Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    Excel

    Uploaded by

    leona
    The regression analysis found a strong positive correlation (R-Square of 0.989515) between variables X1, X2, and X3 and the variable Y based on data from 6 banks. Variable X3 measuring number of employees had the largest effect size and lowest p-value in predicting Y, which represents customer traffic. The normal probability plot showed the data closely followed a normal distribution, meeting the assumptions of the linear regression model.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Excel

    Uploaded by

    leona
    22 views6 pages
    The regression analysis found a strong positive correlation (R-Square of 0.989515) between variables X1, X2, and X3 and the variable Y based on data from 6 banks. Variable X3 measuring number of employees had the largest effect size and lowest p-value in predicting Y, which represents customer traffic. The normal probability plot showed the data closely followed a normal distribution, meeting the assumptions of the linear regression model.

    Original Description:

    ui

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The regression analysis found a strong positive correlation (R-Square of 0.989515) between variables X1, X2, and X3 and the variable Y based on data from 6 banks. Variable X3 measuring number of employees had the largest effect size and lowest p-value in predicting Y, which represents customer traffic. The normal probability plot showed the data closely followed a normal distribution, meeting the assumptions of the linear regression model.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    22 views6 pages

    Excel

    Uploaded by

    leona
    The regression analysis found a strong positive correlation (R-Square of 0.989515) between variables X1, X2, and X3 and the variable Y based on data from 6 banks. Variable X3 measuring number of employees had the largest effect size and lowest p-value in predicting Y, which represents customer traffic. The normal probability plot showed the data closely followed a normal distribution, meeting the assumptions of the linear regression model.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    SUMMARY OUTPUT

    Regression Statistics
    Multiple R 0.998309
    R Square 0.99662
    Adjusted R Square -0.0169
    Standard Error 13.92628
    Observations 6

    ANOVA
    df SS MS F Significance F
    Regression 5 57188.75 11437.75 58.97528 #NUM!
    Residual 1 193.9414 193.9414
    Total 6 57382.69

    Coefficients
    Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0%
    Intercept 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
    X1 -0.00386 0.028672 -0.13474 0.914735 -0.368174282 0.3604477326 -0.36817
    X2 0.01189 0.015916 0.747077 0.591527 -0.190340851 0.2141217253 -0.19034
    X3 0.034771 0.101577 0.342316 0.790034 -1.255880998 1.3254235492 -1.25588
    X4 -1.05735 1.227686 -0.86125 0.54737 -16.65657191 14.5418798268 -16.6566
    X5 8.001364 3.712183 2.155434 0.276541 -39.16638811 55.1691167581 -39.1664

    PROBABILITY OUTPUT

    Percentile Y
    8.3333333333 28.6
    25 45.5
    41.6666666667 45.8
    58.3333333333 76.8
    75 91.2
    91.6666666667 195.4
    Upper 95.0%
    #N/A
    0.360448
    0.214122
    1.325424
    14.54188
    55.16912
    SUMMARY OUTPUT

    Regression Statistics Normal P


    Multiple R 0.994744 250
    R Square 0.989515 200
    Adjusted R 0.973788 150
    100

    Y
    Standard E 9.835458
    50
    Observatio 6 0
    0 10 20 3
    ANOVA
    df SS MS F Significance F
    Regression 3 18259.4 6086.468 62.91818 0.015686
    Residual 2 193.4725 96.73623
    Total 5 18452.88

    Coefficients
    Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
    Lower 95,0%
    Upper 95,0%
    Intercept 8.901781 6.741018 1.32054 0.317514 -20.1025 37.90604 -20.1025 37.90604
    X1 0.006441 0.019469 0.330846 0.772207 -0.07733 0.09021 -0.07733 0.09021
    X2 0.004689 0.010673 0.439331 0.703331 -0.04123 0.050611 -0.04123 0.050611
    X3 5.385732 1.74206 3.091588 0.090627 -2.10975 12.88121 -2.10975 12.88121

    PROBABILITY OUTPUT

    Percentile Y
    8.333333 28.6
    25 45.5
    41.66667 45.8
    58.33333 76.8
    75 91.2
    91.66667 195.4
    Normal Probability Plot
    250
    200
    150
    100
    Y

    50
    0
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
    Sample Percentile
    Tarikan Pergerakan Luas Dasar Bangunan Luas Lantai Bangunan
    NAMA BANK (smp/jam) (m2) (m2)
    Y X1 X2
    KC BNI SURAKARTA 45.5 1218 1218
    KC BRI SURAKARTA 76.8 3293 5396
    KC BTN SURAKARTA 28.6 540 1600
    KC BANK MANDIRI SURAKARTA 91.2 1994 2519
    KC BANK BUKOPIN SURAKARTA 45.8 1220 1889
    KCU BANK BCA SURAKARTA 195.4 6002 8922
    Jumlah Karyawan Jumlah Konter Pelayanan Jumlah ATM
    (orang) (buah) (buah)
    X3 X4 X5
    6 8 6 120
    4 7 4 67
    2 4 2 64
    9 10 9 37
    3 9 3 130
    20 49 20 158

    You might also like