J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010 Oct-Dec; 3(4): 348–352.

doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.70743

PMCID: PMC2966567

Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing

Fatimah Lateef

Author information ► Article notes ► Copyright and License information ►

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract
Go to:

INTRODUCTION
In medical education, there should be exposure to live patients so that medical students and
doctors can acquire the necessary skills. There is also, on the other hand, an obligation to
provide optimal treatment and to ensure patients’ safety and well-being. These two
competing needs can sometimes pose a dilemma in medical education. Also, medicine is a
discipline that is a science as well as an art and repeated exposures with enhanced experience
will help improve skills and confidence.[1]
The growing complexities of patient care require doctors to master not only knowledge and
procedural skills but also the ability to effectively communicate with patients, relatives, and
other health care providers and also to coordinate a variety of patient care activities. Doctors
have to be good team players and their training programmes must systematically inculcate
these skills. Teamwork-related competencies are relatively new considerations in the arena of
health care
Go to:

SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING
Simulation is a technique for practice and learning that can be applied to many different
disciplines and types of trainees. It is a technique (not a technology) to replace and amplify
real experiences with guided ones, often “immersive” in nature, that evoke or replicate
substantial aspects of the real world in a fully interactive fashion. “Immersive” here implies
that participants are immersed in a task or setting as if it were the real world.[2,3]
Full-body mannequin simulators originated in the field of anesthesia in the late 1960s, based
on work done by Denson and Abrahamson from the University of Southern California. This
model was known as ‘Sim One’ and was used for training in endotracheal intubation and
induction of anesthesia. In the 1980s, during the time when personal computers became less
expensive and more simulation software became available, independent groups began to
develop simulator systems. Much of this was utilized in the areas of aviation, military
training, nuclear power generation, and space flights. In the early 1990s, more
comprehensive anesthesia simulation environments were produced, which included the
MedSim and, later, the Medical Education Technologies Inc. (METI) Advanced Human
Patient Simulator. Aviation simulation training concepts then begun to be gradually
introduced into anesthesia and other areas of medicine like critical care, obstetrics,
emergency medicine, and internal medicine. Current full-body simulator models incorporate
computerized models that closely approximate the physiology seen in the human body.
Simulation-based learning can be the answer to developing health professionals’ knowledge,
skills, and attitudes, whilst protecting patients from unnecessary risks. Simulation-based
medical education can be a platform for learning to mitigate ethical tensions and resolve
practical dilemmas. Simulationbased training techniques, tools, and strategies can be applied
in designing structured learning experiences, as well as be used as a measurement tool linked
to targeted teamwork competencies and learning objectives. Simulation-based learning itself
is not new. It has been applied widely in the aviation industry (also known as CRM or crew
resource management), anesthesiology, as well as in the military. It helps to mitigate errors
and maintain a culture of safety, especially in these industries where there is zero tolerance
for any deviation from set standards.[1,3]
Simulation has also begun to change much of the ways in which medicine is taught and how
trainees and junior doctors acquire the relevant skills. Medical, nursing, and other health care
staff also have the opportunity to develop and refine their skills, repeatedly if necessary,
using simulation technology without putting patients at risk.[4] Simulation training centers,
with their new techniques and equipment, offer unique opportunities for dynamic, complex,
and unanticipated medical situations to be practiced and managed. In both aviation and
health care domains, human performance is strongly influenced by the situational context,
i.e., the interaction between the task, the environment, and the behavior of team members. In
aviation, more than 50 years of research has shown that superior cognitive and technical
skills are not enough to ensure safety: effective teamwork skill is a must. Similar
observations are also now being made in the practice of medicine.[3–8]
The cost of simulation training, when it was first introduced, was high, and few institutions
had the vision to realize that it was a worthwhile investment for the long term. It has indeed
turned out to be a very flexible and durable form of medical education and training. Much of
the cost is contributed to by the manpower or technician costs as well as cost of the
laboratory setup and maintenance. The computer- and information technologycontrolled
equipment advances medical learning and ensures that students and doctors learn procedures
and treatment protocols before performing them on actual patients. The simulated
environment allows learning and re-learning as often as required to correct mistakes,
allowing the trainee to perfect steps and fine-tune skills to optimize clinical outcomes.[5,6]
There can also be simulated examples or scenarios of rare or unusual cases that are often
hard to come by in the clinical settings. The simulated situation and scenarios can give
students and inexperienced junior doctors realistic exposure to such cases. It can certainly
help in making books and lecture materials come alive. It helps ensure that students and
trainees gain clinical experience without having to depend on chance encounters of certain
cases. Many also believe that simulation-based learning enhances efficiency of the learning
process in a controlled and safe environment.[9,10]
In the earlier days of medicine some form of “simulation” was already being applied in the
form of case scenarios and the use of case presentations. These are also being utilized to
assess candidates in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Life support
courses such as basic and advanced cardiac life support (BCLS and ACLS, respectively), as
well as basic and advanced trauma life support (BTLS and ATLS, respectively), also utilize
simulation techniques and principles for learning and testing.[5] Simulation is a tool for
learning and training as well as for assessment of performance.[10,11]
The skills requirement which can be enhanced with the use of simulation include:

a. Technical and functional expertise training

b. Problem-solving and decision-making skills
c. Interpersonal and communications skills or team-based competencies

All of these share a common thread in that they require active listening and collaboration
besides possession of the basic knowledge and skills. With every training programme it is
best to have feedback and debriefing sessions that follow. Feedback must be linked to
learning outcomes and there must be effective debriefing protocols following all simulation
exercises. Studies have shown that simulation improves learning.[5,6,9,11] Simulation is
effective in developing skills in procedures that require eye–hand coordination and in those
that call for ambidextrous maneuvers, such as bronchoscopy and other endoscopic
procedures[9–11] Simulation training helps learners prepare to deal with unanticipated
medical events, thus increasing their confidence.
Multidisciplinary teams deliver a multitude of health care services today but many
organizations still remain focused on individual technical responsibilities, leaving
practitioners inadequately prepared to enter complex team-based settings. When health care
providers of different disciplines train separately, it may be difficult to integrate their
capabilities. Effective multidisciplinary teams must always have good communications and
leadershipsharing behavior, which can help ensure patient safety.
Inculcation of teamwork values is an example of the nontechnical, but essential, part of
training of medical professionals. Simulation has the potential to create lasting and
sustainable behavior and culture change that will make health care more effective and safer.
It also has the ability to fundamentally alter learners’ ways of doing things and working with
others. Transformational change can only come about when the learner recognizes the
problems and then adopts a proactive approach to work on it and correct it.
The essence of a team is the shared goal and commitment. It represents a powerful unit of
collective performance, which can be done as an individual or mutually. These must
eventually translate common purpose into specific performance goals. One of the important
ingredients of teams with good outcomes is the basic discipline of the team. Simulation
training and practice affords the essentials for creating an effective medical team with a sense
of group identity, group efficacy, and trust amongst members. There needs to be true
engagement and understanding for team members to work together well. Examples of these
can be seen in the incredible teamwork and excellent team dynamics that can exist during
good resuscitation, certain surgery, and the more complex intensive care cases. Members
who have had sufficient training and knowledge can be flexible enough to adapt to any new
situation and break out of their ingrained routines and they get more proficient with time.
Each member of such a health care team can carry out another team member’s job, which
reflects their interdependence. A learning team will have some degree of substitution,
defined roles and responsibilities, flexibility, good process flow, and an awareness of
common goals. Conflict resolution is another aspect of teamwork that can be practiced
during simulations.
Sexton et al. used a cross-sectional survey to assess errors, stress, and teamwork in medicine
and the aviation industry. Medical staff reported that error is an important issue but difficult
to discuss and that it was not being handled well in their hospital.[12] Other problems that
were mentioned included different perceptions of teamwork amongst team members and
reluctance of senior staff to accept inputs from junior members.[12]
Go to:

INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK AND SKILLS

The health care team comprises doctors from various disciplines, nurses, physiotherapists,
radiologists and radiographers, pharmacists, medical students, and other personnel. The
composition varies according to the objective of the teams; examples include stroke
management teams, trauma teams, acute coronary syndrome intervention teams, etc. The
training of each member of the team is decided by his or her own discipline. As such, there is
a need to bring them together in an integrated fashion to learn how to manage a patient with
complex medical problems. No one discipline is more important than the other. Everyone has
a role to play. In simulated exercises involving teams, members learn how not “to step on
each others’ toes.” They are made aware of their synergistic roles. There must also be some
flexibility allowed at various junctures of decision-making and intervention. Team-work
skills and interpersonal communication techniques are essential components of such training
and exercise.[13–16]
The simulation trainers are often senior staff who have a good grasp and helicopter view of
the whole team-based approach. They must be able to objectively view the group dynamics
and interaction within the teams they train and provide valuable feedback. They will assess
the team’s performance in real-time and may maintain checklists of activities, actions, and
relevant human factors. Videotaping the role-playing is useful as it can be played back and
the highlights shared with the team as part of their learning process. Trainers can points out
both the negative and positive practices and behaviors to the participants.[16,17]
There are also scenario writers for these simulation cases. These writers can customize the
scenarios for interdisciplinary team training and role-playing in order to highlight or facilitate
certain roles or team interaction. These scenarios should be realistic, practical, and
comprehensive. Scenarios would usually also have event triggers, environmental distractors,
and supporting events. They should be developed systematically with proficiency-based
assessment in place, which can emphasize integrative team performance as well as technical
performance. All practice and action should also be validated by data and evidence.[16]
Some common pitfalls that have been observed during team performance include:[17,18]

a. The lack of understanding of roles and responsibilities of other team members,

particularly across disciplines.
b. The absence of clearly defined specified roles may persist, despite generally
acceptable team performance; this may not become obvious until there is a change in
team members, which then reveals the role confusion.
c. Most health care systems have no or few processes or backup plans when errors
occur.
d. There is an unspoken assumption by members that everyone will perform at 100%
efficiency and effectiveness. However, there is no method to measure this.

Go to:

SETTING UP A SIMULATION TRAINING CENTER

A simulation center would be a long-term investment in medical education. It can be used for
undergraduate training (such as in the study of anatomy, physiological functions,
familiarization with medical examination techniques), for residency training (e.g., in refining
and mastering procedural skills and techniques or preparing for practical examinations,
refresher courses, and recertification tests etc.), for continuing medical or nursing education
(e.g., training in practical skills), or for competency testing prior to recruitment.[11] To start
off, there must be a convenient location, usually somewhere on the hospital or university
campus for convenience of proximity. The architecture plan and infrastructure must be
decided upon in consultation with the trainers/end-users of the center. It must include
adequate space for training small groups, rooms with one-way mirrors, and sufficient space
for equipment setup, amongst other facilities. There must also be provision for video
recording equipment. Manpower would include full-time technicians and a manager; the
trainers are usually part-time medical personnel. The decision to purchase suitable
mannequins and equipment must only be made after adequate demonstration and trials have
been done and all parties are satisfied. It is also important to have technical support from the
vendors in the long term. The different forms of medical simulation technology training that
can be considered for the center would include:

1. Human patient simulators: The centerpiece is usually a fullsized patient simulator that
blinks, breathes, and has heart beat, pulse, and respiratory sounds. This mannequin
can be very technologically advanced. For example, it may “interact” with learners
through computer-guided teaching programmes Attached monitors can display vital
signs and this can provide virtual simulation of almost every major bodily function.
This simulator can be used for scenarios from simple physical examination to
 interdisciplinary major trauma management. Some simulators can even recognize
injected medications via a laser bar-code reader and then respond with appropriate
vital sign changes
2. Simulated clinical environment: An intensive care unit, emergency room cubicle, or
operating room is prepared with all the equipment and the crash cart. The setup is as
realistic as the actual facility. Trainees can familiarize themselves with the setup and
arrangements.
3. Virtual procedure stations: Various stations can be set up, depending on what the
focus is. These stations will have all the relevant equipment and setup for the
procedure to be carried out, e.g., bronchoscopy, colonoscopy, intubation. The
simulators can present a variety of different scenarios and pathologies and the trainee
can practice until he/she masters the technique(s).
4. Electronic medical records: As more health care institutions adopt electronic medical
records to track and to manage patients, this can also be a station setup in the center.
The system utilized will have fictitious patients with their histories, notes, and lab
results. There may also be system integration, such as the link between records and
the laboratory as well as the radiology results (digitalized radiographs).

Currently, adult simulation equipment and mannequins are already well established. Pediatric
ones are still in the experimental stage, but there will be future developments. There are
children’s hospital which are already using simulation-based training for their staff.
For institutions that cannot afford to set up an entire simulation laboratory, a less expensive
option could be to invest in simulation mannequins only. This could be purchased in
different numbers and be used for training purposes. Institutions and their leaders must learn
to accept the candidates with an open mind. The leaders must be strict with their education
and training portions. It may also be useful to plan visits to established simulation centers.
Go to:

SAFETY AND SIMULATION

Health care safety can be compared to other high-stakes industries such as aviation, the
military, and nuclear power generation. In these industries, safety depends on the prevention
of human errors and on engineered redundancy so that the systems work without failing.
Morbidity and mortality can be the consequences of failures in these environments.[20–23]
Hospitals do include the numbers of medical errors as one of their key performance
indicators. The utility of simulation in health care is certainly most interesting to consider in
the context of patient safety.[23–25]
One important concept in medical safety is the paradigm of how one learns. Traditionally,
medicine works on the apprenticeship model. Trainees and residents begin caring for patients
on their first day of internship under the supervision of more experienced staff, who provide
a safety net for errors. Despite their learning about medical care before assuming
responsibility of their first patient, there must indeed be a first time for the performance of
high-risk procedures, resuscitation, and the implementation of critical decision-making skills
in real time on real patients. Simulation provides a learning model to complement traditional
learning in medicine. These scheduled simulation exposures can ensure the residents have
exposure to these emergencies, even if they are only simulated scenarios. For the
performance of procedures, it has been shown that the volume of experience decreases
patient complication rates. Simulators do allow for the development of experience prior to
performance of these procedures on patients.[4,11,23–25]
The apprenticeship model of medical teaching has not been widely studied, but newer
methods which are resourceful and intensive have been given greater scrutiny. The body of
literature is gradually emerging. A general scan of the literature from 1969 to 2003
concluded that the rigor and quality of research in simulation needs improvement, although
high-fidelity simulations are educationally effective and complement traditional teaching in
patient care settings. The features of simulation which best facilitate learning include:[23,26]

 The ability to provide feedback

 Repetitive practice
 Curriculum integration
 The ability to range the difficulty levels

The educational benefits of simulation in medical education include the following:

 Deliberate practice with feedback

 Exposure to uncommon events
 Reproducibility
 Opportunity for assessment of learners
 The absence of risks to patients

To date, however, there have been no studies to show that simulation training improves
patient care outcomes directly. There may be some reasons for this. Life-threatening
complications are rare. Most institutions have quality improvement measures in place and
selecting for the impact of simulation on patient outcomes can be difficult. However, there
exist a significant body of data and evidence for the benefit of simulation training in
educational outcomes. Learners who go through simulation do perform better on subsequent
simulated tests and tasks. In a cohort study on medical students from five institutions, one
group was exposed to 2 weeks of deliberate practice of cardiac bedside skills using the
Harvey Cardiology Patient Simulator followed by 2 weeks of traditional ward work, while
the other group went through 4 weeks of traditional ward training. The simulation group
performed at twice as well as the ward group, with only half the training time.[24]
Devita et al. showed that simulated patients had better outcomes if doctors were trained to
work together by reliably performing preassigned roles during a simulator exercise.[25]
Go to:

FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Simulation appears to be here to stay. Perhaps there will be a day when we may use it as a
tool in evaluating candidates for medical school admission, just as dental students are put
through some manual dexterity tests. As medical simulation games are being developed,
medical training may change to include a portion of time dedicated to learning through
gaming. More studies and research are also needed to determine whether simulation
improves patient outcomes. Designers will continue to improve the technology of virtual
reality to make experiences as seamless as possible.[26]
Go to:

CONCLUSION
Simulation-based training has opened up a new educational application in medicine.
Evidence-based practices can be put into action by means of protocols and algorithms, which
can then be practiced via simulation scenarios. The key to success in simulation training is
integrating it into traditional education programmes. The clinical faculty must be engaged
early in the process of development of a programme such as this. Champions and early
adopters will see the potential in virtual reality learning and will invest time and energy in
helping to create a curriculum. They can then help to engage the wider medical community.
Teamwork training conducted in the simulated environment may also offer an additive
benefit to the traditional didactic instruction, enhance performance, and possibly also reduce
errors. The cost-effectiveness of potentially expensive simulation-based medical education
and training should be examined in terms of improvement of clinical competence and its
impact on patient safety. Perhaps, with the adoption of simulation as a standard of training
and certification, health care systems will be viewed as more accountable and ethical by the
population they serve.
Go to:

Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil.
Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Go to:

REFERENCES
1. Jha AK, Duncan BW, Bates DW. Simulator based training and patient safety in: Making
health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Agency for Health care,
Research and Quality, US dept of Health and Human Services. 2001:511–8.
2. Gaba D. Human work environment and simulators. In: Miller RD, editor. In
Anaesthesia.5th Edition. Churchill Livingstone: 1999. pp. 18–26.
3. Gaba D. The future of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:2–
10.[PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Lateef F. What’s new in emergencies, trauma, and shock? Role of simulation and
ultrasound in acute care. J Emerg Trauma Shock . 2008;1:3–5. [PMC free article][PubMed]
5. Shapiro MJ, Morey JC, Small SD, Langford V, Kaylor CJ, Jagminas L, et al. Simulation
based teamwork training for emergency department staff: does it improve clinical team
performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum? Qual Saf Health
Care. 2004;13:417–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Gaba D, Howard SK, Fish K. Simulation based training in anaesthesia crisis resource
management: a decade of experience. Simulation and Gaming. 2001;32:175–93.
7. Boeing Commercial Aircraft group. Statistical study of commercial jet aircraft incidents in
worldwide operations. 1994
8. Olympio MA. Simulation saves lives. Am Soc Anaesth News. 2001;65:15–9.
9. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P.
Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J
Surg. 2004;91:146–50. [PubMed]
10. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, Smith BE, Fish KJ, Botney R. Assessment of
clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral
ratings.Anesthesiology. 1998;89:8–18. [PubMed]
11. Gupta A, Peckler B, Schoken D. Introduction of hi-fidelity simulation techniques as an
ideal teaching tool for upcoming emergency medicine and trauma residency programs in
India. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008;1:15–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and
aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320:754–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury ML, Simon R, Jay GD, Berns SD. The potential for
improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. The MedTeams
Research Consortium. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:373–83. [PubMed]
14. Beaubien JM, Baker DP. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health
care: how low can you go? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:151–6. [PMC free
article][PubMed]
15. Rosen MA, Salas E, Wu TS, Silvestri S, Lazzara EH, Lyons R, et al. Promoting
teamwork: an event-based approach to simulation-based teamwork training for emergency
medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:1190–8. [PubMed]
16. Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. A best evidence systematic review
of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Med Teach. 2007;29:735–51.[PubMed]
17. Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: factors,
processes and outcomes. J Interprof Care. 2005;19:39–48. [PubMed]
18. McPherson K, Headrick L, Moss F. Working and learning together: good quality care
depends on it, but how can we achieve it? Qual Health Care. 2001;10:46–53.[PMC free
article] [PubMed]
19. Reznek M, Harter P, Krummel T. Virtual reality and simulation: training the future
emergency physician. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:78–87. [PubMed]
20. Henriksen K, Dayton E. Issues in the design of training for quality and safety. Qual Saf
Health Care. 2006;15:17–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Farrow D. Reducing the risk of military aircrew training through simulation
technology.Performance and Instruction. 1982;21:3–8.
22. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA. The evolution of Crew Resource Management
training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9:19–32. [PubMed]
23. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, Wears RL, Salisbury M, Dukes KA, et al. Error reduction
and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork
training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res.2003;37:1553–
81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Woolliscroft JO, Calhoun JG, Tenhaken JD, Judge RD. Harvey: the impact of a
cardiovascular teaching simulator on student skill acquisition. Med Teach. 1987;9:53–
7.[PubMed]
25. DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T. Improving medical emergency team
(MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient
simulator. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:326–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Bradley P. The history of simulation in medical education and possible future
directions.Med Educ. 2006;40:254–62. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock are provided here courtesy of Wolters
Kluwer -- Medknow Publications