Revised Memorandum of Facts and Law
Revised Memorandum of Facts and Law
Revised Memorandum of Facts and Law
X--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
X--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
Questions Presented
What is the best action to be done concerning Mr. Branch Manager who
went AWOL after the incident? Can you file a Civil or Criminal case?
Short Answer
Statement of Facts
Discussion
In order to have a better sight at the dispute I recommend that, even
though it is two week and no news about the whereabouts of Mr. Branch
manager, you should try to have a contract with him either by going to his
house or contacting his immediate relatives. I do not recommend that you
would dismiss him from his position in the reason that you may violate a
provision under the Labor Law. I also do not recommend filing hastily a civil or
criminal case against the Mr. Branch Manager because there could be less
expensive and less difficulty in settling this dispute.
If however, you are sure that Mr. Branch Manager stole the cash paid by
Mr. Client and ran away and even issuing a not genuine receipt to the latter, I
advise that you file a civil case or a criminal case against Mr. Branch Manager
to protect your interest. If you only want to collect the cash that Mr. Branch
Manager ran away with, just go for the civil case. In the reason that we can
prove by mere preponderance of evidence that the acts of Mr. Branch Manager
are in violation of a law unlike in a criminal proceeding, we are compelled to
prove the guilt of the latter beyond reasonable doubt. We may incur a much
more expenses in filing a criminal case and with a low percentage of winning.
If you insist in filing a criminal case we can use Article 315 of the Revised
Penal Code which punishes any person who shall defraud another by any
means. Art. 315 Swindling (Estafa) par. 1(b) provides that:
In your case, the Mr. Bank manager can be held liable for estafa because
he had the obligation to submit your payment to the bank but he did not do so.
He abuse his position in order for him to acquire the cash payment of
amortization by Mr. Client.