Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 108 views

    Millikan Oil Drop Derivation Seth Hopper 4/3/06: KVF Eq

    Uploaded by

    Pengintai
    This document outlines Millikan's oil drop experiment to determine the charge of an electron. It derives an equation (Equation 11) that relates the total charge q on an oil drop to measurable quantities like the drop's speeds as it falls freely (vf) and rises in an electric field (vr), as well as constants. This allows experimentally measuring the charge by observing multiple drops and quantizing the results to deduce the fundamental electron charge. The derivation accounts for factors like viscosity and density to relate the drop's radius and mass to its terminal velocities.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Millikan Oil Drop Derivation Seth Hopper 4/3/06: KVF Eq

    Uploaded by

    Pengintai
    108 views3 pages
    This document outlines Millikan's oil drop experiment to determine the charge of an electron. It derives an equation (Equation 11) that relates the total charge q on an oil drop to measurable quantities like the drop's speeds as it falls freely (vf) and rises in an electric field (vr), as well as constants. This allows experimentally measuring the charge by observing multiple drops and quantizing the results to deduce the fundamental electron charge. The derivation accounts for factors like viscosity and density to relate the drop's radius and mass to its terminal velocities.

    Original Description:

    MilliKan Derivation

    Original Title

    MilliKan Derivation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines Millikan's oil drop experiment to determine the charge of an electron. It derives an equation (Equation 11) that relates the total charge q on an oil drop to measurable quantities like the drop's speeds as it falls freely (vf) and rises in an electric field (vr), as well as constants. This allows experimentally measuring the charge by observing multiple drops and quantizing the results to deduce the fundamental electron charge. The derivation accounts for factors like viscosity and density to relate the drop's radius and mass to its terminal velocities.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    108 views3 pages

    Millikan Oil Drop Derivation Seth Hopper 4/3/06: KVF Eq

    Uploaded by

    Pengintai
    This document outlines Millikan's oil drop experiment to determine the charge of an electron. It derives an equation (Equation 11) that relates the total charge q on an oil drop to measurable quantities like the drop's speeds as it falls freely (vf) and rises in an electric field (vr), as well as constants. This allows experimentally measuring the charge by observing multiple drops and quantizing the results to deduce the fundamental electron charge. The derivation accounts for factors like viscosity and density to relate the drop's radius and mass to its terminal velocities.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Millikan Oil Drop Derivation · · · Seth Hopper · · · 4/3/06

    Our goal is to empirically determine the charge of an electron. Start by considering a


    small drop of oil, with mass m, falling freely through air at terminal velocity, vf , as shown.
    If the local acceleration of gravity is g, then Newton’s second law gives

    kvf − mg = ma = 0, (1)

    since the acceleration is zero at terminal velocity. We’re assuming the drag force from the

    k vf Eq

    mg mg k vr

    !
    Drop freely falling with speed vf Drop rising in an electric field with speed vr

    atmosphere is directly proportional to the velocity for some proportionality constant k. This
    turns out to be a valid assumption.
    Now, let’s put the same drop in a static electric field, as would be produced by a capacitor.
    Then, if the drop has charge −q it will feel a force Eq in the direction of the positive plate,
    as is also depicted. Assuming the field is strong enough, the drop will travel upward, so the
    drag force will be pointed down, and at terminal velocity, vr , we have

    Eq − mg − kvr = 0. (2)

    This provides us with a system of two equations. Eliminating k and solving for q gives

    mg (vf + vr )
    q= . (3)
    Evf
    All these quantities can be measured directly except for the mass of the drop. To find it we
    write the mass in terms of the density of the oil, ρ, as
    4
    m = V ρ = πa3 ρ, (4)
    3
    where we’ve assume the drop is a sphere of radius a. The density is a known value, but the
    radius will vary from drop to drop. It is, however related to vf , as is shown by Stokes’ Law:
    s
    9vf η
    a= . (5)
    2gρ
    Here, η is the viscosity of the air and is a linear function of the temperature (see Appendix
    A). So, it looks like we have a means to calculating everything. Unfortunately Stokes’ Law
    is only valid when vf is greater than 0.001 m/s, a condition that will not be satisfied in our
    case. Therefore, we have to add a correction factor to the viscosity, yielding
     
    1 
    η → η b , (6)
    1 + pa

    where b is a known constant and p is the barometric pressure. Eq. (5) then becomes
    v  
    u
    u 9v η 1 
    u f 
    a=t b , (7)
    2gρ 1 + pa

    which can be solved for a by using the quadratic formula to give


    v
    u !2
    u b 9vf η b
    a= t
    + − . (8)
    2p 2gρ 2p
    At this point we have an accurate expression for a, so we plug Eq. (8) into Eq. (4) and
    insert the resulting expression for m into Eq. (3) to get
    v 3
    u !2
    4 ρg (vf + vr ) u b 9vf η b
    q= π t
    + −  . (9)
    3 Evf 2p 2gρ 2p

    For our purposes, the electric field will be produced by a parallel plate capacitor with plate
    separation d and voltage difference V . The electric field is then constant and has the value
    V
    E= . (10)
    d
    Plugging this into Eq. (9) and rearranging gives our final expression for q:
    v 3
     u !2 " #
    4 b 9vf η b vf + vr
     u
    q = πdρg t + −  . (11)

    3 2p 2gρ 2p V vf
    The first term in square brackets will be a constant for the setup and need only be calculated
    once. The second term will be constant for each particular drop, but will have to be calculated
    again whenever a new drop is observed. (That is true only if the temperature, and thus η
    remain constant while observing the drop.) The third term will change each time the force
    from the electric field changes (i.e. when the charge of the drop changes, or the voltage
    between the plates changes).
    Note that this is the total charge on the drop, not the charge of one electron. By observing
    different drops, and the same drop with many different ionizations, you should be able to
    deduce the quantization of electric charge.
    The symbols in Eq. (11) are defined as:

    q: total charge carried by drop (C)

    d: separation between plates of capacitor, 7.62 × 10−3 m

    ρ: density of oil, 886 kg/m3

    g: local acceleration due to gravity, 9.8 m/s2 if you’re on Earth’s surface

    b: constant, 8.226 × 10−3 Pa · m

    p: barometric pressure, ask your TA (Pa)

    η: viscosity of air, see Appendix A (N · s/m2 )

    vf : speed of drop in free fall (m/s)

    vr : speed of drop rising under the force of the E field (m/s)

    V : potential difference across the plates of the capacitor (V).

    You might also like