Reading Lesson
Reading Lesson
Grade Level: Kindergarten Content Area: Reading, Writing & Communicating and Comprehensive Health/Physical Education
Lesson Idea/Topic and Rational/Relevance: Students will work on recognizing word sounds, blending them, and writing
CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) words to build their phonemic awareness skills. This will assess their receptive
communication abilities to follow multiple directions and their expressive communication abilities to articulate phonemic
sounds of letters, and to blend those sounds together in the form of words.
Student Profile: During the leveled reading group portion of the day, students from all four kindergarten classrooms are split
into different groups based on their DRA (Developmental Reading Assessment) reading levels and the scores on their DIBELS
reading assessments. In Megan Hampton’s classroom, the reading group is made up of 18 students, all at a DRA level of 2. In
this group, we focus instruction on phonemic awareness, decoding words while reading, segmenting words into
sounds/syllables, writing and reading sight words, writing phonemically, and blending sounds into words. This group is the
second lowest reading group in kindergarten, so many lessons need modification, support, and scaffolding based on students’
needs.
Understandings:
Students can:
d. Blend sounds orally to make one-syllable words
e. Segment one-syllable words into sounds
g. Identify the initial, medial, and final phoneme (speech sound) of spoken words
Students can:
a. Demonstrate understanding of spoken words, syllables, and sounds (phonemes). (CCSS: RF.K.2)
ii. Count, pronounce, blend, and segment syllables in spoken words. (CCSS: RF.K.2b)
iv. Isolate and pronounce the initial, medial vowel, and final sounds (phonemes) in three-phoneme (consonant-vowel-consonant,
or CVC) words. (This does not include CVCs ending with /l/, /r/, or /x/.) (CCSS: RF.K.2d)
v. Add or substitute individual sounds (phonemes) in simple, one-syllable words to make new words. (CCSS: RF.K.2e)
vi. Identify phonemes for letters.
Students can:
a. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. (CCSS: L.K.1)
i. Print many upper- and lowercase letters. (CCSS: L.K.1a)
viii. Write left to right and top to bottom
ix. Use appropriate pencil grip
Students can:
b. Follow a simple series of instructions for an activity
Inquiry Questions: (Essential questions relating knowledge at end of the unit of instruction, select applicable questions from standard)
Given a beginning, middle, and end sound of a word, students will demonstrate the ability to recognize letters, articulate the letter sounds, blend
them orally through gross motor movements, and successfully write the words that they form.
List of Assessments: (Write the number of the learning targets associated with each assessment)
3. Students blend each sound by “hopping the word”, or saying each letter sound as they hop on each letter.
4. Students will write each CVC word correctly on their own dry erase board.
Approx. Time and Materials Two, fifteen minute rotations (30 minutes)
Materials:
Laminated letter cards (with CVC letters including endings
like n,t,p, etc.)
Three cutouts of lily pads (one for each letter sound) and
one cutout of a frog
Dry erase boards and markers
Procedures The strategy I intend to use is: Guided practice and independent practice during
the station teaching.
I am using this strategy here because: Since this is a new activity that hasn’t
been implemented before in reading groups, I want to start by modelling the
procedure to students. Then, after guiding them through the steps, I will start
authentically assessing their growth and whether or not they are meeting the
lesson’s objectives as they practice independently.
Students achieved the lesson objectives, including demonstrating the ability to use
accurate sounds with letters, blend sounds orally, segment words into sounds, follow
multiple step directions, identify and count initial/medial/final sounds, write letters
using correct hand grip and form, and substitute sounds to make other words. Many
students exceeded objectives by scaffolding their peers utilizing Zoophonics hand
cues and by decoding CVC words before needing to sound them out.
2. What changes, omissions, or additions to the lesson would you make if you
were to teach again?
If I were to teach this lesson again, I would allocate more time for re-reading the
words formed and written in order to enhance the closure portion of the lesson.
Although each student was able to get a turn to “hop through” a CVC word and blend
the word that they formed, the skills would be reinforced more concretely through
repeated practice. Ideally, giving students the opportunity to practice multiple times
would be the most successful way to improve student growth and achievement.
Initially, this lesson did not include the frog or lily pad cut outs, but after introducing
the activity to students, I wanted to increase student interest and engagement.
Incorporating these child-centered aspects of the lesson led to increases in student
interest and participation.
3. What do you envision for the next lesson? (Continued practice, reteach content,
etc.)
In the next lesson, continued practice is necessary to reinforce the content and skills
learned in this lesson. The reading groups portion of the day is helpful because it
allows for extensive focus on re-teaching, practicing, and authentically assessing for
students’ needs. Because of this, this lesson can be reintroduced for future reading
group rotations. Additionally, if students start to lose engagement with the activity, the
same content can be incorporated into a different format to help students continue to
feel excited and motivated to participate.
4. If you used co-teaching, would you use the same co-teaching strategy for this
lesson if you were to teach it again? Were there additional co-teaching
strategies used during the lesson not planned for initially? Please explain.
Since the station teaching model is the co-teaching format used every day in reading
groups, I would choose to use the station teaching model again. This co-teaching model
is helpful because it allows for teachers to integrate many different content areas into
the lesson format, permits the time for more one-on-one modification and
differentiation of the content, and provides the opportunity for authentic assessment of
student skills and growth.