Design of Timber Structures 3 2016

Design of timber structures
Examples
Volume 3 EDITION 2:2016
Design in the ultimate limit state (ULS)

Design of timber joints
Composite timber elements
Horizontal stabilization
Design for ser viceability (SLS)
Design of timber structures – Volume 3 1
Examples Volume 3
EDITION 2:2016
Editor Publisher
Eric Borgström Swedish Forest Industries Federation
Swedish Wood
Facts reviewer Box 55525
Eric Borgström and Rune Karlsson
SE 102 04 Stockholm
Design and production Tel: +46 8 762 72 60
ProService Kommunikation AB Fax: +46 8 762 79 90
E-mail: [email protected]
Illustrations www.swedishwood.com
Cornelia Thelander
Vendela Martinac
ISBN 978-91-980304-4-0
Preface
This is the second revised edition of Design of timber structures Volume 3, Examples
published in 2015. Rules and standards change in pace with the development of society,
why a publication of this type has to be reviewed regularly.
The book series Design of timber structures Volume 1–3 has been produced to make it
easier for structural designers to calculate timber structures and it is adapted to Eurocodes
and to Swedish application rules EKS 10 (BFS 2015:6). It is being used for higher education
at universities and institutes.
In the book series Design of timber structures Volume 1–3 also Volume 1, Structural aspects
of timber construction as well as Volume 2, Rules and formulas according to Eurocode 5
are included. All three books are available in English and Swedish. Since the books are
available in both languages and due to the nuanced content, our goal is that they will play
a role for many users on different skill levels.
The solved examples in Volume 3 has been compiled by the authors of each chapter in Volume 1
respectively. The authors are Roberto Crocetti, Helena Lidelöw, Annika Mårtensson and
Bert Norlin. Sven Thelandersson at the Faculty of Engineering at Lund University has
been responsible for supervision and editing. The solutions to the examples are based on
the rules in SS-EN 1995-1-1, but should not be regarded as an official interpretation of them.
Professional application must be based on the original documents published by CEN with
corresponding national application documents for Sweden.
More information about wood, glulam and timber construction can be found at
www.swedishwood.com.
Stockholm, October 2016
Eric Borgström
Swedish Wood
4 Design of timber structures – Volume 3

Structural aspects of
Volume 1
timber construction
EDITION 2:2016

Examples
Volume 3
EDITION 2:2016

Rules and formulas
according to Eurocode 5
Volume 2 EDITION 2:2016
and design process

Introdu c tion to design red wood produc ts
of sawn timber and enginee
Struc tural propert ies
timber elemen ts in ULS
Design of struc tural
ts
Compo site timber elemen
Horizon tal stabiliz ation
lity
Design for ser viceabi
building system s for housing s – Volume 1 1
Timber Design of timber structure
infrastr uc ture
Struc tural system s for
Design in the ultimat

e limit state (ULS)
Compo site timber elemen
ts
Horizon tal stabiliz ation
Design for ser viceabi
lity (SLS)
Design of timber structure
s – Volume 3 1
General concepts
Material properties
Bending
A xial loading
Cross sec tion subjec ted to shear
Cross sec tion subjec ted to combined stresses
Members with varying cross sec tion or cur ved shape
Ser viceability limit states
Connec tions with metal fasteners
Wall diaphragms
Bracing

Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3 are adapted to Eurocode 5 and the Swedish
application rules EKS 10 (BFS 2015:6).
• Volume 1: Structural aspects of timber construction

• Volume 2: Rules and formulas according to Eurocode 5
• Volume 3: Examples
Dimensionering av träkonstruktioner Dimensionering av träkonstruktioner Dimensionering av träkonstruktioner
Dimensionering av
Projektering av träkonstruktioner Regler och formler Dimensioneringsexempel
enligt Eurokod 5
Del 1 Del 2 Del 3

träkonstruktioner
Del 1: Projektering av
träkonstruktioner
Del 2: Regler och formler
enligt Eurokod 5
Generella begrepp
Materialegenskaper
Introduktion till utformning och dimensionering Böjning
Konstruktiva egenskaper för sågat virke och träbaserade kompositprodukter A xiell belastning
Dimensionering av konstruktionselement i brottgränstillstånd Tvärsnitt utsatt för skjuvning
Dimensionering av träförband Tvärsnitt utsatt för kombinerade spänningar
Sammansatta träelement Element med varierande tvärsnitt eller krökt form Dimensionering av konstruktionselement av trä i brottgränstillstånd (ULS)
Horisontalstabilisering Bruksgränstillstånd Dimensionering av träförband
Del 3: Dimensioneringsexempel
Dimensionering för bruksgränstillstånd Förband med förbindare av metall Sammansatta träelement
Träbyggnadssystem för bostäder Skiv verkan i träregelväggar Horisontalstabilisering
Konstruktionssystem för infrastruktur Stagning Dimensionering i bruksgränstillstånd (SLS)
Dimensionering av träkonstruktioner – Del 3 1

Contents
Contents
The examples in this textbook are numbered after the matching chapter in Design of timber
structures Volume 1. (Chapter 1, 2, 8 and 9 does not contain designing sections.)
Chapter 3, Design in the ultimate limit state (ULS) .......................................................................... 7

Example 3.1 Design of a straight timber joist.............................................................................. 7
Example 3.2 Bearing strength for the support of a timber joist................................................... 9
Example 3.3 Capacity of a notched timber beam..................................................................... 11
Example 3.4 Lateral torsional buckling check of a glulam beam.............................................. 14
Example 3.5 Design of a double tapered beam (ULS and SLS)............................................... 18
Chapter 4, Design of timber joints ................................................................................................... 24

Example 4.1 Design of tie rod connection................................................................................. 24
Example 4.2 Design of nailed connection in a Gerber system.................................................. 26
Example 4.3 Design of bolted connection in tension................................................................ 29
Example 4.4 Design of moment resisting column base............................................................ 31
Chapter 5, Composite timber elements ........................................................................................... 36

Example 5.1 Design of an OSB-webbed I-girder (ULS and SLS)............................................. 36
Chapter 6, Horizontal stabilization ................................................................................................... 44

Example 6.1 Design of bracing system for wind load on the gable of an industrial hall............ 44
Chapter 7, Design for serviceability (SLS) ...................................................................................... 49

Example 7.1 Design of a straight timber joist with respect to deflection................................... 49
Example 7.2 Serviceability check of floor with timber joists – vibration.................................... 51
Example 7.3 Serviceability check of floor with glulam elements – vibration............................. 54
Symbols ............................................................................................................................................. 58

Design of a straight timber joist
3 Design in the ultimate limit state (ULS)

Example 3.1 Design of a straight timber joist
A simply supported rectangular joist is subjected to characteristic permanent loading,

g k = 0,5 kN/m2 and characteristic medium duration variable load qk = 2,0 kN/m2.
The clear span l is 4,5 m and the joists are spaced at 0,6 m centres.
The joist is part of an indoor floor. Service class 1 and safety class 2.
Design the joist in structural timber of strength class C24, for bending moment and
shear load.
Solution
The characteristic value of bending strength is fm,k = 24 MPa.
Safety class 2: γd = 0,91.
The modification factor for load duration and service classes can be taken from Volume 2:
Section 3.2, with load duration class M and service class 1 the factor kmod = 0,8.
Material factor for structural timber, γM = 1,3.
Size factor for depth greater than 150 mm, k h = 1,0 (Volume 2: Section 3.3).
It can often be reasonable to let the factor k h adopt the value of 1,0 even for smaller sizes
of the joist.
Design value of the bending strength:
Design value of the load:
Design value of the bending moment:

The required section modulus of the joist is given by:
A common used width of a timber joist in Sweden is 45 mm. If this is chosen as the width b
the required depth h = 214 mm ( ). A standard section is chosen 45 × 220 mm. This
requires that the joist is braced against lateral torsional buckling by for instance a floor graded
particleboard.
Check the shear capacity of the joist.
The design value of the shear force:
Characteristic value of the shear strength:
Thereby is the design value of the shear strength given by:

The design value of the shear capacity is given by:

According to the national annex in Sweden, at present EKS 10 (BFS 2015:6), the value of A
should be determined on the basis of bef for a structural element subjected to bending moment.
The effective width bef is given by:
where kcr = 3,0 ⁄ fv,k = 0,75 for structural timber C24, not exposed to precipitation and solar
radiation. This gives the following for the design value of shear capacity:

This shows that VEd < VRd, that is the joist has sufficient shear capacity.
Remark: Some way to further reduce VEd is possible, see Volume 2: Chapter 6.

Bearing strength for
the support of a timber joist
Example 3.2 Bearing strength for the support a of timber joist
For the joist in Example 3.1 in this Volume, check the bearing strength at the end supports.
The bearing length has been restricted to 66 mm at each end.
The check for bearing strength is given by:
The value of the bearing stress is given by:
Aef = b ∙ (l b + 0,03) = 0,045 ∙ (0,066 + 0,03) = 0,00432 m2

where b is the width of the beam, l b is the actual bearing length and P = Fc,90,d is the force at
the support.
b = 45 mm
l b = 66 mm
(according to Example 3.1)

Thus the bearing stress is:
The characteristic value of the compressive strength is fc,90,k = 2,5 MPa.
Because g k ⁄ qk < 0,4 it is possible to set kmod and γM = 1,0, according to Volume 1: Section 3.1.3.
The design value of the compressive strength is:
The factor kc,90 is given by Volume 2: Section 5.2:

Bearing strength for
the support of a timber joist
The check is then given by:

This shows that the bearing capacity at the end supports is sufficient.
The example also shows that the fact that only a minor part of the beam is subjected to
compression, allows quite high stresses compared to when a larger area is subjected to
compression. If the joist is supported by a timber top plate, the bearing capacity of that
of course also have to be checked.

Capacity of a notched timber beam
Example 3.3 Capacity of a notched timber beam
qd
200 mm = hef
h = 315 mm
115 mm = hnotch
x 4,9 m x
5,2 m
Figure 3.1
Check the capacity of the beam in the figure above with regard to the ultimate limit state.
The beam is made of glulam GL30c and the cross section is 90 × 315 mm. Service class 1,
safety class 3 and load duration class M.
The design load has been determined to qd = 5,1 kN/m.
The design bending moment is:

The design shear force is:

The characteristic value of the bending strength is fm,k = 30 MPa.
The modification factor for load duration and service classes can be taken from Volume 2:
Section 3.2, with load duration class M and service class 1 the factor kmod = 0,8.
Material factor for glulam, γM = 1,25.
Size factor for depths 231 mm ≤ h < 600 mm, k h = (600 ⁄ 315)0,1 = 1,07
(Volume 2: Section 3.3).
Design value of the bending strength:

namely the bending moment is limited by:

namely the moment capacity is sufficient, provided that the beam is not subject to lateral
buckling.
Characteristic value of the shear strength fv,k = 3,5 MPa.
Thereby is the design value of the shear strength given by:

The design value of the shear capacity is given by:

According to the national annex in Sweden, at present EKS 10 (BFS 2015:6), the value of A
should be determined on the basis of bef for a structural element subjected to bending moment.
The effective width bef is given by:
where kcr = 3,0 ⁄ fv,k = 0,86 for glulam, not exposed to precipitation and solar radiation. This
gives the following for the design value of shear capacity:
This shows that VEd < VRd that is the beam has sufficient shear capacity.
Now the notched areas have to be checked. In Eurocode 5: Section 6.5.2, it is stated that
the following should be verified (also see Volume 2: Section 8.3):

where hef is the reduced depth of the beam in the notch and kv is a reduction factor defined as
follows for beams notched on the same side as the support.

where:
i is the notch inclination
h is the beam depth in mm
x is the distance from the line of action of the support reaction to the corner
of the notch, in mm

kn = 6,5 for glulam.
Width of the beam b = 90 mm

Depth of the beam h = 315 mm
Notch depth at each end of beam hnotch = 115 mm
Notch inclination i=0
Effective beam depth at each end hef = 200 mm
Ratio of hef ⁄ h
α = hef ⁄ h = 0,63
Length of the notch from
the centre line of the end support x = 150 mm

The shear stress is:
while the reduced shear strength is given by:
This means that the notched beam not has a sufficient capacity.
Further calculations give that it could be possible to have a notch corresponding to 16 percent
of the total depth, in order to still have the sufficient shear capacity. Alternatively the notches
could be reinforced for example with wood screws.

Lateral torsional buckling check
of a glulam beam
Example 3.4 Lateral torsional buckling check of a glulam beam

z
y y
h
/2 /2
z
Figure 3.2 b
A simply supported beam is loaded with point loads (coming from columns standing on
the beam). The point loads are of the size Gk = 5,25 kN characteristic action (permanent
duration) and Qk = 14,45 kN variable action (medium-term duration). The beam length is
l = 10 m. The beam has the dimensions h = 630 mm and b = 115 mm and is made of glulam
GL30c.
Check if the beam dimension is enough in service class 1 and safety class 3.
(Include the effect of lateral torsional buckling)
3.4.1 Geometric properties of the beam
Width of the beam b = 115 mm
Depth of the beam h = 630 mm
Clear span of the beam l = 10 000 mm
Section modulus of the beam Wy = b ∙ h2 Wy = 7,61 · 106 mm3

about the y-y axis 6
3.4.2 Glulam properties
Glulam GL30c:
Characteristic bending strength fm,k = 30 N/mm2
Characteristic shear strength fv,k = 3,5 N/mm2
Characteristic compression strength fc,90,k = 2,5 N/mm2

perpendicular to the grain
5th percentile modulus of elasticity E0,05 = 10,8 kN/mm2

parallel to the grain
5th percentile modulus of shear G05 = 0,54 kN/mm2


of a glulam beam
Mean modulus of elasticity E0,mean = 13,0 kN/mm2

Mean shear modulus Gmean = 0,65 kN/mm2
Mean density of the beam ρm = 430 kg/m3
3.4.3 Partial safety factors
EKS 10: Table B-3 for ULS:

Permanent actions γG = 1,35
Variable actions γQ = 1,5
Volume 2: Table 3.1

Material factor for glulam γM = 1,25
Safety class 3 γd = 1,0
3.4.4 Actions
Self weight of the beam g k,selfwt = b ∙ h ∙ g ∙ ρm

(often 5 kN/m3 is assumed as self weight
g k,selfwt = 0,31 kN/m
for timber in general when designing)
Design action from the self weight gd,selfwt = γd ∙ ξ ∙ γG ∙ g k,selfwt

of the beam
gd,selfwt = 0,37 kN/m

Characteristic permanent action Gk,p = 5,25 kN
from the point load
Characteristic variable Qk,p = 14,45 kN

action from the point load
Design action from the point load Fd,p = γd ∙ ξ ∙ γG ∙ Gk,p + γd ∙ γQ ∙ Qk,p

for the critical load case at the ULS
(Eurocode 0: Equation 6:10 and EKS 10: Fd,p = 1,0 ∙ 0,89 ∙ 1,35 ∙ 5,25 + 1,0 ∙ 1,5 ∙ 14,45
Table B-3) using the unfavourable = 27,98 kN
condition variable action

of a glulam beam
3.4.5 Modification factors
Factor for medium duration kmod = 0,8

loading M and service class 1
(Volume 2: Table 3.2)
Size Factor for depth greater k h = 1,0
than 600 mm (Volume 2: Section 3.3)
Lateral stability of the beam kcrit

(Volume 2: Chapter 4)
Effective length of the beam l ef = 0,8 l l ef = 8 m

– adopt case for the most
critical condition – the point load
(concentrated load) at mid-span
Critical bending stress

(Volume 2: Chapter 4 or
Eurocode 5: Equation 6.32)
Relative slenderness for bending λrel,m = 1,25

Lateral stability factor


kcrit = 0,62

of a glulam beam
3.4.6 Bending capacity
The design load case at the ULS will be the result of a combination of self weight of the beam
plus the combined permanent and variable point loads at mid span:
Design bending moment MEd = 74,6 kNm
Design bending strength fm,y,d = 19,20 N/mm2
Design bending strength taking lateral MRd = fm,y,d ∙ Wy ∙ kcrit MRd = 90,6 N/mm2
torsional buckling effect into account
Bending capacity is satisfactory for glulam, 115 × 630 GL30c.
3.4.7 Shear capacity

The design load case will be the result of combination of self weight of the beam plus
the combined permanent and variable point loads at mid span:
Design value for end shear force Vd = 15,8 kN
Modification factor for shear kcr = 3,0 ⁄ 3,5 = 0,86

(crack factor)
Effective width for shear bef = kcr ∙ b bef = 99 mm
Design shear stress τd = 0,38 N/mm2

Design shear strength fv,d = 2,24 N/mm2

(Volume 2: Section 3.1)
The beam dimension is sufficient.

Design of a double tapered beam
(ULS and SLS)
Example 3.5 Design of a double tapered beam (ULS and SLS)
b = 190 mm
hap = 1698 mm
1 = 6m 2 = 2,4 m
5,7°
h =700 mm
 = 20 m
Figure 3.3: Geometry of the beam.
Loads acting on the beam

The loads considered for the design of the double tapered beam are the following: beam self
weight, roof dead load and snow load. The wind load can be neglected. The centre-to-centre
distance between the primary beams is l1 = 6 m. However, the influence area for a beam is
considered 10 percent larger than l × l1, to take into account the effect of the continuity of
the purlins over the primary beams. The snow load is reduced to take into account the roof
shape factor μ = 0,8 + 5,7 ⁄ 20 ∙ 0,3 = 0,8855. Here as an approximation on the safe side
we calculate with the snow load on the leeward side according to EKS 10 as uniformly
distributed along the whole beam length.
Table 3.1
Load type Uniformly distributed load Uniformly distributed load

[kN/m2] [kN/m]
Beam self weight g1k = 1,10
Roof dead load 0,6 g2k = 3,96
Snow 1,5 s = 8,77
Load combinations
A possible collapse of the double tapered beam is of such nature that it might involve a high
risk of injury to persons. Therefore, the safety class is assumed to be high (safety class 3),
thus γd = 1. The beams are assumed to be indoors, in a heated environment. Therefore, they
are characterized by an environment in which relative humidity very seldom, if ever, exceeds
65 %. Thus, the service class can be assumed to be 1.

(ULS and SLS)
Table 3.2
Safety class Service class Load combinations [kN/m] Load duration Kmod Kdef
Serviceability limit state (SLS)
− 1 gk = (g1k + g1k ) = 5,1 − 0,6
− 1 s = 8,77 − 0,6
Ultimate limit state (ULS)
3 → γd = 1 1 gd = 1 · 1,2 · (g1k + g2k) = 6,1 permanent 0,6 −
3 → γd = 1 1 qd = 1 · [1,2 · (g1k + g2k) + 1,5 · s] = 19,23 medium-term 0,8 −
Material
The material used for this structure is glulam GL30c (γM = 1,25, kmod = 0,8).
Table 3.3
Characteristics Design values

Bending fm,d = 19,2 MPa
Shear fv,d = 2,2 MPa
Compression parallel to grain fc,0,d = 15,7 MPa
Compression perpendicular to grain fc,90,d = 1,6 MPa
Tension parallel to grain ft,0,d = 12,5 MPa
Tension perpendicular to grain ft,90,d = 0,32 MPa
Modulus of elasticity E0,mean = 13 000 MPa
Shear modulus Gmean = 650 MPa
3.5.1 Bending at critical section (x = x0)

and at mid-span (x = l ⁄ 2)
a. Determination of stresses
qd
at x = x0 at x =/2
σm,α
α
h0 hap
b σm,0 b σm,0 σt,90

x = x0
x =/2

Figure 3.4
For a symmetrical double tapered beam with constant uniformly distributed load qd,
the location of the critical cross section – that is the abscissa where the maximum bending
stress occurs – can be calculated as follows:

(ULS and SLS)
The corresponding depth of the beam is:
The bending moment at the critical cross section is:
The corresponding bending stress at the critical cross section is:
The bending moment at mid-span is:
The corresponding bending stress at mid span:
At the mid-span (apex zone), the tensile bending stress shall be magnified by a factor k l to take
into account of the fact that the depth of the beam is not constant, but it varies linearly and it
has a singularity at the apex. The magnification factor k l increases with increasing roof slope
and it can be obtained from Volume 2: Section 8.2 or Eurocode 5: Equation 6.43. For a slope
α = 5,7° k l = 1,2.
b. Verifications
At the tapered edge of the beam the bending strength must be reduced by a factor km,α to take
into consideration the effect of simultaneous action of compression parallel to grain, tension
perpendicular to grain and shear. The reduction factor km,α increases with increasing roof
slope and it can be obtained from Volume 1: Figure 3.35. For a slope α = 5,7° → km,α = 0,86.
Table 3.4
Position σm,d [MPa] fm,d [MPa] km,α fm,α,d [MPa] Utilization ratio
x = x0 16,1 19,2 0,86 19,2 · 0,86 = 16,5 16,1 ⁄16,5 = 0,97
x = l ⁄ 2 12,6 19,2 − − 12,6 ⁄19,2 = 0,65
σm,d = design bending stress; fm,d = design bending strength; fm,α,d = reduced design bending strength (tapered edge).

(ULS and SLS)
Lateral torsional buckling

Lateral torsional buckling in the double tapered beam (primary beams) may only occur
between two adjacent purlins, under the condition that 1) the roof is braced in the transverse
direction and 2) the purlins are adequately fastened to the primary beams. In that case,
the buckling length can be assumed as the centre-to-centre distance between purlins, that is
l 2 = 2 400 mm. Within this distance, the depth of the cross section can be regarded as
constant. The critical bending stress can be calculated according to Volume 1: Equation 3.34:

The relative slenderness ratio for bending is defined in Volume 1: Equation 3.30 and the corre-
sponding reduction factor kcrit is defined in Volume 1: Table 3.3:
Since λrel,m ≤ 0,75, full bending strength can be achieved without risk for lateral torsional
buckling.
It is important to check the shear capacity for tapered beams due to the normally low beam
depth at the supports. Yet this check is omitted in this example.
3.5.2 Tension perpendicular to the grain

The tensile stress perpendicular to the grain can be evaluated by multiplying the bending
stress at mid-span by the factor kp, which can be taken from Volume 1: Figure 3.38:
b. Verifications
The tension strength perpendicular to grain shall be reduced in order to take into account
the volume effect. The volume of wood which is loaded in tension can be estimated as follows,
see Volume 1: Table 3.4:

The reduction factor due to volume effect can be calculated according to Volume 1: Equation 3.53:

where kdis is a factor that takes into account that the tension stress perpendicular to the grain
is not uniformly distributed in the loaded timber volume V.
Table 3.5
Position σt,90, [MPa] ft,90,d [MPa] kvol ft,90,d_red [MPa] Utilization ratio
x = l ⁄2 0,21 0,32 0,63 0,63 · 0,32 = 0,20 0,21 ⁄0,20 ≈ 1,045

(ULS and SLS)
Here the need for reinforcement is just about necessary. A calculation with unequal-sided
snowload according to EKS 10 results in a reduction of the bending moment to 97 % com-
pared to the one in the calculation above. The utilization ratio is then 0,97 ∙ 1,045 = 1,01, what
could be acceptable.
Additionally the shear capacity at the supports has to be verified. This is of special importance
for double tapered beams because of their reduced cross sectional height at the supports. By
slopes 1/10 or more the shear stresses at the supports are often designing the beam dimensions.
3.5.3 Shear at the supports

Support reaction
Advantageously the shear force is given by applying the possible reduction according to
Eurocode 5: Section 6.1.7 (3). With purlins spaced at 2400 mm centres a load on 1 200 mm of
the primary beam goes directly to the support and does so not contribute to the shear stress.
The utilization ratio is then 1,908 ⁄ 1,92 = 0,99, what is acceptable.
3.5.4 Compression perpendicular to the grain at the supports

We assume that the column supporting the double tapered beam has a cross section
190 × 360 mm. The support length between beam and column is therefore
b × l b = 190 × 360 mm2.
The compression stress perpendicular to the grain can be evaluated according to Volume 2:
Section 5.2 or Eurocode 5: Section 6.1.5.
b. Verifications
The compression strength perpendicular to grain can be magnified by factor kc,90 = 1,75
Because g k ⁄ qk > 0,4 it is not recommended to choose kmod and γM as 1,0.
Table 3.6
Position σc,90,d [MPa] fc,90,d [MPa] kc,90 f'c,90,d [MPa] Utilization ratio
x=0 2,6 1,6 1,75 1,75 · 1,6 = 2,8 2,6 ⁄ 2,8 = 0,93

(ULS and SLS)
3.5.5 Deflection
For a double tapered beam, resting on supports and subjected to a uniformly distributed load q,
the deflection w should be evaluated by the following equation, Piazza et al. (2005), see
Volume 1: Section 3.6:
where χ = 1,2, Iy and A are the moment of inertia and area of the cross section at the support
respectively, whilst km and kv are defined as:
The instantaneous deflections are:

- wg,inst – due to self weight
- wqs1,inst – due to the variable action qs1 (snow load)
With Ψ2,1 = 0,1 (snow load) and kdef = 0,6 (service class 1), the final deflection is:
This deflection corresponds to l ⁄ 249 which is fully acceptable for an industrial building.
For schools, stores and similar facilities with higher requirements, it can be considered to
manufacture the beam with a precamber of say 70 mm.

Design of tie rod connection
4 Design of timber joints

Example 4.1 Design of tie rod connection
Hint: Failure mode (d) in Volume 2: Figure 10.2 is governing the behaviour of the connection
and the rope effect is not necessary to take into account.
45°
2
x
45
45
x
3
Figure 4.1
A balcony in timber is at the front edge supported by a tie rod made of steel. This steel rod is
attached to the floor beam of the balcony with 12 wood screws. The supporting floor beam has
the dimension 115 × 270 mm. The wood screws have a length of 60 mm, a diameter of 8 mm
and an ultimate strength of 410 MPa. For simplicity the effective diameter def is here assumed
to be equal the outer thread diameter d. This information is usually to be found in the decla-
rations from the screw manufacturers. The thickness of the steel plate is 8 mm. The tensile
resistance perpendicular to the grain of the floor beam is assumed to be sufficient to withstand
the force from the tie rod.
Calculate the maximum load in the tie rod with respect to the capacity of
the steel-to-wood connection.
Spacings and edge distances for the screws are assumed to be adequate.
Geometry
Steel thickness t = 8 mm
Screw diameter def = d = 8 mm
Screw length l s = 60 mm
Screw length in the timber t1 = l s − t = 52 mm
Angle between force and grain direction α = 45°
Number of wood screws n = 12

Design of tie rod connection
Capacity of the connection

Characteristic density, glulam GL30c ρk = 390 kg/m3
Wood screw strength fu = 410 MPa
Partialcoefficient, connection γM = 1,3
Material factor for the connection at the ULS, kmod = 0,65
medium term load M, service class 3
Yield moment wood screw My,Rk = 0,3 fu def 2,6

My,Rk = 2,74 ∙ 104 Nmm
Embedding strength parallel fibers f h,0,k = 0,082(1 − 0,01def ) ρk

f h,0,k = 29,42 MPa
Softwood, correction factor k90 = 1,35 + 0,015def = 1,47
Embedding strength in
the direction of the force
f h,α,k = 23,82 MPa
The connection is a one sided connection with a thick steel plate, that is failure mode c, d or e,
see Volume 2: Figure 10.2 and Volume 1: Table 4.3:
Failure mode c Fv,Rk,c = … = 9,91 kN
Failure mode d Fv,Rk,d = … = 4,83 kN
Failure mode e Fv,Rk,e = … = 5,26 kN
Characteristic capacity Fv,Rk = min(Fv,Rk,c , Fv,Rk,d , Fv,Rk,e) = 4,83 kN
Design capacity Fv,Rd = … = 2,42 kN
Total capacity of the connection Fv = n ∙ Fv,Rd = 29,0 kN
The connection can withstand a force of 29 kN.

Design of nailed connection
in a Gerber system
Example 4.2 Design of nailed connection in a Gerber system
This connection can advantageously be designed so that the force is being transferred via
compression towards the horizontal parts of the steel, what also is the common procedure in
practice. However in the example this have been ignored and focus is to show how nail design
is done.
4.2.1 Problem description

The Gerber connection is placed in the outer bay of a beam with a span in the bay of
23 000 mm. The beam is loaded with an evenly distributed load.
Joint
h =1 305 mm
h
b = 215 mm
 = 23 000 mm
Figure 4.2: Geometry.
- qd = 34,3 kN/m
- Load duration class M
- Nail material, fu = 600 MPa
- Material GL30c, b × h = 215 × 1 305 mm
The shear force to be transferred in the connection is calculated as:
4.2.2 Approach
The Gerber connection is always placed where the moment is (theoretically) zero, which
means that the shear force is relatively large. The connection shall thus be designed so that no
moment is transferred. A principal sketch is shown in Figure 4.3.
V/2 V/2
1 b = 215 mm
Figure 4.3: Principal solution for Gerber connection.

in a Gerber system
In smaller Gerber connections it is possible to use a simple rectangular nail plate placed
centrally in the beam. But for the large connection in Figure 4.3, the steel must also be
designed. Please refer to Eurocode 3 for further details on steel design.
4.2.3 Resistance of nails

Annular ring shanked nails of the dimension 40 – 4,0 mm are assumed. They have a head dia
meter of 6 mm. The connection will be a single shear connection steel-wood. The thickness of
the steel plate is chosen as 5 mm, which means that tsteel > d (5 > 4) and the nail has a fixed
support in the steel plate. Volume 1: Table 4.3 contains the three failure modes that need to be
calculated. The lowest of these three values will be the characteristic resistance for one nail.
The embedding strength is established through using ρk = 390 kg/m3 in Volume 1:
Equation 4.1.
The yield moment of the nail My,Rk with d = 4 mm:
My,Rk = 600 ⁄ 600 ∙ 270 ∙ 42,6 = 9 925 Nmm
Somewhat simplified the formula for smooth, grooved nails has here been applied. In practice
this value is usually obtained from each nail manufacturer.
4.2.3.1 Shear capacity

The thickness t1 is the length of the nail minus the thickness of the steel plate; t1 = 40 – 5 = 35 mm:
Fv,Rk (mode I) = f h,kt1d = 21,1 ∙ 35 ∙ 4 = 2 954 N
Fv,Rk (mode II) = 21,1 ∙ 35 ∙ 4 ∙ ( – 1) = 1 607 N
Fv,Rk (mode III) = 2,3 ∙ = 2 105 N

The lowest capacity of the three failure modes occurs for failure mode II, that is
Fv,Rk = 1,607 kN/nail. The design value is determined using Eurocode 5 with
kmod = 0,8 and γM = 1,3 (also see Volume 2: Section 3.1 and 3.2):
Fv,Rd = 0,8 ∙ 1,607 ⁄ 1,3 = 0,989 kN/nail
4.2.3.2 Axial capacity

The axial capacity is determined using Volume 1: Equations 4.14–4.16 and tpen = t1 = 35 mm:
fax,k = 20 ∙ 10−6 ∙ 3902 = 3,04 MPa Fax,Rk = 3,04 ∙ 4 ∙ 35 = 426 N
f head,k = 70 ∙ 10−6 ∙ 3902 = 10,6 MPa Fax,Rk = 10,6 ∙ 62 = 383 N
Fax,Rk = min(426; 383) = 383 N = 0,383 kN/nail
In practice also these values are usually obtained from each nail manufacturer.

in a Gerber system
4.2.3.3 Fastener capacity

The fastener capacity is obtained by adding the shear and the axial capacities according to
(where the second term in the right part is the rope effect):
FRk = 1,607 + 0,383 ⁄ 4 = 1,70 kN/nail
The contribution from rope effect in relation to the shear capacity is only 6 percent and can
therefore be completely counted, as the limit is 50 percent for annular ring shanked nails, see
Volume 1: Table 4.8.
The design capacity is determined using kmod = 0,8 and γM = 1,3:
4.2.4 Connection design

The number of nails needed on each side of the connection is:
The nails should be placed as close to the neutral axis of the beams as possible to avoid
eccentricity moments. The regulations for spacing parallel and perpendicular to grain needs to
be followed, Volume 2: Section 10.4.2. For nailed joints, a distance of 5d is prescribed perpen-
dicular to the grain and 10d parallel to the grain. A proposed placement of fasteners would be
according to Figure 4.4:
1
h = b = 370 215
Figure 4.4
The size of the triangle where fasteners are to be placed is derived by assuring that 166 nails
fit into the triangle without violating fastener spacing recommendations. To complete
the design of the connection, the steel plates would need to be designed, refer to Eurocode 3
for steel design. Furthermore, the compression perpendicular to the grain of the wood must be
checked as indicated in Figure 4.4, see Volume 2: Section 5.2.

Design of bolted connection in tension
Example 4.3 Design of bolted connection in tension
4.3.1 Problem description

A bolted connection in pure tension shall be designed. The connection could be the bottom
chord in a truss or a purlin in tension. The number of bolts is unknown at the onset of design.
90
270
Figure 4.5
- design tensile force Ntd = 250 kN

- thickness of the steel plate t = 8 mm
- load duration class M, service class 2
- bolt diameter d = 16 mm
- tensile strenght of bolt fu = 360 MPa
- glulam GL30c, ρk = 390 kg/m3.
4.3.2 Strength parameters

The yield moment of the bolt is calculated using Volume 1: Equation 4.6:
The embedding strength of wood is determined according to Volume 1: Equation 4.2:
f h,0,k = 0,082(1 − 0,01 ∙ 16) ∙ 390 = 26,9 MPa
4.3.3 Resistance for a single bolt

The resistance for a single bolt is the sum of the shear and tensile resistances.
4.3.3.1 Shear capacity

The shear capacity is established through using the expressions in Volume 1: Table 4.7,
double shear steel-to-timber joints with t = 0,5d, failure mode j and k, that is pinned support
for the bolt in relation to the steel plate:
Thus, the characteristic shear capacity is 12,9 kN/bolt.

Design of bolted connection in tension
4.3.3.2 Withdrawal capacity

The withdrawal capacity of a bolt is determined using Volume 1: Equation 4.18. Since
a washer is not used, but rather a continuous steel plate, the fictitious washer diameter is
min(12 ∙ 8; 4 ∙ 16) = 64 mm:

Awasher = π(642 − 162) ⁄ 4 = 3 016 mm2
Fax,washer,Rk = 3 ∙ 2,5 ∙ 3 016 = 22,6 kN/side
4.3.3.3 Bolt resistance

The resistance of one bolt is determined:
FRk = Fv,Rk + 2 · Fax,washer,Rk ⁄ 4 = 12,9 + 2 · 22,6 ⁄ 4 = 24,2 kN/bolt
Because a continuous steel plate exists, the whole withdrawal capacity is counted (rope effect).
The design capacity is determined using kmod = 0,8 and γM = 1,3:
4.3.4 Connection layout

The number of bolts will depend on the group effect and the number of rows in the connection.
The group effect is in turn dependent on the number n of fasteners in a row, and therefore
it is of interest to determine the number of rows that can be placed within the beam height
270 mm. The minimum distance between fasteners in a row is 4d according to Volume 2:
Table 10.4. The edge distance to an unloaded edge is 3d. Thus, the maximum number of rows
that can be placed perpendicular to grain is:
4.3.5 Group effect

According to Volume 1: Equation 4.23, bolted joints are affected by a group effect.
The spacing for bolts parallel to the grain is chosen as 7d, which is more than what the standard
requires. Knowing that the boundary for n to result as nef is a spacing of 13d, the determination
of the number of fasteners in one row can be established as:
Without the group effect the connection could have been established using 250 ⁄ 14,9 = 17 bolts,
but now 24 bolts results. If more rows could be accommodated within the beam height, this
would yield a lower number of bolts in total. Increasing the beam height can therefore be
a good suggestion if not other parameters affect the selection of height.
For a connection of this type, a block shear check would have been necessary in practice, see
Volume 1: Section 4.9.3.

Design of moment resisting column base
Example 4.4 Design of moment resisting column base

bp =215 hp =315
b = 200 t=5 t=5
25 30 30 30 30 30 25
50
60
60
60
60
h = 650
60
60
60
60
60
Figure 4.6
60
The base of a column in a storage building shall be designed as moment resisting. The timber
column is fastened with nails to steel sheets cast into the concrete. The column is made
of glulam GL30c with the dimensions hp = 315 mm and bp = 215 mm. The steel sheets are
made of steel S235 with the dimension h = 650 mm, b = 200 mm and a thickness t = 5 mm.
The number of annular ring shanked nails is 60 pieces per sheet, the dimension 60−4,0 and
with a tensile strength of 600 MPa.
Check if the connection has enough capacity to withstand a horizontal force H = 25 kN,
a moment M = 25 kNm and a vertical force V = 25 kN.

1. Geometry
Column width bp = 215 mm
Column depth hp = 315 mm
Length steel sheet h = 650 mm
Width steel sheet b = 200 mm
Thickness steel sheet t = 5 mm
Diameter nail d = 4 mm
Diameter nail head dh = 8 mm
Diameter hole drilled in the steel sheet dhole = d + 1 mm = 5 mm
Nail length ls = 60 mm
Number of nails ⊥ grain nh = 6
Number of nails // grain nv = 10
Penetration depth, nail t1 tpen = ls − t = 55 mm
2. Material properties
Shear strength glulam GL30c fv,k = 3,5 MPa
Tension strength parallel to the grain, ft,0,k = 19,5 MPa
glulam GL30c
Compression strength perpendicular
to the grain, glulam GL30c fc,90,k = 2,5 MPa
Density, glulam GL30c ρk = 390 kg/m3
Tension strength, nail fu = 600 MPa
Yield strength, S235 fyk = 235 MPa
Ultimate strength, S235 fuk = 340 MPa
3. Modification factors
Material factor for glulam at ULS, γM = 1,25
GL30c
Material factor for glulam at ULS, γM,connection = 1,3
Connection
Material factor for glulam at ULS, γM2 = 1,2
Steel
Factor for medium duration loading and kmod = 0,8
service class 2

4. Design section forces

Horizontal force H = 25 kN
Vertical force V = 25 kN
Moment M = 25 kNm
The horizontal force is taken as contact pressure between the column and the steel sheet.
The vertical force is taken as contact between the bottom of the column and the foundation.
The moment is taken as a force couple in the steel sheets.
The resulting force due to the moment Fx = M = 79 kN

hp
This assumes that the force is so small so that the steel sheet does not buckle, which has to be
checked. In this case Eurocode 3: Section 6.3 gives us:
The capacity of the steel sheet with respect to buckling is then Nb,Rd = 0,875 ∙ 0,005 ∙ 0,2 ∙
235 ∙ 103 ⁄ 1,1 = 187 kN. This means that in this case there is no risk of buckling, but that is so
because the moment being moderate in the example and the bottow row of nails are placed as
close to the lower end as possible, with respect to end distance (15d). If the steel sheet would
buckle, the lower end of the glulam column would transfer the force to the concrete through
contact pressure and we would get a much shorter lever to withstand the moment and therefore
an increased force in the tensioned sheet.
Force taken as contact between the steel

sheet and the column. Fy = H = 25 kN
5. Embedding strength
Embedding strength glulam GL30c f h,k = 0,082ρk d −0,3
(Volume 1: Equation 4.1)
f h,k = 21,1 MPa
6. Yield moment, nail
Yield moment, nail My,Rk = 0,45fu d 2,6
Somewhat simplified the formula for smooth, grooved nails has here been applied. In practice
this value is usually obtained from each nail manufacturer.

My,Rk = 9 925 Nmm

7. Axial withdrawal capacity

Axial withdrawal strength fax,k = 20 ∙ 10−6 ρk2
fax,k = 3 MPa
Pull through strength The steel sheet prevents pull through

of the nail head, therefore the pull through
strength is not being calculated.
Withdrawal capacity Fax,Rk = fax,k ∙ d ∙ tpen = 669 N

Withdrawal capacity ⁄ 4 Fax,Rk ⁄ 4 = 167 N
8. Shear capacity of the nails

Thick steelplate t ⁄ d = 1,25 the condition ≥ 1 is satisfied
(Volume 2: Section 10.3
and Volume 1: Table 4.3)
Failure mode c Fv,Rk,c = f h,k t1 d = 21,1 ∙ 55 ∙ 4 = 4,64 kN

Failure mode d

Failure mode e

Capacity for one nail Fv,Rk = min(Fv,Rk,c , Fv,Rk,d , Fv,Rk,e)
Deciding failure mode Failure mode e
Contribution from rope effect Fax,Rk ∕4 = 0,167 kN

(can here be fully counted)
Total design capacity

per nail and shear plane

Least spacing // grain for nails to be 14d = 56 mm

effective (reduction is not needed)
Real distance between nails a1 = 60 mm
Total capacity for the connection FRd,tot = nv ∙ nh ∙ FRd = 10 ∙ 6 ∙ 1,40 = 84 kN
Control of the capacity

The capacity of the nails is enough.
9. Nail spacing
Chosen spacing parallel to the grain a1 = 60 mm
Chosen spacing perpendicular to the grain a2 = 30 mm
Chosen distance to loaded end a3 = 60 mm
Angle between force direction and grain α=0
Required spacing parallel to the grain a1 = (5 + 5 ∙ | cos(0) |) ∙ d ∙ 0,7 = 28 mm
Required spacing perpendicular a2 = 5d ∙ 0,7 = 14 mm

to the grain
Required distance to loaded end a3,t = (10 + 5 ∙ cos(0)) ∙ d = 60 mm
The capacity of the nails is enough to withstand the forces.
To perform a complete check of the connection it is also necssary to check plug shear failure,
the strength of the steel sheets, and if the steel sheet can withstand the horizontal force as
well as to check the connection between the steel sheets and the foundation.

Design of an OSB-webbed I-girder
(ULS and SLS)
5 Composite timber elements

Example 5.1 Design of an OSB-webbed I-girder (ULS and SLS)
A composite beam with flanges in strength class C24 and a web panel of oriented strand board
(OSB 3) is designed as shown below. Check all important resistances in the ultimate limit state
(ULS), except crushing perpendicular to grain due to support reactions. Check also the maximum
instantaneous and final deflections in the serviceability limit state (SLS). For the total load
the requirements for the characteristic load combination are winst ≤ l ⁄ 300 and wfin ≤ l ⁄ 200.
Note that the beam is braced sideways such that lateral torsional buckling cannot occur.
Note also that full composite action can be assumed between the flange timber and the web
panel. Transverse web stiffeners are used at both supports.
The girder is located at a place where safety Dead load + Snow load
class 2 and service class 2 can be assumed.
The rest of the input data are given below:
h
User defined units
Flange width for each side b1 = 45 mm

Flange depth hf = 70 mm
b1 b1
Web panel depth hw = 500 mm
Web panel thickness bw = 15,0 mm hf
Total span l = 7,0 m

Self weight of the roof, g k = 1,35 kN/m y bw
including the girder hw
Snow zone 2,5, snow is sk = 3,60 kN/m z
a medium term load (Is obtained for example when one-sided slope
in Sweden of < 15°, without drifted snow and with spacing hf
at 1800 mm centres)
Figure 5.1
Factor for the quasi permanent ψ2 = 0,2
snow load in Sweden
Material properties
Characteristic and design material properties of C24 timber (solid timber),
see Volume 2, Table 3.3.
Bending strength
Tensile strength
parallel to grain Modulus of elasticity
E0,mean = 11 000 MPa
Compressive strength
parallel to grain
Shear strength

(ULS and SLS)
Partial factor γM = 1,30

Modification factor kmod = 0,80 (medium term load duration M and service class 2)
Creep factor kdef = 0,80
The modification factor, k h
for size effects in bending
and tension, is defined as:
For this flange we have: k h = k hhh(hf ) = 1,16
Bending strength
Tensile strength
parallel to grain
Compressive strength
parallel to grain
Shear strength
Characteristic and design material properties of OSB/3, see Volume 2: Table 3.10.
In plane tensile strength Modulus of elasticity

In plane compressive strength Ew,mean = 3 800 MPa
Panel shear strength Shear modulus

Planar (rolling) shear strength Gw,mean = 1 080 MPa

Partial factor for OSB/3 γM,OSB = 1,2

Modification factor for OSB/3 kw,mod = 0,55 Medium term load duration and service class 2
Creep factor for OSB/3 kw,def = 2,25
Design values:
In plane tensile strength

In plane compressive strength
Panel shear strength
Planar (rolling) shear strength


(ULS and SLS)
Design loads in the ULS, according to the Swedish annex of Eurocode 0
Partial factors γG = 1,35 γQ = 1,5

Partial factor for γd = 0,91
safety class 2, Sweden
ξ-coefficient for permanent ξ = 0,89
loads in Sweden
Total design load from combination, see Eurocode 0: Equation 6.10b, which is the only
relevant combination due to a fairly large difference between sk and g k. Note that γd and ξ are
from the Swedish application rules, EKS 10.
Design load qEd = γd (ξ γG g k + γQ sk) = 6,39 kN/m
Cross sectional properties

As we have a cross-section of two different materials it is convenient to go for a transformed
section or fictitious section as explained in Design of timber structures, Volume 1:
Section 5.1.1.1. This cross-section will be different for the instantaneous, final SLS and final
ULS conditions. Let the elastic modulus of the C24-flange be the reference material. The web
thickness (parallel to the axis of bending) is then changed by the following factors:
Effective width factors
Web thicknesses
Total width of the timber flange b = 2b1 = 90,0 mm
Total beam depth h = 2hf + hw = 640 mm
Function for the second area

moment of inertia, which may
be called for different web
thicknesses

(ULS and SLS)
Second area moment of

inertia of the transformed
cross-sections
Check the bending moment resistance, see Volume 1: Section 5.1.1.2

No system effect can be taken into account, so ksys is not used.
Also, no lateral torsional buckling can occur because we have sufficient bracing, that is kcrit = 1,0
In this case the 3 most

probable failure conditions
are given to the right, which
(Volume 1:
is realized by looking at
Equation 5.6)
the strength properties
Just by looking at the numerical values of the parameters we understand that tension failure
at the centre of the bottom flange will be the likely cause of failure. Note also that the flange
is checked at final conditions, while the web edge is checked at instantaneous conditions.
This is because the flanges have better creep properties than the web panel.
Maximum bending moment

Stress in the C24-timber at
the centre of the tension flange

Compare!
Stress in the C24-timber at
the flange edge

Stress in the OSB web panel at
the edge of the tension flange

We conclude that the tension flange is perfectly optimized with regard to bending failure
of the timber flange as well as the web panel.

(ULS and SLS)
Check the shear force resistance at supports, see Volume 1: Section 5.1.1.3
We have a pure shear failure of the web panel if the free web depth hw = 500 mm is smaller
than 35 bw = 525 mm. The smallest possible value of this limit is 32 bw = 480 mm according
to Volume 1: Table 5.2. Shear buckling will have a negligible effect on the shear resistance,
which can be determined by Volume 1: Equation 5.11 with cv = 1,0.
Maximum design shear force

Compare!
Shear force resistance without
regarding shear buckling, noting
that we have one web panel
No fiddling around with fictitious cross sections is need, as the flanges are not involved in this
failure. We conclude that also the web panel is well designed with regard to its shear resistance.
Check for failure in the glue line between the web panel and the flange timber,
see Volume 1: Section 5.1.1.4
The failure criterion (Volume 1:

Equation 5.20 or 5.21) is

Here we have an I-beam for which ngl = 2, that is 2 equal flange pieces are glued to both sides
of a web panel. Note that bw is the physical thickness and not a fictitious thickness. It is just
that the shear stresses are more concentrated towards the inner corner in an I-beam than in a
boxed beam that is taken into account through ngl.
The depth of the glue line is

We must, therefore, use a reduced planar (rolling) shear strength of the board material, which
is lower than the shear strength of the timber.
ΔS is the first moment of area of the flange part belonging to each glue line, that is taken for
the area that builds up the shear stress in the glue line, noting that the shear stress is zero at
the free edge.
First area moment

In this case the Iy,ULS,fin will produce the largest shear stress. Note also that no μw,ULS,fin is
needed because the stress is already smeared out along the real physical depth of the glue line.

(ULS and SLS)
The shear stress is

Compare!
Compare to the reduced

planar shear strength
We conclude that the glue line has more than sufficient strength.

(ULS and SLS)
Check the maximum beam deflection in the SLS,

see Volume 1: Section 5.1.1.5
The deflection is to be calculated for the characteristic combination, that is as in Eurocode 0,

Equation 6.14b.
Self weight gser = g k = 1,35 kN/m
Snow load sser = sk = 3,60 kN/m
Quasi permanent reduction

factor for snow load, ψ2 = 0,2
Sweden, snow zone 2,5
Timber OSB
Creep factors for service class 2 kdef = 0,8 kw,def = 2,25
Second area moments Iy,SLS,inst = 1,14 ∙ 109 mm4

in the SLS
Iy,SLS,fin = 1,09 ∙ 109 mm4
Area of the web panel, if we are a bit brave, otherwise use

Aw = bw h = 9,60 ∙ 103 mm2 the distance between flange centres
its real physical area
Keep bending and shear deflections apart, because the web panels are much more prone to
creep than the flanges acting in bending. The deflections calculated are based on Volume 1:
Equations 5.85 and 5.86, but the “fca” index is replaced by “bend” for bending and “slip” is
replaced by “shear”. The factor “2” is also removed.
Instantaneous bending deflection

caused by the permanent load

* Note that this is the instantaneous value
to be used for the final bending deflection.
Instantaneous shear deflection

caused by the permanent load

Note that there is no difference between
the two values as they are not based on
a fictitious cross section.
* Note that this is the instantaneous value

to be used for the final shear deflection.

(ULS and SLS)
Instantaneous bending
deflection caused by
the snow load

* Note that this is the instantaneous
value to be used for the final
bending deflection.
Instantaneous shear deflection

caused by the snow load
Note that there is no difference
between the two values as they are not
based on a fictitious cross section.

* Note that this is the instantaneous
value to be used for the final
shear deflection.
Total instantaneous
bending deflection
Total instantaneous
shear deflection
Total instantaneous
deflection
Final bending deflection

from permanent loading
Note the more
Final shear deflection severe creep factor
from permanent loading
Final bending deflection

from snow loading
Note the more
Final shear deflection severe creep factor
from snow loading
Total final bending deflection

Total final shear deflection

Total final deflection

Design of bracing system for wind load
on the gable of an industrial hall
6 Horizontal stabilization
Example 6.1 Design of bracing system for wind load
For missing data see Volume 3: Example 3.5 (this volume).
Geometry of the structure:

The building with the measures l × l tot 20 × 36 m is braced by means of a wind truss in
the roof, consisting of diagonal steel bars and orthogonal compression struts of glulam.
The wind truss is placed right below the roof plane. The horizontal loads are led by means of
purlins to separate compression struts, which lay in the same plane as the diagonal steel bars.
This to avoid eccentricities in the truss joints. The support reactions from the wind truss are
led by means of a pair of diagonal steel bars in each longside wall to the foundation, but they
are not designed in this example. The geometry of the structure is shown in Figure 6.1 below:
Wind truss (the dotted line

represent separate timber struts)
Wind load
1
=6
m
m
20
=
h = 6m
Figure 6.1
Loads acting on the wind truss

The loads considered for the design of the roof wind truss are: wind as primary action
and second order effects generated by beam self weight, roof dead load and snow.
The characteristic value for wind load is assumed 0,53 kN/m2, which generates a pressure
at the windward wall and suction at the leeward wall. The pressure coefficient are assumed
0,85 and 0,3 for the windward wall and the leeward wall respectively. The wind loads
considered for the design of the roof wind truss are shown in Figure 6.2 below.

0,53 · 0,85 = 0,45 kN/m2 (0,45 + 0,16) · 7,5/2 = 2,3 kN/m 0,53 · 0,3 = 0,16 kN/m2
h ≈6+ 1,5= 7,5 m

Windward wall
Leeward wall
tot = 36 m
Figure 6.2
Table 6.1
Load type Uniformly distributed load Uniformly distributed load Load combination factor
[kN/m2] [kN/m] ψ0
Wind 0,45 + 0,16 = 0,61 wk = 0,61 ∙ 7,5 ⁄ 2 = 2,3 0,3

Beam self weight − g1k = 1,10 −
Roof dead load 0,6 g2k = 3,96 −
Snow 1,5 s = 8,77 0,6
In addition to wind, the load generated by the out-of-straightness of the main beams (second
order effects) shall be taken into account. This load can be considered as uniformly distributed
and its characteristic value can be calculated according to Equation 6.28:

where:
• n = 6 is the number of braced beams (note that the total number of beams is 7, but
the beams at the two gables carry only one half of the vertical load)
• M is the bending moment in the beam due to vertical loads, considering the load
combination “STR B”, according to Eurocode 0. The load combination factor should be
taken ψ0 = 0,6 when wind is considered as principal load and ψ0 = 1,0 when snow is
considered as principal load:
• l = 20 m
• kcrit is the factor that takes into account the risk for lateral torsional buckling in an
unbraced beam. The depth of the beam can be assumed hm = (h + hap) ⁄ 2 ≈ 1 200 mm and
l ef = 0,9 ∙ l + 2h:
• kcrit = see Volume 1: Table 3.3
In this example the tilting load from the columns is not considered.

Table 6.2
Load combination Bending moment in the beam M [kNm] λrel,m kcrit qh [kN/m]
a) Wind is the principal load [1,2 · (1,1 + 3,96) + 0,6 · 1,5 · 8,77] · 20 2
1,55 0,41 3,4
= 698,5
8
b) Snow is the principal load [1,2 · (1,1 + 3,96) + 1,5 · 8,77] · 202 1,55 0,41 4,7
= 961,5
8
Load combinations
The safety class is assumed to be high (safety class 3), thus γd = 1. The beams are assumed
to be indoors, in a heated environment. Therefore, they are characterized by an environment
in which relative humidity very seldom, if ever, exceeds 65 %. Thus, the service class can be
assumed to be 1. In this example only load combination in the ULS is considered. Only
the load combination with wind as principal load is shown in this example.
Table 6.3
Safety Service Load combinations [kN/m] Load duration kmod

class class
3 → γd = 1 1 a) qd,a = 1 · [1,5 · wk + 1,0 · qh ] = 1,5 · 2,3 + 3,4 = 6,9 short 0,9
3 → γd = 1 1 b) qd,b = 1 · [1,0 · qh + 1,5 ψ0,w wk] = 1,0 · 3,4 + 1,5 · 0,3 · 2,3 = 4,5 medium 0,8
The governing load combination is thus a), that is wind as principal load.
Material
1. Timber elements
The material used for the struts is glulam GL30c (γM = 1,25, kmod = 0,9). The adopted cross
section for the strut is 190 × 180 mm. Upper chord and lower chord of the wind truss are two
adjacent double tapered beams. The depth of these beams is varying along the span from
700 mm at support to 1 698 mm at mid-span. For the sake of the simplicity, however, it can
be assumed that these beams have constant cross section 190 × 1 200 mm2. The beams are
also made of glulam GL30c. The relevant design values are shown below.
Table 6.4
Design values
Compression parallel to grain fc,0,d = 17,6 MPa
Tension parallel to grain ft,0,d = 14,0 MPa
Modulus of elasticity E0,mean = 13 000 MPa
E0,05 = 10 800 MPa
2. Steel diagonals
The diagonals are made of steel bars quality 4.8. The bars are threaded at their ends.
Table 6.5
Type of bar Design yield stress fyb [MPa] Design ultimate stress fub [MPa]
Steel 4.8 320 400

Design of the wind truss

The wind truss consists of a:
• lower chord and an upper chord of glulam
• orthogonal compression struts of glulam and
• diagonal bars of steel.
Static system Forces acting on the system
qd,a
0,5P P P P 0,5P
2 Glulam double tapered beam 190 x 700/1698/700

4 6 8 10
Glulam strut 190x180
St
ee
lb
ar
6m
M
20
α = 50,2°
1 3 5 7 9
5m 5m 5m 5m
R R
 = 20 m
Figure 6.3
a. Compression struts
The most loaded struts are those at the supports (that is struts 1 − 2 and 9 − 10). The force
acting in these struts is:

Table 6.6
Cross Relative Reduction Compression Compression strength Utilization

section slenderness factor force of the strut ratio
kc in the strut NRd [kN]
Nsd [kN]
190 × 180 1,695 0,348 69,0 kc ∙ A ∙ fcd = 69,0 ⁄210 = 0,33

0,348 · 0,19 · 0,18 · 17,64 · 103 =
210 kN
The same cross section, that is 190 × 180 mm is adopted for all the struts of the wind truss.
b. Diagonal steel bars

The most loaded steel diagonals are those closest to the supports (that is diagonals 2 − 3 and
7 − 10). The force acting in these diagonals is:
Graphical representation of the forces acting in node 2 Forces acting in the steel bar
0,5P
2 N 2-4
β = 39,8°
N2-
3
Figure 6.4
The force acting in the diagonal steel bar is Nsd = 67,4 kN. The design of the diagonal steel
bars is performed as if they were bolts subjected to tensile force, since the end of the bars are
threaded. The partial coefficient for bolts is γM2 = 1,2.
Table 6.7
Steel quality Size Stress area Ultimate stress Tensile strength of the bar
As [mm2] fub [MPa]
4.8 M12 84 400 25,2

4.8 M16 157 400 47,1
4.8 M20 245 400 73,5
4.8 M24 353 400 105,9
Steel bar M20, 4.8 are chosen as diagonal members in the wind truss.
Nsd = 67,4 kN < Ft,Rd = 73,5 kN → OK

with respect to deflection
7 Design for serviceability

Example 7.1 Design of a straight timber joist with respect to deflection
A simply supported rectangular joist is subjected to characteristic permanent loading,

g k = 0,5 kN/m2 and characteristic medium duration variable load qk = 2,0 kN/m2. The clear
span l is 4,5 m and the joists are spaced at 0,6 m centres. The cross section is 45 × 220 mm.
Also see Example 3.1 in this Volume.
The joist is part of an indoor floor in a residential building. Service class 1 and safety class 2.
Design the joist in structural timber of strength class C24.
Determine the deflection of the joist. Two different load cases will be discussed in
the following to show different cases that might be of interest when checks of deflections are
to be made.
Solution
First the deflection for characteristic load combination is determined, that is a deflection
occurring quite seldom during the lifetime of the structure.
The moment of inertia I = 39,93 ∙ 10−6 m4.
Elastic modulus to be
used in serviceability limit state E0,mean = 11 000 MPa
Characteristic load combination:
In this case g k = 0,5 kN/m2, variable load is qk,1 = 2,0 kN/m2 and there is no other variable
load, that is:
The deflection for a simple supported joist is:
The instantaneous deflection for the self-weight is:
The instantaneous deflection for the variable load is:

with respect to deflection
In total the instantaneous (short term) deflection corresponds to ≈ l ⁄ 250 (4 500 ⁄ 18,2).
When the long term deflections are to be estimated it is more relevant to refer to
the quasi-permanent load case:
For residential building loads the value of ψ2 is 0,3, see Volume 2: Table 2.2.
The final deflection from the self-weight can either be determined by using the value:

in:
kdef = 0,6 is given by Volume 2: Table 9.1.
This gives:
Alternatively this deflection can be given by:
The creep deflection for the variable load is determined from ψ2 qk . Corresponding to the self-
weight the deflection for the variable load can be calculated as:
In total the final long term deflection (including the short term effects) corresponds to ≈ l ⁄ 200
(4 500 ⁄ 22,8).
The acceptance for a certain limit has to be determined based upon the use of the structural
element. In some cases the value of l ⁄ 200 can be a problem but in some cases it may be
acceptable. It must be noticed that the short term effects of the characteristic load is included
in l ⁄ 200.

Serviceability check of floor
with timber joists – vibration
Example 7.2 Serviceability check of floor with timber joists

– vibration
A timber floor in a residential building has a clear span of 3,7 m between supports.
The structure comprises 45 × 220 mm timber joists spaced at 0,4 m centres, strength class C18
in service class 1.
The flooring consists of 18 mm thick OSB/3 panel and it is nailed to the joists. In this example
the OSB panel is oriented with the main direction of the strands parallel to the timber joists.
The floor width is 4,4 m and the floor mass, based on permanent loading only, is 35 kg/m2.
Carry out a design check to confirm that the vibration behaviour of the floor will be
acceptable, see Volume 2: Section 9.4 or Eurocode 5: Section 7.3.
OSB/3 t = 18 mm
Figure 7.1
Moment of inertia I:
Second moment of area of flooring/meter width If :
Width of floor structure, B = 4,4 m
Strength class C18

Mean modulus of elasticity of the joists parallel to the grain, E0,mean = 9 000 MPa
OSB/3
Mean modulus of elasticity of flooring parallel to the grain, Em = 4 930 MPa
Mass of the floor (kg/m2), m = 35 kg/m2

a. Check the fundamental frequency of the floor (see Volume 1: Equation 7.25):
The fundamental frequency of the floor is acceptable as it is greater than 8 Hz and

the equations given in Eurocode 5 can be used for a vibration check.
b. Check the static deflection of the floor according to the point load criterion in
Volume 1: Equation 7.19:
Maximum allowable deflection under a 1 kN point load is a = 1,5 mm
Check one single joist:
P = 1 000 N
Since this is not good enough a check is made with regard to the effect of the rigidity in both
floor directions (see Volume 1: Equation 7.20 – 7.22):
Where the load distribution factor κ is determined by:
with:

We then get, after load distribution by means of the flooring, a deflection under the point load:
w = 0,53 ∙ 2,9 mm = 1,6 mm
This means that the static check not is totally fulfilled but all the same we go further with
the control. We could also choose to change the timber quality.
The following should also be valid:

where v is the unit impulse velocity response (m/(Ns2). ζ is the modal damping ratio which
normally can be set to 0,01. The constant b for the control of unit impulse response can be set
to 100 (see Volume 2: Section 9.4):
The unit impulse velocity response is given by:

where n40 is the number of first order modes with natural frequencies up to 40 Hz and b is
the floor width. The value of n40 may be calculated from:
The unit impulse velocity response is then:
This value is higher than the limit value 0,023 m/(Ns2). The chosen floor design
should therefore be adjusted in order to avoid problems with vibration.

with glulam elements – vibration
Example 7.3 Serviceability check of floor with glulam elements

– vibration
A timber floor in a residential multi-storey building is made up of a OSB/3 panel as upper
flange and with glulam beams class GL28cs as webs and bottom flanges. The OSB panel has
a thickness of 25 mm and is oriented with the main direction of the strands parallel to
the glulam beams in this example. The web has a dimension of 42 × 315 mm and a lower
flange with dimension 225 × 42 mm. The beams are spaced at 0,6 m centres.
The floor system can be assumed to have full interaction. The floor has a length of 5,5 m
(in the direction of the webs) and a width of 8,0 m. The floor is simply supported.
The mass of the floor is 45 kg/m2.
Carry out a design check to confirm that the vibration behaviour of the floor will be
acceptable, see Volume 2: Section 9.4 or Eurocode 5: Section 7.3.
OSB/3 t = 25 mm
Figure 7.2
First transform the cross section to a fictive section consisting of glulam, GL28cs.
The effective width beff of the OSB can be determined to 0,15l according to Volume 1:
Table 5.1 or Eurocode 5: Table 9.1. Since l = 5,5 m, beff = 0,825 m which is larger than 0,6 m.
This means that the whole width of the OSB flange can be used in the calculation of the mo-
ment of inertia I.
Elastic modulus for GL28cs E0,mean = 12 500 MPa

Elastic modulus for OSB Em = 4 930 MPa
The fictitious width of the flange is then given by:
Area of the cross-section:

Centre of gravity (from the lower edge):
Second moment of area of the lower flange:
Second moment of area of the upper flange:
Second moment of area of the web:
Second moment of area:
Second moment of area of flooring/meter width:
Width of floor structure, B = 8 m
Mass of the floor (kg/m2), m = 45 kg/m2

a. Check fundamental frequency of the floor:
The fundamental frequency of the floor is acceptable as it is greater than 8 Hz and

the equations given in Volume 1: Section 7.3.3.1 can be used for a vibration check.
b. Check the static deflection of the floor:
Maximum allowable deflection under a 1 kN point load is a = 1,5 mm:
Check one single beam:
P = 1 000 N
The deflection of the floor is less than the allowable value.
The following should also be valid:
where v is the unit impulse velocity response (m/(Ns2). ζ is the modal damping ratio which
normally can be set to 0,01. The constant b for the control of unit impulse response can be set
to 100 (see Volume 2: Section 9.4):
The unit impulse velocity response is given by:

where n40 is the number of first order modes with natural frequencies up to 40 Hz and B is
the floor width. The value of n40 may be calculated from:
The unit impulse velocity response is then:
As the unit impulse velocity response of the floor is less than the allowable value it is
acceptable. The floor has complied with the vibration requirements in Eurocode 5.

Symbols
Symbols
Symbols used in SS-EN 1995-1-1.
Symbol Explanation Fv,Rd Design load-carrying capacity per shear plane

per fastener; Design racking load capacity
Latin upper case letters
Fv,Rk Characteristic load-carrying capacity per shear
A Cross-sectional area
plane per fastener
Aef Effective area of the total contact surface
Fv,w,Ed Design shear force acting on web
between a punched metal plate fastener and
the timber; effective total contact surface Fx,Ed Design value of a force in x-direction
perpendicular to the grain Fy,Ed Design value of a force in y-direction
Af Cross-sectional area of flange Fx,Rd Design value of plate capacity in x-direction
Anet,t Net cross-sectional area perpendicular to Fy,Rd Design value of plate capacity in y-direction
the grain
Fx,Rk Characteristic plate capacity in x-direction
Anet,v Net shear area parallel to the grain
Fy,Rk Characteristic plate capacity in y-direction
C Spring stiffness
G0,05 Fifth percentile value of shear modulus
E0,05 Fifth percentile value of modulus of elasticity
Gd Design value of shear modulus
Ed Design value of modulus of elasticity
Gmean Mean value of shear modulus
Emean Mean value of modulus of elasticity
H Overall rise of a truss
Emean,fin Final mean value of modulus of elasticity
If Second moment of area of flange
F Force
Itor Torsional moment of inertia
FA,Ed Design force acting on a punched metal plate
Iz Second moment of area about the weak axis
fastener at the centroid of the effective area
Kser Slip modulus
FA,min,d Minimum design force acting on a punched
metal plate fastener at the centroid of the Kser,fin Final slip modulus
effective area Ku Instantaneous slip modulus for ultimate limit
Fax,Ed Design axial force on fastener states
Fax,Rd Design value of axial withdrawal capacity of Lnet,t Net width of the cross-section perpendicular
the fastener to the grain
Fax,Rk Characteristic axial withdrawal capacity of the Lnet,v Net length of the fracture area in shear
fastener MA,Ed Design moment acting on a punched metal
Fc Compressive force plate fastener
Fd Design force Map,d Design moment at apex zone
Fd,ser Design force at the serviceability limit state Md Design moment
Ff,Rd Design load-carrying capacity per fastener in My,Rk Characteristic yield moment of fastener
wall diaphragm N Axial force
Fi,c,Ed Design compressive reaction force at end of R90,d Design splitting capacity
shear wall
R90,k Characteristic splitting capacity
Fi,t,Ed Design tensile reaction force at end of shear
wall Rax,d Design load-carrying capacity of an axially
loaded connection
Fi,vert,Ed Vertical load on wall
Rax,k Characteristic load-carrying capacity of
Fi,v,Rd Design racking resistance of panel i or wall i an axially loaded connection
Fla Lateral load Rax,α,k Characteristic load-carrying capacity at
FM,Ed Design force from a design moment an angle α to grain
Ft Tensile force Rd Design value of a load-carrying capacity
Ft,Rk Characteristic tensile capacity of a connection Ref,k Effective characteristic load-carrying capacity
of a connection
Fv,0,Rk Characteristic load-carrying capacity of
a connector along the grain Riv,d Design racking capacity of a wall
Fv,Ed Design shear force per shear plane of fastener; Rk Characteristic load-carrying capacity
Horizontal design effect on wall diaphragm Rsp,k Characteristic splitting capacity
Source: SS-EN 1995-1-1:2004, 1.6

Symbols
Rto,k Characteristic load-carrying capacity of fc,90,k Characteristic compressive strength

a toothed plate connector perpendicular to grain
Rv,d Design racking capacity of a wall diaphragm ff,t,d Design tensile strength of flange
V Shear force; volume fh,k Characteristic embedment strength
V u, V l Shear forces in upper and lower part of beam fhead,k Characteristic pull-through parameter for nails
with a hole
f1 Fundamental frequency
Wy Section modulus about axis y
fm,k Characteristic bending strength
Xd Design value of a strength property
fm,y,d Design bending strength about the principal
Xk Characteristic value of a strength property y-axis
Latin lower case letters fm,z,d Design bending strength about the principal
z-axis
a Distance
fm,α,d Design bending strength at an angle α to
a1 Spacing, parallel to grain, of fasteners within
the grain
one row
ft,0,d Design tensile strength along the grain
a1,CG Minimum end distance to the centre of gravity
of the screw in each timber member ft,0,k Characteristic tensile strength along the grain
a2 Spacing, perpendicular to grain, between rows ft,90,d Design tensile strength perpendicular to
of fasteners the grain
a2,CG Minimum edge distance to the centre of ft,w,d Design tensile strength of the web
gravity of the screw in each timber member
fu,k Characteristic tensile strength of bolts
a3,c Distance between fastener and unloaded end
fv,0,d Design panel shear strength
a3,t Distance between fastener and loaded end
fv,ax,α,k Characteristic withdrawal strength at an angle
a4,c Distance between fastener and unloaded edge α to grain
a4,t Distance between fastener and loaded edge fv,ax,90,k Characteristic withdrawal strength
perpendicular to grain
abow Maximum bow of truss member
fv,d Design shear strength
abow,perm Maximum permitted bow of truss member
h Depth; height of wall
adev Maximum deviation of truss
hap Depth of the apex zone
adev,perm Maximum permitted deviation of truss
hd Hole depth
b Width
he Embedment depth; loaded edge distance
bi Width of panel i or wall i
hef Effective depth
bnet Clear distance between studs
hf,c Depth of compression flange
bw Web width
hf,t Depth of tension flange
d Diameter; outer thread diameter
hrl Distance from lower edge of hole to bottom of
d1 Diameter of centre hole of connector; inner
member
thread diameter
hru Distance from upper edge of hole to top of
dc Connector diameter
member
def Effective diameter
hw Web depth
dh Head diameter of connector
i Notch inclination
fh,i,k Characteristic embedment strength of timber
kc,y, kc,z Instability factor
member i
kcr Crack factor for shear resistance
fa,0,0 Characteristic anchorage capacity per unit area
for α = 0° och β = 0° kcrit Factor used for lateral buckling
fa,90,90 Characteristic anchorage capacity per unit area kd Dimension factor for panel
for α = 90° och β = 90°
kdef Deformation factor
fa,α,β,k Characteristic anchorage strength
kdis Factor taking into account the distribution of
fax,k Characteristic withdrawal parameter for nails stresses in an apex zone
fc,0,d Design compressive strength along the grain kf,1, kf,2, kf,3 Modification factors for bracing resistance
fc,w,d Design compressive strength of web kh Depth factor
ff,c,d Design compressive strength of flange ki,q Uniformly distributed load factor
Source: SS-EN 1995-1-1:2004, 1.6

Symbols
km Factor considering re-distribution of bending uinst,Q,i Instantaneous deformation for accompanying

stresses in a cross-section variable actions Qi
kmod Modification factor for duration of load and wc Precamber
moisture content
wcreep Creep deflection
kn Sheathing material factor
wfin Final deflection
kr Reduction factor winst Instantaneous deflection
kR,red Reduction factor for load-carrying capacity wnet,fin Net final deflection
ks Fastener spacing factor; modification factor for v Unit impulse velocity response
spring stiffness
Greek lower case letters
ks,red Reduction factor for spacing
α Angle between the x-direction and the force
kshape Factor depending on the shape of for a punched metal plate; Angle between
the cross-section the direction of the load and the loaded edge
ksys System strength factor (or end)
kv Reduction factor for notched beams β Angle between the grain direction and the
force for a punched metal plate
kvol Volume factor
βc Straightness factor
ky eller kz Instability factor
γ Angle between the x-direction and the timber
la,min Minimum anchorage length for a glued-in rod
connection line for a punched metal plate
l Span; contact length γM Partial factor for material properties, also
lA Distance from a hole to the centre of accounting for model uncertainties and
the member support dimensional variations
lef Effective length; Effective length of λy Slenderness ratio corresponding to bending

distribution about the y-axis
lV Distance from a hole to the end of the member λz Slenderness ratio corresponding to bending
about the z-axis
lZ Spacing between holes
λrel,y Relative slenderness ratio corresponding to
m Mass per unit area bending about the y-axis
n40 Number of frequencies below 40 Hz λrel,z Relative slenderness ratio corresponding to
nef Effective number of fasteners bending about the z-axis
pd Distributed load ρk Characteristic density
qi Equivalent uniformly distributed load ρm Mean density

σc,0,d Design compressive stress along the grain
r Radius of curvature
σc,α,d Design compressive stress at an angle α to
s Spacing
the grain
s0 Basic fastener spacing
σf,c,d Mean design compressive stress of flange
rin Inner radius
σf,c,max,d Design compressive stress of extreme fibres of
t Thickness flange
tpen Penetration depth σf,t,d Mean design tensile stress of flange
ucreep Creep deformation σf,t,max,d Design tensile stress of extreme fibres of
ufin Final deformation flange
ufin,G Final deformation for a permanent action G σm,crit Critical bending stress
ufin,Q,1 Final deformation for the leading variable σm,y,d Design bending stress about the principal
action Q1 y-axis
ufin,Q,i Final deformation for accompanying variable σm,z,d Design bending stress about the principal
actions Qi z-axis
uinst Instantaneous deformation σm,α,d Design bending stress at an angle α to

the grain
uinst,G Instantaneous deformation for a permanent
σN Axial stress
action G
σt,0,d Design tensile stress along the grain
uinst,Q,1 Instantaneous deformation for the leading
variable action Q1 σt,90,d Design tensile stress perpendicular to the grain
Source: SS-EN 1995-1-1:2004, 1.6

Symbols
σw,c,d Design compressive stress of web

σw,t,d Design tensile stress of web
τd Design shear stress
τF,d Design anchorage stress from axial force
τM,d Design anchorage stress from moment
τtor,d Design shear stress from torsion
ψ0 Factor for combination value of a variable
action
ψ1 Factor for frequent value of a variable action
ψ2 Factor for quasi-permanent value of a variable
action
ζ Modal damping ratio
Source: SS-EN 1995-1-1:2004, 1.6

Disclaimer
Disclaimer
By using the content of Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3, you accept the terms and
conditions of use below. All information in Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3, is provided
solely for information purposes and must not be regarded as creating an advisory or professional
relationship with the reader.
All information is provided as is and without any form of guarantee to the extent permitted by
existing law. Although the publisher tries, to a reasonable extent, to provide reliable information
in Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3, the publisher does not guarantee that the content
is free of errors or mistakes and/or is complete or that the content is up-to-date and relevant to
the user’s needs.
The publisher, Swedish Forest Industries Federation, provides no guarantee for any result of
the use of the information contained in Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3. All use of
information in Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3, is at the user’s own liability and risk.
The rights to the content of Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3, accrue to Swedish Forest
Industries Federation. The content is protected under the Swedish Copyright Act.
Legal action will be taken against any abuse. The content may not be copied.
Swedish Forest Industries Federation accepts no liability for any loss, damage or injury that may
be caused by the content of Design of timber structures Volumes 1–3.

Publications and web sites from Swedish Wood
Publications about wood

Order at www.swedishwood.com/publications.
Design of timber structures Design of timber Design of timber structures Design of timber Design of timber structures Design of timber
structures structures structures
Structural aspects of Rules and formulas Examples
timber construction according to Eurocode 5
Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3

Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3
Structural aspects of Rules and formulas Examples.
timber construction. according to Eurocode 5. 64 pages.
316 pages. 64 pages. Also in Swedish.
Introduc tion to design and design process
Also in Swedish. General concepts Wall diaphragms
Also in Swedish. Format A4.
Format A4. Format A4.
Struc tural properties of sawn timber and engineered wood produc ts Material properties Bracing
Design of struc tural timber elements in ULS Bending
Design of timber joints A xial loading
Composite timber elements Cross sec tion subjec ted to shear Design of struc tural timber elements in ULS
Horizontal stabilization Cross sec tion subjec ted to combined stresses Design of timber joints
Design for ser viceability Members with varying cross sec tion or cur ved shape Composite timber elements
Timber building systems for housing Ser viceability limit states Horizontal stabilization
Struc tural systems for infrastruc ture Connec tions with metal fasteners Design for ser viceability (SLS)
Design of timber structures – Volume 1 1 Design of timber structures – Volume 3 1
Grading Grading Architecture

in wood
of sawn timber in Europe according to EN 1611-1
A guide about
sawn timber in Presentation of the shortlisted
Europe according to entries from the 2016 Timber Prize.
EN 1611-1. 168 pages. In English/Swedish.
Terms and definitions,
methods of measurement
and requirements
Features according to tables
60 pages. Format A4.
Also in Swedish.
Tables
Format A5.
Web sites
www.swedishwood.com

For more information about wood:
www.swedishwood.com
Swedish Wood spreads knowledge, provides inspiration and encourages Box 55525 ISBN 978-91-980304-4-0
development relating to wood, wood products and wood construction.
SE 102 04 Stockholm
The goal is to increase the use of wood in Sweden and in selected international
markets through information and inspiration. Swedish Wood also aims to Tel: +46 8 762 72 60
highlight wood as a competitive, eco-friendly and sustainable material. Fax: +46 8 762 79 90
Swedish Wood is a department within The Swedish Forest Industries Federation [email protected]
ProService 1612
(the organization for Swedish pulp, paper and woodworking industries, swedishwood.com 7 350009 430876 >
www.skogsindustrierna.org). Swedish Wood is supported by the Swedish
sawmill and glulam industries.
© Swedish Forest Industries Federation, 2016.


Design of Timber Structures 3 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design of Timber Structures 3 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design of Timber Structures 3 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design of timber structures

Volume 3 EDITION 2:2016

Design in the ultimate limit state (ULS)

Stockholm, October 2016

4 Design of timber structures – Volume 3