Locking/Adjustment Mechanism

Internship report

Company: Mettler Toledo Safeline Limited

Practical trainer: Mr. S. Howard/Mr. D. Barber
BPV- Teacher: Mr. H. Loeff
Reviewer: Mr. D. Broersma

Author: Miss. K. van den Heuvel 2018

0
Chapter 1
1.1 Introduction
My name is Kelly van den Heuvel; I am a fourth year student Mechanical Engineering BOL level 4 of
the Summa College in Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

From the period of 5 February 2018 until 29 June 2018 I followed an internship at a company named,
Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. This report is about my experience during the internship at the company
and the project I have been working on for the company.

The subjects in my report are about the company, the project that I have been developing during the
internship and my experience with the company and my graduation internship.
Because the internship is based on my project, the majority of the report will be about the product
that I developed.

I hope that, based on this report, I can inform you about the company and its products and the
project I have been working on.
Finally, I would like to thank the company Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. and its employees for their
hospitality and help by offering me a great and instructive graduation internship.
Enjoy reading!

1
The company
The company where I am doing my internship this year is called Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. in
Salford, Manchester UK.

What is Mettler Toledo Safeline Limited?

Mettler-Toledo Safeline is the global market leader for high-performance metal detection systems.
They are a part of Mettler- Toledo’s product inspection division.
Mettler- Toledo supplies metal detection, X-ray inspection, check weighing and vision inspection
technology.
The company forms part of Mettler-Toledo's product inspection division, which supplies metal
detection, X-ray inspection, check weighing and vision inspection technology.

With over 23 years of experience producing

metal detection systems, Mettler-Toledo
Safeline estimates that its installed systems
currently inspect more than one trillion food
and pharmaceutical packages per annum.

They have a wide range of customers as shown

in Fig 1.

Safeline
Safeline was developed in 1989 at METTLER TOLEDO.
The Safeline product was an advanced metal detector
that used digital technology for increased sensitivity and
accuracy.

To expand the detection solutions, METTLER TOLEDO

acquired AVS Raytech and AVS Metrology in 2000. AVS
Raytech manufactured x-ray inspection equipment. The
x-ray inspection equipment combined with the detection
products allowed companies to identify multiple Fig. 1: Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. location
contaminants as well as verifying product integrity and Salford
portion control.

2
What does Mettler Toledo Safeline Limited do?
With safety legislation for the food and packing industry becoming ever more rigorous, it is essential
for brand owners to have efficient and reliable product inspection systems in place to monitor their
manufacturing lines for contamination.
Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. produces metal detectors that can be installed in the manufacturing
lines of those food and packing industry products. The metal detectors need to be very accurate
when it comes to detecting pieces of metal in food because the pieces can be as small as 0.9mm.

Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. has several standard types of metal detectors they sell to different
customers. The types can either have round aperture or a rectangular aperture.
If a customer needs a size which is not covered in the standard sizes, Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.
also makes custom made metal detectors.

Winner of the Queen's Award for Enterprise

In 2012 Mettler-Toledo Safeline received the Queen's Award for Enterprise in the International
Trade category for an outstanding level of export growth.
This award recognises the company's continual commitment to innovation, its expert support team
and its performance in response to growth opportunities in the food, beverage and pharmaceutical
markets.

Fig. 2: Mettler Toledo Safeline’s Queen Award for

Enterprise

3
The assignment
To succeed this graduation internship I need to meet several core tasks and working processes while
completing a single project. The core tasks and working processes I need to meet this year are the
following:

1. Develops products or systems

Working processes:
a. Assembles and absorbs design data
b. Develops designs
c. Chooses materials and parts
d. Calculates production costs
2. Prepares production work
Working processes:
a. Assembles and absorbs production data
b. Produces technical drawings
c. Organises men and means
3. Guards production work
Working processes:
a. Guards production process
b. Guards budget
c. Executes quality controls
d. Delivers the product
4. Maintains products and systems
Working processes:
a. Inspects and tests products and systems
b. Maintains machines and systems

The purpose of the project is to prove that I meet all the core tasks and working process necessary
to graduate.
For the project itself I have to develop a product that improves something in the production line of a
company, in my case Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.

In the first few weeks of my internship I will be busy with research about the company and I am
trying to see if I can find a part of the production line I can improve.
The rest of the weeks I will be busy with the research and the development of a new product. I will
develop the product and guide the entire production process so a good product is produced.

At the end of my internship I will present my new product to the company and hand it over to them.

4
Index
Chapter 1................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Glossary .................................................................................................................................. 7
Chapter 2................................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Body............................................................................................................................................... 8
2.1.1 Assignment Proof of Competence ...................................................................................... 8
2.1.2 Problem definition.............................................................................................................. 15
2.1.3 Plan of action..................................................................................................................... 17
2.1.4 Consistent planning ........................................................................................................... 24
2.1.5 Network planning............................................................................................................... 25
2.1.6 Market and product research ............................................................................................ 26
2.1.7 Set of requirements ........................................................................................................... 40
2.1.8 Ingress Protection rating system ....................................................................................... 42
2.1.8 PNI- analysis for the work environment ............................................................................ 44
2.1.9 Morphological analysis ...................................................................................................... 45
2.1.10 Miller profile ................................................................................................................... 48
2.1.11 Why the morphological analysis and miller profile?............................................................ 49
2.1.12 Technical Design Structure ........................................................................................... 50
2.1.13 Bill of Material ................................................................................................................ 52
2.1.14 Cost price calculation .................................................................................................... 52
2.1.15 Installation instructions .................................................................................................. 52
2.1.16 Organization chart ......................................................................................................... 53
2.1.17 Staffing .......................................................................................................................... 54
2.1.18 Production agreements ................................................................................................. 55
2.2 Core tasks and working processes ....................................................................................... 55
2.3 Bibliography........................................................................................................................... 55
2.4 Attachments .......................................................................................................................... 56
2.4.1 Sketches ............................................................................................................................ 56
2.4.2 Part and assembly drawings ............................................................................................. 56
2.4.3 Workbook 'Proeve van Bekwaamheid' .............................................................................. 56
2.4.4 Poster 2018 Guide to explosive atmospheres and hazardous locations .......................... 56
2.4.5 Organisation Chart November 2017 ................................................................................. 56
2.4.5 Order lists .......................................................................................................................... 56
2.4.6 Meeting reports ................................................................................................................. 56
2.4.7 Measurement reports ........................................................................................................ 56
2.4.8 Hand out powerpointpresentation ..................................................................................... 56
2.4.9 Manuals & Product specifications ..................................................................................... 56

5
 2.1.10 Existing Tablex drawings .............................................................................................. 56
2.4.10 Maintenance report ....................................................................................................... 56
2.5 Evaluations ............................................................................................................................ 57
2.5.1 Timesheets ........................................................................................................................ 57
2.5.2 Evaluation forms................................................................................................................ 78

6
1.2 Glossary

7
Chapter 2
2.1 Body
2.1.1 Assignment Proof of Competence
Name student Kelly van den Heuvel

Student number PS156877

ROC Summa Engineering

Contact person ROC Ad Willems

Telephone number contact person +316 29055320

ROC

E-mailadres contact persoon [email protected]

Name company Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.

Address 19 Montford Street

Place M50 2XD Salford, UK

Practical trainer/ Contact person Steve Howard/ David barber

BPV-company

Function practical trainer(s) Systems Tech Mgr/ Head of Productions

Phone number practical trainer David barber: + 44 (0) 161 848 8636 ext. 1361
[email protected]
E-mail address practical trainer(s)
[email protected]
Qualification, cohort Technician Engineering

Crebonumber qualification 94421

Level 4
1. Develops products or systems
Education

2. Prepares the production process

Core tasks to be carried out
3. Guards production work
4. Maintains products and systems

Test conditions

Location Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd

Start- and end date februari 2017 – juni 2017

Length of time > 200 hours

Assessors
Assessor 1 Dennis Broersma
Function Assessor 1 Project supervisor
Assessor 2 Hans Loeff
Function Assessor 2 Project assessor

8
The assignment description

Name assignment Locking/ Adjustment Mechanism

Geef de opdracht een

naam. Dit kan
bijvoorbeeld het
ordernummer zijn,
maar ook een naam
die aansluit bij de
inhoud.

Standard HDS System

Standard Tablex Pro System

Construction inside the

Tablex and HDS system

9
The assignment description

Context I will carry out my BPV project at the company Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd in
Salford, UK.
Beschrijf kort de My main contacts within the company, regarding the project, are:
situatie/ omgeving Steve Howards, Bob Aldam and David Barber.
van de opdracht, voor
wie (klant/ bedrijf) de The company builds metal detectors for the food and packing industry as well
opdracht wordt as the mechanisms to separate metal particles from the food production line.
uitgevoerd en met wie Two out of 3 Metal detection systems, the HDS system and the standard
wordt Tablex Pro System, you can see in the previous table. The Pipeline metal
gecommuniceerd, detector has the same system. These metal detectors find and intercept tiny
afgestemd en/of metal particles in food products as well as in medicines and are also the three
samengewerkt. products I will be working on.

The company provides the maintenance work that needs to be done on the
machines.
Reason Mettler Toledo wants to keep the customer satisfaction level high and extend
the lifespan of the systems so that less repair and maintenance is needed. In
Motiveer de opdracht order to make this possible they need a solution for the locking/adjustment
en beschrijf wat de mechanism.
aanleiding is. It is my job to create a harmonised locking/adjustment design for all three
products. Utilising the same components where possible and at the same time
implementing improvements to the design from a dfx (Design for Excellence, X
= Manufacturability, Testability, Cost- Effectiveness) perspective with improved
hygiene and functionality.

Adjustability:
The Tablex and HDS system have a vertical range of 900mm to 1200mm and
are able to rotate a full 360⁰. The clamping system I’m going to design must fix
all these movements when closed, but allow all of them when open. The
fixation is not allowed to leave any scratches or traces.

What makes this clamping system hard to develop are the extreme
environments it must operate in (-10 ⁰C to +40 ⁰C) and the extreme level of
hygiene (HACCP) and cleaning it must resist (IP69K, explained in report). The
space to build the clamping system in is very small to keep the entire system
compact, so there is not much room to place a big mechanical system.
Client requirements Requirements of the client:
□ Expected Project Length: 4 months.
Beschrijf de □ Project costs: +- £1000.
specifieke eisen die □ Use a common design for all 3 systems.
de klant/ □ Focus on design aesthetics, ease of use and ergonomics.
opdrachtgever stelt. □ Improve design from a manufacturing perspective.
□ Reduce the chance of marking/scratching the main frame tube support
when carrying out adjustment.
□ Improve the design from a hygienic perspective.
□ Reduce the cost where possible (Not a main driver for the project).
□ Produce up to 3 prototypes as proof of concept (Recommended test
procedure).
□ Work with key suppliers to productionise the concept.

10
The assignment description

Goal The end result has been achieved when:

□ All of the requirements from the set of requirements have been
Beschrijf het investigated and come back in the project realisation.
eindresultaat dat met □ The realisation of the project has happened within the agreed time
deze opdracht moet duration.
worden bereikt. □ The development of the product is achieved within the set time.
□ Completed machine for 6 June.
□ The contact with the client went well and the client is satisfied with the
end result

Assignment Design and build the product in such a way that a working and marketable
product is delivered. This product must replace and improve the current
Beschrijf de inhoud construction. It must be durable, hygienic, firmer and easier to produce.
van de opdracht per
werkproces. 1. Develops products or systems
1.1 Assembles and absorbs design data
□ Identify the operation process based on the existing machine.
□ Identify various functions using methodical design.
□ In conversation with the client to further shape Set of
Requirements.
□ Market research on the internet for similar solutions for the
problem.
Proof:
o Assignment Proof of Competence document
o Set of Requirements
o Plan of Action
o Problem definition document
o Market and product research document

1.2 Develops designs

□ Elaborate existing design in SolidWorks/Inventor into a new, good
and decent design and work out different ideas for encountering
problems.
□ For some problems different solutions have to be devised and
these have to be presented to the client.
□ Work everything out till one final design is created.
Proof:
o Concept sketches
o Package of drawings
o Set of Requirements
o Morphological analysis
o Miller profile
o Technical design structure
o Report "meetings about design"

11
The assignment description

1.3 Chooses materials and parts

□ During the design process, the standardization of parts must be
taken into account. For example, work with key suppliers and use
a common design for all 3 systems.
□ Choose the right materials for the final design based on an
assembly drawing
□ Determine the final parts list, together with the client.
Proof:
o Assembly drawings
o Part drawings
o Parts list
o List of materials
o Substantiation for material choice document
o Report "meetings about materials"

1.4 Calculates production costs

□ Make a cost calculation for the 3 systems and count all working
hours.
□ Convert this into one document for a clear and orderly calculation.
□ Compare the price with existing machines.
Proof:
o Cost calculation
o Organisation chart
o Staffing

2. Prepares production work

2.1 Assembles and absorbs production data
□ Collecting data for preparation of the production process
□ Discuss the realization process of the product with the client.
□ Make agreements about the production cycle and create an items
list
Proof:
o Report "meetings about realization and costs"
o Items list
o Production agreements list
o Bill of material (BoM)
o Order list

2.2 Produces technical drawings

□ Create a package of drawings that relates to the client's predefined
requirements. Eventually this will lead to the final Bill of material.
Proof:
o Package of drawings (Part- and assembly drawings)
o Production drawings
o Bill of material (BoM)
o Operation manual

12
The assignment description

2.3 Organises men and means

□ A separate production planning is made with different milestones
of the production process.
□ Clear agreements are made about who, what and when there will
be produced.
□ A report is drawn up that describes which factors have been taken
into account for production.
Proof:
o Package of drawings (Part- and assembly drawings)
o Installation instructions
o Schedule of work execution
o Report "meeting important factors for production"
o Production planning
o Planning

3. Guards production work

3.1 Guards production process
□ During production, it is expected that assistance will be provided
and the production staff will be guided.
□ Close attention is paid to the production planning.
□ Work stagnation is solved in consultation and accurately
maintained.
Proof:
o Production planning
o Production reporting

3.2 Guards budget

□ Keep track of invoices sent by suppliers.
□ It is accurately recorded whether more/less work is being carried
out and what consequences this has on the cost price.
□ It is being discussed what actions need to be taken in order to
keep the budget correct.
Proof:
o Invoices
o Production reporting
o Project reporting
o Report "actions to keep the budget correct"

3.3 Executes quality controls

□ Instructing and supporting of the employees who ultimately
influence the quality of the system.
□ Lists are made that serve as a quality check.
□ A list is compiled with the requirements for when the product
satisfies the drawings/design.
Proof:
o FAT (Factory Acceptance Test)/SAT (Site Acceptance Test)
o Quality checklists
o Determined Regulations document

13
The assignment description

3.4 Delivers the product

□ Product is delivered and it is checked whether the customer is
satisfied.
□ A report is kept about the work that is carried out, with
specifications and all agreements made concerning the project.
Proof:
o Document "Acceptation through client"
o Production reporting

4. Maintains products and systems

4.1 Inspects and tests products and system
□ Inspection lists are made to check whether the customer's
requirements have been met.
□ An inspection report is made with all tests and checks.
□ With the employees and the client, a maintenance advice is set up
about the maintenance status.
Proof:
o Inspection report
o Production reporting
o Report "Maintenance advice"

4.2 Maintains machines and systems

□ Maintenance work and inspection by means of a maintenance
report.
Proof:
o Maintenance report
Time planning/ Inlezen project 120 uur
Hours planning Planning maken 20 uur
Motiveer de Ontwerpen 160 uur
tijdsplanning Werktekeningen + werkvoorbereiding 80 uur
(wanneer wat te doen Kosten bepalen 40 uur
en de benodigde Montage project 120 uur
hoeveelheid Testen project 120 uur +
660 uur
uren).Vermeld of de
opdracht past binnen
My internship period is 21 weeks. In 17 weeks I have to finish the assignment.
de tijd die ervoor
That is a total of 680 work hours. The assignment will be done within the
beschikbaar is.
agreed timeframe.

Attachments Attachments that will be included in my report are:

□ Sketches
Som de bijlagen op □ Package of drawings
die van toepassing □ Timesheets
zijn (bijvoorbeeld een □ BPV workbook
werktekening). □ Evaluation forms

14
2.1.2 Problem definition

Problem analysis
Mettler Toledo Safeline produces 3 similar metal detection systems. The HDS system, the Tablex
system and the Pipeline system. They are shown below.

HDS system Tablex system Pipeline system

All three systems are mobile and installed on site. They are adjustable in height, rotation and all
have the same fixing mechanism.

The current fixing mechanism consists of two cylinders pushed over each other. On the outside
cylinder a ring is partly welded which can be tightened and loosened with a screwing mechanism. A
handle is attached to the screwing mechanism to ease the action.

When the handle is turned and the screwing mechanism is tightened, the cylinder ring becomes
tighter and smaller and starts clamping around the smaller cylinder on the inside. This clamping
movement fixes the system and prevents any of the cylinders from moving.

Problems
Problems coming with this mechanism are weld breaks or scratches on the surface of the smaller
inner cylinder. These scratches are visible and possible dirt can get stuck in the grooves, which
makes the product more unhygienic. Also, if the weld breaks the entire system can't be fixed
anymore and the entire mechanism needs to be replaced. On some of the systems the metal
detector is welded onto one of the cylinders. In that case the entire metal detector needs to be
replaced. This costs the company a lot of money.

Another issue Mettler Toledo Safeline is coping with is the level of hygiene. The Tablex system will
be placed in clean rooms where pills are produced. The environment is clean but dusty, because the
powder that is in the pills can be flying around. If dust is able to get inside the mechanism and can't
be cleaned easily, it is possible that the dust gets into other medicine products and that can be
dangerous for the consumer.

This same problem can be occurred with the HDS and Pipeline system. If the meat gets stuck in the
mechanism and can't be cleaned properly, it will start to rot and if it ends up back in the meat
production it can cause serious illness for the consumer.

15
Goal
Mettler Toledo Safeline wants to keep the customer satisfaction level high and extend the lifespan of
the systems so that less repair and maintenance is needed.

It is my job to create a harmonised locking/adjustment design for all three products. Utilising the
same components where possible and at the same time implementing improvements to the design
from a dfx (Design for Excellence, X = Manufacturability, Testability, Cost- Effectiveness) perspective
with improved hygiene and functionality.

16
2.1.3 Plan of action

Project description

Background information of the project

The project and the internship are developed to test if my competences are good enough to suffice
to core task 1 till core task 4. The testing of my competences is done based on the assignment I
receive from the company, Mettler Toledo Safeline Limited, and how I fulfil this assignment.

Mettler Toledo Safeline is the global market leader for high- performance metal detection systems.
They build metal detectors for food, beverage and pharmaceutical manufacturers worldwide.
With safety legislation becoming ever more rigorous, it is essential for brand owners to have
efficient and reliable product inspection systems in place to monitor their manufacturing lines for
contamination.

Mettler Toledo Safeline not only builds the metal detectors itself but also the system that separates
the contaminated part from the main product.
In a total of 4 months, I have to develop a product that improves something within the building
process of a complete metal detector.

In week 20 till 23, I will present my developed product to the company and hand over my project to
them.

Problem situation
As soon as the a metal detector is finished, it goes to the customer and is being installed there. The
metal detectors are adjustable in height and rotation to make sure it can be moved in the right
position. Once everything is in position the metal detectors standard is fixed and the system is ready
to go.

Currently the fixing of the standard is done by tightening a

handle which causes a cylinder to tighten and clamp around
the base cylinder. It is very easy to overtighten the handle
which leads to a broken weld inside the clamping cylinder,
(See photo).

Also, the current design leaves scratches on the surface on the

base cylinder when adjusting the height and rotation.

Finally, the current design is not entirely hygienic because

little particles of meat or dust can enter the frame and get
stuck (See drawing).

17
Assignment
The current product is good but not good enough. Costs could be saved if reparation or replacement
can be reduced.
The company and I decided that I am going to develop 3 products that are possible improvements
for the current design. If possible, scratch and dirt free and with a nearly impossible to break design.

The design will be used in all 3 different systems of metal detectors and also the manufacturing ways
are made as easy as possible.

Conditions
Material:
- Drawing material
- Computers
- Microsoft Office/ Excel
- 3D designing program (SolidWorks/Inventor)
- Measuring materials
- Safety equipment
- Internet
- A desk to work on

Services:
- Period of 17 weeks
- ± 680 man hours
- The necessary help from the client

Knowledge:
- Information about the company
- Information about the products they make
- Technical knowledge
- Information about the production methods

18
Specify the products that the project must deliver

Assignment Proof of Competence:

In this document I will explain what my project is about and how I am going to prove I possess all the
core tasks and working processes needed for this project.

Plan of action:
The plan of action is to make clear to myself and the company what it is that I will be doing in the
following 5 months of my internship. It points out what I need to make this project possible and how
much time I think it’s going to take. Also what the dangers can be and what is expected from me.

Planning:
The planning I will create is to make sure I will not fall behind on schedule. It contains a network
planning and a consistent planning. The network planning is important because it shows me what I
have to get done first in order to continue with the rest. The consistent planning is important to show
me what I have to do and accomplish every week.

Problem definition:
The problem definition is really important because it describes the exact situation of the problem. To
complete the problem definition I will also do a market and product research to make sure everything
fits the current situation.

Set of requirements:
In the set of requirements I will note all the specifications that the product should meet. I have to note
at least 30 specifications for my product to meet. All the specifications will be discussed with the client
before adding them to the set of requirements.

Sketches:
At least 50 sketches are being made of the product and parts of the product to figure out what I am
going to design and how everything will work. This gives a clear image about the product and possible
problems you will come across in the future.

Concept choice:
To combine all the different sketches and Ideas to one concept I am going to make a morphological
analysis.
A morphological analysis is a table in which you are trying to find as many other solutions for every
piece of the final concept as possible. Eventually you pick the best solutions for every piece and
combine those into 2 or 3 different final concepts. After designing the 3 final concepts you are going to
choose the best according to the Miller profile.

The Miller profile is a table in which you compare the final concepts with the set of requirements you
have made earlier. The concept that scores the most points will be chosen to be the concept that I’m
going to develop.

A Technical Design Structure will be made of the concept to support the way I am going to design the
product.

CAD drawings:
I will design the concept in a 3D designing program called, Inventor. Every part of the product will
have its own 3D drawing. Eventually from every part and assembly a precise drawing is made.
A Bill of Materials and installation instructions are prepared based on the 3D design.

19
Prototype:
When all the 3D drawings are finished a simple prototype of the final product is made to see if it works
as it should be. It is also very helpful to show the prototype to the company and hear about their
reaction. This prevents the product from having any possible deviations on the opinion of the
company.

Calculations:
To make sure every aspect of making the product is possible and affordable, a cost calculation,
organisation chart, staffing, production agreements and marketing plan are made.

Production:
Once the product is really going to be produced, an operation manual is made together with
installation instructions, a production planning and production agreements. This all is to make sure the
production of the product will go according to plan and can be improved/ repeated.

Quality check:
Once the product(s) is/are produced. It will undergo a certain amount of quality checks to see if it
meets the requirements and if it's safe to use. Also, the company will give their opinion and maybe
make some changes for the future.

Inspection and maintenance:

Once the product is correct, an inspection and maintenance report will be made to keep the product in
perfect condition and to spot possible mistakes quickly.

Eventual product idea: (presentation, demonstration)

When all the previous points are finished, I will have a presentation for the company in which I
demonstrate my product and explain what I have done in the last 4 months.

Report:
All of the previous points will be noted in one big report, together the rest of my gathered project
information.

Demarcation
The project duration has a minimum of 200 hours, but the estimated time the student will be working
on the project is approximately 660 hours. The rest of the time the student will help with other work in
the company.

Risks
Any possible risks to prevent the project from succeeding are:
- Poor planning
- Lack of time
- Late material delivery
- Lack of communication between the student and the different stakeholders
- Technical knowledge of the student
- The amount of help from the different stakeholders

20
Quality
The level of the report will be on college-based level. It will be easy to read but technical knowledge is
required.
Because Mettler Toledo Safeline is my only target audience, the product will be specially designed
based on their requirements. The intention is to develop this product based on the set of
requirements, within 4 months and with the production costs as low as possible. The product is an
improvement of a current system the company has now.
Every few weeks a meeting takes place to check the developing process of the product and to see if
the level of the product developing is high enough.
Eventually a presentation is given to show the developed product to the company and to hand over all
the information gathered by the student.
The quality of the product will depend on the budget, the set of requirements, the production time and
the available materials.

Project phasing and load balancing

Phasing in general
To make sure your product is developed the right way, I have to go through specific phases that will
help me to develop a proper product.
All the phases I will be going through to develop the project are listed and described below:

Analysis phase:
In the analysis phase I am going to investigate the current problem that the company experiences
and I will search for any possible solutions to fix this problem or to make it less disturbing. I will do
some research about the company products and if any similar products on the market already exist
to solve their problem. By communicating with the head of production, I will set up a list of
requirements for the problem I’m going to solve.

Idea phase:
In the idea phase I will try to find as many possible solutions for the product as I possibly can. Every
single thing I think of will be written down or sketched. I will be doing a lot of brainstorming and
eventually make a morphological analysis from my ideas. The purpose of the morphological analysis
is to help me expand my creativity and to find more solutions with the same purpose.

Concept phase:
In the concept phase I am going to try to combine all of the sketches and ideas I had in the previous
phase. I will sketch complete products for the problem and I will select the best concepts based on
the Miller profile. These concept ideas will be improved as much as possible and eventually one of
them is going to be the final concept idea.

Definition phase:
In the definition phase I am going to make a concept model of the product to see if my idea is
actually going to work and it is to prevent certain issues coming up in the build of the product itself.
The built of the concept model is also very important for my communication with the company. If
they can see with their own eyes what my product is going to look like and how it is going to
function, it is easier for them to correct me on certain points and to tell me if it is what they were
expecting.
Another thing I will be doing during the definition phase is organising and planning the build of the
actual product. I will be making an organisation chart, a temporary cost calculation, a staffing and a
marketing plan to make sure the company and I know exactly what we have to expect if we want to
realise this product.

21
Engineering phase:
In the engineering phase I am going to design the product on the computer with a 3D CAD sketching
program called ‘Inventor’. After I have sketched the product in the program, the company can see
exactly what their product is going to look like and how it will be functioning. Every part of the
product can be made separately and the company can build the exact product based on the
Assembly and Production drawings I provide them with.
I will also make installation instructions for the product and a Bill of Material (BoM) so the company
knows exactly how to handle the product and to prevent it or any people from damaging it.

Realisation phase:
In the realisation phase I am going to guide the production process of the 3 products. A production
planning is made. After the production the product will undergo a FAT test and quality checks and a
review will take place on how everything went and what to improve next time. If the product is
approved by the company I will make inspection reports and maintenance reports to keep the
product in top condition for further use.

Final phase:
In the final phase I combine all my gathered information into one big assignment. Based on the
complete assignment I will make a presentation which supports my product and shows the
developing process of it. I will present my product, report and presentation to the company and
hand them over all of the research I have done in the last 4 months so they can use it to develop
other products or for extra information.

22
Milestones
The milestones are the moments the deadlines for a target. In the table below I have listed the
deadlines for this assignment:

Date: ASSIGNMENT
05-02-2018 First day of the internship

28-02-2018 Information meeting about the BPV at college (I cannot participate)

23-02-2018 Assignment formulation (concept)

14-03-2018 Assignment formulation + notification form

04/05 -2018 Progress meeting with the practical trainer

(see appendix 7.2 and 7.4)

5 days before the final meeting/ Hand in project map with complete assignment + core tasks
presentation
Week 20 till 23, 2018 Final interview, presentation and demonstration of the product

(06-06-2018) Hand in assessment by the company

(see appendix 7.3, 7.4, 7.6, 7.7 and 7.8)
29-06-2018 Final day of the internship

05-07-2018 Graduation

The project organization

Project executor: Kelly van den Heuvel
Reviewer: Dennis Broersma
Mentor: Hans Loeff
Supervisor: Steve Howard
Client: Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.

Meeting times:
 Dennis Broersma, contact via Email and Skype
Review my work and advice about potential improvements
 David Barber, every month
Progress meeting
 Steve Howard, every week
Progress meeting, possible questions, comments and improvements

Every week there will be a short evaluation meeting with Systems Tech Mgr, Steve Howard, about
how the past week has been going, what I will be doing in the next week and if I have any things to
be discussed.
Every 4 weeks there will be a meeting with Head of Products, David Barber to talk about the
progress I have been making so far and what the next steps are.

The meetings are planned with the Outlook agenda system. After every meeting short reports are
made by the student.

23
 2.1.4

Naar Ehv Naar Ehv Naar Ehv Valencia

Date 05/02/2018 12/02/2018 19/02/2018 26/02/2018 05/03/2018 12/03/2018 19/03/2018 26/03/2018 02/04/2018 09/04/2018 16/04/2018 23/04/2018 30/04/2018 07/05/2018 14/05/2018 21/05/2018 28/05/2018 04/06/2018 11/06/2018 18/06/2018 25/06/2018
Phase Week 1 (6) 2 (7) 3 (8) 4 (9) 5 (10) 6 (11) 7 (12) 8 (13) 9 (14) 10 (15) 11 (16) 12 (17) 13 (18) 14 (19) 15 (20) 16 (21) 17 (22) 18 (23) 19 (24) 20 (25) 21 (26)
1. Develops products or systems What
1.1 Assembles and absorbs design data Assignment Proof of Competence document
Set of Requirements
Network planning
Consistent planning
PNI- analysis
Plan of Action
Problem definition document
Market and product research document
1.2 Develops designs Concept sketches
Consistent planning

Package of drawings
Morphological analysis
Miller profile
Technical design structure
1.3 Chooses materials and parts Assembly drawings
Part drawings
Parts list
List of materials
Substantiation for material choice document (Not needed if in TDS)
1.4 Calculates production costs Cost calculation
Organisation chart
Staffing
2. Prepares production work
2.1 Assembles and absorbs production data Items list
Production agreements list
Bill of material (BoM)
Order list
Production drawings
Operation manual
2.3 Organises men and means Installation instructions
Schedule of work execution
Report "meeting important factors for production"
Production planning
3. Guards production work
3.1 Guards production process Production of the 3 prototypes
Project reporting
Report "actions to keep the budget correct"
3.3 Executes quality controls FAT (Factory Acceptance Test)/SAT (Site Acceptance Test)
Quality checklists
Determined Regulations document
3.4 Delivers the product Document "Acceptation through client"
3 Working models of the product
4. Maintains products and systems
4.1 Inspects and tests products and systems Inspection report
4.2 Maintains machines and systems Maintenance report

Project map
Presentation
Final product evaluation
Allround evaluation
Work for the company

24
2.1.5 Network planning
Network planning
Number Task Time (weeks) Needed task
A Assignment Proof of Competence document 1 (B)
B Set of Requirements 2 A
C Network planning 1 D
D Consistent planning 1 A
E PNI- analysis 2
F Plan of Action 2 A,B,D
G Problem definition document 1 A
H Market and product research document 1
I Concept sketches 2 B,F,G,H
J Package of drawings 2 J
K Morphological analysis 1 I,J
L Miller profile 1 K
M Technical design structure 1 L
N Assembly drawings 1 J
O Part drawings 1 I
P Parts list 1 I,J
Q List of materials 1 J,N,P
R Substantiation for material choice document 2 Q
S Cost calculation 1 B,Q,T,U
T Organisation chart 1
U Staffing 1 T

V Items list 1 P,Q

W Production agreements list 1 J,S
X Bill of material (BoM) 1 P,Q,V
Y Order list 1 X
Z Production drawings 3 B,N,O
AA Operation manual 4 X,Z
BB Installation instructions 4 AA
CC Schedule of work execution 3 AA,BB
DD Report "meeting important factors for production" 1 X,Z,AA,BB
EE Production planning 2 AA,BB,DD

FF Production of the 3 prototypes 3 AA,BB,DD,EE

GG Project reporting 3 FF
HH Report "actions to keep the budget correct" 3 S,GG
II FAT (Factory Acceptance Test)/SAT (Site Acceptance Test) 3 GG
JJ Quality checklists 2 B,FF,II
KK Determined Regulations document 2 FF,GG,JJ
LL Document "Acceptation through client" 1 B,S,FF,GG,JJ
MM 3 Working models of the product 1 FF,JJ,LL

NN Inspection report 1 JJ,MM

OO Maintenance report 1 B,NN

PP Project map 2 A till OO

QQ Presentation 2 A till PP
RR Final product evaluation 2 A till QQ
SS Allround evaluation 1 RR
TT Work for the company 3

25
2.1.6 Market and product research

Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd isn't the only producer in metal detection systems for the food and
packing industry. Many other companies in the uk and abroad produce and sell these kind of
systems.
The main competitors of Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. are:

CEIA LOMA/ LOCK/ ITW

SESOTEC (S+S) FORTRESS

CEIA
CEIA specialises in the design, engineering and production of metal
detectors and electromagnetic inspection devices. They are one of
the world’s leading suppliers of advanced metal detection systems,
like Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. They are located in Warsaw –
Poland, Brno - Czech Republic and Cologne – Germany.

CEIA's THS metal detectors enable the interception of both

magnetic and nonmagnetic metals, including high-
resistivity stainless steel. An automatic tracking function cancels out
any variation in product effect caused by the product under
inspection.

The THS Metal Detector’s wide bandwidth also allows maximum sensitivity operation at both high
and low transit speeds. This range of metal detectors is being used by many the world’s leading
companies in the food, chemical, textile and pharmaceutical sectors.

CEIA’s approach to the development of its detectors has been to employ the most advanced
electronic and mechanical technologies: Surface Mount Technology (SMT), digital signal analysis,
software upgrades capability and the use of high-quality materials.

Their systems are fully HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) and GMP (Good
Manufacturing Practice) compliant. CEIA Metal Detectors are ISO 9001 certified and constructed of
EC (European Commission) and FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved materials.

Since 2011, the Metal Detection Services (MDS) company became the distributor of
CEIA metal detection systems.

26
 A few of CEIA's products important for my research are the CEIA integrated systems. They are
especially designed for metal contaminant detection in products transported by pipeline especially
meat, soup, preserves, etc.:

Both systems have a few of the same characteristics:

 Standard pipe sizes available to suit all applications
 High immunity to environmental interference
 Easy to clean and inspect
 Minimum installation space required
 State-of-the Art Quality Control of liquid, viscous products and meat
 Detection and ejection of magnetic, non-magnetic and stainless steel metal contaminants
 Structure and components in AISI 316L stainless Steel and food-compatible plastics (EU, FDA
compliant)
 Rugged, IP65/66/69 construction
 Easy to disassemble and clean
 ISO 9001 certified manufacturer
 All parts in contact with the product are in FDA approved materials for food contact

THS/PL21 series THS/PLVM21 series

Specific Characteristics THS/PL21 Specific Characteristics THS/PLVM21

- Very high throughput rate - Detection and ejection of magnetic, non-

- Detection of magnetic, non-magnetic and magnetic and stainless steel metal contaminants
stainless steel metal contaminants - AISI 316L stainless steel construction to IP69K
- AISI 316L stainless steel construction to IP66 protection level
and IP69K protection levels
27
Some specific special features both systems have, are:

Protection degree IP66 – IP69K

Electrical insulation Galvanic isolation of the mains voltage
Compliant with international standards for safety and radio interference
Acoustic emission Acoustic pressure according to Directive 2006/42/EC:
<70 dB (A); <130 dB (C)

Pollution degree (IEC61010-1) Class 2

Installation category (IEC61010-1) Category II
Pneumatic system Stainless steel waterproof container (protection degree: IP66 – IP69K)
Environmental Temperature Operating: → -10 to +55 °C
conditions: Storage: → -25 to +55°C; 70°C for short
periods, 24h max; -40 to +70°C

Relative humidity Operating / Storage: → 5 – 90 %, non-

condensing
Product conditions: Maximum temperature Product in transit: 70°C (THS/PLV)
60°C (THS/PLVM)

Inside the rejected material bin: → 70°C

Maximum allowed Transit pipe: → 1 MPa with product up to 60°C

pressure 0.6 MPa with product up to 90°C

28
LOMA
Like Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd and CEIA, LOMA Systems is also one of the world's leading brands in
the food, pharmaceutical and packaging industries, offering metal detectors, checkweighers and x-
ray inspection systems. They are established in 1969.

Their products are uniquely engineered to facilitate compliance with international product safety
standards, weight legislation and retailers' codes of practice, whilst identifying product defects and
eliminating contaminants for consistent quality. Loma Systems can serve all product inspection
needs under one roof and they have over 40 years of experience in metal detection, checkweighing,
x-ray and data management systems.

Their strength is their reputation based on consistent quality and advanced technology, the result of
a continuous and far-reaching research and development program. Short lead times, modular design
and excellent availability of spare parts, coupled with good customer service.
LOMA's headquarters is based in the UK with direct sales and service operations in France, Germany,
The Netherlands, Czech Republic, Poland, China, Canada and the US. LOMA works closely with our
distributors and OEM’s in over 100 countries worldwide to ensure that all their customers are fully
supported.
The most important products concerning my research are:

Lock Pharmaceutical Metal Detection System

The gas strut stand frame design offers exceptional manoeuvrability making the Lock Pharmaceutical
convenient for use with all leading tablet presses and encapsulation machines.
The Lock Pharmaceutical has Full IQ, OQ, PQ validation documents and certification and is
designed/constructed to be compliant with 21 CFR, Parts 210 and 211 and certified to NEMA 4X /
IP66.

29
A few other features of the frame are:

 Finish: Brushed 304 Stainless Steel with 316 mirror polished

Stainless Steel Reject
 Temperature Range: -10°C to 40°C (14°F to 104°F)
 Humidity: 0 to 95% Relative Humidity (Non-condensing)
 Environment: IP66
 Manufactured with Loma's "Designed to Survive" philosophy
 Lead-free construction
 GMP Compliant System
 Throughput of up to 30,000 units per minute

IQ3+ Pipeline (Meat) Metal Detection System

The IQ3+ Pipeline is a robust system designed for easy strip down cleaning at the end of each
product run to comply with hygiene standards (EN1672-2).
With a full colour touchscreen, multi-level password access and IP69K environmental protection this
system is suitable for both high-care and low-care environments.

Other features of the frame:

 Finish: 304 Brushed Stainless Steel

 Mounting options: Stand or Hinge (Handtmann)
 Temperature range: -10°C to 35°C (14°F to 95°F)
 Humidity: 0 to 95% Relative Humidity (Non-condensing)
 Environment: IP69K
 304 Stainless Steel
 Manufactured with Loma's "Designed to Survive" philosophy
 Lead-free construction
 Available with either Piston or Rotary reject device

30
SESOTEC
Sesotec is an independent organization, first established in Germany in 1976; Their principle facility
for design, development and manufacture, and their commercial headquarters are still there. This
offers consistency which continues through to their subsidiaries and encompasses all their after-
sales activities.

Sesotec is also one of the world's leading manufacturers and developers of inspection, separation
and sorting systems. Their systems are used in process, packaging, and production lines throughout
industry and in the specialized preparation of materials for recycling.

Sesotec's customers operate in a wide variety of industries. From food, pharmaceuticals and plastics
to wood, glass and recycling. For them, the complexities of manufacturing high-quality goods at low
cost are ever present. In many cases, particularly strict hygiene standards must be met.
Sesotec is uniquely positioned as a complete vision inspection solutions provider due to competence
in x-ray, metal detection and optical sorting technology. They are a company which has expertise in
all fields of inspection.

This extensive experience drives their designs toward the following objectives for customers:
 Precise removal of contaminants and impurities without yield loss.
 High-capacity throughput without performance degradation.
 Reliability with extremely low-cost maintenance.
 User-friendly software without sacrificing optimal execution resulting in unique user
experience.

Two products, Sesotec builds, that are important for my research, are:

LIQUISCAN VF+

The LIQUISCAN VF+ is a metal separator for filling applications. When metal is detected, the
separator valve automatically redirects the contaminated product into a special container.
LIQUISCAN VF+ metal separators are supplied mounted on a mobile, height-adjustable stand. The
low center of gravity and balanced design ensures good stability, especially when the system is
moved.

 Detection and separation of metallic contaminations

from pumped products – liquid or pasty
 Closed, sturdy stainless steel design
 Easy and hygienic cleaning due to functional design
and high protection rating
 Easy mounting to vacuum fillers and pumps
 Shortest possible mounting length
 Outstanding ease of operation with product auto-
teach function and state-of-the-art microelectronics

Unlike the other metal detectors, which all have a circular

shaped standard, this one has a rectangular shape.

31
LIQUISCAN PL

The LIQUISCAN PL is a metal separator for pumped products. When metal is detected, the separator
valve automatically redirects the contaminated product into a special container. LIQUISCAN PL metal
separators are supplied on a stainless steel frame suitable for wall or table mounting.

 Detects and separates all magnetic and non-magnetic

metals
 Detection and separation of metallic contaminations
from pumped products – liquid or pasty
 Easy mounting with quick connections to vacuum fillers
and pumps with nominal widths up to 100 mm
 Impressively small installation envelope
 Designed for easy cleaning in high-strength stainless steel
 Meets all IFS and HACCP requirements
 Outstanding ease of operation with product auto learn
function and latest microprocessor technology

32
FORTRESS
Fortress Technology was founded in 1996. They believed that through superior product design and
engineering, the production of higher quality equipment with better sensitivities could be achieved.
The market responded really well to their Fortress Phantom line of metal detectors.

Their latest technology can quickly and economically be field installed in a detector built over 19
years ago. Fortress metal detectors will always be supported with parts, software upgrades and a
global service team for the life of the detector. So their customer can stay up to date with food
safety initiatives without having to purchase a new detector.

Fortress Technology is the only Metal Detector Manufacturer that custom manufactures their
equipment and software, to suit the customers’ needs, applications and specifications to ensure
optimal metal detection with a high ROI. Fortress is famous in the industry for superior performance
and sustainability. Their equipment is used widely in various industries all over the world. They have
manufacturing offices in Canada, the UK, and Brazil serving their worldwide distributors.

Both of the following products fortress produces are used for the following applications:

 Tablets
 Capsules
 Nutraceuticals
 Pharmaceuticals
 Bubble Gum Tablets
 Extruded Candy

Stealth Pharmaceutical Metal Detector

High speed contaminant detection in tablets and candy.
Stealth Pharmaceutical metal detectors are custom manufactured to suit Pharmaceutical and/or
Nutraceutical applications. They use digital signal processing technology and have high sensitivity
levels to ensure the detection of the smallest ferrous, non-ferrous and stainless steel contaminants.
The built-in data collection software with USB connectivity establishes the Stealth as an effective
critical control point complying with stringent HACCP regulations.

Key features:
 Contact Reporter Lite Software Included
 Digital Signal Processing Technology
 Ultra Sensitive Detection
 AutoTest: Self Diagnostic Testing
 Automatic Calibration
 Automatic Configuration for Iron-Enriched
 System Set-Up in Seconds
 Flash Memory Stability
 Multi-Level Password Protection
 Detailed Data Collection
 FDA Compliant
 Compatible with High Speed lines
 Adjustable Height and Tilt Like the LIQUISCAN VF+ this standard design

 Validation Package Included has a rectangular shape.

 IP69K sealed
33
Phantom Pharmaceutical Metal Detector
Designed to Meet Stringent FDA Standards.
The Phantom Pharmaceutical metal detector provides the ideal solution for
detection and rejection of the smallest contaminants in tablets and capsules. With
its current GMP design and construction suited for FDA compliance, the system
meets the stringent QA requirements of the pharmaceutical industry. A free IQ/OQ
Validation package is included.

It's built with a rugged mirrored stainless steel exterior, contact parts are all
removable for cleaning without the need for tools. This compact detector can be
easily angled and height-adjusted to suit any press configuration. Plus, it’s the
only detector that features an electrical powered lift.

Key features:
 Core DSP: Digital Signal Processing (DSP) technology provides unparallelled precision, speed,
and detection results
 UltraSense: Maintains high sensitivity levels to detect the smallest metal contaminants
 Auto Test ensures consistent performance and saves costs
 Automatic Calibration at the touch of a button
 Intuitive User Interface Provides dedicated shortcut keys
 Flash RAM Memory technology prevents information loss
 Robust Modular Design for fewer product parts results in greater reliability
 IP69K sealed

34
Additional
Besides these main competitors of Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. I found some similar products on the
internet that also have the same kind of standard system for metal detection.

PEC2005G3 Pharmaceutical Metal Separator

Product features
 Processing speed can reach about 15000 pellets per minute
 It can handle a variety of categories of drugs, in order to save space, it
take a more compact frame design
 The food grade PVC material is used in the automatic sorting device
 The detection sensitivity is higher than the industry standard, the highest
can be detected is greater than the diameter of 0.3mm ball
 The sensitivity can be adjusted according to the characteristics of the
product, and the number of detection and elimination can be recorded in
real time; Manual clear record
 All stainless steel structure, waterproof (IP66), anti-vibration, strong
adaptability to the environment and temperature changes, easy to clean
 Modular component replacement, it’s easy to maintain
 Multi language function selection (Chinese, English, Korean, Japanese, etc.,
other languages can be customized according to demand)
 Comply with HACCP, GMP, GAMP, FDA, IFS, ISO9001 and other related
certification standards

Specification parameters

appellation parameter

Adjustable angle 30˚ ~ 40˚

Input port size 150mm * 100mm

Pipe diameter Ф50mm

input Height
800(MAX+150)mm
adjustable

Exit height adjustable 350(MAX+150)mm

FeΦ：0.3mm
sensitivity
SUSΦ：0.5mm

Unlike the other metal detection systems, this product

has the height adjustment handle on top.

35
WYNKA DE- DUSTER DS 6000

De-duster Model DS 6000 has the function to clean the remaining dust from tablets coming out of
the tablet machine. This is accomplished by using a variable speed rotary tube (perforated) which
has an internal helical channeling that leads to the device output, where the tablets will be ready for
blister machine.

It isn't a metal detector like all the other exambles but the the standard principle works the same as
the one on the HDS and Tablex system.
Its manufacture is made of stainless steel AISI 316, with a swivel base that allows the system to alter
its slope. The main structure is height adjustable (+/- 50 mm) to facilitate the interconnection of the
equipment with the tablet machine; also, to serve this purpose, it has a small inlet hopper.
The excess product is removed during the rotary path, thus avoiding burrs. Easy mounting and
dismantling, it does not need additional tools.

Features:
 Height adjustment, full 360⁰ freedom of rotation at
tablet inlet
 Suction connection
 Compact design
 Part in contact with product made in AISI316
 Easy cleaning
 General measures 1100x820x340
 Production: 6000 tablets/ minute
 Quiet operation < 68 dB
 The surplus product is removed in its rotary path,
avoiding burrs
 Easy assembly and disassembly, no tools required

36
CASSEL Metal Detector in meat (for meat pumps)

Compact metal detector for sausage pumps and stuffer machines.

Mobile base frame, stand with integrated gas spring for easy height
adjustment 850 – 1200 mm (33.5 – 47.2″), for installation between
stuffer and clip machine. Includes connection cable with external device
plug and socket.

- IP68 sealed

37
The clamp principle

Current clamping system

By tightening the screw that is attached to the handle, the red metal part will start clamping around
the inner cylinder. If the red metal part is tightened enough, it will fix the inner and outer cylinder
completely.

During my research I came accross a few different clamping methods.

Pipe clamp
These standard pipe clamps are very firm and can be mounted in the current construction of the
metal detector's standard. Prices range from £7 till approximately £50 depending on the quality and
size.

38
Chain clamping system
Another good clamping system is the chain clamp.This product is used to fix cylinders before
operating on the tube or cylinder.Their price range is between £25 till £400 depending on strenghts
and sizes.

Some features are:

 Chain holds and locks around any shape or size.
 Ideal for awkward shape pieces.
 Turn screw to adjust pressure and fit work. Stays adjusted for
repetitive use.
 Constructed of high-grade heat-treated alloy steel for
maximum toughness and durability.
 Classic trigger release designed to provide maximum locking
force.

Diaphragm
The reason I put the diaphragm idea in is because it looks like a perfect clamping method for pipes.
You can easily open and close the diaphragm without using too much space and possibly create a
good new clamping method. The diaphragm is nearly a perfect full circle which creates multiple
clamping points. Keeping the inner cylinder in position and giving it a secure fix, so I suspect.

I wasn't able to find similar clamping contstructions with diaphragms so this idea I have to develop
myself and therefore there is no set price for this kind of clamping method.

39
2.1.7 Set of requirements
Product
1.1 The product must fit in the current Tablex and HDS system.
1.2 The product must be as light as possible.
1.3 The edges of the product must have a radius of at least 1mm.
1.4 The product must be able to operate in a climate with a temperature between – 10 ⁰C and
+45 ⁰C.
1.5 Humidity range: Maximum relative humidity 93% for temperatures up to 45 ⁰C.
1.6 The product must be used on different types of metal detectors.
1.7 The product must have lifetime duration with a minimum of 2 years.
1.8 The product must have a professional appearance.
1.9 Surface needs to be scratch resistant.
1.10 All the materials in the product must have a food grade EC 1935/2004 label.
1.11 The Tablex system has a vertical range of 900mm to 1200mm.
1.12 The Tablex system has a full 360⁰ rotation.
1.13 The HDS system has a vertical range of 900mm to 1200mm.
1.14 HDS system product must have IP69 label.

Production
2.1 All the edges of the product must be deburred.
2.2 The material chosen for the product must be as light and firm as possible.
2.3 The accuracy of the measurement must be in millimetres.
2.4 Produce up to 3 prototypes as proof of concept (Recommended test procedure).
2.5 Use a common design for all 3 systems.
2.6 Use standard measurements and sizes for the tubes.
2.7 The project must be developed within a time range of 4 months.

Storage
3.1 The product must handle a storage temperature of -10 to +50 °C.
3.2 The product must handle a clean room and extremely dirty (sausage factory) environment.

Costs
4.1 The product must be developed with the least possible costs (Not a main driver for the
project).
4.2 The chosen material must be good but with the least possible costs.
4.3 The total costs for the project must be around £1000.

Transport and distribution

5.1 The product must be transported by hand.
5.2 The product must be lifted above heads by an adult without too much power.
5.3 The product must be completely intact and working after transport.

Assembly
6.1 The product must be suitable for customers of Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.
6.2 The product must be operated by one person.
6.3 The product must be used multiple times.
6.4 The handle of the product may not break if operated with force.
6.5 The assembly methods may be visible.
6.6 An employee must be able to assemble and disassemble the product without any effort or
extra forces.
6.7 The HDS system handle must be operated while wearing big gloves.

40
Safety
7.1 Moving parts must be protected.
7.2 Prevent clamping danger.
7.3 The product must not be flammable.

Sale
8.1 The product must be delivered with the manual.
8.2 The product may be sold in several parts.
8.3 The product needs a risk assessment.

Maintenance
9.1 Cleaning with antibacterial wipes is possible.
9.2 Cleaning with a high pressure hose is possible.
9.3 Product must be able to resist being cleaned with harsh cleaning chemicals like sodium
hydroxide (LYE), caustic soda.
9.4 If possible, the product must be able to be fixed on site.

Recycling
10.1 The product has to be recyclable according to ISO 1401 environmental policy.
10.2 Minimum waste during manufacturing.
10.3 Optimize the way as much as possible on how a part is made.

Normal usage:
The product is used for clamping. The manual will be followed and no extreme forces are used while
using the product.

41
 2.1.8 Ingress Protection rating system

IP stands for Ingress Protection rating system. It is an internationally recognized scale that relates to
proven protection against environmental factors like liquids and solids.

You can recognize the Ingress protection ratings by the letters IP, followed by two numbers. These
numbers define the amount of protection a digital scale has against specified elements and its ability
to resist foreign matter that could otherwise get inside the product and cause it to fail.

IP68
The first number refers to the amount of protection a scale or indicator enclosure has against solid
matter (such as dust particles)

The second number defines the level of protection against liquids. The higher the digit, the greater
the protection.

Sometimes there is a third character "K" (according to DIN standard 40050-9). "K" identifies that this
enclosure protects against high pressure (up to 1450 PSI), high- temperature wash-down (80 ⁰C)
from less than 4 inches (10,16 cm) away, at various different angles, for a minimum of 30 seconds at
each angle. This rating is designed to provide the maximum environmental protection to electronics
housed inside a protective enclosure.

First number - Protection against solids Second number - Protection against liquids
0 No protection. 0 No protection.
1 Protected against solid objects greater than 50 1 Protected against vertically dripping water.
mm.
2 Protected against solid objects greater than 12 2 Protected against dripping water when tilted up to
mm diameter. 15°.
3 Protected against solid objects greater than 3 Protected against spraying water at an angle of up
2.5mm diameter. to 60° from vertical.
4 Protected against solid objects greater than 4 Protected against splashing water when the
1.0mm diameter. enclosure is tilted at any angle up to 15°.
5 Dust protected. 5 Protected against water jets from any direction
6 Dust tight. No Ingress of dust. 6 Protected against heavy seas or powerful jets of
water.
7 Protected against the effects of short term
immersion (under defined conditions of pressure
and time).
8 Protected against submersion (under conditions
specified by the manufacturer).
9k Protected against close-range high pressure, high
temperature spray downs.

42
IP69K
IP69K rating provides protection against ingress of dust and a combination of chemicals and high
temperature, high pressure water. This means the product can resist environments where
equipment must be carefully sanitized, like food processing companies. Where they use high
temperature wash- down procedures to clean.

IP69K rating is the highest protection available.

How does a product achieve the IP69K?

Products bearing the IP69K rating undergo a challenging set of tests to ensure they offer protection
against penetration of high pressure, high temperature water and dust.

General test specifications are the following:

 Water temperature 80 °C +/- 5 °C
 Sprayed with 14 – 16 liters per minute
 Pressure 8,000 / 10,000 kPa (~1160 - 1450PSI)
 Distance of nozzle to test unit 100 – 150 mm
 Test duration 30 seconds at 90°, 60°, 30° and 0°
 Test angle rotates at 5 RPM
 Water aimed at the housing with increased pressure from each direction must not have any
damaging effect.

43
2.1.8 PNI- analysis for the work environment

Positives:
- I work in a big office
- I have my own desk and computer with 2 screens
- I work with multiple people in the same office
- I am allowed to do everything, as long as I ask
- The feeling that I can ask anything to anyone
- Good and flexible work hours (7:00 till 15:30)
- Warm and fitting work clothes
- People I work with on the work floor
- Practical trainer
- Tidiness of the buildings
- Safety rules (5S)
- Milk machines
- Multiple canteens
- Wi-Fi for my own laptop

Negatives:
- Lower temperature on the work floor
- Having to start so early in the morning
- No windows for fresh air
- The neighbourhood isn't nice to walk through in the morning

Interesting Points:
- Holidays
- Clothing provided

44
2.1.9 Morphological analysis

45
46
47
 2.1.10 Miller profile

Weighing factor Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3 Concept 4 Maximum score

Product
1.1 2 6 8 2 4 8
1.2 1 3 4 2 1 4
1.3 3 3 3 3 3 12
1.4 3 9 12 3 6 12
1.5 3 3 3 3 3 12
1.6 2 4 8 6 2 8
1.7 3 9 12 3 6 12
1.8 2 2 4 6 8 8
1.9 2 4 8 2 6 8
1.10 3 3 3 3 3 12 Concept 1
1.11 1 1 1 1 1 4
1.12 1 1 1 1 1 4
1.13 1 1 1 1 1 4
1.14 1 1 1 1 1 4
Production
2.1 1 1 1 1 1 4
2.2 2 6 4 2 8 8
2.3 3 3 3 3 3 12
2.4 1 1 1 1 1 4
2.5 2 2 2 2 2 8
2.6 3 3 12 9 6 12
2.7 1 1 1 1 1 4
Storage
3.1 3 9 12 3 6 12 Concept 2
3.2 3 3 9 6 12 12
Costs
4.1 1 3 4 1 2 4
4.2 2 6 8 2 4 8
4.3 1 4 3 1 2 4
Transport and distribution
5.1 2 6 8 2 4 8
5.2 2 6 8 4 2 8
5.3 3 12 9 3 6 12
Assembly
6.1 3 3 3 3 3 12
6.2 3 3 3 3 3 12
6.3 3 3 6 12 9 12
6.4 3 3 6 9 12 12
6.5 1 1 2 3 4 4
6.6 2 4 6 2 8 8
6.7 2 2 4 6 8 8
Safety Concept 3
7.1 2 2 4 6 8 8
7.2 3 3 6 9 12 12
7.3 3 3 3 3 3 12
Sale
8.1 2 2 2 2 2 8
8.2 1 1 1 1 1 4
8.3 2 2 2 2 2 8
Maintenance
9.1 2 2 2 2 2 8
9.2 3 3 6 9 12 12
9.3 3 3 6 12 9 12
9.4 1 4 3 1 2 4
Recycling
10.1 3 12 9 3 6 12
10.2 2 4 8 2 6 8
10.3 1 3 4 1 2 4
Total 179 240 169 220
48
Concept 4
2.1.11 Why the morphological analysis and miller profile?
The morphological analysis and miller profile are designing methods to expand your creative ideas
and to invent solutions easier. Especially when making a non-existing product it can save a lot of
time.

Morphological analysis
The morphological analysis is a table which consists of pictures.

The product needs to meet the requirements drafted in the set of requirements above. The
requirements are divided into several features and those features can be further divided into smaller
features. For every feature there are multiple solutions found which are written in the table.
Photographs or sketches are added for better visual insight.

Eventually, every feature has multiple solutions. From every feature the best solution is chosen and
by combining those solutions a complete concept idea will emerge. This process happens three
times until you have three different concept ideas for your product. Eventually the best of three
concepts is chosen based on the miller profile and that will be the final concept.

Miller profile
In the miller profile we compare the requirements, from the set of requirements, with the three
concept ideas from the Morphological analysis. Some requirements are more important than others
so each requirement gets its own weighing factor. The weighing factors I used in my Miller profile
ranging from 1 (Normal) to 3 (Very important).

With each requirement you decide which of the three concept ideas receives the most points and
which one the least. I gave the best concept 3 points and the worst concept 1 point. Then you
calculate the amount of points you give the concept for each requirement times the weighing factor
used for that requirement and that is the final score.

Eventually you count all the gathered points per concept and the concept with the most points is the
one most suited to your requirements. This concept will be your final concept and will be further
developed.

49
2.1.12 Technical Design Structure
After the result of my miller profile usually only one concept is chosen and actually produced.
However, the company I'm working for has a procedure of producing and testing multiple concepts
and then decide in the end which one actually works best. So based on my miller profile and the
limited time I have to produce the concepts, I will only produce the 3 best concepts. These best
concepts are concept 1, 2 and 4. Concept 3 is sketched in 3D designing program Inventor too but will
not be produced.

What is the purpose?

The purpose of the product is to make the earlier mentioned clamping system more convenient,
robust and more hygenic. The current design is really simple, easy to install and it works well, only
the weld in the design breakes too often, the design leaves scratches on one of the cylinders and too
much dirt can get into the system because of the design so this needs to be changed.

Since I have 3 concepts I will describe for each concept how I came up with the design and what the
purpose of the design is.

What requirements must the product meet?

As described in the paragraph above, the few basic requirements every product must meet are the
following. The rest of the requirements can be found in the set of requirements on page......

Improved hygene
The metal detectors will be placed in cleanrooms and harsh environments like saucage factories
where they will become extremely dirty and are cleaned with high pressure hoses and water with
chemicals to kill all the bacteria. The metal detectors (and with that the clamping system) needs to
be tested if it is IP69K proof. Any dirt or dust isn't allowed to enter the clamping system because that
could lead to big hygenal problems for Mettler Toledo's customers.

Less quickly defect

Because quite a bit of force can be applied on the products by employees, it's important that the
products are strong enough to handle the force or a mechanism is made so that the employees can't
put too much force on the clamping system.

Reduce scratching on the surfacesses of the tubes

It is a very important requirement for Mettler Toledo Safeline that their metal detection products
function perfectly and look perfectly. When the product is used by their custormers it's not
supposed to get scratches on the tubes by the clamping system.

Use standard measurements and sizes for the tubes

Because the new clamping system needs to be replaced in an already working standard. One of the
requirements is to change as little as possible on the rest of the standard when fitting the clamping
system.

Also by using standard sizes for the tubes and when desinging the clamping system you can reduce
costs and ease the supply of materials.

50
Below, I am going to describe per concept what the design looks like, what materials I chose to use
and what the value of the design is. I will also give a minimal description of concept 3.

Concept 1

Concept 2

Concept 3

Concept 4
What does the design look like?

What materials are chosen?

What is the value of the design?

51
2.1.13 Bill of Material

2.1.14 Cost price calculation

2.1.15 Installation instructions

52
2.1.16 Organization chart

Olivier Filliol
To start at the top, Olivier A. Filliol is the President and CEO of Mettler Toledo. He runs the
company from the company's headquarters in Greifensee, Switzerland.
Olivier Filliol joined the company in June 1998 as General Manager of the company’s
North American checkweighing operations. He served as Head of Process Analytics from
June 1999 to December 2007 and was named Head of Global Sales, Service and Marketing
in April 2004. He was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the company in
January 2008 and is the director since January 2009.

Under him, many branches all over the world work under the name of Mettler Toledo. Shown on the
table below, one of them is Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.

Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd has a line structure organization, as you can see in attachment (….dfas).
It only has direct vertical relationships between different levels in the firm. This organization
structure tends to simplify and clarify authority, responsibility and accountability relationships. Also
it promotes fast decision making and it's simple to understand.

Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd.

The Managing Director of Mettler Toledo Safeline Ltd. is Alan Purvis. Under him, the company is
divided in 7 different departments:
 Marketing
 Operation
 Human Resources
 Sales
 Finance
 Service
 Product
The department I work in is Products, lead by Head of Products, David Barber.
53
2.1.17 Staffing
To clarify my function as an engineering intern and my position within the company, here is an
organisation chart of the Product department. As you can see in Fig. ….., I work directly under the
Systems Technical Manager, Steve Howard. He is also my supervisor and boss.

54
2.1.18 Production agreements

2.2 Core tasks and working processes

2.3 Bibliography
Subject Link
Introduction and
general information
Market and product CEIA
research http://www.ceia.net/industrial/product.aspx?a=THS/PL21 series
http://www.ceia.net/industrial/product.aspx?a=THS/PLVM21 series
http://www.ceia.net/industrial/product.aspx?a=THS/PH21N%20THS/PH21E

LOMA
http://www.loma.com/en/product-inspection/metal-detection/metal-
detector-pharmaceutical-insight.shtml
http://www.loma.com/en/product-inspection/metal-detection/metal-
detector-pipeline-meat.shtml

SESOTEC
http://www.sesotec.co.uk/en/all-products/

FORTRESS
http://www.fortresstechnology.com/products/

ADDITIONAL
http://www.metaldetectorfactory.com/metal-separator/PEC2005G3-
Pharmaceutical-Metal-Separator.html
http://www.wynka-sa.com/producto/desempolvador/
https://youtu.be/16DKvJ7cnHY
http://www.wynka-sa.com/producto/detector-de-metales/?lang=en
http://cassel-inspection.com/product/metal-detector-in-meat/

Ingress Protection https://www.fairbanks.com/documents/whitepapers/101499.pdf

rating system https://www.averyweigh-tronix.com/News/news-and-case-studies-by-
product/indicators-news-and-case-studies/what-is-the-ip-rating-system/

Organization chart http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/organization/8-types-of-organisational-

structures-their-advantages-and-disadvantages/22143

55
2.4 Attachments
2.4.1 Sketches

2.4.2 Part and assembly drawings

2.4.3 Workbook 'Proeve van Bekwaamheid'

2.4.4 Poster 2018 Guide to explosive atmospheres and hazardous locations

(Zie poster)

2.4.5 Organisation Chart November 2017

2.4.5 Order lists

2.4.6 Meeting reports

2.4.7 Measurement reports

2.4.8 Hand out powerpointpresentation

2.4.9 Manuals & Product specifications

2.1.10 Existing Tablex drawings

HDS

Tablex

2.4.10 Maintenance report

56
2.5 Evaluations
2.5.1 Timesheets

Week: 1 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/

Work processes
Date: For example:
05-2-2018 1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
9:00 – - Introduction with HR manager Tony Hickson
Monday 16:00 - Filling in contracts
- Make safety assessments
- Introduction with Steve Howard, Systems Tech
Mgr
7 - Shown around the work environment
7:00 – - Given my own desk and software codes
Tuesday 15:30 - Saying hi to the guys on the work floor
- Form Assignment Proof of Competence
8.5 (Concept)
7:00 – - Form Assignment Proof of Competence
Wednesday 15:30 (Concept)
- Create consistent planning
8.5
7:00 – - Observe with the build of a Tablex System
Thursday 15:30 - Finish consistent planning
- Create and finish network planning
- Finish Form Assignment Proof of Competence
8.5 (Concept)
- Start Set of Requirements
7:00 – - Meeting with Steve Howard about progress and
Friday 13:30 Set of Requirements
- Create report of meeting
- Work on Set of Requirements
6.5
Comments:
Total 39
This week I started the internship and project. I got my place in the office
amount of
and started working on the first few documents. I also oriented a bit on the
hours
product I will be working on.
In the end of the week I already discussed the Set of Requirements with
Steve Howard so next week I can continue to develop the idea more.
Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-1-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

57
Week: 2 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
12-2-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday 0 Flu

Tuesday 0 Flu

Wednesday 0 Flu

Thursday 0 Flu

7:00 – - Finish making Set of Requirements

Friday 12:30 - Send first documents to Hans Loeff
- Start Plan of Action

5.5
Comments:
Total
This week I was only able to work on Friday due to the bad flu I caught in
amount of 5,5
the weekend. This gives me a small backlog but nothing I can't fix yet.
hours
Next week I will be finishing the plan of action and start on the sketches for
the idea.

Total days 1

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

58
Week: 3 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
19-2-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:00 – - Finish Plan of Action
Monday 15:30 - Start problem definition
- Start Market and Product research
- Start making concept sketches
8.5
7:00 – - Finish problem definition
Tuesday 15:30 - Make concept sketches
- Work on Market and Product research
- Set up report
8.5 -
7:00 – - Do research on Market and Product research
Wednesday 15:30 - New monitor installed
- Inventor installed
8.5 - Research on inventor
7:00 – - Research on Market and Product research
Thursday 15:30 - Process information Market and Product
research

8.5
7:00 – - Process information Market and Product
Friday 12:30 research
- Read through Product Specification HDS system
- Meeting with Steve Howard
5.5
Total
Comments:
amount of 39,5
This week I did a lot of research about the product and the market around
hours
it. I finished the plan of action and started thinking about the first concepts
for the product. Also, I got my license for Inventor and I have been teaching
myself how to work with the program a bit so in a few weeks I can start
Total days 5
making the 3D designs.

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 23-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

59
Week: 4 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
26-2-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:30 – - Finish Market and Product research
Monday 16:00 - Research about Ingress Protection rating
system + finish
8.5 - Start Morphological analysis
7:00 – - Continue with sketches
Tuesday 15:30 - Research on inventor
- Start package of drawings Clamp 1

8.5
7:30 – - Package of drawings Clamp 2 and 3
Wednesday 16:00 - Gather drawings of the HDS and Tablex system
- Design some more drawings
8.5
7:30 – - Work on morphological analysis
Thursday 16:00 - Design the 3 clamp systems
- Meeting with Steve Howard

8.5
7:30 – - Taking apart competitors system for
Friday 13:00 information

5.5
Comments:
Total 39,5 This week I started on the 3D drawings and the morphological analysis. I had
amount of a meeting with Steve Howard about the next steps I'm going to take. Those
hours will be the designing and developing of 3 concepts. All 3 concepts will be
produced and tested afterwards.
Next week I'm going to continue on the 3D drawings and hopefully finish the
Total days 5 morphological analysis and miller profile so I can eliminate the other ideas
I've had.

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 2-3-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

60
Week: 5 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
05-3-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:30 – - Start and finish Miller profile
Monday 16:00 - Continue drawing 3D sketches

8.5
7:00 – - Finish morphological analysis
Tuesday 16:00 - Finish concept sketches
- Continue drawing 3D sketches

9
7:00 – - Start on Technical Design Structure:
Wednesday 15:30  What is the purpose?
 Wat requirements must the product meet?
8.5 - Continue drawing 3D sketches
- Move desks
7:00 – - Make organization chart
Thursday 16:00 - Make staffing
- Continue on Technical Design Structure:
 Concept 3
9
7:00 – - Continue on Technical Design Structure:
Friday 12:30  Concept 3
- Continue on drawing 3D sketches

5.5
Comments:
This week I finished the morphological analysis and miller profile so I know
Total 40,5 from this point what 3 concepts I'm actually going to develop. I continued on
amount of the 3D sketches and made the organisation chart and staffing already.
hours I had some problems with Inventor this week because I had to move desks
and had no computer anymore to work on Inventor. So I changed the
planning a bit and did the organisation chart and staffing first.
Total days 5 Next week hopefully I'll be able to continue my work on Inventor and make
some progress on the drawings.

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-3-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

61
Week: 6 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
12-3-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:00 – - Rewrite Form Assignment Proof of Competence
Monday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5

Thursday 0 Visiting The Netherlands

Friday 0 Visiting The Netherlands

Total
amount of 39,5
hours
Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-3-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

62
Week: 7 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
19-3-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
9:00 – -
Monday 16:00

7
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 –
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total 38
amount of
Comments:
hours

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-1-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

63
Week: 8 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
26-3-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday 0 Half a day off (Visiting The Netherlands for Easter

weekend)

Friday 0 Bank holiday

Comments:
Total
amount of 5,5
hours

Total days 1

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

64
Week: 9 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
02-4-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday 0 Bank holiday

7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 39,5
hours
Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 23-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

65
Week: 10 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
09-4-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
9:00 – -
Monday 16:00

7
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 –
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total 38
amount of
Comments:
hours

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-1-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

66
Week: 11 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
16-4-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 5,5
Comments:
hours

Total days 1

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

67
Week: 12 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
23-4-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:00 – -
Monday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5

Thursday 0 Half a day off (Visiting The Netherlands)

Friday 0 Visiting The Netherlands

Total
amount of 39,5
hours
Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 23-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

68
Week: 13 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
30-4-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday 0 Visiting The Netherlands

7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 –
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total 38
amount of
Comments:
hours

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-1-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

69
Week: 14 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
07-5-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday 0 Early May bank holiday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 5,5
Comments:
hours

Total days 1

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

70
Week: 15 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
14-5-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:00 – -
Monday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5

Wednesday 0 Half a day ( To Valencia, Visiting brother)

Thursday 0 To Valencia (Visiting brother)

Friday 0 To Valencia (Visiting brother)

Total
amount of 39,5
hours
Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 23-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

71
Week: 16 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
21-5-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday 0 To Valencia (Visiting brother)

7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 –
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total 38
amount of
hours Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-1-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

72
Week: 17 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
28-5-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday 0 Spring bank holiday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 5,5
Comments:
hours

Total days 1

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

73
Week: 18 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
04-6-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:00 – -
Monday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 39,5
hours
Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 23-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

74
Week: 19 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
11-6-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
9:00 – -
Monday 16:00

7
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 –
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total 38
amount of
hours Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 9-1-2018

Signature student
Signature practical trainer

75
Week: 20 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
18-6-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 5,5
Comments:
hours

Total days 1

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 16-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

76
Week: 21 Hours Description of the activities Core tasks/
Work processes
Date:
25-6-2018 For example:
1.2 - 2.3 - 4.1
etc.
7:00 – -
Monday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Tuesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Wednesday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Thursday 15:30

8.5
7:00 – -
Friday 12:30

5.5
Total
amount of 39,5
hours
Comments:

Total days 5

Name student Name practical trainer Date:

Kelly van den Heuvel Steve Howard 23-2-2018

Signature student Signature practical trainer

77
2.5.2 Evaluation forms

78