Reduction of Energy Losses in Electrical Distribution Systems
Reduction of Energy Losses in Electrical Distribution Systems
Reduction of Energy Losses in Electrical Distribution Systems
Paper 0176
Paper 0176
optimization system has smaller worst voltage drops, overloads, The technique used in this research was the mutation
and energy losses. Reduction of losses improves system quality, probability in which the algorithm flips certain number of bits
security, and reliability. It can improve utilization factors of (from zero to one or vice versa) in each of the selected
existing facilities and defer feeder expansion project. As a result, individuals to be mutated in the aim of increasing the
a utility can produce power with higher quality and lower individual fitness. The probability value used was 0.2 (i.e.
electricity price, which will attract customers to the utility and 20% of the individuals will be mutated). The value was low
enhance the utility competitive ability in the deregulated comparably with the crossover ratio in order to keep the
environments. The network configuration management exploitation/exploration balance. The GA will run for several
technique is considered on top of these solutions. At first, they preset time, or the difference in the fitness value does not
considered two objectives such as optimization of voltage drop
change for several preset number of generations. Fig. 1
and overload then, loss reduction in distribution systems. So, an
Shows a flow chart describes how GA works to reach the
attempt was made to solve the network reconfiguration problem
optimum solution.
having multiple objectives such as minimization of power losses,
load balancing among supply transformers, minimization of the
worst voltage drop and overload. Pareto front [2] had proposed
a GA based approach to solve the optimization problem of
technical losses in the electrical distribution networks. The
reconfiguration algorithm directly constructs an optimal solution
for voltage drop, overload and minimum losses accounting for
the major constraints on maneuvers such as the network must
not have any closed loops, and the limitations of line capacities
or voltage drops are satisfied.
THE PROPOSED GENETIC ALGORITHM
A genetic algorithm developed by J.H. Holland (1975) [3] is
a model of machine learning, which derives its behavior from
a metaphor of the processes of evolution in nature. GAs is
executed iteratively on a set of coded chromosomes, called a
population, with three basic genetic operators: selection,
crossover and mutation. Each member of the population is
called a chromosome (or individual) and is represented by a Fig. 1 Basic structure of genetic algorithm
string all the strings and applies three operators in order to Let us consider problem having "m" objectives:
optimize the function. [4-5], GAs uses only the objective
function information and probabilistic transition rules for
genetic operations. Any two solutions u(1) and u(2) (having ‘t’ decision variables
each) can have one of two possibilities one dominates the
a) Selection other or none dominates the other. A solution u(1) is said to
This operator is used by the algorithm to choose the best dominate the other solution u(2), if the following conditions
individuals or chromosomes based on their fitness values (as are true: The solution u(1) is no worse (say the operator
the fitness of the individual increase it becomes more likely denotes worse and denotes better) than u(2) in all objectives,
to be selected) to form the initial population. [4]. or
b) Crossover
This operator is used by the algorithm to enhance the fitness The solution u(1) is strictly better than u(2) in at least one
value of the individuals. In this operator, two randomly objective, or
selected individuals (called parents) exchange some of their
genes together in order to get two new two individuals are
called offspring. And the method that was used is crossover If any of the above condition is violated, the solution u(1)
probability with a probability value equals to 0.8 which does not dominate the solution u (2). If u(1) dominates the
means that crossover operator will be applied on 80% of the solution u(2), then we can also say that u(2) is dominated by
individuals in the current population. This technique was u(1), or u(1) is non-dominated by u(2) , or simply between
chosen due its superiority among the other crossover the two solutions, u(1) is the non-dominated solution, then
techniques as it ensures the transportation of the best traits in the resultant solution v dominate any member of that set then
the current generation to next one [4-6]. the set is called local Pareto optimal set. [7].
c) Mutation DISTRIBUTION NETWORK PLANNING CRITERIA
This operator prevents the algorithm from being trapped in
local minima as it helps in the recovering of the lost traits due PRAO software [9] enables analysis of the current state of
to the crossover operator. It also helps in the exploration of electricity supply regarding load flow and voltage profile in
the search space thus adding more diversity to the population. the normal condition and the reliability or quality analysis in
CIRED2013 Session 5 0167
CIRED 24st International Conference on Electricity Distribution Stockholm, 10-13 June 2013
Paper 0176
Paper 0176
TABLE III was calculated using multi criterion algorithm. Multi criterion
RESULT AFTER MANEUVER SAMPLE NETWORK FROM EGYPT algorithm has been used to reduce the system power losses. This
algorithm is based on reconfiguration of the system under study,
Impact index Existing situation Maneuver
while observing the over load and voltage drop combined with
Overload kVA 6857.4 0.0 system loss to reach the optimum configuration for the system.
Sum of losses kW 723.8 198.7 Results of the paper show that the multi criterion algorithm has
Max. voltage drop % 8.38 3.04 succeeded to reduce technical loss for all sample networks of the
Total powered load kVA 14287.8 14287.8 system to reach the acceptable limit.
Non-technical losses such as unanticipated increases in system
Openings Closings losses due to equipment deterioration over time, but are usually
SHOUBR_291 EL_ZER_040 ignored in any calculations. System miscalculation on the part of
EL_ZER_054 EL_400_013 the utilities, due to accounting errors, poor record keeping, or
EL_ZER_033 271196_048 other information errors may also contribute to NTL [12].
EL_ZER_039 EL_SHO_046 • Non-technical losses are calculated by the use of statistical
196107_032 793400_025 analytical methods for detecting electricity theft by
167400_017 EL_SHO_044 analyzing utility billing information.
It's obvious from Table III that the maneuver succeed to • Smart Grid can capture the identification and reduction of
reduction overload, voltage drop and power loss this mean non-technical losses through aggregation of load and
that, the multi criterion algorithm solution to develop the collecting voltage data at points throughout the network,
network according to the criteria as shown on fig.5. fig.6 shows those modern meters that can delete non-
technical losses.