Washing Insulators
Washing Insulators
Washing through Mathematical Modeling of w,. is the coefficient of the negative pollution. If the
Pollution Deposits rainfall is O[mm], then p - ( k ) = p ( k - 1) because of
3.1 Data Acquisition no natural washing. T h e pollution deposit p ( k ) is
described as
Actual d a t a of the pollution deposit, the decision
malting of t,he washing and t,he weather conditions +
P ( k ) = P + ( k ) P- (IC) + e ( k ) (3)
were acquired during the period of September 1st where e ( k ) is modeling error at, k .
1993 to October 31st 1993 at Karatsu substation of 3.3 Automatic Decision Making of Insulator
Saga prefecture in Japan. Karatsu substation is just, Washing
one kilometer range from the sea and it, is one of the The discriminant analysis is adopted to the auto-
badly hit substations from salty winds. T h e records matic decision making of the insulator washing[9].
of pollution deposits were taken from the instrument Probability of the insulator washing is used for
called 'salt meter' which had a pilot insulator and the discriminant function of the decision making.
a special chamber t o measure the leakage current T h e probability is determined by use of the multi-
of the insulators at a constant humidity and damp dimensional normal distribution.
condition. T h e available d a t a are, average wind ve- Two groups for discrimination are set as G A and
locity [m/s], wind direction (16 directions), accumu- Gg and the factors are z = ( X I ,z2, . . . , z ~ ) The~ .
lated rainfa.11 [mm/h], mean temperature ["C] and group Gi ( i = A , B ) are cha.racterized by generation
humidity [%I in hourly basis, and poliution depositss rate pi and probability density funct,ion fi(z) whose
[mg/cm2] c.ollect,ed every 2 hours for day and every 3 population mean is pi and popuhtion variance ma.-
hours for night a.t normal winds a.nd every 1 hour at trix is &. T h e probability ~ A ( z ) where the sample
the time of strong winds. Figure 1 shows the pollu- z belongs to G A ,is in proportional t o ~ A ~ A ( z then
) ,
tion deposit) (bar), decision making (+), rainfall and the probability ~ A ( z ) is calculated as
wind velocit,y during t8heperiod of September 1993
at Karatsu substa.tion.
3.2 Mathematical Modeling of Pollution De- T h e discriminant, func.tion is defined by the proba.-
posits bilit,y ~ A ( z ) , then t,he decision is made by
The pollut,ioii deposit p ( k ) was modeled as the E (;A, g A ( z ) >
addition of t,wo sepa.ra.tely identified components of
positive pollution deposit p+( k ) and nega.tive pollu-
{ :E E G B , otherwise (5)
where X is a. threshold va.lue. The multi-dimensional
tjion deposit, p - ( k ) [ 6 , 71. As the pollution at, rainy norma.1 dist,ribut,ion is a.dopted for t,he proba.bility
conditions a.re a combina.t,ion of t,he negative effect, densit,y function fi(z) as
due to ra.infal1 and t8hepositrive effect caused by wind,
it, wa.s understood that t8he phenomenon of positive
pollut,ion has t,o be fully identified first,, and then the T
(z- p i ) , i = A , B .
-1
dat,a. with the effect of ra.infal1 should be dealt, with. Qi (z- p i )
T h e positjive polliit,ion deposit, is proportional to In calculation of (4), the generation ra.t,epi, t,he pop-
t,he summation of the t8hird power of wind velocity ulat,ion mean pi and the population variance matrix
as Ci a.re estima.t,ed by tshese sa.mple values. Then, the
a.ut,oma.tic decision is made according t o (5).
- 20
2.$ 15
-52
0 10
5
g o 911 5 10 20 25 30
l5 [date]
Fig. 1. Pollution deposit (bar), decision making (+), rainfall and wind velocity during the period of Septem-
ber 1993 at Karatsu substation of Saga prefecture in Japan.
time of the measurements of the pollution deposits ahead prediction of the pollution deposits. T h e n ,
was set a.s 1 day because the measurement interval for the decision making d a t a (19 times), the mean
of 2 or 3 hours was too short to observe the changes was 4 . 6 1 6 9 ~ 10-3[mg/cm2] and the sta.nda.rd devi-
of the pollution deposits especially at normal con- ation was 2.2287x10-'[mg/cm2], for the no de-
ditions. T h e pollution deposits at 23 o'clock were cision making d a t a (598 t,imes), the mean was
used a.s the day's mea.surement, and the wind veloc- 2 . 6 6 1 2 ~10-3[mg/cm2] a.nd t8he standard deviation
it8ies were c.onsidered only from seashore (upper di- was 1 . 3 0 2 8 10-3[mg/c~n2]l.
~ T h e results shows t h a t
rections from NW t o SE). First, we extract the d a t a the decision makings were done when the predic-
of no decision making (44 days) a n d the coefficient tions of the pollution deposits were rat,her high
,wTjwa.s calculated by using the d a t a of no rainfall compared with those of no decision making. T h e
(31days). T h e n , the coefficient w,.was calculated by mean and the standa.rd deviation of the pollution de-
using the d a t a of rainfall. To estimate the coeffi- posits of the decision making time were calculated as
cient 'IU,., the d a t a of which accumulated rainfall of a 4 . 2 6 3 2 ~10-'[mg/cm2] and 2 . 1 1 7 2 ~ 1 0 - ~ [ m g / c m ~ ] ,
c1a.y is great,er t,han l[mm] are used (13 days) because respectively. As a. result,, the decision rna.ltings were
t,here are few effect for natural washing when the ac- done when the pollution deposits became increa.sed
cumulated rainfall in a day is I["]. T h e estimated and the dangerous situa.tions were predictmed.
coefficients were w, = 1.2649 and TU,. = 0.2077. Finally, automatic decision making wa.s ca.rried
To assure the effectiveness of the proposed model, out by use of the proposed method. T h e fa.ctJorfor
t8he prediction of the pollution deposits were car- the automatic decision malting in (5) was z ( k ) =
ried out at every measurement d a t a of the pollu- (jj(k+2),exp(-1/1--141)/14). Here, @ ( k + 2 ) is the 2
t,ion deposits. To predict the pollution deposits, hours ahead prediction of t,he pollution deposits by
we a.ssumed that, the weather condition did not using the model (3) where the wind velocity, wind
change until next measurement time. We com- direction and rainfall were assumed t o be kept as 2
pared the proposed model with another simple model hours and the factor exp(-lk - 141)/14) wa.s intro-
whose prediction kept the pollution deposit until duced because almost a.11 decision were ma.& at 14
next measurement. T h e root mean squares error o'clock (13 times), 3 times of decision malting were
were 1 . 8 0 l0-'[mg/cm2]
~ for the proposed model a.t 17 o'clock and the last times of 3 decision mak-
and 1 . 9 3 1O-'[mg/cm2]
~ for the simple predictmion ings were 0, 7 a.nd 21 o'clock. T h e proba.bility of the
method a.nd the results shows the effectiveness of the decision making g A ( z ) was calcuhted by using (4).
proposed model. Figure 2 shows the proba.bility and the predictions
Next,, t,he decision making d a t a and no deci- of the pollution deposits. T h e result, of the a . u t o
sion making data. were compared by the 2 hours inatic decision malting (5) when the threshold value
410
11 + +t+ ' + + ++ + + t + + + + + Japanese).
Electric Joint Research, vol. 35, no. 3 (1979) (in
Japanese).
Y. Higashimori: Insuhtor Contamination due
to Typhoons and Shehering Effects of Topo-
graphical Environments, Trans. of IEE Japan,
vol. 110-B, no. 11 (1990) (in Japanese).
Y. Higashimori: Rapid Salt Contamination of
3 ' dog tjhe Insulator Surfa.ce by Typhoons, Trans. of
'0 100 200 300 400, 500 600 IEE Japan, vol. 113-B, no. 2 (1993) (in
Number of measurement [tunes]
.Japanese).
Fig. 2. Probability of the decision malting, actual N . Nanaya.kkara., M. Nakamura, S. Goto and
decision making (+) and the 2 ahead prediction of T. Tmiguchi: Modeling and Prediction of Rapid
the pollution deposits at Karatsu substation Pollution of Insulators in Substations Ba.sed on
Weather Information, Proceedings of the 1994
Korean Automatic. Control Conference (1994).
T. Sensyu, et al: Analysis of the Relation be-
tween Salt Pollution for Insulators and trhe Me-
teorological Conditions, Power Research Insti-
tute Report, no. 73020 (1973) (in .Japanese).
Total Wash Det. Corr. Fault Miss T. Sensyu, et al: On the Estimation of Max-
617 19 25 10 9 15 imum Density of Sea Salt Deposition on the
52.6% 47.4% 2.4% Insulators, Power Research Institut,e Report,
no. 73056 (1974) (in Japanese).
S. Gotso, M. Na.ltamura., N . Nanayakkara.,
X = 0.165 is shown in Table 1. T h e percentage of the T . Mat,sunaga. and T. Ta.niguchi: Automatic
correct decision making (52.6 %) is not, so high and Decision Making of Washing the Ra.pid Pol-
it caused by the safety side of the human decision lutjed Insulators in Substations, Proceedings of
ma.king. T h e pollution deposits of the 9 fault detec- t,he 26th ISCIE Intjernationa.l Symposium on
tion data. are equal or less than 0.0031[mg/cm2] and Sttoc,ha.stic Systems Theory a.nd It,s Applica-
it is not, fatal error for t,he decision making of the t8ions,pp. 167-171 (1995)
insulator washing. S. Got,o, M. Naltamura., N . Nanaya.kkara and
T. Ta.niguchi: Automat,ization of Human Deci-
5 . Conclusion sion Ma.lting for Washing Time of Polluted In-
A niet,hod of automatic decision making for wasli- s u h t o r s in Substat,ions, Proceedings of the 34th
ing the polluted insulators in substations near coa.sta1 SICE Annual Conference (1995)
area.s was developed. The automatization was based T. Oltuno, H. Kume, T. Haga and T. Yoshizawa,
on t,he modeling of the polliit,ion depositss and the Mult8ivaria.ble Analysis Method, pp. 273-302,
discriminant a.nalysis by using the multi-dimensional Nikka.giren (1971) (in .Japanese).
norma.1 distribution. T h e proposed method was ap-
plied t,o the actual da.ta of t8he 1Cara.tsu substation
and over SO[%] of human decisions were correctly de-
tec,ted with the proposed automatic decision making
process. T h e future problem is t,o increa.se the per-
centage of t8hecorrect, detection a.nd to decrea.se t,he
miss det,ect,ion.
Acknowledgnent
T h e authors a.re grat,eful t,o engineers in Sa.ga,
bra.nch of Kyushu Elect,ric Power Compa.ny for t,heir
cominent,s and dat>a.a.cquisit8ion.
References
[l] Elect>ric.Joint, Resea.rch, vol. 20, no. 2 (1964) (in
411