12-05-2017
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE EVOLUTION OF EARTHQUAKE
RESISTANT DESIGN
IS 1893 PHILOSOPHY OF
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN
V
? Lack of Knowledge
on Earthquake
Yogendra Singh, Professor & Head Demand and Building
Capacity
Department of Earthquake Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Vdes Linear Elastic
Building Response
5/12/2017
STAGE - 2
4
EVOLUTION OF EARTHQUAKE
WHAT IS EARTHQUAKE ? RESISTANT DESIGN
V Elastic Forces
Reduced for
Design by R
Inelastic
Vdes
Response
yield max
5/12/2017 5/12/2017 STAGE - 3
2 5
EVOLUTION OF EARTHQUAKE EVOLUTION OF EARTHQUAKE
RESISTANT DESIGN RESISTANT DESIGN
Demand Reduced
S Based on Inelastic
Capacityof building
Performance Point
des
Sd
STAGE - 1
5/12/2017 5/12/2017 STAGE - 4
3 6
12-05-2017
SEISMIC HAZARD WHICH
EARTHQUAKE TO DESIGN FOR ? RESPONSE SPECTRUM
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
7 10
EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS RESPONSE SPECTRUM
Magnitude: Indicator of total energy
released during the rupture
most popular scale is Richter Scale
Intensity: Indicator of the severity of
ground shaking at a site
most popular scales are MMI & MSK
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
11
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA
GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS
DAMAGE POTENTIAL DEPENDS ON:
Amplitude of ground motion
PGA, PGV, PGD
Frequency content
Duration of earthquake
These parameters depend on magnitude, source
characteristics, path characteristics and local site
conditions
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
12-05-2017
UNIFORM HAZARD SPECTRUM SEISMIC ZONATION
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE
PSHA contour maps for India (NDMA 2011)
Contour maps based on PSHA for
various return periods TR and spectral
acceleration values (PGA, Sa)
DESIGN BASIS EARTHQUAKE (DBE):
10% Probability of exceedance in 50 years.
Average return period of 475 years.
TR PGA Sa (0.5s) Sa (1.25s)
475 a
MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE (MCE):
2,475 a
2% Probability of exceedance in 50 years. 4,975 a
Average return period of 2,500 years. 9,950 a
Considered as the theoretical limit.
TR * PGA Sa (0.2s) Sa (1.0s)
ZMCE = 2 X ZDBE
2,475 a
* as provided in IBC (2% in 50 years)
5/12/2017
SEISMIC MICROZONATION
SEISMIC ZONATION DELHI
MICROZONATION
REPORT
Seismic Microzonation
For a city or small region, taking into account the
local variation in ground shaking level, due to
variation in topography and geotechnical
conditions
Seismic Macrozonation
Based on average value of ground shaking level
for a larger region seismic zone
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
12-05-2017
SITE SPECIFIC SPECTRA
IMPORTANCE OF DUCTILITY IN
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
DESIGN
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
RISK TARGETED HAZARD MCER
ROLE OF DUCTILITY
FE
Seismic Force
m
R
Y
Elastic
FY
Ductile
Y m
Displacement
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
23
DUCTILITY ROLE OF DUCTILITY
Effective Elastic Limit Ductility results in the reduction of
Actual Resistance
effective earthquake forces on the
structure.
ry
Actual Yield
Point Effective Yield
For long period systems : Equal
Resistance
Level
Useful Limit of
displacement principle:
Displacement
Reduction factor = ductility ratio
um= uy
R
O uy Displacement um
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
24
12-05-2017
ROLE OF DUCTILITY RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR
8. Ordinary RC shear walls : 3.0
FE 2 9. Ductile shear walls : 4.0
(R+1)
Seismic Force
m
Y 2 10. Ordinary shear walls
with OMRF : 3.0
Elastic
11. Ordinary shear walls
Ductile
with SMRF : 4.0
12. Ductile shear walls
FY with OMRF : 4.5
13. Ductile shear walls
with SMRF : 5.0
Y m
Displacement
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
25 28
ROLE OF DUCTILITY
For short period systems : Equal
energy principle MAJOR CHANGES IN
Reduction factor is less than the IS 1893 (2006)
ductility ratio
R 2 1
5/12/2017 5/12/2017
26
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR
The response spectra starts with constant acceleration plateau for
1. Ordinary RC Moment resisting frames : 3.0 0<T<0.1 sec also; earlier it was defined as linear function with
2. Special RC moment resistant frames : 5.0 respect to period of vibration.
3. Steel frames with concentric braces : 4.0 The velocity controlled range of the design response spectra has
4. Steel frames with eccentric braces : 5.0 been increased up to a period of vibration of 6.0 sec; earlier this
5. Un-reinforced masonry buildings : 1.5 limit was up to 4.0 sec.
6. Masonry buildings with horizontal Similar to NZS code which suggest plateau for short-periods in cases
RC Bands : 2.5 where static method is applied.
7. Masonry buildings with horizontal
RC Bands and vertical reinforcement : 3.0
5/12/2017
27 30
12-05-2017
RESPONSE SPECTRUM MINIMUM DESIGN BASE SHEAR
The minimum design base shear as a predefined percentage of the
building weight has been introduced as design criteria. This is
dependent on seismic zone.
Seismic Zone % of seismic weight of the
building
II 0.7
III 1.1
IV 1.6
V 2.4
ASCE 7 also provides an expression for Cs to calculate minimum
design base shear Cs > 0.044SdsI > 0.01.
31 34
RESPONSE SPECTRUM LOAD COMBINATIONS
32 35
PERIOD OF VIBRATION FOR BUILDINGS
VERTICAL COMPONENT
WITH STRUCTURAL WALLS
This formulae has been adopted from EN 1998.
33 36
12-05-2017
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
5/12/2017 SYMMETRY OF PLAN
37
RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR
38 Pounding
PRINCIPLES OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
DESIGN
Reduced mass
Symmetry and regularity
Strength & over-strength
Ductility
5/12/2017
Pounding
12-05-2017
EFFECT OF MASONRY INFILLS
5/12/2017
Pounding
DRIFT LIMITS IS 1893 (2016)
Drift at design load
0.4%
Gap between adjacent buildings/building
components
If the floors are at different levels
S=R1d1+R2d2
If the floors are at the same level
S=(R1d1+R2d2)/2
5/12/2017
Strut action of Infills
DRIFT LIMITS EC8
for buildings having non-structural
elements of brittle materials attached to
the structure:
dr 0.005 h
for buildings having ductile non-
structural elements:
dr 0.0075 h
without non-structural elements:
dr 0.010 h
= 0.4 for importance classes III and IV and = 0.5 for importance
classes I and II.
5/12/2017
Strut action of Infills
12-05-2017
IRREGULARITY IN ELEVATION URM Infills
5/12/2017
RC FRAME BUILDINGS WITH URM INFILLS
In RC buildings with URM infills, variation of story stiffness and
strength should be investigated along the height of the building
considering in-plane strength and stiffness of infill walls. If it results
in irregularity it should be corrected in Zones III, IV and V.
Modelling guidelines for URM infills has been included.
Equivalent diagonal strut model should be used for modelling of
URM infill walls. Ends of diagonal strut should be considered pin-
jointed.
Failure of URM Infills
53
RC FRAME BUILDINGS WITH URM INFILLS
URM Infills
54
12-05-2017
RC FRAME BUILDINGS WITH URM INFILLS BUILDINGS WITH OPEN GROUND STOREY
55 58
BUILDINGS WITH OPEN GROUND STOREY TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY
A building is said to be torsionally irregular if maximum
displacement of any floor in the direction of lateral force at one end
is more than 1.5 times its horizontal displacement at the far end in
that direction.
ASCE 7 defines torsional irregularity in terms to the ratio of the
maximum inter-storey drift to average inter-storey drift. If it exceeds
1.20 or 1.40, the building is said to have torsional irregularity or
extreme torsional irregularity, respectively.
EN 1998 defines torsional irregularity in terms of ratio of static
eccentricity to torsional radius. As per EN 1998 torsional irregularity
is said to exist when e/r exceeds 0.30.
56 59
BUILDINGS WITH OPEN GROUND STOREY TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY
57 60
12-05-2017
TORSIONAL FLEXIBILITY
61
COUPLING IN ORTHOGONAL
DIRECTIONS
62
Thank You !
63
