0% found this document useful (0 votes)
304 views30 pages

L8 Unit Commitment Lagrange Relaxation

This document discusses unit commitment and Lagrange relaxation solution methods. It provides an overview of dynamic programming and Lagrange relaxation for solving the unit commitment problem. It then focuses on the Lagrange relaxation method, outlining the steps of solving the dual problem through iterative updates of the Lagrange multipliers to minimize the duality gap. An example is provided to demonstrate applying Lagrange relaxation to find the optimal unit commitment schedule.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
304 views30 pages

L8 Unit Commitment Lagrange Relaxation

This document discusses unit commitment and Lagrange relaxation solution methods. It provides an overview of dynamic programming and Lagrange relaxation for solving the unit commitment problem. It then focuses on the Lagrange relaxation method, outlining the steps of solving the dual problem through iterative updates of the Lagrange multipliers to minimize the duality gap. An example is provided to demonstrate applying Lagrange relaxation to find the optimal unit commitment schedule.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

(EEE-800) Power System Operation, Control and Optimization

EEE-800

Lecture 8: Unit Commitment/Lagrange Relaxation


10:26 AM 1
Outline
• Unit Commitment Solution Methods
• Dynamic Programming
• Lagrange Relaxation

10:26 AM 2
10:26 AM 3
10:26 AM 4
10:26 AM 5
Note:
𝑑𝑞 λ
𝛼 = 0.5 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑑λ
+ve
𝑑𝑞 λ
𝛼= 0.1 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑑λ -ve

using 𝜆 = 2 from previous example ⇒ dual function; 𝑥1 = 4 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 1 ⇒ J∗ = f x1 , x2 = 5


1st iteration: 2nd iteration:

λ0 =0 𝑑𝑞 λ 5 0
= − (𝜆 ) + 5
5 𝑑λ 2
𝑞 ∗ = 𝑞 λ0 = − (𝜆0 )2 + 5λ0 =0
4
𝑑𝑞 λ
from dual function; 𝑥1 = 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 0 λ1 = λ0 + 𝛼 = 2.5
𝑑λ

10:26 AM 6
using; λ1 = 2.5; dual function gives; 𝑥1 = 5 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 1.25

5
𝑞 ∗ = 𝑞 λ1 = − 4 (𝜆1 )2 + 5λ1 = 4.6875

𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑔𝑎𝑝 = (J ∗ − 𝑞 ∗ )/q∗ =0.0666

Similarly, repeat this process for next iterations…

10:26 AM 7
9:56 AM 8
10:26 AM 9
10:26 AM 10
Step 2

Is fixed in Step 1

10:26 AM 11
10:26 AM 12
Ignore the start up cost
-
- -

10:26 AM 13
Step 1

10:26 AM 14
10:26 AM 15
10:26 AM 16
10:26 AM 17
Example 4E; Solution
𝐹1 𝑃1 = 500 + 10𝑃1 + 0.002𝑃12 ; 100 ≤ 𝑃1 ≤ 600
𝐹2 𝑃2 = 300 + 8𝑃1 + 0.0025𝑃12 ; 100 ≤ 𝑃2 ≤ 400
𝐹2 𝑃3 = 100 + 6𝑃1 + 0.005𝑃12 ; 50 ≤ 𝑃3 ≤ 200

𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 ⇒ 𝐽∗ = 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝐸𝐷 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑠.
Note: If not enough generation is committed for any hour then take 𝐽∗ = 10000 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟
4
ഥ1 + 𝑈2 + 𝑈3 ))
𝐽∗ = ෍( 500 + 10𝑝1 + 0.002𝑝12 𝑈1 + 300 + 8𝑝2 + 0.0025𝑝22 𝑈2 + 100 + 6𝑝3 + 0.005𝑝32 𝑈3 + 10000 ∗ (𝑈
𝑡=1

1st Iteration

𝜆𝑡 = [0 0 0 0]

𝑈𝑖 𝑡 = 1 min[𝐹𝑖 𝑃𝑖 − 𝜆𝑡 𝑃𝑖𝑡 ]
𝑈𝑖 𝑡 = 0 0

10:26 AM 18
2nd Iteration [Step 1]
𝑇 𝑁
𝑑 𝑑 𝑑
𝑞 𝜆 = L P, U, λ = 𝑡
෍ 𝜆𝑡 (𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 − ෍ 𝑃𝑖𝑡 𝑈𝑖𝑡 )
𝑑𝜆 𝑑𝜆 𝑑𝜆
𝑡=1 𝑖=1

1 2 3 4
𝑡
=σ𝑇𝑡=1 𝜆𝑡 (𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 − σ𝑁 𝑃 𝑡 𝑡
𝑈
𝑖=1 𝑖 𝑖 ) = [P , P , P , P
load load load load ]

= [170,520,1100,330]

⇒ ⇒ [1.7, 5.2, 11, 3.3]

10:26 AM 19
For; 𝜆 = 5.2 5.2 − 10
2nd
2ndIteration [Step 2]
Iteration 𝑃1 = = −𝑣𝑒 ⇒ 𝑃1𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 100
0.004
5.2 − 8
𝜆𝑡 = [1.7, 5.2, 11, 3.3] 𝑃2 = = −𝑣𝑒 ⇒ 𝑃2𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 100
0.005
𝑑 5.2 − 6
F P = 10 + 0.004P1 = λ 𝑃3 = = −𝑣𝑒 ⇒ 𝑃3𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 50
𝑑𝑃1 1 1 0.01
𝑑
F P = 8 + 0.005P2 = λ
𝑑𝑃2 2 2 For; 𝜆 = 11
11 − 10 𝑜𝑝𝑡
𝑑 𝑃1 = ⇒ 𝑃1 = 250
0.004
F P = 6 + 0.01P3 = λ
𝑑𝑃3 3 3 11 − 8
𝑃2 = = 600 > 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 ⇒ 𝑃2𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 400
0.005
11 − 6
For; 𝜆 = 1.7 𝑃3 = = 500 > 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 ⇒ 𝑃3𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 200
0.01
1.7 − 10
𝑃1 = = −2075 ⇒ 𝑃1𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 100
0.004
For; 𝜆 = 3.3 3.3 − 10
1.7 − 8 𝑃1 = = −𝑣𝑒 ⇒ 𝑃1𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 100
𝑃2 = = −1260 ⇒ 𝑃2𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 100 0.004
0.005
3.3 − 8
1.7 − 6 𝑃2 = = −𝑣𝑒 ⇒ 𝑃2𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 100
𝑃3 = = −430 ⇒ 𝑃3𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 50 0.005
0.01
3.3 − 6
𝑃3 = = −𝑣𝑒 ⇒ 𝑃3𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 50
0.01
10:26 AM 20
𝜆 = 1.7 5.2 11 3.3 𝐹1 𝑃1 − 𝜆1 𝑃1 = 500 + 10𝑃1 + 0.002𝑃12 − 𝜆1 𝑃1
For 𝑃1 = 100 at 𝜆1 =1.7 => 𝐹1 𝑃1 − 𝜆1 𝑃1 =1350
[𝐹1 𝑃1 − 𝜆𝑃1 ] = 1350 1000 375 1190
𝑃1𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃1𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃1
𝑜𝑝𝑡 𝑃1𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑈1 = 1 𝜆 = 1.7 5.2 11 3.3
Unit1 𝐹3 𝑃3 − 𝜆𝑃3 = 327.5 152.5 − 700 247.5
𝑃3𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃3𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃3𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑃3𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑈1 = 0
𝑈3 = 1
𝑡=1 𝑡=2 𝑡=3 𝑡=4 Unit3

𝜆 = 1.7 5.2 11 3.3 𝑈3 = 0


𝐹2 𝑃2 − 𝜆𝑃2 = 955 605 − 500 795
𝑡=1 𝑡=2 𝑡=3 𝑡=4
𝑃2𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃2𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑃2𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑃2𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑈2 = 1
Unit2

𝑈2 = 0

𝑡=1 𝑡=2 𝑡=3 𝑡=4


10:26 AM 21
You can calculate in Matlab
𝑡
𝑞 𝜆 = 500 + 10𝑝1 + 0.002𝑝12 𝑈1 + 300 + 8𝑝2 + 0.0025𝑝22 𝑈2 + 100 + 6𝑝3 + 0.005𝑝32 𝑈3 + 𝑠𝑢𝑚(𝜆𝑡 (𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 − 𝑠𝑢𝑚(𝑃𝑖𝑡 𝑈𝑖𝑡 ))

3rd Iteration [Step 1]


𝑇 𝑁
𝑑 𝑑 𝑑
𝑞 𝜆 = L P, U, λ = 𝑡
෍ 𝜆𝑡 (𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 − ෍ 𝑃𝑖𝑡 𝑈𝑖𝑡 )
𝑑𝜆 𝑑𝜆 𝑑𝜆
𝑡=1 𝑖=1

𝑡
=σ𝑇𝑡=1 𝜆𝑡 (𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 − σ𝑁 𝑡 𝑡
𝑖=1 𝑖 𝑈𝑖 ) = [170,520,500,330]
𝑃

⇒ ⇒ [3.4, 10.4, 16, 6.6]

10:26 AM 22
3rd Iteration [Step 2]
Repeat the same steps

Economic Dispatch (ED)


Solve for 𝑃1 , 𝑃2 , 𝑃3 and λ , 𝑤𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑡
𝑑 𝑃1 =136.36
F P = 10 + 0.004P1 = λ1 𝑃2 =509.09 > limit
𝑑𝑃1 1 1
𝑑 𝑃3 =454.54 > limit
F P = 8 + 0.005P2 = λ2 λ=10.54
𝑑𝑃2 2 2
𝑑
F P = 6 + 0.01P3 = λ3 Set 𝑃2 , 𝑃3 at max limits, giving
𝑑𝑃3 3 3
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 =1100 𝑃1 =500
𝑃2 =400
Assume all units are operating within limits so λ1 =λ2 =λ3 =λ 𝑃3 =200
2:37 PM 23
10:26 AM 24
10:26 AM 25
Reading
• D. Bertsekas, G. Lauer, N. Sandell and T. Posbergh, "Optimal short-
term scheduling of large-scale power systems," in IEEE Transactions
on Automatic Control, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-11, Jan 1983

10:12 AM 26
10:26 AM 27
10:26 AM 28
10:26 AM 29
Assignment 2
• Due on 17/11/2017 (11:50 am)

10:26 AM 30

You might also like