The Role of Persuasion in Classical Justice

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

The Role of Persuasion in Classical Justice

Grant Eagleson

English 1101 Tocheva

The use of persuasion is a key attribute of language. Manipulating the thoughts,

beliefs, and actions of others with words is extremely powerful. The Oxford English

Dictionary defines persuasion as “The addressing of arguments or appeals to a person in

order to induce cooperation, submission, or agreement” (OED Online). In a judicial context,

one would see persuasion as essential. The court system is, by design, unbiased and

therefore requires effective persuasion in order for verdicts to be made in a case. Examples

of this method of justice are found in Classical texts such as Aeschylus’ The Eumenides and

Plato’s Apology.

In The Eumenides, when Orestes is put on trial in Athens for the murder of his

mother, he is given the opportunity to present his case and persuade observers of his

innocence. Athena states “Defend yourself against their charge…speak all this clearly, speak

to me” (Aeschylus 450-456). The people of Athens and Athena are not being compassionate

towards Orestes, they merely want a fair verdict as stated by law. Athena establishes the

basic guidelines of a court system: “My contestants,

summon your trusted witnesses and proofs,

your defenders under oath to help your cause,

And I will pick the finest men of Athens,


return and decide the issue fairly, truly-

bound to our oaths, our spirits bent on justice” (Aeschylus 560-565). This is a crucial aspect

of justice; its goal is to establish fairness, equality and to determine what is right. It becomes

the job of individuals to present what they believe to be the correct view of the situation,

inevitably affecting the outcome. The “finest men of Athens” are the jury, those trusted to

decide Orestes’ fate. In the end, it is skilled persuasion of Apollo and Athena that

determines the outcome and saves his life, showing the effectiveness of the ancient courts at

achieving true justice. Orestes confessed to his crime, yet goes free due to the strength and

integrity of his argument.

Plato, however, substitutes the courts with the logical mind of Socrates. In The

Apology, Socrates debates the issue of whether or not to flee his beloved city to avoid

execution. In an extremely calculated manner, he examines his options and states “A man

who is good for anything ought not to calculate the chance of living or dying; he ought only

to consider whether in doing anything he is doing right or wrong” (Plato Apology). This is a

noble statement, and sets the tone for entire dialogue. He manages to be completely

unbiased while pondering this case, an amazing feat of abstract thought and detachment from

personal considerations. This is justice in its purest form. It is difficult not to admire his

restraint and selflessness. Socrates’ powers of reasoning and persuasion are so great that he

manages to convince his closest friends that it is only right that he should die, rather than

compromise the values of their society.

Sources
"persuasion, n." OED Online. Oxford University Press, September 2014. Web. 4 October

2014.

Aeschylus, and Philip Vellacott. The Orestian Trilogy. England: Penguin, 1985. Print.

Plato. "Plato, Phaedo." Plato, Phaedo, Section 58b. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Oct. 2014.

Revenge: Defining the Inescapable Human Emotion

As long as humans continue acts of hostility towards each other, the afflicted parties will

yearn for revenge. It would be naive to suggest that most people are not tempted to deliver

comeuppance to their rivals. In literary works, revenge often functions as a plot device, used

to balance the action and finalize the story. This often occurs at the end of a story, giving

audiences the “happy ending” they crave. It is an all-inclusive passion, the lust for revenge

consuming both aristocrats and peasants, gods and mere mortals. As a result, it spans the

ages and all societal boundaries.

In Aeschylus’ work The Libation Bearers, Orestes and his sister Electra plot and then

exact revenge upon their mother; punishment for the murder of their father and poetic justice.

Their matricide is done without concerns of legal repercussions, they are only motivated by a

desire to subject her to the same fate her victim received. Orestes cries “Oh she’ll pay,

she’ll pay, by the gods and these bare hands-


just let me take her life and die!” (Aeschylus 425-427). This is revenge of the most brutal

variety, intent on causing pain and suffering without regard for personal safety. In

accordance with its brutality, such revenge is the kind often found within the legal system.

Decisions, made by Orestes and countless others in fits of passion and rage, result in criminal

charges. Yet strangely enough, it is exactly this type of revenge that most people sympathize

with, and possible even rationalize. It has a recurring place within our court system, showing

that there is no escape from extreme emotion when handling matters of law.

Themes of revenge extended beyond the classical period, into the Middle Ages.

Chaucer describes this in The Miller’s Tale, a small section of his large work The Canterbury

Tales. This story is much more lighthearted and therefore more inconsequential than that of

Orestes, but retains importance nonetheless. Absalon, the man who has been wronged,

swears vengeance: “I wouldn’t let this go for all the town.

I’d take my soul and sell it to the Devil

To be revenged upon him! I’ll get level.

O God, why did I let myself get fooled?” (Chaucer 103). The girl he loves and her lover

have wronged him and caused embarrassment, so Absalon will go to great length in order to

avenge these crimes. It does not matter that he is socially superior, such societal structures

are disregarded in the midst of an emotional extreme.

After examining all textual examples, I define revenge as this- An aggressive act of

retribution, with the purpose of equalizing the words and actions of opposing parties to

achieve a perceived feeling of justice.

Sources
Aeschylus, and Philip Vellacott. The Orestian Trilogy. England: Penguin, 1985. Print.

Chaucer, Geoffrey, and Nevill Coghill. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.

You might also like