Hindu Law - Unit 5
Hindu Law - Unit 5
Hindu Law - Unit 5
3 Application of Act
4 Definitions
12 Guardian not to be appointed for minors undivided interest in joint family property
13 Welfare
Duties & Powers of Guardians; A detailed study of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956;
Case Laws:
Maintenance: Traditional Rights and Rights under Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act 1956.
2 Application of Act
3 Definitions
(iv) the adoption is made in compliance with the other conditions mentioned in this Chapter.
Kumar Sursen v. State of Bihar – Under section 6 the law does not recognize an adoption by a
Hindu of any person other than a Hindu;
Suma Bewa v. Kunja Bihari Nayak – Law is well settled that adoption displaces the natural line of
succession and therefore, a person who seeks to displace the natural succession to the property
alleging an adoption must prove the factum of adoption and its validity by placing sufficient
materials on record.
Devgonda Raygonda Patil v. Shamgonda Raygonda Patil – Section 6 does not bar a lunatic person
from being adopted.
Any male Hindu who is of sound mind and is not a minor has the capacity to take a son or a
daughter in adoption: Provided that, if he has a wife living, he shall not adopt except with the
consent of his wife unless the wife has completely and finally renounced the world or has ceased
to be a Hindu or has been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound mind.
Explanation. – If a person has more than one wife living at the time of adoption, the consent of
all the wives is necessary unless the consent of any one of them is unnecessary for any of the
reasons specified in the preceding proviso.
Ram Sundar v Kali Narain – it was observed that mere weakness of mind is not sufficient, what is
necessary to be proved is that infirmity of mind has been such as to disable him from
understanding what he was doing.
In Ambarish Kumar v Hatu Prasad, it was held that a person who is deaf and dumb but is in a
position to express himself to signs and gestures though not clearly, cannot be called a person of
unsound mind.
(a) who is of sound mind, (b) who is not a minor, and (c) who is not married, or if married, whose
marriage has been dissolved or whose husband is dead or has completely and finally renounced
the world or has ceased to be a Hindu or has been declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction
to be of unsound mind, has the capacity to take a son or daughter in adoption.
Earlier, an unmarried female as well as a widow had no power to adopt except under the
authority
Post amendment of the act, an unmarried woman who completes the age of eighteen can adopt
a child.
If she be married
A married woman whose husband is living has no capacity to adopt even with the consent of her
husband
marriage is dissolved
No person except the father or mother or the guardian of a child shall have the capacity to give
the child in adoption.
Subject to the provisions of 1[ sub- section (3) and sub- section (4)], the father, if alive, shall
alone have the right to give in adoption, but such right shall not be exercised save with the
consent of the mother unless the mother has completely and finally renounced the world or has
ceased to be a Hindu or has been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound
mind.
The mother may give the child in adoption if the father is dead or has completely and finally
renounced the world or has ceased to be a Hindu or has been declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be of unsound mind.
Where both the father and mother are dead or have completely and finally renounced the world
or have abandoned the child or have been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of
unsound mind or where the parentage of the child is not known, the guardian of the child may
give the child in adoption with the previous permission of the court to any person including the
guardian himself.
Before granting, permission to a guardian under sub- section (4), the court shall be satisfied that
the adoption will be for the welfare of the child, due consideration being for this purpose given
to the wishes of the child having regard to the age and understanding of the child and that the
applicant for permission has not received Or agreed to receive and that no person has made or
given or agreed to make or give to the applicant any payment or reward in consideration of the
adoption except such as the court may sanction.
(i) the expressions” father” and” mother” do not include an adoptive father and an adoptive
mother;
(ia) ” guardian” means a person having the care of the person of a child or of both his person
and property and includes-
(a) a guardian appointed by the will of the child’ s father or mother, and
(ii) ” court” means the city civil court or a district court within the local limits of whose
jurisdiction the child to be adopted ordinarily resides.
Dhanraj v Suraj Bai, it was held that adoption of a ‘step-son’ given in adoption by the step-
mother who has no capacity to do so is invalid by virtue of Section 5(i) read with Section 6(ii) of
the Act.
A mother can give her child by her previous husband in adoption if she remarries; Mother of an
illegitimate child can give the child in adoption without the consent of her paramour to whom
the child was born
He or she is a Hindu
He or she has not been married unless there is a custom or usage applicable to the parties which
permits persons who are married being taken in adoption
He or she has not completed the age of fifteen years, unless there is a custom or usage
applicable to the parties which permits persons who have completed the age of fifteen years
being taken in adoption
In Rakhi v. 1st Addl. District Judge, it was observed that a person aged about 28 years can never
be adopted. Sec. 10 (iv) of the Act prescribed the age at 15 years. Such adoption is to follow the
prescribed procedure for the adoption namely, actual giving and taking in adoption as prescribed
in Sec. 11(vi) of the Act.
In Maya Ram v. Jainarian, it was held that the adoption of a married Jat boy who was above 15
years of age, as valid on the force of customs prevailing in that community.
In Khazan Singh v. Union of India, where the adopted child originally belonged to the higher
caste, but on adoption was to one beloging to the Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Tribe
Certificate was granted to him on the basis of adoption and it was held that the certificate could
not be cancelled without giving opportunity to the adoptee to prove that adoption was valid in
spite of the bar of age.
12 Effects of adoption
the child cannot marry any person whom he or she could not have married if he or she had
continued in the family of his or her birth
any property which vested in the adopted child before the adoption shall continue to vest in
such person subject to the obligations if any attaching to the ownership of such property,
including the obligation to maintain relatives in the family of his or her birth
the adopted child shall not divest any person or any estate which vested in him or her before the
adoption
18 Maintenance of wife
21 Dependants defined
22 Maintenance of dependants
23 Amount of maintenance
24 Claimant to maintenance should be a Hindu
29 Repeals
30 Savings
Case Laws: