13 33210 1 10 20180123
13 33210 1 10 20180123
13 33210 1 10 20180123
Civil Engineering
Ultimate Strength of Steel Cellular
Beams with Semi-Rigid Connections
OnlineFirst (2018) paper 11304
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.11304
Creative Commons Attribution b Abdelhalim Madjour1*, Mohamed Rédha Soltani1, El Haddi Harkati1
research article Received 24 July 2017; Revised 24 October 2017; Accepted 27 November 2017
Abstract 1 Introduction
Over the past several years, extensive theoretical, numerical and Throughout the last several decades, cellular beams have
experimental research has been carried out on the structural been used extensively in steel construction to pass under-floor
behavior of steel beams with web openings of various shapes. services ducts (water and sewage pipes, air ducts, cables etc.)
However, in all these studies, cellular beams have always been and for their aesthetic and design advantages.
treated or designed as simply supported at their ends. In other The process of manufacturing cellular beams consists of
words, the beam to column connections are assumed as nomi- cutting the web of the parent profile by flame in a zigzag pattern
nally pinned. The main aim of the present paper is to perform along its centerline. The two obtained T-sections are shifted
numerical simulations to determine whether the use of end plate and rewelded producing beams with hexagonal, circular or
connections, instead of simple connections, could enhance the sinusoidal openings and lead to an increase in height compare
global bending and/or shear capacity of cellular beams with to the parent profile. Cellular beams with sinusoidal openings
circular and sinusoidal web openings. called Angelina are fabricated only by using one oxycutting
Interaction between a circular or sinusoidal opening in the line instead of two for the standard perforated beams with reg-
beam web and endplate connection has also been studied. ular circular or hexagonal openings. By increasing the depth
Data obtained from a number of experimental research pro- of the beam, the strong axis bending strength and stiffness are
grams on steel solid beam to column connections and simply improved without increasing the weight of the beam allow-
supported cellular beams, available in the literature, were uti- ing this type of beams to be used for medium to long spans
lized to validate the numerical models developed in this paper. constructions. The digital and parallel fabrication processes
The numerical simulations using ABAQUS software were per- reduces considerably the cost of cellular beams.
formed on full scale cellular steel beams connected to the col- In the current structural European design codes [1–3], steel
umns with seven types of endplate connections. The results were or composite cellular beams have always been designed as
compared with those obtained for similar simply cellular beams. simply-supported at their ends. Simple connections, which are
classified as nominally pinned that are assumed to transmit end
Keywords shear only and to have negligible resistance to rotation, are used.
endplate connection, cellular beams, pinned connections, cir- Fin plates, double angle web, and partial end plates beam to col-
cular openings, sinusoidal openings, ultimate load umn connections are commonly classified as nominally pinned.
Typical examples of these connections types are shown in Fig. 1.
a) b)
c)
c) bolt detail
Fig. 6 Loading and lateral support conditions [17] Fig. 7 Typical finite element mesh of end plate steel connection
parameter. Tie constraints are used to tie together two surfaces was used to define the failure load.
for the duration of a simulation. They are particularly useful To account for the large displacements (P-∆ effect), “large
for rapid mesh refinement between dissimilar meshes. Contact Displacement static analysis” was adopted. The kinematic
between the bolt shank and the inside of the bolt hole was con- description of the elements in nonlinear geometrical analysis
sidered as frictionless. is based on the updated Lagrangian formulation. Within each
A tri-linear elastic-plastic uniaxial stress-strain curve for the increment, the nonlinear equilibrium equations are solved by
connection components and for the cellular beams was used to means of the Newton–Raphson approach.
simulate the material behaviour of steel in both tension and com- Appropriate boundary conditions, that are consistent with
pression as depicted in Fig. 10(a). A bilinear stress strain rela- the actual constraints which the specimens undergo in the test
tionship was utilized for the high-strength bolts as shown in Fig. setups, were applied.
10(b). The points defining the stress–strain curves are taken from Displacements values recorded for each step load at pre-
the test data given in references [14–18]. The Von Mises yield defined joints were used to calculate the relative joint rotation
criterion was used in conjunction with the Prandtl–Reuss associ- connection. Displacements values recorded for each step load
ated flow rule to determine the onset of yielding and the amount at predefined joints as illustrated in Fig. 11 were used to cal-
of incremental plastic strain. In Abaqus, the material response to culate the relative joint rotation connection by the following
unidirectional stress is input through σt vs. εt, the true stress and formula used in Augusto et al [14]:
the true strain respectively which account for large strains, where:
U − Uc2
σ t = σ n (1 + ε n ) (1) φ j = arctan c1 − θc (4)
hb
ε t = ln(1 + ε n ) (2) where:
and εn and σ n are the engineering (nominal) strain and stress Uc1 and Uc2 are the horizontal displacements at the reference
respectively. points C1 and C2.
Furthermore, Abaqus requires the input of the plastic true hb is the distance between points C1 and C2
strains instead of the total true strains in the plastic range. The θc : is the column elastic rotation,
plastic true strain is defined by the following equation:
σt
ε pl = ε t − ε te = ε t − (3)
E
where εte is the true elastic strain.
The constitutive model is integrated by means with a robust
radial return mapping algorithm.
For the endplate joint specimens, the loading was applied
in two steps. In the first step, pretension effects in the bolts
caused by the tightening of each bolt were simulated by apply-
ing compressive forces to bolts. In the second step, monotonic
loading was applied by assigning vertical displacements at the
top of the column for the specimen BC1 and by vertical load at Fig. 11 Reference points and dimensions used to calculate the joint rotation
the end of the beam for the specimens J1.1, J3.1 and J4.1. For
the simply supported cellular beams, the loading was applied For the simple supported perforated beams, vertical dis-
monotonically under force control. The simulation terminates placements for different load levels were plotted at the points
when divergence in the calculation occurs. The last increment where deflections were recorded during the tests.
a) Specimen A1 b) Specimen A2
c) Joint 3 d) Joint 4
utilized as reference specimens. The moment-rotation curve For comparison purposes between the characteristics of the
of each of the four connections is compared with two similar joints with solid beams and those with perforated beams, it
connections configuration but in which the solid beam is sub- was assumed that the total height of a cellular beam and the
stituted with perforated beam with circular or sinusoidal web solid beam are identical. The geometric configurations of the
openings. Geometric limits of the openings adopted for each web openings were adopted in order to minimize the mechan-
specimen were within the limits recommended in the Annex ical characteristics of the connections. This would be realized
N of ENV 1993-1-1 [1] and the design guidelines for Angelina by considering the largest allowed web openings positioned as
beams published by ArcelorMital [20]. Geometric parameters close as possible to the column face.
of the perforated beams adopted in the present study are shown The dimensions of the openings in the web beams are given
in Fig. 16. The diameter of the circular openings d0 is equal to in table 1.
80% of the web depth. Dimensions that define the shape and
Table 1 Dimensions of the openings in the beam webs
the layout of the sinusoidal opening geometric parameters are
as follows: Joint d0 a0 (mm) W (mm) ls
• The depth of web opening a0 to the clear height of the web 1 284.1 275.2 488.8 250
• W the length of the intermediate web post is equal to 250 3 350.7 359.2 611.6 250
Fig. 20 Typical load-mid-span deflection curves of a selection of full scale cellular beams with circular openings and for various types of beam to column
connections
The increase in deflection at failure load varies between: as red in the contours. Plastic strains are observed around the
1) 174% and 642% for cellular beams with circular open- opening and the joint.
ings subjected to uniformly distributed load The two specimens demonstrated high plastic deformations
2) 203% and 393% for cellular beams with circular open- around the openings and the joint. For cellular beams with cir-
ings subjected to mid-span concentrated load cular openings, in the regions subjected to high global bending
3) 156% and 466% for cellular beams with sinusoidal open- moment and low global shear force (Fig. 24(b)), it can be shown
ings subjected to uniformly distributed load that the three sections above and below the openings are fully
4) 326% and 468% for cellular beams with sinusoidal open- or partially yielded in compression and in tension. The plas-
ings subjected to mid-span concentrated load. tic zones above and below the openings expanded to the upper
These results also show that the percentage increases in both and the lower flanges as the global moment is increased. As
ultimate load and maximum deflection change significantly the global moment decreases and the global shear increases,
with the geometry of the cellular beams and the type of load- four plastic zones appears at inclined cross sections of the tee
ing. The values of the ultimate loads and maximum deflections web situated at the second opening as can be shown in figure
obtained from the numerical simulations are widely scattered 24(a). A similar yield pattern is also revealed around the sinu-
limiting the possibility of predicting accurately the increase in soidal openings as illustrated in figure 25(a). At the first circu-
strength of cellular beams connected to the columns with flush lar opening from the support, the yield zones overlap due to a
end plates when compared to the simply supported one higher global shear force and interaction effects between the
first opening and the joint. Those yield patterns are observed in
5.2.2 Failure Modes simply supported cellular beams and they lead to the conven-
In this study, the yield criterion is used to predict the failure tional flexural and Vierendeel mechanisms. Because Vierend-
modes of cellular beams. Failure mechanisms associated with eel mechanism is likely to occur in cellular beams with large
instabilities are not considered. Like the von Mises stresses, web openings, four plastic hinges are formed at each corner of
the equivalent plastic strains (PEEQ in ABAQUS) at integral all sinusoidal openings including those subjected to low global
points are scalar values that are often used to define the yield shear force as depicted in figure 25(a). Yielding is also observed
surface size of isotropic ductile materials such as metals. Figs. at the mid-height of the web-post between two adjacent sinusoi-
24 and 25 show the surface plots of the equivalent plastic strain dal openings. This type of yielding pattern may lead to a mecha-
of the two cellular beams with circular and sinusoidal open- nism provoked by the fracture of the mid-depth weld joint. This
ings FPD500 when subjected to uniformly distributed load at failure mode is likely to occur for short horizontal joints of the
failure. All the elements that exhibit plastic strain are shown web-post when they are subjected to high horizontal shear.
Fig. 23 Comparison of ultimate loads of cellular beams with sinusoidal openings and various types of beam to column connections
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 24 Plastic equivalent strain (PEEQ) contour plot of specimen FPD500 with circular openings under uniformly distributed load at failure
(c)
(b)
Fig. 25 Plastic equivalent strain (PEEQ) contour plot of specimen FPD500 with sinusoidal openings under uniformly distributed load
Furthermore, the numerical results have also shown that at beam having the same span and subjected to the same load as
failure, all the components of the connection (endplate, bolts the real beam.
and shear panel) and the end-posts of all models exhibit fully Thus, if the bending moment transferred by the connection
or partially plastic deformations as illustrated in Figs. 24 and is known, the mid-span moment would be calculated from:
25. The fact that using more resistant joints does not improve
Mspan = M0 – Msupp (8)
the ultimate load of the cellular beams indicates that the cellu-
lar beams fail before the joints develop their full plastic resis- The mid-span moment of the simply supported beam due
tance or their maximum plastic rotations or they fail simulta- to the uniformly distributed load qu or the mid-span concen-
q QL
neously. Therefore, the flush endplates used in this study can trated load Qu at failure are respectively, ul and u .
2
8 4
be classified as full strength joint. The ultimate loads qu and Qu are obtained from the above
According to EN-1993-1-8 [5], the beam to column end- numerical analyses.
plate connections behave elastically for up to at least 2/3 of The ratio λ of the predicted hogging to sagging moments
its moment resistance. Therefore, it can be concluded that at at failure for the cellular beams connected to the columns
failure, the beam end moments MEd should satisfy: with flush endplate subjected to mid-span concentrated load
and uniformly distributed load are presented in table 3 and
Mj,ela ≤ Msupp ≤ Mj,Rd (5) 4, respectively. The moment resistant of each joint configu-
where: ration was calculated using commercial software developed,
Mj,ela is the maximum elastic moment of the connection specifically for steel joint design, by Autodesk in accordance
Mj,Rd is the moment resistance of the connection. with the component method of EN 1993-1-8 [5]. The ratio
of hogging to sagging moments at failure was calculated by
5.2.3 Moment distribution at failure considering for the support moment the two extreme values,
In this section, the numerical results obtained above are adopted by EN 1993-1-8 [5], which may be experienced by
used to evaluate the moment at the support and the mid-span endplate joints beyond the elastic limit, Msupp = 2/3Mj,Rd and
cross sections in the cellular beams connected to the columns Mj,Rd .It can be observed that the ratios λ of hogging to sagging
with flush endplate at failure. In order to achieve this objective, moments at failure are quite different, depending on the geo-
the following assumption has been assumed: metrical parameters of the cellular beams and the type of the
applied load.
2Mj,Rd /3 ≤ Msupp ≤ Mj,Rd (6)
Equation (7) and the numerical results presented in Table
This assumption was verified for the cellular beams con- 4 and 5 can be used to estimate the ultimate load capacity of
nected to the column with flush end plates considered in this cellular beams with large closely spaced openings.
study. For cellular beams subjected to uniformly distributed load:
At all stages of loading, the sum of the absolute values of 8 (1 + λ )
the mid-span and the supports moments must satisfy the fol- qu = Msupp (9)
λ12
lowing equilibrium equation:
2 M j ,Rd
If we assume M supp = , hence
Msupp + Mspan = M0 (7) 3
0.11 ≤ λ ≤ 0.16 for cellular beams with circular openings
where: 0.06 ≤ λ ≤ 0.12 for cellular beams with sinusoidal openings
M0 is the maximum positive moment of a simply supported
Table 4 Predicted ratio of hogging to sagging moments for cellular beams subjected to midspan concentrated load at failure
Beam designation M0 (kN.m) Mj,Rd (kN.m) Mspan (kN.m) λ = Msupp /Mspan (kN.m)
M0 - 2/3Mj,Rd M0 - Mj,Rd 2/3 Mj,Rd / Mspan Mj,Rd / Mspan
FF300
(1) 560 86.68 502.21 473.32 0.11 0.15
(2) 480.96 96.88 416.37 384.08 0.15 0.20
FF400
(1) 1506.12 258.24 1333.96 1247.88 0.13 0.17
(2) 1471.25 318.88 1258.66 1152.37 0.17 0.21
FF450
(1) 2009.62 494.55 1679.92 1515.07 0.20 0.24
(2) 2088 571.66 1706.89 1516.34 0.22 0.27
FF550
(1) 2886 608.51 2480.32 2277.49 0.16 0.21
(2) 2465 641.64 2037.24 1823.36 0.20 0.26
(1) Cellular beams with circular openings
(2) Cellular beams with sinusoidal openings
Table 5 Predicted ratio of hogging to sagging moments for cellular beams subjected to uniformly distributed load at failure
Beam designation M0 (kN.m) Mj,Rd (kN.m) Mspan (kN.m) λ = Msupp /Mspan (kN.m)
M0 - 2/3Mj,Rd M0 - Mj,Rd 2/3 Mj,Rd / Mspan Mj,Rd / Mspan
FF300
(1) 502.25 86.68 444.46 415.57 0.13 0.17
(2) 1058.91 96.88 994.32 962.03 0.06 0.09
FF400
(1) 1721.22 258.24 1549.06 1462.98 0.11 0.15
(2) 2719.14 318.88 2506.55 2400.25 0.08 0.12
FF450
(1) 2455.88 494.55 2126.18 1961.33 0.16 0.20
(2) 3633.12 571.66 3252.01 3061.46 0.12 0.16
FF550
(1) 3600 608.51 3194.32 2991.49 0.13 0.17
(2) 4373.2 641.64 3945.44 3731.56 0.11 0.15
(1) Cellular beams with circular openings
(2) Cellular beams with sinusoidal openings