Phraseology Manual 1.0.clearway
Phraseology Manual 1.0.clearway
Phraseology Manual 1.0.clearway
ICAO Phraseology Reference Guide CLEARWAY 2016 ALL CLEAR AGC safety initiative
Introduction
Communication error is the biggest causal factor in both level busts and runway
incursions in Europe. This document aims to provide Commercial Air Transport
(CAT) pilots and other pilots flying IFR within controlled airspace with a quick
reference guide to commonly used radiotelephony (RTF) phrases that may be
encountered during a routine CAT flight in European Airspace. It also explains
some of the rationale behind the use of certain words and phrases to aid
understanding and reinforce the need for compliance with standard phraseology.
The goal is to improve safety by raising RTF standards.
The need for clear and unambiguous communication between pilots and Air
Traffic Control (ATC) is vital in assisting the safe and expeditious operation of
aircraft. It is important, therefore, that due regard is given to the use of standard
words and phrases and that all involved ensure that they maintain the highest
professional standards when using RTF. This is especially important when
operating within busy sectors with congested frequencies where any time wasted
with verbosity and non-standard, ambiguous phrases could lead to flight safety
incidents.
Phraseology has evolved over time and has been carefully developed to provide
maximum clarity and brevity in communications while ensuring that phrases are
unambiguous. However, while standard phraseology is available to cover most
routine situations, not every conceivable scenario will be catered for and RTF
users should be prepared to use plain language when necessary following the
principle of keeping phrases clear and concise.
Note:
This document uses RTF examples showing both pilot (denoted by blue italic
text) and ATCO (denoted by Black text) communication. For example:
Pilot - Metro Ground, Clearway 728, request taxi
ATC - Clearway 728, Metro Ground, taxi to holding point A1, hold short of Runway
17
NB: ATC may request Clearway 728 to confirm when Runway 18 is vacated
Clearway 728, after landing LATA M Airbus 321, cross Runway 09 at C2, after
After landing LA TA M Airbus 321, cross Runway 09 at C2 after, Clearway 728
Then:
Clearway 728, taxi to holding point C1, runway 27
Taxi to holding point C1, runway 27, Clearway 728.
Then:
Clearway 728 contact Metro Tower 123.625
Contact Metro Tower 123.625, Clearway 728.
In the airport environment, the word ‘cleared’ shall only be used in connection
with a clearance to take-off or land. To aid clarity, a take-off clearance will
always be issued separately.
Once airborne:
Clearway 728, contact Metro Radar 124.6
Contact Metro Radar on 124.6, Clearway 728.
Or:
Clearway 728 hold position, after departure climb to altitude 6000 feet
Holding, after departure climb to 6000 feet, Clearway 728
Initial Calls
Studies show that an initial call which does not contain all the required
information can lead to a loss of separation. On first contact after departure
include:
Call-sign
SID
Current or passing level plus cleared level
The information in the initial call is essential for the safety of the aircraft by
ensuring mutual understanding between the crew and the controller of the
intention for the aircraft.
Omissions will require an additional call for clarification which may lead to
frequency congestion.
Once airborne:
Clearway 728, contact Metro Radar 124.6
Contact Metro Radar 124.6, Clearway 728
Degrees
Headings ending in zero can easily be confused with flight levels (this confusion
can be avoided by appending the word ‘degrees’, however this is not an ICAO
requirement or recommendation).
Flight Levels
Flight levels below FL100 are referred to as two digit numbers e.g. Climb flight
level eight zero to reduce the risk of confusion with a heading instruction eg.
heading zero eight zero.
Flight levels 100, 200 and 300 are often confused for 110, 210 and 310: special
care should be taken when enunciating ‘zero zero’.
En-Route RTF
If able, ATC will give the clearance as follows ‘…Climb to FL 320, Negative
RVSM’. Notice that the term ‘Negative RVSM’ is used in the clearance and
the read-back, thus ‘Climb to FL 320, Negative RVSM…’. Otherwise ATC will
state that they are unable to issue the clearance into RVSM airspace.
Avoiding Action
To and For
Use of the word ‘to’ directly before a climb/descent instruction or change of
heading can be confused as ‘two’. Such confusion is avoided by using the
mandatory words ‘flight level’ or ‘heading’ immediately before the numbers.
Clearway 728, climb to FL180.
Clearway 728, turn left to heading 310 degrees.
There are also occasions where inappropriate use of the word ‘for’ can introduce
confusion if it is interpreted as the number ‘four’.
Turning right heading 240, cleared ILS approach runway 27 Right, maintain
3000 ft until glide-path runway 27 right
Continue Approach
If the runway is obstructed when the aircraft reports ‘final’, but it is expected to
be available in good time for the aircraft to make a safe landing, the controller will
delay landing clearance by issuing an instruction to ‘continue approach’. The
controller may explain why the landing clearance has been delayed. An
instruction to ‘continue’ is NOT a clearance to land.
The Go-Around
Instructions to carry out a missed approach may be given to avert an unsafe
situation. When a missed approach is initiated cockpit workload is inevitably
high.
Any transmissions to aircraft going around shall be brief and kept to a
minimum.
In the event of a missed approach being initiated by the pilot, the phrase
‘going around’ should be used.
Pilot initiated:
Clearway 728, going around
Roger (followed by suitable instruction)
Operators should ensure that ATC Units have readily available 24 hour contact
details of company flight operations control.
Ricardo Videla
Commercial Pilot
www.clearway.cl
[email protected]
+569 5586 4209
Estoril 200 of. 728. Las Condes
Santiago - Chile