International Journal of Mechanical and Production

Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD)

ISSN (P): 2249-6890; ISSN (E): 2249-8001
Vol. 7, Issue 6, Dec 2017, 663-668
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF SiCp

REINFORCED Al 6061 MMC USING SQUEEZE CASTING PROCESS

L. NATRAYAN1, MAHARSHI SINGH2 & M. SENTHIL KUMAR3

1,3
School of Mechanical and Building Sciences, VIT University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT

Currently, Aluminium (Al) 6061 material is used in Automobile and industry applications, Al 6061 matrix material
gives good formability with excellent mechanical properties. Reinforcement of distribution is a major problem in some casting
methods and to overcome this casting problem, squeeze casting technique was used in this research work, where Aluminium
6061 act as a matrix material and SiCp was used with different volume percentage. The effects of volume in ractions of
reinforcements on the composite properties were investigated. The micro structural characterization results revealed a
homogenous distribution of SiC particles in the matrix, which is almost free of pores can be obtained by squeeze casting
method. The mechanical characterization revealed that the density, hardness and impact energy of composites increased while
increasing the percent volume fractions of SiC particles.

Original Article
KEYWORDS: Aluminium 6061, SiC, Squeeze Casting Technique, MMC, Volume Fraction & Mechanical Characterization

Received: Nov 02, 2017; Accepted: Nov 23, 2017; Published: Dec 18, 2017; Paper Id.: IJMPERDDEC201774

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, aluminum alloys are replaced by aluminium matrix composites in the automobile industry
to improve the energy efficiency and environmental requirements [1]. Aluminium matrix composites are known for
their excellent physical and mechanical properties. The soft aluminium is reinforced with hard and stiff ceramic
particles. The structural aluminium alloys, such as 6xxx and 7xxx series are the most commonly used matrix
materials due to their low density and high thermal conductivity [2]. In literature survey, some authors investigated
and reported unreinforced alloys that gives less mechanical properties, compared to particulate reinforced composites.

The inexpensive ceramic reinforcements such as SiC, Al2O3 particles are the most widely used
reinforcements in metal matrix composites [3]. Metal matrix composites are generally produced earthier liquid
metallurgy or powder metallurgy techniques [4, 10]. In the casting techniques, particulate segments were
mechanically distributed in the liquefied earlier for solidification of the melt. Hence, the squeeze casting method is
known as a very promising route for manufacturing near net shape MMC components at relatively lesser cost [4].
The implementation of high pressure during squeeze casting process yield, relatively homogenous and fine
microstructure, and improve the adhesion between the molten metal and reinforcement [5-7]. In different
environmental temperature condition impact, the behavior of composite was affected by fragile medium
reinforcement bonding, clustering of particles and then by cracking [8]. Properties of element clustering on the SiCp
reinforced Al Metal matrix composites; the result exposed microstructure and has familiarity, with more
percentage of particle fracture, than random distribution and during the tensile deformation, the particle clustering

www.tjprc.org [email protected]
664 Maharshi Singh, L. Natrayan & M. Senthil Kumar

has higher effect on the mechanical properties of MMC [9]. We investigated the fracture behaviour and cycle fatigue of Al
7034/SiCp-UA (Unger-aged) and Al7034/SiCp-PA (Peak-aged) MMCs and increase the temperature of two composites, in
its ductility and modulus strength of the composite microstructure that has decreased. The deprivation in cyclic fatigue life
was more obvious, for the under-aged, than the peak-aged microstructure [10].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this research work, Aluminum 6061 alloy selected as matrix material with the density (theoretical) of 2.7
g/cm3and SiCp has been selected as a reinforcement material, with average particle size of 10µm. Due to the decrease in the
reinforcement, the particle size, higher tensile strength and better ductility was achieved in previous research report [11].
Squeeze casting process were used to fabricate the Al 6061 and SiCp metal matrix composite. Table 1 and 2 shows that,
chemical composition of Al6061 alloy and SiCp. The volume fractions of SiCp reinforcement are 10%, 15 % and 20 %.

Table 1: Chemical Composition of Aluminium 6061alloy

Elements Mn Cr Fe Cu Si Mg Zn Ti Al
(Wt. %) 0.01 0.05 0.17 0.33 0.71 1.12 0.1 0.01 Balance

Table 2: Chemical Composition of SiC Particle

Elements SiC Al2O3 SiO2 Fe2O3 FreeC Others
(Wt.%) 98.54 0.20 0.68 0.24 0.26 0.08

In various researches, it was investigated that, the reinforcement preheating to eliminate the desorbing gases,
surface impurities and amend surface composition. Most of the authors reported that, Preheating temperature of the
reinforcement range is 200-8000 C [11-14]. Fig.1, shows the schematic diagram sequence of steps involved in squeeze
casting, A performance was put into the mold and preheated with the mold to the solidus temperature of 6061 Al alloy,
which is 5800 C. Molten Al alloy heated at 7000C was then poured into the mold, followed by the push action of the
preheated ram, under the control of the hydraulic press were adopted in this work.

Figure 1: Schematic Diagram Illustrating the Sequence of Steps Involved in Squeeze Casting

(a) Molten metal poured into the pre-heated die, (b) application of squeeze pressure and (c) solidified casting.

In squeeze casting of the composites, a pressure of 100 MPa was applied, until the ram could no longer advance,
which meant that, the penetration of the liquid metal into the preform was completed. After casting, the composite was
cooled.

CHARACTERIZATIONS

Casting composites test specimens were prepared by ASTM standard, for various tests. Microstructure

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11

An Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Behaviour of SiCp Reinforced 665
Al 6061 MMC using Squeeze Casting Process

characterization was implemented on the prepared composite specimen, to investigate the distribution of Al6061 and
SiC particles. Rule mixture and Archimedes principal were used, to calculate the theoretical and experimental density of
the prepared composite specimen. Fig 2 and 3, shows the tested hardness and impact of the test specimens, Rockwell
hardness tester was used to measure the hardness and the Izod impact test was used to find the effect of SiCp on the
matrix alloy.

Figure 2: Hardness Test Specime Figure 3: Izod Impact Test Specimen

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Microstructure

Figure 4 shows the optical micrograph of 20 vol. % of SiCp reinforced aluminium composite. From the Figure 4(a),
it was evident that, SiCp was uniformly distributed in the aluminium alloy. Figure 4 (b) revealed that, there was a particle
clustering in some places, but there was a strong interfacial bonding between the SiC particles and aluminium alloy, in this
optical micrographs pictures, it shows clearly that, high volume fraction of SiCp are uniformly distributed, through using
Squeeze casting technique.

Figure 4: Optical Micrographs of MMC with 20 wt. % of SiC [50X, 100X]

Density

Figure 5 shows that, variation in the density of the different SiCp volume percentage in composites, Densities of the
SiCp and Matrix alloy is 3.2g/cm3 and 2.7g/cm3, separately. Results shows that, increasing the volume fraction of SiCp
reinforcement and its density values also increased, and the theoretical density of composites was higher than experimental
density in the results, as the density of SiCp was higher than matrix material.

www.tjprc.org [email protected]
666 Maharshi Singh, L. Natrayan & M. Senthil Kumar

Figure 5: Variation of Density with Volume % of SiC Particles

Hardness

Figure 6, shows the variation in hardness of composites with volume % of SiC particles. The addition of hard SiC
particles into the soft Al6061 alloy, improved the hardness of composites. The hardness of composites is increased more or
less linearly with the volume fraction of reinforcements, in the Al alloy. This effect could be attributed to the presence of
hard SiC particles, which increases the load-bearing capacity of the material and also, restrict the matrix deformation by
constraining dislocation movement.

Figure 6: Variation of Hardness with Figure 7: Variation of Impact Energy

Volume % of SiC Particles with Volume % of SiC Particles

Impact Energy

The variation in impact energy of composites with volume % of SiC particles, is presented in Figure7. The impact
energy of composites increased linearly, with the volume % of SiC particles in the Al alloy. This was due to the presence of
hard SiC particles, in the matrix alloy.

CONCLUSIONS

• The Al 6061 -SiC composites were synthesized successfully, using squeeze casting process with varying SiC wt %
(10%, 15%, and 20 %) of reinforcement and the microstructure, mechanical properties are evaluated. From the
experimental study, it reveals the following conclusions:

• The Fabrication of aluminum base composites using squeeze casting method, results in a homogenous dispersion

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11

An Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Behaviour of SiCp Reinforced 667
Al 6061 MMC using Squeeze Casting Process

of the reinforcement particles in the metal matrix. The matrix is almost pore free, showing complete infiltration of
the aluminium melt into the SiC perform.

• Microstructures reveal a uniform distribution of SiC particles in the matrix alloy of Al 6061, with good wett
ability and bond between the matrix and reinforcement, which causes high retention percent of SiC particles in the
matrix alloy, and increases the hardness of alloy.

• The values of density in composites are increased, by increasing the volume fraction of reinforcements, but
experimental density was lower than theoretical density.

• The hardness and impact energy of composites increased linearly with the volume fraction of reinforcements, in
the Al alloy.

• The mechanical strength of Al6061-20 vol % SiC composite is superior to those of the 10 and 15 wt % Al 6061
matrix composite materials.

REFERENCES

1. Sahin Y, Acılar M (2003) Production and properties of SiCp-reinforced aluminium alloy composites. Compos Part A-Appl S
34: 709-718.

2. Kumar GBV, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N, Bhagyashekar MS (2010) Studies on Al6061-SiC and Al7075-Al2O3Metal Matrix
Composites. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering 9: 43-55.

3. Miracle DB, Donaldson SL (2002) ASM Handbook Volume 21: Composites

4. Huda D, El Baradie MA, Hashmi MSJ, Metal matrix Composites: Manufacturing aspects. J mater process Technol
1993:37:513.

5. Hwu, B., Lin, S. and Jahn, M. “Effect of process parameters on the properties of squeeze cast SiCp- 6061 Al metal matrix
composite", Materials Science and Engineering, A207, p 135 (1996).

6. Hwu, B., Lin, S. and Jahn, M. “The interfacial compounds and SEM fractography of squeeze cast SiCp /6061 Al composites",
Materials Science and Engineering, A206, p 110 (1996).

7. Kok M (2005) Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater
Process Tech 161: 381-387.

8. A. Chennakesava Reddy, Studies on Loading, Cracking and Clustering of Particulates on the Strength and Stiffness of
7020/SiCp Metal Matrix Composites, International Journal of Metallurgical & Materials Science and Engineering (IJMMSE),
Volume 5, Issue 1, January - February 2015, pp. 53-66

9. SedatOzden, RecepEkici, Fehmi Nair, Investigation of impact behaviour of aluminium based SiC particle reinforced metal–
matrix composites, Composites: Part A 38 (2007) 484.

10. Zhang Peng, Li Fuguo, Effects of Particle Clustering on the Flow Behavior of SiC Particle Reinforced Al Metal Matrix
Composites, Rare Metal Materials and Engineering 39 (2010) 1525.

11. M. M. Siva et al., Effect of Microstructure and Hardness Properties of Al2011 based Composites for Titanium Di Boride using
Stir Casting Method, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development
(IJMPERD), Volume 7, Issue 2, March - April 2017, pp. 187-200

www.tjprc.org [email protected]
668 Maharshi Singh, L. Natrayan & M. Senthil Kumar

12. T.S. Srivatsan, Meslet Al-Hajri, V.K. Vasudevan, Cyclic plastic strain response and fracture behavior of 2009 aluminum alloy
metal-matrix composite, International Journal of Fatigue27 (2005) 357.

13. S. M. Seyedreihani, Processing of Squeeze cast Al 6061-30Vol% SiC Composites and their characterization, materials and
deisgn 27 (2006) 216-222.

14. Hemanth RD., M. Senthil kumar, Ajith gopinath & Natrayan. L, Evaluation of mechanical properties of E-Glass and Coconut
fiber reinforced with polyester and Epoxy resin matrices, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering
Research and Development (IJMPERD), ISSN (P): 2249-6890; ISSN (E): 2249-8001, Vol. 7, Issue 5, Oct 2017, 13-20.

15. G.B. Veeresh Kumar, C.S.P. Rao, N. Selvaraj. Studies on mechanical and dry sliding wear of Al6061–SiC composites.
International Journal of Scientific &Engineering Research. (2012) 1185–1191.

16. S. Ray, "Review: Synthesis of cast metal matrix particulate composites", Journal of Material Science. 28 (1993) 5397-5413.

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11