NWRB Pampanga River Basin

NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES BOARD
THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
THE STUDY
ON
INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
FOR
POVERTY ALLEVIATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
IN
THE PAMPANGA RIVER BASIN
IN
THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
FINAL REPORT
VOLUME IV: SUPPORTING REPORTS
JANUARY 2011
JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY
CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.

in association with
NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD.
Composition of Final Report
Volume I: Summary
Volume II: Main Report
Volume III: Supporting Reports
Sector A: Topography and Meteo-Hydrology
Sector B: Socio-Economy
Sector C: Agricultural and Fishery Water Management
Sector D: Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage System
Management
Sector E: Flood and Sediment Disaster Management
Sector F: Water-related Environmental Management
Sector G: Watershed Management
Sector H: Water Resources Development and Management
Volume IV: Supporting Reports
Sector I: Socio-Environmental Consideration
Sector J: Guideline for Formulation of IWRM Plan
Sector K: Formulation of IWRM Plan
Sector L: Plans for Legal and Institutional Framework
Sector M: Water-related Data Management
Appendix: Minutes and Discussion Records on SC, TWG and Stakeholder
Meetings
Exchange Rate used in the Report is:

PHP 1.00 = US$ 0.0217 = JP¥ 1.934
US$ 1.00 = PhP 46.15 = JP¥ 89.25
(as of 31st December 2009)
Sector I
Environmental and Social Considerations on
Programs and Projects of IWRM Plan
Sector I. Environmental and Social Considerations
on Programs and Projects of IWRM Plan
Table of Contents
Pages
I.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. I-1
I.2 Existing Legislation and Legal Systems governing Environmental and Social
Consideration in Philippines ............................................................................................. I-2
I.2.1 Current Overall Legal Framework .......................................................................... I-2
I.2.1.1 Environmental Impact Statement System, Presidential Decree No. 1586
(1978) .......................................................................................................... I-2
I.2.1.2 Presidential Proclamation No. 2146 (1981) and No. 803(1996) ................. I-2
I.2.1.3 DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of 2003 (DAO 03-30),
Revised Procedural Manual (2007) ............................................................. I-2
I.2.1.4 Recent Issued Memorandum Circulars (MCs) Relevant to PEISS.............. I-2
I.2.2 Procedures of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ........................................ I-2
I.2.2.1 Projects Covered by PEISS ......................................................................... I-3
I.2.2.2 Responsible Government Institutions for PEISS......................................... I-5
I.2.2.3 Required Documents by PEISS ................................................................... I-5
I.2.2.4 Outlines of Required Documents by PEISS ................................................ I-7
I.2.2.5 Public Participation in EIA Process ........................................................... I-15
I.2.3 Laws, Regulations and Guidelines Concerning Land Acquisition and
Involuntary Resettlement ...................................................................................... I-16
I.2.3.1 Guidelines for the Acquisition of Certain Parcels of Private Land
Intended for Public Use Including the Right-of-Way Easement of
Several Public Infrastructure Projects, Administrative Order No. 50
(1999) ........................................................................................................ I-16
I.2.3.2 An Act to Facilitate the Acquisition of Right-of-Way, Site or Location
for National Government Infrastructure Projects and for other Purposes,
Republic Act 8974 (2000).......................................................................... I-16
I.2.3.3 The Agricultural Land Reform Code, Republic Act 6389 (1971) ............. I-16
I.2.3.4 Executive Order 1035 (1985) .................................................................... I-16
I.2.3.5 Presidential Decree No. 1533 (1978) ........................................................ I-16
I.2.3.6 Urban Development and Housing Act, Republic Act 7279 (1992) ........... I-16
I.2.3.7 Instituting the National Drive to Suppress and eradicate Professional
Squatters and Squatting Syndicates, Executive Order No.153 (1999) ...... I-17
I.2.3.8 Executive order No.228 (1987) ................................................................. I-17
I.2.3.9 Relevant Guidelines................................................................................... I-17
I.2.4 Laws and Regulations Concerning the Environmental Standards and Social
Aspects .................................................................................................................. I-17
I.2.4.1 Environment Code, Presidential Decree No. 1152 .................................... I-17
I.2.4.2 Water Code, Presidential Decree No. 1067 ............................................... I-17
I.2.4.3 Clean Water Act, Republic Act 9275 ......................................................... I-17
I.2.4.4 Clean Air Act of 1999, Republic Act No. 8749 ......................................... I-17
I.2.4.5 Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, Republic Act No. 9003
(2000) ........................................................................................................ I-18
i
I.2.4.6Pollution Control Law, Presidential Decree No. 984 ................................ I-18
I.2.4.7Forestry Reform Code, Presidential Decree No. 705 ................................ I-18
I.2.4.8National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS), Republic Act No.
7586 ........................................................................................................... I-18
I.2.4.9 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act, Republic Act No. 8731 ........................... I-18
I.3 Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Environmental and Social Impacts ........................ I-19
I.3.1 Outline of the Programs and Projects in IWRM Plan ........................................... I-19
I.3.2 Identification of the Projects covered by PEISS ................................................... I-19
I.3.3 Alternative Options for the Conceptual Projects Categorized as
Environmentally Critical Project under PEISS ..................................................... I-20
I.3.4 Screening and Scoping of the Programs and Projects based on the JICA
Guidelines for Environmental and Social Considerations .................................... I-21
I.3.5 Result of Initial Screening and Scoping of the Programs and Projects in IWRM
Plan ....................................................................................................................... I-21
I.3.6 Scoping Results and Proposed Mitigation Measures ............................................ I-21
I.3.5 Result of Initial Screening and Scoping of the Programs and Projects in IWRM
Plan ....................................................................................................................... I-21
I.3.6 Scoping Results and Proposed Mitigation Measures ............................................ I-22
I.3.6.1 Significant adverse impacts (A-) ............................................................... I-22
I.3.6.2 Less significant adverse impacts (B-) ........................................................ I-23
I.4 Identification of the necessary monitoring items during the project cycles ..................... I-27
I.4.1 Construction phase ................................................................................................ I-27
I.4.2 Operation phase .................................................................................................... I-27
I.4.3 Throughout the project cycles ............................................................................... I-28
I.5 Important Notice on Implementation of the Projects ........................................................ I-29
List of Tables
List of Tables in Report
Table I.2.2.1 Summary of Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs) ........................................ I-4

Table I.2.2.2 Summary of Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)............................................ I-4
Table I. 2.2.3 Project Groups for EIA under PEISS ..................................................................... I-5
Table I. 2.2.4 Summary of Project Groups, EIA Report Types, Decision Documents,
Deciding Authorities and Processing Duration ...................................................... I-7
Table I. 3.1.1 Number of Proposed and Conceptual Projects under IWRM Plan ...................... I-19
Table I. 3.2.1 Proposed and Conceptual Programs and Projects in IWRM Plan Covered by
PEISS ................................................................................................................... I-19
Table I. 3.3.1 Alternative Options for Conceptual Projects Categorized
as Environmentally Critical Projects ................................................................... I-20
Table I. 3.4.1 Proposed and Conceptual Programs and Project in IWRM Plan with Possible
Negative Environment Impacts Identified in Initial Screening Process .............. I-22
Table I. 3.4.2 Details, Timing of Occurrence and Mitigation Measures for Significant
Adverse Impacts (A-)........................................................................................... I-23
Table I. 3.4.3 Details, Timing of Occurrence and Mitigation Measures for Less Significant
Adverse Impacts (B-) ........................................................................................... I-23
ii
Table I. 3.5.1 Recommended Monitoring Measures of Environmental Parameters at
Construction Phase .............................................................................................. I-27
Table I. 3.5.2 Recommended Monitoring Measures of Environmental Parameters at
Operation Phase ................................................................................................... I-28
List of Annex Tables
Annex-T I.2.2.1 Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Types for
New Single & Co-Located Projects .............................................................IT-1
Annex-T I.2.2.2 Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Types for
New Single Co-Located Projects .................................................................IT-3
Annex-T I.3.1.1 Outlines of Proposed and Conceptual Projects and Programs of
IWRM Plan ................................................................................................IT-18
Annex-T I.3.4.1 Summary of Environmental Scoping for Projects and Programs of
IWRM Plan ................................................................................................IT-25
List of Figures
List of Figures in Report
Figure I. 2.2.1 Summary Flowchart of EIA Process ...................................................................... I-3
List of Annex Figures
Annex-F I.2.2.1 Potential ECAs in Region III ...................................................................... IF-1

Annex-F I.2.2.2 Organization chart of DENR ...................................................................... IF-2
Annex-F I.2.2.3 Organization chart of EMB ......................................................................... IF-3
iii
Sector I: Environmental and Social Considerations
on Programs and Projects of the IWRM Plan
Sector I. Environmental and Social Considerations on

Programs and Projects of the IWRM Plan
I.1 Introduction
The IWRM Plan prepared during the present study is consist of six (6) sectors including 18 proposed
and 30 conceptual programs and projects1, which cover multi-sectoral fields, such as agricultural and
irrigation development, municipality water supply, sanitation, sewerage, flood and disaster
management, watershed management, water related environment management, and water resource
management to support the Government of Philippines in managing water resources in a sustainable
manner.
In order to assess if the implementation of any of the proposed programs and projects would create
any adverse impacts on natural and social environments in the localities, the Study Team conducted a
simple initial environmental examination (IEE) of the proposed projects by using screening and
scoping methods. In addition, the present legislative and institutional framework governing
environmental assessment in the country was also reviewed. The results of the simple IEE are
summarized in the following sections.
1
The proposed programs and projects are planned by the relevant government agency, while the conceptual programs and
projects are proposed by the Study Team and subjects for further revision to determine the project components. Basically, the
programs and projects in the IWRM Plan have been prepared in consultation with the stakeholders in the course of the Study.
I-1
I.2 Existing Legislation and Legal Systems governing Environmental

and Social Consideration in Philippines
I.2.1 Current Overall Legal Framework
In Philippines, any private or public projects or activities which are envisaged to have a negative
impact on the environment are subjects of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) by Philippine
Environmental Impact Statement System (PEISS). EIA is the preliminary analysis of the potential
impacts of the project on the environment. Aware of the possible negative effects of the
implementation of industrial and other activities, the government had instituted measures to encourage
the use of EIA as a planning and decision making tool.
PEISS is a set of laws, regulations, administrative orders and guidelines for EIA. Among them some of
the most important laws and guidelines are listed below.
I.2.1.1 Environmental Impact Statement System, Presidential Decree No. 1586 (1978)
An act establishing and centralizing the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System under the
National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC), which merged with the National Pollution
Control Commission (NPCC) in June 1987 to become the Environmental Management Bureau
(EMB).
I.2.1.2 Presidential Proclamation No. 2146 (1981) and No. 803(1996)
It proclaims Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs) to have significant impacts on the quality of the
environment and Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs) as environmentally fragile areas within the
scope of the EIS System.
I.2.1.3 DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of 2003 (DAO 03-30), Revised Procedural
Manual (2007)
It provides implementing rules and regulations of Presidential Decree No. 1586, establishing the
Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System (PEISS). Also, detailed information in definitions
of technical terms, procedures, related laws and regulations are described.
I.2.1.4 Recent Issued Memorandum Circulars (MCs) Relevant to PEISS
(1) MC No. 2010-14, Standardization of Requirements and Enhancement of Public
Participation in the Streamlined Implementation of the Philippine EIS System
It prescribes streamlined procedures of PEISS, especially for application of ECC
(Environmental Compliance Certificate) and CNC (Certificate of Non-Coverage) with the
outlines of the relevant EIA reports and CNC application form required.
(2) MC No. 2010-002, Clarification to DENR MC No.2010-14 and Other EIS System Policy
Issuances
It clarifies the outlines of EIA reports described in MC No.2010-14 for the relevant report
types defined by DAO 03-30 Revised Procedural Manual as well as exemption of the certain
projects from securing ECC regardless their location.
I.2.2 Procedures of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
The procedures of EIA can be grouped into; pre-study stage (screening and scoping), EIA study stage
and the post-study stage (review, decision-making and monitoring) as shown in the following diagram.
I-2
Project
EIA Required No EIA

Pre-Study Stage
EIA Study Scoping
EIA Study/ Report Preparation

EIA Study Stage by the Project Proponent as
a requirement for ECC application
Change of
Public Involvement
Project Review and Evaluation of EIA
plan/ facilitated by DENR-EMB
Relocation
Issuance of ECC w/ recommendations to

Denial of ECC
other entitles w/ mandate on the project
Post-Study Stage
Secure necessary permits / clearances from other EMB

Divisions, DENR Bureaus, other GAs and LGUs
Expansion/Project modifications Implementation
Environmental Impact Monitoring and Evaluation/Audit

Legend:
Proponent driven
DENR-EMB driven
Proponent driven but the EIA process as
requirements are under the mandate of
other entities
Source: Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of 2003 (DAO 03-30)(2007)
Figure I. 2.2.1 Summary Flowchart of EIA Process
I.2.2.1 Projects Covered by PEISS

Projects which have been originally declared as Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs) or projects
in Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs) are assumed to have significant impacts on the quality of
the environment, and to be subjects of PEISS. The four (4) ECP project types and twelve (12) ECA
categories have been declared through Proclamation No. 2146 (1981) and Proclamation No. 803
(1996), as summarized Table I.2.2.1 and 2.2.2, respectively.
I-3
Table I.2.2.1 Summary of Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs)
Main Categories Sub-Category
A. Golf Course Project - Golf course projects/complex
- Iron and Steel Metals
- Non-ferrous Metal Industries
B. Heavy Industries
- Petroleum and Petrochemical Industries
- Smelting Plants
- Fishery Projects-dikes for/and fishpond development projects
C. Resource Extractive Industries - Forestry Projects
- Major mining and quarrying projects
- Major Dams
- Major Reclamation Projects
D. Infrastructure Projects
- Major Power Plants (Proc No. 2146 declared types: fossil-fueled, nuclear
fueled, hydroelectric or geothermal)
Table I.2.2.2 Summary of Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)

ECA Categories Examples
A. Areas declared by law as national
Areas of the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS)
parks, watershed reserves, wildlife
preserves, and sanctuaries
B. Areas set aside as aesthetic, potential Areas declared and reserved by the Department of Tourism or other
tourist spots authorities for tourism development
C. Areas which constitute the habitat for
Areas inhabited by indeterminate species, threatened species, rare species,
any endangered or threatened species
endangered species, such species categolized as Appendix I or II of CITES
of indigenous Philippine wildlife
as well as listed in the The National List of Threatened Fauna
(flora and fauna)
- National historical landmarks, geological monuments, paleontological
D. Areas of unique historic, and anthropological reservations as designated or determined by the
archeological, geological, or scientific National Historical Institute, National Museum, National Commission
interests for Culture and the Arts, National Commission on Geological Sciences,
and other authorities
E. Areas which are traditionally
- Areas that are occupied or claimed as Certificated Ancestral
occupied by cultural communities or
Domains/Lands by indigenous communities
tribes
-
Areas frequently visited or hard-hit by typhoons
-
Areas frequently visited or hard-hit by tsunamis
F. Areas frequently visited and or -
Areas frequently visited or hard hit by earthquakes
hard-hit by natural calamities -
Storm surge-prone areas
(geologic hazards, floods, typhoons, -
Flood-prone areas
volcanic activity, etc. -
Areas prone to volcanic activities
-
Areas located along fault lines or within fault zones
-
Drought-prone areas
-
Lands with slope of 50% or more
G. Areas with critical slope
-
Alienable and disposable forest lands and unclassified forests
-
Irrigated and irrigable areas and other areas mapped under the Network
H. Areas classified as prime agricultural
of Protected Areas for Agriculture (NPAA) of the Bureau of Soils and
lands
Water Management (BSWM)
I. Recharged areas of aquifers - Areas of sources of water replenishment
- Areas that are tapped for domestic purposes
J. Water bodies
- Areas which support wildlife and fishery activities
- Tidal areas covered by salt-tolerant, intertidal tree species
K. Mangrove Areas
- Areas declared as mangrove swamp forest reserves
- Areas characterized by the assemblage of different types of marine
plants and organisms
L. Coral Reefs
- Areas identified by local sources such as PAWB-DENR to be rich in
corals.
Source: Compiled by the Study Team based on Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of
2003 (DAO 03-30)(2007)
I-4
Since the official GIS data of ECAs is under preparation according to EMB2, the Study Team prepared
the map of the potential ECAs located in Region 3 as shown in Annex- F I.2.2.1.based on the available
GIS data referred to Annex-T.I.2.2.1.
I.2.2.2 Responsible Government Institutions for PEISS
The review and supervision of PEISS are conducted by the Environmental Management Bureau
(EMB), Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). The respective organization
charts of DENR and EMB are shown in Annex-F I.2.2.2 and 2.2.3, respectively.
DENR is the government entity which is mandated to handle issues related to following five tasks as
described in the legislations concerned:
Assure the availability and sustainability of the country's natural resources through judicious use and
systematic restoration or replacement, whenever possible;
Increase the productivity of natural resources in order to meet the demands for forest, mineral, and
land resources of a growing population;
Enhance the contribution of natural resources for achieving national economic and social
development;
Promote equitable access to natural resources by the different sectors of the population; and
Conserve specific terrestrial and marine areas representative of the Philippine natural and cultural
heritage for present and future generations.
Under the framework of PEISS, EMB is responsible for the issuance of decision making documents
such as Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC), Certificate of Non-Coverage (CNC) and Denial
Letter. Also, EMB Regional Offices in respective regions are primary responsible for the consultation
and supervision of development projects.
I.2.2.3 Required Documents by PEISS
To help identifying required documents under PEISS for consultation and decision making by EMB -
DENR, the projects are classified into five major groups as shown in Annex-T I.2.2.2 and summarized
below.
Table I. 2.2.3 Project Groups for EIA under PEISS
Groups Type and location of the project
ECPs in either ECAs or NECAs (Environmentally Critical Projects in either Environmentally
Group I
Critical Areas or Non-Environmentally Critical Areas)
Group II NECPs in ECAs (Non-Environmentally Critical Projects in Environmentally Critical Areas)
NECPs in NECAs (Non-Environmentally Critical Projects in Non-Environmentally Critical
Group III
Areas)
Group IV Co-located Projects in either ECA or NECA
Group V Unclassified Projects
EIA-covered projects listed above require either of follows depending on the project type, location,
magnitude of potential impacts and project threshold.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
Programmatic EIS (PEIS),
Initial Environmental Examination Report (IEER),
IEE Checklist (IEEC),
Environmental Performance Report and Management Plan (EPRMP),
2
Although the MC No.2010-004 prescribes the guidelines for use of screening and ECA map systems, the ECA map has not
been completed yet according to the EMB staff.
I-5
Programmatic Environmental Performance Report and Management Plan (PEPRMP), or
Application form to be processed in the Automated Processing System (APS)3.
All documents should be prepared by the project proponent to be submitted together with the
following information to the EMB Central Office or the Environmental Impact Assessment Division in
respective EMB Regional Office:
Proof of compatibility with the existing land use plan, if necessary,
Proof of ownership or authority over the project site,
Accountability Statements of the proponent and the EIS preparers,
Photographs or plates of the project site, impact areas an affected areas and communities,
Duly Accomplished Project Environmental Monitoring and Audit Prioritization Scheme (PEMAPS)4
Questionnaire,
Copy of Previous ECC (if any), and
Latest Self Monitoring Report(SMR) 5 (if with previous ECC, Compliance Monitoring Report
(CMR)Format6).
The above information also can be included or attached to the respective EIA report. Then, the
decision documents may either be an ECC, CNC or a Denial Letter, described as follows.
Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)
An ECC is issued as a certificate of Environmental Compliance Commitment to which the
proponent conforms with after DENR-EMB explains the ECC conditions.
Certificate of Non-Coverage (CNC)
A CNC certifies that the project is not covered by the EIS System and is not required to secure an
ECC, based on the review of submitted application form under APS.
Denial Letter
A Denial Letter is issued for disapproval of the application. It shall contain an explanation for the
disapproval and guidance on how the application can be improved to a level of acceptability in
the EIA process.
In addition, ECC amendment is one of the decision documents for the existing co-located projects for
modification or re-starts up of the single or projects as well as the operating projects without ECCs.
Following table shows the types of EIA report, decision document, deciding authority and processing
duration by project group.
3
Currently APS is an internal system managed by EMB RO although EMB plans to develop an online
application system for CNC with the possible management system of the application fees according to the
interview with EMB staff.
4
PEMAPS is an internal EMB strategy for selecting and prioritizing projects to be subject to compliance
monitoring, based on evaluation by EMB and the Proponent’s responses to the Environmental Risk
Categorization Questionnaire described in the Revised Procedural Manual for DAO 03-30.
5
SMR is a detailed report on compliance to environmental standards specific to environmental laws as
described in Revised Procedural Manual for DAO 03-30.
6
CMR format is provided in Revised Procedural Manual for DAO 03-30.
I-6
Table I. 2.2.4 Summary of Project Groups, EIA Report Types, Decision Documents,
Deciding Authorities and Processing Duration
Documents
Processing Duration
Required For Decision Deciding Authority
Project Groups (Working Days)
ECC/CNC Document (MC-2010-14)
(MC2010-14)
Application
I: ECPs (single I-A: New EIS
projects) in I-B: Existing Projects for ECC EMB Director /
40 days
either Modification ,Re-start up EPRMP DENR Secretary
ECA or NECA or Operating without ECC
II-A: New EIS
ECC
EMB RO (Regional
20 days
IEER / Office) Director
ECC
II: NECPs IEEC
(single projects) App. for APS CNC EMB RO Director 1 day
in ECA II-B: Existing Projects for
Modification, Re-start up EPRMP ECC EMB RO Director 20 days
or Operating without ECC
App. for APS CNC EMB RO Director 1 day
III: NECPs
(single projects) III-A: New App. for APS CNC EMB RO Director 1 day
in NECA
IV-A: New DENR
IV: Co-located
PEIS ECC Secretary/EMB 40 days
Projects
Director
IV-B: Existing Projects
ECC/ECC
for Modification, Re-start
PEPRMP Amendme EMB RO Director 20 days
up or Operating without
nt
ECC
V: Unclassified
App. for APS CNC EMB RO Director 1 day
Projects
Source: Prepared by the Study Team based on Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of
2003 (DAO 03-30) (2007), Memorandum Circular No.2010-14, and information obtained from the interview with
EMB
Besides, Memorandum Circular No.2010-002 prescribes that the following projects shall be exempted
from securing ECC regardless of the location:
LPG storage and refilling stations with less than or equal to one (1) ton storage capacity,
Gasoline stations prior to 1996 without any expansion or modification,
Low-cost subdivision/housing and resettlement area projects with total gross lot area of one (1)
hectare or less including amenities, if any, and
Fast foods and restaurants with less than one (1) hectare total gross flood area including parking and
other open spaces
I.2.2.4 Outlines of Required Documents by PEISS
Followings are outlines of the required documents for application of ECC or CNC in accordance with
Memorandum Circular No.2010-14.
(1) Outline of EIS, IEE and IEE Checklist78(Proposed New Single Projects)
Executive Summary
• Project Fact Sheet PD Summary
• Process Documentation of the conduct of EIA (EIA Team, EIA Study Schedule & Area, EIA Methodology, Public
Participation)
7
Existing approved IEE checklist report format may still be used until the issuance of updates based on the
prescribed outline in accordance with MC 2010-14.
8
Required degree of the description of each content shall be deferred corresponding to the type of the required
documents and subjects to be determined at the technical scoping.
I-7
• Summary of Baseline Characterization Key Environmental Impacts and Management & Monitoring Plan and EMF
& EGF
Commitments
I. Project Description
1.1 Project Location and Area
• Map showing sitio, barangay, municipality, province, region boundaries, vicinity, proposed buffers surrounding the
area and
Primary & secondary impact areas
• Geographic coordinates (shape file data) of project area
• Rationale for selection primary & secondary impact areas
1.2 Project Rationale
Cite and focus on the need for the project based on national and local economic development and in terms of
contribution to
sustainable development agenda or current development thrusts of the Philippines
1.3 Project Alternatives
• Cite criteria used in determining preliminary options for facility siting, development design, process/technology
selection, resource
utilization including discussion of the consequences of not proceeding with the project
• Reasons for selecting the preferred options delineated in terms of technical, commercial, social and natural
environmental
aspects
• summary of the comparative environmental impacts of each alterative
1.4 Project Components
• Major components
• other Support Facilities (Le. energy/power generating facility, water supply system)
• Pollution control devices and corresponding facilities being served or connected
• Footprint of proposed layout of project facilities
1.5 Process/ Technology Options
• Production process (indicate type of raw material & final product) if process industry; Construction if
infrastructure such as
buildings, roads & bridges
• Power generation & water supply system
• Waste Management Systems
1.6 Project Size
• total project area in square meters or hectares
• annual production rate & working days/hours if process industry
1.7 Development Plan, Description of Project Phases and Corresponding Timeframes
Phases to be described in terms identifying specific activities (w/ special attention on those with significant
environmental impacts)
and corresponding projected implementation timeframes:
• Pre-construction (planning, acquisition of rights to use land,)
• Construction (land/site clearing, temporary housing, transport of materials, health and other services for the
workforce)
• Operation (projected period of start-up/commissioning/full operation of various project components)
• Abandonment (Land/soil restoration, decontamination or remediation activities and procedures & projected year of
Abandonment).
1.8 Manpower
Tabulate the following per project phase:
• manpower requirements;
• expertise/skills needed;
• nature & estimated number of jobs available for men, women indigenous peoples (if sited in IP ancestral land);
preferred scheme for sourcing locally from host and neighboring LGUs and those from outside
1.9 Indicative Project Investment Cost
II. Analysis of Key Environmental Impacts
2.1 Land
2.1.1 Land Use and Classification
• Discuss inconsistencies/possible conflicts with existing land use/zoning/classification and encroachment in ECAs
• Discuss Projected change as a result of project implementation (Le. Loss of topsoil/overburden (for agricultural
areas or
adjacent to agricultural areas))
2.1.2 Geology/Geomorphology
Discuss Projected change and change management as a result of project implementation such as the following:
• Change in surface landform/ topography/ terrain/slope
• Change in sub-surface/ underground geomorphology
• Inducement of subsidence/ collapse
• Inducement of landslides or other natural hazards
2.1.3 Pedology
I-8
Analyze project's impact and provide management measures for the following as may be needed:
• erodability potential
• bank stability
• Change in soil quality/fertility
2.1.4 Terrestrial Biology
Analyze project's impact and provide management measures with regards to the following as may be needed:
• Vegetation removal and loss of habitat
• Threat to existence of important local species
• Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of important species
• 4 Hindrance to wildlife access
2.2WATER
2.3.1 Hydrology/Hydrogeology
• Change in drainage morphology
• Change in stream, lake water depth
• Reduction in stream volumetric flow
• Inducement of flooding
• Water resource use and competition
• Reduction/Depletion of groundwater flow
2.3.2 Oceanography
• Change in circulation pattern
• Change in bathymetry
2.3.3 Water Quality
• Identify specific source of possible pollution load and discuss assimilative capacity of the receiving water body
(Le. groundwater,
stream water, lake water, marine water
• Include as part of the environmental management and monitoring plan, the sampling site map
2.3.4 Freshwater or Marine Ecology
Identify source of threat to ecology and discuss assimilative capacity of the receiving ecosystem
• Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of species
• Loss of important species
• Loss of habitat
2.3 AIR
2.3.1 Meteorology/Climatology
• Discuss the project's possible effect on local climate if any
• Discuss the project's contribution to global greenhouse gas if any
2.3.2 Air Quality (& Noise)
• Identify specific source of possible pollution load and discuss assimilative capacity considering the ambient air
quality/noise
levels in the area
2.4 PEOPLE9
2.4.1 Identify settlers that will be displaced from among the existing settlers
2.4.2 Discuss the in-migration patterns impact as a result of project implementation
2.4.3 Discuss the impacts on IPs and Culture/lifestyle (if any)
2.4.4 Discuss the project implementation's threat to public health vis-a-vis the baseline health conditions in the area
2.4.5 Discuss local benefits expected from project implementation
2.4.6 Discuss how the project would affect the delivery of basic services and resource competition in the area
2.4.7 Discuss how the project would affect traffic situation in the area
2.4.8 Identify entity to be accountable for environmental management in the area
2.4.9 Discuss how the project would affect existing properties in the area in terms of relocation and devaluation
2.4.1 0 Identify affected properties
III. ENVIRONMENTAUECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Identify and provide management measures for:
• Chronic Risks
• Acute Risks / Worst Case Scenario
IV. IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLAN
Limit to most significant impacts per project phase and per environmental component arising from key
environmental aspects
The SOP and IEC Framework shall be required for all ECPs. These may be required for EIS-Based ECC
applications for non ECPs
based on the EMB-RO's discretion.
9
This topic can include the resettlement action plans, compensation measures for land acquisition and
livelihood development plans for the affected indigenous peoples
I-9
The SOP of the project shall be derived from, and aligned with, the LGU's existing SOP. The project's SOP normally
aims to prevent/mitigate and/or enhance a project's adverse and positive impacts, respectively, on people's
livelihood, health and environment.
The SOP shall contain the following: a.) Livelihood or community development programs/activities, b.) Responsible
community members/beneficiaries, c.) partner institutions(government, NGO, others), d.) timeframe
implementation, and e.) source and amount per activity/component
The IEC Framework shall include the following information:
a. Target Sector Identified as Needing Project IEC
b. Major Topic/s of concern in Relation to Project
c. IEC Scheme / Strategy / Methods
d. Information Medium
e. Indicative Timelines and Frequency
f. Indicate Cost
The framework for compliance monitoring including environmental performance indicators shall serve as standards
for determining compliance. This shall correspond to the baseline environmental parameter necessary to monitor the
identified key environmental impacts for the specific sector/project type.
As a pro-active tool for minimization/elimination of adverse consequences to the environmental quality, the project
proponent shall propose "Environmental Quality Performance Level" (EQPL) for each critical parameter identified
above. At least two EQPLs are required namely the action and limit level. A third optional criterion is the early
warning level which is actually a red-flagging alert level.
It shall also include description of the monitoring scheme and mechanisms to be employed:
• Self-Monitoring Plan
• Multi-sectoral Monitoring Framework (for ECPs and EIS-based Non-ECPs as deemed necessary by EMB RO)
• Environmental Guarantee and Monitoring Fund Commitment (for ECPs and EIS-based Non-ECPs as deemed
necessary by EMB RO)
VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE POLICY AND GENERIC GUIDELINES
The policy and generic guidelines are to be consistent with the relevant agencies' requirements that are to be
complied with after the EGG is issued, e.g. MGB has a prescribed ERP content for mining projects.
VIII. ABANDONMENT /DECOMMISSIONING IREHABILITATION POLICIES AND GENERIC GUIDELINES
Statement on Proponent's policies and generic procedures; Detailed Abandonment/Decommissioning Plan to be
submitted post-EGG, within a timeframe specified in the EGG
IX. INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION
Discuss the Table of Organization of the Proponent where the reporting line and manpower complement/positions of
the EU, MEPEO or equivalent units to higher management and relationships with operating departments are shown
Source: Memorandum Circular No.2010-14
(2) Outline of PEIS (Proposed New Co-located Projects) (Maximum of 350 pages )
PROJECT FACTSHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background and Rationale
1.2 PEIA Approach and Methodology
1.3 PEIA Public Participation
1.4 The PEIA Team
1.5 PEIA Schedule
CHAPTER 2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
2.1 Project Location and Area Coverage
2.2 Development Framework
2.3 General Land Use Allocation
2.4 Phasing and Site Development Components
2.5 Process Description of Locator Plant
2.6 General Stages of Development and Activities
2.7 Organization and Management
2.8 Project Schedule and Cost
CHAPTER 3 ECOLOGICAL PROFILING
FOR AIR,WATER, LAND AND PEOPLE SECTOR
• Study Area Coverage
• Environmental Management Goals and Indicator Limits
• Approach and Methodology
• Environmental Status Assessment
• Carrying Capacity Analysis
• Environmental Management Strategies
• Monitoring Needs Assessment
CHAPTER 4 IMPACTS, HAZARDS AND RISK ANALYSIS
I-10
• ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EHIA)
• CHAPTER 4B INTEGRATED RISK ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
ANNEXES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(3) Outline of EPRMP (Single Project Expansion/Modification)

Executive Summary
• Project Fact Sheet PD Summary
• Process Documentation of the conduct of EIA (EIA Team, EIA Study Schedule & Area, EIA Methodology, Public
Participation)
• Summary of Baseline Characterization Key Environmental Impacts and Management & Monitoring Plan and EMF
& EGF Commitments
I. Project Description
1.1 Project Location and Area
• Map showing sitio, barangay, municipality, province, region boundaries, vicinity, proposed buffers surrounding the
area and Primary & secondary impact areas
• Geographic coordinates (shape file data) of project area
• Rationale for selection primary & secondary impact areas
1.2 Project Rationale
Cite and focus on the need for the project based on national and local economic development and in terms of
contribution to sustainable development agenda or current development thrusts of the Philippines
1.3 Project Alternatives
• Cite criteria used in determining preliminary options for facility siting, development design, process/technology
selection, resource utilization including discussion of the consequences of not proceeding with the project
• Reasons for selecting the preferred options delineated in terms of technical, commercial, social and natural
environmental aspects
• summary of the comparative environmental impacts of each alternative
1.4 Project Components
In Matrix form, describe / identify the existing, proposed expansion/modification & resulting final project scope in
terms of:
• Major components
• other Support Facilities (Le. energy/power generating facility, water supply system)
• Pollution control devices and corresponding facilities being served or connected
• Footprint of proposed layout of project facilities
1.5 Process/ Technology Options
In Matrix form, describe / identify the existing, proposed modification & resulting final process/technology in terms
of:
• Production process (indicate type of raw material & final product) if process industry; Construction if
infrastructure such as
buildings, roads & bridges
• Power generation & water supply system
• Waste Management Systems
1.6 Project Size
In Matrix form, describe the existing, proposed expansion & resulting total capacity/project scope in terms of:
• total project area in square meters or hectares
• annual production rate & working days/hours if process industry
1.7 Development Plan, Description of Project Phases and Corresponding Timeframes
Phases to be described in terms identifying specific activities (w/ special attention on those with significant
environmental impacts) and corresponding projected implementation timeframes:
• Pre-construction (planning, acquisition of rights to use land,)
• Construction (land/site clearing, temporary housing, transport of materials, health and other services for the
workforce)
• Operation (projected period of start-up/commissioning/full operation of various project components)
• Abandonment (Land/soil restoration, decontamination or remediation activities and procedures & projected year of
Abandonment).
1.8 Manpower
Tabulate the following per project phase:
• manpower requirements;
• expertise/skills needed;
• nature & estimated number of jobs available for men, women indigenous peoples (if sited in IP ancestral land);
preferred scheme for sourcing locally from host and neighboring LGUs and those from outside
1.9 Indicative Project Investment Cost
II. Analysis of Key Environmental Impacts
I-11
2.1 LAND
2.1.1 Land Use and Classification
• Discuss actual performance/experience in terms of how impacts were addressed in the implementation of the
original project plan & any additional related issues with the proposed expansion/modification & how they will be
addressed
• Discuss historical environmental performance & how it will be improved or maintained as needed
2,1,2 Geology/Geomorphology
Discuss actual performance/experience in terms of how the impacts were addressed in the implementation of the
original project plan & any additional related issues with the proposed expansion/modification & how they will be
addressed
2.1.3 Pedology
Discuss erosion history & change in soil quality/fertility with the implementation of the original project plan & any
additional impact of the expansion/modification in terms of:
• erodability potential
• bank stability
• Change in soil quality/fertility
2.1.4 Terrestrial Biology
Discuss actual environmental management performance/experience with the implementation of the original project
plan & any additional impact of the expansion/modification with respect to the following:
• Vegetation removal and loss of habitat
• Threat to existence of important local species
• Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of important species
• Hindrance to wildlife access
2,2WATER
2.3,1 Hydrology/Hydrogeology
• Change in drainage morphology
• Reduction in stream volumetric flow
• Inducement of flooding
• Water resource use and competition
• Reduction/Depletion of groundwater flow
2.3.2 Oceanography
• Change in circulation pattern
• Change in bathymetry
2.3,3 Water Quality
• Identify additional & total source of possible pollution load and discuss assimilative carrying capacity of the
receiving water body (i.e, groundwater, stream water, lake water, marine water)
• Discuss actual environmental management performance/experience with the implementation of the original project
plan & any additional impact of the expansion/modification
• Include as part of the environmental management and monitoring plan, the actual sampling site map and any
changes in sampling site as a result of the expansion/modification
2,3.4 Freshwater or Marine Ecology
• Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of species
• Loss of important species
• Loss of habitat
2.3 AIR
2.3.1 Meteorology/Climatology
• Discuss the existing project's effect on local climate and corresponding effect of the expansion/modification, if any
• Discuss the existing project's contribution to global greenhouse gas and corresponding effect of the
expansion/modification, if any
2,3.2 Air Quality (& Noise)
• Identify additional & total source of possible pollution load and discuss assimilative capacity considering the
ambient air quality/noise levels in the area
2.4 PEOPLE
Discuss how the following were handled in the original project and identify additional of such for the expansion
/modification:
2.4.1 Displacement of settlers
2.4.2 Impact of In-migration patterns as a result of project implementation
2.4.3 impacts on IPs and Culture/Lifestyle (if any)
2.4.4 project implementation's threat to public health vis-à-vis the baseline health conditions in the area
I-12
2.4.5 local benefits expected from project implementation
2.4.6 Effect on the delivery of basic services and resource competition in the area
2.4.7 Effect on traffic situation in the area
2.4.8 Entity to be accountable for environmental management in the area
2.4.9 Effect on existing properties in the area in terms of relocation and devaluation
2.4.10 Other affected properties
III. ENVIRONMENTAUECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Discuss actual experience with the implementation of the original project plan & any additional impact of the
expansion/modification with respect to the following:
• Chronic Risks
• Acute Risks / Worst Case Scenario
IV. IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLAN (IMP)
Discuss occurrence of the projected impacts and how this was managed with the original project implementation.
Discuss adjustments that should be made in consideration of the expansion/modification and present the revised
IMP.
V. Social Development Plan (SDP) and IEC Implementation
The SDP and IEC Framework required for all ECPs and for EIS-Based ECC applications for non ECPs (at the
EMB-RO's discretion) for the original project shall have been implemented.
For the expansion/modification, this part of EIA Study Report shall be focused on the discussion of the status of
implementation of SDP and IEC commitments. Any necessary change in the SDP and IEC in consideration of the
expansion/modification shall be identified
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MONITORING
An analysis of the "Environmental Quality Performance level" (EQPl) monitoring for each critical parameter
identified for the original project implementation shall be discussed here. Additional monitoring parameters for the
expansion/modification or identified lacking parameters based on the monitoring results shall be presented and
incorporated in the revised monitoring plan.
A description of the monitoring scheme and mechanisms actually being employed such as the following shall be
discussed:
• Self-Monitoring Plan
• Multi-sectoral Monitoring Framework (for ECPs and EIS-based Non-ECPs as deemed necessary by EMB RO)
• Environmental Guarantee and Monitoring Fund Commitment (for ECPs and EIS-based Non-ECPs as deemed
necessary by EMB
RO)
Any proposed changes / addendum to the existing scheme shall be discussed
VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE POLICY AND GENERIC GUIDELINES
Status of the implementation of the policy and generic guidelines and any proposed change shall be discussed here.
VIII. ABANDONMENT IDECOMMISSIONING IREHABILITATION POLICIES AND GENERIC GUIDELINES
IX. Status of the implementation of the policy and generic guidelines and any proposed change shall be discussed
here.
X. INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION
Update on the Table of Organization of the Proponent where the reporting line and manpower complement/positions
of the EU, MEPEO or equivalent units to higher management and relationships with operating departments are
shown
(4) Outline of PEPRMP (Expansion/Modification Projects) (maximum of 200 pages)

Project Fact Sheet
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1) Brief Description of the Co-located Projects vis-a-vis the proposed expansion or changes
2) Brief Summary of Project's EIA Process
3) Brief description of the baseline environmental conditions focused on the critical parameters
4) Summary on the EIA Findings on the Key Significant Impacts of the Project and corresponding EMP highlights
5) Summary of the Environmental Monitoring Plan on the most significant impacts and key measures
DRAFT MAIN PEPRMP
1.0 BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT'S EIA PROCESS
2.1 Terms of Reference of the EIA Study
2.2 EIA Team (Proponent & Preparer Team members, module of involvement, expertise)
2.3 EIA Study Schedule
2.4 EIA Study Area (project area up to extent of coverage of study)
2.5 EIA Methodology (per module)
2.6 EIA Public Participation Initiatives (if any)
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Identify scope of original ECC and/or existing facilities and proposed expansion/modification. Discuss the master
plan of the original project vis-à-vis the actual project implementation and changes in the master plan.
I-13
4.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION (limit to relevant modules)
This section shall discuss carrying capacity for the applicable regulated pollutant based on actual discharges. It shall
also discuss discharge allocation and 'maximum allowable limits' (MAL) status with the implementation of the
original project and corresponding plans with the implementation of the expansion/modification projects. The
following sectors shall be tackled
here:
4.1 The Land
4.2 The Water
4.3 The Air
4.4 People
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE BASED ON THE ORIGINAL ECC-COVERED
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN - (This section shall discuss actual and applicable environmental
management and monitoring plan including any EMS.)
5.1. Impact(s) Mitigation Plan (IMP)
5.2. Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) and other Monitoring Modes
5.3. Information, Education and Communication (IEC) and Social Development Program
(SOP) or Community Assistance Program (CAP)
5.4. Environmental Risk Management and Emergency Response Programs (ERP)
5.5. Abandonmen/Rehabilitation Programs
5.6. Institutional Set-up
5.7. Achievements/Awards and Outstanding Accomplishments on the Environment
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT - (when applicable - this section shall discuss the safety records of
the preceding two years. Highlights of the hazard assessment/analysis, ORA or other safety studies should also be
discussed.)
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) FOR CURRENT PROJECT & PROPOSED
MODIFICATIONI EXPANSION - including EMF and EGF
8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
9.0 ANNEXES
9.1. Commitments or Agreements
9.2. Accountability Statements of Preparers & Proponent
9.3. Photographs or plates of the project site, impact areas an affected areas and communities
9.4. Environmental Data
NOTE: The EIA Findings on the project's environmental impacts and management measures will advise DOH if
the project will pose a public health risk to the environment. For this purpose, DOH shall provide DENR-EMB with
a declaration of Health Sensitive Projects and Health Sensitive Areas. Until such time, DOH shall review EHIA
independently of the EIA Process. Further, workers' HIA component of the EHIA is recommended to be
coordinated by DOH with DOLE for the latter's consideration in its requirement of an Occupational Health and
Safety Program from the Proponent.
(5) 1-Page Application Form for CNC under APS

1. Name of the Project
2. Project Location
3. Proponent Name
4. Proponent Address
5. Contact Person
6. Proponent Means of Contact
7. Project Type/Undertaking
8. Project Size
9. Description of Project Activities (i.e., during preconstruction, construction, operation and abandonment)
As per the projects with high risk or impact due to geohazard status of the proposed location, e.g.,
housing projects on critical slopes, high rise buildings and dams, the EIA study for abovementioned
shall include the identification of geohazards in the area, which shall be basis for the recommendation
in the ECC for further geological assessment and preparation of Geological Identification Report
(GIR) or Geohazard Assessment Report (GAR) or Engineering Geological Assessment Report
(EGGAR) for submission to and review by the relevant competent agencies10.
10
Memorandum Circular No.2010-002, issued in September 2010, EMB
I-14
Also, Social Development Program (SDP) shall be required for all ECPs, while may only be required
for EIS-based NECPs with high social impacts to be determined by the EMB Regional Office (RO)11.
I.2.2.5 Public Participation in EIA Process
(1) Information, Education and Communication (IEC) and Public Scoping
One of operating principles of the PEISS is to make an accurate disclosure of relevant
information by Project Proponents and other stake holders in the EIA process. DENR
Administrative Order No. 30 Series of 2003 (DAO 03-30) states that Information, Education
and Communication (IEC) of Local Government Unit (LGU) is required at the minimum of
EIS-based applications as part of the social preparation process at pre-Scoping. In fact, the
IEC serves as a basis for preliminary identification of stakeholders and related issues in
preparation for the Public Scoping to be conducted for EIS-based applications.
(2) Further Public Participation in PEISS
Consistent with the basic policy of PEISS wherein the EIA process shall be based on a timely,
well-informed public participation of potentially affected communities, stakeholders in both
direct and indirect impact areas need to be informed of, and consulted on, the project proposal
at earliest EIA stage as possible12.
With an aim of disclosure of the EIA findings for ECPs, Public Hearing or Public
Consultation shall be implemented with the participation of all the stakeholders.
With an aim of disclosure of the EIA findings, Public Hearing shall be implemented for
EIS-based applications wherein Public Scoping was undertaken. A wavier of the Public
Hearing requested by the Proponent may be granted by the DENR-EMB if there is no
mounting opposition or written request for one with valid basis. In such cases, the Public
Consultation might be conducted instead.
The notice of Public Hearing shall provide explicit instruction on registration, access to the
EIA report, preparation of position papers, and on mechanics how issues may be received
before or during the hearing. Prior to Public Hearings or Public Consultations, the proponents
is required to give copies of EIA report and relevant documents to EMB regional offices,
LGUs and other stakeholders for a well-informed participation in the hearing/consultation
process.
(3) Involvement of Indigenous Peoples in decision-making process
In 2006, NCIP Administrative Order No.1, namely, the Free and Prior Informed Consent
(FPIC) guidelines, was promulgated by the National Commission of Indigenous People
(NCIP). The objective of the guideline is to ensure genuine participation of Indigenous
Cultural Communities (ICC) and Indigenous Peoples (IPs) in decision-making as well as to
protect the rights of ICCs/IPs in the introduction and implementation of activities that will
impact upon their Ancestral Domains/Lands(ADs/ALs).
Also, the guideline details the process for conducting Field Based Investigation (FBI) and
obtaining the Certification Precondition from the NCIP attesting that the applicant has
complied with the requirements for securing the affected ICC/IP’s FPIC. It is required for
the EIS (Environment Impact Statement)-based projects which can affect the ADs to follow
the FCIP procedures.
NCIP regional office is responsible for receiving applications for the issuance of Certificate
Precondition as well as implementing FBI and overseeing the process to obtain the FPIC from
the IPs/ICCs.
11
Memorandum Circular No.2010-002, issued in September 2010, EMB
12
MC 2010-14 provides the guidelines for determining direct and indirect impact areas as well as those for stakeholder
identification.
I-15
I.2.3 Laws, Regulations and Guidelines Concerning Land Acquisition and Involuntary
Resettlement
I.2.3.1 Guidelines for the Acquisition of Certain Parcels of Private Land Intended for Public
Use Including the Right-of-Way Easement of Several Public Infrastructure Projects,
Administrative Order No. 50 (1999)
The order is an amendment of the procedures for acquisition of property, declared by Presidential
Decree No. 1533 mentioned in the latter section.
With respect to the conditions to be complied with during the negotiated sale, the order states that all
the government agencies which are engaged in public infrastructure projects shall first negotiate with
the owner for the acquisition of parcels of private land intended for public use including the
right-of-way easement of such projects, by offering in writing a purchase price of an amount
equivalent to 10% higher than the zonal value of the said property. During the negotiation, the
landowner shall be given 15 days within which to accept the amount offered by the concerned
government agency as payment for the land.
After the abovementioned period and no acceptance is made by the landowner, the concerned agency,
in coordination with the Solicitor General, shall initiate expropriation proceedings in the proper court,
depositing 10% of the offered amount.
Besides, the order prescribes the standards for the assessment of the value of the land subject of
expropriation proceeding.
I.2.3.2 An Act to Facilitate the Acquisition of Right-of-Way, Site or Location for National
Government Infrastructure Projects and for other Purposes, Republic Act 8974 (2000)
It declares that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. Towards
this end, the State shall ensure that owners of real property acquired for national government
infrastructure projects are promptly paid just compensation. The Act also provides Guidelines for
Expropriation Proceedings including compensation of the property which shall be appraised by
determining the market values of lands and improvements. The Sec. 8 states that the implementing
agency shall take into account the ecological and environmental impact of the project.
I.2.3.3 The Agricultural Land Reform Code, Republic Act 6389 (1971)
The Act amended the agricultural land reform code. The agricultural lessee shall be entitled to
disturbance compensation equivalent to five times the average of the gross harvests on his landholding
during the last five preceding calendar years.
I.2.3.4 Executive Order 1035 (1985)
The order provides the procedures and guidelines for the acquisition of private properties or rights for
development projects by the government, including government-owned or controlled corporations and
state colleges and universities.
Acquisition shall be done either through negotiated sale or expropriation. The order gives authority to
the government implementing agency/instrumentality concerned to immediately institute expropriation
proceedings if the parties fail to agree in negotiation of the sale. The just compensation to be paid for
the property acquired through expropriation shall be in accordance with the provisions of P.D. No.
1533 under-mentioned.
I.2.3.5 Presidential Decree No. 1533 (1978)
It establishes a uniform basis for determining just compensation and the amount of deposit for
immediate possession of the property involved in eminent domain proceedings.
I.2.3.6 Urban Development and Housing Act, Republic Act 7279 (1992)
This Act provides policy to undertake, in cooperation with the private sector, a comprehensive and
continuing Urban Development and Housing Program. The program is aimed to uplift the conditions
of the underprivileged and homeless citizens in urban areas and in resettlement areas by making
I-16
available to them decent housing at affordable cost, basic services, and employment opportunities. The
Program covers lands in urban and urbanizable areas, including existing areas for priority development,
zonal improvement sites, slum improvement and resettlement sites. Under this Act, eviction and
demolition are allowed in danger areas such as railroad tracks, garbage dumps, riverbanks, shorelines,
waterways, and other public places such as sidewalks, roads, parks, and playgrounds.
I.2.3.7 Instituting the National Drive to Suppress and eradicate Professional Squatters and
Squatting Syndicates, Executive Order No.153 (1999)
The Act states that the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) and the
Department of Justice (DOJ) shall have authority to call on the relevant government agencies to give
their assistance and cooperation to intensify the national drive against the professional squatters and
squatting syndicates.
Also, the Act prescribes that the National Police Task Force shall be strengthened as the operational
arm of the HUDCC in the implementation of the provisions of the order.
I.2.3.8 Executive order No.228 (1987)
The Act describes that the landowner is exempt from capital gains tax on the compensation paid to
him/her when payment is made for agricultural land acquired by the government.
I.2.3.9 Relevant Guidelines
Some of the guidelines prepared to put the above-mentioned laws into effect are listed below.
Implementing Rules and Regulations Governing the Registration of Socialized housing Beneficiaries
(1993)
Implementing Guidelines for the Acquisition, Validation, Disposition and Utilization of Lands for
Social Housing (1993)
Implementing Rules and Regulations to Ensure the Observance of Proper and Humane Relocation
and Resettlement Procedures Mandated by the Urban Development and Housing Act (1992)
Guidelines for Land Validation for Socialized Housing, Local Financial Circular 3-92 (1992)
Guidelines of Executive Order No.153
I.2.4 Laws and Regulations Concerning the Environmental Standards and Social Aspects
I.2.4.1 Environment Code, Presidential Decree No. 1152
Known as the Philippine Environment Code, it launches a comprehensive program on environmental
protection and management. It also provides for air, water quality, land use, natural resources and
waste management for fisheries and aquatic resources; wildlife; forestry and soil conservation; flood
control and natural calamities; energy development; conservation and utilization of surface and ground
water and mineral resources.
I.2.4.2 Water Code, Presidential Decree No. 1067
A decree instituting a water code which revises and consolidates the laws governing the ownership,
appropriation, utilization, exploitation, development, conservation and protection of water resources.
I.2.4.3 Clean Water Act, Republic Act 9275
An Act which aims to protect the country’s water bodies from pollution of all possible sources
(industrial, commercial, agriculture and household activities). It provides for a comprehensive and
integrated strategy to prevent and minimize pollution through a multi-sectoral and participatory
approach involving all the stakeholders.
I.2.4.4 Clean Air Act of 1999, Republic Act No. 8749
An Act which lays down policies to prevent and control air pollution. The act sets standards of exhaust
gas from vehicles, manufacturing plants and so on to follow. All potential sources of air pollution must
I-17
comply with the provisions of the Act. As such, all emissions must be with in the air quality standards
set under the law. It also imposes the appropriate punishments for violators of the law.
I.2.4.5 Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, Republic Act No. 9003 (2000)
An Act providing for an ecological solid waste management program, creating the necessary
institutional mechanisms and incentives, declaring certain acts prohibited and providing penalties,
appropriating funds therefore, and for other purposes.
I.2.4.6 Pollution Control Law, Presidential Decree No. 984
An Act that serves as the foundation for managing industrial activities impacting air and water quality.
It empowers the DENR to impose ex-parte cease and desist orders (CDO) on the grounds of
immediate threat to life, public health, safety or welfare, or to animal or plant life when wastes or
discharges exceed the normal.
I.2.4.7 Forestry Reform Code, Presidential Decree No. 705
The Forestry Reform Code of the Philippines recognizes that there is an urgent need for proper
classification; management and utilization of the lands of the public domain to maximize their
productivity to meet the demands of the increasing population of the Philippines. It surmises that to
achieve the above purpose, it is necessary to reassess the multiple uses of forest lands and resources
before allowing any utilization to optimize the benefits that can be derived. It also emphasizes not only
the utilization but more so on the protection, rehabilitation and development of forest lands to ensure
the continuity of their productive condition.
I.2.4.8 National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS), Republic Act No. 7586
An Act that aims to protect and maintain the natural biological and physical diversities of the
environment notably on areas with biologically unique features to sustain human life and development
as well as plant and animal life. It establishes a comprehensive system of integrated protected areas
within the classification of national park as provided for in the Constitution to secure for the Filipino
people of present and future generations the perpetual existence of all native plants and animals. It
encompasses outstandingly remarkable areas and biologically important public lands that are habitants
of rare and endangered species of plants and animals, bio-geographic zones and related ecosystems,
whether terrestrial, wetland or marine.
I.2.4.9 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act, Republic Act No. 8731
An Act that prescribes provision for the promotion and recognition of the rights of Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous Peoples (ICCs/IPs) with an aim to preserve their culture, traditions and
institutions to ensure the equal protection and non-discrimination of members. Also, the Act
determines the definition of the Ancestral Domains and Ancestral Lands with the procedures on how
to delineate the corresponding area as well as the issuance of certificate of ancestral domain title
(CADT).
In addition, the Act states establishment of the National Commission on Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) as a primary government agency for the assistance of
ICCs/IPs as well as creation of the Ancestral Domain Fund to cover compensation of r expropriated
lands, delineation and development of ancestral domains.
I-18
I.3 Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Environmental and Social

Impacts
I.3.1 Outline of the Programs and Projects in IWRM Plan
The IWRM Plan prepared in November 2010 is composed of six (6) sectors including 18 proposed and
30 conceptual programs and projects as listed below. Annex-T I 3.1.1 gives the outlines and scopes of
the respective programs and projects.
Table I. 3.1.1 Number of Proposed and Conceptual Projects under IWRM Plan
Proposed Conceptual
Sector Total
Projects Plans*
1. Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery 11 3 14
2. Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage 4 11 15
3. Flood and Sediment Disaster Management 2 3 5
4. Watershed Management - 4 4
5. Water-related Environment Management 1 4 5
6. Inter-sector for Water Resources Management - 5 5
Total 18 30 48
Note (*): Proposed by JICA Study Team
Source: JICA Study Team
I.3.2 Identification of the Projects covered by PEISS

In accordance with PEISS mentioned in Section I.2.2, in total 22 programs and projects included in the
IWRM Plan may require preparation of the documents for ECC/CNC application at least in their F/S,
as shown in Annex-T I.3.1.1 and summarized in Table I.3.2.1.
Table I. 3.2.1 Proposed and Conceptual Programs and Projects
in IWRM Plan Covered by PEISS
Documents Required For Code of
Groups Description
ECC/CNC Application Projects Concerned*1
ECPs (Environmentally Critical AI-P-01, 02*2, 09,
Projects) in either ECAs Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ IS-C-02, MW-P-04,
Group I (Environmentally Critical Areas) Environmental Performance Report and MW-C-05, 06,
or NECAs (Non-Environmentally Management Plan (EPRMP) FL-C-01,
Critical Areas)
EIS/EPRMP AI-P- 04,11, AI-C-01,
Initial Environmental Examination Report MW-P-02,
(IEER) / MW-C-01~04,
NECPs (Non-Environmentally
Group II Initial Environmental Examination Checklist FL-P-01~02,
Critical Projects) in ECAs
(IEEC) / App. for Application form to be WQ-P-01, WQ-C-04
processed in the Automated Processing (Group II or III,
System (APS) depending on the
project locations)
Group III NECPs in NECAs App for APS
Programmatic Environmental -
Co-located Projects in either ECA Impact Statement (PEIS)/ Programmatic
Group IV
or NECA Environmental Performance Report and
Management Plan (PEPRMP)
Group V Unclassified Projects App for APS AI-P-03, 05
Note: 1*: The project codes correspond to the project titles as shown in Annex-T I.3.1.1.
2*:- The original ECC was issued on 21st of January, 1992 based on the Environmental Impact Assessment
undertaken in 1986. An updated EIS was prepared during the F/S study conducted in 2009 due to the possible
changes of the base line data.
As shown above, there are four (4) proposed and four (4) conceptual projects identified as
Environmentally Critical Project (ECP) under Group I which requires EIS for ECC application. While,
there are six (6) proposed and six (6) conceptual projects defined as NECP, which shall be categorized
into Group II or III depending whether the project site is located in ECAs or not since there is
I-19
limitation of the information to determine the project sites at this stage. Besides, there are two (2)
projects categorized as Group V which requires preparation of the application format for Automated
Processing System (APS).
In addition, other conceptual and planned projects of the IWRM plan could be categorized into
above-mentioned groups when their project components and sites are determined.
I.3.3 Alternative Options for the Conceptual Projects Categorized as Environmentally Critical
Project under PEISS
As mentioned in the previous section, there are four (4) conceptual projects proposed by the Study
Team and categorized as ECP under Group I. In order to mitigate the potential adverse impacts by the
projects, the alternative options for the projects are considered as tabulated below.13
Table I. 3.3.1 Alternative Options for Conceptual Projects Categorized
as Environmentally Critical Projects
Code of
Alternative options examined Outline/Scope of the Program/Project Remarks
Projects*
Option 1 Bayabas storage dam Major activity is the construction of the dam (H=110m)
MW-C-05/
and its relevant structures with an aim to have the -
IS-C-02
reservoir with 144 MCM storage capacity.
Option 2 Balintingon storage damand Major activities are the construction of the facilities:
conveyance to AMRIS Rock-fill center-core dam (H=140m) and its appurtenant
structures with an aim to have the reservoir with 572
MCM storage capacity.
Open-type powerhouse equipped with 2 Francis type
Same as
turbines with the capacity of 15 MW
AI-P-01
Diversion weir (L=140m)
Irrigation facilities: main canal (L=109km),
laterals(L=168km) and sub-laterals, main and
supplementary farm ditches, drainage channels
(L=210km), and access roads
Option 3 Upgrading and improvement Major activity is to upgrade the main canals in AMRIS
of irrigation facilities and by concrete lining to reduce the conveyance loss in the
-
water management of canals.
AMRIS
Option 4 Excess water for MWSS Major activity is the construction of Laiban Dam which
from Ipo Dam (Laiban Dam) is expected to correspond to the future water demand of -
Metro Manila.
Option 1 Residual groundwater Major activity is the installation of wells with the
MW-C-06 atsurrounding pipelines with pumps for water intake from neighboring
cities/municipalities municipalities.
Option 2 Direct abstraction of surface Major activity is the installation of the systems for direct
water of Pampanga River at abstraction of surface water of Pampanga river through -
Cong Dadong Dam the reservoirs
Option 3 Gumain Reservoir Project Major activity is construction of 108m high, zoned
embankment dam to store irrigation water which covers
Same as
11,000 ha of paddy field and 5,200 ha of sugarcane
AI-P-09
plantation and to increase the watersupply in 7,900 ha of
Porac-Gumain & CaulamanRiver Irrigation System.
Option 1 River Channel Improvement Major activities are construction of riverbank
FL-C-01 andchannel dredgeing/excavation at the downstream of -
Pampanga river.
Option 2 Flood Retarding Basin Major activity is construction of dike to set up the flood
-
retarding basin in Pampanga river basin.
Note*: The project codes correspond to the project titles as shown in Annex-T I.3.1.1.
13
Since the project components shall be revised in the further studies, the alternative options are subject to be changed to
select the optimum option in the following studies. Therefore, this report limits to the simple initial IEE for each option
without the selection of the optimum options.
I-20
I.3.4 Screening and Scoping of the Programs and Projects based on the JICA Guidelines for
Environmental and Social Considerations
All the proposed and conceptual programs and projects of the IWRM Plan were re-examined in
accordance with JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Considerations, so that the Study
Team could formulate the IWRM Plan to minimize any adverse impacts. To do so, the following
procedures were taken.
Step 1 Screening: All the 18 proposed and 30 conceptual programs and projects including the
alternative options were screened by using a checklist as shown in Annex-T I.3.4.1.
Step 2 Scoping: The potential impacts which are expected by a project were further reviewed to
evaluate the extent and nature of the respective impacts.
Step 3 Selection of the mitigation measures: Based on the evaluation, mitigation measures to the
projects with potential adverse impacts were proposed.
I.3.5 Result of Initial Screening and Scoping of the Programs and Projects in IWRM Plan
As for the impact assessment of the Screening, the relevant environmental impact items were ranked
depending on its environmental and social significance in accordance with rating criteria listed below.
Rating Criteria
・A+/-: Significant positive/negative impact is expected.
・B+/-: Some positive/negative impact is expected.
・C+/-: Extent of positive/negative impact is unknown. (A further examination is required in
the further project formulation)
・-: No negative impact is expected.
The results of the initial screening of all the proposed and conceptual programs and projects in the
IWRM Plan are shown in Annex-T I.3.4.1. Accordingly, there are 11 programs and projects including
10 options with the rating of A- and/or B- on the relevant environmental impact items as summarized
below.
I-21
Table I. 3.5.1 Proposed and Conceptual Programs and Project in IWRM Plan with
Possible Negative Environment Impacts Identified in Initial Screening Process
Possible Negative Environment Impacts by the Project
Code of Items expected to be
Projects affected by
Items expected to be affected by less adverse impacts (B-)
Concerned* significant adverse
impacts (A-)
- Construction phase: Topography, Landscape, Air pollution, Waste, Noise and
AI-P-01/ - Planning phase:
vibration
MW-C-05/ Involuntary
- Construction and operation phase: Inequality between beneficiaries and
IS-C-02 resettlement, Social
project-affected peoples, Water use right, Water pollution,
（Option-2） vulnerable groups
- Operational phase: Flow regime of lake and river, Flora and fauna, Bottom sediment
- Construction phase: Topography, Landscape, Air pollution, Waste, Noise and
- Planning phase: vibration
Involuntary - Construction and operation phase: Inequality between beneficiaries and
AI-P-02
resettlement, Social project-affected peoples, Water use right, Flora and fauna, Water pollution
vulnerable groups - Operational phase: Flow regime of lake and river, Bottom sediment, National park or
equivalent area in terms of its ecological importance
AI-P-04 - - Operation phase: Flow regime of lake and river
AI-P-09/ - Construction phase: Topography, Landscape, Air pollution, Waste
MW-C-06 - - Construction and operation phase: Water use right, Flora and fauna, Water pollution
（Option-3） - Operational phase:Flow regime of lake and river, Bottom sediment
MW-P-01/02 - - Operational phase: Flow regime of lake and river
- Construction phase: Topography and geology, Landscape, Waste
MW-P-04 - - Construction and operation phase: Water use right, Water pollution
- Operational phase: Flow regime of lake and river, Bottom sediment
MW-C-05/ - Construction phase: Topography and geology, Landscape, Air pollution, Waste
IS-C-02 - Construction and operation phase: Water use right, Flora and fauna, Water pollution
（Option-1） - Operational phase: Flow regime of lake and river, Bottom sediment
- Construction phase: Topography and geology, Landscape, Air pollution, Waste,
- Planning phase:
MW-C-05/ Noise and vibration
IS-C-02 Involuntary
- Construction and operation phase: Inequality between beneficiaries and
resettlement, Social
（Option-4） project-affected peoples, Flora and fauna, Water pollution
vulnerable groups
- Operational phase: Flow regime of lake and river, Bottom sediment
MW-C-06
- - Planning phase: Conflict of interests
（Option-1）
MW-C-06
- - Operation phase: Flow regime of lake and river
（Option-2）
- Planning phase: - Construction phase: Air pollution, Water pollution, Waste, Noise and Vibration
FL-C-01
Involuntary - Construction and operation phase: Inequality between beneficiaries and
（Option-1）
resettlement project-affected peoples
- Planning phase: - Planning phase: Conflict of interests
FL-C-01 Land use and - Construction and operation phase: Existing social infrastructure, National park or
（Option-2） utilization of local equivalent area in terms of its ecological importance, Flora and fauna, Water pollution
resources - Operation phase: Flow regime of lake and river
I.3.6 Scoping Results and Proposed Mitigation Measures

I.3.6.1 Significant adverse impacts (A-)
As a result of the screening mentioned in the former section, significant adverse impacts (A-) would
be expected for the following three (3) environmental components. The following table also indicates
the timing of the occurence of the impacts and the corresponding possible mitigation measures.
I-22
Table I. 3.6.1 Details, Timing of Occurrence and Mitigation Measures
for Significant Adverse Impacts (A-)
Timing of the
Environmental Details of the adverse
Projects* occurrence of Mitigation measures
Components impacts
the impacts
i) The installation of the AI-P-01, 02, Planning - Selection of the alternative project sites
Involuntary infrastructures would MW-C-05(Opt.2,4), phases with less number of affected households
resettlement cause involuntary IS-C-02(Opt.2,4),
through the discussion with the community
resettlement at the FL-C-01(Opt.1) 14
project sites. - Proper planning, implementation and
monitoring of appropriate resettlement
action plans
ii) Land acquisition for FL-C-01(Opt.2) Planning - Proper planning, implementation and
Land use/ the flood retarding phase monitoring of compensation measures for
utilization of basin (approx.16,000 the land owners
local resources ha) could be
happened.
iii) Involuntary AI-P-01, 02, Planning - Enhancement of full participation of IPs in
Social resettlement would MW-C-05(Opt.2,4), phases accordance with Free and Prior Informed
vulnerable involve communities IS-C-02(Opt.2,4), Consent (FPIC) guidelines in coordination
groups of Indigenous with NCIP
Peoples. - Preparation, implementation and
monitoring of the action plans to recover
the livelihoods for the indigenous peoples
affected considering their culture and
traditional customs
I.3.6.2 Less significant adverse impacts (B-)

Also, less significant adverse impacts (B-) would be expected for the following 14 environmental
components as tabulated below.
Table I. 3.6.2 (1/4) Details, Timing of Occurrence and Mitigation Measures
for Less Significant Adverse Impacts (B-)
Timing of the
Components impacts
the impacts
i) Some of the existing roads FL-C-01(Opt.2) Construction - Supplementary infrastructures at the
Existing Social could be affected by the and operation junctions of the existing roads and
Infrastructures
construction of the dike. phases planned dike with the aim to secure
the current accessibility of the
communities.
ii) The resettlement could AI-P-01, 02, Construction - Proper planning, implementation and
Inequality impact the income level of MW-C-05(Opt.2,4) and operation monitoring of appropriate
between
the project-affected , IS-C-02(Opt.2,4), phases resettlement action plans
beneficiaries
and peoples. FL-C-01(Opt.1)
project-affected
peoples
… Continue to next page
14
For AI-P-01, and MW-C-05/IS-C-02(Opt.2), 800-1,000 families would be expected to be resettled by the project, based on
the interview with General Tino. In case for AP-P-02, 548 families would be expected to be resettled according to the
information from the interview with NIA. Also, MW-C-05/IS-C-02 (Opt.4) could affect 4,300 families. As for FL-C-01
(Opt.1), the involuntary resettlement of 2,365 families would be expected based on Pampanga Delta Development Project
(Flood Control Component) Review Study for Phase-2. 2003, Nippon Koei Co., Ltd.
I-23
Timing of the
Components impacts
the impacts
iii) Some conflict may be MW-C-06(Opt.1) Planning - Information sharing between relevant
Conflict of arisen between relevant phase LGUs from the early stage of the
interests LGUs in terms of the project
allocation of required - Organizational setup of
ground water sources. inter-municipal bodies to mediate
disputes
Some conflict of the FL-C-01(Opt.2) Planning - Information sharing between relevant
interest may be arisen phase stakeholders from the early stage of
between the implementing the project
agencies and some
environmental
organizations due to the
potential impacts on the
biodiversity in the locality.
iv) Some conflict of the water AI-P-01,02,09, Construction - Information sharing with the holders
Water use right use right would be MW-P-04, and operation of current water use right at the
and common expected considering that MW-C-05 phases project relevant area from the early
land use right current status of water use (Opt.1,2), stage of the project in order to reach
right may not be conferred MW-C-06(Opt.3), the mutual consensus on possible
on the implementing IS-C-02(Opt.1,2) transference of the water right for
agencies for respective project implementation
project purposes. - Organizational setup to mediate
disputes among stakeholders
v) Some changes on AI-P-01,02,09, Construction - Introduction of the slope protection
Topography topography and MW-P-04, phases works in case of the high risk of the
and geology geographical features are MW-C-05 soil erosion
expected due to the (Opt.1,2,4), -Examination of the alternative project
relevant earthworks. MW-C-06(Opt.3), sites which require less arthworks
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
vi) Some changes on flow AI-P-01,02,04, 09, Operation - Examination and securement of the
Flow regime of regime of lake, river and MW-P-01,02,04, phases amount of water flow required for the
lake and river swamp would be expected MW-C-05 livelihood activities and biodiversity
due to storage or (Opt.1,2,4), in the down streams
extraction of river water MW-C-06(Opt.2,3)
by the infrastructure to be ,IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4
constructed. )
I-24
Timing of the
Components impacts
the impacts
vii) Installation of the AI-P-02 Operation - Examination and consideration of the
National park reservoir may result in a phase amount of water flow required for the
or equivalent habitat change of the area habitats of flora and fauna in the
area in terms of which is connected to respective area.
the ecological Zambales range
importance considered as Important
Bird Area15.
The project FL-C-01(Opt.2) Construction - Conservation measures for the
implementation may alter and operation habitats of the important species,
the current condition of phases especially waterfowls, such as
Candaba swamp which restoration of the vegetations cleared
has been declared as a bird in course of the project
sanctuary by LGU as well implementation, and securement of
as recognized as a Ramsar the necessary water flow for the
candidate site and part of species.
the East - Examination of the alternative project
Asian-Australasian site
Flyway.
viii) The distribution of flora AI-P-01, 02, 09, Construction - Minimal cleaning of vegetation
Flora and and fauna in the area may MW-C-05(Opt.1,2, and operation - Restoration of the vegetation cleared
Fauna be altered due to the 4), phases by the project implementation,
clearance of vegetation by MW-C-06(Opt.3), especially at the habitats of
the construction works and FL-C-01 (Opt.2), vulnerable species
change of the flow regime IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4) - Examination and consideration of the
in and around the area. amount of water flow required for the
habitats of flora and fauna in the
respective area
ix) The original landscape can AI-P-01, 02, 09, Construction - Plantation of grasses at the slope with
Landscape be changed by the slope MW-P-04, phase installation of the structure measures
cutting works at the MW-C-05 if necessary
installation of the (Opt.1,2,4),
facilities. MW-C-06(Opt.3),
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
x) Air pollution due to AI-P-01, 02, 09, Construction - Proper maintenance of the
Air pollution equipment use for MW-P-04, phase equipments
installation of the MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,
infrastructures may impact 4),
on air quality in and MW-C-06(Opt.3),
around the project site. FL-C-01 (Opt.1)
Dust and particulate IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4) - Spraying water on exposed surfaces
generation could impact of the construction area
on air quality.
15
Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Stage II Feasibility Updating Study, December, 2009, National Irrigation
Administration
I-25
Timing of the
Components impacts
the impacts
xi) Soil inflow due to the AI-P-01, 02, 09, Construction - Quarrying of the gravels at the site
Water pollution earthworks could MW-P-04, Phase apart from the rivers
deteriorate water quality MW-C-05(Opt.1,2, - Slope protection works with
of the localities. 4), vegetation covers
MW-C-06(Opt.3),
FL-C-01 (Opt.1)
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
Soil inflow into the water AI-P-01, 02, 09, Operation - Slope protection works with
bodies due to the erosion MW-P-04, phase vegetation covers
of upper catchments could MW-C-05(Opt.1,2, - Check dams at the critical tributaries
impact on water quality of 4),
the localities. MW-C-06(Opt.3),
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
xii) The increment of the AI-P-01, 02, 09, Construction - Proper treatment of the waste in
Waste workers at the MW-P-04, phases coordination with LGUs
construction stage can MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,
increase the amount of the 4),
waste or generate waste MW-C-06(Opt.3),
scrap materials. FL-C-01 (Opt.1)
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
xiii) The local residents in and AI-P-01,02, Construction - Time-limited use of the equipments
Noise and around the project sites MW-C-05(Opt.2,4) phases
vibration would be disturbed by ,
noise due to the FL-C-01 (Opt.1),
construction works IS-C-02(Opt.2,4)
xvi) Some impacts caused by AI-P-01,02,09, Operation - Slope protection works with
Bottom the bottom sediment at the MW-P-04, phases vegetation covers
sediment water storages, such as MW-C-05(Opt.1,2, - Check dams at the critical tributaries
limitation of the water 4)
storage capacity of the MW-C-06(Opt.3),
dams or water pollution, IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
would be expected
I-26
I.4 Identification of the necessary monitoring items during the project

cycles
Based on the adverse impacts identified in the former section, necessary items to be monitored were
identified by phase of the project cycle.
I.4.1 Construction phase
There are five (5) environmental parameters, such as soil erosion, air quality, water quality, waste,
noise and vibration to be monitored during the construction phase. The recommended monitoring
measures including location, frequency of monitoring and analysis measures are summarized below.
Table I. 4.1.1 Recommended Monitoring Measures of Environmental Parameters
at Construction Phase
Parameters to be Frequency of
Projects* Location Analysis measures
monitored monitoring
a. Soil erosion AI-P-01,02,09, MW-P-04, Project sites Monthly - Measurement of the
MW-C-05 (Opt.1,2,4), size of soil erosion
MW-C-06(Opt.3), and slope failures
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
b. Air quality/ Dust AI-P-01, 02, 09, MW-P-04, Project sites and Prior to - Gravimetric method
pollution Total MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,4), their operation
Suspended MW-C-06(Opt.3), FL-C-01 (Opt.1), surrounding area
Particulate (TSP) IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
c. Water quality/ AI-P-01, 02, 09, MW-P-04, Project sites Quarterly - Water sampling
BOD, PH, DO MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,4),
MW-C-06(Opt.3), FL-C-01 (Opt.1),
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
d. Waste AI-P-01, 02, 09, MW-P-04, Project sites and Twice a week - Waste characterization
MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,4), camping sites - Waste Volume
MW-C-06(Opt.3), FL-C-01 (Opt.1), measurement
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
e. Noise and AI-P-01,02, MW-C-05(Opt.2,4), Project sites and Quarterly - Use of Sound Level
vibration FL-C-01 (Opt.1), their Meter
IS-C-02(Opt.2,4) surrounding
areas
I.4.2 Operation phase

As well, the recommended monitoring measures for three (3) environmental parameters at the
operation phase, such as biodiversity, water quality and bottom sediment are tabulated below.
I-27
Table I. 4.2.1 Recommended Monitoring Measures of Environmental Parameters
at Operation Phase
Parameters to be Frequency of
Projects* Location Analysis measures
monitored monitoring
a. Biodiversity AI-P-01, 02, 09, Project sites Yearly - Reconnaissance
MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,4), and/or affected survey to grasp the
MW-C-06(Opt.3), FL-C-01 (Opt.2), surrounding area current condition of
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4) fauna and flora
- Counting of the
important species
c. Water quality/ AI-P-01, 02, 09, MW-P-04, Outfall of Quarterly - Water sampling
BOD, PH, DO MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,4), spillway,
MW-C-06(Opt.3), FL-C-01 (Opt.1) reservoir zone
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
b. Bottom AI-P-01,02,09, MW-P-04, Reservoir Once in 5 - Measurement with the
sediment MW-C-05(Opt.1,2,4) years equipments such as
MW-C-06(Opt.3), echo sounder
IS-C-02(Opt.1,2,4)
I.4.3 Throughout the project cycles

As per the impact on the project affected peoples including indigenous people to be generated by the
involuntary resettlement and land acquisition, implementation of the resettlement action plan,
compensation plan and other action plans for the recovery of the livelihoods of the project affected
people shall be monitored by the implementation agencies throughout the project cycles.
I-28
I.5 Important Notice on Implementation of the Projects

When the environmental and social consideration of the project, which consists of the IWRM Plan, is
examined, the comments, suggestions and recommendations of the stakeholders have to be
incorporated through stakeholder meetings. Moreover, the methodologies and procedures for
organizing of the stakeholder meetings shall accord to the standards in the Philippines, and those in of
the donor, if the project is implemented through assistance from the donor.
I-29
Annex-Tables
Annex-T I.2.2.1 (1/2) Summary of Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)
GIS data collected for the preparation of the maps
by the Study Team
Data collected Sources

A. Areas declared by - Initial Component of - Protected Areas and
law as national NIPAS for establishment Wildlife Bureau, DENR
Areas of the National Integrated
parks, watershed - Proclaimed/Declared - JICA Study Team
Protected Areas System (NIPAS)
reserves, wildlife Protected Areas
preserves, and
sanctuaries
- Nature-based Tourism - Partnerships in
Sites Environmental
B. Areas set aside as Areas declared and reserved by the
Management for the Seas
aesthetic, potential Department of Tourism or other
of East Asia (PEMSEA),
tourist spots authorities for tourism development
Manila Bay Area
Environmental Atlas
C. Areas which Areas inhabited by indeterminate - -
constitute the habitat species, threatened species, rare
for any endangered species, endangered species, such
or threatened species species categolized as Appendix I or II
of indigenous of CITES as well as listed in the The
Philippine wildlife National List of Threatened Fauna
(flora and fauna)
- National historical landmarks, - Historical and Cultural - PEMSEA, Manila Bay
geological monuments, Sites Area Environmental Atlas
paleontological and anthropological
D. Areas of unique
reservations as designated or
historic,
determined by the National
archeological,
Historical Institute, National
geological, or
Museum, National Commission for
scientific interests
Culture and the Arts, National
Commission on Geological
Sciences, and other authorities
- Ancestral Domains with - National Commission on
approved (Certificate of Indigenous Peoples
Ancestral Domain Title) (NCIP)
E. Areas which are CADT - JICA Study Team
- Areas that are occupied or claimed - Ancestral Domains with
traditionally
as Certificated Ancestral on-going social
occupied by cultural
Domains/Lands by indigenous preparation
communities or
communities - Ancestral Domains with
tribes
completed survey
- Ancestral Domains with
on-going survey
- Areas frequently visited or hard-hit
by typhoons
- Areas frequently visited or hard-hit
F. Areas frequently
by tsunamis
visited and or
- Areas frequently visited or hard hit - Philippine Institute of
hard-hit by natural
by earthquakes Volcanology and
calamities (geologic - Active Volcanoes
- Storm surge-prone areas Seismology
hazards, floods,
- Flood-prone areas (PHIVOLCS)
typhoons, volcanic
- Areas prone to volcanic activities
activity, etc.
- Areas located along fault lines or
within fault zones
- Drought-prone areas
- Lands with slope of 50% or more
G. Areas with critical - U.S. Geological Survey
- Alienable and disposable forest - Earthquake Epicenters
slope (USGS)
lands and unclassified forests
IT-1
Annex-T I.2.2.1 (2/2) Summary of Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)
GIS data collected for the preparation of the maps
by the Study Team
Data collected Sources

- Irrigated and irrigable areas and
other areas mapped under the
H. Areas classified as
Network of Protected Areas for
prime agricultural - Faultlines - DENR Region III
Agriculture (NPAA) of the Bureau
lands
of Soils and Water Management
(BSWM)
I. Recharged areas of - Areas of sources of water
- Flood-prone Areas - JICA Study Team
aquifers replenishment
- Philippine Atmospheric,
- Areas that are tapped for domestic
Geophysical &
purposes - Tropical Cyclone
J. Water bodies Astronomical Services
- Areas which support wildlife and frequency
Administration
fishery activities
(PAGASA)
- Tidal areas covered by salt-tolerant, - Slope - JICA Study Team
intertidal tree species
K. Mangrove Areas
- Areas declared as mangrove swamp
forest reserves
- Areas characterized by the - Strategic Agriculture and - BSWM, DA
assemblage of different types of Fisheries Development - JICA Study Team
marine plants and organisms Zones(SAFDZ)
L. Coral Reefs
- Areas identified by local sources
such as PAWB-DENR to be rich in
corals.
Source: Compiled by the Study Team based on Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 30 Series of
2003 (DAO 03-30)(2007)
IT-2
Annex-T I.2.2.2 (1/15) Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Types for New Single Co-Located Projects1
GROUP I: ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL PROJECTS (ECPs)2 in both Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs) and Non-ECAs, as declared in and Presidential Proclamation
No.803(1996) for Golf Courses, and Presidential Proclamation No. 2146 (1961) for Heavy and Resource Extractive Industries & Infrastructure Projects
EIA Report Type Required /
Project Size
Project Type Decision Document
Parameter
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) / EDC
A. GOLF COURSES
1. A.1 Golf course projects/complex number oif holes regardless of number of holes
B. HEAVY INDUSTRIES
4
2. B.1 Iron Steel Mills annual production rate > 30,000 MT
5
3. B.2 Non-Ferrous Metal Industries annual production rate > 30,000 MT
6
B.3 Petroleum and Petrochemical Industries
4. B.3.a. Petrochemical industry projects annual production rate > 30,000 MT
5. B.3.b. Recycling of oil and other petroleum chemicals daily recycling rate > 10 MT
6. B.3.c. Refineries annual production rate > 30,000 barrels
7
7. B.4 Smelting Plants annual smelting rate of raw material > 15,000 MT
C. RESOURCE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES
IT-3
8
C.1 FISHERY PROJECTS - DIKES FOR/AND FISHPOND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
8. C.1.a. Fishery/Aquaculture Projects (inland-based, e.g., lakes, rivers, etc.) total water spread area to be utilized > 25 hectares
9. C.1.b. Fishery/Aquaculture Projects in water bodies (coastal areas) total water spread area to be utilized > 100 hectares
C.2. FORESTRY PROJECTS
C.2.a. Logging Projects
10. C.2.a.1. Communit Based Forest Resources Utilization (CBFRU)9 volume of trees to be cut > 10,000 m3
11. C.2.a.2. Integrated Forest Management Agreement (IFMA) projects9 volume of trees to be cut > 10,000 m3
12. C.2.a.3. Timber License Agreement (TLA) volume of trees to be cut > 10,000 m3
13. C.2.b. Grazing Projects9, 10 grazing capacity > 1 head/hectare
14. C.2.c. Introduction of Exotic Fauna in Public and Private Forests Regardless of number or area
15. C.2.d. Major Wood Processing Projects equivalent annual production rate > 8,000 m3
16. C.2.b.1. Pulp and Paper Industries annual production capacity > 50,000 MT
C.3. MAJOR MINING AND QUARRYING PROJECTS
17. C.3.a. Coal Mining annual extraction rate > 70,000 MT
C.3.b. Extraction of metallic ores (on shore)
annual extraction rate OR > 100,000 MT OR
18. C.3.b.1. - Open pit method with mechanical operations, blasting or combincations thereof
area to be mined > 25 hectares
annual extraction rate OR > 150,000 MT OR
19. C.3.b.2 - Other methods
area to be mined > 25 hectares
GROUP I: ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL PROJECTS (ECPs)2 in both Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs) and Non-ECAs, as declared in and Presidential Proclamation
No.803(1996) for Golf Courses, and Presidential Proclamation No. 2146 (1961) for Heavy and Resource Extractive Industries & Infrastructure Projects
Extraction of non-metallic ores with or without explosive
- Limestone/shale/silica/clay/placer and other non-metal ores annual extraction rate OR > 75,000 MT OR
20. C.3.c.
- Aggregates (sand, stone, gravel) quarry area > 20 hectares
- Dredging activities resulting to commercial use or ore recovery
C.3.d. Extraction of Oil and Gas (Land-based)11
21. C.3.d.1. - Commercial extraction of oil daily commercial extraction rate > 4,000 barrels (or equivalent)
22. C.3.d.2. - Commercial extraction of gas daily commercial extraction rate > 250,000 m3
Metallic Mineral or ore processing
23. C.3.e. annual processing (inputs) > 70,000 MT
(e.g. copper, lead, nickel, cobalt, zinc, silver, magnesium and manganese, gold)
Non-metallic mineral processing plants like cement, other cement products, clinker,
24. C.3.f. annual production rate > 50,000 MT
limestone
Non-metallic minderal processing projects like ceramic industries, manufacture of
25. C.3.g. annual production rate > 70,000 MT
glass and glass products, manufacture and processing of calcium
26. C.3.h. Off-shore mining (including commercial extraction of oil and gas, deuterium)11 Regardless of commercial capacity or area
D. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
IT-4
Reservoir flooded area OR meter storage > 25 hectares OR

27. D.1. MAJOR DAMS
capacity > 20 million m3
28. D.2. MAJOR RECLAMATION PROJECTS area reclaimed > 50 hectares
D.3. MAJOR ROAD & BRIDGES
29. D.3.a. Bridges and viaducts, new construction length > 10.0 km
30. D.3.b. On-grade railway system, new Regardless of length and width
Roads, new construction, widening length with no critical slope OR length with > 20.0 km OR
31. D.3.c.
(including RO-RO facilities) crititcal slope > 10.0 km
32. D.3.d. Tunnels and sub-grade roads and railways length > 1.0 km
D.4. MAJOR POWER PLANTS (Proc No. 2146 declared types: fossil-fueled, nuclear fueled, hydroelectric or geothermal)
33. D.4.a. Fuel Cell total power production capacity > 100 km
34. D.4.b. Gas-fired thermal power plants total power production capacity > 50 km
35. D.4.c. Geothermal facilities total power production capacity > 50 km
36. D.4.d. Hydropower facilities water impounding capacity > 20 million cubic meters
37. D.4.e. Other thermal power plants (e.g., diesel, bunker, coal, etc.) total power production capacity > 30 MW
GROUP II - Non-ECPs in Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)
First Set of Group II Projects under similar Project Types as declared in Presidential Proclamation No. 2146
EIA Report Type for Corresponding Project Size/Threshold/
Project Size Decision Document
Project Type 3
Parameter Initial Environment Examination (IEE Report Project Description
12
IEER or IEE Checklist: IEEC) / ECC Report / CNC
A. HEAVY INDUSTRIES
4 < 200 MT annually
38. A.1. Iron and Steel Mills annual production rate > 200 MT but < 30,000 MT
AND < 1.0 MT daily
5 < 200 MT annually
39. A.2. Non-Ferrous Metal Industries annual production rate > 200 MT but < 30,000 MT
AND < 1.0 MT daily
6
A.3. Petroleum and Petrochemical Industries
< 200 MT annually
40. A.3.a. Petrochemical industry projects annual production rate > 200 MT but < 30,000 MT
AND < 1.0 MT daily
< 1.0 MT daily
41. A.3.b. Recycling of oil and other petroleum-based chemicals daily recycling rate > 1.0 MT but < 10 MT
AND < 200 MT annually
<200 barrels annually
IT-5
42. A.3.c. Refineries annual production rate > 200 barrels but < 30,000 barrels
AND < 1.0 barrels daily
7 annual smelting rate of < 200 MT annually
43. A.4. Smelting Plants > 200 MT but < 15,000 MT
raw material AND < 1.0 MT daily
B RESOURCE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES
8
B.1 FISHERY PROJECTS - DIKES FOR/AND FISHPOND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Fishery /Aquaculture Projects (inland-based, e.g., lakes, total water spread area > 1 hectare
44. B.1.a. < 1 hectare
rivers, etc. to be utilized but < 25 hectares
total water spread area > 1 hectare
45. B.1.b. Fishery/Aquaculture Projects in water bodies (coastal areas) < 1 hectare
to be utilized but < 100 hectares
B.2. FORESTRY PROJECTS
B.2.a. Logging Projects
46. B.2.a.1. Community Based Forest Resources Utilization (CBFRU)9 volume of trees to be cut < 10,000 m
3
47. B.2.a.2. Integrated Forest Management Agreement (IFMA) projects9 volume of trees to be cut < 10,000 m
3
48. B.2.a.3. Private land timber utilization (PLTU)9 volume of trees to be cut > 100 m3 < 100 m
3
3
49. B.2.a.4. Timber License Agreement (TLA) volume of trees to be cut < 10,000 m
9, 10 1 head/hectare (but not more
50. B.2.b. Grazing Projects Grazing capacity
than 100 heads/100 hectares)
51. B.2.c. Introduction of Exotic Flora in Public and Private Forests regardless of number or area
9 equivalent annual 3
52. B.2.d. Minor Wood Processing Projects > 1,000 to 8,000 m < 1,000 cubic meters
AND production rate
Project Type 3
IEER or IEE Checklist: IEEC) / ECC Report12 / CNC
53. B.2.d.1. Pulp and Paper Industries annual production capacity < 50,000 MT
B.3. MINOR MING & QUARRYING PROJECTS
54. B.3.a. Batching Plant (with or without crushing) All batching plants
55. B.3.b. Coal mining annual extraction rate Up to 70,000 MT
B.3.c. Extraction of metallic ores (on shore)
・Open pit method with mechanical operations, blasting or annual extraction rate
56. B.3.c.1. < 100,000 MT AND < 25 hectares
combinations thereof AND area to be mined
< 200.0 MT per year
annual extraction rate > 200 MT but < 150,000 MT
57. B.3.c.2. ・Other methods AND < 1.0 MT daily
AND area to be mined AND < 25 hectares
extraction
Extraction of non-metallic ores with or without explosive
IT-6
・imestone/shale/silica/clay/placer and other non-metal ores annual extraction rate < 75,000 MT
58. B.3.d. ・Aggregates (sand, stone, gravel) AND AND
・Dredging activities resulting to commercial use or ore quarry area < 20 hectares
recovery
11
B.3.e. Extraction of Oil and Gas (Land-based)
daily commercial < 4,000 barrels
59. B.3.e.1. ・Commercial extraction of oil
extraction rate (or equivalent)
daily commercial
60. B.3.e.2. ・Commercial extraction of gas < 250,000 m
3
extraction rate
61. B.3.f. Marble slab processing plant All marble slab processing plants
Metallic Mineral or ore processing
62. B.3.g. (e.g., copper, lead, nickel, cobalt, zinc, silver, magnesium
and
< 200.0 MT annually AND
63. B.3.g.1. ・With physical or mechanical processing annual processing (inputs) > 200.0 MT annually but < 70,000 MT
< 1.0 MT daily
64. B.3.g.2. ・With chemical processing annual processing (inputs) < 70,000 MT
65. B.3.h. Non-commercial Geothermal Explocation Projects Regardless of area or number of wells
Project Type
Parameter Initial Environment Examination3 (IEE Report Project Description
12
IEER or IEE Checklist: IEEC) / ECC Report / CNC
Non-commercial mineral and fossil mining projects: core
drilling/sampling, exploration (drilling and testing); feasibility
studies; geo-scientific, physical surveys; gravity survey;
66. B.3.i. regardless of capacity or area
piloting; reconnaissance; research and development activities;
seismic survey, and similar activities with no significant earth
moving activities, etc.
Non-metallic mineral processing plants like cement, either < 200.0 MT annually AND
67. B.3.j. annual production rate > 200 MT but < 50,000 MT
cement products, clinker, limestone, sulfur < 1.0 MT daily
Non-metallic mineral processing projects like ceramic
< 200.0 MT annually AND
68. B.3.k. industries, manufacture of glass and glass products, annual production rate > 200 MT but < 70,000 MT
< 1.0 MT daily
manufacture and processing of calcium
C. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
IT-7
Reservoir flooded area

69. C.1. MINOR DAMS AND water storage < 25 hectares AND < 20 million m3
capacity
MINOR POWER PLANTS (Proc. No. 2146 declared types:
C.2.
fossil-fueled, nuclear fueled, hydroelectric or geothermal)
total power production
70. C.2.a. Small power plants < 1 MW unless specified below
capacity
71. C.2.b. Fuel Cell > 5MW but < 100 MW < 5 MW
capacity
72. C.2.c. Gas-fired thermal power plants > 10.0MW but < 50.0 MW < 10.0 MW
capacity
73. C.2.d. Geothermal facilities >10MW but < 50.0 MW < 1 MW
capacity
< 20 million cubic meters
74. C.2.e. Hydropower facilities Run-of-river system
water impounding capacity
75. C.2.f. Other thermal power plants (e.g, diesel, bunker, coal, etc.) > 5.0 MW but < 30.0 MW < 5.0 MW
capacity
Project Type 3
IEER or IEE Checklist: IEEC) / ECC Report12 / CNC
76. C.3. MINOR RECLAMATION PROJECTS area reclaimed < 50 hectares
C.4. MINOR ROADS & BRIDGES
Regardless of length for foot
77. C.4.a. Bridges and viaducts, new construction length > 80 m but < 10.0 km bridges; <80 m for other
bridges
length with no critical > 2 km but < 20.0 km
78. C.4.b. Roads, new construction, widening (including RO-RO facilitiesslope OR length with OR < 2 km
critical slope > 2 km but < 10.0 km
79. C.4.c. Elevated roads, flyover/cloverleaf/interchanges Regardless of length and width
80. C.4.d. Tunnels and sub-grade roads and railways length < 1.0 km
81. C.4.e. Pedestrian passages All underpass projects All overpass projects
C.5. OTHER POWER PLANTS & POWER FACILITIES (not listed in Proclamation No. 2146)
IT-8
total power
82. C.5.a. Small power plants < 1 MW unless specified below
production capacity
total power
83. C.5.b. Powerbarge > 1 MW but < 10 MW < 1 MW
production capacity
power carrying
84. C.5.c. Power transmission lines > 138 KV
capacity
Renewable energy projects such as
total power
85. C.5.d. ocean, solar, wind, tidal power except > 100 MW > 5 MW but < 100 MW < 5 MW
production capacity
waste-to-energy and biogas projects
86. C.5.e. Substations switchyard power output > 220 Kv < 220 kV
Waste- to-energy projects including total power
87. C.5.f > 50.0 MW > 1 MW but < 50 MW < 1 MW
biogas projects production capacity
total power
88. C.5.g Wind farms/Wind projects > 5 MW but < 100 MW < 5 MW
production capacity

Second Set of Group II Projects as defined by DENR-EMB (not included in declared Project Types as declared in Presidential Proclamation No. 2146)
Project Type 3
Parameter Initial Environment Examination (IEE Project Description
Report IEER or IEE Checklist: IEEC) / ECC Report12 / CNC
D. AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY
Agricultural plantation
89. D.1. Area to be developed > 1,000 hectares > 100 hectares but < 1,000 hectares < 100 hectares
(e.g. orchards, including rubber plantation)
annual production
90. D.2. Agricultural processing facilities > 50,000 MT > 5,000 MT but < 50,000 MT < 5,000 MT
rate
91. D.3. Cut-flower industry Projects regardless of capacity or area
D.4. Livestock Production
92. D.4.a. Pigs/Goats (enclosed) stock population > 5,000 heads > 100 heads but < 5,000 heads < 100 heads
13
93. D.4.b. Poultry/birds stock population > 100,000 heads > 10,000 heads but < 100,000 heads < 10,000 heads
94. D.4.c. Rice mill milling rate > 1 ton/hr < 1 ton/hr
IT-9
E. Buildings, Storage Facilities and Other Structures

95. E.1. Cemetery Area to be developed > 5.0 hectares < 5.0 hectares
Commercial (Business centers with
< 1 hectare; All other
residential units (mixed use), malls,
total /gross floor area > 1 hectare commercial establishments that
supermarkets, public markets)
96. E.2. including parking and > 2.5 hectare but sell only non-perishable goods
・Fastfood/Restaurant Projects
other areas < 2.5 hectares and/or showrooms for motor
・Commercial Establishments (i.e.
vehicles and similar products
Showrooms)
Commercial (office spaces only)
total /gross floor area
Institutional and other related
97. E.3. including parking and > 1 hectare < 1 hectare
facilities: religious, government, and
other areas
educational
Facilities for Barangay Micro-Business
98. E.4. 14 regardless of capacity or area
Enterprise (BMBE) Projects
99. E.5. Family dwellings/Apartments type including parking and Regardless of area
other areas
Funeral parlors, crematorium,
columbarium
other areas
Project Type
Parameter Initial Environment Examination3 (IEE Project Description
Institutional and other related Clinics (out-patient, health
Primary, Secondary, Tertiary hospitals or Medical
101. E.7. facilities: centers, dental clinics)
Facilities
medical facilities including rural health units
Institutional and other structures with
102. E.8. Regardless of size or area
laboratory facilities
Motels, Hotels,
Condominium/Apartelles (residential)
other areas
104. E.10. LPG storage and refilling storage capacity Regardless of capacity
Refilling station projects/gasoline
105. E.11. storage capacity > 20 kL < 20 kL
station projects
Storage of petroleum, petrochemical or
106. E.12. storage capacity > 5,000 kL < 5,000 kL but > 20 kL < 20 kL
related products
IT-10

Storage facilities, non-toxic/hazardous
materials, substances or products
other areas
Storage facilities, toxic/hazardous
108. E.14 storage capacity > 1,000 MT > 0.1 MT but < 1,000 MT < 0.1 MT
materials, substances or products
Subdivision and housing projects,
resettlement projects, economic and total land area,
109. E.15. socialized housing project, open including all common Regardless of area
market housing and other similar and other areas
(horizontal) and development projects
15
110. E.16. Telecommunication Projects Regardless of type
F. Chemical Industries (For associated building requirements, refer to Group E.14/E.15)
Manufacturing, processing and/or use quantity of toxic
111. F.1. of substances included in the Priority chemicals to be used > 1.0 MT > 0.001 MT but < 1.0 MT < 0.001 MT
Chemical List per month
Manufacture of explosives, propellants
112. F.2. daily production rate > 5 MT > 0.001 MT but < 5 MT < 0.001 MT
and industrial gases
Manufacture of agri-chemicals and
< 200 MT annually
113. F.3. other industrial chemicals not in the annual production rate > 30,000 MT > 200 MT but < 30,000 MT
AND < 1 MT daily
PCL
Project Type
12
Report IEER or IEE Checklist: IEEC) / ECC Report / CNC
Pharmaceutical industries and
manufacture of soap and detergents, < 200 MT annually
114. F.4. annual production rate > 50,000 MT > 200 MT but < 50,000 MT
health and beauty products, and other AND < 1 MT daily
consumer products
Surface coating industries (paints,
< 200.0 MT annually
115. F.5. pigments, varnishes, lacquers, anti- annual production rate > 30,000 MT > 200 MT but < 30,000 MT
AND < 1.0 MT daily
capacity fouling coating, printing inks)
116. G. Cottage Industries16 regardless of capacity or area
117. H. Demonstration and Pilot Projects regardless of capacity or area
12
I. Environmental Enhancement and Environmental Mitigation Projects ( PD Report required)
118. I.1. Artificial Reef regardless of capacity or area
IT-11
Pollution control devices or facilities

required under the ECC condition/s of
119. I.2. regardless of capacity or area
the "main" projects covered under
Groups I or II.
Pollution control devices or similar
facilities intended to prevent emissions no Groups I and II components
120. I.3. and/or discharges beyond allowable wherein thresholds are required
limits (e.g. for compliance with Clean an EIS, IEER or IEEC
Air Act or Clean Water Code)
Prevention or proactive measures
against potential natural hazards (such no Groups I and II components
121. I.4. as shore protection, river wherein thresholds are required
embankment/river bank stabilization, an EIS, IEER or IEEC
seawall, etc.)
capacity or area based on the
recommendations and
122. I.5. Reforestation projects
endorsement of FMB and/or
PAWB on a case-to-case basis
Project Type
12
17
J. Food and Related Industries (For associated building requirements, refer to Group II E.14/E.15)
Animal products processing (fish/meat
123. J.1. processing, canning, slaughterhouses, daily production rate > 10,000 kg > 500 kg but < 10,000 kg < 500 kg
etc.
Coconut processing plants (including
124. J.2. monthly production rate > 25,000 MT < 25,000 MT
production of coconut based products)
Distillation and Fermentation Plants
125. J.3. annual production rate > 50,000 < 50,000 MT
(e.g. bio-ethanol project)
Food preservation (e.g., drying,
126. J.4. fresszing) and other methods aside regardless of capacity
from canning
IT-12
127. J.5. Fruit and vegetable processing daily production rate > 500 kg < 500 kg
daily processing rate
128. J.6. Leather and related industries > 1 MT < 1.0 MT
of raw hides
Other types of food (and other food by-
129. J.7. products, additives, etc.) processing annual production rate > 50,000 MT < 50,000 MT
industries
> 100,000 L (liquid)
<100,000 L (liquid) OR
130. J.8. Processing of dairy products monthly production rate OR
< 100,000 kg (solid)
> 100,000 kg (solid)
131. J.9. Sugar Mills annual production rate > 50,000 MT < 50,000 MT
18
K. Manufacture of Other Products, e.g. Packaging Materials (For associated building requirements, refer to Group II D.12/D.13)
132. K.1. Glass-based products annual production rate > 30,000 MT < 30,000 MT
Metal-based products (including Semi-
133. K.2. annual production rate > 15,000 MT < 15,000 MT
Conductor/Electronic Industries
134. K.3. Paper and plastic-based products annual production rate > 15,000 MT < 15,000 MT
135. L. Pipeline Projects
136. L.1. Fuel pipelines length > 25 km < 25 km
137. L.2. Other pipelines length > 50 km < 50 km
Project Type 3
12
Service industries which do not emit
pollutants except for domestic wastes
and occupying a space equal to or less
138. M. than limits specified in Groups I or II regardless of capacity or area
for infrastructures or other applicable
project components needed in the
19
service industry.
N. Textile, Wood, Rubber Industries ( For associated building requirements, refer to Group II E.14./E.15.)
21
Garment manufacturing
20
139. N.1. Textile, Wood, Rubber Industries annual production rate > 50,000 MT < 50,000 MT w/o dyeing and only involves
spinning, cutting and sewing
22
140. N.2. Wood and Metal Furniture Assembly regardless of capacity or area
IT-13
O. Tourism Industry
Resorts and other tourism/leisure
141. O.1. Area to be developed > 25 hectares > 0.1 hectares but < 25 hectares < 0.1 hectare
projects
P. Transport Terminal Facilities
142. P.1. Airports functional size larger than a private strip Private airstrips
Land transport terminal (for buses,
< 1 hectare without service
143. P.2. jeepneys and other modes of total land area 1 hectare to > 2 hectares
facilities
transportation)
> 15.0 hectares with
reclamation < 15.0 hectares reclamation
144. P.3. Sea port, causeways, and harbors Area to be developed OR OR < 1.0 hectares (w/o reclamation)
> 25.0 hectares (w/o < 25.0 hectares (w/o reclamation)
reclamation)
Treasure Hunting Projects
145. Q. regardless of capacity or area
(located in NIPAS areas)
R. Waste Management Projects daily production rate
quantity of waste to be
146. R.1. Compost/fertilizer making > 15 MT < 15 MT
treated annually
quantity of waste to be 3 3 3
147. R.2. Domestic wastewater treatment facility > 5,000 m < 5,000 m < 30 m
treated annually

Project Type 3
Hazardous waste treatment, recycling,
and/or disposal facilities (for recycling quantity of waste to be
148. R.3. > 10.0 MT < 10.0 MT
of lead, see details in Group I - Heavy treated annually
industries)
Industrial and hospital waste (non-
3
149. R.4. hazardous) materials treatment number of users > 50 m < 50 m3
facilities
150. R.5. Landfill for industrial and other wastes kind of activity Multi-users Single-user
quantity of waste to be with composting facilities (see
151. R.6. Materials Recovery Facilities material segregation only
treated annually category of composting above)
IT-14
Receiving facilities, paper, plastic, and < 300,000 MT involve manual or

152. R.7. daily waste input > 300,000 MT
other materials recycling OR involving the use of chemicals mechanical sorting only
Sanitary landfill for domestic wastes
153. R.8. > 1,000 MT < 1,000 MT
only
S. Water Supply, Irrigation or Flood Control Projects
"< 25 hectares
154. S.1. Impounding System or Flood Control Projec reservoir flooded area > 25 hectares
OR impounded water < 20 million m3 "
155. S.2. irrigation System (Distribution System only)service area > 1,000 hectares > 300 hectares but < 1,000 hectares < 300 hectares
> 6 wells and other
number of production
156. S.3. Water Supply Systems (Complete System systems (e.g. infiltration < 6 wells
wells
gallery, etc.
Level II - communal faucet
distribution supply Level III - with household connection and water
157. S.4. Water Supply System (Distribution only) and
level treatment
Level I - deep wells
Wildlife Farming or any related
158. T. 23 regardless of area butterfly farming
projects as defined by PAWB
GROUP III - Non-Environmentally Critical Projects in Non-Environmentally Critical Areas (NECPs in NECAs) - non-covered projects
All Group II Project Types in NECA : Application for Automated Processing System (APS) required to be submitted for Enhancement and
A. Mitigation Projects as basis for confirmation of benign nature of proposed activity, and CNC is required to be secured. All other projects shall be at
the option of the Proponent to prepare an App. form for APS as basis for a CNC, should the Proponent opt to secure one.
1
GROUP IV - CO-LOCATED PROJECTS
Co-located projects (mix of single projects in a contaguous area optionally applied as one project under one area/zone administrator) shall be
159. A.
automatically required a Programmable EIS regardless of capacity, area and number of locators/components.
GROUP V - UNCLASSIFIED PROJECTS

IT-15
All Unclassified Projects shall submit a Project Description as an interim documentary requirement. Unclassified Projects may be covered or non-covered by the EIS
Project Type requiredto submit an App. form for APS
160. A. Projects using new processes/technologies with uncertain impacts
161. B. All other projects not listed in Groups I, II, III and IV
Annex-T I.2.2.2 (14/15) Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Types for New
Single Co-Located Projects1
ENDNOTES TO Annex-T I.2.2.1

1. Single Projects may be an individual project listed in this Annex-T I.2.2.1, or a multi-component project
applied as a single project under one (1) ownership or proponent, i.e. combination of related individual
projects need to support the main project being applied for, e.g., a nickel mining project with components
comprised of road network, bridge, port/causeway, buildings, and power plant, max threshold among project
components will apply.
Single Projects may also include individual projects of locators within an economic or industrial zone or
park, opting to apply for individual ECCs. However, if the administrator of the zone, park or any integrated
development within a defined contiguous area, adopts the option to apply for one (1) ECC for the entire
program of development within such contiguous area, the group of projects shall be collectively called
“Co-located Projects” which shall then be required a Programmatic EIS.
2. Per NECP Office Circular No. 3 of 1983, and updated by EMB with DTI concurrence on 06 July 2004 as
authorized by Sections 2-D and 3-A of AO 42 issued on 02 November 2002 by the President of the
Philippines.
3. The IEE documentary requirement may either be an IEE Reportor an IEE Checklist. DENR-EMB
requires the usage of the 28 checklists available at the EMB offices or downloadable from the EMB website.
These are marked with © superscript in the IEE columns by Project Groups I and II.
4. Iron and steel mills refer to the organized and coordinated arrangement of manufacturing processes
designed to prepare or smelt or process iron ores, steel scraps and/or primary iron and steel mill products
into marketable products except when process involves reheating or resizing only.
5. Non-ferrous metal industries refer to the organized and coordinated arrangement of manufacturing
processes designed to prepare smelt or process non-ferrous metals into marketable products. This shall
include projects characterized by any of the following specification: a) classified as large industrial plants
under the implementation rules of LOI No. 950 and b) will process non-ferrous metals such as cadmium,
chromium and lead.
6. Petroleum/Petrochemical Industries shall refer to the organized and coordinated arrangement of
manufacturing processes designed to physically and/or chemically transform petroleum and its derivatives
into marketable products. Projects listed in this grouping with thresholds > 5,000 MT shall be covered by
Level 1 or Level 2 ERA requirement, as appropriate.
7. Smelting plant projects shall refer to the organized and coordinated arrangement of manufacturing
processed designed to smelt metals or alloys and cast the same into some special form.
8. Dikes for/and Fishpond Development Projects shall refer to natural or artificial water impoundment
involving dike construction and harvesting the same as marketable size and quantities.
9. Processing shall be done at the EMB Regional Office, however approval will be at the EMB Central
Office for logging projects involving cutting of trees equal to or greater than 5,000 cubic meters and
for wood processing with greater than 4,000 cum if equivalent product per year, per Dec. 13, 2006 DENR
Secretary Memorandum Circular.
10. Grazing Projects shall refer to the management of forest range resources for forage productivity needed to
support livestock production. Exceedance of the natural grazing capacity of 1 head/hectare is considered
critical as specified in MNR AO No. 50 (1982).
11. The reckoning of “commercial extraction” of onshore and offshore oil & gas projects shall be after DOE’s
approval of the Service Contractor’s Declaration of Commerciality.
12. Poultry/birds covers all avian species regardless whether these are ostrich, quails, ducks or fighting cocks,
while the term head or pigs refer to individual heads of pigs not the sow level.
13. Facilities for Barangay Micro-Business Enterprises (BMBE) Projects as defined by R.A. 9178 including
similarly-scaled projects with less than PhP 3.0 million capitalization involving only assembly of
components, molding, sculpturing, cutting, sowing, knitting, weaving, briquetting, and carpentry works.
14. Telecommunication Projects – including a) broadcasting towers, monopole/guyed towers, three and
four-legged self supporting towers and other similar structures; b) Indoor Antennae; c) based Transceiver
Station (refers to equipment housing only and does not involve installation of a tower, based transceiver
station antenna without equipment room or tower, and based transceiver station mounted on any existing
structures; d) On top of a building (Mounted on a Building) wall mounted and floor mounted; e) Pole and
Parapet Mounted Antennae; f) Monopole Tower. Structural integrity of telecommunication and broadcasting
towers, including similar structures, is deemed to be under the jurisdiction of the LGUs (in line with the
building code requirements). And, radiation concerns are deemed to be under the jurisdiction of DOH.
IT-16
Annex-T I.2.2.2 (15/15) Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Types for New
Single Co-Located Projects1
15. Cottage Industries – manufacture of stuffed toys, handicraft, souvenir items, decorative accessories, paper
boxes, rope twines, throw pillow, etc. that do not generate toxic or hazardous materials and/or strong/highly,
pollutive wastes; abaca trays, bags, belts; baseboards, baskets, beads, bird cage; blinds; boat shelves; bone
products, candle; ceramics; chandeliers, Christmas ornaments; cloth hat; cords, decorative accessories;
decorative angels decorative flowers or ornamental; decorative statues; doll house, fashion accessories; flower
pots; food bowl; fossil stones; fruit bowls; garden accents; gift wares; hemp nets; hand painted terracotta;
handcrafted carabao horns; handicrafts; house wares; jewelry case, key holder; laces; lamp base; lighting
fixtures; lighting accessories, other; mini airplanes; mirror frames; molding frames; native fiber décor;
nativity cards; paper boxes, paper mache; pencil case, porcelain and fiberglass items; religious decors; ribbons,
rope, salad server; shell furniture; shirt printing; shoes; souvenir items; stainless steel kitchen equipment;
stretcher; throw pillow; topiaries; torcher floor lamps; toys and stuffed toys; twines; vases, wall decors;
wallet; wheel chairs, wine caddies, wire decors; wooden antiques; wooden hand painted cabinets; wooden
mini boats.
16. Food and Related Industries – shall refer to the organized and coordinated arrangement of manufacturing
processes designed to produce food, food by-products and beverages from various raw materials sources
into marketable goods. The following projects or undertaking falls under this category: sugar mills,
distillation and fermentation plants, fruit and vegetable processing, processing of dairy products, Animal
products processing (fish/meat processing, canning, slaughterhouses, etc.), food preservation (e.g., drying,
freezing) and other methods aside from canning, leather tanning and related industries, Gelatin, adhesives
and other food by-products processing plants, coconut processing plants, and other types of food processing
industries.
17. Manufacture of Other Products, e.g. Packaging Materials shall refer to the organized and coordinated
arrangement of manufacturing processes designed to produce paper, plastics, glass and metal-based
packaging materials and other marketable products from various raw material sources using molding,
heating and other mechanical processes only.
18. Service Industry is defined as the sector of economy that supplies the needs of consumers but produces no
tangible goods. Examples include information technology services, vehicle emission testing centers,
consultancy services, broker-forwarding business, sea and air freight services, importation or purchase of
equipment, containerized shipping services, trucking, banks, lending institutions, telecommunications and
broadcasting towers, trading (of securities, stocks, etc.) business and similar activities.
19. Textile, Wood and Rubber Industries – shall refer to the organized and coordinated arrangement of
manufacturing processes designed to produce marketable products and secondary raw materials from fibers,
woods, rubber, paper and similar materials.
20. Garment manufacturing includes production of apron; blouses; bottle cover; cardigan for ladies and
children; carpets and rugs; children garments; coin purse; crochet slipper and shoes; dresses; embroidered
kitchen linens and table tops; face towel; hand woven embroidered piña barong; hats; knit tops; knitted
sweaters; knitting pullover; leather gloves; mats; napkin rings; napkin; oven mittens; panel curtains, pants;
pillowcase; placemats; pot holder; shirts; skirts and overall; sweatshirts; table cloth; table linens; table
runner; telephone cover; trousers.
21. Wood and Metal Furniture Assembly (antique reproduction, buri furniture, dining sets; iron chairs and
table; iron frames; rattan furniture; sala set; tables and chairs; and similar projects).
22. Wildlife Farming – establishments or facilities for wildlife farming, protection, conservation, commercial
purposes.
IT-17
Annex-T I.3.1.1 (1/7) Outlines of Proposed and Conceptual Projects and Programs of IWRM Plan
Groups Possible Documents
Proposed/Conceptual
Sector Outline/Scope of the Program/Project under Required For
Program/Project
PEISS ECC/CNC Application
1. Agriculture/ AI-P-01: Balintingon Reservoir Major activities are the construction of the facilities:
Irrigation and Multipurpose Project (BRMP) ・ Rock-fill center-core dam (H=140m) and its appurtenant structures with an aim to have the
Fisheries reservoir with 572 MCM storage capacity.
・ Open-type powerhouse equipped with 2 Francis type turbines with the capacity of 15 MW Group I EIS
・ Diversion weir (L=140m)
・ Irrigation facilities: main canal (L=109km), laterals(L=168km) and sub-laterals, main and
supplementary farm ditches, drainage channels (L=210km), and access roads
AI-P-02: Balog-Balog Multipurpose Major activities are construction of the facilities:
Project Phase 2 ・ High earth and rock fill dam (H=113.5m) with the storage capacity of 625 MCM (effective storage:
525 MCM)
・ Hydropower plant with the capacity of 43.5MW
・ 150 to 200 deep production wells to develop ground water for supplementation of the irrigation Group I EIS
water supply
・ Fishery component consisting of the construction and production of tilapia species in fixed
floating cages of at least 150 ha within the Balog-Balog reservoir area. Estimated fishery production
IT-18
per cage is 6,300 kg/year*cage.

AI-P-03: Sector Loan on Major activity is rehabilitation of diversion works, canal system, drainage system, road, and O&M
Group V App. for APS
Rehabilitation of Irrigation Facilities facilities.
AI-P-04: Casecnan Multi-purpose Major activities are:
Power & Irrigation Project Irrigation ・ New construction of extension of Super Diversion Canal, construction of lateral, and sub-lateral
Component Phase 2 canals, drainage canals and related structures Group II/III EIS/App. for APS
・ Rehabilitation/Improvement of UPRIS, such as rehabilitation of PENRIS main and lateral canals,
and related structures
AI-P-05: Procurement of Pumps, Major activity is procurement of the following materials:
Drilling Rigs & Related Equipment ・ 1,000 units of centrifugal pumps
Group V App. for APS
・ 1 units of trailer mounted rotary/percussion type drilling rings
・ 2 units of resistively machines & electric logger
AI-P-06: Irrigation Water Resources Major activities are:
Augmentation Pump Establishment ・ Procurement of 1,330 units of pumps including diesel engines
- -
Project ・ Installation of 301 units of shallow tube wells
・ Installation of 1,029 units of surface water pump irrigation to cover the entire target area
AI-P-07: Appropriate Irrigation Major activity is installation of the irrigation system with drip sprinkler and flood irrigation operated
Technologies for Enhanced by the solar power - -
Agricultural Production

Proposed/Conceptual
Program/Project
1. Agriculture/ AI-P-08: Central Luzon Groundwater Major activities are:
Irrigation and Irrigation Systems Reactivation ・ Construction of 100 deep well pump systems covering 5,000 ha
- -
Fisheries Project ・ Provision of rural water supply in the selected barrangays
・ Procurement of equipment
AI-P-09: Gumain Reservoir Project Major activity is construction of 108m high, zoned embankment dam to store irrigation water which
covers 11,000 ha of paddy field and 5,200 ha of sugarcane plantation and to increase the water Group I EIS
supply in 7,900 ha of Porac-Gumain & Caulaman RIS.
AI-P-10: Rehabilitation of AMRIS Major activity is rehabilitation of Bustos, Lower & Upper Maasim Dam. - -
AI-P-11: Construction of Priority Major activities are:
Small Scale Irrigation Systems/Small ・ Construction of SWIP and SDD in the above-mentioned provinces IEE checklist/
Group II/III
Water Impounding Projects (SWIP), ・ Rehabilitation of SDD and SWIP in Nueva Ecija App. for APS
Small Diversion Dam Projects (SDD)
AI-C-01: New Construction of Small Major activity is construction of small scale irrigation systems which are not covered by on-going
Scale Irrigation Project under BSWM and planned projects under BSWM such as:
IT-19
・ Diversion Dam (18 nos in 959 ha) IEE checklist/

Group II/III
・ Small Water Impounding Projects (24 nos in 1,635 ha) App. for APS
・ Small Farm Reservoir (4 nos in 112 ha)
・ Shallow Tube Well (STW) and others
AI-C-02: Introduction of Water Major activities are:
Saving Irrigation Technology ・ Trial and research on water saving irrigation technology
・ Operation of demonstration farms on water saving irrigation technology
・ Training to trainers and technical campaign to Irrigator’s Associations - -
・ Monitoring with close coordination among related agencies, such as DA, NIA, PhilRice, IRRI,
and JICA technical cooperation project, etc.
・ Capacity development of IAs
AI-C-03: Improvement of Major activities are:
Monitoring System and Capacity ・ Installation of additional discharge measurement device
Development for Proper Water ・ Improvement of discharge monitoring system
- -
Management in NISs and CISs ・ Review of calibration of conversion tables
・ Establishment of communication system
・ Capacity development
Proposed/Conceptual
Program/Project
2. Municipal Water MW-P-01: Rehabilitation of Umiray- Major activities is permanent rehabilitation works which includes:
Supply, Sanitation Macua Facilities ･ Complete restoration of the access road to tunnel outlet
and Sewerage ･ Construction of permanent RCDG bridge for tunnel outlet
･ Widening of ox-bow channel at the tunnel outlet
･ Intake structures such as various mechanical gates; trash rack, waterway protection works,
- -
retaining wall, ogee dam, etc.
･ Rehabilitation of mini-hydro plant
･ Construction of log arresters
･ Installation of power/communication cables inside the tunnel
･ Village/Housing relocation
MW-P-02: Sumag River Diversion Major activity is construction works such as:
Project ･ Intake facilities Group II/III IEE/App. for APS
･ Connection canal to the tunnel
MW-P-03: Bulacan Treated Bulk Major activity is construction works such as: water supply facilities, including a raw aqueduct, a
IT-20
Water Supply Project treatment plant, reservoirs, pumping station and primary lines which cover 10 municipalities of - -
Bulacan.
MW-P-04: Metro Clark Bulk Surface Major activity is installation of the water system with possible construction of storage dams at EIS (Possible amendment
Group I
Water Project some of the potential sites such as Marimula, Sacobia and Bangut. for existing ECC)
MW-C-01: Additional Level 3,2,1 Major activities are:
facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan ・ Development of water supply systems:
MW-C-02: Additional Level 3,2,1 1) Installation of new water system
facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga 2) Expansion and rehabilitation of the existing water system
Group II/III IEE/App. for APS
MW-C-03: Additional Level 3,2,1 ・ Soft components:
facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija 1) Utilization of high technology equipment in development of water system
MW-C-04: Additional Level 3,2,1 2) Immediate water repairs
facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac 3) Provision of water meters
MW-C-05: Extended Bulacan Bulk There are four (4) options proposed:
Water Supply Project ・ Bayabas Storage Dam
・ Balintingon Storage Dam (same as AI-P-01)
・ Upgrading and improvement of irrigation facilities and water management of AMRIS, consisting Group I EIS
of installation of the water pipes/aqueducts
・ Excess water for MWSS from the dams such as Ipo dam which can be constructed outside the
Pampanga river basin
Proposed/Conceptual
Program/Project
2. Municipal Water MW-C-06: Pampanga Bulk Water There are three (3) options proposed:
Supply, Sanitation Supply Project ・ Residual groundwater at surrounding cities/municipalities
Group I EIS
and Sewerage ・ Pampanga river at Cong Dadong dam
・ Gumain storage dam, same as AI-P-09
MS-C-01: Additional sanitary Major activities are:
facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan ・ Installation of conventional toilets and ecosan toilets
MS-C-02: Additional sanitary ・ Capacity development of the implementing agencies for social preparation for users
facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga
- -
MS-C-03: Additional sanitary
facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija
MS-C-04: Additional sanitary
facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac
MP-C-01: Septage Treatment and Major activity is purchase of trucks for transportation of septage to the septage treatment and
- -
Disposal Facility disposal facilities, such as the existing sanitary landfill in Kalangitan, Capas, Tarlac.
IT-21
3. Management of FL-P-01: Flood Control Measures in Major activities are:

Flood and Sediment Mt. Pinatubo Devastated Area- ・ Widening of the existing “pilot third river channel” (22.6 km in length from the confluence with
The type of the document
Disasters Focus on Pasac Delta Abacan river/San Fernando river) from the existing bottom width of 30 to 60 m
for ECC shall require
・ Excavation of the Pasac river as an eastern alignment of the pilot third river channel Group II/III
further discussion with
・ Local drainage improvement connecting the San Fernando river to the Third river and the
EMB
excavation of San Fernando river (total length:29.6m)
・ Key road raising to ensure that the transportation routes can be maintained during floods
FL-P-02: Bacolor Comprehensive Major activities are:
Rehabilitation Master Plan ・ Construction of Gugu ring dike (7.8 km in length)
・ Completion of the unfinished portion of Gugu Dike (1.0 km in length) The type of the document
・ Channel excavation of Gugu creek and other various creeks (20 km in length) for ECC shall require
Group II/III
・ Slope protection of various creeks in Bacolor municipality (11.0 km in length) further discussion with
・ Construction of new drainage canals (47.5 km in length) EMB
・ Installation of floodwater pumps in the southern part of Bacolor (2 units)
・ Construction of diversion channel for Pasig-Potrero river
FL-C-01: Flood Mitigation for The options proposed are:
Pampanga Delta ・ Construction of riverbank and channel dredgeing/excavation at the downstream of Pampanga
Group I EIS
river
・ Development of the flood retarding basin through construction of the dike
Proposed/Conceptual
Program/Project
3. Management of FL-C-02: Community Based Flood Major activities are:
Flood and Sediment Early Warning System for Provinces ・ Establishment of the simple monitoring and communication system managed by the community
Disasters of Pampanga, Tarlac and N. Ecija for flood warning
・ Capacity building for the municipal and barangay personnel for operation, maintenance and - -
management of the flood warning system
・ Information, Education and Communication (IEC) for the residents on the eligible flood
evacuation routes/evacuation centers
FL-C-03: Maintenance, Rehabilitation Major activity is implementation of the maintenance, rehabilitation and improvement works for
and Improvement for Drainage and drainage and flood control facilities.
- -
Flood Control Facilities under
Jurisdiction of LGUs
FL-C-04: Integration of Salient Major activity is awareness raising activities targeting the students.
Points of IWRM for Pampanga River - -
Basin into School Curricula
IT-22
4. Watershed WS-C-01: Upland Development Possible component of the project is capacity development of upland farmers through the trainings,
- -
Management Program such as FFS with provision of the necessary equipments.
WS-C-02: Protected Area Major activities are:
Management Program ・ Characterization of watershed (basic resource inventory, assessment and mapping, and socio-
economy survey)
・ Designation and ground delineation of the management zones
・ Organization of PAMBs and establishment of IPAF
・ Formulation of Protected Area Management Plans and harmonization with ancestral domain
plans, forest land use plans and comprehensive landuse plans to address conflicting land use
issues
- -
・ Setting up of the mechanism to streamline compliance with FPIC requirements in ancestral domain
areas
・ Initial implementation of priority action plans:
- Community-based reforestation through assisted natural regeneration in 5,615 ha of degraded
forests
- Biodiversity and wildlife conservation
- Alternative livelihood for forest occupants
- IEC campaigns
WS-C-03: Urban Greening Program Major activities are:
・ Community/volunteers organization - -
・ Planting of timber and non-timber species

Proposed/Conceptual
Program/Project
4. Watershed WS-C-04: Eco-tourism Program Major activities are:
Management ・ Capacity development of the communities on guiding tours and relevant business management - -
・ Installation/renovation of the relevant facilities
5. Water-related WQ-P-01: Clean Development Major activities are:
Environment Mechanism ・ Installation of facilities for wastewater and waste collection Group II/III IEE/App. for APS
Management ・ Installation of treatment facilities to capture and convert methane gas, and to produce electricity
WQ-C-01: Capacity Development to Major activities are:
Upgrade Water Quality monitoring ・ Revision and rationalization of the existing monitoring system of water quality/effluent
and Data Management Program ・ Preparation of inventory and identification of the pollution sources
・ Capacity development of the staffs on laboratory management with the provision of appropriate
facilities and equipments - -
・ Capacity development of WQMA governing board, private industries and other stakeholders
・ Strength the regulatory and coordination mechanism among the DENR-EMB, the LGUs and
relevant agencies
IT-23
・ IEC
WQ-C-02: Capacity Development to Major activities are:
Improve Water Quality and ・ Assessment of carrying capacity studies
- -
Aquaculture Fisheries Management ・ Capacity building of relevant agencies
・ Setup the information management systems
WQ-C-03: Capacity Development Major activities are:
Project to Improve Industry ・ Organization of the counterpart team
Adoption of Cleaner Production ・ Preparation of inventory of non-compliant industries
Options ・ Evaluation of production and environmental management system of the participating industries
・ Needs assessment and priority setting - -
・ Setting up of institutional, policy, market-based financial support mechanisms
・ Preparation of the industry-specific clean production manuals
・ Trainings
・ IEC
Proposed/Conceptual
Program/Project
5. Water-related WQ-C-04: Construction of Sanitary Major activities are:
Environment Landfills and Support Facilities in ・ Construction of 5 sanitary landfills in Nueva Ecija, with the capacity for the 485,802 populations:
Management Nueva Ecija and Cluster Waste 1) Provincial sanitary landfill at Gen.Tino
Transfer Stations in Bulacan and 2) Sanitary landfills at Munoz City, San Jose City, Palayan City and St. Rosa
IEE-checklist/
Pampanga 3) Materials Recovery Facilities : 12 municipalities Group II/III
App. for APS
・ Construction of 4 cluster transfer station-cum-materials recovery facilities for a cluter of LGUs in
Bulacan and Pampanga, with the capacity for 2,020, 740 populations
1) Construction of 1 cluster transfer station each for a) Baliuag and Calumpit, b) Hagonoy and
Malolos City, c) Angeles City and Guagua, d) Mabalacat and San Fernando City
6. Inter-sector for IS-C-01: Establishment of Major activities are:
Water Resources Comprehensive Groundwater ・ Installation of monitoring wells
Management Monitoring in Pampanga River Basin ・ Setting up of the monitoring network with the database management system - -
・ Capacity development of NWRB in ground water resource monitoring, which may include policy
setting up for the groundwater regulation.
IS-C-02: Project for Recovery of There are four (4) options proposed which could be combined depending on the results of the
IT-24
Reliability of Water Supply in Angat- following studies :

Umiray System ・ Bayabas Storage Dam
・ Balintingon Storage Dam (same as AI-P-01)
Group I EIS
・ Upgrading and improvement of irrigation facilities and water management of AMRIS, consisting
of installation of the water pipes/aqueducts
・ Excess water for MWSS from the dams such as Ipo dam which can be constructed outside the
Pampanga river basin
IS-C-03: Enhancement of Monitoring Major activities are:
System for Surface Water in ・ Establishment of monitoring networks with proper database management
- -
Pampanga River Basin ・ Capacity development of NWRB/RBO in monitoring of surface water to obtain the necessary data
for control of water permits
IS-C-04: Capacity Development of Major activities are:
NWRB and Relevant Agencies on ・ Capacity development of NWRB and relevant agencies on 1) improvement of water permit
Water Allocation and Distribution system, especially irrigation water use in Angat-Umiray system, and 2) operation of water allocation - -
and its monitoring in Angat-Umiray system
・ Identification of potential/existing critical area for water
Annex-T I.3.4.1 (1/4) Summary of Environmental Scoping for Projects and Programs of IWRM Plan
Sector Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery
Project Code*/ Impact Items AI-P-01 AI-P-02 AI-P-03 AI-P-04 AI-P-05 AI-P-06 AI-P-07 AI-P-08 AI-P-09 AI-P-10 AI-P-11 AI-C-01 AI-C-02 AI-C-03
1 Involuntary resettlement A- A- C- C- - - - - C- C- C- C- - -
2 Local Economy such as Employment & Livelihood, etc. B+/C- B+/C- B+ B+ B+ B+ B+ B+ B+/C- B+ B+ B+ B+ C+
3 Land use & Utilization of Local Resources B+/C- B+/C- B+ B+/ C- B+ B+ B+ B+ B+/C- C+/C- B+ B+ B+ C+
Social Environment
4 Regional severance C- C- - C- - - - - C- - C- C- - -
Existing social infrastructure & Services such as Traffic/Existing Public

5 C+/C- B+ /C- B+ C- - - C+ - B+ B+ - - B+ -
Facilities
6 Social vulnerable groups such as the poverty and ethnic minority C+/A- C+/A- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - -
7 Inequality between beneficiaries and project-affected peoples B- B- - - - - - - C- C- C- C- - -
8 Cultural heritage C- C- - - - - - - C- - C- C- - -
9 Conflict of interests C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C- C- - -
10 Water use right and common land use right B- B- C- C- C- C- - C- B- C- C- C- C+ -
11 Sanitation C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C- C- - -
12 Disaster (natural risk) and epidemic as HIV B+ /C- B+ /C- C- C- C- C- - C- B+ /C- C- C- C- - -
13 Topography and geology B- B- - - C- C- - - B- - - - - -
14 Soil erosion C- C- - C- - - - - C- C- C- C- - -
IT-25
Natural Environment
15 Ground water C+/C- C+/C- - - C- C- - C- C+/C- C- C+/C- C+/C- - -
16 Flow regime of lake and river B- B- C- B- C- C- - - B- C- C- C- - -
17 National Park or equivalent area in terms of its ecological importance C- B- C- C- - C- C- C- C- C- C- C- - -
18 Coastal and sea area C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- - C- C- C- - -
19 Flora and fauna B- B- C- C- C- - - C- B- C- C- C- - -
20 Climate - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 Landscape B- B- - - - - - - B- - C- C- - -
22 Global warming - - - - - - C+ - - - - - - -
23 Air pollution C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C- C- - -
24 Water pollution B- B- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- B- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - -
25 Soil pollution C- C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C- - C+/C- C+/C- - -
Pollution
26 Waste B- B- C- C- C- C- - C- B- C- C- C- - -
27 Noise and vibration B- B- C- C- - - - - C- C- C- C- - -
28 Ground subsidence - - - - C- C- - C- - - C- C- - -
29 Offensive odor C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C- C- - -
30 Bottom sediment B- B- - - - - - - B- - C- C- - -
31 Accident C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C- C- - -
Note:Evaluation categories are as follows;

A+/-: Significant positive/negative impact is expected.
B+/-: Some positive/negative impact is expected to some extent.
C+/-: Positive/negative impact is unknown in the scoping stage (Further study was required.).
-: No negative impact is expected. Therefore, the item under this category is not subject to the EIA/IEE
* The project codes correspond to the project titles as shown in Annex-T I.3.1.1.
Sector Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage
MW-C - 05 MW-C – 06

Project Code*/ Impact Items MW-P- 01 MW-P- 02 MW-P- 03 MW-P- 04 MW-C - 01 MW-C - 02 MW-C - 03 MW-C - 04
Opt.1 Opt.2 Opt.3 Opt.4 Opt.1 Opt.2 Opt.3
1 Involuntary resettlement C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- A- C- A- C- C- C-
2 Local Economy such as Employment & Livelihood, etc. C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ B+/C- B+/C- B+ B+/C- B+ C+/C- B+/C-
3 Land use & Utilization of Local Resources B+ B+ B+ B+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+/C- B+/C- B+ C+/C- B+ B+ B+/C-
Social Environment
4 Regional severance - - - - C- C- C- C- B+/C- C- - B+/C- C- C- C-

5 B+ - - - - - - - C- B+/C- B+ B+/C- - - B+
Facilities
6 Social vulnerable groups such as the poverty and ethnic minority C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C+/C- C+/A- C+/C- C+/A- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C-
7 Inequality between beneficiaries and project-affected peoples C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- B- - B- C- - C-
8 Cultural heritage - - - C- C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C-
9 Conflict of interests - - C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- B- C- C-
10 Water use right and common land use right - C- C- B- C- C- C- C- B- B- C- C- C- C- B-
11 Sanitation - C+ B+ C- C+ C+ C+ C+ C- C- C- C- C- C+/C- C-
B+
12 Disaster (natural risk) and epidemic as HIV - C+ B+
C-
C- C- C- C- C- B+ /C- C- C- C- C- B+ /C-
13 Topography and geology - - - B- - - - - B- B- - B- - - B-
14 Soil erosion C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- - C- C- - C-

IT-26
Natural Environment
15 Ground water - - - C+/C- - - - - C+/C- C+/C- - C+/C- C+/C- C- C+/C-
16 Flow regime of lake and river B- B- C- B- C- C- C- C- B- B- C- B- C- B- B-
17 National Park or equivalent area in terms of its ecological importance C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- - - C- C- C-
18 Coastal and sea area - - - - C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - C- C- - - C- -
19 Flora and fauna C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- B- B- C- B- C- - B-
20 Climate - - - - - - - - - - - - - C- -
21 Landscape C- C- C- B- C- C- C- C- B- B- - B- C- - B-
22 Global warming - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23 Air pollution - - - C- - - - - C- C- C- C- C- C- C-
24 Water pollution C+/C- C+/C- B+/C- B- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- B- B- C+/C- B- C+/C- - B-
25 Soil pollution - - - C- - - - - C- C- C+/C- C- C+/C- - C-

Pollution
26 Waste - - - B- - - - - B- B- C- B- C- - B-
27 Noise and vibration C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- B- C- B- C- B+ C-
28 Ground subsidence - C+ B+ - B+ B+ B+ B+ - - - - C- - -
29 Offensive odor - - - C- - - - - C- C- C- C- C- - C-
30 Bottom sediment - - C- B- C- C- C- C- B- B- - B- C- C- B-
31 Accident C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C- C-

Sector Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage Flood and Sediment Disaster Management Watershed Management
FL-C- 01
Project Code*/ Impact Items MS-C- 01 MS-C- 02 MS-C- 03 MS-C- 04 MP-C- 01 FL-P- 01 FL-P- 02 FL-C- 02 FL-C- 03 FL-C- 04 WS-C - 01 WS-C - 02 WS-C - 03 WS-C - 04
Opt.1 Opt.2
1 Involuntary resettlement - - - - - C- C- A- - - - - - - - -
2 Local Economy such as Employment & Livelihood, etc. C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ B+ B+ B+ B+ - B+ - C+ B+ C+ C+
3 Land use & Utilization of Local Resources - - - - - B+ B+ B+ A- - - - C+ C+ C+ C+

Social Environment
4 Regional severance - - - - - C- - C- C- - C+/C- - - - - -

5 - - - - C+ B+ - - B- - B+ - - - - C+
Facilities
6 Social vulnerable groups such as the poverty and ethnic minority - - - - - C- C- C- C- C+ C+ - C+ C+ C+ C+
7 Inequality between beneficiaries and project-affected peoples - - - - - C- C- B- C- - C+/C- - C- C- - C-
8 Cultural heritage C- C- C- C- - - - - - - C- - - - C- -
9 Conflict of interests - - - - - - - C- B- - C- - C- C- C- C-
10 Water use right and common land use right - - - - - - - - - - C- C+ C- C- C- C-
11 Sanitation B+ B+ B+ B+ B+ - - - - - - - - - - -
12 Disaster (natural risk) and epidemic as HIV C+ C+ C+ C+ B+ B+ B+ B+ B+/B- B+ C+ - - - - -
13 Topography and geology - - - - - C- C- C- C- - - - - - - -
14 Soil erosion - - - - - C- C- C- C+/C- - C+ - C+ C+ C+ C+

Natural Environment
15 Ground water C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - C- C- C- C- - - - - - - -

IT-27
16 Flow regime of lake and river - - - - - C- C- C+/C- B- - C- - - - - -
17 National Park or equivalent area in terms of its ecological importance C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+ C+/C- C+/C- C- B- - C+/C- C+ C+ B+ C+ B+
18 Coastal and sea area C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - C- C- C- C- - - C+ - - - -
19 Flora and fauna C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - C+/C- C+/C- - B- - C+/C- C+ B+ B+ B+ B+
20 Climate - - - - - - - C- - - - - - - - -
21 Landscape - - - - - C- C- C- C- - - - C+ C+ C+ C+
22 Global warming - - - - - - - C- C- - - C+ C+ C+ C+ C+
23 Air pollution - - - - - - - C- C- - - C+ - - - -
24 Water pollution C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+ C- C- B- B- - C- C+ - - - -
25 Soil pollution C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+ C- C- C- - - C- C+ - - - -

Pollution
26 Waste C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+- C- C- B- C- - C- C+ - - - -
27 Noise and vibration - - - - - C- C- B- C- - C- - - - - -
28 Ground subsidence - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -
29 Offensive odor C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- C+/C- - - - - - - C- - - - - -
30 Bottom sediment - - - - - C- C- C- - - - - - - - -
31 Accident C- C- C- C- - C- C- C- C- - C- - - - - -

Sector Water-related Environment Management Inter-sector for Water Resources Management
IS-C- 02
Project Code*/ Impact Items WQ-P-01 WQ-C-01 WQ-C-02 WQ-C-03 WQ-C-04 IS-C- 01 IS-C- 03 IS-C- 04
Opt.1 Opt.2 Opt.3 Opt.4
1 Involuntary resettlement - - - - C- - C- A- C- A- - -
2 Local Economy such as Employment & Livelihood, etc. C+ - C+ - C+ C+ B+/C- B+/C- B+ B+/C- C+ C+
3 Land use & Utilization of Local Resources C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+/C- B+/C- B+ C+/C- C+ C+

Social Environment
4 Regional severance - - - - - - B+/C- C- - B+/C- - -

5 - - - - - - C- B+/C- B+ B+/C- - -
Facilities
6 Social vulnerable groups such as the poverty and ethnic minority - - - - - - C+/C- C+/A- C+/C- C+/A- - -
7 Inequality between beneficiaries and project-affected peoples - - - - - - C- B- - B- - -
8 Cultural heritage - - - - C- - C- C- - C- - -
9 Conflict of interests - - - - C- - C- C- C- C- - B+
10 Water use right and common land use right - - - - C- - B- B- C- C- - -
11 Sanitation C+ - - - B+ - C- C- C- C- - -
12 Disaster (natural risk) and epidemic as HIV - - - - - - C- B+ /C- C- C- - -
13 Topography and geology - - - - C- - B- B- - B- - -
14 Soil erosion - - - - C- - C- C- - C- - -

IT-28
Natural Environment
15 Ground water - - - - C+ B+ C+/C- C+/C- - C+/C- C+ C+
16 Flow regime of lake and river - - - - - - B- B- C- B- - -
17 National Park or equivalent area in terms of its ecological importance C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ - C- C- - - - -
18 Coastal and sea area - C+ C+ C+ C+ - - C- C- - - -
19 Flora and fauna C+ C+- C+- C+- C+- - B- B- C- B- - -
20 Climate - - - - - - - - - - - -
21 Landscape - - - - - - B- B- - B- - -
22 Global warming C+ - - C+ - - - - - - - -
23 Air pollution C+ - - C+ C+ - C- C- C- C- - -
24 Water pollution B+ B+ B+ C+ C+ C+ B- B- C+/C- B- B+ C+
25 Soil pollution B+ C+ C+ C+ C+ - C- C- C+/C- C- - -

Pollution
26 Waste B+ - - C+ B+ - B- B- C- B- - -
27 Noise and vibration - - - - C- - C- B- C- B- - -
28 Ground subsidence - - - - - - - - - - - C+
C+/ C+/
29 Offensive odor C-
- - C+
C-
- C- C- C- C- - -
30 Bottom sediment - - - - - - B- B- - B- - -
31 Accident C- - - - C- - C- C- C- C- - -

Annex-Figures
Annex-F I.2.2.1 Potential ECAs in Region III
IF-1
NATIONAL MAPPING AND
POLLUTION
RESOURCE INFORMATION
ASSOCIATION BOARD
AUTHORITY
NATIONAL WATER
RESOURCES BOARD
LAGUNA LAKE
MINES ADJUDICATION OFFICE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BOARD SECRETARY
NATIONAL SOLID
WASTE MANAGEMENT LAND REGISTRATION
COMMISSION AUTHORITY
PASIG REHABILITATION
COMMISSION
PHILIPPINE MINING
HEAD EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
ASSISTANT CORPORATION
SENIOR UNDERSECRETARY NATURAL RESOURCES
AND CHIEF OF STAFF DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
LAW ENFORCEMENT
TASK FORCE
(19)
PUBLIC AFFAIRS PHILIPPINE FOREST BUKIDNON FOREST

OFFICE CORPORATION CORPORATION
OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISING OFFICE OF THE

OFFICE OF THE OFFICE OF THE OFFICE OF THE OFFICE OF THE
UNDERSECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR INTERNAL AUDIT
UNDERSECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY UNDERSECRETARY UNDERSECRETARY FOR
FOREIGN ASSISTED AND ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE SERVICE
POLICY AND PLANNING FOR STAFF BUREAUS FOR FIELD OPERATIONS SPECIAL CONCERNS
SPECIAL PROJECTS AND LEGAL
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT
SECRETARY SECRETARY FOR FOREIGN
IF-2
SECRETARY FOR RIVER SECRETARY FOR FIELD SECRETARY FOR LEGAL SECRETARY FOR
FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSISTED AND SPECIAL
BASIN CONTROL OFFICE OPERATIONS SERVICE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
CONCERNS AND LANDS PROJECTS OFFICE
PROJECT
FINANCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCE
PLANNING & POLICY RIVER BASIN PROJECT DESIGN & OPERATIONS & LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIAL CONCERNS
LEGAL SERVICE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT
STUDIES OFFICE CONTROL OFFICE PACKAGING SERVICE MANAGEMENT LIAISON OFFICE SERVICE OFFICE
SERVICE SERVICE
SERVICE
ECOSYSTEMS PROTECTED
FOREST LAND
RESEARCH AND AREAS AND
MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT WILDLIFE
BUREAU BUREAU
BUREAU BUREAU
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND

NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL MINES & GEOSCIENCES
(RENRO) MANAGEMENT BUREAU BUREAU
(16)
ECOSYSTEMS PROTECTED AREAS,

FOREST LAND
RESEARCH & WILDLIFE & EMB REGIONAL
MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT MGB REGIONAL OFFICE
DEVELOPMENT COASTAL ZONE MGT. OFFICE RDs (16)
SECTOR SECTOR
SECTOR SECTOR
1 Technical Support 1 Technical Support

2 Technical Skills provider for RENROs 2 Technical Skills provider for RENROs
PENROs
(80)
ADMINISTRATIVE AND LOGISTICAL SUPERVISION
CENROs
(170)
Annex-F I.2.2.2 Organization chart of DENR

Office of the Director
Office of the Assistant Director
National Solid Waste

Pollution Adjudication
Management Commission
Board Secretariat
Secretariat
Environmental Impact Research and Environmental Environmental

Environmental Administrative and
Assessment and Development Education and Planning and Policy Legal Division
Quality Division Finance Division
Management Division Division Information Division Division
Planning and Personnel Legal Research

Review and Air Quality Pollution
Education Program Section and Advisory
Evaluation Management Research
Section Evaluation Section
IF-3
Section Section Section

Section
Records Section
Prosecution
Systems Coordination Water Quality Laboratory Section
Information Policy Review and
Planning and Management Services Property Section
Section Analysis Section
Management Section Section Section
Accounting Hearing Section

Institutional Section
Monitoring and Chemicals Information
Coordination and
Validation Management Technology and
Documentation
Section Section Statistics Section Budget Section
Section
Hazardous
Waste Cashier Section
Management EMB – Regional Offices
Section
- Proposed structure per DAO 2002-17 and AO 42
Administrative Legal and Environmental Planning &

- Existing EMB structure Environmental
and Finance Environmental Impact Assessment Programming, MIS &
Quality Division
Division Education Division Division Statistics Division
Annex-F I.2.2.3 Organization chart of EMB

Sector J
Guideline for Formulation of IWRM Plan
Sector J. Guideline for Formulation of IWRM Plan
Table of Contents
Pages
J.1 General ................................................................................................................................ J-1
J.1.1 Objectives of the Guideline ................................................................................... J-1
J.1.2 Basic Concept on the IWRM Plan ......................................................................... J-1
J.2 Planning Procedures - Overview ...................................................................................... J-2
J.3 Planning Procedures - Details ........................................................................................... J-5
J.3.1 Setting of Planning Framework ............................................................................. J-5
J.3.2 Selection of the Eligible Projects for IWRM of Pampanga River Basin ............... J-5
J.3.3 Preliminary Study on Alternative Approaches to the Specific Issues .................... J-6
J.3.4 Grouping of the Projects ........................................................................................ J-6
J.3.5 Development Scenarios by and Phased Implementation Schedule for the
Projects in Group-A ............................................................................................... J-7
J.3.6 Evaluation and Prioritizing of the Inter-sector Projects in Group-B ...................... J-8
J.3.7 Development Scenarios by and Phased Implementation Schedule for the
Projects in Group-B ............................................................................................... J-9
J.3.8 Formulation of IWRM Plan ................................................................................. J-10
J.3.9 Institutional Setup Plan for IWRM of Pampanga River Basin .............................J-11
J.3.10 The Stakeholders related to IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin ...................J-11
J.3.10.1 Hierarchy of Stakeholders and Preparation of Opportunities for
Consensus Building and Hearing of Opinions...........................................J-11
J.3.10.2 Timing and Topics of Meetings ................................................................ J-12
J.3.11 Schedule for Planning Procedures ....................................................................... J-12
List of Tables
Table J. 3.2.1 Number of Projects relevant to IWRM for Pampanga River Basin ................... J-6
Table J. 3.5.1 Typical Development Scenarios by the Projects in Group-A............................. J-8
Table J. 3.6.1 Categories and Criterions for Evaluation of the Projects ................................... J-9
Table J. 3.10.1 Hierarchies and Functions of Stakeholders ...................................................... J-12
Annex-T J.3.6.1 Scoring Criteria for Evaluation of the Project ............................................ JT-1
i
List of Figures
Figure J. 1.2.1 Process of IWRM ............................................................................................... J-1

Figure J. 3.8.1 Image of Output of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin.......................J-11
Figure J. 3.11.1 Schedule for Planning Procedures ................................................................... J-13
ii
Sector J. Guideline for Formulation of IWRM Plan
J.1 General
J.1.1 Objectives of the Guideline
This Guideline aims at attaining the following objectives:
(1) The Guideline shall furnish the definite procedures and methodologies for formulation of the
IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin.
(2) The outputs of the Guideline shall be presented to and consented by the stakeholders in the
course of the study. Thus, the Guideline shall be used as a tool for consensus building of the
stakeholders on the proposed IWRM Plan.
(3) The Guideline is especially prepared for Pampanga river basin. However, its substantial part of
the outputs shall be useful as the reference to and/or standards for formulation of the IWRM Plan
for other river basins.
J.1.2 Basic Concept on the IWRM Plan
The IWRM would be a flexible tool for optimizing of the sustainable development of the water
resources as quoted from the “Catalyzing Change”, a handbook issued by Global Water Partnership.
The IWRM is also assumed not to be a goal in itself, but it should be an approach to promote the
coordinated development and management of water resources and maximize the resultant economic
and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystem.
The process of IWRM shall move forward like a spiral with several different stages starting from the
initial primitive stage toward the mature stages as shown in Figure J.1.1.1. Each of the stages in the
process of IWRM shall cover the sequence of the four (4) steps of: (a) assessment of existing
conditions, (b) planning (i.e., formulation of the IWRM Plan), (c) implementation of the projects for
IWRM and (d) monitoring on the results of the project implementation. Moreover, the accountability
to and synergy with the stakeholders has to be assured through involvement of the multi-stakeholders
at every steps of the IWRM.
The present stage for the IWRM in Pampanga river basin is the initial spiral stage, and of the above
four (4) steps, the present study supports those of items (a) and (b). The follow-up activities after the
present study are indispensable to completion of the initial spiral stage of the IWRM.
Mature Stages
4 1
2
Involvement of
Multi-Stakeholders 3
Stage 3
at 4 1
Every Stage of 2
IWRM Stage 2
3
4 1
Stage 1 Analysis 2
Monitoring
3 Planning
Primitive Stage Implementation
Figure J. 1.2.1 Process of IWRM
J-1
J.2 Planning Procedures - Overview

As described above, this Guideline is to furnish the definite procedures and methodologies for
formulation of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin. The procedures together with
methodologies for plan formulation are summarized as below:
Step 1: Assessment (Identification of the Problems and Issues on IWRM)
Assessment on the principal problems and issues on the IWRM in Pampanga river basin shall be made
as the basic approach to formulation of the IWRM Plan. The problems and issues are latent in the
various aspects such as: (a) the water resources development, allocation and distribution for the
irrigation, the municipal water and other various water demands, (b) the flood and sediment disaster
management, (c) the watershed management and (d) other water-related environment managements.
Moreover, some of the problems and issues are not limited into a single sector but they extend across
several sectors causing the inter-sector conflicts.
Step 2: Setting of the Planning Framework
The planning frameworks shall be set as the preconditions for formulation of the IWRM Plan. The
principal items of the planning frameworks are such as:
 Target completion year of the entire plan,
 Socio-economic frames by the target year,
 Visions, objectives and sector goals of IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin, and
 Ceilings for the Project Investment Cost.
The details on setting of the planning framework are as described in the following subsection J.3.1.
Step 3: Selection of the Potential Projects for IWRM of Pampanga River Basin
Various government agencies and non-government entities currently implement and/or propose the
projects, which could cope with the aforesaid issues and/or problems on IWRM and make a
contribution to the visions, objectives and sector goals for the IWRM Plan. These on-going and
proposed projects shall be identified as the components of the IWRM Plan. The details on selection
of the projects for IWRM are as described in subsection J.3.2.
In addition, the conceptual projects, which are essentially required to solve the issues and/or problems
but currently neither implemented nor proposed, shall also be further proposed as the components of
the IWRM Plan.
Step 4: Preliminary Study on Alternative Approaches to the Specific Issues
Some of the projects selected as the potential components of the IWRM Plan in the above Step3 may
contain several alternative approaches to cope with their own specific issues. The optimum plan
among the alternative approaches would be ideally determined before finalizing of the IWRM Plan.
However, the feasibility study shall be required to determine such optimum plan. On the other hand,
the IWRM Plan would involve numerous projects to attain a variety of water-related development
scenarios, and therefore, the feasibility study would be hardly carried out, in detail, for each of the
individual projects. From this point of view, the IWRM Plan shall take the following fundamental
rules:
 The feasibility study shall be included as a part of the project and undertaken before
commencement of the physical project works.
 The outline of the project features together with the project investment cost required shall be
provisionally assumed talking the conceptual alternative approaches into account, and
 The preliminary study on the project(s) may be carried out to estimate the most-likely optimum
plan, when the project is judged to prominently influential to the entire IWRM Plan and at the
same time, the basic information for the preliminary study are available.
J-2
The details on the preliminary study on the alternative approaches are as described in subsection J.3.3.
Step 5: Grouping of the Projects
The projects selected as the IWRM Plan in the above Step3 shall be divided into Group-A and
Group-B in order to facilitate the programming of the under-mentioned project development scenarios
and the project implementation schedule/the project investment program. The projects in Group-A
have to be implemented in accordance with the basic social and natural requirements regardless to the
amount of the project cost. All projects not included into Group A are classified into Group B. The
typical projects classified in Group B are such as the regional economic development project and the
projects for mitigation of the water related disaster, which shall be implemented by the special budget
during the specific term(s). The details on grouping of the projects are as described in subsection
J.3.4.
Step 6: Setting of Development Scenarios by and Phased Implementation Schedule for the
Projects in Group-A
The target development scenario for the project in Group-A shall be set as the prerequisite for the
phased project implementation schedule. That is, the development scenario shall be firstly delineated
and, then, the phased implementation schedule shall be programmed in order to attain the development
scenarios. The details on development scenarios by and phased implementation schedule for the
projects in Group-A are as described in subsection J.3.5.
Step 7: Evaluating and Prioritizing of the Projects in Group-B
The projects classified into Group-B in the above Step5 shall be evaluated in order to prioritize them.
The evaluation is made to the inter-sector projects, which extend over the various water-related sectors
such as (a) the agriculture/irrigation and fishery development, (b) the municipal water supply,
sewerage and sanitation, (c) the flood and sediment disaster management, (c) the watershed
management and (d) water-related environment management. The details on evaluating and
prioritizing of the projects in Group-B are as described in subsection J.3.6.
Step 8: Development Schedules by and Phased Implementation Schedule for the Projects in
Group-B
The phased implementation schedules for the projects in Group-B shall be programmed in accordance
with the priority orders of the projects as evaluated in the above Step7 and the ceilings of the project
investment cost for each of the short-term, the mid-term and long-term. Then, the phased
development scenarios shall be delineated as the resultants of the phased implementation schedule.
However, when the development scenarios proposed by the priority orders of the projects are hardly
accepted by the stakeholders, the priority orders shall be reexamined and a certain modification for the
phased implementation schedule as well as development scenarios shall be made. The details on the
development schedules by and the phased implementation schedule for the projects in Group-B are as
described in subsection J.3.7.
Step 9: Formulation of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin
The implementation schedules, the investment programs and the development scenarios of the projects
shall be finalized by integrating the outputs given in the above Step6 and Step8, and the following
items shall be clarified:
 The phased programs in the short term (2011-2015), the mid-term (2016-2020) and the long
term (2021-2025),
 The expected eligible financial source for the projects,
 The implementation bodies for the projects,
 The sectors, which the projects would belong, such as (a) agriculture/irrigation and fishery
development, (b) municipal water supply, sanitation and sewerage, (c) flood and sediment
disaster management, (d) watershed management, and (e) water-related environment
management.
J-3
The details on formulate the IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin are as described in subsection
J.3.8.
Step 10: Formulation of Institutional Setup Plan
The optimum institutional setup plan, which would be required to execute the aforesaid spiral
processes of IWRM for assessment, formulation, implementation and monitoring of the projects, shall
be also proposed.
J-4
J.3 Planning Procedures - Details

J.3.1 Setting of Planning Framework
As described above, the planning framework shall be set as the preconditions for formulation of the
IWRM Plan. The principal items to be included in the planning framework are as enumerated below:
(1) Target Year
The target year is the completion year for all of the proposed projects in IWRM Plan. In this
study, the target year is set at 2025, and the project implementation period is divided into the
following three (3) terms: (a) Short-term for a period from 2011 to 2015, (b) Mid-term for a
period from 2016 to 2020 and (c) Long-term for a period from 2021 to 2025.
(2) Socio-economic Frame
The socio-economic frame is to prescribe the trends of the socio-economic conditions such as
the population growth and the growth of the GRDP in the study area. These socio-economic
conditions by the above target year are indispensable to estimate the future municipal water
demand, flood damage potentials and other basic information for formulation of the IWRM
Plan.
(3) Visions, Objectives and Sector Goals of IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin
The IWRM Plan shall involve the various multi-water-sector-projects/ programs. Hence, the
inter-sector visions are proposed as the principal targets common to all proposed projects for
IWRM of Pampanga river basin. The objectives in the several categories are further assumed
to embody the visions. Moreover, each of the water-related sectors in the IWRM Plan is
provided with the concrete sector goals, which could enhance the objectives and/or visions.
The principal policies in the existing national and/or regional development programs such as
MTPDP 2004-2010, and RPFP, 2005-2030 are referred in setting of the above visions,
objectives and sector goals of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin.
(4) Ceilings for the Project Investment Cost
When the implementation of the projects excessively concentrates upon any of the short-term,
mid-term and/or long-term, the total project investment cost may exceed the affordable limit
of the national and/or regional budgetary capacity. From this point of view, the approximate
ceilings of the project investment cost are provisionally estimated for each of the short-term,
mid-term and long-term with referring to the previous actual disbursement for the projects.
J.3.2 Selection of the Eligible Projects for IWRM of Pampanga River Basin
There are a large number of the water related projects, which are currently being undertaken and/or
proposed by various government agencies and private entities in the study area. Of these projects,
those, which are judged to be effective to attain the aforesaid visions, objectives and sector goals, are
selected as the components of the IWRM Plan. Moreover, the JICA Study Team in corroboration with
the members of SC and TWG as well as other stakeholders further worked out the conceptual projects,
which would be essentially required to cope with the water-related problems and issues such as the
water shortage, the flood/sediment disasters and the deterioration of the water-related environment.
It should be noted that the conceptual projects would require either further study such as feasibility
study or determination of the basic project component, before their implementation. The number of
eligible projects for IWRM of Pampanga river basin is as listed below:
J-5
Table J. 3.2.1 Number of Projects relevant to IWRM for Pampanga River Basin
On-going Proposed Conceptual
Sector Total
Projects Projects Plans*
Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery 14 11 3 28
Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage 3 4 11 18
Flood and Sediment Disaster Management 4 2 4 10
Watershed Management 12 - 4 16
Water-related Environment Management 3 1 4 8
Inter-sector for Water Resources Management - - 4 4
Total 36 18 30 84
Note (*): Proposed by JICA Study Team
J.3.3 Preliminary Study on Alternative Approaches to the Specific Issues

As described in Step 4 in the foregoing subsection J.2, the IWRM Plan deals with a large number of
the projects and therefore, the comparative study on the alternative approaches for each of the projects
shall be hardly carried out, in detail, at the stage of formulation of IWRM Plan. From the above
points of view, the IWRM Plan shall take the three (3) principal rules as described in Step4 in
subsection J.2.
In the formulation of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin, it is preliminarily assumed that nine
(9) projects among 84 projects would possible contains the alternative approaches, and the following
two (2) of them were further examined as the objectives of the preliminary study.
 Project for Recovery of Reliability of Water Supply in Angat-Umiray System (Code: IS-C-02)
 Flood Mitigation for Pampanga Delta (Code: FL-C-01)
The above alternative approaches would be compared and the optimum approach shall be selected
from the various points of view such as: (a) economic viability as expressed by EIRR and/or the
project least cost, (b) the financial affordability against the project investment cost, (c) the technical
viability (d) the environmental impacts including those to the natural environments (such as
geographic conditions, the vegetation and the water quality) and the social environments (such as the
house resettlements, lapse of the right of land ownership and loss of the opportunity) and (f)
adaptability to the future possible climate changes. The optimum approach would consist of the
several projects as its components, and these components would be merged into one project.
J.3.4 Grouping of the Projects
As described in the aforesaid Step5 of the planning procedures in subsection 7.2, the potential projects
for IWRM Plan of Pampanga river basin as selected in section 7.4 shall be classified into the Group-A
and B according to their purposes and/or contents. The details for this classification are as described
hereinafter:
(1) Group-A
The following projects shall be classified into Group-A
(a) The projects for basic human needs like the municipal water supply projects, which are
indispensable to secure the life of the people,
(b) The projects, which are indispensable for preservation of the irreversible natural
environments and/or resources, and.
(c) The projects for rehabilitation and/or maintenance of the existing water resources
management facilities, which are indispensable for sustainment of the inherent design
capacity of the facilities.
The projects of the above items (a) to (c) have to be implemented in accordance with the
social, natural and/or physical fundamental requirement regardless to the amount of the
project cost. For instance, the expansion of the safe municipal water supply system has to be
unconditionally required to cope with the growth of the population as the basic human need.
J-6
Moreover, the target development scenarios for the projects in Group-A shall be set as the
prerequisite for implementation of the project. That is, the development scenarios shall be
firstly set, and then the implementation schedule of the projects shall be programmed to attain
the development scenarios.
(2) Group-B
The following projects shall be classified into Group-B
(a) The projects for economic development, which could enhance the growth of the regional
economy and/or improvement of the livelihood in the region,
(b) The projects for mitigation of flood and sediment disasters, which could contribute to the
better public welfare and the growth of the regional economy, and
(c) The ad hoc projects, which could support and/or strengthen the annual regular projects
classified into Group-A
The commencement of the projects for the above items (a) to (c) could be optionally selected
depending on the availability of budget for project implementation. The projects of the
above items (a) and (c) would be implemented by the special budget during the specific
term(s). The phased implementation schedule of the projects in Group-B shall be firstly
determined based on the following two (2) factors into account:
(a) The priority orders of the projects, which could be determined taking the results of
inter-sector project evaluation, and
(b) The ceilings of the project investment cost for each of the short-term, mid-tem and
long-term.
After the phased implementation schedule of the projects is determined, then the development
scenarios shall be delineated as the resultants of the project implementation schedule.
However, when the development scenarios delineated as the resultants of the project
implementation schedule are deemed to be unjustifiable and/or they are hardly accepted by the
stakeholders, the prioritizing of the projects shall be reexamined and a certain modification for
the project implementation schedule as well as the development scenarios shall be made.
J.3.5 Development Scenarios by and Phased Implementation Schedule for the Projects in
Group-A
As described above, the projects classified into Group-A have to be implemented in accordance with
the development scenarios which shall be determined by the essential social, natural and physical
needs regardless to the amount of the project cost. The typical development scenarios and their
corresponding phased implementation schedules for Pampanga river basin are set for as shown in
Table J.3.5.1.
J-7
Table J. 3.5.1 Typical Development Scenarios by the Projects in Group-A

Sector Development Scenario
Agriculture/ The on-going six (6) annual regular projects for rehabilitation of the existing irrigation facilities shall
Irrigation and be sustained until 2025 so as to improve the agricultural productivities.
Fishery The on-going four (4) annual regular projects for fishery development shall be sustained until 2025
Development so as to improve the fishery productivities.
The water supply capacity of the existing Angat-Umiray System shall be strengthened to promise the
full supply level for municipal water demand in Metro Manila and irrigation water demand in
AMRIS by 2020.
The new bulk water supply system with the capacity of 2.7m3/s for Bulacan Province shall be
developed to cope with the incremental population and preserve the safe water quality for drinking
by 2015.
The new bulk water supply system with the capacity of additional 3.8m3/s for Bulacan Province shall
be developed to cope with the incremental population and preserve the safe water quality for
Municipal Water
drinking by 2025.
Supply, Sanitation
The new bulk water supply system with the capacity of 0.8m3/s for Metro Clark (Pampanga and
and Sewerage
Tarlac Provinces) and 1.3m3/s for Pampanga Province shall be developed to cope with the
incremental population and preserve the safe water quality for drinking by 2025.
Safe drinking water access with Level 3,2,1 water supply system shall reach to 100% by 2025
The service area of Level 3 water supply system in the urban area shall cover 80% of the households
in the study area by 2025. At the same time, the present coverage ratio of Level 3 water supply
system in the rural area shall be maintained by 2025, notwithstanding the future increment of
population.
The whole households in the study areas shall be provided with the sanitary toilets by 2025.
The on-going annual regular program for rehabilitation and maintenance of river dyke and slope by
Management of DPWH shall be sustained by 2025 so as to preserve the inherent design capacities of the facilities.
Flood and The annual regular program for rehabilitation and maintenance of drainage and flood cool facilities
Sediment by LGUs shall be sustained by 2025.
Disasters Public awareness on IWRM shall be improved through integration of the salient points of IWRM
into school curricula.
Watershed The on-going nine (9) regular programs for watershed management in Pampanga river basin shall be
Management sustained by 2025, which could expand the new forest cover at the rate of 660 ha per annum.
The non-structural projects by DENR and LGUs, which are intended to protect water quality, shall
Water-related
be sustained by 2025 so as to reduce the pollution load from various sources.
Environment
The structural programs for reduction of the risk for contamination in water body shall be sustained
Management
by 2025.
J.3.6 Evaluation and Prioritizing of the Inter-sector Projects in Group-B

Evaluation of the projects, which are classified into Group-B, shall be made to prioritize the projects
and to formulate the phased implementation program for them. The evaluation is made from the
viewpoints of six (6) categories namely: (a) Viability of the Project, (b) Enhanced Livelihood,
(c) Improved Quality of Life, (d) Decentralized Development, (e) Sustained Ecosystem and
(f) Empowered People. Of these categories, the Item (a) of the “Viability of the Project” is the
fundamental factor to judge the viabilities in implementing the project. On the other hand, other
items of (b) to (f) are indexes to evaluate how the project could make a contribution to the aforesaid
strategic objectives.
Each of the categories for evaluation would have further four (4) to five (5) criterions for evaluation as
listed in Table J.3.6.1, and the total number of criterions for evaluation would reach 25 items. Such
rather large number of criterions would be advantageous for the well-balanced evaluation of the wide
range of the projects in various water-related sectors.
J-8
Table J. 3.6.1 Categories and Criterions for Evaluation of the Projects

Category Criterion for Evaluation
1.1 Economic viability
1.2 Technical viability
1. Viability of the
1.3 Financial affordability
Project
1.4 Impacts to natural and social environments
1.5 Adaptability to the climate change
2.1 Creation of new job opportunities in the Region
2. Enhanced 2.2 Increase of the income level in the Region
Livelihood 2.3 Improvement of livelihood for the vulnerable group*
2.4 Reduction of the income gaps in the urban areas and the rural areas
3.1 Increase of the access to the safe drinking water
3. Improved 3.2 Increase of the par-capita municipal water supply volume
Quality of Life 3.3 Improvement of the sanitary and health conditions
3.4 Mitigation of the flood risks and hazard
4.1 Development of the regional economic development centers
4. Decentralized 4.2 Increase of the regional productivity in the agriculture, fishery, forestry, industry and service sectors
Development 4.3 Creation of a favorable circumstances for private investment in the Region
4.4 Enhancement of social equity in the Region
5.1 Enhancement of the sustainable monitoring on the ecosystem
5. Sustained 5.2 Protection of the ecologically vulnerable areas
Ecosystem 5.3 Promotion of vegetation in the watersheds
5.4 Reduction of the potential pollution loads
6.1 Promotion of stakeholder participation in project planning and execution
6. Empowered 6.2 Improvement/transfer of knowledge and skills
People 6.3 Promotion of community-based activities
6.4 Empowerment of the vulnerable group*
Note: *: The vulnerable group includes the poor, the indigenous peoples, the women-headed households, the out-of-school
youths, the handicapped and the elderly
Each of the above criterions for evaluation would have three (3) ranks of scores. The projects, which
may be expected to attain the high performance in the criterion, would take the score of 3, while those,
which would attain the lower performance, would take scores of 2 or 1. The detailed criterions for
scoring are as shown in Annex-T J.3.6.1.
(1) Score 3: Achievement of the criterion for evaluation has been already verified and/or it has
been programmed as one of the primary purposes of the project.
(2) Score 2: The project is judged to make a certain indirect contribution to the criterion for
evaluation, although achievement of the criterion is not the primary purpose of the
project and/or it has been clearly verified yet.
(3) Score 1: The project is judged to hardly satisfy the criterion and/or make any contribution to
the criterion.
J.3.7 Development Scenarios by and Phased Implementation Schedule for the Projects in
Group-B
The IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin would include 41 projects classified into Group-B. Of these
projects, 12 ongoing projects are to be implemented in accordance with their existing schedules, which
had already been fixed by the project proponents. On the other hand, other 29 proposed and/or
conceptual projects are to be implemented taking the following prerequisites into account:
 The projects shall be implemented in order of the scores made in the aforesaid inter-sector
project evaluation.
J-9
 The investment cost of the projects shall be accumulated in accordance with the above priority
order of the projects. However, the accumulated investment cost over the sum of the
investment cost for the ongoing infra-development projects1 shall not exceed the ceiling costs
(i.e., 31.6 billion pesos for the short-term, 33.7 billion pesos for the mid-term and long-term).
 When the accumulated investment cost exceeds the ceiling of either the short-term or the
mid-term, the project implementation shall shift to the next term (i.e., from the short-term to
the mid-term or from the mid-term to the long-term) and the accumulation of the investment
cost shall be reset and restart.
 Judging from the scope of the projects, several projects would need the implementation period
of more than 5 years extending over each of the short-term, the mid-term or the long-term.
When the project has the implementation period of more than 5 years, its costs for the first and
second 5-year term are estimated taking the disbursement schedule prepared by the project
proponent and/or the scopes of the projects into account.
J.3.8 Formulation of IWRM Plan
The following items (1) to (5) shall be the components of the IWRM Plan and formulated with
referring to the results of examinations described in the foregoing subsections J.3.5 to J.3.7 (refer to
Figure J.3.8.1):
(1) Project List
The on-going, proposed and conceptual projects, which could be effective to attain the visions,
objectives and sector goals of the IWRM Plan by 2025, shall be proposed and put into the
Project List. The necessary information in the Project List shall include the title of the project,
the implementing body of the project, the necessary project investment cost and the project’s
classification of the aforesaid Group-A and Group-B.
(2) Project Implementation Program
The implementation schedule for each of the above projects shall be proposed as the phased
programs for the short-term (2011-2015), the mid-term (2016-2020) and the long-term
(2021-2025). Some of the projects would be completed within a shingle term, while some
would extend across more than two (2) of the terms.
(3) Project Investment Program
The project investment schedule shall be proposed as the phased program for investment of
the project cost in each of the short-term (2011-2015), the mid-term (2016-2020) and the
long-term (2021-2025). The budgetary source for investment and/or the method for
procurement of the budget shall be also proposed as a part of the program taking the
ownership of the project, the budgetary capacity of the project implementing body and the
possibility of the external financial assistance into account.
(4) Development Scenarios
The phased development scenarios for each of the short-term, the mid-term and the long-term
shall be proposed in accordance with the above phased implementation schedule of the
projects. The development scenarios shall be also proposed by each of the sectors of IWRM
such as (a) agriculture/irrigation and fishery development, (b) municipal water supply,
sanitation and sewerage, (c) flood and sediment disaster management, (d) watershed
management and (e) water-related environment management.
1
The ongoing infra-development projects include 12 projects in Group-B and 11 projects, which are being undertaken
by NIA, DA and DPWH as the yearly regular program for maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing water related
infrastructures and classified into Group-A.
J-10
Sector Goals of the IWRM Plan List of Projects for IWRM Plan
Visions and Objectives of
the IWRM Plan Selection of Projects as Components
of IWRM Plan in the Sectors of:
Phased Project Implementation
 Agriculture/Irrigation and
Program
Fishery Development
 Municipal Water Supply,
Sewerage & Sanitation
 Flood and Sediment Disaster Phased Project Investment Program
Management
 Watershed Management
 Water-related Environment
Management Phased Development Scenarios
 Other Inter-sector Aspects
Figure J. 3.8.1 Image of Output of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin
J.3.9 Institutional Setup Plan for IWRM of Pampanga River Basin

Institutional and organizational strengthening will be sought out from two (2) aspects:
(1) To manage and/or to coordinate key issues in water resources in the river basin: such as
reasonable allocation and regulation of water rights, upstream and downstream issues in flood
control, watershed management, water quality management, sustainable groundwater
management, etc., and
(2) To establish River Basin Organization (RBO) for Pampanga river basin as the implementing body
for the proposed IWRM Plan in terms of equitable and sustainable development, environmental
conservation, and operation and maintenance of the river facilities and the monitoring system in
the river basin.
The former would be related to the improvement of the Water Code and capacity strengthening of
NWRB as an apex body for water right and water resources management. The latter would be
related to capacity strengthening of sector agencies such as DENR (watershed, forest management,
water quality management), DPWH (flood control and water-related natural disasters), NIA (irrigation
water management) and LGUs (watershed, forest management, water quality management, flood
control and water-related natural disasters, communal irrigation, groundwater management). The
purpose, function, role and responsibility of the stakeholders as well as the financial sustainability and
the regional policy on would be clarified to validate the RBO.
J.3.10 The Stakeholders related to IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin
J.3.10.1 Hierarchy of Stakeholders and Preparation of Opportunities for Consensus Building
and Hearing of Opinions
The participation of and consensus building with the stakeholders is essentially required to IWRM. It
is, however, virtually difficult to make consensus with all of the stakeholders, since the number of the
potential stakeholders in Pampanga river basin would be more than 20 million people including those
related organizations and residents living in Pampanga river basin, Metropolitan Manila and the region
from which water is transmitted. Accordingly, the priority stakeholders shall be selected and divided
into three groups with different degree of participation for the planning process as shown in
Table J.3.10.1.
J-11
Table J. 3.10.1 Hierarchies and Functions of Stakeholders

Hierarchy/Expected Members Function
1. Core stakeholders  To make the final decisions on
 Steering Committee members consensus
 Technical Working Group members  To bring forward the problems and
needs for IWRM
 To propose the draft plan on IWRM
2. Stakeholders (representatives at entire basin level)  To bring forward the problems and
 Related governmental organizations needs for IWRM
 Related organizations (water users association, fisherman’s  To propose the draft plan on IWRM
association, water supply company, power supply company etc.)
 Representatives of local level stakeholders
 Representatives of association of indigenous people, woman’s
association, and religious association, etc.
 Representatives of LGUs in Metro Manila
 Representatives of LGUs related to water transmission to
reservoirs in the basin
 NGO and Academies
 Others, if necessary
3 Other stakeholders  To be disclosure the information
 Other stakeholders who are not included in other stakeholders of through Web-site etc.
the above items 1 to 2
Three (3) kinds of meeting, which consists of the Steering Committee Meeting, the Technical Working
Group Meeting and the Stakeholder Meeting, are held for hearing of opinions and consensus building
on the proposed IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin. Decision making on consensus in the present
study is basically under responsibility of the core stakeholders which consists of the members of the
steering committee and technical working group. On the other hand, the Stakeholder Meeting aims at
hearing of their opinions. The members for the Steering Committee and Technical Working Group had
been determined at the early stage of the study.
J.3.10.2 Timing and Topics of Meetings
The Steering Committee and Stakeholder Meetings are held as one set at each juncture in the course of
the study. The Technical Working Meetings had been also originally scheduled at each juncture in
the course of the study, but rescheduled, on the way of the study, to be held once a month as far as the
activities of the JICA Study Team continues in Philippines.
The main activities in the Steering Committee and Technical Working Group Meeting include
discussion on pending issues in the previous meetings, decision making and confirmation of agenda
for succeeding stakeholder meeting. On the other hand, in the Stakeholder Meeting, explanation of
the results of the study and hearing of the opinion from the stakeholder are carried out according to the
agenda approved by the Steering Committee and Technical Working Group. The options brought
forward by the stakeholders are to be incorporated into the work in the next step, and the results of the
work are discussed in the next meeting for Steering Committee and Technical Working Group
Meetings.
J.3.11 Schedule for Planning Procedures
As described in subsection J.1.2, the process of IWRM should move forward like a spiral with several
different stages, and each of the stages covers the four sequences of: (a) Assessment of existing
conditions, (b) Planning (i.e., formulation of the IWRM Plan), (c) Implementation of the projects for
IWRM and (d) Monitoring on the results of the project implementation.
The present stage for the IWRM in Pampanga river basin is the initial spiral stage, and of the above
four sequences at this stage, the Item (a) for Assessment of existing conditions and item (b) for
Planning are being undertaken for a 2-year period of from February 2009 to January 2011 as shown in
Figure J.3.11.1.
J-12
Objectives of Assessment and Plan Formulation 2009 2010 2011

and Meetings 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2
Assessment (identification of
Step1 1 1 1 1 1 1
the Problems and Issues on
Assessment and Plan Formulation
Setting of the Planning

Step2 1 1 1
Framework
Selection of Eligible
Step3 1 1 1 1 1
Projects/Plans for IWRM of
Comparative Study on
Step4 1 1 1
Alternative Approaches to the
Evaluation and Prioritizing of
Step5 1 1 1 1
the Projects/Plans
Formulation of the IWRM Plan
Step6 1 1 1 1
for Pampanga River Basin
Formulation of Organization/
Step7 1 1 1 1 1 1
Institutional Plan
Steering Committee (SC) Meeting ● ● ● ● ● ●
Meeting
Technical Working Group (TWG) Meeting

●●● ●●● ●●● ●
(Including Joint SC and TWG Meetings)
Stakeholder Meeting ● ● ● ●
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
Reporting
IC/R P/R1 IT/R P/R2 DF/R F/R
Figure J. 3.11.1 Schedule for Planning Procedures
J-13
Annex-Tables
Annex-T J.3.6.1 (1/3) Scoring Criteria for Evaluation of the Project
Scoring
Point of Evaluation
3 2 1
Viability Economic viability The EIRR of the Project is above 15%. The Project is in either of the following cases: The Project is in either of the following cases:
of the  The EIRR of the Project is in a range of 9 to  The EIRR of the Project is below 9%,
Project 15%,  Any economic evaluation for the Project
 Any economic evaluation of the project has has not been made yet and the project is
not been made but Project is likely to be not likely to be economically viable.
economically viable
Technical viability Technical viability of the Project has Technical viability of the Project has not been There remain uncertainties in the technical
been confirmed through relevant studies confirmed but no particular technical difficulty viability of the Project.
and/or through previous in executing the project is foreseeable.
implementation.
Financial affordability The necessary budgetary arrangement The necessary budget arrangement has not Difficulties in budgetary arrangement are
has been made. been made but any difficulties in arranging the foreseeable.
budget are not foreseeable.
Impacts on natural and social The project is not likely to cause any The Project is in either of the following cases: The potential adverse impacts on the natural
environment significant adverse impact to the natural  The potential adverse impacts on natural and social environment are likely to be serious
and social environment. and social environment could be mitigated and beyond mitigation
 The ecological and social benefits far
outweigh the likely adverse impacts
JT-1
Adaptation to climate change The Project would possess the direct The Project would possess the indirect The Project would hardly possess anyt
mechanism adaptable to the climate mechanism adaptable to the climate change. mechanism adaptable to the climate change.
change.
Enhanced Creation of new job The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
Livelihood opportunities in the Region creation of the new job opportunities in contribution to creation of the job contribution to creation of the job
the Region. opportunities in the region. opportunities in the region.
Increase of the income levels The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
in the region increase of the income levels in the contribution to increase of the income levels in contribution to increase of income levels in
Region. the region. the region.
Improvement of livelihood The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
for the poor, the indigenous improvement of livelihood for the poor, contribution to improvement of livelihoo for contribution to improvement of livelihood for
peoples, the women-headed the women-headed households, the the poor, the women-headed households, the the poor, the women-headed households, the
out-of-school youths, the handicapped, out-of-school youths, the handicapped, the out-of-school youths, the handicapped, the
households, the out-of-school
the elderly and other vulnerable groups. elderly and other vulnerable groups. elderly and other vulnerable groups.
youths, the handicapped, the
elderly and other vulnerable
groups.
Reduction of the income gaps The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
between the urban areas and a reduction in income gaps between contribution to reduction in income gaps contribution to the reduction in income gaps
the rural areas the urban and rural areas between the urban and rural areas. between the urban and rural areas.
Scoring
Point of Evaluation
3 2 1
Improved Increase of access to The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
Quality Life safe drinking water increase of access to safe drinking contribution to increase of access to safe contribution to increase of access to safe
water. drinking water. drinking water.
Increase of the The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
municipal water supply increase of the municipal water supply contribution to increase of the municipal water contribution to increase of the municipal water
volume volume supply volume. supply volume.
Improvement of The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
sanitary and health improvement of the sanitary conditions contribution to the improvement of sanitary contribution to the improvement of sanitary
conditions and/or reduction of water-related conditions and/or reduction of water-related conditions and/or reduction of water-related
diseases. diseases. diseases..
Mitigation of flood The Project would directly reduce risks The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
risks and hazards to life and damage to property/assets contribution to the reduction of risks to life and contribution to the reduction of risks to life
due to chronic flooding. damage to property/assets due to chronic and damage to property/assets due to chronic
flooding. flooding.
Decentralized Development of The Project is indispensable to the The Project is not necessarily indispensable to The Project would hardly make any
Development regional economic development of regional economic but could support the development of the contribution to development of the regional
centers centers. (Typical examples of the regional economic centers centers.
Project are such as the bulk water
JT-2
supply project and the urban flood

control/drainage improvement project.)
Increase of productivity The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
in the Region’s the increase of productivity in the contribution to the increase of productivity in contribution to the increase of productivity in
agriculture, industrial Region’s agriculture, industrial and the Region’s agriculture, industrial and service the Region’s agriculture, industrial and service
service sectors. sectors. sectors.
and service sectors.
Creation of a favorable The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
climate for enterprise the creation of a favorable climate for contribution to the creation of a favorable contribution to the creation of a favorable
and private investment enterprise development and private climate for enterprise development and private climate for enterprise development and private
investments in the Region. investments in the Region. investments in the Region.
in the Region
Enhancement of social The Project would directly contribute to The Project would make an indirect The Project would hardly make any
equity in the Region the equitable distribution of access to contribution to the equitable distribution of contribution to the equitable distribution of
the following: access to the following: access to the following:
 economic opportunities  economic opportunities  economic opportunities
 economic goods and services  economic goods and services  economic goods and services
 social services  social services  social services.
Scoring
Point of Evaluation
3 2 1
Sustained Enhancement of the The Project would directly The Project would make an indirect contribution The Project would hardly make any
Ecosystem sustainable monitoring on contribute to enhancement of the to enhancement of the sustaining monitoring of contribution to enhancement of the
the ecosystem sustaining monitoring of vital vital ecosystems. sustaining monitoring of vital ecosystems.
ecosystems.
Protection of the The Project would directly The Project would make an indirect contribution The Project would hardly make any
ecologically vulnerable contribute to the protection of to the protection of ecologically vulnerable areas. contribution to the protection of ecologically
areas ecologically vulnerable areas. vulnerable areas .
Promotion of vegetation in The Project would directly The Project would make an indirect contribution The Project would hardly make any
the watersheds contribute to the increase of the increase of vegetation cover in the contribution to the increase of vegetation
vegetation cover of the watersheds. cover in the watersheds.
watersheds.
Reduction of potential The Project would directly The Project would make an indirect contribution The Project would hardly make any
pollution loads contribute to the reduction of to the reduction of potential pollution loads. contribution to the reduction of potential
potential pollution loads. pollution loads.
Empowered Promotion of stakeholder The Project is inherently designed Some of the Project activities would support and The nature of the Project precludes any
People participation in project to promote stakeholder encourage stakeholder participation. opportunity for meaningful stakeholder
planning and execution participation throughout the participation.
project cycle.
JT-3
Improvement/transfer of The Project is designed to Some of the Project activities would support and The nature of the Project precludes any
knowledge and skills, beliefs facilitate the transfer of skills and encourage the transfer of skills and knowledge as opportunity to transfer of skills and
and attitudes through knowledge as well as promote well as promote changes in beliefs, values and knowledge as well as promote changes in
changes in beliefs, values and attitudes related to water resource use, protection beliefs, values and attitudes related to water
participatory approaches in
attitudes related to water resource and management. resource use, protection and management.
water-related projects use, protection and management.
Promotion of The Project is inherently designed The Project would make a certain indirect The nature of the Project precludes any
community-based activities to promote community-based support to or partly encourage community-based possibility for community-based
activities. activities. undertakings.
Empowerment of the The empowerment of such The empowerment of such vulnerable The nature of the Project precludes any
indigenous peoples, the vulnerable stakeholders is inherent stakeholders may be incidental but is not latent meaningful opportunity to empower such
women-headed HH, in the Project design. in the Project design. vulnerable stakeholders.
handicapped, the
out-of-school youths, the
elderly and other
vulnerable stakeholders
Sector K
Formulation of IWRM Plan
Sector K. Formulation of IWRM Plan
Table of Contents
Pages
K.1 Setting of Planning Framework ............................................................................................ K-1
K.1.1 Target Year ............................................................................................................ K-1
K.1.2 Socioeconomic Framework .................................................................................. K-1
K.1.2.1 Projected Population in the Study Area ..................................................... K-1
K.1.2.2 Projected Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) .............................. K-1
K.1.2.3 Price Level of Project Cost ........................................................................ K-2
K.1.3 Visions, Objectives and Sector Goals of IWRM for the Study Area .................... K-2
K.1.3.1 Purpose for Setting of Visions, Objectives and Sector Goal ..................... K-2
K.1.3.2 National and Regional Development Policies ........................................... K-2
K.1.3.3 Visions, Objectives and Sector Goals adopted for the Study .................... K-5
K.1.4 Grouping of the Projects ....................................................................................... K-7
K.1.5 Ceiling of Investment Cost for Projects in Group B ............................................. K-8
K.1.6 Estimation Basis for the Ceiling of Investment Cost ............................................ K-8
K.2 Project Implementation Schedule ....................................................................................... K-10
K.2.1 Implementation Schedule for Group-A Projects ................................................. K-10
K.2.2 Implementation Schedule for Group-B Projects ................................................. K-10
K.2.3 Number of Projects to be Implemented and Project Investment Cost for Each
of 5-year Term..................................................................................................... K-11
K.3 Project Investment Plan ....................................................................................................... K-13
K.3.1 General ................................................................................................................ K-13
K.3.2 Project Investment Plan for Agriculture, Irrigation and Fishery Development .. K-14
K.3.3 Project Investment Plan for Development of Municipal Water Supply,
Sanitation and Sewerage ..................................................................................... K-14
K.3.4 Project Investment Plan for Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters ...... K-17
K.3.5 Project Investment Plan for Watershed Management ......................................... K-18
K.3.6 Project Investment Plan for Water-related Environment Management ............... K-18
K.3.7 Project Investment Plan for Inter-Sector Water Resources Development,
Allocation and Distribution................................................................................. K-19
K.4 Development Scenarios ........................................................................................................ K-20
K.4.1 Development Scenarios for Group-A Projects .................................................... K-20
K.4.1.1 Development Scenarios in Sector of Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery
Development............................................................................................ K-20
K.4.1.2 Development Scenarios in Sector of Municipal Water Supply,
Sanitation and Sewerage.......................................................................... K-20
K.4.1.3 Development Scenarios in Management of Flood and Sediment
Disasters .................................................................................................. K-22
K.4.1.4 Development Scenarios in Watershed Management................................ K-23
K.4.1.5 Development Scenarios in Water-related Environment Management ..... K-23
K.4.2 Development Scenarios for Group-B Projects .................................................... K-24
K.4.2.1 Development Scenarios in the Sector of Agriculture, Irrigation and
Fishery Development............................................................................... K-24
K.4.2.2 Development Scenarios for Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and
Sewerage.................................................................................................. K-25
i
K.4.2.3 Development Scenarios for Management of Flood and Sediment
Disasters .................................................................................................. K-25
K.4.2.4 Development Scenarios for Watershed Management .............................. K-26
K.4.2.5 Development Scenarios for Water-related Environment Management ... K-26
K.4.2.6 Development Scenarios for Inter-Sector Water Resources Development,
Allocation and Distribution ..................................................................... K-27
List of Tables
Table K. 1.2.1 Projected Population Growth Rates for the Study Area .................................... K-1
Table K. 1.2.2 Annual Average Growth Rate of Gross Value Added in Region III from
1995 to 2007 ..................................................................................................... K-1
Table K. 1.2.3 Average Annual Increase Rate of Wholesale Price Index against Previous
Year ................................................................................................................... K-2
Table K. 1.3.1 Objectives Delineated in MTPDP 2004-2010 ................................................... K-2
Table K. 1.3.2 Sustainable Outcomes and Strategic Themes in the IWRM Plan
Framework ........................................................................................................ K-5
Table K. 1.3.3 Vision Statement ............................................................................................... K-5
Table K. 1.3.4 Goals in Each of the Sectors of Water Development and Management ............ K-7
Table K. 1.4.1 Results on Grouping of the Projects.................................................................. K-7
Table K. 1.5.1 Ceilings of Investment Cost for Projects in Group B........................................ K-8
Table K. 1.6.1 Summary of National Government Budget....................................................... K-8
Table K. 1.6.2 National Budget Allocated to the Projects for Water-Related Infrastructure
Development..................................................................................................... K-8
Table K. 2.3.1 Number of Projects to be implemented in Each of Short, Medium and
Long-term ....................................................................................................... K-11
Table K. 3.1.1 Project Cost to be disbursed in Each of Short, Mid and Long-term ............... K-13
Table K. 3.1.2 Project Investment Cost divided according to Classifications and Status of
the Projects (Project Implementation Period: 2011 – 2025) ........................... K-13
Table K. 3.1.3 Project Investment Cost divided according to Classifications and
Implementing Bodies of the Projects (Project Implementation Period:
2011 – 2025) ................................................................................................... K-14
Table K. 3.2.1 Project Investment Cost for Agriculture, Irrigation and Fishery
Development................................................................................................... K-14
Table K. 3.3.1 Project Investment Cost for Development of Municipal Water Supply,
Sanitation and Sewerage ................................................................................. K-15
Table K. 3.3.2 Conversion of Project Investment Cost to Unit Cost ...................................... K-15
Table K. 3.4.1 Project Investment Cost for Management of Flood and Sediment
Disasters ......................................................................................................... K-17
Table K. 3.4.2 Projects by DPWH for Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters.......... K-18
Table K. 3.5.1 Project Investment Cost for Watershed management ...................................... K-18
Table K. 3.6.1 Project Investment Cost for Water-related Environment Management........... K-19
Table K. 3.7.1 Project Investment Cost for Inter-Sector Water Resources Development,
Allocation and Distribution ............................................................................ K-19
ii
Annex-T K.1.4.1 Grouping of Projects (Group-A Projects) .................................................. KT-1

Annex-T K 2.2.1 Principal Objectives and Contents of Major Discussions in TWG
Meetings, Stakeholder Meeting and Joint SC and TWG Meeting in
September and October 2010 ..................................................................... KT-3
Annex-T K.2.1.2 Development Scenarios and Relevant Projects (Group-A)........................ KT-6
Annex-T K.2.1.3 Implementation Schedule for Group-A Projects ........................................ KT-8
Annex-T K.2.2.4 Results of Evaluation (Scoring) of Group-B Projects by Study Team ....... KT-9
Annex-T K.2.2.5 Results of Evaluation (Scoring) of Group-B Projects by TWG
Members .................................................................................................. KT-10
Annex-T K.2.2.6 Group-B Projects to be Implemented in Short, Medium and Long
Term ......................................................................................................... KT-11
Annex-T K.2.2.7 Implementation Schedule for Group-B Projects ...................................... KT-12
Annex-T K.2.2.8 Development Scenarios and Relevant Projects (Group-B) ...................... KT-13
iii
Sector K. Formulation of IWRM Plan
K.1 Setting of Planning Framework

K.1.1 Target Year
The target year of the IWRM Plan under this planning stage had been set at 2025 as agreed in the
“Minutes of Meeting on Implementation Agreement for the Study.” On the premise of the target year
2025, the project implementation period is divided into the following three 5-year terms. The phased
implementation schedule as well as the phased investment program for the IWRM Plan is formulated
on the premise of the said three terms.
(1) Short-Term for the period from 2011 to 2015;
(2) Medium-Term for the period from 2016 to 2020; and
(3) Long-Term for the period from 2021 to 2025.
K.1.2 Socioeconomic Framework

K.1.2.1 Projected Population in the Study Area
Since about 99% of the whole extent of the study area belongs to the four provinces of Bulacan,
Nueva Ecija, Pampanga and Tarlac, the population projection for the study area is made based on the
Census for the said provinces. The specific population growth rates for the provinces are assumed
based on the projection by the National Statistic Coordination Board (NSCB), as listed below:
Table K. 1.2.1 Projected Population Growth Rates for the Study Area
Province 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2025
Bulacan 2.70% 2.41% 2.18% 1.94%
Nueva Ecija 1.62% 1.50% 1.31% 1.10%
Pampanga 1.81% 1.62% 1.42% 1.23%
Tarlac 1.70% 1.55% 1.35% 1.16%
The Study Area 2.06% 1.86% 1.66% 1.46%
Source: NSCB
K.1.2.2 Projected Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)

The projected growth of GRDP is estimated from the past annual average growth rate of Gross Value
Added (GVA) in the industrial sectors recorded for Region III. Region III had an increase in GVA
from 1995 to 2007, as listed below.
Table K. 1.2.2 Annual Average Growth Rate of Gross Value Added in
Region III from 1995 to 2007
Gross Value Added (in million pesos) Annual Ave. Growth Annual Ave. Growth
(1) Sector In 1995 In 2003 In 2007
Rate of GVA Rate of GVA
(1995-2007) (2003-2007)
Agriculture, Fishery & Forest 38,532 64,012 93,539 7.7% 8.2%
Industry 59,398 127,901 175,857 9.5% 9.0%
Service 62,009 155,377 231,959 11.6% 10.2%
Total 159,939 347,426 501,356 10.0% 9.4%
Source: NSCB
K-1
K.1.2.3 Price Level of Project Cost

The project cost discussed in this project formulation is converted to the price level as of 2009 using
the “Wholesale Price Index (WPI) for Construction Material” shown below.
Table K. 1.2.3 Average Annual Increase Rate of Wholesale Price Index against Previous Year
Year in Interval 1960–1969 1970–1979 1980–1989 1990–1999 2000–2008 1960–2009
WPI - Construction Materials 5.58% 5.65% 5.68% 5.52% 7.39% 5.97%
K.1.3 Visions, Objectives and Sector Goals of IWRM for the Study Area
K.1.3.1 Purpose for Setting of Visions, Objectives and Sector Goal
The IWRM Plan would involve multi-water-sector projects such as those in the sectors of:
(i) agriculture/irrigation and fishery development; (ii) municipal water supply, sanitation and
sewerage; (iii) management of flood and sediment disasters; (iv) watershed management,
(v) water-related environmental management; and (vi) water resources development, allocation and
distribution. Taking these multi-sector projects into account, the visions for the IWRM Plan are
proposed as the principal targets common to all proposed projects for the IWRM of Pampanga river
basin. The objectives in the several categories are further assumed to embody the visions. Moreover,
each of the water-related sectors in the IWRM Plan is provided with concrete sector goals, which
could enhance the objectives and/or visions.
K.1.3.2 National and Regional Development Policies
The visions, objectives and sector goals shall be in line with the national and regional development
policies. The policies on the nationwide and/or region-wide socioeconomic development and
political improvement in the Philippines have been delineated through the “Medium-Term Philippine
Development Plan (MTPDP) 2004-2010”1) and the “Regional Physical Framework Plan (RPFP)
2005-2030, Central Luzon”2). The IWRM Plan Framework in the Philippines3) had been also
formulated through the leadership of NWRB in 2006 as the nationwide roadmap to enhance the
adequate supply of clean water at a reasonable price, while at the same time effectively safeguarding
biodiversity and healthy environment. The details of these national and regional development policies
are as described hereinafter.
(1) Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan 2004-2010
The Philippines recorded the national average poverty incidence of 34% in 2000, which
worsened from 33% in 1997. In the light of such extremely high and aggravating poverty
incidence, the MTPDP 2004-2010 addressed “Poverty Alleviation” as the priority task of the
government. The MTPDP further emphasizes the necessity to accelerate the country’s
economic development, particularly through decentralized development for the small and
medium enterprises (SMEs) and agribusiness, which could lead to the reduction of
unemployment and rural poverty. Taking these conditions into account, the MTPDP set
ten (10) objectives to contribute toward poverty alleviation and national economic
development,
Table K. 1.3.1 Objectives Delineated in MTPDP 2004-2010
Category Objectives
Livelihood (1) Increase of job opportunities and income
Education (2) Increase of enrollment rate of schools
Fiscal Status (3) Creation of fiscal status balanced with right revenues and expenditures
(4) Spread of transport and digital infrastructure network over the country
(5) Sustainable supply of power and water over the country
Decentralized (6) Spread of new centers of government, business and community in Luzon, Visayas
Development and Mindanao
(7) Development of Subic-Clark corridor as the competitive international service and
logistics center in Southeast Asia Region
(8) Execution of elections of high integrity
National Harmony (9) Peace in Mindanao and to all insurgencies
(10) Closure of divisive issues generated by the EDSA Revolution
K-2
Of the above objectives, those under the categories of livelihood and decentralized
development in particular are closely related to the water management for the study area, and
they are further elaborated as below.
(a) The Objectives under the Category of Livelihood
The MTPDP stated that poverty in the Philippines is basically the problem in rural areas,
because a majority of the poor are the small and/or landless farmers, the farm workers,
the fisher-folks and the indigenous people, and most of them are engaged in agriculture.
Moreover, they tend to reside in the environmentally vulnerable areas and be
handicapped by the less public service such as power/water supply.
From the above points of view, the MTPDP highlighted agriculture and agro-forestry
development as the principal driving force for job creation, which could lead to poverty
alleviation as well as economic development in rural areas, in particular.
The MTPDP worked out the nationwide vision to create two million jobs in the
agricultural sector, which should have been achieved through development of
two million hectares of new agricultural land. At the same time, the MTPDP stressed
the necessity for increase of agricultural productivity at competitive prices, which could
lead to the incremental income of farmers. Hence, the strengthening of irrigation water
supply and/or expansion of agro-forestry as a part of watershed management would be
highlighted to increase job opportunities in the agricultural sector and the income of
farmers.
(b) The Objectives under the Category of Decentralized Development
The MTPDP addressed the necessity for spreading the new urban centers in Luzon,
Visayas and Mindanao to decongest the overconcentration of economic activities in
Metro Manila and to spur economic growth in the Philippines. The Subic-Clark
corridor, which is partially located in the study area, in particular, is highlighted as the
potential competitive international service and logistics center in Southeast Asia.
Angeles, San Fernando and other major cities located in the study area would also be the
strong candidates as the new government, business and community centers, because of
the existing infrastructures and the easy access to Metro Manila through the North
Luzon Expressway. The development of new bulk water supply systems, sewerage
systems, flood mitigation systems and other water development/management programs
would be the critical factors to create such new urban centers.
(2) Regional Physical Framework Plan (RPFP) 2005-2030, Central Luzon
The RPFP 2005-2030 set forth the following four (4) primary targets of regional development:
 Increase of agricultural productivity, which could lead to the increase of farmer’s
income in particular;
 Reduction of business cost through upgrading of the existing road infrastructure and
strengthening of the linkages between the existing economic zones and their host
municipalities;
 Reduction of the risk on natural calamities such as floods, landslides and
earthquakes/tsunamis; and
 Increase of growth potential through agrarian reform, increase of enrollment rate of
schools and improvement of residents’ physical condition.
All of the above targets are likely to be oriented to the achievement of socioeconomic
development, which could lead to improvement of living conditions and livelihood of
residents finally contributing to poverty alleviation and economic development in the region.
To achieve the visions, the RPFP set the following policies, strategies and/or action plans in
each of the water-related sectors.
K-3
(a) Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery

 The primary agriculture and aquaculture lands shall be preserved without being
converted to other uses.
 The government shall continue to support agriculture and aquaculture
development, especially in the construction of irrigation and drainage facilities.
 Science and technologies shall be harnessed to increase agriculture and
aquaculture productivity with competitive costs for production.
 Priority shall be given to the development of new irrigation systems in order to
expand the agricultural production areas. Existing irrigation systems shall be also
rehabilitated and improved to increase their efficiencies.
(b) Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage
 The region’s groundwater and surface water resources shall be properly developed
and managed to satisfy the demand and reduced cost for municipal water supply.
 Existing municipal water supply and sanitation facilities shall be rehabilitated,
improved and properly maintained. New facilities shall be also developed to
increase their efficiency and service coverage.
(c) Management of Floods and Sediment Disasters
 Extensive and efficient flood control systems shall be provided to protect the
settlement and production areas, in particular.
 Utmost effort shall be made to retain floodwater in the upper and middle reaches
by suitable reservoir or flood retarding pond/swamp. This would ensure better
control over floods and at the same time, create possible water resources
development for multi-purpose project functions like power generation, irrigation
and recreational facilities.
 Expansion of settlements in areas prone to disasters shall be restrained.
(d) Watershed Management
 The region shall focus on reforestation in open areas.
 Building of settlements and/or livestock production shall be discouraged in the
upland areas with steep ground slopes of more than 18% and 30%, respectively.
Production activities in NIPAS areas shall be also strictly prohibited.
 Massive reforestation of degraded mangrove ecosystems shall be pursued.
(3) Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) Plan Framework in the Philippines
The ever-increasing water demand is becoming a critical factor to the socioeconomic
development and global competitiveness in the Philippines. Moreover, there is a critical
linkage between better water management in various sectors and the country’s socioeconomic
development. From these points of view, the MTPDP underscored a need to adopt the
IWRM approach as a more integrated and holistic management of water resources in the
Philippines. This approach involves the coordinated development and management of water,
land and related resources within the hydrological boundaries, to optimize economic and
social welfare without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems.
The IWRM Plan Framework delineated four (4) Sustainable Outcomes, which are the medium
to long-term goals for the water resources management in the Philippines. To achieve the
Sustainable Outcomes, nine (9) Strategic Themes, which are either sector or inter-sector
imperatives, are further set forth in the IWRM Plan Framework. The contents of the
sustainable outcomes and strategic themes are as shown below.
K-4
Table K. 1.3.2 Sustainable Outcomes and Strategic Themes in the IWRM Plan
Framework
Sustainable Outcomes Strategic Themes
 To ensure the rational, efficient and ecologically sustainable allocation of
Effective Protection and water.
Regulation for Water  To enhance the effectiveness in groundwater management and aquifer
Security and Ecosystem protection.
Health  To achieve the clean and healthy water.
 To mitigate the risks of climate change events and water-related disasters.
 To promote water conservation/stewardship and improve the water use
Sustainable Water Resources
efficiency.
and Responsive Services for
 To expand the access and ensure availability of affordable and responsive
Present and Future Needs
water supply and sanitation services.
Improved Effectiveness,  To promote the participatory water governance and supportive enabling
Accountability, and Synergy environment.
among Water-Related  To strengthen the knowledge management and the building capacity for
Institutions and Stakeholders IWRM.
Adaptive and Proactive
 To explore the new pathways to water resource management - water
Response to Emerging/
sensitive design and water rights trading.
Future Challenges
K.1.3.3 Visions, Objectives and Sector Goals adopted for the Study
With reference to the above nationwide and/or region-wide development plan and IWRM Plan
Framework, the following visions, objectives and sector goals are adopted for the IWRM Plan of the
study area.
(1) Visions
“Poverty Alleviation” and “Economic Development” are raised as the priority tasks in the
MTPDP. All of the socioeconomic and infrastructure development programs proposed in the
RPFP for Central Luzon are also directed to the said two principal tasks. With reference to
the MTPDP and the RPFP, “Poverty Alleviation” and “Economic Development” are adopted
as the principal visions of the IWRM plan for Pampanga river basin.
It is herein noted that “Poverty Alleviation” is oriented to not only the betterment of
livelihood/increase of income for poverty thresholds but also securing the basic human needs
such as safe drinking water and safe living conditions against flood and other water-related
disasters. At the same time, the approaches to “Poverty Alleviation” shall not be made to
sacrifice the vital ecosystem. Likewise, “Economic Development” shall be oriented to not
only development of the regional economy but also preserving and/or recovery of the
ecosystem in Pampanga river basin.
The related vision statement proposed by a member of TWG is as shown in Table K1.3.3.
Table K. 1.3.3 Vision Statement
The Pampanga river basin (PRB) shall become the most economically advanced river basin in the country
that shall attain the lowest incidence of poverty, fully restored watershed and ecosystems, properly utilized and
managed water resources, adequately provided modern infrastructure facilities, and an empowered citizens in
partnership with transparent, accountable, and development-oriented leaders.
The average ratio of poverty thresholds in the study area as of 2006 is about 20%, which is
lower than the national average of about 33%. Nevertheless, particular attention shall be given
to the ratio of poverty thresholds in Nueva Ecija Province in the study area. The ratio in this
province is about 38%, which exceeds the national average. A majority of the employees in
the province are engaged in the agriculture/forestry sector and one of the crucial issues on
poverty alleviation for the province should be addressed to increment the income of
employees in the sector.
It is further noted that manufacturing, agriculture/forestry and trade are the three (3) major
industries in Region III, which produce the Gross Value Added of more than 50% in the region.
K-5
Accordingly, these three industrial sectors shall take the principal role for the “Economic
Development” in the study area, so that enhancement of the bulk water supply system for
manufacturing and the irrigation system for agriculture would be the important water-related
works to ensure the economic development in the study area. Enhancement of the irrigation
system in particular would be the crucial issue, since Region III is the largest irrigated
paddy-producing district in the country taking the share of about 22% of the national total.
(2) Objectives
To achieve the said principal visions, the following five (5) items are further proposed as the
objectives of the IWRM plan for Pampanga river basin with reference to the MTPDP, RPFP
and IWRM Plan Framework in Philippines:
(a) Objective 1: Enhanced Livelihood
Objective 1 is oriented to the enhancement of the minimum requirement for livelihood,
which shall contribute to poverty alleviation. The importance of this objective is
emphasized in the MTPDP for the Philippines as well as the RPFP for Central Luzon. To
achieve this objective, both the MTPDP and RPFP emphasized the necessity to increase
job opportunities in the agricultural sector, and agricultural productivity with
competitive production costs.
(b) Objective 2: Improved Quality of Life
Objective 2 is oriented to the improvement of the quality of life, which shall be one of
the essential factors for poverty alleviation similar to the above Objective 1. Both the
MTPDP and RPFP highlighted the importance of the following two water management
systems for improvement of the quality of life, namely; (i) the substantial municipal
water supply system, which could promise access to safe drinking water; and
(ii) substantial mitigation system against flood, sediment disasters and other
water-related damages.
(c) Objective 3: Decentralized Development
Objective 3 is the main driving force for the decentralized socioeconomic development
of the existing urban centers in the study area such as Clark Field, Angeles City and San
Fernando City, and the agricultural development in the rural areas. Both the MTPDP
and RPFP highlighted two principal water-related issues to give a strong incentive of
such decentralized development, namely; (i) availability of adequate municipal water
supply for the urban centers and adequate irrigation water supply for the principal
irrigation areas in the study area; and (ii) minimization of damage by floods, sediment
disasters and other water-related disasters in the study area.
(d) Objective 4: Sustained Ecosystem
The above Objectives 1, 2 and 3 would contain active interventions to reform the
existing natural environment, which could result in spoiling the rich biodiversity and the
healthy ecosystem. To avoid such adverse effects to the ecosystem, Objective 4 is to be
launched. The major approaches to attain this objective would include reforestation of
mangroves and other degraded ecosystems and inducement of sanitary facilities and
efforts to improve the quality of surface water.
(e) Objective 5: Empowered People
As described above, water resource development and management shall involve various
sectors such as those for water allocation/distribution, mitigation of water-related
disasters and conservation of ecosystems. To achieve a well-balanced water resources
development and management, it is indispensable to involve all of the stakeholders in
the IWRM Plan and pursue capacity building for them at all stages and key processes.
From this point of view, this objective is proposed as a part of the MTPDP and the
IWRM-RFP and applied in the study.
K-6
(3) Goals of Each of Water related Sectors

To achieve the aforesaid five (5) objectives, the goals for each of the water-related sectors are
assumed, with reference to the MTPDP, RPFP and the IWRM Plan Framework as listed
below.
Table K. 1.3.4 Goals in Each of the Sectors of Water Development and Management
Sector Goal
 Rehabilitate and develop irrigation system
Agriculture and
 Enhance new agricultural technology on water management
Hydropower
 Sustainable fishery under integrated water resource management
 Improve water supply quality
Municipal Water Supply,
 Ensure necessary water supply capacity
Sanitation and Sewerage
 Reduce pollution load
Flood and Sediment
 Mitigate chronic damage by flood and sediment disasters
Disaster Mitigation
 Intensify management, protection and maintenance of vulnerable and
ecologically sensitive area
Watershed Management
 Increase forest cover of critically denuded uplands, and mangrove areas and
urban corridors
 Strengthen water quality monitoring, data management, regulatory and decision
Water-related Environment support system
Management  Reduce pollution load from various sources in key areas of Pampanga river basin
in order to render quality of waters fit for specified uses
K.1.4 Grouping of the Projects

As described in Sectors C to H, 84 projects are selected as the eligible components of the IWRM for
Pampanga river basin. These projects are classified into the Group-A and B in order to facilitate
programming of the under-mentioned project implementation schedule and development scenarios.
The detailed criteria for classification to Group-A and B are as described in the foregoing Section J.3.4
in Sector Report J.
As the results of classification, the projects are divided into Group-A and B as listed in Annex-T
K.1.4.1 and summarized Table K.1.4.1. The Group-A includes 43 projects and the investment cost of
about 97 billion pesos in total. The Sector of the “Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage”
requires the largest cost of about 69 billion pesos in Group-A, which correspond to about 71% of the
group total. On the other hand, the Group-B includes 41projects requiring the investment cost of
about 72 billion pesos in total. The Sector of “Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery” takes 18 projects and
the investment cost of 55 billion pesos in total (or about 76% of the total), which is the largest in
Group-B. The second largest is in the Sector of Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters taking 7
projects and the project investment cost of about 12 billion pesos (about 17% of the total).
Table K. 1.4.1 Results on Grouping of the Projects
Number of Project Cost
Group Sector
Projects (million pesos)
Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery 10 12,388
Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage 15 68,571
Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters 3 3,687
A Watershed Management 9 623
Water-related Environment Management 5 3,417
Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation and Distribution 1 7,966
Sub-total 43 96,652
Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery 18 55,400
Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage 3 1,155
Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters 7 12,071
B Watershed Management 7 2,951
Water-related Environment Management 3 248
Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation and Distribution 3 607
Sub-total 41 72,432
Total 84 169,084
K-7
K.1.5 Ceiling of Investment Cost for Projects in Group B

The ceiling of project investment cost shall be one of the important factors to determine the
implementation schedule for the projects in Group B. When the implementation of projects
excessively concentrates upon any of the aforesaid short-term, medium-term and/or long-term, the
total project investment cost may exceed the affordable limit of the national and/or regional budgetary
capacity. From this point of view, the approximate ceilings of investment cost for the projects in
Group B are provisionally estimated for each of the short-term, medium-term and long-term, as listed
in Table K.1.5.1. The detailed estimation bases for these ceilings of investment cost are as described
in Section K.1.6.
Table K. 1.5.1 Ceilings of Investment Cost for Projects in Group B
Term Period Ceiling Amount
Short-term 2011–2015 31.7 billion pesos
Mid-term 2016–2020 33.7 billion pesos
Long-term 2021–2025 33.7 billion pesos
Total 2011–2025 99.1 billion pesos
K.1.6 Estimation Basis for the Ceiling of Investment Cost

The national budget of the Philippines had increased from 0.948 trillion pesos in 2005 to 1.426 trillion
pesos in 2009, with the annual average incremental rate of about 11% as listed below.
Table K. 1.6.1 Summary of National Government Budget
(Unit: Billion Pesos)
Allocated to Departments and Allocated as Special Purpose
Year Total
Agencies Funds
2005 442 506 948
2006 401 652 1,053
2007 458 669 1,126
2008 722 592 1,315
2009 710 716 1,426
Of the above national budget, 15 to 20 billion pesos (about 1.0 to 1.4% of the national budget) are
allotted to infrastructure development of the water source/distribution for irrigation implemented by
NIA and flood mitigation by DPWH, as listed in Table K.1.6.2.
Table K. 1.6.2 National Budget Allocated to the Projects for Water-Related
Infrastructure Development
(Unit: Billion Pesos)
Year Description Water Use* Flood Mitigation** Total
(1) Whole Nation 7.31 7.93 15.25
2007 (2) Study Area 1.52 0.27 1.79
(3) Share {(2)/(1)} 20.80% 3.30% 11.70%
(1) Whole Nation 8.04 6.73 13.67
2008 (2) Study Area 2.08 0.56 2.64
(3) Share {(2)/(1)} 25.90% 8.30% 19.30%
(1) Whole Nation 12.55 6.93 19.48
2009 (2) Study Area 0.36 1.54 1.9
(3) Share {(2)/(1)} 2.90% 22.30% 9.80%
Note: *: Budget allocated to projects of NIA under the “Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Program” in “Special
Purpose Funds”
**: Budget allocated to projects of DPWH under the “Department Fund”
Source: Budget Expenditures/Sources by the Department of Budget and Management
In addition to the above national budget, the LGUs also have a certain budget for the implementation
of water-related projects. Nevertheless, the annual total budgets of the provincial governments in the
study area are in the range of about 1 to 2.4 billion pesos only and such amounts would make it
virtually difficult to shoulder the necessary costs for the major water-related development projects.
K-8
Accordingly, the national budget could be regarded substantially as the sole eligible source for the
implementation of major water-related projects. At the same time, the budget could be unevenly
concentrated to a particular project, which would be implemented during a particular period, provided
that the project implementation is judged to be strategically important for the nation. Moreover, the
national budget has increased in the recent five (5) years with an annual incremental rate of about 11%,
and this incremental tendency is expected to continue for the time being. From these viewpoints, the
ceilings of investment cost for the projects are estimated on the following assumptions:
 The national budget for water-related infrastructure development projects would be able to
continue to increase by 11% per year until the end of the short-term plan (i.e., 2015); and
 Taking into account the maximum percentage of the above national budget allocated to the
study area in the previous years, about 20% of the national budget could be expended, as the
ceiling, for project development in the study area.
Based on the above assumptions, the ceiling of investment by the target year 2025 is estimated at
about 99 billion pesos, and those for short-term, medium-term and long-term plans are as listed in
Table K.1.5.1.
K-9
K.2 Project Implementation Schedule

K.2.1 Implementation Schedule for Group-A Projects
As described in Section J.3.4 and J.3.5 in Sector Report J, the development scenarios relevant to the
Group-A projects are firstly conceived taking the basic social and natural needs into account , and then
the implementation schedule for Group-A projects are set up to catch up the development scenarios.
The typical development scenarios are as enumerated below:
 The development scenarios, which have to be timely implemented in accordance with the basic
human needs: The typical scenario is such as development of the bulk municipal water supply
system, which has to be completed in the right term to meet the municipal water demand
increased with the urban population growth.
 The development scenarios, which shall be gradually attained throughout the short, medium
and long-term: The scenarios are oriented to the gradual improvement of the social and/or
natural environments such as (a) increase of the access to the safe drinking water through the
expansion of the pipe water supply system and the sanitary toilets, (b) expansion of the forest
coverage through the yearly regular program of reforestation and (c) increase of the agricultural
activities through the yearly regular maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing irrigation
facilities.
The JICA Study Team proposed the development scenarios for the Group-A projects in due
consideration of: (a) the problems/issues on IWRM in Pampanga river basin (refer to Chapter 6) and
(b) the visions, objectives and sector goals of the IWRM (refer to Section K1.3). The proposed
development scenarios were further reviewed and revised through the TWG meetings on
September 29, 2010, the TWG workshop on October 07, 2010 and the stakeholder meeting on
October 13, 2010 (refer to Annex-T K.2.1.1). As the results, the specific development scenarios for
Pampanga river basin were finally determined and the implementation schedule for Group-A projects
were further proposed in due consideration of the right time for completion of the projects to catch up
the development scenarios. The proposed development scenarios and the relevant project
implementation schedules are as shown in Annexes-T K.2.1.2 and 2.1.3. The details of the
development scenarios are further described in the following Section K.4.1.
K.2.2 Implementation Schedule for Group-B Projects

As described in the Section J.3.4, the Group-B projects are oriented to the following items:
 Development of the regional economy,
 Mitigation of the flood and sediment disasters and
 Support of the yearly regular projects classified into Group-A.
Target completion year of the Group-B project could be optional in general, and the priority order of
the projects is assumed as the principal factor for programming of the implementation schedules for
the Group-B projects. The detailed methodologies for setting of the priority order of the projects and
the implementation schedule are as described in the foregoing Sections J.3.6 in Sector Report J and 7.9
in Main Report.
The priority order of the Group-B projects is determined based on the results of scoring for each of the
project. The scorings for the Group-B projects were firstly made by the JICA Study Team and then the
results of the scorings are reviewed and revised by 13 members of the TWG, who represent the
following agencies: NIA, NPC, BSWM, PHILVOLCS, DENR-RBCO, DPWH-FCSEC, PAGASA,
DILG-Region III, Provincial Gov. of Tarlac (PPDO), Provincial Government of Bulacan (PGENRO),
NEDA-Region III, MWSS, DENR-PAWB and NWRB.
K-10
The specific procedures taken for the scorings of the projects are as below:
(1) The scorings of the 29 proposed and conceptual projects1 were firstly made by the JICA Study
Team as shown in Annex-T K.2.2.4. The results of the scorings were presented to and discussed
by the TWG members in the TWG Meeting on September 29, 2010.
(2) The TWG-Workshop was held on October 7, 2010. Each of the TWG members reviewed the
results of the above scorings by the JICA Study Team, and revised the results of scorings through
the Workshop. The scorings for each of the projects revised by the TWG members are averaged
into the geometric mean as shown in Annex-T K.2.2.5.
(3) Some of the TWG members proposed to make the second-round scorings for the projects not
referring to the results of scoring by the JICA Study Team. This second-round scoring aimed at
attaining more objective and precise results of scorings. In accordance with the proposal, the
second-round scoring was individually made by each of the TWG members in the days following
to the Workshop. However, the second-round scorings were prepared by three (3) members
only.
(4) The limited number of second-round scorings was judged to hardly represent the collective
conclusion of the whole TWG members on scoring. From this point of view, the priority order of
the projects is finally determined according to the first-round scores made during the Workshop
as stated in the above item (2).
In addition to the above priority order of the projects made by the scoring, the ceiling project
investment cost for each of the short, medium and, long-term is another important factor to determine
the implementation schedule for the Group-B projects. The details of the ceiling project investment
cost are as described in Section K1.6, and the projects to be implemented in the short, medium and
long-term are proposed taking the ceiling project investment cost into account as shown in
Annexes-T K.2.2.6 and 2.2.7. The development scenarios to be attained by the proposed
implementation schedule are assumed as shown in Annex-T K.2.2.8 and described in detail in the
following Section K.4.2.
K.2.3 Number of Projects to be Implemented and Project Investment Cost for Each of 5-year
Term
In accordance with the aforesaid the implementation schedules for the Group-A and B projects, the
number of the projects to be implemented in each of the short, medium and long-term is estimated as
shown in Tables K.2.3.1.
Table K. 2.3.1 Number of Projects to be implemented in
Each of Short, Medium and Long-term
Classification of Projects Short-term Mid-term Long-term Total
Group A 41 36 36 113
Project to be Implemented
Group B 33 17 6 56
within the Term
Total 74 (44%) 53 (31%) 42 (25%) 169 (100%)
Group A 41 0 2 43
Projects to be commenced
Group B 33 7 1 41
in the Term
Total 74 (88%) 7 (8%) 3 (4%) 84 (100%)
Group A 5 2 36 43
Project to be Completed
Group B 23 12 6 41
within the Term
Total 28 (33%) 14 (17%) 42 (50%) 84 (100%)
A total of 84 projects are to be implemented throughout the short, medium and long term. Out of these
projects, 74 projects are firstly commenced in the short-term, and 28 projects of them are completed
within the same term as listed in Tables K.2.3.1. The remainders (i.e., 46 projects) continue to be
1
The Group-B includes 12 ongoing projects out of 41 projects in total. These ongoing projects are to be implemented in
accordance with their existing implementing schedules, which had already been programmed by the project proponents.
On the other hand, other 29 proposed and/or conceptual projects are to be implemented in due consideration of the
priority order of the projects into account as described above.
K-11
implemented in the next medium-term. Likewise, 53 projects are implemented in the medium-term
including 7 projects to be newly commenced and 14 projects to be completed within the term. The
number of projects to be finally implemented in the long-term is 42, which include 3 projects to be
newly commenced.
K-12
K.3 Project Investment Plan

K.3.1 General
It is clarified that a total of about 169 billion pesos would need to be invested for implementation of
the whole projects for IWRM plan of Pampanga river basin (i.e., 84 projects). Of the total project
investment cost, 61.5 billion pesos (36% of the total investment cost) is disbursed in the short-term
and followed by 52.7 billion pesos (31%) in the medium-term and 55.0 billion pesos (33%) in the
long-term as shown in Table K.3.1.1.
Table K. 3.1.1 Project Cost to be disbursed in Each of Short, Mid and Long-term
(Unit: million pesos)
Classification of Project Short-term Mid-term Long-term Total
Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery Development 22,163 26,164 19,461 67,788
Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage Development 29,137 8,980 31,609 69,726
Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters 6,431 6,597 2,730 15,758
Watershed Management 1,721 1,588 265 3,574
Water-related Environment Management 1,501 1,371 793 3,666
Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation and Distribution 509 7,965 99 8,573
Total 61,462 52,665 54,957 169,085
Of the total project investment cost of about 169.1 billion pesos, the ongoing projects and the proposed
projects would require the investment cost of 21.5and 77.5 billion pesos, respectively as shown in
Table K.3.1.2. The necessary budgetary sources of a total of 99.0 billion pesos for the ongoing and
proposed projects have been arranged and/or they are being sought by the project proponents. On the
other hand, there is nothing to be done with the project investment cost of about 70.1 billion pesos for
the conceptual projects. The conceptual projects for Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and
Sewerage Development in particular require the large budgetary sources for their investment of 48.1
billion peso.
Table K. 3.1.2 Project Investment Cost divided according to Classifications and Status of the
Projects (Project Implementation Period: 2011 – 2025)
Ongoing Proposed Conceptual
Classification of Project Total
Project Projects Projects
Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery Development 12,766 54,208 814 67,788
Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage Development 5,213 16,456 48,057 69,726
Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters 1,454 5,820 8,484 15,758
Watershed Management 1,662 1,912 3,574
Water-related Environment Management 356 1,036 2,273 3,665
Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation and Distribution 8,573 8,573
Total 21,452 77,520 70,113 169,085
As shown in Table K.3.1.3, the public investment by the national government agencies and/or the local
government units would be the major financial sources for all projects other than those for municipal
water supply, sanitation and sewerage development. The public investment could include the private
investment induced by BOT and/or the foreign financial assistance.
In the sector for the municipal water supply, sanitation and sewerage development, the sewerage
development could be implemented through the public investment by the LGUs, while the municipal
water supply development has to be implemented, in principle, through the non-public investment by
the public corporation/private firm.
Almost half of the investment cost (i.e., 34.2 billion pesos) is for the municipal water supply
development by the public corporation and/or private firm. This investment cost is to be recovered
through the collection fee for municipal water supply services. Details on this cost recovery are as
described in the under-mentioned Section K.3.3.
K-13
Table K. 3.1.3 Project Investment Cost divided according to Classifications and Implementing
Bodies of the Projects (Project Implementation Period: 2011 - 2025)
(Unit million pesos)
Project Implementing Bodies
NGAs Public
Classification of Project
NGAs LGUs & Corporation/ Total
LGUs Private Firm
Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery Development 53,514 - 14,274 - 67,788
Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage Development - 35,521 - 34,205 69,726
Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters 11,242 3,008 1,508 - 15,758
Watershed Management 1,873 - 1,669 32 3,574
Water-related Environment Management 533 2,025 71 1,036 3,665
Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation and Distribution - - 8,573 - 8,573
Total 67,162 40,554 26,095 35,273 169,085
The project investment plan for each of the sectors is as described hereinafter:
K.3.2 Project Investment Plan for Agriculture, Irrigation and Fishery Development
As shown in Table K.3.2.1, the total project cost in this sector, which is to be disbursed by 2025, is
estimated at about 67.8 billion pesos. Of this total project cost, about 98% or 665.5 billion pesos is
used for development and operation/maintenance of the national irrigation system being financed from
the “National Government Fund for Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Program”, which is
allocated to NIA. In addition to the Fund, the “Irrigation Service Fee (ISF)” is to be used as part of the
operation and maintenance for the existing irrigation facilities. However, the actual budget for Region
III allotted from the ISF in the recent five (5) years from 2004 to 2008 is in a range of 51.3 to 64.2
million pesos only, which could hardly make a substantial contribution to the allotment to the
necessary project cost.
Aside from the above budget of NIA, the following projects are to be financed from the national
budget of the Department of Agriculture and/or local government budge:
 The projects for development of the small scale irrigation system (the project codes of AI-G-08,
AIP-11 and AI-C-01): The investment cost for these projects is estimated at about 811 million
pesos, which is to be financed from the budget of DA-BSWM and the LGUs.
 The projects for inland fishery development (the project codes of AF-G-01 to 04): The
investment cost for these projects is estimated at 450 million pesos in total and to be financed
from the budget of DA-BFAR.
Table K. 3.2.1 Project Investment Cost for Agriculture, Irrigation and Fishery Development
Principal Entities
Object* Short-term Mid-term Long-term Total
for Financing
1 NIA 21,545 97.2% 25,714 98.3% 19,268 99.0% 66,527 98.1%
2 DA and LGUs, 469 2.1% 300 1.1% 43 0.2% 811 1.2%
3 DA 150 0.7% 150 0.6% 150 0.8% 450 0.7%
Total 22,163 100.0% 26,164 100.0% 19,461 100.0% 67,788 100.0%
Note:
*: Object 1: Development and operation/maintenance for the large-scale irrigation systems and capacity development for
agricultural development
Object 2: Development and operation/maintenance of small scale irrigation system
Object 3: Development of inland fishery
K.3.3 Project Investment Plan for Development of Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and
Sewerage
The projects, which belong to this sector, would require the project investment cost of about
67.9 billion pesos in total as listed below:
K-14
Table K. 3.3.1 Project Investment Cost for

Development of Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage
Principal Entities
for Financing
1 WD 3,793 13.0% 3,610 40.2% 3,722 11.8% 11,127 16.0%
2 Public 0 0.0% 255 2.8% 255 0.8% 510 0.7%
3 Corporation/ 13,111 45.0% 1,176 13.1% 23,661 74.9% 37,948 54.4%
4 Private Firm** 5,562 19.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,562 8.0%
5 519 1.8% 304 3.4% 267 0.8% 1,090 1.6%
6 LGU 5,507 18.9% 3,635 40.5% 3,704 11.7% 12,846 18.4%
7 645 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 645 0.9%
Total 22,163 29,137 100% 8,980 100% 31,609 100% 69,726
Note:
*: Object 1: Expansion of Level 3 and 2 municipal water supply system
Object 2: Construction/provision of septage treatment and disposal facilities
Object 3: Development of bulk water supply system
Object 4: Strengthening of Water Supply Capacity of Angat Umiray System
Object 5: Expansion of Level 1 municipal water supply system
Object 6: Construction/provision of sanitary toilets
Object 7: Development of Sewerage System
**: MWSS and private firms such as Manila Water Company Inc. (MWCI) and Maynilad Water Service Incorporated
(MWSI)
The project investment cost for the Object 4 and 7 shown in the above Table K.3.3.1 have been
secured by the public water service corporations such as MWSS and Clark Water as well the local
government of Cabanatuan City. Moreover, the project investment cost for the Objects 5 and 6 could
be allotted by the budget of the LGUs. Thus, the available financial sources for the project
investment of the Objectives-4 to 7 could be foreseeable. On the other hand, the budgeting process
of the project investment cost for the Objects 1 to 3 has to be newly clarified.
The project investment for the Objects 1 to 3 is subject to the “full cost recovery” both for the initial
construction cost and the annual O&M cost for the project facilities. That is, the WDs and/or the
public water service corporations such as MWSS and CDC as the project implementing bodies, would
secure the necessary initial construction cost of the facilities and recover the initial cost as well as the
annual O&M cost of the facilities by collecting the fee for use of the facilities from the water users.
In order to clarify the availability of the above “full cost recovery”, the project investment costs for the
above Objects 1 to 3 are converted to the unit costs per served water volume and compared with the
current prevailing water rates. The results of the conversion are as listed in Table K.3.3.2 and the
detailed clarification on the “full cost recovery “is as described in the under-mentioned items (1)
to (3):
Table K. 3.3.2 Conversion of Project Investment Cost to Unit Cost
Initial Annualized Cost (million pesos/year) Annual Water
Unit Cost
Object* Investment Cost Annualized Initial Annual O&M Consumption
Total (peso/m3)
(million pesos) Investment Cost** Cost (mil. m3/year)
1 11,130 1,137.5 1,030.8 2,168.4 103.1 21.0
2 510 104.8 355 459.8 110.5*** 4.2
3 37,948 3,880.40 379.7 4,260.1 225.9 18.9
Note:
*: Object 1: Expansion of Level 3 and 2 municipal water supply system
Object 2: Construction/provision of septage treatment and disposal facilities
Object 3: Development of bulk water supply system
**: The initial investment cist is converted to the annualized cost based on the following assumptions.
 The project life is assumed at 50years for Object 1 and 3, while it is assumed at 7years for Object 2.
 The time interval for replacement of the facilities is assumed at 25 years for Object 1 and 3, while it is assumed
at 7years for Object 2.
 The annual interest rate is assumed at 10%。
***: The figure is estimated on the premises of the volume of water consumption for Level 3 water supply system
K-15
(1) Expansion of Level 3, 2, 1 Municipal Water supply System

As described in the under-mentioned item (1) in Section K.4.1, the “expansion of Level 3, 2
and 1 municipal water supply system toward 2025” is raised as one of the development
scenarios for improvement of water supply quality and securing of the necessary water supply
volume.
Expansion of the Level 1 water supply system is to be financed by the LGUs and it is not
subject to full cost recovery as described above. On the other hand, the necessary investment
cost for expansion of Level 3 and 2 water supply system is to be secured and recovered by the
WDs. That is, WDs would secure the initial investment cost by their own budget or loan
from LWUA, and recover it by collecting of the water service fee from the water users.
Out of 76 WDs in total in the study area, 13 WDs are expected to secure the necessary initial
investment cot by their own budgets judging from the classification of WDs by LWUA (refer
to subsection D.6.3.1). On the other hand, the remaining 63 WDs would need to have the loan
from LWUA to secure the initial investment cost.
As shown in Table K.3.3.2, the total initial investment cost is 11.1 billion pesos, and 6.1
billion pesos of it could be assumed as the necessary amount of the loan from LWUA to the
above 63 WDs. This amount of 6.1 billion pesos is disbursed for 15-year period from 2011
to 2015, and therefore, the annual average disbursement is estimated at 0.41billion pesos/year.
The future available annual loan by LWUA is estimated at about 4.8 billion pesos/year (refer
to subsection D.6.3.1). Judging from the available loan amount by LWUA, the above annual
average disbursement of 0.41million pesos/year is judged to be secured.
As shown in Table K.3.3.2, the unit cost for the initial investment and the O&M for expansion
of Level 3 and 2 municipal water supply systems is estimated at about 21pesos/m3. On the
other hand, the water rate for service of Level 3 and 2 municipal water supply systems is in a
range of 16 to 21 pesos/m3. Judging from the unit cost for project investment and the current
water rate for service, the project investment could be fully recovered by the water rate
without the large increment in the water rate.
(2) Construction/Provision of Septage Treatment and Disposal Facilities
As described in the under-mentioned item (2) in Section K.4.2, one of the development
scenarios is oriented to construction/provision of the septage treatment and disposal facilities,
which shall cover about 80% of the households in the urban area of the principal ten (10)
cities/municipalities by 2025. In this study, it is proposed that this project is to be
implemented by WDs, and its investment cost is to be fully recovered by the following
manners:
 As shown in Table K.3.3.2, the necessary project investment cost is estimated at
4.2pesos/m3 assuming the water consumption volume of the Level 3 water supply
system. In order to recover the said project investment cost, it is proposed that the
investment cost of 4.2 pesos/m3 shall be surcharged to the above water rate for the
service of Level 3 and 2 water supply service.
 The above surcharge cost is called “Environmental Fee” as suggested by in “the
business model for development of septage treatment and disposal facilities by WDs”
project and, MWSS has already applied it since 2008.
(3) Development of Bulk Water Supply System
As described in the under-mentioned item (2) in Section K.4.1, development of the bulk water
supply system is proposed for Bulacan Province, Pampanga Province and Metro Clark area in
particular. The project investment cost for development of the bulk water supply system is to
be recovered through the following manners:
K-16
 The public water service corporation such as MWSS as well as the relevant private
firms would be the implementing body for development of the bulk water supply
system. The initial investment cost for the development is estimated at 37.9 billion
pesos in total as shown in Table K.3.3.2. The budgetary capacities of these
implementing bodies would be able to secure the said necessary initial investment cost
judging from their previous business showings.
 As shown in Table K.3.3.2, the sum of the initial investment cost and the annual O&M
cost for development of the bulk water supply system could be equivalent to about
19pesos per unit m3 of water consumption. In addition, the cost of about 21pesos/m3
for expansion of Level 3 and 2 water supply system is required as a part of the bulk
water supply service. Accordingly, the investment cost of about 40peoso/m3 in total is
required for the service of the bulk water supply system.
 The service of the bulk water has been already introduced to Meycauayan WD and
Obando WDin Bulacan Province. The present water rate for those service areas of
the bulk water supply is around 42 pesos/m3, which is almost equal to the above
necessary investment cost (i.e., 40pesos/m3).
 As compared with the necessary investment cost with the present water rate for the
bulk water supply services, the investment cost could be fully recovered by the water
rate. The water rate of the bulk water service is far higher than the water rate of
municipal water service without the bulk water supply. The water users may accept
such high water rates, which would be because of the safe and stable water supply
promised by the bulk water supply system.
K.3.4 Project Investment Plan for Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters
The initial project investment cost in this sector is estimated at 15.8 billion pesos. Of this total initial
investment cost, about 70% or 10.9 billion pesos is to be financed from the national government
budget allocated to DPWH. The projects other than those by DPWH are: (a) operation, maintenance
and improvement of the small scale flood control and drainage systems, which are to be financed by
the LGUs and (b) development of the flood forecasting and warning systems, which is to be financed
by the budget of LGUs and PAGASA.
Table K. 3.4.1 Project Investment Cost for Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters
(unit: million pesos)
Principal Entities
for Financing
1 DPWH 5,121 79.6% 5,594 84.8% 227 8.3% 10,942 69.4%
2 LGUs 1,008 15.7% 1,000 15.2% 2,500 91.6% 4,508 28.6%
3 Others 302 4.7% 3 0.0% 3 0.1% 308 2.0%
Total 6,431 100.0% 6,597 100.0% 2,730 100.0% 15,758 100.0%
Note:
*: Object 1: Development and O&M of the large-scale flood control facilities, maintenance of the major river
channels/river facilities and capacity building on management of flood and sediment disasters.
Object 2: Establishment of community-based flood forecasting warning and evacuation system and operation,
maintenance and improvement of the small-scale flood control and drainage facilities, which are under
jurisdiction of LGUs.
Object 3: Capacity development on the dam reservoir operation against flood, etc.
DPWH undertakes the following five (5) projects for management of flood and sediment disasters for
Pasac river system and Pampanga river system. Of these projects, the project of FL-G-02 is currently
in progress, and a substantial part for its necessary budget has been arranged already. Moreover, the
budgetary arrangement for the ongoing two (2) projects for Pasac river system (i.e., the projects of
FL-G-01 and FlL-G-02) have also been made, and the proposed projects for Pasac river system (i.e.,
L-P-01) is now being made on the premises of the foreign financial assistance. On the other hand,
the project for Pampanga river system (i.e., FL-C-01) is left behind since the Phase 1 of the project
had been suspended in 2002, and the budgetary arrangement of the project is being required.
K-17
Table K. 3.4.2 Projects by DPWH for Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters
Investment Cost
Project Code Name of Project
（Mil. Php）
FL-G-03 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Works for River Dike and Slope 679
FL-G-01 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUMP) Phase III Part I 470
FL-G-02 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUMP) Phase III Part II 5
FL-P-01 Flood Control Measures in Mt. Pinatubo Devastated Area- Focus on Pasac Delta 4,320
FL-C-01 Flood Mitigation for Pampanga Delta 5,468
Total 10,942
The national government budget allotted to DPWH includes those for: (a) Programs (for the line
operations), (b) Projects (for implementation of the locally funded and foreign assisted projects and (c)
others (for interest payment, etc). The operation and maintenance of the flood control facilities
and/or the river channels is basically financed from the budget for above Programs for the line
operation. However, the national total budget financed from the Programs for O&M of the flood
control facilities/river channels was limited to 2.9 billion pesos in 2009. This budget is likely to be
quite inadequate and thereby, a part of the budget for the above Projects has to be used for O&M just
like the case of the project of FL-G-03.
K.3.5 Project Investment Plan for Watershed Management

The project investment cost of 3.6 billion pesos in total is to be disbursed during the 15-year period
from 2011 to 2025 as shown in Table K.3.5.1. Of the total investment cost, about 91% or 3.3 billion
pesos are financed from the national budget of DENR and used for reforestation, agro-forestry, and
hillside works in the upland and preservation of the forest.
Table K. 3.5.1 Project Investment Cost for Watershed management
Principal Entities for
Financing
1 DENR 1,559 90.6% 1,509 95.0% 187 70.6% 3,255 91.1%
2 Others 162 9.4% 79 5.0% 78 29.4% 319 8.9%
Total 162 9.4% 79 5.0% 78 29.4% 319 8.9%
Note:
*: Object 1: Reforestation, agro-forestry, hill-side works in the upland and preservation of the forest in the classified forest
land.
Object 2: .Preservation of forest in the watershed of the dam reservoir and urban greening
Out of the said total investment cost of 3.6 billion pesos, about 46.5% or 1.7 billion pesos is disbursed
to the ongoing projects and therefore, it could be secured provided that the present annual budgets
allotted to the projects are sustained until 2025. The remaining budget of 1.9billion pesos (53% of
the total investment cost) is for the conceptual project, and need to be secured from the new financial
sources, which may require the foreign financial assistance and/or the private investment through
BOT.
K.3.6 Project Investment Plan for Water-related Environment Management

The project investment cost of about 3.7 billion pesos in total is to be disbursed during the 15-year
period from 2011 to 2025 as shown in Table K.3.6.1. Out of the total investment cost, about 53% or
2.0 billion pesos is for construction and operation of solid waste management facilities for Nueva
Ecija, Bulacan and Pampanga Province, which is undertaken through the project of WQ-C-04. In
order to attain the said solid waste management, Nueva Ecija Province has already arranged the
necessary budget for construction of five (5) sanitary landfills and their support facilities. As for
Bulacan and Pampanga Province, however, the definite budgetary arrangement for the solid waste
management has not been made yet and it remains as the future task. In order to minimize the budget
for solid waste management for the two provinces, the proposed project works for the provinces are
limited to construction and O&M of the transfer stations assuming usage of the existing two (2)
sanitary landfills located in Tarlac and Bulacan Province.
K-18
The Clean Development Mechanism Program (CDM) projects would require the second largest
investment cost of about 1.0 billion pesos next to the above solid waste management. This investment
cost would be shouldered by the private firms through BOT leaded by DENR. Other project works
such as establishment of water quality monitoring system, capacity buildings and IEC relevant to the
water-related environment management would be financed by the national government budget allotted
to DENR, the budget of the LGUs and the private investments.
Table K. 3.6.1 Project Investment Cost for Water-related Environment Management
Principal Entities
for Financing
1 LGUs 109 21.4% 99 1.2% 99 100.0% 307 3.6%
2 Private Firm 300 58.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 300 3.5%
3 DENR and Others 100 19.6% 7,866 98.8% 0 0.0% 7,966 92.9%
Total 509 100.0% 7,965 100.0% 99 100.0% 8,573 100.0%
Note:
*: Object 1: Solid water management
Object 2: CDM programs
Object 3: Establishment of the water quality monitoring system and capacity building/IEC on the water- related
environment management.
K.3.7 Project Investment Plan for Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation and
Distribution
The project investment cost of about 8.6 billion pesos in total is to be disbursed during the 15-year
period from 2011 to 2025 as shown in Table K.3.7.1. Out of the total investment cost, about 93% or
8.0 billion pesos is for the project for recovery of reliability of water supply capacity of the existing
Angat-Umiray System (Project of IS-C-02). The feasibility study for this project needs to be firstly
undertaken by NWRB to clarify the necessary project components, which would include the new
water resources development, and the organization setup for implementation of the project.
Moreover, it would be necessary to clarify the possible financial sources and their shares for allotment.
The possible financial sources would include the national government fund by NWRB, NIA, NPC, the
LGU’s fund by Bulacan Province, the corporation/private fund by MWSS and its relevant MWCI and
MWSI, and other private fund collected through BOT.
Table K. 3.7.1 Project Investment Cost for Inter-Sector Water Resources Development,
Allocation and Distribution
Principal Entities
for Financing
1 NWRB, Others** 100 19.6% 7,866 98.8% 0 0.0% 7,966 92.9%
2 NWRB 109 21.4% 99 1.2% 99 100.0% 307 3.6%
3 NWRB 300 58.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 300 3.5%
Total 509 100.0% 7,965 100.0% 99 100.0% 8,573 100.0%
Note:
*: Object 1: Recovery of reliability of water supply of Angat-Umiray System
Object 2: Establishment of monitoring system for usage of the surface water and groundwater
Object 3: Capacity building on water allocation and distribution
K-19
K.4 Development Scenarios

K.4.1 Development Scenarios for Group-A Projects
The target development scenarios for Group-A projects are proposed as described hereinafter.
K.4.1.1 Development Scenarios in Sector of Agriculture/Irrigation and Fishery
Development
In order to enhance the sector goals of “rehabilitation and development of the irrigation system” and
“sustainable fishery under integrated water resources management”, the following two (2)
development scenarios are proposed:
(1) Rehabilitation of Existing Irrigation Facilities
The development scenario is oriented to improvement of the agricultural productivities by
sustaining of the following seven (7) ongoing programs for rehabilitation and/or maintenance
of the existing irrigation facilities throughout the short, medium and long-term:
 AI-G-03: Repair, Rehabilitation of Existing Groundwater Irrigation Systems,
Establishment of Groundwater Pump Project ,
 AI-G-04: Balikatan Sagip Patubig Program,
 AI-G-05: Repair, Rehabilitation, Restoration & Preventive Maintenance of Existing
National & Communal Irrigation Facilities,
 AI-G-06: Restoration/Rehabilitation of Existing NIA Assisted Irrigation System,
 AI-G-08: Rehabilitation of Small Water Impounding Projects/Diversion Dams and
 AI-G-09: Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, Irrigation Component .
(2) Sustainable Fishery Production
The development scenario is oriented to sustainable fishery productivities by continuity of the
following four (4) ongoing projects, which are being undertaken by BFAR, DA or LGU,
throughout the short, medium and long-term:
 AF-G-01: Aquaculture Fisheries Development Programs,
 AF-G-02: Comprehensive Regulatory Services,
 AF-G-03: Support Projects and Activities and
 AF-G-04: Fisheries Resources Management for Improved and Sustainable Harvest.
K.4.1.2 Development Scenarios in Sector of Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and
Sewerage
In order to achieve the sector goal of “improvement of water quality”, “ensuring of necessary water
supply capacity”, and “reduce of pollution load”, the seven (7) development scenarios are proposed in
the study. Moreover, in order to embody these development scenarios, implementation of 17 projects
is proposed. The details of these development scenarios and the projects to embody the development
scenarios are as described hereinafter:
(1) Short-term Development of Bulk Water Supply System for Bulacan Province
The groundwater in Bulacan Province is currently used as the principal source for municipal
water supply in the Province. However, the supply capacity by the groundwater is judged to
reach the critical level causing the land subsidence as well as the serious sanitary intrusion to
the groundwater. Hence, a development scenario on the “MW-P-03: Bulacan Treated Water
Supply Project”, which is most likely to use the surface water as the source, is proposed. This
K-20
bulk water supply system shall be completed by 2015 promising the water supply capacity of
2.7m3/s, which cover the municipal water demand of about one million residents.
(2) Strengthening of Water Supply Capacity of Angat Umiray System
The Angat-Umiray System is the principal water supply source for the municipal water use in
Metro Manila and the irrigation water use in AMRIS. However, the updated water demand
for the municipal and irrigation use exceed far over the water supply capacity of Angat
Umiray System. As the results, the serious water shortage occurs almost every two year.
Taking the potential water shortage into account, the development scenario is oriented to
strengthening of the water supply capacity of Angat Umiray System. In order to attain the
development scenario, the following three (3) projects are scheduled to urgently complete
within the short-term.
 MW-G-01: Angat Water Utilization and Aquaduct Improvement Project (AWUAIP)
Phase 2
 MW-P-01: Rehabilitation of Umiray-Macua Facilities and
 MW-P-02: Sumag River Diversion Project.
The above urgent reinforcement of the existing Angat-Umiray System would still hardly attain
the full supply level of the System for its present relevant water demand. Hence, The Project
of “IS-C-02: Project for Recovery of Reliability of Water Supply System in Angat-Umiray
System” is scheduled in the short-term and medium-term. The Project could drastically boost
up the reliability of the Angat Umiray System and promise the municipal water supply for
Metro Manila with a design safety level of 10-year return period and the irrigation water
supply for AMRIS with a design safety level of 5-year return period by 2020.
(3) Expansion of Level 3,2,1 Municipal Water Supply
The following development scenarios on the step-wise expansion of the Level 3 , 2 and 1
municipal water supply system in the study area is proposed in order to improve the water
supply quality and at the same time to ensure the necessary water supply capacity:
 The coverage of Level 3, 2, 1 water supply system with safe drinking water supply
shall reach 100% by 2025.
 The coverage ratios of the Level 3 Water Supply System in the urban area shall
increase 1% per annum by 2015, and the average ratio in the whole urban areas of the
study area shall reach 80% by 2025. At the same time, the lowest coverage ratio of
Level 3 System in the urban areas shall not be below 46.5%2 in 2025 so as to avoid the
extremely uneven distribution of the System.
 The present average coverage ratio of Level 3 Water Supply System in the rural area
shall be maintained until 2025, notwithstanding the future increment of population.
The target coverage ratio of Level 3 in the rural area is 18% in average for the whole
study area.
In order to attain the above development scenario, implementation of the following four (4)
projects throughout the period from 2011 up to 2025 is proposed:
 MW-C-1: Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan
 MW-C-2: Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga
 MW-C-3: Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija
 MW-C-4: Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac)
2
The boundary of 46.5% for the lowest coverage ratio is derived from the future expected incremental rates of 17% for a
period of 17 years (from 2008 to 2025) added to half of the present average coverage ratio as of 2008 (= 29.5%).
K-21
(4) Construction/Provision of Sanitary Toilets

In order to reduce the pollution load in the study area, which could make an indirect
contribution to secure the safe drinking water from the source of the groundwater, the
following development scenario is proposed:
 The rate of construction/provision of the sanitary toilets in all municipalities and cities
shall increase at the rate of 10% per annum by 2015, and
 All households in the study area shall be provided with sanitary toilets by 20253.
In order to attain the development scenario, implementation of the following four (4) projects
is proposed:
 MS-C-1: Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan,
 MS-C-2: Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga,
 MS-C-3: Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija and
 MS-C-4: Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac
(5) Development of Bulk Water Supply System for Metro Clark
In order to cope with the increment of the municipal water use in the Metro Clark, a
development scenario is oriented to gradual expansion of the bulk water supply system with a
full supply capacity of 0.8ｍ3/s toward 2025. In order to attain the development scenario,
“MW-P04; Metro Clark Bulk Surface Water Project” is proposed.
(6) Long Term Development of Bulk Water Supply System for Bulacan and Pampanga
Province
In order to serve the incremental provincial population and cope with deterioration of the
groundwater quality, proposed is the development scenario such that the bulk water supply
system with the supply capacity of 5.5m3/s for Bulacan and 1.3m3/s for Pampanga Province
shall be developed by 2025. The projects to embody the bulk water supply are as listed below:
 MW-C-05: Extended Bulacan Bulk Water Supply Project and
 MW-C-06: Pampanga Bulk Water Supply Project
K.4.1.3 Development Scenarios in Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters
In order to make a contribution to mitigation of the chronic flood damage and improvement of
knowledge on the flood management, the following development scenarios are proposed:
(1) Sustainment of Regular Program for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of River Dike and
Slope
Most of the existing river dikes, levees, river slope protection and other river structures in
Pampanga and Pasac river basins are seriously deteriorated at present. In order to cope with
such degradation of the river structures as well as river channels, a development scenario is
oriented to sustainment of maintenance and rehabilitation of river dike and slope. The
development scenario shall be embodied through the proposed project of “FL-G-03:
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Works for River Dike and Slope”. The project had started in
2008 and it is proposed to continue the project as the yearly regular program toward 2025.
(2) Sustainment of Regular Program for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Drainage and
Flood Control facilities
In order to cope with deterioration of the urban drainage facilities under jurisdiction of the
LGUs, the development scenario is proposed. In order to embody the development scenario,
3
The target year is set at 2025, because the main purpose of construction/provision of sanitary toilets is to secure the
access to safe drinking water for all by 2025, which is stated in the Philippine Water Sector Roadmap.
K-22
the project of “FL-C-03: Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Improvement for Drainage and
Flood Control facilities under jurisdiction of LGUs” shall be sustained as the yearly regular
program toward 2025.
(3) Improve of Public Awareness
In order to improve the public awareness on the management of the flood and sediment
disasters, proposed is the development scenario, which is oriented to inclusion of the salient
points of the knowledge on the management of the flood and other principal issues of IWRM
into the curricula of primary and secondary school. In order to attain the development scenario,
the project of “FL-C-04; Integration of Salient Points of IWRM for Pampanga River Basin
into School Curricula” shall be implemented throughout the short, medium and long-term.
K.4.1.4 Development Scenarios in Watershed Management
The following development scenario is proposed to attain the sector goals of: “intensifying of
management, protection and maintenance of vulnerable and ecologically sensitive area” and “increase
of forest cover of critically denuded uplands, mangrove areas and urban corridors”:
(1) Sustainment of the On-going Regular Program for Watershed Management
The development scenario is oriented to sustaining the following ongoing nine (9) regular
programs for watershed management in Pampanga river basin until 2025. Through execution
of the projects, it is expected that the present forest cover of 187,500ha would expand by
about 10,000ha at the rate of 660ha per annum by 2025.
 WS-G-01: Forest Protection and Law Enforcement Program (FPLEP)
 WS-G-02: Community-based Forest Management Program
 WS-G-04: Coastal Resource Management Program (CRMP)
 WS-G-05: Protected Area Community-based Resource Management Program
(CBFM-PACBRMA)
 WS-G-06: Private Forest Plantation Development Program (PFPDP)
 WS-G-07: NIA-UPRIIS’ Watershed Management Program
 WS-G-08: NPC's Watershed Management Program
 WS-G-09: Integrated Social Forestry (ISF) Projects
K.4.1.5 Development Scenarios in Water-related Environment Management
The following development scenarios are proposed to enhance the sector goals for reduction of the
pollution load:
(1) Dealing with Contamination of Surface, Ground and Coastal Water
The pollution load from various sources shall be reduced by sustaining the following three (3)
ongoing non-structural measures, which are the regular program by DENR and LGU.
 WQ-G-01: Ecological Solid Waste Management Program (ESWMP)
 WQ-G-02: Industrial Pollution Control Program (IPCP)
 WQ-G-03: Sagip-Ilog Project
(2) Reduction of Risk for Contamination in Water Body
By 2025, the following two (2) structural measures shall be implemented to reduce the risk of
contamination from livestock, domestic and industrial wastes:
 WQ-P-01: Clean Development Mechanism Projects
K-23
 WQ-C-04: Construction of Sanitary Landfills and Support Facilities in Nueva Ecija

and Cluster Waste Transfer Stations in Bulacan and Pampanga
K.4.2 Development Scenarios for Group-B Projects

The phased implementation schedule for 41 Group-B projects is proposed as described in the
foregoing Section K.2.2. Hence, the development scenarios are conceived as the consequences of the
proposed implementation schedule (refer to Annex-T K.2.2.5). The detailed development scenarios are
as described hereinafter.
K.4.2.1 Development Scenarios in the Sector of Agriculture, Irrigation and Fishery
Development
The following four (4) development scenarios are expected through implementation of a total of 18
projects in the short-term, the medium-term and the long-term. The development scenarios would
enhance the sector goals of: (a) Improvement of the irrigation system, and (b) enhancement of new
agricultural technologies on water management in particular:
(1) Improvement of Irrigation Technologies
As the consequence of implementation of the following three (3) projects, the innovative
irrigation technologies shall be developed and the capacity building on usage of the
technologies shall be made so as to increase the irrigation efficiency and save the irrigation
water by 2015.
 AI-P-07: Appropriate Irrigation Technologies for Enhanced Agricultural Production
 AI-C-02: Introduction of Water Saving Irrigation Technology
 AI-C-03: Improvement of Monitoring System and Capacity Development for Proper
Water Management in NISs and CISs
(2) Short-term Development of Infrastructures for Irrigation
The agricultural productivity shall be increased through the following seven (7) irrigation
development projects, which contribute to the beneficial area (newly developed) of 5,880ha,
the beneficial area (rehabilitated) of 37,046 ha and beneficiaries of 56,640 farm-families in
total, by 2015.
 AI-G-01: Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Phase 1
 AI-G-02: Along-along Creek Irrigation Project (UPRIIS Div3)
 AI-G-10: Upper Tabuating SRIP
 AI-G-07: Participatory Irrigation Development Project, APL1-Infrastructure
Development
 AI-P-10: Rehabilitation of AMRIS
 AI-P-03: Sector Loan on Rehabilitation of Irrigation Facilities
 AI-P-11: Construction of Priority Small Scale Irrigation Systems/Small Water
Impounding Projects, Small Diversion Dam Projects
(3) Mid-term Development of Infrastructures for Irrigation
The agricultural projects shall be increased through the following seven (7) irrigation
development projects, which contribute to the beneficial area (newly developed) of 58,443ha,
the beneficial area (rehabilitated) of 50,904ha and beneficiaries of 101,893 farm-families in
total by 2020.
 AI-P-02: Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Phase 2
K-24
 AI-P-04: Casecnan Multi-purpose Irrigation & Power Project Irrigation Component

Phase 2
 AI-C-01: New Construction of Small Scale Irrigation Project under BSWM
 AI-P-08: Central Luzon Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project
 AI-P-06: Irrigation Water Resources Augmentation Pump Establishment Project
 AI-P-05: Procurement of Pumps, Drilling Rigs & Related Equipment
(4) Long-term Development of Infrastructures for Irrigation
The agricultural projects shall be increased through the following two (2) projects, which
contribute to beneficial area (newly developed) of 31,199ha and beneficiaries of 9,152
farm-families by 2025.
 AI-P-01: Balintingon Reservoir Multipurpose Project (BRMP)
 AI-P-09: Gumain Reservoir Project
K.4.2.2 Development Scenarios for Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage
The following two (2) development scenarios are expected as the consequence of implementation of
three (3) projects. The development scenarios would enhance the sector goal of the “reduce the
pollution load” in particular.
(1) Development of Sewerage Systems
The following two (2) on-going projects for development of the sewerage systems shall be
completed by 2015. Upon completion of the projects, about 12 % of the population in
Cabanatuan City and 100% in Clark would be served by the public sewerage system.
 MP-G-01: Cabanatuan Sewerage System
 MP-G-02: Expansion of Clark Sewerage System
(2) Construction/Provision of Septage Treatment and Disposal Facilities
The services of the septage treatment and disposal facilities shall be provided through the
project of “MP-C-01: Septage Treatment and Disposal Facility” to about 80% of the urban
area in the following ten cities/municipalities by 20254: (1) Angeles, (2) San Fernando, (3)
Guagua, (4) Mabalacat, (5) Baliuag, (6) Calumpit, (7) Hagonoy, (8) Malolos, (9) Cabanatuan,
and (10) Tarlac.
K.4.2.3 Development Scenarios for Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters
The five (5) development scenarios in the sector are to be achieved through implementation of the
seven (7) projects.
(1) Flood Mitigation for Pasac River Basin (Eastern Pinatubo Area)
The following on-going and proposed flood mitigation projects for Pasac river basin shall be
completed by 2015. Upon completion of the projects, the chronic flood damage in the area
of about 57,300 ha would be mitigated, and about 309,000 people would be benefitted.
 FL-G-01: Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUMP) Phase III Part I
 FL-G-02: Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUMP) Phase III Part II
 FL-P-01: Flood Control Measures in Mt. Pinatubo Devastated Area- Focus on Pasac
Delta
4
The target year has been set at 2025 referring the output from 4th stakeholder meetings, although the target
water quality of Manila Bay by DENR is to be Class SB category by 2020.
K-25
(2) Flood Mitigation for Pampanga Delta

The chronic flood damage in Pampanga Delta shall be mitigated through implementation of
the project of “FL-C-01: Flood Mitigation for Pampanga Delta” by 2020. Upon completion of
the project, the potential flood inundation area of about 32,400 ha would be mitigated, and
about 175,000 people would be benefitted
(3) Capacity Building on the Appropriate Dam Reservoir Operation against Flood
The capacity building on the appropriate reservoir operation against flood for Pantabangan
Dam and Angat Dam shall be completed through the technical cooperation by JICA by 2015.
This technical cooperation is currently being undertaken under the on-going project of
“FL-G-04 Flood Forecasting and Warning System Capacity Building Project upon Dam
Release in the Philippines”.
(4) Establishment of Community-based Flood Forecasting and Warning System for
Provinces of Pampanga, Tarlac and Nueva Ecija
Bulacan Province had established the community-based flood forecasting and waning system
in 2005. Succeeding to Bulacan Province, other three (3) provinces in the study area,
Pampanga, Tarlac and Nueva Ecija shall be provided with the community-based flood
forecasting and waning system by 2015
(5) Flood Mitigation for Bacolor Municipality
The Project of “FL-P-02: Bacolor Comprehensive Rehabilitation Master Plan” shall be
implemented by 2025. Upon completion of the Project, the flood damage potential in the area
of about 107,500 ha in Bacolor Municipality in Pampanga Province would be mitigated.
K.4.2.4 Development Scenarios for Watershed Management
The following development scenario shall be achieved to attain the sector goals of: “intensifying of
management, protection and maintenance of vulnerable and ecologically sensitive area” and “increase
of forest cover of critically denuded uplands, mangrove areas and urban corridors”:
(1) Strengthening of the On-going Reforestation Efforts
The following seven (7) special projects shall be implemented in order to strengthen the
on-going reforestation efforts. Upon completion of the projects, the forest cover shall
expand by 39,900ha.
 WS-G-03: Integrated Agro-Forestry Development Program (CBFM-CARP)
 WS-G-11: Forestlands Management Project (FMP)
 WS-G-12: Pampanga River Basin Rehabilitation Project (PRBRP)
 WS-C-01: Upland Development Program (UDP)
 WS-C-02: Protected Area Management Program (PAMP)
 WS-C-03: Urban Greening Program
 WS-C-04: Community-based Eco-tourism Program
K.4.2.5 Development Scenarios for Water-related Environment Management
The following development scenarios shall be achieved to attain the sector goals of “strengthening of
the water quality monitoring” and “reduce of pollution loads”:
(1) Improvement of Monitoring and Processing System for the Water Quality Data
By 2015, DENR shall improve the monitoring and processing system for the water quality
data through implementation of the project of “WQ-C-01 Capacity Development to Upgrade
WQ Monitoring and Data Management Program”.
K-26
(2) Capacity Development to Reduce Pollution Load

By 2020, the capability of fishpond operators and non-compliant industries shall be improved
through implementation of the following two (2) projects over the medium-term towards
adopting cleaner production options in order to reduce their impacts on water quality.
 WQ-C-02: Capacity Development to Improve Water Quality and Aquaculture Fisheries
Management
 WQ-C-03: Capacity Development Project to Improve Industry Adoption of Cleaner
Production Options
K.4.2.6 Development Scenarios for Inter-Sector Water Resources Development, Allocation
and Distribution
The following two (2) development scenarios shall be achieved in order to strengthen of monitoring
system on the water resources and make capacity development on water allocation and distribution:
(1) Enhancement of Monitoring of Groundwater and Surface Water
By 2025, the monitoring of the groundwater and surface water shall be enhanced through
implementation of the following two (2) projects in order to apprehend the actual status of the
water resources in Pampanga river basin:
 IS-C-01: Establishment of Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring in Pampanga
River Basin
 IS-C-03: Enhancement of Monitoring System for Surface Water in Pampanga River
(2) Capacity Development on Water Allocation and Distribution
By 2015, the appropriate methodologies on the water allocation and distribution for municipal
water use, irrigation, hydropower generation and other various water uses shall be introduced
to NWRB and other relevant agencies through implementation of the project of “IS-C-04:
Capacity Development of NWRB and Relevant Agencies on Water Allocation and
Distribution”.
References
1) NEDA: Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan 2004-2010, 2004.
2) NEDA Region III: Updated Central Luzon Regional Physical Framework Plan (RPFP) 2005-2030, 2006.
3) NWRB: IWRM Plan Framework in the Philippines, 2006.
K-27
Annex-Tables
Annex-T K.1.4.1 (1/2) Grouping of Projects (Group-A Projects)
Initial Investment
Project Project O&M cost
Sector Serial No. Implementing Agency Cost
Group
Code Name of Project (Million Pesos) (Mil.Pesos/year)
1 AI-G-03 Repair, Rehabilitation of Existing Groundwater Irrigation Systems, Establishment of Groundwater Pump Project (REGIP) NIA 398 None
2 AI-G-04 Balikatan Sagip Patubig Program (BSPP) NIA 46 None
3 AI-G-05 Repair, Rehabilitation, Restoration & Preventive Maintenance of Existing National & Communal Irrigation Facilities NIA 1,579 None
4 AI-G-06 Restoration/Rehabilitation of Existing NIA Assisted Irrigation System (RRE-NIAIS) NIA 8,767 None
Agriculture/ 5 AI-G-08 Rehabilitation of Small Water Impounding Projects / Diversion Dams DA-BSWM 128 None
A Irrigation and 6 AI-G-09 Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, Irrigation Component NIA 1,020 None
Fishery 7 AF-G-01 Aquaculture Fisheries Development Programs DA-BFAR
8 AF-G-02 Comprehensive Regulatory Services DA-BFAR
450 None
9 AF-G-03 Support Projects and Activities DA-BFAR
10 AF-G-04 Fisheries Resources Management for Improved and Sustainable Harvest DA-BFAR
Sub-total 12,388 0.0
11 MW-G-01 Angat Water Utilization and Aquaduct Improvement Project (AWUAIP) Phase 2 MWSS 4,568 * 30.5
12 MW-P-01 Rehabilitation of Umiray-Macua Facilities MWSS 454 2.3
13 MW-P-02 Sumag River Diversion Project MWSS 540 2.7
14 MW-P-03 Bulacan Treated Bulk Water Supply Project MWSS/LGU 11,935 119.3
15 MW-P-04 Metro Clark Bulk Surface Water Project CDC 3,527 35.3
16 MW-C-01 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan LWUA/WDs/LGUs /Private WSPs 3,839 324.2
17 MW-C-02 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga LWUA/WDs/LGUs /Private WSPs 4,914 416.6
Municipal Water
18 MW-C-03 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija LWUA/WDs/LGUs /Private WSPs 2,903 249.3
A Supply, Sanitation
and Sewerage 19 MW-C-04 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac LWUA/WDs/LGUs /Private WSPs 559 46.2
20 MW-C-05 Extended Bulacan Bulk Water Supply Project LGU 16,754 167.7
21 MW-C-06 Pampanga Bulk Water Supply Project LGU 5,732 57.4
KT-1
22 MS-C-01 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan LGUs 3,676 18.4
23 MS-C-02 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga LGUs 4,725 23.6
24 MS-C-03 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija LGUs 3,477 17.4
25 MS-C-04 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac LGUs 968 4.8
Sub-total 68,571 1,515.6
26 FL-G-03 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Works for River Dike and Slope DPWH 679 None
Management of
27 FL-C-03 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Improvement for Drainage and Flood Control Facilities under Jurisdiction of LGUs LGUs 3,000 None
A Flood and Sediment
Disasters 28 FL-C-04 Integration of Salient Points of IWRM for Pampanga River Basin into School Curricula DE-Region III 8 None
Sub-total 3,687 0.0
29 WS-G-01 Forest Protection and Law Enforcement Program (FPLEP) DENR/PENRO/CENRO 39 None
30 WS-G-02 Community-based Forest Management Program DENR/RCBFMO 71 None
31 WS-G-04 Coastal Resource Management Program (CRMP) DENR/PAWCZMS 37 None
32 WS-G-05 Protected Area Community-based Resource Management Program (CBFM-PACBRMA) DENR/PAWCZMS 13 None
Watershed 33 WS-G-06 Private Forest Plantation Development Program (PFPDP) DENR-FRDD 93 None
A
Management 34 WS-G-07 NIA-UPRIIS’ Watershed Management Program NIA-UPRIIS 180 None
35 WS-G-08 NPC's Watershed Management Program NPC 107 None
36 WS-G-09 Integrated Social Forestry (ISF) Projects LGUs/DENR/RCBFMO 51 None
37 WS-G-10 Private-sector Watershed Management Initiatives Private Firm/NGOs 32 None
Sub-total 623 0.0
38 WQ-G-01 Ecological Solid Waste Management Program (ESWMP) DENR-EMB III 192 None
39 WQ-G-02 Industrial Pollution Control Program (IPCP) DENR-EMB III 153 None
Water-related
40 WQ-G-03 Sagip-Ilog Project DENR-EMB/LGUs/Pvt. Sector 11 None
A Environment
41 WQ-P-01 Clean Development Mechanism Private Industries 1,036 63.0
Management
42 WQ-C-04 Construction of Sanitary Landfills and Support Facilities in Nueva Ecija and Cluster Waste Transfer Stations in Bulacan and Pampanga LGUs 2,025 349.0
Sub-total 3,417 412.0
43 IS-C-02 Project for Recovery of Reliability of Water Supply in Angat-Umiray System NWRB/NIA/MWSS/NPC/LGU 7,966 39.8
A Others
Sub-total 7,966 39.8
Total for Group A Projects 96,652 1,967.4
Note: *: The project cost is not total cost, but only for 2011-2025.
Annex-T K.1.4.1 (2/2) Grouping of Projects (Group-B Projects)
Initial Investment
Project Project O&M cost
Sector Serial No. Implementing Agency Cost
Group
Code Name of Project (M illion Pesos) (M il.Pesos/year)
1 AI-G-01 Balog-Balog M ultipurpose Project Phase 1 NIA 236 * 11.8
2 AI-G-02 Along-along Creek Irrigation Project (UPRIIS Div3) NIA 25 * 1.3
3 AI-G-07 Participatory Irrigation Development Project, APL1-Infrastructure Development NIA 41 * 0.3
4 AI-G-10 Upper Tabuating SRIP NIA 76 * 1.3
5 AI-P-01 Balintingon Reservoir M ultipurpose Project (BRM P) NIA/G. Trino 13,591 68.0
6 AI-P-02 Balog-Balog M ultipurpose Project Phase 2 NIA 16,095 80.5
7 AI-P-03 Sector Loan on Rehabilitation of Irrigation Facilities NIA 222 1.1
8 AI-P-04 Casecnan M ulti-purpose Irrigation & Power Project Irrigation Component Phase 2 NIA 7,000 35.0
9 AI-P-05 Procurement of Pumps, Drilling Rigs & Related Equipment NIA 206 1.0
Agriculture/ Irrigation
B 10 AI-P-06 Irrigation Water Resources Augmentation Pump Establishment Project NIA 130 0.7
and Fishery
11 AI-P-07 Appropriate Irrigation Technologies for Enhanced Agricultural Production NIA 654 3.3
12 AI-P-08 Central Luzon Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project NIA 1,429 7.1
13 AI-P-09 Gumain Reservoir Project NIA 13,729 68.6
14 AI-P-10 Rehabilitation of AM RIS NIA 983 4.9
15 AI-P-11 Construction of Priority Small Scale Irrigation Systems/Small Water Impounding Projects, Small Diversion Dam Projects DA Region III/LGUs 169 0.8
16 AI-C-01 New Construction of Small Scale Irrigation Project under BSWM BSWM /LGUs 514 2.6
17 AI-C-02 Introduction of Water Saving Irrigation Technology NIA 150 None
18 AI-C-03 Improvement of M onitoring System and Capacity Development for Proper Water M anagement in NISs and CISs NIA 150 7.5
Sub-total 55,400 295.8
19 M P-G-01 Cabanatuan Sewerage System LGU 189 1.9
M unicipal Water
20 M P-G-02 Expansion of Clark Sewerage System Clark Water 456 4.6
B Supply, Sanitation
KT-2
21 M P-C-01 Septage Treatment and Disposal Facility M CWM C/LGUs/WDs/Private 510 355.0
and Sewerage
Sub-total 1,155 361.5
22 FL-G-01 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUM P) Phase III Part I DPWH 470 * 23.5
23 FL-G-02 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUM P) Phase III Part II DPWH 5* 0.3
24 FL-G-04 Flood Forecasting and Warning System Capacity Building Project upon Dam Release in the Philippines PAGASA 300 None
M anagement of Flood
25 FL-P-01 Flood Control M easures in M t. Pinatubo Devastated Area- Focus on Pasac Delta DPWH 4,320 21.6
B and Sediment
Disasters 26 FL-P-02 Bacolor Comprehensive Rehabilitation M aster Plan LGU 1,500 7.5
27 FL-C-01 Flood M itigation for Pampanga Delta DPWH 5,468 27.3
28 FL-C-02 Community Based Flood Early Warning System for Provinces of Pampanga, Tarlac and N. Ecija LGUs 8 0.4
Sub-total 12,071 80.6
29 WS-G-03 Integrated Agro-Forestry Development Program (CBFM -CARP) DENR/RCBFM O/DAR 31 None
30 WS-G-11 Forestlands M anagement Project (FM P) DENR-FASPO 996 None
31 WS-G-12 Pampanga River Basin Rehabilitation Project (PRBRP) DENR-FRCD 12 * None
Watershed 32 WS-C-01 Upland Development Program DA/DENR/LGUs 980 None
B
M anagement 33 WS-C-02 Protected Area M anagement Program (PAM P) DENR/PAWCZM S 404 None
34 WS-C-03 Urban Greening Program DENR/LGUs/Pvt. Sector 264 None
35 WS-C-04 Community-based Eco-tourism Program DOT/DENR/LGUs 264 None
Sub-total 2,951 0.0
36 WQ-C-01 Capacity Development to Upgrade WQ M onitoring and Data M anagement Program DENR-EM B 140 None
Water-related
37 WQ-C-02 Capacity Development to Improve Water Quality and Aquaculture Fisheries M anagement DA-BFAR 48 None
B Environment
38 WQ-C-03 Capacity Development Project to Improve Industry Adoption of Cleaner Production Options DTI/DENR/Private Industries 60 None
M anagement
Sub-total 248 0.0
39 IS-C-01 Establishment of Comprehensive Groundwater M onitoring in Pampanga River Basin NWRB/Others 297 3.7
40 IS-C-03 Enhancement of M onitoring System for Surface Water in Pampanga River Basin NWRB/Others 10 2.0
B Others
41 IS-C-04 Capacity Development of NWRB and Relevant Agencies on Water Allocation and Distribution NWRB/Others 300 None
Sub-total 607 5.7
Total for Group B Projects 72,432 743.5
Grand Total 169,084 2,710.9

Note: *: The project cost is not total cost, but only for 2011-2025.
Annex-T K 2.2.1 (1/3) Principal Objectives and Contents of Major Discussions in TWG Meetings,
Stakeholder Meeting and Joint SC and TWG Meeting in September and October 2010
TWG Meeting on Sep. 29, 2010

Objectives:
1. To discuss the proposed prioritization order of the projects and development scenario for IWRM of Pampanga River
Basin
2. To discuss the proposed IWRM institutional setup.
3. To discuss the interim results of preliminary Initial Environmental Evaluation (IEE) done for the projects
Contents of Major Discussions:
1. The TWG members shall have another meeting for their own validation on the prioritization of the different projects
that were identified.
The TWG Workshop for the validation of the prioritization of project components of the IWRM Plan is scheduled on
October 7, 2010 at Sulo Hotel from 9 – 4 pm.
2. The monitoring of water quality and the watershed environment shall not be integrated into one TWG in the
organizational structure of the RBC since water quality is with EMB and there is a possibility for either of the sectors to
be neglected.
The proposal of the Study Team was a separate TWG for each. However, it was decided to integrate them under one
TWG through FDG since the two sectors are coordinated and both are under the organization of DENR.
3. The Study Team proposed that DILG shall head the TWG for water supply, sanitation and sewerage in the proposed
organization setup of RBC. However, the TWG shall be headed by the LWUA or water districts (WDs) while the
sanitation and sewerage to be under the DENR-EMB.
The original idea of the Study Team was for the DOH to chair the TWG for monitoring sanitation and sewerage, while
it was modified to DILG in accordance with suggestion by FDG.
TWG Meeting on Oct. 07, 2010
Objectives:
1. To validate and/or improve the evaluation criteria for prioritization of projects as components of the IWRM Plan; and
2. To validate and/or improve the results of prioritization of projects made by the Study Team through Delphi technique
Improvement of Results of Project Evaluations and Prioritization of Projects:

1. The results of project evaluations and prioritization of projects made by the Study Team were revised by 13 TWG
Members who represent from NIA, NPC, BSWM, PHILVOLCS, DENR-RBCO, DPWH-FCSEC, PAGASA,
DILG-Region III, Tarlac Province, Bulacan Province, NEDA-Region III, MWSS, DENR-PAWB and NWRB.
1. The cost of P75M for the project “FL-C-02: Community Based Flood Early Warning System for Provinces of
Pampanga, Tarlac and N.E” is deemed to be too costly in comparison with the cost of the similar project completed in
Bulacan. Moreover, the Project shall be implemented earlier than its target implementation in 2016 proposed by the
Study Team.
2. The benefits by the above Project could be gained for a longer period of time if it can be implemented earlier.
Moreover, it is recommended to give the project more functionality by not limiting its use to flood alone but to utilize
the data that can be monitored for research development, infrastructure, etc.
3. It was informed that the Provincial Disaster Coordinating Council (PDCC) of Nueva Ecija is now considering the
proposal for the community-based flood early warning system which will be discussed with the Governor.
4. After the discussion, the participants replicated the evaluation done by Mr. Otogawa by project sets. Using the
Scoring Matrix, the participants revised the scores of the projects for each set, as they see fit. Revised scores were
placed in the blank above the scoring made by Mr. Otogawa. The new scores were incorporated and the total scores
were collated by the encoders for each project set. The scores for Project Sets 1, 2 and 3 were collated and integrated
by the Chief Encoder using geometric mean to arrive at the final scores.
KT-3
Stakeholder Meeting on Oct. 13, 2010
Objectives:
1. To present the methodologies for the formulation of the development scenarios, implementation program and
investment program of the water-related projects proposed as components of the IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin
by the JICA Study Team;
2. To discuss the approach and framework for the proposed institutional set-up plan for IWRM for Pampanga River Basin;
3. To present the web-page developed for the Pampanga River Basin Study; and
4. To review and validate the development scenarios, implementation program and investment program targeted for the
short-term, mid-term and long-term.
1. The Study Team shall come up with a review of the Medium Term Development Plan (MTDP) of each province
within the river basin. The particular consideration shall be given to the following three projects: (1) Cabo Holistic
Development Project; (2) Tabuating River Irrigation System and (3) Sierra Madre Watershed Development Program.
* The Study Team made an attempt to review the MTDP, but it was virtually difficult to take overview of the
MTDPs for the whole provinces in the study area. Due to the difficulty, the whole of the MTDP was not
incorporated and it was reflected only in the “FL-C-03: the Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Improvement for
Drainage and Flood Control Facilities under Jurisdiction of LGUs”. It is further noted that of the above three
projects to be given the particular consideration, the “Tabuating River Irrigation System “has been included as a
part of the proposed IWRM Plan (refer to AI-G-10: Upper Tabuating SRIP”), but other two projects were not
incorporated due to the invalid old information on them.
2. In accordance with comments given in the meeting, the following revisions were made for the Project of “MW-P-04:
Metro Clark Bulk Water Supply Project”.
 The name of Project was renamed from “Development of Water Supply System for Clark Special Economic Zone
(2020∼2025)
 The project implementation period is revised from 2020-2025 to 2011-2025.
 The objective area is expanded from the Clark New Frontier Area to the whole Metro Clark, which covers a part
of Tarlac and Pampanga Province.
 The classification of the Project is revised from the Group-B Project to Group-A Project.
3. In accordance with the comments given in the meeting, the target completion year of the Project of “MP-C-01:
Construction/ Provision of Septage Treatment and Disposal Facilities” was revised from 2020 to 2025.
4. In accordance with the comments, the development scenario on “Level 3 Water Supply System” was modified to the
development scenario on “Level 3, 2,1 Water Supply System”.
5. In accordance with the comments in the meeting, the following two projects were added as the components of the
IWRM Plan for Pampanga River Basin.
 FL-C-03 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Improvement for Drainage and Flood Control Facilities under
Jurisdiction of LGUs
 FL-C-04 Integration of Salient Points of IWRM for Pampanga River Basin into School Curricula
6. In accordance with the comments in the meeting, the following two projects were transferred from Group-B to
Group-A:
 WQ-P-01: Clean Development Mechanism Projects
 WQ-C-04: Construction of Sanitary Landfills and Support facilities in Nueva Ecija and Cluster Water Transfer
Stations in Bulacan
KT-4
Joint SC and TWG Meeting on
Objectives:
1. To present the revised prioritization order of the projects and development scenarios as well as the revised institutional
setup plan for IWRM of the Pampanga River Basin.
.
1. There shall be a footnote that states that the proposed grouping of the projects into Group A & B is not fixed but the
projects can be transferred from one grouping to the other depending on the future situation and necessity for the project
2. The Chairperson for the TWG on Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage in the organization setup for RBC should be
DILG and DOH instead of DILG and LWUA.
3. E.O. to be drafted should include a provision that will direct National Government Agencies to initially allocate
contributions to the operation of the RBC from their respective offices and eventual allocation of specific funds from
the national government for its operation.
4. The long-term option of legislative action to institutionalize creation of RBOs/RBCs in the country should be included.
5. Issues/conflicts on arbitration and monitoring of water rights shall be resolved first at the RBC level and only
unresolved issues shall be elevated to NWRB. In this regard, the arbitration shall be subject to the guidelines or
agreement that will be developed between RBC and NWRB.
KT-5
Annex-T K.2.2.2 (1/2) Development Scenarios and Relevant Projects (Group-A)
Term of Project Implementing Cost (million pesos)
Implementation Code Name of Project Agency Short-term M id-term Long-term Total
(1) Rehabilitation of Existing Irrigation Facilities Repair, Rehabilitation of Existing Groundwater Irrigation Systems,
AI-G-03 NIA 216 91 91 398
Establishment of Groundwater Pump Project (REGIP)
The agricultural productivities shall be improved through rehabilitation of the existing irrigation facilities.
AI-G-04 Balikatan Sagip Patubig Program (BSPP) NIA 46 0 0 46
Repair, Rehabilitation, Restoration & Preventive M aintenance of

AI-G-05 NIA 1,027 276 276 1,579
Existing National & Communal Irrigation Facilities
Whole Terms
Restoration/Rehabilitation of Existing NIA Assisted Irrigation
AI-G-06 NIA 3,437 2,665 2,665 8,767
System (RRE-NIAIS)
Rehabilitation of Small Water Impounding Projects / Diversion
Agriculture/Irrigation AI-G-08 DA-BSWM 43 43 43 128
Dams
and Fisheries
AI-G-09 Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, Irrigation Component NIA 340 340 340 1,020
(2) S ustainable Fishery Production AF-G-01 Aquaculture Fisheries Development Programs DA-BFAR
The fishery productivities shall be sustained through the on-going regular projects. AF-G-02 Comprehensive Regulatory Services DA-BFAR
Whole Terms 150 150 150 450
AF-G-03 Support Projects and Activities DA-BFAR
Fisheries Resources M anagement for Improved and Sustainable
AF-G-04 DA-BFAR
Harvest
Total 5,259 3,565 3,565 12,388
(1) S hort-term Development of Bulk Water S upply S ystem for Bulacan Province
M W-P-03 Bulacan Treated Bulk Water Supply Project M WSS/LGU 11,935 0 0 11,935
M WSS shall provide the bulk municipal water supply system to Bulacan Province in order to retrieve the deterioration
of the groundwater currently used as the source for municipal water use in the Province by 2015. The water supply Short-term
system shall have the supply capacity of 2.7m3/s, which could cover the municipal water demand of about one million.
(2) S trengthening of Water S upply Capacity of Angat Umiray S ystem Angat Water Utilization and Aquaduct Improvement Project
M W-G-01 M WSS 4,568 0 0 4,568
(AWUAIP) Phase 2
KT-6
(a) The more sustainable water supply by Angat-Umiray system shall be enhanced through implementaion of M W-
M W-P-01 Rehabilitation of Umiray-M acua Facilities M WSS 454 0 0 454
G-01, M W-P-01 and M W-P-02 by 2015 so as to mitigate the chronic shortage for the municipal water use in Short-term and
M etro M anila and the irrigation water use in AM RIS. M id-term
M W-P-02 Sumag River Diversion Project M WSS 540 0 0 540
(b) The reliability of water supply in Angat Umiray System shall be fully recovred through implementaion of IS-C- Project for Recovery of Reliability of Water Supply in Angat- NWRB/NIA/
IS-C-02 100 7,866 0 7,966
02 by 2020. Umiray System M WSS/NPC/LGU
(3) Expansion of Level 3, 2, 1 Municipal S upply S ystem LWUA/WDs/LGUs/
M W-C-01 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan 1,404 1,200 1,235 3,839
Private WSPs
(a) The coverage of Level 3, 2, 1 water supply system with safe drinking water supply shall reach 100% by 2025. LWUA/WDs/LGUs/
M W-C-02 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga 1,714 1,588 1,612 4,914
Private WSPs
(b) The coverage ratios of the Level 3 Water Supply System in the urban area shall increase 1% per annum by 2015, LWUA/WDs/LGUs/
M W-C-03 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija 973 957 973 2,903
and their average ratio shall reach 80% by 2025. At the same time, the lowest coverage ratio in the urban area Private WSPs
Whole Terms
shall not be below 46.5% in 2025. LWUA/WDs/LGUs/
M unicipal Water M W-C-04 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac 221 169 169 559
Private WSPs
Supply, Sanitation and
(c) The present average coverage ratio of Level 3 Water Supply System in the rural area shall be maintained until
Sewerage
2025, notwithstanding the future increment of population. The target coverage ratio to be maintained is 18% in
average for the whole study area.
(4) Construction/Provision of S anitary Toilet M S-C-01 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan LGUs 1,774 948 954 3,676
The rate of construction/provision of the sanitary toilets in all municipalities and cities shall increase at the rate of 10%
M S-C-02 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga LGUs 1,969 1,356 1,400 4,725
per annum by 2015, and the whole households in the study area shall be provided with the sanitary toilet by 2025. Whole Terms
M S-C-03 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija LGUs 1,394 1,037 1,046 3,477
M S-C-04 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac LGUs 370 294 304 968
(5) Development of Bulk Water S upply S ystem for Metro Clark
M W-P-04 M etro Clark Bulk Surface Water Project CDC 1,176 1,176 1,175 3,527
Whole Terms
The bulk water supply system (supply capacity of 0.8m3/s) shall be gradually expanded to the entire M etro Clark by
2025.
(6) Long-term Development of Bulk Water S upply S ystem for Bulacan and Pampanga Province
M W-C-05 Extended Bulacan Bulk Water Supply Project LGU 0 0 16,754 16,754
The bulk water supply system with the supply capacity of additional 3.8m3/s for Bulacan and 1.3m3/s for Pampanga Long-term M W-C-06 Pampanga Bulk Water Supply Project LGU 0 0 5,732 5,732
Province shall be developed by 2025 in order to serve the incremental provincial population and cope with deterioration
of the groundwater quality.
Total 28,592 16,591 31,354 76,537

Annex-T K.2.2.2 (2/2) Development Scenarios and Relevant Projects (Group-A)
Term of Project Implementing Cost (million pesos)
Implementation Code Name of Project Agency Short-term Mid-term Long-term Total
(1) Sustainment of Regular Program for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of River Dike and Slope Maintenance and Rehabilitation Works for River Dike and
FL-G-03 DPWH 226 226 227 679
Slope
Until 2025, the following regular program for maintenance and rehabilitation of the deteriorated river dike
Whole Terms
and slope of Pampanga, Angat and Pasac river systems of 54km in length, which are under jurisdiction of
DPWH, shall be sustained to maintain the original river flow capacities and morphology
(2) Sustainment of Regular Program for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Drainage and Flood Control Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Improvement for Drainage
Facilities for LGUs FL-C-03 LGUs 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000
and Flood Control Facilities under Jurisdiction of LGUs
Management of Flood Until 2025, the following regular program for maintenance and rehabilitation of the drainage and flood Whole Terms
and Sediment control facilities, which are under jurisdiction of the Provincial Governments of Pampanga, Bulacan, Nueva
Disasters Ecija and Tarlac, shall be sustained to maintain the original design capacity of the facilities.
(3) Improvement of Public Awarenss on IWRM Integration of Salient Points of IWRM for Pampanga River
FL-C-04 DE-Region III 2 3 3 8
Basin into School Curricula
Toward 2025, public awarness on IWRM shall be improved thorugh the annual regular program on the salient
Whole Terms
points of IWRM into school curricula for primary and secondary school in the aspect of IWRM for Pampanga
river basin.
Total 1,228 1,229 1,230 3,687

(1) Susttainment of the On-going Regular Program for Watershed Management DENR/PENRO/CE
WS-G-01 Forest Protection and Law Enforcement Program (FPLEP) 13 13 13 39
NRO
The major on-going nine (9) regular programs for watershed management in Pampanga river basin shall be
WS-G-02 Community-based Forest Management Program DENR/RCBFMO 24 24 23 71
sustained by 2025, which could lead to the following outcomes:
WS-G-04 Coastal Resource Management Program (CRMP) DENR/PAWCZMS 12 12 13 37
(a) The 285,300has. of tenured and untenured forestlands shall be protected against illegal harvesting, Protected Area Community-based Resource Management
WS-G-05 DENR/PAWCZMS 4 4 5 13
encroachment, forest fires, illegal land use and conversion. Program (CBFM-PACBRMA)
WS-G-06 Private Forest Plantation Development Program (PFPDP) DENR-FRCD 36 29 28 93
KT-7
(b) The present forest cover of 187,500has shall be expanded through timber forest establishment and agro-
WS-G-07 NIA-UPRIIS’ Watershed Management Program NIA-UPRIIS 100 40 40 180
forestry by about 10,000has. at the rate of 660has. per annum. Forest expansion will cover an additional Whole Terms
Watershed
Management 2.63% of the total classified and unclassified forestlands (377,500has.) in Pampanga river basin by WS-G-08 NPC's Watershed Management Program NPC 51 28 28 107
2025.
(c) The present agro-forestry cover shall expand by about 29,700has. at the rate of 200has. per annum as
WS-G-09 Integrated Social Forestry (ISF) Projects LGUs/DENR/RCBFMO 17 17 17 51
the basic strategy to provide additional income source to upland dwellers, particularly the indigenous
peoples. WS-G-10 Private-sector Watershed Management Initiatives Private Firm/NGOs 11 11 10 32
(d) Conservation of natural ecosystems and their critical habitats will be sustained in order to protect bio-
diversity. The area to be conserved includes: (i) natural forests within the 79,800has. of protected areas
of Mt. Arayat NP, Pantabangan-Carranglan WFR and Angat WFR, and (ii) old and re-established
mangrove forests within 77,400has. of coastal areas of Pampanga and Bulacan.
Total 268 178 177 623

(1) Dealing with Contamination of Surface, Ground and Coastal Water
WQ-G-01 Ecological Solid Waste Management Program (ESWMP) DENR-EMB III 64 64 64 192
The pollution load from various sources shall be reduced by sustaining the ongoing non-strutural measures
Whole Terms WQ-G-02 Industrial Pollution Control Program (IPCP) DENR-EMB III 51 51 51 153
under three (3) ongoing regular DENR and LGU programs that are intended to protect water quality.
DENR-EMB/
WQ-G-03 Sagip-Ilog Project 5 3 3 11
LGU/Pvt. Sector
Water-related
(2) Reduction of Risk for Contamination in Water Body
Environment WQ-P-01 Clean Development Mechanism Projects Private Industries 518 518 0 1,036
Management
By 2025, the structural measures will be implemented to reduce the risk of contamination from livestock, Construction of Sanitary Landfills and Support Facilities in
Whole Terms WQ-C-04 LGUs 675 675 675 2,025
domestic and industrial wastes. These include: (a) waste-to-energy CDM projects for livestock farms in Nueva Ecija and Cluster Waste Transfer Stations in Bulacan
Bulacan and the sanitary landfill in Tarlac and Bulacan; and (b) sanitary landfills in N. Ecija and waste
transfer stations in Pampanga and Bulacan.
Total 1,313 1,311 793 3,417
Grand Total 36,660 22,874 37,119 96,652

Annex-T K.2.2.3 Implementation Schedule for Group-A Projects
Sector Code Name of Project Implementing Agency Short-term Mid-term Long-term

AI-G-03 Repair, Rehabilitation of Existing Groundwater Irrigation Systems, Establishment of Groundwater Pump Project (REGIP) NIA 216 91 91
AI-G-04 Balikatan Sagip Patubig Program (BSPP) NIA 46
AI-G-05 Repair, Rehabilitation, Restoration & Preventive Maintenance of Existing National & Communal Irrigation Facilities NIA 1,027 276 276
AI-G-06 Restoration/Rehabilitation of Existing NIA Assisted Irrigation System (RRE-NIAIS) NIA 3,437 2,665 2,665
Agriculture/ AI-G-08 Rehabilitation of Small Water Impounding Projects / Diversion Dams DA-BSWM 43 43 43
Irrigation and
Fisheries AI-G-09 Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, Irrigation Component NIA 340 340 340
AF-G-01 Aquaculture Fisheries Development Programs DA-BFAR 38 38 38
AF-G-02 Comprehensive Regulatory Services DA-BFAR 38 38 38
AF-G-03 Support Projects and Activities DA-BFAR 38 38 38
AF-G-04 Fisheries Resources Management for Improved and Sustainable Harvest DA-BFAR 38 38 38
MW-P-03 Bulacan Treated Bulk Water Supply Project MWSS/LGU 11 935
MW-G-01 Angat Water Utilization and Aquaduct Improvement Project (AWUAIP) Phase 2 MWSS 4 568
MW-P-01 Rehabilitation of Umiray-Macua Facilities MWSS 454
MW-P-02 Sumag River Diversion Project MWSS 540
IS-C-02 Project for Recovery of Reliability of Water Supply in Angat-Umiray System NWRB/NIA/MWSS/NPC/LGU 100 7,866
MW-C-01 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan LWUA/WDs/LGUs/Private WSPs 1,404 1,200 1,235
MW-C-02 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga LWUA/WDs/LGUs/Private WSPs 1 714 1 588 1 612
Municipal Water MW-C-03 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija LWUA/WDs/LGUs/Private WSPs 973 957 973
Supply, Sanitation
KT-8
and Sewerage MW-C-04 Additional Level 3,2, 1 Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac LWUA/WDs/LGUs/Private WSPs 221 169 169
MS-C-01 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Bulacan LGUs 1,774 948 954
MS-C-02 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Pampanga LGUs 1,969 1,356 1,400
MS-C-03 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Nueva Ecija LGUs 1,394 1,037 1,046
MS-C-04 Additional Sanitary Facilities towards 2025 in Tarlac LGUs 370 294 304
MW-P-04 Metro Clark Bulk Surface Water Project CDC 1 176 1 176 1 175
MW-C-05 Extended Bulacan Bulk Water Supply Project LGU 16 754
MW-C-06 Pampanga Bulk Water Supply Project LGU 5,732
Management of FL-G-03 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Works for River Dike and Slope DPWH 226 226 227
Flood and Sediment FL-C-03 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Improvement for Drainage and Flood Control Facilities under Jurisdiction of LGUs LGUs 1 000 1 000 1 000
Disasters FL-C-04 Integration of Salient Points of IWRM for Pampanga River Basin into School Curricula DE-Region III 2 3 3
WS-G-01 Forest Protection and Law Enforcement Program (FPLEP) DENR/PENRO/CENRO 13 13 13
WS-G-02 Community-based Forest Management Program DENR/RCBFMO 24 24 23
WS-G-04 Coastal Resource Management Program (CRMP) DENR/PAWCZMS 12 12 13
WS-G-05 Protected Area Community-based Resource Management Program (CBFM-PACBRMA) DENR/PAWCZMS 4 4 5
Watershed
WS-G-06 Private Forest Plantation Development Program (PFPDP) DENR-FRCD 36 29 28
Management
WS-G-07 NIA-UPRIIS’ Watershed Management Program NIA-UPRIIS 100 40 40
WS-G-08 NPC's Watershed Management Program NPC 51 28 28
WS-G-09 Integrated Social Forestry (ISF) Projects LGUs/DENR/RCBFMO 17 17 17
WS-G-10 Private-sector Watershed Management Initiatives Private Firm/NGOs 11 11 10
WQ-G-01 Ecological Solid Waste Management Program (ESWMP) DENR-EMB III 64 64 64
Water-related WQ-G-02 Industrial Pollution Control Program (IPCP) DENR-EMB III 51 51 51

Environment WQ-G-03 Sagip-Ilog Project DENR-EMB/LGU/Pvt. Sector 5 3 3
Management WQ-P-01 Clean Development Mechanism Projects Private Industries 518 518
WQ-C-04 Construction of Sanitary Landfills & Support Facilities in Nueva Ecija and Cluster Waste Transfer Stations in Bulacan & Pampanga LGUs 675 675 675
Annex-T K.2.2.4 Results of Evaluation (Scoring) of Group-B Projects by Study Team
Viability Enhanced Improved Decentralized Sustained Empowered
Project Grand
Sector of the Project Livelihood Quality of Life Development Ecosystem People Rank
Code Total
1 2 3 4 5 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T
AI-P-01 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 11.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 49.0 15
AI-P-02 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 12.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 50.0 12
AI-P-03 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 14.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 50.0 12
AI-P-04 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 12.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 49.0 15
AI-P-05 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 40.0 28
AI-P-06 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 40.0 28
Agriculture / Irrigation AI-P-07 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 54.0 4
and Fishery
AI-P-08 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 44.0 24
AI-P-09 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 38.0 30
AI-P-10 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 53.0 7
AI-P-11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 50.0 12
AI-C-01 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 46.0 20
AI-C-02 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 11.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 54.0 4
AI-C-03 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 11.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 54.0 4
KT-9
Municipal Water MW-P-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 38.0 30
Sewerage MP-C-01 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 44.0 24
FL-P-01 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 12.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 6.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 56.0 2
Management of Flood FL-P-02 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 38.0 30
and Sediment Disasters
FL-C-01 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 55.0 3
FL-C-02 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 7.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 48.0 17
WS-C-01 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 53.0 7
Watershed WS-C-02 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 53.0 7
Management
WS-C-03 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 46.0 20
WS-C-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 45.0 23
WQ-P-01 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 47.0 19
WQ-C-01 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 9.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 46.0 20
Water-related
Environment WQ-C-02 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 48.0 17
Management
WQ-C-03 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 43.0 27
WQ-C-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 44.0 24
IS-C-01 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 12.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 51.0 10
Others IS-C-03 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 12.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 51.0 10
IS-C-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 60.0 1
Annex-T K.2.2.5 Results of Evaluation (Scoring) of Group-B Projects by TWG Members
Viability Enhanced Improved Decentralized Sustained Empowered
Project Grand
Sector of the Project Livelihood Quality of Life Development Ecosystem People Rank
Code Total
1 2 3 4 5 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T 1 2 3 4 T
AI-P-01 2.9 2.7 1.9 1.8 1.1 10.4 2.9 2.9 2.0 2.8 10.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 4.9 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.9 2.8 1.9 8.6 47.6 18
AI-P-02 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 12.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.8 10.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 49.8 13
AI-P-03 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.0 13.8 2.0 2.9 2.1 2.8 9.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 4.1 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.7 8.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 7.6 47.8 17
AI-P-04 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.1 12.1 2.9 2.9 2.0 2.8 10.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 4.1 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 48.8 14
AI-P-05 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 7.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 39.7 29
AI-P-06 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 40.0 28
Agriculture / Irrigation AI-P-07 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 11.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 54.0 4
and Fishery
AI-P-08 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 44.0 24
AI-P-09 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 4.1 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 38.1 30
AI-P-10 2.1 2.0 2.9 2.1 1.1 10.1 2.9 3.0 1.9 2.9 10.7 2.9 2.9 1.9 1.1 8.8 1.9 3.0 1.9 1.9 8.7 1.0 1.0 2.1 1.0 5.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.8 8.5 51.9 8
AI-P-11 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.9 11.1 3.0 3.0 2.1 3.0 11.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.2 1.1 3.0 2.0 2.9 8.9 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.1 5.2 2.9 2.0 3.0 2.1 9.9 50.4 12
AI-C-01 2.0 1.9 1.0 2.1 2.9 9.8 3.0 3.0 2.1 3.0 11.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.2 1.1 3.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.3 2.0 2.0 2.8 1.9 8.6 46.0 21
AI-C-02 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.8 11.0 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 11.1 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.8 1.8 2.7 1.8 2.0 8.3 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 4.8 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 10.7 50.7 10
AI-C-03 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 10.8 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 53.8 5
KT-10
Municipal Water MW-P-04 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.0 8.6 1.9 2.0 1.0 1.0 5.9 2.1 2.9 1.9 1.0 7.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 1.1 7.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 4.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 37.6 32
Sewerage MP-C-01 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.0 8.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.5 1.1 2.9 1.0 7.5 1.9 1.0 1.9 2.0 6.8 1.0 2.9 1.9 2.9 8.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 42.9 27
FL-P-01 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.1 12.1 1.9 2.9 2.0 1.9 8.7 1.0 1.0 2.9 3.0 7.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.0 10.7 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 6.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 55.4 2
Management of Flood FL-P-02 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 6.1 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.9 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 38.0 31
and Sediment Disasters
FL-C-01 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 1.9 3.0 3.0 2.0 9.9 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.0 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.0 10.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 54.5 3
FL-C-02 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 11.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.9 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 7.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.2 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 48.1 15
WS-C-01 1.9 1.9 2.0 3.0 3.0 11.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.9 5.9 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.0 1.1 3.0 3.0 2.0 9.1 3.0 2.1 3.0 2.1 10.1 52.9 7
Watershed WS-C-02 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 7.9 1.1 1.1 1.0 3.0 6.2 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 8.0 1.1 3.0 3.0 2.0 9.1 3.0 2.0 2.9 2.0 9.9 53.1 6
Management
WS-C-03 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 11.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 46.0 20
WS-C-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 1.1 2.0 2.0 7.1 45.1 23
WQ-P-01 1.9 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 11.9 1.0 2.9 1.1 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 6.1 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 46.9 19
WQ-C-01 2.0 2.9 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.9 3.0 1.0 8.9 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 45.7 22
Water-related
Environment WQ-C-02 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 10.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.9 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.9 8.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 47.8 16
Management
WQ-C-03 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0 10.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 9.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0 8.1 43.1 26
WQ-C-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 1.1 9.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 4.1 2.6 1.0 3.0 1.0 7.6 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 6.1 1.0 2.9 2.0 3.0 8.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 43.8 25
IS-C-01 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 12.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 1.0 9.8 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.1 9.1 2.8 2.8 1.9 2.0 9.6 50.5 11
Others IS-C-03 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 12.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 1.1 9.9 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 2.1 1.0 2.0 8.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.0 10.8 50.8 9
IS-C-04 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 1.9 2.8 2.1 2.0 8.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 9.5 2.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 10.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 7.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 11.6 58.6 1
Annex-T K.2.2.6 Group-B Projects to be Implemented in Short, Medium and Long Term
Initial Investment Cost Implementaion Period
Project
Priority Implementing (M illion Pesos) (years) Score
Order Agency
Code Short-tem M id-term Long-term Total Short-tem M id-term Long-term Total
Group-A Project for M aintenance and Rehabilitation of Existing Facilities 5,485 3,791 3,792 13,067
On-going Group-B Projects 2,339 498 0 2,837

Capacity Development of NWRB and Relevant Agencies on Water
IS-C-04 NWRB/Others 300 300 Less than 5 58.6
Flood Control M easures in M t. Pinatubo Devastated Area- Focus on
FL-P-01 DPWH 4,320 4,320 Less than 5 55.4
Pasac Delta
FL-C-01 Flood M itigation for Pampanga Delta DPWH 100 5,368 5,468 5 5 10 54.5
Appropriate Irrigation Technologies for Enhanced Agricultural
AI-P-07 NIA 654 654 Less than 5 54.0
Production
Improvement of M onitoring System and Capacity Development for
AI-C-03 NIA 150 150 Less than 5 53.8
Proper Water M anagement in NISs and CISs
DENR/
WS-C-02 Protected Area M anagement Program (PAM P) 202 202 404 5 5 10 53.1
PAWCZM S
DA/DENR/
WS-C-01 Upland Development Program 490 490 980 5 5 10 52.9
LGUs
AI-P-10 Rehabilitation of AM RIS NIA 983 983 Less than 5 51.9
Enhancement of M onitoring System for Surface Water in Pampanga NWRB/
IS-C-03 10 10 Less than 5 50.8
River Basin Others
AI-C-02 Introduction of Water Saving Irrigation Technology NIA 150 150 Less than 5 50.7
Establishment of Comprehensive Groundwater M onitoring in NWRB/
IS-C-01 99 99 99 297 5 5 5 15 50.5
Pampanga River Basin Others
Construction of Priority Small Scale Irrigation Systems/Small Water DA Region III/
AI-P-11 169 169 Less than 5 50.4
Impounding Projects, Small Diversion Dam Projects LGUs
AI-P-02 Balog-Balog M ultipurpose Project Phase 2 NIA 8,942 7,153 16,095 5 4 9 49.8
Casecnan M ulti-purpose Irrigation & Power Project Irrigation
AI-P-04 NIA 5,000 2,000 7,000 5 2 7 48.8
Component Phase 2
Community Based Flood Early Warning System for Provinces of
FL-C-02 LGUs 8 8 Less than 5 48.1
Pampanga, Tarlac and N. Ecija
Capacity Development to Improve Water Quality and Aquaculture
WQ-C-02 DA-BFAR 48 48 Less than 5 47.8
Fisheries M anagement
AI-P-03 Sector Loan on Rehabilitation of Irrigation Facilities NIA 222 222 Less than 5 47.8
WS-C-03 Urban Greening Program LGUs 88 88 88 264 5 5 5 15 46.0

BSWM /
AI-C-01 New Construction of Small Scale Irrigation Project under BSWM 257 257 514 5 5 10 46.0
LGUs
Capacity Development to Upgrade WQ M onitoring and Data
WQ-C-01 DENR-EM B 140 140 Less than 5 45.7
M anagement Program
DOT/DENR/
WS-C-04 Community-based Eco-tourism Program 132 132 264 5 5 10 45.1
LGUs
NIA/
AI-P-01 Balintingon Reservoir M ultipurpose Project (BRM P) 9,708 3,883 13,591 5 2 7 44.6
G. Trino
AI-P-08 Central Luzon Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project NIA 1,429 1,429 Less than 5 44.0
DTI/DENR/
Capacity Development Project to Improve Industry Adoption of
WQ-C-03 Private 60 60 Less than 5 43.1
Cleaner Production Options
Industries
M CWM C/
M P-C-01 Septage Treatment and Disposal Facility LGUs/WDs/ 255 255 510 5 5 10 42.9
Private
Irrigation Water Resources Augmentation Pump Establishment
AI-P-06 NIA 130 130 Less than 5 40.0
Project
AI-P-05 Procurement of Pumps, Drilling Rigs & Related Equipment NIA 206 206 Less than 5 39.7
AI-P-09 Gumain Reservoir Project NIA 1,716 12,013 13,729 1 7 8 38.1
FL-P-02 Bacolor Comprehensive Rehabilitation M aster Plan LGU 1,500 1,500 Less than 5 38.0
Total 30,287 33,582 21,630 85,499
KT-11
Annex-T K.2.2.7 Implementation Schedule for Group-B Projects
Sector Code Name of Project Implementing Agency Short-term Mid-term Long-term

AI-P-07 Appropriate Irrigation Technologies for Enhanced Agricultural Production NIA 654
AI-C-02 Introduction of Water Saving Irrigation Technology NIA 150
AI-C-03 Improvement of Monitoring System and Capacity Development for Proper Water Management in NISs and CISs NIA 150
AI-G-01 Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Phase 1 NIA 236
AI-G-02 Along-along Creek Irrigation Project (UPRIIS Div3) NIA 25
AI-G-10 Upper Tabuating SRIP NIA 76
AI-G-07 Participatory Irrigation Development Project, APL1-Infrastructure Development NIA 41
AI-P-10 Rehabilitation of AMRIS NIA 983
Agriculture/Irrigati AI-P-03 Sector Loan on Rehabilitation of Irrigation Facilities NIA 222
on and Fisheries AI-P-11 Construction of Priority Small Scale Irrigation Systems/Small Water Impounding Projects, Small Diversion Dam Projects DA Region III/LGUs 169
AI-P-02 Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Phase 2 NIA 8,942 7,153
AI-P-04 Casecnan Multi-purpose Irrigation & Power Project Irrigation Component Phase 2 NIA 5,000 2,000
AI-C-01 New Construction of Small Scale Irrigation Project under BSWM BSWM/LGUs 257 257
AI-P-08 Central Luzon Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project NIA 1,429
AI-P-06 Irrigation Water Resources Augmentation Pump Establishment Project NIA 130
AI-P-05 Procurement of Pumps, Drilling Rigs & Related Equipment NIA 206
AI-P-01 Balintingon Reservoir Multipurpose Project (BRMP) NIA/G. Trino 9,708 3,883
AI-P-09 Gumain Reservoir Project NIA 1,716 12,013
KT-12
Municipal Water MP-G-01 Cabanatuan Sewerage System LGU 189

Supply, Sanitation MP-G-02 Expansion of Clark Sewerage System Clark Water 456
and Sewerage MP-C-01 Septage Treatment and Disposal Facility LWUA/WDs/LGUs/Private WSPs 255 255
FL-G-01 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUMP) Phase III Part I DPWH 470
FL-G-02 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUMP) Phase III Part II DPWH 5
Management of FL-P-01 Flood Control Measures in Mt. Pinatubo Devastated Area- Focus on Pasac Delta DPWH 4,320
Flood and Sediment FL-C-01 Flood Mitigation for Pampanga Delta DPWH 100 5,368
Disasters FL-G-04 Flood Forecasting and Warning System Capacity Building Project upon Dam Release in the Philippines PAGASA 300
FL-C-02 Community Based Flood Early Warning System for Provinces of Pampanga, Tarlac and N. Ecija LGUs 8
FL-P-02 Bacolor Comprehensive Rehabilitation Master Plan LGU 1,500
WS-G-03 Integrated Agro-Forestry Development Program (CBFM-CARP) DENR/RCBFMO/DAR 31
WS-G-11 Forestlands Management Project (FMP) DENR-FASPO 498 498
WS-G-12 Pampanga River Basin Rehabilitation Project (PRBRP) DENR-FRCD 12
Watershed
WS-C-01 Upland Development Program (UDP) DA/DENR/LGUs 490 490
Management
WS-C-02 Protected Area Management Program (PAMP) DENR-PAWZCMS 202 202
WS-C-03 Urban Greening Program DENR/LGUs/Pvt. Sector 88 88 88
WS-C-04 Community-based Eco-tourism Program DOT/DENR/LGUs 132 132
Water-related WQ-C-01 Capacity Development to Upgrade WQ Monitoring and Data Management Program DENR-EMB 140
Environment WQ-C-02 Capacity Development to Improve Water Quality and Aquaculture Fisheries Management DA-BFAR 48
Management WQ-C-03 Capacity Development Project to Improve Industry Adoption of Cleaner Production Options DTI/DENR/Private Industries 60
IS-C-01 Establishment of Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring in Pampanga River Basin NWRB/Others 99 99 99
Others IS-C-03 Enhancement of Monitoring System for Surface Water in Pampanga River NWRB/Others 10
IS-C-04 Capacity Development of NWRB and Relevant Agencies on Water Allocation and Distribution NWRB/Others 300
Annex-T K.2.2.8 (1/3) Development Scenarios and Relevant Projects (Group-B)
Cost (Million)
Target Completion Implementing
Sector Development Scenario Project Short-term Mid-term Long-term Total
Period Agency
(2011-2015) (2016-2020) (2021-2025) (2011-2025)
(1) Improvement of Irrigation Technologies Appropriate Irrigation Technologies for Enhanced Agricultural
AI-P-07 NIA 654 654
Production
The innovative irrigation technologies shall be developed and the capacity building on
Short-term AI-C-02 Introduction of Water Saving Irrigation Technology NIA 150 150
usage of the technologies shall be made so as to increase the irrigation efficiency and
save the irrigation water by 2015. Improvement of Monitoring System and Capacity Development for
AI-C-03 NIA 150 150
Proper Water Management in NISs and CISs
(2) Short-term Development of Irrigation Systems
AI-G-01 Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Phase 1 NIA 236 236
The agricultural productivity shall be increased through the seven (7) irrigation
AI-G-02 Along-along Creek Irrigation Project (UPRIIS Div3) NIA 25 25
development projects, which contribute to the beneficial area (newly developed) of
5,880ha, the beneficial area (rehabilitated) of 37,046 ha and beneficiaries of 56,640 farm- AI-G-10 Upper Tabuating SRIP NIA 76 76
families in total, by 2015.
Participatory Irrigation Development Project, APL1-Infrastructure
Short-term AI-G-07 NIA 41 41
Development
AI-P-10 Rehabilitation of AMRIS NIA 983 983
AI-P-03 Sector Loan on Rehabilitation of Irrigation Facilities NIA 222 222

Construction of Priority Small Scale Irrigation Systems/Small Water DA Region III/
AI-P-11 169 169
Impounding Projects, Small Diversion Dam Projects LGUs
Agriculture/Irrigation (3) Mid-term Development of Irrigation Systems
AI-P-02 Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Phase 2 NIA 8,942 7,153 16,095
and Fisheries
The agricultural projects shall be increased through the six (6) irrigation development Casecnan Multi-purpose Irrigation & Power Project Irrigation
AI-P-04 NIA 5,000 2,000 7,000
projects, which contribute to the beneficial area (newly developed) of 58,443 ha, the Component Phase 2
beneficial area (rehabilitated) of 50,904 ha and the beneficiaries of 101,893 farm-families AI-C-01 New Construction of Small Scale Irrigation Project under BSWM BSWM/LGUs 257 257 514
in total by 2020.
KT-13
Short-term/Mid-term
AI-P-08 Central Luzon Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project NIA 1,429 1,429
Irrigation Water Resources Augmentation Pump Establishment
AI-P-06 NIA 130 130
Project
AI-P-05 Procurement of Pumps, Drilling Rigs & Related Equipment NIA 206 206
(4) Long-term Development of Irrigation Systems
AI-P-01 Balintingon Reservoir Multipurpose Project (BRMP) NIA/G. Trino 9,708 3,883 13,591
The agricultural projects shall be increased through the two (2) irrigation development
AI-P-09 Gumain Reservoir Project NIA 1,716 12,013 13,729
projects, which contribute to the beneficial area (newly developed) of 31,100 ha and the
Mid-term/Long-term
beneficiaries of 9,152 farm-families in total by 2025.
Total 16,905 22,599 15,896 55,400

(1) Development of Sewerage Systems
MP-G-01 Cabanatuan Sewerage System LGU 189 189
The on-going development for the sewerage systems for Cabanatuan City in Nueva Ecija
Short-term MP-G-02 Expansion of Clark Sewerage System Clark Water 456 456
and Clark City in Tarlac shall be completed by 2015. Upon completion of the projects,
about 12 % of the population in Cabanatuan City and 100% in Clark would be served by
the public sewerage system.
(2) Construction/Provision of Septage Treatment and Disposal Facilities LWUA/WDs/LGUs
Municipal Water MP-C-01 Septage Treatment and Disposal Facility 255 255 510
/Private WSPs
Supply, Sanitation
The services of the septage treatment and disposal facilities shall be provided to about
and Sewerage
80% of the urban area in the following ten cities/municipalities by 2025: (1) Angeles, (2)
Mid-term/Long-term
San Fernado, (3) Guagua and (4) Mabalacat, (5) Baliuag, (6) Calumpit, (7) Hagonoy and
(8) Malolos, (9) Cabanatuan and (10) Tarlac.
Total 645 255 255 1,155

Cost (M illion)
Implementing
Sector Development Scenario Target Completion Period Project Short-term M id-term Long-term Total
Agency
(2011-2015) (2016-2020) (2021-2025) (2011-2025)
(1) Flood Mitigation for Pasac River Basin (Eastern Pinatubo Area)
FL-G-01 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUM P) Phase III Part I DPWH 470 470
All on-going, proposed and conceptual flood mitigation projects for Pasac river basin shall be
FL-G-02 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Project (PHUM P) Phase III Part II DPWH 5 5
completed by 2015. Upon completion of the projects, the chronic flood damage in the area of
Short-term
about 57,300 ha would be mitigated, and about 309,000 people would be benefitted. Flood Control M easures in M t. Pinatubo Devastated Area- Focus on Pasac
FL-P-01 DPWH 4,320 4,320
Delta
(2) Flood Mitigation for Pampanga Delta

FL-C-01 Flood M itigation for Pampanga Delta DPWH 100 5,368 5,468
The flood mitigation plan for Pampanga Delta shall be completed by 2020. Upon completion of
Short-term and M id-term
the projects, the chronic flood damage in Pampanga Delta of about 32,400 ha would be mitigated,
and about 175,000 people would be benefitted.
(3) Capacity Building on the Appropriate Dam Reservoir Operation against Flood Flood Forecasting and Warning System Capacity Building Project upon Dam
FL-G-04 PAGASA 300 300
Release in the Philippines
M anagement of Flood The capacity building on the appropriate reservoir operation against flood for Pantabangan Dam
Short-term
and Sediment Disasters and Angat Dam shall be made through the technical cooperation by JICA by 2015.
(4) Establishment of Community-based Flood Forecasting and Warning S ystem for Provinces Community Based Flood Early Warning System for Provinces of Pampanga,
FL-C-02 LGUs 8 8
of Pampanga, Tarlac and Nueva Ecija Tarlac and N. Ecija
Succeeding to Bulacan Province, Pampanga, Tarlac and Nueva Ecija shall be provided with the
Short-term
community-based flood forecasting and waning system by 2015.
(5) Flood Mitigation for Bacolor Municipality

FL-P-02 Bacolor Comprehensive Rehabilitation M aster Plan LGU 1,500 1,500
KT-14
The current potential flood damage in Bacolor M unicipality shall be reduced through river
Long-term
channel improvement of Gugu River, drainage improvement by 2025.
Total 5,203 5,368 1,500 12,071

(1) S trengthening of the On-going Reforestation Efforts DENR/
WS-G-03 Integrated Agro-Forestry Development Program (CBFM -CARP) 31 31
RCBFM O/DAR
The seven (7) special projects shall be implemented in order to strengthen the on-going
reforestation efforts. The target outcomes by the special projects are as below: WS-G-11 Forestlands M anagement Project (FM P) DENR-FASPO 498 498 996
(a) The forest cover shall expand by 39,900has. at the rate of 2,660has./yr by 2025 through
WS-G-12 Pampanga River Basin Rehabilitation Project (PRBRP) DENR-FRCD 12 12
implementation of WS-G-03, WS-G-11, WS-G-12, WS-C-01, WS-C-02 and WS-C-04.
DA/DENR/
WS-C-01 Upland Development Program (UDP) 490 490 980
LGUs
(b) Agro-forestry cover shall expand by 21,500has. at the rate of 1,430has./yr through
WS-C-02 Protected Area M anagement Program (PAM P) DENR-PAWZCM S 202 202 404
implementation of WS-G-11, WS-G-12 and WS-C-01. The expansion of agro-forestry
could enhance access to the livelihood and economic opportunities for upland occupants,
DENR/LGUs/
particularly the indigenous communities. WS-C-03 Urban Greening Program 88 88 88 264
Pvt. Sector
(c) The degraded and severely eroded uplands/untenured watersheds of 10,500has. in Whole Period
WS-C-04 Community-based Eco-tourism Program DOT/DENR/LGUs 132 132 264
Watershed M anagement particular shall be restored through implementation of WS-C-01.
(d) Urban greening (WS-C-03) shall cover 7,300has. of open spaces and 222 linear km of
roads and riverbanks.
(e) The objective forest protection area of 56,100has. under WS-C-02 shall be officially
included into the NIPAS areas and provided with the formal management in order to
conserve the biodiversity in critical habitats and natural ecosystems.
(f) The facilities and services for eco-tourism to the natural integrated protected areas and/or
the critical habitats in the study area shall be improved through WS-C-04 so as to increase
the income levels for the communities and to enhance the present natural conditions of the
important habitats and ecosystems in these areas.
Total 1,453 1,410 88 2,951

Cost (Million)
Target Completion Implementing
Sector Development Scenario Project Short-term Mid-term Long-term Total
Period Agency
(2011-2015) (2016-2020) (2021-2025) (2011-2025)
(1) Improvement of Monitoring and Processing System for the Water Quality Data Capacity Development to Upgrade WQ Monitoring and Data
WQ-C-01 DENR-EMB 140 140
Management Program
DENR shall improve the monitoring and processing system for the water quality data
taking the following measures: (a) Rationalize water quality monitoring and pollution
Short-term
regulatory compliance, (b) Compile inventory of pollution sources, (c) Upgrade
management capability of DENR Staffs and other stakeholders and (d) Upgrade the data
Water-related management system
Environment
(2) Capacity Development to Reduce Pollution Load Capacity Development to Improve Water Quality and Aquaculture
Management WQ-C-02 DA-BFAR 48 48
Fisheries Management
The capability of fishpond operators and non-compliant industries will be improved over Capacity Development Project to Improve Industry Adoption of DTI/DENR/
Short-term and Mid-term WQ-C-03 60 60
the mid-term towards adopting cleaner production options in order to reduce their Cleaner Production Options Private Industries
impacts on water quality.
Total 188 60 0 248

(1) Enhancement of Monitoring of Groundwater and Surface Water Establishment of Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring in
IS-C-01 NWRB/Others 99 99 99 297
Pampanga River Basin
The monitoring of the groundwater and surface water shall be enhanced in order to Enhancement of Monitoring System for Surface Water in Pampanga
Whole Terms IS-C-03 NWRB/Others 10 10
apprehend the actual status of the water resources in Pampanga river basin River
(2) Capacity Development on Water Allocation and Distribution Capacity Development of NWRB and Relevant Agencies on Water
Others IS-C-04 NWRB/Others 300 300
The appropriate methodologies on the water allocation and distribution for municipal
Short-term
water use, irrigation, hydropower generation and other various water uses shall be
KT-15
introduced to NWRB and other relevant agencies
Total 409 99 99 607
Grand Total 24,803 29,791 17,838 72,432

Sector L
Legal and Institutional Framework
Sector L. Legal and Institutional Framework
Table of Contents
Pages
L.1 Present Institutional-Setup for Water Resources Management ......................................... L-1
L.1.1 Present Legal Framework ......................................................................................L-1
L .1.1.1 Background of National and Regional Administration ..............................L-1
L .1.1.2 Hierarchy of Law ........................................................................................L-1
L .1.1.3 National Policies and Laws ........................................................................L-2
L .1.1.4 Legal Frameworks for Policy, Planning, Approval, Implementation, and
Monitoring of Water-related Projects .........................................................L-3
L.1.2 Present Institutional-Setup .....................................................................................L-5
L .1.2.1 National Government Agencies ..................................................................L-5
L .1.2.2 Functional Relationship among National and Local Governments ............L-5
L .1.2.3 Institutional Structure by Sector .................................................................L-6
L .1.2.4 Institutional Framework for the Study Area ...............................................L-8
L.1.3 Present Framework of Water Resources Management ..........................................L-9
L .1.3.1 The Constitution and Water Code...............................................................L-9
L .1.3.2 Regulation of Water Resources Allocation ............................................... L-11
L .1.3.3 Water Use Regulation during Draught .....................................................L-13
L .1.3.4 Water Resources Planning and Assessment ..............................................L-14
L .1.3.5 Strengthening of NWRB and Water Code by EO 123 ..............................L-15
L .1.3.6 Present Status of IWRM and River Basin Organization...........................L-17
L.2 Problems and Issues on IWRM Institution ........................................................................ L-20
L.2.1 Mission of IWRM ................................................................................................L-20
L .2.1.1 Issues ........................................................................................................L-20
L .2.1.2 Historical Background of IWRM .............................................................L-20
L .2.1.3 Mission of IWRM.....................................................................................L-20
L.2.2 Functions of RBOs...............................................................................................L-21
L .2.2.1 Issues ........................................................................................................L-21
L .2.2.2 Type of RBOs ...........................................................................................L-21
L .2.2.3 Functions of RBOs in Philippines and Other Countries ...........................L-22
L.2.3 Gap Analysis and Strategic Issues .......................................................................L-24
L .2.3.1 Gap Analysis .............................................................................................L-24
L .2.3.2 Definition of Strategic Issues ...................................................................L-25
L.3 Proposed Institutional-Setup for IWRM ............................................................................ L-30
L.3.1 Study Framework .................................................................................................L-30
L.3.2 Strategic Issues and Key Actions .........................................................................L-30
L .3.2.1 Basic Aspects of Actions ..........................................................................L-30
L .3.2.2 Proposed Key Actions ..............................................................................L-31
L.3.3 Amendment of Related Laws, Rules and Guidelines ..........................................L-36
L .3.3.1 Constitution, Water Code, Civil Code and Local Government Code .......L-36
L .3.3.2 Improvement of Water Code and Other Related Laws, Rule and
Guidelines .................................................................................................L-37
L.3.4 Capacity Improvement of Organizations .............................................................L-39
i
L .3.4.1 Capacity Assessment of Existing Line Agencies and LGUs ....................L-40
L .3.4.2 Key Actions to Strengthen NGAs/RLAs and LGUs.................................L-42
L .3.4.3 Capacity Building of Missing Functions for IWRM ................................L-42
L .3.4.4 Design of River Basin Committee ............................................................L-44
L.3.5 Strengthening of Financial Capacity for Sustainable IWRM...............................L-48
L .3.5.1 Key Actions to Strengthen Financial Capacity .........................................L-48
L .3.5.2 Fund Sources for Sustainable IWRM .......................................................L-48
List of Tables
Table L. 1.1.1Hierarchy of Laws and Regulations in Philippines...............................................L-2

Table L. 1.3.1Existing and Planned River Basin Management Organizations .........................L-18
Table L. 2.2.1Type of RBOs .....................................................................................................L-22
Table L. 2.2.2Type of River Basin Organization in Philippines and Other Countries ..............L-22
Table L. 2.2.3Key Functions of Typical Existing and Proposed River Basin Organization .....L-23
Table L. 2.3.1Key IWRM Functions and Strategic Issues ........................................................L-25
Table L.3.2.1 Strategic Issues and Aspects of Actions ..............................................................L-31
Table L.3.4.1 Countermeasures and Corresponding NGAs/RLAs and LGUs for
Empowerment .....................................................................................................L-42
Table L.3.4.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of three RBO options .......................................L-43
Table L.3.4.3 Allocation of Operation Cost of RBC .................................................................L-47
Table L.3.4.4 Role of NGAs/RLAs and LGUs for Monitoring System....................................L-48
Annex-T L.1.1.1 Water Sector Laws and Policies .................................................................. LT-1

Annex-T L.1.2.1 Mandate of Key Government Agencies in Water Resources
Management................................................................................................ LT-3
Annex-T L.1.2.2 Key Water Supply Sector Agencies: Delineated Roles and
Responsibilities ........................................................................................... LT-6
Annex-T L.1.2.3 Institutional Structure of Water Supply and Sanitation ............................... LT-7
Annex-T L.1.2.4 Institutional Structure of National Government Agencies in Flood
Mitigation ................................................................................................... LT-8
Annex-T L.1.2.5 Institutional Structure of Watershed and Forest Management (Draft) ........ LT-9
Annex-T L.1.3.1 NWRB 2005 Fees and Charges ................................................................ LT-10
Annex-T L.3.3.1 Key Actions to Improve Water Code and Related Rules and
Guidelines ................................................................................................. LT-12
Annex-T L.3.3.2 Key Actions to Introduce Specific Multipurpose Dam Law ..................... LT-13
Annex-T L.3.4.4 Key Actions to Strengthen Line Agencies and LGUs ............................... LT-14
Annex-T L.3.5.1 Key Actions to Strengthen Financial Capacity for Sustainable IWRM .... LT-14
ii
List of Figures
Figure L. 2.1.1 Mission of Water Resources Management .......................................................L-21

Figure L. 2.3.1 Approach for Defining Strategic Issues ...........................................................L-24
Figure L. 3.1.1 Role of Institutional-Setup ...............................................................................L-30
Figure L. 3.2.1 Empowerment Elements for Basic Aspects .....................................................L-31
Figure L. 3.4.1 Organizational Structure of River Basin Committee .......................................L-45
Annex-F L.1.2.1 Functional Chart of Water Related Agencies in the Philippines ................ LF-1
Annex-F L.1.2.2 Functional Relationship among Central Government Agencies and
Local Governments .................................................................................... LF-2
Annex-F L.1.2.3 Organizational Chart of Province of Pampanga ........................................ LF-3
Annex-F L.1.3.1 Flowchart for Processing of Water Permit Application ............................. LF-4
Annex-F L.1.3.2 Organization Chart of Present NWRB as of March 2009 Source:
NWRB ....................................................................................................... LF-5
Annex-F L.1.3.3 NWRB’s Proposed Organizational Structure as of March 2009 ................ LF-6
Annex-F L.1.3.4 Logical Framework for NWRB ................................................................. LF-7
Annex-F L.1.3.5 NWRB's Proposed Organizational Structure, September 2010 ................. LF-8
Annex-F L.2.2.1 General Relationship of State Water Resource Plans to the Basin Plan
for the Murray-Darling River..................................................................... LF-9
Annex-F L.2.2.2 Objective, Mission and Activities of Japan Water Agency .................... LF-10
Annex-F L.3.4.1 Organization Structure of Regional Development Council of Region
III ..............................................................................................................LF-11
Annex-F L.3.4.2 RBO under of RBCO and Satellite RBCO, Manila Bay Site
Coordination Committee.......................................................................... LF-12
Annex-F L.3.4.3 Proposed creation of a Committee on River Basins under the
Regional Development Council (RDC) III .............................................. LF-13
Annex-F L.3.4.4 Independent Pampanga River Basin Council .......................................... LF-14
Annex-F L.3.4.5 Position of NWRB for Water Rights Regulation among RBCO and
RBO ......................................................................................................... LF-15
List of Appendix
Appendix L-1 Related Articles of CHAPTER III APPROPRIATION OF WATERS, Water

Code of the Philippines (1966)
iii
Sector L: Legal and Institutional Framework
Sector L. Legal and Institutional Framework
L.1 Present Institutional-Setup for Water Resources Management

L.1.1 Present Legal Framework
L .1.1.1 Background of National and Regional Administration
The administration of the Philippines is divided in three levels of governance: namely, national,
regional and local governments. The nation has been divided into 17 administrative Regions based on
their geographical locations: namely, Regions I to XII, NCR, CAR, ARMM, CARAGA and
Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao. NCR covers Metro Manila.
The local governments are classified into three hierarchies; namely, province, city/municipality and
barangay. Province is composed of city, municipalities and barangays. Provinces, city, municipalities
and barangays have respective council (Sanggunian) for their own legislation. Region is the national
administrative division for regional administration and coordination among multiple provinces.
The Local Government Code (LGC) enacted in 1991 essentially re-defined the role, relationship and
linkages of national, provincial, city/municipal and barangay institutions in provisions of basic
services, infrastructures and utilities. The new direction mandated the Local Government Units
(LGUs) to play a larger role in planning and implementing local infrastructures and utilities in
particular water supply and sanitation. This raised significant institutional capacity and resource
allocation issues.
The LGUs are subdivided into 81 provinces, 136 cities, 1,495 municipalities and 42,008 barangays as
of December 31, 2008. The LGUs are grouped into seventeen (17) regions. The Department of Interia
and loca Government (DILG) exercises general supervision in the provinces and cities of 16 regions.
The Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao is not part of the general supervision function of DILG.
The main national government agencies establish respective regional and provincial offices for
regulating own responsible sector among provinces and municipalities, allocation of national budget,
implementation of national projects, etc.
L .1.1.2 Hierarchy of Law
The hierarchy of the laws enacted by the National Government of the Philippines is shown in
Table L.1.1.1 (5.1.1). The Constitution and the Republic Act (RA) are enacted by the Congress while
the Executive Order (EO) is promulgated by the President. The Presidential Decree (PD) was
promulgated by the President during the martial law period, 1972-1986. The Administrative Order
(AO) and the memorandum circular (MC) are issued by the secretary of a department and the head of
agencies or offices respectively.
Provincial ordinance is enacted by the provincial council, while provincial governors, municipal and
city mayors have authority to issues local administrative order.
The executive order, administrative order, memorandum circular and local administrative orders could
be cancelled if the national or local administration changed. Legislative actions of Congress
predominate over the executive actions or decision of the Office of the President. The government
administrators and managers in the Philippines tend to consider that the institution and organizations
established by laws (Republic Act and Presidential Decree) are sustainable, but those established by
Executive Orders and Administrative Orders are tentative and tend to be abolished or not functioning
after change of the administration.
L-1
Table L. 1.1.1 Hierarchy of Laws and Regulations in Philippines

Hierarchy Enactment Example
I. National Laws and Regulations
(1) Constitution Congress -The Philippine Constitution (1987 new)
(2) Republic Act Congress -The Water Code of the Philippines-1776
1946-1972, 1987-present (Common Wealth Act No.146)
-The Civil Code of the Philippines (RA No.
386-1949)
(3) Presidential Decree President -Water Code (PD No. 1067-1976) as
1972-1986 period amended
(4) Executive Order President EO 123-2002
1987-present
(5) Administrative Order Department Secretary -DENR Administrative Order No. 2005-10
Implementation Rules and Regulations of
the Clean Water Act
(6) Memorandum Circular Head of Agency/Office -NWRB Resolution No.010-0305-2005
-NIA: MC17S78 Clarification on the ...
(7) Others, Guidelines Head of Agency -Implementing Rules and Regulations, the
Amended of the Water Code-1979 (March
2005), Guideline by NWRB
II Laws and Regulations for Local Governments
(1) Provincial Ordinance Provincial Council Provincial Revenue Code of Bulacan
(Sanggunian Panlalawigan) (Bulacan PO No. C-003, 2004)
(2) City/Municipal/ City/Municipal/Barangay-Council (Sanggunian Panlungsod/ Sanggunian
Barangay-Resolution/ Bayan/ Sanggunian Barangay)
Regulation
(3) Local Administrative Order Governor (Province), Mayor (City/ Municipality), Punong barangay
Note: Refer to the legislative body of Barangay/Municipal/City/Province in SEC.390,445,457,467 of LGC;
Philippine Commonwealth 1935-1946; Modified Parliamentary Republic 1978-1985; Republic under martial
law 1972-1986; Republic 1987-present
L .1.1.3 National Policies and Laws

Transformation of the national policies for water supply, water resources management,
decentralization, privatization, environmental protection and rationalization, and corresponding main
laws and orders in the water resources sector from 1970s are summarized in Annex-T L.1.1.1.
(1) Water Supply and Water Resources Management Policy
The main three legislations defining the institutional setup of the water supply sector were
enacted in 1970s. Those are Republic Act No. 6234-1971 created Metropolitan Waterworks
and Sewerage System (MWSS) for water supply in Metro Manila, Provincial Water Utilities
Act-1973 authorized formation of local water districts in provincial centers outside Metro
Manila, and the Water Code of the Philippines-1976 established the framework for water
resources management. The Public Service Law, Presidential Decree No. 1206-1977
mandated National Water Resources Board (NWRB) to supervise water utilities including the
regulation of water tariff except those under MWSS and Local Water Utility Administration
(LWUA).
(2) Decentralization Policy
The Local Government Code-1991 transferred responsibility for public services to local
governments in their areas. Local governments at all levels (provinces, city/municipalities and
barangays) were made responsible for basic service delivery. Pursuant to this Code the LGUs
shall endeavor to be self-reliant and shall continue exercising the power and discharging the
duties and functions currently vested upon them.
L-2
(3) Privatization Policy of Infrastructures

Privatization of infrastructure was initiated for electric-power projects by the first legal
framework, Executive Order No. 215-1987. The former BOT Law, RA No. 6959-1990 sought
to enable the framework for private sector participation in infrastructure development
including water supply. The Republic Act No. 7718-1994 (present BOT Law) amended RA
No. 6959-1990 more flexible to implement roads, airports, water, information technology, etc.
allowing nine type of scheme.
National Water Crisis Act-1995 provided the government with special powers to recognize
sector agencies and pursue private sector participation. This act facilitated the privatization of
water supply and sanitation in Metro Manila.
(4) Environmental Policy
Presidential Decree 1152-1977, the Philippine Environmental Code established the standards
for air and water quality, and guidelines for land use management, natural resources,
groundwater, and waste management. The Philippines Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
System was established by Presidential Decree No. 1586-1979. The Philippine Clean Water
Act-2004 defines the policies for pursuing economic growth within the framework of
sustainable development in the aspect of water quality management of all water bodies. The
Department of Environment and Natural Resource (DENR) is responsible for the execution of
these laws.
(5) Rationalization Policy of Governments
Rationalization of government agencies stem from the Public Service Law, PD No.1206-1977.
The Administrative Code-1987 vested the President with residual powers to reorganize the
Executive Branches of the governments. NWRB has been being restructured through
Executive Order No. 123-2002, and been entrusted with responsibility for regulation of water
service providers in water districts. Executive Order No. 366-2004 directed all department
secretaries to conduct strategic review of the operations of the executive branches.
Implementation of EO 123 has not yet finalized. Executive Order No. 279-2004 outlined
substantial reforms in the financing of the water supply sector, particularly with regard to the
role of LWUA on providing finance to water districts, by pursuing more actively water
districts and other water providers to the private capital market.
The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) has approved the Rationalization Plan of
seven government agencies. The seven agencies include the Office of President, the Office of
the Vice President, the Department and Labor and Employment, DBM, Department of Science
and Technology, Department of Tourism, and the Civil Service Commission. Applications of
the rest of agencies are still pending at DBM for approval as of June 2009.
Since 1995 successive governments have pursued their policy objectives through executive
orders issued by the president rather than laws passed by the Congress.
L .1.1.4 Legal Frameworks for Policy, Planning, Approval, Implementation, and Monitoring
of Water-related Projects
(1) Background
Mandate and responsibility of National Governments and sectoral agencies are governed by
laws and regulations in the Philippines, but authority and responsibility for sector
policymaking, planning, regulation, implementation and monitoring of projects are severely
fragmented, spread across different government tiers and various national government
agencies1). Fragmentation might be partly induced by the three policies of privatization,
decentralization and rationalization.
(2) NEDA as the Highest Social and Development Planning and Policy Coordination Body
The National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) is the country’s highest social and
development planning and policy coordination body. In performance of its function, the
L-3
NEDA Board is assisted by five Cabinet-level agency committees: namely, Development

Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC), Infrastructure Committee (INFRACOM),
Investment Coordination Committee (ICC), Social Development Committee (SDC), and
Committee on Tariff and Related Matters (CTRM). The NEDA Secretariat serves as the
technical secretariat to all these committees, except for the DBCC, which is served by the
DBM.
The NEDA defines the institutional roles and responsibilities of sector agencies; sets broad
coverage targets for the country; and defines broad policies, particularly regarding access of
low-income groups to service, cost recovery to sustainability, incentive to improve operational
efficiency, and mechanism for private sector improvement. Allocation of the national funds is
determined by Department of Budget and Management (DBM). The Department of Finance
(DOF), for its part, sets and implements policies on the use of grants and guarantees from the
national government and official development assistance (ODA). The projects of which
budget exceed Peso 500 millions are subject to review and approval by NEDA.
(3) National Sector Policies, Planning and Implementation, and Local Government
Key national government agencies are responsible for sector policy, planning, implementing
and monitoring of national projects, and regulatory function specific to their jurisdiction. Each
department issues Department Order for authorities of officials of respective department for
planning, approval, implementation and monitoring of projects under its responsible sector.
Local Governments at all administrative levels retain de facto responsibilities of public
utilities including water supply and sanitation for policy, planning, and regulatory functions
specific to their jurisdictions, through respective Local Government Unit (LGU). This
includes choosing financing and management options, deciding on tariffs, providing
investment and funding support, and setting performance standards.
The Regional Development Council (RDC) regulates and approves inter-provincial and
government loan projects. The NEDA requires endorsement for implementation from the
concerned all provinces for the RDC’s approval. The secretariat of RDC is NEDA.
(4) Allocation of Sector Roles between National Government and Local Governments
The present Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the national and local governments
were prepared reflecting the new sector role of the LGUs based on Local Government
Code-1991 (LGC-1991). The basic services and facilities vested in the LGUs are listed for
Barangay, Municipality, Province and City respectively in SEC.17, CHAPTER I of the
LGC-1991.
(a) Basic Services and Facilities Vested in LGUs
Those basic services and facilities in water-related sector include, but not limited to, the
following:
For a Barangay -Services and facilities related to general hygiene and sanitation, and
maintenance of water supply systems;
For a Municipality -Extension and on-site research and facilities related to agriculture
and fishery activities, inter-barangay irrigation systems, water and soil resources
utilization and conservation projects, and enforcement of fishery laws in municipal
waters including conservation of mangroves; Implementation of community-based
forestry projects including integrated social forestry programs subject to supervision,
control and review of DENR, and management and control of communal forests;
Services and facilities related to general hygiene and sanitation; and Communal
irrigation, small water impounding projects, artesian wells, spring development, rain
water collections and water supply systems, sea walls, dikes, drainage and sewerage,
and flood control;
For a Province -Assistance in organization of farmers and fisherman’s cooperatives and
L-4
other collective organizations, and transfer of appropriate technology; and

Inter-municipal water-works, drainage and sewerage, flood control, irrigation systems
and reclamation projects; and
For a City -All the services and facilities of the municipalities and provinces.
(b) Public Works and Infrastructures Vested in National Government
National agencies or offices concerned should have devolved to LGUs the responsibility
for the provision of basic services and facilities enumerated in SEC.17 of LGC.
Regional offices of national agencies or offices whose functions were devolved to LGUs
should also have been phased out. However, sector projects have been still led generally
by national agencies in coordination with LGUs due to limitation of funds and resources
of LGUs.
Notwithstanding the provision of subsection (b) of SEC.17 of LGC the public works and
infrastructure projects and other facilities, programs and services funded by the National
Government Appropriation Act, other special laws, pertinent executive orders, and those
wholly or partially funded from foreign sources, are not covered under SEC.17, except
in those cases where the LGU concerned is dully designated as the implementing
agency for such projects, facilities, programs, and services.
L.1.2 Present Institutional-Setup
L .1.2.1 National Government Agencies
The key national government agencies involved in the water resources management are Office of the
President (OP), the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA), National Water Resources
Board (NWRB), Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Department of Agriculture
(DA), Department of Energy (DE), Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR),
Department of Finance (DOF), Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG), and
Department of Health (DOH). The mandates of the key government agencies in water resources
management are summarized in Annex-T L.1.2.1.
The National Water Resources Board (NWRB) and National Commission on Indigenous People
(NCIP), Metropolitan Water Works and Sewerage System (MWSS), National Irrigation Administration
(NIA), National Power Corporation (NPCOR/NPC), Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), and
Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA) are regulatory and/or implementation agencies under
OP, DPWH, DA, DE, DENR and DOH respectively.
The mandates of these national agencies and line and staff bureaus are mutually correlated. The
functional chart of the water-related national agencies over 30 in the Philippines is illustrated in
Annex-F L.1.2.1. The functional relationship with the local governments is presented in subsection
L.1.2.2 of this report. Detailed functions of these agencies with respective responsible sector are
presented in subsection L.1.2.3. The mandate and organization structure of NWRB are presented in
subsection L.1.3.2 (1) and subsection L.1.3.5 (1) respectively.
L .1.2.2 Functional Relationship among National and Local Governments
Part of the roles and authorities of the national government agencies were transferred to the local
governments based on LGC-1991(refer to subsection L.1.1.4 (4)). Under decentralization and
rationalization policies, the present institutional arrangements for the functional relationships among
the national government agencies and local governments are still in transition. The roles of the
national government and local governments have not been unified, and those vary depending on the
sector policy and prevailing conditions. Annex-F L.1.2.2 illustrates the present functional relationships
among the water related national government agencies and local governments. The illustrated relation
is still progressive as of June 2009, and it is subject to clarification among the agencies concerned.
L-5
L .1.2.3 Institutional Structure by Sector

This section deals with further allocation of the responsibility and authority of the national government
agencies and the local governments focusing on the key water-related sectors and subjects (refer to
Annex-F L.1.2.2).
(1) Water Supply and Sanitation
The delineated roles and responsibilities of the key agencies of water supply sector are
summarized in Annex-T L.1.2.2. Annex-T L.1.2.3 illustrates the institutional structure of
domestic and municipal water supply and sanitation among national government agencies and
local governments.
The NWRB, Metropolitan Water Works and Sewerage System (MWSS), Local Water Utilities
Administration (LWUA) and LGUs are regulatory agencies for water supply. The NWRB
regulates water service providers including some LGU managed water utilities in terms of
water supply tariff and coverage and services. The water supply and sanitation services to
cities and municipalities of Metro Manila are regulated by MWSS. The services are currently
provided by two private concessionaires, Manila Water Company, Inc. (MWCI) and Maynilad
Water Services, Inc. (MWSI).
NEDA Resolution No.4 (series of 1994) allows LGUs to implement all levels of water supply
projects and redefines the role of other sector agencies.
The LWUA regulates urban water supply except the Metro Manila. The Department of
Interior and Local Government (DILG) regulates and implements rural water supply. The
LWUA and the Water Supply and Sanitation Project Management Office (WSSPMO) of DILG,
through their respective funding activities, define and enforce specific quality and
performance standards of service for water districts and LGU-managed systems, respectively.
They also assist water and sanitation service providers through capacity building and technical
assistance.
Services by LWUA initially implemented the Level III water supply projects which were
financially viable. LWUA’s support, in particular, extends beyond technical assistance to
actual improvement in execution of individual water district projects and governance of Water
Districts.
The WSSPMO plays a critical role in the rural water supply sector due to their area
management role in local territories. It participates in general administration and institutional
building, such as assistance to LGUs in the formation of rural and/or barangay water works
and sanitation associations and identification of water supply systems.
The DPWH, together with DILG and DOH provided initially technical assistance to LGUs in
planning, implementation and operation and maintenance of water supply facilities limiting to
the period of two years.
Under the 2004-2010 Medium Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP), the National
Anti-Poverty Commission Water Supply Coordination Office (NAPC-WASCO) was created
as the national coordinating unit for the implementation of the President’s Priority Program of
Water (P3W). This program gives special attention to “waterless” LGUs nationwide.
NEDA resolution No.5 reaffirms the principle of provision of sewerage and sanitation services
on the basis of willingness-to-pay. The resolution mandates the establishment of a Central
project Support Office (CPSO) at LWUA to assist LGUs in the formulation, preparation and
implementation of sewerage and sanitation projects.
EO 279 (February 2004) instituted reforms in the financing policies for the water supply and
sewage sector and water service providers; rationalizing the LWUA’s organizational structure
and transferring it to the office of the President. EO 387 (November 2004) transferred LWUA
from the office of the president to DPWH. EO 421 (April 2005) refocused LWUA’s functions
L-6
and organizational structures as envisaged in EO 279. EO 738 (July 2008) transferred LWUA
from DPWH to DOH.
(2) Irrigation
There are three types of irrigation systems in the Philippines; national, communal and private.
Under the jurisdiction of Department of Agriculture (DA), the functions of National Irrigation
Administration (NIA), created initially by RA 3601-1963, were broadened under Presidential
Decree Nos. 552-1974 and 1702-1980, both amendments to RA-3601. NIA undertakes
program- oriented and comprehensive water resources projects for irrigation purposes as well
as concomitant activities such as flood control, drainage, land reclamation, hydropower
development, watershed management, etc. except private irrigation systems. Communal
irrigation systems were devolved to LGUs based on Irrigation Management Transfer (IMT)
started in 2009 and the LGC-1991. Private irrigation systems are composed of plantations
operated by companies and small private irrigation systems.
In irrigation sector NIA plays a main role of implementation, operation and maintenance of
the nation’s irrigation systems in collaboration with local governments except private
irrigation systems. The IMT is planned to be completed in 5 years under the NIA’s
rationalization plan approved in 2008. The National Irrigation System Offices (NISOs) and
the Provincial Irrigation Offices (PIOs) have been merged within a province or a cluster of 2-4
provinces as the Irrigation Management Offices (IMOs) in order to strengthen financial
viability of National Irrigation Systems (NISs). IMOs are managed by Regional Irrigation
Offices (RIOs) under NIA.
NIA issued several manuals for design, operation and maintenance: for example, Design
Manual for Diversion Dams (1987 under process) , Design Manual for Canals and Canal
Structures (under process), General Operation & Maintenance Manual (Final Report January
1991).
(3) Flood Control
Flood control requires a river basin approach participated with multiple government agencies.
Annex-T L.1.2.4 illustrates the institutional structure of national government agencies in flood
control. The DPWH has played a main role in flood control and oversees its national and
regional projects.
The projects under DPWH have been executed at present based on Department Order No. 24,
Series of 2007, Amended Omnibus Levels of Authorities of Officials of DPWH. The levels of
authorities delegated are 11 groups based on the DPWH project cycle and functions and
services of other offices. Those levels are planning, environment and social aspects, design,
land acquisition and infrastructure right-of-way, procurement, contract management,
infrastructure maintenance, quality control, human resources, financial resources, and
equipment and property (other than real estate).
PMO-Major Flood Control Projects (PMO-MFCP) manages the planning, design,
construction, and operation and maintenance of major flood control projects of the nation.
PMO-MFCP transfers the role of operation and maintenance of river and flood control
facilities of selected river basins to Regional Offices of DPWH such as the Agno-PMO Flood
Control Office after construction. Some provincial governments contribute to a part of
operation and maintenance based on the memorandum between DPWH and the LGU
concerned by arrangement of NEDA depending on the prevailing local conditions.
The Flood Control and Sabo Engineering Center (FCSEC) under DPWH takes charge of
planning of flood control and sabo works.
DPWH issued a series of technical guidelines and standards: for example, Design Guidelines,
Criteria and Standards for Public Works and Highways in 4 volumes (1987 called Red Book),
DPWH Standard Specifications for Public Works Structures (1995), Technical Standards and
Guidelines for Planning and Design (draft March 2002), Manual on Construction Supervision
L-7
of Flood Control Project (December 2004), Manual on Maintenance of Flood Control and
Drainage Structures (April 2005). Upgrading of the Red Book is in process.
(4) Watershed Management
Pursuant to Executive Order No. 192 (10 June 2007), the DENR is the primary government
agency responsible for the conservation, management, development and proper use of the
environment and natural resources, including forests and watershed areas. The Forest
Management Bureau (FMB) under DENR formulates and recommends policies and/or
programs for the effective protection, development, occupancy, management and conservation
of forest lands and watershed.
Annex-T 1.2.5 illustrates the regulatory functions and corresponding responsible national
government agencies and LGUs in watershed and forest management. NIA, NPC, PNOC (the
Philippine National Oil Company) MWSS and the WDs are guided by DENR policies and
collaborate with the latter to protect and preserve the watershed areas in their respective areas
of responsibility. There are inter-agency agreements by and among them to combine their
efforts and resources in maintaining and promoting environmentally sound watershed areas.
Community involvement is also encouraged by enlisting people participation in undertakings
and development projects on watershed areas, and safeguarding them.
On the other hand, the Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) under the
Department of Agriculture (DA) remains responsible for the assessment, development and
preservation of existing and potential soil and water resources for agriculture.
The LGUs also can perform watershed management functions but are subject to supervision
and control of DENR based on the Local Government Code. Province and municipalities
implement the community-based forest management, social forestry, and watershed project,
with discretion of LGU executives.
(5) Water Quality
The Clean Water Act (CWA), RA No. 9275-2004 enacts comprehensive water quality
management in all water bodies and in the control and abatement of pollution from the
land-based sources. The water quality standards and regulations are being enforced
irrespective of sources of pollution. The act provides, among others, that DENR in
coordination with NWRB shall designate certain areas as water quality management areas
using appropriate physiographic units such as watersheds, river basins or water resources
regions. The implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of CWA-2004 was promulgated
pursuant to Section 32 of CWA-2004 and EO 192-1987, DENR Charter.
(6) Large Dam
Most of the large dams were planned and constructed by NPC and NIA. However, no unified
nationwide planning and design standard for dam and its appurtenant structures were
established yet. NPC customarily applied the USBR standards and manuals to dams.
L .1.2.4 Institutional Framework for the Study Area
There are no specific institutional and legal arrangements in the study area with respect to
water-related sector planning and implementation, and IWRM. The legal framework for policy,
planning, approval, implementation of water-related projects, and the regulatory framework of water
resources management are basically same as those applied nationwide except those transferred to the
provincial, city, municipal and barangay governments based on the LGC-1991. The power and
attributes of local government, inter-government relationship, local legislation, organization structure
and staffing, local taxation and fiscal matters, local fiscal administration including budgeting, and
share of local government units in the national wealth are enumerated in the LGC. The local
governments have not initiated yet further specific and/or own arrangements for the management of
water related sector.
L-8
Annex-F L.1.2.3 shows the organization chart of the Government of Province of Pampanga as a
typical organization chart in the study area. The organization under Provincial Governor is composed
of the provincial treasurer office, the provincial engineer’s office, the provincial planning and
development office (PPDO), the provincial budget office, the provincial agriculturist office, the
provincial assessor’s office, the integrated provincial health office, the provincial library and
information office, and the provincial jail. This organizational structure is basically same as those in
other provinces.
The PPDO takes charge of planning of provincial strategic development plan.
L.1.3 Present Framework of Water Resources Management
L .1.3.1 The Constitution and Water Code
(1) The Constitution
The national policy on water, as a natural resource, is enshrined in Section 2, Article XII of
the Philippine Constitution-1987 which, as pertinent, wits:
"All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum and other mineral
oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna,
and other natural resources are owned by the State. The exploration, development, and
utilization of natural resources shall be under the full control and supervision of the
State. In cases of water rights for irrigation, water supply, fisheries, or industrial uses
other than the development of water power, beneficial use may be the measure and
limit of the grant."
(2) The Water Code
(a) Objective
The Water Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 1067-1976) is the basic
water law of the Philippines. It is anchored on the principle that all waters belong to the
State. Proceeding from this premise, these waters are not subject to acquisitive
prescription. The State may allow the use or development of water by administrative
concession, but the utilization, development, conservation and protection of water
resources shall remain within the control of and regulation by government.
In synthesis, the objectives of the Water Code are to:
 Establish the basic principles and structural framework relating to the
appropriation, control, conservation and protection of water resources to achieve
their optimum development and efficient use, to meet present and future needs;
 Define the scope of the rights and obligations of water users and provide for the
protection and regulation of such rights;
 Institute a basic law to govern the ownership, appropriation, utilization,
exploitation, development, conservation and protection of water resources and
rights to land related thereto; and
 Identify the administrative agencies which will enforce the Code.
(b) Definition and state ownership of water
"Water" is expansively defined by the Code. Thus, Article 4 thereof declares that
"Waters, as used in this Code, refers to water under the ground, water above the ground,
water in the atmosphere and the waters of the sea within the territorial jurisdiction of the
Philippines." This definition practically captures the entire segment and categories of
water resources in their natural state or from the perspective of their source. This
fundamental policy was enunciated in the Philippine Constitution, incorporated in the
Civil Code (see succeeding section), and now reiterated in the Water Code. Other
provisions of the Water Code categorically reinforce this stand as can be seen from the
L-9
provisions of Articles 5 and 6 of the Water Code.

Article 5. The following belong to the State:
 Rivers and their natural beds;
 Continuous or intermittent waters of springs and brooks running in their natural
beds and the beds themselves;
 Natural lakes and lagoons;
 All other categories of surface waters such as water flowing over lands, water
from rainfall whether natural or artificial and water from agricultural runoff,
seepage and drainage;
 Atmospheric water;
 Subterranean or ground water; and
 Seawater
Article 6. The following waters found on private lands also belong to the State:
 Continuous or intermittent waters rising on such (private) lands;
 Lakes and lagoons naturally occurring on such lands;
 Rain water falling on such lands;
 Subterranean or ground waters; and
 Waters in swamps and marshes.
The owner of the land where the water is found may use the same for domestic purposes
without securing a permit, provided that such use shall be registered, when required by
NWRB. NWRB, however, may regulate such use when there is wastage or in times of
emergency.
(c) Separation of water from land
The provisions of Article 6 of the Water Code are a departure from the stipulations of
the Civil Code on water. Before their repeal by the Water Code, certain provisions of the
Civil Code, particularly those on ownership of waters (Section 503) recognized private
ownership of certain categories of water (i.e., continuous or intermittent waters rising on
lands of private ownership; lakes and lagoons, and their beds, formed by Nature on such
lands; subterranean waters found on the same; etc.). These laws on the ownership of
waters found in private lands are now expressly abrogated by Article 6 of the Water
Code. Other instances of repeal of Civil Code provisions by the Water Code are treated,
in passing, in succeeding sections.
(d) Appropriation
The appropriation of water which is the acquisition of rights over the use of water or the
taking or diverting of waters from a natural source, is governed by the Water Code.
Provided such use or taking or diversion is accomplished in a legal manner and for a
lawful purpose, the Code allows appropriation of water for any of the following
purposes:
 Domestic - the utilization of water for drinking, washing, bathing, cooking or
other household needs, home gardens, and watering of lawns or domestic animals;
 Municipal - the utilization of water for supplying the water requirements of the
community;
 Irrigation - the utilization of water for producing agricultural crops;
L-10
 Power generation - the utilization of water for producing electrical or mechanical

power;
 Fisheries - the utilization of water for the propagation and culture of fish as a
commercial enterprise;
 Livestock raising - the utilization of water for large herds or locks of animals
raised as a commercial enterprise;
 Industrial - the utilization of water in factories, industrial plants and mines,
including the use of water as an ingredient of a finished product;
 Recreational - the utilization of water for swimming pools, bath house, boating,
water skiing, golf courses and other similar facilities in resorts and other places of
recreation. (Art. 10, Water Code)
(e) Water rights and permit
Under the Water Code, no person shall appropriate water without a water right. A water
right is acquired with the issuance of a water permit which is the evidence of the water
right granted. The following may apply for a water permit:
 Citizens of the Philippines who are of legal age;
 Associations, duly registered cooperatives or corporations organized under the
laws of the Philippines, at least 60% of the capital of which is owned by citizens
of the Philippines; and
 Government entities and instrumentalities including government-owned or
controlled corporations.
 The measure and limit of appropriation of water is its beneficial use. Beneficial
use as defined in the Code is the utilization of water in the right amount during the
period that water is needed for producing the benefits for which the water is
appropriated. Standards of beneficial use are prescribed by NWRB to the
appropriators of water for different purposes and conditions.
(f) Revision
The National Water Resources Board (NWRB; former NWRC) promulgated the
Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR-1979) of the Water Codes (PD No.
1067-1976) as a guideline. Revision of the IRR-1979 in accordance with EO 123-2002
was approved and implemented in 2005.
The revision of the Water Code -1976 has been initiated for the meetings with the head
of offices and stakeholders. The progress and the content of the draft have not been
disclosed yet to the public.
L .1.3.2 Regulation of Water Resources Allocation
(1) NWRB as Apex Regulatory Body
The overall responsibility for coordination of water resources development and management
is vested in the National Water Resources Board (NWRB) which was initially created as
National Water Resources Council (NWRC) by Presidential Decree No. 424-1974. Its basic
mandate is to administer and enforce the Water Code. NWRC was converted to NWRB by
Executive Order No. 124-A-1987.
The jurisdictional powers, functions and duties of NWRB include: (a) to formulate policies
and guidelines on water resources development and management; (b) to effect cross-sectoral
and inter-departmental coordination of water resources development activities; (c) to grant or
issue water permits and certificates of public convenience/and necessity; (d) to advise NEDA
L-11
on matters relating to water resources development plans, programs and projects, and (e) to
exercise jurisdiction over disputes concerning water allocation and utilization.
The NWRB is a manifestly a collegial and quasi-judicial body. Its governing board is
composed of five cabinet departments (DENR, NEDA, DOF, DOJ, DOH) and a water agency,
NHRC. Three cabinet departments, DPWH, DA and DTI involved in water users and four
water agencies, LWUA, MWSS, NIA, NPC were excluded from the board members after
Executive Order No. 123-2002. The Chairman of the board is the Secretary of DENR at
present.
(2) Water Permit Procedure
NWRB’s procedure for processing and approval of water permit application is illustrated in
Annex-F L.1.3.1. Procedure Item No.9 Technical Appraisal and Clearance from other agencies
are done by deputized agencies in practice: for example, NIA for agriculture and fisheries,
NPC for hydropower, LGUs and MWSS for municipal water. Issue of permit to drill for
groundwater (Procedure Items No. 11-13) requires much manpower in urban and rural areas.
Procedure No. 6 Hearing Adjudication/Decision and Procedure No. 14 Technical Evaluation
also require much manpower of the Board.
The NWMB has a plan to empower deputizing any official or agency of the government to
perform any of its specific functions or activities in order to resolve its chronic shortage of
manpower. In particular it was sought to achieve the regular submission of an accomplishment
report to monitor performance related to water permits in remote areas from the office of
NWRB in Manila. Memorandum of Agreement were signed in 2004 between NWRB and
the three municipalities based on Resolution No.008-1003, Deputizing the Three
Municipalities of Sta. Fe, Bantayan and Madridejos in Batanyan Island, Cebu, October 23,
2003. The task of the deputy stipulated in the agreement covers:
 Receive water permit application (WPA);
 Verify details on application and compliance with requirements;
 Receive filing fees;
 Ensure the postings of WPAs at designated posting areas;
 Conduct field investigations/site inspections;
 Submit recommendations on the WPA to the Board;
 Deliver Permit to Drill (PTD) to applicant issued by the Board;
 Receive well data after the well has been drilled;
 Verify that water permittees comply with the conditions imposed in the water permit;
 Monitor drilling of wells and other water resources development activities in the area
consistent with the positions of the Water Code of the Philippines;
 Collect well data;
 Perform such other similar functions relative to the processing of WPAs.
(3) Levy Related to Water Permits
(a) Fees and Charges
The NWRB is responsible to collect the levy (water fees and charges) related to the
water permit as stipulated in the Water code.
Pursuant to Executive Order No. 1973 series of 2000 and per NWRB Resolution No.
010-0305 dated 21 March 2005, NWRB on its 29th Meeting approved the
application/filing fees and annual water charges as shown in Annex-T L.1.3.1.
L-12
(b) Responsibility of Concessionaires

The National Power Corporation (NPC) was exempted from the annual water charge
(item B) due to its non-profit character based on Presidential Decree No. 938 (May
1976)2). However, after issue of the NWRB Resolution-1998 all the parties granted
water permit (concession) must pay the annual water charges regardless of private or
public entity. The NPC still does not pay in spite of the opinion of Department of Justice
(DOJ) that NPC must pay. National Irrigation Authority (NIA) also had not paid the
annual water charges without legal exemption though the charge to irrigation use is less
than a half of other uses. The filling fee can be exempted.
Irrigators associations who rely on the irrigation system of NIA are responsible to pay
the irrigation service fee (ISF) to NIA. NIA is responsible to pay the annual water
charges for the system’s granted water permit (concession).
Irrigators who operate own irrigation systems are also responsible to pay the annual
water charges for their granted water permit.
(c) Collection Rate of Annual Water Charges
The water utility division of NWRB sends the annual water charge bills to the
concessionaries. The Chares paid to NWRB are remitted to Bureau of Treasury under
Department of Finance (DOF), and those are treated as the national funds. Manila Water
Company Inc. and Manilad Water Service Inc. of MWSS paid the annual water charges
in 2007.
Many water users do not pay the annual water charge after granting of respective water
permits. The water utility division of NWRB has a capacity of billing to only 30 – 40 %
of the concessionaires due to limited staff capacity. Out of the entities billed about 80 –
85 % pay the charge at present.
Out of the number of entities not billed (60 – 70% of the concessionaries) 20% is NIA,
10% is NPC and 70% is Water Districts. There are four types of irrigation water users:
individual farmers using shallow wells, irrigators associations for communal irrigation,
NIA for government irrigation systems, and corporations mainly plantations. It is
technically difficult to capture the individual farmers because many individual farmers
abandoned their farms due to dry out of shallow wells. Majority of the irrigators
associations paid the charge, but exact number of the irrigators associations is not
captured at present because collapsed associations were not captured. NIA intentionally
does not pay the charge. Some of the large corporations do not pay too. Those entities
which do not pay are subject to review and inspection because many irrigation lands
were converted to sub-division lots (household residential areas) in particular in Bulacan
and Dampang. Review and inspection surveys were not conducted yet due to shortage of
the manpower of NWRB.
L .1.3.3 Water Use Regulation during Draught
(1) Technical Working Group
The NWRB executes appropriate water use regulation during draught case by case. For
example the technical working group (TWG), established in 1960s for the water allocation of
the Angat dam, currently holds monthly regular meeting under secretariat of NWRB. The
Angat multipurpose dam (hydropower, irrigation, municipal water supply to Manila, etc.) is
located at Angat River, the tributary of Pampanga River in the province of Bulacan. The TWG
regular meeting for the Angat dam is functioning as a kind of draught regulation committee.
(2) A Case of Litigation for Water Right Allocation
During the severe draught in September 1997 caused by El. Nino the majority of the water of
Angat Dam allocated to NIA by the water permit, of which water users are irrigators
associations, was transferred to MWSS based on the fist priority to the domestic and
L-13
municipal use as stipulated in Article 95 of the Water Code. Farmers (irrigators association)
did not claim the compensation for the water rights following the regulation by the secretary
of NIA. Majority of farmers had not paid the irrigation service fee fully for long time. Farmers
had to pay the irrigation service fee if they claim the compensation. On the other hand, the
provincial government of Bulacan litigated against MWSS. The Regional Trial Court
determined that Manila Water Supply System (MWSS) shall pay the royalty (1% of the gross
sales) to the province of Bulacan based on Section 13 of the Local Government Code-1991.
The resolution has not been finalized yet. MWSS plans to appeal to the Court of Appeal if the
resolution is finalized.
This case suggests that the position of the irrigators association in terms of water rights is
weak and unstable under the present Water Code. The purpose of the annual water charges
based on water permit and the purpose of the royalty of water based on the Local Government
Code 1991 are different, thus those will be subject to review.
L .1.3.4 Water Resources Planning and Assessment
(1) Water Resources Planning and IWRM
The NWRB is tasked with collating, coordinating and updating the framework plans for water
resources and for NEDA to integrate the plans for water resources development and
management into national strategies and policies. In 1994, NWRB produced an updated
National Framework Plan on Water Resources Management that incorporated Regional
framework Studies. The NWRB also recommends to NEDA suitable action plans to address
emerging issues in the water resources sector as they evolve.
On the other hand, the NEDA Board, which is chaired by the President of the Philippines,
formulates national policies and strategies including those on the water resources sector. The
NEDA has been the leading agency in preparing the Medium Term Philippine Development
Plan (MTPDP) and the Medium Term Public Investment Plan (MTPIP). Both planning
documents incorporate water resources sector plans at the national and regional levels. There
are also coordinating committees established to align development of water resources with the
national strategies and fiscal direction of the government. The role of NWRB in this segment
of water resources management is confined to updating policies on water resources and
integrating various sub-sector policies, strategies and plans on water resources.
The NWRB does not have the authority to determine the priority of the projects for
implementation of a specific river basin water resources master plan. Neither a national
government agency nor a local government has authority to determine and implement such an
IWRM Master Plan which involved in multiple provinces and multiple water sectors in a river
basin.
For planning and implementation of an IWRM Basin Master Plan which involved in multiple
regions and sectors, cross-coordination of the Regional Development Council (RDC) and the
Infrastructure Committee (INFRACOM) may be necessary for provincial governments and
national agencies respectively.
The RDC regulates and approves inter-provincial projects and government loan projects under
the secretariat by NEDA. The function of INFRACOM, chaired by the Director General of
NEDA Secretariat, is to advise the President and the NEDA Board on matters concerning
infrastructure development, including highways, airports, seaports and shore protection,
railways, power generation, transmission and distribution, tele-communication, irrigation,
flood control and drainage, water supply and sanitation, national buildings for government
offices, hospitals and related buildings, state colleges and universities, elementary and
secondary school buildings, and other public works.
(2) Water Resources Assessment
Assessment of water resources is a collaborative effort by several agencies of government.
The Bureau of Research and Standards (BRS), the National Irrigation Administration (NIA)
L-14
and the National Power Corporation (NPC) are the three agencies that are primarily
responsible for the collection of stream flow data.
In 1974, NWRB assumed the responsibility of accumulating and processing data on river
stages and discharges. In 1987, the functions of NWRB were realigned and the maintenance
of the national network of stream flow data was transferred to BRS. The actual collection and
processing of the stream flow data in the field are under the direct control and supervision of
the regional offices of DPWH. There are about 274 monitoring stations nationwide which
daily register river stages. The information and data collected from these stations are
submitted to the DPWH regional offices where they are fed and processed through the BRS
developed computerized data processing system. It is reported that BRS does not have
sufficient capacity to continue recoding and processing of stream flow as of September 2010.
It is noted that the regional offices are primarily project-oriented and are the implementing
arms of the department. Water data collection is not an inherent mandate of the office.
The NIA and NPC are also involved in generating stream flow data mainly for the purpose
required by their respective projects. Data collection activities by these agencies are normally
confined to monitoring stations surrounding their project sites. Information gathered by these
agencies are processed but are hardly published. Collectively, these agencies maintain about
168 stream flow stations which monitor river stages and discharges. It is necessary that the
data gathered by these agencies are included in the information network for stream flow data
to be useful.
L .1.3.5 Strengthening of NWRB and Water Code by EO 123
(1) Progress of EO 123
The NWRB is composed of five divisions with 126 positions under the Office of Executive
Director (OED): namely, policy and program division, water right division, water utilities
division, monitoring and enforcement division, and administrative and financial division. Its
organization chart is shown in Annex-F L.1.3.2. The total staff number is only 103 including 8
of the OED as of June 2009 for the 126 positions. It is reported that shortage of present
manpower is serious to execute its mandate.
The NWRB was attached to President Office at the end of 2009. EO 123 aims to strengthen
NWRB, to attach NWRB to DENR and transferred the review and approval of the tariff of
Water Districts to NWRB from the Local Water Utility Administration (LWUA). Under EO
123 the NWRB is required to execute the three tasks:
(a) Review of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Water Codes and amend
the same,
(b) Formulate a new or revised organization structure for its secretariat to effectively and
efficiently carry out its mandate under PD 424 (1974) and PD 1067 (1976),
(c) After approval of the new or revised organization and manpower structure of NWRB
secretariat by the president, NWRB shall then be transferred to DENR as a bureau for
purpose of administrative control and supervision.
The first task was approved and implemented in 2005. For the second task NWRB proposed,
to DBM for its approval in 2008, a new organization which provides three services with 182
positions: namely, policy, coordination and integration service, economic regulatory service,
and resource regulation service. The new organization structure is shown in Annex-F L.1.3.3.
It was prepared based on the logical framework for NWRB3) illustrated in Annex-F L.1.3.4.
The mandate of NWRB stipulated in the Organizational Performance Indicator Framework
(2008) is “NWRB coordinates and regulates all water resources development and
management of the country. It is responsible for achieving a scientific and orderly
development of all water resources consistent with the principles of optimum utilization,
conservation, and protection to meet present and future needs”.
L-15
After NWRB was transferred from President Office to DENR based on Executive Order No.
860 on 8 February 2010, NWRB reviewed the proposed organization structure of 2008, and
drafted amendment as shown in Annex-F.1.3.5 where the legal and adjudication office is
extended to Service and the number of position is increased from 182 to 196. Section 4 of E.
O. No. 860 wits, “the NWRB shall desist from regulating the water tariffs of Water Districts,
which shall hereinafter be undertaken by the Local Water Utilities Administration in
accordance with Presidential Decree No. 198 as amended by Executive Order 124-A, series of
1987”.
(2) Past Legislative Reform Initiatives
(a) Initiative by DENR with UNDP
In 1996 President Ramos created the Presidential Task Force on Water Resources
Management and Development (PTFWRDM) under DENR, assisted by the United
Nations Development Program (UNDP), to develop a comprehensive water resources
management strategy as well as to prepare a draft bill on water resources to respond to
the Water Crisis Act in 1995. In August 1997, the PTFWRDM drew up a legislative
proposal to create a new apex body to take charge of water resources management and
economic regulation of all utilities within the country. The proposal sought to create the
Water Resources Authority of the Philippines (WRAP) as a new entity to take over the
functions, powers and responsibilities of NWRB, in addition to new and broad powers
and functions. The bill was pended and adjourned during the 10th Congress
(1995-1989), and re-filed during the 12th Congress (2001-2004) and 13th Congress
(2004-2007), but it never leaded to the committee hearing stage. The task force was
disbanded in 2002. A new WARP bill, as Senate Bill No. 799 was filed with the Public
service committee of the Senate during the 14th Congress (2007-2010).
(b) Initiative by NEDA with IBRD
A policy report made by NEDA for International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD) in 1996 recommended that economic regulation (regulation of
water service providers) be separated from resource management (regulation of water
utilization including issue of water permit and enforcement of laws) and proposed the
creation of a Water Regulatory Commission (WRC) as an independent economic
regulatory body. The WRC proposal was originally initiated in 1997 by DPWH as an
offshoot of the MWSS privatization. The farmers envisaged that water resources
regulation would still remain with NWRB while the WRC would devote itself to purely
economic regulation. The WRC draft bill completed in July 2001 was filed in the Senate
as Senate Bill No. 1227 during the 12th Congress (2001-2004) but it never reached the
Committee hearing stage. In the 14th Congress (2007-2010) Senate Bill No. 519 which
proposed to create the WRC was referred to two Senate committees where it remained
pending.
(c) Conflict of Two Bills (WRAP and WRC)
Both bills for the WRAP (by DENR) and WRC (by NEDA) intended to strengthen the
country’s economic regulatory framework but the underlying principles are divergent.
While the WRC separates the resources regulatory functions from economic regulation,
the WRAP proposes to create an apex body incorporating both functions. Both bills
drafted at almost the same period by two different executive departments were funded
by two different donor agencies.
There was not enough consultation done with the different stakeholders regarding the
two bills. Many stakeholders were very worry about the powers vested in the WRAP
and raised their objections with some resorting to lobbying against the bill with their
Congress allies. The WRC bill appeared later also failed to get active support from the
stakeholders including the main sector players, i.e. NWRB, LWUA, DILG, Philippine
Association of Water Districts (PAWD) and LGUs without enough consultation.
L-16
During the 14th Congress these two conflicting bills, WRAP and WRC have been filed.
To move forward these bills the major stakeholders in the sector must agree on the end
result.
(3) Recommendation by NEDA
The NEDA, the NWRB and the GTZ jointly recommended a regulatory reform of the water
supply sector in the Philippines in November 20084). The theme of the recommendations is
summarized below.
(a) The NWRB shall continue to exist purely as a resource management regulatory agency
after the time when WRC is formed. During the interim period or prior to creation of
WRC, it shall continue to function as a resource and economic regulator and shall be
strengthened to be able to improve the both functions. NWRB shall also start discussions
with other economic regulators to harmonize functions and start the deputization process.
(b) The LWUA should continue to function as a specialized funding agency and a provider
of technical and management assistance to all types of water utilities. All WDs with the
Conditional Certificates of Conformance (CCC) should automatically be granted an
operating license by WRC.
(c) A special law creating WRC should be enacted by the government purely for economic
regulation of the sector. All types of water utilities should be under the ambit of WRC
except those created under special laws.
L .1.3.6 Present Status of IWRM and River Basin Organization
(1) IWRM as National Policy
The Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP) 2004-2010 adopted the Integrated
Water Resources Management (IWRM) through the river basin approach as the general
strategy for water resources management. In this regard, the creation of river basin
organizations or any appropriate authorities was identified as a specific strategy to manage
water resources. It envisages that water resources management is a society’s responsibility,
sharing and transparent and fully integrated planning of the whole stretch of the river system
considering all upstream and downstream users.
(2) Current Situation of RBO
In the Philippines River Basin Organizations (RBO) were established as authority, council,
commission or board in the past for four river basins: namely, Laguna Lake Development
Authority (LLDA) in 1969, the Bicol River Basin Council in 1973, the Agno River Basin
Development Commission, and Bohol Integrated Water Resources Management Board
(BIWRMB) in 2007. A non-governmental multi-sectoral body, PCEEM Davao Foundation
Inc. is also functioning to assist protection and/or rehabilitation of watersheds and water
quality management of the Talomo-Lipadas Watersheds (TLWs) since 2002. There is a
movement to establish Agusan River Basin Authority, Cagayan River Basin Authority and
several river basin development authorities drafted as House Bills in 2009.
There is no official river basin organization for Pampanga river basin at present. The Upper
Pampanga River Basin (UPRB) Coordination Council was established by Province of Nueva
Ecija collaborated with the Central Luzon State University, NIA and others in 2002, but there
is no official report of activities in NEDA Region III. The present status of activities of the
RBOs is summarized in Table L.1.3.1.
L-17
Table L. 1.3.1 Existing and Planned River Basin Management Organizations

River Basin Presence of River Basin Authority/Council/Commission/RBO
Pasig-Laguna Lake  Laguna Lake Development Authority (RA No. 4850-1969), Presidential Decree
River Basin (2,520 km2) No. 813, 1975, LLDA under DENR
Bicol River Basin  Bicol River Basin Council (EO No. 412-1973)
(3,771 km2)  Bicol River Basin PMO (EO No. 359-2004)
 Bicol River Basin and Watershed Management Project, Phase II, World Bank,
planned
Agno River Basin  The existed Agno River Basin Development Commission was abolished, but
(5,952 km2) movement to reactivate to create Agno River Basin Development Authority, draft
House Bill Nos. 2379, 2498
Bohol Province  Bohol IWRM Board (Executive Order No.10, 2007, Province), to materialize
(island of 4,177 km2) Bohol Environment Code of 1998
Agusan River Basin  Agusan River Basin Authority, proposed with a draft bill in Master Plan for the
(10,921 km2) Agusan River Basin Project, Final Report, 2007
Cagayan River Basin  Cagayan River Basin PMO (EO No.474-2008)
(25,469 km2)  Draft House Bill No.5090 creating Cagayan River Basin Authority
Pampanga River Basin  UPRB Coordination Council established in 2002 but no activities
(10,434 km2)  PRCS-PMO (Project Flood Control Cluster 2) of DPWH Region III for flood
control exists
 Integrated Water and Soil Resources Management (IWSRM) proposed by
NEDA-Region III
(3) RBCO
DENR envisaged to be the primary government agency which responsible for the
conservation, management, development and proper use of the country’s environment and
natural resources, including those in reservations, watershed areas and lands of the public
domain, as well as the licensing and regulation of all natural resources utilization as may be
provided by law. The RBCO intended to orchestrate and provide the overall direction and
technical assistance in the implementation of policies, plans and programs for the protection,
conservation, management and wise use of the country’s river basins. It shall ensure effective
and efficient improvement of all mandates and provision of EO 510.
The DENR, River Basin Control Office (RBCO) proposed to establish National River Basin
Commission (NRBC) chaired by the DENR secretary which is to be supported by RBCO,
Water Resources Management Bureau (a line bureau), River Basin Organization (RBO),
DENR-RENRO (Regional Environmental and Natural Resources office), etc. in March 20075),
(Refer to the proposed organizational set up6)). Under this proposal the RBO was composed of
River Basin Field Management Office (RBFMO) and River Basin Council (RBC). The
NWRB was proposed to be reorganized into the Water Resources Management Bureau
(WRMB) mainly tasked to administer regulatory functions on water resources use, rights,
granting of water permits, imposition of penalties for administrative violations and other water
related regulations relative to the principle of integrated and ecosystem-based water resources
management approach. It also tasks to implement water regulations and monitor compliance
to the regulations. In order to materialize this proposal RBCO of DENR intended to introduce
a concept of river basin management under the River Law of Japan in line with the
amendments of the Water Codes. This proposal was canceled in 2009.
Since February 2010 the NWRB has been attached to DENR and RBCO is scheduled to be
merged with the River Basin Development Division of NWRB as proposed in the organization
structure (refer to Section L.1.3.5(1), Annex-F L.1.3.3 and Annex-F L.1.3.5) based on the
Rationalization Plan submitted to DBM for approval.
L-18
(4) Proposed House Bills Creating River Basin Authority

Five House Bills were drafted for creating River Basin Authorities infringing the concept of
managing the whole stretch of the river system. The House Bill Nos. 927 (An Act creating the
Ifugao-Isaberla River Basin Authority), 1299 (the Zamboanga River Development Authority),
1338 (the Iloilo and Muelle Loney Development Authority), 1810 (Each City or Municipality
to create a River Basin Development Authority), 3199 (Each City or Municipality to create a
River Basin Development Authority) cover only cities and tributaries of the major river basins.
The House Bill No. 5090 creating the Cagayan River Basin Authority (CAVARIA) is
consistent with the MTPDP.
L-19
L.2 Problems and Issues on IWRM Institution

L.2.1 Mission of IWRM
L .2.1.1 Issues
The intended function of IWRM of the RBOs in the Philippines tends to be very broad. The IWRM
mission targeted by some RBOs, such as Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA),
Ifugao-Isabela River Basin Development Authority (House Bill), etc. is an integrated management of
all sector projects exceeding the frame of water-related sectors. There seems to be no such case in
the other countries. What should be the IWRM envisaged for the target year 2025 in Pampanga river
basin?
L .2.1.2 Historical Background of IWRM
A concept of river basin management was established by the Tennessee Valley Authority in the USA in
the 1930th. In the Lake Conference Sussex in 1949 the term, comprehensive river basin
developments was identified first. An initial international activity for IWRM was the
recommendation of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) in 1971 to ECE
Governments concerning River Basin Management7). Stockholm Declaration on Human
Environment of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in 1972 recommended an
integrated approach to water resources management8). The International Water Law Association
(Association Internationale De Droit Des Eaux) clarified legally the IWRM concept in Caracas
Conference 1976. The principles of the Dublin statement on Water and Sustainable Development
(1992)9) inspired the Rio declaration in 1992. Global Water Partnership (GWP) was established in
1996 to clarify the principles for water resources management.
What is the difference of the two terms; comprehensive management and integrated management?
Both comprehensive management and integrated management consider five perspectives; function,
geography, administration, hydrology and ecology, and interdisciplinary10). Hydrology and ecology
is part of function but it is assumed independent from the specific aspect of environmental
conservation. Difference between the two terms, ‘comprehensive’ and ‘integrated’ will be originated
from firstly, to which extent related perspectives are well taken into consideration for the subject water
issues. Secondly to which extent administrative power and mandates of concerned implementing
organizations are clearly defined and well allocated to achieve the specific goal of IWRM11).
Though the concept of IWRM has been acknowledged internationally it has not been institutionally
materialized yet in most countries including USA (depending on State), United Kingdom, Japan, etc.
L .2.1.3 Mission of IWRM
The mission of IWRM adopted in Agenda 21 (Chapter 18) aimed mainly to manage the whole water
environment by a river basin unit, and to develop relevant water codes and concerned administrative
organizations. The IWRM mission has been expanded gradually toward three different aspects. The
first essential mission that is applied in arid and semi-arid countries aims to manage the key
inter-active water elements; surface water and groundwater for water use, and water quantity and
water quality. Its key management elements were i) securing safe water supply to various uses and
ii) securing water quality for sanitation and ecology (effluent control and waste water treatment).
The second, a broader mission aims to integrate the three key inter-active elements; water, land and
environments including securing safety against flood (flood control). Its key management elements
cover flood control, soil erosion, compound pollution, preservation of watersheds and habitats, and
irrigation and drainage issues in addition to ones in the first mission. The third, an extreme broad
mission aims to integrate water and social and economic developments which form a broad aspect of
sustainable development in long-term. Its key management elements expand from the water related
development and environment to all kind of development activities by integrating infrastructure plans,
land use plans and urban development plans.
The second mission that covers the three attributes; water use, flood control and water environment
L-20
illustrate in Figure L.2.1.1 has been widely acknowledged both in the OECD countries and the
developing countries, but the third broadest mission is still in conceptual level. The third mission
crates a new layer of authority which is confronted with the reality of the existing mandates of line
agencies that reflected historical background of the politics and socioeconomic structure of the country
concerned. Creation of a new layer of authority is subject to discussion in Pampanga river basin.
The IWRM concept at any level is made functional provided with an essential support system of
monitoring system and database system for scientific and equitable coordination and management.
Concept of IWRM
Securing safe and
reliable water supply
Water Use
Flood Water
Control Environment
Securing safety Securing
against flood water quality

Figure L. 2.1.1 Mission of Water Resources Management
L.2.2 Functions of RBOs

L .2.2.1 Issues
The National Water Resources Board (NWRB) recommended that a river basin organization should be
organized in line with the preparation of the Study. Both the NWRB and JICA agreed that the
creation of the river basin organization will be the best interest of the Study12). The NWRB envisages
that the creation of the RBO would materialize IWRM by a river basin unit and positive effect to
reinforce water resources management including water rights would be gained. On the other hand the
IWRM Plan concept was accepted as part of the Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan
(2004-2010) during the Central Luzon Water Summit, but creation of RBO or other organizational
structure is not part of NEDA Region III plan because the existing Regional Development Council
(RDC) is functioning well at present. The NEDA Region III respects the present mandates of the
national and regional line agencies and local governments keeping basically unchanged.
Strengthening of the existing institution and organizations is recommended without creating a new
layer of authority. The NEDA Region III have apprehension that creation of a RBO would create a
new layer of authority which overlaps with the authority of the RDC to coordinate implementation of
the projects concerned with multiple provinces and sectors.
This Section analyzes the present RBOs in the Philippines presented in Section L.1.3.6 by classifying
RBOs in terms of dimensions of their functions or authority, and by comparing with cases in other
countries, and reviews the direction of appropriate RBO functions of Pampanga River.
L .2.2.2 Type of RBOs
The RBOs presented in Section L.1.3.6 are classified into five types in terms of dimensions of the
functions or authority of RBOs as shown in Table L.2.2.1. Type 1 has the broadest and strongest
functions while Type 5 has narrow functions.
L-21
Table L. 2.2.1 Type of RBOs

Functions/Authority in the River basin Type 1 2 3 4 5
To make policy, plan, coordinate, implement all projects concerned ○
To make policy, plan, coordinate, implement river-related projects together with River ○
Basin Management Office
To regulate and monitor water rights ○ ○ ○ ○
To prepare water resources development plan for the basin’s water rights ○
To advocate IWRM and monitor water and watershed environment ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
To operate and maintain river and hydraulic structures ○ ○ ○
○: Function included.
The existing, planned and studied RBOs in the Philippines and two practices in Australia and Japan
are classified based on the corresponding functions in Table L.2.2.2.
Table L. 2.2.2 Type of River Basin Organization in Philippines and Other Countries
Case of Philippines Case of Other
Type
Existing Studied/Planned Counties
1.Statutory body for integrated area Ifugao-Isabela River
development and management of all LLDA(1966/ amended 1975) Basin Development
infrastructures Authority(House Bill)
Bicol River Basin Council
2.Statutary body for policy making,
(1973), Implementation by
planning, coordinating all inter-
Bicol River Basin Management
agency activities
Office EO No. 359 (2004)
3.Statutory coordination body for
Bohol IWRM Board (2008), Agusan River Basin
advocating IWRM and monitoring
PCEEM-Davao Inc. (2002) Authority
watershed environment
4.National agency for water Murray-Darling
resources management for the Basin Authority,
specified basin Australia (2008)
5.National agency for construction
Japan Water Agency
and O&M of the facilities in the
(2003)
specified basin
The Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) classified as Type-1 RBO, but it is a body for an
integrated area development. LLDA has extremely broad and powerful functions in particular
planning and regulating all kind of infrastructures not limiting to advocating water resources and
environmental management. Functions of Type-2 are broad and similar to Type-1 though its main
services are focused on water-related projects in a river basin or a tributary of a river basin. The Bohol
IWRM Board classified as Type-3 is a statutory coordination body for advocating IWRM and
monitoring watershed environment. Its functions are limited to mainly management of watershed
environment and water quality. Pceen-Davao Foundation Inc. classified as Type-3 is a NGO for
multi-sector collaboration through net working ad collaboration of local stakeholders. The Agusan
River Basin Authority (ARBA) aims to integrate comprehensive land use and water use plan, and also
to integrate the ARB Master Plan into the local government code, but its functions are limited to
coordination.
L .2.2.3 Functions of RBOs in Philippines and Other Countries
Type-1 and Type-2 RBOs in the Philippines are basically different from those have been operated in
the advanced countries in particular Australia and Japan. Type-1 and Type-2 will create a new layer
of authority due to their broad functions which overlaps the functions of RDCs or NEDA Regional
offices or other line agencies. Type-3, Type-4 and Type-5 do not create overlapping authority with
the line agencies in principle. The key functions of the five RBOs in the Philippines and two RBOs
in Australia and Japan are compared with in Table L.2.2.3.
L-22
The water rights administration has been linked with the basic plan for water resources development in
Type-4 and Type-5 (Refer to Annex-F L.2.2.1 and L.2.2.2). There is no such legal arrangement in the
Philippines. For example, the Basic Plan for Water Resources Development, which is linked with
water rights of a river basin, is under the mandates of the national river administrator, Minister of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan. The NWRB explains that the micro and macro
framework of water rights is not delineated well by a river basin unit in the Philippines. The micro
framework of water rights is a management framework to issue respective water permits (water rights),
while the macro framework is a management framework to regulate water rights allocation and
conflicts in a region from a part of the basin to the whole basin between more than two water rights
based on the water resources policy. Allocation of the function of operation and management of the
river and hydraulic structures is not well defined between the national government and local
governments in the Philippines, and this underlines a basic difference of the functions of RBOs.
The Murray-Daring Basin Authority (MDBA) - Type-4 was transferred to a national agency for water
resources management in 2009. Its mission is noted to aim at the most advanced water resources
management. Its functions are limited to manage the river basin’s water resources including
water-related environment and the river basin water resources development plan. Reallocation of
water rights is facilitated through water rights trading to achieve reasonable, efficient and equitable
allocation of water rights among water users. Japan Water Agency (JWA) – Type-5 is a national
agency for IWRM, but its functions are limited to only construction and operation and maintenance of
the river facilities within the specified river basins. For both Type-4 and Type-5 operation and
management of the river and hydraulic structures is a key basic function.
Table L. 2.2.3 (1/2) Key Functions of Typical Existing and Proposed River Basin Organization
Type Name Key Functions
1 Laguna Lake  Survey, planning, management and technical assistance
Development  Approve or disapprove all plans, programs and projects proposed by local governments
Authority (Republic within the region
Act No. 4850, 1966)  Develop water supply for various purposes
 Plan, finance and undertake all infrastructure projects in the area
 Issue a water use permit and a discharge permit, and collect fees for use of water and
discharges and environmental user fee
 Regulating, monitoring and O&M activities
 Require the cities and municipalities to pass zoning ordinances and regulatory measures
 Act coordination with existing government agencies in establishing water quality standards
1 Inugao-Isabela River  Prepare, review, evaluate River Basins Comprehensive Master Plan in the interest of
Basin Development Regional Development Plans and other areas and sectoral plans as basis for proposing
Authority (House improvements in existing policies governing the protection, preservation, management and
Bill, 2009) development of resources within the basin
 Spearhead the coordination of inter-agency activities within its jurisdiction in
implementation
2 Bicol River Basin  Review and pass upon the programming and allocation of funds of agencies for all projects
Council (EO No.  Integrate and coordinate with implementing agencies of the government all plans and
412, May 1973) programs affecting the Bicol River Basin
 Call on any department, bureaus, office, etc. of the government for assistance as required
 Do all such other things and to transact all such business as necessary
3 UPRB Coordinating  Orchestrating planning, implementing and evaluating of an integrated water resources
Council (2002) management program
 Serve as a policy making body and a clearing house of ideas as far as planning and
implementing programs and activities
 Develop plans and programs in order to address the problems identified in the diagnostic
study: rational utilization of water, establishment of a database, monitoring and evaluating
of surface and groundwater quality, and watersheds.
L-23
Table L.2.2.3 (2/2) Key Functions of Typical Existing and Proposed River Basin Organization
Type Name Key Functions
3 Bohol IWRM Board  Establish environmental indicators related to water resources to monitor and report
(EO No. 10, 2007)  Propose and implement policies and action plans related to IWRM
 Advocate for IWRM operational localization
 Harmonize the development, management, control, and regulation of land use and monitor
the implementation of laws and regulations
 Execute water permit application (WPA), monitor, compliance activities
3 Pceen-Davao  Assist government and civil society by: empowering communities; providing technical and
Foundation Inc. monitoring assistance; establishing, information; building capabilities and generating
(NGO 2002) financial and other resources
 Undertake technical and policy studies; provide venue for conflict resolution; undertake
community-based resource management projects; facilitate tours; document and share
traditional knowledge on natural resource management
4 Murray-Daring  Preparing the Basin Plan and future amendments
Basin Authority,  Implementing and enforcing the Basin Plan
Australia (2008)  Advising the minister on the accreditation of state water resource plans
 Developing a water rights information service which facilitates water trading
 Gathering information, monitoring and undertaking research
 Construction, operation and maintenance of the river assets
 Natural resource management programs
5 Japan Water Agency  Construction, reconstruction and operation of structures related to power generation
(2003)  Studies, surveys, tests and researches for water resources development
L.2.3 Gap Analysis and Strategic Issues

L .2.3.1 Gap Analysis
(1) Objective
The objective (goal) of the institutional and organizational arrangements is to materialize the
IWRM Plan in Pampanga river basin in practice. The gaps between the objective and the
prevailing problems and needs have been analyzed. Then the strategic issues have been
identified and defined to fulfill the gaps and to achieve the objective through the top-down
and bottom-up approaches. Appropriate actions are studied as alternative countermeasures
for the strategic issues. Four sustainable outcomes and nine strategic themes delineated in
the National IWRM Plan Framework (November 2006) have been also referred to define the
strategic issues.
National & Prevailing
Regional Policy Gap Problems and
Objective (Goal) Needs at Site
Top‐down Bottom‐up
Approach Approach
Steering Committee Definition of Stakeholder

Technical Working Strategic Issues Participation
Group
Actions as
Countermeasures
Figure L. 2.3.1 Approach for Defining Strategic Issues
L-24
(2) Key IWRM Functions and Strategic Issues

Eleven strategic issues have been defined for five key IWRM functions as set out in Table
L.2.3.1 based on the problem-cause and objective-analyses done through a series of the joint
steering committee meetings with the technical working group, the technical working group
meetings, the stakeholder consultation, the focus group discussion and the counterpart
meetings. Those IWRM functions and strategic issues are not directly related to
prioritization and implementation of projects but are the basis for the integrated water
resources management. Definition of the eleven strategic issues is presented in the following
section. The key alternative actions for these strategic issues are presented in Section L.3.
Table L. 2.3.1 Key IWRM Functions and Strategic Issues
Key IWRM Functions Strategic Issues
1.Water use management and water Issue-1:Strengthen Water Rights Regulation Capacity
rights allocation Issue-2:Enhance Efficient Water Use and Re-allocation of Water Rights
Issue-3:Modify Overlapping Water Charge System
Issue-4:Achieve Sustainability of Groundwater
Issue-5:Introduce Specific Law to Enhance Multipurpose Dam Projects
2.Water quality and environmental Issue-6:Enforce to Maintain Environmental Flow
management Issue-7:Strengthen Water Quality Monitoring and Management
3.Management of flood and natural Issue-8:Manage and Mitigate Risks from Water-related Disasters
disasters
4.Watershed and forest management Issue-9:Improve Watershed and Forest Management
5.Localize, implement, O&M of Issue-10:Set up Authority to Implement IWRM Plan
IWRM Plan from regional interests Issue-11:Strengthen Execution and Financial Capacity for Sustainability
L .2.3.2 Definition of Strategic Issues

(1) Strategic Issue-1 Strengthen Water Rights Regulation Capacity
(a) Background Issues
Strengthen water rights regulation to secure the rational, equitable, efficient and
ecologically sustainable allocation of water, and to secure seasonal water supply
reliability and long-term water supply is one of the sustainable outcomes of the National
IWRM Plan Framework. The NWRB’s resolution on the water rights allocation
among MWSS, AMRIS (NIA), Bulacan and NPC (non-consumptive) concerning the
Bustos Dam and the Angat Dam operation is pending due to partly of the situation the
aggregate quantity of the present water use permit exceeds the potential dependable
flow (refer to Section 5.7 Water Resources Development, Allocation and Distribution of
the Main Report). If present institution is kept unchanged the water supply security
level (reliability) in Angat river basin will decrease, and it will result in increasing a risk
of the regional socio-economic loss.
Short coming of the present system is:
 There is no legal target or standard to define the minimum water resources supply
security level and to control aggregated quantity of water permit to be issued for a
region or the whole basin;
 The present quantitative monitoring system is very weak at cross-checking the
regional water balance and regulate the aggregated discharge and quantity of more
than two water permits in a region where daily or seasonal water diversion
conflicting is expected;
 Present enforcing power is also not effectively functioning to regulate over issues
or to control of the aggregate rate and quantity of water permit; and
 With reference to the grid law (RA 9136), NPC’ responsibility of peak power
L-25
generation, NPC does not follow the NWRB’s regulation to modify the daily peak
hydropower generation for meeting the regional demand of irrigation water and
municipal water supply. The water code and the grid law are competing.
(b) The Water Code and Water Permit
In Art. 18 of the water code, the water permit specifies first; the maximum amount of
water which may be delivered or withdrawn, second; the maximum rate of diversion or
withdrawal, third; the time or times during the year when water may be diverted or
withdrawn. But the present water permit is granted by the maximum rate of diversion
only. There is no requirement for the regulation on the seasonal diversion and daily
fluctuation of water use.
The permit shall specify the maximum rate, maximum quantity, daily or seasonal
variation of diversion (the time or times during the year) to control efficient water use.
Art. 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30 of the water code is not appropriately enforced by
NWRB due to partly insufficient definition of these articles and/or weak enforcement
power. The related Articles of CHAPTER III APPROPRIATION OF WATERS, Water
Code of the Philippines (1966) are listed in Appendix L-1.
(2) Strategic Issue-2 Enhance Efficient Water Use and Re-allocation of Water Rights
Sustainable water resources and responsive services for present and future needs is one
of the sustainable outcomes of the National IWRM Plan Framework. However, the
present public and user base allocation system of water rights results in wasteful
consumption of water and spawns the growing scarcity of water. There is no incentive
for water users in particular irrigators to save water or to increase water use efficiency.
Reduction of non-revenue water including leakage reduction has been achieved
dramatically by Manila Water Company (MWC) due to high incentive to increase its
profit. However, irrigators using the NIA irrigation system have no incentive to save
their water use. Irrigation facilities fee is accounted by the unit of irrigation land area
instead of the unit of used water quantity (m3). The water right title holder is NIA
instead of irrigators and thus water saving does not result in reduction of annual water
charges. NIA has not paid it to NWRB yet. Saving of irrigation water does not
increase income of irrigators like MWC. Benchmarking of best practices in water
allocation from other countries is also anticipated.
(b) Present Water Code
Art.19 of the water code enables the title holder to lease or transfer of water rights, but
lease and transfer may not be implemented by this article only because detailed IRR is
not clear including definition of lease and transfer, required conditions, process,
compensation for lease or transfer, etc. Rule, guidelines, procedure, etc., are subject to
the approval of NWRB.
(3) Strategic Issue-3 Modify Overlapping Water Charge System
(a) Present Water Code
On June 6, 2003, the provincial Bulacan Governor filed a suit against MWSS to compel
the water agency to furnish the local government its financial statements or any
financial document showing MWSS’ income from 1992 up to the present, and that it be
paid its share in the earnings of agency resulting from the latter’s utilization of the water
resources derived from Angat Dam. During the case two legal questions were raised:
whether or not the water in Angat Dam is part of the national wealth of the country; and
whether or not the Bulacan provincial government is entitled to collect a share from the
proceeds of the water stored in Angat Dam. The Regional Trial Court decided on June
3, 2005. In June 2008 the Court of Appeal ordered MWSS to remit to Bulacan
L-26
Province its share from the water firm’s earnings generated from its use of water from
Angat Dam from 1992 up to the present based on Section 291 of the Local Government
Code (LGC) of 1991.
The NWRB comments that the overlapping provisions on the water charges in the Water
Code (NWRB’s water fees and charges for concession) and the LGC (a share of the
national wealth by LGUs) are to be unified.
(b) Present Water Code and Local Government Code
Art.3&6(waters belong to the State) of the water code, and IRR Setion8 (water fee or
charges) deals only water fees and charges for all appropriators.
Chapter 2- Share of Local Government Units in the National Wealth (sec. 289 to Sec.
295) of the LGC stipulates details of the share of the national wealth.
(4) Strategic Issue-4 Achieve Sustainability of Groundwater
In Bulacan Province in Pampanga River land subsistence and saline water intrusion in
the groundwater are progressive due to excessive groundwater withdrawal. Enhancing
effectiveness in groundwater management and aquifer protection is one of the strategic
themes of the National IWRM Plan Framework. However, there is no institutional
arrangement to prevent excessive groundwater pumping. There is also no extensive
groundwater monitoring system for sustainable groundwater development; both quantity
and groundwater level. On the other hand Section 46 of IRR, Water Code allows
exhaustion of groundwater. It is expected to clarify the organization and its
responsibility of groundwater management and also to enhance transfer of the municipal
water supply sources from groundwater to surface water.
IRR Section 46 Requirement of Drilled Well, item d is subject to modification, wit:
‘Groundwater mining may be allowed provided that the life of the groundwater
reservoir system is maintained for at least 50 years.’
(5) Strategic Issue-5 Introduce Specific Law to Enhance Multipurpose Dam Projects
At present one line agency or one main entity can takes charge of implementation of a
large reservoir dam, where cost allocation of the dam body (common facilities) or
allocation of reservoir capacity is not defined. The beneficiary’s pay principle (BPP) is
not enacted yet. The reservoir operation rule for the peak daily hydropower operation,
water discharge allocation rule during draught among irrigation and municipal water
supply has not been rationally and equitably executed as expected by water users.
There is also no specific cost allocation for the flood control purpose for the dam
reservoir operation in the Philippines. The reservoir operation rule during extreme
flood events has not been settled yet among the stakeholders in the central Luzon area
after the flood evens in 2009. This issue is originated partly from the fact that there is
no legal basis about cost and reservoir volume allocation rule among multiple water
users (also among public and private entities) in the Philippines yet, such as the specific
multipurpose dam law in Japan. Without definition of the cost allocation of the dam
reservoir for flood control the reservoir operation rule described in the strategic issue-8
also may not be consolidated.
Art.30 of the water code deals with only compensation in case modified to
multi-purpose development.
L-27
(6) Strategic Issue-6 Enforce to Maintain Environmental Flow

Among water users environmental flow is considered to be a major determinant of
ecosystem health, not provision of a minimal quantity. Effective protection and
regulation of ecosystem is one of the sustainable outcomes of the National IWRM Plan
Framework. One of the strategic objectives is to establish policy framework and to
undertake innovative programs to restore and/or to improve the health of priority
stressed rivers, lakes, and other water bodies as well as to ensure that those currently not
significantly stressed remain healthy. However, no concessionaires comply with the
required discharge of the minimum flow (10% of the dependable flow), which is
responsible for the concessionaries with the condition of water permit. Definition of
the present minimum flow is not well comprehended among water users. The water
managers argue lack of scientific technical tools and data and information for setting the
standard minimum flow.
Art.66 (minimum stream flows for rivers and streams, minimum water levels for lakes)
of the water code and Section 47 of IRR deal with the issues.
(7) Strategic issue-7 Strengthen Water Quality Monitoring and Management
Groundwater quality deterioration is serious at some local areas due to discharges of
effluents, mainly organic matters from the domestic sewerage and the incompliant
industries. Manila Bay Coordination Committee was established as a satellite office of
RBCO of DENR to control the increasing pollution loads to the Manila Bay. In spite
of inter-sector and inter-regional efforts sources of pollution loads have not been
clarified yet. However, the present institution to monitor and to enforce water quality
control is not effective. There are a few water quality monitoring stations in Pampanga
River except at large dam or headwork sites.
(b) Present Water Code and Clean Water Act
Chapter VI Conservation and Protection of Waters and Watershed and Related Land
Resources (Art. 66 to Art. 78.) deals with water quality management, where pollutants
are defined by the National Pollution Control Commission. The clean water acts
govern comprehensive water quality framework. However, there are no specific
regulations or standards for the density of water quality monitoring stations,
responsibility of water users, and functions of establishment, operation and maintenance
of the water quality monitoring. In particular there is no specific responsibility on the
water users in Pampanga river basin to share the cost of water quality monitoring and
management.
(8) Strategic Issue-8 Manage and Mitigate the Risk from Water-related Disasters
There is no flood control basin plan (FCBP) in Pampanga River except for the
Pampanga Delta Development Project, Phase I to III for the lower stretch of the river.
There is also no target flood control level (for example once in 10 years or 20 years) for
the serious flood plain lands in Pampanga River. The reservoir operation rules during
the extreme floods incidents have not been officially establish yet by the JOMC for
Angat Dam, Pantabangan Dam, San Roque Dam, Binga Dam, etc. This is partly
originated from the fact that there is no legal basis to define the responsibility to
mitigate risks from floods of each of the water users concerned. Establishment of the
FCBP for the whole river basin or the concerned river stretch, and establishment of the
flood control account for the dam reservoirs related with the strategic issue-5 might
L-28
provide a clue to resolve the issue. Other issues with respect to manage and mitigate
flood disasters are:
 Right-of-way is one of the serious barriers for implementing flood control projects
in the study area in particular construction of dike systems; and
 Responsibility of O&M of the flood control and river facilities is not well defined
after transfer of the facilities from DPWH to LGUs based on the LGC of 1991.
Lack of funds for O&M and monitoring of flood control and river facilities is also
serious.
Chapter V Control of Waters (Art.53. to Art.65.) deals with control of flood plain lands,
flood control structures, and flood plain management plan, etc. Art.51. defines the
public domain of the river. There are no IRR or technical standards for the flood
control plan, flood control target level, reservoir operation rule, and maintenance of the
river facilities at present.
(9) Strategic Issue-9 Improve Watershed and Forest Management
Responsible functions and territory of watershed management are not well defined,
fragmented and overlapping among DENR, related national agencies and different level
of local governments in particular forest management. Funds for implementation,
maintenance and monitoring are also limited. Necessity of institutional strengthening
has been reported but detailed and concrete problems and causes about the weak
capacity have not been clarified well.
(10) Strategic Issue-10 Set up Authority to Implement Pampanga River Basin IWRM
There are no specific institutional and legal arrangements in Pampanga river basin to
localize and implement IWRM Plan in practice in particular water resources
management and maintenance. It is necessary to study further if creation of a RBO is
required for Pampanga river basin, and the direction of the basic conditions, and what
functions of RBO are to be targeted.
RDC Region III is the highest policy and decision-making body in the region for
development plans, investment programs, project monitoring, etc.
There are several conflicting institutional proposals for River Basin Organization (RBO)
such as a committee under RDC Region III, RBO as a part of the line agency, River
Basin Control Office (RBCO), DENR, Independent River Basin Council as a
coordination body, and RBO as a operation and maintenance body of the river facilities.
The Purpose and function of RBO is not well defined yet among the options.
Advocate and implement the IWRM Plan particularly monitoring of water rights, water
quality, ecosystem and O&M of flood control facilities are the key missing functions of
the existing organizations.
(11) Strategic Issue-11 Strengthen Execution and Financial Capacity of LGUs for
Sustainability
It is necessary to clarify institutionally allocation of responsibility of the operation and
maintenance, and the burden of operation and maintenance costs of the river facilities in
the basin if projects of river facilities such as dikes and flood retarding basins are
implemented. It is also indispensable to strengthen the financial capacity of both
LGUs and the line agencies to set up sustainable IWRM from the regional interests.
L-29
L.3 Proposed Institutional-Setup for IWRM

L.3.1 Study Framework
The role of the institutional-setup is at the position of implementing arrangements to localize and
implement the IWRM Plan as illustrated in Figure L.3.1.1.
Vision in 2025
Sector
Objectives Sector Goal
Projects & Programs
Guide National IWRM

IWRM Plan
Plan Framework
・ Group A Projects
・ Group B Projects
Technical IWRM
Guidelines
Implementing
Arrangements
Institutional and
Organization
Source JICA Study Team
Figure L. 3.1.1 Role of Institutional-Setup
The IWRM Plan would neither be implemented by amendment of the existing laws only nor capacity
strengthening of the existing organizations only. The key actions are structurally reviewed from the
three basic aspects: i.e., the legal aspect, the organizational aspect, and the financial aspect. Three
aspects of actions are the basic elements to empower implementing functions, and thus those are to be
executed simultaneously. Section L.3.2 deals alternative key actions for the respective strategic issues
defined in Section L.2.3.2 at first. Sections L.3.3 to L.3.5 integrate the key actions from the three
aspects respectively.
L.3.2 Strategic Issues and Key Actions
L .3.2.1 Basic Aspects of Actions
The three basic aspects of actions are defined as follows:
i. Legal Aspect: Amendment of related laws (the water code, the local government code,
etc.), regulation, rules, standards, guidelines;
ii. Organizational Aspect: Capacity strengthening of the existing organizations (NGAs/RLAs,
LGUs, etc) and supplement of missing functions to the existing ones; and
iii. Financial Aspect: Strengthening of financial capacity necessary to achieve sustainable
IWRM for Pampanga river basin.
Key alternative actions are studied as countermeasures to empower the existing and new institution
from the three aspects as shown in Figure L.3.2.1.
L-30
Existing Laws, Rules,

Legal Aspect Guidelines
New Laws, Rules, Guidelines
Existing Organization
Organizational Aspect
New Organization
Existing Financial System

Financial Aspect
New Financial System
Source JICA Study Team
Figure L. 3.2.1 Empowerment Elements for Basic Aspects
The respective strategic issues and the corresponding basic aspect of actions are summarized in
Table L.3.2.1.
Table L.3.2.1 Strategic Issues and Aspects of Actions
Key IWRM Issues Strategic Issues Basic Aspects of Actions
1.Water use Issue-1:Strengthen Water Rights Regulation i. Legal Aspect
management and Capacity ii. Organizational Aspect
water rights Issue-2:Enhance Efficient Water Use and
allocation Re-allocation of Water Rights
Issue-3:Modify Overlapping Water Charge
System
Issue-4:Achieve Sustainability of Groundwater
Issue-5:Introduce Specific Law to Enhance
Multipurpose Dam Projects
2.Water quality and Issue-6:Enforce to Maintain Environmental
environmental Flow
management Issue-7:Strengthen Water Quality Monitoring ii. Organizational Aspect
and Management
3.Management of Issue-8:Manage and Mitigate Risks from i. Legal Aspect
flood and natural Water-related Disasters ii. Organizational Aspect
disasters
4.Watershed and Issue-9:Improve Watershed and Forest ii. Organizational Aspect
forest management Management iii. Financial Aspect
5.Localize, Issue-10:Set up Authority to Implement IWRM ii. Organizational Aspect
implement, O&M of Plan iii. Financial Aspect
IWRM Plan from Issue-11:Strengthen Execution and Financial
regional interests Capacity for Sustainability
L .3.2.2 Proposed Key Actions

The description of the background of respective strategic issues is presented in Section L.2. This
section presents the alternative key actions (solutions) from the three aspects if applicable. Prospective
outcomes by the respective key actions are presented in Section L.3.3.2 for the amendment of the
water code and other related laws, rule and guidelines, Section L.3.4.2 for the capacity strengthening
of the line agencies and LGUs, Section L.3.4.3 for the capacity building of the missing functions for
IWRM, and Section L.3.5.2 for the strengthening of financial capacity.
L-31
(1) Strategic Issue-1 Strengthen Water Rights Regulation Capacity

(a) Amend Articles of Water Codes
The articles of the water code subject to amendment or modification to resolve the issue
are set out below.
 Establish an effective period of the water permit for 5 to 10 years to allow the
NWRB to review and enforce rational and efficient use of water (Art.26 & 28);
 Establish a rule to enforce the concessionaire to take concrete water saving
measures (Art.29 & 30, IRR Section22);
 Establish a penal rule to revoke the water permit if its concessionary executes no
measures of efficient use other than act of violation (Art.29 & 30);
 Provide Article to let the water code prevail over the other law (the grid law)
specifically for water rights regulation;
 Provide clear compensation rule for the loss of the priority concessionaire in time
of emergency (Art.22 & 23); and
 Modify the condition of water permit to specify concrete seasonal water use
schedule including non-consumptive use instead of only the maximum rate of
diversion or withdrawal (seasonal quantity and rate), (Art.18).
(b) Key Actions
The issue-1 will not be resolved by the amendment of the water code only. Appropriate
combination of legal, organizational and financial strengthening of water resources
management will be required as was in the advanced countries. Those actions will
cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Amend the relevant article of the water code and IRR;
 Establish a legal basis to make a water resources basin development plan (the
Basin Plan) to execute quantitative management of daily and/or seasonal variation
of regional water budget (balance) for Pampanga river basin and the strategic
river;
 Link legally water rights and the Basin Plan;
 Establish planning technical standards for the Basin Plan;
(ii) Organizational Aspect
 Establish NWRB owned reliable and accurate monitoring stations for discharge,
ecological flow and water quality at key water conflict areas;
 Strengthen the capacity of NWRB for monitoring and enforcing water rights; and
(iii) Financial Aspect
 Strengthen financial capacity of NWRB including annual water charge collection.
(2) Strategic Issue-2 Enhance Efficient Water Use and Re-allocation of Water Rights
(a) Amend Article of Water Code
The articles of the water code subject to amendment to resolve the issue are set out
below.
 Provide articles to link the water permit and the basin water resources
development plan (Basic Plan) to enable short and long term quantitative water
L-32
rights management with securing water supply reliability;

 Provide an article to establish relevant monitoring stations for transparent and
equitable water rights regulation including daily discharge;
 Establish planning standards for the Basic Plan to secure safe bulk water supply to
various water uses with a reliable risk; and
 Provide article to enable to reallocate the present water rights title granted to the
public entities such as NIA, MWSS and Bulacan Province to the water users such
as irrigators and/or water supply companies.
(b) Key Actions
The issue-2 will not be resolved by the revision of the water code only. Appropriate
combination of strengthening of legal power of water resources management will be
required in line with the issue-1. Those actions will cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Amend relevant articles of the water code and Implementing Regulation and Rules
(IRR);
 The key actions for the issue-1 are to be implemented simultaneously;
 Clarify risk of water supply failure of the conflicting water rights to enhance water
rights transfer and trading;
 Change the present constant annual water charge system for water permit into
different water charge for different supply reliability and seasonal variation; i.e.,
high charge for high reliability, high season, and longer concession like in
Australia;
 Establish reliable assurance and compensation rule for water transfer and trading;
and
 Establish IRR and technical guidelines for water transfer and trading.
(3) Strategic Issue-3 Modify Overlapping Water Charge System
(a) Key Actions
The issue-3 might not be resolved by the revision of the related article of the water code
or that of the local government code only. At present the public entities (NIA, MWSS,
Bulacan Province) still hold the water rights title which ware granted before
privatization of NIA and water companies. MWSS re-granted the water permit to the
water users, two companies. Bulacan Province also has a plan to re-grant its water right
to the water supply providers in the province in the future. NWRB and Bulacan
Province are both government entities (in spite national or local). The water permit
annual charge and the charge based on the share of the national wealth seem to be
overlapping to the water users. However, the purpose of these charges is basically
different. The former is national charge on water rights while the latter is a kind of
royalty to the natural resources. The LGUs are entitled to charge royalty to the
beneficiary as a part of local revenue if necessary based on the LGC. The duplication
issue is originated partly from such a condition that the title holders of the water rights
are still the government entity. If the water right of the public entities is transferred
totally to the water users, the charge by NWRB and the charge by LGU as royalty would
not be duplicated. Those actions will cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Review the overlapping provisions of the local government code with the water
code (Art.3&6, IRR Section8), etc;
L-33
 Provide an Article in the water code not to allow duplicated layer of granting water
permit to public entities; and
 The public entities that have water rights at present independently transfer those to
the water users.
(4) Strategic Issue-4 Achieve Sustainability of Groundwater
(a) Key Actions
The issue-4 will not be resolved by the revision of the water code only. Appropriate
combination of legal and organizational strengthening will be required. Those actions
will cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Modify IRR Section 46(Requirement of Drilled Well), item d;
 Empower the groundwater monitoring and enforcing function of the LGUs from
the regional interests; and
 Establish a regional monitoring system to monitor regional groundwater level
collaborated with EMB and LGUs including quantity and quality.
(5) Strategic Issue-5 Introduce Specific Law to Enhance Multipurpose Dam Projects
(a) Key Actions
The actions to empower legal arrangements cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Establish a account for flood control reservoir capacity instead of incidental
function for the multipurpose dams;
 Establish a specific law to define an equitable cost allocation rule among public
(in particular flood control) and private beneficiaries for multi-purpose projects to
reduce dam construction cost share among water users; and
 Link the reservoir operation rule with the cost share of reservoir volume allocation
and the flood control basin plan.
(6) Strategic Issue-6 Enforce to Maintain Environmental Flow
(a) Key Actions
The necessary actions to empower legal arrangements cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Provide concrete standard, enforcement measures and penalty to breakers in order
to execute strict regulation of Art.66, and IRR Section 47; and
 Set up an institution to enforce and monitor all concessionaires to comply with
requirement of the minimum stream flows for rivers and minimum water levels for
lakes to ensure environmental conservation.
(7) Strategic issue-7 Strengthen Water Quality Monitoring and Management
(a) Present Water Code and Clean Water Act
Chapter VI Conservation and Protection of Waters and Watershed and Related Land
Resources (Art. 66 to Art. 78.) deals with water quality management, where pollutants
are defined by the National Pollution Control Commission. The clean water acts govern
comprehensive water quality framework. However, there are no specific regulations or
L-34
standards for the density of water quality monitoring stations, responsibility of water
users, and functions of establishment, operation and maintenance of the water quality
monitoring. In particular there is no specific responsibility on the water users in
Pampanga river basin to share the cost of water quality monitoring and management.
(b) Key Actions
To resolve the issue-7 appropriate combination of institutional, organizational and
financial strengthening will be required as was in the advanced countries. Those actions
will cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Execute the key actions for the strategic issues-6 on parallel;
 Establish responsibility and role of water users on the water quality management
in the Basin;
 Strengthen the capacity of RBCO, EMB, FMB and related LGUs to execute and
enforce water quality management effectively;
 Strengthen the water quality monitoring system;
 Increase the fund of DENR to set up monitoring stations and O&M of the
monitoring systems; and
 Introduce the beneficiary’s pay principle (BPP) for the cost of water quality
management.
(8) Strategic Issue-8 Manage and Mitigate the Risk from Water-related Disasters
(a) Key Actions
The necessary actions to empower institutional arrangements cover:
(i) Legal Aspect
 Prepare the flood control basin plan (FCBP) for the severe flood prone areas based
on Art.53. of the water code (promote, coordinate protection of flood plain lands,
and flood plain management plan by the secretary of DPWH);
 Establish IRR and planning standards for the FCBP;
 Link legally the FCBP with reservoir operation rule of the large dams concerned;
 Amend IRR for the Right-of-way of the public domain of river regime; and
 Reconfirm the definition of the responsibility of O&M of the flood control and
river facilities after transfer of the facilities from DPWH to LGUs (MOA).
(9) Strategic Issue-9 Improve Watershed and Forest Management
(a) Key Actions
The necessary actions to empower organization cover:
 Monitor the progress and outcomes of the ongoing capacity development of the
development projects and programs for forest and watershed management
financed by JICA and other donors;
 Conduct capacity assessment on the outcomes from the ongoing projects and
L-35
programs; and
 Strengthen the execution capacity of the weak functions of FMB and LGUs still
remained based on the capacity assessment.
(10) Strategic Issue-10 Set up Authority to Implement Pampanga River Basin IWRM
(a) Key Actions
The necessary actions to empower organization cover:
 Clarify the necessary functions and missing functions in the existing organizations
for IWRM implementation;
 Supplement the function to the line agency (NWRB, DENR) or RDC and execute
capacity strengthening for monitoring and execution; and
 Set up an appropriate RBO for Pampanga river basin based on the regional
consensus.
(11) Strategic Issue-11 Strengthen Execution and Financial Capacity for Sustainability
(a) Key Actions
The necessary actions to empower financial capacity cover:
 Increase the share of O&M budget for the river facilities in both LGUs and
NGAs/RLAs (DPWH);
 Establish specific finances in LGUs for O&M;
 Set up a water users association to advocate sustainable IWRM in the Basin;
 Collect association fee for the O&M of RBO and IWRM; and
 Set up special accounts for sustainable IWRM in Pampanga river basin.
L.3.3 Amendment of Related Laws, Rules and Guidelines
Key issues concerned with the present Water Code and the related articles of the Constitution, the
Civil Code, and the Local Government Code are recited from Section L.1.3.1. In Section L.3.3.2 the
key actions with respect to the institutional aspect are integrated and recompiled out of the key actions
in Section L.3.2.2. Prospective key outcomes by the key institutional actions are also briefed in
Section L.3.3.2(1).
L .3.3.1 Constitution, Water Code, Civil Code and Local Government Code
(1) The Constitution and Water Code
Definition and state ownership of water
The national policy on water, as a natural resource, is enshrined in Section 2, Article XII of
the Philippine Constitution of 1987. The Water Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree
No. 1067-1976) is the basic water law of the Philippines. It is anchored on the principle that
all waters belong to the State. Proceeding from this premise, these waters are not subject to
acquisitive prescription.
Separation of water from land
The provisions of Article 6 of the Water Code are a departure from the stipulations of the Civil
Code on water. Before their repeal by the Water Code, certain provisions of the Civil Code,
particularly those on ownership of waters (Section 503) recognized private ownership of
certain categories of water. These laws on the ownership of waters found in private lands are
L-36
now expressly abrogated by Article 6 of the Water Code. Other instances of repeal of Civil
Code provisions by the Water Code are treated.
Improvement of Water Code and Civil Code for Strategic Issue-2

The Water Code enable to lease or transfer of water rights in Article 19 based on Articles 5
and 6. To resolve Strategic issue-2 supplemental provision of article may be necessary to
define water rights as tradable property in the Civil Code.
Refer to further details of the Constitution and Water Code in Section L.1.3.1.
(2) Local Government Code
Basic Services and Facilities Vested in LGUs
The Local Government Code of 1991 transferred responsibility for public services from the
national agencies to local governments in their areas at all levels (provinces,
city/municipalities and barangays). The basic services and facilities vested in the LGUs are
listed for Barangay, Municipality, Province and City respectively in SEC.17, CHAPTER I of
the LGC- of 1991.
Public Works and Infrastructures Vested in National Government
Regional offices of national agencies or offices whose functions were devolved to LGUs
should also have been phased out. However, sector projects have been still led generally by
national agencies in coordination with LGUs due to limitation of funds and resources of
LGUs.
Share of Local Government Units in the National Wealth
Chapter 2- Share of Local Government Units in the National Wealth (sec. 289 to Sec. 295) of
the LGC stipulates details of the share of the national wealth.
Refer to further details of the Local Government Code in Section L.1.1.4 (4).
L .3.3.2 Improvement of Water Code and Other Related Laws, Rule and Guidelines
(1) Improvement of Water Code and Related Rules and Guidelines
The strategic issues and key actions related with improvement of the water code and other
related laws, rules and guidelines in Section L.3.2.2 are re-compiled in Annex-T L.3.3.1. The
highlighted actions for the strategic issues-1 to 4 and 6 to 8 are: to establish an effective period
of water permit for review by NWRB, to provide clear compensation rule for the loss due to
the priority concessionaire in time of emergency; to modify the condition of the amount of
water permit to specify concrete seasonal water use schedule; to make a water resources basin
development plan (the Basin Plan) for the strategic river basins and to link legally with the
water rights; to enable to reallocate the present water right title of the public entities to actual
water users; to establish reliable assurance and compensation rule for water transfer and
trading; and to prepare the flood control basin plan (FCBP) for the severe flood prone areas
and to link legally with the reservoir operation rules of large dams.
With the actions in Annex-T L.3.3.1 the following outcomes would be materialized to cope
with the corresponding strategic issues:
 The water resources supply security level in a region or the whole basin will be
controlled within the target risk of failure (for Issue-1);
 The regional water rights conflict will be significantly mitigated by the quantitative
regulation of the regional water budget covering the aggregated discharge and quantity
of more than two water permits in a region where daily or seasonal water diversion
conflict prevails (for Issue-1);
L-37
 Enforcing power of NWRB will effectively function to regulate over issues or to

control of the aggregate rate and quantity of water permit, and the prevailing water
rights conflict will be mitigated. Provision of the NWRB owned monitoring system is
also essential (for Issue-1);
 Incentive of water saving activities for water users in particular irrigators will be
enhanced, the present wasteful consumption of water will be mitigated, and the
growing scarcity of water will be mitigated (for Issues-2 & 3);
 The national and local governments will be legally responsible to maintain the
sustainability of groundwater (for Issue-4);
 The national and local governments will be legally responsible to monitor the
environmental flow and water quality for sustainability of the regional water
environment (for Issues-6 & 7);
 The national and local governments will be legally responsible to mitigate regional
risks from floods linked with the flood control basin plan (FCBP) (for Issue-8); and
 Flood control function of dam reservoirs will be legally justified to mitigate regional
risk from floods linked with the FCBP (for Issue-8).
Details of the background and corresponding outcomes are noted hereunder.
Verification of Regional Water Supply Security Level
With the foregoing outcomes it will also be made possible to assess if the water shortage in
Angat River during the draught period could be mitigated in reality by the construction of the
proposed two dams, Balintingon Dam and Bayabas Dam. It will also provide instrumentation
to verify quantitatively if the water shortage in the Manila metropolitan area and the related
water source area will occur only in time of emergency (extreme draught event) stipulated in
Article 22 of the water code or as chronic events.
Incentive of Water User’s Water Saving Activities
The purpose to provide an Article is to enable to reallocate the present water rights title
granted to the public entities such as NIA, MWSS and Bulacan Province to the water users
such as irrigators and/or water supply companies is to enhance water saving activities
(Strategic Issue-2). With this provision the irrigators relied on the irrigation system of NIA
will be required to pay the annual water charge for the water permit while NIA will be
required by the irrigators to reduce the irrigation facilities fee (IFF) as the balance to the
annual water charge to NWRB. NIA is also required to change the charge system of IFF from
the unit of irrigation area to the unit of used water quantity.
Those disadvantages will be balanced by the advantages, surplus benefits between the
advantages and disadvantages that are estimated to be positive and large based on the
experiences in the advanced countries. If the irrigators of NIA system pay the annual water
charge regularly it will become a legal evidence of the water use (water rights) and the
irrigators would be legally entitled to charge the compensation for the loss induced by the
priority of the municipal water supply in time of emergency to the water supply company. The
surplus water right which is created by the water saving activities by irrigators can be
transferred to the municipal water supply companies with costs by regulation and/or by
trading. The surplus water rights will become an income source of irrigators. The irrigators
also have an incentive to reduce the water permit charge and/or IFF.
Legal Basis to Determine Reservoir Operation Rule to Mitigate Risk from Floods
There is a conflict among water users of Angat Dam, and the regional governments and
residents concerning how to mitigate the region’s flood risks after the flood incident in 2010.
The reservoir operation rule during the extreme floods has not been officially established yet
for Angat Dam by the Joint Operation and Management Committee (JOMC). It is still pending
L-38
in spite of the regulatory arrangements by JOMC due to partly no legal basis on the reservoir
operation rule.
The water rights were vested among NIA, MWSS, NPC and Province of Bulacan, but its
reservoir operation is conflicted among those water users due to shortage of the dependable
flow inside the watershed and the limited storage capacity for flood control during the rainy
season. On the other hand the flood control by the reservoir is the significant interests of the
regional governments and residents downstream. Water uses in the dry season and flood
control in the wet season are mutually tradeoff under its reservoir operation rule. The water
users demand the dam operator to keep the reservoir water level at the highest level even just
before the rainy season, while the local governments and DPWH in charge of mitigating flood
risks demand to keep the reservoir water level at the lowest level. The construction cost of
Angat Dam facilities were originally borne by NPC except a part by MWSS for the municipal
water supply facilities. Neither storage volume allocation nor cost allocation of the common
facilities of the dam was determined among the beneficiaries at the time of the dam
commission. In particular flood control function was simply treated as incidental. The
downstream residents have enjoyed the incidental flood control benefit without the cost share
and the legal basis for the flood control function of the dam. In Japan the flood control
function of large dams is defined legally by the allocation of reservoir volume to flood control.
The cost allocation for the flood control volume is also shared legally among the concerned
beneficiaries in terms of allocation of the common facilities cost of a dam.
In order to resolve the present issue the legal basis to determine the reservoir operation rule of
a large dam shall be established by specifying the flood control function of dam reservoir
linked with the flood control basin plan (FCBP) in which the regional flood control risk level
in a river basin is legally defined. The cost required to keep flood control storage shall be
borne by the public entity concerned.
(2) Specific Multipurpose Dam Law and Civil Code
The key actions related with the strategic issue-5, introduction of specific multipurpose dam
law presented in Section L.3.2.2 are compiled in Annex-T L.3.3.2. The issue-5 and the issue-8
(Manage and Mitigate Risks from Water-related Disasters) are mutually correlated. The
highlighted actions for the strategic issues-5 and 8 are: to introduce specific law to define an
equitable cost allocation of multipurpose dams; to establish flood control account for
multipurpose dams; and to define water permit as tradable property in the civil code.
With the actions to resolve the strategic issue-5 and 8 the following outcomes would be
materialized:
 Multipurpose dam projects will be enhanced based on the legal basis on the cost and
reservoir volume allocation rule among multiple water users including both public and
private sectors (Issue-5);
 The national and regional government will be legally responsible to share equitably the
cost of flood control function of dam reservoirs with water users to mitigate regional
risks from floods linked with the flood control basin plan (Issue-5 & 8); and
 Water permit will be defined as property or asset which can be treated as guaranty in
the civil code (Issue-5).
The heavy cost burden owing to the reservoir operation rule for flood control function of a
large dam will be equitably mitigated by the cost share by the relevant national and local
governments.
L.3.4 Capacity Improvement of Organizations
Section L.3.4.1 briefs the result of the capacity assessment of the existing line agencies and LGUs for
respective sector roles: planning of provincial governments and integrated area development, water
resources management, irrigation, municipal water supply, sanitation and sewerage, flood control and
L-39
mitigation of natural disasters, forest and watershed management, water quality management, and
mitigation of sediment disaster and soil control.
The key actions related with the capacity strengthening of the line agencies and LGUs in Section
L.3.2.2 are integrated and recompiled from the organizational aspect, and presented in Section L.3.4.2
only for the organizations for which capacity strengthening is assessed necessary. Section L.3.4.3
presents the key actions required for capacity development of the missing functions focusing on the
functions of river basin organizations.
L .3.4.1 Capacity Assessment of Existing Line Agencies and LGUs
(1) General
Under the decentralization and rationalization policies, the present institutional arrangements
for the functional relationships among the national government agencies and local
governments are still in transition. The roles of the national government and local
governments have not been unified, and those vary depending on the sector policy and
prevailing conditions. Annex-F L.1.2.2 illustrates the present functional relationships among
the water related national government agencies and local governments. The illustrated relation
is still progressive as of March 2010,
(2) Planning of Provincial Governments and Integrated Area Development
Planning of the provincial government is well executed by the provincial planning and
development office (PPDO) under LGC of 1991. Integrated area development approach has
been well deployed for integration and prioritization of inter-provincial and inter-municipal
development projects under Regional Development Council (RDC) of Region III. The role of
RDC is the policy coordination and decision-making body in the region. The functions of
RDC are formulation of development plans and investment programs, project monitoring, and
budgeting and investment programming. The organization structure of RDC Region III is
illustrated in Annex-F L.3.4.1.
No specific issues were identified to empower the existing PPDO and RDC management
through the steering committee meetings, technical working group meetings and stakeholder
consultations except missing functions for IWRM Plan implementation.
(3) Water Resources Management
The various issues identified for water resources management include (refer to Section 5.7 and
Section 8.4 of the Main Report):
(d) Risk of failure of sustainable water sources for the municipal water supply in the region
including groundwater;
(e) Risk of failure of securing water sources for expansion of large irrigation system;
(f) Inadequate reliability of water supply in Angat-Umiray System; and
(g) Expected increase of conflict among water users, municipal and irrigation water, and
hydropower generation.
Both legal and organizational empowerment is required to resolve these issues.
(4) Irrigation
In irrigation sector National Irrigation Administration (NIA) plays a main role of
implementation, operation and maintenance of the nation’s irrigation systems in collaboration
with local governments except private irrigation systems (refer to present status of the
irrigation sector in Section L.1.2.3 (2)).
No specific issues were identified to empower the existing irrigation management through the
steering committee meetings, technical working group meetings and stakeholder consultations
(refer to Section 5.2 and Section 8.2 of the Main Report). Water rights of irrigators are weak in
Pampanga river basin.
L-40
(5) Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage

Annex-T L.1.2.3 illustrates the institutional structure of domestic and municipal water supply
and sanitation among national government agencies and local governments. The NWRB,
Metropolitan Water Works and Sewerage System (MWSS), Local Water Utilities
Administration (LWUA) and LGUs are regulatory agencies for water supply (refer to present
status of the water supply and sanitation sector in Section L.1.2.3 (1)).
No specific issues were identified to empower the existing urban and rural water supply
management in Pampanga River through the steering committee meetings, technical working
group meetings and stakeholder consultations except implementation of sewerage system
(refer to Section 5.3 and Section 8.3 of the Main Report).
(6) Flood Control and Mitigation of Natural Disasters
Flood control requires a river basin approach participated with multiple government agencies.
Annex-T L.1.2.4 illustrates the institutional structure of national government agencies in flood
control. The DPWH has played a main role in flood control and oversees its national and
regional projects (refer to present status of the flood control and natural disasters sector in
Section L.1.2.3 (3)).
No specific issue was identified to empower the existing flood control and natural disaster
management in Pampanga River through the steering committee meetings, technical working
group meetings and stakeholder consultations except O&M of the river facilities (refer to
Section 5.4 and Section 8.4 of the Main Report).
The issue of the reservoir operation of the multipurpose dam, mostly operated by NPC and
NIA, is identified to improvement for both during draught period and during extreme floods
incidence (refer to Section L.3.2.2).
(7) Forest and Watershed Management
Annex-T L.1.2.5 illustrates the regulatory functions and corresponding responsible national
government agencies and LGUs in watershed and forest management. Pursuant to Executive
Order No. 192 (10 June 2007), the DENR is the primary government agency responsible for
the conservation, management, development and proper use of the environment and natural
resources, including forests and watershed areas through the Forest Management Bureau
(FMB) (refer to present status of the flood control and natural disasters sector in Section
L.1.2.3 (4)).
The legal and organizational framework of forest and water shed management is well defined.
The issue identified is how to empower the executing capacity at site with collaboration with
RBCO, FMB, LGUs, NIA and NPC (refer to Section 5.5 and Section 8.5 of the Main Report).
(8) Water Quality Management (fresh water, coast water)
The Clean Water Act (CWA), RA No. 9275-2004 provides, among others, that DENR in
coordination with NWRB shall designate certain areas as water quality management areas
using appropriate physiographic units such as watersheds, river basins or water resources
regions (refer to present status of the flood control and natural disasters sector in Section
L.1.2.3 (5)).
The issue identified is how to empower the monitoring system and the executing capacity with
collaboration with RBCO, EMB, LGUs and related line agencies through the steering
committee meetings, technical working group meetings and stakeholder consultations (refer to
Section 5.6 and Section 8.6 of the Main Report).
(9) Mitigation of Sediment Disaster and Soil Control
The Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) under the Department of
Agriculture (DA) remains responsible for the assessment, development and preservation of
existing and potential soil and water resources for agriculture.
L-41
No specific issues were identified to empower the sediment disaster and soil control
management in Pampanga river basin through the steering committee meetings, technical
working group meetings and stakeholder consultations (refer to Section 5.4 and Section 8.4 of
the Main Report).
L .3.4.2 Key Actions to Strengthen NGAs/RLAs and LGUs
The national government agencies (NGAs) and the local government units (LGUs) subject to legal
amendment and capacity improvement based on the organizational capacity assessment in Section
L.3.4.1 are summarized in Table L.3.4.1.
Table L.3.4.1 Countermeasures and Corresponding NGAs/RLAs and LGUs for Empowerment
Key IWM Issues Countermeasures NGAs/RLAs and LGUs for Empowerment
1.Water rights allocation Revision of water code, etc. NWRB
Capacity development NWRB, DENR
2.Water quality management Capacity development EMB/DENR, LGUs
3.Flood control: Right of way Revision of water code, etc. PMO/DPWH, LGUs, NWRB
Land use law NEDA, LGUs
3.Flood control: O&M cost Capacity development DPWH, DPWH-Region III, LGUs
Establish RBO NEDA-Region III, RBCO/DENR, DPWH,
NIA
4.Watershed and forest Capacity development RBCO&FMB/DENR, LGUs
management
5.Localize, implement, O&M of Capacity development NEDA-Region III, RBCO/DENR, NWRB,
IWRM Plan from regional DPWH, NIA, LGUs
interests Establish RBO NEDA Region III, LGUs, RBCO/DENR,
DPWH, NIA, RDC Region III, LGUs
The key actions and the strategic issues related with the capacity strengthening of NGAs/RLAs and
LGUs in Section L.3.2.2 are re-compiled in Annex-T L.3.4.4.
L .3.4.3 Capacity Building of Missing Functions for IWRM
(1) Mission and Functions for IWRM
To which extent the mission of the IWRM is to be targeted? The IWRM mission covering the
three key management elements is recommended to apply to Pampanga river basin among the
three options presented in Section L.2.1.3 (refer to Figure L.2.1.1).
The IWRM mission at any level is made functional provided with an essential support of
monitoring system and database system for scientific and equitable coordination and
management.
To achieve the mission of the foregoing IWRM the following functions are envisaged to be
introduced (Refer to Issue-1, Issue-10 & Issue-11 in Table L.2.3.1):
 To make IWRM policy and plan, coordinate, localize the IWRM Plan;
 To implement and maintain the IWRM Plan including key water-related projects and
corresponding operation and maintenance;
 To regulate and monitor water rights;
 To prepare water resources development plan for the basin’s water rights;
 To advocate IWRM and monitor water and watershed environment; and
(2) Definition of Missing Functions under Existing Organizations
Creation of new agencies is not encouraged in Region III because the existing
instrumentalities of the bureaucracy are very capable and in better position to implement
IWRM initiatives. New entities may only be created out of the abolition of existing ones or
merger of two or more government organizations under scrap-and build principle. The role of
RDC is the policy coordination and decision-making body in the region. The functions of
L-42
RDC are formulation of development plans and investment programs, project monitoring, and
budgeting and investment programming. Integration and prioritization of development
projects can be handled by RDC.
The mission and functions of the IWRM will not be materialized in Pampanga river basin by
the capacity strengthening of the existing organizations presented in Section L.3.4.2 and
Section L.3.4.3 only. The questions related with the missing functions are:
 Who will maintain and manage the IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin after the
JICA Study?
 Who will take charge of overseeing, advocating, localization and maintenance of the
IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin?
 How the NWRB regulates the water rights conflicts which could be more serious in the
future?
 Who will take charge of the financial burden of implementing IWRM in practice?
 How to authorize publicly a core or apex regulating organization with relevant
mandates without creation of a conflicting layer of authority?
RBO will be designed to take charge of the missing functions identified in Section L.3.4.3 (2),
and it is also envisaged to answer to these questions.
(3) Options of River Basin Organization
Description of Options
The TWG Meetings (February 24, 2010), Stakeholder Consultation (March 11, 2010) and
Focus Group Discussion (March 17, 2010) were executed to discuss about the IWRM mission,
the position of the regional water governance, the type, functions and options of river basin
organization (RBO) (refer to Section L.2.1 and L.2.2). The advantages and disadvantages of
the three of options, RBO under RBCO/ DENR, River Basin Committee (RBC) of RDC, and
an independent River Basin Council (RBC) are summarized in Table L.3.4.2. The organization
charts for the three options are illustrated in Annex-F L.3.4.2 for RBO under RBCO,
Annex-F L.3.4.3 for RBC of RDC and Annex-F L.3.4.4 for independent RB Council
respectively. The position of water rights regulation of NWRB is illustrated in
Annex-F L.3.4.5.
Table L.3.4.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of three RBO options
RBO Option Advantage Disadvantage
RBO under -Strong integration of watershed, forest and -Weak leadership of LGUs;
RBCO/DENR water quality management under DENR; -Unclear function of water rights
-Strong mandate under President Office; regulation;
-Budgetary allocation from DENR; -Weak technical capacity at field works;
-Potential overlapping functions with
RDC
-Implementation by NGAs/RLAs and
LGUs is required because RBO has no
execution function;
RBC of RDC -Strong coordination by the existing RDC -Implementation by NGAs/RLAs and
without overlapping authority; LGUs is required because RBO has no
-NWRB keeps function of water rights execution function;
regulation; -Weak technical capacity at field works;
-RDC leadership of IWRM Plan and investment -Present MOA for O&M of Pampanga
programs; Delta FCF does not work well;
Independent -Strong advocacy power with the regional -Implementation by NGAs/RLAs and
RBC interests; LGUs is required because RBO has no
-NWRB keeps the function of water rights execution function;
regulation; -O&M Budgetary allocation by LGUs and
NGAs/RLAs;
L-43
Description of River Bain Committee of RDC Region III

The attendants of the Focus Group Discussion supported the River Basin Committee proposed
by NEDA region III under RDC Region III as the best option among the three options. It is
still not final but is subject to the review and decision by the steering committee.
The mission and functions of IWRM recommended by the Study Team separates basically the
function of RDC from the functions of IWRM; the policy coordination and decision-making
on the area development projects in the region.
The advantage of the RBC of RDC is that advocate and maintenance of the IWRM Plan for
Pampanga river basin can be executed under the strong coordination by the existing RDC
without overlapping authority, while the implementation of the project plans and programs
will remain under the jurisdiction of concerned LGUs, RLAs, or Government Owned and
Controlled Corporation (GOCC). The RBC will lead in the advocacy for the adoption of the
IWRM Plan in the respective plans and investment programs of the bureaucratic levels.
Working together, Pampanga river basin-IWRM Plan implementation will be the joint and
collective responsibilities of all the sectors concerned.
Its disadvantage is that the technical execution capacity at field works is weak and a financial
support from the national government agency is not available because the RBC is independent
from NGAs.
L .3.4.4 Design of River Basin Committee
(1) Objective of River Basin Committee
The objective of the Pampanga River Basin Committee setup under the Regional
Development Council of NEDA Region III, hereinafter referred to as the Committee is to
materialize the IWRM Plan for Pampanga river basin (Pampanga river basin-IWRM) in
collaboration with the implementing line agencies and local governments. The mission of the
IWRM for Pampanga river basin is to manage the whole water resources and environment for
securing safe water supply, safety against flood and other natural disasters, and water quality
by a river basin unit in line with the National IWRM Plan Framework (November 2006).
(2) Territorial Jurisdiction
The Committee shall have jurisdiction over all the area within Pampanga river basin from the
origins to the estuaries.
(3) Allocation of Power and Functions for Implementing IWRM
Key national government agencies (NGAs) are responsible for sector policy, planning,
implementing and monitoring of national projects, and regulatory function specific to their
jurisdiction. Local Governments at all administrative levels retain de facto responsibilities of
public utilities including water supply and sanitation for policy, planning, and regulatory
functions specific to their jurisdictions, through respective Local Government Units (LGUs).
The NGAs also takes charge of the public works and infrastructure projects and other facilities,
programs and services funded by the National Government Appropriation Act, other special
laws, pertinent executive orders, and those wholly or partially funded from foreign sources.
The Regional Development Council (RDC), a policy coordination and decision-making body
regulates and approves inter-provincial and government loan projects (refer to
Annex-FL3.4.1). The NEDA requires endorsement for implementation from the concerned all
provinces for the RDC’s approval. The secretariat of RDC is NEDA.
The Committee takes charge of the decision making and coordination at the level of
committee specific to the mission of the IWRM for the Pampanga river basin-IWRM only
which is not included in the existing functions of NGAs/RLAs, LGUs and RDC: to make
policy and plan, to monitor, oversee and coordinate, and to secure funding to conduct
activities for Pampanga river basin-IWRM, while NGAs, RLAs and LGUs are responsible to
L-44
implement the decision of the Committee specific to Pampanga river basin-IWRM (refer to
Annex-FL 3.4.3).
The provincial river basin sub-committee is an option that is able to be established depending
on necessity of respective provinces.
(4) Power and Functions of the Committee
The Committee has a power of decision on its functions at the level of committee of RDC.
However RDC Region III has authority to reverse the decision.
The Committee shall perform the following functions:
 To make Pampanga river basin-IWRM policy and plan, coordinate, localize the IWRM
Plan;
 To oversee and coordinate the implementation of Pampanga river basin-IWRM Plan;
– To arbitrate (resolve issues/conflict) and monitor water rights;
– To regularly review and update water resources development plan based on the
monitoring data;
– To advocate Pampanga river basin-IWRM and monitor water quality and quantity
and watershed environment;
– To monitor O&M of the river facilities;
 To secure funding sources to support the activities for Pampanga river basin-IWRM;
 To establish, to supplement or to scrap Technical Working Groups (TWG) for specific
purposes which support the Committee such as providing necessary information and
technical advocating and monitoring activities including data collection, clarification
and analyses;
 To enforce the committee members (LGUs, RLAs, NGAs, NGOs) to execute the
specific tasks as determined by the Committee;
(5) Organizational Structure and Secretariat
The Committee shall be composed of members, a chairperson, a co-chairperson, vice
chairperson, secretariat and TWGs as shown in Figure L.3.4.1.
River Basin Committee (RBC)
Secretariat
TWGs will be setup when required.
TWG for TWG for TWG for TWG for TWG for TWG for
arbitrate and monitoring monitoring monitoring securing Monitoring and
monitoring water water quality water supply, O&M of river funding sources implementing
rights and watershed sanitation and facilities to support IWRM Plan
(surface water and environment sewerage projects and
groundwater) programs
Chair – Chair – NEDA R./
Chair – NWRB Chair – DENR Chair – Chair – DPWH
DBM/NEDA R. NWRB
Co-Chair – a Co-chair – a DILG/DOH Co-chair – a
Co-chair – a Co-chair – a
representative of representative of Co-chair – a representative of
representative of representative of
LGUs LGUs representative of LGUs
LGUs LGUs
LGUs
Figure L. 3.4.1 Organizational Structure of River Basin Committee
L-45
The members of the Committee are composed of major stakeholders in the water related
sectors. The members, the chairperson, the secretariat, the technical working groups and the
term are as follows1:
 Member of the Committee; Provincial governors (7 provinces), Regional Directors of
the Technical Secretariat (6), NWRB, DA, RBCO, NPC2, a representative of NGOs3, a
representative of private sector, etc. inside Pampanga river basin,
 Chairperson of the Committee; a representative elected from the provincial governors
by all the Committee members,
– Co-chairperson; a representative of NGO4,
– Vice chairperson; NWRB or RBCO/DENR5,
 Secretariat to the Committee; NEDA Region III,
 Technical Working Groups (TWGs); to be established as required,
– Chairpersons of TWGs: a representative from the concerned NGAs/RLAs and
other stakeholders such as NEDA Region III, NWRB, DENR, DILG, DOH,
DPWH, DBM, NIA, NPC, LGUs, NGOs, private sectors, etc.,
– Co-chairperson of TWGs6; a representative from LGUs or NGO,
 Term of chairperson, co-chairperson and vice chairperson: the same as the RDC
chairperson (4 years) or power sharing (2 years).
(6) Responsibilities of the Committee Members
The organizations represented by the Committee members are responsible to execute the
specific tasks as determined by the Committee and to contribute to the relevant TWG
activities.
(7) Responsible Activities
(a) The activities of the Committee
The Committee is responsible to conduct the functions of the Committee (refer to Item
(4)), to organize and to operate the committee meeting with support of the secretariat
and the TWGs.
(b) The Activities of the Member Regional Line Agencies, the Member Local
Government Units, NWRB, NPC
(i) All the members of the Committee (the member Regional Line Agencies, the
member Local Government Units, NWRB, NPC, NGOs) and the TWGs are
responsible to conduct the relevant activities of the TWG as determined by the
Committee.
(ii) All the members of the Committee are responsible to conduct the relevant
1
Those will be subject to clarification by the RDC.
2
The Region III, Central Luzon Region is comprised of 7 Provinces of Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Pampanga,
Zambales, Bulacan, Aurora and Bataan, and 5 cites of Angels, Cabanatuan, Olongapo, Palayan, and San Jose
(Nueva Ecija) with 2 Reginal Centers, San Fernando and Pampanga. NEDA, DENR, DILG, DOH, DPWH (including
BRS), DBM are included as the Regional Directors of the Technical Secretariat in the Committee. NWRB, DA, NPC
and RBCO are also supplemented as the committee members. Legal basis will be necessary to include as the members
the provinces and cities which are inside Pampanga river basin but are not included in the Region III.
3
People’s Organizations are treated as one of NGOs.
4
Option of Co-chairperson is suggested in the focus group discussion (FGD), but possibility of NGO
representative is subject to clarification if NGOs have mandate.
5
Option of Vice-chairperson is suggested in the FGD to support the chairperson because the IWRM isrequires
technical support.
6
Option of Co-chairperson is suggested in the FGD to share the responsibility between NGAs an LGUs.
L-46
activities of the relevant tasks based on the functions specific to their

jurisdiction by the use of respective funds as determined by the Committee.
(8) Allocation of Operation Cost of the Committee and the Specific Tasks
The operation cost of the Committee is composed of the secretariat operation cost, the office
operation (rent, utilities, office facilities, etc.), meeting costs of the Committee, and activity
cost of the TWGs.
The operation cost of the Committee shall be allocated among the members of the Committee
depending on the relevant tasks.
Table L.3.4.3 Allocation of Operation Cost of RBC
Task Responsible Operation Cost
Secretariat NEDA Region III
Office space including utilities, etc. NEDA Region III
Meeting costs Shared by NEDA Region III & other member
organizations
Activities of TWGs Concerned RLAs, LGUs and NGAs
The cost of the activities and the meeting of TWGs shall be responsible to the concerned RLAs,
LGUs and NGAs. (subject to confirmation)
The cost of the specific tasks and activities of the implementing organizations (RLAs, LGUs
and NGAs) which are determined and enforced by the Committee shall be responsible of the
concerned implementing organizations.
(9) Technical Working Groups
The technical working groups (TWGs) listed below shall be established to support the
relevant functions and activities of the Committee. The Committee is able to supplement or to
scrap the TWGs depending on the necessity.
 IWRM Plan (Chair NWRB/NEDA Region III): make Pampanga river basin-IWRM
policy and plan, coordinate, oversee to localize, to implement and to maintain
Pampanga river basin-IWRM Plan,
 Water Right Arbitration (Chair NWRB): prepare water resources development plan for
the basin’s water rights, and monitor water rights regulation and enforcement (surface
and groundwater),
 Monitoring Water Quality and Watershed Environment (Chair DENR): advocate
IWRM in coordination with NWRB and monitor water quality, ecosystem and
watershed,
 Monitoring Water Supply, Sanitation & Sewerage (Chair DILG/DOH): monitor
implementation, operation and maintenance of water supply, sanitation and sewerage
projects,
 O&M of River Facilities (Chair DPWH): operate and maintain river facilities,
 O&M Costs (Chair NEDA Region III/ DBM); monitor to secure availability of O&M
cost for the Committee, the river facilities and the monitoring facilities.
(10) Monitoring System
It is necessary to establish a set of monitoring systems for surface water, ground water and an
information system for management and data sharing. The role of NGAs/RLAs and LGUs for
the monitoring systems is as set out below.
L-47
Table L.3.4.4 Role of NGAs/RLAs and LGUs for Monitoring System

Organization Information System Surface Water Groundwater
NWRB Specific system for Water Rights Regulation/ Discharge Water Rights/ Regulation,
Angat Dam reservoir gauging at key stations Monitoring regional water
operation level
NIA/MWSS/ Share of OM costs, data Water use recording, system OM
NPC
BRS Share of data Discharge gauging under the
mandate of BRS
PAGASA Weather & FFWS Rainfall recording, FFWS, system
OM
LGUs Share of OM costs, data Recording & system OM
DENR/DOH Share of OM costs, data Water quality, Ecology & system Water quality & system
OM OM
(11) Implementation Guidelines

The TWGs shall prepare the implementing guidelines to execute smooth operation of the
Committee and the TWGs in consultation with the stakeholders.
(12) Legal Basis
The power and functions of the Committee and the source of funds to implement the
Committee, the TWGs and the specific tasks of the executing organizations shall be
appropriated by MOAs or Executive Order. In the long term enactment of Republic Act will
be targeted.
L.3.5 Strengthening of Financial Capacity for Sustainable IWRM
L .3.5.1 Key Actions to Strengthen Financial Capacity
The Strategic issues and key actions to strengthen financial capacity for sustainable IWRM of the line
agencies and local government units are re-compiled in Annex-T L.3.5.1. The key actions are namely:
to empower the financial capacity of NWRB; to increase the fund of DENR for water quality
monitoring; to introduce the beneficiary’s pay principle and to collect funds from the proposed
Pampanga river basin-Water Users Association; to increase the share of DPWH O&M budget for the
river facilities; and to set-up special accounts for sustainable Pampanga river basin-IWRM.
L .3.5.2 Fund Sources for Sustainable IWRM
(1) General
How to materialize the financial sustainability for Pampanga river basin-IWRM is one of the
biggest challenges in the prevailing policy of the Philippines. To achieve the financial
sustainability sources of the necessary funds, method of collection and allocation of the funds
are to be clarified. In-depth discussion and concrete actions will be necessary about this
agenda during the course of implementing Pampanga river basin-IWRM.
(2) Potential Fund Sources
There are various potential fund sources for the activities of RLAs, LGUs and NGAs and for
operating the River Basin Committee (RBC). Enacting the Republic Act or an Executive
Order is a definitive solution but it may be not practicable. The concerned National and
Regional Line Agencies and LGUs will be required to find new fund sources by themselves.
Potential fund sources are listed below as an example.
(a) For the Activities of RLAs, LGUs and NGAs for Pampanga river basin-IWRM
1) Annual operation and maintenance (O&M) budget for the infrastructures such as
dikes, pumping stations, flood gates, dredging, etc. of NGAs/RLAs and LGUs
2) Revenue in General Accounts of
a. Exploitation fee/royalty of LGUs: gravels and sands, mining, floating logs, fish
L-48
culture, etc.
b. Annual water charge for water permit (municipal, fisheries, livestock, irrigation,
power generation, industrial, recreation, others) of NWRB
c. Land tax from new lands created by coastal reclamation, former channel
reclamation, etc. of LGUs
d. Utilization fee of the area inside the river regime (parks, tennis court, baseball
ground, school ground, driving school, golf course) of LGUs
3) Financial Aid Program (Sector loan for rehabilitation of river facilities)
(b) For Operating the Committee
1) Allocation of the revenue of the General Accounts
a. Exploitation fee/royalty of LGUs
b. Annual water charge for water permit
2) Water user’s association fee
Annual water charge for water permit collected by NWRB is the revenue of DBM at present
but some portion of the charge may be allowed to be allocated to the specific purpose of water
resources management and water rights regulation. The utilization of the area inside the river
regime is a potential source of the public land use. Fee from the water user’s association of
industries and factories is also a potential source.
(3) Collection and Allocation
Potential methods of collecting necessary funds and allocating collected funds are listed as
follows:
(a) Increase the share of the O&M budget of DPWH for the river facilities which is much
smaller than that of highways and roads, of NIA for the irrigation facilities (IFF is not
sufficient), and of DENR for the monitoring systems
(b) Make a part of the revenue in the general accounts as a special account for the O&M:
items a, b, c, d
(c) Collect strictly the annual water charge for water permit based on the beneficiaries’ pay
principle (BPP) from the organization which does not pay now, such as NIA, NPC, etc. It
can be used as a fund to establish and operate water right monitoring and enforcement.
The annual charge for hydropower use is generally highest from BPP in the international
standard.
(d) Establish water user’s associations for the new RBC and collect association member fee
for commercial and industrial activities (hydro-electric power, fish culture, river – water
tourism, navigation, plant, agriculture, etc) based on the BPP for the operation and
maintenance of monitoring systems and preservation activities of water environment in
the river basin as is in some European countries.
L-49
References
1) Chapter 7 Water Supply and Sanitation, Policy and Institutional Framework, Philippines Meeting
Infrastructure Challenges, the World Bank Group in the Philippines, Public-Private infrastructure Advisory
Facility, December 2005, P110.
2) Further Amending Certain Sections of Republic Act No. 6395 entitled “An Act Revising the Charter of the
National Power Corporation” as amended by Presidential Decree Nos.380, 395 and 758. Section 13.
Non-profit character of the Corporation; Exemption from All Taxes, Duties Fees, Imports and Other Charges
by the Government and Government Instrumentalities.
3) Organizational Performance Indicator Framework, FY 2008 Performance Budget of Department/Agencies,
Sustaining Philippine Expenditure Management Reform, Department of Budget and Management, December
2007
4) The Philippine Water Supply Sector Road Map, November 2008, pp 179-181
5) DENR, RBCO, The Integrated River Basin Management and Development Master Plan (IRBMDMP), March
2007, pp 65-79
6) IRBMDMP, March 2007, pp 79
7) Recommendation to ECE Governments concerning River Basin Management, approved by the Committee on
Water Problems, E/ECE/WATER/9, Annex, 1971.
8) Stockholm Declaration on Human Environment of the United Nations Conference on the Human
Environment, 16 June 1972, UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14.
9) Dublin statement on Water and Sustainable Development, Guiding Principles, 1992.
10) Grigg, Neil S., etal, Water Resources Management, Mcgrow-Hill, 1996, pp 218-221.
11) Katumi Mushiake: River, the River Association Japan, November 2003, p8.
12) Item 10 (3) River basin organization of Minute of Meetings on Implementation Arrangement of the Study
(March 14, 2008)
L-50
Annex-Tables
Annex-T L.1.1.1 (1/2) Water Sector Laws and Policies
National Legislation and Policies Salient Provision
Republic Act No. 6324 of 1971 Creating the MWSS and making it responsible for water supply
in Metro Manila. In 1997, the MWSS was privatized with the
management and operations transferred to MWSI and MWCI
under a 25-years concession contract.
Presidential Decree No.198 of Creating the LWUA and the local WDs. It established LWUA as
1973 (Provincial Water Utilities Act the government resources provider and the WDs as the local
as amended) water service providers. It is also gives authority to LWUA as a
specialized lending institution for, and provides technical and
training assistance to the WD’s.
Presidential Decree No. 424 of 1974 Creating the NWRC, now the NWRB, to coordinate the planning
(National Water Resources of some 30 water resources agencies of the government.
Council-NWRC Charter)
Presidential Decree No. 856 of 1975 Codifying and enforcing the various sanitation policies of the
(Sanitation Code of the Philippines) government including standards for water supply, food
processing and servicing, sanitary facilities, sewerage and sewage
management, markets and abattoirs, industrial hygiene and
funeral parlors.
Presidential Decree No.1067 of 1976 Provides the framework for complementing the provisions of the
(Water Code of the Philippines, as constitution on water resources development and management
amended) with regard to water quality. This includes the rule governing the
rights and obligation of water uses as well as the administrative
structure to enforce the provisions of the water code. The code
adopts prior appropriation doctrine of “first in time, first in right”
for water allocation.
Presidential Decree No.1152 of 1977 Provides the comprehensive program on environmental
(The Philippine Environmental protection and management covering air, water quality, land
Code) use, natural resources and waste management for fisheries and
aquatic resources; wildlife; forestry etc.
Presidential Decree No. 1206 of Mandates NWRB to supervise, control and regulate all water
1977 (Public Service Law) utilities except those falling under the jurisdiction under the
MWSS and the LWUA. EO 123 of September 2002 mandates
NWRB to approve tariffs of local water districts.
The Philippine Constitution of 1987 Provides the basic principles of water resources development and
management, which stipulate that all water of the Philippines
belong to the states.
Executive Order No. 292 of 1987 Vested the President with residual powers to reorganize the
(The Administrative Code) Executive Branch.
Executive Order No. 124-A of 1987 Converted NWRC into the NWRB.
EO 192 of 1987 Provides for the organization of the DENR as the lead agency in,
(Department of Environmental and among others, promulgating the (a) rules and regulation for the
Natural Resources-DENR Charter) control of water, air and land pollution, and (b) ambient and
effluent standards for water and air quality.
Executive Order No. 215 of 1987 The first legal framework for privatization of power projects by
President Corazon Aquino resulting in the implementation of
about 20 power projects.
Republic Act No. 6957 of July 1990 Authorized the financing, construction, operation and
maintenance of government infrastructure projects by the private
sector resulting in the implementation of only two projects.
Republic Act No. 7160 of 1991 Defines the function and powers of LGUs) i.e., provinces, cities,
(Local Government Code) municipalities and barangays, in environmental protection. R.A
No.7160 mandates LGUs to undertake watershed- related
activities, initially confined to community- based management
(CBFM) social forestry and watershed projects. Since then, a
number of environmental functions of various NGAs have been
developed to LGUs.
LT-1
Annex-T L.1.1.1 (2/2) Water Sector Laws and Policies
National Legislation and Policies Salient Provision
Republic Act No. 7718 of April 1994 Amending certain sections of Republic Act No. 6957-1990,
(The Philippine BOT Law) entitled “An Act Authorizing the Financing, Construction,
Operation and Maintenance of Infrastructure Projects by the
Private Sector, and for Other Purposes”.
National Water Crisis Act of 1995 Provided the legal basis for the privatization of the MWSS in
1997.
Executive Order No. 123 of Straightening the NWRB including assumption of LWUA’s
September 2002 (Reconstructing the WD tariff approving authority.
NWRB)
Republic Act No. 9206 of 2003 Reenact, authorize the President to direct changes in the
(General Appropriation Act) organizational units or key positions in any department or
agency, and require all department/agencies of the Executive
Branch to conduct a comprehensive review of their
respective mandates, missions, objectives, functions,
programs, projects, etc., and to improve government’s
service delivery and productivity.
Republic Act No. 9275 of 2004 Provisions for comprehensive water quality management. It
(Philippine Clean Water Act) also provides the framework for sustainable development to
achieve a policy of economic growth in a manner consistent
with the protection, preservation and revival of the quality of
fresh, brackish and marine waters. The passage of R.A 9275
is also the first attempt to consolidate different fragmented
laws of the Philippines on water resources management and
sanitation.
Executive Order No. 279 of February Instituted reforms in the financing policies for the water
2004 supply and sewerage sector and water service providers;
rationalizing the LWUA’s organizational structure and
transferring it to the Office of the President.
Executive Order No. 366 of October Directing to all Department Secretaries a strategic review of
2004 (Strategic Review of the the operations of the Executive Branch and providing options
Operations of the Executive Branch) and incentives for government employees who may be
affected by the rationalization of the functions and agencies
of the Executive Branch.
Executive Order No. 387 of Transferred LWUA from the Office of the President to
November 2004 DPWH.
Executive Order No. 421 of April 2005 Refocusing LWUA’s functions and organizational structure
as envisioned in EO 279.
Executive Order No. 510 of March Creating River Basin Control Office (RBO) in DENR.
2006 (Creating River Basin Control RBCO has power and function, together with DPWH, to
Office) rationalize the various existing river basin projects such as:
Mt. Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation, Iloiro Flood
Control, Lower Agusan Flood Control, Bicol River Basin and
Watershed Management, etc., to develop a national master
plan for flood control together with DPWH and National
Disaster Coordinating Council, to rationalize and prioritize
reforestation in watersheds, and to perform other functions as
President and DENR secretary may direct.
LT-2
Annex-T L.1.2.1 (1/3) Mandate of Key Government Agencies in Water Resources Management
Line Bureau or Concerned
Unit of Government Responsibility / Concerns Related to Water
Agency
1. National Infrastructure Staff Formulates and approves policies on water
Economic and resources, and coordinate social and development
Development planning as the government central planning body
Authority (NEDA) Regional Development Sets direction of economic and social development
Councils (RDCs) in region through which regional development
efforts are coordinated
Investment Coordination Evaluates/appraises/approves major development
Committee/NEDA Board projects
2. Office of the National Water Resources Coordinates and regulates water activities in the
President (OP) Board (NWRB) country; supervise and regulates operations of water
utilities outside jurisdiction of LWUA and MWSS;
formulates and recommends policies on water
resources
The National Commission on Protects and promotes the interest and well-being of
Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) the Indigenous Cultural Communities/Indigenous
Peoples (ICCs/IPs) with due regard to their beliefs,
customs, traditions and institutions
3. Department of Metropolitan Waterworks and Constructs, maintains and operates
Public Works and Sewerage System (MWSS) domestic/municipal water supply and sewerage
Highways (DPWH) projects in Metro Manila and Contiguous areas
including watershed management
Bureau of Research and Undertakes hydrological survey and data collection
Standards (BRS)
PMO - Major Flood Control Manage the planning, design, construction,
Projects (PMO-MFCP) operation and maintenance of major flood control
projects
PMO - Rural Water Supply Manage the planning, design, construction,
(PMO-RWS-CARP) operation and maintenance of foreign-assisted rural
water supply projects
PMO - Small Water Manages the planning, design, construction,
Impounding Projects operation and maintenance of locally-founded and
(PMO-SWIM) devolved to foreign assisted SWIM projects
LGUs
4. Department of National Irrigation Undertakes program-oriented and comprehensive
Agriculture (DA) Administration (NIA) water resources projects for irrigation purposes as
well as concomitant activities such as flood control,
drainage, land reclamation, hydropower
development, watershed management, etc.
Bureau of Soils and Water Undertakes assessment, development and
Management (BSWM) conservation of existing and potential soil and water
sources for agriculture; undertakes cloud seeding
activities
Bureau of Fisheries and Formulates plans for the proper management,
Aquatic Resources (BFAR) accelerated development and proper utilization of
country's fisheries and aquatic resources
5. Department of National Power Corporation Develops electricity power generation facilities
Energy (DOE) (NPCOR/NPC) including hydroelectric and geothermal power;
constructs dams, reservoirs, diversion facilities and
plants and watershed management
National Electrification Promotes, encourages and assists public service
Administration (NEA) entities to achieve service objectives, implements
Office of Energy Affair (OEA) Promotes development of indigenous energy
resources such as mini-hydro projects
LT-3
Agency
6. Department of Environmental Management Formulates environment quality standards for water,
Environment and Bureau (EMB) air, land, noise and radiation; approves
Natural Resources environmental impact statements and issues
(DENR) Environmental Compliance Certificate
Mines and Geo-Science Bureau Manages, develops and conserves the country's
(MGSB) mineral resources; monitors and maps groundwater
resources
Forest Management Bureau Formulates and recommends policies and programs
(FMB) for the effective protection, development,
management and conservation of forest lands and
watersheds
Protected Areas and Wildlife Undertakes the protection and conservation of
Bureau (PAWB) natural wetlands such as lakes, marshes, swamps,
etc.
National Mapping and Responsible for integrated surveys, mapping,
Resources Inventory Authority charting, oceanography, land classification, aerial
(NAMRIA) photography, remote sensing, etc.
Laguna Lake Development Responsible for regional water resources
Authority (LLDA) development and management in the Laguna Lake
catchment area
7. Department of Environmental Health Service Responsible for water supply and sanitation
Health (DOH) (EHS) programs and strategies to forestall
environment-related diseases
Bureau of Research Monitors quality drinking water
Laboratories (BRL)
Local Water Utilities Specialized lending institution for promoting,
Administration (LWUA) developing, regulating and financing water utilities,
excluding Metro Manila
8. Department of Philippine Atmospheric, Disseminates atmospheric, geophysical and
Science and Geophysical and Astronomical astronomical data for use by economic sectors, the
Technology Services Administration scientific and engineering communities, and the
(DST) (PAGASA) general public
Philippine Council for Formulates national agriculture, forestry, and
Agriculture, Forestry and natural resources research and development
Natural Resources Research programs on multi-disciplinary, inter-agency
and Development approach for the various commodities including
(PCAFNRRD) water resources
9. Department of Water Supply and Sanitation Supports the provision of water supply and
Interior and Local Program Management Office sanitation services by local government units
Government (DILG) (WSS-PMO) (LGUs)
10. Local Provincial Governments Promotes the development of infrastructure
Government Units including irrigation, water supply, electricity power
(LGUs) and roads
Municipal and Barangay Promotes municipal and barangay WS & S,
Governments watershed and other programs
LT-4
Agency
11. Department of Office of Civil Defense (OCD) Monitors safety dams and other water resources
National Defense projects; prepares and supports the general public
(DND) in emergencies
Philippines Air Force (PAF) Undertakes rain enhancement through cloud
seeding
12. Department of Philippine Ports Authority Plans, develops, operates and maintains ports and
Transportation and (PPA) port facilities
Communication(DTC)
13. Department of Philippine Tourism Authority Promotes and develops the recreational use of
Tourism (DOT) (PTA) water resources
14. Department of Board of Investment (BOI) Proponent of the CALABARZON integrated area
Trade and Industry study, covering water resources, among other
(DTI) aspects
15. Department of Implements the government's flagship anti -
Social Welfare and poverty project - Kapit - Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan
Development - Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social
(DSWD) Services (KALAHI-CIDSS) which includes water
system construction in priority municipalities
16. Department of Lead implementing agency of Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) and
(DAR) orchestrates the delivery of support service to
farmer-beneficiaries in the KALAHI ARZones,
expanded agrarian reform communities composed
of cluster of contiguous land-reform barangays
Source: Philippine Water Supply Sector Roadmap, 2008-2010 Secretariat’s Report to the INFRACOM such –Committee on
Water Resources, November 2008, pp17-18
LT-5
Annex-T L.1.2.2 Key Water Supply Sector Agencies: Delineated Roles and Responsibilities
Agency Roles and Responsibility

NEDA Coordinates the preparation of national development plan and investment programs:
• Formulation of sector policies and strategies
• Monitoring implementation of policies, programs and projects
NWRB Regulation of WSPs including some (consenting) LGU- managed water utilities
• Traffic regulation
• Coverage and service regulation
• Management implementation of policies, program and projects
LGUs Based on the Local Government Code, LGUs bear multiple mandates in the sector such
as resources regulation, water supply provision, economic regulation of their utilities,
and planning and implementation of water supply and sanitation programs
• Preparation of water and sanitation master plans
• Monitoring of local water and sanitation coverage and update of sector profile
• Provision of support to water supply providers (WSPs) such as the RWSAs, BWSAs
and cooperative including funding IRA
LWUA Capacity building support to WSPs
• Provision of technical advisory services and financial assistance to water districts
• Provision of technical and institutional support to LGUs and WSPs
• Setting design standards for water supplies operated by water districts and other WSPs
DILG Capacity building support to LGUs
• Provision of capacity building training to LGUs
• Coordination of LGU master plan preparation
• Provision of information to LGUs on available sector programs and financing
DPWH Provision of technical support to LGUs upon request including implementation of level
I and level II projects
DOF/GFIs Financing support for the water supply sector
• DOF oversees performance of GFIs like DBP, LBP and LWUA
• GFIs (DBP, LBP and LWUA) provides funding for the water supply sector
NAPC-WASCO Coordinates the P3W water supply projects for the 432 municipalities outside of Metro
where people’s access to water supply is below 50 percent, 210 communities within
Metro Manila and 201 municipalities in conflict zone covered by peace agreements with
the RPMP/RPA/ABB (in 2000), CPLA (in 1986) and MNLF (in 1996).
DENR Based on E.O 192 (1987), the DENR serves as lead agency in, among others,
promulgating the (1) rules and regulations for the control of water, air and land pollution
and (2) ambient and effluent standard for water and air quality.
MWSS For water supply and sewerage services in Metro Manila through private water utilities.
It is also serves as the economic regulatory agency in the national capital region.
Source: PWSS Roadmap Institutional Development Framework Validation Workshop, Richmond Plaza Ortigas Center,
October 13, 2006
LT-6
Annex-T L.1.2.3 Institutional Structure of Water Supply and Sanitation
Type of Service DILG DOH DPWH
(Central Agencies) Water Supply & Sanitation PMO LWUA Hospital MWSS Infrastructures PMO-RWS
Regional Health Regional Foreign

Regional Office Metro Manila
Office Office Assisted
Government Owned and Provincial District Rural
(LGUs) WS Projects
Controlled Corporation Hospital Engineer's
Office
Province City/Municipal Barangay
Formal Level of WS Service Rural Urban CPSO

No Access - SSIP/SHH WS
Level 1: Point Source LGUs/CBOs
Level 2: Fixed Communal Faucets LGUs/CBOs
Level 3: Piped Household Connections LGUs/CBOs POs WDs MWCI/MWSI
  
LT-7
Financing
Technical Services to LGUs    
- Prioritization of Projects/Programs
- Technical Standards & Guidelines
- Construction, O&M
CBO = Community-Based Organization; PO= Private Operator; SSIP = Small-Scale Independent Provider; SHH = Self-provision by household
CPSO = Central Project Support Office for sewerage and sanitation projects
Annex-T L.1.2.4 Institutional Structure of National Government Agencies in Flood Mitigation
AGENCY MANDATE / COVERAGE
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES DOST- DOST- REMARKS
DENR DPWH OCD/NDCC DA-NIA DA-BSWM NPC NWRB NEDA NHRC DILG / LGU NGO DCC
PHIVOLCS PAGASA
A. Non-Structural Measures (Reducing Vulnerability)
Harmonization of Hazards / Vulnerability Maps    DENR - MGB
Watershed Management/Reforestation   DENR - FMB
Monitroing, Forecasting and Warning System  

Land Use Zoning and Regulations   
Information Education and Communication Programs        DECS
Evacuation Plan    
B. Structural Measures (Reducing Hazard Magnitude)
Planning, Design, Construction and Maintenance of Flood Control, Sabo     
Structures, Dams, Small Water Impounding Projects & other mitigating Major Flood Dams 15m and SWIP Dam for Multi-purpose Local Drainage
Control Projects above erosion control Dam and river works MMDA, DPWH-
structures incl. evacuation centers MFCP, FCSEC
DPWH-MFCP
Strenthening/Rehabilitation/Maintenance of Existing Structures      RO/DEO
DPWH-MFCP
Updating of Master Plan of Major River Basins    RO/DEO
DPWH-MFCP
Master Plan for Principal and Critical River Basins    RO/DEO
C. Response, Recovery and Development (Mitigating Impacts)
Damage and Needs Assessment   
LT-8
Flood Fighting    
Rescue and Recovery Operations    
Evacuation and Relief Works    
Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Works
-Psycho-social Programs   
-Livelihood Programs   
Resettlement   HLURB
D. Institutional Strengthening
Capacity Building for Agencies and LGUs        
Technical Standards & Guidelines on Planning, Design, Construction and      
Maintenance Dams Dams Dams
Research and Development   

Criteria on Prioritization of Projects / Programs   
Viable Financing Mechanism for Projects / Programs     
Linkages and Networking with Foreign Forecasting Institutions  
Rapid Media-Link System for Near Real Time Dissemination    
Databases on Natural Hazards to Identify Trends     
Source: DENR, River Basin Control Office, "Integrated River Basin Management and Development Master Plan, Executive Summary", 2006, p.77
Annex-T L.1.2.5 Institutional Structure of Watershed and Forest Management (Draft)
National Agencies Office of the President DPWH DA DE
DENR PAMB
NCIP NDCC PMO-MFC FCSEC BSWM NIA NPC
FMB, FMS RBCO PAWD
PENRO/CENRO PASU
Local Government LGUs, WDs
Type of Service Municipality Province City RBO
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 
 Watershed Project Rationalize
 Protection of Soil and Water 
 Control of Illegal Logging,
Kaingin Farming, Unsustainable
Practices
 Flood Control National M/P    Planning
 Protection of Project Area  
FOREST MANAGEMENT (CBFM)  Rationalize
 Social Forestry  
 Community-based Forestry  
Project
LT-9
 Integrated Social Forestry   

Program
 Community Forestry  
 Forest Fire Protection  
 Conservation of Mangrove   / 
PROTECTED AREA 
MANAGEMENT
 Management of Conservation 
Areas
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DENR-FMS
 Policies, Plans, Programs
 Forest Protection and
Maintenance
 Community Involvement
Notes:  Main national agency;  Regulatory function;  responsible organization
Annex-T L.1.3.1 (1/2) NWRB 2005 Fees and Charges
Pursuant to Executive Order No. 197 series of 2000 and per NWRB Resolution No. 010-0305 dated March 2005,
the National Water Resources Board on its 29th Meeting approved the following fess and charges:
NATURE OF SERVICE APPROVED

RATES* (in Pesos)
A. Application/Filing Fee
1. Water Permit
(a) Municipal 5,000
(b) Irrigation
(1) National/Corporation 5,000
(2) Communal/Individual 500
(c) Power generation 5,000
(d) Fisheries 5,000
(e) Livestock Raising
(1) Backyard
(2) Commercial 1,000
(f) Industrial 3,000
(g) Recreational 5,000
(h) Other Purposes 5,000
5,000
2. Transfer of Water Permit
(a) Municipal 5,000
(b) Irrigation
(1) Communal/Individual 3,000
(2) National Corporation 5,000
(c) Power Generation 5,000
(d) Fisheries 3,000
(e) Livestock Raising
(1) Backyard 1,000
(2) Commercial 3,000
(f) Industrial 5,000
(g) Recreational 5,000
(h) Other Purposes 5,000
3. Registration for Domestic Use 100

4. Registration as Well Driller and Renewal (annual)
(a) Sole Proprietor 1,000
(b) Partnership or Corporation 2,000
5. Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC)/certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity(CPCN) 3,000
6. Provisional Authority 3,000
7. Extension of CPC/CPCN Validity Renewal 3,000
8. Authority to Increase Capital Stock 2,000
9. Time Extension to Submit Annual Report of Operation 1,500
10. Authority to Charge Water Rate 2,500
11. Protests/Water Use Conflicts 3,000
12. Appeal Fee 1,000
13. Rate Adjustment/Increase 3,000
14. Sale/Transfer/Lease of Water System with CPC/CPCN 2,000
15. Donation of Water System with CPC/CPCN 2,000
16. Authority of Extension of Service 2,000
17. Re-Appraisal/Re-Evaluation of Assets 5,000
LT-10
Annex-T L.1.3.1 (2/2) NWRB 2005 Fees and Charges
B. Annual Water Charge
WITHDRAWAL COST/LPS (In Php)
Base Not more than 10 More than 10 lps
CLASSIFICATION Cost lps but not More than 50 lps
(liter / second) exceeding 50 lps
a) Municipal 5,000 5.50 8.50 11.00
b) Fisheries 500 2.75 4.25 5.50
c) Livestock (Backyard/Commercial) 500 2.75 4.25 5.50
d) Irrigation (Communal/Individual) 500 2.75 4.25 5.50
5,000 5.50 8.50 11.00
(National/Corporation) 5,000 2.75 4.25 5.50
e) Power Generation 5,000 10.25 15.80 20.45
f) Industrial 5,000 10.25 15.80 20.45
g) Recreation 5,000 10.25 15.80 20.45
h) Others
NOTE: For declared critical areas in Metro Manila, the following rates shall apply:
a) In area adequately serviced by MWSS concessionaires: 100% of water tariff of the concessionaires
b) In areas not adequately serviced by MWSS concessionaires: 35% of water tariff of the concessionaires
i) Charge for overy extraction for non-critical areas P 3,000 for every 1 lps or fraction thereof over extracted
j) Other Charges
(j-1) Use of Water at its Natural Location for Fish Culture
(j-1-a) For surface area < 15 has. Base Cost of 500 + P110/ha.
(j-1-b) For surface are > 15 has. Base Cost of P500 + P 1,650 for 15 has. Plus P0.65/ha. in excess of 15
has.
k) Waterworks Supervision
(k-1) Supervising /Regulation Fee P0.50 per P100 capital stock subscribed or paid or if no shares have
been issued, of the capital invested, or of the property and equipment,
whichever is higher.
C. Other Charges Approve Rates (in Pesos)

1. Annual Report Form 200
2 Certification Charge
a) Certification for Memorial Parks 3,500
b) Certificate of the Water Availability 1,500
c) Other Technical Certification 1,000
d) Certified photo copy. 50
3. CPC/CPCN Certificate 500
4. Certificate of Compliance 3,500
5. Testing and Sealing Fee of Water Meters 50
D. Penalties
1. Owner
(a) Operation of a system without a CPC/CPCN P5,000 per year reckoned from date of operation or five years whichever
comes first but not to exceed P25,000
(b) Non-payment of Annual Water Charge 50% of due per year or fraction thereof plus additional interest for
delinquency under Sec. 84 of Amended IRR.
(c) Non-submission of Annual Report Form P2,500 per year + P25/day of delay but not to exceed P5,000
(d) Refusal to have meters and tested and sealed Additional 20% of approved testing and sealing fee for water meter
times total active connection per year.
(e) Illegal extraction of groundwater More than P800 but not exceeding P1,000 per day of violation
2. Well Drillers
(a) Drilling without Permit to Drill 20,000 (1st offense)
30,000 (2nd offense)
Revocation and Registration (3rd offense)
(b) Non-registered well drillers 50,000
E. Penalty for Delinquency (Sec. 84 of the Amended IRR)

Where the penalty imposed is a fine, additional penalty interest equivalent to 2% per month of delay or a fraction thereof until fully
paid shall be charged.
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED AT THE 29TH MEETING OF THE NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES BOARD ON MARCH 21, 2005.
MICHAEL T. DEFENSOR, Chairman, National Water Resources Board, Republic of Philippines
LT-11
Annex-T L.3.3.1 Key Actions to Improve Water Code and Related Rules and Guidelines
Strategic Key Actions to Improve Water Code and Related Rules and Guidelines
Issue
Issue-1 -Establish an effective period of the water permit for 5 to 10 years to allow the NWRB to review
and enforce rational and effective use of water (Art.26 & 28);
-Establish a rule to enforce the concessionaire to take concrete water saving measures (Art.29 &
30, IRR Section22);
-Establish a penal rule to revoke the water permit if its concessionary executes no measures of
effective use other than act of violation (Art.29 & 30);
-Provide Article to specify that the water code prevails over other law (the grid law) in case of
water rights regulation;
-Provide clear compensation rule for the loss due to the priority concessionaire in time of
emergency (Art.22 & 23);
-Modify the condition of the amount of water permit to specify concrete seasonal water use
schedule including non-consumptive use instead of only the maximum rate of diversion or
withdrawal (seasonal quantity and rate ), (Art.18).
-Establish institution to make a water resources basin development plan (the Basin Plan) to
execute quantitative management of daily and/or seasonal variation of regional water budget
(balance) for the economically important river basins including the Pampanga River; (same as
Issue-2)
-Link legally water rights and the Basin Plan; (same as Issue-2)
-Establish planning technical standards for the Basin Plan; (same as Issue-2)
Issue-2 -Provide articles to link the water permit and the basin water resources development plan (Basic
Plan) to enable short and long term quantitative water rights management with securing water
supply reliability; (same as Issue-1)
-Provide an article to establish relevant monitoring stations for transparent and equitable water
rights regulation including daily discharge and water quality;
-Establish planning standards for the Basic Plan to secure safe bulk water supply to various water
uses with a reliable risk; (same as Issue-1)
-Provide article to enable to reallocate the present water right title granted to the public entities
such as NIA, MWSS and Bulacan Province to the water users such as irrigators and/or water
supply companies;
-Clarify risk of water supply failure of the conflicting water rights to enhance water rights transfer
and trading; (same as Issue-1)
-Change the present constant annual water charge system for water permit into different water
charge for different supply reliability and seasonal variation; i.e., high charge for high reliability,
high charge for high season, high charge for longer concession like in Australia;
-Establish reliable assurance and compensation rule for water transfer and trading;
-Establish IRR and technical guidelines for water transfer and trading;
Issue-3 -Review the overlapping provisions of the local government code with the water code (Art.3&6,
IRR Section8), etc;
-Provide an Article in the water code not to allow duplicated layer of granting water permit to
public entities;
-The water rights granted to the public entities at present shall be independently transfered to the
actual water users;
Issue-4 -Modify IRR Section 46(Requirement of Drilled Well), item d;
Issue-5 -Provide Article to link the Water Code and Specific Multipurpose Law if the new law is enacted;
Issue-6 -Provide concrete standard, enforcement measures and penalty to breakers in order to execute
strict regulation of Art.66, and IRR Section 47;
-Set up an institution to enforce and monitor all concessionaires to comply with requirement of
the minimum stream flows for rivers and minimum water levels for lakes to ensure environmental
conservation;
Issue-7 -Establish responsibility and role of water users on the water quality management in the Basin;
Issue-8 -Prepare the flood control basin plan (FCBP) for the severe flood prone areas based on Art.53. of
the water code (promote, coordinate protection of flood plain lands, and flood plain management
plan by the secretary of DPWH);
-Establish IRR and planning standards for the FCBP;
-Link legally the FCBP with reservoir operation rule of large dams concerned;
-Improve IRR for the Right-of-way of the public domain of river regime;
LT-12
Annex-T L.3.3.2 Key Actions to Introduce Specific Multipurpose Dam Law
Strategic Key Actions to Establish Specific Multipurpose Dam Law
Issues
Issue-5 -Establish water account of flood control instead of incidental function for multipurpose dams;
-Establish a specific law to define an equitable cost allocation rule among public (in particular
flood control) and private beneficiaries for multi-purpose projects to reduce dam construction
cost share among water users;
-Link the reservoir operation rule with the cost share of reservoir volume allocation and the flood
control basin plan;
-Supplement article to define water permit as tradable property in the Civil Code in line with the
specific multipurpose dam law;
LT-13
Annex-T L.3.4.4 Key Actions to Strengthen Line Agencies and LGUs
Strategic Key Actions to Strengthen Line Agencies and LGUs
Issues
Issue-1 -Establish NWRB owned reliable and accurate monitoring stations for discharge, ecological flow
and water quality at key water conflict areas;
-Strengthen the capacity of NWRB for monitoring and enforcing water rights;
Issue-4 -Empower the groundwater monitoring and enforcing function of the LGUs from the regional
interests;
-Establish a regional monitoring system to monitor regional groundwater level collaborated with
EMB and LGUs including quantity and quality;
Issue-7 -Strengthening the capacity of RBCO, EMB, FMB and related LGUs to execute and enforce
water quality management effectively;
-Strengthen the water quality monitoring system;
Issue-9 -Monitor the progress and outcomes of the ongoing capacity development of the development
projects and programs for forest and watershed management financed by JICA and other donors;
-Conduct capacity assessment on the outcomes from the ongoing projects and programs;
-Strengthen preventive measures of forest fire including capacity development;
-Strengthen the execution capacity of the weak functions of FMB and LGUs still remained for
watershed and forest management;
Issue-10 -Clarify the necessary functions and missing functions in the existing organizations for IWRM
implementation;
-Supplement the function to the line agency (NWRB, DENR) or RDC and execute capacity
strengthening for monitoring and execution;
-Set up an appropriate RBO for the Pampanga River based on the regional consensus;
-Set up a water users association to advocate sustainable IWRM in PRB;
Annex-T L.3.5.1 Key Actions to Strengthen Financial Capacity for Sustainable IWRM
Strategic Key Actions to Strengthen Financial Capacity for Sustainable IWRM
Issues
Issue-1 -Strengthen financial capacity of NWRB including annual water charge collection;
Water
Rights
Issue-7 -Increase the fund of DENR for monitoring stations and O&M of the monitoring systems;
Water -Introduce the beneficiary’s pay principle (BPP) for the cost of water quality management;
Quality
Issue-11 -Increase the share of O&M budget for the river facilities in both LGUs and LAs (DPWH);
Strengthen -Establish specific finances in LGUs for O&M;
Execution -Set up a water users association to advocate sustainable IWRM and collect association fee
Capacity and for the O&M of RBO and IWRM;
Sustainability -Set up special accounts for sustainable IWRM in the Basin;
-Reconfirm the definition of the responsibility of O&M of the flood control and river
facilities after transfer of the facilities from DPWH to LGUs (MOA);
LT-14
Annex-Figures
Policy Making & Planning
NEDA
DENR
NEDA
DOF
Coordination / Regulation DOJ
Members
DOH
NWRB NHRC
Exec. Dir., NWRB
Water Quality & Sanitation Watershed Management Integrated Area Data Collection Research Cloud Seeding
Development
EMB DOH FMB BSWM NWRB BRS DOST-PCAFNRRD PAF BSWM
BRL EHS NIA NPC LLDA RDCs NAMRIALWUA ERDB
LGUs MWSS PAWB BOI PEZA MGBPAGASA
LWUA-WDs RBCO MWSS NIA
LF-1
Irrigation Hydro Power Water Supply Flood Management Fisheries & Recreation Ports & Navigation
NIA DA DOEPSALM NAPC-WASCO DPWH-PMO BFAR PTA PPA

BSWM NPC PEMC DOF-CDA OCD-NDCC
DBP DAR PAGASA
DPWHMWSS MMDA
LWUA-WDs
PTAHUDCC
DILG-PMO
PEZALGU’s
Source: Philippine Water Supply Sector Road Map, p.19, modified by JICA study
Annex-F L.1.2.1 Functional Chart of Water Related Agencies in the Philippines

OFFICE OF THE
PRESIDENT
DBM DOF NEDA DENR DILG DOH DPWH DA DOE

Budgeting Funding Planning NWRB Environment
Water Rights &
& Regulation Watershed PMO PMO
of CPC Regional NIA NPC NEA
Holders Regional LWUA Health Regional
Offices Office Office
Regional Hydropower
Irrigation Dam
Water Provincial District MWSS
PLG OO Urban Office
Users Hospital Engineer’s Office
Water
Office
Districts
FMB PAWB ERDB MGB EMB
Concessionaries
MLG OO in
RENRO CLG OO Provincial Metro Manila
Infrastructures
LF-2
(Roads, Utilities,
Flood Control,
Irrigation, etc.)
Irrigation
PENRO Municipal/ LGUs
Management
City
Office (IMO)
LGUs Provincial
CENRO Health Office
Water
Supply
LGU Providers
Communal
Owned/ Rural Health
Irrigation
Operated Office
System
Sanitation & Water

Function of Local Government Quality Control
Source; JICA Study Team

Annex-F L.1.2.2 Functional Relationship among Central Government Agencies and Local Governments
LF-3
Annex-F L.1.2.3 Organizational Chart of Province of Pampanga

1.
File Application
With Documents
2.
Hydropower Recreational
Agriculture Domestic Drainage
Industrial Fisheries
Purpose Purpose Purpose
Purpose Purpose
9. 14.
Technical
Determine Technical
Appraisal by
Compliance w/ Evaluation by
Deputized
requirements NWRB staff
Agencies
10.
LF-4
11. 12.
Obtain clearance
Yes Issue Permit
Posting of Is source from to Drill 15. NWRB staff
From other
Application Groundwater?
agencies recommended
To the Board
Is there
No 16.
13. Submit well
Protest?
data to Board Decides
NWRB
Yes
Yes
18.
7. 8. 17.
Hearings Issue Water
Adjudication/ In favor of
Return No Yes Permit
No Application
Decision by the Applicant? Approved?
Papers
Board
Source: NWRB
Annex-F L.1.3.1 Flowchart for Processing of Water Permit Application
Board of Director
Office of Executive
Director
(8/9)
Policy and Water Right Water Utilities Monitoring and Administrative and
Program Division Division Division Enforcement Financial Division
( 22 / 26 ) ( 13 / 18 ) (12 /15 ) Division (18 /25 ) ( 30 / 33 )
Policy and
Permit Section Registration and Operation and General Service
Formulation
Licensing Section Monitoring Section Section
Section
Program Complaint and

Water Rate Water Meter Personnel and
Evaluation and Investigation
Regulation System Calibration Section Records Section
Coordination Section
Water Resources Litigation and Budget and

Evaluation Section Enforcement
Assessment and Adjudication Accounting
Section
Section System Section
Water Resources Litigation and Collection and

Systems and Evaluation Section
Information Adjudication Disbursement
Accounts Section
Section Section Section
Note: Values in ( ) indicate staff number/position.
Policy Monitoring Administrative

Water
and WaterRight and and
Utilities
Program Enforcement Financial
Engineer 10 4 - 11 -
Special investigator - 5 - - -
Planning officer 1 - - - -
Development - - - 2 -
management officer
Instrument technician - - - 4 -
Information analyst 3 - - - -
Statistician 1 - - - -
Economist 3 - - - -
Financial analyst - - 3 - -
Regulation officer - - 7 - -
Attorney - 1 - - -
Administrative 4 3 2 1 30
Total 22 13 12 18 30
(95+8=103)
Annex-F L.1.3.2 Organization Chart of Present NWRB as of March 2009 Source: NWRB
LF-5
Source: Proposal to DBN, NWRB
Annex-F L.1.3.3 NWRB’s Proposed Organizational Structure as of March 2009
LF-6
Economic Growth
Societal Goal Towards Poverty Reduction
Sustainable Water Management

Sectoral Goal and Development
Organizational Outcomes
Increased availability and

Effective water resources
accessibility of safe and
allocation
affordable water supply
Major Final Outputs
Policy Formulation and Regulation of Water Regulation of Water Service

Coordination Utilization Providers
P/A/Ps
Formulation of policies Issuance of water permits Granting of Ceritificate of

Public Convenience (CPC)
Review of water resources Resolution of water use to water service providers
projects conflicts
Tariff setting
Conduct of Master Plan Issuance of permit to drill
studies, assessment of Business plan reviews
water supply and demand Monitoring of water
resources Conduct of performance
Maintenance of water audit of CPC grantees (5
resources data bank Enforcement of laws, orders year tariff methodology)
and notices
Adjudication and resolution
of cases
Testing and calibration of

water meters
Monitoring of compliance,
CPC grantees
Source: Organizational Performance Indicator Framework, FY 2008 Performance Budget of

Department/Agencies, Sustaining Philippine Expenditure Management Reform, Department of Budget
and Management, Malacanang, Manila, December 2007, p668.
Annex-F L.1.3.4 Logical Framework for NWRB
LF-7
NWRB BOARD
Office of the Executive Director
Office of the Deputy Executive Director

 Office of the Executive Director/Deputy Exec. Director Staff
 Management Information System Staff
 Internal Audit Staff
Financial & Administrative Office  Public Affairs Information Staff
 Human Resources Management & Records Section
 Finance Section
 Treasury Section
 General Services Section
LF-8
Legal & Adjudication Policy, Coordination & Resource Regulation Economic Regulation
Service Integration Service Service Service
River Basin
Policy and Program Water Rights Standards & Technical Financial Regulation
Legal Division Adjudication Division Development
Division Division Compliance Division Regulation Division Division
Division
Note: Note:  Policy  River Basin  Permit  Standards  Registration &  Financial
 Composed of pool  Composed of pool Formulation Institutional Section Monitoring Licensing Monitoring
of lawyers, of lawyers, LLB Section Development Section Section Section
Section
 Technical
LLB graduates and graduates and Evaluation
stenographers stenographers
 Program  Reservoir  Technical  Tariff
Evaluation & Section Regulation and Operations Regulation
 River Basin Project
Coordination Planning & Monitoring Section Section
Section
 Assessment &
Section
Implementation Water Pricing
Section
 Consumer Affairs
Section and Compliance
 Project  Technical
Management Investigation & Section
 River Basin
Section Capacity Dev't Enforcement
Section Section
Annex-F L.1.3.5 NWRB's Proposed Organizational Structure, September 2010

Scope of BEFORE the Basin Plan is made
Some shared strategies
(Example: Basin Salinity Management Strategy)

Basin-wide
Issues Basin state

NSW VIC VIC OLD ACT
Water sharing Bulk Water allocation Water resource Water sharing Key water
plans entitlements plans plans plans planning
Water instruments
2014 2019 2014 2014 2014
resource plan Typical plan
expiry
10 years 15 years 5 years 10 years (As required)
Local issues Planning/review
Industry and individual water rights holders
Scope of AFTER the Basin Plan is made
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
Basin-wide
Issues BASIN PLAN
Basin-wide strategy for water resource planning and management,
NSW VIC VIC OLD ACT Basin state

Water
Water resource Water resource Water resource Water resource Water resource Water planning
resource plan
plans plans plans plans plans instruments
2014-2024 2019-2029 2014-2024 2014-2024 2014-2024 Typical plan

Local issues
period
Industry and individual water rights holders
Source: web-site of Murray-Daring Basin Authority
Annex-F L.2.2.1 General Relationship of State Water Resource Plans to the Basin Plan for the
Murray-Darling River
LF-9
Source: Japan Water Agency
Annex-F L.2.2.2 Objective, Mission and Activities of Japan Water Agency
LF-10
All provincial governors and city The Regional Directors of agencies
mayors, mayors of municipalities represented in the National Economic and
designated as provincial capitals, RDC 3 Full Development Authority Board (NEDA,
and mayors of municipalities Council DAR, DA, DBM, DENR, DOF, DFA,
designated as regional center; DOH, DILG, DOLE, DPWH, DOST, DTI,
All presidents of the provincial DOTC, BSP) and the Regional Directors
league of mayors of DECs, DSWD and DOT.
Secretary
Private Sector Public Sector
Accredited private Accredited NGOs LGUs: The provinces of Tarlac, Nueva Regional Line
sector based in the based in the region Ecija, Pampanga, Zambales, Bulacan Agencies (RLAs):
region and Bataa, and the cities of Angeles, NEDA, DTI, DA,
Cabanatuan, Olongapo, Palayan and San DAR, DENR,
Jose (Nueva Ecija) with San Fernando, DPWH, DepEd,
Pampanga as the Regional Center. TESDA, NIA
members
RDC 3 Full
Council
§4.1
Executive
Committee
§4.3
Advisory
Committee
§4.2
SECCOMs
Sectoral Special Task Forces
Committees Committees
SCDA RGC-MC §4.4 Balik
SCED RPMC §4.8 MacArthur
SCID RKCG §4.5 Solid Waste
SCSD RSCC §4.9 Mgmt
RLUC §4.6
PDAC §4.10
RPC §4.7
SC: Sectoral Committee RGC-MC: Regional Government Center Management Committee
DA: Development Administration RKCG: Regional KALAHI Convergence Group
ED: Economic Development RLUC: Regional Land Use Committee
ID: Infrastructure Development RPC: Regional Productivity Committee
SD: Social Development RPMC: Regional Project Monitoring Committee
RSCC: Regional Statistical Coordination Committee
PDAC: Project Development Assistance Committee
Source: Handbook of the Regional Development Council III (RDC III)

Central Luzon Region, Revised August 2006, p26 & pp. 1-25
Annex-F L.3.4.1 Organization Structure of Regional Development Council of Region III
LF-11
DENR Secretary FMB (Forest Management Bureau)
LMB (Land Management Bureau)
NWRB Undersecretary
MGB (Mine and Geosciences Bureau)
Assistant Secretary PAWB (Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau)
for RBO
ERDB (Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau)
Executive Director
EMB (Environmental Management Bureau)
RBCO
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 NCR Region 4A Region 13

Regional Executive
Director
Manila Bay RBCO
LF-12
FMB EMB MGB PAWB

FMB EMB MGB PAWB LMB ERDB
(satellite)
RBCO - PMO (satellite)
River Basin Site RBCO - PMO

Coordination
RBO RBO Committee RBCO: Manila Bay Site
Coordination Committee
Chairman
RBO RBO DENR DPWH DILG DA …

Pampanga
(Proposed)
NIA
Source: RBCO-DENR, January 2010
Annex-F L.3.4.2 RBO under of RBCO and Satellite RBCO, Manila Bay Site Coordination Committee
Regional
Development Council
(RDC) III
SCID SCSD SCED SCDA River Basins Committee
River Basins Committee

(Chair: Provincial Governor Provincial River
Members: Provincial governors, Basin
Regional Directors of the Technical Sub-committees
Secretariat, NGOs, Pos, Private
Sector, etc.)
Policy-making & Investment
Coordination
Technical Secretariat
(NEDA, DENR, NWRB,
DPWH, DOH, etc.)
Provincial River
Basin
Sub-committees
The relationship of the RDC III – RBC Policy & Regional

Coordination Development Council
vis-à-vis the regular frontline agencies
(RDC) III
Secretariat
Roles & Functions: (NEDA III)
Policy coordination & Decision-making
body in the region:
Formulation of development plans & River Basins
Investment Programs; Project monitoring; Seccoms Committee
Budgeting & investment programming
Roles & Functions:

Formulation of agency plans and LGUs RLAs
programs;
Implementation of plans and programs
Executing GOCCs
Units
Annex-F L.3.4.3 Proposed creation of a Committee on River Basins under the Regional
Development Council (RDC) III
LF-13
Pampanga River Basin Council (PRBC)
Executive Committee (EC)
Financial and Administrative Office Secretariat
TWG for monitoring TWG for TWG for TWG for TWG for
water rights monitoring water monitoring monitoring O&M collecting O&M
regulation and quality, watershed and of river facilities costs for the
enforcement ecosystems and forest for flood control council, river
(surface water and sanitation management facilities and
groundwater) monitoring
facilities
Chair – NWRB Chair – DENR Chair – DENR Chair – DPWH Chair – DBM
Co-Chair – a Co-chair – a Co-chair – a Co-chair – a Co-chair – a
representative of representative of representative of representative of representative of
LGUs LGUs LGUs LGUs LGUs
Note: PRBC and EC are multi-sectoral, led by the Chair, a representative of LGUs in
Region 3.
A representative of PRBC or EC is elected by the member of PRBC and EC
respectively
Annex-F L.3.4.4 Independent Pampanga River Basin Council
LF-14
DENR Other
DPWH
NWRB RBCO Agencies
Office of the Executive Director PMO

Deputy Executive Director
Regional
Office
FMB
Policy, Coordination Resource Regulation Economic Regulatory
& Integration Service Service Service District
Engineer’s
Regional Office
Office
Policy & River Basin Water Standards Technical Financial
Program Development Rights Compliance Regulation Regulation
Division Division Division Division Division Division (LGUs)
Provincial
LF-15
Manila Bay Site

Infrastructures
Coordination Committee
(Roads, Utilities,
flood control,
RBO RDC
Alternative-2: Irrigation, etc.)
Direct Issue NIA, LLDA, Selected WDs, Pampanga Region III
Deputize water (Proposed)
of Water Selected RBOs Permit acceptance
Permit (deputize water permit O&M of River
& monitoring Facilities
acceptance and monitoring) O&M of
(Alternative-1)
River facilities
Alternative-1 (Alternative-2)
Annex-F L.3.4.5 Position of NWRB for Water Rights Regulation among RBCO and RBO
Appendix
APPENDIX L-1
Related Articles of CHAPTER III APPROPRIATION OF WATERS, Water Code of the
Philippines (1966)
Art. 18 All water permits granted shall be subject to conditions of beneficial use, adequate standards
of design and construction, and such other terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Council.
Such permits shall specify the maximum amount of water which may be delivered or
withdrawn, the maximum rate of diversion or withdrawal, the time or times during the year when
water may be diverted or withdrawn, the point or points of diversion or location of wells, the place of
use, the purposes for which water may be used, and such other requirements the Council deems desire.
Art.19. Water wrights may be leased or transferred in whole or in part to another person with prior
approval of the Council, after due notice and hearing.
Art.20. The measures and limit of appropriation of waters shall be for beneficial use.
Beneficial use of water is the utilization of water in the right amount during the period that
the water is needed for producing the benefits for which the water is appropriated.
Art. 21. Standards of beneficial use shall be prescribed by the Council for the appropriator of water for
different purposes and conditions, and the use of waters which are appropriated shall be measured and
controlled in accordance therewith.
Excepting those for domestic use, every appropriator of water shall maintain water control
and measuring devices, and keep records of water withdrawal. When required by the Council, all
appropriators of water shall furnish information on water use.
Art. 22. Between two or more appropriators of water from the same source of supply, priority in time
of appropriation shall give the better right, except in times of emergency the use of water for domestic
and municipal purposes shall have a better right over al other uses; Provided, that where water
shortage is recurrent and the appropriator for municipal use has a lower priority in time of
appropriation, then it shall be his duty to find an alterative source of supply in accordance with
conditions prescribed by the Council.
Art.24. A water right shall be exercised in such a manner that the rights of third persons or of other
appropriators are not prejudiced thereby.
Art.25. A holder of a water permit may demand the establishment of easement necessary for the
construction and maintenance of the works and facilities needed for the beneficial use of the waters to
be appropriated, subject to the requirements of just compensation and to the following conditions:
1
a. That he is the owner, lease, mortgagee or one having rental right over the land upon
which he proposes to use water; and
b. That the proposed easement is the most convenient and the least onerous to the servient
estate.
Easement relating to the appropriation and use of water may be modified by the agreement of
the contracting parties provided the same is not contrary to law or prejudicial to the third
persons.
Art.26. Where water shortage is recurred, the use of water pursuant to a permit may, in the interest of
equitable distribution of benefit among legal appropriators, be reduced after due notice and hearing.
Art.27. Water users shall bear the diminution of any water supply due to natural causes of fore
majeure.
Art.28. Water permits shall continue to be valid as long as water is beneficially used; however, it may
be suspended on the grounds of non-compliance with approved plans and specifications or schedules
of water distribution; use of water for a purpose other than that for which it was granted; non-payment
of water charges; wastage; failure to keep records of water diversion, when required; and violation of
any term or condition of any permit or of rules and regulation promulgated by the Council.
Temporary permits may be issued for the appropriation and use of water for short periods
under special circumstances.
Art.29. Water permit may be revoked after due notice and hearing on grounds of non-use; gross
violation of the conditions imposed in the permit; unauthorized scale of water; willful failure or refusal
or to comply with rules and regulation or any lawful order; pollution, public nuisance or acts
detrimental to public health and safety; when the appropriator is found to be disqualified under the law
to exploit and develop natural resources of the Philippines; when, in the case of irrigation, the land is
converted to non-agricultural purposes; and other similar grounds.
Art.30. All water permits are subject to modification or cancellation by the Council, after due notice
and hearing, in favor of a project of greater beneficial use or for multi-purpose development, and a
water permittee who suffers thereby shall be dully compensated by the entity or person in whose favor
the cancellation was made.
2
Sector M
Water-related Data Management
Sector M. Water-related Data Management
Table of Contents
Pages
M.1 General ................................................................................................................................... M-1
M.1.1 Data Classification ............................................................................................... M-1
M.1.2 Existing Data and Knowledge Management ........................................................ M-2
M.1.3 Collected Data and Information ........................................................................... M-4
M.1.4 Major Concerns and Issues on Existing Condition of Water-related Data in the
Study Area ............................................................................................................ M-5
M.2 GIS Database Development .................................................................................................. M-7
M.2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................. M-7
M.2.2 Data Collection .................................................................................................... M-7
M.2.3 GIS Database Build-up ........................................................................................ M-8
M.2.3.1 Data Types ................................................................................................ M-8
M.2.3.2 Coordinate System.................................................................................... M-9
M.2.3.3 Directory Structure ................................................................................... M-9
M.2.4 Technical Transfer .............................................................................................. M-10
M.3 Pampanga River Basin IWRM Study Website ................................................................. M-11
M.3.1 Objective .............................................................................................................M-11
M.3.2 Administration and Hosting ................................................................................M-11
M.3.3 Features/Sections ................................................................................................M-11
M.3.4 User Types ......................................................................................................... M-13
M.3.4.1 Access Restrictions ................................................................................. M-13
List of Tables
Table M. 1.3.1 Number of Documents Collected in the Study ............................................... M-4

Table M. 1.3.2 Major Contents of Data/Information Collected .............................................. M-4
Table M. 3.4.1 User Accessibility ......................................................................................... M-13
Annex-T M.1.3.1 List of Collected Documents .................................................................... MT-1

Annex-T M.1.4.1 List of Spatial Data: Shapefiles .............................................................. MT-21
Annex-T M.1.4.2 List of Spatial Data: Tables ..................................................................... MT-28
Annex-T M.1.4.3 Detailed Specifications Shapefile and Table Data .................................. MT-30
Annex-T M.1.4.4 List of Spatial Data: Raster ..................................................................... MT-45
i
List of Figures
Figure M. 1.2.1 Existing Official Data and Knowledge Management Options in NWRB.... M-2
Figure M. 2.2.1 Coverage of 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study .................................... M-7
Figure M. 2.3.1 Linking of Tables ......................................................................................... M-8
Figure M. 2.3.2 Batch File Configuration ........................................................................... M-10
Annex-F M.1.2.1 NWRB Intranet Site .................................................................................. MF-1

Annex-F M.1.2.2 NWRB Official Website ........................................................................... MF-2
Annex-F M.1.2.3 PhilWATSAN Website .............................................................................. MF-2
Annex-F M.1.2.4 NWIN Website .......................................................................................... MF-3
Annex-F M.3.1.1 Pampanga River Basin IWRM Study Website.......................................... MF-4
ii
Sector M. Water-related Data Management
M.1 General
M.1.1 Data Classification
Data to be used for planning, monitoring and their management are key components for efficient and
effective water resources management in a river basin. In general, the following categories of data
are necessary to be collected and managed properly when water resources management is
implemented.
(1) General data
The general data include fundamental information not only for water resources management
but also other development and management activities in a region. The information
extracted from a general topographic map, statistical information on demography, regional
economy and so on, basic socio-natural condition such as land cover, land category, geology
and hydrogeology are included in this category.
(2) Basic data for water resources management
The basic data for water resources management are specific for water resources management.
The information on facilities related to water use such as storage dam, diversion dam, canal,
irrigation area, production wells, as well as location of monitoring stations for stream flow
(both for water quantity and quality) and climate condition, are included in this category.
The delineated sub-basins and catchments are likewise grouped here.
(3) Monitoring/Permit data
The monitoring/permit data are further divided into the following categories.
 Monitoring data related to water resources such as observation record of quantity,
quality and water level of stream flow, water level of monitoring wells and climatic
conditions
 Operation record of storage dam and diversion dam
 Water use permit
 Waste water discharge permit
 Control monitoring record for water use permit and waste water discharge permit
(4) Analysis/Planning data
Various data categorized are used to develop data for planning and analysis such as surface
water and groundwater availability. The information which shows future visions and
projects in a river basin is also included in this category. The information would be utilized
for decision support for water resources management in a river basin.
(5) Knowledge data
Any practical knowledge from previous experiences in activities related to water resources
management in a river basin is also important and it should be accumulated for future use.
In this section, the existing data and knowledge management in NWRB is firstly described. Secondly,
the existing condition of the water-related data and information in the study area is summarize with
issues and concerns for their utilization.
M-1
M.1.2 Existing Data and Knowledge Management

The NWRB currently maintains the following knowledge management portals: (see also
Figure M.1.2.1).
 NWRB Intranet
 Official website of NWRB (www.nwrb.gov.ph)
 Philippine Water Supply and Sanitation Sector portal (www.philwatsan.org.ph)
 National Water Information Network website (www.nwin.nwrb.gov.ph)
Server in NWRB Outside host server
Update
Intranet
download Update
(occasional) Official
webpage
NWRB Pubilc
staff Update PhilWATSAN
webpage
via
Update Internet
NWIN NWIN
database Replication database
Extraction (occasional)
Exchange of Information
via LAN
via Internet
via Media (DVD)
Figure M. 1.2.1 Existing Official Data and Knowledge Management Options in NWRB
(1) NWRB Intranet

The intranet started its operation in 2006. The main objectives are to facilitate knowledge
sharing among divisions, ensure transparency, easy dissemination of information and improve
the different business processes of NWRB. The wide use of intranet has improved the
tracking of water permit applications, improved service delivery to clients both external and
internal, improved our policy development and documentation and improved our organization
and structure. The contents vary from press releases, policy resolutions, Memorandum of
Agreement, minutes of meetings, pictures taken from different events, different NWRB forms
such as leave forms and travel order forms and other NWRB related information. Update of
the intranet is done monthly by the identified contributors in each division. A dedicated server
for the portal is installed at NWRB.
Annex-F M.1.2.1 shows the main page of the NWRB intranet.
(2) Official website of NWRB (www.nwrb.gov.ph)
NWRB currently maintains its own official website. However, due to the transfer of the
agency under the DENR, a new one is now being prepared for integration as a subdomain of
the latter.
M-2
The current website of NWRB contains brief introduction of NWRB, mission, vision,
organizational structure, accomplishments, profiles of different divisions, fees and charges and
other NWRB water related information. The water permit application form can also be
downloaded through this site. Update of the web is done occasionally by NWRB staff..
The website is hosted outside NWRB.
As detailed in the succeeding sections, a website was developed for purposes of this study.
To access this, a link was created in NWRB’s website.
Annex-F M.1.2.2 shows the main page of the official website of NWRB.
(3) Philippine Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Portal (www.philwatsan.org.ph)
The PhilWATSAN portal started as a project initiated by NWRB in 2006, in collaboration
with other government agencies, with support from the German Technical Cooperation
Agency (GTZ)- Water Sanitation Program. By 2007, it was institutionalized as a
government program now being pursued by 10 collaborating agencies serving as the Technical
Working Group (TWG) to the portal: National Water Resources Board, Department of Interior
and Local Government- Water Supply and Sanitation Project Management Office
(DILG-WSSPMO), Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA), Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), National Economic Development Authority
(NEDA), National Anti-Poverty Commission – Water Supply and Sanitation Coordinating
Office(NAPC-WASCO), Department of Agriculture- Bureau of Soils and Water Management
(DA-BSWM), Department of Health (DOH), Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System
(MWSS), Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). The portal contains policies,
projects/programs, research/publications and statistics related to water supply and sanitation
sector. It is not just a repository of data and information. It is also a dynamic tool for
monitoring the country’s progress as currently pursued under the Philippine Water Supply
Sector Roadmap. Update of information is done by member agencies through the internet.
Annex-F M.1.2.3 shows the main page of the PhilWATSAN portal.
(4) National Water Information Network (NWIN) website (www.nwin.nwrb.gov.ph)
The National Water Information Network (NWIN) 39) started in 2000 as a project to address
the need to rationalize the collection of water related data. It is a computer-based system
capable of electronically linking the databases of water resources data collection agencies and
provide easy access to user agencies. NWRB acts as a central repository of data to which
various participating agencies are linked such as National Water Resources Board (NWRB),
Bureau of Research and Standards (BRS), Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), Mines
and Geo-sciences Bureau (MGB), Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA), National
Irrigation Administration (NIA), National Economic Development Authority (NEDA),
Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA)
and the Department of Interior and Local Government- Water Supply and Sanitation
Management Office (WSSPMO-DILG). The NWIN website contains rainfall data, stream
flow data, water quality data, dam inventory, groundwater data, list of rivers and water permits
data. NWRB used to keep high speed cable connections among participating agencies and
maintains the 24x7 website hosting but due to budget constraints the physical connections
have been disconnected making it difficult for participating agencies to upload data directly to
the servers. They were also restrained from publishing some information due to policy
issues raised by other participating agencies. The website is now hosted outside NWRB.
There was no significant update of data since 2004 except for water permit data being
regularly updated by NWRB.
Annex-F M.1.2.4 shows the main page of the NWIN website.
NWRB plans to maintain a single website by integrating all the above mentioned websites to better
serve the public.
M-3
M.1.3 Collected Data and Information

The documents related to the water resources management/development in the study area have been
collected during the study period and listed in Annex-T M.1.3.1. The number of documents collected
is shown below.
Table M. 1.3.1 Number of Documents Collected in the Study
Category Number of Items Collected
00 IWRM General 42
01 Laws & Institution 33
03 Regional Development 26
04 Water Resources Management and Development 80
05 Domestic Water Supply 48
06 Irrigation 70
07 Groundwater 43
08 Dam 24
09 Flood and Sediment Disasters 54
10 Water Quality Management 40
11 Watershed Management 40
12 Development of Database 27
13 Guidelines 44
14 Environment 42
15 Fishery 8
Total 621
A variety of relevant data and information were also collected. The major contents of the
data/information are as listed in Table M. 1.3.2.
Table M. 1.3.2 Major Contents of Data/Information Collected
Category Major Content Data Source
 Map with a scale of 1 to 50,000 developed from
Topographic Map JICA, NAMRIA
aerial photography taken in 2006
Provinces of Pampanga, Bulacan, Nueva
Socio Economy  Present and projected Socio-economic profile
Ecija and Tarlac
Water districts in Provinces of Pampanga,
Water District  Inventory of the domestic water supply service
Bulacan, Nueva Ecija and Tarlac
 Forestry statistics
Watershed  List of watershed management project
Cenro, DENR Region III
Management  Land cover map
 Statistics of mangrove
 Results of laboratory test on river water quality,
Water Quality DENR Region III
sediment load, groundwater
 Operation Record of Pantabangan and Angat Dam
Dam operation NIA and NPC Dam Offices
Reservoir
 Location map of irrigation area
 Recorded and projected irrigation schedule
Irrigation NIA HQ, NIA Region III, UPRIIS
 Diversion requirement of the major irrigation area
 Extent of irrigation area
 Flood damage record PDCC, RDCC
Flood
 Actual extent of flood inundation area Dartmouth Flood Observatory
 Features of existing wells
 Record of land subsidence
Groundwater NWRB, MGB
 Results of laboratory test on the groundwater,
geological map
Meteorological and
 Climate, rainfall, river flow discharge, and tidal data PAGASA, BRS
hydrology
National Statistic  National Socio Economic Census NSO
Water Use Right  Inventory of water use rights NWRB
Bureau of Agricultural Statistics of
Fishery  Fishery statistics
Department of Agriculture
M-4
M.1.4 Major Concerns and Issues on Existing Condition of Water-related Data in the Study
Area
Based on the collected data and information described in the foregoing subsection, necessary spatial
data for water resources management planning in the study area have been prepared as listed in
Annex-T M.1.4.1, M.1.4.2, M.1.4.3 and M.1.4.4.
The major issues and concerns for the existing condition of water-related data in the study area are
described below based on the experience on the data collection.
(1) General data
 Fortunately, new NAMRIA 1:50,000 topographic maps prepared in 2008 are available
for most of the study area in vector format. This made the study team to utilize the
most updated land condition in the study area.
 DENR Region III has prepared a lot of general data, most of which were extracted
from the old NAMRIA topographic maps, that are available for the study and these
were utilized. The agency, however, can’t specifically identify which data were
developed in-house and which were sourced from other government offices.
 Administrative boundary is different for many different data sources. It is difficult to
fix the administrative boundary in the present study. NWRB and the study team
agreed to use the administrative boundary given by the NAMRIA topographic maps.
 In many municipalities/cities, a landuse plan is still under preparation. Moreover,
landuse type used by LGUs is different with each other. It is difficult to prepare an
integrated landuse map for the provincial government.
 Some data for ancestral domains and protected areas only indicate a general
description of the areas, such as the name of the municipality or barangay.
Assumptions had to be made to approximate the locations of these features.
 Some data lack or have no information at all on the coordinate system. This affects
the accuracy of their locations as assumptions had to be made on their geographic
positions. This is also the case with other data classifications.
(2) Basic data for water resources management
 There is a database in NIA for irrigation related facilities in vector format. Part of this
database is available for the study. Other information is basically available in
non-vector format. A lot of basic data are created by the study team, refereeing the
existing information and so on.
 To maintain consistency to the general data, it was sometimes necessary to adjust the
data, especially in their location.
 The data and information of production wells are scattered in several agencies,
although LWUA has solid database for production wells.
(3) Monitoring/permit data
 Monitoring and permit data are the most frequently changing. However, they are
scattered among several different agencies. There is no integrated management of
those data.
 Processed climatic data from PAGASA are not free in general.
 Some monitoring data for production wells are kept in water districts. It is necessary
to collect the data one by one.
 There are limited data available for surface water quality in the study area.
M-5
 Operation record of storage dam and diversion dam is available for NWRB by request
basis. However, there is no direct and synchronized sharing of the information among
the related agencies.
 The waster water discharge permit data are not well organized. It is difficult to
extract necessary information for assessment of pollution load from the filed
information for discharge permits.
 There is no solid database for control monitoring both for water use permit and waste
water discharge permit. This may cause the difficulty for the monitoring activities to
be reflected in the assessment and planning processes.
(4) Analysis/Planning data
 The data were prepared during the course of the present study.
(5) Knowledge data
 There is no database for integrating previously accumulated knowledge for the water
resource management in the study area.
M-6
M.2 GIS Database Development

M.2.1 Overview
The capability of Geographic Information System (GIS) to efficiently capture, store, update,
manipulate, analyze and display all forms of geographically referenced information makes it a very
powerful tool in making decisions. It is useful for natural resources management, disaster
management, urban and regional planning, transportation studies, utilities management, etc.
The development of a comprehensive GIS database offered the study team a better insight of the
conditions of the Pampanga River Basin and its surrounding areas. It provided support to the
analyses made in the study.
M.2.2 Data Collection
Majority of the base data came from The Study for Mapping Policy and Topographic Mapping for
Integrated National Development Plan in the Republic of Philippines by NAMRIA-JICA on 2008 that
updated several 1:50,000 topographic map sheets in Central Luzon. Figure M.2.2.1 shows its
coverage which overlaps about 75% of the Pampanga River Basin. Additional base data were
obtained from DENR Region III, which developed their own GIS database from old NAMRIA
1:50,000 maps.
Figure M. 2.2.1 Coverage of 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study
The study team also collected specific data from various government agencies related to the offices’
mandate (e.g. DENR-PAWB for protected areas, NCIP for indigenous peoples, NSO for population,
etc.)
Relevant data that are freely distributed over the internet, such as the WorldClim and SRTM, were
downloaded and used in the study.
The data were gathered in both hard and softcopy formats and required the necessary processing in
order to be integrated into the GIS database. Generally, the collected raw data came in the following
formats:
M-7
(1) ESRI Shapefile

(2) ESRI ArcInfo Coverage
(3) AutoCAD DWG/DXF
(4) Microsoft Excel
(5) Raster Images (JPG, TIFF, PDF, etc.)
(6) Google Map KML/KMZ files
(7) Lot Technical Descriptions
(8) Text Descriptions
(9) Harcopies
M.2.3 GIS Database Build-up
After evaluating the collected data, they were integrated into the GIS database. It primarily involves
the conversion of all data to digital format and making them conform to the adopted standards.
The quality of the data were checked and edited. Errors such as overlapping features, gaps, unclosed
polygons and other inconsistencies were corrected and the final output were stored in the database.
Annex-T M.1.4.1, M.1.4.2, M.1.4.3 and M.1.4.4 list all the spatial data created and used in the study.
M.2.3.1 Data Types
(1) ESRI Shapefile
The main GIS data format used in the study is the ESRI Shapefile.
(2) Tables
Using a common attribute, a table maybe linked to a GIS database to provide additional
information. Temporarily joining two or more tables minimizes the number of fields in the
GIS data. Figure M.2.3.1 shows samples of simple linking of tables.
Figure M. 2.3.1 Linking of Tables
The list in Annex-T M.1.4.2 also indicates to which GIS data a particular table may be linked.
The data formats used are Microsoft Excel (.xls), dBase (.dbf), and comma-separated values
(.csv).
(3) Raster
The study used GeoTIFF and JPG (along with their corresponding world files) as raster data
formats.
M-8
(4) Hyperlink
Incidentally, only Microsoft Excel files were used as hyperlinks for this study. But generally,
any file format may be used.
M.2.3.2 Coordinate System
The raw data collected came in different coordinate systems. Though, as mentioned in the previous
sections, some lack or has no information at all so assumptions had to be made to process these data.
To maintain consistency with the NAMRIA 1:50,000 maps which were used as the basemap, the
coordinate system used in the study is UTM Zone 51 N, Luzon 1911 datum.
M.2.3.3 Directory Structure
The GIS data prepared in the study are stored in a directory named as “PRB-IWRM”. It is further
organized into the following sub-directories:
(1) Database_AV
This directory contains all the shapefiles, tables and hyperlinked data..
(2) Raster
This directory contains all the raster data.
(3) Maps
From the GIS database, various thematic maps were produced to support the analyses of the
study team.
Selected from all the maps that were created throughout the study, a final set was made and
grouped according to the following sectors:
(a) Agriculture / Irrigation and Fishery
(b) Municipal Water Supply, Sanitation and Sewerage
(c) Management of Flood and Sediment Disasters
(d) Watershed Management
(e) Water-related Environment Management
(f) Others
The maps are in ESRI ArcGIS Map (.mxd), version 9.3. They are also exported to JPG
format as found in the Quicklooks directory.
(4) Documentation
Information about GIS-related data are found in this directory.
The ArcGIS software requires the replication of directory structures when the files are transferred from
one machine to another. For this study, the MXD files were routed to the N: drive. A batch file,
Start_PRB-IWRM.bat, containing a command that would substitute any directory to a temporary N:
drive was created. This makes it easier for the data to be stored in the users’ preferred location.
Using any text file editor software, the file may be modified to configure the directory path.
Figure M.2.3.2 shows the contents of the batch file when opened in Windows Notepad. When it is
executed, the path C:¥Projects¥PRB-IWRM will be substituted as N: drive.
M-9
Figure M. 2.3.2 Batch File Configuration
M.2.4 Technical Transfer

On March 2010, a three-day training on GIS was conducted by the JICA Study for the NWRB
counterpart personnel. The first two days were focused on an overview of basic GIS concepts and an
introduction to the functionalities of ESRI’s ArcGIS software. The third day, meanwhile, was held in
preparation for another training involving Runoff Analysis Modeling. Using GIS, actual input data
were prepared for use in the said training.
The training materials used in these activities are shown in Training Material and Manuals (separate
volume in digital format).
When the study was already near its concluding stages, a presentation was also held to brief the
NWRB staff on all the GIS data created and used for the project.
M-10
M.3 Pampanga River Basin IWRM Study Website

M.3.1 Objective
An open-source web application was developed to primarily serve as a tool for information sharing
and coordination among the individuals and agencies involved in the study. This is likewise a
repository of various data that are open for disclosure to all concerned parties.
Annex-F M.3.1.1 shows some samples of the website.
M.3.2 Administration and Hosting
The administration of the website will be under NWRB, whose personnel were provided technical
training for guidance in troubleshooting. The source codes and the documentations were likewise
turned over to the agency. If necessary, this will also enable them to do further customizations in the
website.
A copy of the documentation is found in Training Material and Manuals (separate volume in digital
format).
The website is integrated to the official website of the NWRB as an additional link.
M.3.3 Features/Sections
(1) User Login / Logout
The accessibility to some features was limited depending on the user browsing the website.
Hence, a login/logout feature was added. Usernames and passwords were provided to select
users.
Detailed information regarding user restrictions are discussed in the succeeding sections.
(2) Home
The Home page is comprised of four sub-menus:
 Project Description: This section contains some basic information about the study such
as its background, the importance of the IWRM, etc.
 Objectives: The goals of the study are listed in this section.
 Members: The names and other useful information about the members of the Technical
Working Group, Steering Committee, NWRB Counterpart Personnel and the JICA
Study Team are found in this section. It likewise provides, if available, the logos and
links to the websites of the participating agencies.
 Study Area: The characteristics of the study area are described in this section – its area,
extents, affected local government units, etc.
(3) IWRM Plan Framework
The IWRM Plan Framework section is currently empty. This will be filled out upon the
completion of the study.
(4) Lessons Learned
The Lessons Learned section contains uploaded information from the agencies regarding their
experiences from the study that may be useful to other projects in the future.
(5) Minutes of Meetings
Minutes of meetings related to the study are stored in this section. These are made available
in any file format, depending on the preference of the one uploading of the data.
(6) Downloadable Data
M-11
Select users may upload relevant data which can be accessed by others. Restrictions may be
set to limit the accessibility of some files only to certain users.
For easier browsing, the data may be grouped and filtered according to the following:
 By Agency (e.g. NWRB, JST, DENR, PAGASA, etc.)
 By File Extension (e.g. pdf, doc, xls, jpg, etc.)
 By Category (e.g. reports, maps, statistics, presentations, etc.)
(7) Google Maps Interface
For sharing spatial information, the website was interfaced with the Google Maps application.
It allows users not only to view map data that were created and utilized in the study, but also
to make their own contributions to the datasets. However, restrictions were set on how these
will be accepted to regulate and filter any irrelevant data.
The data may be represented as point, line or polygon features.
(a) Study Data
The GIS data used in the study were transformed to Geographic Coordinate System
(WGS84 datum) and were converted to KML file format for Google Map compatibility.
They are overlaid against the application as layers of information where display may be
turned on/off using checkboxes.
(b) User-Contributed Data
Users may also contribute additional information through the following options:
 Digitizing: The user clicks on the map the corresponding location of the feature
and then adds a description.
 Coordinate Input: The user inputs the geographic coordinates of the feature in
Decimal Degrees or DMS (Degrees-Minutes-Seconds) format and then adds a
description. For lines or polygons, these coordinates will be treated as vertices
where the first and the last pairs correspond to the features’ endpoints or the points
of closure, respectively.
 Upload their own KML’s
(8) Forum
The website features pages where members may communicate with each other in a forum or
message board style.
This section may be accessed by select members only.
(9) Contact Us
For the people to send feedbacks, the website provides the contact details of NWRB. It
contains the agency’s mailing address, telephone and fax numbers, email address, and location
map.
(10) Search
A search engine was incorporated as a tool for easier browsing of the site.
(11) Calendar
To keep track of important events, a web calendar application was added to the website.
This may be viewed in calendar style in its main page or as a quick reminder, which is a frame
visible in every page displaying all events set to occur within thirty days from the current date.
Event details such as the description, location, time, etc. may be indicated.
(12) Hit Counter
M-12
The website is equipped with a hit counter that may be used in the monitoring and analysis of
the number of visitors and other web statistics.
M.3.4 User Types
The website has four levels of user access. Initially, the following groupings were been made.
 User 1: Website Administrator(s)
 User 2: Technical Working Group, JICA Study Team
 User 3: Steering Committee Members (who are not part of the Technical Working Group),
Stakeholders and other concerned individuals/agencies
 User 4: Public
M.3.4.1 Access Restrictions
Not all information may be fully disclosed to anyone browsing the site so a restriction function was
incorporated to limit the accessibility of some features. Usernames and passwords were provided to
Users 1-3.
Table M.3.4.1 summarizes the key differences of user access for each section.
Table M. 3.4.1 User Accessibility
Feature User 1 (Website User 2 User 3 User 4
Administrator) (TWG, JST) (SC, Stakeholders, (Public)
others)
Home Full Control Read-only Read-only Read-only
Lessons Full Control Can upload and Can download Can download
Learned Full Control download Can download Can download
Minutes of Can upload and
Meetings download
Can only edit/delete
Downloadable Full Control the files that he/she Can download Can only download
Data uploaded unrestricted files
Can upload and set
restrictions
Can download
Can only edit/delete
Google Maps Full Control the files that he/she
Interface uploaded
Data used in the Data used in the Data used in the
study can be viewed study can be viewed study can be viewed
Can contribute Can contribute Can contribute

information without information but it information but it
restrictions won't be displayed won't be displayed
until approved by the until approved by the
Website Website
Administrator Administrator
Forum Full Control With access With access No access
Contact Us Full Control Read-only Read-only Read-only
Search Full Control Can search Can search Can search
Calendar Full Control Can post events Can post events Cannot post events
Hit Counter Full Control Can only view Can only view Can only view
number of hits number of hits number of hits
M-13
Annex-Tables
Annex-T M.1.3.1 (1/20) List of Collected Documents
Word/ Hard
Code Tittle Author Year PDF Language
PPT Copy
00_IWRM General
00_01 Master Plan for the Agusan River Basin Project (Draft Final Report) ADB/DENR 2005 √ E
00_02 Master Plan for the Agusan River Basin Project (Interim Report) ADB/DENR 2006 √ E
00_03 Master Plan for the Agusan River Basin Project (Interim Report) ADB/DENR 2006 √ E
00_04 Master Plan for the Agusan River Basin Project (Final Report), Vol.III(B) ADB/DENR 2007 √ E
00_05 Master Plan for the Agusan River Basin Project (Draft Final Report), Vol.IV ADB/DENR 2007 √ E
00_06 Master Plan for the Agusan River Basin Project (Draft Final Report), Vol.I Executive Summary ADB/DENR 2007 √ E
00_07 Basic Survey for IWRM (Progress Report) NWRB/JICA 2006 √ E
00_08 Basic Survey for IWRM (Final Report), Vol.IV-Databook NWRB/JICA 2005 √ E
00_09 IWRM and the Role of NWRB NWRB 2008 √ E
00_10 River Basin and Watershed Management Program. Bicol River Basin, Final Report World Bank 2005 √ E
00_11 Integrated River Basin Management and Development Masterplan (Main Report) DENR-RBCO 2005 √ E
00_12 Integrated River Basin Management and Development Masterplan (Executive Summary) DENR-RBCO 2005 √ E
00_13 Integrated River Basin Management and Development Masterplan DENR-RBCO 2005 √ E
00_14 IWRM Plan Framework in the Philippines-Working together to Secures Sustainable Water for All NWRB 2006 √ E
IWRM Plan Framework in the Philippines Summary- Working together to Secures Sustainable
00_15 NWRB 2007 √ E
Water for All
MT-1
00_16 Inegrated Water Resources Management (is it working) Mr.A.K.Biswas 2008 √ E

00_17 Bohol Integrated Water Resources Management Strategic & Operational Plan (2009-2020) Bohol IWRM Borad 2007 √ E
00_18 IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level (Presentation) UNESCO 2009 √ E
00_19 IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level (Part 1) UNESCO 2009 √ E
00_20 IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level (Part 2-1) UNESCO 2009 √ E
00_21 IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level (Part 2-2) UNESCO 2009 √ E
00_22 IWRM Guidelines at River Basin Level (Part2-3) UNESCO 2009 √ E
00_23 Executive Briefing on IWRM for Bohol IWRM Board gtz 2008 √ E
Integrated Water and Soil Resources Management_IWSRM_and Advocacy Initiatives for Ground
00_24 NEDA-Region III √ √ E
RawWater Pricing (LADCC mtg clarkfield)
00_25 Philippine Progress on Implementing IWRM Reforms (mbcc final presentation) NWRB 2007 √ E
00_26 Catalyzing_change-final Global Water Partnership 2004 √ E
Study on IWRM for Poverty Alleviation and Economics Development in Pampanga River Basin
00_27 NWRB 2005 √ E
(Pampanga RBstudy)
00_28 National Water Resource Board Presentation NWRB 2008 √ E
00_29 Itengrated Water Resources Management (Presentation) NWRB √ E
00_30 IWRM Symposium PPT presentations NWRB 2006 √ E
00_31 Basic Survey for IWRM (Final Report) NWRB/JICA 2007 √ E
00_32 Central Luzon IWRM Summit NEDA 2005 √ E
00_33 Central Luzon IWRM Summit NEDA 2005 √ E
00_34 Central Luzon IWRM Summit Concept Paper NEDA 2005 √ E
00_35 Central Luzon IWRM Summit WSG_consolidated NEDA 2005 √ E
00_36 Central Luzon IWRM Summit RESOLUTION NEDA 2005 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
00_37 Philippine Water Resources Management and Development: A Situationer NWRB 2006 √ E
00_38 UNEP Support for Achieving the IWRM 2005 Target, Philippines National Report NWRB 2007 √ E
International Water Management
Complication of Papers Presented during the Philippines National Workshop on the Development of
00_39 Institute, Central Luzon 2005 √ E
Effective Water management Institution
University, NIA
00_40 MemorandumUnderstanding_AgusanRiverBasin ADB 2008 √ E
00_41 TOR_Agusan ADB 2008 √ E
00_42 Central Luzon Water Summit NEDA 2005 √ E
01_Law&Institution
01_01 Proposal for a Revised Organization and Staffing Structure for the NWRB 2005 √ E
Institutional Strengthening of NWRB through the Enhancement of the processing of water permit,
01_02 application, billing and related information system and the creation/establishment of the water 2005 √ E
resoureces regional council secretariat (WRRCS) in Region 7
01_03 Action planfor reforms relating to the national water resources board NWRB 1995 √ E
01_04 Water Code and Implementing Rules and Regulations 1979 √ E
01_05 Local Government Code 1991 √ E
01_06 Water Code and Amended Implementing Rules and Regulations 2005 √ E
01_07 RBO-TrainingManualFinal 2008 √ E
MT-2
Compilation of Papers Presented during the Philippies National Workshop on the Development of
01_08 2000 √ E
Effective Water Management Institutions
01_09 NRWB Organizational Chart √ E
01_10 Constructive River Administrative in Japan 1996 √ E
01_11 Integrated Water Resources Management for River Basin Organizations UNDP 2008 √ E
01_12 River Law in Japan JICA √ E
01_13 EO No. 318 Promoting Sustainable Forest Management in the Philippine GOP 2004 √ E
Executive order No. 10 Series of 2007 (creating the Bohol Integrated Water Resources Management
01_14 GOP 2007 √ E
Board (BIWRM) Providing for its Functions and other Purposes
01_15 Mines and Geoscinces Bureau √ E
01_16 Country Paper, National Water Sector Apex Body Philippines: National Water Resources Board ADB √ E
01_17 Organization Report on Agno River Basin Development Comission ADB √ E
01_18 Executive Order No. 359 (Creating the Bicol River Basin Project Management Office) GOP 1989 √ E
01_19 Executive Order No. 774 (Reorganizing the Presidential Task Forces for Climate Change GOP √ E
01_20 National Water Resources Board (NWRB 2005 fees and Charges) NWRB √ E
01_21 NWRB (2007 Accomplishment Report) NWRB 2007 √ E
01_22 Executive Order No. 123, Reconstituting the National Water Resources Board GOP 2002 √ E
01_23 E.O. No. 366 "Rationalization" GOP 2004 √ E
01_24 EO No. 510 (Creating the RBCO) GOP Jun-05 √ E
Manual on Maintenance of Flood Control and Drainage Structures” DPWH-JICA, April 2005（水･
01_25 FCSEC-DPWH 2005 √ J
河川関連法規部分のコピー）
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
公共事業道路省・JICA専門家
01_26 フィリピン国水資源･流域管理関連の組織及び法令の概要 2004 √ J
香川明人
01_27 DO-2007-28-732_ManilaBayEnvionmental ManagementProject DENR 2007 √ E
01_28 NWRB Proposed Organizational Structure NWRB 2008 √ E
01_29 Functional Chart of Water Related Agencies NWRB Jun-05 √ E
01_30 活動報告書（統合水資源管理）、2006年3月神宮保（JICA短期専門家） JICA 2006 √ J
EO 785 Mandating the Presidential Task Force onClimate Change to Develop the National Climate
Change Framework, Directing the Task Group on Information to develop and Coordinate a National
01_31 Information, Education and Communications Program, Directing the Presidential Adviser on GOP √ E
Climate Change to Review Government Climate Change Programs and Official Development
Assistance Project
01_32 Upper Pampanga River Basin Coordinating Council √ E
01_33 Policies, Institution and Climate Risk Management in the Philippines University of Philippines 2009 √ E
03_Regional Development
03_01 Central Luzon Regional Development Investment Program, 2005-2010 NEDA 2004 √ E
03_02 Regional physical Framework Plan (Region III), 2004-2030 NEDA √ E
03_03 Central Luzon Updated Development Plan, 2008-2010 NEDA 2004 √ E
03_04 Regional physical Framework Plan (Region III), 2005-2030 NEDA 2006 √ E
MT-3
03_05 Updated Regional Development Plan, 1996-1998 NEDA √ E

03_06 Regional Physical Framework Plan of the Central Luzon Region, 1999-2020 NEDA √ E
03_07 Regional Development Council Central Luzon (Regional Physical Framework Plan, 1993-2023 NEDA √ E
03_08 Regional Physical Framework Plan (Regional Land Use Committee), 1993-2022 NEDA √ E
03_09 Midium-Term Philippine development Plan, 2004-2010 GOP 2004 √ E
03_10 Major Development Programs and Projects (NCR), 1986-1992 √ E
03_11 Major Development Programs and Projects (Rizal), 1986-1992 √ E
03_12 Major Development Programs and Projects (Laguna), 1986-1992 √ E
1999-
03_13 DPWH Medium Term Infrastructure Program DPWH √ E
2004
03_14 DPWH Medium Term Infrastructure Development Program DPWH 2007 √ E
03_15 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Japanese) JICA 1995 √ J
03_16 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. I) JICA 1995 √ E
03_17 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. II) JICA 1995 √ E
03_18 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. III) JICA 1995 √ E
03_19 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. IV) JICA 1995 √ E
03_20 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. V) JICA 1995 √ E
03_21 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. VI) JICA 1995 √ E
03_22 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. VII) JICA 1995 √ E
03_23 The Master Plan Study for Central Luzon Development Program (Vol. VIII) JICA 1995 √ E
03_24 Bacolor_Final Report U.P. PLANADES √ √ E
03_25 Next frontier CLARK FREEPORT 2008 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
2011-
03_26 Midiumterm Development Plan-2011-2013_N.E PPDO-Nueva Ecija √ E
2013
04_Water Resources&Management
04_01 Technical Notes Part 1 (Hydrological Data Book) DPWH 1989 √ E
04_02 The Small Water Impounding Management (SWIM) Project (Vol. III) DPWH 1991 √ E
Updating on the Master Plan on Water Resources Mangement in Two Selected River Basins (Final
04_03 DENR 2006 √ E
Report)
Workshop Towards a Sustainable Water Supply within the Framework of the Water Resources
04_04 NWRB 2001 √ E
Management
04_05 Workshop on the Philippine Proigram Action in the Water Resources Sector NWRB √ E
04_06 Workshop in River Management in the Philippine JICA 2000 √ E
Master Plan Study on Water Resources Management in the Republic of the Philippines (Final Report
04_07 JICA 1998 √ E
Vol. I Executive Summary)
The Study on Water Resources Development for Metro Manila in the Republic of the Philippines
04_08 JICA 2003 √ E
(Final Report Vol. II Master Plan Main Report)
04_09 JICA 2003 √ E
(Final Report Vol. III Master Plan Supportng Report)
MT-4
04_10 JICA 2003 √ E

(Final Report Vol. IV Feasibility Study Main Report)
04_11 JICA 2003 √ E
(Final Report Vol. V Feasibility Study Supporting Report)
04_12 JICA 2003 √ E
(Final Report Vol. VI Feasibility Study Data book)
Water Resources Development Project (WRDP) IBRD Loan No. 4110-PH Project Progress Report
04_13 NIA 2005 √ E
No.17
04_14 Water Resources Development Project (WRDP) IBRD Loan No. 4110-PH NIA 2001 √ E
Water Resources Development Project (WRDP) IBRD Loan No. 4110-PH Project Progress Report
04_15 NIA 2002 √ E
No.11
04_16 Reference Materials on Water Use and Management in the Philippines CALABARZON 1998 √ E
04_17 JICA 1998 √ E
Vol. II Main Report)
04_18 JICA 1998 √ E
Vol. III-1 Supporting Report)
04_19 JICA 1998 √ E
04_20 JICA 1998 √ E
04_21 JICA 1998 √ E
Vol. IV Data Book)
04_22 Pampanga River Basin (PRB) Rehabilitation Project Development Plan DENR-Region3 2007 √ E
04_23 Final Report Clark Special Economic Zone Water Resources Study CDC √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
04_24 Philippine Water Resources Summary Data NWRB √ E
04_25 River in the Philippines JICA 1997 √ E
04_26 JICA 2003 √ E
(Final Report Vol. I Executive Summary)
Master Plan Study on Water Resources Management in the Republic of the Philippines (Interim
04_27 JICA 1998 √ E
Report Vol. II Supporting Report)
04_28 JICA 1998 √ J
Vol. I Executive Summary)
04_29 JICA 2003 √ J
(Final Report Vol. I Executive Summary)
04_30 Pampanga River Basin Framework Plan NWRC, UNDP 1983 √ E
04_31 BALINTINGON RESERVOIR MULTIPUPOSE PROJECT NIA Region3 √ E
04_32 Final Report for the 300 MLD Bulk Water Supply Project MWSS 1999 √ E
04_33 The Study of Engineering Alternatives for the 300 MLD Bulk Water Supply Project MWSS 2000 √ E
04_34 Feasibility Study Agos Project, Main Report NPC 1991 √ E
04_35 Feasibility Report on Agos River Hydropower Project, Main Report NPC 1981 √ E
04_36 Laiban Dam Project, Summary MWSS 2000 √ E
04_37 Final Report(Laiban Dam)
MT-5
04_38 Balintingon Reservoir Multipurpose Project Feasibility Study NIA 1983 √ E

04_39 Report for Study on Hydropower Potential in Luzon Island, Main Report JICA/NPC 1987 √ E
04_40 Report for Study on Hydropower Potential in Luzon Island, Appendix A JICA/NPC 1987 √ E
04_41 Report for Study on Hydropower Potential in Luzon Island, Appendix B JICA/NPC 1987 √ E
04_42 Report for Study on Hydropower Potential in Luzon Island, Appendix C JICA/NPC 1987 √ E
Water Supply, Swerage, and Sanitation Master Plan for Metro Manila, Final Report, Vol.1,
04_43 MWSS 2005 √ E
Summary
04_44 Feasibility Study Report on Balingon Multipurpose Project. Main Report, MWSS 2006 √ E
04_45 Umiray-Angat Transbasin Tunnel Rehabilitation Project, Phase II MWSS √ E
Umiray-Angat Transbasin Tunnel Rehabilitation Project, Phase II, Implementation Schedule and
04_46 MWSS √ E
Cost
04_47 Clark Special Economic Zone Water Resources Study Clark Development Corporation 2000 √ E
04_48 Clark Special Economic Zone Hydrology and Hydraulics of Spang Cauyayan Lake Clark Development Corporation 2000 √ E
04_49 Balintong Multiporpose Project √
04_50 Balog-Balog Multiporpose Project √
04_51 Survey-Inventory on Water Impounding Reservior NWRC √
04_52 Investigation to Interested Investor and Contractors News Paper √
Masterplan Study on the Samll Impounding Management (SWIM) Project-Main ReportMasterplan 1988-
04_53 JICA √
Study on the Samll Impounding Management (SWIM) Project-Data Book 1990
04_54 Supplimental Report Balintong RMP-Nueva Ecija Data 2008 √
04_55 Masterplan Study on the Samll Impounding Management (SWIM) Project-Data Book JICA 1990 √
04_56 Reports on Effect of Eruption of Pinatubo in Balog Balog Project 1991 1991 √
04_57 The Project for Balog Balog Multi Porpose Project-Implementation Program NIA 1999 √
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
04_58 Balog Balog Multipurpose Project(Project Brifer as of September 30, 2009) Vicente Vicmudo 2008 √
04_59 General Layout 2008-BalogBalog Multi Purpose Project NIA 2008 √
04_60 BalintingonProjectOverview Powerpoint presentation √
04_61 BBMP Briefer As of March 31, 09-final Vicente Vicmudo √
04_62 bbmp-General layout 2009 √
04_63 p1-01 Water_Allocation_Between_Irrigation_and_Municipal_Use INWEPF √
Terminal Report (2000-2004) Establishment of Participatory Technology Demonstration farm for
04_64
Marginal Uplands
04_65 Rapid Assessment of Water Supply Sources (Prov. of Bukidnon)
04_66 Rapid Assessment of Water Supply Sources (Prov. of Maguindanao)
04_67 Rapid Assessment of Water Supply Sources (Prov. of North Cotabato)
04_68 Rapid Assessment of Water Supply Sources (Prov. of South Cotabato)
04_69 Rapid Assessment of Water Supply Sources (Prov. of Sultan Kudarat)
04_70 Report on Demonstration Farm Component
04_71 NIA'S Compensation Package
Confirmation of MWSS Water Permit for this present withdrawal rate of 22 cms from the Angat
04_72
Reservoir
04_73 Memorandum of Agreement on the Angat Water Protocol
MT-6
Angat Reservoir Monthly Allocation with Optimization-Simulation Model and Autoregressive Model
04_74
to Forecast Inflow
04_75 Small Scale Technical Assistance Water Resources Management (Angat Reservoir)
04_76 Comments on MWSS Water Rights Certification Issued by NWRB
04_77 Central Mindanao-Mindanao Allah River Basin
04_78 Western Mindanao-Pulangui River
04_79 Methodology Manual for Feasibility Study of Interim Improvement Project
04_80 Pre Feasiility Study Report of Water Impounding Projects_Prov. of N.E-1994 Prov. of N.E
05_Domestic Water Supply
05_01 Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Sector Plan 1992-2010 (Prov. Of Pampanga) DPWH 1992 √ E
05_02 Province of Tarlac Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Development Plan 1992-2010 Prov. of Tarlac 1991 √ E
Study on the Provincial Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Section Plan in the Republic of the
05_03 JICA 1995 √ E
Philippines (Progress report III)
05_04 Province of Nueva Ecija Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Development Plan 1992-2010 Prov. Of Nueva Ecija 1991 √ E
05_05 Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council √ E
05_06 Project Proposal Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Rehabilitation Project (RWSSRP) DILG 1997 √ E
05_07 Philippine Association of Water District, Inc. 1997 √ E
05_08 Manila Water Supply (Project III) √ E
05_09 Small Scale Independent Providers in Metro Manila and Vicinity: Responding to Customers Needs WPEP 2002 √ E
05_10 Water Supply and Sanitation Performance Enhancement Project 2000 √ E
05_11 Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Sector Plan 1992-2010 (Prov. Of Bulacan) DPWH 1992 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
05_12 Philippine Water Supply Sector Road Map GTZ/NWRB 2008 √ E
05_13 Final Report Clark Special Economic Zone Hydrology and Hydraulics of Sapang Cauayan Lake √ E
05_14 Angles Ciry Water disrict Water Safety Plans √ E
An Inventory of Needs, Problems and Proposed Solution of Families affected by the Proposed Laiban
05_15 √ E
Dam Project
05_16 Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Sector Plan 1992-2010 (Province of Bataan) DPWH 1992 √ E
05_17 フィリピン国における下水道セクターの現状 JBIC √ J
05_18 ピナツボ被災民生活用水供給計画基本設計調査報告書 JICA 1992 √ J
05_19 ピナトゥボ火山災害復旧機材整備計画基本設計調査報告書 JICA 1991 √ J
Water Supply, Swerage, and Sanitation Master Plan for Metro Manila, Final Report, Vol.1,
05_20 MWSS 2005 √ E
Summary
05_21 Sewerage Treatment Plant for Cabanatuan City, Design Report, Vol.1, Main Report Cabanatuan City 2003 √ E
Cabanatuan City Comprehensive Drainage System, Supplimental Study on Hydrology and Water
05_22 Cabanatuan City 2003 √ E
Quality
05_23 Reply from MWSS on Water Demand in MetroManika and Bulacan MWSS 2009 √ E
05_24 LWUA Proposed Project of the WAter District in the Province LWUA √
05_25 Prov. of Nueva Ecija Water Supply, Sewerage and Sanitation Development Plan 1992-2010 √
05_26 World Health Organization √
MT-7
05_27 Population and Housing-Angeles City NSO √

05_28 Population and Housing-Aurora NSO √
05_29 Population and Housing-Bataan NSO √
05_30 Population and Housing-Bulacan NSO √
05_31 Population and Housing-Bulacan-II. NSO √
05_32 Population and Housing-Nueva Ecija NSO √
05_33 Population and Housing-Nueva Vizcaya NSO √
05_34 Population and Housing-Pampanga NSO √
05_35 Population and Housing-Pangasinan NSO √
05_36 Population and Housing-Quezon NSO √
05_37 Population and Housing-Rizal NSO √
05_38 Population and Housing-Tarlac NSO √
05_39 Population and Housing-Zambales NSO √
05_40 Philippine Roadmap NEDA 2009 √
05_41 Supply Sewerage and Sanition Sector Plan-1992-2010_Pampanga DPWH 1992 √
05_42 Water Supply and Sanitation Tool box Data √
05_43 AWUAIP MWSS Presentation √
05_44 Laiban MWSS Presentation √
05_45 MWSS_Data MWSS √
05_46 Amendment to Consession Agreement √
05_47 LWUA_Manual on Water Rates and Related Practise LWUA √
05_48 Local Water Utilities Administration_Annual Report 2008 LWUA √
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
06_Irrigation Development
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
A Report of Final / Defeinitive Development Plan
Tarlac Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project (TGISRP) under the Central Luzon
06_01 NIA 2000 √ E
Irrigation Project (CLIP)
Main Report
06_02 Definite Development Plan (Appendix-VIII_Project Evaluation) NIA 2000 √ E
06_03 SWIM Project (Inception Report) DPWH 1990 √
06_04 The Study on Strengthning of NIA's Management System, Final Report, Vol.1, Main Report NIA, JICA 2001 √ E
06_05 The Study on Strengthning of NIA's Management System, Final Report, Vol.2, Appendix NIA, JICA 2001 √ E
06_06 The Study on Strengthning of NIA's Management System, Final Report, Vol.1, Main Report NIA, JICA 2001 √ J
06_07 The Study on the Irrigators Association Strengthning in National Irrigation Systems, Summary NIA, JICA 2003 √ J
06_08 The Study on the Irrigators Association Strengthning in National Irrigation Systems, Main Report NIA, JICA 2003 √ E
06_09 The Study on the Irrigators Association Strengthning in National Irrigation Systems, Annex NIA, JICA 2003 √ E
06_10 Introduction of NIA-UPRIIS NIA-UPRIIS √ E
06_11 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Main Text DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
MT-8
06_13 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Annex, Vol-I DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
06_14 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Annex, Vol-II DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
06_15 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Annex, Vol-III DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
Definitive Development Plan
06_16 Irrigation Component of the Casecnan Multipurpose Irrigation and Power Project (CMIPP-IC) under NIA 2000 √ E
the Central Luzon Irrigation Project (CLIP), Main report
the Central Luzon Irrigation Project (CLIP), Appendix-I Meteorology and Hydrology
the Central Luzon Irrigation Project (CLIP), Appendix VIII, Project Evaluation
Mapping and Agricultural Potential for the Integrated Rural Development in Pampanga, Main
06_19 JICA/DAF 1992 √ E
Report
06_20 Mapping and Agricultural Potential for the Integrated Rural Development in Pampanga, Annex-I JICA/DAF 1992 √ E
06_21 Mapping and Agricultural Potential for the Integrated Rural Development in Pampanga, Annex-II JICA/DAF 1992 √ E
06_22 General Operation & Maintenance Manual, Final Report, Excutove Summary NIA 1991 √ E
06_23 Fisheries Development Study, Pampanga Delta/Candaba Swamp Area Development Project √ E
06_24 National Irrigation Administration Corporate Plan:2008-2017 NIA 2009 √ E
06_25 Provincial Irrigation Profile, Bulacan NIA 1989 √ E
06_26 Provincial Irrigation Profile, Nueva Ecija NIA 1989 √ E
06_27 Provincial Irrigation Profile, Pampanga NIA 1989 √ E
06_28 Provincial Irrigation Profile, Tarlac NIA 1989 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
06_29 NIA Organizational Structure 2008 NIA √
06_30 NIS MAP √
06_31 Memorandum Circular √
06_32 Gumain FS JICA 1985 √
06_33 PIDP report Euroestudios 2006 √
2008-
06_34 Communal System IA Operatiopn and Maintenance Performance NIA-BANEMO √
2009
2008-
06_35 Ginintuang Masaganang Ani Program (Prov. Nueva Ecija) Data Provincial Agriculture √
2009
06_36 Summary Evaluation Report Data 2009 √
06_37 Japanese Report 2006 √
06_38 Japanese Report-final 2006 √
2005-
06_39 Project Completion Report_(IASS)-Angat Maasim River Irrigation System NIA - Region III √
2006
06_40 Loan Agreement 2009 √
06_41 System of Rice Intensification Phil Rice 2009 √
2009-
06_42 Indicative Irrigation Development Program (2009-2020) Data from NIA √
2020
MT-9
06_43 List of Priority Small Scale Irrigation System Data √

06_44 Small Water Impounding Project Data from BSWM 2008 √
06_45 Statement of Allotment and Obligation and Balances Data 2009 √
06_46 Nueva Ecija Data from PPDC Nueva Ecija √
06_47 AMRISbrief-basic-Ver.97-2003 Presentation √
06_48 IndicativeIrrigationDevelopmentPlan_Nov09 Data √
06_49 37mrs copy for jica √
2010-
06_50 RegIrrDevProg_Reg3 √
2019
2010-
06_51 RegIrrDevProg_UPRIIS UPRIIS √
2019
Philippine Sustainable
06_52 WB Appraisal Report (PIDP) 2009 √
Development Unit
06_53 Map
06_54 Updated Feasibility Study for the Casecnan Project
06_55 Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Feasibility Updating Study-2.
06_56 Balog-Balog Multipurpose Project Feasibility Updating Study
Guidelines for the Adoption of Water Saving Technologies in Integrated Rice Production system in
06_57
the Phil
06_58 Agrarian Reform Infrastructure Support Project Phase II(ARISP-II)
06_59 Agrarian reform Stracture Support Project-III
06_60 Baling-Tulay Irrigation Association INC.
06_61 Central Luzon Fisheries Situation (Presentation)
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
06_62 Republic Act No. 3601 an Act Creating the NIA
06_63 Republic Act(RA) No. 8435-Agriculture and Fishery Modernization Act of 1997
06_64 Republic of the Philippines Congress of the Philippines Metro Manila
06_65 Stratigic Agriculture & Fishery Development Convergence Zone
06_66 System Rice Intensification(SRI)
06_67 Scaling Up Poverty Reduction - Shanghai Conference
06_68 Agrarian Reform Fund Project
06_69 Agrarian Reform Infrastructure Support Project-I
06_70 Agrarian Reform Infrastructure Support Project-II
07_Ground Water
07_01 Geo-Resistivity survey in Angeles City NIA 2008 √ E
07_02 PAGF-Activity 025 Strenthening Management of Ground Water Resources with LGUs PAGF 2001 √ E
Strenthening Management of Ground Water Resources with LGUs (Draft Guidelines and Operating
07_03 NWRB 2002 √ E
Procedure Report)
07_04 Ground Water Resources Development Planning NWRB 1998 √ E
07_05 LGU- Training-Workshop on Groundwater Permit Processing and Monitoring 2001 √ E
07_06 Cavite Water Supply Development Study in the Republic of the Philippines (Vol. 4) Data Book 1995 √ E
07_07 Draft Institutional Framework Report √ E
MT-10
07_08 Strenthening Management of Ground Water Resources with LGUs (Institutional Framework Report) NWRB 2001 √ E
07_09 Water Balance Study and Ground Water Modeling Report (Metro Manila) NWRB 2004 √ E
07_10 Study on the Groundwater Development in Metro Manila (Vol. I Summary Report) MWSS √ E
07_11 Study on the Groundwater Development in Metro Manila (Vol. II Main Report) MWSS √ E
07_12 Study on the Groundwater Development in Metro Manila (Vol. III Suporting Report) MWSS √ E
07_13 Study on the Groundwater Development in Metro Manila (Vol. III Supporting 2 Report) MWSS √ E
07_14 Ground Water Resources Development Plan 1998-2030 LWUA √ E
U.P. Center for Integrative and
07_15 Groundwater Overuse, Land Subsidence, and Enhanced Flooding in Southern Central Luzon 2005 √ E
Developmental Studies
07_16 Baseline Syurvey on Nationwide Groundwater Quality Monitoring in the Philippines JICA 2000 √ E
Groundwater Data Banking Report
07_17 Concepcion Water District 2007 √ E
Concepcion Water District
A Report of Final / Defeinitive Development Plan
Tarlac Groundwater Irrigation Systems Reactivation Project (TGISRP) under the Central Luzon
07_19 NIA 2000 √ E
Irrigation Project (CLIP)
Main Report
07_20 Geo-Resistivity Survey in Angeles City (Oct. 2008) NWRB √ E
07_21 Geological of the Philippines 2008 √ E
07_22 Well Registered in Pampanga River Basin √ E
Relative Sea Level Changes and Worsening Floods in the Western Pampanga Delta: Causes and
07_23 √
Some Possible Mitigation Measures
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
Prelimenary Groundwater Resource Survey in Brgys. San Marcos and Pio Cruzcoza, Calumpit,
07_24 √ E
Bulacan
07_25 Groundwater Data Province of Bulacan √ E
07_26 NIA Shallow Groundwater Irrigation Project (Spanish Grant_Technical Evaluation) Pampanga √ E
07_27 Cabanatuan Pumping Water Fluctuation, Nueva Ecija √ E
07_28 Groundwater Resources Evaluation and Well Inventory of Concepcion, Tarlac Rick Rodel C. Luis √ E
07_29 Geological and Mineral Resources of Nueva Ecija 1976 √ E
07_30 Geological and Mineral Resources of Pampanga Province √ E
Report on the Groundwater Resouces Survey of Brgy. San Jose de Orquico and Vicinity in Tarlac
07_31 2004 √ E
City
07_32 Characterization of San Marcois Aquifer and Adjoining Areas in Calumpit, Bulacan √
07_33 Preliminary Hydrogeological Assesment of Mt. Arayat National Park, Pampanga Province √
Hydrogeological Survey of the Resettlement Areas for the Evacuess Affected by Mount Pinatubo
07_34 √
Eruption in Pampanga and Tarlac Provinces
07_35 Report on the Hydrogeological Survey of Brgy. Margot and Vicinity, Angeles City √
07_36 Hydrogeological Survey of Brgy. Camias, Porac, Pampanga 1996 √
MT-11
07_37 Groundwater Evaluation and Well inventory of Concepcion, Tarlac √

07_38 Water Resources Survey of Barangay Balaong San Miguel Bulacan √
07_39 Groundwater Resources Investigation Bulacan √
07_40 Groundwater Resources Investigation Pampanga √
07_41 Groundwater Resources Investigation Tarlac √
07_42 Groundwater Resources Investigation Nueva Ecija √
07_43 Metro Manila Groundwater Areas √
08_Dam
08_01 Pantabangan Dam Public Information Drive Briefing Kit Pantabangan Dam √ E
08_02 Angat Water Supply Optimization Project Distribution Phase (AWSOP-OFCF) Technical Report MWSS 1991 √ E
08_03 Casecnan Trans-Bsin Diversion Project (Feasibility Study Vol 5 Appendix M&N) NIA √ E
08_04 Report for Study on Hydropower Potentials in Luzon Island (Main Report) JICA 1987 √ E
08_05 Umiray - Angat Transbasin Study (Feasibility Study_Appendix A Hydrology) ADB 1992 √ E
08_06 Umiray - Angat Transbasin Study (Feasibility Study Appendix B - Reservoir Operation) ADB 1992 √ E
08_07 Umiray - Angat Transbasin Study (Feasibility Study_Appendix E EIA) ADB 1992 √ E
08_08 Umiray - Angat Transbasin Study (feasibility Study Main Report Vol.I) ADB 1992 √ E
08_09 Angat Hydro Electric Power Plant NPC 2008 √ √ E
08_10 Water Resources Development Project Final Report (Task 5 Main Report) World Bank 1994 √ E
08_11 Water Resources Development Project Final Report (Task 5 Vol. II Annexes) World Bank 1994 √ E
08_12 Workshop EPP (Angat Dam Ipo Dam) BNPP 2008 √ E
08_13 Dams in the Philippines NWRB 2000 √ E
08_14 Pantabangan Dam and its Appurtenant Structures NIA-UPRIIS √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
the Central Luzon Irrigation Project (CLIP), Main report
the Central Luzon Irrigation Project (CLIP), Appendix-I Meteorology and Hydrology
the Central Luzon Irrigation Project (CLIP), Appendix VIII, Project Evaluation
08_18 Introduction of Angat dam NPC √ E
08_20 Angat Dam FFWSDO NPC 2008 √ E
08_21 SchematicDraw_AngatSystem NPC √ E
08_22 首都圏で一時配電停止 2007年6月26日新聞記事コピー（The Dail Manila shinbun) Daily Mania Nwes paper 2007 √ E
Flood Forecasting Office. Instrumentation & Flood Forecasting & Warning System for Dam
08_23 NIA-UPRIIS √ E
Operation (IFFWSDO)
08_24 Pantabangan Dam NIA-UPRISS-DRD √ E
08_25 Water Code of the Philippines_Implementing Rules and Regulation
09_Flood Management
MT-12
09_01 Overall Network System of FFWSDO Angat Dam √ E

The Study on Flood Control Project Implementation System for Principal Rivers in the Philippines
09_02 CTI Engineering Int'l Co., Ltd 2004 E
(Main Report)
09_03 Community Based Flood Early Warning System PAGASA 2007 √ E
09_04 Basin Mean Probable Rainfall √ E
09_05 Flowchart of Sediment Analysis √ E
The Study on the Nationwide Flood Risk Assessment and the Mitigation Plan for the Selected Area
09_06 JICA/DPWH 2006 √ E
in the Republic of the Philippines (Progress Report)
09_07 Specific Discharge Curve Rainfall Intensity Duration Curve Isoyet of Probable 1-day Rainfall DPWH 2003 √ E
09_08 Meteorological Data √ E
09_09 Integrated Plan for the Mount Pinatubo Affected Areas PHIVOCS 1994 √ E
09_10 Nationwide Flood Control Plan and River Dredging Program NIPPON KOEI 1982 √ E
Study for the Preparation of Flood Control Manual for Department of Public Works and Highways
09_11 JICA 2003 √ E
Technical Standards and Guidelines (Final Report_Main Report Vol.I)
09_12 Philippine Flood Control 1977 NWRC 1977 √ E
The Study on Drainage Improvement in the Core Area of Metropolitan Manila Republic of the
09_13 JICA 2005 √ E
Philippines (Final Report Summary)
09_14 San Fernando River DPWH √ E
09_15 San Fernando River - II DPWH √ E
Ready Project Hazard Mapping and Assessment for effective Community-Based Disaster Risk
09_16 OCD √ E
Management
09_17 Manual on Maintenance of Flood Control and drainage Structures DPWH 2005 √ E
09_18 PDDP - Phase 1 DPWH 2002 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
Basic Design Study Report on the Project for the Upgrading of Flood Forecasting and Warning
09_19 JICA 2007 √ E
System in the Pampanga and Agno River Basin in the Republic of the Philipplines
09_20 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project Phase III (Main Report) NIPPON KOEI 2009 √ E
09_21 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project Phase III (Executive Summary) NIPPON KOEI 2009 √ E
Briefing Materials (Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project (PHUMP) Province of Pampanga and
09_22 DPWH √ E
Tarlac
Basic Design Study Report on the Project for the Upgrading of Flood Forecasting and Warning
09_23 JICA 2007 √ J
System in the Pampanga and Agno River Basin in the Republic of the Philipplines
09_24 Rivers in the Philippines DPWH.JICA 1997 √ E
09_25 Water & Flood DPWH.JICA 2004 √ E
09_26 PRCS-PMO Pampanga River Control System - Project Management Offic, DPWH DPWH,JICA √ E
09_27 PAMPANGA DELTA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLOOD CONTROL COMPONENT DPWH 2007 √ E
The Study on Flood and Mudflow Control for Sacobia-Bamban/Abacan River Draining from
09_28 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ J
Mt.Pinatubo, Summary
09_29 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ E
Mt.Pinatubo, Summary
09_30 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ E
Mt.Pinatubo, Main Report
MT-13
09_31 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ E
Mt.Pinatubo, Appendix 1
09_32 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ E
Mt.Pinatubo, Appendix 2
09_33 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ E
Mt.Pinatubo, O&M
09_34 DPWH, JICA 1996 √ E
Mt.Pinatubo, Databook
09_35 Digmara River Flood Control DPWH-FCSEC √ E
09_36 Project Template - Pampanga Delta DPWH 2006 √ E
09_37 Project Template - DigmalaRiver DPWH 2006 √ E
09_38 OCD- DisastreManagement Education Material OCD 2007 √ E
09_39 Pinatubo PhaseII Final report DPWH, NK √ E
09_40 Pinatubo PhaseII RAP DPWH, NK √ E
09_41 Pinatubo PhaseII Final IP DPWH, NK √ E
09_42 Pinatubo PhaseII ICC-PE DPWH, NK √ E
09_43 Pinatubo PhaseII Presentation DPWH, NK √ E
09_46 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Annex, Vol-I DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
09_47 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Annex, Vol-II DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
09_48 Feasibility Report on the Pampanga Delta Dvelopment Project, Annex, Vol-III DPWH, NIA, JCA 1982 √ E
09_49 Flood Mitigation Framework Plan_June2006 DPWH 2006 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
U.P. Center for Integrative and
09_50 Groundwater Overuse, Land Subsidence, and Enhanced Flooding in Southern Central Luzon 2005 √ E
Developmental Studies
DPWH Region Iii
09_51 Updates on Various Critical Projects undertaken along RIVERBANKS 4th District of Pampanga √ E
4th District Office
09_52 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project Phase III-Interim Report NIPPON KOEI 2009 √ E
09_53 Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Mitigation Project Phase III-Main Report NIPPON KOEI √
09_54 Ondoy-pepeng floods2009-2 INTERNET √
10_Water Quality Management
10_01 Final Report Data Base Development for Water Quality Management (Phase 1) JICA 2007 √ E
Review of the Draft Guidelines and Manual on the Protection and Rehabilitation of Conataminted
10_02 √ E
Rivers
10_03 Manila Bay Refined Risk Assessment PEMSEA - DENR 2004 √ E
10_04 Philippines Water Resources Development Project URBAS √ E
10_05 Manila Bay Integrated Environment Monitoring Program GEF-UNDP-IMO 2006 √ E
10_06 Analysis and Design of Water Quality Database System (Draft Final Report) 2001 √ E
10_07 Ecosystem and Peolple the Philippine MA Sub-Global Assessment MEA √ E
10_08 Manila Bay Coastal Strategy DENR 2003 √ E
10_09 The Philippine Environmental Quality report √ E
MT-14
10_10 Philippines Environment Monitor 2003 World Bank 2003 √ E

10_11 The Manila Bay Issues, Concern, Challenges and Need for Immediate Action DENR 2008 √ E
10_12 Manila Bay Environmental Management Project: Challenges and Achievements PERSEA √ J
10_13 OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY DENR 2006 √ E
10_14 The Study on the Effect of Sea Water Intrusion on Agriculture and Fishery Industry, Main Report DPWH 1998 √ E
10_15 The Study on the Effect of Sea Water Intrusion on Agriculture and Fishery Industry, Appendix DPWH 1998 √ E
10_16 The Study on the Effect of Sea Water Intrusion on Agriculture and Fishery Industry, Tables DPWH 1998 √ E
10_17 The Study on the Effect of Sea Water Intrusion on Agriculture and Fishery Industry, Figures DPWH 1998 √ E
10_18 ManilaBayEnvironmentalAtlas PEMSEA √ E
10_19 EnvMonitor 2003 water quality DENR 2003 √ E
10_20 DEVELOPMENT OF DATABASE FOR WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT DENR 2006 √ E
10_21 Region 3 Water Quality Status Report DENR-EMB, JICA 2007 √ E
DENR Administrative Order No.2005-10, Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Philippines
10_22 EMB-DENR 2005 √ E
Clean Water Act of 2004 (Republic Act No.9275)
10_23 Philippines Environment Monitor 2003 DENR 2003 √ E
10_24 Philippines Environment Monitor 2005 DENR 2005 √ E
10_25 Clark Special Economic Zone Water Resources Study Clark Development Corporation 2000 √ E
10_26 Angels City Water District, Water Safty Plans Angels City √ E
I.C.Agulto, E.B.Sibayan, N.
10_27 Extent of Groundwater amd Tailwater Reuse Contamination with Agricultural Chemical in UPRISS 2008 √ E
A.Candelara and A.R.E.Agulto
10_28 Water Quality Assessment of Selected Barangays of Malolos and Guiguinto, Bulacan Carolyn V. Sacdalan √ E
Report on the Saltwater Intrusion Survey in the Municipalities of Calumpit, Hagonoy amd Paombong
10_29 √ E
Bulacan
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
10_30 Bulacan State University-DOST √ E
10_31 Mecauayan City_Physical Chemical Analysis √ E
10_32 Maycauayan City_Bacteriological Test Result √ E
10_33 Maycauayan Water Quality Analysis √ E
10_34 Operational Plan for the Manila bay Coastal Strategy MBEMP 2005 √ E
10_35 Ecological Sanitation Factsheet 2007 √
10_36 MMO RS-WQMA Initial AP JICA & EMB 2009 √
10_37 Solid_WasteManagement For MetroManila_JICAMP JICA
10_38 Solid_WasteManagement For MetroManila_JICAMPsummary_J JICA
10_39 SWM_Boracay&MOM_NK_MPSummary NIPPON KOEI & JICA
10_40 SWM_Boracay&MOM_NK_Chap II-09 Cost Estimate and Financial Aspect NIPPON KOEI & JICA
11_Watershed Management
11_01 Master Plan for Forestry Developoment DENR 1990 √ E
11_02 2004 Philippine forestry Statistics DENR 2004 √ E
11_03 Agos River Watershed Management Engr. Wilson Tagbo 2008 √ E
11_04 Regional Watershed Conference NWRB 2008 √ E
11_05 Forestation and Re-Vegitation NEDA-Region III √ E
Integrated Water and Soil Resources Management_IWSRM_and Advocacy Initiatives for Ground
MT-15
11_06 NEDA-Region III √ √ E

RawWater Pricing (LADCC mtg clarkfield)
11_07 Watershed Management Section Activities √ E
11_08 DENR-PENRO Nueva Ecija √ E
Charactization Report of the 8th Critical Watersheds (NIPAS Initial Components Supporting the
11_09 √ E
NIA'S
11_10 Primaer on the Revised Master Plan for Forestry Development DENR-FMB 2003 √ E
11_11 Recommended Species for Various Uses DENR-FMB 2003 √ E
11_12 TECHNICAL REPORT WATERSHED DATABASE PROJECT DENR-FMB, JICA √ E
LLDA/Community Development
11_13 Community Participation and Involvement in Natural Resources Management √ E
Division
11_14 LIST OF PROCLAIMED WATERSHED FOREST RESERVES DENR-FMB √ E
11_15 Presentation DENR Region III Forest Management DENR Region III √ E
11_16 Watershed Management of Pantabangan Dam NIA-UPRISS-DRD √ E
DENR PENRO-Nueva Ecija
11_17 DENR PENRO Nueva Ecija √ E
Programs and Activities
11_18 Highlight of DENR PENRO-Nueva Ecija DENR PENRO Nueva Ecija √ E
11_19 Watershed Management - Pantabangan Dam NIA-UPRIIS √ E
11_20 Watershed Presentation-Pantabangan NIA-UPRIIS √ √ E
11_21 Initial Protected Area Plan of the Carranglan-Pantabanga Watershed DENR-Region III √ E
11_22 Project Evaulation of Technical Cooperation Project -CBFMP JICA/DENR 2008 √ E
11_23 Final List of Watershed supporting 140 River Irrigation Systems of NIA NIA √ E
11_24 Guideline in the Preparation of Watershed Management Plan DENR √ E
11_25 Maasim Integrated Watershed Management Plan DENR 2009 √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
11_26 Profile of Pampanga River Basin DENR √ E
11_27 Porac -Gumain Watershed Charactrerization DENR √ E
11_28 Six-Year Work and Financila Plan for Reforestation for Pampanga River Basin DENR √ E
11_29 Update on Watershed Management Initiatives FMB, DENR √ E
11_30 Angat IPO Dam-Data Data √ E
11_31 CBFM collected Data Data 2000 √ E
11_32 Solid Waste Management of Bulacan-Data Data 2009 √
11_33 Philippines Forestry Statistic-1980 Philippine Forestry Statistic 1980 √
Orient Integrated Development
11_39 Pre-Feasibility Study on Holistic Water Catchment Project_N.E 1997
Consultant Inc.
11_40 Sustainable Agri-Ecozone Development Program Feasibility Study_N.E-1999 Prov. Of Nueva Ecija 1999
12_Development Database
12_01 Policy Guidelines and Technical Criteria for Data Collection NWRB 2001 √ E
MT-16
12_02 Improvement on Groundwater Data Collection Network (draft Data Base Report) NWRB 2001 √ E
Improvement on Groundwater Data Collection Network (draft Analysis/\evaluation of Groundwater
12_03 2001 √ E
Availability)
12_04 Draft Design Report 2001 √ E
12_05 Improvement of National Water Data Collection Network Streamflow Monitoring (Draft Report) NWRB 2001 √ E
Improvement of National Water Data Collection Network Streamflow Monitoring (Draft Final
12_06 NWRB 2001 √ E
Report Vol.I)
12_07 NWRB 2001 √ E
Report Vol.II)
12_08 NWRB 2001 √ E
Report Vol.III)
12_09 NWRB 2001 √ E
Report Vol.IV)
12_10 NWRB 2001 √ E
Report Vol.V)
Improvement of National Water Data Collection Network for Ground water Monitoring (Final
12_11 NWRB 2002 √ E
Report Vol. I Executive Summary)
12_12 NWRB 2002 √ E
Report Vol. II Policy Guidelines and Technical Criteria)
12_13 NWRB 2002 √ E
Report Vol. III Design Report)
12_14 NWRB 2002 √ E
Report Vol. III Database Analysis of Groundwater Availability)
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
Integration of National Water Data Collection Networks for Streamflow, Groundwater and Water
12_15 NWRB 2003 √ E
Quality Monitoring (Final Report)
12_16 National Water Information Network (Vol. II Main Report) NWRB 2003 √ E
12_17 National Water Information Network (Vol. II Main Report) NWRB 2003 √ E
12_18 National Water Information Network (Monthly Progress Report) NWRB 2001 √ E
12_19 National Water Information Network (Draft Network Design Layout Report) NWRB 2001 √ E
12_20 WRDP (Improvement of National Netwokt of Streamflow Monitoring NWRB 2001 √ E
12_21 Policy Guidelines and Technical Criteria for Data Collection (Draft Report) NWRB 2001 √ E
Improvement of National Water Data Collection Network Streamflow Monitoring (Final Report Vol.
12_22 NWRB √ E
II, Vol. III Vol. IV)
The Study for Mapping Policy and Topographic Mapping for Integrated National Development Plan
12_23 JICA/NAMRIA 2008 √ E
in the Republic of the Philippines, Final Report, Vol I, Summary
12_24 JICA/NAMRIA 2008 √ J
in the Republic of the Philippines, Final Report, Vol I, Summary
12_25 JICA/NAMRIA 2008 √ E
in the Republic of the Philippines, Final Report, Vol II, Main Report
株式会社パスコ, 株式会社野村
12_26 フィリピン国国土総合開発計画促進に関する地図政策支援行政整備調査 2008 √ J
総合研究所
MT-17
12_27 Integrated Information Management System for Coastal and Marine Environtment IIMS √ E
13_Other Data (Guidelines)
13_01 Handbook on Philippine Government Procurement GPPB 2007 √ E
13_02 Planning Strategically HLURB 2001 √ E
13_03 Standard Specifications for Public Works and Highways DPWH √ E
13_04 CLUP Guide Book HLURB 2006 √ E
13_05 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations for PD 957 HLURB 2001 √ E
13_06 Water Philippines 2003 (Technical Papers) 2003 √ E
13_07 Philippines Water Data NWRB 1970 √ E
13_08 Japanese Book √ E
13_09 Local Water Utilities Administration (List of Water District Per Area √ E
13_10 Information Kit MWSS Regulatory Office MWSS √ E
13_11 Principal River Basins of the Philippines √ E
13_12 A Worldwide Surface Water Classification System √ E
13_13 Power Inventory NWRB 1977 √ E
13_14 Tide and Current Tables NMRIA 2007 √ E
13_15 Manual for Estimation of Probable Maximum Precipitation WMO 1986 √ E
13_16 Population Dimension of Planning NEDA 1975 √ E
13_17 National Physical Framwork Plan NEDA 1992 √ E
13_18 Water Advocates Resources Book (Water as Natural Resource_Book I) √ E
13_19 Water Advocates Resources Book (Understanding the Water Sector_Book II) √ E
Water Advocates Resources Book (Planning for Community-Based Integrated Water Resource
13_20 √ E
Management_Book III)
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
13_21 Water and Floods a Look at Philippine River and Flood Mitigation Efforts 2004 √ E
1999-
13_22 Country Assistance Strategy World Bank √ E
2002
13_23 The 2000 Philippine Human Development Index NSCB 2002 √ E
13_24 2000 Philippine Provincial Poverty Statistics NSCB 2003 √ E
13_25 2001 Food Balance Sheets of the Philippines NSCB 2004 √ E
13_26 National Education Expenditure Accounts 1991-1998 NSCB 2002 √ E
13_27 Poverty Assessment in the Philippines NSCB √ E
13_28 Gross Regional Domestic Product (Base Year: 1985-2005-2007) NSCB 2008 √ E
13_29 2006 Compendium of the Philippine Enviroment Statistics NSCB 2006 √ E
13_30 Quarterly Economic Indeces of the Philippines (1st Quarter 2005- 4th Quarter 2008 (1978-100) NSCB 2009 √ E
13_31 2006 Official Poverty Statistic of the Philippines NSCB 2008 √ E
13_32 2000 Input-Output Accounts of the Philippines NSCB 2006 √ E
13_33 Philippine National Health Accounts 2005 NSCB 2008 √ E
13_34 Foreign Direct Investments (Third Quarter 2008) NSCB 2008 √ E
13_35 National Accounts of the Philippines NSCB 2009 √ E
13_36 Preliminary Assessment of Water Resources of the Philippines Tambuyong Development Center 2000 √ E
MT-18
13_37 SAE of poverty (Full Report) NSCB 2009 √ E

13_38 Sustainable Livelihiid Option for the Philippines-Coastal Ecosystem DENR-MBEMP-PMO 1997 √ E
13_39 Sustainable Livelihiid Option for the Philippines-Urban Lowland Ecosystem DENR-MBEMP-PMO 1997 √ E
13_40 Sustainable Livelihiid Option for the Philippines-Upland Ecosystem DENR-MBEMP-PMO 1997 √ E
2004-
13_41 Comparative income Statement Data from NIA √ E
2008
13_42 Estimation of Local Poverty in the Philippine-Nov. 2005 NSCB √ E
13_43 Guidline in Municipal Comprehensive LandUse Planning-1996 NIA-Reg III 1996 √ E
13_44 Official Gazzette 2009 √ E
14_Environment
14_01 CANDABA Candaba Presentation √ √ E
14_02 EAST ASIA-AUSTRALIAN FLYWAY NETWORK √ √ E
14_03 Revised Procedure Manual for Environmetal Impact Assessment (EIA) EIAMD 2007 √ √ E
14_04 Summary of Status of Ad Al Delineation and Titling as of March 31, 2009 Data 2009 √ √ E
14_05 Instituting the National Drive to Surpress and Eradicate Professional Squatters E.O 153 √ √ E
14_06 National Commision on Indigenouse Peoples Data NCIP √ √ E
14_07 Republic Act 8371 1997 √ √ E
14_08 RA 6389_1971-Files √ √ E
14_09 RA_6389_1971_CARP Law Internet Sources √ √ E
14_10 Land Acquisition, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Indigenouse Peoples Policy DPWH 2007 √ √ E
14_11 Land Acqusition and Resettlement Plan for Can-Asujan 2003 √ √ E
14_12 Land Acqusition and Resettlement Plan 2007 √ √ E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
Hassall & Associates
14_13 Resettlement Policy and Program Framework for NAI and PGAN 2003 √ √ E
International
14_14 Instituting the National Drive to Suppress and Eradicate Professional Squaters √ √ E
14_15 DOF Local Finance Circular 1-97_Guidelines_Inventory of Lands 1997 √ √ E
14_16 DOF Local Finance Circular 3-92_Valuation of Lands for Socialized Housing 1992 √ √ E
14_17 PD 772_1975_Anti-squatting Law_files Internet Sources √ √ E
14_18 Executive Order_ No_ 1035 Internet Sources √ √ E
14_19 Implementing Rules And Regulations Governing Summary Eviction Law Data √ √ E
Act of
14_20 IRR_Acquisition Valuation Disposition √ √ E
1992
14_21 IRR_Beneficiary Registration √ √ E
Act of
14_22 IRR_Proper and Humane Relocation Procedures √ E
1992
14_23 PHILIPPINE LAWS, STATUTES AND CODES - CHAN ROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY Internet Sources √ E
14_24 Republic Act7835 - CISFA, 1994 Law Data 1994 √ E
14_25 Republic Act8368 - Repeal of PD 772, 1997 Law Data 1997 √ √ E
14_26 Republic Act7279 Law Data 1991 √ √ E
Act of
MT-19
14_27 Republic Act7279_IRR_sec.18 Law Data √ E

1992
14_28 Republic Act 9397 Law Data 2006 √ √ E
14_29 2004 Statistics on Philippine Protected Areas and Wildlife Resources DENR 2004 √ √ E
2004-
14_30 20090427_Annaul Water Fowl Census for Candaba Swamp Data from Candaba Pampanga √ √ E
2008
14_31 20090427_Asian Water Fall Site-2 √ √ E
14_32 20090427_Asian Water Fall Site. √ √ E
Preliminary Compalation of Information on Wetlands of the Philippines Asian Wetland Bureau Philippine
14_33 √ √ E
(excerpt_from_Directory_of_Phil_Wetlands_1990) Foundation Inc.
Revised Implementing Rules and Regulation of republic Act 7586 or the National Irrigated Protected
14_34 √ √ E
Areas System(dao-2008-26_114).
14_35 Hotspots Data Notepad √ √ E
14_36 IBA, Ramsar sites in Philippine √ E
14_37 National Wetland Action Plan_Ph √ E
14_38 National_Red_List_Wild_Fauna √ E
Status of the Philippines Fresh Water Wetlands and Recomended Conservation Management Presentation Laguna Lake
14_39 √ E
Strategies Development Authority
14_40 National Report on Wet Lands DENR-PAWB 2005 √ E
14_41 Review_of_Legislation_and_Policies_on_Phil_Wetlands DENR-PAWB 2005 √ E
14_42 Bird Watchin in the Philippines Wild Bird Club of the Philippines E
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
15_Fishery
Word/ Hard
PPT Copy
15_01 3rd Quarter Report BFAR Data from BFAR 2009 √ √ E
15_02 BFAR Central Luzon Pampanga Priority Plans and Program 2009 Presentation from BFAR 2009 √ √ E
15_03 BFAR Primier Fisheries Management Agency Data from BFAR √ √ E
15_04 Brief Profile of Manilabay Coastline in Bulacan √ √ E
15_05 Fisheries Resource Management for Improve and Sustainable Harvest √ √ E
15_06 Fisheries Resource Management for Improve and Sustainable Harvest-Brochure √ √ E
15_07 Fisheries Resource Management for Improve and Sustainable Harvest-Presentation √ √ E
Provincial Agriculture office of
15_08 Bulacan Fish Market Study √ √ E
Bulacan
MT-20
Annex-T M.1.4.1 (1/7) List of Spatial Data: Shapefiles
Category Layer Description Data Classification Geometry Sources Year Coverage Remarks
• Technical Description (TD) and Map was provided to the JST
A_CandSwampWildlifeSanct_Lot Candaba Wildlife Sanctuary (lot) General polygon DENR-PAWCZM 2009 lot area • Error in the TD was discovered and (approximate) correction was made by JST
in plotting the lot
NAMRIA-JICA, The Study for
Mapping Policy and
Topographic Mapping for • If available, information from the NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study was used. For
2008
Integrated National other areas, NAMRIA 1:250,000 Topographic Map Digital Vector Data was used.
A_CityMun City / Municipal boundary General polygon Development Plan in the Region III and vicinity • The NAMRIA 1:250,000 Data was provided by NWRB.
Republic of Philippines • There is no indication on the actual source date for the NAMRIA 1:250,000
NAMRIA 1:250,000 Data, but it was turned over to NWRB early 2008.
Topographic Map Digital 2008
Vector Data
Mapping Policy and
2008
City / Municipal boundary inside
A_CityMun_SA General polygon Development Plan in the Region III and vicinity • The NAMRIA 1:250,000 Data was provided by NWRB.
Study Area only
Administrative Vector Data
Mapping Policy and
Topographic Mapping for
2008
Integrated National
A_CityMun_Main Selected City/Municipality General point Development Plan in the Study Area • Generated from centroid of A_CityMun.shp
Republic of Philippines
NAMRIA 1:250,000
MT-21

Vector Data
A_Philippines Philippine Coastline General polygon DENR Region III 2009 Philippines • Merged data of Land Cover Map (2005)
Mapping Policy and
2008
A_Province Provincial Boundary General polygon Development Plan in the Region III and vicinity • The NAMRIA 1:250,000 Data was provided by NWRB.
Vector Data
A_StudyArea Study Area Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Mapping Policy and • If available, information from the NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study was used. For
Topographic Mapping for other areas, GIS data obtained from DENR Region III was used.
2008
Transportation Tr_Road Road General line Integrated National Study Area and vicinity • Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
Development Plan in the 1:50,000 topographic maps with different dates but prior to the 2008 NAMRIA-
Republic of Philippines JICA Mapping Study.
DENR Region III 2009
DPWH-JICA-NIA, Feasibility
Completed Major Structural Flood Report on the Pampanga 1982
I_StrucFloodMitProj General line Study Area • Features were roughly digitized only
Mitigation Project Delta Development Project
JICA Study Team 2009
Infrastructure
DPWH-JICA-NIA, Feasibility
Pampanga Delta Dev't Project, Flod Report on the Pampanga 1982
I_PDPP_FC General line Study Area • Features were roughly digitized only
Component Delta Development Project
• Around 70% were plotted with the internet (e.g. Google Earth, Wikimapia, etc.)
Buildings B_CityMunHall City / Municipal Hall General point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity as source
• Around 30% were assumed
NIA, Definitive Development
Plan, Irrigation Component of
UPRIIS (Districts 1-5), Casecnan (Phase
Hy_Canal Canal Basic line the Casecnan Multipurpose 2000 • Source where data was digitized from may be geographically inaccurate
2)
Irrigation and Power Project
(CMIPP-IC)
Proposed Drainage Channel in
Hy_CandabaDrChan Flood Retarding Basin in Candaba Basic line JICA Study Team 2009 Candaba
Swamp
Proposed Emergency Spillway in
Hy_CandabaEmSpill Flood Retarding Basin in Candaba Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Candaba
Swamp
Proposed Outlet Channel with Gate
Hy_CandabaOutletChGate in Flood Retarding Basin in Basic line JICA Study Team 2009 Candaba
Candaba Swamp
Proposed Flap Drainage Gate in
Hy_CandabaFlapDrGate Flood Retarding Basin in Candaba Basic point JICA Study Team 2009 Candaba
Swamp
Proposed Surrounding Dike in Flood
Hy_CandabaRBDike Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Candaba
Retarding Basin in Candaba Swamp
Hy_CatchmentPasac Pasac Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Hy_CatchmentProposedDam Proposed Dam Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Hy_CatchmentRiversMain Main Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Hy_CatchmentSubBasin Sub-Basin Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Sub-Basin Catchment + Simplified
Hy_CatchmentSubBasinTransBasin2 Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity Tarlac and Umiray Trans-Basin Catchments were simplified.
Trans-Basin Catchment
Hy_CatchmentSubBasin_3Main 3 Main Sub-Basin Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Hy_CatchmentTransBasin Trans-Basin Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Water Balance Catchment Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
MT-22
Hy_CIS Communal Irrigation System Basic point NIA 2006 Region III
Hy_CPWaterBal Water Balance Control Points Basic point JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Hydrology Intake Points for Existing & Future
Hy_DamIntakePointsNIS Basic point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
NIS
Hy_DamMain Main Dam Basic point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Hy_DamProp Proposed Dam Basic point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
NWRB-DPWH-JICA Master
Plan Study on Water
Resources Management in 1998
the Republic of the
Philippines
Hy_DamSiteIdentifiedPossible Identified Possible Dam Site Basic point NWRB, Survey/Inventory on Study Area and vicinity
1978
Water Impounding Reservoirs
Pre-Feasibility Study Report
on Water Impounding
1994
Projects in the Province of
Nueva Ecija
Hy_DivDamMain Main Diversion Dam Basic point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Hy_DivDamTransBasin Main Trans-Basin Dam Basic point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Hy_GWAvail Groundwater Availability Analysis polygon NWRC 1982 Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Pampanga, Bulacan • Unpublished data
Hy_LakeMain Main Lake General polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Hy_NIP National Irrigation Project Basic polygon NIA 2004-2006 Region III
NIA 2006
Hy_NIS National Irrigation System Basic polygon Region III • Edited by the JICA Study Team upon consultation with NIA
Hy_PIA Potential Irrigation Area Basic polygon NIA 1994 Region III
NAMRIA-JICA, The Study for • Necessary features were selected by JICA Study Team
Hy_ReservoirMain Main Reservoir Basic polygon 2008 Study Area
Integrated National • Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
NAMRIA-JICA, The Study for • Necessary features were selected by JICA Study Team
2008
Hy_RiversMain Main River Basic line Integrated National Study Area and vicinity • Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
EMB 2007 • Water Usage Classes are from EMB
Mapping Policy and
Gugu Creek Supplementary Data Topographic Mapping for
Hy_RiversMain_GuguCrSupData Basic line 2008 Gugu Creek and Vicinity
for Main River Integrated National
Development Plan in the
Surface Water based on the Normal
Hy_SurfWater Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Operation Level of Proposed Dams
Hy_SRIP Small River Irrigation Project Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area • Location was assumed
• Contains the following, aside from SWIP: (1) Diversion Dam, (2) Farm Reservoir,
Hydrology Hy_SWIP Small Water Impounding Project Basic point BSWM 2009 Study Area
(3) Water Impounding Project
2008
All line-feature Water Bodies from Integrated National • Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
Hy_WaterBodies_Line General line Study Area
raw data Development Plan in the 1:50,000 topographic maps with different dates but prior to the 2008 NAMRIA-
DENR Region III 2009 • Unverified names and features
MT-23

2008
All poygon-feature Water Bodies Integrated National • Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
Hy_WaterBodies_Polygon General polygon Study Area
from raw data Development Plan in the 1:50,000 topographic maps with different dates but prior to the 2008 NAMRIA-
DENR Region III 2009 • Unverified names and features
Selected Hydrometric Stations
Hy_WatershedHMS Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Watersheds
Mapping Policy and
Topographic Mapping for • Extracted from the "gravelly sand" layer which is labeled as "lahar" in the
L_LaharDeposit Lahar Deposit General polygon 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Project Study Pilot Area
Integrated National printed version of the topographic map.
DENR Region III 2009 • Conflicting with official statistical data (FMB)
L_LandClassification Land Classification General polygon Study Area
JICA Study Team 2009 • Reclass field by JST
L_LandCover_DENR Land Cover from DENR Region III General polygon DENR Region III 2009 Study Area • Original source is NAMRIA, 2005
NAMRIA-JICA, The Study for • For the DENR Region III data, unconfirmed information states that it was based
Mapping Policy and on 2002-2003 satellite images but report was released on 2005
Land Condition Topographic Mapping for • Combination of reclassified data (by JICA Study Team) of L_LandCover_DENR
2008
Integrated National and L_LandCover_NAMRIAJICA
L_LandCover_JST Land Cover by JICA Study Team General polygon Study Area
Development Plan in the • If available, information from the NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study was used. For
Republic of Philippines other areas, GIS data obtained from DENR Region III was used.
DENR Region III 2009 • This data was officially adapted as the Land Cover Data for purposes of this
JICA Study Team 2009 study.
Mapping Policy and
Land Cover from NAMRIA-JICA Topographic Mapping for
L_LandCover_NAMRIAJICA General polygon 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Project Study Pilot Area • Compiled from different layers of the NAMRIA-JICA Project
Project Integrated National
DPWH-NK, Pinatubo Hazard
Urgent Rehabilitation Project,
Monitoring and Planning of
L_LandSub Inferred Land Subsidence General line Flood Control Works on the 2002 Study Area
Land Condition Pasac Delta (inc. the Porac-
Gumain River) and Third River
Channel, Final Report
BSWM 2009
L_SAFDZ SAFDZ General polygon Study Area • Features were roughly digitized only
N_Climate Climate General polygon Philippines • Code of PAGASA is different from DENR
PAGASA 2007
• If available, information from the NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study (~20 m interval)
Mapping Policy and
was used. For other areas, GIS data obtained from DENR Region III (100 m
2008 interval) was used.
Integrated National
N_Contours_50K Contour General line Region III and vicinity • Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
1:50,000 topographic maps with different dates but prior to the 2008 NAMRIA-
JICA Mapping Study.
• Down to 5 meter contour intervals in some areas.
• Data from DENR Region III was created in-house - digitized from NAMRIA
Contour prior to Mt. Pinatubo 1:50,000 topographic maps with different dates but prior to the 2008 NAMRIA-
N_Contours_50K_PrePinatubo General line DENR Region III 2009 Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity
eruption JICA Mapping Study.
• In 100 meter contour intervals.
Contour inside the surrounding dike DPWH-JICA-NIA, Feasibility
Surrounding Dike in Flood Retarding
N_Contours_CandabaRBDike in flood retarding basin in Candaba General line Report on the Pampanga 1982 • In 1 meter contour intervals.
Basin in Candaba Area
Area Delta Development Project
Elevation ranges classified by JICA
N_Elevation Analysis polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area • Based on N_Contours_50K
Study Team
MT-24
Elevation ranges classified by JICA

Study Team inside the surrounding • Based on N_Contours_CandabaRBDike
N_Elevation_CandabaRBDike Analysis polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Candaba
dike in flood retarding basin in • A few ranges were assumed
Candaba Area
Geology (1st set provided by DENR DENR Region III • Recoding by JICA Study Team
Natural Condition N_Geology1 General polygon 2009 Study Area
Region III) JICA Study Team • Information from MGB indicates that it could have been from a 1963 Geological
Geology (2nd set provided by DENR
N_Geology2 General polygon DENR Region III 2009 Study Area
Region III)
N_Hydrogeology Hydrogeology General polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area • Classified by JICA Study Team with N_Geology1 as the base
PAWCZMS Region III
N_Mangrove Mangrove General polygon 2009 Pampanga & Bulacan • Digitized by JICA Study Team from provided image files
JICA Study Team
Mapping Policy and
N_MountainsHills Mountains and Hills General point 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Project Study Pilot Area
Integrated National
Contour of Annual Total
N_PAnnual_Contour Analysis line JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity • Derived from WorldClim precipation data, modified with smoothing
Precipitation
Contour of Dry Season (November-
N_PDry_Contour Analysis line JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity • Derived from WorldClim precipation data, modified with smoothing
April) Average Monthly Precipitation
Contour of Annual Potential
N_PETAnnual_Contour Analysis line JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity • Derived from WorldClim PET data, modified with smoothing
Evapotranspiration
Contour of Wet Season (May-
N_PWet_Contour October) Average Monthly Analysis line JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity • Derived from WorldClim precipation data, modified with smoothing
Precipitation
Slope (in percent) in standard
N_SlopePercent General polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area • Derived from N_Contours_50K using 100 m contour intervals
ranges
N_Soil Soil General polygon DENR Region III 2009 Study Area
Mapping Policy and
2008
Integrated National
N_SpotHt Spot Height General point Study Area and vicinity
NAMRIA 1:50,000
Spot Height prior to Mt. Pinatubo • Digitized from NAMRIA 1:50,000 topographic maps with different dates but prior
N_SpotHt_PrePinatubo General point Topographic Maps Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity
eruption to the 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Mapping Study.
Natural Condition
N_TAnnual_Contour Contour of Annual Temperature Analysis line JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity • Derived from WorldClim precipation data, modified with smoothing
Mapping Policy and
N_WaterSurfElev Water Surface Elevation General point 2008 NAMRIA-JICA Project Study Pilot Area
Integrated National
WorldClim data link shapefile (point WorldClim 2006
N_WorldClim_Point General point Study Area and vicinity
format) JICA Study Team 2009
WorldClim data link shapefile WorldClim 2006
N_WorldClim_Polygon General point Study Area and vicinity
(polygon format) JICA Study Team 2009
Ha_ActVolcano Active Volcano General point PHIVOLCS 2006 Philippines
Ha_Earthquake Earthquake General point USGS 2009 Philippines • Downloaded from USGS website on 26 April 2009
DENR Region III 2009 Study Area
Ha_Erosion Erosion General polygon • Edited by the JICA Study Team for data consistency
JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Ha_Faultlines_DENR Faultline from DENR Region III General line DENR Region III 2009 Study Area
• Filtered information from Ha_Faultlines_DENR with reference from MGB
MT-25
Hazard Ha_Faultlines_JST Faultline by JICA Study Team General line MGB Geological Map 1963 Study Area
Geological Map
Ha_FlFloodExitPt Flash Flood Exit Points General point MGB Philippines
• Extracted by JICA Study Team from image downloaded from Dartmouth Flood
Flooded Areas from Dartmouth
Ha_FloodedAreas_DFO General polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity Observatory website
Flood Observatory
• Period covers 2001-2004 and August 2004
Ha_FloodProneAreas_MGB Flood Prone Areas from MGB General polygon MGB Philippines
Proposed location of Discharge
M_DischGaugSta_Prop Basic point JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
Gauging Stations
NWRC, Philippine Water
Resources Summary Data 1980
Vol. 1
BRS
NWRC, Pampanga River
1983
Basins Framework Plan
DPWH-JICA, The Study on
Flood Control Project
M_HMS Hydometric Station Basic point Implementation System for 2004 Study Area and vicinity • Original coordinates were adjusted by the JICA Study Team
Principal Rivers in the
Philippines, Annex 3
Monitoring NIA, Definitive Development
the Casecnan Multipurpose 2000
(CMIPP-IC), Appendix 1
M_IntakeFlowMeas Intake Flow Measurement Basic point JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
LWUA-JICA Baseline Survey
on Nationwide Ground Water
2003
Quality Monitoring in the
M_PumpingStation Pumping Station Basic point Philippines Study Area
1998,
MGB
2000
NWIN,
1980
http://www.nwin.nwrb.gov.ph
PAGASA-JICA, Basic Design
Study Report on the Project
for Upgrading of Flood
Forecasting and Warning 2007
System in Pampanga and
Agno River and Basins in
Republic of the Philippines
NIA, Definitive Development
the Casecnan Multipurpose 2000
(CMIPP-IC), Appendix 1
DPWH-NK, Pinatubo Hazard
• Locations of features with no coordinates were estimated by the JICA Study
M_RainfallStation Rainfall Station Basic point Urgent Rehabilitation Project, Study Area and vicinity
Team
Monitoring and Planning of
Flood Control Works on the
Pasac Delta (inc. the Porac- 2002
Gumain River) and Third River
Channel, Final Report,
Monitoring
Appendix No. 2, Meteorology
and Hydrology
JICA-NWRB, The Study on
Water Resources
Development for Metro Manila
in the Republic of the 2003
Philippines, Final Report, Vol.
MT-26
III, Master Plan Study,

Supporting Report
M_Thiessen Thiessen Polygon Analysis polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
PAGASA-JICA, Basic Design
Study Report on the Project
for Upgrading of Flood
Forecasting and Warning 2007 • Locations of features with no coordinates were estimated by the JICA Study
M_WLRR Water Level / Rainfall Station Basic point Study Area
System in Pampanga and Team
Agno River and Basins in
Republic of the Philippines
Water Quality Monitoring Station
M_WQMonStation_Prop Basic point JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
proposed by JST
Ancestral Domain with Approved • Actual coordinates in PRS92 Zone 3 were provide by NCIP and were just
S_AD_AppCADT General polygon NCIP 2010 Study Area and vicinity
CADT transformed by JST
• Location were estimated by the JICA Study Team based on the information
NCIP 2010
Ancestral Domain with On-Going provided by NCIP
S_AD_SocPrep General polygon Study Area and vicinity
Social Preparation • Area/size of features more or less correspond to the approximated area
JICA Study Team 2010 provided by NCIP
NCIP 2010
Ancestral Domain with Completed provided by NCIP
S_AD_SurvComp General polygon Study Area and vicinity
Survey • Area/size of features more or less correspond to the approximated area
Socio-Economic JICA Study Team 2010 provided by NCIP
NCIP 2010
Ancestral Domain with On-Going provided by NCIP
S_AD_SurvOnGoing General polygon Study Area and vicinity
Survey • Area/size of features more or less correspond to the approximated area
JICA Study Team 2010 provided by NCIP
PEMSEA, Manila Bay Area
S_HistCulSite Historical and Cultural Sites General point 2007 Study Area • Rough digitization of features only
Environmental Atlas
PEMSEA, Manila Bay Area
S_NatTour Nature-Based Tourism Sites General point 2007 Study Area • Rough digitization of features only
Environmental Atlas
• Some areas unlocated by PAWB were assumed by the JICA Study Team
PAWB 2004 based on location descriptions and raw GIS data
• Large discrepancies were observed for some features between the official area
Initial Component of NIPAS and those obtained via GIS
S_ProtAr_Init General polygon Region III and vicinity
proposed for establishment • Some features were edited by JICA Study Team to maintain consitency with
existing coastline and administrative data.
• Shapes of those belonging to the initial component that were later proclaimed
maybe the same.
Socio-Economic
• Some areas unlocated by PAWB were assumed by the JICA Study Team
PAWB 2004 based on location descriptions and raw GIS data
• Large discrepancies were observed for some features between the official area
Proclaimed/Declared Protected those obtained via GIS
S_ProtAr_Proc General polygon Region III and vicinity
Areas • Some features were edited by JICA Study Team to maintain consitency with
existing coastline and administrative data.
• Shapes of those belonging to the initial component that were later proclaimed
maybe the same.
Map sheet index for the NAMRIA

O_701Index General polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
topographic map, 701 series
NIA, Indicative Irrigation
• Not all programs listed in the original source were plotted
O_AnnualIrrigationPrograms Annual Irrigation Programs Basic point Development Program 2010- 2009 Study Area and vicinity
• Plotting was estimated based on rough locations of barangays
2019
MT-27
EMB Region III 2003-2008 • Location of discharge permittees were plotted approximately by the JICA Study
O_DischargePermittees Location of Discharge Permittees Basic point Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Pampanga, Bulacan
JICA Study Team 2009 Team based on barangay
O_Industry Industries operating in Region III Basic point EMB Region III 2009 Region III
Pilot Area of the NAMRIA-JICA
O_JicaNamriaPilotArea Basic polygon JICA Study Team 2009 NAMRIA-JICA Project Study Pilot Area
Mapping Study
Others Location of Mining and Quarrying MGB Region III 2003-2008 • Location of discharge permittees were plotted approximately by the JICA Study
O_MinesQuarries Basic point Study Area and vicinity
area JICA Study Team 2009 Team based on the barangay as provided in the addresses
Label for combined old and new
O_NAMRIATopoLabel General point JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity • For use in one particular map
NAMRIA topographic maps
O_NorthArrow North Arrow General polygon JICA Study Team 2009 Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity • For use in one particular map
• Features are just indicative locations of project areas and does not reflect the
O_Projects Projects General polygon JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
actual extents
O_TenurialInst Tenurial Instruments General polygon Study Area • Combination of selected data Tree Plantations and Protected Areas (Initial)
PAWB 2004
NWRB 2007 • Some coordinates were adjusted by the JICA Study Team
O_WaterRights Location of Water Abstractions Basic point Study Area and vicinity
JICA Study Team 2009 • Locations of features with no coordinates were estimated by the JICA Study
Annex-T M.1.4.2 (1/2) List of Spatial Data: Tables
Category Layer Description Link To Link Field Data Classification Format Sources Year Coverage Remarks
Administrative
Transportation
Status of compliance with ESWM various PPDO's 2009

Infrastructure I_ESWMComp08 \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC General XLS
as of 2008
various PG-ENRO's 2009
Buildings
Estimated Diversion Water
Demands for Existing CISs and
Hy_DivWatDemExistCISSSI_Maj \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Small Scale Irrigation For Major
Rivers
Demands for Existing CISs and
Hy_DivWatDemExistCISSSI_Oth \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Small Scale Irrigation for Other
Rivers
Hy_DivWatDemExistNIS \04_Hydrology\Hy_DamIntakePointsNIS Name Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Demands for Existing NIS
Estimated Net Diversion Water
Hy_DivWatDemExistNIS_Net \04_Hydrology\Hy_DamIntakePointsNIS Name Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Demands for Existing NIS
Hy_DivWatDemFutureNIS \04_Hydrology\Hy_DamIntakePointsNIS Name Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Demands for Future NIS
Estimated Net Diversion Water
Hy_DivWatDemFutureNIS_Net \04_Hydrology\Hy_DamIntakePointsNIS Name Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Demands for Future NIS
Estimated Minimum Stream Flow
Hy_MinStrFlowReq \00_Administrative\Hy_CPWaterBal CP_ID Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Requirement
Surface Water Resource Potential
(Equivalent to 80% Reliablity) with
Hy_SurfWatResPot_Dams \00_Administrative\Hy_CPWaterBal CP_ID Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Existing and Proposed Storaged
Damsat Control Points
Surface Water Resource Potential
Hy_SurfWatResPot_QuasiNat \00_Administrative\Hy_CPWaterBal CP_ID Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
in Quasi-Natural Condition
Estimated Fisheries Water Demand
Hy_WaterDemandFish \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
by Water Balance Catchment
Estimated Irrigation Water Demand
Hy_WaterDemandIrrig_GW for Groundwater Source by \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Hydrology
MT-28
City/Municipality
Present and Projected Industrial
Hy_WaterDemandInd_SW Water Demand for Surface Water \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Source
Estimated Livestock Water Demand
Hy_WaterDemandLiv \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
by City Municipality
Present and Projected Municipal
Hy_WaterDemandMun_CityMun_OutS
Water Demand by City/Municipality \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
A
outside Study Area
Hy_WaterDemandMun_CityMun_SA Water Demand by City/Municipality \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
in Study Area
Hy_WaterDemandMun_Prov_SA Water Demand by Province in \00_Administrative\A_Province PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Study Area
Water Permits for Each
Hy_WaterPermit_CityMun_GW \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
City/Municipality: Ground Water
Water Permits for Each
Hy_WaterPermit_CityMun_SW \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
City/Municipality: Surface Water
Water Permits for Each Sub-Basin:
Hy_WaterPermit_SB_GW \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentSubBasin Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Ground Water
Water Permits for Each Sub-Basin: \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentSubBasinTrans
Hy_WaterPermit_SB_SW Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Surface Water Basin2
various Provincial Health
2009
Hy_WaterSupplyCov Water Supply Coverage \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS Offices Study Area and vicinity
Evaluation of Water Usage
Hy_WaterUsageCondGW \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Condition for Ground Water Source
Land Condition
\06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Point POINTID WorldClim 2006

N_WcElev Elevation based on WorldClim Data General DBF Study Area and vicinity
\06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Polygon POINTID JICA Study Team 2009
Potential Evapotranspiration based \06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Point POINTID
N_WcPET General DBF JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Natural Condition on WorldClim Data \06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Polygon POINTID
Precipitation based on WorldClim \06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Point POINTID
N_WcPrec General DBF JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Data \06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Polygon POINTID
Temperature based on WorldClim \06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Point POINTID WorldClim 2006
N_WcTemp General DBF Study Area and vicinity
Data \06_NaturalCondition\N_WorldClim_Polygon POINTID JICA Study Team 2009
Annex-T M.1.4.2 (2/2) List of Spatial Data: Tables
Category Layer Description Link To Link Field Data Classification Format Sources Year Coverage Remarks
PAGASA 2006 • Frequency of Tropical Cyclone calculated by using
Ha_Cyclone Tropical Cyclone frequency \00_Administrative\A_Province PSGC General XLS Philippines
JICA Study Team 2009 Record Year 1948-2000
Ha_GWBalance Groundwater Balance Risk \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Domestic Pollution Load for Sub-
Ha_PollLoadDom_CatchSB \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentSubBasin Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Basin Catchment
Hazard Domestic Pollution Load for Water
Ha_PollLoadDom_CatchWB \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Balance Catchment
Total Pollution Load for Sub-Basin
Ha_PollLoadTot_CatchSB \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentSubBasin Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Catchment
Total Pollution Load for Water
Ha_PollLoadTot_CatchWB \04_Hydrology\Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Code Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Balance Catchment
PAGASA 1977-2007
Table to setup hyperlink for climatic
M_Hyperlink_ClimData.xls \08_Monitoring\M_RainfallStation Name Basic XLS Cabanatuan, CLSU Muñoz
data NK:CMIPP 1977-2007
JICA Study Team 1977-2007
Table to setup hyperlink for daily NWRB varying
M_Hyperlink_DailyDischarge.xls \08_Monitoring\M_HMS ID_HMS Basic XLS 23 Stations within the Study Area
discharge BRS dates from
varying
Table to setup hyperlink for daily dates from
M_Hyperlink_DailyPrec.xls \08_Monitoring\M_RainfallStation Name Basic XLS PAGASA 9 Stations of PAGASA synoptic stations
precipitation 1950's-
2000's
Monitoring
Table to setup hyperlink for
M_Hyperlink_interpolatedSelectedStati 36 Stations within and around the Study
interpolated monthly precipitation \08_Monitoring\M_RainfallStation Name Basic XLS JICA Study Team 2009
onMonthlyPrecipitation.xls Area
for selected stations
NWRB
Table to setup hyperlink for monthly
M_Hyperlink_MonthlyDischarge.xls \08_Monitoring\M_HMS ID_HMS Basic XLS 1946-2007 58 Stations within the Study Area
discharge
BRS
Table to setup hyperlink for raw

M_Hyperlink_rawSelectedStationMont 36 Stations within and around the Study
data of monthly precipitation for \08_Monitoring\M_RainfallStation Name Basic XLS PAGASA 1951-2007
hlyPrecipitation.xls Area
selected stations
Population of Indigenous People for
S_IP_Pop_FullCM \00_Administrative\A_CityMun_SA PSGC General XLS NCIP 2006 Region 3
entire City/Municipality
Indigenous People Population
S_IP_PopProf \00_Administrative\A_Province PSGC General XLS NCIP 2006 Region 3
MT-29
Profile
S_IP_RegProf Indigenous People Regional Profile \00_Administrative\A_Province PSGC General XLS NCIP 2006 Region 3
Population for entire
S_Pop_FullCM \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC General XLS NSCB 2007 Study Area and vicinity
City/Municipality
S_Pop_SA Population for Study Area \00_Administrative\A_CityMun_SA PSGC General XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Population Density for entire
S_PopDen_FullCM \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC General XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
City/Municipality
S_PopDen_SA Population Density for Study Area \00_Administrative\A_CityMun_SA PSGC General XLS JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area and vicinity
Population Projection for entire
S_PopProj_FullCM \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC General XLS NSO 2007 Study Area and vicinity
City/Municipality
Population Projection for Study
S_PopProj_SA \00_Administrative\A_CityMun_SA PSGC General XLS JICA Study Team 2007 Study Area and vicinity
Area
Served Population by
S_ServedPop_CityMun_OutSA City/Municipality outside Study \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Socio-Economic
Area
Served Population by
S_ServedPop_CityMun_SA \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
City/Municipality in Study Area
Served Population by Province in
S_ServedPop_Prov_SA \00_Administrative\A_Province PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
Study Area
Additional Population to be Served
S_ServedPopAdd_CityMun_OutSA by City/Municipality outside Study \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area and vicinity
Area
S_ServedPopAdd_CityMun_SA \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
by City/Municipality in Study Area
S_ServedPopAdd_Prov_SA \00_Administrative\A_Province PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS JICA Study Team 2010 Study Area
by Province in Study Area
NSCB-WB, Intercesal
S_Poverty Poverty \00_Administrative\A_CityMun_SA PSGC General XLS Updating of Small Area 2003 Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Pampanga, Bulacan •Values are for the entire cities/municipalities
Poverty Estimates
Provincial Health Offices 2009
S_SanitaryToiletCov Sanitary Toilet Coverage Ratio \00_Administrative\A_CityMun PSGC Analysis/Planning XLS Study Area and vicinity
Others
Annex-T M.1.4.3 (1/15) Detailed Specifications Shapefile and Table Data
Category Layer Format Field Type Description
FID Object ID Object ID
A_CandSwampWildlifeSanct_Lot Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
ArSqKm Double Area in sq km
Shape Polygon Geometry
CityMun Text Name of city/municipality
Province Text Name of province
AqSqKm Double Area in sq km of the entire city/municipality
ArSqKm_SA Double Area in sq km inside Study Area
Catergory, where:
A_CityMun Shape 0 - Outside Study Area
1 - Inside Study Area
Category Short Integer
2 - Related Area for Water Demand
3 - Metro Manila
4 - Related Area for Water Transfer
ArRatio Double Ratio (in percentage) between ArSqKm_SA and ArSqkm
PSGC Text Philippine Standard Geographic Code
Class Text Distinguishes if the feature is a city or a municipality
AqSqKm Double Area in sq km of the entire city/municipality
ArSqKm_SA Double Area in sq km inside Study Area
Catergory, where:
A_CityMun_SA Shape 0 - Outside Study Area
1 - Inside Study Area
Category Short Integer
2 - Related Area for Water Demand
3 - Metro Manila
Administrative
4 - Related Area for Water Transfer
ArRatio Double Ratio (in percentage) between ArSqKm_SA and ArSqkm
Shape Point Geometry
Classified as a capital city?
Capital Short Integer 0 - No
A_CityMun_Main Shape 1 - Yes
Considered as main city/municipality (Selection #1)?
Cat1 Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Considered as main city/municipality (Selection #2)?
Cat2 Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
A_Philippines Shape
A_Province Shape Province Text Name of province
AqSqKm Double Area in sq km
A_StudyArea Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
Transportation Tr_Road Shape
Shape Line Geometry
I_StrucFloodMitProj Shape Shape Line Geometry
Name Text Name of project
T_PDPP-FC Shape Shape Line Geometry
Phase Short Integer Project Phase
PSGC N/A Philippine Standard Geographic Code
Province N/A Name of province
CityMun N/A Name of city/municipality
VolMTPD N/A Volume of Waste Generation (Metric Tons Per Day)
Are there any Segregation (3R) activities?
0 - No
1 - Yes
Seg N/A
2 - Partial
3 - Not Applicable
4 - No Information
Are there any Materials Recovery Facilities?
0 - No
1 - Yes
MRF N/A 2 - Partial
3 - Proposed
4 - Not Applicable
Infrastructure
5 - No Information
Are there any Open Dumpsites?
0 - No
I_ESWMComp08 XLS
1 - Yes
OD N/A 2 - Partial
3 - Proposed
4 - Not Applicable
5 - No Information
Are there any Closed Dumpsites?
0 - No
1 - Yes
CD N/A 2 - Partial
3 - Proposed
4 - Not Applicable
5 - No Information
Are there any Sanitary Landfills?
0 - No
1 - Yes
SL N/A 2 - Partial
3 - Proposed
4 - Not Applicable
5 - No Information
Buildings B_CityMunHall Shape Location is based on assumptions and maybe highly inaccurate?
AssLoc Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
MT-30
Hy_Canal Shape
Shape Line Geometry
Hy_CandabaDrChan.shp Shape
Hy_CandabaEmSpill.shp Shape
Hy_CandabaOutletChGate.shp Shape
Hy_CandabaFlapDrGate.shp Shape
Hy_CandabaRBDike.shp Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
Hy_CatchmentPasac Shape
Name Text Name of catchment
Hy_CatchmentProposedDam Shape Recommended?
Recommend Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Code Text Catchment code assigned by the JICA Study Team
Hy_CatchmentRiversMain Shape
Code_NWRB Text Catchment code assigned by NWRB
Name_NWRB Text Name of catchment assigned by NWRB
Code_NWRB Text Catchment code assigned by NWRB
Name_NWRB Text Name of catchment assigned by NWRB
P_annual Double Annual precipitation
PET_Annual Double Annual PET
P_01 Double Precipitation: January
P_02 Double Precipitation: February
P_03 Double Precipitation: March
P_04 Double Precipitation: April
P_05 Double Precipitation: May
P_06 Double Precipitation: June
P_07 Double Precipitation: July
P_08 Double Precipitation: August
P_09 Double Precipitation: September
Hy_CatchmentSubBasin Shape
P_10 Double Precipitation: October
P_11 Double Precipitation: November
P_12 Double Precipitation: December
PET_01 Double PET: January
PET_02 Double PET: February
PET_03 Double PET: March
PET_04 Double PET: April
Hydrology PET_05 Double PET: May
PET_06 Double PET: June
PET_07 Double PET: July
PET_08 Double PET: August
PET_09 Double PET: September
PET_10 Double PET: October
PET_11 Double PET: November
PET_12 Double PET: December
Hy_CatchmentSubBasinTransBasin2 Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
Hy_CatchmentSubBasin_3Main Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
Hy_CatchmentTransBasin Shape
Hy_CatchmentWaterBal Shape
Name Text Name of CIS
Status Text Status
Hy_CIS Shape
Official data from NIA indicating the city/municipality where CIS is located.; this information may not be consistent
CityMun_Off Text
with the adminstrative data used in this study
ArHa_Off Double Official data from NIA indicating the area in hectares
ID Long Integer Unique ID
CP_ID Text Control Point ID
Hy_CPWaterBal Shape DrArSqKm Double Drainage area in sq km
DStrCatch Text Most Downstream Catchment
RiverSys Text River System
Descr Text Description
Hy_DamIntakePointsNIS Shape
Name Text Name of dam / intake point
Status Text Identifies if dam is existing or proposed
Hy_DamMain Shape
Name Text Name of dam
Type Text Type of dam
Name Text Name of dam
Recommended?
Hy_DamProp Shape
0 - No
Recommend Short Integer
1 - Yes
2 - For consideration
NorOpLevM Double Normal operation Level in meters
MT-31
Code Text Code of site
Site Text Name of site
River Text Name of related river
Lat Text Latitude
Long Text Longitude
DrArSqKm Text Drainage area in sq km
DamHtM Text Dam height in meters
GRVolMCM Text Gross Reservoir Volume in million cu. meters
Used for Irrigation?
Hy_DamSiteIdentifiedPossible Shape I Double 0 - No
1 - Yes
Used for Hydropower?
P Double 0 - No
1 - Yes
Used for Flood Control?
FC Double 0 - No
1 - Yes
Used for Municipal/Industrial?
MI Double 0 - No
1 - Yes
Agency Text Agency
Status Text Status
Hy_DivDamMain Shape Shape Point Geometry
Name Text Name of diversion dam
Hy_DivDamTransBasin Shape Shape Point Geometry
Name Text Name of trans-basin diversion dam
Code N/A Catchment code assigned by the JICA Study Team
River N/A River
WRm3ps_01 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: January
WRm3ps_02 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: February
WRm3ps_03 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: March
WRm3ps_04 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: April
WRm3ps_05 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: May
Hy_DivWatDemExistCISSSI_Maj XLS
WRm3ps_06 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: June
WRm3ps_07 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: July
WRm3ps_08 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: August
WRm3ps_09 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: September
WRm3ps_10 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: October
WRm3ps_11 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: November
WRm3ps_12 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: December
River N/A River
WRm3ps_05 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: May
Hydrology Hy_DivWatDemExistCISSSI_Oth XLS
IntakePt N/A Intake Point
NIS N/A NIS
River N/A River
Hy_DivWatDemExistNIS XLS WRm3ps_05 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: May
NIS N/A NIS
River N/A River
NWRm3ps_01 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: January
NWRm3ps_02 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: February
NWRm3ps_03 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: March
NWRm3ps_04 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: April
Hy_DivWatDemExistNIS_Net XLS NWRm3ps_05 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: May
NWRm3ps_06 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: June
NWRm3ps_07 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: July
NWRm3ps_08 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: August
NWRm3ps_09 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: September
NWRm3ps_10 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: October
NWRm3ps_11 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: November
NWRm3ps_12 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: December
NIS N/A NIS
River N/A River
Hy_DivWatDemFutureNIS XLS WRm3ps_05 N/A Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: May
MT-32
NIS N/A NIS
River N/A River
NWRm3ps_01 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: January
NWRm3ps_02 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: February
NWRm3ps_03 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: March
NWRm3ps_04 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: April
Hy_DivWatDemFutureNIS_Net XLS NWRm3ps_05 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: May
NWRm3ps_06 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: June
NWRm3ps_07 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: July
NWRm3ps_08 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: August
NWRm3ps_09 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: September
NWRm3ps_10 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: October
NWRm3ps_11 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: November
NWRm3ps_12 N/A Net Diversion Water Requirement in m3/s: December
Area Text Area classification
Hy_GWAvail Shape ArSqKm Double Area in sq km
Groundwater Availability category where
A - High Productivity
Category Text B - Medium Productivity
C - Limited Productivity
S - Limited by Salt Water Encroachment
P_Annual N/A Annual Total Precipitation in mm/year
PET_Annual N/A Annual Total PET in mm/year
R_H_Annual N/A Annual Total Recharge (High) in mm/year
R_L_Annual N/A Annual Total Recharge (Low) in mm/year
Sub1ArSqKm N/A Sub-Area 1 in sq km
Hy_GWAvail Shape SWE_ArSqKm N/A Saltwater Encroached Area in sq km
Rat_RA_Aq N/A Ratio of Restricted Area by Acquifer Condition
Rat_RA_SW N/A Ratio of Restricted Area by Saltwater Intrusion
GWPH_MmpY N/A Groundwater Resource Potential (High) in mm/year
GWPH_MCMpY N/A Groundwater Resource Potential (High) in MCM/year
GWPL_MmpY N/A Groundwater Resource Potential (Low) in mm/year
GWPL_MCMpY N/A Groundwater Resource Potential (Low) in MCM/year
SWEH_MmpY N/A Part of groundwater resources potential which may be affected by possible saltwater intrusion (High) in mm/year
SWEH_MCMpY N/A Part of groundwater resources potential which may be affected by possible saltwater intrusion (High) in MCM/year
SWEL_MmpY N/A Part of groundwater resources potential which may be affected by possible saltwater intrusion (Low) in mm/year
SWEL_MCMpY N/A Part of groundwater resources potential which may be affected by possible saltwater intrusion (Low) in MCM/year
Hy_LakeMain Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
Name Text Name of lake
CP_ID N/A Control Point ID
Hy_MinStrFlowReq XLS
MSFR_m3ps N/A Minimum Stream Flow Requirement in cu.m/s
QNat_m3ps N/A Quasi-Natural in cu.m/s
Hy_SurfWatResPot_Dam XLS DxTB_m3ps N/A With Existing Storage Dams, Without Trans-Basin, in cu.m/s
Hydrology DTB_m3ps N/A With Existing Storage Dams, With Trans-Basin, in cu.m/s
EPD_m3ps N/A With Existing and Proposed Storage Dams, in cu.m/s
AAD2_m3ps N/A Probable Annual Ave. Discharge for 2-year return period, in cu.m/s
Hy_SurfWatResPot_QuasiNat XLS
MMD2_m3ps N/A Probable Minimum Monthly Discharge for 2-year return period, in cu.m/s
DepFl_m3ps N/A Dependable Flow in cu.m/s
P_ArSqKm N/A Present Net Fishpond Area in sq km
F_ArSqKm N/A Future Net Fishpond Area in sq km
Perc_FrWat N/A Percentage of Freshwater Fishpond (%)
P_T_m3ps N/A Present Total Water Demand in cu.m/s
P_T_MCMpY N/A Present Total Water Demand in MCM/year
Hy_WaterDemandFish XLS
P_FW_m3ps N/A Present Fresh Water Water Demand in cu.m/s
P_FW_MCMpY N/A Present Fresh Water Water Demand in MCM/year
F_T_m3ps N/A Future Total Water Demand in cu.m/s
F_T_MCMpY N/A Future Total Water Demand in MCM/year
F_FW_m3ps N/A Future Fresh Water Water Demand in cu.m/s
F_FW_MCMpY N/A Future Fresh Water Water Demand in MCM/year
UOm3ps N/A Water Use Permit: Others, in cu.m/s
UNIAm3ps N/A Water Use Permit: NIA, in cu.m/s
DO08m3ps N/A Demand: Others, in cu.m/s
Hy_WaterDemandIrrig_GW XLS DNIA08m3ps N/A Demand: NIA, in cu.m/s
ArHa_25 N/A New Area in Ha, 2025
DAr25_m3ps N/A Demand in New Area (2025), in cu.m/s
D_08_m3ps N/A 2008 Demand, in cu.m/s
D_08_MCMpY N/A 2008 Demand, in MCM/year
D_25_m3ps N/A 2025 Demand, in cu.m/s
D_25_MCMpY N/A 2025 Demand, in MCM/year
WD08_m3ps N/A Industrial water demand in cu.m/s, 2008
Hy_WaterDemandInd_SW XLS WD08_MCMpY N/A Industrial water demand in MCM/year 2008
WD25_m3ps N/A Industrial water demand in cu.m/s, 2025
WD25_MCMpY N/A Industrial water demand in MCM/year 2025
R_Com_Cat N/A Ratio of Commercial Farm and Cattle/Carabao
R_Com_Oth N/A Ratio of Commercial Farm and Other Livestock
R_Com_Poul N/A Ratio of Commercial Farm and Poultry
H_Cat_08 N/A Cattle / Carabao in 2008 (Head)
H_Oth_08 N/A Other Livestock in 2008 (Head)
Hy_WaterDemandLiv XLS
H_Poul_08 N/A Poultry in 2008 (Head)
H_Cat_25 N/A Cattle / Carabao in 2025 (Head)
H_Oth_25 N/A Other Livestock in 2025 (Head)
H_Poul_25 N/A Poultry in 2025 (Head)
WD08_m3ps N/A Water Demand in cu.m/s (2008)
WD08_MCMpY N/A Water demand in MCM/year (2008)
WD25_m3ps N/A Water Demand in cu.m/s (2025)
WD25_MCMpY N/A Water demand in MCM/year (2025)
MT-33
U_L3_08 N/A Urban municipal water demand for Level 3, 2008
U_ST_08 N/A Urban municipal water demand Sub Total, 2008
R_L3_08 N/A Rural municipal water demand for Level 3, 2008
R_ST_08 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2008
Tot_08 N/A Total municipal water demand, 2008
Hy_WaterDemandMun_CityMun_OutSA R_ST_15 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2015
Hydrology Hy_WaterDemandMun_CityMun_SA R_ST_15 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2015
Hy_WaterDemandMun_Prov_SA R_ST_15 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2015
MT-34
Hy_NIP Shape
Name Text Name of NIP
Type Text Type
Name Text Name of NIS
Status Text Status
NIS classification in 2008 where
0 - No Information
Class_08 Short Integer 1 - Safe
Hy_NIS Shape
2 - Conditionally Safe
3 - At Risk of Shortage
NIS classification in 2025 where
0 - No Information
Class_25 Short Integer 1 - Safe
2 - Conditionally Safe
3 - At Risk of Shortage
FID Polygon Object ID
Hy_PIA Shape
Shape Geometry Geometry
Hy_ReservoirMain Shape
Name Text Name of reservoir
Shape Line Geometry
Name Text Name of river
Code_NWRB Text River code assigned by NWRB
Name_NWRB Text River name assigned by NWRB
Code Text River code assigned by the JICA Study Team
Hy_RiversMain Shape Labelling Priority:
Label Short Integer 0 - Not Important
1 - Important
WaterUsage Text Water Usage
Sub-classification as Main River:
Category Short Integer 0 - Minor
1 - Major
Hy_RiversMain_GuguCrSupData Shape
Shape Line Geometry
Hy_SurfWater Shape Name Text Name of Proposed Dam
NorOpLevlM Double Normal operation Level in meters
Hy_SRIP Shape Shape Point Geometry
Name Text Name of SRIP
Name Text Name of SWIP
Status Text Status
WS_Ar Double Watershed area [no information from source regarding the unit]
Pond_Ar Double Pond area [no information from source regarding the unit]
Dam_HtM Double Dam height in meters
Dam_Len Double Dam length [no information from source regarding the unit]
Hy_SWIP Shape Svc_Ar_W Long Integer Service Area (Wet Season) [no information from source regarding the unit]
Hydrology Svc_Ar_D Long Integer Service Area (Dry Season) [no information from source regarding the unit]
Benef Long Integer Number of beneficiaries
Type of SWIP where:
DD - Diversion Dam
Type Text FR - Farm Reservoir
SWIP - Small Water Impounding Project
WIP - Water Impounding Project
ID Text Unique ID
Hy_WaterBodies_Line Shape Shape Line Geometry
Name Text Name of Water Body (unverified)
Hy_WaterBodies_Polygon Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
Name Text Name of Water Body (unverified)
DM_m3ps N/A Domestic / Municipal, in cu.m/s
MWSS_m3ps N/A MWSS, in cu.m/s
Irrig_m3ps N/A Irrigation, in cu.m/s
NIA_m3ps N/A NIA, in cu.m/s
Hy_WaterPermit_CityMun_GW XLS PG_m3ps N/A Power Generation, in cu.m/s
Fish_m3ps N/A Fisheries, in cu.m/s
Ls_m3ps N/A Livestock, in cu.m/s
Ind_m3ps N/A Industrial, in cu.m/s
Rec_m3ps N/A Recreation, in cu.m/s
Oth_m3ps N/A Other Purpose, in cu.m/s
T_xPG_m3ps N/A Total Excluding Power Generation, in cu.m/s
Total_m3ps N/A Total, in cu.m/s
Hy_WaterPermit_CityMun_SW XLS PG_m3ps N/A Power Generation, in cu.m/s
Fish_m3ps N/A Fisheries, in cu.m/s
PG_m3ps N/A Power Generation, in cu.m/s
Hy_WaterPermit_SB_GW XLS Fish_m3ps N/A Fisheries, in cu.m/s
MT-35
PG_m3ps N/A Power Generation, in cu.m/s
Hy_WaterPermit_SB_SW XLS Fish_m3ps N/A Fisheries, in cu.m/s
Hy_WatershedHMS Shape HMS_ID Short Integer ID
Remarks Text Remarks
U_L3_08 N/A Urban water ratio for Level 3, 2008
U_L21_08 N/A Urban water ratio for Levels 2 and 1, 2008
U_Uns_08 N/A Urban unsafe water ratio, 2008
U_Safe_08 N/A Urban safe water ratio, 2008
R_L3_08 N/A Rural water ratio for Level 3, 2008
Hy_WaterSupplyCov XLS R_L2_08 N/A Rural water ratio for Level 2, 2008
R_L1_08 N/A Rural water ratio for Level 1, 2008
R_Uns_08 N/A Rural unsafe water ratio, 2008
Hydrology
R_Safe_08 N/A Rural safe water ratio, 2008
Tot_L3_08 N/A Total water ratio for Level 3, 2008
Tot_Uns_08 N/A Total unsafe water ratio, 2008
Tot_Safe_08 N/A Total safe water ratio, 2008
GWP_H N/A Groundwater Potential (High) in MCM/year
GWP_L N/A Groundwater Potential (Low) in MCM/year
SWE_H N/A Part of groundwater resources potential which may be affected by possible saltwater intrusion (High) in MCM/year
SWE_L N/A Part of groundwater resources potential which may be affected by possible saltwater intrusion (Low) in MCM/year
Dem_Oth_08 N/A Demand for other uses (2008) in MCM/year
GWH_I23_08 N/A GWP_H for Level 2 & 3 and Industrial use (2008) in MCM/year
GWL_I23_08 N/A GWP_L for Level 2 & 3 and Industrial use (2008) in MCM/year
Dem_I23_08 N/A Demand for Level 2 & 3 and Industrial use (2008) in MCM/year
Hy_WaterUsageCondGW XLS Def_08 N/A Deficit (2008) in MCM/year
Dem_Oth_25 N/A Demand for other uses (2025) in MCM/year
GWH_I23_25 N/A GWP_H for Level 2 & 3 and Industrial use (2025) in MCM/year
GWL_I23_25 N/A GWP_L for Level 2 & 3 and Industrial use (2025) in MCM/year
Dem_I23_25 N/A Demand for Level 2 & 3 and Industrial use (2025) in MCM/year
Def_25 N/A Deficit (2025) in MCM/year
Evaluation in 2008 where:
Eval_08 N/A R: At Risk
HR: At High Risk
Evaluation in 2025 where:
Eval_25 N/A R: At Risk
HR: At High Risk
L_LaharDeposit Shape
L_LandClassification Shape Class Text Original Land Classification
Reclass Text Land Classification with modifications by the JCIA Study Team
Class Text Original Land Cover
L_LandCover_DENR Shape
Reclass Text Land Cover as reclassified by the JICA Study Team
Reclass2 Text Land Cover as reclassified (slightly more detailed) by the JICA Study Team
L_LandCover_JST Shape Reclass Text Land Cover as reclassified by the JICA Study Team
Land Condition
Class Text Original Land Cover
L_LandCover_NAMRIAJICA Shape
Reclass Text Land Cover as reclassified by the JICA Study Team
L_LandSub Shape Shape Line Geometry
SubsCmPYr Double Land Subsidence in cm/yr
Descrip Text Description
L_SAFDZ Shape Classified as an SAFDZ Area?
SAFDZ Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
N_Climate Shape
CodeDENR Text Code assigned by DENR
CodePAGASA Text Code assigned by PAGASA
N_Contours_50K Shape Shape Line Geometry
Elevation Line Elevation in meters
N_Contours_50K_PrePinatubo Shape Shape Line Geometry
Natural Condition
N_Contours_CandabaRBDike Shape Shape Line Geometry
N_Elevation Shape Range Text Range ID
Range2 Text Actual Elevation in meters ranges
N_Elevation_CandabaRBDike Shape
Range Text Elevation in meters range
MT-36
Descrip Text Description
N_Geology1 Shape
Code Text Original Code
Code2 Text Code by the JICA Study Team
N_Geology2 Shape Descrip Text Description
Code Text Original Code
N_Hydrogeology Shape
Class Text Hydrogeology classification
Brgy_Off Text Official data from PAWCZMS-DENR-Region 3 indicating barangay where mangrove is located
N_Mangrove Shape
CitMun_Off Text Official data from PAWCZMS-DENR-Region 3 indicating city/municipality where mangrove is located
Prov_Off Text Official data from PAWCZMS-DENR-Region 3 indicating province where mangrove is located
ArHa_Off Double Official data from PAWCZMS-DENR-Region 3 indicating area in hectares
N_MountainsHills Shape
Name Text Name of Mountain/Hill
Class Text Classification
N_PAnnual_Contour Shape Shape Line Geometry
Contour Double Annual precipitation contour
N_PDry_Contour Shape Shape Line Geometry
Contour Double Dry season precipitation contour
N_PETAnnual_Contour Shape Shape Line Geometry
Contour Double Annual PET contour
N_PWet_Contour Shape Shape Line Geometry
Contour Double Wet season precipitation contour
N_SlopePercent Shape
Range Text Slope range
N_Soil Shape Class Text Soil classification
Reclass Text Soil as reclassified by the JICA Study Team
N_SpotHt Shape Shape Point Geometry
N_SpotHt_PrePinatubo Shape Shape Point Geometry
N_TAnnual_Contour Shape Shape Line Geometry
Natural Condition
Contour Double Annual temperature contour
N_WaterSurfElev Shape Shape Point Geometry
N_WorldClim_Point Shape Shape Point Geometry
POINTID Long Integer ID
N_WorldClim_Polygon Shape Shape Polygon Geometry
POINTID Long Integer ID
POINTID N/A ID
N_WcElev DBF
ELEVATION N/A Elevation in meters
POINTID N/A ID
PET_01 N/A PET: January
PET_02 N/A PET: February
PET_03 N/A PET: March
PET_04 N/A PET: April
PET_05 N/A PET: May
PET_06 N/A PET: June
N_WcPET DBF
PET_07 N/A PET: July
PET_08 N/A PET: August
PET_09 N/A PET: September
PET_10 N/A PET: October
PET_11 N/A PET: November
PET_12 N/A PET: December
PET_annual N/A Annual PET
POINTID N/A ID
P0_01 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: January
P0_02 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: February
P0_03 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: March
P0_04 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: April
P0_05 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: May
P0_06 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: June
P0_07 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: July
P0_08 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: August
P0_09 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: September
P0_10 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: October
P0_11 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: November
P0_12 N/A Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: December
P_01 N/A Precipitation: January
N_WcPrec DBF
P_02 N/A Precipitation: February
P_03 N/A Precipitation: March
P_04 N/A Precipitation: April
P_05 N/A Precipitation: May
P_06 N/A Precipitation: June
P_07 N/A Precipitation: July
P_08 N/A Precipitation: August
P_09 N/A Precipitation: September
P_10 N/A Precipitation: October
P_11 N/A Precipitation: November
P_12 N/A Precipitation: December
P_ANNUAL N/A Annual precipitation
P_DRY N/A Dry season precipitation
P_WET N/A Wet season precipitation
MT-37
POINTID N/A ID
T_JAN N/A Temperature: January
T_FEB N/A Temperature: February
T_MAR N/A Temperature: March
T_APR N/A Temperature: April
T_MAY N/A Temperature: May
T_JUN N/A Temperature: June
Natural Condition N_WcTemp DBF
T_JUL N/A Temperature: July
T_AUG N/A Temperature: August
T_SEP N/A Temperature: September
T_OCT N/A Temperature: October
T_NOV N/A Temperature: November
T_DEC N/A Temperature: December
T_ANNUAL N/A Annual temperature
Ha_ActVolcano Shape
Name Text Name of volcano
Class Text Classification of activity
Date_ Date Date of occurence
Lat Double Latitude
Ha_Earthquake Shape
Long Double Longitude
Depth Short Integer Depth
UTC_hhmmss Double Coorinated Universal Time (UTC) in [hh][mm][ss.ss]
Mag Double Magnitude
Ha_Erosion Shape
Class Text Original Classification
Reclass Text Reclassification by the JICA Study Team
Shape Line Geometry
Classification of fault line where:
Ha_Faultlines_DENR Shape AP - no information from source data
Class Text CF - Concealed Fault
HF - High Angle Fault
NF - Normal Fault
Ha_Faultlines_JST Shape Shape Line Geometry
Class Text Classification of fault line
Ha_FlFloodExitPt Shape
Located inside the Study Area?
StudyArea Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Area is frequently flooded?
Ha_FloodedAreas_DFO Shape
F_All Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Area was flooded during August 2004 only?
F_Aug04 Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Ha_FloodProneAreas_MGB Shape
Ha_Cyclone XLS
Cyc_Freq N/A Frequency of Tropical Cyclone (times/year); Record Year 1948-2000
Municipal & Industrial Groundwater Balance in 2008, where
0 - no risk
Hazard R_MI_2008 N/A 1 - conditional risk
2 - at risk
3 - at high risk
Total Groundwater Balance in 2008, where
0 - no risk
R_T_2008 N/A 1 - conditional risk
2 - at risk
3 - at high risk
Municipal & Industrial Groundwater Balance in 2025, where
0 - no risk
Ha_GWBalance XLS R_MI_2025 N/A 1 - conditional risk
2 - at risk
3 - at high risk
Total Groundwater Balance in 2025, where
0 - no risk
R_T_2025 N/A 1 - conditional risk
2 - at risk
3 - at high risk
Groundwater Balance in 2008, where
0 - no risk
R_2008 N/A
1 - at risk
2 - at high risk
Groundwater Balance in 2025, where
0 - no risk
R_2025 N/A
1 - at risk
2 - at high risk
ArSqKm N/A Area in sq km
Pop08 N/A 2008 Population
PL_Tot08 N/A Pollution Load: Domestic in kg-BOD/day, 2008
PL0_Tot25 N/A Pollution Load: Domestic in kg-BOD/day, 2025 (without structural measures)
Ha_PollLoadDom_CatchSB XLS
PL1_Tot25 N/A Pollution Load: Domestic in kg-BOD/day, 2025 (with structural measures)
PopDen08 N/A 2008 Population Density
PLD_Tot08 N/A Pollution Load Density: Domestic in kg-BOD/day/sqkm, 2008
PLD0_Tot25 N/A Pollution Load Density: Domestic in kg-BOD/day/sqkm, 2025 (without structural measures)
PLD1_Tot25 N/A Pollution Load Density: Domestic in kg-BOD/day/sqkm, 2025 (with structural measures)
Ha_PollLoadDom_CatchWB XLS
MT-38
Ha_PollLoadTot_CatchSB XLS
Hazard
Ha_PollLoadTot_CatchWB XLS
M_DischGaugSta_Prop Shape
ID_HMS Double HMS ID
Location Text Location
Or_Lat Double Original Latitude
Or_Long Double Original Longitude
JST_Lat Double Laitude adjusted by the JICA Study Team
JST_Long Double Longitude adjusted byt he JICA Study Team
OrDrArSqKm Text Original Drainage area in sq km
M_HMS Shape
JSTDRSqKm Text Drainage area in sq km modified by the JICA Study Team
RiverName Text River Name
Status
Status Text o - operational
a - abandoned
Location was modified by JICA Study Team?
ModLoc Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
M_IntakeFlowMeas Shape Shape Point Geometry
Status Text Status if existing or proposed
WD Text Water District
Source Text Source
M_PumpingStation Shape
Lat Double Latitude
Cl_MgPL Double Chloride concentration in mg/l
No Text Rainfall Station ID
Name Text Name of Rainfall Station
Province Text Province
Type Text Type
Data source where:
1 - NWIN, http://www.nwin.nwrb.gov.ph/
2 - PAGASA-JICA, Basic Design Study Report on the Project for Upgrading of Flood Forecasting and Warning
System in Pampanga and Agno River and Basins in Republic of the Philippines, 2007
3 - NIA, Definitive Development Plan, Irrigation Component of the Casecnan Multipurpose Irrigation and Power
Source Text Project (CMIPP-IC), Appendix 1, 2000
4 - DPWH-NK, Pinatubo Hazard Urgent Rehabilitation Project, Monitoring and Planning of Flood COntrol Works
on the Pasac Delta (inc. the Porac-Gumain River) and Third River Channel, Final Report, Appendix No. 2,
Monitoring
Meteorology and Hydrology, 2002.
5 - JICA-NWRB, The Study on Water Resources Development for Metro Manila in the Republic of the
Philippines, Final Report, Vol. III, Master Plan Study, Supporting Report, 2003.
M_RainfallStation Shape Pave Double Average precipitation
P0 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level
P0_01 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: January
P0_02 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: February
P0_03 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: March
P0_04 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: April
P0_05 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: May
P0_06 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: June
P0_07 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: July
P0_08 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: August
P0_09 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: September
P0_10 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: October
P0_11 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: November
P0_12 Double Precipitation at estimated Mean Sea Level: December
Or_Lat Double Original Latitude
M_Thiessen Shape No Text Rainfall Station ID
Name Text Name of Rainfall Station
Pave Double Average precipitation
Name Text Name of Water Level / Rainfall Station
Lat Double Latitude
Data source where:
M_WLRR Shape
2 - PAGASA-JICA, Basic Design Study Report on the Project for Upgrading of Flood Forecasting and Warning
Source Text
System in Pampanga and Agno River and Basins in Republic of the Philippines, 2007
JST - JICA Study Team
Obs Text Observation
Status Text Status
ID Short Integer Unique ID
M_WQMonStation_Prop Shape WaterBody Text Related Water-body
CItyMun Text City/municipality where it is located
DKmSFHall Double Straight-line distance to San Fernando City Hall, Pampanga
DKmSFCent Double Straight-line distance to the centroid of City of San Fernando, Pampanga
MT-39
Name Text Name of CADT
S_AD_AppCADT Shape Code Text Code
Tribe Text Tribe
ArHa_Off Double Total Area from NCIP; in hectares
IndCode Text Index Code (with reference to table in report)
Name Text Name of Ancestral Domain
S_AD_SocPrep Shape
Tribe Text Tribe
Benef_Fam Short Integer No. of Beneficiaties (Families)
ArHaAp_Off Double Approximated Area from NCIP; in hectares
S_AD_SurvComp Shape Tribe Text Tribe
Benef_Ind Short Integer No. of Beneficiaties (Individuals)
S_AD_SurvOnGoing Shape
Tribe Text Tribe
S_HistCulSite Shape Name Text Name of site
S_IP_Pop_FullCM XLS Comm_Cnt N/A Number of communities
Fam_Cnt N/A Number of families
Tribe N/A Tribe
Aeta_Fam N/A Number of Aeta families
Aeta_Ind N/A Number of Aeta individuals
Abe_Fam N/A Number of Abelling families
Abe_Ind N/A Number of Abelling individuals
DR_Fam N/A Number of Dumagat/Remontado families
DR_Ind N/A Number of Dumagat/Remontado individuals
S_IP_PopProf XLS
IKK_Fam N/A Number of Ibaloi/Kalanguya/Kankanaey (Cordillera Tribes) families
IKK_Ind N/A Number of Ibaloi/Kalanguya/Kankanaey (Cordillera Tribes) individuals
IB_Fam N/A Number of Ilongot/Bugkalot families
IB_Ind N/A Number of Ilongot/Bugkalot individuals
Total_Fam N/A Total number of families
FamRat_Per N/A Ratio between Provincial Total and Regional Total of families (in percent)
Total_Ind N/A Total number of individuals
IndRat_Per N/A Ratio between Provincial Total and Regional Total of individuals (in percent)
Socio-Economic
District_Cnt N/A Number of districts
City_Cnt N/A Number of cities
S_IP_RegProf XLS Mun_Cnt N/A Number of municipalities
CityMun_IP N/A Number of cities/municipalities with indigeous people
Comm_Cnt N/A Number of communities
Pop06_Fam N/A 2006 Population (families)
Pop06_Indiv N/A 2006 Population (individuals)
S_NatStour Shape Name Text Name of site
S_Pop_FullCM XLS
S_Pop_SA XLS
S_PopDen_FullCM XLS
S_PopDen_SA XLS
S_PopProj_FullCM XLS
S_PopProj_SA XLS
MT-40
U_L3_08 N/A Served population for Level 3, 2008
U_ST_08 N/A Served population Sub Total, 2008
S_ServedPop_CityMun_OutSA XLS R_ST_15 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2015
Socio-Economic S_ServedPop_CityMun_SA XLS R_ST_15 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2015
S_ServedPop_Prov_SA XLS R_ST_15 N/A Rural municipal water demand Sub Total, 2015
MT-41
A_UL3_0825 N/A Additional population to be served for Urban Level 3, 2008-2025
A_RL3_0825 N/A Additional population to be served for Rural Level 3, 2008-2025
S_ServedPopAdd_CityMun_OutSA XLS A_RL2_0815 N/A Additional population to be served for Rural Level 2, 2008-2015
S_ServedPopAdd_CityMun_SA XLS A_RL2_0815 N/A Additional population to be served for Rural Level 2, 2008-2015
Socio-Economic
S_ServedPopAdd_Province_SA XLS A_RL2_0815 N/A Additional population to be served for Rural Level 2, 2008-2015
PovInc N/A Poverty Incidence
PovInc_SE N/A Poverty Incidence Standard Error
CoeffVar N/A Coefficient of Variation
Rank N/A Rank, with 1 being the poorest
S_Poverty XLS
PoorPop N/A Magnitude of poor population
PovGap N/A Poverty Gap
PovGap_SE N/A Poverty Gap Standard Error
PovSev N/A Severity of Poverty
PovSev_SE N/A Severity of Poverty Standard Error
Name Text Name of Protected Area
Leg Text Legislation
Date_ Date Date
S_ProtAr_Init Shape
ArHa_Off Double Area from PAWB; in hectares
Category Text Category
Proclaimed as Protected Area?
Proclaimed Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Region Text Region
Name Text Name of Protected Area
S_ProtAr_Proc Shape Leg Text Legislation
Date_ Date Date
ArHa_Off Double Area from PAWB; in hectares
Category Text Category
Region Text Region
Province N/A Name of city/municipality
S_SanitaryToiletCov XLS
CityMun N/A Name of province
ToilCovRa N/A Sanitary toilet coverage ratio
MT-42
O_701Index Shape
MapNumber Text Map Number
MapName Text Map Name
Program Text Name of program
O_AnnualIrrigationPrograms Shape Province Text Name of province
District Text Name of district
Barangay Text Name of barangay
ID Text Dishcharge Permittee ID
Name Text Name of Permittee
Address Text Address
Class Text Project classification
RefNo Text Reference No.
O_DischargePermittees Shape DateRec Date Datre Received
DateApp Date Date Applied
DateIss Date Date Issued
DateExp Date Date of Expiry
Geocode Text Geocode (Barangay), for location estimation
Located inside the Study Area?
StudyArea Short Integer 0 - No
1 - Yes
Class Text Industry classification
Name Text Name of Industry
O_Industry Shape Or_Lat Double Original Latitude
O_JicaNamriaPilotArea Shape
Commodity Text Mineral Commodity
Name Text Name of Company/Permittee/Operator
Others
Location Text Location of mining claims
Address Text Mailing Address
TelNo Text Telephone No.
FaxNo Text Fax No.
Website Text Website
Email Text Email Address
O_MinesQuarries Shape
Official Text Managing Official (Position/Designation)
PermContNo Text Permit/Contract No.
ArHa Double Area in sq km
VolCuM Double Allowed volume in cu m
VolMt Double Allowed volume in mt
VolNoU Double Allowed volume (no units)
PermDurFr Date Permit Duration (From)
PerDurTo Date Permit Duration (To)
Status Text Status
PSGC Text Philippine Standard Geographic Code (Barangay), for location estimation
O_NAMRIATopoLabel Shape
O_NorthArrow Shape
ProjCode Text Project Code
ProjGrp Text Project Group
Sector Text Sector
O_Projects Shape SerialNo Double Serial Number
ProjName Text Project Name
Agency Text Implementing Agency
ICostPHP Double Initial Cost in PHP
OMCostPHP Double Operation & Maintenance Cost in PHP
Ten_JST Text Tenurial Instruments as reclassified by the JICA Study Team from orinal tree plantations data
Classification, where
Govt - Government Program
O_TenurialInst Shape Class Text
Pvt - Private Forest Plantations
Others
ProjName Text Project Name
Area
ArSqKm Double
• Except for Protected Areas (Initial), where official areas were used if available, areas were calculated using GIS
MT-43
Location ID, where
0 - Coordinates are available
1 - Coordinates are corrected by the JICA Study Team
L_ID Double
2 - Estimated by barangay
3 - Estimated by city/municipality
4 - excluded
Permit Text Permit No.
Grantee Text Grantee
Source Text Source
Type Text Type of water right
Or_Lat Text Original Latitude in DMS
Or_Long Text Original Longitude in DMS
JST_Lat Text Laitude adjusted by the JICA Study Team in DMS
Others O_WaterRights Shape
JST_Long Text Longitude adjusted byt he JICA Study Team in DMS
JST_Lat2 Double Laitude adjusted by the JICA Study Team in decimal degrees
JST_Long2 Double Longitude adjusted byt he JICA Study Team in decimal degrees
Charges Double Charges
Granted Double Permitted volume
Purpose Text Water right purpose
Date_App Date Date Applied
PSGC_P Text Provincial Philippine Standard Geographic Code
PSGC_M Text City/Municipal Philippine Standard Geographic Code
PSGC_B Text Barangay Philippine Standard Geographic Code
Code_WB Text Corresponding Water Balance Catchment Code
Code_SB Text Corresponding Sub-Basin Catchment
Status of water rights where:
0 - operational
Status Short Integer
1 - abandoned as of 2007
2 - abandoned as of 2009
Class Text Water right classification
Reclass Text Water right reclassification
MT-44
Annex-T M.1.4.4 List of Spatial Data: Rasters
Category Layer Description Data Classification Format Sources Year Coverage Remarks
TIN TIN General TIN JICA Study Team 2009 Region III • Based on N_Contours_50k, N_SpotHt
DEM_100 DEM, 100 m cell size General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Region III
DEM, 100 m cell size, clipped to
DEM_100_studyarea General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Study Area
DEM, 100 m cell size, clipped to
DEM_postpinatubo_100 General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity
Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity
DEM prior to Mt. Pinatubo eruption,
DEM_prepinatubo_100 General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity
DEM 100 m cell size
Raster calculation between post
Diff_postprepinatubo General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity • DEM_postpinatubo_100 - DEM_prepinatubo_100
and pre Mt. Pinatubo eruption
Hillshade_100 Hillshade, 100 m cell size General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Region III
Hillshade_50 Hillshade, 50 m cell size General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
TIN_prepinatubo TIN prior to Mt. Pinatubo eruption General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Mt. Pinatubo and vicinity • Based on N_Contours_50k_PrePinatubo and N_SpotHt_PrePinatubo
SRTM4 SRTM4 General GeoTIFF CGIAR-CSI 2009 Partial areas of Luzon and Visayas • Downloaded from http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org
SRTM4_Hillshade_90 SRTM4 hillshade, 90 m cell size General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Partial areas of Luzon and Visayas • Based on SRTM4
Slope in degree unit, 100 m cell
Slopedegree_100 General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Region III
size
Slope in degree unit clipped to
Slopedegree_100_studyarea General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Study Area, 100 m cell size
Slope
Slope in percent unit, 100 m cell
Slopepercent_100 General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Region III
size
Slope in percent unit clipped to
Slopepercent_100_studyarea General GeoTIFF JICA Study Team 2009 Study Area
Study Area, 100 m cell size
Partial Areas of the Philippines and
Alt WorldClim Altitide General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean01 WorldClim Temperature (Jan) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean02 WorldClim Temperature (Feb) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean03 WorldClim Temperature (Mar) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean04 WorldClim Temperature (Apr) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean05 WorldClim Temperature (May) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
WorldClim Tmean06 WorldClim Temperature (Jun) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
MT-45
vicinity
Tmean07 WorldClim Temperature (Jul) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean08 WorldClim Temperature (Aug) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean09 WorldClim Temperature (Sep) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean10 WorldClim Temperature (Oct) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean11 WorldClim Temperature (Nov) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
Tmean12 WorldClim Temperature (Dec) General GeoTIFF WorldClim 2006 • Downloaded from http://www.worldclim.org
vicinity
3030-1_Olongapo 3030-1_Olongapo General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Olongapo
3031-1_O'Donnel 3031-1_O'Donnel General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 O'Donnel
3031-2_MountPinatubo 3031-2_MountPinatubo General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Mount Pinatubo
3032-1_SanCarlos 3032-1_SanCarlos General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 San Carlos
3032-2_Camiling 3032-2_Camiling General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Camiling
3033-2_Dagupan 3033-2_Dagupan General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Dagupan
3130-1_Malolos 3130-1_Malolos General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Malolos
3130-4_Guagua 3130-4_Guagua General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Guagua
3131-1_Cabanatuan 3131-1_Cabanatuan General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Cabanatuan
3131-2_SanMiguel 3131-2_SanMiguel General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 San Miguel
NAMRIA50K_New
3131-3_Angeles 3131-3_Angeles General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Angeles
3131-4_Tarlac 3131-4_Tarlac General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Tarlac
3132-2_Munoz 3132-2_Munoz General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Munoz
3132-3_Gerona 3132-3_Gerona General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Gerona
3132-4_Cuyapo 3132-4_Cuyapo General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Cuyapo
3133-3_Binalonan 3133-3_Binalonan General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Binalonan
3230-4_Angat 3230-4_Angat General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Angat
3231-3_Sibul 3231-3_Sibul General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Sibul
3231-4_GeneralTinio 3231-4_GeneralTinio General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 General Tinio
3232-3_PalayanCity 3232-3_PalayanCity General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA 2007 Palayan City
7073-4_Botolan 7073-4_Botolan General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA Map Information: 1977 Botolan
7174-1_San_Jose 7174-1_San_Jose General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA Reprinted: 1990 San_Jose
7175-2_San_Nicolas 7175-2_San_Nicolas General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA No information San_Nicolas
7272-1_Mt_Irid 7272-1_Mt_Irid General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA Reprinted: 2005 Mt_Irid
7273-1_Gabaldon 7273-1_Gabaldon General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA No information Gabaldon
NAMRIA50K_Old 7273-2_Ulalikan_Point 7273-2_Ulalikan_Point General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA No information Ulalikan_Point
7274-1_Maria_Aurora 7274-1_Maria_Aurora General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA Reprinted: 1990 Maria_Aurora
7274-2_Ligaya 7274-2_Ligaya General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA No information Ligaya
7274-4_Pantabangan 7274-4_Pantabangan General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA No information Pantabangan
7275-2_Tauayan 7275-2_Tauayan General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA Reprinted: 2005 Tauayan
7275-3_Burgos 7275-3_Burgos General JPG + Worldfile NAMRIA Reprinted: 2003 Burgos
Annex-Figures
Linked to NWIN database
Source: Intranet Site in NWRB
Annex-F M.1.2.1 NWRB Intranet Site
MF-1
Link to access PRB-IWRM Study website
Source: www.nwrb.gov.ph
Annex-F M.1.2.2 NWRB Official Website
Source: www.philwatsan.org.ph
Annex-F M.1.2.3 PhilWATSAN Website
MF-2
Source: www.nwin.nwrb.gov.ph
Annex-F M.1.2.4 NWIN website
MF-3
Annex-F M.3.1.1 Pampanga River Basin IWRM Study Website
MF-4

NWRB Pampanga River Basin

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NWRB Pampanga River Basin

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NWRB Pampanga River Basin

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES BOARD

THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY

CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.

Exchange Rate used in the Report is:

List of Tables in Report

Table I.2.2.1 Summary of Environmentally Critical Projects (ECPs) ........................................ I-4

List of Annex Tables

List of Figures in Report

Figure I. 2.2.1 Summary Flowchart of EIA Process ...................................................................... I-3

List of Annex Figures

Annex-F I.2.2.1 Potential ECAs in Region III ...................................................................... IF-1

Sector I. Environmental and Social Considerations on

I.2 Existing Legislation and Legal Systems governing Environmental

EIA Required No EIA

EIA Study Scoping

EIA Study/ Report Preparation

Issuance of ECC w/ recommendations to

Secure necessary permits / clearances from other EMB

Expansion/Project modifications Implementation

Environmental Impact Monitoring and Evaluation/Audit

Figure I. 2.2.1 Summary Flowchart of EIA Process

I.2.2.1 Projects Covered by PEISS

Table I.2.2.2 Summary of Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)

(3) Outline of EPRMP (Single Project Expansion/Modification)

(4) Outline of PEPRMP (Expansion/Modification Projects) (maximum of 200 pages)

(5) 1-Page Application Form for CNC under APS

I.3 Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Environmental and Social

I.3.2 Identification of the Projects covered by PEISS

I.3.6 Scoping Results and Proposed Mitigation Measures

I.3.6.2 Less significant adverse impacts (B-)

I.4 Identification of the necessary monitoring items during the project

I.4.2 Operation phase

I.4.3 Throughout the project cycles

I.5 Important Notice on Implementation of the Projects

Data collected Sources

Data collected Sources

Reservoir flooded area OR meter storage > 25 hectares OR

Reservoir flooded area

GROUP II - Non-ECPs in Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)

E. Buildings, Storage Facilities and Other Structures

total /gross floor area

Pollution control devices or facilities

GROUP II - Non-ECPs in Environmentally Critical Areas (ECAs)

Receiving facilities, paper, plastic, and < 300,000 MT involve manual or

GROUP V - UNCLASSIFIED PROJECTS

ENDNOTES TO Annex-T I.2.2.1

per cage is 6,300 kg/year*cage.

Groups Possible Documents

・ Diversion Dam (18 nos in 959 ha) IEE checklist/

3. Management of FL-P-01: Flood Control Measures in Major activities are:

Groups Possible Documents

Reliability of Water Supply in Angat- following studies :

1 Involuntary resettlement A- A- C- C- - - - - C- C- C- C- - -

Existing social infrastructure & Services such as Traffic/Existing Public

7 Inequality between beneficiaries and project-affected peoples B- B- - - - - - - C- C- C- C- - -

12 Disaster (natural risk) and epidemic as HIV B+ /C- B+ /C- C- C- C- C- - C- B+ /C- C- C- C- - -

13 Topography and geology B- B- - - C- C- - - B- - - - - -

15 Ground water C+/C- C+/C- - - C- C- - C- C+/C- C- C+/C- C+/C- - -