UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DIVISION

ALEXANDRIA
Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG)
Pro Se CASE No. 1:17 –cv - 1106
V DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
Chief Judge Honorable Rebecca Beach Smith
USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia
Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, Judge Liam O'Grady, Judge Anthony J. Trenga, Senior
Judge James C. Cacheris, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton, Senior Judge T.S. Ellis, III, Magistrate Judge
Theresa C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson, Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis, Magistrate
Judge Michael Nachmanoff, Magistrate Judge T. Rawles Jones, Jr. USDC of the Eastern Division of Virginia
(Alexandria)
Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, Judge Diana
Gribbon Motz, Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. Judge Robert B. King, Judge Dennis W. Shedd, Judge Allyson
K. Duncan, Judge G. Steven Agee, Judge Barbara Milano Keenan, Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. Judge Albert
Diaz, Judge Henry F. Floyd, Judge Stephanie D. Thacker, Judge Pamela A. Harris, Senior Judge Clyde H.
Hamilton, Senior Judge Andre M. Davis Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, District Judge James E. Boasberg,
District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, District Judge Rudolph Contreras, Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth,
Senior Judge Ellen S. Huvelle, Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton, Senior Judge Richard J. Leon, Senior Judge
Rosemary M. Collyer USDC of the District of Columbia
Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
Judge Brian Kenney, Judge Stephen Mitchell US Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
(Alexandria)
John and or Jane Doe 1 – 100
Defendants all Public Servants, individually and in his or her official capacity as a Federal
Judge an Officer of the Court

MOTION FOR JUDGE HENRY HUDSON TO RECONSIDER

THE ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 17,2017
IS RIDDLED WITH JUDICIAL / LEGAL ERRORS AND BIAS RETALIATION
That New Evidence Supports Reconsideration

THAT THE JUDGES HAVE IGNORED THE DOCUMENTS AND THE TRUTH TO PROTECT ONE OF THEIR OWN
JUST LIKE FAKE MEDIA IGNORING THE TRUTH and
THAT OUR PRESIDENT is DONALD J TRUMP who has stated “OUR JUDICIARY IS BROKEN”

THAT THE COURT'S ACTIONS OF A JUDGE WHO IS BEING SUED (Chief Judge Rebecca Smith) TO CHOSE THE
JUDGE TO ACT AS THE JURY, violates the Judicial Canons and Ethics. The appearance of the COVER UP stinks
further of a pile of DEAD FISH who can no longer do there job. AS ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS STATED
AT THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY ON FRIDAY NOVEMBER 17, 2017 that we are cleaning up our Judges, that Judges
are “Umpires calling balls and strikes” Judges are not Jurors and Judge Hudson in this Order on November 17,
2017 acted as “GOD”, “JURY” and with OBVIOUS KNOWLEDGEABLE BIAS TO PROTECT MANY OF HIS OWN in the
“OLD BOYS NETWORK OF VIRGINIA” which he appears to be an active member in since his youth. JUDGE HUDSON
USING RETALIATION of Plaintiffs rights to redress the courts unless a Judge PLAYING GOD states it is something

1
they would consider. THIS IS THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA with a Judge IGNORING THE EVIDENCE of other
CORRUPT JUDGES AND LAWYER’s. Violating my 7th Amendment right to a Jury Trial. The Seventh Amendment
(Amendment VII) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. My CIVIL RIGHTS.

THAT the DISINGENUOUS, MAFIA style behavior of the court has been fully disclosed in this ORDER of November
17, 2017, when on November 16, 2017 Plaintiff is noticed that Judge Hudson is the “CHOSEN” and JUDGE HUDSON
states he has READ everything in all my cases by November 17, 2017 - YET LEAVES OUT JUDGE HILTON”S
RECUSAL on 3 Case’s in the past weeks ( Cases 1:17-cv-290, 1:17-cv-819, 1:17-cv-925) The Recusal of Judge
Kloch, The Financial Conflict of Judge Clark, That fact Plaintiff was found innocent of the Extortion of monies and it was
deemed by the City of Alexandria Police and Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel the monies and Real Estate by all
appearance and what documents with no discovery was owed to Plaintiff. THAT PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN BARRED
FROM COLLECTING ON WHAT IS OWED HER BY JUDGES RULING WITH BIAS.

That this case being filed on October 3, 2017 the SHOPPING OF A JUDGE to try and SQUASH PLAINTIFF LIKE A
BUG for the outcome the defendants wanted is obvious to even any lay person who review’s the complaint. That
what happened to Linda Kennedy is happening to Plaintiff, to several others that will go unnamed to not hurt them in the
courts further. That FEAR, the UNNECESSARY FEAR and HARM done to Litigants that the Judges do is not only
ILLEGAL but, is CRIMINAL.

That JUDGE HUDSON mimic what his good friend and colleague from practicing law BEN DIMURO wants in his filing
does not go unnoticed. THIS CASE was stayed by JUDGE TRENGA so he could refuse subpoenas by all appearance.
See Attached Exhibit 1 Recusal / Apology letter not attached from Judge Kloch.

THAT the appearance is JUDGE HUDSON picked and choose what JUDGE HUDSON wanted to address to further try
and BULLY A PRO SE LITIGANT ignoring the CONSTITUTIONAL and CIVIL RIGHTS of an AMERICAN CITIZEN
ignoring the COVER UP and the EVIDENCE of all the PEOPLE WHO have with KNOWLEDGEABLE, MALICIOUS intent
to harm / rape JWG of all her American Constitutional Rights.

COMES NOW Plaintiff states the LACK OF INTEGRITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COURTS is
what got President Donald Trump elected, and will keep him in office. That Attorney General Jeff Sessions and
his own White House Attorney’s have made it clear it is time to CLEAN UP THE COURTS. That Plaintiff as stated
in her Complaint, she came to the Federal Court due to her Civil Rights, her United States Constitutional Rights were
being violated in the Virginia State Courts. That Plaintiff found the Federal Court Judges to be on the same party list of
the Virginia State Judges all one big happy family called the “Old Boys Network”. That in a “Cover Up” for one of their
own, they will go to any lengths - even MURDER.

2
Plaintiff will address each Page of Judge Hudson’s “ORDER” with the law under Rule 59 (e) the courts have recognized
three grounds for amending a judgement “(1) to accommodate an intervening change in controlling lae:(2) to account for
new evidence not available at trial:, or (3) to correct a clear error of law or PREVENT MANIFEST OF INJUSTICE.”

1. Page 3 & 4 of Order: Thank you for approving my IFP. That JWG should not be IFP except the Courts have
allowed my life to be stolen from me. I have come to the courts to correct the CRIMINAL acts that have created
the INJUSTICE. That JWG contacted early on her State Senator Patsy Ticer1 to have the bait and switch
pulled. That JWG was set up to meet with Martha Kent the x-wife of Judge Donald Kent. Martha after listening
to the issues / judicial misconduct she asked me if I knew who she was. JWG stated “NO” she went on to state
she was the x-wife of Judge Donald Kent - “She and her family could not get a FAIR TRIAL either” further stated
“YOU can not WIN this YOU are no longer one of them” ie: one of them the “OLD BOYS NETWORK”
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Recusal of Judges is not MOOT - but, we can pass on that
3. Pages 4 - 6 Plaintiff’s Current Complaint: The one Judges LOVE LOVE LOVE to state U.S.C. § 19159(e)(2)
NO CLAIM and FRIVOLOUS That the RULE OF LAW ignored is even under the presumption that plaintiff’s
statements of facts are all true2; and even construing all reasonable conclusions therefrom in favor of the
plaintiff (just as the most plaintiff-leaning jury is permitted to do);
the court may/must dismiss the case if and only if it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can (given sufficient
time and resources to develop evidence, such as discovery and depositions) show (to the judge’s discretionary
satisfaction) no set of facts in support of his claims which would entitle him to relief under the prevailing/relevant
laws. Yoichiro Hamabe, Functions of Rule 12(b)(6) in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Categorization
Approach, Campbell Law Review ʋ15 №2 (Jan 1993).
4. Claims were stated clearly how the Judges ABUSED their Power to protect many of their own.
5. Further states Page 5 JWG can not claim a § 1983 that the JUDGES have IMMUNITY that they are above the
law. THE CONFLICT here is you use case’s JUDGE’s DECIDED to protect themselves from being held
accountable even when they know they are WRONG. THAT Judges immunity comes from other Judges.
The problem in this country with our Judges is they POLICE THEMSELVES and the Elected Officials and
agencies that are to hold them accountable are Lawyers who are put into place to COVER UP the criminal
mis justice by JUDGES. It takes courage to call out a JUDGE. But, today I know my TRASH Collectors have
more integrity than most Judges. Nowhere in 42 U.S.C. 19833 does it state that a Judge is immune. That

1
Senator Patsy Ticer and JWG were in TWIG together lived close enough to walk to her home, yet she would not meet
with JWG in Virginia she insisted in meeting in Richmond where instead of being at the meeting she set JWG up with
the x-wife of Judge Donald Kent each ABUSED their POWER to manipulate and maliciously try to rape JWG of her
rights
2
That the Bankruptcy Transcripts and Trustee Thomas Gorman states clearly that JWG has been honest, candid and I
am changing my ruling from In Rem
3
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or
Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United
States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law,
suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a
judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not
be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the
3
 only Judge’s believe they are IMMUNE from the Law and Accountability, again it is the Judicial Abuse that
President Trump acknowledged that got him elected. That Discretion does not include ABUSE OF POWER.
6. The Question all Judges should be concerned about is Will they become the next Harvey Weinstein
SCANDAL for the ABUSE OF POWER the Smoke and Mirrors of Absolute Immunity? JUDGES do not get
to ignore the law to protect their own. It was stated clearly at the Federalists Event the ABA is a corrupt entity.
Will the Judicial Abusive Acts and Actions of POWER make Judges the next Harvey Weinstein type
Scandal as the Rape has no different feeling - Abusive Power of Judges is worse than Physical Rape as
they are EMPOWERED by so many Janice being a Rape Victim in College and the man going to JAIL for
several years. The Knowledgeable and Deliberate Judicial Abuse of Power / RAPE is much worse than that
Physical Rape - RAPE BY JUDGES LAST LONGER and IS a LONGER
LASTING TRAUMA
7. When a judge knows the he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statute expressly depriving him
of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost., Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F2d, cer den Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S..Ct
2020 451 U.S. 939, 68L.Ed 2d 326. In Rankin v. Howard 633 F.2d 844 (1980) the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary
impunity prongs were absent; later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1972 (1986), the Ninth Circuit, en banc,
criticized the “judicial nature” analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankin’s
ultimate result wasn't changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial
immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction.
8. THE ONLY PEOPLE who believe Judge’s are above the law and have ABSOLUTE JUDICIAL IMMUNITY is
JUDGES and it is Judges who have created this Smoke and Mirrors that they are above the law. Further it is
the Elected Officials and Lawyers who turn the other way to empower it - with the silence because of the
Retribution and Retaliation Judges use.
9. That JUSTICE has no time limit. That the Judiciary the Government and the Elected Officials to protect one
of their own Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman is obvious and your comments in footnotes
on Page 6 is clear you wish to minimise U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of a Felony and ignore a Lawyers Criminal Spree.
It was a FEDERAL JUDGE who helped JWG with JWG’s Default Judgement in September of 2007 when
Lawyer Ilona lied in court and in court documents. THE FEDERAL JUDGE stated very clearly “You have
just won your case, Lawyer’s are not allowed to LIE IN COURT” that Judge frown on that.
10. That Judge Hudson states “Plaintiff’s current Complaint fails to state a viable claim of constitutional or
legal significance against any of the named Defendants. “ This is a disingenuous Statement it is clear even
to a layman that Plaintiff has been denied any and all Justice in the State Court and then in the Federal Court.
11. That Judge Hudson claimed to have read everything that has happened to Plaintiff and you now are “GOD” and
state JWG does not deserve JUSTICE.
12. That you ignore: 1. September 2007 Lawyer Ilona lying in Court 2. September 2007 a Federal Judge
declaring and helping me with my Default Judgement 3. All Judges in the Circuit Court of Alexandria Recuse

purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be
considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
4
 while Judge Haddock for his declared “LOVE LOVE LOVE “ for Ilona choses all Judge’s to control the outcome
of all.
13. The Recuse of Judge Kloch and apology letter - Exhibit 1
14. That in May of 2008 Ilona states in Court: 1. Me and my family had nothing to do with your children as you
raisen them Catholic, 2. Judge J. Howe (the chosen Judge by Haddock) calls me all the time for legal advice
you can’t win 3. David didn’t steal that money from Sonia only leaving Ilona through her law firm to steal it
which is shown in Exhibit 1 of the Complaint. Attached Exhibit 2 shows a short Estimate of monies owed to
JWG. THAT all JUDGES are aware of the CRIMINAL SPREE of Lawyer ILONA since on or around November
1983 through today.
15. That ILONA with knowledgeable intend has abused all the Judge’s putting them into a CRIMINAL SPREE of
their own by ignoring the Constitutional Right of a Jury Trial to JWG for the harm caused her. But, why should
Ilona worry about that when no JUDGE has the Integrity to hold Ilona Grenadier Heckman accountable. I
wonder how Judge Albert Grenadier would feel about how she stole from his mother and his two granddaughters.
16. The Law is clear in a self reporting group of people you must report such criminal activity - not COVER
IT UP.
17. That all complaints have been reviewed by lawyers after being filed - and Plaintiff has been assured her claims
have standing. Plaintiff has the TRUTH and the documents to prove it and that is what it takes for a Complaint.
BUT, you also need a Judge with Integrity who is not trying to COVER UP the criminal spree of one of
their own with the help of others.
18. Motions to intervene Page 7 That someone who Intervenes needs to have evidence and show that they bring
to the table further proof of the Criminal Conspiracy of the Defendants to harm JWG.
19. That Linda Kennedy shows a PATTERN AND PRACTICE of VIRGINIA Corruption that has been accepted
and become a way of life for the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials. That the Virginia State Bar
(Exhibit 1 and 2 with Intervene ) would tamper with her transcripts and LIE about it ie through Michael McCauley
and he would in Plaintiff’s case would meet Plaintiff for Lunch in Arlington - he did not want JWG coming to his
Office or Richmond. He would have JWG send the information to VSB Michael McCauley’s home in Richmond
for him to ignore for a year and then to threaten Janice with FACEBOOK explosion? Michael McCauley in
several of his e-mail correspondence BRAGGED ABOUT WHAT A CHRISTIAN MAN HE WAS, his denial and
COVER UP of several to keep POWERFUL Lawyers rich or richer is not a christian thing.
20. That Linda Kennedy EXHIBIT 3 (with her Intervene) states clearly that the Virginia Supreme Court Justice
was aware of and has participated in the corruption and COVER UP of the corruption in the Judiciary with Chief
Judge Rebecca Smith by all appearance and timing. That as a dying man this was his attempt to clear a
conscious for the apparent HELL he appears to believe he is headed to for his acts and actions on Earth.
21. That you leave out the TRANSCRIPTS in Plaintiff’s Bankruptcy that stated clearly that JUDGE KENNEY was
ignoring JUDICIAL Misconduct and when he didn’t report it as well all the Judges listed above they violated
U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of a Felony
22. That George McDermott’s tapes show that each hearing was denied. That JWG would show up at the
Courthouse to be - “Oh didn’t someone call you, the hearing has been canceled the Judge will decide in

5
 Chambers” JUDGES HAVE NO INTEGRITY TO FACE PLAINTIFF and act in a professional manner ignoring
the Judicial Canons and the Virginia and United States Constitutional Rights of JWG.
23. That to dismiss this Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief
may be granted; Is weak, disingenuous and misleading. Judge’s are not above the LAW. JWG
is not on a Witch Hunt, JWG is demanding JUSTICE for the HARM DONE TO HER. JWG will file
notice to remove Judge Hilton from the suit as he did the right thing, He followed the law -
admitted to a BIAS as Judge Kloch has done and recused himself - he has damaged JWG,
wasted her time and what little resources she has, but, by recusing himself he also EMPOWERS
this suit with evidence of Bias by the Judges. Judge Hilton's Actions in recusal of Case No.
1:17-280 JWG v. Judge James Clark, Case No. 1:17 -cv - 819 JwG v Ilona Grenadier Heckman
et al and Case No. 1:17 -cv- 925 JWG v. OCWEN et al.
24. That when Judge Kloch recused himself - JWG never went after him for his criminal activity to
collude prior to that. Now that Judge Hilton has recused I will not go after him. Again I am not
on a witch hunt, I am not going to stop till there is a settlement or JUSTICE. The Judges have
created a situation so there is no way Ilona and others will settle as why should she or they
have to do the right thing - SHE / THEY OWN THE JUDGE’s. That she and her POWERFUL
FRIENDS through breakfast, lunch, dinner, sex. Weekend getaway will always WIN and not be
held accountable until forced to.
25.Page 7 - 8 Appeal will be made if necessary
26.Page 8 - 14 The Show Cause Order - Lawyer Ben DiMuro request of Judge Case No.
1:17-cv- 819 - Judge Kenney in Bankruptcy Court recent Order all asking the same in a Show
Cause Order - is to INSURE THE COVER UP OF THE EXPOSURE of the Judiciary, the Government
and the Elected OFFICIALs as the IMMUNITY OF Judges breaking the law is smoke and mirrors
granted them by other Judges. Judge Kenney, Ben DiMuro and Judge Hudson all want one of
their friends to be able to Control JWG from exposing the TRUTH they hope to remove her
Constitutional rights to address the courts, so their CRIMINAL ACTS and ACTIONS can continue
without being exposed.
27. That the Criminal Spree of the Judiciary, the Government and the Elected Officials has no
Statute of Limitations as all STATE and FEDERAL JUDGES as implied in the Recusal of Judge
kloch and then Judge Hilton shows that JWG is not Frivolous. More important the
Federal Judge who stated clearly and helped JWG with Motion for Default Judgement
empowered JWG with his words that it is illegal - against the law for lawyers to lie in
court.
28. Further the Professional Code of ethics states this clearly, along with candor with the courts and
the responsibility to report Judicial Abuse of Power and Judicial Misconduct.
29. That you have ignored the Criminal Spree of Judges and Lawyers cherry picking what you want
to say in your “ORDER” to appear Fair while it is all Smoke and Mirrors and full of “BULLSHIT” no
different than the ones we will further discuss as you did.

6
30. It should be noted the LAW overrides Case Law. The laws were made to be followed. The
Case Law was created by Judges opinions and bias to state how and what they want the law to
say. But, Judges do not make the laws - Congress makes the laws - it is the Judge who
has to follow that law and uphold it. It is a Judge’s responsibility for fairness in the
Courtroom. When that does not happen a Judge should be held accountable.
31. Page 8 Judge Hudson states (in less than 24 hours) reviewed all prior filings, and has
decided that everything all the illegal jailing torture, for illegally gotten legal fees by corrupt
lawyers, 14 days in solitary confinement, the extortion charges, the people hired to harm her
physically and mentally, the libel, the slander, the fraud, the conversion and theft of Real Estate,
Money, over $20 Million (Exhibit 2 attached), the hate crimes against her from for being
Catholic, the disgusting websites done and still online, the lawyers lying in court, in court
documents, the mailing back of my documents, the financial conflict of Judges, the Judges
telling me to my face I would never get a fair trial and many more RICO and RACKETEERING
criminal activity by the Government, the Judiciary and Elected Officials is considered FRIVOLOUS
to you shows you either do not know the law or have decided to collude and help to COVER UP
THE CRIMINAL SPREE against JWG. THE GANG, MAFIA Style criminal spree is acceptable to you?
32.It appears Judge Hudson supports DEBTORS PRISONS which is illegal in the United
States of America. But, then again Judge Hudson JAILED A RETARDED MAN with the knowledge
he was innocent and had no regrets as reported, says you will ignore the UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS to get what YOU think is right not what the law
states and or our Constitution states. JWG was illegally jailed and tortured with hope JWG would commit Suicide
- MURDER AND the judicial abuse by Judges is the hope of the Old Boys Network when there Murder for Hire,
there malicious ways don’t work.
33. Under CRAMER under all law JUDICIAL Misconduct, ABUSE of POWER is criminal.
34. Page 9 Judge Hudson states “Plaintiff a frustrated litigant who fervently believes that she was
wronged decades ago, now seeks to hold the judges who presided over her cases responsible for
not ruling in her favor” Litigant is frustrated but, she is “PISSED” also. That this case arises
because this is not a decade old issue has no relevance there was and is no statute of limitations
on Equitable Distribution in a Divorce. When Fraud exists. That the Judges allowed themselves
to be purchased to Cover Up for Ilona ( widow of Judge Albert Grenadier and his 1st cousin Jerry
Hecman of Keller & Heckman LLP, Both POWERFUL MEN) . This issue with the Judges and the
corruption, collusion is a decade issue and that is why this suit was done. That if you can’t
get a fair trial you can not hold your opponent accountable.
35. Judge Ellis lll wrote an “ORDER” that was bias and further helped the Judiciary, the
Government and the Elected Officials Cover Up their Criminal Spree along with Ilona’s. To
further Empower these types of Orders shows the Bias of Judge Hudson.
36. Judge Ellis is named as a Defendant. That Judge Ellis is guilty of U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of a
Felony. His Order no different than this one or Judge Brinkema the ones Judge Hilton and Judge

7
 Lee and other Judges in the District of Columbia wrote to further the COVER UP THE GANG /
MAFIA BEHAVIOR OF DIVORCE LAWYER ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN, the Judiciary, the
Government and the Elected Officials
37. That all Settlement Offers and or Offers to settle this by JWG to the Government, the Judiciary
and Elected Officials have been laughed at as they OWN THE JUDGES ET AL and know they can
marginalize a poor pro se litigant.
38. Further under President Trump / the Department of Justice has shown he / it is taking Serious
the Corruption and Cover Up in the Government. the Judiciary and Elected Officials as seen with
his IRS settlement when the IRS was targeted against Conservatives for Democrats benefits.
The appearance is in my case Virginia State Democrats up to the Governor Terry McAuliffe who
is a lawyer is / are using their POWER To Cover Up while Republicans look the other way - really
no different than the IRS scandal.
39.Page 10 Judge Brinkema - Has liabled and slandered JWG in others Orders. That Judge
Brinkema has made clear her “HATRED” OF JWG for exposing her bias and willing to do
whatever it takes to COVER UP criminal activity for her personal financial gain. Which the
question comes into play how much of the $251 Billion Dollars collected from Banks by AG Eric
Holder went to Federal Judges indirectly or directly? That what she ignored was the two
defendants BWW Law Group and Howard Bierman acted in a PAY BACK to Ben DiMuro / one of
the leaders of Ilona’s “GANG”. That all “ORDERS” from the 4th Circuit claim that they enforce
the DEFAULT that Judge Brinkema put on JWG.
40. That lawyers did default and had acted criminally - shows a BIAS. Further her financial conflict
really no different than pointed out about Judge Hilton who did recuse for Bias sets a strong
presidence and shows that JWG is not imagining or is not frivolous in her Motions to Recuse to
these Judges.
41. That Plaintiff will show that the Judges when it came to default treated Plaintiff different than
they treated BWW Law Group and Howie Bierman.
42. That having in the past Judge’s as friends JWG is well aware of how a Judge is purchased and
how they do business: breakfast, lunch, dinner, sex, a weekend getaway, bribery.
43.Page 10 Judge Hilton The Appearance of Justice is as Important as Justice itself
44.Judge Hilton recused himself on:
● 1:17 -cv - 280 JWG v Judge James Clark on 11-01-2017
● 1:17 -cv- 819 JWG v. Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman et al on 11-01-2017
● 1:17 -cv- 925 JWG v. OCWEN et al on 11-13-2017

Judge Trenga has stayed the cases delegated to him due to Case No. 1:17 - cv-
1106

● 1:17 -dv- 819 JWG v. Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman et al 11-13-2017
● 1:17 -cv- 925 JWG v. OCWEN et al on 11-13-2017

August 12, 2009 the Recusal / apology by Judge Kloch Exhibit No. 1

8
 April 17, 2009 BEN DIMURO of DIMURO GINSBERG Wrote threatening letter that JWG was trying to Extort money
from Ilona - Money that Ilona owed JWG from malicious manipulation, and stealing it from JWG.
1. Through evidence filed in Adverse Complaint Case No. 1:17 -cv- 1106 supports that the lies of Ilona
Grenadier even after given the evidence that JWG was telling the Truth Ben DiMuro called in his favors
to have JWG investigated for EXTORTION gor Monies owed in EXHIBIT
2. July 2009 is involved with e-mails from the Grenadier’s to myself in the collusion of their racist bigot
attitude to the fact I raised by girls Catholic. Calling the Pope a “wanker”
3. October of 2009 with the collusion of Randy Sengel - Commonwealth Attorney of the City of
Alexandria, using bullying and scare tactics to get JWG charged with the Extortion game he had
come up with in April of 2009 when hired by Ilona Grenadier and her law firm, to use whatever illegal and
unprofessional tactics it took to dispose of exposure to her criminal activities.
4. By all appearance the Extortion issue with Randy Sengel bringing in the City of Alexandria Police
Charles Pak to try and intimidate JWG.
5. By all appearance hired by Ilona Grenadier for his friendships, lack of integrity
6. Worked with the VSB, JIRC, Judges, and other Government employees in collusion to deny JWG due
process.

That the information in 10 is included to show that JWG per Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel and the City of
Alexandria Virginia Police JWG was owed the money. But you can not get a Corrupt Lawyer with a “GANG” that will
physically and mentally work with you to KILL JWG.

45.Chief Judge Rebecca Beach Smith The Law is clear under U.S.C. § 4 and all other charged
laws by all the Judges who chose to stay silent instead of speaking out and up of the Criminal
Activity of the Judge’s to COVER UP along with many others.
Judges do not (nor does anyone else, not even the President ⌥, by general statute, right or
custom) enjoy immunity from criminal liability. The following is a (non-exhaustive) list of crimes that may be
attributed to judges, provided the necessary causes-of-action present themselves. Any single one of these crimes
could/should/would constitute grounds for impeachment.

18 USC §401(2) — Criminal Contempt of Court (by the judge, an officer of the court).β
18 USC §1519 — Obstruction of Justice: Falsification of Records; Concealment; Cover-Up.
18 USC §4 — Misprision of Felony.
18 USC §1503, §1505 — “Omnibus Clauses”: Obstruction of Justice or Proceedings.
18 USC §242 — Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.
28 USC §453 — Judicial Oath of Office.
5 USC §3331 — Civil Service Oath of Office.
18 USC §1621-1623 — Perjury (Lying Under Oath); Subornation; False Declarations Before Court.
18 USC §1001 — False Statements or Entries (Oath/Swearing Not Required).
5 USC §7311(1-2); 5 USC §3333; 18 USC §1918(1-2) — Loyalty; Affidavit Of Loyalty; Disloyalty.
18 USC §371 — Conspiracy.
18 USC §1341(1346) — Honest-Services Fraud (Perhaps/Probably NOT).
18 USC §2381, 2382 — Treason; Misprision.

46.That JWG understanding is that Linda Kennedy also has an awful lot of inappropriate, criminal
activity of Judge Smith. That she has a dog in this fight to Cover up and silence JWG at any
cost.

9
 47.Page 11 Judge Mitchell - the Order Judge Mitchell did stated clearly he felt the Truth was not
told but, he was going to go ahead and allow lawyers to steal from JWG. I will prove that to the
Jury - JWG does not have to prove this to you and for you to state every allegation has to be
proven prior to even allowing the case to move forward is criminal and shows a BIAS.
48. Page 11 Judge Hudson states I did not show proof of the website: this is untrue as it is
in several of the cases that he claims he read and also in this suit a portion of it is No. 205 on
Pages 26 - 28 a very disingenuous statement.
49. Page 11 Judge Hudson in his hopes of intimidation and harassment states: There can
be no doubt that Plaintiff has a history of vexatious, harassing and repetitious lawsuits. Judge
Hudson leaves out why JwG has filed so many suits and the Pattern and Practice of Judges
colluding to COVER UP and ignore the criminal activity of those denying any type of a fair trial by
a Jury. Instead his comments are BIA’s and they alone should recuse Judge Hudson as they are
oppinnated and not true.
50.THAT it is clear by Page 11 JUDGE HUDSON agrees JUSTICE IS NOT TO BE GRANTED to
Pro Se poor people whom are no longer a party to the “Old Boys Network”
51.That JWG is the x-wife of a son of a Judge. That JWG having had friends that are Judges -
getting advice from Judges is well aware of the Judicial agreement to protect each other and
their own at all costs. No different than the Blue Wall of the Police.
52.Page 12 Judge Hudson has confused the claims in the Sonia Grenadier Trust and the thefts of
Monies and Real Estate. That divorce lawyer Ilona used a forged Trust Agreement through her
law firm to steal monies the documents are attached to the complaint under Exhibit 1 Case No.
1:17-cv-1106 and in the other cases with more documents. This is considered a criminal
offence that the Judges are covering up and if you continue to cover up makes you Judge
Hudson an accessory to the fact.

ALL of PLAINTIFF'S ACTIONS and CLAIMS HAVE MERIT: THIS CASE is brought because of the
MERIT and the COVER UP by BIAS JUDGES WHO are allowing aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty
criminal activity in the Government, the Judiciary and ELECTED OFFIcIALS to COVER UP.
THIS ORDER IS CLEARLY BIAS TO PROTECT THEIR OWN

53.Page 12, 13 and 14 CLEARLY SHOWS JUDGE HUDSON’s want / LOVE for ilona no
different than JUDGE HADDOCk and others. That JWG is going after Ilona for the Real
Estate and monies as she was the TRUSTEE and she controls. That again if Judge Hudson had
done the research as he claimed in the 24 hours he had the case he would know this.
54. That at the top of the page 12 he acknowledges the forgery the date should be November of
1983 and the theft of funds as exposed in In Exhibit 1 of the Complaint. In or around April of
2014 the last property stolen was sold below market - at the insistence of Ilona.
55. That he acknowledges the TAMPERING WITH THE GRAND JURY next That Exhibit attached is the
Order from Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser and the letter to Judge Potter. That Judge
Potter and Commonwealth attorney kidnapped JWG and all her witness holding forcing
disclosure of what we were going to tell the GRAND JURY then dismissing the GRAND JURY

10
 privately to ensure no contact is a CRIMINAL ACT and to try and make light of TAMPERING WITH
a GRAND JURY in the UNITED STATES of AMERICA is unbelievable. Exhibit attached 3 & 4
56. Further in the IFP that has been denied in the City of Alexandria Court yet approved in all other
courts shows a criminal bias to deny JUSTICE and exposure of their crimes.
57. Further the x-stepmother of My x-husband David Grenadier controls the properties who as a
lawyer early on put into Trust with her being Trustee. The first time I saw this was in or around
1993 when David started talking divorce.
58.Page 13 & 14 Appears to be a pity party for the courts having to do the job they are paid to
do. That once we allow Judges to decide who gets to file and what gets to be filed we have
taken away another right. The United States of America is on its way to being NAZI, GERMANY
to take the way the right of any citizens to address the courts so you can COVER UP criminal
activity of the courts is CRIMINAL.
CONCLUSION
59. The appearance and the statement made by Judge Hudson show legal error after legal error and
the Order was written with not all the FACTS needed.
60. That filed with this you will see Notice of the Removal of Judge C. Hilton for his recusal.
61. This all stems from a Divorce without a Property Settlement were in the State of Virginia
Equitable Distribution and when monies are commingled property becomes marital property by
law in the State of Virginia where the Divorce took place. That much of the Real Estate that
Plaintiff’s money went into was stolen out from under her, through lies, documents done by
lawyers not licensed in Virginia. This was done by an experience Divorce Lawyer to line her own
pockets further. This is a pattern and practice of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
62. This suit though is about the JUDGES who have prevented JUSTICE. See JWG can be upset with
those that have tortured her, stolen from her, harmed her physically, emotionally, and ruined
her. But, it is those that EMPOWER these people to do it that are responsible. It is the Judges
who allow lawyers to lie in court, lie in court documents, mislead the court with false evidence it
is the “JUDGES” who allow you to be raped of your life and then when you go into the courtroom
it is the Judges who rape you of you liberties you are guaranteed by being an American Citizen.
63. We sent our young men and women off to war to fight for rights we no longer have in our own
courts.
Relief Requested
1. Plaintiff is open to a settlement by the combination of the State / Federal Government, State / Federal Elected
Officials, State / Federal Judiciary and the Other People mention in Complaint 49 - 109 proposed John and Jane
Does as named in Complaint. As this Cover Up is no different than the IRS Cover Up and many others.
2. Plaintiff requests the case be reopened under the new evidence given to Judge Hudson.
3. Plaintiff finds the not STATING A CLAIM and or no RIGHTS under 1983 not with keeping with the law and the
rights of all American Citizens to redress the Courts.
4. That the Show Cause be Dismissed as it is done in RETALIATION along with all the insults, slander of Plaintiff
throughout the Order.
5. That the Interven of Linda Kennedy be reinstated and allowed
6. That the Interven of George McDermott be reinstated and allowed
7. That Judge Henry Hudson recuse himself for conflict if he feels he can not hold his “FRIENDS”,
“COLLEAGUES”, and the “OLD BOYS NETWORK” (Government, Elected Officials and Judiciary) of Virginia
accountable for the Cover Up of the Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
8. That America is at a Crossroads - the corruption has festered for so many years, and what has come from that
is we are leaving the world in a worse place than when we were born into it. Plaintiffs generation lost sight of and

11
 ignored the direction our country was going, and have had an awakening. That as President Donald Trump has
made clear “NOW IS THE TIME TO DRAIN THE SWAMP” and it includes our courts. It is truly with great
sadness that I had to bring this suit. But it is with great COURAGE that I am demanding JUSTICE.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs

Plaintiff demands a Jury Trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Along with the hearing to be filmed by a Camera man of the choosing of Plaintiff Janice.

I, Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Plaintiff in this action. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that each of said
allegations is true and correct.
Date: November 22, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

/S/_____________________________
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Signed with Courage
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Telephone (202) 368-7178
Email [email protected]

CERTIFICATION: I declare under penalty and perjury: That No attorney has prepared or assisted in
the preparation of this document. Janice Wolk Grenadier - Name of Pro Se Party.
_______________________________
November 22, 2017 Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on or around the 23rd day of November, 2017 , I will hand deliver, USPS Mail,
email electronically the foregoing, to the following:
Chief Judge Honorable Rebecca Beach Smith, USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia
Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, VA 23510
Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, Judge Liam O'Grady, Judge Anthony J. Trenga, Senior
Judge James C. Cacheris, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton, Senior Judge T.S. Ellis, III, Magistrate Judge Theresa
C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson, Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis, Magistrate Judge Michael
Nachmanoff, Magistrate Judge T. Rawles Jones, Jr. USDC of the Eastern Division of Virginia (Alexandria)
Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse, 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314
Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Judge Paul V. Niemeyer, Judge Diana Gribbon
Motz, Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. Judge Robert B. King, Judge Dennis W. Shedd, Judge Allyson K. Duncan,
Judge G. Steven Agee, Judge Barbara Milano Keenan, Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. Judge Albert Diaz, Judge
Henry F. Floyd, Judge Stephanie D. Thacker, Judge Pamela A. Harris, Senior Judge Clyde H. Hamilton, Senior
Judge Andre M. Davis Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Lewis F. Powell Jr. Courthouse & Annex, 1100 East Main Street, Suite 501, Richmond, VA 23219
Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, District Judge James E. Boasberg, District Judge
Amy Berman Jackson, District Judge Rudolph Contreras, Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth, Senior Judge Ellen
S. Huvelle, Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton, Senior Judge Richard J. Leon, Senior Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
USDC of the District of Columbia, 333 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington D.C. 20001
Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse and William B. Bryant Annex, 333 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20001
Judge Brian Kenney, Judge Stephen Mitchell United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
( Alexandria), 200 S. Washington St., Alexandria, VA 22314-5405

Janice Wolk Grenadier

12