IMPLEMENTATION OF

BELARUS ROADMAP FOR

HIGHER EDUCATION
REFORM

6TH MONITORING REPORT

(MAY-OCTOBER 2017)

Prepared by the Belarusian Independent Bologna Committee

and the Ad Hoc Committee of the Belarusian National Platform
of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum

October 2017
 According to the timeline of the Belarus Roadmap for Higher Education Reform implementation, by this
time, Belarus should have fulfilled all its obligations. However, as for the terms established by the
Roadmap, the Belarusian authorities are far from fulfilling the overwhelming majority of these
obligations.

The monitoring of the Roadmap implementation demonstrates that none of the commitments assumed
by Belarus in 2015 is implemented completely and on time.

After analysing the level of implementation of the most socially significant Roadmap requirements by
the Belarusian side, we have to conclude that from the list of the changes most expected by the public
only the following Roadmap requirements are enforced or planned to be implemented:

 transition to the three-cycle Bologna higher education model: bachelor – master - PhD, and
 issue of the Diploma Supplement automatically and free of charge

All the other commitments, such as:

 introduction of the National Qualification Framework

 creation of the Independent Quality Assurance Agency
 changes in the current system of mobility permits, to allow for longer periods of mobility within
EHEA for both staff and students without a ministerial approval
 withdrawal of the existing practice of graduate work placement
 overcoming the discrimination of students of private higher education establishments when it
comes to granting them financial aid (preferential loans)
 guarantees of academic freedom and expansion of institutional autonomy, including widening
of students’ participation in management of higher education institutions
 providing students and faculty members with the right to freely establish and register
organisations without any discrimination, in particular by abolishing Article 193.1 of the
Criminal Code

are not enforced, and their implementation is not provided by any draft legal acts.

Thus, out of nine Roadmap obligations, which are significant for the society, only two could be
implemented by the Belarusian authorities if the new Education Code is adopted by May 2018. However,
this is an unlikely development as the review of this bill by the National Assembly was postponed
indefinitely.

There is a lack of progress in the areas of great concern to the EHEA members. These issues were behind
excluding Belarus accession to the EHEA from the agenda in 2012.

In order to preserve the Belarusian higher education reform dynamic, the EHEA members should be
persistent and coherent in their approaches towards Belarus’ implementation of the Roadmap
commitments, adhering to their principles while evaluating the introduction of fundamental
academic values into the Belarusian legislation and practice.

2
In view of the current state of affairs, the best solution is to extend the Roadmap implementation
timeline for 2-3 years and to maintain international control over its implementation.

Implementation of the Roadmap provisions as of 1 October 2017

1. Structural reforms
Qualifications framework
 Commit to developing a National Qualifications framework compatible with the QF-
EHEA.
 Commit to establishing a timetable for this work and to identify a national steering
group by the end of 2015 and to launch work on the NQF in the first half of 2016.
Legislative, legal and methodological frameworks, information support

The legal basis of the higher education system in relation to the creation of the National Qualification
Framework (NQF), higher education system, and other Bologna tools of providing transparency,
include legal and regulatory acts, as well as other methodical documents and guidelines developed
in 2011-2015; there are also specific documents establishing higher education standards generated
on the basis of 2011 education standards (2nd cycle of higher education) and the ones of 2013 (1st
cycle of higher education).
These are Decisions of the Ministry of Education on higher education standards for the 1st Cycle (d/d
February, 3rd, 2016 №7; d/d May, 30th, 2016 №42; d/d July, 8th, 2016 №65; d/d July, 25th, 2016
№68; d/d July, 25th, 2016 №69; d/d August, 11th, 2016 №79) and Decisions of the Ministry of
Education on higher education standards for the 2nd Cycle (d/d February, 8th, 2016 №8; d/d May,
25th, 2016 №40; d/d July, 18th, 2016 №67; d/d August, 23rd, 2016 №83; d/d September, 15th, 2016
№90; d/d September, 30th, 2016 №92; d/d September, 30th, 2016 №93; d/d October, 7th, 2016
№94).

The website of the Advisory Group for the Roadmap support was launched.

The official cite of the National Institute of Higher Education where all the educational standards
drafts for higher education are posted was also developed. This site also contains legal and regulatory
acts on the development and implementation of new educational standards as well as the public
discussion on this matter - National Portal for Educational Standards Drafts for Higher Education.

National Qualification Framework (NQF)

In 2015-2017 Belarus did practically nothing at the legislative level to create the National Qualification
Framework.

Until now, the only regulatory legal act dedicated to the NQF, which launched the process of its
development, is Decision of the Council of Ministers d/d January, 17th, 2014 №34 “On developing
the national system of qualifications in the Republic of Belarus”.

3
This Decision launched a pilot project aimed at developing a number of professional standards,
however with no further incorporation in other legal acts.

In the labor legislation (the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus), as well as in the new project of
the Education Code of the Republic of Belarus, not to mention the current Education Code, there are
no mentions of the national system of qualifications, the National Qualification Framework,
professional standards and related terminology and procedures.

In a number of decisions of the National Council of rectors of higher education establishments

(Decision №1 d/d 16 June 2016 «About the formation and introduction of qualification frameworks,
taking into account the introduction of the Republic of Belarus into the European Higher Education
Area», Decision of Presidium №2 d/d 22 February 2017 «Formation of the National Qualification
Framework to provide quality of higher education, its conformity with requirements of today’s labor
market»), in the letter of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus to higher education
establishments (d/d 14 October 2016 №08-19/4097/ds «About the organization of the educational
process in higher education establishments in the 2016/2017study year»), there are words on the
necessity to activate the working-out of the National Qualification Framework.
Thus, in the Decision of the Presidium of the National Council of rectors of the Republic of Belarus in
February 2017 (№2 d/d February, 22nd, 2017), it is noticed that although a certain basis to work out
the NQF is already created (educational levels according to ISCED 2011, their duration, transition
conditions, and learning outcomes are defined, the council of rectors urges to speed up the work
aimed at working out the NQF.

In particular, the council of rectors has called

«1. … the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus …
1.1) to address to the Government with an offer to activate the working-out of the NQF;
1.2) to approve the project of the National Qualification Framework of higher education of the
Republic of Belarus (BelQF) and to discuss it at national and international levels;
1.3) to confirm the plan of working out and introducing the National Qualification Framework
of higher education of the Republic of Belarus (BelQF);
1.4) to define an order of support and actualization of the National Qualification Framework of
higher education of the Republic of Belarus (BelQF).
2. … the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Republic of Belarus
2.1) while working out the national system of qualifications, to consider the National
Qualification Framework of higher education of the Republic of Belarus (BelQF) approved by the
Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus; …
3. … the National Institute of Higher Education and the National Institute of Vocation
Education …
3.2) to make offers to the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus on the basic structural
elements and quantity of levels of the national framework of the qualifications corresponding to EQF-
LLL;
3.3) to develop and present to the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus a plan of
working out the National Qualification Framework corresponding to EQF-LLL (as an element of the
national system of qualifications); …

4
 3.5) to organize a public-professional discussion of the developed projects of the National
Qualification Framework of higher education of the Republic of Belarus (BelQF) and the National
Qualification Framework corresponding to EQF-LLL.» 1

Thanks to open sources, it is known that the approximate plan of measures aimed at perfecting the
national system of qualifications of the Republic of Belarus (2016-2019) was presented during a
presentation and that it provides the following steps, which implementation is planned for the period
from 2016 to 2019:

«1. Introduction into the labor legislation of terms and concepts of the new model of the national
system of qualifications (professional standard, NQF, skill level, etc.) - 2017
2. Working-out and coordination of the project of the National Qualification Framework of the
Republic of Belarus and its preparation to be approved - 2017
3. Working-out and approval of regulatory legal acts regulating an order of working-out and
approval of professional standards - 2017
4. Formation of a plan of working out and approving professional standards - 2017
5. Working-out and approval of regulatory legal acts regulating an order of recognizing results
of informal education, evaluation, and certification of qualifications - 2017-2018
6. Introduction of modifications and additions into the educational legislation of the Republic of
Belarus regarding the system of professional qualifications, order of assigning qualifications,
recognitions of results of informal education - 2017-2019.» 2

However, there are no publicly open officially confirmed «Plan to work out and introduce the
National Qualification Framework of higher education of the Republic of Belarus (BelQF)», «Plan to
work out the National Qualification Framework corresponding to EQF-LLL», and «National
Qualification Framework of higher education of the Republic of Belarus (BelQF)», mentioned in
Decision of the Presidium of the National Council of rectors (№2 d/d February, 22nd, 2017), no
«Approximate plan of measures aimed at perfecting the national system of qualifications of the
Republic of Belarus (2016-2019)».

In November 2016, the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus created a national working
group to develop the National Qualification Framework consisting of 5 people (heads of the
educational system and education establishments) 3 . No results of the work of this group are
published.

On January, 25th, 2017, in the Ministry of Education and Science of Germany (Berlin, Germany), there
was the 4th session of the Consultative Group of the Roadmap, during which, inter alia, the question
«Working-out of the National Qualification Framework of levels of higher education of the Republic

1 Decision of the Presidium of the National Council of rectors of Belarus №2 d/d February, 22nd, 2017 «Formation of the National Qualification
Framework to provide quality of higher education, its conformity with requirements of today’s labor market».
http://srrb.niks.by/ .
2 Perfecting the national system of qualifications of the Republic Belarus: problems and prospects of introduction of the National Qualification

Framework. – Presentation by Mironova T. N., director of the scientific research institute of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of
Belarus. - 2016.
http://www.ipq.org.ua/upload/files/files/03_Novyny/2016.05.25-
26_NQS_Belarus/%D0%9F%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%97%D0%95%D0%9D%D0%A2%D0%90%D0%A6%D0%98%D0%AF_%D0%9C%D0%B8
%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA_2016.pdf
3
http://ag2.bsu.by/ru/main.aspx?guid=4251

5
of Belarus» was discussed and the project of the National Qualification Framework of higher
education of Belarus was presented in the version of January 2017 in English4, which includes four
levels, three of which (higher education, I cycle; higher education, II cycle (Master's degree program),
and postgraduate study of I cycle (postgraduate studies or PhD programs)) in certain degree
correspond to the Qualification Framework of the European Higher Education Area, and
postgraduate study of II cycle (doctoral studies or Advanced Research Degree Program) has no
equivalent in the EQF system. The Russian-language version of the project of the NQF of HE of Belarus
has not been found in open sources.

There is no official information on stages and results of working out the NQF and professional
standards. The information sources are still separate presentations and publications.

Conclusions

The absence of openness in the course of working out the NQF does not make it possible to
reliably establish the degree of progress in the implementation of this requirement of the
Roadmap. However, the current legislation and discussed bills allow us to conclude that this
work has not left the frameworks of its initial stage and cannot be completed within the terms
envisaged by the Roadmap.

Architecture of higher education

In the Belarus Roadmap For Higher Education Reform, regarding the transition to three-level system,
it is said that in order to achieve the necessary results, Belarus will assume the following obligations:
As part of this work, commit to introducing the three-cycle system on the agreed Bologna model,
establishing a first degree of 180 - 240 ECTS credits and consequently to gradually phase out the
remaining 5 year bakalavr degree, and subsequently measure student workload in ECTS, as
stipulated in the revised ECTS Users’ Guide.

Legislation, regulatory legal acts, and standard-methodical support of higher education

In 2016, there were a number of actions that had to do with modernization of higher school and
perfection of the contents of higher education. On 12 October 2016, there was the national round
table «Implementation of EHEA tools in the national education system»5; on 30 November 2016 - the
scientific-practical seminar «Pressing questions of working out educational standards of higher
education of Generation 3+» 6 ; on 13 December 2016 – the 4th annual Dutch-Belarusian-Polish
conference «Education as human rights: higher education modernization in reply to the 21st
century’s challenges»7; on 30 March 2017 - the international seminar «Contemporary approaches in

4 http://ag2.bsu.by/ru/main.aspx?guid=4251
5
http://www.nihe.bsu.by/index.php/ru/novosti-instituta/1255-respublikanskij-kruglyj-stol-realizatsiya-instrumentov-evropejskogo-
prostranstva-vysshego-obrazovaniya-v-natsionalnoj-sisteme-obrazovaniya
6 http://www.nihe.bsu.by/index.php/ru/upd
7 http://bolognaby.org/index.php/sobitiya/novosti/623-konferentsiya-obrazovanie-kak-pravo-cheloveka-modernizatsiya-vysshego-

obrazovaniya-v-otvet-na-vyzovy-xxi-veka

6
education-program contents of higher education»8. During these events, some changes in the project
of the Education Code were presented 9 ; questions of forming projects of a new generation of
educational standards 3+, based on the competence approach, using results of education and ECTS10
11, as well as a new form of an annex to the diploma, which contents and structure correspond to the

Diploma Supplement, were discussed.

On 09 March 2017, there was a round table of the Standing Commission on education, culture, and
science of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus and the
Ministry of Education that discussed a project of a new edition of the Education Code of the Republic
of Belarus12. However, nothing is known about the further destiny of the "long-suffering" Code.

In the Code project, there is an attempt to build a three-level model of higher education: there appear
the terms "bachelor" [bakalavr] and "master" [magistr]; the term and definition of «doktorant»
(candidate for a doctor's degree) is excluded from the existing Code; the following levels of higher
education are introduced: Bachelor's program (bakalavriat; general higher education), Master's
program (magistratura; profound higher education), and scientifically-focused vocational education
(aspirantura; postgraduate studies), which is transformed from postgraduate study and which
should correspond to the third cycle (doctoral studies) in the Bologna architecture of higher
education, as well as the continuous educational program of higher education that unites preparation
in bakalavriat and magistratura for separate specialties.

At the same time, in the Code project, it is underlined that «the educational system includes … higher
educational system, system of scientifically-focused vocational education, …» that makes it possible
to consider that the third cycle - «the scientifically-focused vocational education» - is not integrated
completely into the higher education structure yet.

It is necessary to mark that in the Code project, contrary to the Roadmap requirements, the
definitions of cycles (levels) of higher education do not reflect a range of ECTS credits for each
educational level. The duration of training is still calculated by years.

Conclusions

Obligations to reform the architecture of higher education, as a whole, are carried out by the
Belarusian party. At the same time, it is necessary to notice that the architecture of three
cycles has not been approved legislatively yet. Prospects of accepting the new edition of the
Education Code remain vague. Besides, in the Code project, there is the approach to define the

8 http://www.nihe.bsu.by/index.php/ru/novosti-instituta/1418-mezhdunarodnyj-seminar-sovremennye-podkhody-v-uchebno-programmnom-
obespechenii-vysshego-obrazovaniya
9 Legal aspects of implementing EHEA tools in the national educational system. - Presentation by Titovich I. - NIHS, 2016.

http://bolognaby.org/images/uploads/2016/12/Titovich_2016_confer.pdf

10Features of designing educational standards of Generation 3+. - Presentation by Artemyeva S. M. - NIHS, 2016.
http://www.nihe.bsu.by/images/norm-c/project-doc/30_11_2016.pdf

11 Use of credits with the account of priority ranking of learning outcomes. - Presentation by Shvaiko V. G. - NIHS, 2016.
http://www.nihe.bsu.by/images/norm-c/project-doc/ECTS.pdf
12
https://www.bsuir.by/ru/news/98968-proekt-redaktsii-kodeksa-respubliki-belarus-ob-obrazovanii-obsudili-v-bguir

7
duration of education, which does not consider the recommendations of the Roadmap and the
reviewed ECTS Users' Guide.
Quality assurance
Commit to establishing, by the end of 2017, the legal basis for an independent quality assurance
agency in conformity with the European Standards and Guidelines.
By the end of 2015, develop a timetable for establishing this agency.
Through the BFUG, invite foreign quality assurance experts to advise on the timetable and plans
for establishing the agency as well as on the process leading to it being established.
If we compare the project and the current Education Code, we shall see a certain movement in the
direction of implementing the Roadmap requirements, including the requirement to have open
statistical information on results of quality control. Simultaneously, just like before, the project does
not provide any other semantic evaluation of quality and control purposes, except for checks on
«conformity of education to requirements of the educational standard, education-program
documentation of a corresponding educational program». Thus, it is only possible to hope that these
requirements will correspond in due course to ESG principles.

There is also an obvious vacuum in questions of regulating licensing and accreditation of educational
institutions and educational programs. Rigid restrictions of this activity by only state structures
obviously contradict the Roadmap provisions.

There are no changes in the practice of providing quality externally. The system, standard base, and
accreditation and licensing procedures remain the same; attraction of foreign experts and interaction
with foreign agencies, working in the field of quality control, are not to be expected. The system does
not correspond to ESG requirements because of the absence of the National Qualification Framework
and professional standards based on a functional approach. It does not use a considerable part of
criteria of the ENQA network. For example, stakeholders practically do not participate in quality
evaluation procedures; results evaluation criteria are not explained to students; reports on internal
and external evaluation of quality are not published; the Quality Department does not publish
analytical reviews of results of its activity, either.

Conformity of the current and projected acts of legislation and other regulation (accepted for the
Quality Department) to ESG recommendations as for 15 indicators allocated by us (numbers of the
summary list of ESG standards is preserved) shows their partial conformity only:

Indicator Need to modify Need to Conformity

№
the legislation modify the with
acco
practice Roadmap
rdin
requireme
g to
nts
ESG

1 2 3 4 5

8
 Cyclical external quality assurance
1.10 no no yes
Institutions should undergo external
quality assurance in line with the ESG on a
cyclical basis.
Use of internal quality assurance
2.1 yes yes no
procedures: External quality assurance
procedures should take into account the
effectiveness of the internal quality Do not take
assurance processes described in Part 1 of into
the European Standards and Guidelines. no practice
consideration
Designing methodologies fit for
2.2 yes yes no
purpose
External quality assurance should be
defined and designed specifically to ensure Interested
its fitness to achieve the aims and parties are not
objectives set for it, while taking into involved; their
account relevant regulations. Stakeholders purposes are
should be involved in its design and not considered;
continuous improvement.
Implementing processes
2.3 yes yes no
External quality assurance processes
should be reliable, useful, pre-defined,
implemented consistently and published.
They include - a self-assessment or
equivalent; - an external assessment
normally including a site visit; - a report
resulting from the external assessment; - a
consistent follow-up.
Regarding self- Regarding
assessment revalidation
of the data of
the self-
assessment
report
Peer-review experts
2.4 yes yes no
External quality assurance should be
carried out by groups of experts that
include (a) student member(s). Regarding Regarding
attraction of attraction of
students students
Criteria for outcomes
2.5 no no yes
Any outcomes or judgements made as the
result of external quality assurance should
be based on explicit and published criteria
that are applied consistently, irrespective

9
 of whether the process leads to a formal
decision.
Reporting
2.6 yes yes no
Full reports by the experts should be
published, clear and accessible to the
academic community, external partners
and other interested individuals. If the
agency takes any formal decision based on
the reports, the decision should be
published together with the report.
Complaints and appeals
2.7 no no yes
Complaints and appeals processes should
be clearly defined as part of the design of
external quality assurance processes and
communicated to the institutions.
3.1 Activities, policy and processes for yes yes no
quality assurance
Agencies should undertake external
quality assurance activities as defined in
Part 2 of the ESG on a regular basis. They
should have clear and explicit goals and
objectives that are part of their publicly
available mission statement. These should
translate into the daily work of the agency.
Agencies should ensure the involvement of
stakeholders in their governance and
work.

3.2 Official status yes yes no

Agencies should have an established legal
basis and should be formally recognised as
quality assurance agencies by competent
public authorities.

3.3 Independence yes yes no

Agencies should be independent and act
autonomously. They should have full
responsibility for their operations and the
outcomes of those operations without
third party influence.

3.4 Thematic analysis yes yes no

Agencies should regularly publish reports
that describe and analyze the general

10
 findings of their external quality assurance
activities.

3.5 Resources yes yes no

Agencies should have adequate and
appropriate resources, both human and
financial, to carry out their work.

3.6 Internal quality assurance and yes yes no

professional conduct
Agencies should have in place processes
for internal quality assurance related to
defining, assuring and enhancing the
quality and integrity of their activities.

3.7 Cyclical external review of agencies yes yes no

Agencies should undergo an external
review at least once every five years in
order to demonstrate their compliance
with the ESG.

Conformity with four out of fifteen criteria formally equals about 30% of the implementation of the
ESG standards - however, being taken out of the context, they actually cannot be considered partially
implemented requirements of the Roadmap as they only reflect the necessary minimum for the
existence of the accreditation system. Thus, in none of published projects of standard documents that
have to do with quality assurance in higher education, no changes to correct the situation are found.

No schedule of creating an independent agency (as provided by the Roadmap) is developed. There
are no changes aimed at rapprochement with the ESG in the standard documentation of the
Department of Quality, a structural subdivision of the Ministry of Education that has to carry out and
methodically support accreditation. Therefore, actually, this requirement of the Roadmap is not
fulfilled at all; there is no preparatory work because the program of developing education in the
Republic of Belarus for 2016-2020 includes no creation of an independent agency of accreditation
and bringing the standard base in conformity with the ESG provisions. The instructive letter of the
Ministry of Education «About the organization of the educational process in higher education
establishments in the 2017/2018 educational year» d/d 23 August 2017 №08-19/5447 does not
provide any modifications of the legislation and accreditation practice.

However, there are certain prospects of implementing the obligations of the Roadmap – even though
much delayed.

Thus, there is an important initiative of the National Council of rectors - on 26 July 2017, during its
session, it analyzed the current system of quality assurance in Belarusian higher education
establishments. It expressed the expediency of using the ESG recommendations in practice by those

11
who are responsible for quality assurance, which confirms our conclusions about the discrepancy
between the quality assurance system and the Roadmap requirements and the fact that the activity
of the department of accreditation of higher education establishments does not answer to the ESG
recommendations. The Council made the following decision:

- To recommend to the Ministry of Education to consider a possibility of introducing some procedural

changes in the order of carrying out accreditation of higher education establishments, taking into
account the international experience;
- To work together with the Ministry of Education on the question of creating (forming) a structure
responsible for evaluation of quality of higher education in the context of the Roadmap provisions;
- To consider a possibility of placing representatives of Belarus in European and international
associations and networks in the field of education quality assurance.

It is possible to see that among the heads of higher education establishments there are those who
understand the value of European approaches to assure quality of higher education and the necessity
of their application in Belarus.

Unfortunately, this understanding has not turned into any real plan of actions. It is possible to think
that the only result is the statement of the Minister of Education I. V. Karpenko within the framework
of the «national teachers' meeting» on August, 24th, 2017, on the need to create a center to provide
the formation in the country of a system of independent evaluation of quality of education, i.e. the
agency of control in the educational sphere should become such a center. It, according to the Minister,
will be created by the way of uniting structures subordinated to the Ministry of Education - the
Department of Quality and the Institute of Control of Knowledge, which now solve absolutely
different tasks.

Obviously, the independence of such an agency will only be provided in relation to education
establishments, but not in relation to the Ministry - as the agency remains subordinated to it. Thus,
the only step planned to be implemented within the Roadmap is to withdraw the accreditation
agency from the structure of the Ministry of Education, but to preserve the subordination of the new
agency to the Ministry.

There is no information on the preparatory work aimed at implementing this idea in open sources.

Conclusions

The introduction of the ESG recommendations into the current and future legislation remains
unsatisfactory. Less than a third of the recommendations is reflected in statutory acts. The
obligation to create an independent agency of quality assurance is not fulfilled.

Recognition
By the end of 2016, review legislation and practice with a view to identifying any modifications
needed to bring them into conformity with the obligations undertaken by Belarus as a State
party to the Lisbon Recognition Convention.
By the end of 2017, implement any required modification of practice that does not require

12
amending legislation.
By the end of 2017, develop a timetable for the implementation of required legislative
modifications.

There are still no published data on the carrying-out of evaluation of the legislation and law-
enforcement practice. There have been no changes in the existing normative documents.

In the project of the Education Code (Article 114), there is a norm that says that recognition of
education periods belongs to the competence of education establishments. However, this article is
not coordinated with ECTS - in the existing practice it only leads to formal account of the time spent
by a student in another educational institution, but it does not lead to recognition of the studies
fulfilled during this period even in cases of carrying out official exchanges.

The Code project does not settle the situation with reception of additional and informal education
abroad. Cases of mobility inside the country are excluded from the process of recognizing the periods
of training. There is no regulation of recognition of refugees’ education. Qualifications of the third
step of higher education are excluded from the recognition process: the diploma of the researcher
issued after the end of aspirantura (postgraduate studies) has no value at the national labor market
and, hence, cannot be recognized abroad; recognition in the form of establishing the equivalence of
the diploma of the candidate of science is within the competence of the Higher Certifying Commission
and is taken out of the frameworks of the educational legislation.

The program of developing education in the Republic of Belarus for 2016-2020 does not presuppose
to improve the mechanisms of recognition procedures.

The instructive letter of the Ministry of Education «About the organization of the educational process
in higher education establishments in the 2017/2018 educational year» d/d 23 August 2017 №08-
19/5447 does not provide any modifications of the legislation and recognition practice.

During the current year, the work of the Belarusian ENIC has been analyzed by a group of experts of
the Flemish ENIC/NARIC. The results of the analysis have not been published in open sources.

Conclusions

The implementation of the Roadmap obligations as for recognition can be estimated as 50%
because joining to the Lisbon convention and work on recognition of foreign qualifications
according to its basic provisions is being conducted in the country. However, there is no
information on the carried-out analysis of the legislation and the practice of its application;
there is no plan to eliminate obvious discrepancies or, at least, it is not known to the public.

Tools to provide transparency

ECTS and learning outcomes

13
The Roadmap of reforming higher education in Belarus, in the part of the ECTS implementation and
learning outcomes, says that in order to achieve the necessary results Belarus will assume the
following obligations:

By the end of 2015, develop a plan to implement ECTS in accordance with the revised ECTS Users’
Guide by the end of 2017, with a strong focus on learning outcomes, curriculum design, delivery
as well as assessment and applied to mobility programmes
By the end of 2017, develop a plan to issue the Diploma Supplement in the format developed by
the Council of Europe, the European Commission and UNESCO to all students automatically, free
of charge and in a widely spoken language (other than Russian).

In spite of the fact that in Decision №2 of the Presidium of the National Council of rectors d/d 22
February 2017 it is underlined that «…in the project of the Education Code of the Republic of
Belarus…
- each educational level is described in terms of learning outcomes (competences); …
- kinds (cycles) of education are defined by the duration of training in credits»,
this information does not reflect reality.

In the project of the Education Code, there are no descriptors of levels, no learning outcomes, and no
range of ECTS credits for each level (cycle) of education.

The project of the Education Code says that the system of academic hours and/or the system of
credits can be applied while planning educational programs of higher education and while defining
their labor intensity, which attests that the use of ECTS credits has no binding character. The
description of the credit in the project of the Code has no correlation with learning outcomes and
does not consider the complexity of the discipline, its importance, as well as kinds of educational
activity, during calculations, which does not correspond to the Roadmap requirements and
corresponds not to the full to the ECTS Users' Guide provisions. In 2015, even before the Yerevan
conference, in Belarus a methodology of calculating credits was developed and put in force. Credits
were introduced into curricula. After the acceptance of the new ECTS Users' Guide, the credits
calculating methodology was not corrected despite the fact that the letter of the Ministry of Education
of the Republic of Belarus to higher education establishments (d/d 14 October 2016 №08-
19/4097/ds «About the organization of the educational process in higher education establishments
in the 2016/2017 educational year» says that within 2016, together with the NIHS [National Institute
of Higher School], measures should be taken to work out «… normative legal acts that will regulate
the measurement of labor intensity of the educational process in credits according to the ECTS …».

The ECTS implementation plan until the end of 2017 according to the reviewed ECTS Users' Guide
and with the account of the priority ranking of learning outcomes, which, according to the Roadmap,
should have been developed till the end of 2015, is still absent in official sources.

In the project of the Code, there is no term «learning outcomes» at all.

14
It is necessary to admit that in the Code project the credits are not used to plan, to implement, and to
monitor educational programs. They are not used to organize mobility and to recognize periods of
training, either.

In the Code project, as well as in the current Code, «the competence approach» is mentioned only,
but without any further detailed elaboration.

At the same time, it is necessary to positively mark that projects of models of educational standards
of Generation 3+ developed for bakalavriat (Bachelor's program) and magistratura (Master's
program) are based on the competence approach – they contain learning outcomes and ranges of
credits for a corresponding educational level and are presented on the web-site «National portal of
projects of educational standards of higher education»13. The specified indicators are not developed
for the so-called scientifically-focused vocational education as a third cycle of higher education.

There are no approved models of educational standards of Generation 3+ and educational standards
developed on their basis, which can be explained by the absence of the legislative and standard-
methodical base for their acceptance.

Conclusions

Proceeding from the accessible information, it is possible to notice that there are some
movements in the implementation of the Roadmap requirements when it comes to the
implementation of the ECTS according to the reviewed ECTS Users' Guide and with the account
of the priority ranking of learning outcomes; however, there are no considerable changes in
the higher educational system yet.

The Code project in a new wording cannot provide to the full the implementation of the
obligations concerning such a system of credits that would correspond to the ECTS Users'
Guide aimed at planning and implementing curricula and at diversifying and developing
academic mobility.

Diploma Supplement
The Roadmap of reforming higher education in Belarus, in the part of the Diploma Supplement in the
format developed by the Council of Europe, says that in order to achieve the necessary results Belarus
will assume the following obligations:
By the end of 2017, develop a plan to issue the Diploma Supplement in the format developed by
the Council of Europe, the European Commission and UNESCO to all students automatically, free
of charge and in a widely spoken language (other than Russian).
There is no accessible and other information on the preparation of the Diploma Supplement in the
format developed by the Council of Europe, the European Commission, and UNESCO to all students

13
http://www.edustandart.by/

15
automatically, free of charge, and in a widely spoken language (other than Russian). We can think of
what can be made in this direction, being based on the Code project only.

The Code project says that it is possible to issue an annex to the diploma of bakalavr (Bachelor) and
magistr (Master) according to the all-European sample of the «Diploma Supplement» (DS); however,
nothing is said about “automatically, free of charge, and in a widely spoken language (other than
Russian)”. The solution of the question whether citizens of Belarus have a possibility to receive the
DS «in a widely spoken language (other than Russian)» remains vague because the Code project plans
to issue the DS in other languages, but only «to foreign citizens and stateless individuals who
temporarily stay or temporarily live in the Republic of Belarus, who received education in the
Republic of Belarus».

Mobility of higher education staff and students and internationalization

In autumn 2015, launch work on a plan to facilitate, develop and diversify the international
mobility of staff and students to as well as from Belarusian higher education institutions. Such
a plan would be expected to include changes to the current system of mobility permits, to allow
longer periods of mobility within the EHEA for both staff and students, without ministerial
approval. The plan should be completed by the end of 2016 and should outline policy measures
as well as any required legislative measures required to increase and diversify academic
mobility from Belarus to its partners in the EHEA. Any required legislative measures should be
introduced by mid-2017.
Thus, in the sphere of mobility of higher education staff and students and internationalization, the
Roadmap has two tasks:
1). To work out a Plan of providing, developing, and diversifying international mobility;

2). To modify the existing system of granting travel permissions for the purpose of prolongation of
terms of stay of tutors and students in the EHEA countries without the necessity of receiving
permissions from the ministry.

Working-out of the Plan of providing, developing, and diversifying international mobility

As of the end of September 2017, there is no Plan of providing, developing, and diversifying
international mobility (as a complete and approved document); it is possible to constate partial
implementation of this task.

It is attested by the project - «Concepts of developing international academic mobility within the
framework of the EHEA» (October 2016). The project «Concepts...» contains a short analysis of the
condition of academic mobility, formulations of purposes, tasks, priorities, and directions of its
development, as well as a list of concrete actions/events aimed at providing, developing, and
diversifying international mobility of tutors and students who come to Belarusan higher education
establishments, as well as those who go abroad, which, to a certain degree, corresponds to the
Roadmap provisions. The project "Concepts..." mentions sources and approximate volumes of
financing of academic mobility and formulates tasks of strategic planning of this sphere and
substantial increase of quality of administration of international exchange programs.

16
The project «Concepts...» contains a task of «working out regulatory legal acts regulating academic
mobility according to the norms of the project of the new version of the Education Code». However,
in the project of the new edition of the Code, no correction of articles that have to do with legal
securement of academic mobility is envisaged.

Besides, it is necessary to mark a number of activities of the Ministry of Education in the sphere of
academic exchanges and internationalization. In particular, the state-run program «Education and
youth policy» for 2016-2020 pays certain attention to the development of academic mobility of tutors
and students. It says that «tutors’ traineeship and invitation of well-known experts in their areas
from abroad for lectures create preconditions to improve the quality of teaching». The scale of
academic mobility of tutors («the number of tutors of higher education establishments (HEEs) who
had traineeships abroad») is considered one of three criteria of implementing the task of improving
the quality of preparation of experts with higher education. In order to «increase the competitiveness
of higher education in the world educational space», the development of «cooperation of Belarusan
HEEs with foreign HEEs regarding the implementation of educational programs» and «activization
of students and tutors exchanges at national and international levels» are envisaged.

Thus, it is possible to say that despite the absence of a complete and approved Plan there has been
certain work in the sphere of developing academic mobility and internationalization that coincides
with the Roadmap purposes.

Modification of the existing system of granting travel permissions for the purpose of
prolongation of terms of stay of tutors and students in the EHEA countries without the
necessity of receiving permissions from the ministry.

As of September 2017, the task is not fulfilled. Conditions of trips abroad are regulated by Order
№108 of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus d/d 10 February 2016 «About
consideration of documents of official journeys abroad of employees of organizations subordinated
to the Ministry of Education», published already after Belarus joined the Bologna process.

Its analysis attests that there are no basic changes in the organization of such trips. Just like before,
students and tutors who are going abroad for the term of more than 10 days need to receive
permission of the Ministry of Education. This order remains in force now, which makes it possible to
conclude that the basic requirement of the Roadmap in sphere of academic mobility - «Modification
of the existing system of granting travel permissions for the purpose of prolongation of terms of stay
of tutors and students in the EHEA countries without the necessity of receiving permissions from the
ministry» - is not fulfilled.

Conclusions

Thus, it is possible to constate that out of the two tasks: one – “To work out a Plan of providing,
developing, and diversifying international mobility” - is fulfilled partially; the other one – “To modify
the existing system of granting travel permissions” - is not fulfilled completely. The total activity of
the Ministry of Education in the sphere of academic mobility and internationalization can be
estimated in the volume of 50% of what is needed; there is certain progress in targeting, planning,
and transparency of the process.

17
Lifelong learning and the social dimension of higher education
By the end of 2015, develop a plan for the recognition of prior learning and implement the plan
by the end of 2017.
Since the beginning of the Roadmap implementation, the Belarusian Ministry of Education was not
planning this kind of work. This article was not included in the Working Plan for EHEA Tools
Introduction into the National System of Education for 2015-2018 presented by the Belarusian party
to AG2. The topic of recognition of results of informal education according to the ECTS Users’ Guide
2015 is reflected neither in accepted statutory acts, nor in the project of the new edition of the
Education Code, which public discussion was launched in February 2017.

By the end of 2016, review the obligation for students whose education is financed by public
funds to accept work placements on graduation with a view to limiting it to specific professions
for which there is a significant unmet need in the country and taking into account practice in
other European countries.
The obligation to restrict the practice of compulsory work placements of HEEs graduates, whose
education is financed by the state budget, is not fulfilled.

There are no basic changes in the legislation that regulates the practice of compulsory work
placements of HEEs graduates.

The only step to soften the consequences for the graduates who refuse compulsory work placements
is Decision of the Council of Ministers №998 d/d 07 December 2016 to reduce on 20-30% the sizes
of penal sanctions (the so-called compensation by the graduate of expenses of the budget on the
preparation of the expert). This reduction becomes possible because the sums, which were used to
pay scholarships, are excluded from the means that have to be returned to the state budget.

Simultaneously, contrary to the obligations of the Roadmap implementation, the practice of

compulsory work placements is not limited, but au contraire – there are steps that essentially worsen
the condition of graduates of higher education establishments. Decree of the President of the
Republic of Belarus №4 d/d 09 January 2017
http://www.pravo.by/upload/docs/op/P31700004_1484168400.pdf widens the use of such a tool
as “targeted preparation of experts”, providing not 2-year compulsory work placements, but not less
than 5-year compulsory work placements. The share of places for students of targeted preparation
is increased up to 50% in the field of public health services, up to 60% - for agricultural specialties,
and up to 40% - for all other specialties. Besides the increase of the duration of compulsory work
placements, this targeted preparation allows the state to transfer partially or completely the
expenses on training of students to so-called «those who need these experts».

In the project of the new edition to the Education Code presented for the public discussion in
February 2017, there are no changes that correspond to the Roadmap obligations. There is a detailed
analysis of the project.

18
In 2016 and 2017, there were serious problems with the employment of young experts. For the first
time during a long period of time, the staff deficit was replaced by a deficiency of workplaces,
especially for people with no work experience. In these conditions, the system of distribution of
graduates inherited from the Soviet period has turned into obvious and absolutely inefficient
anachronism. Its preservation became possible, mainly, at the expense of manipulations with
statistics, direct pressure upon heads of HEEs, and intimidation of students. Under the pressure of
the authorities, rectors and deans of higher education establishments are compelled to compensate
the lack of demands for graduates by forcing students trained at the expense of the budget to submit
fictitious demands from employers in order to preserve good statistics. It is proved by the report on
the distribution of graduates in the 2016/2017 educational year, prepared by a number of
independent students’ organizations (Brotherhood of organizers of students’ self-rule, Belarusian
Students’ Association) and the Human Rights Defending Center "Spring" [Viasna].

Monitoring of infringements of the rights Even admitting there is a problem, Alexander Lukashenko
has rejected any modernization of the employment system, “We had very serious debates recently,
what to do in this regard, because we are having serious turbulence in the economy. I’m categorically
against it.”

Despite the blocking of changes in the system of compulsory placement of graduates of higher
education establishments at the highest political level, such changes in the spirit of the Roadmap are
supported by a considerable number of rectors and some members of Parliament.

BFUG’s principled and consecutive position concerning the implementation of the Roadmap
obligations could strengthen the positions of reformers in the educational system and spur
modernization of the anachronistic system of compulsory work placements.
By the end of 2017 review the criteria for financial support for students with a view to ensuring
social equity unaffected by applicants' gender, race, colour, disability, language, religion,
political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, association with a national minority,
property, birth or other status.
Criteria of granting of financial aid to students have not been reviewed. Students of private higher
education establishments still have no right to receive such help. In particular, it concerns soft loans
to receive higher education, scholarships, etc. Only students of a budgetary form of studying have the
right to receive material aid at the expense of the budget.

In comparison with the current standards, no essential changes regarding bigger social justice while
granting financial aid to students are introduced into the project of the new edition of the Education
Code.

The right to receive the Grant of the President of the Republic of Belarus now covers all HEEs students
– it can be considered the only exception. Before - this right belonged only to students of state-run
HEEs and higher education establishments of consumer cooperative societies.

Still, this expansion of the circle of people who have the right to receive this grant will have no
essential influence on the scale of financial aid because it is limited by the quota of 200 grants
according to Decree №398 of the President of the Republic of Belarus d/d 06 September 2011 «About
social support to students».

19
Conclusions

The Belarusian party’s obligations in the sphere of continuous education and social
dimension of higher education are not fulfilled - their implementation is not planned in
projects of legal acts.
Fundamental values of the EHEA
Implement the commitments made by the ministers at their meeting in Yerevan, as stipulated in
the Yerevan Ministerial Communiqué.
By mid-2017, the Ministry will conduct an analysis of national legislation and submit to
Parliament proposals for required measures to incorporate the principles of the Magna Charta
Universitatum and Council of Europe recommendation Rec/CM(2012)7 on the public
responsibility for academic freedom and institutional autonomy.
By mid-2016, develop a plan detailing legislative and policy measures aimed at enabling
students and staff to organize freely and to register their organizations. By mid-2017, introduce
any required legislative measures.
In accordance with the Yerevan Communiqué, Belarus was obliged to support and defend the
academic freedom and to guarantee the faculty and students can participate fully in management of
autonomous higher education institutions.

However, contrary to the obligation, Belarusian human rights defending organizations recorded the
increase of repressions against students and faculty. The Polish government had to reinstate Kastuś
Kalinoŭski Scholarship Program to support repressed Belarusian students. This program established
in 2006 was redesigned in 2016 for the purpose of deepening Belarusian graduates’ professional
qualification. The intensification of academic repressions in Belarusian universities forced the Polish
side to return to the initial goal of the scholarship - to support Belarusian students expelled from
their home universities on political grounds to continue their higher education at Polish universities.

On September, 4th, 2017, the Council of human rights defending organizations of Belarus confirmed
the status of victims of academic repressions of first 15 candidates who would like to receive the
Kalinoŭski Scholarship.

It is characteristic that by this time three Belarusian universities have signed the Magna Charta
Universitatum. However, it has not stopped academic repressions and infringements of academic
freedoms in these higher education establishments.

The Belarusian party’s obligation - to present by the middle of 2017 a proposal to Parliament to
incorporate the principles of the Magna Charta Universitatum and the Council of Europe
recommendation Rec/CM(2012)7 on the public responsibility for academic freedoms and
institutional autonomy - is not carried out.

Recommendations do not find their reflection in the educational policy.

20
Neither Government, nor Ministry of Education distributes the Recommendations among people and
organizations dealing with higher education. The English text or its translation into Russian or
Belarusian is published on none state information resource or web-site of higher education
establishments. There are publications of the Recommendations on specialized web-sites (pages)
dedicated to Belarus’ participation in the EHEA, which creation was reported by the Ministry of
Education.

The CM/Rec(2012)7 is not mentioned in official documents of the Ministry of Education.

The Belarusian authorities do not carry out the obligations provided by Article 7 of the
CM/Rec(2012)7 - to create conditions to provide academic freedoms: in particular, to accept the
National Qualification Framework and to create an Independent Quality Assurance Agency. There is
still the practice of restricting academic autonomy of higher education establishments because of the
preservation of typical curricula.

Collegiate bodies of higher education establishments, the academic community still have no powers
to make obliging decisions on key questions of the life of universities.

There is censorship based on the requirement to submit the process of teaching and education to the
purposes of the state ideology and prosecution of students and tutors on political grounds.

The analysis of changes and additions in the Code project demonstrates that no considerable changes
in providing academic freedoms and institutional autonomy are planned.

There are no plans to return the terms «academic freedoms» and «institutional (university)
autonomy», withdrawn from the Law on Education in 2009, to the current legislation.

The Code project does not provide the CM/Rec(2012)7 guarantees of the rights of institutions and
individuals to be protected from any external intervention of the authorities and to be provided with
the freedom to teach, to study, and to research with no fear of disciplinary actions, dismissal, or other
forms of punishment.

Just like before, these rights are not individualized in regard to students and faculty members of
higher education establishments, are declarative, and contain no implementation mechanisms. They
do not even declare the right to teach, to study, and to research with no fear of disciplinary actions,
dismissal, or other forms of punishment. At the same time, a number of articles have restrictions of
academic freedoms or do not create obstacles for infringements of academic freedoms (state
ideology, absence of termless contracts of tutors, arbitrary establishment of terms of contracts by
HEEs rectors, absence of interdiction to restrict academic freedoms of tutors by referring to the
status of employees of state-run institutions, etc.)

The Code project does not provide any expansion of HEEs organizational autonomy. In particular, no
transition from appointment to election of rectors of higher education establishments is envisaged.

In the Code project, the implementation of the CM/Rec(2012)7 recommendations regarding the
widening of financial and personnel autonomy is not envisaged.

21
As for academic autonomy, the Code project presupposes small expansion of the rights of higher
education establishments to form curricula (from 35% to 50%), but it does not change essentially
the independence level in other aspects of academic activity.

No redistribution of powers in favor of collegiate regulatory bodies of higher education

establishments is envisaged by the project.

It is not planned to introduce other CM/Rec(2012)7 recommendations into the legislation.

By mid-2016, develop a plan detailing legislative and policy measures aimed at enabling
students and staff to organize freely and to register their organizations. By mid-2017, introduce
any required legislative measures.
The Belarusian party has made no steps to implement this obligation. There are still declarative
norms in the Education Code about the right of pupils and tutors to participate in or to create
organizations, but it does not correspond to the real practice and legislation on the creation and
registration of public associations.

The basic restrictions are still the following: 1) the order of state registration is of an allowing, instead
of notifying character; the procedure is difficult, with a possibility of arbitrary refusals in registration
of any created organization; 2) interdiction of activity of a non-registered public association, for
which infringement there is criminal punishment up to two years of imprisonment (Criminal Code,
Article 193.1); 3) the legislation establishes essential restrictions for public associations to receive
financing from internal and foreign sources; 4) the right of public associations to have peaceful
meeting, as well as the freedom of expression, is essentially limited.

The implementation of the Roadmap requirements should provide, at least, a transition from the
allowing principle of state registration of organizations to the notifying principle. Besides, it is
necessary to cancel Article 193.1 of the Criminal Code - criminal punishment for activity of NGOs with
no state registration. However, no steps in the direction of liberalization of the legislation in this
regard are planned.

Conclusions

The Belarusian party’s obligations as for the implementation of fundamental academic values
are not fulfilled; their implementation is not planned in the discussed projects of legal acts.

General conclusions

The Roadmap implementation monitoring demonstrates that none of the obligations assumed by the
Belarusian party in 2015 is fulfilled completely and on time.

By October 2017, when it was planned to complete the implementation of these obligations, it is
possible to see the absence of any considerable progress in the creation and legislative securing of
the National Qualification Framework, the absence of any legislatively secured transition to the

22
Bologna architecture of three cycles, the absence of any progress in the creation of an Independent
Quality Assurance Agency, and only 30% of implemented ESG standards. There is some progress in
the ECTS implementation, but meanwhile the use of this tool does not correspond with many
standards of the ECTS Users' Guide. Nothing is known about plans to provide automatically free-of-
charge issue of the Diploma Supplement. As for the development of academic mobility and
internationalization, there was some work on the Plan of providing, developing, and diversifying
international mobility; however, there are no data that this Plan was approved. The obligation to
modify the existing system of granting travel permissions for the purpose of prolongation of terms
of stay of tutors and students in the EHEA countries without the necessity of receiving permissions
from the ministry is not carried out. None of obligations concerning social dimension of higher
education and implementation of fundamental academic values is fulfilled. Despite the obvious
inefficiency and the public demand to change the system of compulsory work placements of
graduates, the implementation of this obligation is pointedly blocked by the authorities. The
obligation to implement the CM/Rec(2012)7 recommendations, legislative measures, and measures
of the educational policy aimed at providing the right of students and tutors to freely create
organizations and to register them is pointedly ignored, too.

In the project of the new edition of the Education Code discussed in February 2017, there were
proposals to implement the Bologna architecture and to introduce the right of graduates of higher
education establishments to receive the Diploma Supplement. At the same time, this project did not
contain provisions that would provide the implementation of other obligations of the Roadmap.

The implementation of the Roadmap has recently deteriorated as the discussion on the new
Education Code at the National Assembly is postponed indefinitely.

Changes and amendments to other legal acts (Labor Code, Criminal Code, Civil Code, Law about public
organizations, etc.), which could provide the implementation of the Roadmap obligations, are not
introduced and not discussed publicly.

Many results of the international examination of the Belarusian educational policy and legislation,
carried out within the framework of the EHEA, are not published and remain unknown to the public.
It aggravates the atmosphere of information closeness that characterizes the Belarusian higher
educational system even more.

Public access to regulatory documents of the Ministry of Education has been gradually curbed in
2017. For the first time in many years, there is limited access to ministerial guidance and
methodology letters on how to organize the educational process in higher education institutions.

There is lack of progress in the areas of the social dimension of higher education and the
implementation of academic values, i.e. the spheres that initially were of great concern to the EHEA
members. These issues were behind excluding Belarus accession to the EHEA from the agenda in
2012.

Unfortunately, the Belarusian authorities will not manage to fulfill their obligations as for the
implementation of the Roadmap provisions within the agreed time period. The best solution in such
a situation would be to extend the Roadmap implementation timeline for 2-3 years and to maintain
international control over its implementation.

23
About the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum
The Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum (EaP CSF) is a unique multi-layered regional civil
society platform aimed at promoting European integration, facilitating reforms and democratic
transformations in the six Eastern Partnership countries - Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
Moldova and Ukraine. Serving as the civil society and people-to-people dimension of the Eastern
Partnership, the EaP CSF strives to strengthen civil society in the region, boost pluralism in public
discourse and policy making by promoting participatory democracy and fundamental freedoms.
For more information, visit www.eap-csf.eu

24