WA SEF Summary DRAFT June 2015 Draft 6
WA SEF Summary DRAFT June 2015 Draft 6
WA SEF Summary DRAFT June 2015 Draft 6
The academy serves children of all abilities and has no religious affiliations and (apart from ARK Globe Academy) is the only Southwark secondary school that does not operate a
banding system. Over 60% of our students live on the Ayelsbury Estate and our intake is from over 27 primary schools.
• Gun and knife crime, drugs and a gang culture are inherent to our students’ experiences. Walworth Academy is for many, an oasis of safety, calm and exceedingly high
expectations, whatever their struggle: school deprivation factor is 0.42 vs the national figure of 0.22.
• Our students and their families experience extremely high levels of deprivation, overcrowded housing and increasing cases of homelessness.
• In 2012, the Estate’s unemployment rate stood at 16%, compared to the Borough average of 11%.
Our intake is significantly below the national average and yet our students achieve broadly in line with national attainment at 5+A*-C including English and maths. We exceed
national rates of progress in English and maths.
Staffing: 8 NQTs, 3 Schools Direct, 8 supply for long term absence or vacancies.
We are a happy, aspirant, safe and hardworking Academy. We are relentless in our drive to provide the best outcomes and opportunities for our students, who deserve
nothing less.
Achievement
Good (2) Evidence
Evidence
Achievement of pupils is good; despite low KS2 baseline data students make excellent progress and attain well in both English and Maths. Our RoL contains
some inaccuracies which are being addressed though most of the data is in line with the schools own analysis.
• 62% of pupils achieved both English and Maths A*-C in 2014 (* awaiting remarks) See data file
• Pupils make good progress in line with national averages: in 2014 67% made at least 3 levels progress in English and 72% in Maths
• Science is now more in line with English results at 63% A*-C 2014 from 48% 2013. Targeted underperforming foundations subjects have all made
significant improvement, e.g. Art 4.8% 2013 to 77% 2014.
• Attainment, progress and value added in Maths has been outstanding for the last 4 year. Even with a significant drop in English results, they are still above
national average for A*-C at 65% vs 62%.
• Improvements in student progress across KS3 compared to previous years is outstanding. The overall rates of progress for end of yr 9 2014 is 5.9 sub
levels in English and 6.2 in maths.
• The rates of progress in English over the this last year for year 7 in English are 2.5 sub levels and 2.2 sub levels for maths.
• The impact of our Literacy catch up programme is extremely positive, for example, of the year 9 Literacy students (72) still on the programme, 83% have
made 3+ sub level progression 2013-2014. Pupil
• As a result of increased rigour and focus we have significantly closed the PP vs on PP gap from 15% to 7% as well as closing the WBRI gap. We must premium data
now reduce the gender gap, especially in English. sheet
• Students identified with disabilities or statements have a well-established trend of making strong progress and their attainment at the end of KS4 is above
national average for similar groups.
75% good or better is for known observations whereas unannounced observations is 72% good or better. Teaching has improved from December 53% good
+ (Dec 2012) to 75% Good+ , June 2014 - ARK Monitoring Visit – Miriam Rosen.
‘In the very best lessons, teachers ask questions that are progressively more challenging to students’ thinking. They challenge students to think for themselves. In
most lessons, questioning is used well to encourage students to extend and justify their answers’.
• English and Maths teaching is consistently good with many examples of outstanding practice
• Pupils make good or better progress from their starting points and this is now better evidenced in the written outcomes from lessons
CPD record
• Teachers have high expectations for and positive relationships with students; they know students well and meet their needs accordingly.
2013-14
We have achieved this improvement and continue to tackle under performance where it exists through:
CPD and
• The development of our coaching model based on the leverage leadership observation and feedback model progression
• The launch of our ‘good to great’ programme documents
• Regular on-going subject specific support from ARK network leads for English, Maths, Science and inclusion
• All INSET and staff meetings now have a teaching and learning focus EXTERNAL
• All teaching staff now have a timetabled CPD session where they co-plan and share best practice consultant
• Middle leadership development through the ARK/Future Leader NPQML programme (OFSTED)
• Appraisal and threshold progression is directly dependent on the quality and impact of each teacher’s performance. feedback
Our own internal moderation of the quality of teaching and learning has moderated by the ARK monitoring visits (joint observations) and training for senior
leaders from OFSTED inspectors.
Key areas for development
• Remove inconsistencies in departments, particularly MFL and embed greater consistency in new departments: science and maths.
• In a minority of lessons students are still too dependent on teacher direction and need further opportunities to develop their independence and self-
reliance; TALK is a teaching and learning priority for all teachers this year.
• Although moderation shows that more homework is set at a higher standard we need greater consistency in how students record their homework and
ensuring that students respond to written feedback.
• Embed the practice and impact of the 6 new HODs.
The governing body, a group of highly skilled and committed individuals provide very effective challenge and support to the school. They are tenacious in LGB
holding the Principal and other leaders to account, and ensure that performance and r e w a r d are closely aligned. T h e Chair of Governors working minutes/Principals
relationship with the new Principal is very strong, purposeful and focused on achieving outstanding t e a c h i n g and learning. PM targets
The governing body ensures that resources are extremely well used for the benefit of students, including the high proportion eligible for the pupil premium.
They review statutory policies and ensure that all requirements are met, including those relating to safety of students.
Key areas for development
• Tackle inconsistency in subject leadership where it continues through individualised CPD and tight line management
• Consolidate the new pastoral and SLT structure and increases the distribution of leadership and whole school accountability of the Assistant
Principals.
• Continue to increase the profile and celebration of cultural and religious events.
• Create and implement greater opportunity for students to debate political issues.