Nader Muhammad Saleh Al-Jawarneh: Abstract
Nader Muhammad Saleh Al-Jawarneh: Abstract
Nader Muhammad Saleh Al-Jawarneh: Abstract
ISSN: 2455-3689
www.ijrtem.com Volume 1 Issue 5 ǁ July. 2016 ǁ PP 64-72
Abstract : The global mega-trends as the case in the Business Management School (BMS) at Turkish Republic of North Cyprus
(TRNC) are leading to increase the levels of their school, dynamism and uncertainty in the corporate environment and outside the
country. In an uncertain economy, the BMS needs effective strategies that will enable it to prosper. Traditional leadership
approaches have been recognized insufficient by the rapid changes in the knowledge economy. This business need to practice
systemic innovation in this fast-changing, knowledge-driven global business landscape in order to remain competitive with the
available Universities and Colleges. Strategic administration is random to the span of the association, however will probably
happen in a violent business environment. Item separation and cost administration were additionally straightforwardly connected to
vital authority. Finally, this study affirmed that viable vital administration practices could help business associations in BMS to
upgrade their execution while contending in disorderly and cracked situations. Estimation instruments have additionally been
produced, which might be utilized by administrators, experts and different specialists to quantify these marvels in future.
I. Background
This section depicts the changing around the worldwide business scene and demonstrates the pertinence of strategic leadership
rehearses in this work. Also, a percentage of the difficulties confronting BMS will be portrayed. Lastly the risky way of the absence
of strategic leadership practices in BMS association will be outlined.
Statement of Research Problem: Previous and also recent research studies make that clear that there are an elevated external and
internal doubt due to rising possibilities as well as risks, not enough the actual Awareness of needs as well as the actual facilities
related problems and also environment and insufficient course. Many organizations spend most time realizing and re-acting to
unpredicted changes and difficulties as opposed to anticipating and get yourself ready for them. This is what called turmoil
supervision. Businesses caught off guard might devote significant amounts of time, money, and effort playing get caught up. They
will use upward their vitality coping with instant issues with tiny vitality still left to anticipate and prepare for the following issues.
This kind of vicious loop tresses many businesses into a reactive position. This research examine is to assess the impact associated
with strategic planning on organizational overall performance, which with the future enhances organizational survival.
Specific objectives
To establish the need of strategic thinking and planning in the organization.
To establish the performance of the selected organization that use strategic thinking and planning as compared to the ones they
are not using.
Identifying the challenges that faced by the selected organization as a new organization practicing strategical thinking and
planning.
Establishing the factors for strategic thinking and planning, as much as how these factors affect the performance of the selected
organization.
Research Questions : In this study, mainly five questions were asked, the major question was “what is the impact factor of the
strategic thinking and planning on organizational performance and survival, the rest of the questions were,
Researcher : This study will give the ability to the researcher to achieve a PHD diploma in Business Management. Moreover, it is
the first requirement for the partial fulfillment of this diploma in Business Management. Finally, the researcher will understand the
effects of strategic thinking and how they can impact on the organizational performance.
Participating Organization : In this part, if the selected organization of this study can be considered by the management of
participating companies, this will lead this organization to act as the resource material in order to refer when formulating strategic
thinking and planning. Finally, the selected organization can learn and improve the areas of gaps where weaknesses are detected.
Moreover, the selected organization will be the source of knowledge, as much as it will be used by leaderships as a guide for
implementing strategic thinking and planning.
Other Researchers : For future researchers who are interested in this area can use this work as a reference or literature review for
their research.
To Business Management School (BMS) : This work will be as a reference in the BMS and a helpful material for students who are
willing to study related studies.
Scholars : As finally, this study will be a benefit scholars and academic in filling the gaps in literature review as a complete study in
the impact factors of strategic thinking and planning on the performance of an organization.
Limitation of the Study :According to this study, the researcher targeted leaderships, directors, managers and secretaries of the
selected organization, there was something called bias on the provided information, so that they tried to respond positively on the
study‟s questions. Moreover, the serial managers were frumps with relevant information.
Scope of the Study : This work which is entitled “Strategic thinking and its impact on the performance of an organization” aimed to
report as a survey research in order to identify the roles which played in the performance of an organization to improve and increase
the level of it to a higher situation. Furthermore, limited research has thus far been conducted exactly on the impact of str ategical
leadership on the Strategic thinking and its impact on performance of the business organization in the Business Management School
(BMS) at the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus (TRNC). Moreover, according to the gap that culminated, this work aims to answer
the research question: “What is the impact strategical thinking on the performance of this organization”?
Innovations : Equation (1) expresses the extent enterprise system for innovation tendency, in this section, in order to detect the
importance and impacts of enterprise systems multi innovations belong to the same organization. Intensity process can be written as
in Equation (2).
(2)
Where, is the unhidden inherent variable for more than one organization‟s processes,
set of expected determinants that affects the number of innovations, the rest of variable are same as Equation (1),
enterprise system, and
standard error.
Estimation Process : Considering Equations (1) and (2) with maximum probabilities, rely information techniques must be
employed for inference since the advancement depth will be measured through the amount of recognized improvements within this
examine. Generally speaking, this kind of two-part model suffers from A range tendency as good info might be available for leaders
just. In general, examine however, this choice does not happen because the questionnaire features the right development issue for
each and every questioned firm at the end of the list of questions and possesses absolutely no distinctive questions with regard to
innovators only (Mezghanni, 2010). This constellation leads to a so named nook remedy, featuring a potentially big proportion
associated with zeros in the quantity of improvements. These 0's might occur for several reasons. Generally speaking, considering
both hurdle and inflated models that clearly allowing for different treatments for the zeros and positive outputs.
The stumbling block or the multi part model, the zeros are calculated by using the density function , so that
and (3)
In order to calculate the positive count which is obtained by the truncated density as
(4)
In order to ensure that the summation of the probabilities gives one, multiply Equation (4) by .
Quelling repressors in order to simplify, then the density of the stumbling block is expressed as
(5)
This stumbling block model is represented by the reflection of two stages of decision making process, each one as a model with its
own decision. These two cases are independent on each other. Therefore, the actual difficulty model could be believed by way of
maximum possibility simply by separately maximizing two conditions, one related to the 0's and also the additional one to the actual
advantages. The beginning uses the full sample; the second part utilizes only the positive depend findings.
Here appears that the zero inflated system is completely differs from the other model with , assuming that
for all . Where, in the other system the zero inflated combines directly with , with density . in the case of zero value for
the binary process and a probability of , then the result y is also zero. While, the case when binary process gets value of one
with probability , then the result y takes value in ascending order starting from zero from the count density . This yields
that the value zero takes place in both models, the density of the zero inflated model is represented as
(6)
Since the zero-inflated design enables a couple of different types of 0's, it is expected to function as more sensible choice regarding
inference in the present analysis. Nevertheless, any Voong analyze is used in the following to recognize whether or not the hurdle or
perhaps the zero-inflated product is suitable in the given set up. represents the probability, this can be constant or can be
parameterized inside the binomial model as logit or even probit. While considering the second part, which can be based on Poisson
or even the negative part of binomial distribution.
These can either give significant backing to the progressions a leader needs to roll out or render those improvements conceivable.
Subsequently the best leaders pay a lot of regard for the configuration of the components around them. They verbalize a clear feeling
of reason, make compelling administration groups, needs and arrangement their drives precisely, overhaul association structures to
make great execution less demanding and in particular, incorporate every one of these strategies into one sound system (Klein er,
2009). This configuration of key initiative is subsequently an incorporated gathering of practices that assemble an association's
ability for change and capacity to perform. To create and keep up this limit, four basic components should be incorporated together:
the dedication to the association's motivation, the cosmetics of the top administration group, the abilities and inspiration of
individuals all through the association and an arrangement of well-picked key activities that can take the association forward
(Worley et al., 2010).
Literature Review : All studies around the effects of the market disorder and technological changes on strategic thinking and the
impact of the performance was studies as:
Lafley and Martin (2013) characterized strategy as an incorporated arrangement of decisions that extraordinarily positions the firm
in its industry in order to make feasible point of interest and better esteem relative than the opposition. Additionally, examined how
leaders in some cases approach system through ineffectual perspectives, for example, comparing methodology to vision or to an
arrangement. Vaez et al., (2015) prepared a survey study by gathering the documents and the structural equation, also used the
equations model in order to perform the deductive analysis for testing the hypothesis. Moreover, the author proved that the market
disorder and the changes in the technology have the direct and considerable effects on the strategic thinking. Finally, stated that
these changes need important steps in order to manage them, as much as preparing the background in order to strengthen the
strategic thinking.
Rahnama et al., (2015) conducted a study in order to identify the factors which affect the strategic thinking. Also gathered the data
through questionnaire about Shiraz municipality. As much as, proved that the market disorder and the changing in the technology
enhance the thinking at any organizational level. Dehgahi et al., (2015) identified the main components of the strategic thinking
which affect the decision-making process, as much as investigated their roles in order to improve the process for managers.
Moreover, obtained a result that strategic thinking positively affects the decision-making operation. Nazemi et al., (2015)
investigated the demonstrating wish in huge scale shapes. Additionally, distinguished the fundamental wellsprings of the instability
in the present recreation because of the restrictions in information to host expansive scale models and also proliferation of different
predispositions over the coordinated demonstrating framework. Ferreira et al., (2015) expected to comprehend the truth of social
administration associations, the level of execution of vital arranging and additionally the effect of its application on hier archical
viability. Key arranging is one of such a significant key administration instrument and one of its principle targets is to make
associations more viable. In this way, the exploration has been directed so as to figure out whether key arranging is executed in
social administration associations and what impacts has its application had on authoritative viability. At last, presumed that the
selection of vital arranging affects hierarchical adequacy of social administration associations.
Benefits of Strategic Thinking on an Organization : In reviewing the particular overall performance with the businesses, it is
always intriguing to remember those businesses that execute at the greatest levels possess some kind of formalized proper plan set up
and possess applied it well. On the other hand, individuals‟ businesses that have difficulty don't have any strategy in place and also
appear to flounder inside their efforts to achieve success.
For a business to reach your goals, there needs to be the plan for fulfillment. The proper program helps you to offer course and
concentrate for many employees. This points to be able to certain outcomes in which can be attained as well as establishes a course of
action with regard to achieving these. An ideal program also helps the various function units within a business to be able to arrange
on their own together with common targets. Probably, the key cause of company disappointment just isn't creating a proper plan in
place which is being nicely implemented. If your enterprise offers small idea exactly where It's went, it's going to stroll aimlessly
along with things altering continually as well as staff puzzled by The purpose of their own work. Creating a proper plan is simple
enough. It may need several thought plus some feedback from consumers among others, yet businesses need to be consistently
garnering feedback from suitable component groups by using a continuing schedule. The entire process of having an ideal program
should be satisfying for all included and usually helps create more powerful marketing and sales communications among people with
the planning team. To produce a strategic program, set up a preparing group that includes workers, managers, operator and also
clients. They should be held in order to ten to be able to twelve people. There are a number associated with steps mixed up in method
and it needs superb facilitation to help keep points on course. Summarizing the benefits of implementing a strategic thinking and
planning process, the list of benefits is tabulated in Table 1.
Table 1: List of Benefits that can be Gained Through Strategic Thinking and Planning
1. Focusing on important items as time, talent, and money. 2. Proving the awareness of changing the
environment as foundation
3. Analyzing the internal business and evaluating its 4. Recognizing the impacts which change the
performance. business environment.
5. Aware of the organization and its potentials as strengths 6. Identification and analysis of the available
and weaknesses. opportunities and potential threats.
7. Redirection the Organization when needed 8. Bringing strategic issues to its top management.
9. Setting more than one set of realistic objectives. 10. Better decision making.
11. Improving the level and performance of the organization. 12. Identification or may be vanishing weaknesses.
13. Controlling problems. 14. Better communication with other competitors.
Data Collection : The researcher requested a permission from his adviser in order to write, taking permission to go to the selected
organization, and distribute the questionnaires. The questionnaires were submitted to the selected organization and given a period of
one week to fill and answer the questions, then collected, and the researcher did the required calculations, then tabulated them.
Structured and unstructured forms were used in the questionnaires.
Data Analysis : Qualitative and quantitative analysis were used in order to analyze both kinds of questionnaires and the personal
interviews.
Analysis and Findings : In this section, the percentage of the response for the questionnaires was considered as good, so that it met
the expectations of the researcher, as much as it was assumed to access the challenging top organization‟s owner, presidents, and
directors. Moreover, the researcher was satisfied from the obtained result 82%. Even though, some persons left some questions
empty.
Interviews : Table 3 presents the response rate of the interview, where the interview was conducted beside the questionnaires in
order to assist some of the respondents for their English as the main language was the Turkish language.
Analysis and Findings :In this section, the response rate was comparatively higher in comparison with the questionnaires, this
result due to the main language in the selected organization was the Turkish language as firstly, secondly, the selected organization
is completely new one and its age is one year, for this reason, the directors, leaders, and the owner were interested to have like this
interview.
Need of Strategic Thinking and Planning : In this item, the need of strategic thinking in the selected organization which depends
on the training level for each member. The obtained results are tabulated in Table 4, and shown in Figure 1.
Encountered Challenges by the Selected Organization : The challenges of the effective strategic thinking and planning process in
the selected organization are tabulated in Table 5 and the obtained results are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
Analysis and Findings : From the Table 5 above, it is apparent that all the actual stated obstacles were influencing effective
strategic pondering as well as preparing within a business. Many respondents admitted which inadequate authority and emotions of
lack of possession on the part of department managers and employees respectively as a major burden in order to efficient ideal
considering in an organization. Also influencing effective strategic thinking is lack of concerning employees in forming methods as
this makes them believe that the particular methods already been formulated are usually strange in their mind consequently
requirement for opposition which usually affects the ideal organizing in an organization.
Effective Strategic Thinking and the Essential Factors : Table 6 shows the effective factors that are mainly necessary for the
effective strategical thinking and planning in the selected organization.
V. Conclusion
From the findings from the study carried out, the actual investigator concludes in which strategic thinking is a crucial device which
should not be assumed. An organization which usually has to excel need to utilize strategic thinking to gain competing edge on
competitors. Strategical thinking is applicable to all or any organizations no matter their particular dimensions and also scope of
functions. The control over the actual businesses need to set up the need for proper thinking and also planning in their respective
businesses as well as formulate policies and finances in order to achieve organizational goals. Simply by creating the requirement of
strategic pondering, the particular administration may with each other work at achieving the company objectives from the
organization. It really is obvious how the business designed to use ideal pondering execute better than these do not, and therefore
managers need to realize that proper pondering provides direction to the total business for attaining company goals. One can find
tremendous barriers in order to proper considering method which obstacles may be get over by aiming firm construction with th e
company goals and including employees in strategy ingredients given that are going to responsible in implementing people methods.
The difficulties can also be conquering by communicating successfully with employees upon what they are designed to perform to
have business goals.
References
1. Abhakorn, J. (2008). The Implications of Learner Strategies for Second or Foreign Language Teaching. School of Education,
Communication, and Language Sciences, Newcastle University. ARECLS, Vol.5, pp. 186-204.
2. AlQahtani, S. A. M. (2014). Top Management Teams‟ Influence on Strategic Decision Making and Firms‟ Outcome in the Case of Saudi
Arabia‟s Private Sector. University of Southampton. Faculty of Business and Law. School of Management.
3. Anzam, (2013). Top Management Team Entrepreneurial Behavior: Insights from Team Process. 03. Entrepreneurship, Small Business and
Family Enterprise Competitive Session.
4. Barron, J. M., Chulkov, D. V., Waddell, G. R., Barron, J. M., Chulkov, D. V., and Waddell, G. R. (2011). Top management team turnover,
CEO succession type, and strategic change. Journal of Business Research. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved, pp. 904-910.
5. Bugental, D. B., Ellerson, P. C., Lin, E. K., Rainey, Kokotovic, B. A., and O‟Hara, N. (2002). A Cognitive Approach to Child Abuse
Prevention. Journal of Family Psychology. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 243–258.
6. Cervone, D., William G. Shadel, W. G., and Jencius, S. (2001). Social-Cognitive Theory of Personality Assessment. Personality and Social
Psychology Review. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 33–51.
7. Cohen, J. F., and Dennis, C. M. (2010). Chief Information Officers: An Empirical Study of Competence, Organizational Positioning and
Implications for Performance. School of Economic and Business Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand. SAJEMS NS 13, No. 2, pp.
203-221.
8. Curado, C. (2006). The Knowledge Based-View of The Firm: From Theoretical Origins to Future Implications. ISEG – Universidade
Técnica de Lisboa Rua Miguel Lupi, 20. 1249-078 Lisboa, pp. 1-18.
9. Curado, C., and Bontis, N. (2006). The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. Int. J.
Learning and Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 367-381.
10. Datta, S., and Datta, M. I. (2014). Upper-Echelon Executive Human Capital and Compensation: Generalist Vs Specialist Skills. Strategic
Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J. Published online Early View in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI:
10.1002/smj.2267.
11. Masanell, R. C., and Ricart, J. E. (2009). From Strategy to Business Models and to Tactics. Working paper. Harvard Business School, pp.
1-45.
12. Myerson, R. B. (1996). Nash Equilibrium and The History of Economic Theory. Department of Economics, University of Chicago.
http://home.uchicago.edu/~rmyerson/, pp. 1-35.
13. Nickols, F. (2016). Strategy Definitions & Meanings. http://www.nickols.us/articles.html, pp. 1-14.
14. Peter B. Seddon, P. B., and Lewis, G. P. (2003). Strategy and Business Models: What‟s the Difference. Department of Information
Systems, The University of Melbourne Victoria, Australia 3010. 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 236-248.
15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. First Free Press Edition 1980. The Free
Press. A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc. 1230 Avenue of the Americas.
16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Strategy and Competitive Advantage. Competitive advantage is at the heart of a firm's performance in competitive
markets. New York Free Press, 1985). The treatment in this chapter draws heavily on Porter's pioneering effort.
17. Porter, M. E. (1996). What Is Strategy. Harvard Business Review, pp. 61-78.
18. Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, pp. 26-27.
19. Pourabdollahian, G., and Copani, G. (2014). Proposal of an Innovative Business Model for Customized Production in Healthcare. Institute
of Industrial Technologies and Automation (ITIA), National Research Council (CNR), Milan, Italy. Modern Economy, 5,
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2014.513107, pp. 1147-1160.
20. Seddon, P. B., and Lewis, G. P. (2003). Strategy and Business Models: What‟s the Difference. Department of Information Systems, The
University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 236-248.
21. Sherin, B., and Fuson, K. (2005). Multiplication Strategies and the Appropriation of Computational Resources. Journal for Res earch in
Mathematics Education. Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 347-395.
22. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning. Elsevier, pp. 172-194.
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/lrp.
23. Ulwick, A. W. (1984). Business Strategy Formulation. Theory, Process, and the Intellectual Revolution. British Library Cataloguing in
Publication Data is available. www.quorumbooks.com.
24. Wiersema, M. F. (2010). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change. University of California, Irvine. Academy
of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 91-121.
25. Wulf, T., Roleder, K., and Frisch, S. (2011). The impact of a CEO‟s task knowledge on the leader life cycle. HHL – Leipzig Graduate
School of Management. Working Paper Chair of Strategic Management and Organization.
26. Yamak, S., and Usdiken, B. (2006). Economic Liberalization and the Antecedents of Top Management Teams: Evidence from Turkish
„Big‟ Business. British Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 177–194.