BCG Product Portfolio Apple
BCG Product Portfolio Apple
BCG Product Portfolio Apple
High Low
Low
iPod
Top competitors by Product Line 2008-2009 (% share of units sold)
MP3
Apple 72.0 71.0 6.45(71.0/11.0)
Sandisk 10.0 11.0
Microsoft 3.0 4.0
Smart
Phones
Apple 47.4 14.4 .40(14.4/36.4)
Nokia 17.3 36.4
Industry Growth Estimates by Product Line 2008-2010 (in millions of units sold)
iPod - The iPod line of MP3 player was currently classified as a “cash
cow”, mainly due to high market share in a relatively low projected
growth market. Two factors that could impact This product line’s BCG
classification was a decrease in market share or an increase in
projected demand for MP3 players. A decrease in market share (alone)
for Apple’s iPod line of products would move it into the “dog”
classification. An increase in market demand (alone) for the iPod line
would move it into the “star” classification. An (unlikely) change in both
factors (decreased market share and increased market demand) would
make the iPod a “question mark”. Students may justify their answers by
speculating on what changes would need to occur in the competitive
marketplace to support the most likely scenario - Apple’s loss of a very
large market share (e.g., competitors focus on a specific market
demographic, competitive product improvements, etc.). However, a
substantial loss of share would be necessary for the iPod to move from
its “cash cow” position.
SUMMARY
Apple Inc. centers on its ability to provide innovative computer,
portable digital music, and mobile communication products to its
customer base. Such markets are characterized by rapid technological
advances in both hardware and software resulting in the frequent
introduction of new products with competitive price, feature, and
performance characteristics. Price competition in these markets has
been intense. Apple competitors who sold personal computers based
on other operating systems aggressively cut prices and lowered their
product margins to gain or maintain market share. In addition, as the
personal computer industry and its customers placed more reliance on
the Internet, an increasing number of Internet devices that were
smaller, simpler, and less expensive than traditional personal
computers were emerging. The mobile communications industry is also
highly competitive and includes several large, well-funded and
experienced companies. Apple anticipate that competition for
SmartPhone customers will intensify as others attempt to imitate the
iPhone’s functionality and applications. Apple’s music products and
services face significant competition from other companies promoting
their own digital music and content, including those offering free music
and video services. Competitors with substantial resources may be able
to provide such products and services at little or no profit or even at a
loss to compete with Apple’s iPod offerings. Future of Apple Inc. rests
with its ability to continue its strategy of offering new and innovative
products. So far Apple has done exactly that. Unlike other technology
companies who hold focus groups and conduct market research, “Apple
does not ask people what they wanted, it tells them what they were
going to want next” (Grossman). The main challenge for Apple inc, is to
be able to periodically and accurately assess their product line portfolio
and to remain competitive and maximize Apple’s corporate earnings.
This demonstrates how Apple might use the BCG Growth-Share
portfolio analysis tool to accomplish this task.