Elizabeth Darling Faith Based Sex Scandal Order Regarding George Bush
Elizabeth Darling Faith Based Sex Scandal Order Regarding George Bush
Elizabeth Darling Faith Based Sex Scandal Order Regarding George Bush
F L. E [)
(1 P fl 1' P
BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause,
and specificallypro se Plaintiff George R. Scott III's Motion to Recuse [#6], filed January 26, 2015.
Scott moves to recuse United States District Judge Lee Yeakel from this action on grounds Judge
Yeakel was appointed by former President George W. Bush, who "could become" a named
defendant in the suit. Mot. Recuse [#6] at 1. The Court now enters the following order DENYING
the motion.
According to Scott' spro se Complaint [#1], Defendant Elizabeth M. Darling, to whom Scott
was formerly married, "created and caused a Faith Based sex scandal" by using "Texas State funds
to pay for expenses related to multiple adulterous affairs." Compl. [#1] at 5. Scott alleges Governor
Perry "has been and is currently involved in the cover up of Ms Darling's Faith-Based sex scandal
which he inherited from President George W. Bush when he appointed Ms Darling as President/CEO
of his Faith Based creation, The Onestar Foundation of Texas in 2009." Id. at 6.
Case 1:15-cv-00011-LY-AWA Document 37 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 3
Having reviewed the Complaint and the file as a whole, the Court can discern absolutely no
meritorious basis upon which former President George W. Bush could be named as a defendant in
this lawsuit. Moreover, even were Scott to name former President Bush as a defendant, a federal
judge need not recuse himself from every case involving the President who appointed him. See, e.g.,
Armenian Assembly of Am., Inc. v. Cafesjian, 783 F. Supp. 2d 78, 93 (D.C. Cir. 2011) ("The case
law is clear that recusal is not warranted where a judge is alleged to be biased based solely on
political connections to the President who appointed [him]."); United States v. Gordon, 974 F.2d
1110, 1114 (9th Cir. 1992), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Bagdasarian, 652 F.3d
1113 (2011) ("It is not reasonable to suspect that Judge Rafeedie's ability to preside impartially
would be affected by the fact that President Reagan appointed him."). A federal judgeship is a life-
tenured position, and federal judges take an oath to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform
all duties. . . under the Constitution and laws of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 453. As the D.C.
Circuit has noted, Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, both Clinton appointees, participated in Clinton v.
Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), and Chief Justice Burger and Justices Blackmun and Powell, all Nixon
appointees, participated in United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). In re Executive Office of
the President, 215 F.3d 25, 25-26 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Consequently, the Court finds Judge Yeakel
Accordingly,
TRANSFERRED to the Austin Docket of the Honorable Lee Yeakel, United States District
Judge.
-2-
Case 1:15-cv-00011-LY-AWA Document 37 Filed 02/27/15 Page 3 of 3
7'l?d47VVi1
SAM SPARKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE