Acronym; Study Type/Design; Patient Population Primary End Point and Results Summary
Author; Study Size (P value; OR or RR; Conclusions
Year Published & 95% CI) Comments
Hemispheric Stroke
Sundseth J, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: Early death (during primary hospitalization) No age-related impact on early death
al.251 Retrospective cohort MCA infarction with after decompression for MCA infarct
2017 cerebral edema and Results: MCA infarct with additional anterior or posterior
27942881 Size: N=45 decompressive cerebral artery territorial involvement only clinically significant
craniectomy predictor of early in-hospital death
Exclusion criteria:
N/A
Alexander P, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: Death and disability mRS • Quality of evidence high for death;
al.250 analysis of RCTs RCTs comparing low for functional outcome mRS 0–3;
2016 conservative vs. DHC Results: moderate for mRS 0–4 (wide CIs and
27884858 Size: N=338 patients for ischemic MCA • DHC reduced death 69% vs. 30% problems in concealment, blinding of
(7 RCTs) infarct syndrome • Severe disability (mRS=4), 32% and very severe disability outcome assessors, stopping early
(mRS=5), 11% • DHC left 34% with mRS 4–5 and
Exclusion criteria: 11% mRS 5
N/A
134
Yang MH, et Study type: Meta- Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: N/A • Compared to conservative
al.249 analysis RCTs of DHC for treatment DHC decreased mortality
2015 stroke Results: DHC reduces mortality, death or major disability and improved functional outcome in
25661677 Size: N=314 patients (mRS>3) and death or severe disability (mRS>4); associated a clinically meaningful manner
(6 studies) Exclusion criteria: with slightly higher proportion of major disability (mRS4–5) in • Increase in the proportion of
N/A survivors survivors with major disability was
not clinically meaningful
Agarwalla PK, et Study type: Literature Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: N/A • Review of literature on craniotomy
al.245 review N/A in acute stroke
2014 Results: N/A • Supports current guidelines as
24402484 Size: N/A Exclusion criteria: written
N/A
Suyama K, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: 30-d mortality and functional outcome (mRS) at • Only 8.7% of patients with
al.252 Retrospective cohort DHC 3 mo malignant MCA infarction underwent
2014 DHC in Japan
25045787 Size: N=355 Exclusion criteria: Results: Overall mortality 18.6%; only 5% with favorable • Mean age 67; patients aged >60 y
N/A functional outcome (mRS<4); Poor outcome associated with comprised 80% of cohort
GCS<6 and midbrain compression • 22% of patients had mRS=4;
26.9% with mRS=5
• Age not found to be independent
risk factor of poor outcome
Yu JW, et al.253 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: Mortality at 30 d and six mo; outcome (“good” • Decompressive craniectomy
2012 Retrospective cohort Malignant MCA outcome mRS≤3; “poor” outcome mRS>3) reduced mortality and improved rate
23210030 infarction, age>18 y, of good outcomes
Size: N=131 decompressive Results: Reduction in mortality in craniectomy group vs • Age was not independently
hemicraniectomy conservative care group (29.3% vs 58.9% at 30 days and associated with death at six months
within 48 h of stroke 48.3% vs 71.2% at six months). Death rate at six mo was not or poor outcome.
onset; NIHSS>or=18 statistically different between age groups (>or=70 y vs <70 y)
for right-sided nor was rate of favorable outcome (P=0.137, P=0.077)
infarction, High preoperative NIHSS was associated with higher rate of
NIHSS>or=20 for left- six-month mortality (P=0.047)
sided infarction
135
Exclusion criteria:
Preexisting significant
disability
(mRS>vs=4), pupils
fixed and dilated,
hemorrhagic infarction
>50% MCA territory
on CT
Cerebellar Stroke
Agarwalla PK, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: e 1° end point: N/A • Non-randomized studies, with a
al.245 Comprehensive Sigle institution and mix of retrospective series of various
2014 literature review multi-institution series Results: Suboccipital decompression is a life-saving sizes
24402484 in which suboccipital procedure in patients with massive cerebellar infarctions. • Cerebellar infarction with
Size: 12 Sigle decompression was Ventriculostomy was commonly performed either in isolation symptomatic edema and mass effect
institution and multi- used in the treatment as treatment of hydrocephalus or as adjunctive treatment to may be indicated before neurological
institution series, of cerebellar infarct suboccipital decompression (60%, n=172); Several studies deterioration, but the timing is
N=283 identify progressive decline in level of consciousness as unclear
Exclusion criteria: indication for decompression or ventriculostomy. Long term • Ventriculostomy is commonly
N/A functional outcomes after suboccipital decompression for performed; very rare mention of
massive cerebellar infarctions are correlated with immediate upward herniation only in setting of
preoperative level of consciousness. aggressive cerebrospinal fluid
diversion without suboccipital
decompression
Mostofi K246 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: Morbidity and mortality (GCS at 1 mo) • Suboccipital craniectomy improves
2013 Retrospective series Massive cerebellar outcome over medical management
23532804 stroke Results: Clinically meaningful improvement in outcomes/GCS • Only 3% of patients received
Size: N=53 in surgical group ventriculostomy
Exclusion criteria:
N/A
136
Raco A, et al.244 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1° end point: mRS and death • Most patients treated
2003 Retrospective cohort Cerebellar infarct conservatively did well
14580272 Results: 20/25 patients without decompression with good • 8 patients were treated with
Size: N=44 Exclusion criteria: outcomes; 13/17 with ventriculostomy or decompression with ventriculostomy only
Deep coma good outcomes; overall mortality 13.6% • Only 3 patients were treated with
ventriculostomy plus decompression
• One patient treated with
decompression only
• Recommend ventriculostomy for
hydrocephalus and worsening
consciousness; decompression
reserved for worsening despite
ventricular drainage
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; DHC, decompressive hemicraniectomy; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score; MCA, middle cerebral artery; N/A, not available; and RCT,
randomized controlled trial.
Literature search topics: cerebral edema, surgical decompression suboccipital AND Cerebral edema, impact of age AND Cerebral edema, hypothermia, corticosteroids AND
Cerebral edema, decompression timing AND Cerebral edema, ventriculostomy, hydrocephalus AND Cerebral edema, barbiturates AND Cerebral edema, corticosteroids AND
Cerebral edema, cerebellar decompression
Table LX. Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Impact of Treatment of Cerebral and Cerebellar Edema Following Acute Ischemic
Infarction
Study Acronym; Aim of Study; Patient Study End Point Results Relevant 2° End Study Summary
Author; Study Type; Population Intervention (Absolute Event Rates, Point (if any) Limitations; Conclusions
Year Published Study Size (N) (# patients) / P value; OR or RR; & Adverse Events Comments
Study 95% CI)
Comparator
(# patients)
DESTINY II Aim: To determine impact Inclusion Intervention: 1° end point: Survival Death at 6 mo N/A • Hemi-
Juttler E, et al.254 of decompressive criteria: Decompressive without severe disability craniectomy
2014 craniotomy on patients Malignant MCA hemicraniectomy (mRS <5) at 6 mo: improved primary
24645942 aged >60 y infarct (n=49) proportion who survived end point (38%
randomized mRS 0-4 was 38% in vs. 18%; OR,
Study type: RCT within 48 h Comparator: hemicraniectomy group vs. 2.91; 95% CI,
Conservative 18% in control group (CI, 1.06–7.49;
Size: N=112 Exclusion treatment in the 1.06–7.49; P=0.04); P=0.04)
criteria: Age <60 ICU (n=63) mRS 3 7% surgery group • None with
vs. 3% control group mRS<3; 35% vs.
137
y, intracerebral 15% with
hemorrhage Safety end point: N/A mRS=4; 28% vs.
18% with mRS=5
• Improved
survival in pts
aged >60 y; most
patients are
disabled
ChiCTR Aim: To assess Inclusion Intervention: 1° end point: mRS at 6 • 6- and 12- • Stopped early • DHC reduced
Zhao J, et al.255 effectiveness of DHC on criteria: Patients DHC (n=24) mo: DHC reduced mortality month mortality • Concluded that mortality in all
2012 patients ≤80 y aged18–80 y significantly at 6 and 12 and mRS after 1 DHC <48 h subgroups at 6
22528280 with malignant Comparator: mo (33.3 vs. 82.6%, y reduced death and 12 mo
Study type: RCT MCA infarct Medical P=0.001); significant • Subgroup and severe (12.5% vs.
management reduction in poor outcome analysis disability even in 60.9% and 12.5
Size: N=47 Exclusion (n=23) (mRS>4) in 36 patients performed for patients aged vs. 60.9%)
criteria: Age >80 after 6 mo (P<0.001) patients aged 60–80 y • Fewer patients
y; DHC > 48 h of 60–80 y had mRS>4
stroke onset Safety end point: (33.3 vs. 82.6%)
Significant reduction
(P<0.001) in mortality after
36 patients completed 6
mo follow up
DESTINY, Aim: Analyze Inclusion Intervention: 1° end point: mRS at 1 Case fatality rate N/A • Decompressive
DECIMAL, effectiveness of criteria: age 18- Decompressive year dichotomized at 1 year, mRS hemicraniectomy
HAMLET; decompressive 80 y with MCA hemicraniectomy between favorable (0-4) dichotomized within 48 hours
Vahedi, et al.247 craniectomy in malignant malignant and unfavorable (5 or between 0-3 and of malignant
2007 MCA infarction infarction, Comparator: death); more patients in 4 to death. MCA infarction
17303527 enrolled in Conservative decompressive group had reduces mortality
Study type: Pooled HAMLET, treatment in the mRS≤4 (75% vs 24%; and increases
analysis of three RCTs DECIMAL, or ICU aRR 51%; 95% CI, 34-69), numbers of
DESTINY trials; an mRS≤3 (43% vs 21%; patients with
Size: N=93 treated within 48 aRR 23%) and survived favorable
h after stroke (78% vs 29%; aRR 50%) outcome (mRS
0-4)
Exclusion Safety end point: N/A • Numbers
criteria: Age>60; needed to treat
failed enrollment of two for
survival with
138
in any of the mRS≤4, four for
RCTs survival with
mRS≤3, and two
for survival
irrespective of
functional
outcome
Abbreviations: CI indicates confidence interval; DHC, decompressive hemicraniectomy; h, hour; HR, hazard ratio; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; OR, odds
ratio; RCT, randomized clinical trial; and y, year.
Literature search topics: Cerebral edema, surgical decompression suboccipital AND Cerebral edema, impact of age AND Cerebral edema, hypothermia, corticosteroids AND
Cerebral edema, decompression timing AND Cerebral edema, ventriculostomy, hydrocephalus AND Cerebral edema, barbiturates AND Cerebral edema, corticosteroids AND
Table LXI. Deleted

Table LXII. Deleted
Table LXIII. Deleted
Table LXIV. Deleted
Table LXVI. Deleted
Table LXVII. Deleted
Table LXVIII. Deleted
Table LXIX. Deleted
Table LXX. Deleted
Table LXXI. Deleted
Table LXXII. Deleted
Table LXXIII. Deleted
Table LXXIV. Deleted
Table LXXV. Deleted
Table LXXVI. Deleted
139
Table LXXVII. Nonrandomized Studies of Early Secondary Prevention in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Year Published
Anticoagulation
Gioia LC, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Symptomatic HT at day 7 (defined as PH2 with • Rivaroxaban may be safe for
al.207 Prospective open- Patients with AF ≥4-point increase in NIHSS score) initiation ≤14 d of TIA or minor to
2016 label treated with moderate severity ischemic stroke in
27222524 rivaroxaban ≤14 d of Results: No patients developed symptomatic HT patients with AF
Size: N=60 TIA or ischemic • Study limited by small sample size
stroke (NIHSS <9) and observational design
Exclusion criteria:
GFR <30 ml/min,
contraindication to
MRI
VISTA analysis Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Ordinal shift mRS at 90 d; recurrent stroke or • Initiation of anticoagulation
Abdul-Rahim Retrospective cohort AIS with known h/o sICH at 90 d (defined by ≥4-point increase on NIHSS therapy 2–3 d post-stroke
AH, et al.419 AF or on baseline associated with fewer events of
2015 Size: N=644 ECG; patients Results: recurrent stroke with no appreciable
25319957 (individual patient randomized to • Combined antithrombotic therapy (AC + AP) associated increase in rates of sICH;
data from placebo or any drug with more favorable ordinal mRS (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.32– • Limitations: nonrandom selection
neuroprotection trials with no known action 2.42) of antithrombotic therapy subject to
in AIS) on stroke outcome • Anticoagulation associated with fewer RS and sICH at 90 d selection bias - patients in “no
compared to no antithrombotic therapy antithrombotic group” had higher
Exclusion criteria: baseline NIHSS and greater
Lacking data on comorbidities; NOACs were not
relevant baseline and prescribed at the time of these data
outcomes data
RAF Study Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Composite stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, • Initiating AC 4–14 d from stroke
Paciaroni M, et Prospective cohort Known or newly sICH, major extracranial bleeding within 90 d onset in patients with AF had better
al.202 diagnosed AF outcomes; high CHA2DS2-VASc,
2015 Size: N=1029 Results: 12.6% primary outcome NIHSS, large ischemic lesions, and
26130094 (multicenter Europe Exclusion criteria: HR, 0.53 (0.30–0.93) starting AC 4–14 d vs. <4 d type of AC associated with
and Asia) Contraindication to composite outcome
AC • Study limited by non-
randomization
140
Antithrombotics after Hemorrhagic Transformation
Kim JT, et al.322 Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Neurological deterioration, vascular events, • Suggests patients with AIS and
2014 Retrospective Patients with AIS and and death at 1 mo hemorrhagic transformation do
24587041 analysis hemorrhagic better with early reinitiation of
transformation Results: Antithrombotics vs. no antithrombotics (1.6% vs antithrombotics than not
Size: N=222 11.1%, P=0.041) • Study limited by single-center,
Exclusion criteria: retrospective analysis
• Early death or lost
to f/u
• Malignant infarction
> 2/3
• Bleeding disorders
• H/o recent
hemorrhage
• Brain surgery
TAIST Study type: Post- Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Hemorrhagic transformation at 10 d and • LMWH is safe to administer in the
England TJ, et hoc analysis from Patients within 48 h functional outcomes at 3 and 6 mo (mRS, BI) acute stroke setting
al.323 RCT of AIS, treated with • Patients with sICH were excluded;
2010 medium and high Results: No difference in hemorrhagic transformation on post-hoc analysis subject to subject
21030711 Size: N=1297 dose tinzaparin LMWH or functional outcomes in patients with HT bias
(LMWH) vs. ASA
Exclusion criteria:
Presence of
hemorrhagic
transformation on
prerandomization
head CT
Endovascular Therapy in CeAD
CADISS Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Difference in recurrent stroke at 12 mo • Dissecting aneurysms have a
subgroup Retrospective CeAD patients within between CeAD patients with DA and without DA benign natural history and
Larsson SC et analysis of CeAD 7 d of symptom onset endovascular therapy is not
al.325 patients with and Results: DA vs. no DA: OR, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.10–7.31; necessary in the majority of cases
2017 without DA Exclusion criteria P=0.88) • Corroborated by accompanying
28087823 • Intracranial artery systematic review
Size: N=264 dissection • Study limited by possible selection
and survival bias
141
• Contraindications
to antithrombotic
therapy
• Baseline
antithrombotic
therapy
• Pregnancy
Jensen J, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: No difference in 90-days mRS ≤2, adjusted Retrospective analysis prone to
al.420 Retrospective CeAD patients OR, 0.62 (0.12–3.14; P=0.56) selection bias. With medical therapy
2016 analysis managed with EVT alone, the overall prognosis and
27286992 (n=24) vs. no EVT Results: Adjusted OR, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.12–3.14; P=0.56) natural history of CeAD, including
Size: N=161 dissecting aneurysms, is
Exclusion criteria: favorable324,325
None listed
Ahlhelm F, et Study type: Inclusion criteria: 1 end point: Technical success (8/10), complications • Stenting is feasible for CeAD in
al.326 Retrospective case CeAD patients (3/10), recurrent ischemic events patients with recurrent ischemic
2013 series managed with events despite optimal medical
25187774 stenting due to 1) Results: No recurrent ischemic events at mean f/u 47 mo therapy but is rarely indicated
Size: N=10 iatrogenic dissection • Limited by small sample size and
or 2) recurrent selection bias
ischemic events
despite optimal
antithrombotic
treatment
Exclusion criteria:
N/A
Abbreviations: AC indicates anticoagulant; AF, atrial fibrillation; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; AP, antiplatelet; CI, confidence interval; BI, Barthel Index; CeAD, cervical artery
dissection; DA, dissecting aneurysm; ECG, electrocardiogram; EVT, endovascular therapy; f/u, follow-up; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; h, hour; h/o, history of; HR, hazard ratio;
HT, hemorrhagic transformation; IV, intravenous; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health
Stroke Scale; NOAC, new oral anticoagulant; OR, odds ratio; PH2, parenchymal hematoma type 2; RCT, randomized clinical trial; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage;
RR, relative risk; RS, recurrent stroke; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Literature search topics: Antiplatelet AND Anticoagulation
142
Table LXXVIII. Deleted
Table LXXIX. Deleted
Table LXXX. Deleted
Table LXXXI. Deleted
Table LXXXII. Deleted
Table LXXXIII. Original Wording of Recommendations Reworded from Previous Guidelines and Statements
2018 AIS GL Original Wording of Recommendation* Reworded for Clarity in 2018 AIS GL
Section/Rec # or
Table/Heading
1.2. Rec 1 The use of a stroke assessment system by first aid providers is recommended.
1.2. Rec 3 EMS personnel should provide prehospital notification to the receiving hospital that a potential stroke patient is en route so that the appropriate hospital
resources may be mobilized before patient arrival.
1.3. Rec 1 EMS leaders in coordination with local, regional, and state agencies and in consultation with medical authorities and local experts should develop triage
paradigms and protocols that ensure that all patients with a known or suspected stroke are rapidly identified and assessed by use of a validated and
standardized instrument for stroke screening, such as the FAST (face, arm, speech test) scale, LAPSS, or the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale
(CPSS).
1.3. Rec 2 Regional systems of stroke care should be developed. These should consist of the following:
a. Healthcare facilities that provide initial emergency care, including administration of intravenous r-tPA, such as primary stroke centers, comprehensive
stroke centers, and other facilities, and
b. Centers capable of performing endovascular stroke treatment with comprehensive periprocedural care, including comprehensive stroke centers and
other healthcare facilities, to which rapid transport can be arranged when appropriate.
1.3. Rec 3 Patients should be transported rapidly to the closest available certified PSC or CSC or, if no such centers exist, the most appropriate institution that
provides emergency stroke care as described in the statement.
1.6. Rec 2 When implemented within a telestroke network, teleradiology systems approved by the Food and Drug Administration (or equivalent organization) are
useful in supporting rapid imaging interpretation in time for fibrinolysis decision making.
1.7. Rec 1 It may be useful for primary stroke centers and other healthcare facilities that provide initial emergency care, including administration of intravenous r-
tPA, to develop the capability of performing emergency noninvasive intracranial vascular imaging to most appropriately select patients for transfer for
endovascular intervention and to reduce the time to endovascular treatment
1.7. Rec 2 Endovascular therapy requires the patient to be at an experienced stroke center with rapid access to cerebral angiography and qualified
neurointerventionalists. Systems should be designed, executed, and monitored to emphasize expeditious assessment and treatment. Outcomes for all
patients should be tracked. Facilities are encouraged to define criteria that can be used to credential individuals who can perform safe and timely intra-
arterial revascularization procedures.
2.1. Rec 1 The use of a stroke rating scale, preferably the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), is recommended.
2.2. Rec 8 If endovascular therapy is contemplated, a noninvasive intracranial vascular study is strongly recommended during the initial imaging evaluation of the
acute stroke patient but should not delay intravenous r-tPA if indicated. For patients who qualify for intravenous r-tPA according to
guidelines from professional medical societies, initiating intravenous r-tPA before noninvasive vascular imaging is recommended for patients who have
not had noninvasive vascular imaging as part of their initial imaging assessment for stroke. Noninvasive intracranial vascular imaging should
143
then be obtained as quickly as possible.
2.3. Rec 2 Baseline electrocardiogram assessment is recommended in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke but should not delay initiation of intravenous
rtPA.
2.3. Rec 3 Baseline troponin assessment is recommended in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke but should not delay initiation of intravenous rtPA.
2.3. Rec 4 The usefulness of chest radiographs in the hyperacute stroke setting in the absence of evidence of acute pulmonary, cardiac, or pulmonary vascular
disease is unclear. If obtained, they should not unnecessarily delay administration of fibrinolysis.
3.2. Rec 2 Patients who have elevated blood pressure and are otherwise eligible for treatment with intravenous rtPA should have their blood pressure carefully
lowered so that their systolic blood pressure is <185 mm Hg and their diastolic blood pressure is <110 mm Hg before fibrinolytic therapy is initiated.
3.5. Rec 1 Intravenous rtPA (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg) is recommended for selected patients who may
be treated within 3 hours of onset of ischemic stroke. Physicians should review the criteria outlined in Tables 10 and11 (which are modeled on those
used in the NINDS Trial) to determine the eligibility of the patient.
3.5. Rec 2 Intravenous rtPA (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg) is recommended for administration to eligible patients who can be treated in the time period of 3 to
4.5 hours after stroke onset. The eligibility criteria for treatment in this time period are similar to those for people treated at earlier time periods within 3
hours, with the following additional exclusion criteria: patients >80 years old, those taking oral anticoagulants regardless of INR, those with a baseline
NIHSS score >25, those with imaging evidence of ischemic injury involving more than one third of the MCA territory, or those with a history of both stroke
and diabetes mellitus.
3.5. Rec 8 Intravenous alteplase in patients who have received a dose of LMWH within the previous 24 hours is not recommended. This applies to both prophylactic
doses and treatment doses.
3.5. Rec 11 Treating clinicians should be aware that hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia may mimic acute stroke presentations and check blood glucose levels before
intravenous initiation. Intravenous alteplase is not indicated for nonvascular conditions.
3.5. Rec 12 Because time from onset of symptoms to treatment has such a powerful impact on outcome, delaying treatment with intravenous alteplase to monitor for
further improvement is not recommended.
3.5. Rec 13 In patients undergoing fibrinolytic therapy, physicians should be aware of and prepared to emergently treat potential side effects, including bleeding
complications and angioedema that may cause partial airway obstruction.
3.5. Rec 14 Patients who have elevated blood pressure and are otherwise eligible for treatment with intravenous rtPA should have their blood pressure carefully
lowered (Table 9) so that their systolic blood pressure is <185 mm Hg and their diastolic blood pressure is <110 mm Hg before fibrinolytic therapy is
initiated. If medications are given to lower blood pressure, the clinician should be sure that the blood pressure is stabilized at the lower level before
beginning treatment with intravenous rtPA and maintained below 180/105 mm Hg for at least the first 24 hours after intravenous rtPA treatment.
3.5. Rec 16 In patients eligible for intravenous rtPA, benefit of therapy is time dependent, and treatment should be initiated as quickly as possible. The door-to-needle
time (time of bolus administration) should be within 60 minutes from hospital arrival.
3.7. Rec 1 Patients eligible for intravenous r-tPA should receive intravenous r-tPA even if endovascular treatments are being considered.
3.7. Rec 4 Although the benefits are uncertain, the use of endovascular therapy with stent retrievers may be reasonable for carefully selected patients with acute
ischemic stroke in whom treatment can be initiated (groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset and who have causative occlusion of the M2 or M3
portion of the MCAs, anterior cerebral arteries, vertebral arteries, basilar artery, or posterior cerebral arteries.
3.7. Rec 5 Although the benefits are uncertain, the use of endovascular therapy with stent retrievers may be reasonable for carefully selected patients with acute
ischemic stroke in whom treatment can be initiated (groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset and who have causative occlusion of the M2 or M3
portion of the MCAs, anterior cerebral arteries, vertebral arteries, basilar artery, or posterior cerebral arteries.
3.7. Rec 9 The technical goal of the thrombectomy procedure should be a TICI grade 2b/3 angiographic result to maximize the probability of a good functional
clinical outcome.
144
3.7. Rec 14 Use of salvage technical adjuncts, including intraarterial fibrinolysis, may be reasonable to achieve these angiographic results if completed within 6 hours
of symptom onset.
3.8. Rec 2 Initial treatment with intra-arterial fibrinolysis is beneficial for carefully selected patients with major ischemic strokes of <6 hours’ duration caused by
occlusions of the MCA. However, these data are derived from clinical trials that no longer reflect current practice, including the use of fibrinolytic drugs
that are not available. A clinically beneficial dose of intra-arterial r-tPA is not established, and r-tPA does not have US Food and Drug Administration
approval for intra-arterial use. As a consequence, endovascular therapy with stent retrievers is recommended over intra-arterial fibrinolysis as first-line
therapy
3.8. Rec 3 Intra-arterial fibrinolysis initiated within 6 hours of stroke onset in carefully selected patients who have contraindications to the use of intravenous r-tPA
might be considered, but the consequences are unknown.
3.11. Rec 4 At present, use of devices to augment cerebral blood flow for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke is not well established. These devices
should be used in the setting of clinical trials.
3.12. Rec 1 At present, no pharmacological agents with putative neuroprotective actions have demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes after ischemic stroke,
and therefore, other neuroprotective agents are not recommended.
3.13. Rec 2 In patients with unstable neurological status (either stroke-in-evolution or crescendo TIA), the efficacy of emergent or urgent carotid endarterectomy is
not well established.
4.2. Rec 3 Supplemental oxygen is not recommended in nonhypoxic patients with acute ischemic stroke.
4.6. Rec 2 Dysphagia screening is reasonable by a speech-language pathologist or other trained healthcare provider.
4.6. Rec 4 Selection of instrumental study (fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with
sensory testing) may be based on availability or other considerations.
5.1. Rec 9 Osmotic therapy for patients with clinical deterioration from cerebral swelling associated with cerebral infarction is reasonable.
5.2. Rec 1 Recurrent seizures after stroke should be treated in a manner similar to other acute neurological conditions, and antiepileptic agents should be selected
by specific patient characteristics.
5.2. Rec 2 Prophylactic use of anticonvulsants is not recommended.
Table 6: Intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg; maximum dose, 90 mg) is recommended for selected patients who may be treated within 3 hours of onset of ischemic
Within 3 h stroke. Physicians should review the criteria outlined in Tables 10 and 11 (which are modeled on those used in the 2 NINDS trials) to determine the
eligibility of the patient.
Table 6: For otherwise medically eligible patients ≥18 years of age, intravenous alteplase administration within 3 hours is equally recommended for patients <80
Age and >80 years of age. Older age is an adverse prognostic factor in stroke but does not modify the treatment effect of thrombolysis. Although older
patients have poorer outcomes, higher mortality, and higher rates of sICH than those <80 years of age, compared with control subjects, intravenous
alteplase provides a better chance of being independent at 3 months across all age groups.
Table 6: Intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg; maximum dose, 90 mg) is recommended for administration to eligible patients who can be treated in the time period of
3-4.5 h 3 to 4.5 hours after stroke onset. The eligibility criteria for treatment in this time period are similar to those for people treated at earlier time periods within
Table 6: 3 hours, with the following additional exclusion criteria: patients >80 years old, those taking oral anticoagulants (OACs) regardless of international
Age, Diabetes normalized ratio (INR), those with a baseline NIHSS score >25, those with imaging evidence of ischemic injury involving more than one third of the
mellitus, Prior middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory, or those with a history of both stroke and diabetes mellitus.
stroke, Severity,
OACs, Imaging
Table 6: Within 3 hours from symptom onset, treatment of patients with milder ischemic stroke symptoms that are judged as nondisabling may be considered.
Severity 0- to 3-h Treatment risks should be weighed against possible benefits; however, more study is needed to further define the risk-to-benefit ratio.
window
145
Table 6: The benefit of intravenous alteplase administration for acute stroke patients with a baseline NIHSS score >25 and presenting in the 3- to 4.5-hour window
Severity 3- to 4.5-h is uncertain.
window
Table 6: Preexisting disability does not seem to independently increase the risk of sICH after intravenous alteplase, but it may be associated with less
Preexisting neurological improvement and higher mortality. Thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase for acute stroke patients with preexisting disability (mRS
disability score ≥2) may be reasonable, but decisions should take into account relevant factors other than mRS (including quality of life, social support, place of
residence, need for a caregiver after alteplase administration, patients’ and families’ preferences, and goals of care).
Table 6: Intravenous alteplase may be reasonable in patients who have a history of warfarin use and an INR ≤1.7.
Coagulopathy
Table 6: When there is a history of recent or active vaginal bleeding causing clinically significant anemia, then emergent consultation with a gynecologist is
Menstruation probably indicated before a decision about intravenous alteplase is made.
Table 6: Intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke known or suspected to be associated with extracranial cervical arterial dissection is reasonably safe within
Extracranial 4.5 hours and is probably recommended.
cervical
dissections
Table 6: For patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke and a history of recent MI in the past 3 months, treating the ischemic stroke with intravenous alteplase
Recent MI is reasonable if the recent MI was non-STEMI, is reasonable if the recent MI was STEMI involving the right or inferior myocardium, and may be
reasonable if the recent MI was STEMI involving the left anterior myocardium.
Table 6: Intravenous alteplase administration for ischemic stroke may be considered in pregnancy when the anticipated benefits of treating moderate to severe
Pregnancy stroke outweigh the anticipated increased risks of uterine bleeding.
*Original publication and date noted in 2018 AIS GL. Changes to Class and LOE, if any, are noted in the 2018 GL.
146
References
1. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, McMullan PW Jr, Qureshi AI, Rosenfield K, Scott
PA, Summers DR, Wang DZ, Wintermark M, Yonas H; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on
Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the early management of
patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a.
2. Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr, Bushnell CD, Cucchiara B, Cushman M, deVeber G, Ferro JM, Tsai FY; on behalf of the
American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Diagnosis and management of cerebral
venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.
2011;42:1158–1192. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e31820a8364.
3. Smith EE, Kent DM, Bulsara KR, Leung LY, Lichtman JH, Reeves MJ, Towfighi A, Whiteley WN, Zahuranec D. Accuracy of prediction
instruments for diagnosing large vessel occlusion in individuals with suspected stroke: a systematic review for the 2018 guidelines for the
early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:XXX–XXX. doi: 10.1161/STR. 0000000000000160.
4. Smith EE, Kent DM, Bulsara KR, Leung LY, Lichtman JH, Reeves MJ, Towfighi A, Whiteley WN, Zahuranec D. Effect of dysphagia
screening strategies on clinical outcomes after stroke: a systematic review for the 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with
acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.
2018;49:XXX–XXX. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000159.
5. Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P, Chumbler NR, Frankel MR, George MG, Gorelick PB, Horton KB, Kaste M, Lackland DT,
Levine SR, Meyer BC, Meyers PM, Patterson V, Stranne SK, White CJ; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council;
Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology
and Intervention. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the
American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:2635–2660. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192361.
6. Higashida R, Alberts MJ, Alexander DN, Crocco TJ, Demaerschalk BM, Derdeyn CP, Goldstein LB, Jauch EC, Mayer SA, Meltzer NM,
Peterson ED, Rosenwasser RH, Saver JL, Schwamm L, Summers D, Wechsler L, Wood JP; on behalf of the American Heart Association
Advocacy Coordinating Committee. Interactions within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/
American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:2961–2984. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182a6d2b2.
7. Deleted
8. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT,
Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial
147
fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice
guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society [published correction appears in Circulation. 2014;130:e270–271]. Circulation. 2014;130:2071–
2104. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000040.
9. Wijdicks EF, Sheth KN, Carter BS, Greer DM, Kasner SE, Kimberly WT, Schwab S, Smith EE, Tamargo RJ, Wintermark M; on behalf of
the American Heart Association Stroke Council. Recommendations for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling:
a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1222–1238.
doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6.
10. Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Lewis EF, Lutz BJ, McCann RM, Rabinstein AA, Saposnik G, Sheth KN, Zahuranec DB, Zipfel
GJ, Zorowitz RD; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council
on Clinical Cardiology. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1887–1916. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000015.
11. Deleted
12. Smith EE, Saver JL, Alexander DN, Furie KL, Hopkins LN, Katzan IL, Mackey JS, Miller EL, Schwamm LH, Williams LS; on behalf of
the AHA/ASA Stroke Performance Oversight Committee. Clinical performance measures for adults hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke:
performance measures for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.
2014;45:3472–3498. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000045.
13. Singletary EM, Charlton NP, Epstein JL, Ferguson JD, Jensen JL, MacPherson AI, Pellegrino JL, Smith WW, Swain JM, Lojero-Wheatley
LF, Zideman DA. Part 15: first aid: 2015 American Heart Association and American Red Cross guidelines update for first aid. Circulation.
2015;132(suppl 2):S574–S589. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000269.
14. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF,
Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American
Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding
endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.
2015;46:3020–3035. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000074.
15. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, Demchuk AM, Fugate JE, Grotta JC, Khalessi AA, Levy EI, Palesch YY, Prabhakaran S,
Saposnik G, Saver JL, Smith EE; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Epidemiology and
Prevention. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a statement for
healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [published correction appears in Stroke.
2016;47:e262]. Stroke. 2016;47:581–641. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000086.
16. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M,
Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council,
Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research.
148
Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
American Stroke Association [published corrections appear in Stroke. 2017;48:e78 and Stroke. 2017;48:e369]. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–e169.
doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
17. Ojike N, Ravenell J, Seixas A, Masters-Israilov A, Rogers A, Jean-Louis G, Ogedegbe G, McFarlane SI. Racial disparity in stroke
awareness in the US: an analysis of the 2014 National Health Interview Survey. J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2016;7:365.
18. Ekundayo OJ, Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Xian Y, Zhao X, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Cheng EM. Patterns of emergency
medical services use and its association with timely stroke treatment: findings from Get With The Guidelines–Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual
Outcomes. 2013;6:262–269. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000089.
19. Mochari-Greenberger H, Xian Y, Hellkamp AS, Schulte PJ, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Schwamm LH, Smith EE.
Racial/ethnic and sex differences in emergency medical services transport among hospitalized US Stroke patients: analysis of the national
Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002099. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002099.
20. Boden-Albala B, Stillman J, Roberts ET, Quarles LW, Glymour MM, Chong J, Moats H, Torrico V, Parides MC. Comparison of acute
stroke preparedness strategies to decrease emergency department arrival time in a multiethnic cohort: the Stroke Warning Information and
Faster Treatment Study. Stroke. 2015;46:1806–1812. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008502.
21. Berglund A, Svensson L, Wahlgren N, von Euler M; HASTA Collaborators. Face Arm Speech Time Test use in the prehospital setting,
better in the ambulance than in the emergency medical communication center. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37:212–216. doi: 10.1159/000358116.
22. De Luca A, Giorgi Rossi P, Villa GF; Stroke Group Italian Society Pre Hospital EMERGENCY SERVICES. The use of Cincinnati
Prehospital Stroke Scale during telephone dispatch interview increases the accuracy in identifying stroke and transient ischemic attack
symptoms. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:513. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-513.
23. Lin CB, Peterson ED, Smith EE, Saver JL, Liang L, Xian Y, Olson DM, Shah BR, Hernandez AF, Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC. Emergency
medical service hospital prenotification is associated with improved evaluation and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Circ Cardiovasc
Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:514–522. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965210.
24. – 31. Deleted
32. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, Campbell BC, Nogueira RG, Demchuk AM, Tomasello A,
Cardona P, Devlin TG, Frei DF, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkhemer OA, Jovin TG, Siddiqui AH, van Zwam WH, Davis SM, Castaño
C, Sapkota BL, Fransen PS, Molina C, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Chamorro Á, Lingsma H, Silver FL, Donnan GA, Shuaib A, Brown S, Stouch
B, Mitchell PJ, Davalos A, Roos YB, Hill MD; HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes
from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1279–1288. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647.
33. Deleted
34. Deleted
149
35. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reeves MJ, Bhatt DL, Xian Y, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH. Door-to-needle
times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement
initiative. JAMA. 2014;311:1632–1640.
36. Xian Y, Xu H, Lytle B, Blevins J, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Smith EE, Saver JL, Messe SR, Paulsen M, Suter RE, Reeves MJ, Jauch
EC, Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC. Use of strategies to improve door-to-needle times with tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute
ischemic stroke in clinical practice: findings from Target: Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003227. doi: 10.1161/
CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003227.
37. Target Stroke Phase II website http://www.strokeassociation.org/STROKEORG/Professionals/TargetStroke/Target-Stroke-Phase-II_
UCM_469859_Article.jsp#.Wk1CBd-nF3g. Accessed January 3, 2018.
38. Scott PA, Meurer WJ, Frederiksen SM, Kalbfleisch JD, Xu Z, Haan MN, Silbergleit R, Morgenstern LB; INSTINCT Investigators. A mul-
tilevel intervention to increase community hospital use of alteplase for acute stroke (INSTINCT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:139–148. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70311-3.
39. Dirks M, Niessen LW, van Wijngaarden JD, Koudstaal PJ, Franke CL, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Huijsman R, Lingsma HF, Minkman MM,
Dippel DW; PRomoting ACute Thrombolysis in Ischemic StrokE (PRACTISE) Investigators. Promoting thrombolysis in acute ischemic
stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1325–1330. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596940.
40. Phabphal K, Hirunpatch S. The effectiveness of low-cost teleconsultation for emergency head computer tomography in patients with
suspected stroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:439–442. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080603.
41. Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill MD, Goyal, M. A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary
diagnosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1732.
42. Johnston KC, Worrall BB; Teleradiology Assessment of Computerized Tomographs Online Reliability Study. Teleradiology Assessment of
Computerized Tomographs Online Reliability Study (TRACTORS) for acute stroke evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2003;9:227–233. doi:
10.1089/153056203322502605.
43. Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Hoxworth JM, Patel AC, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Meyer
BC; for the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) in Arizona–The Initial Mayo Clinic
Experience (AZ TIME) Investigators. CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular
neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. Stroke. 2012;43:3095–3097. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255.
44. Spokoyny I, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Demaerschalk BM, Lyden PD, Hemmen TM, Guzik AK, Chen JY, Meyer BC. Pooled assessment of
computed tomography interpretation by vascular neurologists in the STRokE DOC telestroke network. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis.
2014;23:511–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.023.
45. Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC, Dzialowski I, Kunz A, Wolz M, Hentschel H, Schultheiss T, Kepplinger J, Schneider H, Wiedemann B,
Wojciechowski C, Reichmann H, Gahn G, von Kummer R. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine.
Neurology. 2013;80:332–338. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07d0.
150
46. Demaerschalk BM, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Meyer BC. Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the Stroke Team Remote
Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona telestroke trials. Telemed J E Health.
2012;18:230–237. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0116.
47. Kepplinger J, Barlinn K, Deckert S, Scheibe M, Bodechtel U, Schmitt J. Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87:1344–1351. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003148.
48. Fong WC, Ismail M, Lo JW, Li JT, Wong AH, Ng YW, Chan PY, Chan AL, Chan GH, Fong KW, Cheung NY, Wong GC, Ho HF, Chan
ST, Kwok VW, Yuen BM, Chan JH, Li PC. Telephone and teleradiology-guided thrombolysis can achieve similar outcome as thrombolysis
by neurologist on-site. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:1223–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.01.022.
49. Barlinn J, Gerber J, Barlinn K, Pallesen LP, Siepmann T, Zerna C, Wojciechowski C, Puetz V, von Kummer R, Reichmann H, Linn J,
Bodechtel U. Acute endovascular treatment delivery to ischemic stroke patients transferred within a telestroke network: a retrospective
observational study. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:502–509. doi: 10.1177/1747493016681018.
50. Vagal A, Meganathan K, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye O, Hornung R, Khatri P. Increasing use of computed tomographic perfusion and
computed tomographic angiograms in acute ischemic stroke from 2006 to 2010. Stroke. 2014;45:1029–1034. doi: 10.1161/
STROKEAHA.113.004332.
51. Demaerschalk BM, Yip TR. Economic benefit of increasing utilization of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke
in the United States. Stroke. 2005;36:2500–2503. doi: 10.1161/01. STR.0000185699.37843.14.
52. Demaerschalk BM, Durocher DL. How diagnosis-related group 559 will change the US Medicare cost reimbursement ratio for stroke
centers. Stroke. 2007;38:1309–1312. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260185.74694. a7.
53. Penaloza-Ramos MC, Sheppard JP, Jowett S, Barton P, Mant J, Quinn T, Mellor RM, Sims D, Sandler D, McManus RJ; on behalf of the
BBC CLAHRC Investigators. Cost-effectiveness of optimizing acute stroke care services for thrombolysis. Stroke. 2014;45:553–562. doi:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003216.
54. Tan Tanny SP, Busija L, Liew D, Teo S, Davis SM, Yan B. Cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke:
experience from Australian stroke center. Stroke. 2013;44:2269–2274. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001295.
55. Health Quality Ontario. Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a health technology assessment. Ont Health
Technol Assess Ser. 2016;16:1–79.
56. Ganesalingam J, Pizzo E, Morris S, Sunderland T, Ames D, Lobotesis K. Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy using stent
retrievers in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:2591–2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009396.
57. Song S, Fonarow GC, Olson DM, Liang L, Schulte PJ, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, Schwamm LH, Saver JL.
Association of Get With The Guidelines–Stroke program participation and clinical outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with ischemic
stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:1294–1302. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011874.
58. Generalized efficacy of t-PA for acute stroke: subgroup analysis of the NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1997;28:2119–2225.
151
59. Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Hansen MD. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score
strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology. 1999;53:126–
131.
60. Frankel MR, Morgenstern LB, Kwiatkowski T, Lu M, Tilley BC, Broderick JP, Libman R, Levine SR, Brott T. Predicting prognosis after
stroke: a placebo group analysis from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Trial. Neurology.
2000;55:952–959.
61. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, Aichner F, Bluhmki E, Dávalos A, Erilä T, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, Hennerici MG, Kaste M,
Köhrmann M, Larrue V, Lees KR, Machnig T, Roine RO, Toni D, Vanhooren G; for the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-
MOnitoring STudy Investigators. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data
profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-MOnitoring STudy (SITS-MOST). Stroke.
2008;39:3316–3322. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510768.
62. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, Haley EC, Grotta J, Marler J. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale
using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2220–2226.
63. Josephson SA, Hills NK, Johnston SC. NIH Stroke Scale reliability in ratings from a large sample of clinicians. Cerebrovasc Dis.
2006;22:389–395. doi: 10.1159/000094857.
64. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Emr M, Warren M, Marler J. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale certification is reliable across multiple
venues. Stroke. 2009;40:2507–2511. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532069.
65. Fonarow GC, Saver JL, Smith EE, Broderick JP, Kleindorfer DO, Sacco RL, Pan W, Olson DM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm
LH. Relationship of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale to 30-day mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke. J
Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:42–50. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.111.000034.
66. Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, Luby M, Butman JA, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Patronas N, Latour L, Warach S. Magnetic
resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison.
Lancet. 2007;369:293–298. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2.
67. Hwang DY, Silva GS, Furie KL, Greer DM. Comparative sensitivity of computed tomography vs. magnetic resonance imaging for detect-
ing acute posterior fossa infarct. J Emerg Med. 2012;42:559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.101.
68. Brazzelli M, Sandercock PA, Chappell FM, Celani MG, Righetti E, Arestis N, Wardlaw JM, Deeks JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging ver-
sus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2009:CD007424.
69. Wardlaw J, Brazzelli M, Miranda H, Chappell F, McNamee P, Scotland G, Quayyum Z, Martin D, Shuler K, Sandercock P, Dennis M. An
assessment of the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance, including diffusion-weighted imaging, in patients with transient ischaemic
attack and minor stroke: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1–368, v. doi:
10.3310/hta18270.
152
70. Wardlaw JM, Seymour J, Cairns J, Keir S, Lewis S, Sandercock P. Immediate computed tomography scanning of acute stroke is cost-
effective and improves quality of life. Stroke. 2004;35:2477–2483. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143453.78005.44.
71. Barber PA, Hill MD, Eliasziw M, Demchuk AM, Pexman JH, Hudon ME, Tomanek A, Frayne R, Buchan AM; ASPECTS Study Group.
Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J
Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1528–1533. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.059261.
72. Heidenreich JO, Hsu D, Wang G, Jesberger JA, Tarr RW, Zaidat OO, Sunshine JL. Magnetic resonance imaging results can affect therapy
decisions in hyperacute stroke care. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:550–557. doi: 10.1080/02841850801958320.
73. Lees KR, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Bluhmki E, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Grotta JC, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Lansberg MG, Lindley RI,
Lyden P, Murray GD, Sandercock PA, Toni D, Toyoda K, Wardlaw JM, Whiteley WN, Baigent C, Hacke W, Howard G; on behalf of the
Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists’ Collaborators Group. Effects of alteplase for acute stroke on the distribution of functional outcomes: a pooled
analysis of 9 trials. Stroke. 2016;47:2373–2379. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013644.
74. Aghaebrahim A, Streib C, Rangaraju S, Kenmuir CL, Giurgiutiu DV, Horev A, Saeed Y, Callaway CW, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C, Pacella
C, Ducruet AF, Jankowitz BT, Jovin TG, Jadhav AP. Streamlining door to recanalization processes in endovascular stroke therapy. J
Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:340–345. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012324.
75. Messe SR, Khatri P, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, Saver JL, Bhatt DL, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Cox M, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH.
Why are acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving IV tPA? Results from a national registry. Neurology. 2016;87:1565–1574.
76. Zaidi SF, Shawver J, Espinosa Morales A, Salahuddin H, Tietjen G, Lindstrom D, Parquette B, Adams A, Korsnack A, Jumaa MA. Stroke
care: initial data from a county-based bypass protocol for patients with acute stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:631–635. doi: 10.1136/
neurintsurg-2016-012476.
77. IST-3 Collaborative Group. Association between brain imaging signs, early and late outcomes, and response to intravenous alteplase after
acute ischaemic stroke in the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3): secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol.
2015;14:485–496.
78. Demchuk AM, Khan F, Hill MD, Barber PA, Silver B, Patel S, Levine SR; NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Importance of leukoaraiosis
on CT for tissue plasminogen activator decision making: evaluation of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26:120–125.
doi: 10.1159/000139658.
79. Dzialowski I, Hill MD, Coutts SB, Demchuk AM, Kent DM, Wunderlich O, von Kummer R. Extent of early ischemic changes on computed
tomography (CT) before thrombolysis: prognostic value of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score in ECASS II. Stroke. 2006;37:973–
978. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000206215.62441.56.
80. Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Barber PA, Silver B, Patel SC, Levine SR; for the NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group, NIH. Importance of early
ischemic computed tomography changes using ASPECTS in NINDS rtPA Stroke Study. Stroke. 2005;36:2110–2115. doi: 10.1161/
01.STR.0000181116.15426.58.
153
81. Patel SC, Levine SR, Tilley BC, Grotta JC, Lu M, Frankel M, Haley EC Jr, Brott TG, Broderick JP, Horowitz S, Lyden PD, Lewandowski
CA, Marler JR, Welch KM; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Lack of clinical significance
of early ischemic changes on computed tomography in acute stroke. JAMA. 2001;286:2830–2838.
82. Charidimou A, Pasi M, Fiorelli M, Shams S, von Kummer R, Pantoni L, Rost N. Leukoaraiosis, cerebral hemorrhage, and outcome after
intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis (v1). Stroke. 2016;47:2364–2372. doi: 10.1161/
83. Qureshi AI, Ezzeddine MA, Nasar A, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, Janjua N, Divani AA. Is IV tissue plasminogen activator beneficial in patients
with hyperdense artery sign? Neurology. 2006;66:1171–1174. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208407.69544.5a.
84. Mair G, von Kummer R, Morris Z, von Heijne A, Bradey N, Cala L, Peeters A, Farrall AJ, Adami A, Potter G, Cohen G, Sandercock PA,
Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM; IST-3 Collaborative Group. Effect of alteplase on the CT hyperdense artery sign and outcome after ischemic
stroke. Neurology. 2016;86:118–125. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002236.
85. Charidimou A, Shoamanesh A; International META-MICROBLEEDS Initiative. Clinical relevance of microbleeds in acute stroke
thrombolysis: comprehensive meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87:1534–1541. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003207.
86. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH, Turc G, Nolte CH, Jung S, Cordonnier C, Fiebach JB, Scheitz JF, Klinger-Gratz PP, Oppenheim C,
Goyal N, Safouris A, Mattle HP, Alexandrov AW, Schellinger PD, Alexandrov AV. Risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after
intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and high cerebral microbleed burden: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol.
2016;73:675–683. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0292.
87. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study
Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587.
88. Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, Kemp S, Schlaug G, Skalabrin E, Bammer R, Kakuda W, Lansberg MG, Shuaib A, Coplin W, Hamilton
S, Moseley M, Marks MP; DEFUSE Investigators. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the
Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:508–517. doi:
10.1002/ana.20976.
89. Huang X, Cheripelli BK, Lloyd SM, Kalladka D, Moreton FC, Siddiqui A, Ford I, Muir KW. Alteplase Versus Tenecteplase for
Thrombolysis After Ischaemic Stroke (ATTEST): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:368–
376. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70017-7.
90. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD000213.
91. Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, Campbell B, Chung K, Miteff F, O’Brien B, Bladin C, McElduff P, Allen C, Bateman G, Donnan G, Davis
S, Levi C. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1099–1107. doi: 10.1056/
NEJMoa1109842.
92. Hacke W, Furlan AJ, Al-Rawi Y, Davalos A, Fiebach JB, Gruber F, Kaste M, Lipka LJ, Pedraza S, Ringleb PA, Rowley HA, Schneider D,
Schwamm LH, Leal JS, Söhngen M, Teal PA, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K, Wintermark M, Warach S. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with
154
acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:141–150. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70267-9.
93. Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, Levi C, Butcher KS, Peeters A, Barber PA, Bladin C, De Silva DA, Byrnes G, Chalk JB, Fink JN,
Kimber TE, Schultz D, Hand PJ, Frayne J, Hankey G, Muir K, Gerraty R, Tress BM, Desmond PM; EPITHET Investigators. Effects of
alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised
trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:299–309. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70044-9.
94. Furlan AJ, Eyding D, Albers GW, Al-Rawi Y, Lees KR, Rowley HA, Sachara C, Soehngen M, Warach S, Hacke W; for the DEDAS
Investigators. Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS): evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours after
stroke onset. Stroke. 2006;37:1227–1231. doi: 10.1161/01.STR. 0000217403.66996.6d.
95. Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, Bogousslavsky J, Davalos A, Eliasziw M, Fischer M, Furlan A, Kaste M, Lees KR, Soehngen M, Warach
S; for the DIAS Study Group. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke
thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke. 2005;36:66–73. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000149938.08731.2c.
96. Ehrlich ME, Turner HL, Currie LJ, Wintermark M, Worrall BB, Southerland AM. Safety of computed tomographic angiography in the
evaluation of patients with acute stroke: a single-center experience. Stroke. 2016;47:2045–2050. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013973.
97. Aulicky P, Mikulík R, Goldemund D, Reif M, Dufek M, Kubelka T. Safety of performing CT angiography in stroke patients treated with in-
travenous thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:783–787. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.184002.
98. Lima FO, Lev MH, Levy RA, Silva GS, Ebril M, de Camargo EC, Pomerantz S, Singhal AB, Greer DM, Ay H, González RG, Koroshetz
WJ, Smith WS, Furie KL. Functional contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of acute ischemic stroke does not increase the risk of contrast-
induced nephropathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:817–821. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1927.
99. Hopyan JJ, Gladstone DJ, Mallia G, Schiff J, Fox AJ, Symons SP, Buck BH, Black SE, Aviv RI. Renal safety of CT angiography and perfu-
sion imaging in the emergency evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1826–1830. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1257.
100. Krol AL, Dzialowski I, Roy J, Puetz V, Subramaniam S, Coutts SB, Demchuk AM. Incidence of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients un-
dergoing acute stroke computed tomography angiography. Stroke. 2007;38:2364–2366. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482778.
101. Josephson SA, Dillon WP, Smith WS. Incidence of contrast nephropathy from cerebral CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging.
Neurology. 2005;64:1805–1806. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000161845.69114.62.
102. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, San Román L, Serena J, Abilleira S, Ribó M, Millán M, Urra X,
Cardona P, López-Cancio E, Tomasello A, Castaño C, Blasco J, Aja L, Dorado L, Quesada H, Rubiera M, Hernandez-Pérez M, Goyal M,
Demchuk AM, von Kummer R, Gallofré M, Dávalos A; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom
onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780.
103. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle
HP, Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, Baxter BW, Devlin TG, Lopes DK, Reddy VK, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer OC,
155
Jahan R; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med.
2015;372:2285–2295. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.
104. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei
DF, Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA,
Choe H, Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Linares G, Mandzia JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB,
Smith EE, Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD; ESCAPE Trial Investigators.
Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–1030. doi: 10.1056/
NEJMoa1414905.
105. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, Yan B, Dowling RJ, Parsons MW, Oxley TJ, Wu TY, Brooks M,
Simpson MA, Miteff F, Levi CR, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, Steinfort BS, Priglinger M, Ang T, Scroop R, Barber PA,
McGuinness B, Wijeratne T, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Bladin CF, Badve M, Rice H, de Villiers L, Ma H, Desmond PM, Donnan
GA, Davis SM; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med.
2015;372:1009–1018. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792.
106. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL, Soudant M, Oppenheim C, Moulin T, Guillemin F; THRACE Investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after
intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1138–1147. doi:
10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30177-6.
107. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF,Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJ, van
Walderveen MA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van
Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga
RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den
Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, van den Berg R,
Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CB, Dippel DW; MR CLEAN Investigators. A
randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587.
108. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, Yavagal DR, Ribo M, Cognard C, Hanel RA, Sila CA, Hassan
AE, Millan M, Levy EI, Mitchell P, Chen M, English JD, Shah QA, Silver FL, Pereira VM, Mehta BP, Baxter BW, Abraham MG, Cardona
P, Veznedaroglu E, Hellinger FR, Feng L, Kirmani JF, Lopes DK, Jankowitz BT, Frankel MR, Costalat V, Vora NA, Yoo AJ, Malik AM,
Furlan AJ, Rubiera M, Aghaebrahim A, Olivot JM, Tekle WG, Shields R, Graves T, Lewis RJ, Smith WS, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Jovin
TG DAWN Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct [published online
ahead of print November 11, 2017]. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/
NEJMoa1706442.
109. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, McTaggart R, Torbey MT, Kim-Tenser M, Leslie-Mazwi T,
Sarraj A, Kasner SE, Ansari SA, Yeatts SD, Hamilton S, Mylnash M, Heit JJ, Zaharchuk G, Kim S, Carrozzella J, Palesch YY, Demchuk
156
AM, Bammer R, Lavori PW, Broderick JP, Lansberg MG; on behalf of the DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Thrombectomy for stroke with
perfusion imaging selection at 6–16 hours. N Engl J Med. In press.
110. Berkhemer OA, Jansen IG, Beumer D, Fransen PS, van den Berg LA, Yoo AJ, Lingsma HF, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Lycklama À
Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MA, van den Berg R, Bot JC, Beenen LF, Boers AM, Slump CH, Roos YB, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Dippel
DW, van der Lugt A, van Zwam WH, Marquering HA, Majoie CB; on behalf of the MR CLEAN Investigators. Collateral status on baseline
computed tomographic angiography and intra-arterial treatment effect in patients with proximal anterior circulation stroke. Stroke.
2016;47:768–776. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011788.
111. Menon BK, Qazi E, Nambiar V, Foster LD, Yeatts SD, Liebeskind D, Jovin TG, Goyal M, Hill MD, Tomsick TA, Broderick JP, Demchuk
AM; for the Interventional Management of Stroke III Investigators. Differential effect of baseline computed tomographic angiography col-
laterals on clinical outcome in patients enrolled in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke. 2015;46:1239–1244. doi:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009009.
112. Saber H, Silver B, Santillan A, Azarpazhooh MR, Misra V, Behrouz R. Role of emergent chest radiography in evaluation of hyperacute
stroke. Neurology. 2016;87:782–785. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002964.
113. Roffe C, Nevatte T, Sim J, Bishop J, Ives N, Ferdinand P, Gray R; Stroke Oxygen Study Investigators and the Stroke Oxygen Study
Collaborative Group. Effect of routine low-dose oxygen supplementation on death and disability in adults with acute stroke: the Stroke
Oxygen Study Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1125–1135. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11463.
114. Bennett MH, Weibel S, Wasiak J, Schnabel A, French C, Kranke P. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD004954.
115. Heyboer M 3rd, Sharma D, Santiago W, McCulloch N. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: side effects defined and quantified. Adv Wound Care
(New Rochelle). 2017;6:210–224. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0718.
116. Heyboer M 3rd, Jennings S, Grant WD, Ojevwe C, Byrne J, Wojcik SM. Seizure incidence by treatment pressure in patients undergoing
hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014;41:379–385.
117. Wohlfahrt P, Krajcoviechova A, Jozifova M, Mayer O, Vanek J, Filipovsky J, Cifkova R. Low blood pressure during the acute period of
ischemic stroke is associated with decreased survival. J Hypertens. 2015;33:339–345. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000414.
118. Vemmos KN, Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K, Zakopoulos N, Synetos A, Manios E, Konstantopoulou P, Mavrikakis M. U-shaped relationship
between mortality and admission blood pressure in patients with acute stroke. J Intern Med. 2004;255:257–265.
119. Okumura K, Ohya Y, Maehara A, Wakugami K, Iseki K, Takishita S. Effects of blood pressure levels on case fatality after acute stroke. J
Hypertens. 2005;23:1217–1223.
120. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Decker WW, Weaver AL, Brown RD Jr. Initial emergency department blood pressure as predictor of survival after
acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;65:1179–1183. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000180939.24845.22.
121. Castillo J, Leira R, García MM, Serena J, Blanco M, Dávalos A. Blood pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke is
associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome. Stroke. 2004;35:520–526. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000109769.22917.B0.
157
122. Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM, Phillips SJ, Sandercock PA; for the IST Collaborative Group. Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in the
International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2002;33:1315–1320.
123. Manning LS, Mistri AK, Potter J, Rothwell PM, Robinson TG. Short-term blood pressure variability in acute stroke: post hoc analysis of the
Controlling Hypertension and Hypotension Immediately Post Stroke and Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives collaborative
study trials. Stroke. 2015;46:1518–1524. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009078.
124. Muscari A, Puddu GM, Serafini C, Fabbri E, Vizioli L, Zoli M. Predictors of short-term improvement of ischemic stroke. Neurol Res.
2013;35:594–601. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000181.
125. Visvanathan A, Dennis M, Whiteley W. Parenteral fluid regimens for improving functional outcome in people with acute stroke. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD011138.
126. Butcher K, Christensen S, Parsons M, De Silva DA, Ebinger M, Levi C, Jeerakathil T, Campbell BC, Barber PA, Bladin C, Fink J, Tress B,
Donnan GA, Davis SM; for the EPITHET Investigators. Postthrombolysis blood pressure elevation is associated with hemorrhagic
transformation. Stroke. 2010;41:72–77. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.563767.
127. Perini F, De Boni A, Marcon M, Bolgan I, Pellizzari M, Dionisio LD. Systolic blood pressure contributes to intracerebral haemorrhage after
thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2010;297:52–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.06.025.
128. Toni D, Ahmed N, Anzini A, Lorenzano S, Brozman M, Kaste M, Mikulik R, Putaala J, Wahlgren N; SITS Investigators. Intravenous
thrombolysis in young stroke patients: results from the SITS-ISTR. Neurology. 2012;78:880–887. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824d966b.
129. Mazya M, Egido JA, Ford GA, Lees KR, Mikulik R, Toni D, Wahlgren N, Ahmed N; for the SITS Investigators. Predicting the risk of
symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase: safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke
(SITS) symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk score. Stroke. 2012;43:1524–1531. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644815.
130. Wu W, Huo X, Zhao X, Liao X, Wang C, Pan Y, Wang Y, Wang Y; TIMS-CHINA Investigators. Relationship between blood pressure and
outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients administered lytic medication in the TIMS-China Study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0144260. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0144260.
131. Endo K, Kario K, Koga M, Nakagawara J, Shiokawa Y, Yamagami H, Furui E, Kimura K, Hasegawa Y, Okada Y, Okuda S, Namekawa M,
Miyagi T, Osaki M, Minematsu K, Toyoda K. Impact of early blood pressure variability on stroke outcomes after thrombolysis: the
SAMURAI rt-PA Registry. Stroke. 2013;44:816–818. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.681007.
132. Waltimo T, Haapaniemi E, Surakka IL, Melkas S, Sairanen T, Sibolt G, Tatlisumak T, Strbian D. Post-thrombolytic blood pressure and
symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:1757–1762. doi: 10.1111/ene.13118.
133. Liu K, Yan S, Zhang S, Guo Y, Lou M. Systolic blood pressure variability is associated with severe hemorrhagic transformation in the early
stage after thrombolysis. Transl Stroke Res. 2016;7:186–191. doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0458-6.
134. Saxena M, Young P, Pilcher D, Bailey M, Harrison D, Bellomo R, Finfer S, Beasley R, Hyam J, Menon D, Rowan K, Myburgh J. Early
temperature and mortality in critically ill patients with acute neurological diseases: trauma and stroke differ from infection. Intensive Care
Med. 2015;41:823–832. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3676-6.
158
135. Lyden P, Hemmen T, Grotta J, Rapp K, Ernstrom K, Rzesiewicz T, Parker S, Concha M, Hussain S, Agarwal S, Meyer B, Jurf J, Altafullah
I, Raman R. Results of the ICTuS 2 Trial (Intravascular Cooling in the Treatment of Stroke 2). Stroke. 2016;47:2888–2895. doi: 10.1161/
136. Geurts M, Petersson J, Brizzi M, Olsson-Hau S, Luijckx GJ, Algra A, Dippel DW, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB. COOLIST (Cooling for
Ischemic Stroke Trial): a multicenter, open, randomized, phase ii, clinical trial. Stroke. 2017;48:219–221. doi: 10.1161/
137. Piironen K, Tiainen M, Mustanoja S, Kaukonen KM, Meretoja A, Tatlisumak T, Kaste M. Mild hypothermia after intravenous thromboly-
sis in patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2014;45:486–491. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003180.
138. Hemmen TM, Raman R, Guluma KZ, Meyer BC, Gomes JA, Cruz-Flores S, Wijman CA, Rapp KS, Grotta JC, Lyden PD; for the ICTuS-L
Investigators. Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Hypothermia for Acute Treatment of Ischemic Stroke (ICTuS-L): final results. Stroke.
2010;41:2265–2270. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592295.
139. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, Kaste M, von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Brott T, Frankel M, Grotta JC, Haley EC Jr, Kwiatkowski T,
Levine SR, Lewandowski C, Lu M, Lyden P, Marler JR, Patel S, Tilley BC, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Wilhelm M, Hamilton S; ATLANTIS
Trials Investigators; ECASS Trials Investigators; NINDS rt-PA Study Group Investigators. Association of outcome with early stroke
treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. 2004;363:768–774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-
6736(04)15692-4.
140. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo G, Sandercock P, Lindley RL, Cohen G. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute
ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2364–2372. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60738-7.
141. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, Hennerici MG, Kaste M, Kuelkens S, Larrue V, Lees KR, Roine RO,
Soinne L, Toni D, Vanhooren G; SITS-MOST investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe
Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet. 2007;369:275–282. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4.
142. IST-3 Collaborative Group, Sandercock P, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI, Dennis M, Cohen G, Murray G, Innes K, Venables G, Czlonkowska A,
Kobayashi A, Ricci S, Murray V, Berge E, Slot KB, Hankey GJ, Correia M, Peeters A, Matz K, Lyrer P, Gubitz G, Phillips SJ, Arauz A.
The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the
Third International Stroke Trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:2352–2363.
143. Anderson CS, Robinson T, Lindley RI, Arima H, Lavados PM, Lee TH, Broderick JP, Chen X, Chen G, Sharma VK, Kim JS, Thang NH,
Cao Y, Parsons MW, Levi C, Huang Y, Olavarría VV, Demchuk AM, Bath PM, Donnan GA, Martins S, Pontes-Neto OM, Silva F, Ricci S,
Roffe C, Pandian J, Billot L, Woodward M, Li Q, Wang X, Wang J, Chalmers J; ENCHANTED Investigators and Coordinators. Low-dose
versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2313–2323. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515510.
159
144. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von
Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J
Med. 2008;359:1317–1329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.
145. Bluhmki E, Chamorro A, Dávalos A, Machnig T, Sauce C, Wahlgren N, Wardlaw J, Hacke W. Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3.0-4.5
h after onset of acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS III): additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
Neurol. 2009;8:1095–1102. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70264-9.
146. Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Grond M, Hennerici M, Lees KR, Mikulik R, Parsons M, Roine RO, Toni D, Ringleb P; SITS Investigators.
Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 h after an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR. Lancet
Neurol. 2010;9:866–874. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70165-4.
147. Romano JG, Smith EE, Liang L, Gardener H, Camp S, Shuey L, Cook A, Campo-Bustillo I, Khatri P, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Sacco RL,
Schwamm LH. Outcomes in mild acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis: a retrospective analysis of the Get With the
Guidelines-Stroke registry. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:423–431. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4354.
148. Adams RJ, Cox M, Ozark SD, Kanter J, Schulte PJ, Xian Y, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Schwamm LH. Coexistent sickle cell disease has no
impact on the safety or outcome of lytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke: findings from Get With The Guidelines–Stroke. Stroke.
2017;48:686–691. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015412.
149. Sloan MA, Price TR, Petito CK, Randall AM, Solomon RE, Terrin ML, Gore J, Collen D, Kleiman N, Feit F. Clinical features and
pathogenesis of intracerebral hemorrhage after rt-PA and heparin therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the Thrombolysis in Myocardial
Infarction (TIMI) II Pilot and Randomized Clinical Trial combined experience. Neurology. 1995;45:649–658.
150. Mahaffey KW, Granger CB, Sloan MA, Green CL, Gore JM, Weaver WD, White HD, Simoons ML, Barbash GI, Topol EJ, Califf RM.
Neurosurgical evacuation of intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: experience from the
GUSTO-I trial: Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Plasminogen Activator (tPA) for Occluded Coronary Arteries. Am Heart J.
1999;138(pt 1):493–499.
151. Goldstein JN, Marrero M, Masrur S, Pervez M, Barrocas AM, Abdullah A, Oleinik A, Rosand J, Smith EE, Dzik WH, Schwamm LH.
Management of thrombolysis-associated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:965–969. doi: 10.1001/
archneurol.2010.175.
152. French KF, White J, Hoesch RE. Treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage with tranexamic acid after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen
activator. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:107–111. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9681-5.
153. Yaghi S, Eisenberger A, Willey JZ. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke after thrombolysis with intravenous
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a review of natural history and treatment. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1181–1185. doi: 10.1001/
jamaneurol.2014.1210.
154. Yaghi S, Haggiagi A, Sherzai A, Marshall RS, Agarwal S. Use of recombinant factor VIIa in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage fol-
lowing intravenous thrombolysis. Clin Pract. 2015;5:756. doi: 10.4081/cp.2015.756.
160
155. Yaghi S, Boehme AK, Dibu J, Leon Guerrero CR, Ali S, Martin-Schild S, Sands KA, Noorian AR, Blum CA, Chaudhary S, Schwamm LH,
Liebeskind DS, Marshall RS, Willey JZ. Treatment and outcome of thrombolysis-related hemorrhage: a multicenter retrospective study.
JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1451–1457. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2371.
156. Stone JA, Willey JZ, Keyrouz S, Butera J, McTaggart RA, Cutting S, Silver B, Thompson B, Furie KL, Yaghi S. Therapies for hemorrhagic
transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017;19:1. doi: 10.1007/s11940-017-0438-5.
157. Frontera JA, Lewin JJ 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Aisiku IP, Alexandrov AW, Cook AM, del Zoppo GJ, Kumar MA, Peerschke EI, Stiefel MF,
Teitelbaum JS, Wartenberg KE, Zerfoss CL. Guideline for reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage: a statement for health-
care professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:6–46. doi: 10.1007/
s12028-015-0222-x.
158. Foster-Goldman A, McCarthy D. Angioedema from recombinant TPA administration: case report and pathophysiology review. Am J Ther.
2013;20:691–693. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3182799083.
159. Gorski EM, Schmidt MJ. Orolingual angioedema with alteplase administration for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Emerg Med.
2013;45:e25–e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.02.004.
160. Lewis LM. Angioedema: etiology, pathophysiology, current and emerging therapies. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:789–796. doi: 10.1016/j.
jemermed.2013.03.045.
161. Lin SY, Tang SC, Tsai LK, Yeh SJ, Hsiao YJ, Chen YW, Chen KH, Yip BS, Shen LJ, Wu FL, Jeng JS. Orolingual angioedema after
alteplase therapy of acute ischaemic stroke: incidence and risk of prior angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use. Eur J Neurol.
2014;21:1285–1291. doi: 10.1111/ene.12472.
162. Correia AS, Matias G, Calado S, Lourenço A, Viana-Baptista M. Orolingual angiodema associated with alteplase treatment of acute stroke:
a reappraisal. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.045.
163. O’Carroll CB, Aguilar MI. Management of postthrombolysis hemorrhagic and orolingual angioedema complications. Neurohospitalist.
2015;5:133–141. doi: 10.1177/1941874415587680.
164. Myslimi F, Caparros F, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Moulin S, Gautier S, Girardie P, Cordonnier C, Bordet R, Leys D. Orolingual angioedema
during or after thrombolysis for cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2016;47:1825–1830. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013334.
165. Pahs L, Droege C, Kneale H, Pancioli A. A novel approach to the treatment of orolingual angioedema after tissue plasminogen activator
administration. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68:345–348. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.019.
166. Jeong HG, Kim BJ, Yang MH, Han MK, Bae HJ, Lee SH. Stroke outcomes with use of antithrombotics within 24 hours after recanaliza-
tion treatment. Neurology. 2016;87:996–1002. doi: 10.1212/WNL. 0000000000003083.
167. von Kummer R, Mori E, Truelsen T, Jensen JS, Grønning BA, Fiebach JB, Lovblad KO, Pedraza S, Romero JM, Chabriat H, Chang KC,
Dávalos A, Ford GA, Grotta J, Kaste M, Schwamm LH, Shuaib A, Albers GW; for the DIAS-4 Investigators. Desmoteplase 3 to 9 hours
after major artery occlusion stroke: the DIAS-4 Trial (Efficacy and Safety Study of Desmoteplase to Treat Acute Ischemic Stroke). Stroke.
2016;47:2880–2887. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013715.
161
168. Albers GW, von Kummer R, Truelsen T, Jensen JK, Ravn GM, Grønning BA, Chabriat H, Chang KC, Davalos AE, Ford GA, Grotta J,
Kaste M, Schwamm LH, Shuaib A; DIAS-3 Investigators. Safety and efficacy of desmoteplase given 3-9 h after ischaemic stroke in patients
with occlusion or high-grade stenosis in major cerebral arteries (DIAS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:575–584. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00047-2.
169. Haley EC Jr, Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown DL, Fanale C, Libman R, Kwiatkowski TG, Llinas RH, Levine SR,
Johnston KC, Buchsbaum R, Levy G, Levin B; for the Tenecteplase in Stroke Investigators. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute
ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2010;41:707–711. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.
109.572040.
170. Logallo N, Novotny V, Assmus J, Kvistad CE, Alteheld L, Rønning OM, Thommessen B, Amthor KF, Ihle-Hansen H, Kurz M, Tobro H,
Kaur K, Stankiewicz M, Carlsson M, Morsund Å, Idicula T, Aamodt AH, Lund C, Næss H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L.
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint
trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:781–788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3.
171. Nacu A, Kvistad CE, Naess H, Øygarden H, Logallo N, Assmus J, Waje-Andreassen U, Kurz KD, Neckelmann G, Thomassen L. NOR-
SASS (Norwegian Sonothrombolysis in Acute Stroke Study): randomized controlled contrast-enhanced sonothrombolysis in an unselected
acute ischemic stroke population. Stroke. 2017;48:335–341. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014644.
172. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA,
Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millán M, Davis
SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Román LS, Ribó M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin
TG; HERMES Collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.
173. Campbell BC, Hill MD, Rubiera M, Menon BK, Demchuk A, Donnan GA, Roy D, Thornton J, Dorado L, Bonafe A, Levy EI, Diener HC,
Hernández-Pérez M, Pereira VM, Blasco J, Quesada H, Rempel J, Jahan R, Davis SM, Stouch BC, Mitchell PJ, Jovin TG, Saver JL, Goyal
M. Safety and efficacy of solitaire stent thrombectomy: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Stroke. 2016;47:798–806.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012360.
174. Bush CK, Kurimella D, Cross LJ, Conner KR, Martin-Schild S, He J, Li C, Chen J, Kelly T. Endovascular treatment with stent-retriever
devices for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147287. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0147287.
175. Lemmens R, Hamilton SA, Liebeskind DS, Tomsick TA, Demchuk AM, Nogueira RG, Marks MP, Jahan R, Gralla J, Yoo AJ, Yeatts SD,
Palesch YY, Saver JL, Pereira VM, Broderick JP, Albers GW, Lansberg MG; DEFUSE 2, IMS III, STAR, and SWIFT Trialists; DEFUSE 2
IMS III STAR and SWIFT Trialists. Effect of endovascular reperfusion in relation to site of arterial occlusion. Neurology. 2016;86:762–770.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002399.
162
176. Yoo AJ, Simonsen CZ, Prabhakaran S, Chaudhry ZA, Issa MA, Fugate JE, Linfante I, Liebeskind DS, Khatri P, Jovin TG, Kallmes DF,
Dabus G, Zaidat OO; for the Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading Collaborators. Refining angiographic biomarkers of
revascularization: improving outcome prediction after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke. 2013;44:2509–2512. doi:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990.
177. Marks MP, Lansberg MG, Mlynash M, Kemp S, McTaggart R, Zaharchuk G, Bammer R, Albers GW; DEFUSE 2 Investigators. Correlation
of AOL recanalization, TIMI reperfusion and TICI reperfusion with infarct growth and clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:724–
728. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010973.
178. Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Marnat G, Saleme S, Costalat V, Bracard S, Desal H, Mazighi M, Consoli A, Piotin
M; ASTER Trial Investigators. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute
ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:443–452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9644.
179. Dippel DW, Majoie CB, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, van Zwam WH, Lingsma HF, Koudstaal PJ, Treurniet KM, van
den Berg LA, Beumer D, Fransen PS, Berkhemer OA; for the MR CLEAN Investigators. Influence of device choice on the effect of intra-
arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute
Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands). Stroke. 2016;47:2574–2581. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013929.
180. Berkhemer OA, van den Berg LA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, Yoo AJ, Lingsma HF, Schonewille WJ, van den Berg R, Wermer MJ, Boiten J,
Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Hollmann MW, van Zwam WH, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CB, Dippel DW,
Roos YB; MR CLEAN Investigators. The effect of anesthetic management during intra-arterial therapy for acute stroke in MR CLEAN.
Neurology. 2016;87:656–664. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002976.
181. Löwhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Leiram B, Sundeman H, Dunker D, Schnabel K, Wikholm G, Hellström M,
Ricksten SE. General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the AnStroke trial
(Anesthesia During Stroke). Stroke. 2017;48:1601–1607. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016554.
182. Schönenberger S, Uhlmann L, Hacke W, Schieber S, Mundiyanapurath S, Purrucker JC, Nagel S, Klose C, Pfaff J, Bendszus M, Ringleb
PA, Kieser M, Möhlenbruch MA, Bösel J. Effect of conscious sedation vs general anesthesia on early neurological improvement among
patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:1986–1996. doi:
10.1001/jama.2016.16623.
183. Jovin TG, Saver JL, Ribo M, Pereira V, Furlan A, Bonafe A, Baxter B, Gupta R, Lopes D, Jansen O, Smith W, Gress D, Hetts S, Lewis
RJ, Shields R, Berry SM, Graves TL, Malisch T, Rai A, Sheth KN, Liebeskind DS, Nogueira RG. Diffusion-weighted imaging or computer-
ized tomography perfusion assessment with clinical mismatch in the triage of wake up and late presenting strokes undergoing neuro-
intervention with Trevo (DAWN) trial methods. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:641–652. doi: 10.1177/1747493017710341.
184. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute
ischaemic stroke: International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1997;349:1569–1581.
163
185. CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke: CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke
Trial) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1997;349:1641–1649.
186. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Tseng MC, Cecconi E. Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2014:CD000029.
187. Siebler M, Hennerici MG, Schneider D, von Reutern GM, Seitz RJ, Röther J, Witte OW, Hamann G, Junghans U, Villringer A, Fiebach JB.
Safety of Tirofiban in acute Ischemic Stroke: the SaTIS trial. Stroke. 2011;42:2388–2392. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599662.
188. Pancioli AM, Broderick J, Brott T, Tomsick T, Khoury J, Bean J, del Zoppo G, Kleindorfer D, Woo D, Khatri P, Castaldo J, Frey J, Gebel J
Jr, Kasner S, Kidwell C, Kwiatkowski T, Libman R, Mackenzie R, Scott P, Starkman S, Thurman RJ; for the CLEAR Trial Investigators.
The combined approach to lysis utilizing eptifibatide and rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke: the CLEAR stroke trial. Stroke. 2008;39:3268–
3276. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.517656.
189. Adeoye O, Sucharew H, Khoury J, Tomsick T, Khatri P, Palesch Y, Schmit PA, Pancioli AM, Broderick JP; for the CLEAR-ER, IMS III,
and ALIAS Part 2 Investigators. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator plus eptifibatide versus recombinant tissue-type
plasminogen activator alone in acute ischemic stroke: propensity score-matched post hoc analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:461–464. doi: 10.1161/
190. Adeoye O, Sucharew H, Khoury J, Vagal A, Schmit PA, Ewing I, Levine SR, Demel S, Eckerle B, Katz B, Kleindorfer D, Stettler B, Woo
D, Khatri P, Broderick JP, Pancioli AM. Combined approach to lysis utilizing eptifibatide and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen
activator in acute ischemic stroke-full dose regimen stroke trial. Stroke. 2015;46:2529–2533. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010260.
191. Ciccone A, Motto C, Abraha I, Cozzolino F, Santilli I. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2014:CD005208.
192. Adams HP Jr, Effron MB, Torner J, Dávalos A, Frayne J, Teal P, Leclerc J, Oemar B, Padgett L, Barnathan ES, Hacke W; for the AbESTT-
II Investigators. Emergency administration of abciximab for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke: results of an international
phase III trial: Abciximab in Emergency Treatment of Stroke Trial (AbESTT-II). Stroke. 2008;39:87–99. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.
106.476648.
193. Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Wang D, Wang C, Wang C, Li H, Meng X, Cui L, Jia J, Dong Q, Xu A, Zeng J, Li Y, Wang Z, Xia H,
Johnston SC; CHANCE Investigators. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med.
2013;369:11–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215340.
194. Wang Y, Pan Y, Zhao X, Li H, Wang D, Johnston SC, Liu L, Meng X, Wang A, Wang C, Wang Y; on behalf of the CHANCE
Investigators. Clopidogrel With Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CHANCE) trial: one-year outcomes.
Circulation. 2015;132:40–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014791.
195. Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, Barsan W, Battenhouse H, Conwit R, Dillon C, Elm J, Lindblad A, Morgenstern L, Poisson SN, Palesch
Y. Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial: rationale and design. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:479–483.
doi: 10.1111/ijs.12129.
164
196. Johnston SC, Amarenco P. Ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1395. doi:
10.1056/NEJMc1610106.
197. Whiteley WN, Adams HP Jr, Bath PM, Berge E, Sandset PM, Dennis M, Murray GD, Wong KS, Sandercock PA. Targeted use of heparin,
heparinoids, or low-molecular-weight heparin to improve outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis of
randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:539–545. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70079-6.
198. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Kane EJ. Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD000024.
199. Yi X, Lin J, Wang C, Zhang B, Chi W. Low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than aspirin in preventing early neurologic dete-
rioration and improving six-month outcome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:1537–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.
2013.12.036.
200. Wada T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsubara T, Fushimi K, Nakajima S, Yahagi N. Outcomes of argatroban treatment in patients with ath-
erothrombotic stroke: observational nationwide study in Japan. Stroke. 2016;47:471–476. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011250.
201. Kate M, Gioia L, Buck B, Sivakumar L, Jeerakathil T, Shuaib A, Butcher K. Dabigatran therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients without
atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2015;46:2685–2687. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010383.
202. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Falocci N, Caso V, Becattini C, Marcheselli S, Rueckert C, Pezzini A, Poli L, Padovani A, Csiba L, Szabó L, Sohn
SI, Tassinari T, Abdul-Rahim AH, Michel P, Cordier M, Vanacker P, Remillard S, Alberti A, Venti M, Scoditti U, Denti L, Orlandi G, Chiti
A, Gialdini G, Bovi P, Carletti M, Rigatelli A, Putaala J, Tatlisumak T, Masotti L, Lorenzini G, Tassi R, Guideri F, Martini G, Tsivgoulis
G, Vadikolias K, Liantinioti C, Corea F, Del Sette M, Ageno W, De Lodovici ML, Bono G, Baldi A, D’Anna S, Sacco S, Carolei A, Tiseo
C, Acciarresi M, D’Amore C, Imberti D, Zabzuni D, Doronin B, Volodina V, Consoli D, Galati F, Pieroni A, Toni D, Monaco S, Baronello
MM, Barlinn K, Pallesen LP, Kepplinger J, Bodechtel U, Gerber J, Deleu D, Melikyan G, Ibrahim F, Akhtar N, Mosconi MG, Bubba V,
Silvestri I, Lees KR. Early recurrence and cerebral bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: effect of anti-
coagulation and its timing: the RAF study. Stroke. 2015;46:2175–2182. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008891.
203. Mokin M, Kass-Hout T, Kass-Hout O, Radovic V, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Snyder KV. Intravenous heparin for the treatment of intraluminal
thrombus in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a case series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5:144–150. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010134.
204. Vellimana AK, Kadkhodayan Y, Rich KM, Cross DT 3rd, Moran CJ, Zazulia AR, Lee JM, Chicoine MR, Dacey RG Jr, Derdeyn CP, Zipfel
GJ. Symptomatic patients with intraluminal carotid artery thrombus: outcome with a strategy of initial anticoagulation. J Neurosurg.
2013;118:34–41. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12406.
205. Barreto AD, Alexandrov AV, Lyden P, Lee J, Martin-Schild S, Shen L, Wu TC, Sisson A, Pandurengan R, Chen Z, Rahbar MH, Balucani
C, Barlinn K, Sugg RM, Garami Z, Tsivgoulis G, Gonzales NR, Savitz SI, Mikulik R, Demchuk AM, Grotta JC. The Argatroban and
Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study: final results of a pilot safety study. Stroke. 2012;43:770–775. doi: 10.1161/
165
206. Barreto AD, Ford GA, Shen L, Pedroza C, Tyson J, Cai C, Rahbar MH, Grotta JC; on behalf of the ARTSS-2 Investigators. Randomized,
multicenter trial of ARTSS-2 (Argatroban With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Stroke). Stroke. 2017;48:1608–1616.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016720.
207. Gioia LC, Kate M, Sivakumar L, Hussain D, Kalashyan H, Buck B, Bussiere M, Jeerakathil T, Shuaib A, Emery D, Butcher K. Early riva-
roxaban use after cardioembolic stroke may not result in hemorrhagic transformation: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study.
Stroke. 2016;47:1917–1919. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013491.
208. Chang TS, Jensen MB. Haemodilution for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD000103.
209. Ginsberg MD, Palesch YY, Hill MD, Martin RH, Moy CS, Barsan WG, Waldman BD, Tamariz D, Ryckborst KJ; ALIAS and Neurological
Emergencies Treatment Trials (NETT) Investigators. High-dose albumin treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (ALIAS) part 2: a ran-
domised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:1049–1058. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70223-0.
210. Martin RH, Yeatts SD, Hill MD, Moy CS, Ginsberg MD, Palesch YY; for the ALIAS Parts 1 and 2 and NETT Investigators. ALIAS
(Albumin in Acute Ischemic Stroke) trials: analysis of the combined data from parts 1 and 2. Stroke. 2016;47:2355–2359. doi: 10.1161/
211. Lapchak PA. Taking a light approach to treating acute ischemic stroke patients: transcranial near-infrared laser therapy translational science.
Ann Med. 2010;42:576–586. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.532811.
212. Stemer AB, Huisa BN, Zivin JA. The evolution of transcranial laser therapy for acute ischemic stroke, including a pooled analysis of
NEST-1 and NEST-2. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:29–33. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0071-3.
213. Zivin JA, Albers GW, Bornstein N, Chippendale T, Dahlof B, Devlin T, Fisher M, Hacke W, Holt W, Ilic S, Kasner S, Lew R, Nash M,
Perez J, Rymer M, Schellinger P, Schneider D, Schwab S, Veltkamp R, Walker M, Streeter J; for the NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety
Trial-2 Investigators. Effectiveness and safety of transcranial laser therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:1359–1364. doi:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547547.
214. Hacke W, Schelinger PD, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Dahlof BS, Kasner SE, Howard G, Shuaib A, Richieri SP, Dilly S, Zivin J.
Transcranial laser therapy (TLT) for acute ischemic stroke: results of NEST 3, a pivotal phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT).
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35:191.
215. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Vedula KC, Weaver AL, Decker WW, Brown RD Jr. Impact of acute blood pressure variability on ischemic stroke
outcome. Neurology. 2006;66:1878–1881. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219628.78513.b5.
216. Kaste M, Fogelholm R, Erilä T, Palomäki H, Murros K, Rissanen A, Sarna S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of
nimodipine in acute ischemic hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1348–1353.
217. Wahlgren NG, MacMahon DG, De Keyser J, Indredavik B, Ryman T. The Intravenous Nimodipine West European Trial (INWEST) of ni-
modipine in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:204–210.
218. Horn J, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, Limburg M. Very Early Nimodipine Use in Stroke (VENUS): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial. Stroke. 2001;32:461–465.
166
219. Schrader J, Lüders S, Kulschewski A, Berger J, Zidek W, Treib J, Einhäupl K, Diener HC, Dominiak P; on behalf of the Acute Candesartan
Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke Survivors Study Group. The ACCESS Study: evaluation of Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Therapy in Stroke
Survivors. Stroke. 2003;34:1699–1703. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000075777.18006.89.
220. Eveson DJ, Robinson TG, Potter JF. Lisinopril for the treatment of hypertension within the first 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke and
follow-up. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.08.005.
221. Bath PM, Martin RH, Palesch Y, Cotton D, Yusuf S, Sacco R, Diener HC, Toni D, Estol C, Roberts R; for the PRoFESS Study Group.
Effect of telmisartan on functional outcome, recurrence, and blood pressure in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke: a PRoFESS
subgroup analysis. Stroke. 2009;40:3541–3546. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555623.
222. Potter JF, Robinson TG, Ford GA, Mistri A, James M, Chernova J, Jagger C. Controlling Hypertension and Hypotension Immediately Post-
Stroke (CHHIPS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:48–56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-
4422(08)70263-1.
223. Robinson TG, Potter JF, Ford GA, Bulpitt CJ, Chernova J, Jagger C, James MA, Knight J, Markus HS, Mistri AK, Poulter NR; COSSACS
Investigators. Effects of antihypertensive treatment after acute stroke in the Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative
Study (COSSACS): a prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:767–775. doi: 10.1016/S1474-
4422(10)70163-0.
224. Sandset EC, Bath PM, Boysen G, Jatuzis D, Kõrv J, Lüders S, Murray GD, Richter PS, Roine RO, Terént A, Thijs V, Berge E; SCAST
Study Group. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled,
double-blind trial. Lancet. 2011;377:741–750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60104-9.
225. He J, Zhang Y, Xu T, Zhao Q, Wang D, Chen CS, Tong W, Liu C, Xu T, Ju Z, Peng Y, Peng H, Li Q, Geng D, Zhang J, Li D, Zhang F, Guo
L, Sun Y, Wang X, Cui Y, Li Y, Ma D, Yang G, Gao Y, Yuan X, Bazzano LA, Chen J; CATIS Investigators. Effects of immediate blood
pressure reduction on death and major disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the CATIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA.
2014;311:479–489. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282543.
226. Bath PM, Krishnan K. Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD000039.
227. Oh MS, Yu KH, Hong KS, Kang DW, Park JM, Bae HJ, Koo J, Lee J, Lee BC; Valsartan Efficacy oN modesT blood pressUre REduction in
acute ischemic stroke (VENTURE) Study Group. Modest blood pressure reduction with valsartan in acute ischemic stroke: a prospective,
randomized, open-label, blinded-end-point trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:745–751. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12446.
228. Enos Trial Investigators, Bath PM, Woodhouse L, Scutt P, Krishnan K, Wardlaw JM, Bereczki D, Sprigg N, Berge E, Beridze M, Caso V,
Chen C, Christensen H, Collins R, El Etribi A, Laska AC, Lees KR, Ozturk S, Phillips S, Pocock S, de Silva HA, Szatmari S, Utton S.
Efficacy of nitric oxide, with or without continuing antihypertensive treatment, for management of high blood pressure in acute stroke
(ENOS): a partial-factorial randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:617–28.
229. Lee M, Ovbiagele B, Hong KS, Wu YL, Lee JE, Rao NM, Feng W, Saver JL. Effect of blood pressure lowering in early ischemic stroke:
meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:1883–1889. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009552.
167
230. - 234. Deleted
235. Dennis M, Lewis S, Cranswick G, Forbes J; FOOD Trial Collaboration. FOOD: a multicentre randomised trial evaluating feeding policies in
patients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:iii–iv, ix.
236. Geeganage C, Beavan J, Ellender S, Bath PM. Interventions for dysphagia and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000323.pub2.
237. Sørensen RT, Rasmussen RS, Overgaard K, Lerche A, Johansen AM, Lindhardt T. Dysphagia screening and intensified oral hygiene reduce
pneumonia after stroke. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013;45:139–146. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e31828a412c.
238. Brady M, Furlanetto D, Hunter RV, Lewis S, Milne V. Staff-led interventions for improving oral hygiene in patients following stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD003864.
239. Wagner C, Marchina S, Deveau JA, Frayne C, Sulmonte K, Kumar S. Risk of stroke-associated pneumonia and oral hygiene. Cerebrovasc
Dis. 2016;41:35–39. doi: 10.1159/000440733.
240. Dennis M, Caso V, Kappelle LJ, Pavlovic A, Sandercock P. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for prophylaxis for venous
thromboembolism in immobile patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2016;1:6–19.
241. Meader N, Moe-Byrne T, Llewellyn A, Mitchell AJ. Screening for post-stroke major depression: a meta-analysis of diagnostic validity stud-
ies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:198–206. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304194.
242. Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El Husseini N, Hackett ML, Jorge RE, Kissela BM, Mitchell PH, Skolarus LE, Whooley MA, Williams LS; on
behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Quality of Care
and Outcomes Research. Poststroke depression: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e30–e43. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000113.
243. AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised
controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:46–55.
244. Raco A, Caroli E, Isidori A, Salvati M. Management of acute cerebellar infarction: one institution’s experience. Neurosurgery.
2003;53:1061–1605.
245. Agarwalla PK, Stapleton CJ, Ogilvy CS. Craniectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(suppl 1):S151–S162. doi: 10.1227/
NEU.0000000000000226.
246. Mostofi K. Neurosurgical management of massive cerebellar infarct outcome in 53 patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:28. doi: 10.4103/2152-
7806.107906.
247. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van
der Worp HB, Hacke W; DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET Investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the
middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:215–222. doi: 10.1016/S1474-
4422(07)70036-4.
168
248. Maciel CB, Sheth KN. Malignant MCA stroke: an update on surgical decompression and future directions. Curr Atheroscler Rep.
2015;17:40. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0519-4.
249. Yang MH, Lin HY, Fu J, Roodrajeetsing G, Shi SL, Xiao SW. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with malignant middle cerebral
artery infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2015;13:230–240. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.12.002.
250. Alexander P, Heels-Ansdell D, Siemieniuk R, Bhatnagar N, Chang Y, Fei Y, Zhang Y, McLeod S, Prasad K, Guyatt G. Hemicraniectomy
versus medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e014390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-
014390.
251. Sundseth J, Sundseth A, Jacobsen EA, Pripp AH, Sorteberg W, Altmann M, Lindegaard KF, Berg-Johnsen J, Thommessen B. Predictors of
early in-hospital death after decompressive craniectomy in swollen middle cerebral artery infarction. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159:301–
306. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-3049-0.
252. Suyama K, Horie N, Hayashi K, Nagata I. Nationwide survey of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery
infarction in Japan. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1158–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.015.
253. Yu JW, Choi JH, Kim DH, Cha JK, Huh JT. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction
in patients older than 70 years old. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2012;14:65–74. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2012.14.2.65.
254. Jüttler E, Unterberg A, Woitzik J, Bösel J, Amiri H, Sakowitz OW, Gondan M, Schiller P, Limprecht R, Luntz S, Schneider H, Pinzer T,
Hobohm C, Meixensberger J, Hacke W; DESTINY II Investigators. Hemicraniectomy in older patients with extensive middle-cerebral-
artery stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1091–1100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311367.
255. Zhao J, Su YY, Zhang Y, Zhang YZ, Zhao R, Wang L, Gao R, Chen W, Gao D. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle ce-
rebral artery infarct: a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients up to 80 years old. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:161–171. doi: 10.1007/
s12028-012-9703-3.
256. Curley G, Kavanagh BP, Laffey JG. Hypocapnia and the injured brain: more harm than benefit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1348–1359. doi:
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8cf2b.
257. Wan YH, Nie C, Wang HL, Huang CY. Therapeutic hypothermia (different depths, durations, and rewarming speeds) for acute ischemic
stroke: a meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:2736–2747. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.06.017.
258. – 321. Deleted
322. Kim JT, Heo SH, Park MS, Chang J, Choi KH, Cho KH. Use of antithrombotics after hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke.
PLoS One. 2014;9:e89798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089798.
323. England TJ, Bath PM, Sare GM, Geeganage C, Moulin T, O’Neill D, Woimant F, Christensen H, De Deyn P, Leys D, Ringelstein EB; on
behalf of the TAIST Investigators. Asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation of infarction and its relationship with functional outcome and
stroke subtype: assessment from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2010;41:2834–2839. doi: 10.1161/
324. Deleted
169
325. Larsson SC, King A, Madigan J, Levi C, Norris JW, Markus HS. Prognosis of carotid dissecting aneurysms: results from CADISS and a
systematic review. Neurology. 2017;88:646–652. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003617.
326. Ahlhelm F, Benz RM, Ulmer S, Lyrer P, Stippich C, Engelter S. Endovascular treatment of cervical artery dissection: ten case reports and
review of the literature. Interv Neurol. 2013;1:143–150. doi: 10.1159/000351687.
327. - 335. Deleted
336. Schwartz J, Dreyer RP, Murugiah K, Ranasinghe I. Contemporary prehospital emergency medical services response times for suspected
stroke in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20:560–565. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1139219.
337. Morgenstern LB, Gonzales NR, Maddox KE, Brown DL, Karim AP, Espinosa N, Moyé LA, Pary JK, Grotta JC, Lisabeth LD, Conley KM.
A randomized, controlled trial to teach middle school children to recognize stroke and call 911: the Kids Identifying and Defeating Stroke
Project. Stroke. 2007;38:2972–2978. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490078.
338. Carrera D, Campbell BC, Cortés J, Gorchs M, Querol M, Jiménez X, Millán M, Dávalos A, Pérez de la Ossa N. Predictive value of
modifications of the prehospital rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale for large vessel occlusion in patients with acute stroke. J Stroke
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.032.
339. Kim JT, Chung PW, Starkman S, Sanossian N, Stratton SJ, Eckstein M, Pratt FD, Conwit R, Liebeskind DS, Sharma L, Restrepo L, Tenser
MK, Valdes-Sueiras M, Gornbein J, Hamilton S, Saver JL; on behalf of the FAST-MAG Trial (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy–
Magnesium) Nurse-Coordinators and Investigators. Field validation of the Los Angeles Motor Scale as a tool for paramedic assessment of
stroke severity. Stroke. 2017;48:298–306. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015247.
340. McMullan JT, Katz B, Broderick J, Schmit P, Sucharew H, Adeoye O. Prospective prehospital evaluation of the Cincinnati Stroke Triage
Assessment Tool. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017:1–8.
341. Sauser K, Levine DA, Nickles AV, Reeves MJ. Hospital variation in thrombolysis times among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the con-
tributions of door-to-imaging time and imaging-to-needle time. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:1155–1161. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1528.
342. van Wijngaarden JD, Dirks M, Niessen LW, Huijsman R, Dippel DW. Do centres with well-developed protocols, training and infrastructure
have higher rates of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke? QJM. 2011;104:785–791. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr075.
343. Jeng JS, Tang SC, Deng IC, Tsai LK, Yeh SJ, Yip PK. Stroke center characteristics which influence the administration of thrombolytic
therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a national survey of stroke centers in Taiwan. J Neurol Sci. 2009;281:24–27. doi: 10.1016/
j.jns.2009.03.004.
344. Douglas VC, Tong DC, Gillum LA, Zhao S, Brass LM, Dostal J, Johnston SC. Do the Brain Attack Coalition’s criteria for stroke centers
improve care for ischemic stroke? Neurology. 2005;64:422–427. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150903.38639.E1.
345. Asimos AW, Norton HJ, Price MF, Cheek WM. Therapeutic yield and outcomes of a community teaching hospital code stroke protocol.
Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:361–370.
346. Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Ward MP, Richemont PC, Brazdys K, Koch TC,
Miley ML, Hoffman Snyder CR, Corday DA, Meyer BC; for the STRokE DOC AZ TIME Investigators. Stroke team remote evaluation
170
using a digital observation camera in Arizona: the initial Mayo Clinic Experience Trial. Stroke. 2010;41:1251–1258. doi: 10.1161/
347. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, Thomas RG, Lyden PD. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the
STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:787–795. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-6.
348. Rai AT, Smith MS, Boo S, Tarabishy AR, Hobbs GR, Carpenter JS. The ‘pit-crew’ model for improving door-to-needle times in
endovascular stroke therapy: a Six-Sigma project. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:447–452. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012219.
349. Wardlaw JM, Carpenter T, Sakka E, Mair G, Cohen G, Shuler K, Palmer JM, Innes K, Sandercock PA. Imaging perfusion deficits, arterial
patency and thrombolysis safety and efficacy in acute ischaemic stroke: an observational study of the effect of advanced imaging methods in
the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3), a randomised controlled trial. Efficacy Mech Eval. 2014;1(3). doi: 10.3310/eme.01030.
350. Mocco J, Zaidat OO, von Kummer R, Yoo AJ, Gupta R, Lopes D, Frei D, Shownkeen H, Budzik R, Ajani ZA, Grossman A, Altschul D,
McDougall C, Blake L, Fitzsimmons BF, Yavagal D, Terry J, Farkas J, Lee SK, Baxter B, Wiesmann M, Knauth M, Heck D, Hussain S,
Chiu D, Alexander MJ, Malisch T, Kirmani J, Miskolczi L, Khatri P; THERAPY Trial Investigators. Aspiration thrombectomy after
intravenous alteplase versus intravenous alteplase alone. Stroke. 2016;47:2331–2338. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013372.
351. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Yeatts SD, Khatri P, Hill MD, Jauch EC, Jovin TG, Yan B, Silver FL, von Kummer R, Molina
CA, Demaerschalk BM, Budzik R, Clark WM, Zaidat OO, Malisch TW, Goyal M, Schonewille WJ, Mazighi M, Engelter ST, Anderson C,
Spilker J, Carrozzella J, Ryckborst KJ, Janis LS, Martin RH, Foster LD, Tomsick TA; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III
Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903. doi: 10.1056/
NEJMoa1214300.
352. Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, Sgoifo A, Ponzio M, Sterzi R, Boccardi E; SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators. Endovascular
treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:904–913. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213701.
353. Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, Alger JR, Nenov V, Ajani Z, Feng L, Meyer BC, Olson S, Schwamm LH, Yoo AJ, Marshall RS, Meyers
PM, Yavagal DR, Wintermark M, Guzy J, Starkman S, Saver JL; MR RESCUE Investigators. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular
treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:914–923. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212793.
354. Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS; TREVO 2 Trialists. Trevo versus Merci
retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet.
2012;380:1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61299-9.
355. Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, Jovin TG, Baxter B, Nogueira RG, Clark W, Budzik R, Zaidat OO; SWIFT Trialists. Solitaire Flow Restoration
Device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.
Lancet. 2012;380:1241–1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61384-1.
356. Ogawa A, Mori E, Minematsu K, Taki W, Takahashi A, Nemoto S, Miyamoto S, Sasaki M, Inoue T; for the MELT Japan Study Group.
Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the Middle Cerebral Artery Embolism
Local Fibrinolytic Intervention Trial (MELT) Japan. Stroke. 2007;38:2633–2639. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488551.
171
357. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, Gent M, Rowley H, Kase C, Pessin M, Ahuja A, Callahan F, Clark WM, Silver F, Rivera F. Intra-
arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial: Prolyse in Acute Cerebral
Thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999;282:2003–2011.
358. Ali K, Warusevitane A, Lally F, Sim J, Sills S, Pountain S, Nevatte T, Allen M, Roffe C. The Stroke Oxygen Pilot Study: a randomized con-
trolled trial of the effects of routine oxygen supplementation early after acute stroke: effect on key outcomes at six months. PLoS One.
2014;8:e59274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059274.
359. Singhal A, Partners SPOTRIAS Investigators. A phase IIB clinical trial of normobaric oxygen therapy (NBO) in acute ischemic stroke
(AIS). Neurology. 2013;80(suppl):S02.001.
360. Roffe C, Ali K, Warusevitane A, Sills S, Pountain S, Allen M, Hodsoll J, Lally F, Jones P, Crome P. The SOS pilot study: a RCT of routine
oxygen supplementation early after acute stroke: effect on recovery of neurological function at one week. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19113. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0019113.
361. Roffe C, Sills S, Pountain SJ, Allen M. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of fixed-dose routine nocturnal oxygen supplementation
on oxygen saturation in patients with acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.
2009.02.008.
362. Singhal AB, Benner T, Roccatagliata L, Koroshetz WJ, Schaefer PW, Lo EH, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, Sorensen AG. A pilot study of
normobaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:797–802. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000158914.66827.2e.
363. Rønning OM, Guldvog B. Should stroke victims routinely receive supplemental oxygen? A quasi-randomized controlled trial. Stroke.
1999;30:2033–2037.
364. Adelman EE, Scott PA, Skolarus LE, Fox AK, Frederiksen SM, Meurer WJ. Protocol deviations before and after treatment with intravenous
tissue plasminogen activator in community hospitals. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.
2015.08.036.
365. Kodankandath TV, Shaji J, Kohn N, Arora R, Salamon E, Libman RB, Katz JM. Poor hypertension control and longer transport times are
associated with worse outcome in drip-and-ship stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:1887–1890. doi: 10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.04.013.
366. Lyerly MJ, Albright KC, Boehme AK, Bavarsad Shahripour R, Houston JT, Rawal PV, Kapoor N, Alvi M, Sisson A, Alexandrov AW,
Alexandrov AV. Safety of protocol violations in acute stroke tPA administration. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:855–860. doi:
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.019.
367. Kellert L, Rocco A, Sykora M, Hacke W, Ringleb PA. Frequency of increased blood pressure levels during systemic thrombolysis and risk
of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2011;42:1702–1706. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.604744.
368. Karaszewski B, Thomas RG, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Temporal profile of body temperature in acute ischemic stroke: relation to stroke
severity and outcome. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-123.
172
369. den Hertog HM, van der Worp HB, van Gemert HM, Algra A, Kappelle LJ, van Gijn J, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DW. An early rise in body
temperature is related to unfavorable outcome after stroke: data from the PAIS study. J Neurol. 2011;258:302–307. doi: 10.1007/s00415-
010-5756-4.
370. Broessner G, Beer R, Lackner P, Helbok R, Fischer M, Pfausler B, Rhorer J, Küppers-Tiedt L, Schneider D, Schmutzhard E. Prophylactic,
endovascularly based, long-term normothermia in ICU patients with severe cerebrovascular disease: bicenter prospective, randomized trial.
Stroke. 2009;40:e657–e665. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.557652.
371. den Hertog HM, van der Worp HB, van Gemert HM, Algra A, Kappelle LJ, van Gijn J, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DW; PAIS Investigators. The
Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) In Stroke (PAIS) trial: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet Neurol.
2009;8:434–440. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70051-1.
372. Horn CM, Sun CH, Nogueira RG, Patel VN, Krishnan A, Glenn BA, Belagaje SR, Thomas TT, Anderson AM, Frankel MR, Schindler KM,
Gupta R. Endovascular Reperfusion and Cooling in Cerebral Acute Ischemia (ReCCLAIM I). J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:91–95. doi:
10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010656.
373. Su Y, Fan L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Ye H, Gao D, Chen W, Liu G. Improved neurological outcome with mild hypothermia in surviving
patients with massive cerebral hemispheric infarction. Stroke. 2016;47:457–463. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009789.
374. Hong JM, Lee JS, Song HJ, Jeong HS, Jung HS, Choi HA, Lee K. Therapeutic hypothermia after recanalization in patients with acute
ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014;45:134–140. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003143.
375. Ovesen C, Brizzi M, Pott FC, Thorsen-Meyer HC, Karlsson T, Ersson A, Christensen H, Norrlin A, Meden P, Krieger DW, Petersson J.
Feasibility of endovascular and surface cooling strategies in acute stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;127:399–405. doi: 10.1111/ane.12059.
376. Clark WM, Albers GW, Madden KP, Hamilton S. The rtPA (alteplase) 0-to 6-hour acute stroke trial, part A (A0276g): results of a double-
blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study: Thromblytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Study Investigators. Stroke. 2000;31:811–816.
377. Clark WM, Wissman S, Albers GW, Jhamandas JH, Madden KP, Hamilton S. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase) for
ischemic stroke 3 to 5 hours after symptom onset: the ATLANTIS study: a randomized controlled trial: Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute
Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke. JAMA. 1999;282: 2019–2026.
378. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor
E, Trouillas P. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic
stroke (ECASS II): Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251.
379. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Höxter G, Mahagne MH. Intravenous thromboly-
sis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS).
JAMA. 1995;274:1017–1025.
380. Mori E, Minematsu K, Nakagawara J, Hasegawa Y, Nagahiro S, Okada Y, Truelsen T, Lindsten A, Ogawa A, Yamaguchi T; on behalf of
the DIAS-J Investigators. Safety and tolerability of desmoteplase within 3 to 9 hours after symptoms onset in Japanese patients with
ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:2549–2554. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009917.
173
381. Coutinho JM, Liebeskind DS, Slater LA, Nogueira RG, Clark W, Davalos A, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Fischer U, Gralla J, Saver JL, Pereira VM.
Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke: a pooled analysis of the SWIFT
and STAR Studies. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:268–274. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5374.
382. Grech R, Pullicino R, Thornton J, Downer J. An efficacy and safety comparison between different stentriever designs in acute ischaemic
stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.09.011.
383. Rodrigues FB, Neves JB, Caldeira D, Ferro JM, Ferreira JJ, Costa J. Endovascular treatment versus medical care alone for ischaemic stroke:
systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;353:i1754.
384. Touma L, Filion KB, Sterling LH, Atallah R, Windle SB, Eisenberg MJ. Stent retrievers for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:275–281. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4441.
385. Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, Alhazzani W, Selim MH, Farrokhyar F, Spears J, Kulkarni AV, Singh S, Alqahtani A, Rochwerg B, Alshahrani M,
Murty NK, Alhazzani A, Yarascavitch B, Reddy K, Zaidat OO, Almenawer SA. Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a
meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;314:1832–1843. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13767.
386. Chen CJ, Ding D, Starke RM, Mehndiratta P, Crowley RW, Liu KC, Southerland AM, Worrall BB. Endovascular vs medical management
of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2015;85:1980–1990. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002176.
387. Elgendy IY, Kumbhani DJ, Mahmoud A, Bhatt DL, Bavry AA. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of
randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2498–2505. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.070.
388. Fargen KM, Neal D, Fiorella DJ, Turk AS, Froehler M, Mocco J. A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating
endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:84–89. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011543.
389. Kumar G, Shahripour RB, Alexandrov AV. Recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion improves outcomes: a meta-analysis. J
Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:868–874. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011418.
390. Marmagkiolis K, Hakeem A, Cilingiroglu M, Gundogdu B, Iliescu C, Tsitlakidou D, Katramados A. Safety and efficacy of stent retrievers
for the management of acute ischemic stroke: comprehensive review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1758–1765. doi:
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.021.
391. Yarbrough CK, Ong CJ, Beyer AB, Lipsey K, Derdeyn CP. Endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke: systematic review
and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:3177–3183. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009847.
392. Almekhlafi MA, Menon BK, Freiheit EA, Demchuk AM, Goyal M. A meta-analysis of observational intra-arterial stroke therapy studies
using the Merci device, Penumbra system, and retrievable stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:140–145. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3276.
393. Fields JD, Khatri P, Nesbit GM, Liu KC, Barnwell SL, Lutsep HL, Clark WM, Lansberg MG. Meta-analysis of randomized intra-arterial
thrombolytic trials for the treatment of acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3:151–155. doi:
10.1136/jnis.2010.002766.
174
394. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Rabinstein AA, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during
endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:525–529. doi:
10.3174/ajnr.A4159.
395. Li W, Lin L, Zhang M, Wu Y, Liu C, Li X, Huang S, Liang C, Wang Y, Chen J, Feng W. Safety and preliminary efficacy of early tirofiban
treatment after alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke. 2016;47:2649–2651. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014413.
396. Wada T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, Nakajima S, Yahagi N. Ozagrel for patients with noncardioembolic ischemic
stroke: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:2828–2837. doi:
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.044.
397. Sandercock PA, Counsell C, Kamal AK. Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD000024.
398. Wang Q, Chen C, Chen XY, Han JH, Soo Y, Leung TW, Mok V, Wong KS. Low-molecular-weight heparin and early neurologic
deterioration in acute stroke caused by large artery occlusive disease. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:1454–1460. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1633.
399. Wang QS, Chen C, Chen XY, Han JH, Soo Y, Leung TW, Mok V, Wong KS. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin for acute
ischemic stroke with large artery occlusive disease: subgroup analyses from the Fraxiparin in Stroke Study for the treatment of ischemic
stroke (FISS-tris) study. Stroke. 2012;43:346–349. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.628347.
400. Saver JL, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Stratton SJ, Pratt FD, Hamilton S, Conwit R, Liebeskind DS, Sung G, Kramer I, Moreau G, Goldweber
R, Sanossian N; FAST-MAG Investigators and Coordinators. Prehospital use of magnesium sulfate as neuroprotection in acute stroke. N
Engl J Med. 2015;372:528–536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408827.
401. Hacke W, Schellinger PD, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Dahlof BL, Fulton R, Kasner SE, Shuaib A, Richieri SP, Dilly SG, Zivin J, Lees KR;
for the NEST 3 Committees and Investigators. Transcranial laser therapy in acute stroke treatment: results of Neurothera Effectiveness and
Safety Trial 3, a phase III clinical end point device trial. Stroke. 2014;45:3187–3193. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005795.
402. Seedat J, Penn C. Implementing oral care to reduce aspiration pneumonia amongst patients with dysphagia in a South African setting. S Afr
J Commun Disord. 2016;63.
403. Dennis M, Sandercock P, Reid J, Graham C, Forbes J, Murray G; CLOTS (Clots in Legs Or sTockings after Stroke) Trials Collaboration.
Effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression in reduction of risk of deep vein thrombosis in patients who have had a stroke (CLOTS
3): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:516–524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61050-8.
404. Geeganage CM, Sprigg N, Bath MW, Bath PM. Balance of symptomatic pulmonary embolism and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage
with low-dose anticoagulation in recent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:1018–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.03.005.
405. Qaseem A, Chou R, Humphrey LL, Starkey M, Shekelle P; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Venous
thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern
Med. 2011;155:625–632. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-9-201111010-00011.
175
406. Herisson F, Godard S, Volteau C, Le Blanc E, Guillon B, Gaudron M; SEVEL Study Group. Early Sitting in Ischemic Stroke Patients
(SEVEL): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149466.
407. Morreale M, Marchione P, Pili A, Lauta A, Castiglia SF, Spallone A, Pierelli F, Giacomini P. Early versus delayed rehabilitation treatment
in hemiplegic patients with ischemic stroke: proprioceptive or cognitive approach? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:81–89.
408. Johansson E, Cuadrado-Godia E, Hayden D, Bjellerup J, Ois A, Roquer J, Wester P, Kelly PJ. Recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid
stenosis awaiting revascularization: a pooled analysis. Neurology. 2016;86:498–504. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002354.
409. Bazan HA, Zea N, Jennings B, Smith TA, Vidal G, Sternbergh WC 3rd. Urgent carotid intervention is safe after thrombolysis for minor to
moderate acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:1529–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.082.
410. Chisci E, Pigozzi C, Troisi N, Tramacere L, Zaccara G, Cincotta M, Ercolini L, Michelagnoli S. Thirty-day neurologic improvement as-
sociated with early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29:435–442. doi: 10.1016/j.
avsg.2014.08.028.
411. Devlin TG, Phade SV, Hutson RK, Fugate MW, Major GR 2nd, Albers GW, Sirelkhatim AA, Sapkota BL, Quartfordt SD, Baxter BW.
Computed tomography perfusion imaging in the selection of acute stroke patients to undergo emergent carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc
Surg. 2015;29:125. e1–125.11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.023.
412. Steglich-Arnholm H, Holtmannspötter M, Kondziella D, Wagner A, Stavngaard T, Cronqvist ME, Hansen K, Højgaard J, Taudorf S,
Krieger DW. Thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting in acute ischemic stroke management: benefits and harms. J Neurol.
2015;262:2668–2675. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7895-0.
413. Ferrero E, Ferri M, Viazzo A, Labate C, Berardi G, Pecchio A, Piazza S, Ripepi M, Nessi F. A retrospective study on early carotid
endarterectomy within 48 hours after transient ischemic attack and stroke in evolution. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.
avsg.2013.02.015.
414. Limone BL, Baker WL, Mearns ES, White CM, Kluger J, Coleman CI. Common flaws exist in published cost-effectiveness models of phar-
macologic stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1093–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.013.
415. Shariat A, Yaghoubi E, Farazdaghi M, Aghasadeghi K, Borhani Haghighi A. Comparison of medical treatments in cryptogenic stroke
patients with patent foramen ovale: a randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18:94–98.
416. Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP; for the PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS) Investigators. Effect of
medical treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study. Circulation.
2002;105:2625–2631.
417. Kim JT, Park MS, Choi KH, Cho KH, Kim BJ, Han MK, Park TH, Park SS, Lee KB, Lee BC, Yu KH, Oh MS, Cha JK, Kim DH, Nah HW,
Lee J, Lee SJ, Ko YC, Kim JG, Park JM, Kang K, Cho YJ, Hong KS, Choi JC, Kim DE, Ryu WS, Shin DI, Yeo MJ, Kim WJ, Lee J, Lee JS,
Saver JL, Bae HJ. Different antiplatelet strategies in patients with new ischemic stroke while taking aspirin. Stroke. 2016;47:128–134. doi:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011595.
176
418. Lee M, Wu YL, Saver JL, Lee HC, Lee JD, Chang KC, Wu CY, Lee TH, Wang HH, Rao NM, Ovbiagele B. Is clopidogrel better than
aspirin following breakthrough strokes while on aspirin? A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-
2014-006672.
419. Abdul-Rahim AH, Fulton RL, Frank B, Tatlisumak T, Paciaroni M, Caso V, Diener HC, Lees KR; VISTA Collaborators. Association of
improved outcome in acute ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation who receive early antithrombotic therapy: analysis from VISTA.
Eur J Neurol. 2015;22:1048–1055. doi: 10.1111/ene.12577.
420. Jensen J, Salottolo K, Frei D, Loy D, McCarthy K, Wagner J, Whaley M, Bellon R, Bar-Or D. Comprehensive analysis of intra-arterial
treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:654–658. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-
012421.
421. Aronow HD, Novaro GM, Lauer MS, Brennan DM, Lincoff AM, Topol EJ, Kereiakes DJ, Nissen SE. In-hospital initiation of lipid-lowering
therapy after coronary intervention as a predictor of long-term utilization: a propensity analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2576–2582. doi:
10.1001/archinte.163.21.2576.
177
Data Supplement 2
Literature Searches
1
No. studies
Date range
Database No titles No. full- included based
covered No.
searched or Date search Inclusion Exclusion and text on authors’
by Search terms studies
other source conducted criteria criteria abstracts articles determination
literature returned
used screened reviewed of quality and
search
major impact
Public education, EMS assessment and management: recognize, call 911
Table 1. Nonrandomized Studies of Stroke Awareness and Emergency Medical Services Use
Table 2. Randomized Controlled Trials for Improving Stroke Awareness
Table 4. Nonrandomized Studies of Emergency Medical Services Use of Prehospital Stroke Severity Scales
1/1/2012- Humans, English
PubMed 10/25/2016 None public education stroke 468 61 22 0
10/25/2016 only
No
clinicaltrials.gov 10/25/2016 N/A None public education stroke 40 40 N/A 0
restrictions
1/1/2012-
PubMed 10/25/2016 English only None ems management stroke 66 66 23 0
10/25/2016
1/1/2012-
PubMed 10/25/2016 English only None prehospital stroke management 116 116 40 0
10/25/2016
No
clinicaltrials.gov 10/26/2016 N/A None ems stroke 45 45 N/A 0
restrictions
No
clinicaltrials.gov 10/26/2016 N/A None Prehospital stroke 49 49 N/A 0
restrictions
Emergency evaluation: benefit of stroke scale use
Table 3. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Prediction Value of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
11/4/2016
1/1/2011- Clinical Studies,
PubMed (updated Non-English NIH Stroke Scale, Use 276 276 2 0
2/4/2017 Clinical Trials
2/4/2017)
11/4/2016
PubMed (updated Non-English NIH Stroke Scale, Benefit 31 31 0 0
2/4/2017)
11/4/2016
PubMed (updated Non-English NIH Stroke Scale, Emergency 151 151 2 0
2/4/2017)
2
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
CT attenuation IV alteplase interaction
Table 17. Randomized Controlled Trials of Interaction of Baseline Imaging Computed Tomography Hypodensity with Treatment Effect for Intravenous Alteplase
Table 18. Randomized Controlled Trials of Interaction of Baseline Computed Tomography Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign with Treatment Effect for Intravenous Alteplase
"tissue plasminogen
activator"[MeSH Terms] AND
("brain
ischemia/radiography"[Mesh
Terms] OR "cerebrovascular
disorders/radiography"[Mesh
Terms] OR
"stroke/radiography"[Mesh Terms])
AND ("randomized controlled trials
as topic"[MeSH Terms] OR
No limit ("randomized controlled
RCTs with
(4/1/1990 - trial"[Publication Type] OR
PubMed 10/30/2016 interaction term Non-English 82 82 7 5
2/28/2016 "randomized controlled trials as
calculated
returned) topic"[MeSH Terms] OR
"randomized controlled trial"[All
Fields] OR "randomised controlled
trial"[All Fields]) OR ECASS[All
Fields] OR "NINDS rt-PA Stroke
Study"[All Fields] OR EPITHET[All
Fields] OR "early ischemic
changes"[All Fields] OR
hypoattenuation[All Fields] OR
"Alberta Stroke Program Early CT
score"[All Fields])
'tissue'/exp OR tissue AND
('plasminogen'/exp OR
plasminogen) AND activator AND
No limit
RCTs with 'clinical' AND trial AND (early AND
(1/1/2004-
EMBASE 10/30/2016 interaction term Non-English ischemic AND changes OR 21 21 1 0
12/30/2016
calculated hypoattenuation OR 'alberta'/exp
returned)
OR alberta) AND ('stroke'/exp OR
stroke) AND program AND early
AND ct AND score
RCTs with
Personal files, referenced by other
Other 10/31/2016 N/A interaction term Non-English 5 4 4 1
studies
calculated
3
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
CT attenuation IAT interaction
Table 17. Randomized Controlled Trials of Interaction of Baseline Imaging CT Hypodensity with Treatment Effect for IV alteplase
RCTs with stroke AND "Alberta Stroke
1/1/2015 –
PubMed 10/31/2016 interaction term Non-English Program Early CT score" AND 49 49 5 2
12/31/2016
calculated (thrombectomy OR endovascular)
thrombectomy AND 'clinical' AND
trial AND (early AND ischemic
No limit
RCTs with AND changes OR hypoattenuation
(1/1/2011 -
EMBASE 10/31/2016 interaction term Non-English OR 'alberta'/exp OR alberta) AND 17 17 0 0
12/31/2016
calculated ('stroke'/exp OR stroke) AND
returned)
program AND early AND ct AND
score
RCTs with
Personal files, referenced by other
Other 10/31/2016 N/A interaction term Non-English 1 1 1 1
studies
calculated
Hyperdense MCA IV alteplase interaction
Table 18. Randomized Controlled Trials of Interaction of Baseline Computed Tomography Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign with Treatment Effect for Intravenous Alteplase
"tissue plasminogen
activator"[MeSH Terms] AND
("brain
ischemia/radiography"[Mesh
Terms] OR "cerebrovascular
disorders/radiography"[Mesh
Terms] OR
No limit "stroke/radiography"[Mesh Terms])
RCTs with
(1/1/2010 - AND ("randomized controlled trials 1 (and 16
PubMed 10/21/2016 interaction term Non-English 17 2 2
12/31/2016 as topic"[MeSH Terms] OR cited by)
calculated
returned) ("randomized controlled
trial"[Publication Type] OR
"randomized controlled trials as
topic"[MeSH Terms] OR
"randomized controlled trial"[All
Fields] OR "randomised controlled
trial"[All Fields])) AND "hyperdense
middle cerebral artery"[All Fields]
4
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
'tissue'/exp OR tissue AND
No limit
RCTs with ('plasminogen'/exp OR
(1/1/1999 -
EMBASE 10/30/2016 interaction term Non-English plasminogen) AND activator AND 4 34 3 1
12/31/2016
calculated 'clinical' AND trial AND hyperdense
returned)
middle cerebral artery sign
Hyperdense MCA IV alteplase interaction II
Table 19. Observational Studies of Interaction of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebral Microbleeds with Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Alteplase
No limit Thrombectomy OR endovascular
RCTs with
(1/1/2004 - OR intra-arterial AND "hyperdense
PubMed 11/2/2016 interaction term Non-English 10 10 0 0
12/31/2015 middle cerebral artery"[All Fields]
calculated
returned)
No limit
RCTs with thrombectomy AND 'clinical' AND
(1/1/2012-
EMBASE 10/30/2016 interaction term Non-English trial AND hyperdense middle 2 2 0 0
12/31/2016
calculated cerebral artery sign
returned)
Door-to-imaging times achievable
Table 16. Observational Studies of 2016 Door-to-Computed Tomography Times
US only, door-to- Non-English ("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR 15 15 4 3
CT time "stroke"[All Fields]) AND (door-to-
2016 CT[All Fields] OR (door-to-
PubMed 10/31/2016 publication needle[All Fields] AND
date ("contraindications"[Subheading]
OR "contraindications"[All Fields]
OR "ct"[All Fields]))) 2014-2016
2016
US only, door-to-
EMBASE 10/31/2016 publication Non-English stroke AND 'door to ct' 25 25 0 0
CT time
date
2016
US only, door-to- Personal files, referenced by other
Other 10/31/2016 publication Non-English 1 1 1 1
CT time studies
date
Multimodal imaging
Table 20. Randomized Controlled Trials of Intravenous Thrombolytics Employing Multimodal Imaging
Table 21. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Intravenous Thrombolytics Employing Multimodal Imaging
acute ischemic stroke AND trial
10/10/2016
OR multimodal imaging OR
PubMed (updated No range None None 357 274 27 8
penumbra OR mismatch OR
10/11/2016)
imaging selection
Other 10/11/16 No range None None Personal files 1 1 1 1
5
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Vessel and collateral status imaging
Table 22. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Creatinine Testing Prior to Contrast Computed Tomography
Table 24. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Collateral Status
10/10/2016
acute stroke AND CTA OR MRA
PubMed (updated No range None None 757 395 37 8
OR vessel imaging OR collaterals
10/11/2016
Interaction of baseline MRI microbleeds with IV alteplase
Table 19. Observational Studies of Interaction of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebral Microbleeds with Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Alteplase
abstracts,
includes
English only, studies
11/16/2016 microbleeds AND stroke AND
PubMed 11/16/2016 Adults, meta- included in 6 6 2 2
-7/31/2013 thrombolysis AND meta-analysis
analyses more recent
meta-
analyses
abstracts,
includes
English only, studies
11/16/2016 microbleeds AND stroke AND
Embase 11/16/2016 Adults, meta- included in 17 17 0 0
-8/31/2004 thrombolysis AND meta-analysis
analyses more recent
meta-
analyses
Blood pressure
Table 29. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Blood Pressure and Thrombolysis
10/28/2016
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, blood pressure and AIS;
PubMed (updated 582 321 20 8
2/28/2017 English foreign lang vasoactive agents and AIS
2/28/2017)
Oxygen supplementation
Table 26. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Supplemental Oxygen
10/26/2016
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, oxygen supplementation and acute
10/27/2016 English foreign lang stroke
10/27/2016)
10/28/2016
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, acute stroke and oxygen
12/7/2016 English foreign lang supplementation
12/7/2016)
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric,
Google singhal and oxygen and stroke 2 2 1 2
12/7/2016 12/7/2016 English foreign lang
6
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Temperature
Table 30. Nonrandomized Studies of Hyperthermia After Acute Ischemic Stroke
Table 31. Randomized Controlled Trials of Normothermia
Table 32. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypothermia
Table 33. Randomized Controlled Trials of Hypothermia
PubMed hypothermia and acute stroke 210 51 15 8
PubMed hyperthermia and acute stroke 202 50 0 0
PubMed normothermia and acute stroke 73 15 6 4
PubMed anti-pyretics and acute stroke 318 3 2 1
Blood Pressure and Endovascular Therapy
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, blood pressure and stroke and
PubMed 83 5 1 1
10/28/2016 10/28/2016 English foreign lang endovascular therapy
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, blood pressure and stroke and
PubMed 43 3 0 0
10/28/2016 10/28/2016 English foreign lang recanalization
Induced Hypertension Therapy
PubMed 11/9/2016 induced HTN - therapy - stroke 297 1 0 0
11/9/2016 English foreign lang
Therapeutic Hypertension – Stroke
PubMed therapeutic hypertension - stroke 373 1 1 0
PubMed ischemic stroke - vasopressors 120 0 0 0
Blood pressure and Thrombolysis
PubMed BP and thrombolysis and stroke 182 45 15 13
HBO
Table 27. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hyperbaric Oxygen
1/1/2010 - from 2010 on; pediatric,
HBO and acute ischemic stroke 20 20 4 1
PubMed 3/29/2017 3/29/2017 English foreign lang
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, cerebral air emboli and stroke and
PubMed
11/22/2016 11/22/2016 English foreign lang HBO 10 1 1 1
7
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
PubMed
11/22/2016 11/22/2016 English foreign lang cerebral air emboli and stroke 67 6 0 0
Hypotension
Table 23. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endovascular Therapy
1/1/2010- from 2010 on; pediatric, hypotension and acute stroke and
PubMed 135 5 5 0
12/14/2016 12/14/2016 English foreign lang treatment
IV lysis
Table 39. Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Intravenous Fibrinolytics Other Than Alteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
1/1/1980- thrombolysis + stroke +
PubMed 12/16/2016 RCTs Non RCTs 1250 543 78 21
11/30/2016 randomized
Alteplase, IV, stroke
Table 34. Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Intravenous Alteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
tissue plasminogen activator, rtPA,
tPA, intravenous or IV alteplase,
1/1/1995– Human, English,
MEDLINE 12/22/2016 Non-RCTs stroke or ischemic stroke or 5134 879 269 87
12/1/2016 Adults
thrombosis or brain ischemia or
cerebrovascular disorders
Intravenous alteplase for mild stroke 3-4.5 hours
Table 35. Randomized Controlled Trials of Intravenous Alteplase for Mild Stroke 3–4.5 Hours
Table 36. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Intravenous Alteplase 3–4.5 Hours for Mild Stroke
3-4.5 hours RCT
thru
PubMed 4/16/2017 subgroup English only ECASS III AND subgroup 3 3 1 1
12/31/2009
analysis
thru registry compare
PubMed 4/16/2017 English only alteplase AND mild stroke AND 4.5 19 19 1 1
9/30/2005 < 3 to 3-4.5
Thru registry compare alteplase AND mild stroke AND 3-
PubMed 4/16/2017 English only 2 2 1 1
5/30/2013 < 3 to 3-4.5 4.5
thru registry compare
PubMed 4/16/2017 English only 3-4.5 AND SITS-ISTR 5 5 1 0
10/31/2008 < 3 to 3-4.5
thru alteplase AND mild stroke AND 4.5
Embase 4/16/2017 3-4.5 h data English only 4 4 1 0
12/31/2013 AND clinical trial
Intravenous Fibrinolysis
Table 38. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies of Antithrombotic Agents Given Within 24 Hours After Intravenous Alteplase for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Adults - after thrombolysis + stroke +
1/1/1995- case reports 952
PubMed 12/16/2016 1995 antithrombotics OR antiplatelets 252 15 1
12/16/2016
8
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Endovascular interventions
Table 23. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endovascular Therapy
Table 41. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Endovascular Therapy
Table 42. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing General Anesthesia to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Therapy
Table 43. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries Comparing General Anesthesia to Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Therapy
studies not
regarding
acute
acute ischemic stroke AND
humans, ischemic
1/1/1966- thrombectomy OR
PubMed 9/21/2016 English-only, 10 stroke, 42,251 42,251 585 32
9/21/2016 endovascular OR intra-arterial OR
or more patients commentarie
stent retriever OR clot retrieval
s, editorials,
letters to the
editor
Humans, Studies not
English-only. regarding
Cochrane (Randomized acute
acute ischemic stroke AND
Central trial, meta- ischemic
1/1/1966- thrombectomy OR endovascular
Register of 9/25/2016 analysis, stroke, 3445 3445 197 32
9/25/2016 OR intra-arterial OR stent retriever
Controlled systematic commentarie
OR clot retrieval
Trials review, pooled s, editorials,
analysis, or letters to the
registry) editor
Anticoagulation
Table 46. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Anticoagulant to Control
Table 47. Nonrandomized Studies of Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Ischemic StrokeTable 77. Studies of Early Secondary Prevention in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "anticoagulation", "acute ischemic 112 112 11 1
PubMed
7/4/2017 Humans stroke"
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "anticoagulation", "acute ischemic 5 5 1 0
PubMed 7/4/2017 Humans, Clinical stroke"
Trial
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "enoxaparin", "acute ischemic 5 5 0 0
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "dalteparin", "acute ischemic 1 1 0 0
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "heparin", "acute ischemic stroke" 49 49 5 2
PubMed
7/4/2017 Humans
9
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "apixaban", "acute ischemic 12 12 2 0
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "rivaroxaban", "acute ischemic 20 20 2 0
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "dabigatran", "acute ischemic 30 30 3 1
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "argatroban", "acute ischemic 6 6 3 1
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "argatroban", "stroke" 38 38 2 2
PubMed
7/4/2017 Humans
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "edoxaban", "acute ischemic 4 4 0 0
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "fondaparinux", "acute ischemic 2 2 0 0
PubMed
Antiplatelet
Table 44. Nonrandomized Studies of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Table 45. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Antiplatelet to ControlTable 77. Nonrandomized Studies of Early Secondary Prevention in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "aspirin", "acute ischemic stroke" 98 98 1 1
PubMed
7/4/2017 Humans
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "aspirin", "acute ischemic stroke" 33 33 1 1
PubMed 7/4/2017 Humans, Clinical
Trial
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "clopidogrel", "acute ischemic 47 47 2 0
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "clopidogrel", "acute ischemic 12 12 2 0
PubMed 7/4/2017 Humans, Clinical stroke"
Trial
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "ticagrelor", "acute ischemic 4 4 2 1
PubMed
7/4/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "prasugrel", "acute ischemic 0 0 0 0
PubMed
7/10/2017 1/1/2010- English & None "cilostazol", "acute ischemic 14 14 1 0
PubMed
Neuroprotection
Table 48. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Other Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke
"neuroprotection", "acute ischemic
1/1/2010- English &
PubMed 7/10/2017 none stroke" 87 87 0 0
7/10/2017 Humans
10
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Cost-effectiveness of CT/MRI in acute stroke
Table 15. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Routine Stroke Care
Formal cost-
3/1/1985- cost-effectiveness AND CT AND
PubMed 11/21/2016 effectiveness Non-English 99 99 7 3
11/30/2016 stroke
analysis
Formal cost-
3/1/1985- cost-effectiveness AND MRI AND
PubMed 11/22/2016 effectiveness Non-English 70 70 1 0
11/30/2016 stroke
analysis
Formal cost- cost effectiveness':ti AND ('ct'/exp
7/1/1999-
Embase 12/5/2016 effectiveness Non-English OR ct) AND ('stroke'/exp OR 60 60 4 0
12/31/2016
analysis stroke)
Formal cost-
7/1/1999- 'cost':ti AND ('ct'/exp OR ct) AND
Embase 12/5/2016 effectiveness Non-English 104 104 0 0
12/31/2016 ('stroke'/exp OR stroke)
analysis
Formal cost-
3/1/2003- 'cost':ti AND mri AND ('stroke'/exp
Embase 12/5/2016 effectiveness Non-English 30 30 0 0
12/31/2016 OR stroke)
analysis
Blood pressure II
Table 50. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Treatment for Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
randomized controlled trials +
1/1/1999–
PubMed 11/20/2016 RCTs Non RCTs acute ischemic stroke + blood 180 180 59 14
11/20/2016
pressure treatment
Treatment of hypotension
Table 28. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypotension and Hypovolemia
English only,
association low
first 100
4/1/2017 - blood pressure in Pediatric
PubMed 4/30/2017 Low blood pressure AND stroke best 13 13 8
12/31/1986 acute ischemic
match
stroke with
outcome
Intravenous fluids and stroke
Table 28. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Hypotension and Hypovolemia
first 100
12/1/2016-
PubMed 4/30/2017 English only Pediatric Fluids AND acute stroke best 6 6 1
7/31/1992
match
11
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Transcranial near-infrared laser therapy
Table 49. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Transcranial Laser Therapy for Stroke
(transcranial[All Fields] AND
near[All Fields] AND infrared[All
Fields] AND ("lasers"[MeSH
1/1/2000 - English only,
PubMed 12/12/2016 None Terms] OR "lasers"[All Fields] OR 26 26 4 2
1/1/2016 Adults>18
"laser"[All Fields])) AND
("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR
"stroke"[All Fields])
Transcranial laser therapy
Table 49. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Transcranial Laser Therapy for Stroke
1/12000 - English only,
PubMed 12/12/2016 None NEST-3[All Fields] 4 4 2 1
1/1/2016 Adults>18; RCTs
NILT[All Fields] AND
1/1/2000- English only,
PubMed 12/12/2016 None ("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR 7 7 1 0
1/1/2016 Adults>18
"stroke"[All Fields])
Embase 12/12/2016 None NILT[All Fields] 21 21 0 0
1/1/2016 Adults>18
Embase 12/12/2016 None NEST-3 AND “stroke”[All Fields] 8 8 2 1
1/1/2016 Adults>18
Cerebral edema, surgical decompression suboccipital
Table 59. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Treatment of Cerebral and Cerebellar Edema Following Acute Ischemic Stroke
Table 60. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Impact of Treatment of Cerebral and Cerebellar Edema Following Acute Ischemic Infarction
Cochrane
brain AND edema AND
review,
'cerebrovascular accident' AND
Systematic
1/1/2014 - ([cochrane review]/lim OR
Embase 1/20/2016 review, Meta- None 48 48 1 1
1/1/2016 [systematic review]/lim OR [meta
analysis,
analysis]/lim OR [controlled clinical
controlled clinical
trial]/lim) AND [2014-2016]/pi
trial
cerebral AND edema OR brain
AND edema AND 'cerebrovascular
English
1/1/2013 - accident' AND surgical AND
Embase 1/20/2016 speaking, adult None 251 251 3 2
1/1/2016 decompression OR 'suboccipital
>18
craniotomy' OR 'suboccipital
craniectomy' AND [2013-2016]/py
12
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Cerebral edema, impact of age
("decompressive
craniectomy"[MeSH Terms] OR
("decompressive"[All Fields] AND
"craniectomy"[All Fields]) OR
"decompressive craniectomy"[All
Fields]) AND (("Age"[Journal] OR
"age"[All Fields] OR "Age
(Omaha)"[Journal] OR "age"[All
Fields] OR "Age (Dordr)"[Journal]
OR "age"[All Fields] OR "Adv
Genet Eng"[Journal] OR "age"[All
Fields]) AND greater[All Fields]
1/1/2010 - RCTs and
PubMed 12/24/2016 None AND 60[All Fields]) OR 50 50 5 5
1/1/2016 controlled trials
("aged"[MeSH Terms] OR
"aged"[All Fields] OR "elderly"[All
Fields]) AND ("stroke"[MeSH
Terms] OR "stroke"[All Fields])
AND ("brain oedema"[All Fields]
OR "brain edema"[MeSH Terms]
OR ("brain"[All Fields] AND
"edema"[All Fields]) OR "brain
edema"[All Fields]) AND ((Clinical
Trial[ptyp] OR Review[ptyp]) AND
("2014/01/01"[PDAT] :
"2016/12/31"[PDAT]))
Depression
Table 57. Nonrandomized Studies of Depression Screening in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
English &
1/1/2010 -
PubMed 7/10/2017 Humans None "depression", "screen", "stroke" 28 28 0 0
7/10/2017
13
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Cerebral edema, hypothermia, corticosteroids
("cerebral oedema"[All Fields] OR
"brain edema"[MeSH Terms] OR
("brain"[All Fields] AND
edema"[All Fields] OR
("cerebral"[All Fields] AND
"edema"[All Fields]) OR "cerebral
edema"[All Fields]) AND
("hypothermia"[MeSH Terms] OR
English
1/1/2010 - "hypothermia"[All Fields]) AND
PubMed 1/29/2016 speaking, adult None 35 35 1 1
1/1/2017 ("adrenal cortex
>18
hormones"[Pharmacological
Action] OR "adrenal cortex
hormones"[MeSH Terms] OR
("adrenal"[All Fields] AND
"cortex"[All Fields] AND
"hormones"[All Fields]) OR
"adrenal cortex hormones"[All
Fields] OR "corticosteroids"[All
Fields])
14
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Cerebral edema, decompression timing
(severe[All Fields] AND ("brain
oedema"[All Fields] OR "brain
edema"[MeSH Terms] OR
edema"[All Fields])) AND (major[All
Fields] AND ("stroke"[MeSH
Terms] OR "stroke"[All Fields]))
AND ("transfer
(psychology)"[MeSH Terms] OR
("transfer"[All Fields] AND
"(psychology)"[All Fields]) OR
"transfer (psychology)"[All Fields]
English
1/1/2014- OR "transfer"[All Fields]) AND 96
PubMed 12/24/2016 speaking, adult None 96 0 0
1/1/2016 (("neurosciences"[MeSH Terms]
>18
OR "neurosciences"[All Fields] OR
"neuroscience"[All Fields]) AND
("intensive care units"[MeSH
Terms] OR ("intensive"[All Fields]
AND "care"[All Fields] AND
"units"[All Fields]) OR "intensive
care units"[All Fields] OR
("intensive"[All Fields] AND
"care"[All Fields] AND "unit"[All
Fields]) OR "intensive care unit"[All
Fields])) OR NSU[All Fields] AND
("2014/01/01"[PDAT] :
"2016/12/31"[PDAT])
15
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Cerebral edema, ventriculostomy, hydrocephalus
English edema"[All Fields]) AND
1/2014- 3
PubMed 12/12/2016 speaking, adult None ("hydrocephalus"[MeSH Terms] 3 2 1
1/2016
>18 OR "hydrocephalus"[All Fields])
AND (("ischemia"[MeSH Terms]
OR "ischemia"[All Fields] OR
"ischemic"[All Fields]) AND
"stroke"[All Fields])) AND
("ventriculostomy"[MeSH Terms]
OR "ventriculostomy"[All Fields])
Cerebral edema, barbiturates
English "edema"[All Fields]) OR "cerebral
1/1/2014-
PubMed 1/29/2016 speaking, adult None edema"[All Fields]) AND 25 25 1 1
1/1/2016
>18 (("ischemia"[MeSH Terms] OR
"ischemia"[All Fields] OR
"ischemic"[All Fields]) AND
"stroke"[All Fields])) AND
("barbiturates"[MeSH Terms] OR
"barbiturates"[All Fields])
16
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Cerebral edema, corticosteroids
edema"[All Fields]) AND
(("ischemia"[MeSH Terms] OR
"ischemia"[All Fields] OR
English
1/1/2014- "ischemic"[All Fields]) AND
PubMed 1/29/2016 speaking, adult None 47 47 2 1
1/1/2016 ("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR
>18
"stroke"[All Fields])) AND ("adrenal
cortex hormones"[Pharmacological
Action] OR "adrenal cortex
hormones"[MeSH Terms] OR
("adrenal"[All Fields] AND
"cortex"[All Fields] AND
"hormones"[All Fields]) OR
"adrenal cortex hormones"[All
Fields] OR "corticosteroids"[All
Fields])
("cerebellum"[MeSH Terms] OR
"cerebellum"[All Fields] OR
English "cerebellar"[All Fields]) AND
1/1/1985-
PubMed 1/24/2016 speaking, adult none ("infarction"[MeSH Terms] OR 86 86 3 1
1/1/2016
>18 "infarction"[All Fields]) AND
("decompression"[MeSH Terms]
OR "decompression"[All Fields])
17
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Achieving rapid door-to-needle treatment time in stroke
Table 7. Nonrandomized Studies of Hospitals Achieving Rapid Door-to-Needle Times for IV Alteplase in Stroke
Table 9. Nonrandomized Studies Comparing Efficacy of Multilevel Interventions to Increase Intravenous Alteplase Use
PubMed 2/4/2017 Non-English Door to needle time, stroke 192 192 5 3
PubMed Non-English “Door-to-needle” time, stroke 188 188 5 3
2/4/2017 2/4/2017 Clinical Trials
PubMed Non-English DTN time, stroke 41 41 0 0
2/4/2017 2/4/2017 Clinical Trials
Cochrane Door to needle time, stroke,
2/4/2017 no limit Trials Non-English 27 27 0 0
Library variations
1/1/2011-
Google Scholar 2/4/2017 In-Title Search Non-English “door to needle time stroke” 106 106 5 3
2/4/2017
Increasing alteplase treatment in stroke
Table 72. Nonrandomized Studies of Hospital Stroke CapabilitiesTable 8. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Efficacy of Multilevel Interventions to Increase Intravenous Alteplase
Use
1/1/2011- Clinical Studies, Non-English
PubMed 2/4/2017 Quality Improvement, stroke 112 112 4 2
2/4/2017 1/1/2011- Clinical Studies, Non-English Community hospitals, stroke, time
PubMed 55 55 5 3
2/4/2017 Clinical Trials factors
1/1/2011- Clinical Studies, Non-English Community hospitals, stroke,
PubMed 2/4/2017 26 26 5 3
2/4/2017 Clinical Trials treatment,
Benefit of participation in QI registry
Table 14. Nonrandomized Studies Assessing the Impact of Stroke System Quality Improvement Processes
1/1/2011- Clinical Studies, quality improvement program,
PubMed 2/4/2017 Non-English 231 231 5 3
2/4/2017 Clinical Trials stroke
Telestroke and Teleradiology
Table 10. Randomized Controlled Trials of Level of Agreement Between Central Read and Spoke Radiologists and Hub Neurologists in Interpreting Head Computed Tomography Scans of
Stroke Patients Presenting to Telestroke Hospitals
Table 11. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Synchronous Audio Video Telemedicine to Telephone-Only for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Table 78. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Telestroke for Triaging Patients for Endovascular Therapy
[(Telemedicine or Remote
RCT, Since Consultation) AND Stroke] OR
1/1/1999-
MEDLINE 1/12/2017 1999, Human, None Telestroke; Limited to Humans, 35 35 7 7
3/1/2017
Adults, English Adults, and Randomized
Controlled Trials
18
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Early mobility
Table 58. Randomized Controlled Trials of Mobility Intervention
PubMed 2/21/2017 1/1/2010- RCT pediatrics - (("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR 44 12 5 5
2/21/2017 late "stroke"[All Fields]) AND ("early
rehabilitation ambulation"[MeSH Terms] OR
("early"[All Fields] AND
"ambulation"[All Fields]) OR "early
ambulation"[All Fields]) AND
("treatment outcome"[MeSH
Terms] OR ("treatment"[All Fields]
AND "outcome"[All Fields]) OR
"treatment outcome"
Nutrition
Table 53. Randomized Controlled Trials of Nutrition
PubMed 2/21/2017 1/1/2010- RCT Pediatrics (("enteral nutrition"[MeSH Terms] 18 10 4 4
4/26/2017 OR ("enteral"[All Fields] AND
"nutrition"[All Fields]) OR "enteral
nutrition"[All Fields]) AND
"stroke"[All Fields])) AND Clinical
Trial[ptyp]
Oral care
Table 54. Nonrandomized Trials, Observational Studies, and/or Registries of Oral Hygiene
Table 42. Randomized Controlled Trials of Oral Care
PubMed 4/26/2017 1/1/2010- Guidelines and Pediatrics oral care methods, stroke, stroke
4/26/2017 up to data and late nursing,
sources RCT rehabilitation 48 7 3 1
PubMed 4/26/2017 1/1/2010- Guidelines and Pediatrics ("mouth"[MeSH Terms] OR
4/26/2017 up to date and late "mouth"[All Fields] OR "oral"[All
sources - NRCT, rehabilitation Fields]) AND care[All Fields] AND
Systematic ("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR
Reviews, "stroke"[All Fields]) AND
observation, ("pneumonia"[MeSH Terms] OR
adults >=18 "pneumonia"[All Fields]) 29 10 7 4
19
No. studies
Date range
covered No.
literature returned
search
major impact
Stroke, DVT prophylaxis
Table 56. Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis
PubMed 12/23/2016 1/1/2010- RCTs only, Pediatrics (("stroke"[MeSH Terms] OR 24 11 11 5
(updated 1/20/2017 English only, "stroke"[All Fields]) AND dvt[All
1/20/2017) adults ≥18 Fields] AND ("prevention and
control"[Subheading] OR
("prevention"[All Fields] AND
"control"[All Fields]) OR
"prevention and control"[All Fields]
OR "prophylaxis"[All Fields])) AND
((Clinical Trial[ptyp] OR
Randomized Controlled Trial[ptyp])
AND hasabstract[text])
20

Aha 2018 Stroke

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aha 2018 Stroke

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aha 2018 Stroke

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AHA/ASA Guideline

2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients

Endorsed by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Edward C. Jauch, MD, MS, FAHA; Chelsea S. Kidwell, MD, FAHA;

N ew high-quality evidence has produced major changes

Table 3. Abbreviations in This Guideline Table 3. Continued

ASCVD Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease LMWH Low-molecular-weight heparin

CS Conscious sedation MRI Magnetic resonance imaging

EMS Emergency medical services RCT Randomized clinical trial

EVT Endovascular therapy RR Relative risk

GA General anesthesia rtPA recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator

GWTG Get With The Guidelines sICH Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage

HBO Hyperbaric oxygen TIA Transient ischemic attack

HR Hazard ratio TJC The Joint Commission

(Continued ) UFH Unfractionated heparin

1. Prehospital Stroke Management and Systems of Care

1.2. EMS Assessment and Management

1.3. EMS Systems

1.4. Hospital Stroke Capabilities

1.5. Hospital Stroke Teams

1.7. Organization and Integration of Components

1.8. Establishment of Data Repositories

1.9. Stroke System Care Quality Improvement Process

2. Emergency Evaluation and Treatment

Table 4. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

3 Visual fields 0—No visual field defect

2.2. Brain Imaging

2.2. Brain Imaging (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

vascular imaging should then be obtained as quickly as possible.

2.2. Brain Imaging (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

2.3. Other Diagnostic Tests

3. General Supportive Care and Emergency Treatment

Recommendation and Class unchanged

3.2. Blood Pressure

3.2. Blood Pressure (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.4. Blood Glucose

3.4. Blood Glucose COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.5. IV Alteplase (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.5. IV Alteplase (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

for original wording.

Table 6. Eligibility Recommendations for IV Alteplase in Patients With AIS

Table 6. Continued

Table 6. Continued

Table 6. Continued

Obtain a follow-up CT or MRI scan at 24 h after IV alteplase before starting

3.6. Other IV Thrombolytics and Sonothrombolysis

3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy

3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.7. Mechanical Thrombectomy (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.8. Other EVTs

3.9. Antiplatelet Treatment

3.9. Antiplatelet Treatment (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.10. Anticoagulants (Continued) COR LOE New, Revised, or Unchanged

3.11. Volume Expansion/Hemodilution, Vasodilators, and Hemodynamic Augmentation

3.12. Neuroprotective Agents

3.13. Emergency CEA/Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Without Intracranial Clot

4. In-Hospital Management of AIS: General Supportive Care