The Role of Persuasion in Classical Justice
The Role of Persuasion in Classical Justice
The Role of Persuasion in Classical Justice
Grant Eagleson
beliefs, and actions of others with words is extremely powerful. The Oxford English
one would see persuasion as essential. The court system is, by design, unbiased and
therefore requires effective persuasion in order for verdicts to be made in a case. Examples
of this method of justice are found in Classical texts such as Aeschylus’ The Eumenides and
Plato’s Apology.
In The Eumenides, when Orestes is put on trial in Athens for the murder of his
mother, he is given the opportunity to present his case and persuade observers of his
innocence. Athena states “Defend yourself against their charge…speak all this clearly, speak
to me” (Aeschylus 450-456). The people of Athens and Athena are not being compassionate
towards Orestes, they merely want a fair verdict as stated by law. Athena establishes the
bound to our oaths, our spirits bent on justice” (Aeschylus 560-565). This is a crucial aspect
of justice; its goal is to establish fairness, equality and to determine what is right. It becomes
the job of individuals to present what they believe to be the correct view of the situation,
inevitably affecting the outcome. The “finest men of Athens” are the jury, those trusted to
decide Orestes’ fate. In the end, it is skilled persuasion of Apollo and Athena that
determines the outcome and saves his life, showing the effectiveness of the ancient courts at
achieving true justice. Orestes confessed to his crime, yet goes free due to the strength and
Plato, however, substitutes the courts with the logical mind of Socrates. In The
Apology, Socrates debates the issue of whether or not to flee his beloved city to avoid
execution. In an extremely calculated manner, he examines his options and states “A man
who is good for anything ought not to calculate the chance of living or dying; he ought only
to consider whether in doing anything he is doing right or wrong” (Plato Apology). This is a
noble statement, and sets the tone for entire dialogue. He manages to be completely
unbiased while pondering this case, an amazing feat of abstract thought and detachment from
personal considerations. This is justice in its purest form. It is difficult not to admire his
restraint and selflessness. Socrates’ powers of reasoning and persuasion are so great that he
manages to convince his closest friends that it is only right that he should die, rather than
Sources
"persuasion, n." OED Online. Oxford University Press, September 2014. Web. 4 October
2014.
Aeschylus, and Philip Vellacott. The Orestian Trilogy. England: Penguin, 1985. Print.
Plato. "Plato, Phaedo." Plato, Phaedo, Section 58b. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Oct. 2014.
As long as humans continue acts of hostility towards each other, the afflicted parties will
yearn for revenge. It would be naive to suggest that most people are not tempted to deliver
comeuppance to their rivals. In literary works, revenge often functions as a plot device, used
to balance the action and finalize the story. This often occurs at the end of a story, giving
audiences the “happy ending” they crave. It is an all-inclusive passion, the lust for revenge
consuming both aristocrats and peasants, gods and mere mortals. As a result, it spans the
In Aeschylus’ work The Libation Bearers, Orestes and his sister Electra plot and then
exact revenge upon their mother; punishment for the murder of their father and poetic justice.
Their matricide is done without concerns of legal repercussions, they are only motivated by a
desire to subject her to the same fate her victim received. Orestes cries “Oh she’ll pay,
variety, intent on causing pain and suffering without regard for personal safety. In
accordance with its brutality, such revenge is the kind often found within the legal system.
Decisions, made by Orestes and countless others in fits of passion and rage, result in criminal
charges. Yet strangely enough, it is exactly this type of revenge that most people sympathize
with, and possible even rationalize. It has a recurring place within our court system, showing
that there is no escape from extreme emotion when handling matters of law.
Themes of revenge extended beyond the classical period, into the Middle Ages.
Chaucer describes this in The Miller’s Tale, a small section of his large work The Canterbury
Tales. This story is much more lighthearted and therefore more inconsequential than that of
Orestes, but retains importance nonetheless. Absalon, the man who has been wronged,
O God, why did I let myself get fooled?” (Chaucer 103). The girl he loves and her lover
have wronged him and caused embarrassment, so Absalon will go to great length in order to
avenge these crimes. It does not matter that he is socially superior, such societal structures
After examining all textual examples, I define revenge as this- An aggressive act of
retribution, with the purpose of equalizing the words and actions of opposing parties to
Sources
Aeschylus, and Philip Vellacott. The Orestian Trilogy. England: Penguin, 1985. Print.
Chaucer, Geoffrey, and Nevill Coghill. The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.