Data Analysis
Data Analysis
By
Terry E. McSween
Quality Safety Edge
Two Types of Problem Solving
Safety
Concerns Process
Two Types of Problem Solving
Safety
Concerns Process
Bo
dy
m
ec
h:
re
a
ch # of Concerns
in
g,
Pr pu
C op l
0
50
100
150
200
250
le er ling
,e
ar gl
Us o fp o ve tc
e Er inch
s/
ha
an
d go po nd
co /re i
nd pe nts
iti ,e
on titiv tc
e
of m
to ot
Bo ol io
dy He s
m a rin
an n
d
ec g ...
h: pr
lift ot
in ec
C g tio
le or n
Pr ar ca
ec of rry
“li in
au n g
tio e
ns of
fir
fo e
Lo r we ”
ca at
tio he
n r
of
to
ol
s
Primary Tool – Pareto Diagram
Bo
dy
m
ec
h:
re
a
ch # of Concerns
in
g,
Pr pu
C o llin
0
50
100
150
200
250
le pe
ar rg g,
lo et
Us o fp ve c
e i n s/
ha
an Er ch
d go po nd
co /r i
nd epe nts
iti ,e
on titiv tc
e
of m
to ot
Bo ol io
dy Hea s a n
m rin nd
ec g . ..
h: pr
lift ot
in ec
C g tio
le o rc n
Pr ar ar
ec of ry
“li in
au g
tio ne o
ns ff
fo ire
Lo r we ”
ca at
tio he
n r
of
to
ol
s
# of Concerns
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Front end
Maitenance
receiving
Shipping and
Repeated Pareto Diagram
Other
Dig Into Your Data
14
12
10
# of Concerns
2
Comments:
0
Front end Maitenance Shipping and Other
1. Not using lifting device.
receiving
2. Lifting device not working properly.
3. Can’t keep up using lifting device.
4. Lifting device difficult to use.
Action Plans
(Often the weak link!)
The ABC Analysis
should guide your action plan.
(And the trick is to
identify and change the consequences.)
ABC Model
Why People Do What They Do
Sometimes:
– They don’t have the skills or knowledge
– They can’t do the job safely
Otherwise
Examples
– Finding more comfortable safety glasses or hearing protection
– Providing glove clips so employees always have gloves with them
– Moving lock-out tags closer to equipment
– Locating ladders in areas where they are likely to be needed
– Placing heavy items on shelves near waist level
Planning Types of Consequences
To change this type
of consequence: Then
Examples:
– Asked observers to provide feedback on target behavior
» Recognize those who do so!
– Asked leaders to thank employees doing observations in
their areas
» Especially important for new observers
» Add it to leadership checklist
» Review data and activities in Steering Committee & staff
meetings
Positive Feedback = Recognition
Implementation tasks:
– Develop criteria for individuals and groups
– Identify potential recognition and celebrations
– Plan administrative process
» How will the Steering Committee determine when the
criteria have been met
» Who will be responsible for this tracking
Plan Team Celebrations
Suggested criteria:
– “Upstream” measures:
» # of observations
» % participation
» Improvement/goal achievement on target behavior
– “Outcome” Measures (unannounced):
» Improvement in LWC (perhaps TRIR)
Plan Team Celebrations
Common criteria:
– First observation
– # of observations
– Conducting a good safety meeting
– Near miss or potential accident reports
– Quality observations
– Safety suggestions
– Off-the-job or home safety
– Other significant safety contribution
Plan Individual Recognition
2
# per 200,000 wk hrs
1.5
0.5
0
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Year
Average Monthly Participation
90
80
70
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 YTD
Positive Consequences