Hypovolemic Shock Guidelines PDF
Hypovolemic Shock Guidelines PDF
Hypovolemic Shock Guidelines PDF
HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK
This document has been reviewed by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and approved by
Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
PRINCIPAL AUTHOR
Marie-Jocelyne Martel, MD, FRCPC, Saskatoon SK
These guidelines reflect emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and are subject to change.The information should not be construed as
dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Local institutions can dictate amendments to these opinions.They should be well doc-
umented if modified at the local level. None of the contents may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission of SOGC.
TABLE 1
QUALITY OF EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT2 CLASSIFICATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The quality of evidence reported in these guidelines has been Recommendations included in these guidelines have been
described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in adapted from the ranking method described in the Classification
the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic of Recommendations found in the Report of the Canadian Task
Health Exam. Force on the Periodic Health Exam.
I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly random- A. There is good evidence to support the recommendation
ized controlled trial. that the condition be specifically considered in a periodic
II-1: Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without health examination.
randomization. B. There is fair evidence to support the recommendation
II-2: Evidence from well-designed cohort (prospective or that the condition be specifically considered in a periodic
retrospective) or case-control studies, preferably from health examination.
more than one centre or research group.
C. There is poor evidence regarding the inclusion or exclu-
II-3: Evidence obtained from comparisons between times or
sion of the condition in a periodic health examination,
places with or without the intervention. Dramatic
but recommendations may be made on other grounds.
results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results
D. There is fair evidence to support the recommendation
of treatment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be
that the condition not be considered in a periodic health
included in this category.
III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical examination.
experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert E. There is good evidence to support the recommendation
committees. that the condition be excluded from consideration in a
1 periodic health examination.
RECOMMENDATION atic approach to vascular areas, will be useful in the prompt con-
2. Clinicians should be familiar with the stages of hemor- trol of hemorrhage. As soon as the first signs of excessive blood
rhagic shock. (III-B) loss and shock are evident, assistance from other members of the
health care team, which may include an anesthetist, a second
RISK FACTORS gynaecologist, a general surgeon, a vascular surgeon, a critical
care specialist, a hematologist, and experienced nursing staff,
Evaluation of all patients presenting for obstetrical care or should be considered when appropriate and if available. Labo-
surgery should include a complete medical history. A personal ratory and blood bank services should be informed and available
or family history of coagulopathy, or personal use of anticoag- for support. Since cell death due to hypoxic injury is the final
ulants, should be documented. A complete physical examina- common pathway in shock, all efforts should be directed at
tion may reveal extensive bruising or petechiae. Investigations restoring tissue oxygenation as soon as possible. A useful
to assess coagulation status should be obtained in these situa- mnemonic to achieve this goal is ORDER: Oxygenate, Restore
tions and consultation from other disciplines considered. circulating volume, Drug therapy, Evaluate response to therapy,
All proposed procedures should be reviewed with the Remedy underlying cause.1,14 Outcome is dependent on early
patient. The risk of complications including hemorrhage recognition and on immediate aggressive therapy, which relies
should be outlined and the discussion documented in the on two basic principles: replace losses and arrest bleeding.
chart.17 Certain clinical conditions and their surgical manage-
ment are associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage, such OXYGENATION
as ectopic pregnancy, myomectomy, abruptio placenta, pla- The initial step in any patient resuscitation is to secure an airway
centa previa, and malignant disease.17 In some situations, it and provide adequate oxygenation.16 In most surgical situations,
may be appropriate to counsel women about autologous blood an airway will already be in place, managed by the anesthetist. If
transfusion or hemodilution techniques.17,18 Jehovah’s Wit- regional anesthesia has been used, supplemental oxygen should
nesses may require special consideration.19 be applied.4 Consideration should be given to endotracheal intu-
bation, if the patient is becoming disoriented or is tiring, and in
RECOMMENDATION an obtunded patient should be instituted immediately.1 After
3. Clinicians should assess each woman’s risk for hemor- extensive fluid resuscitation, edema of the trachea may make intu-
rhagic shock and prepare for the procedure accordingly. bation difficult. Positive ventilatory pressures may be required in
(III-B) those patients with decreased pulmonary compliance.
MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION
4. Resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock should include
Early resuscitation includes control of bleeding and restoration adequate oxygenation. (II-3A)
of circulating blood volume for oxygenation of tissues.16 Tech-
niques to minimize blood loss should be applied whenever pos- RESTORE CIRCULATING VOLUME
sible. Exposure of the bleeding site, experienced assistance, and Intravascular replacement of blood volume lost may be accom-
sound knowledge of pelvic anatomy, as well as a calm, system- plished using crystalloid, colloid, or blood products. Initial
fusion may be difficult to estimate. These patients are at risk ment of hypovolemia suggests that its use may increase the risk
for pulmonary edema and lung injury, if excessive fluid replace- of death.29 Crystalloids and colloids may be used together.22
ment is given.6,7 In monitoring patients with multiple organ
failure, central venous pressure measurements may also be use- RECOMMENDATION
ful in resuscitation and monitoring.16 Normal central venous 6. Isotonic crystalloid or colloid solutions can be used for
pressure is 5 mmHg (range 0–8 mmHg).14 Elevated pressures volume replacement in hemorrhagic shock (I-B). There
are seen in fluid overload, right ventricular failure, pulmonary is no place for hypotonic dextrose solutions in the man-
embolus, cardiac tamponade, and severe tricuspid regurgita- agement of hemorrhagic shock (I-E).
tion. Low values are seen with shock from hypovolemia, sep-
sis, and anaphylaxis.14 TRANSFUSION
Many blood products are available to restore circulating vol-
RECOMMENDATION ume, and replace coagulation factors and oxygen-carrying
5. Resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock should include capacity (Table 4). Component therapy allows specific replace-
restoration of circulating volume by placement of two ment to address specific needs. Hypovolemia is best corrected
large-bore IVs, and rapid infusion of a balanced crystal- with crystalloid solution. In hemorrhagic shock, packed red
loid solution. (I-A) blood cells (PRBC) are most commonly used to restore intravas-
cular volume and oxygen-carrying capacity. The oxygen-
CRYSTALLOID SOLUTIONS carrying capacity of most healthy individuals will not be com-
Crystalloid solutions are electrolyte solutions administered intra- promised until the hemoglobin concentration falls below
venously. Advantages of crystalloid solutions include availabil- 60–70 g/L.1,7,20,30,31 There is no recommended “threshold
ity, safety, and low cost.5,6 The main disadvantage of using hemoglobin.”7,30 Blood losses greater than 20–25% or cases of
crystalloid solutions is their rapid movement from the intravas- documented or suspected coagulopathy may require replace-
cular to the extravascular space, leading to three or more times ment of coagulation factors; coagulation studies are recom-
requirement for replacement,1,4,20,21 and resulting in tissue mended after transfusion of 5 to 10 units of PRBCs.14
edema.22 Ringer’s lactate is preferred over normal saline to avoid Platelet transfusions are indicated in situations of signifi-
hyperchloremic acidosis associated with prolonged use of sodi- cant thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 20,000 to
um solutions.1,23,24 Hypertonic salt solutions are not generally 50,000 per mm3) and continued hemorrhage.31 Coagulation
recommended because of the risk of electrolyte distur- factor concentrates are available for identified deficiencies, and
bances.1,6,20,25 There is no role for hypotonic dextrose solutions fresh frozen plasma can be administered in acute situations
in the management of hypovolemic shock.21 where the partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time
TABLE 4
INDICATIONS FOR BLOOD COMPONENT THERAPY14,20,30-35
Component Indication Usual starting dose
TABLE 5
PHARMACOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM1,7
Agent Usual dose range Effect
Inotropic agents
Dopamine 1–3 µg/kg/min Increased renal output
Vasodilation
2–10 µg/kg/min Increased heart rate
Increased cardiac output
>10 µg/kg/min Peripheral vasoconstriction
Increased heart rate and contractility
Dobutamine 2 –10 µg/kg/min Increased heart rate and contractility
Decreased afterload
Vasopressor agents
Phenylephrine 1–5 µg/kg/min Peripheral vasoconstriction
Norepinephrine 1– 4 µg/min Peripheral vasoconstriction
Epinephrine 1– 8 µg/min Peripheral vasoconstriction