BE Sols - FM14 - IM - Ch3
BE Sols - FM14 - IM - Ch3
BE Sols - FM14 - IM - Ch3
3-1 a. A liquidity ratio is a ratio that shows the relationship of a firm’s cash and other
current assets to its current liabilities. The current ratio is found by dividing current
assets by current liabilities. It indicates the extent to which current liabilities are
covered by those assets expected to be converted to cash in the near future. The
quick, or acid test, ratio is found by taking current assets less inventories and then
dividing by current liabilities.
b. Asset management ratios are a set of ratios that measure how effectively a firm is
managing its assets. The inventory turnover ratio is COGS divided by inventories.
Days sales outstanding is used to appraise accounts receivable and indicates the
length of time the firm must wait after making a sale before receiving cash. It is
found by dividing receivables by average sales per day. The fixed assets turnover
ratio measures how effectively the firm uses its plant and equipment. It is the ratio of
sales to net fixed assets. Total assets turnover ratio measures the turnover of all the
firm’s assets; it is calculated by dividing sales by total assets.
c. Financial leverage ratios measure the use of debt financing. The debt ratio is the ratio
of total debt, which usually is the sum of notes payable and long-term bonds, to total
assets, it measures the percentage of assets financed by debtholders. The debt-to-
equity ratio is the total debt divided by the total common equity. The times-interest-
earned ratio is determined by dividing earnings before interest and taxes by the
interest charges. This ratio measures the extent to which operating income can
decline before the firm is unable to meet its annual interest costs. The EBITDA
coverage ratio is similar to the times-interest-earned ratio, but it recognizes that many
firms lease assets and also must make sinking fund payments. It is found by adding
EBITDA and lease payments then dividing this total by interest charges, lease
payments, and sinking fund payments over one minus the tax rate.
d. Profitability ratios are a group of ratios, which show the combined effects of liquidity,
asset management, and debt on operations. The profit margin on sales, calculated by
dividing net income by sales, gives the profit per dollar of sales. Basic earning power
is calculated by dividing EBIT by total assets. This ratio shows the raw earning
power of the firm’s assets, before the influence of taxes and leverage. Return on total
assets is the ratio of net income to total assets. Return on common equity is found by
dividing net income by common equity.
g. The Du Pont equation is a formula, which shows that the rate of return on assets can
be found as the product of the profit margin times the total assets turnover. Window
dressing is a technique employed by firms to make their financial statements look
better than they really are. Seasonal factors can distort ratio analysis. At certain
times of the year a firm may have excessive inventories in preparation of a “season”
of high demand. Therefore an inventory turnover ratio taken at this time as opposed
to after the season will be radically distorted.
3-2 The emphasis of the various types of analysts is by no means uniform nor should it be.
Management is interested in all types of ratios for two reasons. First, the ratios point out
weaknesses that should be strengthened; second, management recognizes that the other
parties are interested in all the ratios and that financial appearances must be kept up if the
firm is to be regarded highly by creditors and equity investors. Equity investors are
interested primarily in profitability, but they examine the other ratios to get information
on the riskiness of equity commitments. Long-term creditors are more interested in the
debt ratio, TIE, and fixed-charge coverage ratios, as well as the profitability ratios.
Short-term creditors emphasize liquidity and look most carefully at the liquidity ratios.
3-3 Given that sales have not changed, a decrease in the total assets turnover means that the
company’s assets have increased. Also, the fact that the fixed assets turnover ratio
remained constant implies that the company increased its current assets. Since the
company’s current ratio increased, and yet, its quick ratio is unchanged means that the
company has increased its inventories.
3-5 a. Cash, receivables, and inventories, as well as current liabilities, vary over the year for
firms with seasonal sales patterns. Therefore, those ratios that examine balance sheet
figures will vary unless averages (monthly ones are best) are used.
b. Common equity is determined at a point in time, say December 31, 2012. Profits are
earned over time, say during 2012. If a firm is growing rapidly, year-end equity will
be much larger than beginning-of-year equity, so the calculated rate of return on
equity will be different depending on whether end-of-year, beginning-of-year, or
average common equity is used as the denominator. Average common equity is
conceptually the best figure to use. In public utility rate cases, people are reported to
have deliberately used end-of-year or beginning-of-year equity to make returns on
equity appear excessive or inadequate. Similar problems can arise when a firm is
being evaluated.
3-6 Firms within the same industry may employ different accounting techniques, which make
it difficult to compare financial ratios. More fundamentally, comparisons may be
misleading if firms in the same industry differ in their other investments. For example,
comparing PepsiCo and Coca-Cola may be misleading because apart from their soft drink
business, Pepsi also owns other businesses such as Frito-Lay, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and
KFC.
AR
DSO =
S
365
AR
20 =
$20, 000
AR = $ 400 ,000 .
3-2 TA = $200 million, notes payable =$5 million, and LT debt = $25 million.
ROA = PM S/TA
NI/A = NI/S S/TA
12% = 5% S/TA
S/TA = 2.40.
CA CA - I
3-7 CA = $3,000,000; CL = 1.5; CL = 1.0;
CL = ?; I = ?
CA
= 1 .5
CL
$3,000,000
= 1.5
CL
1.5CL = $3,000,000
CL = $2,000,000.
CA - Inv
= 1. 0
CL
$3,000,000 - Inv
= 1 .0
$2,000,000
$3,000,000 - Inv = $2,000,000
I nv = $1,000,000.
We can also calculate the company’s liabilities-to-assets (L/TA) ratio in a similar manner,
given the facts of the problem. We are given ROA = NI/TA and ROE= NI/E. We begin
by finding the percentage of assets financed by equity, E/TA:
E NI E 1
TA
=
TA NI( )( )
= ROA
ROE
= ROA/ROE ( )
E
TA = ROA/ROE = 4%/7% = 57.14%.
By definition, L + E = Total liabilities & Equity = TA. Therefore, the percentage of the
firm financed by liabilities is equal to 1 minus the percentage financed by equity:
L E
TA = 1 − TA = 1 −57.14% = 42.86%.
To find the debt-to-total asset (i.e., the debt ratio), begin with the total liabilities-to-assets
ratio of 42.86%. We are given that half of the liabilities are debt, so the debt ratio is:
$1,312,500 + ΔNP
Minimum current ratio = $525,000 + ΔNP = 2.0.
$810,000 - Inventories
2. = 1.4 $270,000 = 1.4
$2,925,000
= $1,453,500 = 2.01 2.0
$1,395 ,384
= $ 4,275 ,000 = 33% 30%
$ 2,522 ,250
= $ 4,275 ,000 = 59% 60.0%
$ 4,275,000
ROE = PM T.A. turnover EM = 1.51% 1.75 $ 1,752,750 = 6.45%.
For the industry, ROE = 1.2% 3 2.5 = 9%.
Note: To find the industry ratio of assets to common equity, recognize that 1 minus
the Liabilities-to-assets ratio = common equity/total assets. So, common equity/total
assets = 1 – 60% = 40%, and 1/0.40 = 2.5 = total assets/common equity.
c. The firm’s days sales outstanding is more than twice as long as the industry average,
indicating that the firm should tighten credit or enforce a more stringent collection
policy. The total assets turnover ratio is well below the industry average so sales
should be increased, assets decreased, or both. While the company’s profit margin is
higher than the industry average, its other profitability ratios are low compared to the
industry--net income should be higher given the amount of equity and assets.
However, the company seems to be in an average liquidity position and financial
leverage is similar to others in the industry.
The firm appears to be badly managed--all of its ratios are worse than the industry
averages, and the result is low earnings, a low P/E, P/CF ratio, a low stock price, and a
low M/B ratio. The company needs to do something to improve.
3-15 The detailed solution for the problem is available is in the file Ch03 P15 Build a Model
Solution.xls and is available at the textbook’s web site.
The first part of the case, presented in Chapter 3, discussed the situation of Computron
Industries after an expansion program. A large loss occurred in 2013, rather than the
expected profit. As a result, its managers, directors, and investors are concerned about the
firm’s survival.
Jenny Cochran was brought in as assistant to Gary Meissner, Computron’s chairman,
who had the task of getting the company back into a sound financial position. Computron’s
2012 and 2013 balance sheets and income statements, together with projections for 2014,
are shown in the following tables. The tables also show the 2012 and 2013 financial ratios,
along with industry average data. The 2014 projected financial statement data represent
Cochran’s and Meissner’s best guess for 2014 results, assuming that some new financing is
arranged to get the company “over the hump.”
Cochrane must prepare an analysis of where the company is now, what it must do to
regain its financial health, and what actions should be taken. Your assignment is to help
her answer the following questions. Provide clear explanations, not yes or no answers.
Mini Case: 3 - 14
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Balance Sheets
Mini Case: 3 - 15
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Income Statements
2012 2013 2014e
Sales $ $ 5,834,400 $ 7,035,600
3,432,000
COGS except depr. 2,864,000 4,980,000 5,800,000
Depreciation 18,900 116,960 120,000
Other Expenses 340,000 720,000 612,960
Total Operating Costs $ $ 5,816,960 $ 6,532,960
3,222,900
EBIT $ $ 17,440 $ 502,640
209,100
Interest Expense 62,500 176,000 80,000
EBT $ $ (158,560) $ 422,640
146,600
Taxes (40%) 58,640 (63,424) 169,056
Net Income $ $ (95,136) $ 253,584
87,960
Mini Case: 3 - 16
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Ratio Analysis 2012 2013 2014e Industry Average
Current 2.3 1.5 2.58 2.7
Quick 0.8 0.5 0.93 1.0
Inventory Turnover 4.0 4.0 3.45 6.1
Days Sales Outstanding 37.4 39.5 45.5 32.0
Fixed Assets Turnover 10.0 6.2 8.41 7.0
Total Assets Turnover 2.3 2.0 2.00 2.5
Debt Ratio 35.6% 59.6% 22.7% 32.0%
Liabilities/Assets Ratio 54.8% 80.7% 43.8% 50.0%
TIE 3.3 0.1 6.3 6.2
EBITDA Coverage 2.6 0.8 5.5 8.0
Profit Margin 2.6% -1.6% 3.6% 3.6%
Basic Earning Power 14.2% 0.6% 14.3% 17.8%
ROA 6.0% -3.3% 7.2% 9.0%
ROE 13.3% -17.1% 12.8% 17.9%
Price/Earnings (P/E) 9.7 -6.3 12.0 16.2
Price/Cash Flow 8.0 27.5 8.1 7.6
Market/Book 1.3 1.1 1.5 2.9
a. Why are ratios useful? What three groups use ratio analysis and for what
reasons?
Answer: Ratios facilitate comparison of (1) one company over time and (2) one company
versus other companies. Ratios are used by managers to help improve the firm’s
performance, by lenders to help evaluate the firm’s likelihood of repaying debts, and
by stockholders to help forecast future earnings and cash flows.
Mini Case: 3 - 17
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
b. Calculate the 2014 current and quick ratios based on the projected balance sheet
and income statement data. What can you say about the company’s liquidity
position in 2012, 2013, and as projected for 2014? We often think of ratios as
being useful (1) to managers to help run the business, (2) to bankers for credit
analysis, and (3) to stockholders for stock valuation. Would these different types
of analysts have an equal interest in the liquidity ratios?
The company’s current and quick ratios are higher relative to its 2012 current and
quick ratios; they have improved from their 2013 levels. Both ratios are below the
industry average, however.
Mini Case: 3 - 18
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
c. Calculate the 2014 inventory turnover, days sales outstanding (DSO), fixed assets
turnover, and total assets turnover. How does Computron’s utilization of assets
stack up against other firms in its industry?
DSO14 = Receivables/(Sales/365)
= $878,000/($7,035,600/365) = 45.5 Days.
The firm’s inventory turnover ratio has declined, while its days sales outstanding
has been steadily increasing. While the firm’s fixed assets turnover ratio is below its
2012 level, it is above the 2013 level. The firm’s total assets turnover ratio is below
its 2012 level and equal to its 2013 level.
The firm’s inventory turnover and total assets turnover are below the industry
average. The firm’s days sales outstanding is above the industry average (which is
bad); however, the firm’s fixed assets turnover is above the industry average. (This
might be due to the fact that Computron is an older firm than most other firms in the
industry, in which case, its fixed assets are older and thus have been depreciated
more, or that Computron’s cost of fixed assets were lower than most firms in the
industry.)
Mini Case: 3 - 19
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
d. Calculate the 2014 debt ratio, liabilities-to-assets ratio, times-interest-earned,
and EBITDA coverage ratios. How does Computron compare with the industry
with respect to financial leverage? What can you conclude from these ratios?
EBITDA Coverage14 =
(EBITDA+ Lease
Payments ) /
The firm’s debt ratio is much improved from 2013, and is still lower than its 2012
level and the industry average. The firm’s TIE and EBITDA coverage ratios are
much improved from their 2012 and 2013 levels. The firm’s TIE is better than the
industry average, but the EBITDA coverage is lower, reflecting the firm’s higher
lease obligations.
e. Calculate the 2014 profit margin, basic earning power (BEP), return on assets
(ROA), and return on equity (ROE). What can you say about these ratios?
The firm’s profit margin is above 2012 and 2013 levels and is at the industry
average. The basic earning power, ROA, and ROE ratios are above both 2012 and
2013 levels, but below the industry average due to poor asset utilization.
Mini Case: 3 - 20
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
f. Calculate the 2014 price/earnings ratio, price/cash flow ratios, and market/book
ratio. Do these ratios indicate that investors are expected to have a high or low
opinion of the company?
Both the P/E ratio and BVPS are above the 2012 and 2013 levels but below the
industry average.
g. Perform a common size analysis and percent change analysis. What do these
analyses tell you about Computron?
Answer: For the common size balance sheets, divide all items in a year by the total assets for
that year. For the common size income statements, divide all items in a year by the
sales in that year.
Mini Case: 3 - 21
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Common Size Balance Sheets
Assets
2012 2013 2014e Ind.
Cash 0.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3%
Short Term Investments 3.3% 0.7% 2.0% 0.3%
Accounts Receivable 23.9% 21.9% 25.0% 22.4%
Inventories 48.7% 44.6% 48.8% 41.2%
Total Current Assets 76.5% 67.4% 76.2% 64.1%
Gross Fixed Assets 33.4% 41.7% 34.7% 53.9%
Less Accumulated Depreciation 10.0% 9.1% 10.9% 18.0%
Net Fixed Assets 23.5% 32.6% 23.8% 35.9%
Total Assets 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Mini Case: 3 - 22
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
Computron has higher proportion of inventory and current assets than
industry. Computron has slightly more equity (which means less debt) than industry.
Computron has more short-term debt than industry, but less long-term debt than
industry. Computron has lower COGS than industry, but higher other expenses.
Result is that Computron has similar EBIT as industry.
For the percent change analysis, divide all items in a row by the value in the first
year of the analysis.
Mini Case: 3 - 23
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
We see that 2014 sales grew 105% from 2012, and that NI grew 188% from 2013.
So Computron has become more profitable. We see that total assets grew at a rate of
139%, while sales grew at a rate of only 105%. So asset utilization remains a
problem.
Strengths: The firm’s fixed assets turnover was above the industry average.
However, if the firm’s assets were older than other firms in its industry this could
possibly account for the higher ratio. (Computron’s fixed assets would have a lower
historical cost and would have been depreciated for longer periods of time.) The
firm’s profit margin is slightly above the industry average, despite its higher debt
ratio. This would indicate that the firm has kept costs down, but, again, this could be
related to lower depreciation costs.
Weaknesses: The firm’s liquidity ratios are low; most of its asset management ratios
are poor (except fixed assets turnover); its debt management ratios are poor, most of
its profitability ratios are low (except profit margin); and its market value ratios are
low.
i. What are some potential problems and limitations of financial ratio analysis?
1. Comparison with industry averages is difficult if the firm operates many different
divisions.
Mini Case: 3 - 24
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.
5. “Average” performance is not necessarily good.
7. “Window dressing” techniques can make statements and ratios look better.
j. What are some qualitative factors analysts should consider when evaluating a
company’s likely future financial performance?
Answer: Top analysts recognize that certain qualitative factors must be considered when
evaluating a company. These factors, as summarized by the American Association Of
Individual Investors (AAII), are as follows:
2. To what extent are the company’s revenues tied to one key product?
5. Competition
6. Future prospects
Mini Case: 3 - 25
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.