Scribd
Upload
59 views2 pages

HTTP Dapus

This document provides references for research related to the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. The SOLO taxonomy was developed by Biggs and Collis in 1982 as a way to qualitatively assess the level of understanding demonstrated in students' work. It describes five levels of understanding: pre-structural, uni-structural, multi-structural, relational, and extended abstract. The references provided are studies that used the SOLO taxonomy to develop assessment tools and evaluate skills in subjects like science and mathematics.

Uploaded by

Anonymous oV47buBo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
59 views2 pages

HTTP Dapus

This document provides references for research related to the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. The SOLO taxonomy was developed by Biggs and Collis in 1982 as a way to qualitatively assess the level of understanding demonstrated in students' work. It describes five levels of understanding: pre-structural, uni-structural, multi-structural, relational, and extended abstract. The references provided are studies that used the SOLO taxonomy to develop assessment tools and evaluate skills in subjects like science and mathematics.

Uploaded by

Anonymous oV47buBo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

http://www.uq.edu.au/teach/assessment/docs/biggs-SOLO.

pdf

References
Biggs, J.B., & Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The Solo Taxonomy. New
York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

Collis, K. (1983). Development of a group test of mathematical understanding using superitem


SOLO technique. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 6 (1), 5–
14. Google Scholar

Collis, K.F., & Davey, H.A. (1984). The Development of a Set of SOLO Items for High School
Science. Hobart: University of Tasmania, Department of Education. Google Scholar

Collis, K.F., & Davey, H.A. (1986). A technique for evaluating skills in high school
science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23 (7), 651–63. Google Scholar, Crossref

Fischer, G.H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika, 48, 3–
26. Google Scholar, Crossref

Guttman, L. (1984). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method for scale
construction. In Horst, P. (Ed.), The Prediction of Personal Adjustment (pp. 319–48). New
York: Social Science Research Council. Google Scholar

Masters, G.N., & Wilson, M.R. (1988). PC-CREDIT [Computer Program]. Melbourne: University
of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Google Scholar

Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment


Tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960) Google Scholar

Romberg, T.A., Collis, K.F., Donovan, B.F., Buchanan, A.E., & Romberg, M.N. (1982). The
Development of Mathematical Problem-solving Superitems (Report of NIE/ECS Item
Development Project). Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Google Scholar

Romberg, T.A., Jurdak, M.E., Collis, K.F., & Buchanan, A.E. (1982). Construct Validity of a Set
of Mathematical Superitems (Report of NIE/ECS Item Development
Project). Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Google Scholar
Whitely, S.E. (1980). Multicomponent latent trait models for ability tests. Psychometrika, 45
(4), 479–94. Google Scholar, Crossref

Wilson, M. (1985). Measuring Stages of Growth. Hawthorn, Vic.: Australian Council for
Educational Research.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (1989). Saltus: A psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive


development. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 276–89. Google Scholar, Crossref

van den Wollenberg, A.L.. (1982). Two new test statistics for the Rasch model. Psychometrika,
47, 123–40. Google Scholar, Crossref

Wright, B.D., & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago: MESA Press. Google
Scholar

Wright, B.D., & Stone, M. (1979). Best Test Design. Chicago: MESA Press. Google Scholar

You might also like