Ghazanfar - Ali Out of This Thread Posts

Ghazanfar_Ali
Re: Sonic Resonator Results and Findings, As Well As LTspice Models To Download
« Reply #39 on: July 31, 2011, 01:43:06 PM »
Dear Friend. Here is another LTSpice circuit by some friend I have forgotten his name. I
implemented it in LTspice, optimized it by slightly modifying and changing values of the
components. I am attaching it here for study and analysis. I will appreciate comments by all
on it. Thanks in advance. I am also attaching the actual cct by that unknown friend here,
which I optimized to get more power output. You can drive the same with a 5V DC also. It
was basically enlisted in Joule Thief category.
High DCV.jpg (213.71 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 93 times.)

High DC V.zip (373.93 kB - downloaded 21 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #10097 on: December 31, 2011, 05:11:55 AM »
Dear Wesley
I am from Pakistan. And interested in replicating your OU device. Well I tried to replicate it.
* I first wrapped the two halves of the yoke with insulation tape. Wrapped aluminium foil on one half
side wise as per your instructions. Then wrapped it again with an insulation tape.
* Then I give 50 Turns on it with 18 AWG. and then wrapped it again with insulation tape and then 15
T with 18 AWG.
* The two ends of aluminium strip were open. One inside the yoke and one outside.
* Then I gave 21 Turns to one pair of 18 AWG on other half of the yoke in bifilar shape.
* I used 2 x DDS-3X25 as freq gens and DSO-5200A as my oscilloscope and spectrum analyzer.
My readings are as under:-

* I connected spectrum analyzer on aluminium strip and gave white noise to 15 T winding from Gen
1.
* I got spike on 2.55 MHz on spectrum analyzer connected on Strip.
* Then I gave 2.55 MHz square wave with +/- 3.5V amplitude and 50% duty cycle to 15 T and got
maximum spike on strip at the same freq even after adjustment.
* I switched the Gen 1 off.
* Then I gave white noise to 50 T coil from Gen 2 and got spike at 51.5 Khz which was stable and with
largest amplitude. There were also other spikes at 200 KHz 380 Khz etc but they were very low in mV
and with huge ringing. but this 51.5 KHz was stable with 3 V amplitude.
* I then gave this frequency ( square wave 50% duty cycle +/- 3.5V) from Gen 2 and read the max
amplitude on strip at the same very freq even after adjustment.
*Then I found maximum amplitude on Bifilar winding by switching on Gen 1 first with F1 and then
switching it off and then Gen2 . These two F1 and F2 were the best tuned already and had best
voltage output at 2.55 Mhz and 51.5 KHz.
* Then I switched them on again Gen 1 and Gen 2 and saw sinus on bifilar. I infact connected
oscilloscope in series with a 60W Bulb at the two ends of bifilar winding. The oscilloscope showed me
sinus but it was similar to AM signal . In which the carrier was 2.55MHz and enveloping was done by
51.5 Khz. And I kept on playing + - with 51.5 KHz for hours to find max voltage output. and then + -
with 2.55 MHz to find some high peaks. But unfortunately the V out was = V in.
* Please help me and tell me is there any thing wrong in my procedure. Am I making some mistake in
no of windings or connection method. My toroid yoke is 90% similar to yours. Conical in shape and I
wrapped the aluminium strip on its straight edge no on conical edge as you guys told in your videos.
* What I have to do now? and where I have to apply 50 Hz 9V AC ? Is that to be applied when Gen 1
and Gen 2 or also connected and powered on at 15 T and 50 T windings?
* Is the number of turns on bifilar ok? coz I am confused that in your schematic at lithanian site you
have shown 21T each in bifilar (so these make total of 42 turns) but in some forums I have seen u
talking about 100 or 105 Turns ? Please clear me and guide me as I am very much serious in making
this device to run.
* I cannot give more than + / - 3.5 V as it is the limitation of hardware. But resonant freq does not
depend upon voltage I think.
I am grateful If u send me a good and detailed response where I am making some mistake. Thanks.
Picture 001.jpg (13.07 kB, 320x240 - viewed 881 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali

« Reply #10146 on: January 03, 2012, 03:11:59 PM »
@Verpies. Thank you indeed Dear. I was following wrong procedure in finding the 50 T coil frequency.
Now as per your procedure. My freqs where I am getting max peaks are. F1 (15 T) is 10.4 MHz. F2 is
100KHz. But again F3 once set to 50 Hz I play with F2 and F3 there is no amplification at bifillar coil.
May be my toroid does not support NMR. . Well I m going to wind another type of toroid already
cut into two halves by me and see what happens.
But I really appreciate your guidance it is quite helpful to me. By the way the amplifier stage which u
showed which comprises two transisters and also acts as a buffer stage, What do u suggest 2n2222
will serve the purpose with vcc 5V to 9V. or should i go for 2n3055 ?
I also replicated tomB455 KapGen. It produced very fine spark but only at full 220 V input. powered
on my 1 x 60 W Bulb to 50% intensity. (Although I was expecting that bulb will explode) and then
burnt up transformer of my variac. And once I touched my 220 V input wire it was hot. And then I
noted my electric meter reading which counts my home's electricity units and I came to know that
my Kapgen has eaten lot of Amps. I then didnt power it on. I know its coil is not tuned to resonance
freq produced due to spark gap. How do I tune it without a high voltage test eqpt. I had an Idea that if
I disconnect the coil stage from spark gap. And connect a rod as antenna is series with spark gap at
the end instead of coils tube. And then power it on and use my spectrum analyzer at a safety distance
which is of 200 MHz band to see the exact freq of the spark gap. Then make coil for that frequency.
But I dont know the mathematics to find turn ratio of primary coil (which is in Tomb455's case is 85
turns and then 25 turns backward) and secondary coil which is 7 turns in his case. Can u give some
guideline or mathematical calculation to get no of turns for the coils if frequency is found from spark
gap. Is my procedure of finding freq from spark gap is correct?
Waiting for your reply.
Thanks.
Ghazanfar_Ali
« Reply #10152 on: January 05, 2012, 05:44:59 AM »
@ Verpies. Thanks for your informative reply. You are the only one who has shown my the path to
success. I am very much determined to make my STAAAR device replication to work. I have
understood the schematic and the procedure. F2 is the key frequency to be found after a long
procedure which has to be placed in such a fashion with 50 Hz F3 that we get Resonance. (NMR) But
one thing which I was totally not in picture was a phrase in their Lithuanian site. I really didn't
understand it.
" Each generator has feedback with 1 turn on coil and keeps own frequency no matter what changes
inside of coil . This is where you get synchronization." (I understand reactance and current voltage
leading or lagging. )
This is the same point about which u talked in your last reply to me. I have been connecting the
BNC connectors directly to two ends of each coil (15 T and 50 T) with +/- 1 V square wave so far. Coz
there is no schematic on their website pertaining to How freq gens are connected with the two coils.
Can u send me this portion of the schematic. So that I can make 1 T orthogonal coils and place them
accordingly between freq gens and 15 T and 50 T coils and how. Do I have to use only one port of my
freq gen which gives waveform output or I have to incorporate control or sync output ports also. My
freq gens are Hantek DDS-3X25.
Thanks.
Ghazanfar_Ali
@ Verpies (STAAAR Device)

Dear Friend, I thoroughly went through their videos and photographs which they have uploaded in
their Lithuanian website. I am uploading one of their pictures duly labeled by me. I think 1 T coil is
visible for 15 T winding. However for 50 T Primary it is not visible and still is a big question. May be
there is only 1 such coil perpendicular to 15 T and 50 T is left without it and this 1 T with 15 T is
serving the whole purpose. But again I highlight that they wrote, "Each generator has feedback with 1
Turn on coil." As far as I understood, there is only one 1 T coil perpendicular to both 15 T and 50 T
primary windings. However it is in series with 15 T winding only. And it is providing feedback to both
generators due to mutual induction. What do u say?
Waiting for your idea.
Thanks
Ghazanfar Ali
AIDAS_COIL.jpg (140.89 kB, 800x619 - viewed 767 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@ Verpies
Another query is, do both the gens have a common ground. If it is like that then this coil will be in
series with 15 T and should be located between 15 T and outer connector (shield) of BNC of gen
connected with 15 T winding. And thus provides changes in the phases. Questions and Questions. I
think STAAAR team really worked hard to upload only two of their videos in English. I am still waiting
for their Instruction Manual in PDF abt which Arunas mentioned in his video that he is working on it.
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Wattsup and Verpies. I am grateful for your information.

Ghazanfar_Ali
@Verpies and Wattsup
Dear Friends
I was studying your OU devices schematics along with my 80% successful replication of STAAAR
device. I was also scrutinizing data pertaining to Steven Mark's TPU. and after three sleepless nights
in my Lab at home I was able to design a circuit which is a mixture of all of your hard efforts and my
idea. And I found very interesting results. It is to remember that this device is almost a self running
OU device. The only thing which we have to drive with a small power supply is the Pulse Generator
and I think 555 Timer will fulfill this need.
Points of Consideration.
1. Frequency is 1KHz pulse with Vmax = 5V to 9 V. (I used minimum values to drive MOSFETs)
2. Duty cycle should be strictly 50%.
3. Rise and fall time of the pulse must be greater than or = 1nsec.
4. 4700uF electrolytic cap should be charged to 24 V DC before starting pulse gen and connecting
load.
5. Load must be greater than 150 Ohms. Otherwise it will shutdown the device in a few seconds.
6. 345uH L1 is a ferrite toroid with windings. U have to make L1 using LRC meter.
7. Current drain from 4700uF cap is -9.116mA. From Pulse Gen it is 12.058 uA
8. Output with 150 Ohms load or above, I found so far is 200 V Pulsed DC (1KHz) with 6.4 Amps
approx. Hence we got 1200 Watts with an input of 0.06mW.
9. I have tested its simulation so far using National Instruments MultiSim v11. (simulation files are
available on demand).
I need your comments if you have suggestion.

I think we r close to a revolution in the field of free energy if we all share our thoughts and efforts.
This device is for all of u to be optimized. But do remember me in your prayers.
Waiting for your comments.

Kind Regards
Ghazanfar Ali
Pakistan
v1ghazanfar.jpg (494.81 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 162 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@ Gyula
A good question. I am in process of building this circuit in my lab. This is my initial simulation in NI
Multisim. I know unlike LTSpice, Multisim and ORCAD are professional simulators and I always design
my schematics before I start deigning the PCBs. Well the circuit is in Oscillation state and 4700uF
Capacitor is charged to 24 V DC as an initial charge.The Berkhaussen Criterion is optimally set that u
will see the capacitor initially dropping its charge in a few mVs but than back emf from the L1 will
keep it charged without any discharging. In other words the rate of discharge = or slightly < than rate
of charge for this capacitor so it is acting like a battery which is helping in producing back kick offs
from L1 on falling edge of each pulse. Q1 to Q3 are used to provide load sharing and avoid heating up
of MOSFETs.
I am sorry for one more thing I wrongly calculated the input and output voltages. In fact Ammeters
are set on DC it should be on AC. Then we give just 5V and 4.3mA to drive the pulse generator and at
the output we get 200V with 230mA drain across 150 Ohms load. Thus 45W is the Output and
0.215mW is the Input. I think its not bad.
I have not used Air core L1 its toroidal Ferrite Core. I did not get any simulation errors and I kept its
simulation running for 2 hours. 4700uF is not discharging gradually that is a good sign.
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Wattsup and Dole

My Apologies for confusing you. I wrongly connected the wires for MOSFETs' gates as my mind was in
saturation state due to continuous three sleepless nights. This is the latest diagram I have corrected.
U can see the initial, intermediate and over all stages showing the waveforms at output stage, how
they r achieving stability at 200V. I changed the value of C1 to 18uF where I am receiving better
response. C2 is same 4700uF electrolytic Capacitor. I have added the fourth Amp Meter showing
current drain at 150 Ohms load. Now the Input and Ouput power is as under.
Input Power 5V * 13.397mA = 0.66985mW
Output power 200V * 457.656mA = 90.3312W
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar
v1.png (161.91 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 1160 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
Hi Gyula
Thanks for your appreciation. I went through the link and read about Mr.Szili's circuit. It is of course
similar to that of mine but u will notice that I am using only one voltage source which is driving the
pulse generator (5V DC). Instead of other voltage source i am using C2 4700uF which is initially
charged to 24V DC. Well interestingly I am using 18uF Capacitor in parallel with L1 to make it a Tank
circuit well tuned to provide oscillation. By introducing 18uF C1 I am getting the phenomenon by
which C2 never gets discharged and drives the whole circuit to produce high voltage across L1. The
kick offs at this resonant state keep C2 charged. So I think its a lot of achievement. U just have to tune
the circuit to its resonant frequency. One more thing as I wrote 1nsec is the minimum acceptable rise
and fall time for the pulses in my circuit. Where as in Mr Szili's circuit he says that rise time should be
less than 10nsec. I have tested my circuit for rise and fall time between 1nsec and 500nsec and best
results are between 250nsec and 500nsec. i am attaching the performance at 500nsec. See the
readings. Pertaining to your query about losses addressed in the pspice model, I am sorry I never
went into that detail at simulation level. I know the results would be different at hardware level but
not totally different.
Thanks once again for your response.
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar Ali
V1b.png (140.53 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 840 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Verpies
Thanks for your observation. I am attaching the schematic with wattmeter connected at the output
stage across 150Ohms load. The average Wattage is around 42 W. Is this one correct now. This
wattmeter of multisim calculates both for AC and DC signals.
Regards
Ghazanfar Ali
v1c.png (134.17 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 603 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@AbbaRue
I am running its simulation so far. I will switch over to the hardware part after successful optimization.
Average Wattage basing upon guidance by Verpies, comes to be 42W. Approx (Still not bad)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Verpies
Yes u r right. I have checked from their discussion forum and user manual. It calculates both for DC as
well as AC. The Wattmeter does not calculate power factor for non sinusoidal waveforms hence keep
it = 1 for arbitrary waveforms and calculate product of average instantaneous Vs and Is. The circuit is
quite simple and its hardware can be replicated easily.
v1_2.png (208.13 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 66 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Verpies
Correction..... Average of all products of Inst Vs and Is.
Ghazanfar_Ali
« Reply #10386 on: February 01, 2012, 02:07:00 AM »
Ok guys I did it. A self running resonant circuit. Input is around 10mA with 5 V to drive the 555 timer
circuit. Rest the magic is done by initially charged capacitor. the load is connected after switching on
the timer circuit generating pulses. I connected a 50W tungsten filament bulb and it glowed almost to
its full brightness. I tested the circuit with 9V battery just used for driving 555 Timer circuit and it
made the bulb glow for 5 days. Battery is rechargeable one with 1000mAH. Output is almost the
same as around 45W. I will upload the video soon on youtube.
U can replicate it. A very simple one. Use an LRC meter to design the L1. I used a ready made based
on ferrite toroid.
Best of Luck
God bless U All.
v1.png (161.91 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 914 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
This one has also been tested with almost similar results. The oscillation starts without any delay as
compared to previous one. i used 7805 for 9v to 5v DC conversion. Here is the variant. A group tried
to discourage me coz they never want such simple things to be made by everyone just to have a hold
on the subject. But let me tell u Now my next variant is to drive the same circuit using voltage stored
in the capacitor. I am using Teslas radiant antenna (The black hole Antenna) to get collect energy from
atmosphere and drive the same circuit. It's just the ingenuity of mind. Use your precious brain and we
all can do it.
Credit goes to my team member Shahzeb Hussain who recently won Pakistan Intel Prize for young
Innovators.
v1c.png (134.17 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 842 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Baroutologos and Hartiberlin
U both are right. It is having more input stored as an Initial charge in C2 4700uF. But again I just
wanna say that the circuit etraps that energy and it oscillates with in the circuit. The kick offs thus
produced in L1 during falling edge of each pulse are too high to drive the bulb and at the same time
sends back emf to 4700uF cap. It is the same principle in which we protect input stages of Kapgen
using diodes or buffers. Here I did not use any protection and the energy coming back towards C2 is
charging it. And the cycle goes on till the baterry driving the pulse gen is depleted or go below 3.5V.
Interestingly if I connect the load i.e 150 Ohms or greater to the circuit before switching on the pulse
generator, it drains up the whole charge of c2. So the pulse gen should be powered on before
connecting the load. Load below 140 ohms never allow me to re-charge the capacitor again and
again. Value of C1 and L1 is calculated basing upon formula for resonant freq for LC tank cct. 1/
(2*pi*Sqrt(L*C)) and is same as the freq of the pulses from 555 Timer with 50% duty cycle. U have to
fine tune either L1 or C1 to achieve the resonant freq, where the bulb glows to its Max. I tuned the
tank cct using LRC meter and my DSO-5200A oscilloscope. C2 4700uf has the threshold value below it
i didnt get self running phenomenon and Initial charge of 24 V DC in C2 is the threshold below which
Oscillation does not start rather it becomes a damping function. If u see my last two posts. The
damping is clear for sometimes initially but then it is overcome by the sufficient charge c2 gets from
back emf. And at 50V Initial charge it is stable from the start. I have tested it in ORCAD as well as NI
multisim before i got success in hardware. LTSpice is not recommended as it gives wierd results far
away from the reality.
Best of Luck
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Broli
Well u cannot say that resonant freq calculated by the formula is also valid for square pulses. Here
since it is at 50% duty cycle it is 2 time of 1KHz. If u give 2 KHz Sinusoidal it is having the same effect if
u give 2KHz/2 = 1KHz pulse to the same LC cct with 50% duty Cycle. But in this case u will get higher
kick offs. I practically checked that using my DDS 3x25 function gens.
As far as your java based cct sim is concerned. Try to check it again using following steps.
Place an on off switch just before the load of 300Ohms.

Keep the load disconnected from rest of the cct by keep that switch off.
Charge the 4700uF capacitor to 50VDC.
power on the pulse generator and after a few seconds connect the load to rest of the circuit.
This is the only way to trap the energy and get oscillation.
Try this and plz let me know..
Best of Luck
Charge the capacitor completely to 50V DC.
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Gyulasun
Dear, I cannot give u detail pertaining to Hussain's OU device which works on the principle of SM's
TPU. The reason is that we are still trying to optimize it and b4 doing so I cannot make a confusion for
all of you. As far as my self running device is concerned I will try to load the video asap as i m very
much busy in helping my better half for her final exams.
Plz dont mind.
Best Regards
Ghazanfar
Ghazanfar_Ali

« Reply #10434 on: February 02, 2012, 01:04:30 PM »
@broli
Ok i checked ur schematic. 1st of all the performance of N-MOSFETS in falstad sim is really too wierd.
I m not getting any drain from it. i set the threshold v to 200V. Another important thing is that u used
square wave. make it pulse wave by setting the amplitude and dc offset to 2.5 V. In this way u 'll get
5V pulse (between 0 and 5V) with 50% duty cycle. But again i say that i m not even getting oscillation
using falstad sim. its a straight away dc. :| i m sending u the Netlist and try it accordingly and let me
know. Thanks.
Best of luck.
GhazanfarGen.txt (2.93 kB - downloaded 62 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@broli
OK my friend . Well done u r close to it . . As I have told u give it 50 % duty cycle and pulsed dc
between 0 and 5V. I have told u how. And see the magic of my circuit . Your output pulses are
damping coz of negative half cycle of the square wave. Make 0 instead of going to -V.
Best of Luck
Ghazanfar_Ali
Ok I'll made the new thread including all my previous posts related to it and ofcourse the video too. I
m a bit busy in forthcoming week. So dont worry. Oh I forgot to tell u your last sim in which u are
getting pulses, can u upload it again so that i can check your parameter or just send me the .txt file for
its netlist. Thanks.
Ghazanfar_Ali
@DreamThinkBuild and Broli

Thanks for your interest and admiration. Someone tried to dominate his ideas that this will not work,
but I did it and you will also do it soon. It's just the matter of putting the alphabets into correct slots
to get the meaningful words.
Best of Luck
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Broli
Thanks dear. One more thing. Try zener diodes as body diodes instead of these normal diodes. Keep
the BV high. and try
Infact Falstad cannot provide the true spice model of the IRFP260. But professional sims like NI
Multisim and ORCAD have the models in their library.
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Broli
C1 I used is non polar. 18uF IPC-7351 Tantalum
C2 is 47mF electrolytic cap. 50V
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Broli
Ok here is another optimization. I simply increased the amplitude of pulsed DC from (0-5V) to (0-
10V). And now I am placing a 10Ohms load which is almost equivalent to a heating element. Now The
power output is around 800W.
And it did not affect the oscillation.
U can use capacitors in parallel and series combination to get the desired value.
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Broli
Ok here is another optimization. I simply increased the amplitude of pulsed DC from (0-5V) to (0-
10V). And now I am placing a 10Ohms load which is almost equivalent to a heating element. Now The
power output is around 800W.
And it did not affect the oscillation.
U can use capacitors in parallel and series combination to get the desired value.
v1_3.jpg (487.91 kB, 1470x765 - viewed 805 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali
@broli
Sorry Dear I am unable to unzip it. I think the zip file u loaded is corrupt. if u kindly upload it again so
that i can go through it, why your cct is behaving differently?
Regards
Ghazanfar Ali
Ghazanfar_Ali
@Broli
Plz try this and let me know. I think as I mentioned earlier when I started these posts I gave some
initial parameters. u have to set the rise and fall time of the pulse generator either 10ns or its much
better to keep it 500ns. I dont know why it damps on rest of the values. May be its the exact resonant
freq. I am attaching my sim file of NI Multisim. Check the simulation and let me know.
Thanks and Best of luck.
v1_2.zip (320.34 kB - downloaded 122 times.)
Ghazanfar_Ali

@ All
Thanks for your comments. I know you all have some queries. First of all the schematic in which I got
800W is still under my observation coz my device sometimes gives 800 W just after powering on and
connecting the load but sometimes it just stops giving output. The previous one with 42W is stable
and works fine. I am attaching the schematic with bulbs connected as load.
I am out of my home station where I designed the hardware. The simulation is with me in my Laptop
which I am sharing with you all. I used LRC meter to reduced the winding of my ferrite core which was
already 500uH. I haven't used an air core yet as its difficult to get this value for an air core.
I will start a new thread soon with the devices pics.
v1_3 without meters .zip (651.17 kB - downloaded 20 times.)
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 03:16:49 AM by Ghazanfar_Ali »

Ghazanfar - Ali Out of This Thread Posts

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ghazanfar - Ali Out of This Thread Posts

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ghazanfar - Ali Out of This Thread Posts

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ghazanfar_Ali

« Reply #39 on: July 31, 2011, 01:43:06 PM »

High DCV.jpg (213.71 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 93 times.)

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10097 on: December 31, 2011, 05:11:55 AM »

My readings are as under:-

Picture 002.jpg (9.28 kB, 320x240 - viewed 864 times.)

Picture 003.jpg (12.96 kB, 320x240 - viewed 876 times.)

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10152 on: January 05, 2012, 05:44:59 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10193 on: January 10, 2012, 10:52:04 PM »

@ Verpies (STAAAR Device)

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10194 on: January 10, 2012, 11:07:18 PM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10218 on: January 14, 2012, 07:13:01 AM »

@Wattsup and Verpies. I am grateful for your information.

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10228 on: January 16, 2012, 03:26:16 PM »

@Verpies and Wattsup

I need your comments if you have suggestion.

Waiting for your comments.

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10232 on: January 17, 2012, 03:35:44 AM »

« Reply #10237 on: January 17, 2012, 12:40:10 PM »

@Wattsup and Dole

v1.png (161.91 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 1160 times.)

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10240 on: January 18, 2012, 12:25:07 AM »

V1b.png (140.53 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 840 times.)

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10244 on: January 18, 2012, 11:31:58 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10245 on: January 18, 2012, 12:22:55 PM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10259 on: January 20, 2012, 08:35:00 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10260 on: January 20, 2012, 08:38:47 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10386 on: February 01, 2012, 02:07:00 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10387 on: February 01, 2012, 02:16:24 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10418 on: February 02, 2012, 04:00:37 AM »

@Baroutologos and Hartiberlin

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10426 on: February 02, 2012, 10:24:35 AM »

Place an on off switch just before the load of 300Ohms.

Try this and plz let me know..

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10427 on: February 02, 2012, 10:33:43 AM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10435 on: February 02, 2012, 01:11:20 PM »

Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

« Reply #10438 on: February 02, 2012, 01:32:08 PM »