Geotechnical Examples Using: Opensees
Geotechnical Examples Using: Opensees
OpenSees
Pedro Arduino
University of Washington, Seattle
¡ http://opensees.berkeley.edu/
¡ http://sokocalo.engr.ucdavis.edu/~jeremic
¡ http://cyclic.ucsd.edu/opensees/
¡ http://www.ce.washington.edu/~geotech/
opensees/PEER/davis_meeting/
¡ http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/
Examples
Pseudo-Static Pile Pushover Analysis
This example describes how to run a pushover
analysis of a pile in OpenSees.
The pile and spring nodes are tied together using the
equalDOF command.
Pseudo-Static Pile Pushover Analysis
results of pushover analysis for a fixed-head pile
1D Consolidation
Model
Finiteproblem:
element mesh:
The elements and constitutive models match those used in the site response analysis
examples.
The free-field soil response is applied to the model using free-field columns which are much
more massive than the adjacent soil.
Dynamic Analysis of 2D Slope
excess pore pressure ratio lateral displacement
shear stress-strain
excess pore pressure ratio
contours near slope
Dynamic Analysis of 2D Slope
displacement of full mesh during analysis showing propagation of shear
stress waves
Dynamic Analysis of 2D Slope
displacement near the slope with contours of excess pore pressure ratio
(red is ru = 1.0)
Excavation Analysis
This example presents a simulated excavation supported by a
sheet pile wall using OpenSees.
The plane strain formulation of the quad element is used for the
soil with the PressureDependMultiYield nDMaterial for constitutive
behavior.
• Five-span bridge
• Approach embankments
• Variable thickness of liquefiable soil
SPSI of a complete bridge system
Mackie &
Stojadinovic
(2003) C
L
Pile cap passive abutment
Bearing pad spring
earth pressure reaction spring
spring
clay
py spring py
(liquefiable)
(dry sand) liquefiabl
e soil
py (stiff clay)
Pressure Dependent
Nonlinear fiber Pressure Multi Yield material
beam column Independent Multi
Yield material
SPSI of a complete bridge system
Bridge Idealization
OpenSees model
SPSI of a complete bridge system
time time
time time
ru
Self-weight forces
Q
Force at piletoetoe
fc = σh(z) tan δ
3D Pile Analysis
Laterally Loaded Piles (solid-beam contact element)
¡ Perform numerical load test ¡ Compare results
3x Magnification
3D Pile Analysis
Lateral Spreading Effects
Lateral
The
Beam-solid
soilspreading
pile is modeled
contact
is elements
with
modeled
brick
beam-column
by
are
elements
applying
used to
elements
and
model
a free-field
a Drucker-Prager
the soil-pile
displacement
interface
profile to the
constitutive
boundary of model
the model
to capture pressure-dependent strength
3D Pile Analysis
Lateral Spreading Effects
The beam-solid contact elements enable the use of standard beam-column elements
for the pile
A rigid pile kinematic is used to evenly activate the soil response with depth and to obtain
p-y curves which are free from the influence of pile kinematics, reflecting only the
response of the soil.
Computational process
3D Pile Analysis
Lateral Spreading Effects
► Reduced integration
The integration of a typical 4-node quadrilateral element involves 4 integrations
points. If this could be reduced to only a single integration point, that’s 4 times
less work. In 3D, it would be 8 times less work.
10/1/14 47
Stabilized Single-Point Quad
Element
The single-point element is less computationally demanding than the
corresponding full integration element.
Execution time: Quad element = 330 sec SSPquad element = 146 sec
10/1/14 48
Modeling Tools and
Improvements
Liquefaction and lateral spreading involve saturated soil. When saturated, soil
behavior can be described as a two-phase medium.
Finite element formulations have been developed to consider this aspect of soil
behavior (Zienkiewicz and Shiomi 1984, Prevost)
The SSPquad element has been extended for use in the analysis of fluid saturated
porous media. This new element has also been implemented in OpenSees à
SSPquadUP
Near the incompressible-impermeable limit, this element does not satisfy the inf-
sup condition, and stability of the pressure field solution cannot be guaranteed. A
consistent stabilizing term is added to the system.
10/1/14 49
Recent Improvement
Stabilized u-p Quad Element
The SSPquadUP element is evaluated using several test problems. The results are
compared to a nine-node quad element with a u-p formulation.
10/1/14 50
Recent Improvements
Stabilized u-p Quad Element
The effectiveness of the pressure field stabilization near the incompressible limit can
be demonstrated by comparing the pore pressure distribution for stabilized and
unstabilized cases.
9 node quad
unstabilized element
SSPquadUP stabilized SSPquadUP
10/1/14 51
Recent Improvements
Stabilized u-p Quad Element
A site response analysis is conducted to gauge the robustness and efficiency
of the SSPquadUP element.
10/1/14 52
Other Applications: Piles in
Sloping Ground, Bridge bent
analysis
Application
Numerical Analysis of Mataquito River bridge
1D Modeling Approach
Prototype
1m 4m
3m 8m
6m 16 m
Application
3D Parametric Study
Application
3D Parametric Study
Application
3D Parametric Study
Representative Case History
Concepción
Source: FHWA-HRT-11-030
Source: FHWA-HRT-11-030
¡ Relative
movement of
columns with Unseated
Span
respect to their - ~ 11 cm
- In the
- ~ 16 cm
- In the
bases direction of direction of
lateral lateral
spreading spreading
to 11.96 cm
- Opposite to lateral
spreading direction
~0 cm
25.05 m
70.0 m
3-D Finite Element Model
Effects of foundation
cap on the shear
Mmax = 7100 kN.m diagram
Mmax = 4100 kN.m
Universidad Nacional de
Cordoba