An Overview On Bus Rapid Transit System: E-ISSN 0976-7916
An Overview On Bus Rapid Transit System: E-ISSN 0976-7916
An Overview On Bus Rapid Transit System: E-ISSN 0976-7916
Review Article
AN OVERVIEW ON BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM
Agarwal P K1, Sharma Anupama2, Singh A. P3
India, roads are often designed to take a urban transport. It is similar to a mass bus network
particular number of users, say 30,000 persons on the road surface on the lines of a local rail
per hour per direction. But the demand for use network, where pre-ticketing, wider and lower
floors, high frequency and efficiency cut precious
of any one road tells us only part of the story;
commuting time and give breathing space to the
looking at corridor volumes using a travel
roads and parking areas which become bereft of
demand model is a flawed approach. A service
private vehicular congestion. It is also a
which delivers passengers from their desired
comprehensive system wherein cycling and
origins to their desired destinations should be pedestrian paths make the roads more people-
conceived while designing roadways. A single oriented. As many as 35 cities in the world have
dedicated lane BRTS is known to carry 20,000 successful BRTS, including five in China, besides
passengers per hour per direction. The Bus North and Latin America and Europe.
Rapid Transit System (BRTS) system project NEEDS
is intended to reduce traffic on roads while There are many reasons for developing Bus
commuters. The new 160-seater buses will be • Central business districts (CBDs) have
continued to prosper and grow in ways that
operated by metro bus and other contracted
require more transport capacity and
operators. The system helped to reduce traffic,
improved access. Given the cost and
air and noise pollution and lengthy commuting
environmental impacts associated with
times. Segregation by vehicle type or travel
parking and road construction and the
mode is the key to improving traffic flow. In a traditional urban form of most CBDs,
BRTS system the median and the inner most improved and expanded public transport
lane or the left most lane can be dedicated to emerges as an important alternative for
the bus. In case of median lanes bus stops or providing that capacity. In addition, many
stations can be built in the median to further suburban cities exceed the aggregate
improve the flow. Passengers are allowed to employment base of many urban city CBDs
but do not currently have the focus and
cross at the nearest signal or intersections. A
density to make rail-based rapid transit a
well implemented efficiently-run BRTS will
cost effective investment.
also cause citizens to switch travel modes
• BRTS systems can often be implemented
from car to bus, which will further alleviate
quickly and incrementally.
the traffic situation.
• For a given distance of dedicated running
BRT has gained considerable respect around the
way, BRTS is generally less costly to
world as a practical and affordable choice for mass
build than rail transit. Moreover, where separated rail rapid transit lines. For
BRTS vehicles can reliably operate at high example, Bogota’s Trans Milenio system
speeds on high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) serves more than 25,000 peak-hour (Trans
lanes or general-purpose highways and Milenio, 2008), peak-direction maximum
streets over significant proportions of a load point riders. The efficiency of the
given route, running way capital costs will system and high capacity of the passengers
be even lower compared to those for rail depends on the system as a whole and not
modes, which must be purpose-built over necessarily on the size of buses, though
the entire distance covered. when necessary articulated buses could be
• BRTS can be the most cost-effective means used with ease. However, BRTS in other
of serving a broad variety of urban and countries can handle passenger flows in the
suburban environments. BRTS vehicles, range of 5,000 to 25,000 passengers per
whether they are driver-steered or hour per direction. BRTS is designed and
electronically guided, can operate on streets, developed to tackle all the drawbacks of the
in freeway medians, on railroad rights-of- existing bus system in an economical and
way, on aerial structures, and underground. efficient manner. It is a low-cost option for
BRTS systems can also provide a broad providing cities with a quality transit option.
array of express, limited-stop, and local all- MAJOR ELEMENTS OF BUS RAPID
stop services on a single facility without TRANSIT SYSTEM
complex signal and guide-way switching The major elements of bus rapid transit are
systems. described below.
• BRTS can provide quality performance with • Running ways-running ways drive travel
sufficient transport capacity. For example, speeds, reliability and identity. Options
the Ottawa transit way system’s link to the range from general traffic lanes to fully-
CBD carries more people in the peak hour grade separated BRT transit ways
than most LRT segments in North America. • Stations –Stations, as the entry point to the
The Brisbane South East Bus way carries system, are the single most important
approximately the same number of customer interface, affecting accessibility,
maximum load point, peak-hour, and peak- reliability, comfort, safety and security, as
direction passengers about 10,000 per hour well as dwell times, and system image. BRT
(Translink, 2008). Many BRTS lines in station options vary from simple stops with
South American cities carry peak-hour basic shelter to complex intermodal
passenger flows that equal or exceed those terminals with many amenities.
on many U.S. and Canadian fully grade-
health risks to road users and residents. Cost it can carry 5400 bicycles per hour. Average
estimates for HCBS are significantly less than occupancy of a car is 1.15 persons and bicycle
the cost of grade separators, provided to reduce carries one person. This implies that in order to
congestion. move the same number of people we would need
Increased safety 2.6 times the roads are that would be required
By creating segregated bicycle lanes and re- for bicyclists. Give the fact that there is not
designing intersections, conflicts between much space available to expand existing road the
motorized traffic and bicyclists can be reduced future mobility needs and projected trips can
leading to a sharp decrease in the number of only be met by increasing the capacity of the
accidents and fatalities for bicyclists and existing road network. This can be achieved by
motorized two-wheelers. encouraging modes, which are more efficient in
Increased capacity terms of space utilization. Motorized vehicles
An exclusive bus lane carries significantly more benefit because of improved capacity of road
people than an adjoining general traffic lane and improvement in speeds. Capacity estimates
during the peak travel periods. The number of of a typical arterial road in Delhi show
bus riders in an exclusive bus lane exceeds the improvement in corridor capacity by 19-23
number of automobile occupants using adjacent percent by providing an exclusive cycle track. If
lanes. Thus exclusive travel ways result in to the full capacity of the corridor is utilized, i.e.,
increased capacity. If a separate segregated lane provision of a high capacity improvement by 56-
is constructed for BRTS and bicycles, the 73 percent (present carrying capacity is 23,000
curbside lane, which is currently used by passengers/hour to 45,000 passengers/hour)
bicyclists, becomes available to motorized (Tiwari G., 2004). BRT systems provide a
traffic and buses. This relatively small dedicated corridor for quicker bus movements
investment in bicycle lanes can increase the road (coupled with bus priority signaling system) and
space for motorized traffic by 50% on three lane give a segregated and safe corridor for
roads. Bicycle lanes also result in better space pedestrians and non-motorized transport like
utilization. Not only does extra space on the cycles and cycle rickshaws. Salient Features of
main carriageway become available to other Bus Rapid Transit System can be summarized as
modes, the dedicated bicycle track also provides follows:
a higher capacity for bicyclists. Provision of • Bus only, grade-separated (or at-grade
exclusive bicycle track also provides an exclusive) right-of-way: The main feature
opportunity to develop left lane as an exclusive of a BRT system is having dedicated bus
bus lane. For instance a 3.5 m wide lane has a lanes which operate separate from all other
carrying capacity of 1800 cars per hour whereas traffic modes.
Reliability: One of the basic objectives of information advantages of BRTS are seen
any transport infrastructure projects is positively by potential BRTS customers
saving in travel time. Systems with more when they make their travel decisions.
exclusive transit ways would demonstrate When considering impacts on rider‐ship, it
the most reliability and the least schedule is important to note that BRTS systems
variability and bunching. Passenger surveys attract three types of trips:
around the world indicate that reliability is a) Existing transit trips that diverted to the
important for attracting and retaining new BRTS system from other
passengers. New automated vehicle location systems/services
systems allow for the objective and b) Totally new or “induced” trips that were
conclusive measurement of reliability. not made before by transit or any other
Safety and Security: BRTS will be a safe mode
mode of public transportation. Passengers c) Trips that were previously made by
traveling by BRTS are very safe and another, non‐transit mode (drive alone,
neighborhoods through which the system carpool, walk or bicycle) now opt for
passes are also much safer. A single bus BRTS service.
will remove about 50 cars from the road and • Transit Supportive Land Development:
scientific signal systems will make the BRTS will enhance property value along the
neighborhoods safer for local traffic and corridor. In some cases, the development
pedestrians. Customer perceptions of will take place adjacent to transit to the
“personal safety” or security reveal that transit facility, while in other places the
customers perceive BRT systems to be safer development would be integrated with the
than the rest of the transit system. transit stations. Generally, it is being
Increased Rider‐ship: Attracting higher recommended to link transit and land
rider‐ship is one of the main goals of any development around the world and even in
rapid transit investment. The ability to Indian cities where BRTS is being
attract rider‐ship reaffirms the attractiveness implemented including Ahmadabad wherein
of the transit service and confers many increase in FAR is being proposed along
benefits to a region, including reduced BRTS corridor on ring road. Hence, transit
congestion, increased accessibility, and oriented development is envisaged for
reduced pollution. The number of Bhopal also.
passengers is the surest indicator that a • BRTS reduces pollution: When discussing
service is attractive and appropriately urban transportation systems, the primary
designed. The identity and passenger way to improve the environment is through
implementation costs also don't leave suitably redesigned to take care of safety
taxpayers tied to one particular aspect.
technology or solution. REFERENCES
• Proper attention needs to be given to • Bus Rapid Transit System, Bhopal,
Presentation by BCEOM International
pedestrian approach, crossing and France, Bhopal Municipal Corporation,
circulation in bus stations. Continued Sept., 2008, (downloaded from Internet,
Nov., 2009)
planning of BRT stations and • Bhopal City Development Plan under
JNNURM, A Report, Bhopal Municipal
configurations should minimize Corporation, Bhopal, (downloaded from
difficulties of pedestrian circulation and Internet, Nov., 2009)
• Case study:-Social Cost and Benefit
passenger transfer. This implies that Analysis for BRT, Road Research in India,
2008-2009, IRC Highway Research Board.
stations should be as close to
• Kadiyali,L.R,(2008),Traffic Engineering
intersections as possible. Transit stations and Transportation Planning, Khanna
Publishers,Seventh Edition, Delhi.
should be located in the heart of their • Mohan Dinesh, Planning for Public
target service areas. Transport: Integrating Safety, Environment
and Economic Issues, Transportation
• The commuters prefer to board/alight at Research and Injury Prevention Programme
Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi
intersections, Thus creating informal bus 110 016, India.
stops which cause hazardous Traffic • Namasani, Y.K., Traffic Impact Assessment
of Exclusive Bus Lanes, M.Tech
conditions, it is advisable to plan the Transportation Systems Engineering, Dept.
of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, June
facilities as per the commuters’ 2009.
requirements • Singh, A.P., (2010), Strategies for
Development of Environment Friendly, Safe
• A dedicated lane for the buses should and Efficient Public Transport System,
M.Tech Thesis submitted to Dept. of Civil
not be subjected to repeated punctures Engineering, Maulana Azad National
into the facilities existing on the sides, Institute of Technology, Bhopal.
• Tiwari Geetam, Bus Priority Lanes for
such as offices and colonies the design Delhi, Transportation Research and Injury
Prevention Programme, Indian Institute of
provides for adequate pedestrian safety
Technology, Delhi, India 110016
for crossing the roads • Workshop, Bus Rapid Transit System,
Department of Transport, Government of the
• The signal system should be resorted to National Capital Territory of Delhi, 12-13,
at the junctions to minimize the Dec., 2005, Delhi. (downloaded from
Internet, Nov., 2009)
merging/ weaving of the traffic • Yasuf, H, Opening Speech, Proceeding of
Workshop on Bus Rapid Transit System,
• Kerbs dividing the lanes may lead to Dec. 2005, I.I.T, Delhi, Delhi.
accidents without physical kerbs but the
lane segregation will not be possible
without the kerb stones these can be