BCG Product Portfolio Apple

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

BCG GROWTH-SHARE MATRIX

The BCG Growth/Share matrix emerged as a popular portfolio analysis


methods used by industry practitioners. It is a tool that could be
applied to Apple’s array of products. This tool enabled firms to classify
all of their product lines in a 2 x 2 matrix according to the dimensions of
relative market share and market growth rate.

High Low

Star Question Mark


High
• High growth and share • High growth, low share
• Profit potential • Build into stars or phase out
• May need heavy investment to • Requires cash to hold
hold/sustain position
iPhone , iMAC Portable Computers

Cash Cow Dog

Low

• Low growth, high share • Low growth and share


• Established and successful • Low profit potential
product line • Consider divesting product line
• Source of harvesting cash for
other product lines IMAC Desktop Computers

iPod
Top competitors by Product Line 2008-2009 (% share of units sold)

Product Line 2008 2009 Apple Relative MS


Desktop and
Portable
Computers
Apple 8.6 8.8 .34(8.8/26.2)
Dell 29.9 26.2
HP 26.0 25.7

MP3
Apple 72.0 71.0 6.45(71.0/11.0)
Sandisk 10.0 11.0
Microsoft 3.0 4.0

Smart
Phones
Apple 47.4 14.4 .40(14.4/36.4)
Nokia 17.3 36.4

Industry Growth Estimates by Product Line 2008-2010 (in millions of units sold)

Product Line 2008 2009 % Growth 2010 % Growth Market


(’08-’09) (’09-’10) Growth Rate
Desktop 133.7 137.6 2.9 109.8 (20.2) Low
Computers
Portable 141.6 168.2 18.8 256.3 52.4 High
Computers
MP3 players 11.8 9.9 (16.2%) 9.7 (2.1) Low
SmartPhone/ 139.3 172.4 23.8 250.5 45.3 High
related
products
The justification for each of the classification was as follows: The iMAC
desktop computer was classified as a “Dog” due to its low relative
market share (8.8%) as compared to the industry leader which was Dell
(26.2%) and the low market forecast calling for a decline of over 20%.
The industry outlook for desktop computer demand was rapidly
eroding. The MAC portable line of computers (or MacBook) can be
classified as a “questionmark” due to its relatively low market share
(8.8%) as compared to the industry leader which was Dell (26.2%) and
the high market forecast for demand and growth potential in the
portable computer segment of 52.4%. Seeing that computers are
continuing the trend of smaller and more portable, This Apple line has
the potential to be built into a “star” (with increasing market share).
The iPod line of products can be classified as a “cash-cow” mainly
driven by Apple’s (71%) share of the MP3 market and relative to the
next largest competitor (Scandisk with 11%). The project growth rate
for standalone MP3 players was negative but with 2010 forecasts (-
2.1%) improving over the 2009 levels (-16%). Most SmartPhones have
music playing capability which may contribute the declining demand for
standalone MP3 players. The iPhone can be classified as a “question-
mark” due to its relatively low market share (14.4%) as compared to
the industry leader which was Nokia (36.4%) and the high market
forecast for demand and projected growth rate of the Smart Phone
industry (upwards of 45% in 2010). SmartPhones are quickly becoming
the portable choice for music, applications, and communication
therefore the Apple iPhone has the potential to build into a “star” (with
increasing market share).

iMac Desktop Computers - The iMac desktop computer line was


currently classified as a “dog”, mainly due to low market share in a
relatively low projected growth market. Two factors that could impact
This product line’s BCG classification was an increase in market share or
an increase in projected demand for desktop computers. An increase in
market share (alone) for Apple’s iMac desktop computer line would
move it into the “cash cow” classification. An increase in market
demand (alone) for desktop computers would move it into the
“question market” classification. An (unlikely) increase in both factors
(market share and market demand) would make the iMac desktop
computer line a “star”. Students may justify their answers by
speculating on what changes would need to occur in the competitive
marketplace to support the most likely scenario - Apple’s gain in market
share (e.g., product failures on the part of large competitors, mergers,
etc.) as well as increased consumer demand for desktop computing
(e.g., computer use preferences relative to portability, worker office
environment, etc.)

iMac Portable Computers - The iMac portable computer line was


currently classified as a “question mark”, mainly due to low market
share in a relatively high projected growth market. Two factors that
could impact this product line’s BCG classification was an increase in
market share or a decrease in projected demand for portable
computers. An increase in market share (alone) for Apple’s iMac
portable computer line would move it into the “star” classification. A
decrease in market demand (alone) for portable computers would
move it into the “dog” classification. An (unlikely) change in both
factors (increased market share and decreased market demand) would
make the iMac portable computer line a “cash cow”. Students may
justify their answers by speculating on what changes would need to
occur in the competitive marketplace to support the most likely
scenario - Apple’s gain in market share (e.g., product failures on the
part of large competitors, mergers, etc.) as well as decreasing consumer
demand for portable computers (e.g., computer use preferences
relative to portability, worker office environment, etc.)

iPod - The iPod line of MP3 player was currently classified as a “cash
cow”, mainly due to high market share in a relatively low projected
growth market. Two factors that could impact This product line’s BCG
classification was a decrease in market share or an increase in
projected demand for MP3 players. A decrease in market share (alone)
for Apple’s iPod line of products would move it into the “dog”
classification. An increase in market demand (alone) for the iPod line
would move it into the “star” classification. An (unlikely) change in both
factors (decreased market share and increased market demand) would
make the iPod a “question mark”. Students may justify their answers by
speculating on what changes would need to occur in the competitive
marketplace to support the most likely scenario - Apple’s loss of a very
large market share (e.g., competitors focus on a specific market
demographic, competitive product improvements, etc.). However, a
substantial loss of share would be necessary for the iPod to move from
its “cash cow” position.

iPhone - The iPhone was currently classified as a “question mark”,


mainly due to low market share in a relatively high projected growth
market. Two factors that could impact This product line’s BCG
classification was an increase in market share or a decrease in
projected demand for SmartPhones. An increase in market share
(alone) for Apple’s iPhone would move it into the “star” classification. A
decrease in market demand (alone) for the iPhone would move it into
the “dog” classification. An (unlikely) change in both factors (increased
market share and decreased market demand) would make the iPhone a
“cash cow”. Students may justify their answers by speculating on what
changes would need to occur in the competitive marketplace to
support the most likely scenario - Apple’s gain in market share (e.g.,
relationships with partner companies, mergers, etc.) as well as
increased consumer demand for SmartPhones (e.g., desire for all in one
communication devices, range and availability of applications, etc.)

SUMMARY
Apple Inc. centers on its ability to provide innovative computer,
portable digital music, and mobile communication products to its
customer base. Such markets are characterized by rapid technological
advances in both hardware and software resulting in the frequent
introduction of new products with competitive price, feature, and
performance characteristics. Price competition in these markets has
been intense. Apple competitors who sold personal computers based
on other operating systems aggressively cut prices and lowered their
product margins to gain or maintain market share. In addition, as the
personal computer industry and its customers placed more reliance on
the Internet, an increasing number of Internet devices that were
smaller, simpler, and less expensive than traditional personal
computers were emerging. The mobile communications industry is also
highly competitive and includes several large, well-funded and
experienced companies. Apple anticipate that competition for
SmartPhone customers will intensify as others attempt to imitate the
iPhone’s functionality and applications. Apple’s music products and
services face significant competition from other companies promoting
their own digital music and content, including those offering free music
and video services. Competitors with substantial resources may be able
to provide such products and services at little or no profit or even at a
loss to compete with Apple’s iPod offerings. Future of Apple Inc. rests
with its ability to continue its strategy of offering new and innovative
products. So far Apple has done exactly that. Unlike other technology
companies who hold focus groups and conduct market research, “Apple
does not ask people what they wanted, it tells them what they were
going to want next” (Grossman). The main challenge for Apple inc, is to
be able to periodically and accurately assess their product line portfolio
and to remain competitive and maximize Apple’s corporate earnings.
This demonstrates how Apple might use the BCG Growth-Share
portfolio analysis tool to accomplish this task.

You might also like