Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy,

American Physical Therapy Association

Management of Falls in Community-dwelling Older Adults:

A Clinical Guidance Statement from the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy of the

American Physical Therapy Association

Core Working Group: Keith Avin, PT, PhD; Timothy Hanke, PT, PhD; Neva Kirk-Sanchez, PT, PhD;

Christine McDonough, PT, PhD; Tiffany Shubert, PT, PhD†

Clinical Guidance Statement Coordinator: Jason Hardage, PT, DPT, DScPT, GCS, NCS, CEEAA

Practice Committee Chair: Greg Hartley, PT, DPT, GCS, CEEAA

†Content Matter Expert

1
Abstract

Background: Falls in older adults are a major public health concern due to high prevalence,

impact on health outcomes and quality of life, and treatment costs. Physical therapists (PTs)

can play a major role in reducing fall risk for older adults; however, existing clinical practice

guidelines (CPGs) related to fall prevention and management are not targeted to PTs.

Objective: The purpose of this clinical guidance statement (CGS) is to provide recommendations

to PTs to help improve outcomes and reduce unwarranted variation in practice in the

identification and management of fall risk in community-dwelling older adults.

Design and Methods: The Subcommittee on Evidence-based Documents (EBDs) of the Practice

Committee of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy developed this CGS. Existing CPGs

were identified by systematic search and critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines,

Research, and Evaluation in Europe II (AGREE II) tool. Through this process, 3 CPGs were

recommended for inclusion in the CGS and were synthesized and summarized.

Results: Screening recommendations include asking all older adults in contact with a health

care provider whether they have fallen in the past year or have concerns about balance or

walking. Follow-up should include screening for balance and mobility impairments. Older adults

who screen positive should have a targeted multifactorial assessment and targeted

intervention. The components of this assessment and intervention are reviewed in this CGS,

and barriers and issues related to implementation are discussed.

Limitations: A gap analysis supports the need for the development of a PT-specific CPG to

provide more precise recommendations for screening and assessment measures, exercise

parameters, and delivery models.

2
Conclusion: This CGS provides recommendations to assist PTs in the identification and

management of fall risk in older community-dwelling adults.

3
<H1>Background

“Evidence based medicine is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best

evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence

based medicine means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external

clinical evidence from systematic research.”1(p 71) Tools for implementing evidence-based

practice include documents that synthesize available evidence such as systematic reviews and

documents that guide decision-making such as clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and clinical

guidance statements (CGSs), also known as clinical practice appraisals. According to the

Institute of Medicine, “Clinical practice guidelines are statements that include

recommendations intended to optimize patient care that are informed by a systematic review

of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options.”2(p 2)

Clinical practice guidelines use strong methodology to guide a systematic review of all available

literature to develop statements and recommendations for appropriate health care decisions.

In contrast, the CGS systematically compares and synthesizes CPGs of similar topic areas. Key

elements of each CGS “include a discussion of areas of agreement and difference, the major

recommendations and the corresponding strength of evidence and recommendation rating

schemes, and a comparison of guideline methodologies.”3

<H1>Purpose

Each year, approximately 30% of adults aged 65 years or older fall, resulting in $30 billion

dollars spent annually in direct and indirect medical costs.4 According to 2010 National Health

Interview Survey statistics, falls contributed to 13 million medically treated injuries, with 20% of

4
those falls resulting in serious injury that was treated in emergency departments.5 In 2005,

emergency department medical costs for treated falls totaled 6.5 billion dollars.6 Death rates

from falls have increased substantially over the past decade,7 and the number of falls is

projected to increase as the baby boomers age.8 The associated costs of falls and their impact

on quality of life have brought fall risk management and prevention to the forefront of clinical

and public health initiatives.

There is evidence that falls can be prevented by screening to detect risk factors and by the

prescription of tailored interventions, a process within the scope of PT practice.9,10 There is a

substantial body of research on risk factors, interventions, and prevention strategies for falls.11-
16
This research has provided evidence for the development of best-practice recommendations

for fall risk screening including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s STEADI

(“Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries”) Tool Kit17 and published recommendations

such as those developed by the United States Preventive Task Force (USPSTF).18 In addition,

CPGs for the assessment and prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults for health

care practitioners have been developed by several organizations such as the National Institute

for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)19 and the American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics

Societies (AGS/BGS),20 representing a substantial investment of resources and expertise.

A caveat is that these CPGs have been developed within the broad context of medical and

public health practice. As such, they do not specifically address PT clinical decision-making,

which may cause ambiguity in interpreting existing evidence applying that evidence to diverse

5
patient populations and needs. Therefore, the overall aim of this project was to create a CGS to

guide PT practice using existing CPGs that address falls in community-dwelling older adults. The

specific objectives of this document were to (1) identify and critically appraise the available

CPGs; (2) synthesize appraisal findings across high-quality CPGs; (3) provide a clinically useful

summary of recommendations of each CPG for the PT; and (4) report gaps in evidence for CPGs

relevant to PT practice. We expect that PTs will use this CGS to guide clinical decision-making

relating to the screening and management of patients at risk for falls and ultimately to reduce

unwarranted variation in clinical practice and improve health outcomes.

<H1>Methods

<H2>Expert Panel Process

In 2012, the Subcommittee on Evidence-based Documents (EBDs) was assembled by the

Practice Committee of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy. The members of the

Subcommittee and one content matter expert formed the core working group, which was

charged with developing EBDs for PTs for the management of fall risk in older adults. This

working group and the coordinator consisted of PTs with expertise in rehabilitation science,

kinesiology, motor control, geriatrics, measurement, and fall prevention. Multiple panelists had

clinical practice experience with community-dwelling older adults. Although the majority of PTs’

fall-related interactions involve older adults identified as patients, PTs may also address fall risk

in older adults who are not patients, but rather clients seeking consultation and information.

For simplicity, we employ the term “patient” in this document, inclusive of both groups.

6
<H3>Identification and critical appraisal of guidelines

Eleven freely accessible CPG databases were systematically searched for all fall-related content

(Table 1). Intentionally broad search terms included “falls,” “geriatric” and “older adults.” Only

CPGs were included in this document; all other types of EBDs were excluded. Clinical practice

guidelines published between 2000 and 2013 were included if they were written in English and

targeted adults over the age of 65 years living in the community or in assisted-living settings.

The definition of a fall varies in the literature.21,22 One main difference in definitions is whether

falls with loss of consciousness are considered falls. We aimed to address the broadest

definition of falls; therefore, we did not exclude CPGs based on fall definition. Similarly, there is

little consensus on the definition of the term “community-dwelling.” Since residents of assisted-

living settings have varying levels of independence, CPGs targeting this cohort were included in

the search. Due to differences in risk factors and management approaches for fall risk in older

adults in acute care, skilled nursing, and long-term care settings, these settings were excluded.

Clinical practice guidelines were excluded if they were specific to a neurologic condition (e.g.,

stroke, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis) or to fracture management. Figure 1 shows the

flow diagram of reviewed CPGs. Of the 4027 EBDs identified, 5 met inclusion criteria and were

selected for review by the entire core working group.

The 5 CPGs (and associated online content where available) were independently reviewed by

the core working group using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation in Europe II

(AGREE II) tool.23 The AGREE II tool was developed to appraise CPG quality via 23 items

7
addressing 6 key domains: scope and purpose (3 items), stakeholder involvement (3 items),

rigor of development (8 items), clarity of presentation (3 items), applicability (4 items), and

editorial independence (2 items). Each item was rated using a 7-point scale ranging from 1

(strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Item values are summed for each of the 6 domains. In

addition, reviewers respond to a global quality statement: “I would recommend this guideline

for use.” Response options include “yes,” “yes with modifications,” and “no.” Prior to review, all

panelists completed online training24 on the AGREE II method. A calibration process was

performed for the first 2 reviews (NICE19 and AGS/BGS20 CPGs), in which members

independently conducted the AGREE II review, submitted scores, and then discussed each

scoring item via teleconference. All 5 CPGs were appraised by at least 3 reviewers, and 3 CPGs

(NICE,19 AGS/BGS,20 and AGILE25) were reviewed by all members. The core working group

discussed each CPG via a series of 4 telephone conference calls and one in-person meeting.

Consensus was established for any item for which greater than a 2-point range existed among

AGREE II scores.

<H2>Stakeholder Input and Review

Stakeholder input was solicited via separate reviews of 2 successive drafts of the CGS. The first

review was solicited from the consulting group, which consisted of a PT with expertise in falls in

community-dwelling older adults, 2 laypeople who represent the population of interest (i.e.,

community-dwelling older adults), a physician geriatrician, and an exercise physiologist with

expertise in falls in community-dwelling older adults. The core working group considered each

comment and performed consensus edits to produce a revised second draft.

8
The second draft was then reviewed by the external review group, which consisted of 2 PTs

who were board certified in geriatric physical therapy, a PT who was a Certified Exercise Expert

for Older Adults and a consultant on legislative affairs and reimbursement, a public health

policymaker, a primary care physician, a physician geriatrician, and special reviewers with

specific expertise. The core working group considered each comment and performed consensus

edits to produce the third draft.

<H1>Results

<H2>Description of 3 CPGs Rated as “Recommended for Use”

Reviewers obtained highly consistent overall scores and recommendations using the AGREE II

instrument (Table 219,20,25-27). Three CPGs were rated as “recommended for use”; 2 were rated

as “not recommended for use.” The recommended CPGs are briefly described as follows:

<H3>Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older People

Developed by the National Collaborating Centre for Nursing and Supportive Care (NCC-NSC) and

funded by NICE, this CPG19 (hereafter referred to as NICE) was published in 2004, reviewed in

2011, and updated June 2013. This CPG was developed by a multidisciplinary team and

incorporated a wide range of stakeholders, including those from a variety of health professions.

<H3>Prevention of Falls in Older Persons

9
Supported by the AGS/BGS, this CPG20 (hereafter referred to as AGS/BGS) was published in

2001 and revised in 2010. This CPG was developed by a multidisciplinary team and incorporated

a wide range of stakeholders, including a Geriatrics Certified Specialist PT.

<H3>Evidence-based Guidelines for the Secondary Prevention of Falls in Older Adults

Developed by Moreland et al27 and funded by the R. Samuel McLaughlin Foundation, this CPG

(hereafter referred to as Moreland) was published in 2003 and has not been updated. In

contrast with the other 2 CPGs, it does not address primary prevention of falls, but rather was

developed as a tool for clinicians and researchers to address evidence-based assessments and

interventions for those who have fallen and are at high risk for future falls. The characteristics

of the development group were not described.

<H2>Synthesis of CPG Strength of Evidence and Levels of Recommendation

The included CPGs used different definitions and criteria for their grades of recommendations

and levels of evidence (Tables 3 and 4). Also, the actions associated with the recommendations

put forth were not uniform and required interpretation of the working group. Therefore, our

expert opinion is comprised of synthesizing the specific recommendation or recommendations,

strength of the recommendation, and level of evidence. To determine the strength of

recommendation for this CGS, we considered the recommendation strength, grades of levels of

evidence, evidence tables, and our interpretation of the balance between benefit and harm.

This document refers to the grades of the recommendations from this working group as CGS

Grades, and these are described in Table 4.

10
The recommendations from the CPGs are summarized as follows: general recommendations

(Table 5), the components of a multifactorial assessment for older adults at increased risk

(Table 6), and the recommendations related to multifactorial interventions (Table 7). The

recommendations are organized using the World Health Organization International

Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework.28

<H2>Screening Recommendations

The intention of the screening process is to determine if a multifactorial screening is necessary.

The order in which the screening process should take place is outlined in Figure 2.

1. Physical therapists should routinely ask older adult patients if they have fallen in the last

12 months (CGS Grade C: Strong recommendation based on Level III evidence).

Screening should include:

a) History and context of falls over the last 12 months

b) At least one question about the patient’s perception of difficulty with balance or

walking

2. For each patient who reports a fall or falls or reports difficulty with balance or walking,

the PT should screen by observing for gait or balance impairment (CGS Grade C: Strong

recommendation based on Level III evidence).

A screening is positive when either of the following conditions is found:

a) The patient reports multiple falls regardless of balance and gait impairments

b) The patient reports one fall, and a balance or gait impairment is observed

11
Rationale: Overall, the NICE19 and AGS/BGS20 screening recommendations are similar (Table 5);

Moreland27 does not address screening. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and

AGS/BGS recommend screening all older adults by asking them if they have fallen in the past

year. The fall inquiry recommendations include frequency, context, fall characteristics, and,

according to AGS/BGS, self-reported difficulties with balance or walking. National Institute for

Health and Care Excellence recommends assessing the ability to stand, turn, and sit as being

adequate for a first-level screening. American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society does

not describe an initial screening tool but does suggest including one measure of balance, gait,

or both. Examples from AGS/BGS include the Timed “Up & Go” Test,29 the Berg Balance Scale,30

and the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment.31 Although the NICE recommendation is

Grade C based on Level III evidence, our recommendation uses stronger language because the

benefit of these screening activities far outweighs the associated harms.

The CPGs do not address the situation in which an older adult has obvious balance and gait

impairments but does not report a fall in the previous 12 months. American Geriatrics

Society/British Geriatrics Society20 further comments that multifactorial fall risk assessment

should not be applied to those older adults who (1) report only a single fall and (2) demonstrate

no unsteadiness or difficulty with balance or gait.

<H2>Assessment Recommendation

Physical therapists should provide an individualized assessment within the scope of PT practice

that contributes to a multifactorial assessment of falls and fall risk. Additional potential risk

12
factors may need to be addressed by the appropriate provider as indicated (CGS Grade A:

Strong recommendation based on Level II evidence). This assessment should include:

a. Medication review with emphasis on polypharmacy and psychoactive drugs

b. Medical history with emphasis on new or unmanaged risk factors:

i. osteoporosis

ii. depression

iii. urinary incontinence

iv. cardiac disease including signs or symptoms of cardioinhibitory carotid

sinus hypersensitivity

c. Body functions and structure, activity and participation, environmental factors,

and personal factors:

i. strength

ii. balance

iii. gait

iv. activities of daily living

v. footwear

vi. environmental hazards

vii. cognition

viii. neurological function

ix. cardiac function including postural hypotension

x. vision

13
<H3>Health conditions

<H4>Osteoporosis

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 and AGS/BGS20 recommend that

osteoporosis risk or diagnosis be assessed as part of the identification of risk factors for falls.

<H4>Depression

Moreland27 identifies depression as a potentially modifiable risk factor for falls and therefore

recommends assessment. The Geriatric Depression Scale32 is mentioned as a screening tool for

depression in older adults.

<H4>Medication review

All 3 CPGs19,20,27 recommend a medication review as part of the multifactorial assessment.

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 recommends identification of all

medications with dosages. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 and Moreland27

specifically recommend the identification of psychotropic and cardiac medications, as well as

polypharmacy, as risk factors for falls. Moreland identifies the following medication classes as

psychotropic: benzodiazepines, hypnotics, antidepressants, and major tranquilizers. The term

“polypharmacy” is not defined in the CPGs but is often used to represent medication use that is

excessive, inappropriate, or both. This term is operationalized as the use of multiple

medications concurrently, excluding preparations that include more than one drug.

<H3>Body functions and structure

14
<H4>Strength

All 3 CPGs19,20,27 identify muscular weakness as a risk factor for falls. Accordingly, each CPG

includes an assessment of muscle strength as part of a multifactorial assessment. American

Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 and Moreland27 specify inclusion of lower-

extremity strength.

<H4>Balance

All 3 CPGs19,20,27 recommend balance assessment, but no specific procedures or methods are

recommended.

<H4>Cardiovascular function

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 and AGS/BGS20 recommend a cardiovascular

assessment by a health care professional with specialized skills. National Institute for Health

and Care Excellence specifically recommends the need to identify anti-arrhythmic medications.

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society specifically recommends assessing heart

rate and rhythm, postural pulse, blood pressure, and postural hypotension, all of which can be

conducted by a PT. However, heart rate and blood pressure responses to carotid sinus

stimulation should be performed by a qualified medical professional. Moreland27 recommends

identifying the use of cardiac drugs and presence of postural hypotension.

<H4>Cognitive and neurologic function

15
All 3 CPGs19,20,27 address the assessment of cognitive and neurologic function. American

Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 specifies testing lower-extremity peripheral nerve

function, proprioception, reflexes, and cortical, extrapyramidal, and cerebellar function.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 recommends assessing for cognitive

impairments but does not identify the specific items that should be included. Moreland27

recommends assessing mental status, peripheral neuromuscular function, and dizziness.

<H4>Vision

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 recommends an assessment of visual

acuity. While also recommending an assessment of vision, neither NICE19 nor Moreland27

identifies the aspects of vision (e.g., acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception, peripheral

vision, eyewear) that should be addressed.

<H4>Urinary function and incontinence

Assessing for urinary incontinence was recommended by all 3 CPGs,19,20,27 with NICE19

specifically identifying urge and stress incontinence.

<H3>Activity and participation

<H4>Gait

All 3 CPGs19,20,27 identify gait deficits or abnormalities as a risk factor for falls and recommend a

thorough assessment of gait. However, no specific procedures or methods are provided.

Moreland27 recommends assessing for the use of walking aids. National Institute for Health and

16
Care Excellence19 acknowledges that many tests of balance and gait exist and states that the

individual provider should identify appropriate measures for each older adult.

<H4>Activities of daily living

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 recommends assessment of activities of

daily living (ADL) including use of adaptive equipment and mobility aids, while Moreland27

recommends assessment of ADLs and instrumental ADLs as well as transfers.

<H4>Physical activity

Moreland27 is the only CPG to recommend an assessment of physical activity. Specifically, it

identifies moderate activity levels as having a protective effect and high (not defined) and low

(less than once per week) activity levels as risk factors.

<H3>Environmental factors

<H4>Environmental assessment

All 3 CPGs19,20,27 identify home safety and hazards as risk factors for falls and recommend an

assessment of the home for hazards. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19

recommends that specific attention be paid to loose rugs and mats and carpet folds or other

trip hazards.

<H3>Personal factors

<H4>Fear and health perception

17
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 and AGS/BGS20 recommend an assessment

of perceived functional ability and fear of falling.

<H4>Social support

Moreland27 CPG recommends an assessment of the quality of the older adult’s social network.

<H4>Alcohol use

Moreland27 recommends an assessment of “inappropriate alcohol use”; however, it does not

define “inappropriate.”

<H4>Feet and footwear

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 recommends the assessment of feet and

footwear.

<H2>Intervention Recommendations

1. Physical therapists should provide individualized interventions that address all positive

risk factors within the scope of PT practice (CGS Grade A: Strong recommendation based

on Level I evidence). Components of the intervention should include:

a. Strength training that is individually prescribed, monitored, and adjusted (CGS

Grade A: Strong recommendation based on Level I evidence)

b. Balance training that is individually prescribed, monitored, and adjusted (CGS

Grade A: Strong recommendation based on Level I evidence)

18
 c. Gait training (CGS Grade A: Strong recommendation based on Level I evidence)

d. Correction of environmental hazards (CGS Grade A: Strong Recommendation

based on Level I evidence)

e. Correction of footwear or structural impairments of the feet (CGS Grade B:

Recommendation based on Level II evidence)

Rationale: The recommendations above describe the physical therapy-related components of

the multi-disciplinary fall risk management interventions represented within the CPGs. Overall,

recommendations across the CPGs are similar. There is agreement that an individualized

exercise program, including both strength and balance training, should be implemented for

those at risk for falls (Grade A). Recommendations for the multi-disciplinary interventions are

found in Table 7, and the physical therapy components of the interventions are summarized

below.

<H3>Body functions and structure

<H4>Strength and balance training

Both NICE19 and AGS/BGS20 recommend that an individualized program be prescribed and

monitored by an appropriately trained health professional (Grade A). National Institute for

Health and Care Excellence recommends a strength and balance training program, while

AGS/BGS recommends strength, balance, coordination, and gait training. American Geriatrics

Society/British Geriatrics Society recommends individual and group exercises as well as tai chi

and physical therapy. American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society further recommends

offering flexibility and endurance exercises, but not as sole interventions. Moreland27 provides

19
more narrow recommendation of individualized strength and balance training for community-

dwelling women over the age of 80 years. It further recommends tai chi or “equilibrium

control” exercises using foam and firm surfaces.

<H3>Activity and participation

<H4>Walking

With respect to fall prevention interventions, there is no evidence that unsupervised, brisk

walking decreases fall risk. However, it is well documented that walking programs convey other

types of health benefits.33 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 found insufficient

evidence to recommend brisk walking to reduce falls but notes that other benefits of brisk

walking should be considered. Moreland27 recommends against brisk walking in community-

dwelling, post-menopausal women with a history of fracture. National Institute for Health and

Care Excellence indicates that unsupervised, brisk walking may actually have a detrimental

effect in some populations, depending on the patient’s impairments and abilities.

<H4>Gait training

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 recommends gait training for adults at

risk for falls. Moreland27 specifically recommends individualized gait training combined with

strength and balance training for community-dwelling women over the age of 80 years.

Moreland also recommends referral to a PT for those who demonstrate unsteady gait or

require a walking aid.

20
<H4>ADL training

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 and Moreland27 recommend ADL

training for those with difficulty performing ADLs.

<H4>Non-specific exercise

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 found insufficient evidence to recommend

low-intensity exercise and generic group exercise programs that do not target impairments

known to be related to fall risk.

<H4>Education and information giving

Although not included as recommendations in this CGS because of low strength of evidence,

NICE19 recommends providing information verbally and in writing on fall prevention, effective

measures, motivation to engage in exercise, and benefits of engaging in fall risk reduction

(Table 7) (Grade D). Additional recommendations relevant to the educational intervention

include adherence to and motivation to perform exercise programs, where to seek further

advice and assistance, how to summon help should a fall occur, and avoidance of use of multi-

focal lenses while walking (particularly on stairs). American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics

Society20 recommends that tailored education be included in a multifactorial intervention but

not provided as a sole intervention (Grade D). Moreland27 found insufficient evidence to

recommend targeted or untargeted educational programs about falls or fear of falling without

subsequent follow-up on recommendations, but it does recommend education related to

21
specific risk factors found during the assessment, including risky activity level and inappropriate

alcohol use.

<H3>Environmental factors

<H4>Home hazard modification

All 3 CPGs19,20,27 recommend a home hazard assessment and modification for older people who

have fallen and those who are at risk for falls. Both NICE19 and Moreland27 specify that home

hazard assessment should not be conducted without follow-up and modification. The CPGs do

not specify the components of a home hazard assessment or recommend particular home

assessment tools.

<H3>Personal factors

<H4>Footwear

American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20 recommends treatment of foot

problems identified in a multifactorial assessment and advice to include low heel height and

high surface contact area (Grade C). Neither NICE19 nor Moreland27 makes recommendations

regarding footwear.

<H4>Hip protectors

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 found insufficient evidence to recommend

hip protectors for fall prevention. However, it makes the distinction that hip protectors may not

be effective for fall prevention but have been shown to prevent fractures from falling.

22
<H1>Gap Analysis

Existing CPGs19,20,27 are clear that (1) all older adults should be screened for fall risk, (2)

multifactorial assessments targeting an individual’s risk factors should be conducted on those

who screen positive, and (3) tailored interventions should be implemented to address the risk

factors that are identified. Physical therapists can address many aspects of fall risk management

inherent within these 3 areas of screening, assessment, and intervention; however, knowledge

gaps exist across all 3 areas.

<H2>Screening

Physical therapists should play a role in questioning older adults about the presence, frequency,

and circumstances surrounding falls and in screening for balance impairments and gait

limitations. Although taking a fall history seems relatively straightforward, research is limited. It

is not clear which are the key questions regarding the specific circumstances or factors linked to

the fall history that can be used to guide PT clinical decision-making. National Institute for

Health and Care Excellence19 mentions a few balance and gait screening tools. However, not all

of the measures have validated cut points for fall prediction. More research is needed to

synthesize evidence and validate cut points that indicate increased fall risk. There is a need for

evidence-based recommendations to describe the predictive performance (e.g., sensitivity,

specificity, likelihood ratios) and clinical feasibility of fall risk screening tools.

<H2>Assessment

23
A multifactorial assessment is recommended for older adults who screen positive for fall risk

(Table 5). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19 addresses overarching

organizational changes needed to decrease fall risk across the spectrum of care. In that context,

it suggests that assessment should occur within a specialized falls service. Research is needed to

identify the most effective and efficient delivery model or models for fall risk assessment and

management across populations at varying levels of risk. Implementation of these

recommendations may vary depending on practice setting.

Existing CPGs recommend components of a multidisciplinary assessment. The information

obtained from the assessment tools guides treatment decision-making beyond simply

identifying risk for falls. However, more research is needed to identify the pertinent

characteristics of assessment tools for persons at risk for falls. For example, objective measures

are needed to assess the impact of factors such as ADL limitations and cognitive, lower-

extremity, and balance impairments and the corresponding implications for the development of

optimal interventions.

<H2>Interventions

To address recommendations related to cardiac pacing, postural hypotension, medication

modification, vitamin D supplementation, and vision referral, PTs need to consult with and refer

to appropriate health care practitioners. In contrast, interventions specific to balance and gait

impairments can be directly and effectively managed by a PT. However, current

recommendations that guide practice require greater specificity including (1) optimal mode,

24
intensity, and frequency of balance and strength training, (2) optimal strategies for delivery of

exercise programs, (3) optimal strategies for individualization of exercise programs, and (4)

characteristics of older adults who may benefit from specific exercise regimens. Further

guidance as to mode of information delivery and methods to increase adherence is also

needed. Finally, greater specificity is warranted on the prioritization of the components of

home hazard modification based on economic and clinical feasibility.

<H1>Discussion

The purpose of this CGS is to (1) identify, critically appraise, and compare published CPGs on fall

risk management; (2) make recommendations for PT practice in screening, assessing, and

managing fall risk in community-dwelling older adults; and (3) analyze gaps in the existing CPGs

to guide future research and the development of additional EBDs to facilitate physical therapy

and policy decision-making.

The recommendations presented in this CGS are the result of a thorough systematic review and

critical appraisal process. The 3 CPGs that were identified provided recommendations for fall

risk screening, assessment, and intervention. The common recommendations were that (1) all

older adults should be screened for fall risk by asking questions about falls and difficulties in

gait and balance and briefly observing the presence of difficulties in gait and balance, (2) a

positive screening should prompt a comprehensive, multidisciplinary fall risk assessment, and

(3) the multifactorial assessment should be followed by an intervention that addresses

identified risk factors. The multi-disciplinary nature of this assessment lends to some factors’

25
requiring a referral to other qualified health care professionals, while other factors fall within

the scope of PT practice.

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)34 is an independent expert body that

provides evidence-based recommendation statements for preventive services and primary care

for clinicians and health systems. Through the Medicare Improvement for Patients and

Providers Act of 2008, which governs policy for preventive services, the Department of Health

and Human Services is authorized to reimburse preventive services receiving a level A or B

rating from the USPSTF. Reimbursement policies that dictate payment and practice are broadly

influenced by the largest payer for US health care services, the Medicare program. Therefore,

the USPSTF recommendations have a tremendous impact on the implementation of preventive

care.35 The USPSTF has developed recommendations related to fall risk screening and

management which include a Grade B recommendation for exercise or physical therapy and

Vitamin D supplementation to prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults over 65.18 The

USPSTF can be considered a high-quality EBD relevant to fall risk management in community-

dwelling older adults. Compared to the USPSTF, this CGS narrows recommendations to

community-dwelling older adults but expands on recommended components of a multifactorial

assessment and intervention.

It is not recommended to automatically conduct a multifactorial fall risk assessment for all

people aged 65 years or older.18,20 This CGS supports the need for all older adults to be

screened for fall risk when they come into contact with a PT. Our recommendations are

26
consistent with the USPSTF statement18 that history of falls or mobility problems and poor

performance on the Timed “Up &Go” Test29 be used to identify older people at increased risk

for falls. However, more information is needed on the extent to which strength and balance

impairments are associated with fall risk and the amount of change that is associated with

reduced fall risk. In particular, evidence is needed to guide clinicians in appropriately matching

patient characteristics and ability levels to available exercise interventions and evidence-based

programs, for example; criteria for or predictors of success in specific home-based, group-

based, and one-on-one facility-based interventions are lacking.

Consistent with this CGS, the USPSTF18 reports that effective exercise includes group-based

classes, home-based physical therapy, or both and specifies that the effective dose of

intervention ranges from 9 to 75 hours. This wide range is a major gap that can lead to

confusion and practice variation regarding how much exercise would be required to achieve the

optimal reduction in fall rate and fall risk. In addition, neither this CGS nor the USPSTF provides

recommendations for the most effective types of exercise or components of physical therapy

intervention.

Evidence from systematic reviews, some of which have been published since the development

of existing CPGs, provides useful information to address this gap and guide the evidence-based

implementation of guidelines. Sherrington et al14 summarized evidence related to the mode of

delivery and type and intensity of physical activity most effective in reducing the risk for falls in

older adults by conducting a meta-analysis of trials in which exercise was the stand-alone

27
intervention. This synthesis provides evidence of the effectiveness of an exercise dose of at

least 2 hours per week for at least 6 months, with a total dose of over 50 hours. Their analysis

also supports programs that focus on balance training, defined as exercises conducted in

standing in which participants aim to stand with their feet close together or on one leg,

minimize use of their hands for support, and move the body’s center of mass in a controlled

manner. Consistent with the CGS, Sherrington also found that neither walking nor strength

training alone, nor simply encouraging older adults to increase activity, is effective in lowering

fall rate or risk, highlighting the need to integrate both strength and balance training into the

intervention. Depending on the patient’s level of functional ability, the plan of care may include

interventions to address impairments or limitations in endurance, coordination, flexibility,

mobility, gait, feet and footwear, home safety and environmental hazards, and safe and

appropriate use of mobility aids.14

Similarly, a 2012 Cochrane Review and meta-analysis by Gillespie et al16 provides evidence that

multifactorial home-based and group-based interventions that include strength and balance

training and tai chi reduce both fall rate and fall risk. Programs that focused on only strength

training or increasing level of physical activity did not affect rate or risk.

The plan of care should include support for behavior change and optimal adherence.14 Physical

therapists should elicit and incorporate patients’ values and preferences and partner with them

in intervention design. Promoting adherence may also require assessing a patient’s self-efficacy

and fear of falling as potential barriers and connecting the patient with appropriate resources

28
and community providers of evidence-based programs to help support successful behavior

change. Physical therapists must ensure that their patients understand the selected

interventions and their responsibility to engage in and adhere to the program to the greatest

possible degree. Physical therapists working with patients with high fall risk should emphasize

the importance of ongoing physical activity and structured exercise, and patients should be

empowered to self-manage their fall risk or transition to community-based exercise programs

to maintain the gains made in physical therapy.

<H2>Implications for Clinical Practice and Next Steps

This CGS supports that all older adults should be screened for fall risk, and this screening may

trigger a multifactorial fall risk assessment. Policies that relate to either screening or

assessment of the older adult include the following: (1) fall risk screening is a reimbursable

service for physicians when it is included in the introductory “Welcome to Medicare” Wellness

visit but not in subsequent wellness visits, (2) fall screening is a quality indicator for physicians

and practices participating in Meaningful Use and Accountable Care Organization initiatives but

is not reimbursed under Medicare, and (3) fall assessment is a reimbursable service as well as a

Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI)36 indicator. From these initiatives, it is clear that

attempts are being made to focus on fall risk screening and assessment practices in primary

care, but these initiatives do not specifically target PTs. Policy makers should understand the

important role that PTs can play in fall risk screening and management. Physical therapists have

education and expertise in choosing and administering assessment instruments for fall risk

assessment. They are specifically educated in assessment and management of risk factors such

29
as strength and balance impairment, gait and ADL limitation, and home hazards and feet and

footwear.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have recently released the STEADI Tool

Kit,17 based on the AGS/BGS20 CPG. The STEADI provides implementation resources for all

stages of fall risk management. Screening resources in the STEADI Tool Kit include the Timed

“Up & Go” Test,29 30-second Chair Stand Test,37 and 4-Stage Balance Test.38 These tests were

selected based on their performance as fall risk screening measures. The STEADI Tool Kit

includes a list of recommended interventions for older adults at increased fall risk. These

include evidence-based programs in the community such as tai chi,39 Stepping On,40 and the

Otago Exercise Program.41 Tai chi and Stepping On are programs that are available in the

community (e.g., senior centers, YMCAs), delivered by trained lay leaders, and are most

appropriate for higher-functioning older adults. The Otago Exercise Program is delivered by a PT

and is most appropriate for frail, community-dwelling older adults at high risk for falls. Otago is

designed to be delivered in 6 to 9 visits over a one-year period and has demonstrated a 35%

reduction in falls in randomized controlled trials.42 The STEADI Tool Kit is a useful fall risk

management implementation tool and is consistent with this CGS. The programs suggested by

the STEADI Took Kit have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing falls and are important

options for achieving a dose of 50 or more hours of challenging exercise. However, there

remains a paucity of evidence to guide the clinician in matching individual patient impairments,

functional level, and fall risk to the appropriate evidence-based exercise program to maximize

the benefits of participation and minimize the risk of adverse effects.

30
<H2>Limitations

This CGS has several limitations. First, it is specific to older people without neurologic

dysfunction who live in the community and present for care in a clinical setting. This CGS should

not be used to guide assessment or interventions for those in acute care hospitals or skilled

nursing facilities. Second, it is possible that not all relevant CPGs were identified. However,

given the level of redundancy in other databases, we believe that we have minimized this

problem to a reasonable degree.

Also, in the process of developing this CGS, several complexities of integrating findings into

clinical practice became apparent. The CPGs included in this CGS did not explicitly consider the

economic impact of recommendations or the range of delivery models and settings that could

be involved in implementation. Therefore, the economic and resource implications of these

recommendations are unknown. Evidence to demonstrate the health and economic impact of

preventive programs across payment and service delivery models is needed to facilitate policy

change related to coverage of fall prevention programs by third-party payers across health care

settings.

<H1>Conclusions

In summary, existing CPGs are clear that every older adult should be screened for fall risk at

least once per year and that consideration of balance impairment and gait and mobility

limitations is integral to fall risk screening. Fall risk screening may trigger a multifactorial risk

31
assessment, parts of which would be directly implemented by the PT in consultation with other

health care providers. Exercise, including structured physical therapy, is an effective component

of a fall prevention program, and the PT may also directly provide home hazard and footwear

modification and education about fall risk. Current recommendations lack the specificity

required to tailor decision-making by the PT, highlighting the need for both additional research

and a future CPG that is directed at PTs. Nevertheless, this CGS synthesizes current

recommendations to provide direction for PTs as well as descriptions of evidence-based

programs provided in the community that might be useful to facilitate long-term exercise

participation following discharge from a physical therapy episode of care.

This CGS highlights the current state of the evidence for managing fall risk and identifies gaps in

knowledge. The resulting gap analysis demonstrates that more programs need to be developed

and studied for specific subpopulations of older adults, including those with dementia, those

with chronic disease, and those in institutional settings. Also, there is a need for additional

research and tools specifically for physical therapy assessment and intervention. Finally, more

research is needed to optimize components related to exercise interventions, including

strength and balance training.

Standards for CPG and CGS development are evolving rapidly according to Institute of Medicine

standards,2 and new databases are being constructed at multiple levels of analysis, such as the

Guidelines International Network43 for CPGs, the Rehabilitation Measures Database,44 and the

American Physical Therapy Association’s Evaluation Database to Guide Effectiveness (EDGE)45

32
initiative for outcome measures. To maximize resources, minimize clinician confusion and

variation, and improve quality of care, PTs should work to integrate standards and guideline

development processes of diverse entities and the associated technologies. This process

requires careful deliberation and investment by the physical therapy profession. The

development of a CPG specific to the PT management of fall risk to complement this CGS is an

important initiative and a significant step toward improving the quality of care for and quality

of life of community-dwelling older adults.

<H1>Declarations

<H2>Funding Source

This work was supported by a grant from the Department of Practice of the American Physical

Therapy Association.

<H2>Disclosures

Tiffany Shubert is part owner of the Evidence in Motion Fall Prevention Application available for

the Android and iPhone/iPad platforms. There are no other disclosures.

<H1>Acknowledgements

<H2>Consulting Group

The Section on Geriatrics gratefully acknowledges the members of the consulting group:

Holly Jean Coward, MD, CMD (physician geriatrician); Jodi Janczewski, DPT (PT with expertise in

falls in community-dwelling older adults); Dixon and Landy Qualls (community-dwelling older

33
adults); and Debbie Rose, PhD (exercise physiologist with expertise in falls in community-

dwelling older adults).

<H2>External Review Group

The Section on Geriatrics gratefully acknowledges the members of the external review group:

(Bonita) Lynn Beattie, PT, MPT, MHA (public health policymaker); Sandra L. Kaplan, PT, DPT,

PhD (special reviewer with expertise in methods); Jon D. Lurie, MD, MS (primary care

physician); Michelle M. Lusardi, PT, DPT, PhD (special reviewer with expertise in methods and

geriatrics); Mindy Oxman Renfro, PhD, DPT, GCS, CPH (Geriatric Certified Specialist); Cathie

Sherrington, PhD, MPH, BAppSc (special reviewer with expertise in falls in community-dwelling

older adults); Ellen Strunk, PT, MS, GCS, CEEAA (Certified Exercise Expert for Aging Adults and

consultant on legislative affairs and reimbursement); Stephanie A. Studenski, MD, MPH

(physician geriatrician); and Vicki Tilley, PT, GCS (Geriatric Certified Specialist).

34
<H1>References

1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine:

what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71-2.

2. Institute of Medicine. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E,

editor(s). Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;

2011. 2p. Also available: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We-

Can-Trust/Standards.aspx. Accessed November 30, 2013.

3. National Guideline Clearinghouse, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S.

Department of Health & Human Services. Guideline Syntheses. Available at:

http://www.guideline.gov/syntheses/index.aspx. Accessed November 30, 2013.

4. Stevens J. The Cost of Falls Among Older Adults. 2012. Available at:

http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/Falls/fallcost.html. Accessed December 1,

2012.

5. Adams PE, Martinez ME, Vickerie JL, Kirzinger WK. Summary health statistics for the U.S.

population: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Vital Health Stat 10. 2011 Dec;(251):1-117.

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and

Control, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention. Cost of Fall Injuries in the United States,

2005. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/Falls/data/cost-estimates-

figures1-2.html. Accessed September 3, 2013.

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and

Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Available at:

http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars. Accessed March 4, 2014.

35
8. American Hospital Association. When I’m 64: How Boomers will Change Health Care. Chicago:

American Hospital Association; 2007.

9. American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. 2nd ed rev.

Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2003.

10. American Physical Therapy Association. Minimum Required Skills of Physical Therapist

Graduates at Entry-Level BOD P11-05-20-49. Available at:

http://www.apta.org/uploadedFiles/APTAorg/About_Us/Policies/Education/MinimumRequired

SkillsPTGrads.pdf#search=%22minimum required skills%22. Accessed November 30, 2013.

11. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the

community. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1701-7.

12. Rubenstein, L Z. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for

prevention. Age Ageing. 2006;35 Suppl 2:ii37–ii41.

13. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC. Rethinking individual and community fall prevention strategies:

a meta-regression comparing single and multifactorial interventions. Age Ageing. Nov

2007;36(6):656-662.

14. Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JC. Effective exercise

for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Amer Geriatr Soc.

2008;56:2234-43.

15. Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in

community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology.

2010;21:658-68.

36
16. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older

people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9.

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and

Control, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention. STopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and

Injuries (STEADI) Tool Kit for Health Care Providers. Home and Recreational Safety: STEADI Web

page. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/Falls/steadi/index.html

Page last updated: April 11, 2013. Accessed September 3, 2013.

18. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling

older adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med.

2012;157:197-204.

19. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Falls: assessment and prevention of falls

in older persons. NICE Clinical Guideline 161. June 2013. Available at:

http://www.nice.org.uk/CG161. Accessed July 9, 2013.

20. American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and British Geriatrics Society (BGS) Panel on the Clinical

Practice Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons. Prevention of Falls in Older

Persons: AGS/BGS Clinical Practice Guideline. 2010. Available at:

http://www.americangeriatrics.org/health_care_professionals/clinical_practice/clinical_guideli

nes_recommendations/2010/. Accessed July 9, 2013.

21. Hauer K, Lamb SE, Jorstad EC, Todd C, Becker C, Group P. Systematic review of definitions

and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials. Age & Ageing.

2006;35(1):5-10. PubMed PMID: 16364930.

37
22. Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C, Prevention of Falls Network E, Outcomes

Consensus G. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the

Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

2005;53(9):1618-22. PubMed PMID: 16137297.

23. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al for the AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II:

advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J.

2010;182:E839042.

24. http://www.agreetrust.org/resource-centre/agree-ii-training-tools/

25. Goodwin V, Briggs L for the AGILE Falls Guidelines Working Group. Guidelines for the

physical therapy management of older people at risk of falling. AGILE: Chartered

Physiotherapists Working with Older People. August 2012.

26. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Revel-Delhom C, et al. How to manage recurrent falls in clinical

practice: Guidelines of the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology. J Nutr Health Aging.

2011;15:79-84.

27. Moreland J, Richardson J, Chan DH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the secondary

prevention of falls in older adults. Gerontology. 2003;49:93-116.

28. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

(ICF). Geneva; 2001.

29. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail

elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142-8.

30. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly:

preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can. 1989;41:304-11.

38
31. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am

Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:119-26.

32. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression

screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17:37-49.

33. Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign." J Geriatr Phys Ther.

2009;32:2-5.

34. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at:

http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Accessed December 1, 2013.

35. Lesser LI, Krist AH, Kamerow DB, Bazemore AW. Comparison between US Preventive

Services Task Force recommendations and Medicare coverage. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:44-9.

36. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS 2012: 2010 Reporting Experience

Including Trends (2007-2011): The Physician Quality Reporting System and Electronic

Prescribing (eRX) Incentive program. 2012;3.

37. Macfarlane DJ, Chou KL, Cheng YH, and Chi I. Validity and normative data for thirty-second

chair stand test in elderly community-dwelling Hong Kong Chinese. Am J Hum Biol.

2006;18:418-21.

38. Rossiter-Fornoff JE, Wolf SL, Wolfson LI, et al. A cross-sectional validation study of the FICSIT

common data base static balance measures. Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of

Intervention Techniques. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M291-7.

39. Li F, Harmer P, Fisher KJ, et al. Tai Chi and fall reductions in older adults: a randomized

controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:187-94.

39
40. Clemson L, Cumming RG, Kendig H, Swann M, Heard R, Taylor K. The effectiveness of a

community-based program for reducing the incidence of falls in the elderly: a randomized trial.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1487-94.

41. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Tilyard MW, Buchner DM.

Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to

prevent falls in elderly women. BMJ. 1997;315(7115):1065-9.

42. Thomas S. Does the Otago Exercise Programme reduce mortality and falls in older adults?: a

systematic review and meta analysis. Age Ageing. 2010;39:681-7.

43. Guidelines International Network. Available at: http://www.g-i-n.net/. Accessed December

4, 2013.

44. Rehabilitation Measures Database. Available at:

http://www.rehabmeasures.org/default.aspx. Accessed December 4, 2013.

45. American Physical Therapy Association. Outcome Measures in Patient Care. Available at:

http://www.apta.org/OutcomeMeasures/. Accessed July 13, 2014.

40
Figure 1. Flow diagram for clinical practice guidelines.

41
 Figure 2. Identification and management of fall risk for community-dwelling older adults.

Older person encounters

physical therapist

Physical therapist asks person

No Negative initial
Physical therapist the person whether she has
screening: continue
observes balance or fallen in past 12 months or has
usual care
mobility impairment difficulty with balance or
walking
Yes No impairment
identified
Conduct balance Negative screening:
and mobility screening continue usual care
Balance or mobility
impairment noted

Conduct multi-factorial fall risk assessment

Conduct multi-factorial
including: fall risk
assessment
Medication review for psychoactive drugs,
polypharmacy
Medical history of new or unmanaged Risks outside scope
osteoporosis, depression, urinary of PT practice identified
incontinence, and cardiac signs and
symptoms; Refer to appropriate
Assessment of strength, balance, healthcare provider for
mobility/gait, ADL, footwear, environmental identified risks outside
hazards, cognition, neurological function, scope of PT practice
cardiac function, vision

Risks within scope of

PT practice identified

Provide treatment for identified risk factors

within scope of PT practice:
•Strength training • Balance training • Gait
training • Environmental hazard correction •
Footwear correction • Address foot
impairments • Education

42
Table 1. Search Strategy Used for Retrieval of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Database Date Search Total Relevant

Term Results Guidelines

National Guideline Clearinghouse 3/15/2013 Falls 420 14

Geriatric 1983 21

Older 945 7
Adult

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines 4/16/2013 All 132 0

Network Guidelines

National Institute for Health and Clinical 4/16/2013 All 158 1

Excellence Guidelines

Physiotherapy Evidence Database 4/16/2013 Falls 10 8

Geriatric 4 1

Older 14 3
Adult

OT Systematic Evaluation of Evidence 4/19/2013 All 31 0

Guidelines

Guidelines International Network 4/19/2013 Falls 6 3

Geriatric 6 0

Older 2 1
Adult

New Zealand Guidelines Group 4/19/2013 Falls 6 0

Geriatric 2 0

Older 9 0
Adult

Canadian Medical Association 4/19/2013 Falls 5 1

Geriatric 24 2

43
 Older 7 2
Adult

Australian Health & Medical Research 4/19/2013 Falls 1 0

Council CPGs
Geriatric 0 0

Older 13 0
Adult

Royal College of Nursing 4/19/2013 Falls 35 1

Geriatric 8 1

Older 172 1
Adult

Ministry of Health, Singapore 4/19/2013 All 34 1

Guidelines

Total 4027 68

44
Table 2. AGREE II Domain Scores and Recommendations for Use for Each Falls Clinical Practice Guideline19,20,25-
27

Recommend
involvement

developmen

Applicability
Stakeholder

independen
presentatio

ed for Use?
Scope and
Reviewer

Rigour of

Clarity of

Editorial
purpose
CPG

ce
n
t
AGS/BGS20 1 19 13 40 21 8 14 Yes

2 18 12 41 20 9 14 Yes

3 16 12 37 21 8 10 Yes

4 16 15 38 19 11 13 Yes

5 17 13 40 21 12 8 Yes

AGILE25 1 15 10 17 11 7 5 No

2 16 9 13 12 4 3 No

3 19 10 15 17 6 2 No

4 15 9 17 9 8 4 No

5 16 11 15 13 5 3 No

NICE19 1 21 19 52 20 21 11 Yes

2 21 21 50 20 21 13 Yes

3 20 19 49 21 23 13 Yes

4 21 21 51 20 22 13 Yes

5 21 20 51 21 22 10 Yes

FSGG26 1 15 12 20 11 4 7 No

2 15 13 25 14 5 9 No

5 16 13 24 13 4 9 No

Moreland 2 6 37 16 6 2
17 Yes
et al27
4 19 7 35 16 4 2 Yes

5 20 7 37 18 7 2 Yes
Note: Scores are calculated by summing individual item scores included in each domain.
45
Abbreviations: AGS/BGS, American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20; FSGG, French Society of
Geriatrics and Gerontology26; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.19

46
Table 3. Level of Evidence Rating Systems Used in the Development of This Clinical Guidance Statement

NICE19 AGS/BGS20 Moreland27

I Evidence from meta- At least one properly done For prospective studies
analysis of RCT or at least RCT with greater than 80%
one RCT follow-up, evidence levels
II Evidence from at least one II-1 - Well-designed range from 1 (best) to 6
controlled trial without controlled trial without (least). Levels are added
randomization or at least randomization for each criterion, as
one other type of quasi-
described below:
experimental study II-2 - Well-designed cohort
or case-control analytic
study, preferably from
more than one source Is there a statistically
significant adjusted
II-3 – Multiple time series estimate or meta-analysis?
evidence with or without
intervention, dramatic 1=yes
results of uncontrolled 2=no, but all studies are
experiment statistically significant
III Evidence from non- Opinion of respected 3= no, but at least one
experimental studies, such authorities, descriptive study is statistically
as comparative studies, studies, case reports, and significant
correlation studies, and
expert committees
case-control studies 4=no, no studies are
IV Evidence from expert N/A statistically significant
committee reports of
opinions and/or clinical
experience of respected
authorities

47
V N/A N/A Are lower bound
confidence intervals
consistently greater than a
clinical important level?

0=yes

1=no

VI N/A N/A Is there a point estimate of

effect greater than 2.0?

0=yes

1=no

Abbreviations: AGS/BGS, American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.19

48
Table 4. Strength of Recommendation Rating System Used in the Development of this Clinical Guidance Statement

CGS Grade NICE19 AGS/BGS20 Moreland27

A Strong Recommendation Directly based on Category A strong recommendation Single RCT or meta-
based on Level I or Level II I evidence that the clinicians provide analysis of RCTs in which
evidence and benefits the intervention to eligible the lower limit of the CI
substantially outweigh
patients; Grade I or II-1 for the treatment effect
harms.
evidence that intervention exceeds the MCID
directly improves health
outcomes, and benefits
substantially outweigh
harm

B Recommendation based Directly based on Category A recommendation that Single RCT or meta-
on level I or Level II II evidence or extrapolated the clinicians provide the analysis of RCTs in which
evidence and benefits recommendation from intervention to eligible the CI for the treatment
outweigh harms Category I evidence
patients; Grade I or II-1 effect overlaps the MCID,
evidence that intervention but the point estimate is
improves intermediate clinically important
health outcomes, or
Grade II-2 or II-3 evidence
that intervention directly
improves health
outcomes, and benefits
outweigh harm

C Recommendation based Directly based on Category No recommendation for or Expert opinion

on Level III evidence or III evidence or against the routine
extrapolation from Level I extrapolated provision of the
or II evidence and benefits recommendation from
intervention is made;
outweigh harms Category I or II evidence

49
 Grade I or II-1 evidence
that intervention directly
improves outcomes or
improves intermediate
health outcomes, or
Grade II-2 or II-3 evidence
that intervention directly
improves health
outcomes, but balance of
benefits and harms is too
close to justify a general
recommendation

D Not applicable Directly based on Category Recommendation is made Not applicable

IV evidence or against routinely providing
extrapolated the intervention to
recommendation from
asymptomatic patients;
Category I, II, or III
evidence Grade I or II evidence that
intervention is ineffective
or that harm outweighs
benefits

NG Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not possible to calculate

an estimator or point
estimate was not deemed
to be clinical important

50
I Not applicable Evidence is insufficient to
recommend for or against
routinely providing the
intervention; evidence is
lacking or of poor quality
or conflicting, and balance
of benefits and harms
cannot be determined

EO Expert Opinion

Abbreviations: AGS/BGS, American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society20; CI, confidence interval; MCID, minimal clinically important
difference; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence19; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

51
Table 5. General Recommendations from 3 High-quality Clinical Practice Guidelines

NICE19 AGS/BGS20 Moreland et al27

Screening for fall risk For all older people, HCPs All older people under the care Did not address screening
should ask whether they have of a HCP should be asked, at (secondary prevention)
fallen in the past year including least once per year, whether
frequency, context, and fall
they have fallen in the past
characteristics. (C, Level III)
year including frequency,
context, fall characteristics,
Assessment of ability to stand, and difficulties with walking or
turn, and sit is adequate for balance. (NG)
first-level screening. (NG)

Older persons who report a

single fall should be evaluated
for balance and gait using one
of the available evaluations.
(NG)
Evaluation of persons at risk All older people reporting or Multifactorial risk assessment See Table 4 for components of
considered at risk for falling should on people who answer multifactorial risk assessment.
should be assessed for deficits positively to screening
of balance and gait and questions are considered high
considered for interventions to risk and should be considered
address these deficits. (C) for further evaluation. (NG)

Multifactorial risk assessment Multifactorial risk assessment

should be given to people, who should be given on people who
present for medical attention cannot perform or perform
because of a fall, report poorly on a test of balance,
52
 recurrent falls in the past year, gait, or both. (NG)
demonstrate abnormalities of
balance, gait, or both. (C)
Multifactorial risk assessment
Multifactorial risk assessment
should NOT be given on people
should be performed by a HCP
reporting only a single fall and
with appropriate skills and
reporting or demonstrating no
experience in the setting of a
difficulty or unsteadiness
specialized falls service. This
during the evaluation of
assessment should be part of
balance and gait. (NG)
an individualized multifactorial
intervention. (C)

See Table 4 for components of

multifactorial risk assessment.
See Table 4 for components of
multifactorial risk assessment.

Multifactorial interventions Individualized multifactorial The HCP who conducted the Multifactorial interventions
intervention should be fall risk assessment should targeting identified deficits and
considered for older people implement the intervention or environmental hazards are
ensure that it is implemented effective for community-
with recurrent falls or assessed
by a qualified HCP. (NG) dwelling adults. (A)
as being at increased risk for
falls. (A) Interventions should promote
safe performance of daily Interventions should be
activities. (NG) tailored to identified risk
Individualized multifactorial factors and should include an
intervention aimed at exercise program. (A)
promoting independence and
improving physical and
psychological function should

53
 be offered following treatment
for injurious falls. (A)

Fall prevention programs

should accommodate
participants’ different needs
and preferences. (D)

HCPs involved in fall

prevention programs should
discuss which changes a person
is willing to make, address
potential barriers such as low
self-efficacy and fear of falling,
and encourage negotiated
activity change. Information
should be available in
languages other than English.
(NG)

Abbreviations: HCP, health care provider; NG, not graded. See Table 4 for explanation of recommendation grades.

54
Table 6. Components of Multifactorial Assessment as Recommended by Reviewed Clinical Practice Guidelines

NICE19 (Grade C, level III) AGS/BGS20 (NG) Moreland et al27

HEALTH CONDITIONS
Falls Identification of fall history History of fall circumstances of
the fall(s), frequency,
symptoms at time of fall,
injuries, other consequences

Medication Medication review All prescribed and over-the- Psychotropic drugs (level I),
counter medications with multiple drugs (level II)
dosages

Osteoporosis Assessment of osteoporosis Osteoporosis

risk
Depression Depression using GDS (level V)

BODY FUNCTIONS AND STRUCTURE

Strength and balance Assessment of balance, gait, Lower extremity strength Lower-extremity strength
mobility, and muscle weakness (level 2), lower-extremity
coordination (level III),
assessment of balance (level II)

Cognitive and neurologic Cognitive impairments and Neurologic function: cognitive Mental status (level I),
neurologic examination evaluation, lower-extremity peripheral neuromuscular
peripheral nerves, function (level II), dizziness
proprioception, reflexes, and (level III)
tests of cortical,
extrapyramidal, and cerebellar

55
 function

Cardiovascular Cardiovascular exam Heart rate and rhythm, Postural hypotension (level III)
postural pulse, blood pressure
(postural hypotension), heart
rate and blood pressure
responses to carotid sinus
stimulation

Incontinence Urinary continence Urinary continence Incontinence (level III)

Visual Visual impairments Assessment of visual acuity Vision (level III)

ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION

Gait Assessment of gait Assessment of gait (level IV),
use of walking aid (level II)

ADL s ADLs skills including use of ADLs/IADLs (level II), transfers

adaptive equipment and (NG)
mobility aids

Physical activity level Too high (level III) or too low

(level IV), moderate activity
(level II, protective)

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Environmental and home Home hazards Environmental assessment Environmental safety hazards
hazards including home safety (level II)

PERSONAL FACTORS
Health perceptions and fear Perceived functional ability and Assess objective and subjective
fear related to falling
56
 perspectives

Social support Social network poor or good

(level IV)

Alcohol use Increased risk with

inappropriate use (NG),
Alcohol consumption,
protective (level II)

Feet and footwear Examine

Abbreviations: ADLs, activities of daily living; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; IADLs, instrumental activities of daily living. See Tables 3 and 4 for explanation of
evidence levels and recommendation grades.

57
Table 7. Summary of Intervention Recommendations for Community Dwelling Older Adults from reviewed Clinical Practice Guidelines
NICE19 AGS/BGS20 Moreland et al27

HEALTH CONDITIONS
Cardiac conditions For people who have For people who have fallen and
unexplained falls and who have who have cardioinhibitory
cardioinhibitory carotid sinus carotid sinus hypersensitivity,
hypersensitivity, cardiac pacing
dual chamber cardiac pacing
should be considered. (B)
should be considered.

Postural hypotension Treatment of postural Patients with postural

hypotension. (C) hypotension should be treated
and educated. (NG)
Medication review with Psychotropic medications Withdraw or minimize Withdraw psychoactive
modification/withdrawal should be reviewed and psychoactive medication (B) medications and minimize
discontinued, if possible. (B) and other medications. (C) number of medications. (NG)

Cognitive impairment Impaired cognitive status as

measured by the MMSE should
be investigated and treated.
(NG)

Depression Depression as measured by the

GDS should be investigated
and treated. (NG)

Vitamin D insufficiency Vitamin D supplements of at

least 800 IU per day should be
provided to older persons with
proven vitamin D deficiency (A)
or suspected vitamin D
deficiency or otherwise at

58
 increased risk for falls. (B)

BODY FUNCTIONS AND STRUCTURE

Strength and balance For older adults with a history For older adults at risk of Balance exercises are effective.
of recurrent falls, balance and falling, an exercise program (B)
gait deficit, or both, a including balance, strength,
coordination should be For women over the age of 80
strengthening and balance
offered. (A) years with no specific risk
program should be offered.
factors, an individualized home
The program should be
Both individual and group physiotherapy program for
individualized and prescribed
exercises can be used. (B) strengthening, balance and
and monitored by an
flexibility is recommended. (B)
appropriately trained HCP. (A)
Four visits over 2 months with
Tai chi and physical therapy are
regular encouragement over
recommended interventions.
the phone are recommended.
(A)
(B)

Flexibility and endurance

should be offered, but not as
For people with no specific
stand-alone components. (A)
findings, balance exercises
using tai chi or equilibrium
Program should be control and firm and foam
individualized according to surfaces are recommended. (B)
health profile and physical
capabilities, and prescribed,
monitored, and adjusted by an People with deficit in balance
appropriately trained HCP. (I) (tandem stand <3 sec),
strength (<5 chair stands in 30
seconds) or coordination
59
 should be referred to physical
therapy. (NG)

Vision and hearing Cataract surgery should be People with vision and hearing
expedited for women for impairment should be referred,
whom it is indicated. (B) treated, and educated. (NG)

An older person should not

wear multifocal lenses while
walking, particularly on stairs.
(C)

ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION

Walking There is insufficient evidence Community-dwelling
to recommend brisk walking to postmenopausal women with a
reduce falls, but other benefits history of fracture should not
of walking should be engage in a brisk walking
considered exercise program.
Gait For older adults at risk of People with unsteady gait or
falling, the prescribed exercise who use a walking aid should
program should include gait be referred to physical
training. (A) therapy. (NG)
Provide individualized gait
training combined with
strength and balance training
for women over the age of 80
years. (B)
ADL Home environment People who have difficulty
60
 assessment and intervention doing daily activities should be
should include Interventions to referred to occupational
promote safe performance of therapy. (NG)
ADLs. (A)

Education Individuals and their caregivers Education should complement People who use alcohol
should be offered information and address issues specific to inappropriately should be
orally and in writing about: (D) the intervention being educated and referred for
 Fall prevention measures provided, and should tailored treatment. (NG)
 Motivation to engage in to individual cognitive function
exercise programs and language. (C)
 Preventable nature of falls
People who have a risky
 Psychological and physical
activity level (too low or too
benefits of reducing fall risk
Multifactorial intervention high) should be educated
 Where to seek further
should include an education about risk. (NG)
advice and assistance
component. (C)
 How to cope with a fall
 How to summon help
 How to avoid a long lie
Education should not be
provided as a stand-alone
intervention. (D)

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Environmental and home People who are hospitalized Multifactorial intervention People who have fallen should
hazards following a fall should be should include home be provided environmental
offered a home hazard environment assessment and screening and modifications by
assessment and intervention
intervention, including a HCP. (A)
program, carried out by a
mitigation of identified fall risk
61
 trained HCP, as part of factors. (A)
discharge planning. (A)

Home hazard assessment and

modification should not be
provided in isolation. (A)

PERSONAL FACTORS
Footwear Multifactorial interventions
should include management of
foot and footwear problems.
(C)

Older people should be advised

that walking with shoes of low
heel height and high surface
contact area may reduce the
risk for falls. (C)

Social support People who have problems

with their social network
should be referred. (NG)

Abbreviations: ADLs, activities of daily living; HCP, health care provider; MMSE, Mini Mental State Exam; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale.
See Table 4 for definitions of recommendation grades.

62
63