Final Year Project Handbook: School of Social Sciences
Final Year Project Handbook: School of Social Sciences
2. Why is it important?
The Project counts as a double module at Level 3 and hence contributes heavily to the
classification of your degree. Under the rules that apply to the classification of all degrees
within KAC, then if your final average is very close to the boundary for a classification higher
than that suggested by the raw average (e.g. your final average may be 59.4) then your
Project needs to be in the classification of the higher class. In the example shown above,
for example, you would not be considered for an Upper Second Class classification (2:1) if
your project was not graded as a 2:1 or higher.
Your Project indicates your abilities to select, research and then present a substantial piece of
work that displays your intellectual abilities to the full. A well-written project is a useful
document to display to a potential employer when you enter the labour market. In any case,
the skills that you will have deployed are particularly useful should you wish to undertake
work for a higher degree at Masters or at PhD level. Moreover, the fact that you have
researched and organised a substantial piece of work is a skill that you will be asked to deploy
on many occasions in whichever career you choose to enter. You will have learnt to ‘project
manage’ a substantial piece of work and learn the techniques associated with writing and
assembling a large document and these skills will assist you when it comes to similar ventures
in the future.
8. Literature review
This is a particularly important part of the project as you are demonstrating to the readers of
your project that you are familiar with the major themes, issues and debates to be found in the
literature which informs your project.
A literature review aims to inform the reader the state of knowledge concerning a
particular topic area as represented by recognised scholars and researchers. The sources
that you consult for a literature review are principally:
a) Books around the subject area (the more recently published, the better)
b) The periodical literature i.e. articles in the academic journals
c) The Internet may itself help you with both (a) and (b) above as well as providing you with
other sources of information. However, be warned that there is quality control on the net
i.e. almost anybody can publish anything they like. Academic books and articles will
have been through a process known as peer- review in which other academics will have
commented on the quality of the published material before it sees the light of day but
similar quality control mechanisms do not apply on the web (unless, of course, you are
accessing the normal academic literature through the web rather than just browsing web
pages in general)
You should use the resources of the Library to help you to ascertain:
a) how to find abstracts or indexes to a particular source of literature. On-line sources and
CD-ROMs are likely to help you to locate the relevant literature here – but you may then
have the problem of actually retrieving it.
b) The resources of the Internet. However, do be careful of your use of the Net – the
information you download may be ephemeral1, not particularly academic or not ‘quality
checked’ before it is posted.
1
Not only may the content be here today and gone tomorrow, but so may the web-site! If you rely on a source
from the Internet, you may need to make a copy so you can refer to it when the original has disappeared.
Top Tip Photocopy relevant articles and then day-glo the relevant phrases etc.
Top Tip Set yourself arbitrary time-limits for each source that you are
commenting upon e.g. ½ hour for each source so that you do not get too
bogged down.
Top Tip Ensure that you have good biographical details of your sources. A card
index might be useful here – and easy to keep sorted in alphabetical
order.
Top Tip Keep two backups of your project files (on two separate floppies).
Backup after every chapter or section. Keep one backup near your
computer and another in a safe place (your bedroom?). It is most
unwise to keep a backup of your work on a
“friend’s computer”
Progressive focusing
Do not expect your progress to be unilinear – the initial stages may take a certain amount of
time and you may not feel that you are making much progress on the project until you reach
the stage at which your ideas have been clarified and your literature sources are accessible.
Always have your initial plan in mind and be prepared to refine it in the light of subsequent
searches/researches.
Remember that as you read more, your ideas will become progressively refined – and as your
ideas become more refined, this then guides in what direction to read. This whole process is
known as progressive focusing or progressive refinement.
Techniques to aid progressive focusing
1. Are there natural breaks in the data? For example:
NHS before/after the market reforms
The city before/after deregulation (‘Big Bang’)
pre-1979, post 1979 (election of Thatcher government)
2. Are there key reports, White Papers in the area?
3. Is there a key piece of legislation in the area?
4. Is there a single influential book which is the natural starting point?
In a progressive focusing technique, you may wish to adopt a scheme such as the following:
What is the background to the issue (i.e. how did it become an issue or become part of
the agenda of business, politics?
Are there key reports, events?
What is the major point of the legislative framework (if relevant)?
How have plans been implemented?
Is it possible to evaluate the success/failure of a policy?
School of Social Sciences page 10 of 50 Mike Hart
11. Interim Report – the mid-year review
You will be asked to present an interim report on your project in the middle of your project.
In the interim report, you should be able to delineate and defend the major themes of your
project, indicate the shape of your project as a whole and be explicit about the progress made
to date. A typical report will contain:
a) Outline worked in some detail
b) Evidence of a completed literature review
c) Substantial progress in designing methodology for the data collection phase
The mid-year review is compulsory and will be graded by your tutor. This grade will
make up 10% of your final project mark (i.e. 2% of your degree classification).
12. Methodology
In your project, you should include a justification of how you decided to investigate the
Project in the way in which you did. You may think of your methodology in both general
terms and specific terms:
a) General: (your lines of approach e.g. why you chose to investigate the project in the way
in which you did. Was it completely desk-based or did you choose to undertake case
studies, more particular investigations?)
b) Specific: If you have undertaken some field work (questionnaires, interviews, case-
studies) you should include several paragraphs that justify your choice of methods. These
should demonstrate methodological awareness gained from other parts of your course e.g.
how and where you sampled, the theoretical reasoning that lay behind your choice of
method and so on. This is part of the Project in which the methodological principles you
have been taught in the course can be demonstrated.
Hypothesis Testing
Categorical (nominal): Chi-square
Proportions, Interval/Ratio, Scaled T-tests (2 samples)
ANOVA (more than 2 samples
Ordinal Non-Parametric
Your questionnaire analysis should contain:
a statistical description of every question (normally frequency distributions)
Selected hypotheses
Details of sampling
Details of covering letter
Details of response rate (+ efforts to maximise)
Examples of questionnaire itself
(Perhaps DATA and LABELS files)
It is important that you show a degree of methodological expertise i.e. be aware of the
strengths, limitations of this method of gathering data.
Remember that your questionnaire will often be in the form of a PILOT for what you would
do if you had the time and resources for a more detailed enquiry (most appropriate to a post-
graduate enquiry)
Important: If you intend to collect some data by questionnaire, then it is essential that you
1. Have a tutor perform (and record) Ethics Scrutiny before you distribute the questionnaire
2. Obtain the necessary permissions beforehand
3. Think how the results are going to be analysed and incorporated into the report
2. Interviews
Practicalities of recording the data:
Note-taking (your own notes, complete with good quotations)
Audio recording
Ethics requires you to have the permission of interviewee; ideally this should be included
in the recording
The tape/disc/audio-file has to be transcribed to turn it into hard copy – this is best done
within hours of the interview.
How is data to be analysed?
By thematic analysis
By choice of selected quotes (e.g. ‘A representative view was…’ ‘A minority view was…’)
Make connections with the rest of the literature and the rest of the project
Give details of sampling, location etc.
Sample selection, response may have to be justified in similar terms to a quantitative survey
Ethics Considerations
College and Group policies mean that your project must be scrutinized to ensure that you
meet the criteria given in the Ethics Framework at
http://www.winchester.ac.uk/bm/Document/EthicsGuidelines.doc
Preserve anonymity: i.e. not Mr. Jones but Mr. D_____, a Customer Services manager etc.
Get all necessary permissions: This may not be as easy as it sounds
Promise to show material: Typically, showing the relevant chapter will suffice…
3. Approaching Organisations
Only do so after other efforts on your part
Be aware that busy professionals may not necessarily have time for you and/or be
inundated with requests
Materials often have to be paid for (+P&P)
Offers to visit an organisation may be useful
Ask to speak to Information Department, External Relations Department etc.
Use of Graphics
Remember that ‘a picture is worth a thousand words’ but:
Use a spreadsheet to perform the graphics for you
be careful to ensure that it does illuminate and not obscure
label it carefully and cross-reference to the text
Analysis of open-ended questions
These are best analysed as if they had been Multiple Frequencies (tick all that apply) type of
questions.
Read through all of the responses and discern that four themes seem to emerge from the
analysis. For example, Socialising, clubs, sport, music, other. You can then come up with a
multiple frequency question that would capture the information for analysis. Thus if the
original question were
“I spend my spare time in the following way...” and elicited responses such as:
“Socialising, going to clubs, playing badminton” you might derive the themes
Socialising, clubs, sport, music, other
You can then represent the presence of a tick with a 1 and absence with a zero in the column
for each multi-frequency question, making it easy to analyse by computer.
Documents
1. Documents are evidently a source of data – that is why we use them in projects and
research reports.
2. However, documents are themselves data and we need to ask several questions of them:
Who wrote the document? (e.g. Govt. department, pressure group, research body)
What was the purpose of the document? (to campaign? inform?)
Who were the intended readers of the document? (general public, ‘already converted’)
How much reliance can we place upon the data?
3. We need to utilise skills traditionally associated with the historian to ascertain the context
of the document. The same is true also of books i.e. they may reflect the concerns of the
Spelling
1. Spelling checkers are only helpful up to a point:
for example, ‘I do not know weather the whether will be fine’ is not flagged up as an error
in Word XP or earlier
2. Use a good, up-to-date dictionary every day:
Good – Collins, Oxford (preferably 100,000+ words)
Up-to-date so that it contains new concepts, new usages e.g. additionality,
awesome, balti, cache memory, ethnic cleansing, grunge, luvvie, multimedia,
politically correct, techno, wild card
Every day – most professionals do!
3. Use a thesaurus to check for word alternatives
4. Be aware of the fact that some words differ between ‘American’ and ‘British’ English,
and there are variations between Oxford and Collins spelling, too:
Collins Oxford American (Websters)
fulfil fulfil fulfill
colour colour color
organisation organization organization
litre litre liter
There’s nothing wrong with using US English throughout your FYP (this may be a wise
choice for overseas students who learnt American English). The key thing is to be
Stylistic Conventions
1. Where possible, avoid the use of the first person, but do not be frightened of expressing
your own opinions and considered views:
‘It could be argued that….’
(more strongly) ‘The present author would argue that..’
2. Spell out abbreviations the first time that they are used.
(You may need to provide a glossary as well)
3. Remember that a paragraph is a unit of thought, not of length. Thus one paragraph = one
idea
Document Layout
Examples here assume you’re using Microsoft Word for processing your document.
File menu: Page Setup: Margins tab
Set ‘Multiple Pages’ to ‘Mirror Margins’ and then…
Set margins to 2.5cm bottom and outside, 3cm inside, 2cm top
Format menu: Styles and Formatting
Change ‘Normal’ style to have:
Use a formal Font e.g. Times Roman, point size 12 (as used in this document)
In the Paragraph menu, set Normal style to have:
8pt before (so you have white space between paragraphs)
Line Spacing of 18pt (before you do your final print-out – you may want to conserve
paper by sticking to single-spacing until then)
Justification: decide whether you want your document to be fully-justified (with each line
stretch out to reach the right margin) or left-justified (with a ragged right). If you decide
to go for full justification, you’ll need to make sure that headings and styles for use in
Methods of Working
There are 2 basic methods of working:
1. First establishing basic layout and styles in one’s preferred word-processor and then
producing the document with a file for each chapter.
This makes processing faster, and means that a disaster will only affect one chapter, but it
leaves you with a consolidation job at the end, when you copy all the chapter files into the
main document.
It also has the disadvantage that your table of contents does not cover the whole report as
it develops.
2. Establishing the overall structure of the document, using something like skeleton.doc from
the FYP website, then building it up as you proceed.
This has the great advantage that you can always see how the report is structured, and can
insert ‘place-holder’ text as you go, to remind you of work that still has to be done. By
setting up section headings, you can use your table of contents to guide you forward.
The main disadvantage is that you could lose the who file in a system crash, so make sure
you always have a recent back-up. Speed of processing is unlikely to be a problem with a
report of 10,000 words, unless you have a very old and slow computer.
Make frequent back-ups
As your dissertation gets more and more complete, it becomes more and more precious. It is
much more valuable than the medium it is stored upon! Take several backups (e.g. on three
separate disks!)
List of References
Books
Pollitt,C. (1993a) Managerialism and the Public Services (2nd edition),Oxford, Blackwell.
Popay,J. and Williams,G. (eds) (1994) Researching the People’s Health, London,
Routledge.
Lodge,M. (1981) Magnitude Scaling, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative
Applications in the Social Sciences, No.25, Newbury Park, Ca, Sage.
Articles/Chapters in Books
Hart,M.C.(1995c) ‘An “ecological” critique of Total Quality Management – a case study
from NHS Outpatient Clinics’ in Kanji,G.(ed),Total Quality Management, London,
Chapman and Hall.
School of Social Sciences page 24 of 50 Mike Hart
Reports
DHSS(1983) Enquiry into NHS Management (The Griffiths Report), London, HMSO.
Department of Health(1995), The Patient’s Charter & You, London, HMSO.
Department of Health(1992a) Health of the Nation (Cmnd.1986), London, HMSO.
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts(1991),NHS Outpatient Services
[HC270-i], 27 February, London, HMSO.
Bicanic,J. (1993), Waiting Times Study (unpublished report), Swansea, Singleton
Hospital.
Periodicals
Roberts,S. (1990), ‘Why are we waiting?’, Nursing, 4(10):29-31.
Stevens,L. (1995), ‘What the Patients said’, Health Services Journal,19 January:29.
Newspapers
Moore,W. (1995), ‘Lessons from the bedside’, The Guardian (newspaper),
Society section, 6 December 1995, p.6.
Conference papers
Pollitt,C. (1992) ‘The struggle for quality: the case of the NHS’, Paper read to UK
Political Studies Association, Queens University, Belfast.
Berman.E.M. (1995) ‘Ethics and Cynicism in Modern Public Administration’, paper read
to European Group of Public Administration Annual Conference, Erasmus University,
Rotterdam, 6-9 September.
Quotations
A phrase
Deming argues that one potential source of bias in all survey work is ‘bias of the auspices’
(Deming,1944).
An extended quotation
In Deming’s own words:
Bias of the auspices likely stems from a conscious or unconscious desire on
the part of the respondent to take sides for or against the organisation
sponsoring the survey, but perhaps ore to protect his own interests which
may vary with the sponsoring agency.
(Deming(1944) in Denzin(1978) p.239).
Studies quoted within studies
.. by way of comparison, a large American sample (n=37,000) had a mean of
45 minutes in 1977-78 (quoted in Rosander,1985, p.77).
Using others to support your own argument
The point that measurement by itself cannot improve quality is also made by Gaster (1995,
p.108).
Cross-referencing
4. Ensure that every reference in the text is included in the alphabetical References (or
Bibliography) at the end. Conversely, every reference in the References should have
been referred to in the text. Some authorities would make a distinction between a List of
References and a Bibliography (i.e. sources which you have read but to which there is
no specific reference). However, this is potentially confusing so the following advice is
given:
1. Aim for a style in which there is a 1:1 corresponding between the references in the text
and the List of References at the end of the work. Every reference in the text can be
found in the List of References and all entries in the List of References can be found at
some point in the text. This follows the convention of the normal academic paper.
2. Page numbers are not necessary when you are quoting an article (as they always be
included in the references).
3. Note that authors are referred to only by their last name in the text but by last name,
Initials in the references.
Appendices
Appendices follow the List of References..
Typically, they include:
Research instruments (such as copies of a blank questionnaire, a summary of the
statistical data set, extracts from interviews, diaries)
Longer statistical tables that would inhibit the ‘flow’ of the text. It is legitimate to
include a condensed or edited version of a table in the text but to include the full
version of the table in the appendix.
Anything that usefully adds depth to the discussion
Appendices need to be numbered (Appendix I, Appendix II) etc. and you may wish to
name them as well e.g.
(Appendix I – Copy of Questionnaire)
Do not let them dominate the presentation – remember that their function is to provide
background, illustrative material.
Appendices should be brief i.e. only a few pages. Typically, an appendix would contain a
blank copy of your questionnaire (and the tabulated results if you could fit these on 1-2
pages) or 1-2 pages of your transcribed interviews as a sample only.)
Timing
It is always evident whether a document has been carefully proof-read or has been ‘dashed
off’ at the last moment.
You should be at the proof-reading stage at least a week before the final submission date –
one day before is insufficient
Hand-in date
Generally, it is the Monday of Week 9 (or the day following it if it is a Bank Holiday). Keep
in mind 1st May as the general date by which a project needs to be submitted but it may
generally be a day or so before or after that date. BAMBA students taking the fast-track
option have a later date, usually the second Thursday in July of their year in the College.
Dates for the 2004-05 academic year
Business Management Students:
Interim report (10%) due 1st February 2005
The final report (90%) is due Tuesday 3rd May 2005
BAMBA Students:
Interim report (10%) due 26 April 2005
The final report (90%) is due Tuesday 12 July 2005
Formalities
You are required to hand in two bound copies of the dissertation, and you’ll almost certainly
want a third copy for yourself.
Binding does not need to be professional but spiral-binding is used by many students.
Binding can be performed for you by Reprographics at a reasonable cost.
Title Page
Ensure you supply all the required information (see sample Title Page below)
Take pains that you get all of these details correct – think of the impression that it will make.
Choose a formal font e.g. Times New Roman (Font Size 14,18)
University College Winchester
Dissertation title
Cover
The cover should correspond to your title page (especially the title!). In addition, it should
include the copy number in the top right-hand corner, and the word-count.
Word Count
Normally 9,0000-11,000 words (excluding bibliography and appendices)
Use the word counter in your word-processor (if it doesn’t have one, count a few typical
pages and ‘multiply up’)
Over or under-length projects will be penalised.
Abstract
You are not required to produce an abstract. If you do, it should be of the order of 200 words
(maximum).
Acknowledgements/Dedication
This is conventional but…..
Do not be tempted to make them too ornate or ‘flowery’
It is conventional to acknowledge those who have been particularly supportive in terms of
advice, access to source materials etc. but not persons who may have typed up the
document (if not yourself)
Order of contents
Cover Sheet
Title Page
Acknowledgements / Dedication (own page)
Abstract
Table of Contents
Body of Project
List of References
Appendices
Marking of Projects
There are 2 internal markers (of whom one is your tutor)
The two markers will submit an agreed mark. In the event of disagreement, other markers
may be deployed. If academic differences cannot be reconciled, then the project will be seen
by the External Examiner whose decision may be regarded as final.
Useful books
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2000), Research Methods for Business Students,
Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd. (Highly recommended)
Hussey,J. and Hussey, R. (1997), Business Research – a practical guide for undergraduate
and postgraduate students, Basingstoke, Macmillan
Luck, M. (1999), Your Student Research Project, Aldershot, Gower Publishing
Sharp, J.A. and Howard, K. (1996), The management of a student research project (2nd
edition), Aldershot, Gower Publishing
Bell, J. (1993), Doing your Research project (2nd edition), Buckingham, Open University
Press
Edwards, A. and Talbot, R. (1994), The hard-pressed researcher, Harlow, Longman
Denscombe, M. (1998), The good research guide for small-scale research projects,
Buckingham, Open University Press
Swetnam, D. (2000),Writing your Dissertation (3rd ed.),Oxford, How To Books
Hart, M.C. (1993), Survey Design and Analysis using TURBOSTATS, London, Chapman and
Hall (out of print but see author)
Name
Degree Academic
Year
Working Title
Revised Title
Supervisor e-mail:
Tutor copy and Student copy to be completed and initialled at each meeting...
............ ............
..../..../....
............ ............
..../..../....
............ ............
..../..../...
............ ............
..../..../....
............ ............
..../..../....
fyp-form.doc
Exposition/understanding
of underpinning theory.
Depth and sophistication of
analysis.
Comment
Final Notes
A literature review is a piece of discursive prose, not a list describing or summarizing one
piece of literature after another. It's usually a bad sign to see every paragraph beginning with
the name of a researcher. Instead, organize the literature review into sections that present
themes or identify trends, including relevant theory. You are not trying to list all the material
published, but to synthesize and evaluate it according to the guiding concept of your thesis or
research question.
If you are writing an annotated bibliography, you may need to summarize each item briefly,
but should still follow through themes and concepts and do some critical assessment of
material. Use an overall introduction and conclusion to state the scope of your coverage and
to formulate the question, problem, or concept your chosen material illuminates. Usually you
will have the option of grouping items into sections--this helps you indicate comparisons and
relationships. You may be able to write a paragraph or so to introduce the focus of each
section.
Written by Dena Taylor, Director, Health Sciences.
Copyright 2000. All rights reserved. Writing Centre, and Margaret Procter,
Coordinator, Writing Support, University of Toronto.
Acknowledgements:
The following documents have been used in the compilation of this guide and further
information can be obtained from them.
Bournemouth University. Academic Services Group. Library and InformationServices. (1996)
A Guide to Citing Internet Sources [online].Bournemouth, Bournemouth University.
Available from: http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/service-
depts/newlis/LIS_Gen/citation/harvardsystint.html [Accessed 7th July 1998].