Sports Psychology - Notes
Sports Psychology - Notes
Sports Psychology - Notes
Definition:
Sports psychology is essentially the study of how the mind affects physical activity and
athletic performance. According to the American Psychological Association, “sports
psychology addresses the interactions between psychology and sport performance,
including the psychological aspects of optimal athletic performance, the psychological care
and well-being of athletes, coaches, and sport organizations, and the connection between
physical and psychological functioning.”
Personality – definitions:
“The sum total of an individual’s characteristics which make him unique”
(Hollander).
1.Introvert – orientation toward the internal private world of one's self and one's inner
thoughts and feelings, rather than toward the outer world of people and things
Characteristics:
Shy
Timid
Reserved
Aloof
Self sufficient
2.Extrovert - an orientation of one's interests and energies toward the outer world of
people and things rather than the inner world of subjective experience Characteristics
Adventurous
Confident
Sociable
Group dependent,
Enthusiastic
Characteristics:
Calm
even-tempered
Inherited at birth.
Stable
Enduring
Consistent in all situations
As per this theory the Behaviour of a person is as a result of function of personality
The advantage of this theory is it can be easily measured through questionnaires whereas
the disadvantage is it does not take into account environmental influences. It is not a true
indicator of behaviour.
In this approach to the study of human personality, Trait theorists are primarily interested
in the measurement of traits, which can be defined as habitual patterns of behaviour,
thought, and emotion. CATTELL (1965) identified 16 personality traits CATTELL
16 PERSONALITY FACTOR TEST
The following personality trait list describes some of the descriptive terms used for each of
the 16 personality dimensions described by Cattell.
The disadvantage here is that it does not consider inherited behaviour (traits)
3. Interactionist Theory
“Behaviour occurs from the interaction between inherited traits and learned experiences”
PSYCHOLOGICAL
CORE
TYPICAL
REPONSES
ROLE-RELATED
BEHAVIOUR
Hollander believed that personality could be represented by 3 concentric rings, with the
innermost ring being the most difficult to penetrate. The boundary line of each layer gets
wider as you get closer to the centre of the model which shows that each layer is harder to
enter. As you move closer to the centre, your ‘real’ personality begins to surface
1. PSYCHOLOGICAL CORE – the real you, the core concept of self that individuals are
unwilling to reveal.
2. TYPICAL RESPONSES – represents how individuals are likely to respond in a situation.
3. ROLE-RELATED BEHAVIOUR – how an individual responds in a specific situation. This may
be an uncharacteristic behaviour.
4.2 ATTITUDES
Definition:
Consistent
Coaches/ teachers
Parents
Friends/ peers
Past experiences
Prejudice
Media
Cognitive - concerned with beliefs this is known as the information component – FITNESS
TRAINING KEEPS ME Fit
Affective (emotional) - refers to evaluation - reflects values. This is known as the emotional
component I ENJOY TRAINING
Behavioural - refers to behaviour. This concerns how a person intends to behave towards
an attitude object I ATTEND TRAINING SESSIONS REGULARLY
Theories of Attitude:
If a person holds two ideas that oppose and conflict with each other an element of
discomfort arises. Emotional conflict is called DISSONANCE
To reduce this feeling of dissonance, the impact of one of the conflicting ideas could be
lessened and therefore an attitude would change.
Updating knowledge or providing a person with new information can change the cognitive
component
Providing a person with new and positive experiences can modify the affective component
If a skill is simplified or if some form of guidance is used to make execution easier, the
behavioural component of attitude can be changed Remember METHODS OF GUIDANCE
from SKILL ACQUISITION
You need to be aware of most effective way of persuading someone to change their
attitude. In this theory:
• needs to be under control and at the right level depending on the task
The Drive Reduction Theory was created by behaviourist Clark Hull (1943). Hull believed that
behaviour was one of the ways that an organism maintains this balance. His
term drive refers to a state of tension or arousal caused by biological or physiological needs.
Drive Reduction Theory suggests that the more an athlete is aroused the better her/his
performance. A very high arousal level would result in a high performance. However, this
only happens when skills are well-learned. In contrast, if the athletic skill is not well-learned,
performance will deteriorate as arousal increases. Therefore, Drive Reduction Theory
suggests that novices and less skilled people tend rather not to perform well under
pressure. In novices the skill level decreases due to poor habits and techniques. Habits are
described as the performance which is dominant within an individual. Experienced athletes
tend to perform better under pressure due to their superior skills and the use of stress
management techniques.
This theory helps explain why beginners find it difficult to perform well under pressure.
Often beginner’s skill level decreases if they are competing in a relay race using new skills.
However, it also explains how experienced athletes perform better under pressure using
well-learned skills, e.g. good tennis players play better against stronger opponents.
The major weakness of the Drive Reduction Theory is its’ inability to explain why humans do
things which put them into a stressed or unfulfilled state, and why they often fail under high
arousal. While excitement can certainly help an athlete perform, there is a point where the
anxiety becomes too much and actually prevents from high quality performing (Harmison,
2006).
2. Inverted U hypothesis
The Inverted U Hypothesis suggests that optimal performance occurs at an intermediate
level of arousal while both low and high levels of arousal will result in impaired
performance. This proposal is made based on the Yerkes-Dodson law (named after the
researchers who discovered it) which predicts an inverted U-shaped function between
arousal and performance (Yerkes, Dodson, 1908).
In sport, this means that a little excitement and stress associated with competition can have
a positive effect, but a situation that is too stressful is detrimental. However, the optimal
levels of arousal vary between people doing the same task. Even more, for the same person
doing different tasks optimal levels of arousal may vary. However, in general one could
expect that athletes may perform badly because they are over- or under-aroused. In
addition, the optimum arousal levels tend to be lower for more complicated tasks.
The Inverted U Hypothesis is an appealing explanation for performance flaws. In many ways
this explanation fits into the observations from sport performers but in reality is too
simplistic.
Moreover, the optimum level of arousal can also vary in relation to the skill being
performed. Sports that incorporate major muscle groups or gross skills such as weightlifting
may benefit from having higher levels of arousal, whereas activities which incorporate finer
skills and high coordination such as archery or gymnastics may benefit from lower levels of
arousal.
4.4 ANXIETY
An emotional state, similar to fear, associated with arousal and accompanied by feelings of
nervousness and apprehension” associated with
– feelings of nervousness
– feelings of apprehension
• Visualisation – the process of creating a mental image of what you want to happen or feel,
locking into the ‘perfect performance’.
• Self-talk – developing positive thoughts about one’s actions. Is vital that self-talk remains
positive and focus on self-instructing motivational content
• Centering – using deep breathing as a way of refocusing your concentration. Requires the
performer to focus particularly on the rate of breathing and maintaining a slow, steady pace
Theories of Anxiety
Demonstrates that when someone has anxious thoughts he/she will have poorer
performance. This theory distinguishes between somatic and cognitive anxiety:
Cognitive anxiety represents the mental component of anxiety and is caused by negative
expectations about success or about negative self-evaluation. Thus, cognitive anxiety is
worrying and negative thoughts.
Somatic anxiety reflects physiological elements of the anxiety that develops directly from
autonomic arousal. This is perceived as ‘butterflies’ in the stomach, tense muscles, sweating
and nausea.
The theory makes two predictions:
1. There is a negative linear relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance
2. There is an inverted U relationship between somatic anxiety and performance
Multidimensional Anxiety theory suggests that somatic anxiety should decline once
performance begins but cognitive anxiety may remain high if self-confidence is low. Anxiety
felt by the body will have an effect on performance much like that of the inverted U
hypothesis
The Catastrophe Model of Anxiety proposes four specific relationships between cognitive
anxiety, physiological arousal and performance (Hardy, 1990, 1996):
Cognitive anxiety (worry) has a positive linear relationship with performance when
physiological arousal is low (see Figure);
Cognitive anxiety will have a negative relationship with performance when physiological
arousal is high;
Thus, prior to the performance, an important mental task of athlete is to achieve a mental
state where physiological arousal is at her optimal, rather moderate level, without worry
thoughts. Usually, this means that physiological arousal is maintained by optimal warm-up
and behavioural and mental precompetitive routines whereas worry thoughts are avoided
by concentrating on personal challenge and excitement.
• further athletes will peak at high arousal for the same task
The zone
• without effort
• performer is bored
• these thoughts can affect the performer’s confidence and create an almost complete
inability to perform skills properly
• examples are:
• the snooker player who misses an easy shot when in the final frame of an
important match
• the golfer who misses the fairway from the tee when in the lead in a
competition
• this particularly applies to sports which use a fine skill
• anxiety affects arousal, and these theories can also apply to how anxiety affects
performance
Social
Chemical / biochemical
Bacterial
Physical
Climatic
• extremes of weather
Psychological
• mismatch between perception of demands of task
Inhibition
• inhibition of performance
Performance of skills
• muscles tense
Concentration
• concentration is difficult
Symptoms of stress
Physiological symptoms
• increased sweating
• dry mouth
Psychological symptoms
• worry
• feeling overwhelmed
• inability to concentrate
• narrowing of attention
Behavioural symptoms
• rapid talking
• nail biting
• pacing
• scowling
• yawning
• trembling
• frequent urination
Relaxation techniques
Imagery relaxation
Centring
Biofeedback
– cold if stressed
– warm if unstressed
• electromyography
– electrodes taped to specific muscles
Self-talk
• linked to attributions
• develop self-confidence
Mental rehearsal
• helps concentration
Goal setting
• uncertainty is reduced
• confidence is increased
Aggression refers to intent to harm outside the laws of the game which can also be a
response or action with the intention of causing injury or harm.
Causes of aggression
oExtrinsic rewards
What about these sports? In some sports aggression is part of the game, e.g. in boxing you
can punch above the waist and in rugby you can use hard tackles to intimidate an opponent.
This is called INSTRUMENTAL AGGRESSION Instrumental aggression is done within the rules
of the game, in other words it is controlled and channelled.
This is very similar to ASSERTION Assertive behaviour: Does not attempt to harm & is within
rules & spirit of the game.
• Aggression:
• Behaviour intended to cause harm
• Uncontrolled
Assertion:
• Channelled and controlled Think of examples of aggressive and assertive behaviour from
sport. They might be your own experiences or famous examples.
Aggression in sport
1. Hostile aggression: The motive is to harm an opponent. The chief intention of the
aggressor is to inflict injury. Aggressive actions are outside the rules of the game, it is
dysfunctional in the context of any sport. Anger is involved
Assertion
Does not intend to harm. The chief motivation is to complete the skill. It is within the rules
and spirit of the game. It involves robust and forceful play
A number of theories have been put forward to explain the causes of aggression in sport
1. Trait theories – Nature -the cause comes from genetic, inherited personality traits –
2. Social learning theories – Nurture. The cause comes from observing and copying the
behaviour of significant others.
• Aggression is learned from observing and copying high status role models.
• If the aggressive behaviour is reinforced it becomes an accepted mode of behaviour
and becomes part of their behaviour
If the Rugby player tries to achieve a goal/target and his opponent stops them then the
player will develop frustration, leading to more aggression.
The idea that frustration leads to aggression makes sense, and it fits into many of our
observations about Rugby. However, there are far more examples where Rugby players do
not commit aggressive acts. Their responses involve non-aggressive action, or simply
despair.
This suggests that the frustration-aggression relationship may not be as inevitable as the
hypothesis suggests and most current researchers do not accept the linking role of
aggressive drive as inevitable.
Another theory (aggressive-cue theory) suggests that frustration increases arousal, rather
than leading directly to aggression, and it is this increase in arousal that was most likely to
produce the aggressive response. But again, increasing arousal itself is insufficient to lead
directly to aggressive behaviour unless there were cues in the environment.