0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views37 pages

Modeling Dynamic Effects: Our Work So Far Has Been Time-Independent

The document discusses modeling dynamic effects in structural analysis. It covers several topics: 1) Structural dynamics considers how structural response varies with time under forces like acceleration. Modal, harmonic, and transient analysis methods are introduced. 2) Resonance is important, like how wind resonance destroyed the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Resonance can also affect aircraft flutter and vortex shedding. 3) Finite element analysis of structural dynamics uses mass, damping, and stiffness matrices to model dynamic response over time at nodes. The mass matrix depends on density, area, and acceleration terms.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views37 pages

Modeling Dynamic Effects: Our Work So Far Has Been Time-Independent

The document discusses modeling dynamic effects in structural analysis. It covers several topics: 1) Structural dynamics considers how structural response varies with time under forces like acceleration. Modal, harmonic, and transient analysis methods are introduced. 2) Resonance is important, like how wind resonance destroyed the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Resonance can also affect aircraft flutter and vortex shedding. 3) Finite element analysis of structural dynamics uses mass, damping, and stiffness matrices to model dynamic response over time at nodes. The mass matrix depends on density, area, and acceleration terms.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

Modeling Dynamic Effects

 Our work so far has been time-independent


• Structural problems – static (no acceleration)
• Thermal problems – steady state (no change with time)
 Structural dynamics
• We will now consider problems in which time plays a key role
• Various forces lead to structural acceleration
• Structural response varies with time
 Several ways of considering structural dynamic response
• Modal analysis – natural frequencies of a structure
• Harmonic analysis – response of structure under harmonic loading
• Transient analysis – response of structure under general loading
 Simplifications for finite element analysis
• First two have harmonic (sinusoidal) displacements in time
• Governing equations can be simplified significantly (ME 512)
• Third requires transient analysis methods (ME 612)
9-1

1
Importance of Understanding Resonance
 Resonance
• Structure vibrates excessively under periodic loading
• Most typically associated with structure’s natural frequency
• Several examples of importance of resonance

9-2

2
Structural Resonance
 Tacoma Narrows Bridge – famous resonance example
• Wind flow transverse to the bridge
• Torsional oscillations leading to structural failure
• Failure believed related to flutter in aircraft not vortex shedding

http://www.engineering.wright.edu/~jslater/SDTCOutreachWebsite/aeroelasticity.htm 9-3

3
Resonance – Tacoma Narrows Bridge
 Discussion from Wikipedia

9-4

4
Aircraft Flutter
 Interaction between air flow and aircraft structure
• Leads to vibration of structure
• Can be catastrophic if increases with time
• Study using wind tunnels / advanced analysis methods

Boeing 747 C5 Tail


http://www.vibrationdata.com/wind.htm
9-5

5
Vortex Shedding
 Cylinder in cross–flow
• Periodic shedding of vortices (von Karman)
• Leads to periodic loading of cylinder
• Important for tall, cylindrical objects such as smoke stacks / towers
– Avoid using helical strakes to disturb generation of vortices

http://www.idom.es/ada/References/ref-rain-radar/ref-rain-radar.htm#Von%20Karman%20Vortex%20Shedding
http://www.engineering.wright.edu/~jslater/SDTCOutreachWebsite/aeroelasticity.htm 9-6

6
Engine Valvetrain Resonance
 Design of engine valvetrain
• Engine valves – springs push valves close, push rods open valves
• First inclination – stiffer springs mean better response
• Actual result – stiffer springs are heavier, worse response
• Note result at below right – harmonic analysis
– Vary frequency and determine resulting displacement

http://www.stockcarracing.com/techarticles/general/scrp_0608_valvetrain_myths/
9-7

7
Spring-Mass-Damper System
 Consider a 1D spring-mass-damper system
• Spring stiffness k
• Damping coefficient c
• Mass m
• Displacement u(t)
• Force r(t)

 Draw free body diagram


of forces acting on the mass
• Sum of forces equals 0
• Include inertial forces (acceleration)

F 0 

9-8

8
FEA For Structural Dynamics
 For 1D spring-mass-damper
system we found

 We write a similar expression for FEA


• Nodal DOFs (displacement) D and forces r
• Mass matrix M, damping matrix C, stiffness matrix K

 Note simplification for static case (ME 512 so far)


• Forces and displacements are no longer time-dependent

9-9

9
Mass Matrix
 Fundament FEA equation of structural dynamics

 Two new matrices to consider


• Mass matrix M and damping matrix C
• ME 512 – assume no damping (C = 0)

 Mass matrix M  
• Consider D  D  0  M D  R
• Recall direct method for determining K matrix (K D = R)
– Set jth term in D equal to 1, all others to 0
– Forces R that resulted are jth column of K
• Same approach for

finding M
– Set jth term in D equal to 1, all others to 0
– Forces R that resulted are jth column of M
• How much force is required to achieve 1 unit acceleration at a node?
9-10

10
Mass Matrix – 1D Beam Example
 Consider a 1D beam element
• Length L, Area A, Density 
• Leads to total mass AL
 Consider mass matrix terms

• 4 acceleration terms (D )
• 4 force terms (R)
• M is a 4  4 matrix (same size as K)
 m11 m12 m13 m14   v1   F1 
m m22 m23 m24  1   M 1 
  R   21
MD   
 m31 m32 m33 
m34 v2   F2 
 
m41 m42 m43 m44  2  M 2 
 As with stiffnesss matrix, can find mass matrix two ways
• Direct method and analytical method
• Several assumptions can be used to simplify mass matrix as desired
9-11

11
1D Beam Example – Lumped Mass
 Lumped mass matrix
• Distribute all mass terms to the nodes
• Simplest approximation for 1D beam element
 One approach – ignore rotational inertia effects
• Beam modeled by a point mass at each end

 
MD

 Second approach – add rotational inertia effects


• Include rotational inertia of a solid beam from classical physics

 
MD

9-12

12
Consistent Mass Matrix
 Lumped mass matrices have certain benefits
• Beneficial for some transient analyses because no off-axis terms
• Represents an approximation of the acceleration behavior
 Proper form is the consistent mass matrix
• Acceleration considered based on response of every point in body
• This is accomplished by the acceleration field at all points in body
– Based on the shape functions (N) and nodal accelerations ( D)
• Leads to an analytical equation for calculating mass matrix
– Similar to equation for K, result is a fully populated mass matrix

Remember to
make sure that
 156 22 L 54  13L   v1 
density, force
   A L
 22 L
 4 L2
13L  3L2  1  and distance
MD   units all agree!
420  54 13L 156  22 L  v2 
 
 13L  3L
2
 22 L 4 L2  2 
9-13

13
Free Vibration – 1D Spring–Mass Example
 1D spring-mass-damper example
• Set c = 0 (no damping) and no force
• Equation of motion becomes
k u  m u  0 (referred to as free vibration)

 Differential equation is easily solved


• An arbitrary phase angle () added to the solution is also a solution
k u  m u  0  u (t )  u0 sin  t
 Substitute back into original equation to find
k u0 sin  t   m  u0  2 sin  t   0  k   2 m u0 sin  t  0
 This equation has two solutions
• Trivial solution: u0 = 0 (k, m are arbitrary)
• Free vibration:   k m (u0 is arbitrary)
• Refer to  as the natural frequency (units are radians/second)
9-14

14
Free Vibration – General FEA Equations
 Recall general FEA equation of motion
KD  C D M D   R
 Set C = 0 (undamped) and R = 0 (unforced)
KD  M D   0
 As with 1D case, this has a simple solution

Dt   D sin  t  K D sin  t   M   2 D sin  t  0 
K   
M D sin  t  0
2

 Again, this equation has two solutions


• Trivial solution: D = 0 (K, M are arbitrary)
• Free vibration:  is the natural frequency
 The latter represents an eigenvalue problem
• Matrix equation – cannot solve algebraically like spring-mass case
• Eigenvalue (2), eigenvector D
9-15

15
Eigenvalue, Eigenvector – Mathematics
 A bit of background on eigenvalue / eigenvector problems
• Information only – not needed for final exam!
 Consider a matrix A that multiplies a vector x
• This leads to another vector b (i.e. A x = b)
 Are there any cases when b is a multiple of x (b =  x)?
• Substitute and rearrange the equation to find
• Solutions: 1) x = 0 (trivial) 2)   0 (eigenvalue), x  0 (eigenvector)
A x   x  A   I x  0
 How does this relate to our case? Premultiply by M-1 or K-1
• Clearly M–1 K is A, 2 is  (eigenvalue) and D is x (eigenvector)

K    
M D  0  M 1 K   2 I D  0
2

 How do we find eigenvalues, eigenvectors (either form is fine)
• Eigenvalue when (…) term is singular  det (…) = 0
• Once eigenvalue known, eigenvector makes equation become 0
• Kreyszig handout (book used in ME 565, ME 566 – Adv Engr Math) 9-16

16
Free Vibration and FEA – Several Points
Eigenvalue Problem:  K   2
M D  0
 The magnitude of D is irrelevant
• Any multiple of D is also an eigenvector (i.e. solves problem)
• Scale is often set using (benefits for other analyses)
 Do not need to prevent rigid body motion cases in ANSYS
• First several modes will represent rigid body motion modes if they exist
• Associated frequencies will be (approximately) 0
• Note that you must include any actual supports to get correct results!
 Often interested in lowest non-zero frequency
• Called the fundamental natural frequency of the system
• Typically design system to operate at frequencies below this value
 Note that natural frequency can be expressed two ways
• As , with units of radians/second
• As circular frequency f, with units of Hertz ( = 2 f)
• ANSYS returns frequencies as f in Hertz (Hz) 9-17

17
Beam Resonance Example
 Solve for natural frequencies of simple beam problem
• 6 DOFs total, restrain 4 or 5 of them
• Determine natural frequencies and associated mode shapes

9-18

18
Natural Frequency, Damping
 Consider structure operating under cyclic load (L)
• FEA finds fundamental natural frequency 1
• When is static analysis acceptable?
• When do you need to perform a dynamic analysis?
 Good approximation: assume static if L < 1 / 3
• Results are generally within 10% of dynamic analysis
– Perform a harmonic analysis to include dynamic effects (next topic)
• As you approach 1, forces of inertia become important
• Structure operated near natural frequency can have very short life
– Large displacements, large stresses  can lead to rapid failure
 Effect of damping
• Most structures have relatively little damping
• Assume undamped free vibration in most cases
– If included, will find 1-Damped < 1-Undamped (but only slightly different)
• ANSYS can perform calculations using damping
– Based on complex analysis methods [i.e. v = p + i q, i = (-1)½]
– Only do this if you are sure you know what you are doing! 9-19

19
Force, Distance, Mass Units
 As discussed previously, make sure units are consistent
• See NASA handout from earlier in semester
• Before performing dynamic analysis, always check your units!
• Two common metric unit approaches below

• English units – work through similar exercise to check


– Usually simply divide density by appropriate value of g
9-20

20
Structural Symmetry
 Many structures under consideration have symmetry
• Stress analysis – use symmetry to simplify problem
 Vibration modes are not necessarily symmetric
• Example – vibrating string that is simply supported
• Structure and loading (none) are symmetric about midplane
• 1st vibration mode is symmetric but 2nd vibration mode is not

 In general, do not use symmetry in free vibration analyses


– Will result in loss of non-symmetric vibration modes
 Demonstration – consider example two ways
• 24” square steel plate, 0.10” thick
• All edges simply supported
• Solve using ¼ symmetry
• Repeat using full model
9-21

21
Example Problem – ¼ Symmetric Model
 Boundary conditions for ¼ symmetric model

9-22

22
Example Problem – ¼ Symmetric Model
 1st non-zero frequency (33.51 Hz) for ¼ symmetric model

9-23

23
Example Problem – ¼ Symmetric Model
 2nd non-zero frequency (167.72 Hz) for ¼ symmetric model

9-24

24
Example Problem – Full Model
 Boundary conditions for full model

9-25

25
Example Problem – Full Model
 1st non-zero frequency (33.51 Hz) for full model

9-26

26
Example Problem – Full Model
 2nd non-zero frequency (83.83 Hz) for full model

9-27

27
Example Problem – Full Model
 5th non-zero frequency (167.72 Hz) for full model

9-28

28
Nodal Reduction
 Eigenvalue problems can be computationally intensive
• Large models – may need way to improve solution speed
 Recall earlier discussion about static condensation
• Used for Q6 element to reduce internal DOFs

 Similar procedure can be used for modal analysis


• Only keep certain DOFs in your solution
• DOFs to keep – master DOFs | DOFs to condense – slave DOFs
• Can result in significant reduction of solution time
9-29

29
Harmonic Response Analysis
 Undamped free vibration – previous slides
• No damping
• No forces applied – R(t) = 0
Eigenvalue Problem : K   2

M D sin  t  0
• Resulting solution: N modes at i with Di(t) = D i sin t

 Harmonic analysis
• No damping
• Force applied is harmonic – R(t) = R sin t
– Every nodal load is in phase
– Frequency can be any value
• Substitute into governing FEA equation
  R
K DM D
K   2

M D sin  t  R sin  t
K* D  R ; K*  K   2 M  
9-30

30
Harmonic Response Analysis
Harmonic Analysis : K   M  D sin  t  R sin  t
2

K D  R ; K  K   M 
* * 2

 Harmonic response analysis


• Can consider effect of cyclic loading on structure
– Does not include transient part of solution (when load first applied)
• Accounts for inertial effects ignored in a static analysis
• No more complicated than static analysis in terms of solution
– Still looks like static K D = R fundament equation of FEA

 What happens when  = i (one of the natural frequencies)?


• Left hand side of equation is defined to be 0
• Right hand side of equation is defined to be nonzero
• There is no solution – cannot force structure in this way
– Displacements always increase with each cycle
– Structure will likely fail due to large displacements
– Need nonlinear time-dependent analysis to consider fully
9-31

31
Harmonic Response Analysis
 Harmonic response analysis
• Usually performed at a series of frequencies
• Plot results at a given frequency (similar to static analysis plots)
• Can also plot various DOFs / nodal loads versus frequency
• Frame analysis problem from textbook

9-32

32
Transient Analysis – General Dynamic Loading
 Cases considered so far
• Modal analysis – undamped, unloaded
• Harmonic analysis – undamped, sinusoidally loaded
– Does not include transient portion of solution
 Transient analysis (not on final exam)
 M D
K DC D   R
• Loaded by general function R(t)
• Can be damped or undamped
• Generally two approaches to solution
 Modal superposition
• Solve for first M non-zero free vibration modes (M – your decision)
• Combine appropriately to predict solution
 Direct integration – full transient analysis (ME 612)
• Treat FEA equation as an initial value problem (diff. eq.)
• Solve at a series of points in time to predict response
9-33

33
FEA Transient Dynamic Analysis
 Example – transient structural analysis slide from ME 612
• Solve problem as a series of time steps (t = t0, t0 + t, t0 + 2 t, etc.)
• Numerical integration approach – converts terms to mass / damping force vectors
• Shown for information only – do not need for ME 512 final exam!
  K D  R
MD
Displacement  u n  d(tn )
d
Velocity  u n  d(tn )
dt

~
K D  R  RM  RC

34
Transient Analysis – Example
 Frame analysis problem from textbook
• Subject to impulse load (force for period of time)
• ANSYS – requires two different “load steps”
 Book solves problem both ways
• Modal superposition
• Direct integration

9-35

35
Transient Analysis – Example
 Example
• Result at
at single node

 Modal analysis
• Number of
modes used
varies

 Direct integration
• Time step
used varies

 Note that sol’n


is fairly noisy
9-36

36
ME 612 – FEA II
 Provide a brief overview of ME 612
• Topics / class style – below is Spring 2015 schedule

9-37

37

You might also like