The SETT Framework-MITS Handout
The SETT Framework-MITS Handout
Create
Opportunities to Communicate
STOP
Passive
Participation
THINK
Team
Collaboration
ACT
On A
Plan
Presented By:
Raynell Clark, M.A., CCC-SLP
Kim A. Ceasar, M.A., CF-SLP
June 23, 2009
MITS Summer Institute
Traverse City, Michigan
STOP, THINK, ACT!!
USING THE SETT FRAMEWORK TO CREATE
OPPORTUNITIES TO COMMUNICATE
Learner Outcomes
Participants will identify the four components of the SETT Framework
Participants will identify the special education mandates related to AT/AAC
Participants will develop an understanding of the benefits of the SETT Framework
Participants will discover how the SETT Framework is necessary for engineering the
environment
Participants will extend their skill set in At/AAC selection for students with disabilities
SETT Overview
Dr. Joy Zabala, a special educator, designed the collaborative planning and decision making tool
called the SETT Framework. SETT is an acronym for Students, Environment, Tasks & Tools.
Out of her passion for students with disabilities, Dr. Zabala created this framework because of
issues related to device abandonment & underutilization. SETT looks at students with complex
communication needs. Although devices are selected by professionals and educators to warrant
communication, unfortunately, the kinds of changes expected are not attained in participation &
productivity.
Special Education Mandates
Legal requirements tell us WHAT we need to do, but not HOW…Joy Zabala
The IDEA Act ’97 mandates the provision of assistive technology (AT) and offers clear definitions
of assistive technology devices and services. Assistive Technology Devices are any item, piece of
equipment, or product system-whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or
customized-that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of children
with disabilities. Assistive Technology Services are any services that directly assists an individual
with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device. Services
include the following:
Evaluating
Providing Devices
Selecting, Designing, Customizing
Maintaining, Repairing
Coordinating
Training/Technical Assistance-student, family, and school service providers
IDEA Facts
Schools are required to provide assistive technology at no cost to the student/parents if it
is needed for a student to receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE).
The individualized education program (IEP) team is responsible for determining whether a
student requires assistive technology to achieve goals and objectives. This is documented
on the IEP.
IDEA ’97 requires IEP teams to consider the assistive technology needs of all students
during the development of an IEP.
Be sure to consider the following questions as well when following the 5 step model.
If the student is currently using AT, is the AT adequate to address the goals and objectives?
Does the student need AT to participate in daily instructional activities?
Could AT help the student increase communication and social interaction?
The results of these considerations will establish whether or not AT is required and whether more
information is needed to make a decision. Once all things have been considered, it time to SETT a
“DATE”. A Dynamic Assistive Technology Evaluation, DATE, allows collaboration regarding
issues of communication & AT in an evaluative process. This evaluation enables staff to:
Identify and define areas of concern
Gather Information
Analyze information
Generate and prioritize potential solutions
Develop an Action Plan
Identify Outcomes
STUDENT
ENVIRONMENT
TASKS
TOOLS
No-Tech tools:
1. Photos of peers with Low-Tech-Tools:
“Hi” 1. Nine message: Go
symbol- for personally Talk-VOCA ( my turn,
greeting each peer your turn, no cheating,
do you have___? let’s
2. Pencil and paper for play again, I won, I’m
keeping score finished, Uh-oh)
When planning for the use of AAC in the classroom, it is helpful to think of the daily routine as a
framework. Each part of your routine should include specific activities, expectations and
language. To begin, look at a part of the daily routine in which you plan to incorporate the use of
AAC. Then determine what kinds of language tasks and expectations to plan for the AAC
devices and messages you will need to provide for all students to participate. Here are some
suggestions:
READING ACTIVITIES
Recite a repeated line in a story/play/poem
Name the characters in a story
Sequence events in a story
Recall facts
Ask questions {who, what where, etc.}
Follow the steps in multi-step directions {recipe}
State the logical order {first, next, last}
Retell familiar events/stories
Name vocabulary words
Define terms
Yes/no questions to determine comprehension
Make comments {That’s scary, That’s funny, etc.}
WRITING ACTIVITIES
Sequence items to go into a story
List adjectives/adverbs to go into a story
Provide vocabulary to be included in a story
Give details about different parts of a class story
SOCIAL STUDIES
List key individuals (Mayor, Governor, President)
List regions (City, State, Country)
List major products of a State
List key current events
Sequence events of a recent trip
GAMES
Bingo games related to curricular themes
Simon Says
UNO: turn claiming (MY TURN); requesting (I WANT IT); commenting (OH NO,
RATS, YIKES), UNO language SKIP/REVERSE, etc.
Use key phrases (It’s my turn, you are next, you cheated, your turn, etc.)
SNACK TIME
Description: AAC users give nominations for snacks from a group of pictures.
Sample Language:
Listing items (cookie, juice, pop, chips, popcorn, cracker, etc.)
Commenting on food items (yummy, good, yuck, awful, etc.)
Discussing possibilities {telling who has to food items-I HAVE___, JASON HAS___, etc.
STOP, THINK, ACT!!
REFERENCES
Bransford, J Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds) (1999) How People Learn: Brain, Mind Experience,
and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Burkhart, Linda. Key Concepts for Using Augmentative Communication with Children Who
Have Complex Communication Needs. Retrieved from http://www.Lburkhart.com
Cafiero, Joanne, (2005). Meningful Exchanges for People with Autism. Woodbine House
Downey, D. Daughtery, P. Helt., & Saugherty, D. (2004, Sept 21). Integrating AAC Into the
Classroom: Low Tech Strategies. The ASHA Leader, pp 6-7 & 36.
Downing, June (2006) Teaching Communication Skills to Students with Sever Disabilities (2nd
Edition), Baltimore, MS, Paul H. Brooks Publishing
Hoge, Debra & Newsome, Cheryl (2002). The Source for Augmentative Alternative
Communication LinguiSystems, Inc.
Koegel, L. (1995). Communication and Language Intervention In Teaching Children with Autism.
Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing