Comparison of Color Difference Methodes For Multi-Angle Application Konrad Lex BYK-Gardner

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 24

Comparison of Color Difference Methods

for multi-angle Application


Konrad Lex, BYK-Gardner GmbH
10th BYK-Gardner User Meeting, Innsbruck Austria – April 2013
Effect Coatings
70% of todays automotive finishes are effect coatings

• Metallic coatings
accentuate the curved
profile: Light – Dark Flop

• Pearlescent coatings result in a


more spectacular color effect:
Color Flop

• Effect finishes with special glitter effect


(Xirallics ) TM

Page 2, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: L*a*b*- Coordinates

L* = 100
+b*
Yellow L* = + 58,12
a* = + 30,41
-a* b* = + 36,26
Green

+a*
Red

-b* Blue

L* = 0

Page 3, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: Color Difference L*, a*, b*

 = Sample - Standard
 L*
- +
 a*
Sample - +
 b*
E* L* - +

b*

Standard a*

E* = √ (L*)2 + (a*)2 + (b*)2

Page 4, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: L*C*h°- Coordinates

L* = 100 +b*
90°
L* = + 58,12
C* = + 47,32
-a* h° = 50°
180° C*

h° +a*

-b*
270°
L* = 0

Page 5, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: Color Differences C* und H*

+b*
E* = √ (L*)2 + (C*)2 + (H*)2

Sample

Standard
+H*
C*ab C*ab -C*

h°ab h°ab
+a*

Page 6, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: Chromatic – Non Chromatic

+ b* Non-chromatic colors: C* < 10

P
Use L*a*b*
H*
C*
- a* B + a*

- b*
Chromatic colors: C* > 10

Use L*C*h°

Page 7, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: Typical Tolerances

Achromatic
L* a* b*
-15° 2.0 1.0 1.0
15° 2.0 1.0 1.0
25° 1.5 0.7 0.7
Metallics 45° 1.0 0.5 0.5
75° 1.0 0.5 0.5
110° 1.0 0.5 0.5

45° 1.0 0.5 0.5

Solids
*Measurement of Metallic & Pearlescent Colors
Allan Rodrigues, DuPont, 1990

Page 8, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
CIELab - System: Typical Tolerances

Chromatic
L* C* H*
-15° 3.0 2.5 1.5
15° 3.0 2.5 1.5
25° 2.0 2.2 1.2
Metallics 45° 1.5 2.0 1.0
75° 1.0 2.0 1.0

110° 1.0 2.0 1.0

45° 1.5 2.0 1.0

Solids

Page 9, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Color Difference

Delta CIE Lab:

What causes the problem?


Compare to tolerances:

 dH* is too large!

Page 10, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Weighted Color Difference
CMC – Color Difference Formula

Delta E cmc:

Page 11, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Weighted Color Difference
CMC – Color Difference Formula

lSL
 L *   C *   H *  2 2

2 12

ECMC(l :c) =  +


  ab
 + 

ab
 
 lSL   cSC   SH  

• 3-dimensional ellipsoid with axes corresponding to


SH hue, chroma and lightness

cSc • Weighting functions (= semi-axis) SL, SC and SH


are dependent on color of standard

• Factors l and c modify the lengths of relevant


semi-axes

Page 12, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Weighted Color Difference
General Color Difference Formula

Achromatic:
2 2 2
 L * ( )   a * ( )   b * ( ) 
Ew ( ) =   +   +  
 g L  S L ( )   g a  Sa ( )   gb  Sb ( ) 

Chromatic:

2 2 2
 L * ( )   C * ( )   H * ( ) 
Ew ( ) =   +   +  
 g L  S L ( )   gC  SC ( )   g H  S H ( ) 

 measurement geometry
g application parameter e.g. batch or production
S weighting factor
g S tolerance

Page 13, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Weighted Color Components

Achromatic:

L * ( ) a * ( ) b * ( )
Lw ( ) = aw ( ) = bw ( ) =
TolL ( ) Tola ( ) Tolb ( )

Chromatic:

L * ( ) C * ( ) H * ( )
Lw ( ) = Cw ( ) = H w ( ) =
TolL ( ) TolC ( ) TolH ( )

Lw, aw, bw, Cw, Hw < 1.00  within Tolerance

Lw, aw, bw, Cw, Hw > 1.00  out of Tolerance

Page 14, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Weighted Color Difference
CMC – Color Difference Formula

Delta E cmc:

Weighted by dE cmc Tolerances

 dH* is 31% too large!

Page 15, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
How to get Tolerances?
Weighted Color Difference Methods

ECMC E94 E‘DIN


E00 With Lightness
E‘BMW E‘AUDI2000
Correction

Weighting factors Calculation of the Weighting factors


independent from weighting factors are are dependent on
measurement measurement lightness flop and
geometry geometry dependent color flop

There is only one standard, DIN 6175-Part 2 for gonio appearant colors

Page 16, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Silver Metallic
Achromatic light metallic

Page 17 BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Red Metallic
Chromatic medium light metallic

Page 18 BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Yellow Metallic
Chromatic light metallic

Page 19, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Solid White
Achromatic light solid

Page 20, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
How to get Tolerances?
Weighted Color Difference Methods

ECMC E94 E‘DIN


E00 With Lightness
E‘BMW E‘AUDI2000
Correction

Optimized for solid, Optimized for light Applicable for


high chromatic colors metallic finishes metallic and solid
Discontinuity
between solid and
gonioapparent colors

Page 21, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Weighted Deltas

Unweighted Deltas
Weighted Deltas

Unweighted Deltas
Weighted Deltas

Page 22, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Conclusion

• All color difference methods with weighting factors


are closer to the visual than dE* method because
L, a, b, C and H have different visual
sensitivities depending on color.

• Gonioappearant colors may end up with 5 to 25


different tolerances  weighted color components
make the life much easier because the tolerances of
weighted color components are always 1.00

Page 23, BYK-Gardner GmbH, Comparison of Color Difference Methods for multi-angle Application
Thank you for your Attention!

You might also like