This Is Good! More Like This! This Has Potential! Improve: This Is Not Needed! Remove: This Is Missing! Add
This Is Good! More Like This! This Has Potential! Improve: This Is Not Needed! Remove: This Is Missing! Add
Team Names:
CONTENT
Persuasion • How credible and engaging is the written text?
Sufficiency • Is everything present that should be included?
Tone of voice • Is the tone of voice matched with the manifesto?
OVERAL AESTHETIC
Form (style + concept) vs • How appropriate is the form in relation to the salons’ theme?
Content (theme/topics)
Flow • Is the reading of the design considered?
• Does the content appear in a natural and logical progression?
Consistency/Differentiation
• How are the salons presented as part of a whole?
Image (representation) • Is the visual representation appropriate?
Layout
Orientation/Alignment
• Does everything seem to be in the right place and create the right effect?
COLOUR
Depth/Flatness
Static/Active Appropriateness • How appropriate is the colour palette?
Consistency • How well applied is the colour palette?
Navigation • Does colour aid navigation?
TYPOGRAPHY Differentiation • How does colour signpost differentiation?
Choice of font • Is the choice of font appropriate? FOLD
Tone of voice • Does the font’s personality match the brand?
Scale/Contrast • Is scale used efficiently to differentiate and focus the eye? Integration • Is the fold integrated in the design?
Usability • Is it easy to use or interact with the design solution?
Hierarchy • Is the reading of the design considered? Consideration: • Is the fold employed to control the reading of the catalogue?
Attention to detail: • Is the typed text controlled or arbitrarily placed? Pacing Does it support a narrative and pace the user?
Placement Narrative
Alignment
Orientation
Leading/Kerning PAPER
Consistency
Appropriateness • Is the material choice relevant to the concept?
Integration • Is the material well integrated with the design?
Appropriateness:
must always be judged in
relation to message, topic,
theme and audience!