0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views12 pages

2010 Revision Solution - Student

(1) The document contains the solution to a revision question involving matrix algebra and calculus of multiple variables. (2) For a 3x3 matrix A, the document calculates its eigenvalues, eigenvectors, determinant, and inverse. (3) For a function f(x,y), it finds its partial derivatives and applies the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values subject to a constraint.

Uploaded by

moses
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views12 pages

2010 Revision Solution - Student

(1) The document contains the solution to a revision question involving matrix algebra and calculus of multiple variables. (2) For a 3x3 matrix A, the document calculates its eigenvalues, eigenvectors, determinant, and inverse. (3) For a function f(x,y), it finds its partial derivatives and applies the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values subject to a constraint.

Uploaded by

moses
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

35230

MM2

Spring Semester 2010


REVISION SESSION SOLUTION

QUESTION 1

1 -1 1 1 1 1 0
a/ (i) A.B = 2 3 0 1 0 = 5 2
0 3 -1 1 -1 2 1

(ii) B.A is impossible since the number of columns of B is NOT equal to the
number of rows of A (2 ¹3).

(iii) C.e is impossible since the number of columns of C is NOT equal to the
number of rows of e (4 ¹3).

1 1 T 3 3
1 1 1 6
T
(iv) B .d = 1 0 -1 = K O -1 = K O
1 0 -1 -1
1 -1 4 4

1
(v) d .e = H 3 -1 4 L. 0
T
= -1
-1

b/ The characteristics equation is

1-Λ 2
= (1-ΛL2 - 4 = Λ2 - 2Λ - 3 = (Λ -3)(Λ+1) = 0
2 1-Λ

” Λ1 = 3, Λ2 = -1.

2
v O O
2 2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb

i/ For Λ1 = 3.

The eigenvectors v1 = (x, y) associated with Λ1 can be found by solving the


system of equations

-2 2 x 0
(A - Λ1 I )v1 = K O=K O
2 -2 y 0

” - x + y = 0 ” y = x.

Taking x = p gives y = p. Hence, the eigenvectors associated with


Λ1 = 3, are

p 1
v1 = K O = pK O, where p ¹ 0.
p 1

ii/ For Λ2 = -1.

The eigenvectors v2 = (x, y) associated with Λ2 can be found by solving the


system of equations

2 2 x 0
(A - Λ2 I )v2 = K O=K O
2 2 y 0

” x + y = 0 ” y = - x.

Taking x = q gives y = - q. Hence, the eigenvectors associated with


Λ2 = -1, are

q 1
v2 = K O = qK O, where q ¹ 0.
-q -1

c/ (i) The determinant det(A) can be calculated by the cofactor expansion along
one of the rows, or along one of the columns. Below is the cofactor
expansion along the first row

3 0 2 0 2 3
det(A) = 1× - (- 1)× + 1×
3 -1 0 -1 0 3

= - 3 + (-2) + 6 = 1
2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb 3

(ii) The inverse A-1 can be calculated by a series of Row-operations

1 -1 1 1 0 0
2 3 0 0 1 0
0 3 -1 0 0 1

1 -1 1 1 0 0
R2 ™ R2 - 2 R1 0 5 -2 -2 1 0
0 3 -1 0 0 1

1 -1 1 1 0 0
R2 ™ 2 R3 - R2 0 1 0 2 -1 2
0 3 -1 0 0 1

R1 ™ R1 + R2 1 0 1 3 -1 2
0 1 0 2 -1 2
R3 ™ R3 - 3 R2 0 0 -1 -6 3 -5

R1 ™ R1 + R3 1 0 0 -3 2 -3
0 1 0 2 -1 2
R3 ™ - R3 0 0 1 6 -3 5

-3 2 -3
-1 2 -1 2
” A =
6 -3 5

Ÿ Alternatively, the inverse A-1 can be calculated by using its adjoint

1
A-1 = adj(A)
detHAL

The adj(A) can be calculated as below

ò Find the matrix of cofactors of A

0 0 3

1 1 1

1 1 1

6
4 2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb

The 9 cofactors are

3 0 2 0 2 3
C11 = = -3, C12 = - = 2, C13 = = 6,
3 -1 0 -1 0 3

-1 1 1 1 1 -1
C21 = - = 2, C22 = = -1, C23 = = -1,
3 -1 0 -1 0 3

-1 1 1 1 1 -1
C31 = = -3, C32 = - = 2, C33 = =5
3 0 2 0 2 3

The matrix of cofactors is

-3 2 6
C = 2 -1 -3
-3 2 5

ò The adj(A) is the transpose of C

-3 2 -3
T
adj(A) = C = 2 -1 2
6 -3 5

ò The inverse of A is

-3 2 -3 -3 2 -3
-1 1 1
A =
detHAL
adj(A) = 1 2 -1 2 = 2 -1 2
6 -3 5 6 -3 5

QUESTION 2

a/ f(x,y) = x cosy + yex

fx = cosy + yex , f y = -xsiny + ex .

fxx = yex , fyy = -xcosy , fxy = fyx = -siny + ex ,


2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb 5

b/ The unit vector in the direction of the vector (2, -3, 6) is

H 2, -3, 6L H2, -3, 6L


u= =
7
22 + H-3L2 + 62

The gradient of f(x, y, z) = x3 - xy2 -z at a point M (x, y, z) is

õf(x, y, z) = (fx, f y, fz ) = (3x2 - y2 , -2xy, -1).

At the given point P(1,1,0) we have

õf(1, 1, 0) = (2, -2, 1).

The derivative of f(x, y, z) at the point P(1,1,0) in the direction


of the vector (2, -3, 6) is

H2, -3, 6L
Du f(1,1,0) = õf(1, 1, 0) .u = (2,-2,1).
7

H2,-2, 1L.H2, -3, 6L 4


= =
7 7

c/ The critical points of f(x, y) = xy can be found by solving the system


of equations

f = y = 0
: fx = x = 0
” (x, y) = (0, 0) is the unique critical point.
y

Since fxx× fyy - HfxyL2 = 0×0 - 12 = -1 < 0 the point (0, 0) is a saddle point.

x2 y2
d/ To apply Lagrange multiplier technique we set g(x, y) = + - 1.
8 2
We want to find maximum and minimum values of the function f(x,y) = xy,
subject to the side condition g(x,y) = 0.

2 2
Ix

H L
6 2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb

f(x, y) = xy ” õf(x, y) = (y, x).


2
x2 y
g(x, y) =
8
+
2
- 1 ” õg(x, y) = I x4 , y)

Setting õf(x, y) = Λ õg(x, y) we need to find the solution (x, y) and Λ


of the system

x
y = Λ H1L
4
x = Λy H2L
x2 y2
+ = 1 H3L
8 2

Consider two cases:


i/ Case 1: x = 0. From (1) we have y = 0. But (0, 0) is not in the ellipse (3).
ii/ Case 2 : x ¹ 0. From (2) we have y ¹ 0 and Λ ¹ 0. Multiplying (1) and (2),
side by side, gives

xy
xy = Λ2 ” Λ2 = 4 ” Λ1 = 2, Λ2 = -2
4

H2L
ò Λ1 = 2 ” x = 2y (4)

Subsituting (4) into (3) gives H2 yL2 y2 ” y2 = 1


+ = 1
8 2

” y1 = 1, y2 = - 1. Substituting these into (4) gives x1 = 2, x2 = -2.


So, for Λ1 = 2 there are two solutions
(x1 , y1 ) = (2,1), (x2 , y2 ) = (-2, -1). And f(2,1) = f(-2,-1) = 2.

ò Λ2 = - 2. Similarly, we obtain two solutions


(x3 , y3 ) = (2,-1), (x4 , y4 ) = (-2, 1). And f(2,-1) = f(-2,1) = - 2.

Hence, the maximum value is 2, obtained at (2,1) and (-2,-1);


the minimum value is -2, obtained at (2,-1) and (-2,1)
2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb 7

QUESTION 3

4
y= 4-x2
2
a/
x
-2 -1 1 2

-2

y = x2 - 4 -4

2 4 - x2
I = Ù Ù (x2 + 2y)âA = Ù -2 Ù x2 -4
Hx + 2 yL â y â x
R

Since f(y) = 2y is an odd funcion we have

4 - x2
Ù x2 -4 2 y â y = 0. Hence
2 4 - x2 2 2
I =Ù Ù 2 x â y âx = Ù-2 x2 AI4 - x2M - Ix2 - 4M E â x
-2 x -4
2 2
= 2 Ù-2 x2 I4 - x2 M â x = 4Ù0 I4 x2 - x4 M â x

= 4 [ 43 (23 - 0) - 1 5
5
(2 - 0)] =
256
15
8 2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb

b/
y

y= x

x
Π

Π Π sin x Π x sin x
Ù0 Ùy x âx â y = Ù0 Ù0 x â y âx
Π sin x Π
= Ù0 x Hx - 0L â x = Ù 0 sin x â x

=- (cosΠ - cos0) = 2.

c/
y

x
-R R
2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb 9

Hrsin
2Π R
Ù Ù Ky2âA = Ù0 Ù0
2
Q = K Θ N r â r âΘ
R

2Π R 3
= KÙ Θ âΘ ×Ù r â r
2
0
sin 0

K R4 2 Π 1 - cosH2 ΘL
=
4 Ù0 2
âΘ

K R4 1 1
=
4 2
[(2Π - 0) - 2
(sin2Π - sin 0)]

K Π R4
=
4

QUESTION 4

a/ (i) Let X, Y be the groove width and plate thickness . Then

X ~ NI26.8, 0.72 M N(26.8, 0.72 M, Y ~ NI25.1, 0.52 M.

Let C be the distribution of the clearrance between the plate and the edge
of the groove. Then C = X - Y. So C is normally distributed.

E(C) = E(X - Y) = E(X) - E(Y) = 26.8 - 25.1 = 1.7


Var(C) = Var(X) + Var(Y) = 0.72 + 0.52 = 0.74.
ΣC = VarHCL = 0.74 » 0.8602

So, C is normally distributed with mean ΜC =1.7, and standard deviation


ΣC = 0.8602, i.e. C ~ N(1.7, 0.74).

(ii) The plate will not fit into the grove if C = X - Y < 0.

0 - ΜC 0 - 1.7
P(C < 0) = P( Z < ΣC
) = P(Z < 0.8602
) = P(Z < -1.98)
= 1 - P(Z < 1.98) = 1 - 0.9761 = 0.0239
10 2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb

S
(iii) 95% CI = x ¡ tn-1, Α ×
2 n
0.5
= 25.1 ¡ t29 , 0.025 ×
30
0.5
= 25.1 ¡ 2.045 ×
30
» ( 24.92, 25.28 ).

b/ (i)

9 HH01 ::
Μ = 1500 Kj
Μ > 1500 Kl
Here is one-sided test, the p-value of the test is given in Minitab Output 2
Since p-value = 0.069 > 0.05 = Α we do not reject H0 .
The conclusion: the amount of energy is NOT significantly greater than
1500Kj per 100g.

(ii) The data from 24 samples are normally distributed.

c/ Let P(X) be the probability that the component X functions, and P( X )


be the probability that the componet X does not function. Then

P(System functions) = P(C1)×P(C2 or C3 or C4)×P(C5)×P(C6 or C7)


= P(C1)×[1 - P( C2 )×P( C3 )×P( C4 L]×P(C5)×[1 - P( C6 )×P( C7 )]
= (1-0.02)×[1 - 0.005×0.001×0.01]×(1 - 0.01)×[1 - (1-0.02)×(1 - 0.004)]
» 0.98 × 1.0000×0.99×0.9992 (round up to 4 decimal places)
» 0.9

QUESTION 5

a/ 9 HH10 :: The aspirin use and the chance of a heart attack s are independent.
There is a relationship between them .

The test statistic is Χ0 = 2.130


The p-value = 0.144 > 0.05. So we do not reject H0 .
The conclusion: The risk of a heart attack does not depend on the use
of aspirin.
2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb 11

b/ (i) Let Σ1 and Σ2 be the variances of car 1 and car 2, respectively.

:H H0 : Σ21 = Σ22
: Σ21 ¹ Σ22
1

The test statistic and p-value of the test are given in Minitab Output 3.

The test statistic F = 2.49


The p-value = 0.005 < 0.05. So we reject H0 .
The conclusion: The variances for the two groups of cars are
significantly different.

(ii) Let Μ1 and Μ2 be the mean times to reach 100km/h of car 1 and car 2,
respectively.

9 HH01 :: Μ1 = Μ2
Μ1 ¹ Μ2

Since the variances of car 1 and car 2 are significantly different, the test
statistic and p-value of the test are obtained from Minitab Output 1.
The test statistic T - Value = -2.25
The p-value = 0.028 < 0.05. So we reject H0 .
The conclusion: mean times to reach 100km/h of car 1 and car 2 are
significantly different.

(iii) 95% CI for the difference between the mean elapsed times between
the cars is (-1.536, -0.090).

QUESTION 6
a/ The equation for the regression model: Hardness = -1160 + 57.6 Density.

b/ 9 HH01 :: Β1 = 0
Β1 ¹ 0

The test statistic T = 25.24


Since p-value = 0.000 < 0.05 = Α we reject H0 , and accept that Β1 ¹ 0.
The conclusion: There is a significant linear relationship between the
hardness and density of the timber.

c/ Since the model is significant, and R = 94.9% > 75% we can use density
to predict harness.
12 2010 Revision Solution_Student.nb

d/ For a 1 unit increase in density the hardness will increase by 57.5 units
on average.

e/ (i) There appears to be an outlier on the normal probability plot.


(ii) There is a pattern (parabolic) on the Residuals Vs Fits plot.
(iii) The variation in the residuals changes as the fitted value changes.

You might also like