Achaian League - Rizakis
Achaian League - Rizakis
Achaian League - Rizakis
ANTIQUITY
EDITORS
III CAMBRIDGE
^ P UNIVERSITY PRESS
Contents
List of maps
List of contributors
Preface
A note on the transliteration of ancient Greek
List of abbreviations
Maps
ν
VI Contents
19. Federalism and the sea. T h e koina of the Aegean islands 358
Kostas Buraselis
Bibliography 524
Index 590
CHAPTER 6
The ancient Greeks believed that the inhabitants of the historical region of
Achaia, that is to say the northwest of the Péloponnèse, were of Achaian
ethnic extraction. According to one tradition, which is difficult to verify,
the Achaians succeeded an Ionian population at the time of the Dorian
invasion of the peninsula, but in any event it is highly possible that at the
beginning of the Iron Age the territorial and ethnic unity of the region was
permanently shattered.1 That there was indeed an ethnic transition at the
time is confirmed by the fact that in Achaia a dialect of the northwestern
group was spoken during the historical period. This implies that at the time
of these migrations at the end of the Bronze Age this dialect was passed on
by neighboring groups of Aitolians, Boiotians, Ainianians, Thessalians,
and others, and that there was a concurrent shift in the ethnic composition
of the region's population. The demographic shift perhaps also entailed a
change of name, because at the time of the composition of the Catalog of
Ships several centuries later (c. 750 BCE), the residents of Eastern Achaia are
identified as Aigialians and their home as Aigialos, while those of the
western part are known as Kaukones and Epeians.2
These tribal designations do not seem to have persisted for very long,
however, because during the same period, or slightly later, the process of
the creation of a new Achaian identity had begun. It was even suggested
recently that this identity was already part of a common heritage since the
eighth century BCE.3 It is possible that the transmission of the Homeric
poems, in which the poleis of the eastern Achaia are directly related to the
Hdt. 7.94; Strabo 8.7.1; cf. Sakellariou 1991; Osanna 2002: 274, η. 27.
2
Horn. //. 2.574-575; Eust. Schol. adx.i., 574-575 and 569; see Rizakis 1995:114-116 nos. 151,151a, 151b;
Strabo 8.6.19; c f· Rizakis 1995: 302 no. 526; Steph. Byz. s.v. Aigialos, Aigialians. Horn. //. 2.516—619;
cf. Rizakis 1995:116-118 nos. 152,152a, 152b (Epeioi); Horn. HymnAp. (I) 425; cf. Rizakis 1995:123 no.
160; Strabo 8.3.11, 17 (Epeians, Kaukones); Rizakis 1995: 300 no. 522 and 301 no. 523 with other
references; see also Moscati Castelnuovo 2002.
3
Mele 2002: 76 entertains the idea that a first Achaian core identity might even date to the ninth
century BCE. We are unable to say with certainty whether the development of this regional identity
118
The Achaian League 119
4
Achaians as they belonged to the kingdom of Agamemnon, contributed to
either the reappearance of an already-extant sense of Achaian historical
memory, or they aided in the creation of this 'Achaian' identity.5 If, in fact,
we are unaware of the origins and early development of this identity-
forming process, we can still say with more certainty that this process did
not come to fruition until the sixth century, perhaps under Spartan
influence. From this period onwards the name Achaia is applied to the
entire region of the northwestern Péloponnèse.7
Presumably, the context in which this identity was construed was
initially the opposition between the Aigialian-Ionians and Achaian-
Aiolians, crystallizing in the rivalry between Poseidon Helikonios and
Zeus, the respective patrons of the two rival cities Helike and Aigion.
This opposition facilitated the promotion of Zeus who became the custo-
dian of the new Achaian identity - regardless of whether it was 'real' or
imagined - and his sanctuary became their common religious center.9
Zeus, thanks to his tight links with the Achaian past, was far better
equipped than any other divinity to absorb such an integrative function
among the communities of the northwestern Péloponnèse, while also
facilitating the transition of the Aigialos-Aigialians into Achaia-Achaians.
The god thus found himself at the heart of a developing system of ethnic-
regional identity, and then in his capacity as Zeus Homarios, that is "he
who unites" or "accommodates,"10 gradually succeeding in uniting people
was contemporary with or subsequent to the movement which began in the second half of the eighth
century, at the time of the rise of the polis. The often-supposed delay in the development of Achaian
cities, based on an overvaluation of the archaeological argumentum ex sikntio, is rendered void by
recent discoveries: see Rizakis 2012.: 27 and, more generally, Mele 2002: 73-76; Osanna 2002:
274-275.
4
Horn. //. 2.569-575; see Sakellariou 1991:15-16; Mele 2002: 76-77.
5
On the common strategies in this search for an Achaian identity, as well as that of the inhabitants of
the northwestern Péloponnèse and the Argolid, see Giacometti 2001: 28, 31-39; on their relations in
cult, Rizakis 2009. The process of the formation of regional identities in the Péloponnèse is also
described by Mclnerney 2001: 59-61.
See Körner 1974: 458-459. O n the transfer of the remains of Tissamenos to Sparta during the first
half of the sixth century, see Leahy 1955: 26-38; Achaian memory of Sparta: Leveque 1991:573-580.
7
On the rich tradition of the terms Achaia, Achaians, see Stern 1980: 67-70; Cassola 1996: 7-8. The
geographic designator appears for the first time in Hekataios, where Dyme, the most western city, is
defined as both Epeian and Achaian. See Moscati Castelnuovo 2002:171, who refers to Mclnerney
2001: 59-61 regarding the analogous definitions of the identity.
8
See Paus. 7.1.4; cf. Mele 2002: 77.
9
See Breglia 1984: 72-74. The valorization of the cult of Zeus coincides with a period in which Zeus
also assumed a more prominent place in the mythological tradition of other cities of the period
(ninth to sixth centuries BCE).
10
See, for instance, Foucart 1876:100; Cook 1914:16-17; most notably Aymard 1935: 467 n. 2 and 5;
Durante 1957:104-105, cited in Breglia 1984: 71-71; Osanna 1989: 56 η. % Rizakis 2013.
I20 ATHANASIOS RIZAKIS
and providing the Achaians with a political identity." This new identity is,
for the first time, clearly expressed - in a form that is not without political
connotations — in the famous dedication in honor of Zeus in Olympia at
the beginning of the fifth century BCE by the "common ethnos of the
Achaians."12 The Achaians there presented themselves as the direct des-
cendants of the Homeric Achaians through descent from the hero Pelops,
who was himself the grandfather or great-grandfather of Agamemnon and
Menelaos. According to Pausanias (5.25.10), the accompanying inscription
read: "The Achaians, themselves the descendants of Tantalid Pelops,
challenger of the gods, dedicated these statues to Zeus."
The promotion of his cult limited the impact of the rival cult of Poseidon Helikonios who continued
to be worshipped at the regional level.
12
Paus. 5.25.8; see Eckstein 1969: 27-32; Doerig 1977: 20-21; Giacometti 2001: 28-31; Walter-Karydi
1987: 19-32 (on another dedication by Onatas). For the significance of the term Achates in this
document as well as other contemporary inscriptions, see Moggi 2002:126—128.
13
O n the Sikyonian threat and its subsequent impact on the formation of Achaian koinon, see
Giacometti 2001: 16-19; Rizakis 2002: 50; on the pro-Achaian policy of Sparta, see Leahy 1955:
26-38; Giacometti 2009: 9 and n. 5 with relevant bibliography.
14
Hdt. 1.145; see Rizakis 1995:111-112; Helly 1997a; see also the commentary on this passage by Moggi
2002: 125-126. Certain scholars hold that the process of politicization crystallized only during the
first half of the fifth century BCE. Others date the creation of the first koinon to 570—550 BCE: see
Tausend 1992: 23-24; also Walbank 2000; Mele 2002; Cuche 2010: 104; Larsen 1968: 83.
The Achaian League 121
BCE, even though many scholars believe that this happened only at the
beginning of the following century. 15 The Peloponnesian War provides,
here as elsewhere, the context in which political and structural changes
occurred at a regional level; a trend which reveals itself in a political sense
with the appearance of the terms Achaia and Achaians in Thucydides, 1
and for the first time the identification of Achaians as individuals with two
ethnics, especially in epigraphic documents. 1 7
The echo of this new political reality is also found in an interesting
passage of Polybius,1 wno tells us that the Achaian cities of Magna Graecia,
after the anti-Pythagorean revolt (c. 430 BCE), used the institutions of their
Peloponnesian homeland as their model, and subsequently erected a
sanctuary of Zeus Homarios which was destined to be, like the sanctuary
at Aigion, the location of their meetings and debates. This passage is
fraught with problems which have led to divergent interpretations. 19 On
the whole, I agree with Mario Moggi that "the substance of the events is
generally credible, as credible as the framework for the ethno-regional
organization of Achaia, which can be extrapolated from the references of
Polybius."20
The political union of the Achaians probably consolidated itself only
after 417 BCE, thanks to Spartan support which allowed the league for the
first time to outgrow its regional boundaries and expand into the Aitolian
coast at the beginning of the fourth century. 21 In fact, Xenophon informs
15
See Moggi 2002:117-132. A recent update on this question with all relevant bibliography is offered by
Rizakis 2012: 27-28.
16
1.111.3; 115.1; 2.9.2; 3.92.5; 4.21.3; 5.82.1; see Moggi 2002:124-125.
17
See Moggi 2002:120-124; Rizakis 2012: 26-27. This double identity is not attested in the epigraphic
records of the first half of the fifth century. Thus a citizen of Helike, buried on the banks of the
Black Sea, is described in his epitaph (490-480 BCE) as a Peloponnesian of Helike: see Bultunova
1986:59-61. no. 18 with photograph = SEG 36.71$ ; Rizakis 1995: no. 740.
18
Polyb. 2.39.1-6; cf. Strabo 8.7.1. The date by which federal institutions were adopted by Achaian
Italiote cities is usually placed around 430-420 BCE; see Osanna 1989: 205, η. 147 with all previous
bibliography; add Gallo 2002:133, η. ζ. See also Chapter 21 by Michael Fronda, below.
19
See de Sensi Sesti to 1994. T h e veracity of the passage from Polybius was questioned by Morgan and
Hall 1996: 195, but their interpretation was challenged by Walbank 2000: 23-27; cf. also Rizakis
2012: 27-28.
20
Moggi 2002: 118-119 ("la sostanza degli eventi è considerata in genere attentibile, cosi come
attentibile è ritenuto il quadfo della organizzazione etnico-regionale dellAcaia, che si può ricavare
dalle notazioni polihiane.")
21
Notably in Kalydon and Naupaktos, but also in other cities on the Aitolian and Lokrian coasts: see
Xen. Hell. 4.6.1; Strabo 8.7.3; Paus. 10.18.1-3; cf. Aymard 1936: 6, η. ι; Walbank ΐ957 _ Ι 979 : ΐ·ι8;
Merker 1989:303-311; Tausend 199 2 ; Beck 2001b: 356; Rizakis 2012. This expansion was facilitated by
the links which had long existed between the two coasts, but also by political considerations of
the day: Morgan 1997:157 and 165-166; Bommeljé 1988:311-314; Grainger 1990:30-32; Freitag 2009:
18-19; Rzepka 2006: 54.
122 ATHANASIOS RIZAKIS
us that slightly before 389 BCE, the Achaians granted the status of federal
politeia to the citizens of Kalydon across the Gulf, allowing their city's
incorporation into the Achaian League.22 The fact that the Kalydonians
maintained their civic identity while becoming Achaian citizens leads us to
think that, on the one hand, this right of federal citizenship coexisted with
the citizenship of each individual polis. On the other hand, Kalydon's
integration in the league presupposes the existence of a political structure
with a common citizenship that was distinct from that of local
communities.23
The hierarchical ranking of two ethnic identities, as it regularly appears
in both Achaian epigraphic documents and in the legends of federal
coins,24 discloses the superiority of the federal politeia in the political
arena. Achaian federal citizenship could only be granted directly by the
central power, i.e., the federal assembly, but it could also be acquired
indirectly by local citizenship which as such entailed federal citizenship.25
While local citizenship was the title par excellence of any citizen and thus
the expression of their political and social rights at the local level, federal
citizenship broadened their rights, because it granted to each of its bene-
ficiaries the ability to participate in the affairs of the community of all
Achaians. The status of federal citizen accorded even more rights to those
who held it, including the right of owning lands and property (enktêsis)
anywhere in Achaia, to contract marriages, and to go freely about their
economic activities.2 Achaians living in a city other than their own home-
town were not, however, integrated into the citizen body of the city which
welcomed them; only native citizens of the local community were entitled
to participate in the affairs of their local community. This restriction of
local citizenship, consequently, created a sharp distinction between the
political spheres of individual communities in Achaia and their respective
politeiai. At the macro-level, they were of course all tied together as
Achaians.27
Federal institutions
The structure of the federal government in Achaia, based on that of the
cities of the region, is tripartite. It comprises a group of federal magistrates,
a federal council, and an assembly of the people. It is certain that there was
a lively interaction between these three bodies of government in the
handling of federal affairs, but the specific scope of the power of each,
along with the procedures followed, are mostly unknown to us, at least
during the Classical period. We are much better informed regarding these
same questions in the second Achaian confederation, refounded in 280/79
BCE,2 even though numerous details, some of them significant, remain
obscure. The description of Polybius, our principal source with which we
attempt to reconstruct the Achaian League, is plagued by many lacunae;
the historian rarely bothers, in the surviving parts of his work, to provide a
systematic analysis of these institutions or to linger on constitutional
subtleties. The details provided by other literary sources and inscriptions
are not sufficient to fill this gap. It is for this reason that certain aspects of
the Achaian constitution continue to be the object of vigorous debate
among researchers.29
That said, we are certain of one thing: these federal institutions evolved
and adapted themselves gradually to their political and social context.
Before 255 BCE the Achaians appointed a common secretary and two
stratêgoi,30 but after this period a single stratègos was elected whose precise
functions are unknown. Polybius defines the powers in a fairly general
manner - they presided over the administration of common affairs - but
surely their functions took on greater importance and contributed to the
first sizeable extension of the league's territory (251-229 BCE). 31 This
extension was briefly halted by the military success of Kleomenes, king of
Sparta. Achaian setbacks during the war with Kleomenes (228-222 BCE),
and the Social War which followed (220-217), along with the breakdown
of the league, led to a traumatizing experience. In response, the leaders of
Achaia introduced new institutional reforms that targeted the army and the
financial system (217 BCE), 32 and finally a very important reform regarding
the decision-making process. The reform gave great prominence to the
2
Polyb. 2.41.1-15 with Walbank 1957-1979 on this passage; Rizakis 1995: 259-262, n. 430.
29
The most recent review of the debates regarding Achaian institutions is Roy 2003.
30
Polyb. 2.43.1-2; Strabo 8.7.3; cf· Aymard 1938: 297-300.
31
See Aymard 1933 and 1938: 21, 298-299, 322, 358-359 and passim. On the expansion of the league
during this period, Urban 1979.
32
The precise nature of these reforms remains unknown.
124 ATHANASIOS RIZAKIS
boulé, an organ which in its composition was now more flexible and
effective. The integration of several large Peloponnesian cities in the league
at the beginning of the second century entailed, at the instigation of
Philopoimen, a final reform which put an end to Aigion's claims as
exclusive meeting place of the league; the federal capital lost its monopoly
on federal assemblies after 189/8 BCE in favor of a rotating schedule in
various cities.33
The layout of the redrawn map of the political geography was embodied,
as demonstrated by Heinrich Chantraine (1972: 175-190), by a 'younger'
series of Achaian coinage, including silver triobols and bronze coinage34
struck by numerous member-states of the league. Two recent studies
illustrate the issues concerning the production of Achaian silver and bronze
coinage. A long controversy exists about the last period of federal mints
(167-146 BCE).35 Christof Boehringer's study (Boehringer 1991) of the
Poggio Picenze coin hoard argues that federal mints continued even after
the destruction of Corinth in 146 BCE, while others brought some chron-
ological precisions to this hypothesis, supposing that these mints began
during the time of Lucullus and Sulla; some mints might have continued
down to the time of Actium (31 BCE). The majority of scholars now accepts
partial mints during this period, which were mostly used in the context of
military events.3
For several generations, the question of whether or not the Achaians had
a representative government has been a fundamental issue in scholarship.
As indicated by Jakob Larsen (1955: 75-76), the critical terms in this debate
are synklëtos and synodos as indicated in our sources. The first was used from
the second century onwards for an extraordinary meeting of all active
citizens, which was called to address an issue of war or alliance, and later
also to respond to a demand accompanied by letters from the senate in
Rome. 37 The term synodos, on the other hand, was used to designate a
regular assembly which met several times throughout the year at regular
intervals. The crucial question is whether the synodos was a representative
assembly,3 but there is no scholarly consensus here. Andre Aymard
(1938: 63) rejected out of hand the equivalence established between the
33
Liv. 38.30.1-6; Aymard 1938: 293-302; Rizakis 1995: 131 no. 175.
34
See more recently, Warren 2007 and Benner 2008.
35
Benner 2008: 15-19, classifies the silver triobols after 280 into four periods: 280-200, 195-168,
167-146, and 88-30 BCE.
36
On this issue see, most recendy, Touratsoglou 2010: 239 and in n. 9 with bibliography.
37
Polyb. 12.10.10-12; Aymard 1938:192; Larsen 1955: 89.
38
As suggested by Larsen 1945: 66, n. 5, who refers to his unpublished doctoral thesis (Harvard 1927).
The Achaian League 125
39
synodos and the boulé, because he was convinced that the Achaian League
had not taken the decisive step towards having a representative govern-
ment. He posited that the synodoi were the primary assemblies of govern-
ment (next to the boulé and the magistrates), and that the term boulé in
Polybius referred to the council; consequently, he believed that the
bouleutérìon was a council chamber. 40
This view, even though it previously met with some approval, has now
been abandoned by the majority of scholars.41 Larsen has attempted to
demonstrate, correctly, or so it seems, that the term boulé in Polybius
originally refers to the council.42 He supposes that the synodos, the princi-
pal assembly before 217 BCE, transformed itself over the following years into
a meeting of the boulé, thanks to a law passed during this period which
stipulated that henceforth the ordinary people would only be able to come
together in an ekklésia to discuss questions of war and alliance.43 Such a
reform could only strengthen the prerogatives of the boulé', the arena of its
authority soon became autonomous. From that time onwards, the boulé
regularly met four times a year according to a less rigid procedure which
now allowed the discussion of several subjects during any given meeting,
while the synklêtos was held to discuss a single one and specific item of
business.44
39
The most important evidence for this comes from Polyb. 29.23-25. After Aymard, the question was
picked up by Walbank (1957-1979: 3.406-412) and, on several occasions, by Larsen (1955: 75-85,
regulary assemblies = synodoi before 217 BCE; 86-105, synodoi = assemblies of the boulé after 217 BCE;
cf. also Larsen 1968: 165-188).
40
See Aymard 1938, 62-75; 92-95; 150-164.
41
As has already been observed by Larsen (1955:157-159), Aymard goes too far in asserting that when
Polybius (2.37.10) says that the Achaians have "the same magistrates, bouleutai, and dikastai",
bouleutai does not refer to the council but to the legislative assembly. Giovannini (1969a: 1-17)
continues to support the position of Aymard, but cf. the responses of Larsen 1972: 178-185 and
Walbank 1970: 129-143.
42
Larsen 1955: 77,170-171; Larsen 1968:156-188.
43
See Larsen 1972:178-185; also Giovaninni 1969 and Walbank 1970.
44
See Larsen 1955: 76-77 and 92-93; Walbank 1957-1979: 3404; Funke 1994:130.
45
Referenced in Polyb. 5.92.7-10; cf. Ferrabino 1921: 297-301.
126 ATHANASIOS RIZAKIS
46
See also Aymard 1938: 302-307; Errington 1969: 63-64; Anderson 1967:104-105.
47
For my own reservations regarding the existence of districts in Achaia, see Rizakis 2003: 202-206.
48
IG rv.P 73; cf. Lehmann 1983: 245-251; 2001: 82-89; Gschnitzer 1985.
49
Rizakis 2008a: 168-170, no. 116.
50
See Rizakis 2003: 102-107. We might also postulate a role of districts in military affairs as well as
matters of taxation, but this has not yet been proven.
51
In the earliest list certain cities are not represented at all (Aigina, Corinth, Megara, as well as the cities
of central Arkadia and of the south, except Megalopolis). Gschnitzer (1985) argued that, even though
the small cities are not necessarily represented, the large cities must be present, and thus we must ask
ourselves if their absence calls into question their membership in the league at the time of the
inscription. Lehmann (1983), however, demonstrated that Mantineia, even though absent from the
list, was a member in its own right with a significant population at the time when the text was
composed.
52
E.g., Lehmann 1983: 249; Gschnitzer 1985; Rizakis 2003.
The Achaian League 127
53
Moretti 1962: 204-206. Some small cities might have been admitted to the Lykian koinon without a
vote in the synedrion (Moretti 1962:206-207). We do not know whether a similar situation existed in
Achaia in which the citizens of certain cities (e.g., Ascheion), who apparently were not part of the
League, nonetheless used the ethnic Achates (see Rizakis 1995: nos. 597; 598; 605; 659; 66811).
54
Larsen 1955: 68-75.
55
See Chapter 22 by Ralf Behrwald below. See also Troxell 1982; Behrwald 2000; Knoepfler, 2013a.
56
It is difficult to believe that the large cities of the league would have accepted being represented in the
various federal bodies in the same manner as all other poleis, although such an equal representation
cannot be dismissed explicitly, especially in the early history of the league, when twelve core cities -
"equal in their mediocrity" (Plut. Amt. I L I ) - comprised the koinon.
57
More precisely after 189 BCE: see the detailed discussion and relevant bibliography in Knoepfler,
2013a.
58
Liv. 45.28.7 (Aitolia). Thessaly: IGix.2 261 and Liv. 34.51.6 on corresponding census qualifications.
128 ATHANASIOS RIZAKIS
Division of power between the local level and the federal center
Greek federalism is characterized by a duality of identity and a duality of
political power between the federal and the local level, although the dividing
line between the two is not always clear. Member-states maintained their
own distinct identity as autonomous and distinct juridical and political
entities because they preserved their respective political institutions, admin-
istrations, coinages, legal processes, and local constitutions {politeiai). If the
Achaian League, as argued by Aymard, was the master of all affairs which
were of common concern (most notably, external relations, the army and
navy), and the league exacted financial and military contributions, then the
members possessed a fair amount of autonomy and freedom of action that
was not necessarily limited to the sphere of culture (e.g., the organization of
cults, athletic competitions, etc). ° Members might have been hindered to
engage direcdy in relations with the outside world, but the idea of propor-
tional representation in the main bodies of the league provided for an
effective integration into the koinon. Cities could also make their voices
heard in the primary assembly (synklêtos, in which the most pressing decisions
were made by vote according to city) and during regular meetings of the boulé
{synodoi), in which decisions were made by the city delegates. The stratêgos,
the supreme magistrate of the union, was not able to make any important
decision without the approval of the popular assembly - in other words,
without the support of the member-states. In this sense, it would seem fitting
to characterize the league as a true sympoliteia.
59
Note that Eumenes offered 720 talents to the Achaians during the synodos of 185 BCE to be used so
"that they might lend it out and spend the interest in paying the members of the Achaian assembly
during its session" (Polyb. 22.7.3). But it seems impossible to conclude the number of representatives
from this sum.
60
The limitations to this autonomy are outlined by Aymard 1938:166; cf. also Giovaninni 1971.
61
In general, see the account by Rizakis 2008b; cf. Luraghi and Magnetto 2012: 537-544.
The Achaian League 129
magistrates and, if they were found guilty, either imposed a fine or con-
demned them to death. 2 They were also responsible for hearing cases of
treason, but the judges' powers were neither permanent nor clearly
defined. 3 The assemblies could on occasion transform themselves into
tribunals and punish citizens believed to be guilty with either exile or
death; 4 the surviving judgements (four in total) all concern cases of high
treason, 5 and this is certainly not a coincidence. Whatever the specific case
may be, the most important observation to be drawn from this is that the
federal assemblies also possessed judicial authority.
In addition to Polybius, epigraphic evidence also attests to a large number
of conflicts, either between member-states and the central government, or
among member-states themselves. 7 Most of those conflicts clustered around
local border disputes, which are well attested in a series of epigraphic
documents (collected by Harter-Uipopuu 1998). The recent discovery of a
rich inscription from Messene adds to this picture. The text, which concerns
an ongoing territorial dispute between Messene and Megalopolis, allows us
to shed new light on the role of the Achaian League as arbitrator in internal
disputes between its members. 8 Before we turn to the details of the inscrip-
tion, it is imperative to understand the general oudine of conflict resolution
within the league. But this is a difficult endeavor.
Aymard (1938: 166-169) believed that the league (i.e., the assembly)
mediated in cases of disagreement between its member-states and assigned
arbitrators, if it did not judge the issue itself. 9 In particular, he rejected the
view that such disputes were mediated by judges from cities which could,
but did not necessarily have to be, a member of the Achaian League. In this
vein, prior to Aymard, it was conjectured that if the disputing parties were
to seek the mediation from an outside city, the approval from federal
authorities was required to take this course of action. 70 BCaja Harter-
Uibopuu presented a more nuanced interpretation of this necessary pre-
requisite to obtain league approval. She argues that we cannot speak of a
mandatory arbitration by federal authorities and that, in short, the league's
Polyb. 38.18.2-3: death penalty for a hypostratêgos; cf. Paus. 7.13.5: fine of 50 talents imposed on a
stratego*. In the case of ambassadors, the trial was held before dikastai: Polyb. 38.18.3.
3
See Aymard 1938: 183; Larsen 1968: 236-237.
64
Examples are listed in Aymard 1938:182, n. 4 and 183, n. 1; Larsen 1968: 237.
65
See Aymard 1938: 183 n. 1.
All relevant citations are assembled by Aymard 1938: 183 nn. 3 and 4.
67
See Rizakis 2008b; Harter-Uibopuu 1998.
68
See Themelis 2008; Arnaoutoglou 2009/10; Luraghi and Magnetto 2012.
69
IG VII 189 lines 24fr. SIG3 471 = IG rv 2.1 71, lines 4-5 and 9-10.
70
E.g. Raeder 1912: 213-236.
130 ATHANASIOS RIZAKIS
71
Harter-Uibopuu 1998:129; for a similar situation in Aitolia, see Rzepka 2006: 74-92 and 96-97.
72
/ G r v 2 71 = Harter-Uibopuu 1998: no. 3, lines 9-10. According to Arnaoutoglou 2009/10:189 (and
n. 26), this expression should be understood as "the decision of the {synodos of the) Achaians about
the dispute resolution procedure."
73 74
See Moretti 1967:131. See Ager 1996: no. 63.
75
See Arnaoutoglou 2009/10:189. In other sources, various references to the intervening capacities of
federal authorities in the mechanism of conflict resolution among league members survive: see
Harter-Uibopuu 1998: nos. 3, 5, and 9. See also SIC? 66$, lines 13-15 (judgement of a commission
concerning a disagreement between Sparta and the league). Other instances of arbitration that
included at least one judge from the Achaian League: Harter-Uibopuu 1998: nos. 2 and 4.
76
They are possibly identical with those who Aristainos, stratêgos of the confederation, describes as the
principes Achaeorum (Liv. 32.21.1); see Aymard 1938: 328. These principes might be the most
important magistrates of the league. The term is used by Livy in an Aitolian context to refer to
either the supreme magistrates in office or members of the political elite, including influential
persons who had never held a magistracy. See Rzepka 2006: 112-116 and 121.
The Achaian League 131
65-78, 78-84). Although the latter cases were judged by non-federal bodies
(the city of Aigion and a group of Milesian jurors), the league seems to have
retained a supervisory role during the process, as indicated by the reference
to federal damiorgoi. The damiorgoi intervened during the second arbitra-
tion, as they were in charge of collecting the documents produced by the
legal opponents at an earlier point in the process (line 64).77 Similarly,
during the third arbitration - the one involving the six Milesian judges -
the damiorgoi received the legal charges against the Messenians and
brought the issue before the Milesian judges who finally made their verdict
(lines 75-79).?8
The inscription informs us that the federal damiorgoi were also involved in
the administration of justice. They received the legal challenge following the
decision of a synodos and subsequently referred it to a commission that was
capable of considering the issue and arriving at a judgement; elsewhere, they
had the quasi-judiciary duty of imposing a monetary sanction on recalcitrant
litigants who did not wish to abide by the procedure of the resolution.79
Thus, when the Messenians refused to participate in the process of selecting
the third court of arbitration because they considered the case closed, the
damiorgoi imposed a fine on them. It appears, then, that different procedures
existed for setding various disputes in the Achaian League, as is indicated by
the rich variety of procedures in the Messenian inscription. °
In conclusion we are able to say that the document of Messenia, beyond
the numerous details and nuances it provides for our understanding of the
judicial procedures in the Achaian League, also sheds light on the nature of
federalism in ancient Greece in general. The document confirms that the
cities of the Achaian League enjoyed a high degree of political independence,
a verdict which also applies to many other leagues. It thus teaches us that
federalism offered a much broader and indeed intriguing degree of auton-
omy and freedom to the members of a koinon than is commonly assumed.
77
On the damiorgoi, see Velighianni-Terzi 1977: 104-107; Harter-Uibopuu 1998: 68; Arnaoutoglou
2009/10: 190-191. For other examples of their engagement, Harter-Uibopuu 1998: no. 8 (between
182 and 167 BCE).
78 79
See Arnaoutoglou 2009/10: 189. See Arnaoutoglou 2009/10: 191.
80
See Arnaoutoglou 2009/10:190.
Bibliography
524
Bibliography 525
1991. "The King's Peace." In M. Flower and M. Toher (eds.), Georgica: Greek
Studies Presented in Honour of G. Cawkwell. London: 25—48.
1995. "The Ghost of Empire: Reflections on Athenian Foreign Policy in the
Fourth Century BC." In W. Eder (ed.), Die athenische Demokratie im 4.
Jahrhundert ν. Chr. Stuttgart: 79-106.
Badie, A. and M.-F. Billot. 2001. "Le décor des toits de Grèce du 11e s. av. au Ier
s. ap. J.-C." In j.-Y. Marc and J.-C. Moretti (eds.), Constructions publiques et
programmes édilitaires en Grèce entre le ue siècle av. J.-C. et le \er siècle ap. J.-C.
Paris: 61-134.
Bagnali, R. S. 1975. "Ptolemaic Foreign Correspondence in P. Tebt. 8." Journal of
Egyptian Archaeology 61: 168-80.
1976. The Administration of the Ptolemaic Possessions Outside Egypt. Leiden.
Baitinger, H. and B. Eder. 2001. "Hellenistische Stimmarken aus Elis und Olympia:
neue Forschungen zu den Beziehungen zwischen Hauptstadt und Heiligtum."
Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 116:163-257.
2003. "Tesserae di voto ellenistiche da Elide e da Olimpia. Nuove ricerche sulle
relazioni fra la città e il santuario." Geographia Antiqua 12: 95—109.
Baker, P. 2000. "La cause du conflit entre Mélitéa et Narthakion." In L. Dubois
and E. Masson (eds.), Philokypros. MéUnges de philologie et d'antiquités
grecques et proche-orientales dédiés à la mémoire d'Olivier Masson.
Salamanca: 33—47.
Baker, P. and G. Thériault. 2005. "Les Lyciens, Xanthos et Rome dans la première
moitié du I er s. a.C. Nouvelles inscriptions." Revue des études grecques 118:
329-366.
Bakhuizen, S. C. 1989. "The Ethnos of the Boeotians." In Beister and Buckler
1989: 65-72.
1992. "The Town Wall of Akolian Kallipolis." In S. van de Maele and J. Fossey
(eds,), Fortificationes Antiquae. Amsterdam: 171-183.
1994. "Thebes and Boiotia in the Fourth Century B.C." Phoenix 48: 307-330.
Baldwin, D. A. (ed.) 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York.
Balland Α. 1981. Inscriptions d'époque impériaL· du Létôon. Paris.
Baltrusch, E. 1994. Symmachie und Spondai. Berlin.
2008. Außenpolitik, Bünde und Reichsbildung in der Antike. Munich.
Bardani, V. 2011. "Ψήφισμα Πυλίων." In P. Valavanis (ed.), Ταξιδεύοντας στην
κλασική Ελλάδα. Athens: 197-203.
Bartels, J. 2004. "Akarnanische Stadtbefestigungen. Eine Darstellung der
Macht der Poleis?" In E.-L. Schwandner and K. Rheidt (eds.), Macht der
Architektur - Architektur der Macht. Mainz: 92-99.
Barth, F. (ed.) 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of
Culture Difference. London.
Basiez, M.-F. 2007. "La question des étrangers dans les cités grecques ( V M "
siècles). Immigration et partenariat économique." Palhs 74: 213-236.
Bastini, A. 1987. Der achäische Bund ah hellenische Mittelmacht. Frankfurt.
Bauer E. 1907. Untersuchungen zur Geographie und Geschichte der nordwestlichen
Landschaften nach delphischen Inschriften. Diss. Halle.
528 Bibliography
Bearzot, C. 1994. "Un'ideologia del federalismo nel pensiero politico greco?" In
Aigner Foresti et al. 1994: 161-180.
2004a. Federalismo e autonomia nelle Elleniche di Senofonte. Milan.
2004b. "Politela cittadina e politela federale in Senofonte." In S. Cataldi, Poleise
politeiai. Alessandria: 229—257.
2009. "Partis politiques, cités, états fédéraux: le témoignage de l'historien
d'Oxyrhynchos." Mouseion 9: 239-256.
Beck, H. 1997. Polis undKoinon. Stuttgart.
1997/1998. "Das Attentat auf Lykomedes." ΤΕΚΜΗΡΙΑ y. 1-5.
1999. "Ostlokris und die Tausend Opuntier. Neue Überlegungen zum
Siedlergesetz für Naupaktos." Zeitschriftfür Papyrologie und Epigraphik 124:
53-62.
2000. "Thebes, the Boiotian League, and the Rise of Federalism in Fourth
Century Greece." In Bernardini 2000: 331-344.
2001a. "Review of T. Corsten, Vom Stamm zum Bund." Gnomon 73: 525-531.
2001b. "The Laws of the Fathers Versus the Laws of the League: Xenophon on
Federalism." Classical Philology 96: 355—375.
2001c. "Review of G. A. Lehmann, Ansätze zu einer Theorie der griechischen
Bundesstaaten bei Aristoteles und Polybios." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
November 22, 2001: 51.
2003. "New Approaches to Federalism in Ancient Greece. Perceptions and
Perspectives." In Buraselis and Zoumboulakis 2003: 177—190.
2010. "Ephebie - Ritual - Geschichte: Polisfest und historische Erinnerung im
klassischen Griechenland." In H. Beck and H.-U. Wiemer (eds.), Feiern und
Erinnern: Geschichtsbilder im Spiegel antiker Feste. Berlin: 55-82.
(ed.) 2013. A Companion to Ancient Greek Government. Maiden, Mass.
2014. "Ethnic Identity and Integration in Boiotia: The Evidence from
the Inscriptions (6th and 5th Centuries)." In Papazarkadas (ed.) 2014:19-44.
2015. "Greek Federal States." Oxford Bibliographies in Classics Online.
forthcoming. "Between Demarcation and Integration. The Context of Foreign
Policy in Classical Greece." In Hellmann, Fahrmeier, and Vec forthcoming.
Bederman, D. J. 2001. International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge.
Behrwald, R. 2000. Der Lykische Bund. Untersuchungen zu Geschichte und
Verfassung. Bonn.
2007. Hellenika von Oxyrhynchos. Darmstadt.
Beister, H. 1989. "Hegemoniales Denken in Theben." In Beister and Buckler 1989:
131-154.
Beister, PL, and J. Buckler (eds.) 1989. Boiotika. Munich.
Beloch, K. J. 1927. Griechische Geschichte, vol. iv 2 2. Berlin and Leipzig.
Benchimol, E. 2008. "L'hoplite, le char et le javelot: un défilé militaire à l'Itônion
de Coronée à l'époque archaïque?" Ktema 33: 421-432.
Bengtson, H. 1937. Die Strategie in der Hellenistischen Zeit. Ein Beitrag zum antiken
Staatsrecht. Munich.
Benner S. M. 2008. Achaian League Coinage of the 3rd through the ist centuries BCE.
London.
Bibliography 529
Bentley, G. 1987. "Ethnicity and Practice." Comparative Studies in Society and
History 29: 24-55.
Béquignon, Y. 1937. La vallée du Spercheios des origines au we siècle. Paris.
Bercovitch, J. 1986. "International Mediation: A Study of Incidence, Strategies
and Conditions of Successful Outcomes." Cooperation and Conflict 21:
155-168.
1992. "The Structure and Diversity of International Mediation." In Bercovitch
and Rubin 1992: 1—29.
Bercovitch, J. and A. Houston. 2000. "'Why do they do it like this?' An Analysis
of the Factors Influencing Mediation Behavior in International Conflicts."
Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:170—202.
Bercovitch, J. and Z. Rubin, (eds.) 1992. Mediation in International Relations.
Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. London.
Bercovitch, J. and G. Schneider. 2000. "Who Mediates? The Political Economy of
International Conflict Management." Journal of Peace Research 37: 145-65.
Berktold, P., J. Schmid, and C. Wacker (eds.) 1996. Akarnanien. Eine Landschaft
im Antiken Griechenland. Würzburg.
Bernardini, P. (ed.) 2000. Presenza afunzione della città du Tebe nella cultura greca.
Rome.
Bernhardt, R. 1984. Polis und römische Herrschaft in der späten Republik. Berlin.
1987. "Die Entstehung der Legende von der tyrannenfeindlichen Aussenpolitik
Spartas im sechsten und fünften Jahrhundert v. Chr." Hutoria 36: 257-289.
Bertrand, J.-M. 2004. "Frontières externes, frontières internes des cités grecques."
In C. Moatti (ed.), La mobilité des personnes en Méditerranée de VAntiquité à
l'époque moderne: Procédures de contrôle et documents d'identification. Rome:
71-98.
Berve, H. 1926. Das Alexanderreich aufprosopographischer Grundhge. Munich.
1967. Die Tyrannis bei den Griechen. 2 vols. Munich.
Bianchetti, S. and M. R. Cataudella (eds.) 2001. Le "Elleniche di Ossirinco" a
cinquant'anni dalla pubblicazione dei frammenti fiorentini, 1949-1999.
Florence.
Bielman, A. 1994. Retour ah liberté. Libération et sauvetage des prisonniers en Grèce
ancienne. Paris.
Bignardi, A. 1984. Controversiae agrorum e arbitrati internazionali. Milan.
Bikerman, E. J. 1938. Institutions des Séleucides. Paris.
1944. "The Greek Experience of War and Peace." In: L. Bryson, L. Finkelstein,
and R. M. Maciver (eds.), Approaches to World Peace. New York: 203-214.
Bile, M. 2005. "La traité d'alliance entre les Oreioi de Crète et le roi de Cyrène
Magas." In F. Poli and G. Vottéro (eds.), De Cyrène à Catherine: trois mille
ans de Libyennes. Nancy: 19-28.
Bliimel, W. 1994. "Two New Inscriptions from the Cnidian Peninsula: Proxeny
Decree for Epaminondas and a Funeral Epigram." Epigraphica Anatolica 23:
157-159·
Boak, A. E. R. 1921. "Greek Interstate Associations and the League of Nations."
American Journal of International Law 15: 375—83.
530 Bibliography
Boardman, J. 1966. "Evidence for the Dating of Greek Settlements in Cyrenaica."
Annual of the British School at Athens 61:149-156.
Boedeker, D. 1993. "Hero Cult and Politics in Herodotus: The Bones of Orestes."
In C. Dougherty and L. Kurke (eds.), Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult,
Performance, Politics. Cambridge: 164-177.
1995. "Simonides on Plataea: Narrative Elegy, Mythodic History." Zeitschrift für
Papyrologie und Epigraphik 107: 217-229.
Boehringer, C. 1991. "Zur Geschichte der Achaischen Liga im 2. und 1. Jh. v. Chr.
im Lichte des Münzfundes von Poggio Picenze [Abruzzen]." In A. D. Rizakis
(ed.), Achaia und Elis in der Antike. Athens: 163-170.
Boer, J. 1935. Ubbo Emmius en Oost-Frieshnd. Groningen.
Boesch, P. 1908. Theoros. Untersuchung zur Epangelie griechischer Feste. Berlin.
Bolton, P. and G. Roland. 1997. "The Breakup of Nations: A Political Economy
Analysis." Quarterly Journal of Economies uz: 1057—1090.
Bommelaer, J.-F. 2011. "Delphica 3. Le monument des Navarques." Bulletin de
correspondance hellénique 135:199—235.
Bommeljé, S. 1988. "Aeolis in Aetolia." Historia 37: 311-314.
Bommeljé, S., and P. K. Doorn, M. Deylius, J. Vroom, Y. Bommeljé, R. Fagel,
H. van Wijngaarden (eds.) 1987. Aetolia and the Aetolians. Towards the
Interdisciplinary Study of a Greek Region. Utrecht.
Bonnechere, P. 1994. Le sacrifice humain en Grèce ancienne. Athens.
Borba Florenzano, M.B. 1992. "The Coinage of Pyrrhus in Sicily: Evidence of a
Political Project." In T. Hackens, Ν. D. Holloway, R. R. Holloway, and
G. Moucharte (eds.), The Age of Pyrrhus. Providence, R.I.: 207-223.
Bordes, J. 1982. Politeia dansL·pensée grecque jusqu'à Aristote. Paris.
Borza, Ε. N. 1982. Athenians, Macedonians, and the Origins of the Macedonian Royal
House. Princeton.
1999. Before Alexander: Constructing Early Macedonia. Claremont.
Bosworth, Α. Β. 1971. "The Congress Decree: Another Hypothesis." Historia 20:
600-16.
1976. "Early Relations between Aetolia and Macedon." American Journal of
Ancient History 1:164-184.
1980. A Historical Commentary on Arrian 's History of Alexander. Vol. I. Oxford.
Bouchon, R. 2005. Les élites politiques de L· cité de Delphes et du koinon des
Thessaliens: cadre institutionnel, chronologie et pratiques familiales (1er s. av. I
in e s. apr. J.-C); contribution à l'histoire politique et sociale de L· Grèce
centrale sous administration romaine. Diss. Lyon.
2008a. "Les 'porteurs de toge' de Larissa." Topoi 15: 251-284.
2008b. "Les Ainianes à l'époque impériale: mémoire d'un peuple polyphnetos
(Plutarque, Questions grecques 13 et 26; Héliodore, Ethiopiques il, 34)." In
G. De Rapper and P. Sintès (eds.), Nommer et classer dans les Balkans. Athens:
311-321.
2009. "La taxe des affranchis et le financement de la vie publique dans les cités
thessaliennes: nouvelles lectures de documents du 11e s. apr. J.-C."
Αρχαιολογικό έργο Θεσσαλίας και Στέρεας Ελλάδας 2, 2οο6. Volos: 395~4°7·
Bibliography 531
Farenga, V. 2006. Citizen and Self in Ancient Greece: Individuals Performing Justice
and the Law. Cambridge.
Farinetti, E. 2011. Boeotian Landscapes: A GIS-based Studyfor the Reconstruction and
Interpretation of the Archaeological Datasets of Ancient Boeotia. Oxford.
Felsch, R. C. S. (ed.) 1996. Kahpodi 1: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen im Heiligtum
der Artemis und des Apollon von Hyampolis in der antiken Phokis. Mainz.
2007. Kalapodi 11: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen im Heiligtum der Artemis und des
Apollon von Hyampolis in der antiken Phokis. Mainz.
Ferrabino Α. 1921. Il problema dell'unità nazionale nella Grecia. Arato di Sidone e
l'idea federaL·. Firenze.
Ferrary J. L. 1987—1989. "Les Romains de la République et les démocraties
grecques." Opus 6-8: 203-216.
1988. Philhellénisme et impérialisme: aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du
monde hellénistique, de L· seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre
Mithridàte. Rome.
Ferri, S. 1925. "Alcune Iscrizione di Cyrene." Abhandlungen der Akademie der
Wissenschaften, Berlin 5: 3-19 with plates 74-87.
Feyel, C. 2006. Les artisans dans les sanctuaires grecs aux époques classique et
hellénistique à traversL·documentation financière en Grèce. Paris.
2009. Dokimasia. Laplace et le rôle d'examen préliminaire dans les institutions des
cités grecques. Nancy.
Feyel, M. 1942. Polybe et l'histoire de Béotie au 111e siècle avant notre ère. Paris.
Fibiger Bang, P. and W. Scheidel (eds.) 2013. The Oxford Handbook of the State in
the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. Oxford.
Figueira, T., and S. R. Jensen. 2013. "Governing Interstate Alliances." In Beck
2013: 480-496.
Finkelberg, M. 2005. Greeks and Pre-Greeks. Aegean Prehistory and Greek Heroic
Tradition. Cambridge,
(ed.) 2011. The Homer Encyclopedia. 3 vols. Oxford.
Finley, Μ. I. 1982. "Sparta and Spartan Society." In M. I. Finley, Economy and
Society in Ancient Greece. New York: 24-40, 253-255.
Fioretos, Ο. 2011. "Historical Institutionalism in International Relations."
International Organization 65: 367-399.
Fischer, W. i960. "The German Zollverein: A Case Study in Customs Union."
Kyklos 13: 65-89.
Fisher, N. and Van Wees, H. (eds.) 1998. Archaic Greece: New Approaches and New
Evidence. London.
Flacelière, R. 1937. Les Aitoliens à Delphes. Paris.
Flensted-Jensen, P. (ed.) 2000. Further Studies in the Ancient Greek Polis. Stuttgart.
Flensted-Jensen, P., T. H. Nielsen, and L. Rubinstein (eds.) 2000. Polis and
Politics. Studies in Ancient Greek History. Aarhus.
Fornara, C. W. and L. J. Samons IL 1991. Athens from Cleisthenes to Pericles.
Berkeley.
Forsén, Β. 2θθο. "Population and Political Strength of Some Southeastern
Arkadian Poleis " In Flensted-Jensen 2000: 35-55.
Bibliography 543
Forsén, J. and Β. Forsén. 1997. "The Polis of Asea. A Case Study of how
Archaeology can Expand our Knowledge of the History of a Polis." In
T. H. Nielsen (ed.), Yet More Studies in the Ancient Greek Polis. Stuttgart:
163-176.
2003. The Asea Valley Survey. An Arcadian Mountain Valleyfrom the Palaeolithic
Period until Modern Times. Stockholm.
Forsén, J., J. Forsén, L. Karlsson. 2005. "Recent Research Concerning the Walls at
Asea." In 0stby 2005: 307-314.
Fortina, M. 1965. Cassandre, re di Macedonia. Turin.
Fossey, J. M. 1988. Topography and population ofancient Boeotia. 2 vols. Chicago.
1990. The Ancient Topography ofOpuntian Lokris. Amsterdam.
Foucart, P. 1876. "Fragment inédit d'un décret de le Ligue achéenne." Revue
archéologique 32: 96-103.
Fougères, G. 1898. De Lyciorum Communi. Diss. Paris.
Fournier, J. 2010. Entre tutelle romaine et autonomie civique. L'administration
judiciaire des provinces hellénophones de l'Empire romain. Paris.
Fowler, R. L. 1998. "Genealogical Thinking, Hesiod's Catalogue, and the
Creation of the Hellenes." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society
44:1-19.
Franke, P. 1958. "Zur Geschichte des Antigonos Gonatas und der Oitaioi. Ein
Schatzfund griechischer Münzen von Phayttos." Archäologischer Anzeiger.
60-62.
1959. "Zur Chronologie der Strategen und der Münzprägung des Koinon der
Thessaler." Schweizer Münzblätter 35: 61-67.
1961. Die antiken Münzen von Epirus. Wiesbaden.
1970. "ΦΕΘΑΛΟΙ-ΦΕΤΑΛΟΙ-ΠΕΤΘΑΛΟΙ-ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΙ." Archäologischer
Anzeiger. 85-93.
Fraser, P. M. 2003. "Agathon and Cassandra (76Ίχ.ι 2 4.1750)." Journalof Hellenic
Studies 123: 26—40.
Frazer, J. G. 1913. Pausanias' Description of Greece. 2nd edn, London.
Frederiksen, M. 1984. Campania. Rome.
Freeman, E. A. 1893. History of Federal Government in Greece and Italy. 2nd edn,
J. B. Bury (ed.), London.
Frei-Stolba, R. and K. Gex (eds.) 2001. Recherches récentes sur le monde
hellénistique. Vienna.
Freitag, Κ. 1994. "Oiniadai als Hafenstadt. Einige historisch-topographische
Überlegungen." Klio 92: 212—238.
1996a. "Eine vergessene Notiz zur Geschichte Achaias im 5. Jahrhundert v. Chr.
bei Herodot (8.36.2)." Historia 45:123-126.
1996b. "Der Akarnanische Bund im 5. Jh. v. Chr." In Berktold, Büscher, and
Wacker 1996: 75-86.
2006. "Ein Schiedsvertrag zwischen Halos und Thebai aus Delphi." In Freitag,
Funke, and Haake 2006: 211-37.
2007a. "Ethnogenese, Ethnizität und die Entwicklung der griechischen
Staatenwelt in der Antike." Historische Zeitschrift 285: 373-399.
544 Bibliography
2007b. "Der Symmachievertrag zwischen Rom und Thyrrheion aus dem Jahre
94 v. Chr. Ein neues Fragment zu IG ix i 2 2 242." In G. Cresci Marrone and
A. Pistellato (eds.), Studi in Ricordo di Fulviomario Broib. Padova: 341-353.
2007c. "Überlegungen zur Konstruktion von Grenzen im antiken
Griechenland." In Albertz, Blöbaum, and Funke 2007: 49-70.
2009. "Achaea and the Péloponnèse in the Late Fifth to Early Fourth
Centuries." In Funke and Luraghi 2009:15-29.
2010. "Drei Bücher zur Ethnogenese der Boioter." Göttinger Forum für
Altertumswissenschaft 13:1105—1117.
Freitag, Κ., P. Funke, and M. Haake (eds.) 2006. Kult - Politik - Ethnos.
Überregionale Heiligtümer im Spannungsfeld von Kult und Politik. Stuttgart.
Fröhlich, P. and P. Hamon. (eds.) 2012. Groupes et associations dans les cités
grecques. Geneva.
Frolov, E. 1974. "Der Kongreß von Korinth im Jahre 338/337 v.u.Z." In E. C.
Welskopf (ed.), Hellenische Poleis, vol. 1. Berlin: 435-459.
Fronda, Μ. Ρ 2007. "Hegemony and Rivalry: the Revolt of Capua Revisited."
Phoenix 61: 83-108.
2010. Between Rome and Carthage: Southern Italy during the Second Punic War.
Cambridge.
2013. "Southern Italy: Sanctuary, Panêgyris and Italiote Identity." In Funke and
Haake 2013: 123-138.
Fuhrmann, F. 1964. Les images de Plutarque. Paris.
Funke, P. 1980. Homonoia und Arche. Wiesbaden.
1985. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Struktur des Aitolischen Bundes.
Habilitationsschrift: Cologne.
1987. "Zur Datierung befestigter Stadtanlagen in Aitolien. Historisch-
philologische Anmerkungen zu einem Wechselverhältnis zwischen
Siedlungsstruktur und politischer Organisation." Boreas 10: 87—96.
1991a. "Zur Ausbildung städtischer Siedlungszentren in Aitolien." In E.
Olshausen, H. Sonnabend (eds.), Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur Historischen
Geographie des Altertums 2. Bonn: 313-332.
1991b. "Strabone, la geografia storica e la struttura etnica della Grecia nord-
occidentale." In F. Prontera (ed.), Geografìa storica della Grecia antica. Bari:
174-193.
1993. "Stamm und Polis. Überlegungen zur Entstehung der griechischen
Staatenwelt in den Dunklen Jahrhunderten." In J. Bleicken (ed.),
Colloquium aus Anlass des 80. Geburtstages von Alfred Heuss. Kallmünz: 29-48.
1994. "Staatenbünde und Bundesstaaten. Polis-übergreifende Herrschafts-
organisationen in Griechenland und Rom." In K. Buraselis (ed.), Unity
and Units in Antiquity. Athens: 125-133.
1997. "Polisgenese und Urbanisierung in Aitolien im 5. und 4.JI1. v. Chr." In
M. H. Hansen (ed.), The Polis as an Urban Centre and as a Political
Community. Copenhagen: 145—88.
1998. "Die Bedeutung der griechischen Bundesstaaten in der politischen
Theorie und Praxis des 5. und 4. Jhdt.s v. Chr. (Auch eine Anmerkung zu
Bibliography 545
Arist. pol. i26ia22-29)." In W. Schuller (ed.), Politische Theorie und Praxis im
Altertum. Darmstadt: 59-71.
2000. "Zur Datierung der aitolischen Bürgerrechtsverleihung an die Bürger von
Herakleia am Latmos (IGix i 2 ,i, 173)." Chiron 30: 505-517.
2004. "Sparta und die peloponnesische Staatenwelt zu Beginn des 4.
Jahrhunderts und der Dioikismos von Mantineia." In C. Tuplin (ed.),
Xenophon and his World. Stuttgart: 427-435.
2007a. "Die staatliche Neuformierung Griechenlands. Staatenbündnisse
und Bundesstaaten." In G. Weber (ed.), Kulturgeschichte des Hellenismus.
Stuttgart: 78-98, 435-439.
2007b. "Alte Grenzen — neue Grenzen. Formen polisübergreifender
Machtbildung in klassischer und hellenistischer Zeit." In Albertz,
Blöbaum, and Funke 2007:187-204.
2008. "Die Aitoler in der Ägäis. Untersuchungen zur sogenannten Seepolitik
der Aitoler im 3. Jh. v. Chr." In E. Winter (ed.), Vom Euphrat bis zum
Bosporus. Kleinasien in der Antike, vol. 1. Bonn: 253-267.
2009. "Integration und Abgrenzung. Vorüberlegungen zu den politischen
Funktionen überregionaler Heiligtümer in der griechischen Staatenwelt."
Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 11:1-13.
2013a. "Greek Amphiktyonies: An Experiment in Regional Governance." In
Beck 2013: 451-465.
2013b. "Greek Federal States and their Sanctuaries: Identity and Integration.
Some Introductory Remarks." In Funke and Haake 2013: 9-12.
2013c: "Thermika und Panaitolika. Alte und neue Zentren im Aitolischen
Bund." Funke and Haake 2013: 49-64.
Funke, P., H.-J. Gehrke, and L. Kolonas. 1993. "Ein neues Proxeniedekret des
Akarnanischen Bundes." Klio 75: 131-144.
Funke, P. and M. Haake (eds.) 2013. Greek Federal States and their Sanctuaries.
Stuttgart.
Funke, P. and N . Luraghi (eds.) 2009. The Politics of Ethnicity and the Crisis of the
Peloponnesian League. London.
P. Funke, Ν. Moustakis, and B. Hochschulz. 2004. "Epeiros." In Hansen and
Nielsen 2004: 338-50.
Funke, S. 2000. Aiakidenmythos und epeirotisches Königtum. Stuttgart.
Gabba, E. 1994. "Rome and Italy: the Social War." Cambridge Ancient History, vol.
ix: 104-128.
Gadolou, A. 2002. "The Pottery Fabrics and Workshops from Ano Mazaraki. The
1979 Excavation Season." In Greco 2002: 165-204.
Gaebler, H. 1897. "Zur Münzkunde Makedoniens ι." Zeitschrift für Numismatik
20:169-192.
1926a. "Zur Münzkunde Makedoniens 11." Zeitschrift für Numismatik 36:
111-116.
1926b. "Zur Münzkunde Makedoniens in." Zeitschrift für Numismatik 36:
183-198.
Gagarin, M. 1986. Early Greek Law. Berkeley.
546 Bibliography
Hauben, H. 1974. "A Royal Toast in 302 B.C." Ancient Society 5:105-117.
Hawke, J. 2011. Writing Authority: Elite Competition and Written Law in Early
Greece. Dekalb.
Hayek, F. 1948. "The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism." In
Individualism and the Economic Order. Chicago: 255-272.
Head, B. V. 1881. On the Chronological Sequence of the Coins ofBoiotia. London.
1911. Historia Numorum. A Manual of Greek Numismatics. London.
Heideking, J. 1988. Die Verfassung vor dem Richterstuhl. Vorgeschichte und
Ratifizierung der amerikanischen Verfassung ιγ8γ—ιγρι. Berlin.
Heisserer, A. J. 1980. Alexander the Great and the Greeks, The Epigraphic Evidence.
Norman.
Hellenkemper, H. and F. Hild. 2004. Tabula Imperii Byzantini 8: Lykien und
Pamphylien. Vienna.
Hellmann, G., A. Fahrmeir, and M. Vec (eds.) forthcoming. The Transformation
of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries. Oxford.
Helly, B. 1966. "Le groupe des monnaies fédérales thessaliennes avec Athéna aux
pompons." Revue numismatique 8: 7-32 and plates.
1970. "La convention des Basaidai." Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 94:
161-189.
1971. "Décrets de Démétrias pour des juges étrangers." Bulletin de correspon-
dance hellénique 95: 543—579.
1975. "Actes d'affranchissements thessaliens." Bulletin de correspondance
hellénique 99:119-144.
1976. "Lois sur les affranchis dans les inscriptions thessaliennes." Phoenix^o: 143-158.
1980. "La Thessalie à l'époque romaine." Mémoires du centre Jean Palerne 11: 37-50.
1982. "Deux attestations du Victoriat dans les listes d'affranchissement de
Thessalie." In T. Hackens and R. Weiller (eds.), Actes du 9e Congrès de
Numismatique, 1: Numismatique antique. Berne: 165-176.
1987. "Les émissions monétaires de la Confédération thessalienne (n e -i er s. av.
J.-C.)." In Rythmes de L· production monétaire, 4e VAntiquité à nos jours.
Paris: 39-53.
1995. LEtat thessalien. Aleuas le Roux, les tétrades et les tagoi. Lyon.
1996a. "La glose d'Hésychius ΜΕΝΩΝΙΔΑΙ: Pénestes thessaliens ou ostracises
athéniens?" Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 68:
135-146.
1996b. "Sur un passage de la Τέχνη Τακτική d'Asclépiodote: le tableau d'effectifs
de l'infanterie légère." Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes
70: 49- 6 9-
1997a. "Arithmétique et histoire: L'organisation militaire et politique des
Ioniens en Achaïe à l'époque archaïque." Topoi y.y. 207-262.
1997b. "Le diorthôma d'Auguste fixant la conversion des statères thessaliens en
deniers: une situation de passage à la monnaie unique." Topoi 7.2: 63-91.
2000. "Chapiteaux et consoles inscrits: deux exemples thessaliens." In Το Εργο
των Εφορειών Αρχαιοτήτων και Νεωτέρων Μνημείων του ΥΠΤΙΟ στη
Θεσσαλία. Volos: 151-160.
Bibliography 553
200I. "Un décret fédéral thessalien méconnu dans une cité d'Achaïe Phthiotide
(IG ix 2,103)." Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 125: 239-287.
2004. "Epigramme funéraire pour Théotimos, fils de Ményllos, d'Atrax (457 av.
J.-C.)." Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 148:15-28.
2006a. "Un nom antique pour Goritsa ?" In ΑρχαιολογικόΈργο Θεσσαλίας και
Στέρεας Ελλάδας. Volos: 27-51·
2006b. "Eléments pour une histoire de la distribution des territoires en
Thessalie de l'époque néolithique à la fin de l'Antiquité." In 10 Διεθνές
Συνέδριο Ιστορίας και Πολιτισμού της Θεσσαλίας. Larissa: 194—205.
2007. "Le dialecte thessalien; un autre modèle de développement." In I. Hajnal
(ed.), Die Altgriechischen Dialekte: Wesen und Werden. Innsbruck: 177-222.
2008a. "La capitale de la Thessalie face aux dangers de la Troisième guerre de
Macédoine: l'année 171 av. J.-C. à Larisa." Topoi 15: 127-249.
2008b. "Encore le blé thessalien. Trois décrets de Larisa (IGix 2,506) accordant
aux Athéniens licence d'exportation et réduction des droits de douane sur
leurs achats de blé." Studi ellenistici 20: 25-108.
(forthcoming). La Thessalie des "siècles obscurs": un essai d'interprétation
historique. In Mélanges F. Dakoronia.
Hennig, D. 1977. "Der Bericht des Polybios über Boiotien und die Lage von
Orchomenos in der 2. Hälfte des 3. Jh.s v. Chr." Chiron 7:119-148.
1994: "Immobilienerwerb durch Nichtbürger in der klassischen und hellenis-
tischen Polis." Chiron 24: 305-344.
Herman, G. 1987. Ritualised Friendship and the Greek City. Cambridge.
Heuss, A. 1938. "Antigonos Monophthalmos und die griechischen Städte." Hermes
73:133-194.
Hignett, C. 1963. Xerxes' invasion of Greece. Oxford.
Hilpert-Greger, R. 1996. "Der Acheloos-Mythos." In Berktold, Büscher, and
Wacker 1996: 71-74.
Hodkinson, S. 2000. Property and Wealth in Chssical Sparta. Swansea.
Hodkinson, S. (ed.) 2009. Sparta: Comparative Approaches. Swansea.
Hoepfner, W. and E. L. Schwandner (eds.) 1994. Haus und Stadt im klassischen
Griechenland. 2nd edn, Munich.
Hogarth, D. G. 1898/1899. "Excavations at Naukratis," Annual oj"the British School
at Athens 5, 26-97.
Hölkeskamp, Κ.-J. 1993. "Demonax und die Neuordnung der Bürgerschaft von
Kyrene." Hermes 121: 404-421.
1994. "Tempel, Agora und Alphabet. Die Entstehungsbedingungen von
Gesetzgebung in der archaischen Polis." In H.-J. Gehrke (ed.), Rechtskodifi-
zierung und soziale Normen im interkulturellen Vergleich. Tübingen: 135—164.
1999. Schiedsrichter, Gesetzgeber und Gesetzgebung im archaischen Griechenland.
Stuttgart.
Holleaux, M. 1897. "Note sur un décret d'Érétrie." Revue des études grecques 10:
I57
7l89'
1905. "Sur les assemblées ordinaires de la ligue étolienne." Bulletin de correspon-
dance hellénique 29: 362—372.
554 Bibliography
1907. "Dédicace d'un monument commémoratif de la bataille de Sellasia."
Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 31: 94-114.
1930. "Rome, Philippe de Macédoine et Antiochos." Cambridge Ancient History,
vol. vin: 116-240.
1938—1968. Etudes d'histoire et d'épigraphie grecques, 6 vols., ed. L. Robert.
Paris.
Hope Simpson, R. and J. F. Lazenby. 1970. The Catalogue of Ships in Homer's Iliad.
Oxford.
Horden, P. and N. Purcell. 2000. The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean
History. Oxford.
Hornblower, S. 1990. "When was Megalopolis Founded?" Annual of the British
School at Athens 85: 71-77.
1991-2008. A Commentary on Thucydides. 3 vols. Oxford.
2000. "Thucydides, Xenophon, and Lichas: Were the Spartans Excluded from
the Olympic Games from 420 to 400 BC?" Phoenix 54: 212-225.
2002. The Greek World 479-323 BC. 3rd edn. London and New York.
2011. The Greek World 479-323 BC. 4th edn, London.
Horowitz, D. 1975. "Ethnic Identity." In N. Glazer and D. Moynihan (eds.),
Ethnicity: Theory and Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: 111-140.
1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley.
Howran, V. 2005. "The mystery fleet of Xenophon, Hellenica 4.6.14." Scholia 14:
18-33.
Hutton, W. E. 1995. The Topographical Methods ofPausanias. Diss. Austin.
Ianelli, M. T. 1992. "Il contesto archeologico del coperchio di teca da Calo nia:
l'area a sud del tempio dorico." In F. Costabile (ed.), Polis ed Olympeion a
Locri Epizefiri. Catanzaro: 29-35.
Imhoof-Blumer, F. 1878. Die Münzen Akarnaniens. Vienna.
Insoll, T. (ed.) 2007. The Archaeology of Identities: A Reader. London.
Intrieri, M. 1987-1988. "La lega italiota al tempo di Pirro." Miscellanea di Studi
Storici 6: 25—37.
Intzesiloglou, B. G. 2006. "The Inscription of the Kynegoi of Herakles from the
Ancient Theatre of Demetrias." In G. A. Pikoulas (ed.), Inscriptions and
History ofThessaly: New Evidence. Volos: 67-77.
Irigoin J., J. Duchemin, and L. Bardollet. 1993. Bacchylide: Dithyrambes, Epinicies,
Fragments. Paris.
Isler, H. P. 1996. "Der Akarnanische Flußgott Acheloos in der Bildkunst." In
Berktold, Büscher, and Wacker 1996: 169-172.
Iversen, P. A. 2007. "The Small and Great Daidala in Boiotian history." Historia
56: 381-418.
Jachmann, G. 1958. Der homerische Schiffskatalog und die Utas. Cologne.
Jacoby, F. 1944. "Chrestous poiein (Aristotle fr. 592 R)." Classical Quarterly 38:
15-16.
Jacquemin, Α. 1999. Offrandes monumentales à Delphes. Paris.
Jacquemin, A. and D. Laroche. 2001. "Le monument de Daochos ou le trésor des
Thessaliens." Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 115: 305-332.
Bibliography 555
Lomas, Κ. 1993. Rome and the Western Greeks, 350 BC-AD 200: Conquest and
Acculturation in Southern Italy. London.
Lombardo, M. (ed.) 2008. Forme sovrapoleiche e interpoleiche di organizzazione nel
mondo greco antico. Galatina.
Lorber, C. 1999. "Thessalian Countermarks." In M. Amandry and S. Hurter (eds.),
Travaux de numismatique grecque offerts à Georges Le Rider. London: 221-227.
Low, P. 2007. Interstate Relations in CUssical Greece. Cambridge.
Lozano, A. 2005. "El federalismo en el Oriente griego." Studia historical historia
antigua 23, 2005, 345-372.
Lucas, G. 1997. Les cités antiques de L· haute vallée du Titarèse. Lyon.
Lücke, S. 2000. Syngeneia. Epigraphisch-historische Studien zu einem Phänomen der
antiken griechischen Diplomatie. Frankfurt.
Luraghi, N . 1994. Tirannidi archaiche in Sicilia e Magna Grecia da Panezio di
Leontini atta caduta dei Dinomenidi. Florence.
2000. "Author and Audience in Thucydides' Archaeology: Some Reflections."
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 227-239.
2008. The Ancient Messenians: Constructions of Ethnicity and Memory.
Cambridge.
Luraghi, N . and A. Magnetto. 2012. "The Controversy between Megalopolis and
Messene in a New Inscription from Messene (with an Appendix by C.
Habicht)." Chiron 42: 509-550.
Lytle, E. 2010. "Fish Lists in the Wilderness: the Social and Economic History of a
Boiotian Price Decree." Hesperia 79: 253—303.
Ma, J. 2008. "Review of N. Katsikoudis, Dôdônê. Oi timêtikoi andriântes." Bryn
Mawr Classical Review 2008.02.27.
2011. "Court, King and Power in Antigonid Macedonia." In R. Lane Fox (ed.),
Brills Companion to Ancient Macedon. Leiden: 521-543.
Ma, J., N. Papazarkadas, and R. Parker (eds.) 2009. Interpreting the Athenian
Empire. London.
Machu, J. 1951. "Cyrène: la cité et le souverain à l'époque hellénistique." Revue
Historique 205: 41—55.
Mackil, E. 2008. "A Boiotian Proxeny Decree and Relief in the Museum of Fine Arts,
Boston and Boiotian-Lakonian Relations in the 360s." Chiron 38:157-194.
2013. Creating a Common Polity: Religion, Economy, and Politics in the Making of
the Greek Koinon. Berkeley.
Mackil, E. and P. van Alfen. 2006. "Cooperative Coinage." In P. van Alfen (ed.),
Agoranomia: Studies in Money and Exchange Presented to fohn H Kroll. New
York: 201-246.
Maddoli, G. F. 1983. "I culti di Crotone." Atti e Memorie della Società Magna
Grecia 23: 313-343.
Mafodda, G. 2000. / / koinon beotico in età arcaica e classica. Storia ed istituzioni.
Rome.
Magie, D. 1950. Roman Rule in Asia Minor to the End of the Third Century After
Christ, 2 vols. Princeton.
Magnette, P. 2001. Citizenship. The History of an Idea. Colchester.
Bibliography 563
Magnetto, A. 1997. Gli arbitrati interstatali greci li: dal 337 al 196 a. C. Pisa.
Malkin, I. 2001a. "Introduction." In I. Malkin (ed.), Ancient Perceptions of Greek
Ethnicity. Washington, D.C.: 1-28.
2001b. "Greek Ambiguities: Between Ancient Hellas' and 'Barbarian Epirus.'"
In I. Malkin (ed.), Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Washington, D.C.:
187-212.
2011. A Small Greek World. Networks in the Ancient Mediterranean. Oxford.
Manni, E. 1971. "Diodoro e la storia italiota." Kokalos 17:131-145.
Marcellesi, M. C. 2007. "Le 'trésor' du temple du Létôon deXanthos (1975-2002).
Les monnaies rhodiennes et la circulation monétaire en Lycie à la basse
époque hellénistique." Revue numismatique i6y. 45-90.
Marcotte, D. 1985. "Le premier koinón acarnanien et la fin de la seconde ligue
délienne. Note critique." L Antiquité classique 54: 254-258.
Marek, C. 1984. Die Proxenie. Frankfurt.
2006a. Die Inschriften von Kaunos. Munich.
2006b. "Stadt, Bund und Reich in der Zollorganisation des kaiserzeitlichen
Lykien." In H.-U. Wiemer (ed.), Staatlichkeit und politisches Handeln in der
römischen Kaiserzeit. Munich: 107-121.
Mari, M. 2002. Aldi là de l'Olimpo: Macedoni e grandi santuari della Grecia dall' età
arcaica al primo ellenismo. Athens.
2007. "Macedonian Poleis and Ethne in the Greek Sanctuaries Before the Age of
Philip II." Ancient Macedonia 7: 31-49.
2011. "Traditional Cults and Beliefs." In R. Lane Fox (ed.), Brill's Companion to
Ancient Macedon. Leiden: 453-465.
Marksteiner, T. and M. Wörrle. 2002. "Ein Altar für Kaiser Claudius auf dem
Bonda tepesi zwischen Myra und Limyra." Chiron 32: 545-569.
Marquaille, C. 2003. "Ptolemaic Royal Cult in Cyrenaica." Libyan Studies 34:
25-42.
2008. "The Foreign Policy of Ptolemy II." In P. McKechnie and P. Guillame
(eds.), Ptolemy II Philadelphus and his World. Leiden: 39-64.
Martin, D. G. 1975. Greek Leagues in the Later Second and First Centuries u.c. Diss.
Princeton.
Martin, P. M. 1984. "La tradition sur les passeurs de la côte acarnanienne: légende
ou réalité?" In Littérature gréco-romaine et géographie. MéUnges R. Dion. Paris:
45-53·
Martin, T. R. 1985. Sovereignty and Coinage in Classical Greece. Princeton.
Martin, V. 1940. La vie internationale dans la Grèce des cités, v\e—rve s. av. J.-C
Paris.
Mastrocinque, A. 2002. "Zeus Kretagenès seleucido. Da Seleucia a Praeneste (e in
Giudea)." Klio 84: 355-372.
Mastrokostas, E. i960, "Akarnania." Archaiologikon Deltion 16:196.
Matthaiou, A. 2001. "Δύο ιστορικές επιγραφές της Μεσσήνης." In V.
Mitsopoulos-Leon (ed.), Forschungen in der Peloponnes. Athens: 221-231.
Mattingly, H. 1996. The Athenian Empire Restored: Epigraphic and Historical
Studies. Ann Arbor.
564 Bibliography
Mazzoni, I. 1996. "La struttura del koinon acarnano fra il in e il 11 secolo."
Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo 130: 93-98.
1997. "L'ambasceria acarnana a Roma e gli antefatti della guerra illirica."
Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo 131: 3-11.
McAuley, A. Forthcoming. "Princess and Tigress: Apama of Kyrene." In A.
Coskun and A. McAuley (eds), Seleukid Royal Women. Stuttgart.
Mclnerney, J. 1997. "The Phokikon and the Hero Archegetes." Hesperia 66:
193-207.
1999a. "Parnassus, Delphi, and the Thyiades." Greek, Roman and Byzantine
Studies 38: 263-283.
1999b. The Folds of Parnasses. Land and Ethnicity in Ancient Phokis. Austin.
2001. "Ethne and Ethnicity in Early Greece." In I. Malkin (ed.), Ancient
Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Washington D.C.: 51—73.
2013. "Polis and Koinon: Federal Government in Greece." In Beck 2013:
466-479.
McKechnié, P. R. and S. J. Kern. 1988. Hellenica Oxyrhynchia. Warminster.
Meadows, A. 2013. "The Ptolemaic League of Islanders." In K. Buraselis, D.
Thompson, and M. Stefanou (eds.), The Ptolemies, the Sea, and the Nile.
Cambridge: 19-38.
Meier, C. 2011. A Culture of Freedom: Ancient Greece and the Origins of Europe.
Trans. J. Chase. Oxford.
Meiggs, R. 1972. The Athenian Empire. Oxford.
Mele, A. 1993. "Crotone greca negli ultimi due secoli della sua storia." In Crotone e
L· sua storia tra TV e ni secolo a. C. Naples: 235—291.
2002. "Gli Achei da Omero all'età arcaica." In Greco 2002: 67-93.
Mellor, R. 1975. Thea Rome: the Worship of the Goddess Roma in the Greek World.
Göttingen.
Melville-Jones, J. R. 1971. "Some Numismatic Problems in the Delian
Inscriptions." American Numismatic Society 17:127—128.
Mendels, D. 1984. "Aetolia 331—301: Frustration, Political Power, and Survival."
Historia 33:129-180.
Mendoni, L. G. 2007. "Το ιστορικό πλαίσιο της πολιτικής ένωσης των πόλεων
της Κέας στον 4° και τον 30 αι. π.Χ." In Μ. Lagogianni-Georgakarakou
(ed.), Πολιτεύεσθαι τους Κείους κατά πόλεις. Athens: 22—28.
Merker, Ι. L. 1989. "The Achaians in Naupaktos and Kalydon in the Fourth
Century." Hesperia 58: 303-311.
Meyer, E(d). 1909. Theopomps Hellenika. Mit einer Beihge über die Rede an die
Larisaeer und die Verfassung Thessaliens. Hildesheim.
1958. Geschichte des Altertums, vol. v 4 . Stuttgart.
Meyer, E(lizabeth). 2012. "Two Grants of politela and the Molossians at Dodona."
Zeitschrift fur Papyrologie und Epigraphik 180: 205—216.
2013. The Inscriptions of Dodona and a New History ofMolossia. Stuttgart.
Meyer, E(rnst). 1965. "Euboia." Der Kleine Pauly 2: 397-399. Stuttgart.
Meyer-Zwiffelhoffer, E. 2014. "Die griechischen Bundesstaaten als Modell in der
frühneuzeitlichen politischen Theorie und Geschichtsschreibung." In W.
Bibliography 565
Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de. 1972. The Origins of the Pebponnesian War. London.
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. 2005. "Lelantine War." Brill's New Pauly 7: 379-380.
Steinbrecher, M. 1985. Der Delisch-Attische Seebund und die athenisch-spartanischen
Beziehungen in der kimonischen Ara (ca. 478/7—462/1). Stuttgart.
Stern, M. 1980. "Homers Achaioi und die Landschaft Achaia." Mededelingen van
het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 42: 67-70.
Stewart, W. H. 1982. "Metaphors, Models, and the Development of Federal
Theory." Publius 12: 5-24.
Stickler, T. 2010. Korinth und seine Kolonien. Die Stadt am Isthmus im Machtgeßige
des klassischen GriechenUnd. Berlin.
Stiehle, R. 1856. "Der Geograph Artemidoros von Ephesos." Phihhgus 11, 1856:
193-244
Strasser, J. Y. 2003. "La carrière du pancratiaste M. Aur. Dèmostratos Damas."
Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 127: 251—299.
Strassler, R. (ed.) 2009. The Landmark Xenophon's Hellenika. A New Translation
by John Marincola. New York.
Strauch, D. 1996. Römische Politik und Griechische Tradition: die Umgestaltung
Nordwest-Griechenlands unter römischer Herrschaft. Munich.
Stucchi, S. 1965. L'agora di Cirene 1: lati nord ed est della platea inferiore. Rome.
Stylianou, P. J. 1998. A Hutorical Commentary on Diodorus Siculus Book 1$. Oxford.
Svoronos, J. N. 1888. "Monnaies Cretoises inédites et incertaines." Revue
Numismatique 6: 353-395.
Swoboda, H. 1910. "Studien zur Verfassung Böotiens." Klio 10: 315-334.
1912: "Die aetolische Komenverfassung." Wiener Studien 34: 37-42.
1914. Rektoratsrede: Die griechischen Bünde und der modern Bundesstaat.
Prague.
1922. "Die neuen Urkunden von Epidauros." Hermes 57: 518—534.
1924. Zwei Kapitel aus dem griechischen Bundesrecht. Vienna.
Swoboda, H., and K. F. Hermann. 1913. Lehrbuch der griechischen
Staatsalterthümer. Tübingen.
Szanto, E. 1892. Das griechische Bürgerrecht. Freiburg.
Szemler, G. J. 1991. "The Isthmus Corridor during the Dark and Archaic Ages." In
E. W. Kase, G. J. Szemler, P. W. Wallace, N. C. Wilkie (eds.), The Great
Isthmus Corridor Route. Explorations of the Phokis-Doris Expedition I.
Dubuque: 74-104.
Taeuber, H. 1983. "Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit in Arkadien." In I. Weiler (ed.),
Berichte vom ι. Österreichischen Althistorikertreffen. Graz: 32-36.
2006. "Rhodische Schiedsrichter im Achäerbund." In P. Amann, M. Pedrazzi,
and H. Taeuber (eds.), Italo — Tusco — Romana. Vienna: 341-344.
Taita, J. 1999. "Un'anfizionia ad Olimpia? Un bilancio sulla questione nell'inter-
pretazione storiografica moderna." In Storiografia ed erudizione. Quaderni di
Acme 39:149-186.
2002. "Rapporti fra il santuario di Olimpia e lo stato di Elide." In Sviluppi
recenti nelh ricercha antichista. Quaderni di Acme 54: 131—161.
2007. Olimpia e il suo vicinato in epoca arcaica. Milan.
584 Bibliography
Takmer, Β. 2007. "Lex Portoni Provinciae Lyciae. Ein Vorbericht über die
Zollinschrift aus Andriake aus nero nischer Zeit." Gephyra 4:165—188.
Talvio, T. 2011. "The Coin Finds." In Β. Forsén and E. Tikkala (eds.), Thesprotia
Expedition 11. Environment and Settlement Patterns. Helsinki: 311—317.
Tambiah, S. J. 1989. "Ethnic Conflict in the World Today." American Ethnologist
16: 335-349.
Tausend, Κ. 1992. Amphiktyonie und Symmachie: Formen zwischenstaatlicher
Beziehungen im archaischen Griechenland. Stuttgart.
Ténékidès, G. 1956. "Droit international et communautés fédérales dans la Grèce
des cités." In Académie de Droit International Recueil des Cours 11. Leiden:
475-652.
Tex, J. 1973. Oldenbarnevelt. Cambridge.
Themelis, P. 1999. "Ausgrabungen in Kallipolis (Ost-Aetolien)." In W. Höpfner
(ed.), Geschichte des Wohnens, vol. ι. Stuttgart: 427-440.
2004. '"Ανασκαφή Μεσσήνης." In Πρακτικά της εν Αθήναις Αρχαιολογική
Εταιρείας του έτους 200$: 27—53·
2θθ8. "Κρίμα ττερί χώρας Μεσσηνίων και Μεγαλοττολιτών." In Υ. Α. Pikoulas
(ed.), Ιστορίες για την αρχαία Αρκαδία. Stemnitsa; 211—222.
Theocharis, D. R. i960. "Έρευναι εν Δημητριάδι." Thessalika 3: 57~85·
Thomas, R. 1989· Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Greece.
Cambridge.
1996. "Written in Stone? Liberty, Equality, Orality, and the Codification of
Law." In L. Foxhall and A. D. E. Lewis (eds.), Greek Law in Its Political
Setting: Justifications not Justice. Oxford: 9—31.
2005. "Writing, Law, and Writtten Law." In M. Gagarin and D. Cohen
(eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge:
41-60.
Thommen, L. 1996. Ladedaimonion Politeia. Die Entstehung der spartanischen
Verfassung. Stuttgart.
Thompson, W. E. 1983. "Arcadian Factionalism in the 360's." Historia 32:
149-160.
Thornton, J. 2000. "Una regione vista di lontano: la Licia di Strabone dai dati
geografici al mito dell'eunomia." In A. M. Birasch and G. Salmeri (eds.),
Strabon e TAsia Minor. Naples: 401-459.
Tiverios, M. 2008. "Greek Colonisation of the Northern Aegean." In G. R.
Tsetskhladze (ed.), Greek Colonisation: An Account of Greek Colonies and
Other Settlements Overseas, vol. II. Leiden: 1—154.
Torelli, M. 1977. "I culti di Locri." In Atti Taranto 1976· Naples: 147-184.
1987. "I culti." In G. Cingari (ed.), Storia delL· Calabria 1. Rome: 589-712.
Touratsoglou, G. 2010. "Coin Production and Coin Circulation in the Roman
Péloponnèse." In Roman Péloponnèse, vol. πι: 235—251.
Touval, S. and I. W . Zartman. 1985. International Mediation in Theory and
Practice. London.
Toynbee, A. 1935a. A Study of History 11. The Genesis of Civilizations. Oxford.
1935b. A Study of History in. The Growth of Civilizations. Oxford.
Bibliography 585